Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments (lir ll ff ill111411111111111 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM November 14, 2005 TO: Michael Kravetz, via fax: 713- 869 -5571 = 1 ie. ; 1 FROM: LINDSAY BOYER, Staff Planner SUBJECT: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Six (6) complete sets of civil construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached Two (2) revised site plans One (1) 11x17 revised grading and erosion control plan Easement Dedication Sheet required documents If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: David Cottrell, via fax: 713 - 334 -4535 Case file # 05- 00500106 Home of Texas A &M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 4 Project: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - 05- 00500106 PLANNING 1. As indicated on the site plan checklist, 6" raised curbing is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas. Please be aware that in order to receive a Certificate of Occupancy for this site before the Auto Zone site is complete, temporary curbing must be installed for health and safety purposes around the entire edge of the ground lease site. 2. The ground lease area lines include a portion of the new driveway to be constructed off the access road. This portion of the driveway must be constructed with the main shopping center improvements. This line should be redrawn to exclude this portion. Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer Date: November 11, 2005 ENGINEERING 1. No comments Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: November 11, 2005 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2 Li. 0 0 w w u) Q-I c c o 0 0 I- Q 0) 0) r 0) M 00 Z Q' 00 1. 0 t- co h W W co `_ a M CL w u_ Q. O(/) co Q 0 N 11, O L LL ) U. 0 • J ti e- M M N 0 J �- Q Q W Q 0< 0� F - 2 F- w z 0 Q W Z 0)) O O O O Lc) L N n -J 0 0 W H ,- r' H z O z '-- 0 > Z L co o o c L w W O v 0) co W F- l•-• N 0 W 0 ri 0 Q d F- \.\' o 0 W Q m ' 3 Q A _ ref 7 N z 0 M v o M (.0 ti Q Z M O r N Lo h 0) Lo W Q CO r C., N- C`') co CO 1 - O O W Li.. Q m 0 N w CL w CO d m 0 0 D 0 F - 0 2 W u. 'n 8 H u) u" co Z 0 ww 0 a 0 0 ° w 00 p* (Z 0 Z 0 u'0-I O w p w W Z 0 W W J ~ CO Ill 0 0 0 u) D LL_ • L Q F- Z 0 0 � 0 J Z F- W F + B O J W co M V ) u) Z W O u) d 1- WM u) o Q Q Z W Lmo W2z o Q J 0 a 2 Q 0 318p469 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS Know ell men by these presents, thet -RR- 'PR()-RR— - OR'PORAT "!ON .' of the County -of - R -7:('\ - - -, State of'T'RX -.C: , for anl- in conB i deratl on r.of the BUm of one (i 1.00) dollar to me cash in hand paid by the C 1 ty of College Station, Taxes, a municipal corporation in Brazoa County, Texas, duly incorporated under the general laws of the State of Taxes, the racetpt of which is hereby acknowledged, have granted, sold and conveyed, and by theBe prBBenta do grant, Bell and convey" unto the BB 1 d City of College Station, TexBB, certB l n rights and -.- ntereet8 in the form of an EASEMENT on and through the follewinc described propertv..- Lying and being situated in the Crawford Burnett League of Brazos County, Texas, and being a part of the 50.9 Acre Tract conveyed to Area Progress Corporation by Charles Cernino et al by deed recorded in Vol. 246, Page 386 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. The easement herein granted being a strip of land fifteen' feet in width and approximately one thousand and twenty feet in length, and centered upon the line of an existing sewer main- said centerline being described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which bears S 45° W, a distance of approximately twenty five feet from a Northerly corner of said 50.9 Acre T -act and being in the common boundary line of said 50.9 Acre Tract and the City of College Station Cem,etery Tract at the place where said sewer line crosses the property line and said point being approximately three' hundred and eighty feet Southwest of the Southwest R.O.W. line of State Highway 6: THENCE S 15° E a distance of approximately seven hundred and twenty feet along the line of a 12" sewer main to the center of a manhole; THENCE s 38° E a distance of three hundred and eighty feet to end at a manhole on said sewer line. FILED m ) A rtiecilfatil DATE RECORDED - + -ro- AUG 9 -'973 FRANK BOB 817 nO COU -I - -zc O B- ,- ,--- AA.d- Oebuty To heve end to hold the righte end interest herein -efore doecribed unto the a, ea 'r and I do hereby bind myself, my heirs. executors and adminiatratcre, to warn -nt and fc ity of Ccllega Station, Texas, end its successor6 and assigns, against every person wh MIMS my hood o l d f ) Attest: J F. - . - &1J- I [ � ' , AP V. Subacrlbed and aworn to before ma thls the A. 0., 19-. ---- -- day of -- ;1 : -.IL . Notary Public, —20-- rn -nty, Tax. file: / /G: \City Data Files \GIS\ Easements \HTM \V0318P469 \V0318P469.htm 9/28/2005 318p469 Page 2 of 2 COLUMN HARWE . 