HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report MEMORANDUM
March 12, 2003
TO: Zoning Board of Adjustments
FROM: Jennifer Reeves
Email: @ci.college- station.tx.us
SUBJECT: Variance for 822 Nimitz Street.
Item: Consideration, discussion of a rear setback variance request for 822
Nimitz Street, consisting of an encroachment of 17.5 feet into the required 25-
foot rear setback.
Applicant: Eric Barton, (Housing Program Coordinator) - City of College Station
Community Development
Item Summary: This variance case was originally heard and denied on February
4, 2003. The Board only had four members including Chairman Hill. For a
motion to pass with only four members, the vote would have had to be
unanimous. A motion to approve the variance failed (3 -1). A letter was sent to
Chairman Hill on behalf of the applicant for a request of a rehear. The board met
on March 4, 2003 and past the motion passed to rehear the case.
Draft minutes of the February 4th. & March 4th. 2003 ZBA meeting are included
in the ZBA packet.
Attachments:
1. Area map
2. Application
3. Small area map of previous variances granted by the Board of Adjustments in
the same neighborhood.
4. Staff report dated January 23, 2003
5. Minutes from the February 4 & March 4, 2003 meeting
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves Date: 01 -23 -03
Email: jreeves @ci.college - station.tx.us
ZBA Meeting Date: 02 -04 -03
APPLICANT: Eric Barton
REQUEST: Rear setback variance
LOCATION: 822 Nimitz
PURPOSE: To allow Community Development to move forward
with the Optional Relocation Project.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Status of Applicant: Housing Program Coordinator for the City of College
Station Community Development Department
Property Owner: Ruthie L. Glover
Applicable
Ordinance Section: Section 7: District Use Schedule - Table A
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Zoning and Land Use: The subject property and surrounding properties are
developed as R -1 Single Family Residential. Across
Nimitz Street the property is zoned R -6 Apartment
Building /High Density and developed as such.
Frontage: Approximately 50 ft. of frontage on Nimitz Street.
Access: Access is via a driveway onto Nimitz Street.
Topography &
Vegetation: The house is slightly above street level.
Flood Plain: Not within a floodplain
VARIANCE INFORMATION
Setback Required: A rear setback of 25 feet is required for R -1 Single
Family homes.
Setback Requested: A rear setback of 7.5 feet
O:\ group\ deve _ser \stfrpt\zngstfrpt\honda. doc
Case Overview: This case involves a variance needed for the City of
College Station Community Development Department
to move forward with the Optional Relocation Project.
This project involves an existing dilapidated, unsafe
structure that will be replaced by a new, modest brick
structure that will encroach less into the rear setback
than the current structure. The current structure has a
variable encroachment of 19 -20 feet into the rear
setback. The new structure will encroach 17.5 feet
into the rear setback; thus the applicant is
requesting a rear setback of 7.5 feet.
Special Conditions: The applicant has stated as a special condition: due
to Nimitz Street encroaching approximately 15.5 feet
into the front of the owners property, a variance of the
rear setback is required to place the front of the new
31' x 32' replacement dwelling 10 feet from the edge
of the paving of Nimitz Street, a standard already
established by recent development adjacent to the
subject property.
Hardship: As a hardship the applicant has stated: without the
variance, the lot is unbuildable due to the small lot
size of approximately 3,285 square feet. An additional
777 square feet of the front of the lot is unusable
because it is developed as Nimitz Street, leaving
approximately 2,508 square feet of total lot area that
can be developed.
Alternatives: As far as alternatives the applicant has stated:
Building a two -story replacement structure (this option
would be both cost prohibited due to budget
constraints and undesirable for an elderly owner due
to stairs). The current design is for a 992 square feet
replacement dwelling for a family of two adults and
one child.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Ordinance Intent: Building setback requirements usually allow for some
degree of control over population density, access to
light and air, and fire protection. These standards are
typically justified on the basis of the protection of
property values.
Number of Property
Owners Notified: 15
Responses Received: None as of date of staff report
ATTACHMENTS
Location Map
Application
Site Plan
O:\ group\ deve _ser \stfrpt\zngstfrpt\honda.doc
MEMORANDUM
February 18, 2003
TO: Zoning Board of Adjustments (ZBA)
FROM: Jennifer Reeves
Email: jreeves @ci.college - station.tx.us
SUBJECT: Variance for 822 Nimitz Street.
Item: Consideration of a rehearing of a variance request for 822 Nimitz Street,
consisting of an encroachment of 17.5 feet into the required 25 -foot rear setback.
Applicant: Eric Barton, (Housing Program Coordinator) - City of College Station
Community Development Office.
Item Summary: This variance case was originally heard and denied on February
4, 2003. The Board only had four members including Chairman Hill. For a
motion to pass with only four members, the vote would have had to be
unanimous. A motion to approve the variance failed (3 -1). The applicant has not
provided Staff with any additional information regarding this item. A letter was
sent to Chairman Hill on behalf of the applicant, and is included with this
memorandum.
Draft minutes of the February 4, 2003 ZBA meeting are included in the ZBA
packet.
Attachments:
1. Area map
2. Application
3. Staff Report dated January 23, 2003
4. Draft Minutes from the February 4, 2003 Meeting
5. Site Plan
6. Letter from Ruthie Glover dated February 17, 2003
7. Small Area Map showing the previous variances granted in the same
neighborhood.
822 Nimitz February 4, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Slide 3 (SAM)
Good evening, my name is Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner
This case originally was heard February 4th. Of this year, due to the board
having just enough for a quorum the applicant needed a unanimous vote. The
motion to approve the variance failed. March 4th. The applicant came back
before the board to be considered for a rehear and the motion passed..
Basically the applicant is hear again tonight for the board to reconsider the
granting of this variance request. ±' l , /; -1 S < >, 4
1 would like to remind the board that that the City of College Station did acquire
15 and half feet of the front of this lot for Nimkitz street, which does put this lot
under an extreme hardship.
CASE OVERVIEW
Slide 4 (House Photo)
This case involves a variance needed for their Community Development
Department to move forward with the Optional Relocation Project.
This project involves an existing dilapidated, unsafe structure that will be
replaced by a new, modest brick structure that will encroach less into the rear
setback than the current structure. The current structure has a variable
encroachment of 19 -20 feet into the rear setback. The new structure will
encroach 17.5 feet into the rear setback.
Slide 5 (House Photo)
Slide 6 (Survey -1)
Special Condition: As a Special Condition Due to Nimitz Street encroaching
approximately 15.5 feet into the front of the owners property, a variance of the
rear setback is required to place the front of the new 31' x 32' replacement
dwelling 10 feet from the edge of the paving of Nimitz Street, a standard already
established by recent development adjacent to the subject property.
Hardship: As a hardship without the variance, the lot is unbuildable due to the
small lot size of approximately 3,285 square feet. An additional 777 square feet
of the front of the lot is unusable because it is developed as Nimitz Street,
leaving approximately 2,508 square feet of total lot area that can be developed.
Slide 7 (Previous Varinaces): Several Varinces
RESPONES
The only response we have received is a letter from the apartment complex
across the street. They were not for or against the variance, they just had some
concerns about students parking in their parking lot.
Slide 8 (Survey -2)
Slide 9 (Survey -3)
Mr. Eric Barton who is the Housing Program Coordinator the College Station
Community Development Department is here on behalf of the Optional
Relocation Program as well as to represent Ms. Glover the property owner.
I would be glad to answer any questions you may have.