The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMisc. 01_� Single Family Overlay Districts Community Meeting September 18, 2007 Velton'' CAIN Cwnu 1- + scar COMre.V�crsiv.c P16-n H isioric Prescwaii'�M p Nei 5h hoThoodl ekb-kci-i rn 0th. 41- PS 2 atef2--h. Oct. 2S- Ci ecvnciqu n3 • C + yic. ?reservo- iw1 elarfu2) . �- nrcIca4 nCn '� 1 t9" Single-Family Overlays • What is an Overlay? • Why Single-Family Overlay - Emphasis on infill - Guard against • Teardowns • Too-big houses • Too much/not enough parking • Removal of specimen trees • Out of character buildings 2 5 Single-F' amily Ov11herlays f"' t 4 #i) ' At'Pr yY :, it3v`� 'Y:' � Sit _ . 3 Single-Family Overlays • Two 'avers ork-i ars - Neighborhood Prevailing Ovcr a'/ - Neighborhood Conservation Overll • Difference `.J - Set standards - Adjustable standards (*1 4 Neighborhood Prevailing • Setbacks Fro-F Sick $1e-(- • Lot size • Height • Landscape preservation and maintenance • Lot coverage • Garages 1°C- ''cry)A6gett,_ Sirodlih014)( 4--.. -R04 k--evIN .e-n rti aril( 5 Median Setback A B C D E si as „fig Id Ar°lar! Corfe-**4 Median setback is 20 feet t 5 240 S 230 ?� ,( nn utgl t)i-h0,(.. G 51 D M ecW = l(e 0 a D 6 Conservation Overlays • Everything in Prevailing Overlay, plus - Off-street parking - Building materials - Fencing location and materials • Customized for local control 7 Issues • What is a neighborhood? • Who can require a single-family overlay? • What is a conservation study? • Who can participate on the committee? • How long will a study take? • How does this work with redevelopment? • How to apply? * .1-tav4 to n cJtk r F ern4 t 4-? COs- .c Y ✓y 8 ?Y �l�/ �� 1\ 4V3 �a� n ee1 eco � 4(6 \ ,. , A 0. i /11 I. i c�1r1=i4 On_s ee - p g 1,7viS ,v�,ra51, ► 1 Gee i / me a�ivt r1G�� 1 \IaY� rnuivi�rtav�c�e /home � C1�5��1 krcc,k g \\ O 1n kVa'OnI-hc Vpe � ' �cnCe 5k,cAe‘n\-S ,,t2e5s ndavvl5 yelp it r�� Stu 1' lao61uYcC5 ir ' y �; v'3v-k � , imus M taon'ng 9c0,t3 { , . N.,eterooloocca to;tVi-\1 tI -cl -61 .1.6flihi-_. — C,n-Y107V---‘q / \ 5-E-0. -C1-1C44.5 U 1OY1 0 P<6.1P cs E '1 X111 C 171111NI vvKt.Ve\t`"1 ,0-14 -tcA,V c ,o{z�' 4D Re0A1A1 C EC£Y1C,VY1 CkCC4 N He y 5 `/151©✓1 o Pco(kS I 5001- cot a ot0A- \I rcaLkeoprdovH., F Van' �c��i ��x� hcYx� \1WA mek fobt pick. C yrirnv;'i C 1 n \ j`v k(1 ��evl urlcssskonc k ,dues Over ` zyup j9 - Ur v n -r) Noes 00" � e-nd `" Ccm? fey SECTION 18: PLATTING AND REPLATTING WITHIN OLDER RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS 18-A. This section applies to all property in which any portion of that property meets the following criteria: 18-A.1 Any portion of the property is currently zoned or developed for single family residential uses as of January 1,2002 with the exception of NG-1,NG-2,NG- __-_[Deleted: and 3, NPO,and CD zoning districts;and, 18-A.2 The subject property is art of a lot or building plot that was c aced prior to July 15, 1970. This also includes lots that may have been vacated or replatted after July 15, 1970 but where the original plat predates July 15, 1970. 18-B. In addition to the other provisions of this ordinance,no plat,replat,vacating and resubdividing plat or other plat intended to provide for the resubdivision of an existing lot or lots in a residential subdivision may be approved unless: 18-B.1 The plat does not create an additional lot or building plot. 18-B.2 A plat which does create an additional lot or building plot must meet or exceed the average width of the lots along the street frontage,for all lots in the block and contain at least 8,500 square feet of space for each dwelling unit. For the purpose of this section,a lot shall be defined to include the lot,lots and/or portions of lots that have been combined and used as a residential plot,as of the effective date of this ordinance. 18-C. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide documentation during the application process regarding the original plat in which the lot was created. (As Amended by Ordinance No. 2492 dated March 8, 2001) (As amended by Ordinance No.2544 dated January 24, 2002) 18-D. Section 18 shall not be applicable to the following: Plat application submitted to the City of College Station on Monday, February 16, 2004, Record No. 04-00500040 for the creation of two(2)additional lots. The purpose of this subsection is to exempt this property from the provisions of Section 18 as provided in the Plat,to allow the creation of two(2)additional lots. It is further the intention of the City Council to maintain the provisions of Section 18 as to this property as to any subsequent replatting and the provisions of Section 18 as to other pieces of property that are covered by Section 18. (As amended by Ordinance#2698 dated February 26, 2004) 9-53 Rev.7/02 Article 5. District Purpose Statim.tints and Supplemental Standards 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards 5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards The following table establishes dimensional standards that shall be applied within the Residential Zoning Districts, unless otherwise identified in this UDO. Residential Zoning Districts L• a) o L O O - m N M 7 lD N. N y < Q a K C' a a' a' u Q � Min. Lot Area per Dwelling 5 1 5,000 SF 8,000 SF 3,500 SF 2,000 SF None None Unit (DU) Acres Acre _ Min. Lot Width None None 50' None 35'/DU(E) None None None Min. Lot Depth None None 100' None 100' None None None 4 • N Min. Front Setback (I-I) 50' 50' 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) 25'(D) °' o n Min. Side Setback 20' 20' 7.5' 7.5'(C) 7.5'(C) (A) (A)(B) (A)(B) ti L Min. Street Side Setback 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' N o . Min. Side Setback between u Structures (B) 15' 15' 15' 7.5' 7.5' 7.5' , a - Min. Rear Setback (I) 50' 50' 20' 20' 20'(F) 20' 20' 20' °C 2.5 Stories/ 2.5 Stories/ 2.5 Stories/ Max. Height 35' 35' 35' G G 35' 35' 35' Max. Dwelling Units/Acre 0.2 1.0 8.0 6.0 12.0 14.0 20.0 30.0 10.0 N/A Notes: (A) A minimum side setback of 7.5 feet is required for each building or group of contiguous buildings. (B) Lot line construction on interior lots with no side yard or setback is allowed only where the building is covered by fire protection on the site or by dedicated right-of-way or easement. (C) Zero lot line construction of a residence is allowed where property on both sides of a lot line is owned and/or developed simultaneously by single party. Development under lot line construction requires prior approval by the Zoning Official. In no case shall a single-family residence or duplex be built within 15 feet of another primary structure. See Article 8, Subdivision Design and Improvements, for more information. (D) Minimum front setback may be reduced to 15 feet when approved rear access is provided, or when side yard or rear yard parking is provided. (E) The minimum lot width for a duplex dwelling may be reduced to 30 feet per dwelling unit when all required off-street parking is provided in the rear or side yard. (F) Minimum rear setback may be reduced to 15 feet when parking is provided in the front yard or side yard. (G) Shall abide by Section 7.1.H, Height. (H) Reference Section 7.1.D.1.e for lots created by plat prior to July 15, 1970. (I) Reference Se 1.D.1.b for lots with approved rear access. (J) Referen e Section 5.9 for areas in Neighborhood Protection districts Per Ordinance (May 24, 2007) 7 `\ 5.3 Non-Residential Zoning Districts A. Administrative-Professional (A-P) This district will accommodate selected commercial businesses that provide a service rather than sell products, either retail or wholesale. The uses allowed have relatively low traffic generation and require limited location identification. 5-3 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 7. General Developmer .;-tandards Section 7.1 General Provisions c. No structure that is taller than eight feet in height and that has a roof structure that completely or partially blocks the view to the sky shall be located within the required setback area unless specifically allowed herein; d. No part of a yard or other open space required in connection with any building, building plot, or use for the purpose of complying with this UDO, shall be included for any other building, building plot, or use as part of a yard or open space; and e. Where an existing block was created by an approved plat prior to July 15, 1970, a new (infill) single-family dwelling unit shall use the adjacent lots to determine the appropriate front yard setback. The new dwelling unit shall be set no closer to the street or farther back from the street than the nearest neighboring units. Areas zoned NPO, Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District or CD, Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District are exempt from this requirement. 2. Reduction for Public Purpose Vv�1\�.4 �� a. When an existing setback is reduced because of a recent or pending conveyance to a federal, state, or local government for a public purpose and the remaining setback is at least 50 percent of the required minimum setback for the district in which it is located, then that remaining setback will be deemed to satisfy the minimum setback standards of this UDO. b. For the purposes of this subsection, such conveyance shall have occurred within one year immediately proceeding submittal for site plan approval, or be anticipated to occur within one year of site plan approval. 3. Features Allowed Within Required Yards The following features may be located within a required yard but may be subject to additional regulations applied herein: a. Trees, shrubbery, or other landscape features, excluding gazebos or other similar structures that require a building permit; Per Ordinance No. 2902 (June 8, 2006) b. Fences and walls; c. Driveways; d. Sidewalks; e. Utility lines, wires, and associated structures, such as power poles; f. Mechanical equipment such as air conditioning units, pool pumps, and similar equipment; g. Uncovered porches, uncovered steps to building entrances, and uncovered patio decks; h. Covered porches that are open on three sides, may extend up to six feet (6'), including eaves, into any required front or side street setback; Per Ordinance No. 2902 (June 8, 2006) i. Openwork fire balconies and fire escapes may extend up to six feet into any required rear setback; j. Sills, belt courses, cornices, buttresses, chimneys, flues, eaves, and other architectural features may extend up to 18 inches into any required yard; k. Balconies or decks located more than eight feet from the ground may project up to six feet into the required front yard; I. Accessory structures that do not require building permits; m. Bus stops that offer shelter from the elements. Such shelters may be located within a front or side street yard. Shelters may be located within a public right-of- way if a Private Improvement in Public right-of-way permit has been duly issued; and n. Swimming pools and hot tubs without shelter. 7-2 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station Article 4. Zoning Districts Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts Article 4. Zoning Districts 4.1 Establishment of Districts For the purpose of this UDO, portions of the City, as specified on the Official Zoning Map of the City, are hereby divided into the zoning, design, and overlay districts enumerated below. The intensity regulations applicable for such zoning districts are designated in Article 5 and the use regulations are designated in Article 6 of this UDO. Residential Zoning Districts A-O Agricultural-Open A-OR Rural Residential Subdivision R-1 Single-Family Residential R-1B Single-Family Residential R-2 Duplex Residential R-3 Townhouse R-4 Multi-Family R-6 High Density Multi-Family R-7 Manufactured Home Park Non-Residential Zoning Districts A-P Administrative/ Professional C-1 General Commercial C-2 Commercial-Industrial C-3 Light Commercial M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial C-U College and University R&D Research & Development Planned Districts P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District PDD Planned Development District Design Districts WPC Wolf Pen Creek Development Corridor NG-1 Core Northgate Northgate NG-2 Transitional Northgate NG-3 Residential Northgate Overlay Districts OV Corridor Overlay RDD Redevelopment District KO Krenek Tap Overlay NPO Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay CD Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Per Ordinance No. 2881 (March 23, 2006) V k, hf� � t � ' yk 4-1 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statisk—znts and Supplemental Standards 5.8 Overlay Districts Neighborhood Protection Districts Neighborhood Protection Districts are intended to provide additional standards for new construction and redevelopment in established neighborhoods. College Station's older,established neighborhoods provide a unique living environment that contribute to the stability and livability of the City as a whole.These standards are intended to promote development that is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood and preserve the unique characteristics of College Station's older neighborhoods while balancing the need for the redevelopment of vacant or underutilized property. Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District Purpose This district is intended to provide standards that reserve single-family neighborhoods by imposing neighborhood-specific yard,lot,andA ace regulations that reflect the existing character of the neighborhood.The neighborhood stabilization overlay does not prevent construction of new single family structures or the renovation,remodeling,repair or expansion of existing single family structures,but,rather,ensures that new single family structures are compatible with existing single family structures. The underlying district establishes the permitted uses and shall remain in full force,and the requirements of the overlay district are to be applied in addition to the underlying use and site restrictions. The Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay may only be applied to neighborhoods zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. Standards b In general The yard,lot,andpace regulations of the neighborhood stabilization overlay apply only to single family structures. d ,,, , &G_2.s The yard,lot,and space regulations of the neighborhood prevailing overlay must be read together with the yard,lot,and space regulations in Section 5.2,Residential tee- -7-1 L Dimensional Standards:In the event of a conflict between the neighborhood Fir w, prevailing overlay and Section 5.2,the neighborhood prevailing overlay controls. e Development of any property shall be subject to the existing average pattern of development in the overlay within 500 feet of the property for the following standards: l \<; k c kimsr � (( Minimum Front Setback-What if average is closet-Apr further than neighbors in 7? Minimum Side Setback-building code/fire issues? \--r-v.