4 vo pAGE file•/ /C:• \City Tlata Filec \(TR \Facementc \T-TTM \VM 1 RP46A \VM 1 RP4t Q htm 9/7R/7(1(15 (fri-or CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning ea Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM September 13, 2005 TO: Mike Kravetz, Heights Venture Architects fax: 713 - 869 -5573 Email: MICHAEL.KRAVETZ @HVA.CC FROM: Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner SUBJECT: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - Site Plan Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: $200 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews; and, Six (6) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (please include any additional plans that you would like stamped and returned to you) Two (2) revised site plans One (1) landscaping plan One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570. Attachments: Staff review comments / cc: David Cottrell Investments, Inc via fax: 713 - 334 -4535 ✓ Case file #05- 00500106 Home of Texas A &M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3 Project: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - 05- 00500106 PLANNING 1. TxDOT permit for driveway construction is under review. 2. Please provide a table of all the building materials used on the elevation, with their total square footage and the percentages of each. 3. Please provide zoning of abutting parcel on sheet A1.0 4. Please add a note to sheet A1.0 that this site is considered one building plat for the purpose of signage and landscaping. 5. Please provide sanitary sewer /water demands. 6. Fire lane around ground lease site should be paved using a 6" sub -base and 2" asphalt. 7. All end islands should be 180 s.f. for single parking rows, 360 s.f. for double parking rows. There are several areas that still don't meet this requirement, the full 10% of the administrative adjustment should be used to correct this. Currently, you are providing 20 extra spaces than required with an administrative adjustment. 8. Please show Fire Department Connections (FDCs). I was unable to find them, please just give me a call if I missed them somehow. 9. Double dumpster enclosure should be 12 feet deep with no bollards, just clear space. 10. Please dileniate cross access agreement that is noted on the as -built survey (sheet E -5), note 14. Where is this? 11. Where you able to verify that the PUE on Lot 3, extending into this property was abandoned? Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer Date: September 9, 2005 LANDSCAPPING 1. My current count of the landscaping on the property shows the following: 22 Bald Cypress @ 300 pts = 6,600 46 Cedar Elm @ 300 pts = 13,800 28 Drake Elm @ 300 pts = 8,400 9 Live Oak @ 300 pts = 2,700 185 Crape Myrtle @ 40 pts = 7,400 100 Elaeagnus @ 10 pts = 1,000 306 Indian Hawthorn @ 10 pts = 3,060 84 Ligustrum @ 10 pts = 8,40 223 Oleander @ 10 pts = 2,230 Total = 46,030 The legend may be corrected to reflect these numbers, or, a new plan may be submitted with the appropriate trees according to the current legend. Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer Date: September 9, 2005 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 3 ENGINEERING 1. Please designate the proposed ss easements shown on the plan as private. 2. If future development of the property requires water service from the existing water lien in TxDOT ROW, TxDOT Utility permits will be required at time of Site Plan for those sites. 3. With only one of five driveways being designated a construction exit, how will you insure that it is the only one used during construction? 4. Please add note stating that construction will be in accordance with City of College Station Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: September 12, 2005 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 3 11111411 V) 5' m ^ m v 61 ;ilHi i N . _ 53 (° a p W W S .. `< f(,D 5 ' n N w -210 (° a w O �. 7 N � �oZZZZ n 3 N Cn N j N O 0 C U N ... w ffl N y W y N y. O O w w w w w Jc N .. p o a -1-1� o o - p E W N'7 c Fdm3333 o Z (n - 3� R. = oo 000 w °x° W moo 3 = Np NDND � n_ a o d N w w d W 3 ° N» ° w d° ° r p 1 e,2 3-ow mm mo�m 0 m » mmm� -cm dQaaaa a = Ww 0D_ i . -7-----&-• _ M M _ Z, w N o . 0 0 = 3 CD (D 3 N (D N (D W N m Z Pt °- v°'i AAA -'o --- ooC- c xx.6 a m6 ( o �D c ° =wwww y Or o- AAA-,-;02,T. _>• = N == 0 .. W ° a3 x W� c c c 3 ni w �� Q • ' CO (° w o y m o �. aaa ' � 3 3 c _, f 3.,.;;.'1.2,2,E) w w w W 0 3 o W w O m o m,2 3 a m m m o o c m C< mmm =a -m a E50-9Z n - < mmm N ZOO H ?o =O 5-- o 0 0 o W W ao O o a -oav m" 070 = o N �Nm 000 = Ny � "m o A. ww�• S W 000� m �G o m 2 m m (o> •• 0 0 n „0 0 O; � ?. o 0 5 m (?. m m m a r Z� gnF� F 000 o N • c l% m o_y° (° W = = = c o a w - w o 0 3 d N w (p c c c w ^ d � 3 ° w ° ° w W w� w° 333 m n0 �� >> ° 0mc ( w 3 5a-0 a (o mmm� D rn O� (12 7 0 S� (n Era O C ?. a .Ni O 0= RE-g o 0 /� o N W m =. 0c, ° C N N % C g =. Q N O�. O-.. 0 a . O cm o n o c W o - W c o N m 5. m w a w ..E _ °' oaf. O - o N 3NCa o 3 <� 2 °°a -.45(0 0 3 c oSm =o ?W-= 1C a mw O 0) W � 0. Hii DI = N w m 0 W= (� W n “ j w N l i W N o E. 0 o -•. (.W - (° w w O » W r 3 c HH W W ° ° o ° m a ° o o m z v ol f. ...,41.Ni, -, I N r\E ()°\, .12.%litN11 0E4 ' k--.0 � �. w° W W w w (p aw N O _ � a �i1 O N O 000 O 6 0 wMCD- -a = d g ((D 0 m N C m - 00 - - C. = N C m 3 0 742 _ W e 30- w O . � 3 „coo m �. T - N f y w p -(a g. m -.-:-..0-6 p 7D 5M o 3, ;28i -L = N 0 w N - - 0 O Z W w m W W O N N 7— _ w n O S3 < X m m 0 x F N A \ CYO ��� e'� d 7 \ _ o 0 0 _ -��= � 3 (n o (nm o vW �° N.cm o � F DCnm2 • O�vvv • v • m v mm d o o�a '< om W � m = '<- wc 0 oa x o f 3 AF '- �D�� W m = ”' W W N m,w 2 < W W cao 6--8-8-2, W W D-0 W 0 m -0 (� , g - < ° W= (D S ° n W (D W j 0= 000 x O x C o O w 0 . -° W -' O ? W x W m a W (p O . n N W W -- W N G (° ( (° _ ( ° O N N W O O �- N m m .N.. N W m m m m (° 3 c3m " =o c 8 c3W . =.' . - Na = o =Q = WOyw °c W ND o - OW FC a2 = m CD. - 0 N Q C = 1 3 3 w o -{ W F.1-60 0- O= w w W a g W= N C w 7 0- C . 