Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceMCCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING /SURVEYING, INC. 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845 (979) 693 -3838 • Fax (979) 693 -2554 • Email: McClureBrowne @Verizon.net June 17, 2005 Bridgette George Development Coordinator City of College Station Post Office Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Re.: Westfield Village, Phase 5 (FP) — Final Plat MBESI Job #: 1053 -0004 Dear Bridgette: Below is the summary of the revisions made per the staff's comments. ENGINEERING: 1. This item has been deleted from the plat. 2. Duly noted. PLANNING: w . �4� lo' 1. A note has been added to the plat about this point. 2. Duly noted. Attached you should find Two (2) 24 "x36" and Ten (10) 11"x17" copies of the revised final plat. One (1) Mylar original of the revised final plat and Parkland Dedication fees will be submitted prior to the filing of the final plat. One (1) copy of the digital file has been submitted to Nanette Manhart (nmanhart@cstx.gov). Very truly yours, Michael R. McClure, P.E., R.P.L.S. MRM /gsm Deborah Grace - Re: West Villag Pha 5 From: Robert Bumpurs To: Deborah Grace Date: 1/18/2006 4:24:05 PM Subject: Re: Westfield Village Phase 5 I have 3 items remaining. I met with Mike McClure today, he will do some checking and then we can finish the project. The sidewalk that went through the detention pond is in redesign. The sidewalk could still have to be bonded if not completed by signing time. >>> Deborah Grace 1/18/2006 1:28 pm >>> Thanks so much! >>> Bob Mosley 01/18/06 1:27 PM >>> Phases 4 & 5 came through one development permit. A LOC has not been signed. >>> Deborah Grace 1/18/2006 11:21 am >>> Has there been a letter of acceptance yet? They are wanting the plat filed. Thanks! Page 1 CC: Bob Mosley From: Alan Gibbs To: Laza, Kent Date: 6/27/2005 2:09:26 PM Subject: Edelweiss 8 Kent, Similarly, we had previously communicated the 12 -ft alleys should be fine for Edelweiss knowing that it was in accordance with the pending Street Guidelines slated for 6/23 Council Meeting. However, this was not approved. If the 2 -in HMAC is proposed for the streets, the 12 -ft alley can be approved at a staff level with the construction plans and the Development Permit can be issued ahead of the Final Plat being considered by P &Z. If the 2 -in HMAC is not proposed, the 12 -ft alley will need to be a variance considered by P &Z. Likewise, the Development Permit cannot be issued until the alley width is resolved through P &Z. Alan »> Mark Smith 06/27/05 10:53 AM »> Kent, As I understand it, Carol commented that our current alley standard is 20' wide and the 12' width would require a variance from P &Z. I do not know where the 15' figure came from. Carol's is correct about the variance requirement. Until we get the new design guidelines adopted and move all of the roadway geometry stuff out of the ordinance we must follow the variance procedure to deviate from the ordinance. By the way, did the Westfield 4 &5 plans also reflect the increased asphalt thickness that is part of the new design guidelines? Mark Smith Director of Public Works 979 - 764 -3690 CC: Cotter, Carol; Mosley, Bob; Norton, Josh; Smith, Mark Page l of l Deborah Grace - Westfield Village Phases 4 and 5 From: Carol Cotter To: Deborah Grace Date: 1/19/2006 6:52:04 PM Subject: Westfield Village Phases 4 and 5 CC: daleb @mcclurebrowne.com Parkland dedication is only for Development Fee of $358/lot: Phase 4( @79 lots)= $28,282; Phase 5( @35 Tots) = $12,530. file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \dgrace \Local Settings \Temp \GW }00001.HTM 1/20/2006