-° Minimum Rear Setback 7 Minimum Side Street Setback a c, \; `. Minimum Lot Size-What about 18-B in subregs? �v� �jv'�i2�4r� �� 4 L��. Building Height Landscape Volume Impervious Cover \n 1 Driveway Length Garage Location Additional standards-- Tree preservation Conservation Districts 5-28 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Neighborhood Prevailing Median Setback • Setbacks s o E • Lot size • Height ' • Landscape preservation and F s maintenance • Lot coverage • Garages Conservation Overlays Issues • Everything in Prevailing Overlay, plus • What is a neighborhood? - Off-street parking • Who can require a single-family overlay? - Building materials • What is a conservation study? - Fencing location and materials • Who can participate on the committee? • Customized for local control • How long will a study take? • How does this work with redevelopment? • How to apply? Oct' Ems, 2 • \e.>C VArc,ti)C �\1��1 (_,C> _1/4.=\..„ ' -�J -'E-.!.J�-�C<)` �I�J�4 V�V"�..'�' Cj� i yr R��S.p •�.`J--��U`�� \�Y.,"- � C SL p-vim v'� -�� L7L7 690 a O J C-A--) N . • A S� v\c N, ``, \f`•--•-sL-C .i -* Sly Q " Civ CsA9 • ,- o • C�'��--Vic__-�Z' -'Y �`_ 'fir`';.:: G�r��6-`C--�L:� c, `- OBJECTID CODE SUBDIVISIO YEAR SHAPE area 70 A37 SMITH,D.A. 1919 1007565.91281000000 493 C78 COLLEGE PARK 1923 3487417.59939000000 55 A64 PASLER 1936 245766.65820300000 56 A19 GORZYCKI MEADOWLANDS 1936 21382.74817580000 72 A19 GORZYCKI MEADOWLANDS 1936 499558.02054800000 57 A39 COLLEGE HEIGHTS 1938 1020555.27780000000 63 A31 COLLEGE HILLS ESTATES 1 1938 4118836.85845000000 102 A58 BOYETT 1939 2792542.08138000000 538 A28 COLLEGE HILLS WOODLANDS 1939 2156754.88144000000 543 A33 COLLEGE HILLS ESTATES 3 1939 2710182.50266000000 544 A32 COLLEGE HILLS ESTATES 2 1939 622894.68708100000 48 A29 WOODLAND ACRES 1940 2069563.40364000000 101 A34 COLLEGE HILLS ESTATES 4 1940 952675.13425400000 146 C82 HOLIK 1940 574304.70925400000 481 A61 COLLEGE VISTA 1942 630482.12892700000 552 C19 SOUTH OAKWOOD 1943 1824713.34509000000 190 C69 WEST PARK 1946 1483024.33047000000 218 C60 WEST PARK 2 1946 270515.13299200000 50 A16 HOLT 1947 432547.03821100000 96 A57 TAUBER 1947 1103684.25357000000 165 C42 KNOLL 1947 1482215.76994000000 206 C75 BREEZY HEIGHTS 1947 1192472.37434000000 77 A66 PEARCE(Not a Legal Subdivision) 1948 124241.96759400000 500 D104 COLLEGE STATION CEMETERY 1948 920634.83699900000 537 A76 LLOYD SMITH(Not a Legal Subdivision) 1948 393208.87917200000 545 C79 SOUTHLAND ADDITION 1948 314004.48584000000 66 A71 LAUTERSTEIN ADDITION 1949 68755.94499210000 207 C81 SPARKS,W.M. 1949 133973.00658600000 539 A95 BAKER 1949 73826.27444790000 74 A65 ARMSTRONG 1952 88610.31443550000 480 A38 VISOSKI 1952 90387.72858250000 492 A75 OAK TERRACE ADDITION 1952 1172829.88623000000 186 C25 DULANY 1956 133794.62194500000 44 A40 COONER ADDITION 1982 589755.85704000000 229 C76 MCCULLOCH ADDITION 1976 1666007.58206000000 553 C89 OAKWOOD ADDITION 1992 30955.43427650000 536 A63 PRAIRIE VIEW HEIGHTS 1983 413912.51886600000 192 C71 SOUTHEAST COLLEGE PARK 1977 1258490.61578000000 542 A13 WOODLAND ESTATES 1968 1366549.67055000000 \N0 v\IC H,q T c, V:\* F-- i Article 5. District Purpose Stas_ .,;nts and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts A. Purpose Single-Family Overlay Districts are intended to provide additional standards for new construction and redevelopment in established neighborhoods. College Station's older, established neighborhoods provide a unique living environment that contribute to the stability and livability of the City as a whole. These standards are intended to promote development that is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood and preserve the unique characteristics of College Station's older neighborhoods while balancing the need for the redevelopment of vacant or underutilized property. The underlying district establishes the permitted uses and shall remain in full force, and the requirements of the overlay district are to be applied in addition to the underlying use and site restrictions. B. Applicability The Single-Family Overlay Districts may only be applied to neighborhoods zoned R-1, Single Family Residential that are not zoned for Historic Preservation. C. General Provisions 1. The yard, lot, and open space regulations of the Neighborhood Protection Districts must be read together with the yard, lot, and open space regulations in Section 5.2, Residential Dimensional Standards and Section 7.1.D, Required Yards. In the event of a y`i conflict between the Single-Family Overlay Districts and these sections, the Single- � c Family Overlay District controls. 0 2. The area of a Single Family Overlay District must include the entire area of the too r originally platted subdivision that is also zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. yrr, I3. Petition for a Single-Family Overlay District must be signed by at least sixty percent AJ (60%) of property owners in the proposed district area. 4. Single-Family Overlay Districts may not apply to neighborhoods originally platted in the last ten (10) years LA- t.LA- ; Cr/ r r •�, ( G�? D. Districts �7 1. Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District (NPO) F a. Purpose This district is intended to provide standards that preserve single-family neighborhoods by imposing nei. •orhood-specific yard, lot, and open space regulations that r- - the �$;P: character of the neighborhood. The 'eighborhoo. Pr-vailing Overlisi..es not prevent construction of new single fam • . 1-- or e renovation, remodeling, repair or expansion of existing single family structures, but, rather, ensures that new single family structures are compatible with existing single family structures. b. Applicability --- at- The regulations of th eighborhood Prevailing Ove lay apply to all single family and accessory structures within the district. c. Standards Development shall be subject to the existing median pattern of development on the subject and opposing blockface for the following standards: 1) Minimum front setback Front setback is calculated as the median existin front setback of all residential structures on the subject an opposing blockface. 2) Minimum side street setback 5-29 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose Sta,, ants and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts Minimum side street setback is calculated as the median side street setback of all existing residential structures in the district. 3) Minimum lot size Minimum lot size is calculated as the median building plot size of all existing building plots on the subject and opposing.blockface. 4) Building height Building height is calculated as the median buildinci height of all existing residential structures on the subject and opposing blockface. 5) Maximum lot coverage Lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the subject and opposing b.12:rat=e. Lot coverage includes all structures and impervious cover on a site, including but not limited to, patios, driveways, accessory structures, and sidewalks 6) Garage Location and Orientation New garages must be placed in relation to the primary residential structure on the lot consistent with the median pattern of placement on the subject and opposing blockface. New garages must also be oriented consistent with the median pattern of orientation on the subject and opposing blockface. 7) Tree Preservation Any existing tree of 8-inch caliper or greater located outside of the building setbacks are required to be barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must be provided on the site plan. Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper inch. Barricades must be in place prior to any development activity on the property including, but not limited to, grading. 8) Landscape Maintenance Any existing canopy and non-canopy trees inside the building setbacks removed during construction must be replaced on site caliper for caliper, or as determined by the Administrator. 2. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts (NCO) ''� a. Purpose The Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCO) is intended to protect and preserve single-family neighborhoods through a district that is focused on the specific needs of the neighborhood. NCO districts are based on in-depth study of the existing neighborhood conditions, and should be used to protect unique assets and qualities of the neighborhood. Conservation districts may be used for neighborhoods that may not necessarily qualify for Historic Preservation, but offer a distinct character that its residents and the City wish to preserve and protect. It differs from the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay in that it allows neighborhoods to choose from a variety of standards to address neighborhood specific issues. b. Applicability 1) The regulations of the Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay apply to all single family and accessory structures within the district. 2) A neighborhood may not have both a Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay and a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay. c. General Provisions The standards set forward in a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay must be based on findings of a conservation study conducted by the City of College Station in conjunction with a nei• . . stakehol•- .mmittee. The committee must be made up of at least - (6) mem.-• of the neighborhood and the Administrator. •- --- •- '• tudy must include a survey of existing conditions and unique characteristics of the neighborhood and outline the issues that threaten the 5-30 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose Sta „.ents and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts preservation of those characteristics. The Conservation Study will also set forth the items that may be included in the rezoning ordinance. d. Options for Inclusion In applying for a Neighborhood Conservation District Overlay, the following items may be included for study in the Conservation Study and included as standards in the overlay. All development within the district shall be subject to the standards set forth in the rezoning ordinance. 1) Minimum Front Setback If minimum front setback is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum front setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 7.1.D.1.e; or b) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.1; or c) Fixed front setback. A fixed front setback may be established, however, it may not be less than the setback of underlying zoning or more than the existing median front yard setback of structures in the district. 2) Minimum Side Street Setback If minimum side street setback is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum side street setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.2; or b) Fixed side street setback. A fixed side street setback may be established, however, it may not be less than the side setback setback of underlying zoning or more than the existing median side street setback of structures in the district. 3) Minimum lot size If minimum lot size is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum lot size based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Lot size as provided for in Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations, Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Neighborhoods; or b) Contextual lot size as provided for in Section 5.9.C.3; or c) Fixed lot size. A fixed lot size may be established, however, it may not be less than the lot size required of underlying zoning or more than the existing median lot size of lots in the district. 4) Maximum building height If maximum building height is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining maximum building height based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual building height as provided for in Section 5.9.C.4; or b) Fixed building height. A fixed building height may be established, however, it may not be less than the building height required in the underlying zoning district or more than the median height of all residential structures in the district. 5) Tree Preservation 5-31 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose Stae,, y.;nts and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts If tree preservation is chosen for inclusion, any existing tree of 8-inch caliper or greater located outside of the building setbacks are required to be barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must be provided on the site plan. Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper inch. Barricades must be in place prior to any development activity on the property including, but not limited to, grading. 6) Landscape Maintenance If landscape maintenance is chosen for inclusion, any existing canopy and non-canopy trees inside the building setbacks removed during construction must be replaced on site caliper for caliper, or as determined by the Administrator. 7) Maximum lot coverage If maximum lot coverage is chosen for inclusion, maximum lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. Lot coverage includes all structures and impervious cover on a site, including but not limited to, patios, driveways, accessory structures, and sidewalks 8) Garage Access If garage access is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of garage access based on the median method of garage access within the subject neighborhood: a) Front entry; or b) Side entry; or c) Rear entry. 9) Garage Connection If garage connection is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following garage connection types based on the median method of garage connection within the subject neighborhood: a) Attached to the single family structure; or b) Detached from the single family structure. 10)Garage Location If garage location is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following garage locations based on the median location of garages in relation to the primary single family structure within the subject neighborhood: a) In front of the single family structure; or b) To the side of the Attached to the single family structure; or c) To the rear of the single family structure. 11)Off-street parking If off-street parking is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may set a minimum off-street parking standard of 3 spaces per residential unit based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood, however, it may not be included without the inclusion of the study of its impact on maximum lot coverage, as well as garage access, connection, and location in the Conservation Study. 12) Building Materials If Building Materials is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select required building materials and set a minimum percentage for the use of those materials for facades facing a right-of-way. Required materials may only include types of building materials used in the 5-32 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose Staff ..mts and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts subject neighborhood. The Conservation Study should include a listing of all types of materials used in the district as well as the median percentage on building facades facing a right-of-way. The percentage of use of a required material may only be placed on facades facing a right-of-way and may not exceed the median existing percentage of the materials on building facades facing a right-of-way. 13) Fencing If Fencing is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select material and height of fencing that may be allowed based on the median pattern of fence material and height in the subject neighborhood. 