2 p W N - =- N = 0= N w N w N N° 0 m Q m W o° W 0 j C N a 3 0 `G . a m C = N W w W w a N O 0 m N N 0 W w c a w = F W n W m O Fm mw We N w O =, n, =`< _ ma (° 5°? = ='o a ca , -. a 0 W -, .C_.. W a a x. g a W ,< C N = ,< W ° W g N O 0 N (° N Q w w y N -p2, °- 0 3 w y . a 5 N a max O5v W�o3mWm .3.8.-a W '`� °m = p. -..m 0-z-- =O O 0wo. ( 0,, .0.. -= N w 3 - (0.5n-' a "'--- ° . (° N o -O •U O w W O N O *0 C W ' . 5(4. W 0 a w 3 w N -. 3 N O ( ° (°' -=., C = o N F C 0 W ^\ w 3 = =w =o ww= a(o = w = - O a . F W s - 30.2-E, w3 Vv a tQ m* 3,co -z aaNNm w i ao>> to ^ n . y a • 5 ' 8 3 ' mvi 3 - < aa x N_, ^as g = N m v a o (oW � xc�a ( ° ° . f. Fo°:3 � c� 3 �S . a Q O ,c ° Y s� N C w w w 0-0(0? F U m . N w • o' O m' 3 D O 0 5 N 0 0 m ro R- d o n- m W C N �. p W (7 73 ^ ` -,< (° = 3 W d N p= N W i ,- ,{ O IH N p w W N N= W ,< N N w w x ° 2, 7 = 7 O N N n = N w O y � \ = C = N W (° ° N . . - L7 W y w w (° °. o N w C = N= ` \(]des.. °0 °° (° .WNW O a o mN H ° 3 mg ° aP C � 3 , W x = < _ NO a < w = 1: �� w � Q' = O O a n 3 O N N N o O d J N N. y= W ?- (O 5 a N a 2, w w w < c _ W n) F ,c= = o Qo F W = oucm„ .n " m y J O n W O ° N O Q = C W w W N < -0 '0 -p (8 o 0- N N a C m m-p m 5 w a m W o m 5 3 co m 2, c Q P ° w° � ) - m W w (° W ( p O = w (D , < O = 0 W N = m = O _ . N n 0 . _ .. N fU N 0 w 0 N 00 O (p W 0 O 0 _ -00 n a C N w w � : 0 Q d• O n N act C O N W ! as, ' C w 00 W 2, .E _ 1 0 W = W w a 2, -0 = 0 m- V O s *, � m ° N W a ° a � ' N , � g N O Om < o 2, N a- a- W 2,N in o 7.- w W g y N O 5 E W o 05- ( (-(3 w A a s a w a n m m 3 N m y » .( o = • m y o o a< _ F a a 3 c 0.-02 O W o a ? < W. v w= w <W � O90w Tv CA' m 2 0 c Z o g m cci z i0 c°) a °i m N. 5 c o w o ol ° - '3 'Si. 0 -,P.5 o y r o a 2, ° 5 a O = n O m N - 5-'= . Q 26= O ils a < Q c a 94. a N o m o = x 5 >3 ... ,c- ,... c_ W W:- 6-8 6 O icy' w ° o o N N O N , G O (D n C N T (O - N 0- v 2. = W O = w 0 W gc Q C w 0 a 0.0 0 W 4 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM July 25, 2005 TO: Michael Kravetz, via fax 713.869.5573 FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager SUBJECT: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - Site Plan • Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $200 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached. Completed Administrative Adjustment application TxDOT Permit Development Permit Application and supporting documents Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents ( http:// www. cstx. gov /docs /easement_dedication.pdf) If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Lindsay Boyer at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: David Cottrell Investments, Inc., via fax 713.334.4535 1 Case file #05- 00500106 Home of Texas A &M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - 05- 00500106 PLANNING 1. Please be aware that due to the lack of complete material for this submittal, additional comments may arise during future review of this site plan. Also, after 3 reviews, there will be additional fees for further review (repeat comment). 2. If Pad Sites A is to be developed at a future time, please remove grey "screened" site details from the site plan. These will be reviewed when this site is to be developed. Phase lines should be drawn 20' away from any site improvement on the main site, and the area to be developed at a future time must be grassed, and curbing provided (knock -off curbing is allowed if it is indeed temporary until the site is developed) separating it from the main site. The Pad Site lines and any phase lines do not have to be the same (as it appears you will be developing the parking and landscaping for Pad Site containing the coffee shop at the time of the entire development, however all phases must be able to stand alone to meet all regulations, as do all pad sites — this includes parking as well as landscaping. Any site improvements NOT to be done at the time of this site plan should be placed in a Phase 2. For Pad Sites, redrawing the lines for Pad Site B (the coffee shop) to exclude the excess parking provided with that site will help the parking deficiency for the main site. Also, both pad sites are labeled 'B' on the site plan, please correct. 3. Parking ratio for free standing restaurants with drive -thru is 1 space /100 s.f.. Please adjust required parking ratio for Pad Site B accordingly. 4. Please correct the number of provided parking spaces for all the sites. The main site parking provided says 268. I think this should be 468? 5. Please submit application for administrative adjustment for the number of parking spaces required. This reduction in the number of parking spaces is being provided so that a reorganization of the parking lot will be able to meet all end island requirements (minimum 180 s.f. for each end of a parking row), and increase the parking setback to 10' as required by the Unified Development Ordinance (Article 7, Section 9 *) 6. As indicated above, the required parking setback along the ROW is 10'. Please reorganize the parking to meet this ordinance. One solution would be to provided parallel parking along the ROW where parking must be removed to meet this setback in order to gain lost spaces back. 7. All parking rows should have end islands. In the rear of the new retail addition there appears to be a short row of 3 spaces that do not have both end islands. 8. All parking end islands should meet or exceed 180 s.f. for a single row of parking or 360 s.f. for a double row. 9. Any parking spaces adjacent to the ROW may only have 7 contiguous spaces. Sets of seven may be separated by a 18' x 20' island. Keep this in mind when reorganizing the parking. 