HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/13/2013 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review Board
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
September 13, 2013
11:00 AM
City Hall
Administrative Conference Room
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Friday, September 13, 2013, 11:00 AM
Administrative Conference Room
College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas, 77840
1. Call to Order
2. Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting Minutes.
• February 8, 2013
• March 8, 2013
3. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding attached signage for Rudy’s BBQ
located at 504 Harvey Road in the Wolf Pen Creek Design District. Case # 13-
00900152 (J. Paz)
4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an attached sign for Spirit
Halloween located at 410 Harvey Road in the Wolf Pen Creek Design District. Case #
13-00900185 (M. Hester)
5. Possible action and discussion on future agenda items – A Design Review Board Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent
meeting.
6. Adjourn.
Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Board of the City of College Station, Texas will be held on the
Friday, September 13, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. at the City Hall Administrative Conference Room, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station,
Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda
Posted this the____day of________________, 2013 at____p.m.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
By _____________________________
Sherry Mashburn, City Secretary
By _____________________________
Kathy Merrill, Acting City Manager
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Design Review Board of the City of College Station,
Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City
Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City’s website, www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily
accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on__________, 2013 and remained so posted
continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting.
This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time:
______________________ by _________________________.
Dated this _____ day of____________, 2013.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
By_____________________________
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the
day of_______________, 2013.
______________________________
Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas
My commission expires:_________________
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be
made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3541 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed
on www.cstx.gov.
Page 1 of 2
Minutes
Design Review Board
February 8, 2013 - 11:00 a.m.
Administrative Conference Room ~ City Hall
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, Texas, 77840
Board Members Present: Chairman Mike Ashfield, Susan McGrail, Hunter Goodwin,
and Jason Kinnard
Board Members Absent: Don Hellriegel, Bill Mather, Marsha Sanford (alternate),
Steven Schloss and Lindsay Bertrand
Staff Present: Principal Planner Jason Schubert, Staff Planner Lauren Hovde
and Staff Assistant Mandi Alford
Others Present: Donielle Mayer and Pauline Jonasson, Owners, and Chris
Pletcher with Wakefield Signs
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m.
: Call to order.
AGENDA ITEM NO.2:
Mr. Kinnard motioned to approve the absence requests from Don Hellriegel, Bill Mather,
Marsha Sanford, and Steven Schloss (Ms. Bertrand did not submit an absence request); Mr.
Goodwin seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (4-0).
Consideration, discussion and possible action on absence
requests.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3:
Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve
meeting minutes for September 14, 2012.
Mr. Kinnard motioned to approve the meeting minutes with a correction to agenda item no. 3
stating that the vote was (5-0-1) instead of (5-1-0), for the correct placement of the one
abstention; Mr. Goodwin seconded the motion, which passed (4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4:
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding
freestanding and attached signage for Spirit Ice Arena located at 400 Holleman Drive
East in the Wolf Pen Creek Design District. Case # 13-00900012 (LH)
Lauren Hovde, Staff Planner presented the staff report stating that the proposed sign package
included two attached signs and one freestanding sign. On the front façade, the sign will
Page 2 of 2
include text in a white font and graphics displaying ice arena activities in black. The design is
accented by a maroon swoosh on one side. The sign area is 162 square feet. The second
attached sign does not include text, but shows silhouettes in black of people participating in
ice arena activities. The sign area is 139 square feet. The total square footage of attached
signage proposed, 301 square feet is within the allowed amount for this building of 500
square feet. The freestanding sign request involves only a sign face change. The sign
structure is not being altered with this request. The proposed sign face includes graphics of
snow in white with a blue background. The text is shown in white and is accented by a
maroon swoosh on one side.
Chris Pletcher with Wakefield Signs presented modifications for the blue on the freestanding
sign to be a softer shade of blue and to change the hockey player and figure skater
silhouettes.
Mr. Kinnard suggested adding spacing and back lighting to the silhouettes.
