The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/24/2015 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review Board Design Review Board July 24, 2015 @ 11:00 am Administrative Conference Room City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Friday, July 24, 2015 11:00 AM Administrative Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue College Station City Hall College Station, Texas, 77840 1. Call to Order 2. Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes.  June 30, 2015 meeting minutes. 3. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding building elevations and signage for Grand Station Entertainment located at 2400 Earl Rudder Freeway South in the WPC Wolf Pen Creek Design District. Case # WPC2015-000001 (J. Bullock) 4. Possible action and discussion on future agenda items – A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 5. Adjourn. Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Board of the City of College Station, Texas will be held on Friday, July 24, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. at the Administrative Conference Room, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda Posted this the____day of________________, 2015 at____p.m. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By _____________________________ Sherry Mashburn, City Secretary By _____________________________ Kelly Templin, City Manager I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Design Review Board of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City’s website, www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on__________, 2015 and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: ______________________ by _________________________. Dated this _____ day of____________, 2015. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By_____________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of_______________, 2015. ______________________________ Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires:_________________ This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov. Page 1 of 2 Minutes Design Review Board June 30, 2015 - 11:30 a.m. Administrative Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas, 77840 Board Members Present: Chairperson Jane Kee, Steven Schloss, Ceci Mathews, and Mary Edwards (alternate) Board Members Absent: Bill Mather, Rory Cannaday, Susan McGrail, and Elizabeth Natsios Staff Present: Assistant Director, Molly Hitchcock, Principal Planner Jason Schubert, Staff Planner Madison Thomas and Staff Assistant Crystal Derkowski AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order. Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 11:35 a.m. AGENDA ITEM NO.2: Consideration, possible action and discussion to approve meeting minutes for April 17, 2015 Mr. Schloss, motioned to approve the minutes. Ms. Edwards seconded the motion which passed (4-0). AGENDA ITEM NO.3: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the duties of the Design Review Board including background and requirements related to the Wolf Pen Creek and Northgate design districts and the non-residential architectural standards. (J. Schubert) Jason Schubert, Principal Planner, presented the board members with information on the Design Review Board duties and general information about the Wolf Pen Creek District, Northgate District and The Non-Residential Architectural Standards. There was general discussion about the topic of the duties for the Design Review Board. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Adjourn The meeting was adjourned 1:28 p.m. APPROVED: Jane Kee, Chairperson ATTEST: Crystal Derkowski, Staff Assistant Design Review Board July 24, 2015 Page 1 of 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD for Grand Station Entertainment WPC2015-000001 REQUEST: Redesign building façade along Earl Rudder Freeway South and add additional signage. SCALE: Building Elevation: 248 feet along Earl Rudder Freeway South and approximately 32 feet along the north and south facades Signage: additional 50 square feet for a total of 333 square feet of attached signage LOCATION: 2400 Earl Rudder Freeway South ZONING DISTRICT: WPC Wolf Pen Creek APPLICANT: William Scarmardo, W.C. Scarmardo Architect Interiors PROJECT MANAGER: Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner jbullock@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request. Design Review Board July 24, 2015 Page 2 of 3 Design Review Board July 24, 2015 Page 3 of 3 ITEM SUMMARY: In 2008, the Design Review Board approved the installation of attached signage and a change in building colors . The applicant is requesting to redesign the east façade facing Earl Rudder Freeway South and 10 percent of the north and south facades. The applicant is also request to add additional signage of 50 square feet. As the building is located in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning district, the Design Review Board is required to approve building elevations and signage. REVIEW CRITERIA: The proposal meets the minimum technical requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). In accordance with the UDO, the Design Review Board shall evaluate the building elevations and signage according to the following criteria: 1. Lighting: Building lighting will not project horizontally. The applicant proposes three different lighting types. Each pilaster will have a sconce as shown in detail 10. The walls will have sconces shown in detail 8. Each sign will have fixtures that direct light towards the sign. All fixtures are of neutral color. 