10. Please depict painted arrows for traffic circulation indicating one way parking. 11. Please provide curb return radii for all driveways. 12. This entire property is considered one building plot. Please make a note on the Site plan that this site, pad sites A and B are considered to be one building plot for the purposes of signage and Non - Residential Architectural Standards (repeat comment). 13. Please provide curb and pavement details. Current standards for concrete are 5" (6" for firelanes and dumpster approaches), with #4 bar, 18" on center. Asphalt standards are 1.5" of asphalt on 6" of limestone base (repeat comment). NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 3 14. Dumpster locations have been approved by sanitation, however, all dumpster routes must be paved to firelane standards. You may wish to consolidate dumpsters to reduce the amount of firelane paving. 15. Please provide screening details for dumpster. Verify that the clear inside dimensions (inside of bollards) of the dumpster enclosures are 12' x 12' for single dumpsters or 12' x 24' for double dumpster enclosures. There must also be a 12' clear entrance between the gates for the trucks to be able collect (repeat comment). 16. Also, gates for dumpster enclosures must not block any parking. The gate for the enclosure in front of the proposed outdoor storage for the new retail space will block parking. This parking spot could be converted to an island to solve this problem. 17. Please show all existing and proposed fire lanes, hydrants, and FDCs (Fire Department Connections). (repeat comment) 18. Architectural elevations and material samples must be reviewed prior to the issuance of a building permit for compliance with the Non - residential Architectural Standards, located in Article 7.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. (repeat comment) Please advise if elevations will be submitted with building plans, or site plan. 19. Please indicate topography, this may be included in the required drainage and grading plan (repeat comment). 20. Please provide zoning for all abutting properties. 21. Please provide driveway separation distances for all opposite and adjacent driveways. 22. Minimum throat depth for the proposed driveway must be 55' at a minimum. It appears that it is approximately 53' at the first point of conflict. 23. Please locate all utilities and meters either on the site plan or on a utility plan. Be aware that all meters must be located in the ROW or in a PUE. 24. Please provide water and sanitary sewer legend. 25. Please provide TxDOT permit for proposed driveway. Our office will route the permit. 26. Provide overall height of building on the site plan (repeat comment). 27. Please provide a landscaping plan (repeat comment). 28. Provide a general note that all roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right -of -way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance (repeat comment). 29. Please provide an access easement between the restaurant pad site and the Chinese restaurant. The easement should be located between the two properties somewhere parallel to Texas Avenue for future driveway consolidation. 30. Please make a note that all signs are permitted separately, or remove any signage proposed from the site plan. 31. Further submittal must also address previous applicable engineering and electrical comments. Reviewed by: LINDSAY BOYER Date: July 21, 2005 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 3 Gr r ff '11511111111 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 2005 TO: Michael Kravetz, via fax 713 - 869 -5573 FROM: Lindsay Boyer, Project Manager SUBJECT: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - Site Plan Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (please submit additional copies to be stamped for your records) One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please allow 4 weeks to process). Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and the necessary documents are required prior to the issuance of a building permit. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: David Cottrell Investments, Inc via fax 713 - 334 -4535 Case file #05- 00500106 Home of Texas A &M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) — 05- 00500106 PLANNING 1. Please be aware that due to the lack of complete material for this submittal, additional comments may arise during future review of this site plan. Also, after 3 reviews, there will be additional fees for further review. 2. Please identify all adjacent and opposite drives on Valley View and dimension the distances for each driveway separation in compliance with our driveway separation distances. Proposed additional entry drive on Valley View Drive does not meet our current regulations for opposite driveway locations. Any additional entrance must meet the requirements found in Article 7.C.3 of the College Station Unified Development Ordinance (this can be found on our website at: http: / /www.cstx.gov /home /index.asp ?page =418 ) for both opposite and adjacent driveway separation distances. 3. Proposed additional entry drive on Texas Avenue must be approved by TxDOT prior to any approval from the City (See TxDOT comments below). The throat depth for this entrance should meet standards for a major arterial (55'). If this entrance is to be pursued, please dimension the distance between all adjacent entrances in accordance with TxDOT's recommendation. 