5-33 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas NaL6C. k 1CiC: P e 4"k. h Article 5.District Purpose Statements and t,, amental Standards � 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts ' /� �/v • 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts I(�I A. Purpose \�f�_11(I\�' Single-Family Overlay Districts are additional standards for new r 44 , r ction and redevelopment in established neighborhoods. College Stations o er, established neighborhoods provide a unique living environment that contribute to the stability pi t and livability of the City as a whole. These standards are intended to promote development that is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood and preserve the unique I 1� characteristics of College Station's older neighborhoods while balancing the need for the ,e "", redevelopment of vacant or underutilized property. ylAr, -/-'14./1The undelying district establishes the permitted uses and shall remain in full force, and threquirements of the overlay district are to be applied in addition to the underlying use an site restrictions. 2, B. Applicability ( ,�� a- � � The Single-Family Overlay Districts ma auliacilcuLeighborhoods zoned R-1, Single I'C: KJ vt,i- QlAk(J Family Residential that are no oned for His oris Preservation.'1 Comment:What about areas ID for C. General(Provisions redevelopment? 1. The yard, lot, and open space regulations of the Single-Family Overlay Districts must be read together with the yard, lot, and open space regulations in Section 5.2, Residential Dimensional Standards and Section 7.1.D, Required Yards. In the event of a conflict between the Single-Family Overlay Districts and these sections, the Single- Family Overlay District controls. Ar+1 A The are. of a Sin.le Family Overlay District must include the entire area of the I'S 1 S alP I- .inally p at-fed subdivisio 'at is also zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. \ CO Mae IAt` 111l!Usv 1- ID Petiteo for a Single-Family Overlay District must be signed by at least sixty percent / � J bG(5�� U� WAS j!' (60%) .f the total number of property owners in the proposed district area. +r r L (4 Int 4. Single- amity Overlay Districts may not apply to neighborhoods originally platted in the b � 5 v Imo/ last ten 010) years. ® Y cc eir i) i k V, 7 D. Districts Cil't T ` air-MS 0'f ci 2 ' . v al w� cru t -eie 1. Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District(NPO) a. Purpose This district is intended to provide standards that preserve single-family neighborhoods by imposing neighborhood-specific yard, lot, and open space regulations that reflect the existing character of the neighborhood. The Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay does not prevent construction of new sing) famil . structures or the renovation, remodeling, repair or expansion of existin sing-ff mily structures, but, rather, ensures that new singlOmily structures are com a able with existing singlemily structures. b. Applicability The regulations of the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay apply to all single family and accessory structures within the district. t c. Standards . k fC\Sg • ; -.. Development shall be subject to theeexistinal median oattern of dPvelopment{Jon I Comment Needs definition n,ry, per ic, the subject and opposing blockfaces for the following standards: J"` 1) Minimum front setback 'moo Front setback is calculated as the median existing front setback of all —SO (u- . �. 7 residential structures on the subject and opposing blockface. IY� 1 2) Minimum side street setback In t,1 5-29 .1w Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas D .C. , A.d,...614k 0 fie In ail,( Lt 1r \-r-uc 11 • .C_ p p rulc -� -t\i ts-i-tAba ck ." 1c r ' In -� ��' - -. , z ((4 OA P LUCLIA I / CtICA bE) V-a_LAyuf._,LL) Pt.cuS<=) ,ed�Vt l cpr�,�y�� c:Jj �, 1 A r x i- --rtk;rOP Omii,kn \n tu,0 as A _ no r �, Article 5. District Purpose Statements and> mental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts Minimum side street setback is calculated as the median side street setback of —C� _ k ? all existing residential structures in the district. 3) Minimum lot size 1 LN N0 Minimum lot size is calculated as the median building plot size of all existing ` W f1 �y(Q building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. ^ n^ , , l �,/l �kO.A( , A. 4) Building height y,�� "_ Building height is calculated as thel median building heightjof all existing �1 residential structures on the subject an�opposing blockface. ` ) Ylkka 5) Maximum lot coverage tat- . � -Y CA , Lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. � �n �``�� t� Lot coverage includes all structures a impervious cover on a site, including A ,of c'-( a_r VC._�^' we but not limited to, patios,driveways,a uctures, and sidewalks Bill- , e_ duets a.A_,Q 6) Garage Location and Orientation ��%( Y w�S J��/� New garages must be placed in relation to the rimar 'dential structure on /��j�-n QQ c lkO-C/'c i the lot consistent with the median pattern of placement on the subject ands �l, opposing blockface. New oarageslmust also be oriented consistent with the median pattern of orientation(On the subject and opposing blockface. 9 Q `01 1 t�+f`_ -!�'1.,_,1- 7) Tree Preservation u.)tilt L.A.. y►, r CS'\-a r�� ^FJi 0 t C Any existing tree of 8-inch caliper or greater locate outsid of the building �D�a S. setbacks are required to be barricaded and preserved. arricade detail must `, � be provided on the site plan. Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper J ,� inch. Barricades must be in place prior to any development activity on the Lt) l5 S (J� * property including, but not limited to, grading. '7 S) Landscape Maintenance l� Any existing canopy and non-canopy tre inside he building setbacks removed during construction must be rep on site caliper for caliper,or as determined by the Administrator. 2. ,Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts(NCO) (Comment:Cost,timeliness,and who can initiate a. Purpose The Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCO) is intended to protect and preserve single-family neighborhoods through a district that is focused on the specific needs of the neighborhood. NCO districts are based on in-depth study of the existing neighborhood conditions, and should be used to protect unique assets and qualities of the neighborhood. Conservation di • ma be used for 'I 7 neighborhoods that ..e no necessarily qualify or Historic Preservatio ".0 o er �`' i a distinct character that its resi.en s an. t e City wish to preserve and protect. It ki4_ 7 differs from the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay in that it allows neighborhoods to (S �,119 choose from a variety of standards to address neighborhood specific issues. b. Applicability 1) The regulations of the Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay apply to all single family and accessory structures within the district. 2) A neighborhood may not have both a Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay and a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay. w YWI I S )S-. c. General Provisions The standards set,,.r.. . *n . !-i.i•orhood Conservation Overlay must be based on findings of a . servation ' d conducted by the City of College Station in conjunction with a - .nborhood sta eholder committee. The committee must be made up of at least six (6) property owners in the neighborhood and the Administrator. The Conservation Study must include a survey of existing conditions and unique characteristics of the neighborhood and outline the� issues J� D�, 5-30 J\/UO�() 6)64 h , / _A-A-tb )d- . Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 UU City of College Station,Texas • Article 5. s#ict Purpose Statements and: amental Standards 5.9 Si I amily Overlay Districts ��r� that threaten the preservation of those characteristics. The Conservation Study .* `') will also set forth the items that may be included in the rezoning ordinance. d. Options for Inclusion \O`'4 ' O` In applying for a Neighborhood Conservation District Overlay, the following items Imay be included for study in the Conservation Study and included as standards in the overlay. All development within the district shall be subject to the standards set forth in the rezoning ordinance. 1) Minimum Front Setback If minimum front setback is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee •-0, ose one of the following methods of determining minimum front setba, based •n the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood. a) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 7.1.D.1.e; or b) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.1; or bt c) Fixed front setback. A fixed front setback may be establishe. -_• -ver, it (A may not be less than the setback of underlying zoning • more t•an the C existing median front yard setback of structures in the dis ' . 2) Minimum Side Street Setback If minimum side street setback is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum side street setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: � 7 a) Conte ual front set.:cks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.2; or h. �(Vl , b) Fixed si.- reet setback. A fixed side street setback may be established, however, it may not he less than the side setback setback of underlying honing or more than the existing median side street setback of structures in tie district. 3) Minimum lot size /buia at,44ryy (�e* If minimum lot size is chosen for n lusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum lot size based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Lot size as provided for in Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations, Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Neighborhoods; or b) Contextual lot size as provided for in Section 5.9.C.3; or 1r\Wfl(L__„ \ 1 c) Fixed lot size. A fixed lot size may be established, however, it may not beAktu1 less than the lot size required of underlying zoning or more than the ,/ °!, •,Il existing median lot size of lots in the district. 1J n rn 1 / l CA 4) Maximum building height lS� i it ��—(11 `� \.1... /t1) � If maximum building height is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood VSr ► '�` to stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining a maximum building height based on the findings of the Conservation Study of <C . O V1 a the subject neighborhood: D n '` I L ��I/� a) Contextual building height as provided for in Section 5.9.C.4; or l v� " `^' Y b) Fixe. • il.'.. -d buildin. hei•ht ma be established, however, U \ILCiw�� 1 Gley it may not be less than the . ' :'.• '!ht reguire• to the underlying v� C�- zoning .istrict or more t an the median height of all residential structures in the district. t�C 5) Tree Preservation f p "ire qkI l J 7j' ' 5-31 ry� Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas 406)/t C-2 \N..)\0Y-/ 't 1...,(31V - ayii\-- ct,.,b,-Y\ 1 4:>-i' 1 4, Article 5.District Purpose Statements and;�,, amental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts (' 4V-4a(-Al- M1 If tree preservation is chosen for inclusion, any existing tree of 8-inch caliper iT - l�-&. c l ' rt e or greater located outside of the building setbacks are required to be 1•t„i, " barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must be provided on the site Y YOI S ( plan.Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper inch. Barricades must be in ,, 7 place prior to any development activity on the prope including, but not A,, f� �e limited to,grading. --- I- (�(JL i 6) Landscape Maintenance s h-z'"�'r' I l QA-4 ►7V�Ll t.c�Cr9'L-C If landscape mainte..•.- is chosen for inclusion, any xisng canopy and aicta 7 non-canopy tree ' side . e building setbacks removed during construction must be replaced on site caliper for caliper, or as determined by the Administrator. /� 7) Maximum lot coverage 11\116/1/4. rI nJ._ �y If maximum lot coverage is chosen for inclusion, maximum lot coverage is ate. calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the h(J(la,urn subject and opposing blockface. Lot coverage includes all structures and impervious cover on a site, including but not limited to, patios,driveways,accessory structures, and sidewalks 8) Garage�lccess� {Comment:graphic If garage access is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of garage access based on the median method of garage access within the subject neighborhood: a) Front entry; or ?y� a C t/1� �{1 ,n ' a ,, C1c� b) Side entry; or f ala r ruv kOviA I atUtit i4V X- C51141\1' c) Rear entry. y�( — 9) Garage(Connection {Comment:graphic U1 / r If garage connection is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder ,1N fl Inn n .lcommittee ma chos following garage connection types based on �!�►/Y�� (y U1Ll.i�n r-� t lan mmeet�io of garage connectiTh ithin the subject neighborhood: "`4+� �w w a) Attached to the single family structure; o��c-�-^ W 4- C o tal1� ,,� n je hn r1 , 7 `�1 � &I iXf' ` b) Detached from the single family structure. 1'11� 1 .� h .- {Comment:graphic i, . �d_ -V iA- lo)Garage jLocationl C ` 11 R If garage location is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder V,�� lac�� committee may chose one of the following garage locations based on the median location of garages in relation to the primary single famil structureI I� within the subject neighborhood: CAl,l,y thWOS4 °Y1-11-? 1. u(. CCU/ a) In front of the single family structure; o0U� t l�C t Jlr�~ itKOLLi b) To the sid of the Attached to t single famil structuretJor IV I V— ce(tx Cr c) To the rear of the single family structure. f„,., .r// 19ik1 o 44/ti / ,( t,M, Off-street parking Y IUIJ� ISD' V/`�l/��^'' 1n �� j l�p �{p �� ...p----..11)(�L(/ If off-street parking is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder ` Y W V vw committee may set a minimum off-street parking standard of 3 spaces per 1, t / �/,;{ c� residential unit based on the findings of the Conservatio - •the subject ATnJ,t l �{ uv�n`fi Y Gtneighborhood, however, it may not be includes ithout al c including ��,,�(}� INV�i maximum lot coverage,garage access connection a . locatio - 'Deleted:the inclusion of the wi,UW�1GGi/e i t to ti 5911WBuilding Materials d6e9r-1 vvi_ _.c Stitt study of its impact on maximum �t/�L lot coverage,as well as garage If Building Materials is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder access,connection,and location 6Milly committee may select required building materials and set a minimum in the Conservation Study percentage for the use of those materials for facades facing_a right-of-way_ i ,L 7 /y I, --\ Required materials may only include types of'ffrn1 ing materials used in the (Jut' 1 ' , `^^'J� subject neighborhood. The Conservation Study should include a listing of all Ki 5-32 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas A(0\ j rr 0(ki+c5 . a;�l 4- c tit W►,L U illkliFild s Article 5.District Purpose Statements and. omental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts types of materials used in the district as well as the median percentage on f((,A S AWA building facades facing a right-of-way. The percentage of use of a required (,�� `a yTr2ak.f.D.r\material may only be placed on facades facing a right-of-way and may not � < exceed the median existing percentage of the materials on building facades r,�,,! ( �- �1 i - facing a right-of-way. r V�J �e-�lc �ntonc 13)Fencing in MO,S S . �/nCk- If Fencing is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee eir ,t� �/C 4 j� may select material and height of fencing that may be allowed based on the median patern of fence mateiI apa neignt in the subject neighborhood. 