Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/11/2019 - Agenda Packet - Parks Board04-ff' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA Tuesday June 11, 2019 REGULAR MEETINGN6:00 PM Lick Creek Nature Center 13600 Rock Prairie Rd. College Station, TX 77845 1. Call to order and Roll Call. 2. Possible action concerning requests for absences of members. 3. Hear visitors. 4. Consideration, discussion and possible approval of minutes from the May 14, 2019 meeting. 5. Presentation, discussion, possible action on Texas Historical Markers for College Station. 6. Presentation, discussion, possible action on Northgate Park Development. 7. Presentation, discussion, possible action on aquatics recommendations and the issues, strategies and questions involved in the approach. 8. Strategic Planning: Short and Long term. • Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Goals. 9. Report, possible action, and discussion concerning the current Parks Projects Summary and Dedications of Less than Five Acres from Rusty Warncke. • None 10.Presentation, possible action, and discussion on future agenda items: A Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Next Meeting: July 09, 2019 11. Adjourn This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary's Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email ddaassistance@cstx.00v at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY MAY 14, 2019 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES « 6:00 p.m. Lick Creek Nature Center 13600 Rock Prairie Rd. College Station, TX 77845 Staff Present: David Schmitz, Director; Kelly Kelbly, Assistant Director; Rusty Warncke, Project Manager; Andrea Lauer, Admin. Support Specialist Board Present: Joel Cantrell; Thomas Marty; Paul Dyson; Madeline Giroir; John Polasek; Ann Hays; Megan Fuentes 1. Call to order and Roll Call. The meeting was called to order with a quorum present at 6:00 p.m. 2. Possible action concerning requests for absences of members. Don Hellriegel requested an absence. Ann Hays made a motion to approve the absence, and Megan Fuentes approved the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 3. Hear visitors. Patsy Johnson spoke about preserving the history of Thomas Park and Sandy Dillard, President of Rio Brazos Audubon spoke about the study that is being done on the breeding habits of the Kentucky and Swainson Warbler. Once the study is complete it will be given to the Parks and Recreation Department. 4. Consideration, possible approval, and discussion of minutes from the April 09, 2019 meeting. Joel Cantrell made a motion to approve the minutes, and Madeline Giroir seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 5. Presentation, discussion, possible action, on First Down Park. Developer Justin Schultz gave a presentation on First Down Park Parkland Dedication. Thomas Marty made a motion to approve the Parkland Dedication as presented. Ann Hays seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on status of Meyer Senior and Community Center, Larry j. Ringer Library, Fun For All Playground and the Lincoln Recreation Center. Kelly Kelbly gave an update on these projects. Informational item only and no action was taken. 7. Strategic planning: Short and Long term. • Presentation, discussion, possible action regarding Park and Recreation Advisory Board Goals. Informational item only. No action was taken. 8. Report, possible action, and discussion concerning the current Parks Projects Summary and Dedications of Less than Five Acres from Rusty Warncke. Informational item only, no action was taken. This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary's Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email a-taes Lit -lScstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. 9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on future agenda items: A Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. ➢ Next Meeting: June 11, 2019 10.Adjourn. Ann Hays made a motion to adjourn the meeting, and Madeline Giroir seconded the motion. The vote was called. All were in favor, and the meeting adjourned at 6:38 p.m. 06911 eexel'Uo9WS 96e11o91e84S eonAS 909 fed eae6UpoN iol u81Sep MON Y Pz SUGGESTED QUESTIONS AND ISSUES FOR AQUATICS IN COLLEGE STATION [CS] 1. WHAT ARE THE STRATEGIC GOALS FOR AQUATICS IN CS NOW AND OVER THE NEXT 10 TO 20 YEARS? 2. WHAT ARE THE STRATEGIC PLANNING SCENARIOS FOR CS-- BASED ON CURRENT AND FUTURE FORECASTED POPULATIONS OVER THE NEXT 10 TO 20 YEARS? 3. WHAT ACTION PLANS ARE SUGGESTED FOR AQUATICS IN CS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE-- BASED ON THE STRATEGIC GOALS AND PLANNING SCENARIOS? 4. WHAT ARE THE NATIONAL TRENDS IN AQUATICS? HOW MIGHT OR SHOULD THEY INFLUENCE THE CHOICE OF STRATEGIC GOALS, PLANNING SCENARIOS, AND ACTION PLANS IN AQUATICS FOR CS? 5. HOW DOES CS BENCHMARK WITH TWO OR THREE RECOGNIZED CITIES WITH RESPECT TO AQUATICS -BASED ON COMPARABLE SIZE AND OTHER METRICS--? 6. WHAT CHANGES HAVE THESE BENCHMARK CITIES MADE IN THEIR AQUATIC FACILITIES AND CAPABILITES OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS AND WHAT ARE THEIR ACTION PLANS GOING FORWARD? 7. HOW DOES THE PROSPECT OF A YMCA IN CS WITH AQUATIC AMENITIES INFLUENCE THE RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ABOVE? 8. BASED ON THE ABOVE RESEARCH, ANALYSIS, AND PLANS, SHOULD THERE BE A CONSIDERATION OF CONSTRUCTING A "TRADITIONAL" POOL IN THE THOMAS PARK NEIGBORHOOD ZONE? IF A POOL HAD NEVER EXISTED IN THOMAS PARK, WOULD THERE BE A CONSIDERATION OF CONSTRUCTING A "TRADITONAL" POOL THERE OR IN ANY OTHER NEIGHBORHOOD ZONE[S] IN CS? 9. IS THE DECLINING AND LOW LEVEL OF PUBLIC SWIMMING USE AT THOMAS POOL OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS CONSISTENT WITH THE TREND OF DECLINING USE OF "TRADITIONAL POOLS" IN NEIGHBORHOOD ZONES NATIONALLY? NOTE: OVER 2000 TRADITIONAL "NEIGHBORHOOD" CITY POOLS HAVE CLOSED NATIONALLY OVER THE PAST 10 YEARS? KEY RECOMMENDATION: CS SHOULD DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE AQUATICS STRATEGIC AND ACTION PLAN -ONE THAT ADDRESSES THE TYPES OF ISSUES/QUESTIONS PRESENTED ABOVE AND PERHAPS OTHERS-- FOR THE NEAR AND LONG TERM ANTICIPATED CS GROWTH SCENARIOS. NO ACTION SHOULD BE TAKE ON ANY AQUATICS INTITIATIVE UNTIL SUCH AN ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIC/OPERATIONAL PLAN IS COMPLETED. SECONDARY RECOMMENDATION: CS MAY WANT TO CONSIDER SECURING THE SERVICES OF A PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING FIRM WITH A SPECIALIZATION IN THIS DOMAIN? MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CAPTIAL EXPENDITURES, HIGH ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS/EXPENDITURES, AND SUSTANTIAL REPLACEMENT/REPAIR COSTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH EACH POOL -BASED AQUATIC FACILITY. SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION BY DON HELLRIEGEL, CHAIR, CS PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD ,rciermatdon by Topic Login Profile