4. What are pad sites A & B? If these are not to be developed at the time of the rest of the site, phasing lines should be noted. If these are to be separate lots, the property must be replatted. Please be aware that each pad site must meet standards individually, i.e. parking, landscaping, etc. Phase lines should be drawn 20' from any site improvements being made. 5. Any alterations to anything on the site must meet current standards. Parking that is altered because of the curb cuts must meet size and island requirements. This includes raised 6" monolithic curbing and landscaped end islands of 180 square feet, as well as 180 S.F. interior islands for every group of 15 interior parking spaces. (Article 7.2. address off - street parking requirements). Islands should also be landscaped, grassed, or have enhanced paving. End island requirements are also required for the new parking provided by the proposed outdoor storage area, and next to the new dumpster location to end that row of parking. 6. Outdoor storage area next to current Tractor Supply lease space has not been previously approved. Please define if this area is an outdoor sales area or storage. Both areas count towards square footage for parking requirements. Permanent outdoor sales areas must be enclosed by a minimum 6' screen or wall, and may not exceed 1,000 S.F. or 10% of total site area. They also must comply with setbacks. See comment below for regulations regarding outdoor storage area. 7. The proposed additional outdoor storage may not be located within the building setback. The fence must completely obstruct the view of anything inside it (i.e. nothing inside the enclosure may be taller than the fence or wall), and outdoor storage must be fenced or walled by a solid wood fence or masonry wall not shorter than 6 feet and not higher than 8 feet. Also, a chain link fence is not an approved screening method. This area must also be included towards the square footage for parking requirements. 8. Provide a general note that all roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right -of -way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 2 of 4 9. Curb return radii for driveways should be between 20 and 30 -feet. Please indicate the proposed radii. 10. Parking should be completely within the boundaries, for example, parking located in Pad Site B would count towards parking for that site, unless pad site boundary is redrawn. 11. This entire property is considered one building plot. Please make a note on the Site Plan that this site, pad sites A and B are considered to be one building plot for the purposes of signage and Non - Residential Architectural standards. 12. Please provide typical dimension for parking space size, driveway widths, and islands. Our ordinance requires 9' x 20' parking spaces, and it appears spaces along the Valley View Drive do not meet this. 9' x 18' spaces can be used if they abut a landscaped island of at least 4' depth. Also the parking along Pad Site A will require wheelstops or a 4' landscape island. 13. Please provide curb and pavement details. Current standards for concrete are 5" (6" for firelanes and new dumpster approach) with #4 bar, 18" on center. Asphalt standards are 1.5" of asphalt on 6" of limestone base. 14. Dumpster location is fine. Please provide dimensions of dumpster enclosure. Minimum inside dimensions are 12' x 12' with a 12' clear opening for all gates for a single dumpster. Also, provide details for masonry screening. Will this be painted, etc? 15. Please show how the building lease spaces will be configured, sq. footage, and the proposed use for each. Be aware that any use with outdoor storage may only have that storage if the storage area is less than 50% of its lease space in a C -1 zoning district. 16. Please show all existing and proposed fire lanes, hydrants, and FDCs (Fire Department Connections) 17. Architectural elevations and material samples must be reviewed prior to the issuance of a building permit for compliance with the Non - residential Architectural Standards, located in Article 7.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. 18. Please provide location of required bicycle parking. This site is required 8 bicycle parking spaces dispersed so that no lease space is further than 150 -feet from bicycle facilities. 19. Please show correct building setback lines. Setback for C -1 are as follows: • Front: 25' • Rear: 15' • Side street: 15' 20. Current parking ratios are 1 car /250 S.F. of retail space, including outdoor storage and sales area. Please calculate required spaces accordingly. 21. Please indicate topography, this may be included in the drainage and grading plan. 22. Please note on the site plan any floodplain. If there is none, please reference the FEMA/FIRM map number. 23. Please show all easements and utilities. 24. Please show current zoning of the property. 25. Please provide the overall height of the building, including parapets. 26. Signs are permitted separately. Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer Date: June 22, 2005 LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER 1. Landscaping plan must be approved prior to site plan approval. Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer Date: June 22, 2005 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 3 of 4 ENGINEERING 1. As shown, the property will need to be replatted. 2. With the replat, public sanitary sewer infrastructure is required to be extended to each lot. Engineered construction documents are required for public infrastructure, as well as cost estimates. 