6C( 01/4) — \ki.,t(k\M \S CVg., 1. . (Okla A 4A-4-k. '6 .. 1 ,--(ckw-Al, e, Abb - r143 ,1\0,;,‘,,WAt ? 4-\, R ,11\&)c 41) okaivii _p ow VIP i'l 121-ti �,�A0\\R10u�Vl6-ba C, - A)° I OLCcsi red w4 & UUO� t- plc%0. _ . w,,,,,:liy,-4- Vx. noo . � a� omnie 1 Iv 1 A A kt ej vonod t U-v cc/ ts( [A i ��,� atha arc, �. �-�Lovultelki tiwt 0 ottr ._....9 O S S i L , (21/ VaAck 5-33 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas iqe,t6 ill ktrif i,loCC} -11-41)117(1-6(54 .,i ,' t ; "` Presentation notes This item is before you tonight as a result of the May 24th update to City Council on Historic Preservation activities. At that meeting, the Council directed staff to bring forward information about a neighborhood preservation overlay as a result in delays in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. As you may remember, staff brought forward the concept of neighborhood protection standards to the P&Z, and Council at a joint meeting of the bodies last summer. Neighborhood Protection Standards Slide. As I will discuss in a few moments, neighborhood protection can be a number of things and have been used in different cities in a variety of ways. However, they have one thing in common, they are being used to help neighborhoods deal with infill development)and deal with uses of property that were maybe not originally anticipated in the 1/tS, neighborhood. Things like the use of rental property, conversion to businesses or in neighborhoods. neighborhood with qeffects and have been given a broad term of protetion standards. City S --has several standards that are intended toprotect neighborhoods including contextualq'Cr � 5 � O`Yf ,Q{ setbacks, lot size in older neighborhoods,buffers, and commercial building height. V` Some of the issues that established)neighborhoods may face include things like tear downs and new houses being built that are out of character with the rest of the neighborhood in both scale and architecture. An attachment was provided in your packet of an article by Kendig Keast about the economics of why teardowns happen and tools that can be utilized to provide a better fit for new construction. Other issues might include insufficient parking,the remov pecimen trees, as well as units being converted to rental housing. Important to note is that these can happen in neighborhoods that are not necessarily protected by Historic Preservation. Neighborhood Protection standards can provide additional support for older neighborhoods, but can also be applied to neighborhoods that do not necessarily fall under historic preservation because of age or lack of historic significance. Slide 2 One of the best and worst things about neighborhood protection standards is that there are a number of options available to the City. ... City or neighborhood initiated and overlay or base zoning... Each of the examples provided in a packet are from a city, each with their own options. The City of Dallas has a 4 phased approach to neighborhood protection with each phase"nested" into the next and each phase requiring additional neighborhood input and buy-in. The first phase is called Neighborhood Prevailing Standards. These require new construction to be compatible with a number of items such as number of stories, garage access and location, front setback, corner side setback, and , maximum paving with the houses that are located within 500 feet. These are considered interim standards while a Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay is being researched and drafted. A copy of the ordinance for the overlay is included in your packet. These overlays are drafted specifically based on the condition of that area, not to be applied to all neighborhoods that apply for an overlay and are greater in detail than the prevailing standards in scale and location. All of these standards are based on the average lot layout in the district. The remaining steps are a conservation district and then a historic preservation district which get more into preservation and conservation of features of significance to either the neighborhood or for historic purposes. Conservation districts are treated as a stepping stone into historic preservation. In the multi-tiered approach Dallas has tried to address a number of issues with neighborhood protection, but on the other hand, using this template would require a major dedication of additional staff and resources to accomplish the necessary studies in a timely manner for each area the wished to apply for protection. I ,-,X-•N• �`.;`c �o • 5 F s �. �-� _-, �.`,-s \,,.,_,_c,_' .,` � �v J..„,....,,,„1,1/4, � ,`�w 5 ,'-5V`'�� \,,,..„.....1's "� . w, L+i'�c--_-_-<& <( "l--J ,._�)•Ac )‘,\k\-‘-. The second example provided was Austin's residential standards. These standards were _„ (,,,v adopted last year by the City and were controversial between the neighborhoods and the ,,`_(. ,,,,\c,.s._, development community. These standards are an overlay over much of the city and ``' focus mainly on setbacks and on a 3-dimensional buildable area. Neighborhoods also may elect to apply for a rezoning that would al ow them to alter these standards. These standards are fairly straight forward, and with aphics understandable, however do not address other issues such as parking, landscape g, or dealing with influx of rental housing. j l aa The last example is that of Bryan. Their Residential Conservation district is relatively simple and only limits the number of unrelated people from 4 to 2 but does not address any of the issues of infill development. This district is not an overlay but is a base zoning district a neighborhood can apply to rezone to. One of the issues we have all seen covered in the press has been how do you enforce such a restriction. Doing so would like the Dallas requirements mean a major dedication of staff and resources for code enforcement. In dealing with determining the number of unrelated people living together, the City of San Marcos has written into their code a method of determining people living in a unit based on the cars that are parked at a residence registered to different people with different last names for more than\\50% of the days in a 21 day\ period. \, G-,,---- w._ `�_ti i (3.,--�.:,,,_-Yt, d,e c.t_^,:3. --- GL,,,,)_�C ''fi\ r.,_,. c�i\ �9.y)�C i..\ \VN \7 1 .-�..? '' Items that are included and tools that can be used, but by no means exhaustive. They should be tailored to the community which means there is no standards ordinance that can be easily incorporated into the City's ordinances: Number of unrelated anticipate to be an issue. Last spring, the Student Senate passed a resolution asking the City Council not to limit the number of unrelated people like the City of Bryan but to work with the Senate and through existing enforcement avenues to create better relationships between the students and the year round community. It would be imperative if the number of unrelated people is included in the discussion on neighborhood protection standards that the students are included and heard. From a planning perspective, limiting rental housing to certain areas of the city may have negative impacts by creating entire areas of absentee landlords where existing neighbors may not be able to mobilize or organize to effectively petition the city for relief. Neighborhood Protection standards have a number of opportunities and challenges with development and implementation. They are flexible standards that are specifically tailored to city and a neighborhood's needs. Usually they are reviewed at Staff level and can help neighborhoods that do not qualify for historic preservation, or for some reason do not want historic preservation review. On the other hand, additional standards can create more non-conformities in established areas making it important to consider the types of variances that can be granted. 5 g av p► wj hx Additionally, standards need to balance the efforts of redevelopment with the need or (� appropriate infill as well as maintaining access to affordable housing for a variety of income levels. Finally, the need for additional resources to support neighborhood standards cannot be overlooked. Staff would like to receive policy direction from the City Council regarding Neighborhood Protection Standards. Keeping in mind that Staff does not feel these are in lieu of Historic Preservation but standards to be used in concert with historic preservation. \ c c�v.� CA C wv c \\JV C •--"C- -\ v „jo (k.„_� ca `7v�1 a_ C V�.�..\ c' �_� -tel \��.3 v004 he\.tite , c.rxvi,u,vo oy-cAinOk. Neighborhood Protection Districts-Article.095%1". VC 1. Interim Prevailing�istric a. Purpose - - .. ._4; sem.. . .. _� i. is to provide interim standards while study for Stabilization or Conservation district is being completed. (:,14. b. Standards i. Use average of property within 500 feet 1. setbacks (all) 2. lot size udi.6°Veda t 3. height/#of stories 4. Garage location 5. Landscaping volume/tree preservation— N..„,,,, )\.,.),5 c.,)-(,),-- 2 6. Driveway access � v-, a,, ut 2. Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay a. \Purpose `',\ i. Blah \ \_,Nc....- \r , 5 . /) b. Applicability -4-. -:--.07)' 5s • i: Who can have:'ne ii. Criteria for d•termining area c. Standards N i. Based' udy- average condition of area included in overlay ii. Neighbo can identify issues of important, choose from list 1. of c ,� overage/Site Volume Ratio 2. of sia' / 3. Setbacks\ ',.r.c ,'Z,; 4 Height/# o tones y . Features allo d in setbacks-7. ,,:,,f). \ •. Landscaping vo me/preservation 7. Driveway/Garage cation 8. Orientation /4k,14‘ fi/ 9. Fencing location/type J 3. Conservation Dis rict fr a. Purpose b. Stand i.arBlahds -focus on design elements \ i. Based on study-conditions of area included in district ii. Neighborhood can identify issues, choose from list in \, Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay, and also 'N.,, 1. Density 01(n.S Y1voi/i� 2. Allowable uses 3. Non-conforming uses c'"M `3`t'`"` o 4. building materials \-\3"--5 C �a ✓ 5. allowable architectural style (1-:\A-v.1 GIks 6. Demolition delay 4. Historic Preservation /rOMA- akkCtilila. . ircivt-oAD cio vl Also need article 2 for pm coli f^*- applition 0,0.0 l'' pro ces S 3 . 2 aS 9 e.t.eyvip • 1 - Article 5. District Purpose State, -,nts and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Neighborhood Protection Districts 5.9 Districts (� S t h 4e—rami ly Ovev la C A. PO'rpose Neighborhood Protection Districts are intended to provide additional standards for new construction and redevelopment in established neighborhoods. College Station's older, established neighborhoods provide a unique living environment that contribute to the stability and livability of the City as a whole. These standards are intended to promote development that is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood and preserve the unique characteristics of College Station's older neighborhoods while balancing the need for the redevelopment of vacant or underutilized property. The underlying district establishes the permitted uses and shall remain in full force, and the requirements of the overlay district are to be applied in addition to the underlying use and site restrictions. B. Applicability The Neighborhood Protection Districts may only be applied to neighborhoods zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. C. General Provisions 1. The yard, lot, and open space regulations of the eighborhood Protection Districts ust be read together with the yard, lot, and open space regulations in Section 5.2, Residential Dimensional Standards and Section 7.1.D, Required Yards. In the event of a conflict between the Neighborhood Prevailina Overlay and these sections, the Neighborhood Protection District controls. c: '7 2. The area of a Neighborhood Protect District must include the entire area of the originally platted subdivision that is also zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. 3. Petition for a Neighborhood Protection District must be signed by at least sixty (60) percent of property owners in the proposed district area. 4. Neighborhood Protection Districtsnot apply to neighborhoodsiplatted in the last ten (10) years. ry D. Districts 1. Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District (NPO) a. Purpose This district is intended to provide standards that preserve single-family o t, neighborhoods by imposing neighborhood-specific yard, lot, and open space cswP regulations that reflect the existing character of the neighborhood. The bpvv4n� '``r neighborhood stabilization overlay does not prevent construction of new single cycc `+sA✓'''` family structures or the renovation, remodeling, repair or expansion of existing single family structures, but, rather, ensures that new single family structures are compatible with existing single family structures. b. Applicability -7 The regulations of the Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay apply to all single family V." and accessory structures within the district. oI. Standards Development shall be subject to the existing median pattern of development on �� ",`�"1 the subject and opposing blockfacor the following standards: 1) Minimum front setback Front setback is calculated as the median existing front setback of all .residential structures on the subject and opposing blockface. 2) Minimum side street setback • c•t—\c "30^-0) • 5-29 Unified D•velopment Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose State.: .nts and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Neighborhood Protection Districts Minimum side street setback is calculated as the median side street setback of all existing residential structures in the district. 3) Minimum building plot size Minimu t sizZis calculated as the median building plot size of all existing building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. 4) Building height Building height is calculated as the median building height of all existing residential structures on the subject and opposing blockface. 5) Maximum lot coverage a Lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building d0 plots on the subject and opposing blockface. /7,,, Lot coverage includes all structures and impervious cover on a site, including •`t but not limited to, patios, driveways, accessory structures, and sidewalks -ri � V' \ - � 6) garage Location 1 J�lco • 7 New garages must be placed consistent with the median pattern of garage i lacement•on the subject and opposing blockface. cpsczAr—LA- r' \\A \Tree Preservation Any existing tree of 8-inch caliper or greater located outside of the building setbacks are required to be barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must be provided on the site plan. Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper inch. Barricades must be in place prior to anyv activity on the property including, but not limited to, grading. cuoASteft 8) Landscape Maintenance Any existing canopy and non-canopy trees inside the building setbacks removed during construction must be replaceddcaliper for caliper, or as determined by the Administrator. ov. "C-Or 2. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts (CD) a. Purpose W C,OL-T4tis—district is intended to protect and preserve single-family neighborhoods through a district that is focused on the specific needs of the neighborhood. v sc .Nr\A3,_-; Conservation districts are based on in-depth study of the existing neighborhood conditions, and should be used to protect unique assets and qualities of the neighborhood. Conservation districts may be used for neighborhoods that may not necessarily qualify for Historic Preservation, but offer a distinct character that its residents and the City wish to preserve and protect. It differs from the 1`\' ` Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay in that it allows neighborhoods to choose from a variety of standards to address neighborhood specific issues. b. Applicability 1) The regulations of the Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay apply to all single family and accessory structures within the district. 2) A neighborhood may not have both a Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay and a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay. c. General Provisions The standards set forward in a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay must be based on findings of a conservation study conducted by the City of College Station in r conjunction with a neighborhood stakeholder committee. The committee must be \-0\1-'0 ' made up of at least six (6) members of the neighborhood and the Administrator. The Conservation Study must include a survey of existing conditions and unique characteristics of the neighborhood and outline the issues that threaten the preservation of those characteristics. The Conservation Study will also set forth the items that may be included in the rezoning ordinance. 5-30 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose State,.. nts and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Neighborhood Protection Districts d. Options for Inclusion In applying for a Neighborhood Conservation District Overlay, the following items may be included for study in the Conservation Study and included as standards in . the overlay. All development within the district shall be subject to the standards set forth in the rezoning ordinance. 1) Minimum Front Setback ---If. minimum front setback is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum front setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 7.1.D.1.e; or -^ xsb) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.1; or yY" 6t' e Fixed front setback. A fixed setback may be established, however, it must `,pu> be within the established setback of underlying zoning and median front .yard setback of structures in district. .�.� a �� ✓\>}xc v ( 2) Minimum Side Street Setback - ` `� If minimum side street setback is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood ( ." stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining iv\` minimum side street setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: 4.1`Pw a) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.2; or b) Fixed side street setback. A fixed side street setback may be established, CA-LS-5 however, it must be within the established setback of underlying zoning and median side street setback of structures in district. _1 ') ' 3) Minimum lot rIl ' v If minimum lot size is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder ‘04 committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum lot size based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: \.. a) Section 18; or \ „„„\77_ J b) 5.9; or c) Fixed side street setback. A fixed side street setback may be established, however, it must be within the established setback of underlying zoning and median side street setback of structures in district. 4) Maximum building height If maximum building height is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining maximum building height based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual building height as provided for in Sec n 5.9.C.4; r 42S° -' b) Fixed building height. A fixed building height may be estab fished, however, it must be within the established building height of the underlying zoning �� district and the median height of alt residential structures in the district.r 'rete �—S 5) Tree Preservation cam+d \ (-Lk If tree preservation is chosen for inclusion, any existing tree of 8-inch caliper or greater located outside of the building setbacks are required to be barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must be provided on the site plan. Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper inch. Barricades must be in place prior to any activity on the property including, but not limited to, grading. 5-31 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 5. District Purpose Stat. _nts and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Neighborhood Protection Districts 6) Landscape Maintenance If landscape maintenance is chosen for inclusion, any existing canopy and non-canopy trees inside the building setbacks removed during construction must be replaced caliper for caliper, or as determined by the Administrator. 7) Maximum lot coverage If maximum lot coverage is chosen for inclusion, maximum lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. Lot coverage includes all structures and impervious cover on a site, including but not limited to, patios, driveways, accessory structures, and sidewalks 8) Garage Access If garage access is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of garage access based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: -7 � ) , LS a) Front entry; or b) Side entry; or rtrI c) Rear entry. UW-' ,,6\1\1)-) 9) Garage Connection \ ✓P If garage connection is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder \)\)\-;-1 ) " �\, �^, n - committee may chose one of the following garage connection types based on v the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: rte' a) Attached to the single family structure; or cik. Nov b) Detached from the single family structure. \ o �/ S.10)Garage Location k j'�a " If garage location is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder ` 0) committee may chose one of the following garage locations based on the ( /0)( findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) In front of the single family structure; or b) To the side of the Attached to the single family structure; or c) To the rear of the single family structure. 11)Off-street parking If off-street parking is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may set a minimum off-street parking standard of 3 spaces per residential unit based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood, however, it may not be included without the inclusion of the study of its impact on maximum lot coverage, as well as garage access, connection, and location in the Conservation Study. I 12) Building Materials 13) Fencing _ ON(61 (t') 14)Architectural Style WO 15) Demolition Delay Other issues 16) Density 17) Allowable uses 18) Non-conforming uses 19) Features allowed in required yard 5-32 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas 4 Article 5. District Purpose State nts and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Neighborhood Protection Districts Article 11 DEFINITIONS Blockface - That portion of a block or tract of land facing the same side of a single street and lying between the closest intersection streets Lot coverage - A measure of intensity of land use that represents the portion of a site that is impervious. This portion includes but is not limited to all areas covered by buildings, parked structures, driveways, roads, and sidewalks. Neighborhood - A subarea of the city in which the residents share a common identity focused around a school, park, community business center, or other feature. For the purpose of Neighborhood Protection Districts, a neighborhood must include all that area within the original subdivision plat that is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. Neighborhood Character - The atmosphere or physical environment which is created by the combination of land use and buildings within an area. Neighborhood character is established and influenced by land- use types and intensity, traffic generation, and also by the location, size and design of structures as well as the interrelationship of all these features. Article 7.1 - features allowed in required yards? Article 7.2 - Parking? y `� ' c-14 car ".S a"•, v°�� 5-33 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 3.Development Review Procedures Section 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment(Rezoning) 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment(Rezoning) Preapplication Conference A. Purpose To establish and maintain sound, stable, and desirable development / i within the territorial limits of the City, the Official Zoning Map may be \Application amended based upon changed or changing conditions in a particular Submittal Starr area or in the City generally, or to rezone an area or extend the I Review boundary of an existing zoning district. All amendments shall be in 1 accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be amended according to the procedure in Section 3.19, Comprehensive Plan Planning& Amendment. zoning , Commission i B. Initiation of Amendments An amendment to the Official Zoning Map may be initiated by: 1. City Council on its own motion; City 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission; Council 3. The Administrator; or 4. The property owner(s). C. Amendment Application A complete application for a zoning map amendment shall be submitted to the Administrator as set forth in Section 3.1.C, Application Forms and Fees. Application requests for a Planned Development District (PDD) and Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD) shall provide the following additional information: 1. A written statement of the purpose and intent of the proposed development; 2. A list and explanation of the potential land uses permitted; and gril3. A concept plan as described in Section 3.4, Concept Plan Review(PDD and P-MUD ,�j� Districts). •••lication re.uests for a Nei•hborhood Prevailin• Ov•rla District NPO shall •rovide the (Formatted:Font:9 pt - - -- --- -- -- following additional information: - ,5 • .__- An ori final lat . e • bdivision• and a------- Formatted:Normal,Left,Indent: Left: 0.81",Hanging: 0.38",Space 2. A .etition b sixt .e'Cent 60% of the •ro.ert owners in the subdivision. Before: 3 pt, Numbered+Level: 1+ Applicatio -sts for a Nei., borhood Conservation verlay"District__..cO ."shall"provide.the', Numbering Style: 1,2,3,...+Start Y ( ') " `" p " " at:1+Alignment: Left+Aligned at: followlnq ad..ditio. I.infol motion.. 1. An origin.I .lot of the su.• ivision; 0.44"+Tab after: 0.94"+Indent + at: 0.94",Tabs: 1.19", List tab+ 2. A petition .y sixty percen (60%) of the property owners in the subdivision; Not at 0.94" _ 3. A list of six (6) property owners in the neighborhood to serve on neighborhood ,t Formatted:Font:9 pt stakeholder._co mm_ittee;,__a n d 4._�..._Achecklist ofthe_, ro..osed items tobe.._included inthe Conservation Stud F ,Formatted:BodyIndent3,Justified i Per Ordinance No.2981 (May 24,2007) Formatted:Font:9 pt i Formatted:Font:9 pt Formatted:Bullets and Numbering Approval Process k11 f\ 1. Preapplication Conference Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.81", Hanging: 0.38",Space Before: 0 pt, l'i°' Prior to the submission of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment, all potential Numbered+Level: 1+Numbering applicants shall request a Preapplication Conference with the Administrator. The Style:1,2,3, ...+Start at: 1+ ' S5 (^(\ 1 purpose of the conference is to respond to any questions that the applicant may have Alignment: Left+Aligned at: 0.25" �^r- regarding any application procedures,standards,or regulations required by this UDO. +Tab after: 0.75" +Indent at: II-- 0.75",Tabs: 1.19",List tab+Not at r,Q � �,r1 If the Administrator determines that the map amendment request is not in conformity 0.75" with the Comprehensive Plan, he shall not accept the application for the map _................... t� I 9pie) 1 amendment, and no further processing shall occur until the map amendment is in Formatted:Font:10 pt,Not Bold, conformity or a request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan eliminating the ,Not Italic lack of conformity has been submitted by the applicant. 3-4 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 4. Zoning Districts Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts Article 4. Zoning Districts 4.1 Establishment of Districts For the purpose of this UDO, portions of the City, as specified on the Official Zoning Map of the City, are hereby divided into the zoning, design, and overlay districts enumerated below. The intensity regulations applicable for such zoning districts are designated in Article 5 and the use regulations are designated in Article 6 of this UDO. Residential Zoning Districts A-0 Agricultural-Open A-OR Rural Residential Subdivision R-1 Single-Family Residential R-1B Single-Family Residential R-2 Duplex Residential R-3 Townhouse R-4 Multi-Family R-6 High Density Multi-Family R-7 Manufactured Home Park Non-Residential Zoning Districts A-P Administrative/ Professional C-1 General Commercial C-2 Commercial-Industrial C-3 Light Commercial M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial C-U College and University R& D Research & Development Planned Districts P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District PDD Planned Development District Design Districts WPC Wolf Pen Creek Development Corridor NG-1 Core Northgate Northgate NG-2 Transitional Northgate NG-3 Residential Northgate Overlay Districts OV Corridor Overlay RDD Redevelopment District KO Krenek Tap Overlay NPO Neighborhood..._Prevailing Overlay NCO .. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay I HPO Historic Preservation Overlay Per rdinance No. 2881 (March 23, 2006) c.64- c, 4-1 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statements and. .emental Standards 5.8 Overlay Districts units, fiber/cement board, solid wood planking, stucco, or synthetic stucco. Metal siding is prohibited on all exterior walls. There shall be no flat roofs. Use of alternative materials may be approved by the Design Review Board, if such materials meet or exceed the standards herein. When an existing structure is enlarged or modified, the DRB may approve materials other than the standard materials above, if this allows the new construction to be more compatible with existing materials, with the exception that metal siding is not allowed. c. Reflective Glass For non-residential buildings, no more than fifty percent (50%) of any façade facing Krenek Tap Roadway may include reflective glass. For the purposes of this ordinance, reflective glass shall be defined as glass having a reflectance of greater than ten percent(10%). d. Fencing Any fencing visible from the public designated roadway or public area shall be decorative wrought iron or tubular steel, a picket fence or alternative similar products approved by the Design Review Board. Fences along the right-of-way shall not be solid and shall allow visual access to the development. The materials and height limitation referenced above do not apply to fences required for screening as specified in this UDO. e. Sign Regulations Only attached building signs and low profile signs meeting the requirements of the UDO shall be permitted. Building signs shall not obscure other building elements such as windows, cornices,decorative details,etc. 3. Design Standards The following standards apply specifically to single-family and townhome residential development along the Krenek Tap Corridor in addition to other design standards contained within the UDO applicable to single family development. a. Front Setback Residential lots adjacent to Krenek Tap right-of-way shall be oriented so that the front facades of individual units or dwellings face Krenek Tap Road, if there is sufficient property frontage to do so. The front setback of these units shall not exceed fifteen feet (15'). This does not preclude residential street access to Krenek or pedestrian access. b. Front Porches Every front facade visible from Krenek Tap Road shall contain a front porch extending along at least one half of the front façade. These porches shall be large enough and useable for outdoor seating and not solely decorative. c. Parking No driveways or locations for parking shall be allowed in the yard areas facing Krenek Tap Road or along Krenek Tap Road itself. Rear parking and access shall be required. d. Architectural Design All exterior walls visible from the public right-of-way shall be finished in the following materials: brick, native stone, cast stone, textured concrete masonry units, fiber/cement board, solid wood planking, stucco, or synthetic stucco. Metal siding is prohibited on all exterior walls. Alternative materials may be approved by the Design Review Board, if the alternative materials meet or exceed the standards of the materials listed above. The primary material shall not exceed seventy-five percent (75%) of the facade. The façade calculation excludes windows and doors. There shall be no flat roofs. 5-28 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5.District Purpose Statements and., emental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts A. Purpose Single-Family Overlay Districts are intended to provide additional standards for new construction and redevelopment in established neighborhoods. College Station's older, established neighborhoods provide a unique living environment that contribute to the stability and livability of the City as a whole. These standards are intended to promote development that is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood and preserve the unique characteristics of College Station's older neighborhoods while balancing the need for the redevelopment of vacant or underutilized property. The underlying district establishes the permitted uses and shall remain in full force, and the requirements of the overlay district are to be applied in addition to the underlying use and site restrictions. B. Applicability The Single-Family Overlay Districts may only be applied to neighborhoods zoned R-1, Single Family Residential that are not zoned for Historic Preservation. Comment:What about areas ID for C. General Provision redevelopment? 1. The yard, lot, and open space regulations of the Single-Family Overlay Districts must be read together with the yard, lot, and open space regulations in Section 5.2, Residential Dimensional Standards and Section 7.1.D, Required Yards. In the event of a conflict between the Single-Family Overlay Districts and these sections, the Single- Family Overlay District controls. 2. The area of a Single••Family Overlay District must include the entire area of the originally platted subdivision that is also zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. �a � 3. Petition for a Single-Family Overlay District must be signed by at least sixty percent Q (60%)of the total number of property owners in the proposed district area. ( ` 4. Single-Family Overlay Districts may not apply to neighborhoods originally platted in the last ten (10) years. D. Districts 1. Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District(NPO) a. Purpose This district is intended to provide standards that preserve single-family neighborhoods by imposing neighborhood-specific yard, lot, and open space regulations that reflect the existing character of the neighborhood. The Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay does not prevent construction of new single family structures or the renovation, remodeling, repair or expansion of existing single family structures, but, rather, ensures that new single family structures are compatible with existing single family structures. b. Applicability The regulations of the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay apply to all single family and accessory structures within the district. c. Standards Development shall be subject to the existin ,medianpattern of develo men on Comment:Needs definition the subject and opposing9 P blockfaces for the following standards: 1) Minimum front setback Front setback is calculated as the median existing front setback of all residential structures on the subject and opposing blockface. 2) Minimum side street setback 5-29 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Su 1N Ick � �' � G Article 5.District Purpose Statements and- amental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts Minimum side street setback is calculated as the median side street setback of all existing residential structures in the district. 3) Minimum lot size Minimum lot size is calculated as the median building plot size of all existing building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. 4) Building height Building height is calculated as the median building height of all existing residential structures on the subject and opposing blockface. 5) Maximum lot coverage Lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. Lot coverage includes all structures and impervious cover on a site, including but not limited to, patios, driveways, accessory structures, and sidewalks 6) Garage Location and Orientation New garages must be placed in relation to the primary residenti, struc i - on the lot consistent with the median pattern of placement on th- b'ec .nd opposing blockface. New garages must also be oriented consistent with the median pattern of orientation on the subject and opposing blockface. 7) Tree Preservation Any existing tree of 8-inch caliper or greater located outside of the building setbacks are required to be barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must rf/ gj7be provided on the site plan. Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper `I inch. Barricades must be in place prior to any development activity on the S��y /f property including, but not limited to, grading. � I � 8) Landscape Maintenance U Any existing canopy and non-canopy trees inside the building setbacks removed during construction must be replaced on site caliper for caliper,or as determined by the Administrator. 2. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts(NCO)( {Comment:Cost,timeliness,and who can initiate a. Purpose The Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCO) is intended to protect and preserve single-family neighborhoods through a district that is focused on the specific needs of the neighborhood. NCO districts are based on in-depth study of the existing neighborhood conditions, and should be used to protect unique assets and qualities of the neighborhood. Conservation districts may be used for neighborhoods that may not necessarily qualify for Historic Preservation, but offer a distinct character that its residents and the City wish to preserve and protect. It differs from the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay in that it allows neighborhoods to I£ $ choose from a variety of standards to address neighborhood specific issues. b. Applicability 1) The regulations of the Neighborhoo tabilization verlay apply to all single family and accessory structures within the ti is . 2) A neighborhood may not have both a Neighborhood Stabilization Overlay and a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay. c. General Provisions The standards set forward in a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay must be based on findings of a conservation study conducted by the City of College Station in conjunction with a neighborhood stakeholder committee. The committee must be made up of at least six (6) property owners in the neighborhood and the Administrator. The Conservation Study must include a survey of existing conditions and unique characteristics of the neighborhood and outline the issues 5-30 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statements and. .emental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts that threaten the preservation of those characteristics. The Conservation Study will also set forth the items that may be included in the rezoning ordinance. d. Options for Inclusion In applying for a Neighborhood Conservation District Overlay, the following items may be included for study in the Conservation Study and included as standards in the overlay. All development within the district shall be subject to the standards set forth in the rezoning ordinance. 1) Minimum Front Setback If minimum front setback is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum front setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 7.1.D.1.e; or b) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.1; or c) Fixed front setback. A fixed front setback may be established, however, it may not be less than the setback of underlying zoning or more than the existing median front yard setback of structures in the district. 2) Minimum Side Street Setback If minimum side street setback is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum side street setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.2; or b) Fixed side street setback. A fixed side street setback may be established, however, it may not be less than the side setback setback of underlying zoning or more than the existing median side street setback of structures in the district. 3) Minimum lot size If minimum lot size is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining minimum lot size based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Lot size as provided for in Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations, Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Neighborhoods; or b) Contextual lot size as provided for in Section 5.9.C.3; or c) Fixed lot size. A fixed lot size may be established, however, it may not be less than the lot size required of underlying zoning or more than the existing median lot size of lots in the district. 4) Maximum building height If maximum building height is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of determining maximum building height based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual building height as provided for in Section 5.9.C.4; or b) Fixed building height. A fixed building height may be established, however, it may not be less than the building height required in the underlying zoning district or more than the median height of all residential structures in the district. 5) Tree Preservation 5-31 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statements and. amental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts If tree preservation is chosen for inclusion, any existing tree of 8-inch calipertej/ or greater located outside of the building setbacks are required to be � `�/y� barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must be provided on the site J plan.Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper inch. Barricades must be in '< place prior to any development activity on the property including, but not limited to, grading. 6) Landscape Maintenance If landscape maintenance is chosen for inclusion, any existing canopy and non-canopy trees inside the building setbacks removed during construction must be replaced on site caliper for caliper, or as determined by the Administrator. 7) Maximum lot coverage If maximum lot coverage is chosen for inclusion, maximum lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. Lot coverage includes all structures and impervious cover on a site, including but not limited to, patios,driveways, accessory structures, and sidewalks 8) Garage�4ccess� t Comment:graphic If garage access is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of garage access based on the median method of garage access within the subject neighborhood: a) Front entry; or b) Side entry; or c) Rear entry. 9) Garage Connection) (Comment:graphic If garage connection is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following garage connection types based on the median method of garage connection within the subject neighborhood: a) Attached to the single family structure; or b) Detached from the single family structure. 10)Garage)Location) {Comment:graphic If garage location is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following garage locations based on the median location of garages in relation to the primary single family structure within the subject neighborhood: a) In front of the single family structure; or b) To the side of the Attached to the single family structure; or c) To the rear of the single family structure. 11)Off-street parking If off-street parking is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may set a minimum off-street parking standard of 3 spaces per residential unit based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood, however, it may not be included without also including maximum lot covera�.lc e,garage access, connection, and location,. Deleted:the inclusion of the 12)Building Materials study of its impact on maximum lot coverage,as well as garage If Building Materials is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder access,connection,and location committee may select required building materials and set a minimum ,in the Conservation Study percentage for the use of those materials for facades facing a right-of-way. Required materials may only include types of building materials used in the subject neighborhood. The Conservation Study should include a listing of all 5-32 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5.District Purpose Statements and. amental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts types of materials used in the district as well as the median percentage on building facades facing a right-of-way. The percentage of use of a required material may only be placed on facades facing a right-of-way and may not exceed the median existing percentage of the materials on building facades facing a right-of-way. 13)Fencing If Fencing is chosen for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select material and height of fencing that may be allowed based on the median pattern of fence material and height in the subject neighborhood. 