R Wank National Recreation 4 and Park Association Because everyone dt°_2: l'v�es a great pork Aquatics Trends December I, 2016, Department, byGorge Deines, AFC Operations According to the World Waterpark Association, the development of aquatic centers and municipal waterparks is one of the fastest growing segments in the water leisure industry within the United States. One industry report puts the number of U.S. waterparks at 858, up by 24 parks between March 2014 and March 2015, with the majority of them being outdoor, municipally owned waterparks. Aquatics professionals, in order to help their agencies plan for the future and stay relevant to their communities, need to stay on too of current industry trends. Following are some of the most Prevalent nationwide Admission Prices Over the years, as the features and amenities at aquatic centers have changed, the value of admission has steadily increased. While aging swimming pools built in the 1970s and 1980s still charge a modest $1—$2 for admission, the family aquatic centers of the '80s,'90s and 2000s, with their various amenities, can easily charge $5— $10. The more and varied the amenities an aquatic center offers, the more guests it attracts, the longer they stay and the higher the admission fee that can be charged. The primary driver is the length of stay of their guests. Increased Subsidy for Aging Facilities With the rise of newer family -oriented aquatic centers, aging "flatwater'' pools with low admission prices have seen a dramatic drop-off in attendance and use, correlating to higher subsidies. White attendance at these facilities can fall below 100 people per day, newer centers can exceed 500-750 guests per day. However, just because these aging facilities are/ subsidized at a higher rate does not mean they lack value. They stilt provide valuable instructional, competitive, fitness and recreational experiences to communities across the country. Many of these facilities are adding amenities, such as waterslides, climbing walls or an adjacent spray pad to increase their recreational value, as well as focusing on aquatic programs (swim team, water polo, summer camps) and partnerships with local swim teams and school districts to help increase usage of their facility. Rising Construction Costs As municipalities take these older facilities offline and replace them with new ones, the number of aquatic construction projects has increased over the past several years. This, coupled with the rising cost and short supply of materials for aquatic facility construction, has caused a dramatic increase in the price of aquatic construction, sometimes at a rate of 5 percent every six months. Entities looking to build a new aquatic center need to factor in this current inflation rate when developing capital budgets to avoid having to scale back on their design should the bids come in too high. Spray Parks Spray parks have made a big splash as a common replacement for aging swimming pools, particularly because they still provide the community with aquatic experiences without the high operating costs of traditional pools. Spray parks do not require high levels of staffing, require only minimal maintenance I and offer a no -cost (or tow -cost) alternative to a swimming pool. They typically appeal to kids 2-12 year olds and can be a stand -atone facility in a community park or incorporated inside a family aquatic center. School District Competitive Natatoriums Another trend seen across the country pertains to the planning, designing and building of competitive swim venues by school districts. Over the past five to 10 years, school districts have taken the lead in building and operating competitive natatoriums primarily to provide space for their high school swim teams, but also as valuable lane space for local USA swim teams, water polo clubs, synchronized swimming and other community programs, such as swim lessons and water fitness. Several of these natatoriums also have a shallow, warm -water pool that the school district uses to start a water safety program for either second or third graders, since swimming is an integral skill for these students to team. Municipal Aquatics — Go trig or Go Hornet While school districts continue to build competitive venues, municipalities continue to build large outdoor recreational aquatic facilities that incorporate a greater number of aquatic features and attractions that were once reserved for the private waterpark sector. Features such as wave pools, large multilevel childrens play structures and extreme multi -passenger thrill attractions have become more and more commonplace as municipal aquatic facilities continue to provide aquatic experiences similar to those at larger, private waterparks, just on a different scale and, typically, at a lower price point. Partnerships When it comes to the planning, design, construction and operation of an indoor aquatic facility, it makes sense to explore various partnership models in order to maximize the usage of an aquatic center, as well as to minimize the subsidy. A typical approach involves a school district teaming up with a local municipality to collaborate on the construction of a facility and then deciding which entity will be in charge of its operation, or if a third -party operator (such as a YMCA) will be brought in to manage and program the facility. This model helps to keep the pool filled the majority of the day and allows the operating costs to be split three ways instead of just one way. Sustainabitity Whenever we talk about aquatic trends, sustainability — whether environmental or financial — usually rises to the top of the list. A variety of means exist for environmental sustainability, including LED Lighting, variable frequency drives for energy efficiency and regenerative media filtration to save on water usage. In terms of financial sustainability, facilities look at tiered pricing models for both memberships and programming in order to maximize revenue based on demand, as well as at marketing themselves against all entertainment venues, not only other aquatic centers. This, in addition to the Latest software that allows for detailed tracking of personnel hours, facility expenses and revenues, provides aquatic centers with several options to set up their operation for financial success. In addition to staying current about their growing and ever -changing industry, aquatic operators also need to stay tuned in to the needs and desires of their community in order to continue to offer quality aquatics programming and experiences. NRPA Facility Market Reports, which offer key data and insights about the market served within a 10-minute drive of an agency's facility, are a great tool for agencies seeking to gain a greater understanding of the residents they serve. Another great resource of industry information will be the 2017 NRPA Annual Conference, which will include a new aquatic -specific education track. George Deines, AFO, is Project Director for Counsilman-Hunsaker. ECREATION MANAGEMENT IDEAS AND SOLUTIONS FOR RECREATION, SPORTS AND FITNESS FACILITIES Evolving Aquatics Trends in Municipal Aquatic Facility Design By Deborah L. Vence You don't necessarily have to go far to find a top-notch aquatic facility_ Many municipalities today offer 1 `aquatic centers that mimic larger waterparks, equipped with popular features such as drop slides, lazy `rivers and lily pad walks. Families can experience almost a mini vacation, you might say, with the opportunity to take their children all summer long to swim in the pool and zip down winding waterslides. "Municipal facilities are becoming much more advanced than the simple town pool of yesteryear with a ‘� couple of diving boards and maybe a slide or two. Innovative, first -to -market attractions are becoming more commonplace as municipalities begin to embrace the waterpark model of offering excitement and entertainment to their members," said Jessica Mahoney, marketing manager at Aquatic Development Group, a Cohoes, N.Y.