HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) — 05- 00500103
PLANNING
lease=-previde -a rateh- fine -efal-the flans:
1 I 3. As discussed, the site plan cannot be approved until the property is rezoned, legally putted,
/ ,.and the ewer line is relocated. 'T r C 4 Please Incu•e in e i e • ock of the site plans the following additional information: - • - - .
" description (proposed), total site area, and date of submittal (you have the date of submittal
--as-A • '
5 Please verify that the number of parking spaces shown in the legend is the same and the
number depicted on the site plan.
6. The Administrative Adjustment cannot be issued at this time because of the lack of a
special condition of the land and hardship (non - financial).
,7. Please state the overall height of each building on the site plan. Please be aware that any
building over 75' in height requires a height permit.
8. Is the complex gated? If so, please show location and swing paths of gates. Please also
provide a note that there will be a minimum clear space of 20' when the security gates are
opened. This is for fire access.
9. Every group of 15 interior parking spaces (all of those not facing the edges of the property)
requires an 180 square foot parking island to be located (and evenly distributed) within the
interior parking spaces. I cannot see how this requirement is being met.
10. Please either remove the sign shown on the site plan or add a note that all signs will be
reviewed through separate permit. The sign location and details have not been reviewed.
11. Please specify material of retaining wall. Depending on material, the wall may need to be
screened.
12. You may not have more than 7 contiguous parking spaces within 15' of the public right -of-
way.
13. Please label driveway radii. The maximum curb return radius allowed for the driveways is
30'.
14. Please label easements as proposed or existing. If the easement is existing, please provide
the volume and page number.
""15. All Fire Department Connections (FDCs) must be withi 150' of a fire hydrant. Not all of the
FDCs shown meet this requirement. Foc `S m' to (GL s 12 11 ar n,e - reQ .
6. FDCs must be located such that parked cars will not obstruct the path from the hydrant to
the FDC. Many of the FDCs shown do not meet this requirement. A parking island, etc. in
front of the FDC location may be one possible solution.
117. All structures over 30' in height require an aerial access roadway along one of the faces of
the structure. This aerial access roadway must be a minimum off26' wide and must be
located at least 15' from the structure, and not more than 30' from the structure. Please
contact Eric Hurt, Fire Marshall for more information on this requirement.
' 18. Sanitation has not yet commented on this submittal.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: June 20, 2005
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 3
LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER
1. Landscape Plan and Site Plan do not match in site layout.
2. Please be sure that the number of plants shown on the plan matches what is proposed in
the legends.
3. The streetscape point requirement for Wellborn Road is 9,696, and not 9,969 as indicated
on the plan. (I believe that you used the correct number in your calculations.)
4. Please note under 'size and condition' of the non - canopy trees that the minimum caliper
must be met by a SINGLE cane.
5. The 'Big Muhly' is not an approved shrub. - Z ftLW S KA,u0,9 LS S U
6. Dwarf species may not be used for screening. 50% of all screening shrubs must be
evergreen.
7. Please provide the actual caliper of the proposed canopy trees in the legend for each type.
(list F1, F2, F3 trees in the legend).
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: June 20, 2005
ENGINEERING
• Under review.
ELECTRICAL
1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
2. Developer provides 30' of IMC conduit for riser poles. Developer pours transformer pads,
and junction box pads per city specs and design.
3. Developer installs junction boxes as per city specs and design. (junction boxes provided
by the city).
4. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 version or later of plat and /or site plan email to
sweido @cstx.gov.
5. Developer provides load data for project.
6. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes.
7. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines
8. We are presently working with the owners and architects on the electrical infrastructure
design.
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments, please contact Sam Weido at
979.764.6314.
Reviewed by: Sam Weido Date: 6 -15 -05
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced
Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double -Check Back Flow Device, and installed
as per City Ordinance 2394.
2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance
2394.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Page 3 of 3
6/20/2005 7:22 PM WAX -> 9796900329 Page 1 of 3
OV).-I10 3Grr,"44
-�' -911,
CITY OF COLLEGE S'TA 110N
Planning Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
June 20, 2005
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via fax 979.690.0329
FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the fol wing information for further staff review:
One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development
with the revised site and landscaping plans attached
(/ / One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan
,P arkland Dedication fees prior to issuance of a building permit.
