HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplicationCITY OF COIJFGL STATION
Home of TexasA &M University
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: i3 a
DATE SUBMITTED:
TIME: q ZO
STAFF: ks
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
PLANNED DISTRICTS
(Check one) ❑ ($1,165) Planned Development District (PDD)
❑ ($1,165) Planned Mixed -Used Development (P -MUD)
❑X ($315) Modification to Existing PDD or P -MUD Amendment - Planning & Zoning Commission and
City Council Review
Please use Concept Plan Minor Amendment Application for minor amendments as per Section 3.4.J of the UDO.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$315 - 1,165 Rezoning Application Fee.
X Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
I may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
I" Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
proposed request.
�]X One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned Rezoning Map on 24 "x36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
// e. All public and private rights -of -way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
Y❑X Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
❑X A CAD (dxf /dwg) - model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (Shp) digital file (e- mailed to
PDSDigitalSubmitt i @cstx
I Fourteen (14) copies of the Concept Plan on 24 "x36" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO.
• x One (1) copy of the Concept Plan on 8.5 "x11" paper in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO.
The attached Concept Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
checked off.
NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed
within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference December 21 2011
NAME OF PROJECT Northpoint Crossing
ADDRESS 410 Texas Ave South, College Station
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision)
Lot 1& 2 Northpoint Crossing Subdivision and"""
G ENERAL LOCATION O F PROPERTY IF NOT PLATTED:
Northwest corner of Texas Ave & University Drive
TOTAL ACREAGE .J-- acres ,�(p
l st Z-4 0 1 0-
E lsw* ��e r 0 a 055 .res
10/10 ,r Q � �� / ' 1 �l ` Page 1 of 7
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Mitchell & Morgan, LLP c% Veronica Morgan E -mail v @mitchellandmorgan.com
Street Address 511 University Drive East Suite 204
City College Station
Phone Number 979- 260 -6963
State Texas
Fax Number
Zip Code 77840
979 - 260 -3564
E -mail rick @woodridgecapital.com
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Woodridge College Station/, LLC c/o Rick Arambulo
Street Address 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2850
City Los Angeles
Phone Number 310 - 824 -2200
State California Zip Code 90067
Fax Number 310 - 824 -7931
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.):
Name Amanda Wallis E -mail Awallis @Capstone - dev.com
Street Address 431 Office Park Drive
State Alabama Zip Code 35223
Fax Number 205- 949 -2070
City Birmingham
Phone Number 205- 949 -3849
This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated July 07,2011
of the Brazos County Official Records.
(o - Z42 (253
IoZ4 /2Jr
and recorded in Volume loz43 Page 10
to Z43 to I
Existing Zoning PDD Proposed Zoning PDD
Present Use of Property Under Construction as Multi - Family, Retail
Proposed Use of Property Same
Proposed Use(s) of Property for PDD, if applicable:
'-MUD uses w/o the following: Conference /Convention Center, Country Club, Fraternal Lodge, Fuel Sales, Golf Course
)r Driving Range, Parking as Primary Use, SOB, Shooting Range, Utility
P -MUD uses are prescribed in Section 6.2.C. Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance.
If P -MUD:
Approximate percentage of residential land uses: N/A
Approximate percentage of non - residential land uses: N/A
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
This change is to accommodate a change in the Concept Plan from 4 -plex units at Hensel and Meadowland to a 5
story podium building on that area as well as the necessary modifications to accommodate that building and
10/10 Page 2 of 7
2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the
Plan is incorrect.
The zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan
3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
the character of the neighborhood?
This modification to the existing PDD zoning will fit with the character of the remaining development and
surrounding areas.
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
The Comprehensive Plan recognized this property as suitable to the higher densities and mixed use given its
location in the community.
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The existing zoning district is PDD and R -4 Apartments. The current modification will incorporate two areas of the
site that are currently zoned R -4. Area 1 is the portion of right -of -way for Meadowland Street that was abandoned
by the City of College Station and adjacent to Phase 3. Area 2 is the remainder lot along the east side of
Meadowland that is now incorporated as a part of Lot 2, Block 1.