-based company that specializes in waterpark design and construction. "Dual -entry wave pools, boogie boarding surf pool rides —both were first implemented at municipal parks," she said. The fact is that the modem aquatic center has increased in popularity and use. "This increase is attributed to the expansion of programs, services and amenities that appeal to a wider range of the population," said Dennis Berkshire, president of Aquatic Design Group, a full -service aquatic architecture and engineering firm based in Carlsbad, Calif. "It is also attributed to an increase in health and fitness lifestyles and an ever -aging population that is well suited to aquatics activities." The Latest One of the latest trends in municipal aquatic facility design includes specialized areas to serve specific %programs —areas designed for water play, fitness and exercise, competition and lessons. "For example, [an areal within the deeper water to support inflatable water play is a popular feature in modern aquatic centers," Berkshire said. "Swim lessons are typically the greatest source of revenue for a municipal swimming pool, so pool configurations that can support this are important," he said. "Waterpark amenities are also popular to better serve recreation programs and facility rentals." PHOTO COURTESY OF AQUATIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP With multi -programmable water, municipalities benefit from bodies of water that can be used for a variety of activities —"opportunities for leisure, exercise, rehab, competition —all happening in the same body of water (as much as possible)," said Tom LaLonde, AIA, LEED AP, vice president and managing principal, Williams Architects/Aquatics, an Itasca, III. -based architectural firm that specializes in municipal, recreational, residential and commercial design and construction. "Current channels are very popular. By nature, building and operating lazy rivers can be cost -prohibitive. Offering some form of water movement in a smaller feature provides the fun more economically. Current channels can also be used for exercise, as well as gathering spaces," LaLonde said. In addition, you can make use of existing spaces for waterslides. "Waterslides that don't require a dedicated body of water makes them more flexible and cost-effective, yet just as fun," he added. \\In some cases, aging swimming pools are being replaced with spray pads. Spray pads provide dynamic, zero -depth aquatic fun for the entire family. Elements typically combine Municipal facilities are becoming much "various types of water features —flowing, misting, spraying and jetting —offering patrons an immersive more advanced than the simple town pool aquatic experience, at much lower maintenance, operating and staffing costs," said George Sells, of yesteryear with a couple of diving AIA, director, creative studio, Water Technology Inc. (WTI), a Beaver Dam, Wis.-based architectural boards and maybe a slide or two. firm that specializes in planning, design and engineering qualifications in the waterpark industry. LaLonde agreed. "Spray pads are continuing to evolve and offer opportunities for very young to older children. Many manufacturers now offer customization of features to better meet client wishes," he said. "The newer spray pads typically are located on continually draining decks so that the spray features are not in a standing body of water, thus not requiring certified guards. By separating this area with a fence, it allows for a longer, extended season." \\Municipalities now are building aquatic facilities incorporating many of the features and attractions of private waterparks. "Interactive multilevel play structures, wave pools and waterslides are becoming essential to the success of new municipal developments," Sells said, adding that other trends he sees include restroom and changing facilities that are being updated with improved finishes, ventilation and lighting. Also, "Patrons are seeing better foodservice options, as well as small retail venues." In addition, "Shade has become increasingly important to skin care, and municipalities are 1\ responding with abundant shade structures and umbrellas. Overall, patron accommodations are constantly being improved," Sells said. Miklos Valdez, project manager at Counsilman-Hunsaker, an aquatic engineering and design firm in St. Louis, said he sees "zero beach entries with shallow water being a top priority as well as other play features like slides, crossing activities, children's play structures and climbing walls." Crossing activities are installations that have floatables undemeath a rope or cargo net. They are sometimes referred to as lily pad walks, as well. "Children use the rope or net to ... walk across the floatables from one side of the pool to the other," Valdez explained. "It's a challenging activity that engages balance, strength and coordination, but is really just fun." What's more, climbing walls are very popular right now. "Climbing walls are easy to add to an existing facility at a reasonable cost when considering the popularity," said Rich Klarck, lead aquatic engineer at Williams Architects. To boot, slides are becoming more interactive with lighting and "racing slides" with timed events. Users can "race" one another, and try to beat the best time. "Small play features/structures are continually becoming more interactive, focusing on social interaction and leaming for the younger/toddler-aged children," Klarck said. Doug Russell Pool in Midland, TX The community of Midland, Texas, went through an extensive design process with Kimley-Hom and Counsilman-Hunsaker to replace the city's Doug Russell Pool. "The goal was to determine whether the aging facility should be renovated or replaced," Valdez said. "The replacement would need to meet the changing needs and expectations of the citizens and would need to include more programmable, shallow water and new amenities