$ 600 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Page Callaway, via fax 210.820.3361
Xavier Garcia, via fax 512.732.2453
Case file #05- 00500103
Home of Texas A &M University
6/20/2005 7:22 PM GVFAX -> 9796900329 Page 2 of 3
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - 05- 00500103
PLANNING
Landscape Plan and Site Plan do not match in site layout.
G3!'As discussed, the site plan cannot be approved until the property is rezoned, legally platted,
and the sewer line is relocated.
Please include in the title block of the site plans the following additional information: legal
description (proposed), total site area, and date of submittal (you have the date of submittal
as April).
(!'Please verify that the number of parking spaces shown in the legend is the same and the
number depicted on the site plan.
-' '. • - : : •_ • - ' cial).
. Please state the overall height of each building on the site plan. Please be aware that any
building over 75' in height requires a height permit.
dki Is the complex gated? If so, please show location and swing paths of gates. Please also
provide a note that there will be a minimum clear space of 20' when the security gates are
opened. This is for fire access.
Every group of 15 interior parking spaces (all of those not facing the edges of the property)
requires an 180 square foot parking island to be located (and evenly distributed) within the
interior parking spaces. I cannot see how this requirement is being met.
0.81:lease either remove the sign shown on the site plan or add a note that all signs will be
reviewed through separate permit. The sign location and details have not been reviewed.
1 specify material of retaining wall. Depending on material, the wall may need to be
024 creened.
ou may not have more than 7 contiguous parking spaces within 15' of the public right -of-
way.
p1 label driveway radii. The maximum curb return radius allowed for the driveways is
044 0'.
'lease label easements as proposed or existing. If the easement is existing, please provide
61,51 volume and page number.
II Fire Department Connections (FDCs) must be within 150' of a fire hydrant. Not all of the
FDCs shown meet this requirement.
DCs must be located such that parked cars will not obstruct the path from the hydrant to
the FDC. Many of the FDCs shown do not meet this requirement. A parking island, etc. in
front of the FDC location may be one possible solution.
17. All structures over 30' in height require an aerial access roadway along one of the faces of
the structure. This aerial access roadway must be a minimum of 26' wide and must be
located at least 15' from the structure, and not more than 30' from the structure. Please
contact Eric Hurt, Fire Marshall for more information on this requirement.
v.8" Sanitation has not yet commented on this submittal. A ' . 1 � . s
t,) f' - {}v1.1-1
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: June 20, 2005
NOTE: My changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and - bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 3
6/20/2005 7:22 PM GWWFAX -) 9796900329 Page 3 of 3
LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER
1. Landscape Plan and Site Plan do not match in site layout.
2. Please be sure that the number of plants shown on the plan matches what is proposed in
the legends.
3. The streetscape point requirement for Wellborn Road is 9,696, and not 9,969 as indicated on
the plan. (I believe that you used the correct number in your calculations.)
4. Please note under 'size and condition' of the non - canopy trees that the minimum caliper
must be met by a SINGLE cane.
5. The 'Big Muhly' is not an approved shrub.
6. Dwarf species may not be used for screening. 50% of all screening shrubs must be
evergreen.
7. Please provide the actual caliper of the proposed canopy trees in the legend for each type.
(list F1, F2, F3 trees in the legend).
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: June 20, 2005
ENGINEERING
• Under review.
ELECTRICAL
1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
2. Developer provides 30' of IMC conduit for riser poles. Developer pours transformer pads,
and junction box pads per city specs and design.
3. Developer installs junction boxes as per city specs and design. (junction boxes provided
by the city).
4. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 version or later of plat and /or site plan email to
sweido c% cstx.gov.
5. Developer provides load data for project.
6. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes.
7. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines
8. We are presently working with the owners and architects on the electrical infrastructure
design.
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments, please contact Sam Weido at
979.764.6314.
Reviewed by: Sam Weido Date: 6 -15-05
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced
Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double -Check Back Flow Device, and installed
as per City Ordinance 2394.
2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance
2394.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and "bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
will constitute a completely new review.
Page 3 of 3
Glrff illS411114
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning et- Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
July 7, 2005
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via fax 979.690.0329
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal, another $200 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for
further staff review:
One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development
with the revised site and landscaping plans attached
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Page Callaway, via fax 210.820.3361
Xavier Garcia, via fax 512.732.2453
Case file #05- 00500103
Home of Texas A &M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - 05- 00500103
PLANNING
1. Thank you for adding the security gate locations. Please add a note to the plan that there
will be a knox key access for each gate for emergency access.
