HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff CommentsCOLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77x42
Tel: 409 764 3500
MEMORANDUM
May 17, 2000
TO: Duane Faltysek, via fax (979)690-6695
~ ~,~,~~:
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator` Vii` !~
~.
SUBJECT: Valley Brook Apartments -Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address
the comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Three (3) complete sets of building construction documents for the
proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans
attached; and
The attached redlined site plan with staff comments.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please
attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call me at 764-3570.
Electrical & W/WW comments: Developer is responsible for installing conduit per city
spec and design.
Attachments: Staff review comments
Redlines (please pick up at Development Services)
cc: Garrett Engineering, Via fax (979) 846-3094
Case file #00-86
Home of Texas A&M Unive -t
COLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842
Tel: 409 764 3500
MEMORANDUM
May 26, 2000
TO: Duane Faltysek, Via fax (979) 690-6695
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator
SUBJECT: Valley Brook Apartments -Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal
will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not
been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be
submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Engineering is still reviewing the
engineering comments and those should be returned on Tuesday. Please address the
following comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please
attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call me at 764-3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Garrett Engineering, Via fax (979) 846-3094
--~ Case file #00-86
Home of Texas A&M University
~.,
s' ~ ,
I •i•'~
COLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842
Tel: 409 764 3500
MEMORANDUM
May 19, 2000
TO: Garrett Engineering, Via fax (979) 846-3094
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Coordinator
SUBJECT: VALLEY BROOK APARTMENTS (SP) (0-86)
Staff reviewed the grading plan and drainage report for the above-mentioned
project. Please address the attached comments and submit the following
information for further staff review:
Two (2) revised grading plans; and,
Two (2) revised drainage reports.
Please call Ted Mayo if you have any questions regarding the attached
comments.
Attachments: Staff review comments
Grading Plan and 2 redlined Drainage Reports (please pick
up at Development Services)
CC: Duane Faltysek, Via fax (979) 690-6695
Home of Texas A&M University
00
Spa
MEMORANDUM
June 7, 2000
TO: Duane Faltysek, Via fax 690-6695
~`
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinato
SUBJECT: Valley Brook Apartments -Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address
the attached comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Three (3) complete sets of building construction documents for the
proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans
attached (additional sets will be required once the plans have been
approved);
$100 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews; and,
The attached redlines with staff comments.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please
attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call me at 764-3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
Redlines (please pick up at Development Services)
cc: Garrett Engineering, Via fax 846-3094
Case file #00-86
COLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842
Tel: 409 764 3500
MEMORANDUM
May 17, 2000
TO: Duane Faltysek, via fax (979)690-6695
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinat
SUBJECT: Valley Brook Apartments -Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address
the comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Three (3) complete sets of building construction documents for the
proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans
attached; and
The attached redlined site plan with staff comments.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please
attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call me at 764-3570.
Electrical & W/WW comments: Developer is responsible for installing conduit per city
spec and design.
Attachments: Staff review comments
Redlines (please pick up at Development Services)
cc: Garrett Engineering, Via fax (979) 846-3094
Case file #00-86
Home of Texas A&M University
ENGINEERING REVIEW
COMMENTS No. 1
VALLEY BROOK APARTMENTS
Grading Plan
1. Northwest corner of building-- F L 301.75--what point does this refer to?
2. Northeast sector--Flume station 0+20.20--FL 299.18--too high!
3. Need details of existing infrastructure size, type, flowline elevations,
dimensions--water ,sanitary sewer, culverts, inlets, manholes etc.
4. Provide benchmark elevation.
5. Southeast corner--drainage from property to the south and west appears to
drain north. Insure that this runoff has an opening to the revised drainage
way.
6. Concrete pavement detail--specify subgrade compaction.
7. Pilot channel detail--36" width instead of 24".
8. Need dimensions and cross-sections of detention pond and drainway .
9. Need dimensions/details of sidewalk ramps and landings at each end.
Site Plan
1. Provide water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demand and sewer
loading.
2. Is existing water meter sufficient?
General
1.Need details of proposed utility tie-ins (plan and profile )-define easements for
public facilities: note-fire hydrant requires a 6" line.
Drainage Report
1. Post--development Peak Storm Water Discharge (No Detention)analysis-
second page :composite run-off coefficient of 0.60 is calculated wrong. It should
be 0.79. Please correct all data sheets and charts based on this data.
Reviewed by: Ted M Date: 16-May-00
~~ t
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS ~~~~.- ~~,I',(',~j,
No. 3 _
PARTMENTS SP 0 '~~ `~~
Project: VALLEY BROOK A ( ) ( ~U
1. Please have the wording of the floodplain note on the site plan match that of
the note on the utilities plan.
2. Remove "SLOPE @ 1:12" from all ANSII conformity notes. They should state
only that all ramps will meet ANSII standards.