and features." In 2013, Counsilman-Hunsaker was retained by the city of Midland to conduct a feasibility study in order to determine the future of Doug Russell Pool, which, built in the 1950s, was facing physical and functional obsolescence with only a few upgrades since it was built. The goal of the study was to determine whether the facility should be renovated with pool mechanical system upgrades only or replaced with a new aquatic facility to include recreational amenities. Construction costs and operating expenses were provided for each option to ensure that the city had the information needed to make a knowledgeable decision. \\ In December 2013 the city decided to move forward with replacing the facility with a new `1 aquatic center. Today, up to 1,000 people per day are using the new $3.25 million facility that features a \host of amenities, including a 2,400-square-foot lap pool that has a drop slide, climbing wall, four 25-yard lap lanes and water basketball. In addition to a 300-square-foot sprayground, the aquatic facility also features a lazy river, waterslide, lily pad walk, three large stair entries and spray features, as well as a recreation pool that includes a children's play feature with tot slide, zero -depth entry, spray features and underwater shelf. Community Expectations lToday, the public has greater expectations than ever before when it comes to municipal aquatic facilities. "As they have the opportunity to see other pools and facilities, their expectations at home increase. In addition to greater expectations in features and programs, patrons today expect better water and facility quality," Berkshire said. "A successful facility will balance the levels of technology that it uses with the l�capabilities of their staff." Community members are looking for activities the family can enjoy together, such as lazy rivers, double tube slides and aquatic play structures. "They tend to be multigenerational activities and are low risk," Valdez said. The proliferation of private waterpark venues has shown community members what opportunities exist for aquatic attractions, and many are expecting similar experiences, though at a smaller scale, at their local municipal aquatic center, Sells noted. "While the experience expectation has increased over the years, community members typically demand the admission cost of their centers to be far less than private waterparks " he said. Sells noted that school districts are taking the lead more and more in developing swim venues for competition and teaching. "This has allowed municipal aquatic centers to shift their focus to facilities that offer increased entertainment value to patrons," he said. "Community leaders are not only listening and responding to the needs and desires of their constituents regarding leisure activities, they also see the success of existing similar facilities. The 'country club' atmosphere offered by many municipal aquatic centers provides families with an affordable leisure experience close to home." Mahoney said communities are looking to offer more than just a town pool these days. "As competition for people's dollars and attention gets more sophisticated, communities need to keep pace by offering new experiences for their members," she said. Skill -based attractions, such as the surf simulator, provide a path for repeat visitation as members retum more often to improve their skills. PHOTO COURTESY OF COUNSI MAPFHUNSAKER DOUG RUSSEIL POOL "These skill -based platforms also provide a path for entertainment and group gatherings, community contests and events that are always important in a municipal setting," she said. As municipalities increase the amount and types of attractions they offer, they provide a viable option for a day of entertainment. People continue to look to spend their time and money on rewarding experiences for the entire family. As parks develop their programs and add attractions to meet this demand, they increase and grow their membership base substantially, generating community pride and keeping entertainment dollars within their community," Mahoney said. "Unique, attractive and entertaining town centers and water recreational parks," she added, "are a high source of pride for a community and serve as a draw to potential new residents, setting communities apart" LaLonde said community members want to have programmable water for use by all ages (toddlers, teens and adults). "Expectations are to spend a better part of the day at the aquatic facility," he said. "Providing opportunities for at the different demographics (young kids, "\ teens, parents) ensures every age group has something to do, from lap swim/resistive walking to waterslides to splashing in the water with young children." Concessions are a nice amenity, too. "Offering foodservice within the facility keeps the patrons from leaving, and the concession/shade area is a perfect opportunity for families to gather," LaLonde said, adding that rental cabanas are gaining in popularity, too, as a place families can congregate throughout the time they are at the pool. In tum, it brings in additional revenue. Community members are looking for a facility that allows them to monitor children of different ages at the same time. "By placing amenities, such that a parent can watch the toddler in the spray play area and the older children on a slide, makes for a more enjoyable, relaxing day," Klarck said. Moreover, community members also expect a variety of experiences to keep them entertained. �` Examples of this include the drop slide, waterslide, current channel, lap swimming, exercise \programs, lily pad walk, spray features, zip line, concessions, etc. As a general rule, municipal aquatic facilities typically appeal to a certain age group (parents with toddlers, elementary school children). "Once the children reach a certain age they are typically involved in other activities, diminishing the time available to visit the local aquatic park," LaLonde said. \"We have found that facilities that add and promote new amenities every three to five years a continually have good attendance," he added. "It is important for municipalities to revisit the \ amenities offered at their facility every few years in order to add interest to keep attendees retuming and continually attract new visitors." PHOTO COURTESY OF WATER TECHNOLOGY INC Splash Cove in Shawnee, Kan. New attractions at Splash Cove waterpark in Shawnee, Kan., were part of a $9.5 million renovation project. The goal was to increase daily visitation and appeal to residents of all ages. In particular, there was a need for a new wave pool that could make a statement as a main attraction to the waterpark. After searching design templates throughout the United States and overseas, Aquatic Development Group was chosen to provide a new dual -entry wave pool system as the solution for the waterpark's new wave pool attraction. The dual -entry wave pool at Splash Cove has ample space