2. The minimum interior island size is 180 s.f.
3. Thank you for providing the square footages of interior and end islands. Are the numbers
given including or excluding the required end islands (180 s.f. and end of each row or 360
s.f. at a corner)?
4. Please call out driveway radii. I do not see the detail of the entrances on sheet C3.1 as
stated in your note on the site plan.
5. The FDCs for buildings 12 and 13 are still not within 150 feet of a fire hydrant.
6. Not all of the buildings are meeting the aerial apparatus roadway requirements. I
understand that you are working with the fire department on this issue and that plans will be
modified.
7. Please give both inside dimensions for the compactor enclosures.
8. The streetscape point requirement for Wellborn Road is 9,696, and not 9,969 as indicated
on the plan. (I believe that you used the correct number in your calculations.) REPEAT
COMMENT. Please correct.
9. Please provide the actual caliper of the proposed canopy trees in the legend for each type.
(list F1, F2, F3 trees in the legend). REAPEAT COMMENT. To clarify, the legend on sheet
LS -1 shows ALL canopy trees at 3" caliper, the legend on sheets LS -2 and LS -3 show
different sizes, and the legend where you have calculated your landscape points also shows
trees over 3" caliper. Please make all of the information match.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: June 30, 2005
Engineering
1. Site plan does not match utility profiles, please update.
2. Meter sizing will be reviewed with submittal of building plans.
a. Building department requires these meters to be sized using the Building Codes:
Unit Fixture Count Method (Change note on C1.4A)
b. Submit irrigation demands with building plans, show location of meters in an
easement and sizing.
3. (C1.4B & C1.4A) The private fire and domestic lines that feed each building after leaving
the vault need to be depicted as three separate lines not just one line.
4. (C1.4A) "Private Sanitary Sewer Legend ", Sewer Service No. 21 and No. 22 require a
minimum slope of (1/8) for a 6in line.
5. (C1.4B & C1.4A) FDC connections appear to feed into buildings on one line, how would
water be prevented from running into both buildings.
6. (C1.4A) "Private Sanitary Sewer Legend" Why does Sewer Service Numbers 6, 20, 21,
22, 23 go from a 6in line to an 8in line to a 6in line to a 6in line to a 8in line,
respectively?
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 3
7. (C2.5) "Water Line W3 - Profile View" the conflicting sanitary sewer line at Sta. 3 +86.8
is labeled as a 8in line, however on (C1.4A) "Private Sanitary Sewer Legend" it is
labeled as a 6in line (Sewer Service No. 22).
8. Drainage Report:
a. Provide more detail, profile, contours, etc. on the southeast corner of the project
where the drainage water leaves the property.
b. (C1.2B) Please verify elevation of the existing sanitary sewer manhole at the
southeast corner of the project, in relationship to the proposed grade elevation.
This manhole will need to be elevated above the drainage way.
9. Fire Flow Report:
a. The fire department is still reviewing the reduction factor used to design the fire
hydrant layout. Comments will follow.
b. (Table #6) Why is analysis being done by node and not pipe segments? Velocity
of 17.89 on H1 exceeds design maximum required.
10. Sanitary Sewer Report:
a. (C2.5) The proposed slopes of the sanitary sewer line in profile do not match the
proposed slopes in the sanitary sewer report Table #8 and in WinStorm.
b. (Table #8) MH2 to MH3 & MH3 to MH5 velocities appear to below design
minimums. (C2.5) "Sanitary Sewer Line S1 - Profile View" by decreasing the
size of the pipe to a 6in line and using a 1.2% slope a greater velocity can be
achieved. You may have to decreasing the clearance on the sewer /water
conflict to the minimum allowed 6in on MH3 to MH5.
11. Once the plans have been approved we will need a separate set of plans for the sanitary
sewer line location, as to be able to issue DP for sanitary sewer line only.
Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: July 5, 2005
Public Utilities
1. C2.1 Is waterline designed at least 5.5 -ft from edge of easement.
2. C2.2 Why is last leg of W1 8 -in. from 12 +00 to 14 +00? Why not use a 6 -in line. Could
use 8x6x8 connection.