3. To screen the A/C units from Wellborn Road, the proposed line of shrubs
needs to be extended to the rear property line; or shrubbery may be placed
around each set of units.
I ~I ~+0~ ~O ~i~~ G~ / ~/IOS C~/
~__
~-~--
Reviewed by: MOLLY HITCHCOCK Date: 06/06/00
T,F,~,- ~ -~ - w f/,Fi~ ~L , mo ~ ~ r ~ .N~~A ~, l E s~~- ~~v ~~~ ~ F~', ~
~ s Moc.~y ~ ago /»~ ~rrE N/~.~~ ~~ ~n~R ~ oN
/¢ w o~ K !+ C~
T N T T /~I'-~ d l,b Sf~ A rC /YI ,E TO
j Itf ~~v4 J~~A//~/ /~~Q i~ ANO /9-
A/~ TI~L° ~X~T wDRA~N~ oN ~i4CH Pca.~ /3~ NoTE ~~~~ °N z~
/J/
M b ~ ~ y /-~~'/~t ^'~~ i U /''~ A'~ ` /~ ~'~TE ~ ni /pRM P To ! ~
~7~'2
.A//Sl~ STAtio.4/~ A~ /~ ''`-'!f/Clf S ~ / 4 l9^/~p l4 l.s'G ~/q0~
/ 'r N~~ l: lZ~~ ~~cW~
o'~ ~ .' IZ~I ,f G.0/°~ ~ 1VOW sf}YS QoN
f~DTF
/TF~ 3 V,/,E,.rT Ova ~Gh~ua~ ~oetiQ ~~c vN'r~~~~~.gv•~ ynt
To•.v H~ law r w~a'° ~s oi,Vc Tv .o u.~ i
p ~ p ~.T- 6 /~/,~ W /4'`! . N o u1 ~ ~` S/¢ Y !~/tt ~O/h!a.,r/~/e1/G'
Z o~ri onr.~ ,
.~ iD o rf T K.v ovv iuNr+-r TD ~/ NK ~ A,N 'Y moit•/ .
a iFi~~r' vr7r c.~ ~~rr~ N~
cSN~ ~/~ IrOR /9-`'~ Z'~~
~rYI .Ob/.~/E ,L~f/fa'.tTNiN6
Kiuoc ~ Aaw *~ o v~ i4"-'° o ~~ , ~- ° /-'1 ~bRR y /~ U i TN I r SUS l
7U /1'IE f}.iyY.~ o '~ r C/~ ~'/~~4NC~E' ~Z.
.p o ~ ~ N' T M p ~~ ~'yv,s~
its mr.vo ~o A-A~O '7"N/nJ6~ As t~ Go, w~ 11f116NT N~vf2 GAT
j WoR~ wr7N /n~ oN 7Nls-~~ ~.EC,I° ~
Staff Review Comments ~ TI'F~ ~~ ~ f age 1 of 1 ~-
s
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 1
Project: VALLEY BROOK APARTMENTS (SP) (0-86)
NOTE: The City of College Station requires site plans to use a standard
engineering scale. While the site/landscaping plan for Valley Brook
Apartments were reviewed, take note that all future project submittals will
need to meet this requirement. Also, as the City begins the process of
merging digital data submitted by project, the North arrow will be required to
point to the top of plans.
~~ t/2. Maximum building height in an R-5 zoning district is 45'.
~- /3. Please designate the boundaries of the easements.
/4. A note stating that a 100-year floodplain and floodway is not on or adjacent to
the proposed project site is needed on the site plan.
~- / 5. Side and side street setbacks need to be shown on the site plan.
~/ 6. Please show the number of parking spaces required in "PROJECT
ANALYSIS".
~- l/7. The turnaround on the west side of the property needs to be reduced to 4'.
t/8. Please make sure parking space and drive aisle measurements scale out to
match what is stated.
~- ,,/9. The 4' public sidewalk needs to begin 6' behind the curb.
10.A detail of the ramps on the public sidewalk needs to be shown.
~/11.The screening fence around the dumpster site needs to be a minimum of 8'
high. Landscaping needs to screen the dumpster fence on three sides, not
just two.
J12.The dumpster needs to be screened from the Wellborn Road ROW. This
could be done by moving the dumpster pad back and angling more towards
the buildings.
X13. Please show the private utility lines on the site plan.
~- ~ 14.Afterthe curb, grassy area, sidewalk, etc. are scaled correctly, it can be
determined if fire lanes are needed. If no part of the building extends over
150' from the curb line, a fire lane on the property is not needed. If a portion
of the building does extend over 150' from the curb line, both driveways will
need to be designated as fire lanes. If this is the case, please identify the
lanes and provide striping detail.