for seating on all sides of the pool, and the ability to accommodate an increased numbers of patrons. Design Challenges The approval process for any aquatic development or expansion presents its own challenges, and never truer than In the municipal setting when dealing with the necessary red tape requirements and town codes," Mahoney said. "Working with a developer that understands the codes and how to navigate the process is essential for a smooth project transition," she said. "The right company can also help with providing the right training and operational management guidelines, from setting up lifeguard skills clinics to operating and maintaining your wave system in a wave pool or river attraction," Mahoney added. "And, a clear understanding of staffing needs at the outset allows the municipality to prepare for the hiring and budgeting process to run and maintain the park." As greater demands are put on hours and the number of people using an aquatic facility, control of water quality becomes more challenging. "Many aquatic centers operate seven days a week with little or no time for preventative maintenance," Berkshire said. In that case, "Systems must be designed to operate at such levels," he said. "Automated systems have the ability to monitor conditions of a facility or pool water and automatically make adjustments for quality PHOTO control. Some of these systems can become complicated and difficult for staff [to] operate. A successful system is one that the staff can fully understand and operate." Berkshire also said it is unacceptable to say that "poor air or water quality is simply due to more use (over -use) than expected. Systems must be oversized to plan ahead for such use" Meanwhile, Sells suggested that proper aquatic construction requires industry specialized companies. "New aquatic construction is flourishing, and as such, the opportunity exists for companies with marginal aquatic construction experience to secure build contracts, often resulting in substandard facilities," he said. Proper aquatic construction is expensive. and the cost of construction and operation must be understood by the community thoroughly prior to moving forward with that type of project. Municipalities constantly are pressured to incorporate sustainable design into their projects. Securing the proper design team to facilitate a responsible design in an efficient way is not only desirable, but also can minimize operating costs. Cl]URTESY OF AQUATIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP. SPLASH COVE PHOTO COURTESY OF AOUAT1C DEVELOPMENT GROUP Automated mechanical rooms have simplified the filtering operation and stabilized the treatment of the water, allowing for fewer maintenance staff. Operational safety and consistent water quality continue to be the ongoing challenge in any aquatic venue. Valdez added that some issues and challenges today include the "current rise of construction costs and the challenge for communities to make the proper investments in maintenance to continue operation through the expected llfespan of the aquatic facility." So, municipalities need to determine how to pay for construction. "The upfront cost for aquatic facilities is significant In Illinois, grant funding has dried up, which makes it more difficult to fund," LaLonde said. The selection of pool equipment is important in reducing operating and maintenance costs. "Regenerative filters are much more economical to maintain and require a much smaller footprint, thereby reducing building size, which in tum saves money," Klarck said. \LaLonde said municipalities that spend more money up front on higher quality materials and finishes will effectively reduce the cost of upkeep and long -tern maintenance. "The challenge is to come up with the capital in order to do it right so that your long-term maintenance and operation costs are reduced," he said. Klarck added that municipalities need to be open to using other technologies (i.e., premanufactured stainless steel pools in lieu of poured -in -place concrete). "Stainless steel pools require less maintenance. For example, a painted concrete pool needs to be repainted every two to three years. A stainless steel pool has a floor liner, which can last 10 to 12 years before requiring any maintenance," he said. "If done properly, the life of the pool can be significantly extended." (l PHOTO COURTESY OF COUNSILMAN-HUNSAIXERR, JACK CARTER POOL Jack Carter Pool in Plano, Texas The original Jack Carter Pool was opened to the public in 1983 and became a popular spot for residents in Plano, Texas. As the years went on, the facility became outdated, presenting mechanical problems and failures with the structure, making it crucial for a renovation that included an updated property layout and new innovative attractions for guests. It was decided to take suggestions from patrons and citizens of Plano on what to add to the new pool area. Among the large number of suggestions, a surf simulator topped the list. The $12.5 million renovated Jack Carter Pool opened on July 9, 2016, to the public, and attendance levels were approximately 1,333 guests a day. From children as young as 5 to adults, the surf simulator proved to be a popular addition to the park. Fees and Budget Aging swimming facilities still can charge a modest fee for admission. A wide selection of activities and an enjoyable experience will entice patrons to stay longer. "A longer stay can justify a higher admission cost. Newer municipal aquatic facilities with waterpark-like amenities can certainly charge accordingly," Sells said. "The cost to maintain [a facility] varies based on several factors: the size of the facility, the numbers of features and the level of finish for the facility," Valdez said. Also, "We have seen construction cost prices rise between 7 and 10 percent per year on average," he said. "These costs are inherent to any project, but a proper design and a thorough feasibility process will help to ensure the project funds are being well spent, and that the facility will be financially sustainable in the future." And, you don't need to look back 30 years, either, to see how prices have changed. "Costs have roughly doubled in the past 10 to 15 years. Twenty to 30 years ago, most aquatic facilities did not have the sophisticated features you would find in modem aquatic designs," he added. ahoney said adequate upfront budgeting for development and operation, including staffing and equipment maintenance, should be outlined prior to undertaking any project so that the municipality has a realistic picture of operational costs. "Costs, including the price for admission," she said, "will vary depending on the size and location of the project and attractions that are included." Similarly, Berkshire noted that daily admission rates vary greatly depending on the levels of service provided, the economic conditions of the community, and the political environment. "It becomes an issue of both the