3. C2.3 W2 off 6 -in line before 0 +00 should be 6 -in line. Could use 2 - 8x6x8
connections.
4. C2.4 W2 should be 6 -in line tying into existing 6 -in line. 6 -in from 11 +20 to 12 +50.
5. C2.4 W3 Sta 1 +91 Back flow shall be 6 -in. Include backflow device with irrigation
meter. Detail how W4 serves all vaults. (Take a tee off main to each vault.)
6. C2.3 Please depict profile view of water line running from main to vaults. Also provide
detail of valve placement prior to entering vaults.
7. C2.3 Depict all three vaults (Backflow, Domestic, Domestic). Why not have three
separate lines feed the three separate vaults?
8. C2.4 "Water Line W3 - Profile View ", Why not have three separate lines feed the three
separate vaults?
9. Please depict tee, valve, hydrant, bend, etc on actual water line in profile view.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: July 5, 2005
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 3
Grie
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning & Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
July 7, 2005
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via fax 979.690.0329
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above- mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal, another $200 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further
staff review:
V One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development
with the revised site and landscaping plans attached
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Page Callaway, via fax 210.820.3361
Xavier Garcia, via fax 512.732.2453
Case file #05- 00500103
3 oC NI PN L. P`t
1 � ► s � . � s C os i F�sz� -- cr.—
ML{ \c- ecF l t■V1L RA-7
1 ��1w C
Home of Texas A &M University
8. Drainage Report:
a. Provide more detail, profile, contours, etc. on the southeast corner of the project
where the drainage water leaves the property.
(C1.2B) Please verify elevation of the existing sanitary sewer manhole at the
southeast corner of the project, in relationship to the proposed grade elevation.
This manhole will need to be elevated above the drainage way.
9. Fire Flow Report:
oa!' The fire department is still reviewing the reduction factor used to design the fire
hydrant layout. Comments will follow.
b. (Table #6) Why is analysis being done by node and not pipe segments? Velocity
of 17.89 on H1 exceeds design maximum required.
10. Sanitary Sewer Report:
a. (C2.5) The proposed slopes of the sanitary sewer line in profile do not match the
proposed slopes in the sanitary sewer report Table #8 and in WinStorm.
(Table #8) MH2 to MH3 & MH3 to MH5 velocities appear to below design
minimums. (C2.5) "Sanitary Sewer Line S1 — Profile View" by decreasing the
size of the pipe to a 6in line and using a 1.2% slope a greater velocity can be
achieved. You may have to decreasing the clearance on the sewer /water conflict
to the minimum allowed 6in on MH3 to MH5.
4 1,1!'Once the plans have been approved we will need a separate set of plans for the sanitary
sewer line location, as to be able to issue DP for sanitary sewer line only.
Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: July 5, 2005
Public Utilities
CA1P2.1 Is waterline designed at least 5.5 -ft from edge of easement.
C2.2 Why is last leg of W1 8-in. from 12 +00 to 14 +00? Why not use a 6-in line. Could
use 8x6x8 connection.
�C2.3 W2 off 6 -in line before 0+00 should be 6 -in line. Could use 2 - 8x6x8 connections.
4'C2.4 W2 should be 6-in line tying into existing 6-in line. 6 -in from 11 +20 to 12 +50.
,5!' C2.4 W3 Sta 1 +91 Back flow shall be 6-in. Include backflow device with irrigation
meter. Detail how W4 serves all vaults. (Take a tee off main to each vault.)
or C2.3 Please depict profile view of water line running from main to vaults. Also provide
detail of valve placement prior to entering vaults.
t y' C2.3 Depict all three vaults (Backflow, Domestic, Domestic). Why not have three
separate lines feed the three separate vaults?
a C2.4 "Water Line W3 — Profile View ", Why not have three separate lines feed the three
separate vaults?