2. Building design: The building is comprised of brick, EIFS, stone, and metal. Neutral colors are proposed for EIFS and existing brick will be cleaned and stained. Stone will be used as material for pilasters. The proposed canopy has a metal frame with vinyl canopy. In relation to the non-residential architectural standards, the building provides stone pilasters, a canopy, and wall plane projection with a four-foot in depth. 3. Signage: Total square footage of existing signage is 283 square feet. With 248 feet along the public entry façade, attached signage is limited to 500 square feet. The applicant is proposing an additional 50 square feet for a total of 333 square feet of attached signage. The additional “arcade” sign will match existing signage. SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Applicable Review Criteria 2. Application 3. Proposed Building Elevations with Signage 4. Existing Elevations with Signage Page 1 Applicable Review Criteria This district is designed to promote development that is appropriate along Wolf Pen Creek, which, upon creation was a predominantly open and undeveloped area challenged by drainage, erosion, and flooding issues. Development proposals are designed to encour age the public and private use of Wolf Pen Creek and the development corridor as an active and passive recreational area while maintaining an appearance consistent with the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan. The following supplemental standards apply to this project: 1. Lighting. a. Exterior lighting shall be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories shall be harmonious with building design. Light fixtures shall be compatible with fixtures used elsewhere in the district. 2. Building Design. a. Architectural style is not restricted. Evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. b. Buildings shall have good scale and be in harmonious conformance with permanent neighboring development. c. Materials shall be selected for harmony of the building with adjoining buildings. d. Materials shall be selected for suitability to the type of buildings and the design in which they are used. Buildings shall use the same materials, or those that are architecturally harmonious, for all building walls and other exterior building components wholly or partly visible from public ways. e. Materials shall be of durable quality. f. In any design in which the structural frame is exposed to view, the structural materials shall be compatible within themselves and harmonious with their surroundings. g. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, shall have good proportions and relationships to one another. h. Colors shall be harmonious and shall use only compatible accents. i. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building, or they shall be so located as not to be visible from any public ways. j. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects shall be avoided. Variation of detail, form, and siting shall be used to provide visual interest. In multiple building projects, variable siting or individual buildings may be used to prevent a monotonous appearance. 3. Signs. a. Sign Standards. i. Non-residential projects shall follow the requirements of allowed signage for the zoning district appropriate for the specific use in additional to meeting the standa rds listed below. b. Design Criteria. i. The Design Review Board shall evaluate all proposed signage according to the following criteria: 1) Every sign shall be designed as an integral architectural element of the building and site to which it principally relates. Page 2 2) Every sign shall have good scale and proportion in its design and in its visual relationship to buildings and surroundings. 3) The colors, materials, and lighting of every sign shall be restrained and harmonious with the building and site to which it principally relates. 4) The number of graphic elements on a sign shall be held to the minimum needed to convey the sign's major message and shall be composed in proportion to the area of the sign face. 5) Each sign shall be compatible with signs on adjoining premises and shall not compete for attention. 