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
10/10 Page 3 of 7
8. State the purpose and intent of the proposed development.
This PDD modification is to allow a higher density building on the project at Hensel and Meadowland Street. This
building is more in keeping with the style and type of the other buildings located in phase 1 and those in phase 2
along Meadowland.
CONCEPT PLAN SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1.
2. Provide a qeneral statement regarding the proposed drainage.
The drainage design for the project is to maintain the existing runoff patterns and flow volumes to each of the
existing outfall locations. In phase 2 there will be underground detention on Lot 3 under the parking lot area. In
Phase 1 there was no detention requirement because of all the impervious cover that was on the lot originally.
List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought.
See attached letter.
4 If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and /or innovative design concepts to justify the
request.
See attached letter.
Mat is the range of future building n
5 stories - garage 7 stories
10/10 Page 4 of 7
5. Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute and environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony
with the character of the surrounding area.
As stated in our earlier PDD rezoning, the Concept Plan shows redevelopment with a strong mix of uses in a TND
setting. The walkability of the development and the mix of uses will allow for easy interaction with each other
without the use of vehicles.
6. Explain how the proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, a objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan illustrates this site as Urban Mixed Use development. The desire in that category is to
provide "areas that should have the most intense development activities. These areas will tend to consist
exclusively of residential, commercial, and office uses in vertical mixed use structure. " This development will fulfill
those goals and objectives as stated in the Comprehensive Plan.
7. Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not
adversely attect adjacent aeyelopment.
The change with this PDD zoning is altering the building type on the Hensel side of the property. That structure will
be compatible in style and height to the other buildings in Phase2.
I.
g. State how the development has provided adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to: parks, schools,
a11U ULI1C1 UUUIIL, IQI.I IIUCJ.
Public improvements that are necessary to provide service to this project have been designed and constructed.
The project itself has several 'gathering spaces" and amenity areas to support the pedestrians, customers and
tenants of the project.
State how dwelling units shall have access to a public street it tney ao not tront on a pubic street.
All portions of the development that do not have access to a public street will have access to a public way.
10/10 Page 5 of 7
10. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially
iniuriaus to orooerties or improvements in the vicinity.
This Concept Plan and project has already benefitted the overall area by removing existing structures that were
detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. The overall design is such that it complements the adjacent
11. Explain how the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or
pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and
nther uses re asonable anticipated in the area cons ex zoning and land uses in the area.
TIA was written for this PDD and improvements per that report are being implemented to proved safe and
invenient vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian circulation. The modification to the existing PDD does not change the
inclusions of that TIA because the number of units on the project is not increasing from original projections even
th the building type alteration.
Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Planning & Development Services for a formal review after
the "concept plan" has been approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit - except for single -
family development.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
Woodridge College St LLC
a Delaware limiteikfiability9brnpany
Signatur;Ad title Michael Ro feld, Authorized Signatory
Woodridge College Stati hase ,LLC
a Delaware limited lia ty co n
t
10110 By_
Michael Osenfeld, Authorized Signatory
December 17, 2013
Date
Page 6 of 7
CONCEPTUAL PDD /P -MUD SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
❑X A key map (not necessarily to scale).
❑X Title block to include:
❑X Name, address, location, and legal description.
0 Name, address, and telephone number of applicant
❑X Name, address, and telephone number of developer /owner (if differs from applicant)
nX Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
0 Date of submittal
0 Total site area
X❑ North arrow.
100 -year floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if
there is none on the site.
FX� Show the approximate location of the following:
❑X Parking areas
Fx� Building sites and an indication of their use
❑x Artificially lit areas
//0 Open spaces /conservation areas
1 % Greenways
[ Streets and access
Parks
( Schools
(` Trails
Buffer areas (or a statement indicating buffering proposed)
Other special features
RX Approximate accessways, pedestrian and bikeways.
❑X Common and open space areas.
10/1 Print Form Page 7 of 7