Mr. Kinnard motioned to approve the modifications with the sign package labeled P7.1, and
spacing and back lighting added to the silhouettes; Mr. Goodwin seconded the motion which
passed (4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5:
Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing
policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject
on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
No items were presented for future discussion.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6:
Adjourn
Mr. Kinnard motioned to adjourn the meeting; Mr. Goodwin seconded the motion; which
passed unopposed (4-0).
Meeting adjourned at 11:19 a.m.
APPROVED:
Mike Ashfield, Chairman
ATTEST:
Crystal Derkowski, Staff Assistant
Page 1 of 3
Minutes
Design Review Board
March 8, 2013 - 11:00 a.m.
Administrative Conference Room ~ City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas, 77840
Board Members Present: Chairman Mike Ashfield, Jason Kinnard, Don Hellriegel,
Steven Schloss and Susan McGrail
Board Members Absent: Lindsay Bertrand, Hunter Goodwin and Bill Mather
Staff Present: Principal Planner Jason Schubert, Staff Planner Teresa Rogers,
Graduate Civil Engineer Erika Bridges and Staff Assistant
Mandi Alford
Others Present: Bo Miles, Scott Ball, and Dale Brown
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m.
: Call to order.
AGENDA ITEM NO.2:
Mr. Schloss motioned to approve the absence request from Hunter Goodwin (Ms. Bertrand
and Mr. Mather did not submit absence requests); Mr. Kinnard seconded the motion, which
passed unopposed (5-0).
Consideration, discussion and possible action on absence
requests.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3:
Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve
meeting minutes February 8, 2012.
No action was taken. The minutes were left out of the packet and be considered at the next
meeting.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4:
Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a
multi-family site plan, building elevations, and signage for Falcon Point Condos located
at 1915 Dartmouth Street near the northeast corner of Dartmouth Street and Holleman
Drive East in the Wolf Pen Creek District. Case # 12-00500262 (T. Rodgers)
Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner presented the staff report stating that the applicant is proposing
a multi-family residential development located near the northeast corner of Holleman Drive
Page 2 of 3
and Dartmouth Street consisting of 33 units and associated parking for Phase One. This site
plan meets the technical standards of the Unified Development Ordinance.
The subject property received a Conditional Use Permit from the City Council in July 2012,
which allows this project to be exclusively multi-family use. The Concept Plan also required
a cross-access easement which will run parallel to Dartmouth Street and projects to the
southern portion of the parent tract.
The Preliminary Plan was approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission in September
2012 and the Final Plat was approved in December 2012. This site plan is in compliance with
the Concept Plan that was approved with the Conditional Use Permit.
Ms. Rogers recommended approval and explained to the Design Review Board that they
should evaluate the site plan according to the following criteria listed in the staff report.
1. Lighting: The applicant is proposing to use the standard light pole and
luminary fixtures currently ut ilized in the Wolf Peen Creek (WPC) District.
Buildings will contain up/down wall fixtures for building accent lighting
and porch lights at entry doors.
2. Solid waste: The applicant is proposing to have a total of four 300-gallon
solid waste containers on two dumpster pads screened by six-foot brick
walls.
3. Relationship of buildings to site: Multi-family buildings are located at the
northern edge of the property and are proposed as three stories.
4. Relationship of buildings and site to adjoining area: The site is designed
to orient towards Holleman Drive and Wolf Pen Creek which is a focal
point of the WPC District. Residential driveway access will be from
Dartmouth Street. Sidewalks for the property will be developed to connect
to an existing sidewalk running along Dartmouth Street. Cross access will
be provided for the property to the south.
5. Building design: The buildings are brick and Hardi board material with
composition shingle roofing.
6. Landscaping: Landscaping is provided in accordance with the Unified
Development Ordinance.
7. Signs: A low profile sign is proposed at the driveway entrance on
Dartmouth Street. The sign will be the same brick material to match the
building.
Mr. Hellriegel motioned to approve the item as submitted; Mr. Schloss seconded the motion,
which passed unopposed (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing
Page 3 of 3
policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject
on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Mr. Schloss asked that there be a review of the Design Review Board’s role in the Wolf Pen
Creek District and if it is still necessary for items to come to DRB.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6:
Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned 11:21 a.m.
