The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStaff Comments CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 /Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM November 16, 2000 TO: Paul Lodholz, Tackett Lodholz Architects, Via fax (713) 521-0594 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator ~ ~ SUBJECT: University Lutheran Chapel Expansion -Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review and plan approval: Two (2) copies of the revised site and landscape plan; and, Two (2) copies of the revised grading plan. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Earl Havel, Garrett Engineering, Via fax 846-3094 Rev. Larry Krueger, Via fax 846-6687 Case file #00-61 I Home of Texas A&M University COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM April 11, 2000 TO: Larry Krueger, University Lutheran Chapel, Via fax (979) 846-6687 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordi SUBJECT: University Lutheran Chapel -Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Monday, April 17, 10:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for May 4, 2000, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Ten (10) copies of the revised site plan; and, The attached redlines with staff comments If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Redlines with staff comments Staff review comments Electrical & W/WW comments cc: Paul Lodholz, Tackett -Lodholz Architects, Via fax (713) 521-0594 Earl Havel, Garrett Engineering, Via fax (979) 846-3094 Texas District of The Lutheran Church, 7900 E HWY 290, Austin, TX, 78724 Case file #00-61 Home of Texas A&M University • i ~~ ~ ~IeCtSf. ~~ Y~ftR'~ ~h G:Yc~ec~ ~ ~'C~S, ~~~, ,~ STAFF REVIEW CQMMENTS No. 1 Project: UNIVERSITY LUTHERAN (CUP) (0-61) ~/~ Show zoning of abutting parcels. ~j Is there an existing sidewalk along College Main? It is shown on the ~--~ sidewalk master plan, and if there is not one existing, then one will need to be installed. I r ~ s F..7 u~d,~rs+~~~ ~~^~ ~~:~ ~~ c ~~ ~;, pt~~ ~:- w.; c ~~`, What is the ROW width of the surrounding streets? w ~ d~ ~~~r ~~~~~~ ~ -~ ~ ;~ t~ y ~+ rti~ ~ ~ N F 4. Note on plan the FEMA map referred to -map # a d date to determine status of floodplain on site. 5. Shov~ter an sewer servic~e~to building. ~` 6. Is there an easement over the electric lines along Louise? ~ h ~ - ~, ~:~ ,~~~ ~ ~, s ~, ~ y , ~» ,- Ls%c., Id /~ e ~v(C~c }"~~5 I~r~~.:.r..,;;t~b~ ~Y ~IC~fr~C ~~FEI~t~ ;,{ C. f 7 Show the PUE that crosses the property on the same page with the proposed ~y building expansion. A license to encroach, granted by City Council, will be required if any portion of the building, including eave overhang -not just slab, is within the PUE. st ~ c-~ ~4, . +~ ~~ ~ kt 4< <~ ~.~{ c b~.~; Id,~,y s~. ~. ;~ a„~ troy, ,b r,,8' Show fire hydrant on plan to scale, so it can be determined that there is equate fire coverage. . Show existing landscaping to remain on same page as proposed landscaping. 10. The landscaping legend should show existing plants that will remain and proposed plants and calculations based on Section 7.24. E.1. i. Sheet SP-1 shows 3 existing trees adjacent to the building that are shown as crepe myrtles on the topo survey. Irrigation plan will need to be approved before C/O. ~he parking legend needs to calculate parking based on the 130 sanctuary seats shown on the plan. ~~ y,~~~1 ~3.,Fiandicap access is not clear. The type of ramp shown on the grading plan is rc~ , s; c~., not consistent with the location of the handicap parking spaces. ~s the main structure of the building higher than 50ft? If not, then the only set ~~ ~ back that would apply to your building, according to the zoning ordinance, would be the 15ft rear set back. Show only that setback. re ~ ~: ~; ( 15. Water and sewer demands need to be provided. ~,~y~~f ~ f~.-.~ i~ e ~ ~ e fio ~ s ~ ~~ ah « 6A,u c+ e y +~ c t ~~Se ~~,~,vE D c 2 ~^e K P~...~Cu I (I,.c i ~ ~ w..a .