3. TxDOT permits will be required for driveway and any utility connections in TxDOT ROW. The permit applications are submitted through the City of College Station and 4 copies of each application and supporting documents are required. 4. The proposed storm sewer system will be limited to the 10 -year storm if connecting to City system. 5. A development permit application is required with supporting documents. 6. Provide fire flow report. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: June 26, 2005 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design. 2. City of College Station to provide design plan for conduit installation. 3. Developer provides 30' of IMC or rigid conduit for riser poles. 4. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design. 5. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes provided by the city). 6. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 version of plat and /or site plan email to sweido @cstx.gov. 7. Developer provides load data for project. 8. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. 9. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines 10. To discuss any of the above electrical comments, please contact Sam Weido at 979.764.6314. Reviewed by: Sam Weido Date: 6 -21 -05 TxDOT 1. Recommend minimum spacing of 250' between proposed & adjacent existing driveways (35 MPH). Shared access @ existing driveways is preferred. Additional recommendations may be forwarded per District review. 2. Appropriate data will be required for any future permits @ this site. Reviewed By: Karl Nelson Date: June 27, 2005 MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double -Check Back Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Page 4 of 4 - , ,,-; 411111 0 17 k 7 L\ `' °O e i \ ° \\ n iil w M � 'o ^- mm8 * ,n o-o W °r- F °--I �+.+ip<nZ ®'C -iD O O - g. m 0 O — ° Q ' m N o _ � m m m m J a m m ° m � + 3 _ N N IC n m j m a j. m O ? J H U !_UIH (o O m CD - !7 (D (0 •• • C J0C (O (O • h il 8 3 Y CZ) O a ( m p O c S 0- . V ' m m a x - ( N p ^ -3 ^ . N O ° 0." " O N 0 0 0 m , ( N L 0 i Z Y m ) J N f 7: 7 � a 0 %). N N N N 3 '.' O S <7 ,, d ra m a m y `'ln_ y m m m m J A r !� 713s - J \ mm < m pmN N (mo �fD Q33 = - ( ° =m m1 aa aoaa- E W 0 1 N ^° ._Z, .Z•, . _ Z , J (0 m O W o o (O 2 3 3 3 3 (D (D N a) Z r d N ' J.N 4i a £ . N 0 J m ° 0"O j 3 » m m Vl 7 m N r (A 3 J J a N N N m o o a 3 x. Zr. =09( ( C ,(n.,, N N N 41 m n. m 0 0 (0 0 0 C- c f 0 : (0c S N V , - d 3 a x 0 N J° a J (n ° . s J °° 3 4 0 J J J ° J W m °o2x ° ■� ccC 3dm - O Q • (o l ' ) ) 5' w=. �. aaam <p _1 Z f c a o 333 o m m m m n 3 D v ° m o m a d o �.0 a m m m o m e m ( -O � mm ao m 'zo mmm? 73 (DE oov ° o° OO 6 5. ca , i 2ma° •9, E3 5� 0 am° oa) m -Io (° S m -' a N 61 9l • • ., m (r \ ° o w en °" (D a (Q J J J a \ r _ Z� O m O m (0 (O (O 0 J • o `O: 0 5 0 J N (D 0 m �afm mmm oa n m 0 O° ° 'm JJJ(p 3a C m ood F u 0 0 3 a 3 a m m m m c c c m 1 n o (n d . 0 S S m m 0 J m 0 - . O y 0 - J (D 0- Q Q Q o' m m � J '0 7 J 0 m m c (O (L9 m 3 C o- "O a m c0 (D co rn° 0 y N o o o m a) 2 j "o 00--00 cN s v 000 ci'l1 < O a 3 O C m ° ° m cn y C ° m n m ...1 3 0 m \ d.S -om 7a' p( m y m m � ' ° �Na m FT)' ow T W71 � V da m2 m m 3" 0o 7 o'�Sm. o dd cm� O "' m Cu m m a o f O ( � m a » j n o m r E� r mJm�� om a 5 ° � . m 0 � \ r m 4 oo „m mo S � J ° m a F ° 2NJ 5m odFfl CI w s° A m . ^ J- (0 a a d a o 1 %'- ° * v Z m CD m (D CD m O N 2 0 o 3 m- m N O m'� N . N 0 m (D m (( 3 a 0 N o T n o C Ow m J .0 o m m a .0 - J m J -- ` a o ( o " cw - v 0 , 'a ) \ c m m O,c C 2- m m a m a m mNN °� �� r�� o- -o m �, m J 3 � m m - o "� , - + m a o° o m 0. m 3° o - O 3 m �� 3 m '"mm - v, osm o( 3 m r °n c m N a ((0 0 a a ■ - gy p .O 0 N ? m .J 0 N ° m N v, J m O 0 SL n 0 C C ' s r ° ( ° ` 1 y�Q 4 L \'.,' ` �.: N.° 1 \1 T }} 3 otnm �* o00ommKo \ ( Cram ��O 1)W0) UO)'o2•p -� ` m •vJ x ? m S 3 S .< _ m 2. ° .. m m , < - , m S S m m m m 7.0 (0 0 0 • O 3 0, O 00 0 -o-- (o D� a. �` ° ^:m ( co m 3 ; D'0.2 0 cD O. . ica 0e n -- a -o -o Dam °m F 9 v _ < a 3 m 3 m s o a m 3 m 0 5 m o 0 0 o x o x c o o m o �'0 S ( D .t m m ° m m m ,°.. ° N 3 3 m° '� _ N (O J (0 O N (D 4! N 41 o m m » N N m N (0 O g X. 3 0 m m S m N `G m m m - - m co ° m m c0 (D ,- _ o C J 3 N 3 S O N i, , (= ti n n a '0 0 O a 0 a .N. N 2 C ra n J Q G (O C *-- N J 52--(n” J 0" ° 8 N m C m N N 8 m '0 N a N 3 0 m (U o (O J o o 3 a a 3 W Q C J -• b h ° 3 m O y (o Jm !It ° m JQ �o "g m QammC mD' me n m N J X n (D C (n a y n I_ . O F3 0 or r. (0(n ommow Fo 5. .n w mm cam m -m 3 . J o Jm 3 0 v fl ao = 3w o(o v , co aS. p =Jm na c m= i s m .. J 0- J O m L) j ( J n m 7 m 3 J J . N ,O„ 3 0 " N F' n, a o' mo = CD . 3 ( O 0 a 3 " 0 0 m 3 a ° CD (7)- 3�� n m.m �ao a) J a 00 3 c mN,0 =c 7 3 o o -ae7 , - cx .mN N v ° �m Exc.? (0 °� a`3 Fa 2g 3 me Qo 3 mm avm 0 * " °d . mmN v p33odog ( S D ° >> ° r. D ' o aaamF_�'., m c mb • 0- 0. m� = ��o° m (D co c m m(0 J ° - u, o ° w J O m N 0 O N N (0 a g 0 • O' ? J- m D , 0, (D (O CO ? 0 1 A. 3 a n ( Q ° a < J N m .Z, C 3 N J O x'(0 3 • C O a •''. O . a N d 0' < m = j ( Q 5-* a" ( T O a C 3 a . a 3 a ( C �, a N = O f a D . J . y 0 J m J- (O 3 d n ( D r N m n , a S O S 0 / (� 0 O 7 O m (0 a a < (o r O 3 - 7 w O c . a a ( °< o n \ l/ ' {1� O . G . m O 5 m n m < O 'O 7 ' 'O .,AL-.297. m 0 - N V N N a c-651) a O' n ''' 3 ( N m m a N 7 N d J N m O ,00 N ~ f n O a m \ �_ iii J m 0 _i + p to -O J a a ° m � � ° (D 0 a C 0 a (o 0 a C O - n. a (0 a �' -C a d n �.