APPROVED:
Mike Ashfield, Chairman
ATTEST:
Crystal Derkowski, Staff Assistant
Design Review Board Page 1 of 3
September 13, 2013
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
for
Rudy's BBQ - 13-00900152
REQUEST: Replace existing attached signage and add new attached
signs
SCALE: 1.242 acres
LOCATION: 504 Harvey Road
ZONING DISTRICT: WPC Wolf Pen Creek
APPLICANTS: Shannon Pennington, Advanced Sign Company
PROJECT MANAGER: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
jpaz@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed sign package,
with the exception of Sign B.
Design Review Board Page 2 of 3
September 13, 2013
Design Review Board Page 3 of 3
September 13, 2013
ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting to replace and add new attached building
signage to meet the franchise brand changes. A sign package was presented and
approved by the Design Review Board in 1999, when the site was converted to the now
Rudy’s BBQ. Revisions were later made to an attached sign, which was presented and
approved in 2000.
ITEM BACKGROUND: The applicant has proposed a new sign package that consists
of three building signs. All attached signs will utilize red and black colors. The proposed
cabinet sign facing Harvey Road (Sign A) will be similar in size and color to the existing,
with a change in wording to “Country Store” and red neon lighting outlining the sign. A
ribbon sign (Signs B) is proposed to be located along the primary entry façade and an
aluminum sign (Sign C) is proposed to replace an existing attached sign.
Proposed building attached signage is 98.91 square feet facing Harvey Road and 38.16
square feet on the East façade. All proposed signs meet the requirements of the
Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.5, Signs related to allowable sign area.
All signs reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board will require the submittal
of a sign permit application to the Planning & Development Service Department to the
an approved building permit prior to installation of any sign.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed sign, with the exception of the ribbon sign
(Sign B). In Staff’s opinion, the proposed ribbon sign is not consistent with the Wolf Pen
Creek design criteria; the scale and proportion of the sign is not compatible with the
design of other proposed signs and its relationship with the building.
REVIEW CRITERIA:
The Design Review Board shall evaluate all proposed signage according to the
following criteria:
1. Every sign shall be designed as an integral architectural element of the building
and site to which it principally relates.
2. Every sign shall have good scale and proportion in its design and in its visual
relationship to the buildings and surroundings.
3. The color, materials, and lighting of every sign shall be restrained and
harmonious with the building and surroundings.
4. The number of graphics on a signs shall be held to the minimum needed to
convey the sign’s major message and shall be composed in proportion to the
area of the sign face.
5. Each sign shall be compatible with signs on adjoining premises and shall not
compete for attention.
6. Identification signs of a prototype design and corporation logos shall conform to
the criteria for all other signs.
Design Review Board Page 4 of 3
September 13, 2013
SUPPORTING MATERIALS:
1. Application
2. Sign details
3. Color and material samples (provided at meeting)
Design Review Board Page 1 of 3
September 13, 2013
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
for
Spirit Halloween
13-00900185
REQUEST: Provide temporary attached signage for business
SCALE: 2.14 acres
LOCATION: 410 Harvey Road
ZONING DISTRICT: WPC W olf Pen Creek
APPLICANTS: Boo 2 You, LLC
PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
mhester@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Based on the review criteria, it is Staff’s opinion that the proposed
sign does not meet the color requirement for WPC Wolf Pen
Creek zoning, but due to its temporary, seasonal use and that a
banner would not be appropriate due to the time and size
limitation, Staff recommends approval of the proposed attached
sign with the condition that it is removed by November 10, 2013.
Design Review Board Page 2 of 3
September 13, 2013
Design Review Board Page 3 of 3
September 13, 2013
ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting to provide an attached building sign. The
applicant does not wish to resubmit a banner application every two-weeks and already
possesses the lettering for the attached sign. This sign is intended to be removed on
November 10, 2013, as the nature of the business is seasonal.