ability and willingness of patrons to pay and the municipality to charge for services," he said. PHOTO COURTESY OF WATER TECHNOLOGY WC The John & Carla Edwards Aquatic Center in Geneseo, Ill. In Geneseo, III., Williams Architects helped replace the city's outdated pool facility, The John & Carla Edwards Aquatic Center. "The Geneseo Park District was awarded a $2.4 million dollar grant in 2014, but unfortunately the grants were suspended. Instead of having to significantly modify their plans for a new aquatic facility, the Geneseo Community (approximatel 6,000 resi nts) banded together to raise more than $2.4 million for the replacement o t eir outdated and failing pool," LaLonde said. "The Geneseo Park District united the community in a common goal; engaged and informed the public in order to keep everyone on a positive wavelength: and implemented a comprehensive capital campaign to ultimately open the facility," he said. The original pool, built with a community volunteer effort and opened in 1953, was renovated in 1980 and then, in 2015, the pool and bathhouse were demolished and the John & Carla Edwards Aquatic Center was built. 'The old pool had a kiddie pool and main pool with a shallow end, 25-yard/5-foot section and a deep well with two low diving boards and one three -meter board. The project was initiated by a community -wide survey as part of the master plan in 2011," said Andy Thurman, executive director of the Geneseo Park District. 'The new activity pool features a zero -depth entry, current channel, lily pad walk and shallow area for free play. The lap pool has six lanes and a deep well section that includes one three -meter board, one one -meter board, a drop slide and a rock climbing wall," he said. The John & Carla Edwards Aquatic Center sits on the same property as the old outdoor pool. The bathhouse was moved from the east side of the property to the west side of the property to make access to the parking easier. © Copyright 2019 Recreation Management. All rights reserved. THQM LS FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY1 Vi Days in Season 86 \ Lti-3 91 :4 i SO Operational Costs $ 88,029.00 $ 71,000.00 $ 66,000.00 $ 82,088.00 $ 71,055.00 Revenue $ 15,845.00 $ 29,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,234.00 $ 20,708.00 Per Day Operational Costs $ 1,024.00 $ 845.00 $ 725.00 $ 977.00 $ 888.00 f Public Swim Attendance 1`? ) 6,598 i a 894J (3,418/ 12,820 CS{SD Attendance NA 3,493 7,447 2,699 3,629 "Avg Public Swim Attendance i 01 154 /4:11 i 35) Avg CS':SD Attendance NA 42 82 32 45 of Rentals 68 51 40 85 23 Operational Subsidy 83% 59% 70% 75% 71% n l " " 011. J /1'V .)\t ,� a� 11107 /&1-7-7y /fU �%;�'/'' La/A-2-e-6/, L cis ©]©©5 UinC38 P@iract .-; Dallas Parks are categorized into eight Park Classifications based upon the National rRecre�ancj.Park Association (NRPA) guidelines. Each classification serves a specific weed inthe community. View a listing of parks and their designated classifications. MEM ° C]vCs The mini park is used to address limited, isolated, or unique recreation needs of concentrated populations. Mini parks typically serve a quarter -mile radius. The size of a mini -park ranges between 2,500 square feet and one acre in size. These parks may be either active or passive, but address a specific recreational need rather than a particular population density, although a high population density may create a specific recreation need. Recommended improvements for mini parks may include a small pavilion, picnic area, park benches, and a 6 foot -wide perimeter trail. Off-street parking is not recommended. Neighborhood parks serve a variety of age groups within a limited area or neighborhood. 4 They range in size from 1 to 15 acres and generally serve residents within a quarter- to half - mile radius. The neighborhood park includes areas for active recreation activities such as field games, court games, playgrounds, etc. Passive recreation activities may include walking, viewing, sitting, and picnicking. Facilities are generally unlighted and off-street parking is not recommended. Y fJ 114, 6 5 c C©mrfflunECT Pat Enable Google Translate Community parks are larger than neighborhood parks and serve several neighborhoods. They range in size from 16 to 99 acres and generally serve a user area of one to two miles in radius. The community park may include areas for intense recreation activities such as competitive sports, swimming, tennis, playgrounds, volleyball, etc. There may also be passive recreation opportunities such as walking, viewing, sitting, and picnicking. l c tcin©© Cry Puvik Metropolitan parks are large park facilities that serve multiple communities. They range in size from / 00 to 499 acres and serve the entire city. The metropolitan park includes natural areas or developed areas for a variety of outdoor recreation activities such as ball fields, playgrounds, boating, fishing, swimming, picnicking, and trail systems. ReEO©rail Far& Regional parks are very large multi -use parks that serve several communities within a particular region. They are 500 acres or larger in size and serve those areas within a one - hour driving distance. The regional park provides both active and passive recreation opportunities, with a wide selection of facilities for all age groups. They may also include areas of nature preservation for activities such as sightseeing, nature study area, wildlife habitat, and conservation. National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) standards for regional parks vary due to the specific site characteristics and natural resources. SpscICl Ues ATsu Special use areas and parks are for specialized or single -purpose recreation activities. NRPA defines these parks as historical areas, nature centers, marinas, golf courses, zoos, conservatories, arboretums, arenas, amphitheaters, plazas, or community squares. There are no specific standards for size or acreage since each site will vary. Special use parks may carry a double classification. Lgnegv Pgr Ct 0 Erinkages Linear parks and linkages are built connections or natural corridors that link parks together. Typically, the linear park is developed for one or more modes of recreational travels such as walking, jogging, biking, in -line skating, hiking, horseback riding, and canoeing. Linear parks may include active play areas. The NRPA does not stipulate specific standards for linear parks other than they should be sufficient to protect the resource and provide maximum usage. Caneerregnmy Conservancies include areas for protection and management of the natural / cultural environment with recreation use as a secondary objective. Recreation use might include passive recreation such as viewing and studying nature and wildlife habitat. The NRPA does not indicate specific acreage or size standards for the conservancy othe 1Rativ of*ransiate PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department I City of College Station PROJECT UPDATE As