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: July 5, 2005
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and 'bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
wir constitute a completely new review. 3 of 3
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - 05- 00500103
PLANNING
Thank you for adding the security gate locations. Please add a n to the plan that there
N will be a knox key access for each gate fore emergency access. I D 4 1 (p (7Y1 p
The minimum interior island size is 180 s.f.
f ota e of� 0-i) r and - e d
Thank you for providing the square o g islands. Are the numbers
given including or ex lu ing the required end islands (180 s.f. and end of each row or 360
s.f. at a comer)? Note ' �� (TVA P La.V)
,Please call out driveway radii. I do pot see the detail ,of the entrances on sheet C3.1 as
ated in your note on the site plan.Sn O1WY1 (m p Lcu'l
411 The FDCs for buildings 12 and 13 are still not within 150 feet of a fire hydrant.
1tr- Not all of the buildings are meeting the aerial apparatus roadway requirements. I understand
Y i)tc j , at you are working with the fire department on this issue and that plans will -0 modified ' ��-; i v
teM
Please give both inside dimensions for the compactor enclosures. (G - .)1 (0x 1-
• r•. The streetscape point requirement for Wellborn Road is 9,696, and not 9,969 as indicated on
the plan. (I believe that you used thp correct number in your calculations.) REPEAT
/ COMMENT. Please correct. VY.eC "-
Please provide the actual caliper of the proposed canopy trees in the legend for each type.
(list F1, F2, F3 trees in the legend). REAPEAT COMMENT. To clarify, the legend on sheet
LS -1 shows ALL canopy trees at 3" caliper, the legend on sheets LS -2 and LS -3 show
different sizes, and the legend where you have calculated your landscape points also shows
trees over 3" caliper. Please make all of the information match.( ' ,, ?
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: June 30, 2005
01- 6t • fb S
oinAt
Engineering
tA< Site plan does not match utility profiles, please update.
Meter sizing will be reviewed with submittal of building plans.
G� Building department requires these meters to be sized using the Building Codes:
Unit Fixture Count Method (Change note on C1.4A)
Submit irrigation demands with building plans, show location of meters in an
easement and sizing.
(C1.4B & C1.4A) The private fire and domestic lines that feed each building after leaving
the vault need to be depicted as three separate lines not just one line.
4" (C1.4A) "Private Sanitary Sewer Legend ", Sewer Service No. 21 and No. 22 require a
minimum slope of (1/8) for a 6in line.
(C1.4B & C1.4A) FDC connections appear to feed into buildings on one line, how would
water be prevented from running into both buildings.
G6 (C1.4A) "Private Sanitary Sewer Legend" Why does Sewer Service Numbers 6, 20, 21,
22, 23 go from a 6in line to an 8in line to a 6in line to a bin line to a Bin line, respectively?
G7! (C2.5) "Water Line W3 — Profile View" the conflicting sanitary sewer line at Sta. 3 +86.8 is
labeled as a 8in line, however on (C1.4A) "Private Sanitary Sewer Legend" it is labeled
as a bin line (Sewer Service No. 22).
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and "bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 3
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3
Project: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - 05- 00500103
PLANNING
1. It is my understanding that the Fire Marshal has granted a variance allowing the aerial
apparatus roadway to be located at a distance of 35 feet from the structures. As discussed
several of the buildings must be rotated toward the access roadway in order to meet this
standard.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: July 13, 2005
ENGINEERING
1. Provide more detail, profile, contours, etc. on the southeast corner of the project where the
drainage water leaves the property. (We Discussed)
2. (C1.2B) Please verify elevation of the existing sanitary sewer manhole at the southeast
corner of the project, in relationship to the proposed grade elevation. This manhole will
need to be elevated above the drainage way. (We Discussed)
3. Do not extend the 6in water main located on the Northeast portion of the property, cap this
line before it enters the property. (We Discussed)
4. Do extend the 6in water main located on the Southeast portion of the property, to be
connected to the internal water system. (We Discussed)
Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: July 13, 2005
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning & Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
July 14, 2005
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via fax 979.690.0329
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information for further staff review:
$200 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews; and,
One (1) set of construction documents with the revised site plan attached. As
discussed, this submittal can be on smaller sheets.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Page Callaway, via fax 210.820.3361
Xavier Garcia, via fax 512.732.2453
Case file #05- 00500103
Home of Texas AB&M University
0
(ixtr-ff'
6:bo.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning 6. Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
July 14, 2005
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via fax 979.690.0329
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager
SUBJECT: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above- mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information for further staff review:
$200 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews; and,
V One (1) set of construction documents with the revised site plan attached. As
discussed, this submittal can be on smaller sheets.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 764 -3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Page Callaway, via fax 210.820.3361
Xavier Garcia, via fax 512.732.2453
Case file #05- 00500103
Home of Texas A &M University
4 1 :ff illiiiiiiii
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning eT' Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
June 20, 2005 i
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via fax 979.690.0329
FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments
and submit the following information for further staff review:
One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development
with the revised site and landscaping plans attached
One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan
Parkland Dedication fees prior to issuance of a building permit.