6) Identification signs of a prototype design and corporation logos shall conform to the criteria for all other signs. N 4 2 °0 3 '5 3 " E 2 1 0 .6 8 'N 55°27'50" E 567.94'S 30°40'05" E 463.66'S 55°27'50" W 437.43'S 4 2 °0 3 '5 3 " W 2 0 0 .0 0 'N 47°56'07" W 473.00'R e t e n t i o n P o n d T r a f f i c F l o wE x i t R a m pEntrance/ExitEntrance/ExitFnd 1/2 " iro n ro d Set 5/8" iron rodFnd 1/2" iron rodFnd 1/2" iron rodFnd 1/2" iron rod Fnd 1/2" iron rodw/ plastic capC o n c r e t e W a l kA s p h a l tA s p h a l tA s p h a l tU n d e r g r o u n dUtility Ma n h o le R a m pS k a t e E n t r a n c eP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gP a r k i n gC o n c r e t e D r i v eManhole (t y p e ?)FireH ydrantC o n c r e t e A s p h a l tP a r k i n g P a r k i n g P a r k i n gGas Mtr F ir eHy d r a n t S e c u rity Lig h tS e c u rity Lig h tS e c u rity L ig h tS e c u rity Lig h tS e c u rity Lig h tS e c u rity Lig h tS e c u rity Lig h tS e c u rity Lig h tS ec u rity L ig h tMa n h o le (t y p e ?)D u m p s te rP a dCinder-b lo c kStorage A re a C o n c r e t e W a l kC o n c r e t e D r i v eC o n c r e t e D r i v eS to rm D ra inInletManhole (t y p e ?)M a n h o le (t y p e ?)Above GroundA/C Unit PlatformsC o n c r e t eS l a bManhole (t y p e ?)F ir eHy d r a n t20' P u b l i c U t i l i t y E a s e m e n t (V o l . 7 5 7 , P g . 3 3 8 )City of College Station 15' San Sewer LineEsmt (Vol. 305, Pg. 228 D.R.)10.0'10.0'45' Private Access Esmt (Vol. 757, Pg. 338)20' Public Utility Esmt(Vol. 757, Pg. 338)20' Public Utility Esmt (Vol. 757, Pg. 338)20' Public Utility Esmt (Vol. 757, Pg. 338)10' Private Landscape Esmt (Vol. 757, Pg. 338)20' Public Utility Esmt (Vol. 757, Pg. 338)10.0'10.0'L o t 2 R - 1L o t 1 5 R - 1L o t 1 4 RL o t 1 3 RL o t 5 R O v e r h e a d e l e c l i n e s FLOOD ELEVATION See Note 3 FLOOD ELEVATION See Note 3City o f C o l l e g e S t a t i o n20' E l e c E s mt(V o l . 2 3 2 3 , P g . 8 5 O .R .)( Plotted as per Vol. 757, Pg. 338 )DrainageDitchManhole (t y p e ?)P a r k i n gTraffic Island( typical )Traffic Island( typical )U n d e r g r o u n dUtility Ma n h o le S T A T E H I G H W A Y N o. 6 - E a s t B y p a s sW e s t F e e d e r x x x x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ABCDEFGHI36' - 10"30' - 10"83' - 6"9' - 0"2' - 0"12' - 6"2' - 0"34' - 8"36' - 8"7' - 0"19' - 8"14' - 0"tenoshadestructure248' - 0"ws3ws3ws3ws3p1e3e2e1e3e1e2ws1ws2ws1ws1ws1ws1ws1ws1ws1relocatedexistingsignage 117 sfprojects 8"from wallrelocatedexisting signage61 sfprojects 8"from wallst1st1st1st1st1st1st1st1br1br1br1br1br1e3e1e2e3e1e2e3e1e3e2e3e2e3e3ws2ws2ws2ws2ws2stone pilasterstone pilasterstone pilaster20' - 11"2' - 11"17' - 0"2' - 11"2' - 11"12' - 5"23' - 10"2' - 11"relocated existingsignage 36 sfprojects 8" fromwallrelocatedexisting signage69 sfprojects 8"from wallproposedsignage 50 sfprojects 8"from wall6' - 7"17' - 6"1234567121314325' 6" x 10% = 32' - 6"32' - 6"EXISTING BUILDING NO MODIFICATIONS293' - 0"325' - 6"e1e1st1st1br1e3e3e3e3e3ws3p1p11234567121314325' - 6"EXISTING BUILDING - NO MODIFICATIONS293' - 0"325 - '6" X 10% = 32' - 6"32' - 6"mANUFACTURERES AND TRADE NAMES LISTED BELOWESTABLISH A REFERENCE FOR COLOR OR PATTERN ONLYBRIExisting Brick - clean and stainE1EIFS - synergy - color "gauze"E2EIFS - synergy -color "honeysuckle"E3EIFS - synergy - color "jute"FG- 1METAL GUTTER AND FACIA -"mbci" - pOLAR WHITEP1PAINT steel conaopy structure - coloe sw7599P2PAINT FLAT EXTERIOR - TO MATCH E3P3TEXTURED PAINTP4PAINT BLACK GLOSSSF-1STOREFRONT - DARK BRONZEST1cast stone - eldarado stone - "montecito"WS1 WALL SCONCE - "cooper" - ENC Entri LED - blackWS2Wall Sconce - " kicheler " - 9248 - blackWS3Wall SConce - "RRLD comerscial lighting -MATERIALS LEGENDEAST ELEVATION - Wall Area CalculationsTotal Wall Area = 6,943 SFUSE OF BUILDING MATERIALS EAST ELEVATIONMaterial Area in SF % of overall facadeSTONE / PTD. BRICK 2638 SF 38%STUCCO 3842 SF 55%ARCHITECTURAL METAL 148 SF 2%GLAZING 315 SF 5%NET AREA 6943 SF 100%TENSO SHADEstructure and vinylVinyl - WhiteStructure - Sherwin Williams SW 7599 Brick PaverCOOPER INDUSTRIESColor - Black(WS1)ENC Entri LEDBack CaviarSW 6990RRLD COMMERCIAL LIGHTING(WS3)Color - WhiteHigh Reflective White - SW7757KICHLER - 9246color black (WS2)Back CaviarSW 6990Sherwin WilliamsSW 7599Brick Paver(BR1)Existing Brick Stain ColorMONTECITOELDORADO STONEST1SYNERGY EIFS, STUCCOD-BASFtexture for all colors to beFINE TEXTUREe3e1e2Pavillion Beige SW 7512Vanillin SW 6371Paper White SW 7105P.O.Box 3652 3200 Crane Ave. BRYAN, Tx 77801 off 979 779-3336 fax 979.779-3424Sheet Issue Date:Drawn By:Revision7/2/2015 11:44:39 AM2400 Earl Rudder Fwy.College Station, Texas77840Subdivision - EastmarkPh 2NRAReviewA107/02/15bsNRA REVIEWGRANDSTATIONEntertainmentMike Logan2400 Earl Rudder FwyCollege Station, Texas77840 979.696.1100Issue Date 1" = 10'-0"1EAST ELEVATION 1" = 10'-0"2NORTH ELEVATION 1" = 10'-0"3SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"4Material Legend5Wall Materials - East 1" = 100'-0"6Site 1/4" = 1'-0"7Teno Shade8Wall Sconce9Wall Sconce10Wall Sconce 1/4" = 1'-0"11Brick stain Color 1/4" = 1'-0"12Cultured Stone 1/4" = 1'-0"13EIFS East Elevation North Elevation South Elevation