� ° ° O o _ S. m m 3 y m mw O�� �.,� �' N o a 'a m o s p.o - 0 m° a 3 0 '0 3_ m o ' .- ' <m F)S o c ° m in 0o m a „ ° J, ma J m m 5.). co C (' mo c c A ao °» ° O d a a ° m 3 m m N �.o �- � 1 b 0 m 3 O °mmm \ ° ao m o aa ° � "moo .< a N J 3 m m -.I m O C. O m fU n W v C m0 33 coo in n aJ a _ - =.3 -' �io0 .^! J J O c 0 ° a 7 O ° Q O a O ( 0 C° J O ` CD m - 3-' =- ° Q m o ° d5 m m m r m. m° m ( m c0 'D • C O °' N m ■1.j' K l m J o n m o ° m Jn m H I �� c °� 3� o O c 0 m m - y � ° O m a d m ° - n n o J m o m rn \ V f NTU R E ARCH ECT1 LL . September 21, 2005 City of College Station — Site Development 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Response to Staff Review Comments # 3 dated September 9 and 12, 2005. See construction drawings clouded areas with no. 1 in the delta(triangle). Staff Review Comments 3 - response Planning TxDOT permit for driveway construction is under review. ✓la. Please contact Owner and Architect as soon as TX DOT permit is approved. 2. Please provide a table of all the building materials used on the elevation, with their total square footage and the percentage of each. 2a. The building material tab attached as 8 %" x 11" document. Clearly the extensive proposed elevations are a significant improvement, and we do not intend to revise our design based on "boiler plate" ordinance required percentage numbers that are not project specific. 3. Please provide a zoning of abutting parcel on sheet A1.0 /3a. Zoning for the existing Chinese restaurant is C -1, note added to sheet A1.0. 4. Please add a note to sheet A1.0 that this site is considered one plot for the purpose of signage and landscaping. ✓4a. Note has been added to sheet A1.0. 5. Please provide sanitary sewer /water demands. /5a. Demands provided on C5. 6. Fire lane around ground lease site should be paved using a 6" sub -base and 2" asphalt. /6a. The fire lane is scheduled as such, the C3 sheet has been revised with the correct hatch in the firelanes that correspond to the legend. 7. All end islands should be 108 s.f. for single parking rows, 360 s.f. for double parking rows. There are several areas that still don't meet this requirement, the full 10% of the administrative adjustment should be used to correct this. Currently, you are providing 20 extra spaces that required with an administrative adjustment. ✓ 7a. Per discussion with you, the end islands are close enough for approval. 8. Please show Fire Department Connection (FDCs). I was unable to find them, please 15851 Dohs Parkway just give me a call if I missed them somehow. Suite 1060 Addison, Texas 75001 t/ga. Fire department hydrants have been shown on the C5 sheet and noted by FH. Also clouded for ease of identification. 972.490.7 ?92 V 9. Double dumpster enclosure should be 12 feet deep with no bollards, just clear space. 972 . 490.74 44 ✓9a The bollards have been removed from the dumpster enclosures, and the enclosure behind the existing foodstore has been relocated to accomadate the till North loop West existing exit doors and existing electrical panels. See sheet A1.0 & A5.4. suite 800 Houston, Texas 77008 713.869.1103 V September 21- response sheet.doc 713,869.5573 F Page 1 of 2 . - , „, ,; p E W RCIE!. LOTS L.GR „, .., 1 1 0. Please dileniate cross access agreement that is noted on the as built survey (sheet E- 5), note 14. Where is this? 10a. From the title report,(attached) a cross access easement is not identified, however, we have made no changes to existing cross access on this site, Please do not hold up approval based on this very old recorded information. 11. Where you able to verify that the PUE on lot 3, extending into this property was abandoned? Ala. We could not identify any PUE's other than those shown on the survey and our drawings. Landscape / Streetscaping / Buffer 1. My current count of the landscaping on the property shows the following, etc....The legend may be corrected to reflect these numbers or a new plan may be submitted with the appropriate trees according to the legend. ila. The attached landscape drawings reflect corrected point counts and corrected area around the TXDOT curb cut. Engineering 1. Please designate the proposed ss easement shown on the plan as private. ✓1a. Corrected on sheet A1.0. 2. If future development of the property requires water service from the existing water line in TxDOT ROW, TxDOT utility permits will be required at the time of Site Plan for those sites. . The FYI is duly noted. 3. With only one of five driveways being designated a construction exit, how will you insure that it is the only one used during construction? ,/ 3a. We will install temporary signs at each of the other entrances which direct construction vehicles to enter on the Valley View drive. See sheet A1.0. 4. Please add note stating that construction will be in accordance with City of Collage Station Design Guidelines, Specification and details. ..