$600 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
\/
i f
cc: Page Callaway, via fax 210.820.3361
Xavier Garcia, via fax 512.732.2453
Case file #05- 00500103
Home of Texas A &M University
CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) (05- 00500103)
Engineering Review
Comments No. 1
1. Provide plan and profile detail for all public infrastructure.
2. Provide detail for all conflicts between water and sanitary sewer mains (public or
private).
3. Several of the infrastructure connections are located under pavement, please
eliminate these where possible.
4. Label water valves as they are required every 800' as well as at connections.
5. The public water meter must be located in a vault, however can not be located in the
private vault.
6. The water line from the main to the "Backflow Preventor & Double Check System"
must meet CoCS design guidelines.
7. The meter sizing, fire line sizing, domestic line sizing and fire hydrant location
portion of this submittal can not be reviewed until the water demands are determined
using the Building Codes — Unit Fixture Count Method.
8. Please provide irrigation demands, location of irrigation meters and size.
9. Please depict how the internal water line which runs between Bldg 6 thru 19 ends.
10. Verify width of the proposed 15' PUE for the water line running along the southern
portion of the site plan.
11. The proposed 6 inch water main which supports the fire hydrants for this
development, "may be allowed up to a maximum of 1500 feet in length and must
connect at each end to an 8 inch or larger main and shall have no more than 2 fire
hydrants or flushing points." (from the Bryan /College Station Uniform Design
Guidelines, Domestic Water, Maximum Lengths for Water Mains)
12. All private water and sewer lines need to be sized per the Building Code.
13. Have you considered running your domestic services and fire department
connections from the surrounding main lines? The current design will require an
exterior and an interior "Backflow Preventor & Double Check System ", as well as
yearly maintenance on these devices.
14. Sanitary sewer main lines require a manhole every 500 ft, sanitary sewer service
lines require a cleanout every 150 ft and labeled slope.
15. Submit fire flow report.
16. Drainage Report:
a. You may consider changing the pre C = 0.22 to 0.35, this should provide
you with enough flows as to adequately detain all storms.
b. Provide contours, specifically at discharge points.
c. Erosion control may be necessary at discharge points.
d. Provide tabular results of routing information.
e. Why does the post undeveloped hydrograph have a trapezoidal shape
instead of a triangular shape?
f. Clarify ponding volumes.
17. Let me know if you have any further questions. It may be helpful to schedule a
meeting to discuss any issues.
Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: June 23, 2005
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 2
6/23/2005 1:48 PM GWFAX -) 9796900329 Page 1 of 2
4.-""1"" toyai_o
Q,s
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Oi t3
Planning er Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
June 23, 2005
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via fax 979.690.0329
FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP)
Staff reviewed the above- mentioned engineering documents as requested. The following
page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please
address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review and
approval of th plans:
Two (2) sets of revised construction documents.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Josh Norton or
myself at 764.3570.
Attachments: Engineering Staff Review Comments
cc: Page Callaway, via fax 210.820.3361
Xavier Garcia, via fax 512.732.2453
Case file #05- 00500103
Home of Texas A &M University
6/23/2005 1:48 PM GWFAX -> 9796900329 Page 2 of 2
CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) (05 -00500103)
Engineering Review
Comments No. 1
1. Provide plan and profile detail for all public infrastructure.
2. Provide detail for all conflicts between water and sanitary sewer mains (public or
private).
3. Several of the infrastructure connections are located under pavement, please
eliminate these where possible.
4. Label water valves as they are required every 800' as well as at connections.
5. The public water meter must be located in a vault, however can not be located in the
private vault.
6. The water line from the main to the "Backflow Preventor & Double Check System"
must meet CoCS design guidelines.
7. The meter sizing, fire line sizing, domestic line sizing and fire hydrant location portion
of this submittal can not be reviewed until the water demands are determined using
the Building Codes — Unit Fixture Count Method.
8. Please provide irrigation demands, location of irrigation meters and size.
75.iPlease depict how the internal water line which runs between Bldg 6 thru 19 ends.