of June 4,2018 PARKS PROJECTS FOR FY18 and FY19 Total Number of Park Projects Number of Projects in Progress Number of Projects Completed in FY18 & 19 35 22 13 Park Projects managed by Capital Projects in FY18/19 — 6 FY '18 Projects AGGIE FIELD OF HONOR & MEMORIAL CEMETERY Orff. � • Installation of sidewalk to both columbarium's o This project bid out on June 13. Contract awarded to lowest bidder on July 16, 2018, with a pre -construction meeting held on July 23rd. Contractor has 90 days to complete this project. Substantial completion is October 26, 2018. o This project is COMPLETE BEE CREEK PARK • Concession/ restroom upgrades o Rehabilitation or rebuild of existing structure to address restroom, concession, and storage issues. o Hawkins Architecture has been chosen as the design firm. Council approved the contract on May 14, 2018. o Site plan has been sent to Planning and Development Services for their review. Reviews are nearly complete. Look to bid this project out later this month, early July. BACHMANN PARK • Rehabilitation of parking Tots and parking lot lights to address ADA, lighting, and drainage issues. o Kimley Horn was chosen for this project. Council approved the contract on April 12, 2018. o Larry Young Paving was award the contract on October 25, 2018. Construction started on November 26, 2018. Rain and change orders have delayed this project but progress is being made. All three lots are now paved. ADA signage, speed humps, and a few other items are that remain. • Adult Soccer Field Lighting Rehabilitation o Installation of new poles and LED fixtures on the two adult soccer fields. COMPLETE Page 1 PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department I City of College Station CASTLEGATE PARK Ckff" • Installation of a fitness pod and new chain Zink fencing at the tennis courts using Parkland Dedication funds. o Purchase Order for the fitness equipment was issued on Tuesday, May 1. Equipment was delivered to installer in late July. Equipment has been installed. This project is now COMPLETE. o Tennis court fence - Crews removed the old chain link the last week of May and repainted the post and braces the same week. New chain link started going up on June 4. This project is now COMPLETE CENTRAL PARK • Athletic Field Restroom Rehabilitation o Scope of Work - To rehab or rebuild the existing restroom and storage building located at the flat athletic fields. • Hawkins Architecture was chosen for this project. Council approved the contract on the 14th of May. Design work to be completed by mid -September. • Site plan nearly complete. Look to bid this, the pavilion rehab, and Bee Creek all at once, later this month. Early July at the latest. • Parking Tots and lighting o Rehabilitation of existing parking lot to address ADA issues along with drainage and lighting issues. • Kimley Horn was chosen for this project. Council approved this contract on April 12. All design work to be completed by the first of September. • Larry Young paving was award the construction contract on October 25, 2018. Construction started in the softball parking lot, and has continued into the drives. As of June 4, the office and pavilion parking lot are the only lots not paved. Pending weather, those two lots could be paved by the end of next week. • Pavilion Rehabilitation o Scope of work — Expand and update restrooms, update kitchen area, and expand the current pavilion area. • Hawkins was chosen for this project. This project will be grouped together with the athletic field restrooms and the Bee Creek concession stand building. Contract approved by Council on May 14. Design work to be completed by mid - September. • Site plan nearly complete. Look to bid this project out later this month, early July. This project, along with Bee Creek will be bid all at once. • Softball Field Lights o Removal of existing light poles and fixtures and replace them with new poles and LED fixtures. • Project is now COMPLETE. Page 2 PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department I City of College Station GABBARD PARK 4ff" • Upgrades and repairs using Parkland Dedication Funds o Removal of existing concrete fence, with installation of new wrought iron in its place. Repairs to the existing fishing pier and foot bridge will also be part of this project. • Approval of this project went before Council on May 14. Fence demo started June 4. Post and panels will be set the same week. All work will be completed by the end of June. • Project is now COMPLETE. Page 3 PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department I City of College Station Projects Rolled into FY '18/ 19 CRESCENT POINT PARK • Adding park amenities such as exercise equipment, park benches, lights, and a drinking fountain. • Project was bid out on December 215t and approved by Council on February 22. Caprock Construction officially started this project on March 5. They have until December 8, 2018 to finish this park along with Reatta Meadows. • Construction is complete. FUN FOR ALL PARK • Project bid out on June 7th at 2 p.m. • Approved by City Council on July 26. • Submittals are in review. Pre -construction meeting was held on August 13. Contractor has been given notice to proceed with project. • Work in progress - underground utilities and subgrade splash pad and new parking lot. Rain has caused delays. • Playground equipment arrived on 3/4/2019, and has been installed. The splash pad has been poured and crews are currently working on piers for shade structure. • Due to rain, the completion date has been pushed back. Contractor looking at the end of June, early July for completion. All is weather pending. G.K. FITCH/ RINGER LIBRARY TRAIL • Concrete path connecting Fitch Park to the Ringer Library. o Since this path crosses Bee Creek via a pedestrian bridge, a flood study was requested by Planning and Development. o First flood study was completed on January 29. An additional analysis of Bee Creek was requested. First study showed a 1/2" rise in the 100 year flood plan. The second study is now complete and shows zero rise within the 100 year flood plain. However, to achieve zero rise and stay within budget, the design had to be changed. We will now use box culverts instead of a foot bridge to cross Bee Creek. o Planning and Development Services completed their review at the end of August. o Due to abnormally wet winter, we did not advertise this project till February. Bids were opened on 3/5/2019 at 2pm. Kieschnick General Contractors was the lowest bidder. o Council approved this contract on April 11. o Official start date is June 3. Contractor will have till September 2 to finish this project. Page 4 PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department I City of College Station JOHN CROMPTON PARK civff • Construction of a basketball pavilion using Parkland Dedication money. o This project was bid out on May 24 and came in under budget and has been approved by Council. o Contractor working on shop