5-33 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas #IPr' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning er Development Services Single Family Overlays Thank you for your interest in our Single-Family Overlay zoning district. This fact sheet is meant to provide additional assistance to Neighborhood and Homeowner Associations who are considering pursuing an overlay for their neighborhood. As you begin this process, as leaders for your neighborhood, you should be able to answer questions your neighbors have about the overlay and why your association is considering using this tool. 1. What is a Single-Family Overlay? An overlay is a type of district that can be placed over traditional zoning districts which provide additional standards for development in the area of an overlay. A Single-Family Overlay is intended to help protect established neighborhoods from inappropriate infill. There are actually two different types of a Single-Family Overlay — Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay (NPO) and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO). These overlays are similar in the types of standards that are applied, however, they are different in how they are applied. A Prevailing District includes a list of standards that must be adhered to for any expansion or new development that takes place in the overlay. This list includes: • Minimum front setback • Maximum front setback • Minimum side street setback • Minimum lot size • Building height • Maximum lot coverage • Garage location and orientation • Tree Preservation • Landscape Maintenance The intent of this district is to capture and preserve the prevailing standard of development in the neighborhood. A Conservation District includes the same standards of a Prevailing District, however, neighborhoods can choose which standards are applicable to their area. Because neighborhoods can choose the standards that are most important to them, it provides more flexibility for neighborhoods. However, a Conservation District rezoning also requires a Conservation Study to determine how the standards should be applied in the neighborhood. 2. Where can I get a copy of my subdivision plat? Copies of plats are available in the Planning and Development Services Office for $4.50. Free copies can be downloaded from the City of College Station Internet Mapping Service http://www.cstx.gov. The Planner on Call or GIS Technician in Planning and Development Services can assist in how to use this mapping program. Staff may be reached at 979-764-3570. Page 1 of 13 3. What is a Legal Descrip }.rn? A legal description is the Lot, Block, Phase (when applicable), and Subdivision information for each lot. Each street address should have a legal description that looks similar to the following: 100 Apple Street Lot 1, Block 2, Phase 1, Apple Subdivision 4. How can I find out ownership and legal description information? Most likely your neighbors will be your best source of information about their property, however, this information can also be found on the City's Internet Mapping Service — http://www.cstx.qov - or through the County Appraisal District. The Planner on Call or GIS Technician in Planning and Development Services can assist in how to use this mapping program. Staff may be reached at 979-764-3570. The Brazos County Appraisal District information can be found at http://www.brazoscad.org 5. Who can be on a stakeholder committee? Any owner in the neighborhood may serve on the stakeholder committee. We recommend that associations nominate and elect property owners to serve on the committee. They will be responsible for assisting staff in the collection of data and making decisions as to how to use that data, so it is helpful if they are knowledgeable, as well as available to assist staff. 6. What is a neighborhood? A neighborhood is a subarea of the city in which the residents share a common identity focused around a school, park, community business center, or other feature. For the purposes of a Single-Family Overlay District, a neighborhood must contain at least thirty (30) single-family structures in a compact, contiguous area, or be an original subdivision or phase of a subdivision if the subdivision contains fewer than thirty (30) single-family structures. Boundary lines must be drawn to include blockfaces on both sides of a street, and to the logical edges of the area or subdivision, as indicated by a creek, street, subdivision line, utility easement, zoning boundary line, or other boundary. 7. What is the process? Pre-application Conference — If you are considering a rezoning to a Single-Family Overlay, you must first schedule a Pre-Application Conference (PAC) with City Staff. This is an opportunity to meet the staff that will be assisting you in the rezoning process, as well as go over how the process will work, schedule a neighborhood meeting, and gain any assistance you need with gathering information. Neighborhood Meeting — After the PAC, Staff will work with you to schedule a time for a Neighborhood Meeting in which staff will make a presentation to you and your neighbors about the Overlays and answer any questions. Obtain petition signatures— In order to request an overlay, you must have a signed petition from sixty percent (60%) of the property owners in the neighborhood. This will be required at the time the application is made, so associations should begin collecting these signatures as soon as possible after the Neighborhood Meeting. All those signing the petition must receive a copy of the City of College Station Letter to Property Owners Regarding Single-Family Overlays. Complete zoning application — Finally, complete the application and turn it in with all appropriate materials to the City of College Station, Planning and Development Services Department. 8. How long will the process take? Tthe size of your neighborhood will impact how long it will take your association to gather the appropriate materials. However, once the application is turned in, a Neighborhood Prevailing District rezoning will usually take between 6 and 8 weeks to implement. A Neighborhood Conservation District timeline will depend on the type of information that will be studied. Page 2 of 13 9. What if someone cannot.neet the standards of the district? Once the district is in place, and someone is making an expansion or building a new home that does not meet the requirements, a variance must be requested through the Zoning Board of Adjustments who will hear the case and make a determination of any special condition or hardship that must be met to receive a variance. Attachments: Copy of the Ordinance Letter to Property Owners Page 3 of 13 (kff" Petition for Single-Family Overlay Rezoning CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning e'r Development Services By my signature, I have received and reviewed the City of College Station Letter to Homeowners Regarding Single-Family Overlays and confirm my support of the rezoning to: Overlay Request ❑ NPO, Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay ❑ NCO, Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Name Name Street Legal (Print) (Signature) Address Description Page 6 of 13 Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts A. Purpose Single-Family Overlay Districts are intended to provide additional standards for new construction and redevelopment in established neighborhoods. College Station's older, established neighborhoods provide a unique living environment that contribute to the stability and livability of the City as a whole. These standards are intended to promote development that is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood and preserve the unique characteristics of College Station's older neighborhoods while balancing the need for the redevelopment of vacant or underutilized property. The underlying zoning district establishes the permitted uses and shall remain in full force, and the requirements of the overlay district are to be applied in addition to the underlying use and site restrictions. B. Applicability The Single-Family Overlay Districts may only be applied to neighborhoods zoned and developed for single-family residences. C. General Provisions 1. The yard, lot, and open space regulations of the Single-Family Overlay Districts must be read in accordance with the yard, lot, and open space regulations in Section 5.2, Residential Dimensional Standards and Section 7.1.D, Required Yards. In the event of a conflict between the Single-Family Overlay Districts and these sections, the Single- Family Overlay District controls. 2. The City Council may approve a Single-Family Overlay District for an area that contains fewer than thirty (30) single-family structures if the Council determines that: a. The boundary lines are drawn to include blockfaces on both sides of a street, and to the logical edges of the area, as indicated by a creek, street, subdivision line, utility easement, zoning boundary line, or other boundary. Boundary lines that split blockfaces in two should be avoided approving the Single-Family Overlay District will not negatively effect adjacent neighborhoods; b. Approving the Single-Family Overlay District will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare of other property in the area; and c. The creation of a Single-Family Overlay District will meet the purpose of this section. 3. Petition for a Single-Family Overlay District must be signed by at least sixty percent (60%) of the total number of property owners in the proposed district area. 4. Single-Family Overlay Districts may not apply to neighborhoods originally platted in the last ten (10) years. D. Districts 1. Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District (NPO) a. Purpose This district is intended to provide standards that preserve single-family neighborhoods by imposing neighborhood-specific yard, lot, and open space regulations that reflect the existing character of the neighborhood. The Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay does not prevent construction of new single- family structures or the renovation, remodeling, repair or expansion of existing single-family structures, but, rather, ensures that new single-family structures are compatible with existing single-family structures. 5-29 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts b. Applicability The regulations of the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay apply to all single-family and accessory structures within the district. c. Standards Development shall be subject to the existing median pattern of development on the subject and opposing blockfaces for the following standards: 1) Minimum front setback Front setback is calculated as the median existing front setback of all residential structures on the subject and opposing blockface. 2) Maximum front setback I — _ H _ _ H _ _ H — _ _ The maximum front setback, or build-to line, is no more than ten (10) feet back from the minimum111 Pro I front setback. I 3) Minimum side street setback I I Minimum side street setback is I l / calculated as the median side I I street setback of all existing I r 1 residential structures in the o district. I n 4) Minimum lot size ( I Minimum lot size is calculated as ■ 1 ■ the median building plot size of all existing building plots on the I subject and opposing blockface. Example; Mediae M maim Setback fa-the subject and 5) Building height epposi,c,blockf<ee`5'' `e,t Building height is calculated as the median building height of all existing residential structures on the subject and opposing blockface. Building height refers to the vertical distance measured from the finished grade, or the base flood elevation where applicable, and the following points: a) The average height level between the eaves and ridge line of a gable, hip, or gambrel roof; b) The highest point of a mansard roof; or c) The highest point of the coping of Patio-228 sf aoo sf a flat roof. 6) Maximum lot coverage Lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. Lot coverage includes all structures a and impervious cover on a site, House including but not limited to, patios, 1340 sf 5 driveways – gravel or paved, accessory structures, and sidewalks 7) Garage Location and Orientation Sidewalks-174 sf New garages must be placed in relation to the primary residential structure on the lot consistent with 5-30 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 60 feet Is 3214 total impervious cover on 6,000 sf lot 53.6%lot coverage Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts the most frequent pattern of placement on the subject and opposing blockface. New garages must also be oriented consistent with the most frequent direction of orientation on the subject and opposing blockface. See graphics in 5.9.2 for Garage Location and Orientation. 8) Tree Preservation Any existing tree of 8-inch caliper or greater in good form and condition and reasonably free of damage by insects and/or disease located outside of the buildable area are required to be barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must be provided on the site plan. Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper inch. Barricades must be in place prior to any development activity on the property including, but not limited to, grading. 9) Landscape Maintenance Any existing canopy and non-canopy trees in good form and condition and reasonably free of damage by insects and/or disease located within the buildable area removed during construction must be replaced on site caliper for caliper, or as determined by the Administrator. 2. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts (NCO) a. Purpose The Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCO) is intended to protect and preserve single-family neighborhoods through a district that is focused on the specific needs of the neighborhood. NCO districts are based on in-depth study of the existing neighborhood conditions, and should be used to protect unique assets and qualities of the neighborhood. Conservation districts may be used for neighborhoods that offer a distinct character that its residents and the City wish to preserve and protect. It differs from the Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay in that it allows neighborhoods to choose from a variety of standards to address neighborhood specific issues. b. Applicability 1) The regulations of the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay apply to all single- family and accessory structures within the district. 2) A neighborhood may not have both a Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay and a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay. c. General Provisions The standards set forward in a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay must be based on findings of a Conservation Study conducted by the City of College Station in conjunction with a neighborhood stakeholder committee. The committee must be made up of at least six (6) property owners in the neighborhood and the Administrator. The Conservation Study must include a survey of existing conditions and unique characteristics of the neighborhood and outline the issues that threaten the preservation of those characteristics. The Conservation Study will also set forth the items that may be included in the rezoning ordinance. d. Options for Inclusion In applying for a Neighborhood Conservation District Overlay, the following items may be included for study in the Conservation Study and included as standards in the overlay. All development within the district shall be subject to the standards set forth in the rezoning ordinance. 