10. Verify width of the proposed 15' PUE for the water line running along the southern
rtion of the site plan.
e proposed 6 inch water main which supports the fire hydrants for this
development, "may be allowed up to a maximum of 1500 feet in length and must
connect at each end to an 8 inch or larger main and shall have no more than 2 fire
hydrants or flushing points." (from the Bryan /College Station Uniform Design
Guidelines, Domestic Water, Maximum Lengths for Water Mains)
II private water and sewer lines need to be sized per the Building Code.
13. Have you considered running your domestic services and fire department
connections from the surrounding main lines? The current design will require an
exterior and an interior "Backflow Preventor & Double Check System ", as well as
04 9arly maintenance on these devices.
Sanitary sewer main lines require a manhole every 500 ft, sanitary sewer service
lines require a cleanout every 150 ft and labeled slope.
15. Submit fire flow report.
6- Drainage Report:
0,--You may consider changing the pre C = 0.22 to 0.35, this should provide
you with enough flows as to adequately detain all storms.
CJ - rovide contours, specifically at discharge points.
Gr'Erosion control may be necessary at discharge points.
Provide tabular results of routing information.
`)!Why does the post undeveloped hydrograph have a trapezoidal shape
Instead of a triangular shape?
Gf! Clarify ponding volumes.
Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: June 23, 2005
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in
your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been
pointed out to the City of College Station wi8 constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 2
CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP) (05- 00500103)
Engineering Review
Comments No. 1
Provide plan and profile detail for all public infrastructure.
Provide detail for all conflicts between water and sanitary sewer mains (public or
private).
L8'" Several of the infrastructure connections are located under pavement, please
urinate these where possible.
abel water valves as they are required every 800' as well as at connections.
he public water meter must be located in a vault, however can not be located in the
private vault.
0 The water line from the main to the "Backflow Preventor & Double Check System"
must meet CoCS design guidelines.
The meter sizing, fire line sizing, domestic line sizing and fire hydrant location
portion of this submittal can not be reviewed until the water demands are determined
using the Building Codes — Unit Fixture Count Method.
t, P ase provide irrigation demands, location of irrigation meters and size.
Please depict how the internal water line which runs between Bldg 6 thru 19 ends.
jQ Verify width of the proposed 15' PUE for the water line running along the southern
rtion of the site plan.
. ' he proposed 6 inch water main which supports the fire hydrants for this
development, "may be allowed up to a maximum of 1500 feet in length and must
connect at each end to an 8 inch or larger main and shall have no more than 2 fire
hydrants or flushing points." (from the Bryan /College Station Uniform Design
uidelines, Domestic Water, Maximum Lengths for Water Mains)
4,. All private water and sewer lines need to be sized per the Building Code.
3 Have you considered running your domestic services and fire department
connections from the surrounding main lines? The current design will require an
exterior and an interior " Backflow Preventor & Double Check System ", as well as
yearly maintenance on these devices.
t Sanitary sewer main lines require a manhole every 500 ft, sanitary sewer service
lines require a cleanout every 150 ft and labeled slope.
L bmit fire flow report.
116- Drainage Report:
a. You may consider changing the pre C = 0.22 to 0.35, this should provide
you with enough flows as to adequately detain all storms.
b. Provide contours, specifically at discharge points.
c. Erosion control may be necessary at discharge points.
• >.d. Provide tabular results of routing information.
e. Why does the post undeveloped hydrograph have a trapezoidal shape
inste d of a trian ular shape?
f. Clarify ponding volume .
t me • • • • - - - y u er questions. It may be helpful to schedule a
meeting to discuss any issues.
Reviewed by: Josh Norton Date: June 23, 2005
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City of College Station will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 2
( 444
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning 6 Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
June 23, 2005
TO: Rabon Metcalf, via fax 979.690.0329
FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CALLAWAY VILLA APARTMENTS (SP)
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned engineering documents as requested. The
following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be
addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for
further staff review and approval of the plans:
Two (2) sets of revised construction documents.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Josh Norton or
myself at 764.3570.
Attachments: Engineering Staff Review Comments
cc: Page Callaway, via fax 210.820.3361'
Xavier Garcia, via fax 512.732.2453
Case file #05- 00500103
Home of Texas ABM University