/~/al E TNT ~U1~OING STTNQ /SD ~ FROA1 ~U2A ~INF
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
/15. There are no required landscaping points based on the number of parking
spaces.
i/16.Only 15 trees are needed to meet streetscape requirements.
/17. Please verify that the non-canopy trees will be 1.25" caliper or larger.
~- /18. Why is Hawthorne listed under shrubs? fZ~,.no~r~ Fk-o ~, ~.~ sT ~~
~_ / 19. The parking lot needs to be screened from the Wellborn Road ROW.
~- /20. NOTE: Because the berms are also landscaping elements, the grading plan
will be considered as part of the site plan.
~- ,/ 21. Show A/C unit locations.
~- /22.The transformer, parking lot, and (possibly) the A/C units need to be
screened from the ROW.
~- /23. Please provide more information on the irrigation system's backflow
preventer. S.E~ /~-TTi4c~f ~~ ~~T
~-- /24. Please state the density of dwelling units per acre.
/25. Please verify that the utility load demands listed are the maximum demands.
Also, provide the minimum and average water demand in gallons per minutq.
S~'~ feTT/}~ly Fog Fc~inF/L iNF-~,2Mi9T/ON ,c~
Reviewed by: MOLLY HITCHCOCK
Date: 16-May-00
Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1
U5- 26- OU 15:115 $4pA 764 34fl6 DE~'ELfjPD1E~T S~'CS
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 2
Project: VALLEY BROOK APARTMENTS (SP) (0-$6)
Because of the number of changes made to the site plan. a fu!i review was
conducted on the secor7d submittal.
~G~~~ ~~~ /S~/A ~vRN ~~ /rJf~y .~G ~~~r vv
~. ~1. The awner's address and telephone number needs to be included ~rl il~e title
block.
~ oo?- oo:
I~,. /2. Please show the r.~._:~ rent zoning of all abutting parcels.
~,/;:; The site and {andscaping plan's general note about the ~ OG-year flocdpiain
should be similar to that on the utilities plan.
t. The side setback requirement is 7.5' and the side street setback requirement
is 15'. Please adjust the setback lines accordingly. Also, the second ,:{rood
vhowing a 20' rear setback and the arrow coming from the existing 6'' ~~:. i.n,'
should be removed.
~~/5. Indicate the driveway throat length.
~,/Ei. The details of the curb and pavement need to meet City standards. o~/ o~~~,~.~s~
~~ Include a note with the ramp detail that the ramp will rneet all ANSII ~~~a~vs'
standards.
~~8, Please provide landscaping that will screen the A/C units from Wellborn
road.
~9. include a note on the utilities plan that irrigation will be permitted prior to CO.
~,/1 ecify fihe minimum, maximum; an~i average demands of water in gaflor,s
~r minute.
Reviewed by: MOL_1_Y HITCHCOCK
Date: 26-May-00
Staff Review Comments Page ~ of ..
. ~
ENGINEERING REVIEW
COMMENTS No. 2
VALLEY BROOK APARTMENTS
Grading Plan
1. End of proposed 6" water line--Clarify--two notes conflict.
2. Existing sanitary sewers--show sizes ,ie, 6" along south side and 8" along
east side.
Site Plan
1. Existing sanitary sewer on east side is 8" not 6".
2. Sewer loading--1500 GPD--too low--16 three bedroom units
Waterline Plans
1. Sheet W-1 : show structural fill under driveways; specify embedment
2. Flowline at station 1+73 = 294.62 not 264.62.
3. Show location, details of water taps for building service.
4. Standard Detail Sheets W.3/1--W.3/5 -- Need title block completed ;Need to
be seated by a Registered Professional Engineer.
General
1.Please provide details showing sanitary sewer tie-ins including new manhole,
flowline elevations, etc.
2. Engineer's Estimate--Include all new public infrastructure--water, Sanitary
sewer, tie-ins, paving, sidewalks, drainage ,etc.
Reviewed by: Ted Mayo
Date: May 30,2000
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 3
Project: VALLEY BROOK APARTMENTS (SP) (0-86)
1. Please have the wording of the floodplain note on the site plan match that of
the note on the utilities plan.
2. Remove "SLOPE @ 1:12" from all ANSII conformity notes. They should state
only that all ramps will meet ANSII standards.
3. To screen the A/C units from Wellborn Road, the proposed line of shrubs
needs to be extended to the rear property line; or shrubbery may be placed
around each set of units.
Reviewed by: MOLLY HITCHCOCK Date: 06/06/00
Staff Review Comments
Page 1 of 1
ENGINEERING REVIEW
Isle] LVA lLVA IAki Ill &ykirem
VALLEY BROOK APARTMENTS
Grading Plans --6/06/00
1. Not sealed by Registered Professional Engineer
Reviewed by: Ted Mayo Date: June 09,2000