Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Date: February 20, 2003 Email: mhitchcock @ci.college- station.tx.us Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for T- Mobile located at 1361 Earl Rudder Freeway South. (03 -008) Applicant: Michael Baty for T- Mobile Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the cell tower and site plan with the conditions that the facility be limited to 100 feet in height and landscaping be provided. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for a new 120 -ft. cell tower to be located behind Varsity Ford, at the end of Associates Drive. The lease space is in a tract of land zoned C -2 Commercial - Industrial. Undeveloped R -1 Single Family Residential abuts the property to the north and developed C -1 General Commercial abuts the property to the west and south. To the east is platted C -1. The tower meets the separation requirements from an R -1 district and from other towers. As Associates is not a minor arterial or greater, the tower is not required to meet the separation distance from a thoroughfare. The City Council has made its intentions clear to staff by asking for a new ordinance that will limit tower heights in the city to 100 feet. This ordinance has not yet been adopted, but staff has considered the direction City Council has given in making the recommendation that the tower be limited to 100 feet. The tower would meet all separation requirements if it were 120 or 100 feet tall. The proposed tower would be 120 feet from the end of Associates, which is a public right -of -way. Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, has estimated that 35% of Sams and Hollywood 16 traffic use Associates for access, so approximately 2,900 trips are generated on Associates each weekday and 5,500 trips per day are made on the weekend. Staff recommends that landscaping be required with the fencing to mitigate negative visual impacts from the right -of -way. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates the area as Retail Regional. Associates Drive is a local street with no plans for extension. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the city in 1958. It is not platted, but will have to complete the platting process before development may occur. Document586 1 MEMORANDUM May 15, 2003 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner Email: mhitchcock @ci.college - station.tx.us SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for T- Mobile (CUP) Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit for a wireless telecommunication facility located at 1361 Earl Rudder Freeway South. (03 -008) Applicant: Michael Baty for T- Mobile Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the 120 -ft. cell tower and site plan with the condition that landscaping be provided. Item Summary: This item was tabled at the February 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting so consultant recommendations on allowable tower height and a new Wireless Telecommunication Facility ordinance could be considered by the City Council. The consultants have recommended that the maximum tower height remain at 150 feet. The City Council will consider the new WTF ordinance at their May 8 meeting, and the outcome of that action will be discussed with the P &Z at the May 15 meeting. Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application 3. Copy of Staff Report 4. Copy of minutes from the February 20, 2003 P &Z meeting 5. Copy of site plan STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Date: February 20, 2003 Email: mhitchcock @ci.college - station.tx.us Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for T- Mobile located at 1361 Earl Rudder Freeway South. (03 -008) Applicant: Michael Baty for T- Mobile Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the cell tower and site plan with the conditions that the facility be limited to 100 feet in height and landscaping be provided. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for a new 120 -ft. cell tower to be located behind Varsity Ford, at the end of Associates Drive. The lease space is in a tract of land zoned C -2 Commercial - Industrial. Undeveloped R -1 Single Family Residential abuts the property to the north and developed C -1 General Commercial abuts the property to the west and south. To the east is platted C -1. The tower meets the separation requirements from an R -1 district and from other towers. As Associates is not a minor arterial or greater, the tower is not required to meet the separation distance from a thoroughfare. The City Council has made its intentions clear to staff by asking for a new ordinance that will limit tower heights in the city to 100 feet. This ordinance has not yet been adopted, but staff has considered the direction City Council has given in making the recommendation that the tower be limited to 100 feet. The tower would meet all separation requirements if it were 120 or 100 feet tall. The proposed tower would be 120 feet from the end of Associates, which is a public right -of -way. Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, has estimated that 35% of Sams and Hollywood 16 traffic use Associates for access, so approximately 2,900 trips are generated on Associates each weekday and 5,500 trips per day are made on the weekend. Staff recommends that landscaping be required with the fencing to mitigate negative visual impacts from the right -of -way. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates the area as Retail Regional. Associates Drive is a local street with no plans for extension. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the city in 1958. It is not platted, but will have to complete the platting process before development may occur. Document586 1 WTF Considerations: In addition to the standard CUP guidelines (described below), the Commission shall consider the following additional factors when determining whether to recommend a CUP for a telecommunication facility: 1. Height of the proposed tower, surrounding topography and tree coverage and foliage as they relate to: a. Skyline impact, examining whether the proportions of the structure appears to dominate or blend in with the surrounding environment and b. Shadow impact, whether or not the proposed tower will cast shadows that would prevent the reasonable use of enjoyment or surrounding properties. 2. Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. 3. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. 4. Economic impact on adjacent and nearby properties. 5. Proposed ingress and egress. 6. Availability of suitable alternatives and /or existing support structures. Staff Analysis: Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the existence of conditional uses. The Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, when after public notice and hearing the Commission finds that: (Staff comments are in italics) 1. "The proposed use meets all the minimum standards established in the ordinance for the type of use proposed." Staff conducted a technical review and found general compliance with development regulations with the exception of the items listed above in the staff recommendation. 2. "That the proposed use meets the purposed and intent of the ordinance and is in harmony with the development policies and goals and objectives as embodied in the Comprehensive Plan for Development of the City. The request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants, nor be substantially or permanently injurious to neighboring property." The public hearing is an opportunity for the Commission to measure the potential impact on surrounding land uses. The Commission may impose additional reasonable restrictions or conditions to carry out the spirit and intent of the ordinance and to mitigate adverse effects of the proposed use. These requirements may include, but are not limited to, increased open space, loading and parking requirements, additional landscaping, and additional improvements such as curbing, sidewalks and screening." Document586 2 Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of Conditional Use Permits, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval as submitted; 2. Recommend approval with conditions relating to specific site characteristics or with time limitations; 3. Recommend denial with specified reasons; 4. Table; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location map 2. Application 3. Copy of site plan 4. Copy of submitted graphics 5. Copy of revised Master Antenna Plan NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 2 -04 -03 and 2 -25 -03 Advertised Commission Hearing Date: 2 -20 -03 Advertised Council Hearing Date: 3 -13 -03 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 500': 9 Response Received: None as of date of staff report. Document586 3 STAFF REPORT • Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock. Date: • .February 20; 2003 . Email: mhitchcock @ci.college- station.tx.us Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for T- Mobile located at 1361 Earl Rudder Freeway South. (03 -008) Applicant: Michael Baty for T- Mobile Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the cell tower and site plan with the conditions that the facility be limited to 100 feet in height and landscaping be provided. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for a new 120 -ft. cell tower to be located behind Varsity Ford, at the end of Associates Drive. The lease space is in a tract of land zoned C -2 Commercial - Industrial. Undeveloped R -1 Single Family Residential abuts the property to the north and developed C -1 General Commercial abuts the property to the west and south. To the east is platted C -1. The tower meets the separation requirements from an R -1 district and from other towers. As Associates is not a minor arterial or greater, the tower is not required to meet the separation distance from a thoroughfare. The City Council has made its intentions clear to staff by asking for a new ordinance that will limit tower heights in the city to 100 feet. This ordinance has not yet been adopted, but staff has considered the direction City Council has given in making the recommendation that the tower be limited to 100 feet. The tower would meet all separation requirements if it were 120 or 100 feet tall. The proposed tower would be 120 feet from the end of Associates, which is a public right -of -way. Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, has estimated that 35% of Sams and Hollywood 16 traffic use Associates for access, so approximately 2,900 trips are generated on Associates each weekday and 5,500 trips per day are made on the weekend. Staff recommends that landscaping be required with the fencing to mitigate negative visual impacts from the right -of -way. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates the area as Retail Regional. Associates Drive is a local street with no plans for extension. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the city in 1958. It is not platted, but will have to complete the platting process before development may occur. R: WTLTRIPZLTRIPRODIPZ20031P0007476 .DOC 1 WTF Considerations: In addition to the standard CUP guidelines (described below), the Commission shall consider the following additional factors when determining whetherto recommend a CUP.for a telecommunication facility: 1. Height of the proposed tower, surrounding topography and tree coverage and foliage as they relate to: a. Skyline impact, examining whether the proportions of the structure appears to dominate or blend in with the surrounding environment and b. Shadow impact, whether or not the proposed tower will cast shadows that would prevent the reasonable use of enjoyment or surrounding properties. 2. Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. 3. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. 4. Economic impact on adjacent and nearby properties. 5. Proposed ingress and egress. 6. Availability of suitable alternatives and /or existing support structures. Staff Analysis: Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the existence of conditional uses. The Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, when after public notice and hearing the Commission finds that: (Staff comments are in italics) 1. "The proposed use meets all the minimum standards established in the ordinance for the type of use proposed." Staff conducted a technical review and found general compliance with development regulations with the exception of the items listed above in the staff recommendation. 2. "That the proposed use meets the purposed and intent of the ordinance and is in harmony with the development policies and goals and objectives as embodied in the Comprehensive Plan for Development of the City. The request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants, nor be substantially or permanently injurious to neighboring property." The public hearing is an opportunity for the Commission to measure the potential impact on surrounding land uses. The Commission may impose additional reasonable restrictions or conditions to carry out the spirit and intent of the ordinance and to mitigate adverse effects of the proposed use. These requirements may include, but are not limited to, increased open space, loading and parking requirements, additional landscaping, and additional improvements such as curbing, sidewalks and screening." R: 1HTLTRIPZLTRIPRODIPZ20031P0007476 .DOC 2 Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body • on the question of Conditional Use Permits, which will be ultimately decided by City Council.. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval as submitted; 2. Recommend approval with conditions relating to specific site characteristics or with time limitations; 3. Recommend denial with specified reasons; 4. Table; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location map 2. Application 3. Copy of site plan 4. Copy of submitted graphics 5. Copy of revised Master Antenna Plan NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 2 -04 -03 and 2 -25 -03 Advertised Commission Hearing Date: 2 -20 -03 Advertised Council Hearing Date: 3 -13 -03 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 500': 9 Response Received: None as of date of staff report. Ri HTLTRIPZLTRIPRODIPZ2003 1P0007476.DOC 3 STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock. • Date: February 20; 2003 Email: mhitchcock @ci.college- station.tx.us Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for T- Mobile located at 1361 Earl Rudder Freeway South. (03 -008) Applicant: Michael Baty for T- Mobile Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the cell tower and site plan with the conditions that the facility be limited to 100 feet in height and landscaping be provided. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for a new 120 -ft. cell tower to be located behind Varsity Ford, at the end of Associates Drive. The lease space is in a tract of land zoned C -2 Commercial - Industrial. Undeveloped R -1 Single Family Residential abuts the property to the north and developed C -1 General Commercial abuts the property to the west and south. To the east is platted C -1. The tower meets the separation requirements from an R -1 district and from other towers. As Associates is not a minor arterial or greater, the tower is not required to meet the separation distance from a thoroughfare. The City Council has made its intentions clear to staff by asking for a new ordinance that will limit tower heights in the city to 100 feet. This ordinance has not yet been adopted, but staff has considered the direction City Council has given in making the recommendation that the tower be limited to 100 feet. The tower would meet all separation requirements if it were 120 or 100 feet tall. The proposed tower would be 120 feet from the end of Associates, which is a public right -of -way. Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, has estimated that 35% of Sams and Hollywood 16 traffic use Associates for access, so approximately 2,900 trips are generated on Associates each weekday and 5,500 trips per day are made on the weekend. Staff recommends that landscaping be required with the fencing to mitigate negative visual impacts from the right -of -way. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates the area as Retail Regional. Associates Drive is a local street with no plans for extension. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the city in 1958. It is not platted, but will have to complete the platting process before development may occur. R: WTLTRIPZLTRIPRODIPZ20031P0007476 .00C 1 WTF Considerations: In addition to the standard CUP guidelines (described below), the Commission shall consider the following additional factors when determining whether to recommend a CUP.for a telecommunication facility: • 1. Height of the proposed tower, surrounding topography and tree coverage and foliage as they relate to: a. Skyline impact, examining whether the proportions of the structure appears to dominate or blend in with the surrounding environment and b. Shadow impact, whether or not the proposed tower will cast shadows that would prevent the reasonable use of enjoyment or surrounding properties. 2. Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. 3. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. 4. Economic impact on adjacent and nearby properties. 5. Proposed ingress and egress. 6. Availability of suitable alternatives and /or existing support structures. Staff Analysis: Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the existence of conditional uses. The Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, when after public notice and hearing the Commission finds that: (Staff comments are in italics) 1. "The proposed use meets all the minimum standards established in the ordinance for the type of use proposed? Staff conducted a technical review and found general compliance with development regulations with the exception of the items listed above in the staff recommendation. 2. "That the proposed use meets the purposed and intent of the ordinance and is in harmony with the development policies and goals and objectives as embodied in the Comprehensive Plan for Development of the City. The request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants, nor be substantially or permanently injurious to neighboring property." The public hearing is an opportunity for the Commission to measure the potential impact on surrounding land uses. The Commission may impose additional reasonable restrictions or conditions to carry out the spirit and intent of the ordinance and to mitigate adverse effects of the proposed use. These requirements may include, but are not limited to, increased open space, loading and parking requirements, additional landscaping, and additional improvements such as curbing, sidewalks and screening." R. 7476.00C 2 Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body • on the question of Conditional Use Permits, which will be ultimately decided by City Council.. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval as submitted; 2. Recommend approval with conditions relating to specific site characteristics or with time limitations; 3. Recommend denial with specified reasons; 4. Table; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location map 2. Application 3. Copy of site plan 4. Copy of submitted graphics 5. Copy of revised Master Antenna Plan NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 2 -04 -03 and 2 -25 -03 Advertised Commission Hearing Date: 2 -20 -03 Advertised Council Hearing Date: 3 -13 -03 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 500': 9 Response Received: None as of date of staff report. Rwrcrnwzcrnw 7476.noc 3 COLLEGE STATION CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764 -3570 / Fax (979)764 -3496 TO: — kik' � a 7/— - q 7 - 24 4 FROM: Susan Hazlett, Staff Assistant DATE: May 12, 2003 RE: Staff Report P &Z Meeting Following this coversheet is a copy of the Staff Report that was prepared for the following project. Please keep in mind that staffs responsibility is to provide the Planning & Zoning Commission with all pertinent facts of a development case, but that staff is not acting as an advocate for the applicants. Therefore, it is in the applicant's best interest to send a representative to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to speak on behalf of the proposal. This item is scheduled for the Thursday, May 15, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:00 P.M. in City Hall Council Chambers. I have included a copy of the agenda for this meeting. Please contact our office at (979)764- 3570 if you should have any questions. Thanks. COLLEGE STATION CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764 -3570 / Fax (979)764 -3496 TO: ! & /;. 1,tGl/C(,(/l1a �ti / ' 021/ FROM: Susan Hazlett, Staff Assistant DATE: May 12, 2003 RE: Staff Report P &Z Meeting Following this coversheet is a copy of the Staff Report that was prepared for the following project. Please keep in mind that staff's responsibility is to provide the Planning & Zoning Commission with all pertinent facts of a development case, but that staff is not acting as an advocate for the applicants. Therefore, it is in the applicant's best interest to send a representative to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to speak on behalf of the proposal. This item is scheduled for the Thursday, May 15, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. This meeting will begin at 7:00 P.M. in City Hall Council Chambers. I have included a copy of the agenda for this meeting. Please contact our office at (979)764- 3570 if you should have any questions. Thanks. MEMORANDUM May 15, 2003 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner Email: mhitchcock @ci.college - station.tx.us SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for T- Mobile (CUP) Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit for a wireless telecommunication facility located at 1361 Earl Rudder Freeway South. (03 -008) Applicant: Michael Baty for T- Mobile Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the 120 -ft. cell tower and site plan with the condition that landscaping be provided. Item Summary: This item was tabled at the February 20, 2003 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting so consultant recommendations on allowable tower height and a new Wireless Telecommunication Facility ordinance could be considered by the City Council. The consultants have recommended that the maximum tower height remain at 150 feet. The City Council will consider the new WTF ordinance at their May 8 meeting, and the outcome of that action will be discussed with the P &Z at the May 15 meeting. Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application 3. Copy of Staff Report 4. Copy of minutes from the February 20, 2003 P &Z meeting 5. Copy of site plan STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Date: February 20, 2003 Email: mhitchcock @ci.college - station.tx.us Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit - Use & Site for T- Mobile located at 1361 Earl Rudder Freeway South. (03 -008) Applicant: Michael Baty for T- Mobile Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the cell tower and site plan with the conditions that the facility be limited to 100 feet in height and landscaping be provided. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for a new 120 -ft. cell tower to be located behind Varsity Ford, at the end of Associates Drive. The lease space is in a tract of land zoned C -2 Commercial - Industrial. Undeveloped R -1 Single Family Residential abuts the property to the north and developed C -1 General Commercial abuts the property to the west and south. To the east is platted C -1. The tower meets the separation requirements from an R -1 district and from other towers. As Associates is not a minor arterial or greater, the tower is not required to meet the separation distance from a thoroughfare. The City Council has made its intentions clear to staff by asking for a new ordinance that will limit tower heights in the city to 100 feet. This ordinance has not yet been adopted, but staff has considered the direction City Council has given in making the recommendation that the tower be limited to 100 feet. The tower would meet all separation requirements if it were 120 or 100 feet tall. The proposed tower would be 120 feet from the end of Associates, which is a public right -of -way. Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, has estimated that 35% of Sams and Hollywood 16 traffic use Associates for access, so approximately 2,900 trips are generated on Associates each weekday and 5,500 trips per day are made on the weekend. Staff recommends that landscaping be required with the fencing to mitigate negative visual impacts from the right -of -way. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates the area as Retail Regional. Associates Drive is a local street with no plans for extension. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the city in 1958. It is not platted, but will have to complete the platting process before development may occur. Document586 1 WTF Considerations: In addition to the standard CUP guidelines (described below), the Commission shall consider the following additional factors when determining whether to recommend a CUP for a telecommunication facility: 1. Height of the proposed tower, surrounding topography and tree coverage and foliage as they relate to: a. Skyline impact, examining whether the proportions of the structure appears to dominate or blend in with the surrounding environment and b. Shadow impact, whether or not the proposed tower will cast shadows that would prevent the reasonable use of enjoyment or surrounding properties. 2. Design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that have the effect of reducing or eliminating visual obtrusiveness. 3. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. 4. Economic impact on adjacent and nearby properties. 5. Proposed ingress and egress. 6. Availability of suitable alternatives and /or existing support structures. Staff Analysis: Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the existence of conditional uses. The Commission may recommend approval of a conditional use subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, when after public notice and hearing the Commission finds that: (Staff comments are in italics) 1. "The proposed use meets all the minimum standards established in the ordinance for the type of use proposed." Staff conducted a technical review and found general compliance with development regulations with the exception of the items listed above in the staff recommendation. 2. "That the proposed use meets the purposed and intent of the ordinance and is in harmony with the development policies and goals and objectives as embodied in the Comprehensive Plan for Development of the City. The request is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. "That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, welfare, and safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants, nor be substantially or permanently injurious to neighboring property." The public hearing is an opportunity for the Commission to measure the potential impact on surrounding land uses. The Commission may impose additional reasonable restrictions or conditions to carry out the spirit and intent of the ordinance and to mitigate adverse effects of the proposed use. These requirements may include, but are not limited to, increased open space, loading and parking requirements, additional landscaping, and additional improvements such as curbing, sidewalks and screening." Document586 2 Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of Conditional Use Permits, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval as submitted; 2. Recommend approval with conditions relating to specific site characteristics or with time limitations; 3. Recommend denial with specified reasons; 4. Table; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location map 2. Application 3. Copy of site plan 4. Copy of submitted graphics 5. Copy of revised Master Antenna Plan NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 2 -04 -03 and 2 -25 -03 Advertised Commission Hearing Date: 2 -20 -03 Advertised Council Hearing Date: 3 -13 -03 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 500': 9 Response Received: None as of date of staff report. Document586 3