-~+c~ ft S 4 '~ ct.k,~ c f K t...;' t ~ F Y ~J ct.,: K k~ ~ cz.r ~c ~,,1% ~ c~o;C i, ~ ~L N ;, , t G ,~ ~. t c , J:IPZTEXT1Pz02893A.doc 0 Page 1 of 1 Engineering Comments ~~ , 16 On the grading plan the flow line out needs to show an elevation of 349 ~,u,\ instead of the 249 shown currently for the outlet control structure. ~ +y~,~~~~~,~~~.i rev ~~~ ~~~~~,~~- s 17 Insufficient grading details have been provided for review or construction. Ku~S`0~`` 1 . See additional comments on grading plan. Reviewed by: JESSICA JIMMERSON Date: 10-Apr-00 J:IPZTEXT1Pz02893A.doc Page 2 of 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: UNIVERSITY LUTHERAN CHAPEL (CUP) (0-61) 1. ok. 2. College Main is shown on the sidewalk master plan, and since there is not one existing, then one will need to be installed. Staff is looking into the possibility that the City has a project in the works that would include installation of a sidewalk along this section of College Main, in the near future (6-12 months). If it is determined that the City does not have such plans, a sidewalk will need to be installed by the church before a C/O will be issued for the building. 3. ok 4. Note on plan the FEMA map referred to -map # and date - to determine status of floodplain on site. What is the date of the FEMA map used? 5. Show water and sewer service to building. The location of the sewer line in respect to the detention area may need to be addressed. Development engineering will look at that. 6. ok 7. Show the PUE that crosses the property on the same page with the proposed building expansion. A license to encroach, granted by City Council, will be required if any portion of the building, including eave overhang -not just slab, is within the PUE. This still needs to be shown on the site plan. 8. ok 9. ok 10. The landscaping legend should state -"as approved by NRB". 11.ok 12. ok ,, 13. Handicap access is not clear. The type of ramp shown on the grading plan is not consistent with the location of the handicap parking spaces. This still needs to be addressed. 14. ok 15. Water and sewer demands need to be provided. This still needs to be addressed. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 Engineering Comments -These comments still need to be addressed. 16.On the grading plan the flow line out needs to show an elevation of 349 instead of the 249 shown currently for the outlet control structure. 17. Insufficient grading details have been provided for review or construction. 18. See additional comments on grading plan. Reviewed by: JESSICA JIMMERSON Date: 27-Apr-00 Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 3 Project: UNIVERSITY LUTHERAN CHAPEL (CUP)- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (00-61) PLANNING 1. In regards to the sidewalk requirement along College Main -After talking with other City departments staff has determined that there is not a City project planned to install the sidewalk. Therefore, as per the Condtionial Use Permit granted to this project, it is the responsibility of the Church to install the sidewalk. To be stamped approved the site plan needs to show the location of the future sidewalk, in compliance with City standards, as well as, provide construction documents and cost estimates. It is our understanding that GTE plans to move the existing above ground lines along College Main in the near future. It is possible to bond or guaranty the future construction of the sidewalk, so that the remainder of the project may proceed, and the sidewalk can be installed after the GTE lines are moved. Reviewed by: JESSICA JIMMERSON Date: 11-16-00 ENGINEERING -These comments still need to be addressed. 1. On the grading plan the flow line out needs to show an elevation of 349 instead of the 249 shown currently for the outlet control structure. 2. Insufficient grading details have been provided for review or construction. 3. See additional comments on grading plan. 4. This site is in violation of City Ordinance. This project cannot proceed with out compliance to City Ordinance. The preliminary parking lot is supposed to function as detention for this site. Detention has not been constructed to date. This office has been in contact with the construction company and received assurance that the site will come into compliance. However, there has been no such effort. It is the ultimate responsibility of this site to assure compliance. We have had several significant rainfall events in the last several weeks. When this site complies with the City drainage Ordinance the project can proceed. Please contact me if you have any questions. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: 11-16-00 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. J:\PZTEXT\PZ03943.DOC Page 1 of 1