drawings for the structural steel and submittals for the amenities. Once the structural drawings for the pavilion are approved, contractor can start. o Contractor will have 120 days to complete this project. February 4, 2019 is the substantial completion deadline for this project. o This project is Complete LINCOLN CENTER • Expansion was completed at the end of December, 2018. Abatement and demo of the existing facility started the second week of January Renovations to the existing facility continue due to change orders. All work thus far has been completed on time. o Parking lot started February 18 and is complete. Demo of an interior wall is at that remains. Work is expected to be 100% complete by the end of June. NORTHGATE PARK • Design and construction of park located at 306 Spruce Street. o Arkitex Studio was awarded the contract. Firm has until September 3, 2018 to complete all drawings and reviews. o Final drawings where sent the first part of September. All drawings have been sent to Planning and Development Services for final review. Sent mid - October, 2018. o Project bid out April 24th, with Caprock Construction (CRT) submitting the lowest bid. o Currently — Contracts in routing for signatures. ■ Look to go before Council on June 13, 2019 for official approval. RINGER LIBRARY EXPANSION • Project bid February 14, 2018 with contract approval by City Council on March 22. Acklam construction started the week of March 2 and is expected to complete the project August 2019. • Contractor working on first phase of the project. Delays have occurred due to the facility remaining open. Contractor working with staff to resolve all issues in a timely manner. • Structural steel arrived late July. • Due to the dangers of construction, the Library will close November 5, 2018. This will allow for a faster turning around time and more importantly, keep our residents safe during the time of construction. • Acklam on schedule. All utilities have been roughed in. Dry wall is being installed along with windows, and brick. Acklam expects to be 100% dried in in the next few weeks. • Phase 1 was completed on March 4, 2019. Phase II Substantial Walk was held May 8. Items are complete. Awaiting book shelves and other furniture. Page 5 PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department I City of College Station REATTA MEADOWS PARK ck-ff' • Development of Park o Project was bid out December 21, 2017 and approved by City Council on February 22, 2018. Caprock Construction officially started this project on March 5. They had till December 8, 2018 to complete this park. o This park is now complete. SOUTHEAST PARK • Design contract for the first four fields was approved by Council on February 8, 2018. Design firm working on construction drawings. • 98% drawings are in and under review by staff. VETERANS PARK • Phase I expansion —Two additional artificial fields. o Construction of the two new fields began the week of May 17tn. The contractor will have 150 days to reach substantial completion. o Under ground work currently in progress. First section of cast in place box culverts is expected to be poured the week of August 13tn o Nearly all underground is now complete. Contractor working on fields, parking lot, and restroom currently. o Work is expected to be complete on or by March 12, 2019. o Substantial Walk held May 3. Contractor currently finishing up punch list items. All punch list items are nearly complete. Page 6 PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department l City of College Station New Projects for FY19 • Bee Creek o Installation of new LED lights around both softball fields. ■ Electrical engineer working on drawings • College Station Cemetery o Removal of old restroom, installation of new. • Arkitex Studio has been hired to design a new restroom. • This project bid out back in May. Caprock Construction has been award the contract. Official start date is June 10. Contractor will have 120 days to complete, October 7, 2019. • Cove of Nantucket o Installation of park amenities ■ COMPLETE • Edelweiss Gartens o Re -surfacing the basketball court ■ Contractor to start the week of June 3. They will have 7 days to complete. • Gabbard Park o Removal of old playground and surfacing and replace with new ■ Engineered drawings where received late January. Working on installation contract with a contractor. • Lincoln Recreation Center o Refurbish the existing basketball pavilion. New paint, lights, court surfacing, gutter repairs, and drinking fountain. ■ Proposal received on 10/25. Additional work has been added to this project. Updated proposal received on 2/28/2019. Nantucket and the Nature Center are part of this project. • Contract sent to go before Council on May 13th for official approval. • Contractor has started this project and expected to be done will all items by the end of this month. Page 7 PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department 1 City of College Station 4.-ff" • Nature Center Drinking Fountains o Installation of 2 drinking fountains within the Nature Center grounds. o Updated proposal received on 2/28/19. Currently working on install contract. ■ Part of the Lincoln Center and Nantucket project. • Approved by Council on May 13tn • Fountain pads are in. Awaiting arrive of fountains. All work expected to be completed by the end of June. • Pebble Creek o Removal and installation of new fall surfacing on the large playground. ■ Complete. • Richard Carter Park o Removal of all brick paver sidewalks. Replace with solid stamped concrete. • Project has been brought back into budget and approved by City Council on, 3/14/2019. • Work is now COMPLETE • Summit Crossing- o Development of Park o Design of new park started January 2, 2019. ■ 99% drawings are complete and under staff review. Once completed, they will be sent to Planning and Development Services for review. • Thomas Park o Gazebo Roof • Replacement of existing asphalt roof with metal roof • COMPLETE o Playgrounds • North Side • Removal of existing fall surfacing, swing, and metal and metal slide no longer meet the CPSI requireme • In their place, we will install new rubber surfacing, I and a traditional two bay swing o Working on installation contract slide. The swing nts. a new dish swing • South Side • Removal of old play unit and fall surfacing. Replacing with new playground and surfacing. o Working on install contract. Page 8 PROJECT UPDATE Parks & Recreation Department 1 City of College Station • Veterans Park o Phase I B — ■ Pending budget, park staff is looking at adding another restroom closer to Harvey road, more sidewalks, and possibly another playground. In addition, staff is looking at improving drainage in various areas along with improving the roads within the park. • At this time, staff is working with engineers, and Planning and Development Services for all improvements listed above. Once planning issues development permit, we can move forward with this project. Page 9