1) Minimum Front Setback If minimum front setback is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select one of the following methods of determining minimum front setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 7.1.D.1.e; or 5-31 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts b) Contextual front setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.1; or c) Fixed front setback. A fixed front setback may be established, however, it may not be less than the setback of underlying zoning or more than the existing median front yard setback of structures in the district. 2) Minimum Side Street Setback If minimum side street setback is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select one of the following methods of determining minimum side street setback based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual side street setbacks as provided for in Section 5.9.C.2; or b) Fixed side street setback. A fixed side street setback may be established, however, it may not be less than the side setback setback of underlying zoning or more than the existing median side street setback of structures in the district. 3) Minimum lot size If minimum lot size is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select one of the following methods of determining minimum lot size based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Lot size as provided for in Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations, Platting and Replatting in Older Residential Neighborhoods; or b) Contextual lot size as provided for in Section 5.9.C.3; or c) Fixed lot size. A fixed lot size may be established, however, it may not be less than the lot size required of underlying zoning or more than the existing median size of building plots in the district. 4) Maximum building height If maximum building height is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select one of the following methods of determining maximum building height based on the findings of the Conservation Study of the subject neighborhood: a) Contextual building height as provided for in Section 5.9.C.4; or b) Fixed building height. A fixed building height may be established, however, it may not be more than the maximum height allowed in the underlaying zoning district or less than the median height of all residential structures in the district. 5) Tree Preservation If tree preservation is selected for inclusion, any existing tree of 8-inch caliper or greater in good form and condition and reasonably free of damage by insects and/or disease located outside the buildable area are required to be barricaded and preserved. A barricade detail must be provided on the site plan. Trees must be barricaded one foot per caliper inch. Barricades must be in place prior to any development activity on the property including, but not limited to, grading. 6) Landscape Maintenance If landscape maintenance is selected for inclusion, any existing canopy and non-canopy trees in good form and condition and reasonably free of damage by insects and/or disease located within the buildable area removed during construction must be replaced on site caliper for caliper, or as determined by the Administrator. 7) Maximum lot coverage 5-32 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts If maximum lot coverage is selected for inclusion, maximum lot coverage is calculated as the median existing lot coverage on all building plots on the subject and opposing blockface. Lot coverage includes all structures and impervious cover on a site, including but not limited to, patios, driveways, accessory structures, and sidewalks 8) Garage Access If garage access is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may chose one of the following methods of garage access based on the most frequent method of garage access within the subject neighborhood: a) Front entry; or —� 1 b) Side entry; or 11111 c) Rear entry. min 9) Garage Connection 7111111 ) I If garage connection is I t-rr�nt entry garage. Side entry yarape Rear entry�)ara��e selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select one of the following garage connection types based on the most frequent method of garage connection within the subject neighborhood: H H 1 a) Attached to the I I single-family I l structure; or an • b) Detached from the I I single-family Attached Garage Detached Garage I structure. 10)Garage Location If garage location is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select one of the following garage locations based on the most frequent location of garages in relation to the primary single-family structure within the subject neighborhood: a) In front of the single-family structure; or b) To the side of the single-family structure; or c) To the rear of the single-family structure. IIII (.111 1111 I I Front of home Side of home Rear of home I 11)Off-street parking If off-street parking is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may set a minimum off-street parking standard of 3 spaces per residential unit, however, it may not be included without also including maximum lot coverage, garage access, connection, and location in the Conservation Study. 12)Building Materials If Building Materials is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select required building materials and set a minimum 5-33 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts percentage for the use of those materials for facades facing a right-of-way. Required materials may only include types of building materials used in the subject neighborhood. The Conservation Study should include a listing of all types of materials used in the district as well as the median percentage on building facades facing a right-of-way. The percentage of use of a required material may only be placed on facades facing a right-of-way and may not exceed the median existing percentage of the materials on building facades facing a right-of-way. 13)Fencing If Fencing is selected for inclusion, the neighborhood stakeholder committee may select required materials and maximum height. Per Ordinance No, XXXX(December 13, 2007) 5-34 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station,Texas 1 r I enelay pro per)-y Ynur►Off n3 f Gl cCwied tc +-,'ori tran5ic14, \louncl popu uhe l u`p'on C ipan +DW Y) CPAG, on(v, -- xtty1*-s IVeS • 1 VeckA lS1�i C, Seta on$ • ex)gace roc r#- a'f-i v l'+-i e. -rowm Gow h _.V AM eta` - ]611) .� O E U N E - coi ` C C C L7) U O 15 E EE EY) c o o c E . v C o ; s E V C N E co o 7 C C O w U N 2'U C C U C c L E V c o N O 73 o O 7 a 3 m o C U N N 7 a N O E N > y N a) V 7 'p "O E LT oU _o 0 0 7 c -a c > N Ln N E -o a) c E v E a? N ap'7 y 7 a� m a E -0 C N 00 .0 a) 0 = > y L p - y 7 0 0 E 7 >. 3 -o v -p L La c -p ` "C O _ \J E @ (a E E 7 U N N X �_ /0� N E L >, a N O N 7 m ,� Ln N w6 p c0 O g N N N ca N a N U 13 N 0- U N C L7:3 N N T N LC) C fq _ Ua a� T (dJ N � � � �'�5`@� � 3 � m � � @� ENpp �� UE � � � C � cC ami o N Z w c V a v >, © o N ' .0 202 Z cn > a ro o 7 0E O 0Y� 0 , UN :CN cu co E a) a) C C - 3E N CL C O' U co m a -Op UL L c m -o E '� c a c� N co 'm N a) 0 a) U cp 0 o M E m N 3 NW CL o f co CD 75 C ? 4) N N Ln co 0 3 o) a 0 a co N 'C E N La N E co 0 N- a) C) v ✓ N C) V N- CC LU N CO Ln C1 O V- CO C) m N N N O N C CO o N N N h = Co co O a) Lo m C) co C) co a in V cri CC N O CC ON N CO N.CC C) C) O O 1 X X O N- CC) C) N N- CC C) C) M Cf O N N N- N- CO C) Cc) LO CO N CO N LO C) N- N. O 0 a) N- a) V CO CO CU O O N- LO CO COCC O W C) LO O n V V co co O COO 0 LON O LO Co Co O LO C) Ln CO N- O V CO C) O) C) CO N- V O O O CO 0 LU COC�) LO Co N-N- CO CO Ln 0 Lb 1` N cC m .-- LO O O O Nr O O O LO CC `- N- M CO `- '4 r N `-- h r `- 1 N- N ` .0 c0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CC CD Ln CO V CO CO CC CC O CO C0 M 0 d V d O V V O M c0 CC) Lo O co O a CO O V CC CO CC N CC CSD CO O CC O O CO N CO CO CO CO CO N- CO CO CO CO CO Co CCO Co CC Co Co LL) CC co 9 0 in O in LO in in O O O O In N LO LO O O LO LO O LO LO LO LO LO LO LO Cn LO LO LO 0 LO LO 0 LO d' O. CO CCo 00 00 'I' CO CO CO CO W C0 03 '1' CO CO .1' `1' CO CO VI" CO 'IN CO VI' 11' CO '1' 'lc 11- '1N CO CO 'I- CO `It 00 N- I` N- N. 1- 1- I N- N- N- N- N- N- I N- N- N- N- N- N- N- I h N- N- N- N- I` r` h N- I` r` N- 1- rs N N- N- N- N- N- N- N- N- N- N- 1� N- N N- N- N- N- N- h N 1- N- r r N- r r r r r N- N- N- r` N- N- W U CO CO CO I-- F IX- ix- I- I- F- rx- I- r rx- F-- X rx- I-- ti h I-- N-- rx- I- N--- X N- X X X x X I-- Ix C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m TO m CO. m to m m m m m m m m m m m m U) co co co U U co co co U U U U co U co U co (00, 0, 0, U U U U U U U U U U U U U U a) N a) N C) C) C) a) a) a) N a) C) a) C) a) C) C) a) a) a) a) C) a) Cl) Cl) a) N U) C) a) Cl) N N N a) 0 0) o) o) O m C) m 0) O) OF 0) C) 0) o) OF m o) o) OF 0) O o) m o) m 0 0) C) O m C) 0) C) C) 0) w a) a) a) a) a) a) a) C) a) C) a) N a) C) a) a) N a) C) a) C) a) N a) C) a) C) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T a) a) 3 > 7 i ac) a) m r 0 > • a) c a > 7 0 3 Q J o @ U C 0 o c N C) N a Q L0 a) ♦- N U CD rn O N d La N N N N Y = N O V .> > U f0 > a) N C O U C C E d U O C N N U- m 0 a) 3 E 3 t a) 7) @ rn Q_ m Y °) a) p a) a N a) o , , c L 3 3 Y 7 ca — r 0 L1 E Z• .- N X x N ' O C C _.. Y N c O a E C C J N C U w a) l6 7 E 7 7 N 7 O O N J J > m o m co L a M M m CO Li Dain ° -co CO o C $ 0 a o in in 0° t 3 3 3 c° o UO O N LcCO i. O ..:1- co O 0 ON O O O LNO CO Co C) N- Co co r C) M N LO LL) co N- O O 0 0 0 0 CO O 0 0 O�„L M CO N- CO CO O N O VLO V O LO N- CO LO CO O O O N. LO CO V' LO N CO N- LO V' M N C) ,- M CO N C) N N — — coa s - - N V V CO N N CO V CO v- V m CO N V N CD E co Y N N ` T N O 0 .0 CO N C O) U c6 j a) >` a) N o E a) N O a) i cq Op) C C 0 C N O C C Y _ C N C U .a L O) N 0 0 0 U C Co O co og Cl) Lo a) O N a) N N a) N O 2 ID N .... IS co Co N Co O O O a) La C 'n CO 0 7 N 2 J m O R co m } LL m 2 2 co m co N Q J 7i m co co J m Z m a' a' co Q Uc Z . U 0) E c a) a) m a) a •c v !Q N _ LLl N T T. O N d 0 co N ZY E - �° c `) c o E 2 c o Cf/ 2' c C 2 c -e c N L 0 co L` N -0 o m C Q) a >., > �' c rn U 0 ca E Ca ca co 7 N a) ca _c a) V (0 co O N LO ca a) 'p U N U ca O E 0 a) CO L c0 co O ca r' 0 I- M < Cn O Z J -) U -) U a U U UL -) m S J 2 -, O: C7 rt < < 00 2 O W 0 2 U N N N N N N N NN N N • � N � N N N N N N 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ' 2 2 2 i- 2 2 . 2 ' 2 ' 2- 2 2 2 2 2 n E ca) c a) a) a) C 0 a) 0 U "o a) a) .0 N C N N � N C CC C C C C C C C C Fly a' N CC C ,_ C C C C C oa) ooo0vroa 7 m L o a) a) a r v v a) a) a o o a) o a) o v Na) Co c a) (p co d E N c N Y N Q N N N N O N N N fM N N N N N Q 0 E ca 0 C 2 0 a) E co 2 o E 0 E d E d 0 dNNNNN ` N 2 E E 0F- a > H 2 > U a U 2 a 2 a U a i a a a aa °- aa aaaa a a a z U 0 0 0 U U U U U U C.) 0 0 U 0 U C.) U U C.) U N U C.) U U U C.) U 0 U 0 C.) C.) U U U O. CO CO CO a) m Lo CO as co co co co ca Lo co co co as c0 La ca a a) co ca co co La ca ca Lo Lo ca CO CO ca co C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C E C C C C C C CCCCCCCCC W0000000000000000000002000000 000000000 N O) CO CC) CO CO O C) C) C) O O - T ^ N. CO C) C)0C) O O O O • C) C) C) ` O O C) O) O O O CC) CCO O O O O O O W C) 0 1.... N h LO C) C) O N O CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 CO M V (p V' CO CO O CA CL Cr) CO .- O O 0 0 0 0 0 .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- .- 0 0 0 0 ,r 0 0 0 0 O 0 O C) r+ CO .0 C 0 0. CD 0 C a O O LO to co Co Co CO co h Ln CD Co Co Co LO cp CO co O h co co LO LO N- 0O OOO O O O O O O oPQ O O O O 0 O O O O OOO 0 OOOO O OO NO NO O O LOO m 0, 0 O O N. LO N ONZ00000 O AMNC) NNr CC ONV 0) 0 0 1- 0 Co .- 0 0 0 0 .- 0 0 0 O + co ONO � 0O O O O O LO f` Oto CO d' CC r CO C7 CO CT) f) N CO M In N WMNV NO .- D N co .- N. N (i On N N O Q NQ Q Q Q Q Q Q . Q Q < Q Q < < < < < < < < 7 < < < a Q w 0 a a 0 0 Q 0 Q a a 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 u) x - z x S o z z z 14 S = Z z x x x x Z x z x S S S = I x x Z x x x x Ti UJ -° L CO CO J .0 a + al Vi }' 0 N.p C` N- 0 N.0 n P n N- CC P N- 0 CC t` o t` t` h f` N- N- N- CO o O O O O o O O O o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M � o .- � co -a- � � r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CC 0 0 0 0 N .... 21 -D N ' 0 0 0 . \ , U. S N N a) ' 3 - c T L N co C N N @ wn . 1.- 0 = N CO @ 0 a N Y N. N 0 Y yLr O) Ll _ w N N Y Y Y N 7 @ l0 0 N a Vl , ` .ILS oI - S = N 0 °) N ti .IL Cn o 2 C -0 o E rn rn v _ -o U -0 �j.w ma c co La 6 >. x x s N c0 -0 0 0 0 _ a) > c 0 G. 00 2 o 10 -0 0 o c c C = 0 0 cr 3 a) o a) a) c 0 m 0o a) o a 1) 0 0 3 3 m u- a s a) ° a) 0 0 co N , U c m a E a) a) a) 0 3 0 a• TT) 3 a a a o c a -a o w p C a) C 2 Y N a a) N a) _c L O O O N 0 E O a) ca N a) N O Ca a) Co O a 0 O O 7 .c C It 'D m m w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 jakm u_ J 0 a a a,a cL a cn co cn co co U co co I- § 2ZZ 2c.. ZZZ . c,,. 2 7 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO. DATE SUBMITTED (krff 14141 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning e Development Services SINGLE-FAMILY OVERLAY ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: Application completed in full. $500 Application fee Copy of Subdivision Plat (if applicable) Map of proposed area List of all lots to be included in the overlay (by Legal Description) List of contact information for all Neighborhood or Homeowner Association officers List of six (6) property owners serving on the Neighborhood Stakeholder Committee (NCO Only) Signed petition by sixty percent (60%) of all property ownerzn the neighborhood. The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed ip ull. Overlay Re est ❑ NPO, Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay NCO, Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Date of Required Preapplication Conference: Date of Required Neighborhood Meeting: APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name Street Address City State Zip Code E-Mail Address Phone Number Fax Number General Location of Property: Subdivision: Acreage - Total Property: REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Page 4 of 13 3) How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? 4) List any other reasons to support this zone change. The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. Signature of owner (or agent) or applicant Date Page 5 of 13 , - e-,,*` C dic1,- , ic, ,,-:, - - ...,--- , 4 (5 g S i ( -• r\r sP ,,. .k,_, -.011 g -'''—7, , --__3_ ..f,dozi6 c--, e'' 't. t(cC,. .,r * Q 5 3 0, ec) 4, 2\so c — 1u) - '' tsP: rN - ., r- r 'n k t 0 , = _ " n oc c � nrm a, 3 c) Gfi ( = n3 o 3 o (D o - 0 m (fir) C N < fD 3 r.-- - zi:--q= cD,, ta,— s. co U 16 rh\ F-.'\' a -f- . 7 Y 5- e.--: t if- -C ..) U OWN Zr L r1�� 9 Ni.- r'" r tr M VI O \ :- T 0 e, i `n0 1``' Qy h O _ r a ---f-i•-} i z_., rt (--) g-- ..-,, R r- -1 cl. 0 __,, L.,, , __ 9 cli ( I` etO _ n -(1 r4 v 0 N w' N 5. O Lc S V) CD -o �n \ c Com} r) 13 0,1 n 3 c° 0 3 O fD c5 n `C tEl ___E.- 2 0 ( F i .---. 4-, cl. - '- E.- g n rN o i'; l' ,,;,>, 3 , 7 -- ,(N -4 c. v 0 i"") \"j � -FC4 eD T1 Gs/ -F A