ITEM BACKGROUND: The applicant has proposed an attached sign for consideration. The
sign reads “Spirit Halloween” in an orange color (S-G-220 Sweet Mandarin) with black outline
and includes graphic elements consisting of small stars within the word “Spirit”. This color is
not comparable with the approved color palette in the City of College Station’s Site Design
Standards. The proposed location of the sign is to be attached where “Office Max” was for the
prior tenant.
The proposed area for the attached signage is 120 square feet. The allowable sign area is 470
square feet, based on the linear frontage of the main entry façade. All proposed signs meet the
requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.5 ‘Signs’ as it relates to
allowable sign area.
All signs reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board will require the submittal of a sign
permit application to the Planning & Development Department in order to receive an approved
sign permit prior to installation of any signs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the review criteria, it is Staff’s opinion that the proposed sign does not meet the color
requirement for WPC Wolf Pen Creek zoning, but due to its temporary, seasonal use and that a
banner would not be appropriate due to the time and size limitation, Staff recommends approval
of the proposed attached sign with the condition that it is removed by November 10, 2013.
ISSUES / ITEMS FOR REVIEW:
The Design Review Board shall evaluate all proposed signage according to the following
criteria:
1. Every sign shall be designed as an integral architectural element of the building and site
to which it principally relates.
2. Every sign shall have good scale and proportion in its design and in its visual
relationship to the buildings and surroundings.
3. The color, materials, and lighting of every sign shall be restrained and harmonious with
the building and surroundings.
4. The number of graphics on a signs shall be held to the minimum needed to convey the
sign’s major message and shall be composed in proportion to the area of the sign face.
5. Each sign shall be compatible with signs on adjoining premises and shall not compete
for attention.
6. Identification signs of a prototype design and corporation logos shall conform to the
criteria for all other signs.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS:
1. Application
2. Sign details (provided in packet)
3. Color (provided at the meeting)
CITE OF COLLEGE STATION
Home ofTexasA Af University
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO I3 I 45
DATE SUBMITTED 1
TIME D 1 LiU
STAFF P5
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION
WOLF PEN CREEK DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Check all that apply Note All items checked must be presented to the Design Review Board at the
same time Site Plan Building Building Sign
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS T
350 Design Review Board Application Fee
Application completed in full This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered Please attach pages if additional information is provided
For Site Plan Building consideration
932 Site Plan Application Fee
600 minimum Development Permit Application Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee Fee is
1 of acceptable Engineers Estimate for public infrastructure 600 minimum if fee is 600 the balance
is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit
350 Non Residential Architectural Standards Building Review Application Fee if applicable
Fourteen 14 folded copies of site plan
One 1 folded copy of the landscape plan
One 1 copy of the following for building review if applicable
Building elevations to scale for all buildings
A list of building materials for all facade and screening
Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette
Two 2 copies of the grading drainage and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report
Two 2 copies of the public infrastructure plans and supporting documents if applicable
The attached Site Plan and Non Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklists if
applicable with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not check off
For Building consideration
250 Non Residential Architectural Standards Building Review Application Fee if applicable
One 1 copy of building elevations to scale for all buildings
A list of building materials for all facades and screening
Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette
The attached Non Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklist with all items checked off
orA brief explanation as to why they are not checked off if applicable
Pen
consideration
10 copies of sign details with dimensions
10 copies of the building elevation showing sign placement if attached signage is proposed
10 copies of color samples
Material samples
NOTE Proposed development in Wolf Pen Creek must be reviewed by the Design Review Board When staff has
completed their technical review of the proposal it will be scheduled for consideration by the Design Review
Board Ten 10 copies of all current design plans and color samples will be required for the Board
111 Page 1 of 11
I
Proposed use of property a O AJ W0P S v fie
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels on the property r Yes eNo
Square footage of attached sign
Square footage of freestanding sign
For Site Plan consideration describe how the following proposed elements meet the goals of the special district plan and
related regulations
Site Lighting
Norte
Solid Waste
Relationship of buildings to site
Relationship of buildings and site to adjoining areas
Building footprint design
Miscellaneous structures and street hardware
Landscaping
Site Maintenance
111 Page 3 of 11
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification
1 No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued
2 The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein
3 If revoked all work must cease until permit is re issued
4 Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued
5 The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance
6 Other permits may be required to fulfill local state and federal requirements Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP
7 If required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction forms at slab
prepour and post construction
8 Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance
9 If stormwater mitigation is required including detention ponds proposed as part of this project it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project
10 In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction erosion and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets or
existing drainage facilities All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply
11 The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station Texas City Code Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications and Standard Details All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations
12 Release of plans to name or firm is authorized for bidding purposes
only I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit
13 I THE OWNER AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION ARE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE TRUE AND
ACCURATE
Property Owners Date
Engineer Certification
1 The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation including detention ponds proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence
2 1 will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOI and SWPPP Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES ieprojects over 10 acres may
require sedimentation basin
3 The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station Texas City Code Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations
4 I THE ENGINEER AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION ARE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE TRUE AND
ACCURATE
Engineer Date
111 Page 5 of 11
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area Elevation Certificate
required
Residential Structures
D I certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor including all utilities ductwork and any basement at anelevationatleastonefootabovetheBaseFloodElevationRequiredElevationCertificateswillbeprovidedwith
elevations certified during construction forms at slab pre pour and post construction
Engineer Surveyor
Commercial Structures
E I
Date
certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial industrial or other non residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor including all
utilities ductwork and basements elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer Surveyor
OR
Date
1 certify that the structure with its attendant utility ductworkbasementandsanitaryfacilitiesisdesignedtobefloodproofedsothatthestructureandutilitiesductwork
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction forms at slab
prepour and post construction
Engineer Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval
111 Page 7 of 11
M
Streets Parking and Sidewalks
Existing streets and sidewalks ROW
Existing Driveways both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO Article 7
Proposed drives Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO Article 7
Indicate proposed driveway throat length according to UDO Article 7
Proposed curb cuts
For each proposed curb cut including driveways streets alleys etc locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts
Proposed curb and pavement detail
A 6 raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception To include island
planting areas access ways dumpster locations utility pads etc No exception will be made for areas
designated as reserved for future parking
Proposed medians
Proposed sidewalks both public and private
Proposed pedestrian bike circulation and facilities for non residential buildings UDO Article 7
Off Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn tabulated and dimensioned
Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal
Handicap parking spaces
Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO Section 72 or 79
for non residential buildings
Parking setback from ROW to curb of parking lot as required
Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities signs or other conflicts
Security gates showing swing path and design specs with colors
Guardrails Include design and colors
Traffic Impact Analysis for non residential development UDO Article 7
Please note if none is required
Will there be access from a TxDOT ROW Yes No
If yes then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application
Easements and Utilities
Easements clearly designate as existing or proposed and type utility access etc
Utilities noting size and designate as existing or proposed within or adjacent to the proposed site including building
transformer locations above ground and underground service connections to buildings and drainage inlets
Sewer Design Report if applicable
Water Design Report and or Fire Flow Report if applicable
Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary
Meter locations existing and proposed must be located in public ROWor public utility easement
Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include
Minimum water demands
Maximum water demands
Average water demands in gallons per minute and
Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per day
Will there be access from a TxDOT ROW Yes No
If yes then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application
111 Page 9 of 11
OF
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas AdMUniversity
NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING
Refer to UDO Section 79 Non Residential Architectural Standards as appropriate
Sheet size 24 x 36 minimum
Title block to include
Name address location and legal description
Name address and telephone number of applicant
Name address and telephone number of developer owner if differs from applicant
Name address and telephone number of architectengineer if differs from applicant
Date of submittal
Scale should be largest standard scale possible on sheet
List of colors from the City of College Station color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents
Color samples
List of materials to be utilized
Elevations of each non residential building and screening structure Show placement of materials and colors on
the facades according to LIDO Section 5613 or 79
Include the following dimensions
Total vertical square footage minus openings for each facade separately
Total vertical square footage of transparency for each facade separately in Northgate
Total vertical square footage of each building material for each facade separately
Total vertical square footage of each color for each facade separately
Graphic representation and or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material color and
architectural harmony
N Page 11 of 11