- 4a. The note was added to sheet A1.0. Thanks, Michael Kravetz Project Administrat — Heights ntur Architects, LLP `" gyp' 713 - 869 -1103 x 6106 15851 Dallas Parkway direct 281- 854 -6106 suite 101,0 cell 713 299 -4520 Addison, Texas 75001 e -mail michael.kravetz @hva.cc 972,490.7792 V 972.490.74€4 F 1111 North Loop West Suite 800 Houston, Texas 77008 713 869 1103 V September 21- response sheet.doc 713 869 5573 F Page 2 of 2 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM September 13, 2005 TO: Mike Kravetz, Heights Venture Architects via fax: 713 - 869 -5573 Email: MICHAEL.KRAVETZ @HVA.CC FROM: Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner SUBJECT: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - Site Plan Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: v $200 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews; and, Six (6) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (please include any additional plans that you would like stamped and returned to you) /, Two (2) revised site plans N/ One (1) landscaping plan ■ One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan V Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 -3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: David Cottrell Investments, Inc via fax: 713 - 334 -4535 Case file #05- 00500106 Home of Texas AB&M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3 Project: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - 05- 00500106 PLANNING 1. TxDOT permit for driveway construction is under review. 2. Please provide a table of all the building materials used on the elevation, with their total square footage and the percentages of each. 3. Please provide zoning of abutting parcel on sheet A1.0 4. Please add a note to sheet A1.0 that this site is considered one building plat for the purpose of signage and landscaping. 5. Please provide sanitary sewer /water demands. 6. Fire lane around ground lease site should be paved using a 6" sub -base and 2" asphalt. 7. All end islands should be 180 s.f. for single parking rows, 360 s.f. for double parking rows. There are several areas that still don't meet this requirement, the full 10% of the administrative adjustment should be used to correct this. Currently, you are providing 20 extra spaces than required with an administrative adjustment. 8. Please show Fire Department Connections (FDCs). I was unable to find them, please just give me a call if I missed them somehow. 9. Double dumpster enclosure should be 12 feet deep with no bollards, just clear space. 10. Please dileniate cross access agreement that is noted on the as -built survey (sheet E -5), note 14. Where is this? 11. Where you able to verify that the PUE on Lot 3, extending into this property was abandoned? Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer Date: September 9, 2005 LANDSCAPPING 1. My current count of the landscaping on the property shows the following: 22 Bald Cypress @ 300 pts = 6,600 46 Cedar Elm @ 300 pts = 13,800 28 Drake Elm @ 300 pts = 8,400 9 Live Oak @ 300 pts = 2,700 185 Crape Myrtle @ 40 pts = 7,400 100 Elaeagnus @ 10 pts = 1,000 306 Indian Hawthorn @ 10 pts = 3,060 84 Ligustrum @ 10 pts = 8,40 223 Oleander @ 10 pts = 2,230 Total = 46,030 The legend may be corrected to reflect these numbers, or, a new plan may be submitted with the appropriate trees according to the current legend. Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer Date: September 9, 2005 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 3 ENGINEERING 1. Please designate the proposed ss easements shown on the plan as private. 2. If future development of the property requires water service from the existing water lien in TxDOT ROW, TxDOT Utility permits will be required at time of Site Plan for those sites. 3. With only one of five driveways being designated a construction exit, how will you insure that it is the only one used during construction? 4. Please add note stating that construction will be in accord_ ance with City of College Station Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: September 12, 2005 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 3 k [IGHTS VENTURE ARCHITECTS L,LP August 30, 2005 City of College Station — Site Development 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Response to Staff Review Comments # 1 dated June 27, 2005 and Response to Staff Review Comments # 2 dated July 25, 2005 Please review the itemized comments below as they are numbered to correspond to Staff Review comments. Staff Review Comments 1 - response Planning 1. The attached drawings should comprise a complete submittal (3 review). 2. The adjacent drives are noted on A1.0. Distances are not shown because we are not requesting any new drives (other than the Texas Ave location) at this time. 3. Throat distance of 55' -0" has been met as well as the 250' separation distance, RE: A1.0. Please submit thru TX -DOT for approval, (preliminary discussions with Terry Paholek — TX -DOT Engineer indicated no problem for approval of this drive). 4. There are no pad sites or pad buildings to be developed under this permit. 5. All improvements shown on the attached drawings should meet current standards, including, but not limited to: curbing, landscape islands, end islands, dumpsters, drives, etc. 6.- 7. The outdoor storage for the existing "Tractor Supply" and the proposed "We -Rent- It" have been modified to, new 8' -0" high wood fencing, honor setbacks, sized below maximum allowable area, and factored into the parking calculation. RE: A1.0 & A5.4 8. Roof equipment have been screened for the building addition by a parapet wall, with added fencing at the existing mechanical equipment behind the grocer. The note for screening roof and ground - mounted equipment has been added to A1.0 for any equipment still visible on the roof of the existing structure. My field visit indicated that no additional screening is needed per the requirements. 9. Curb return radii for the proposed curb cut is shown on A1.0. The existing drive radii are also shown on A1.0. 10. Parking is entirely located on site and should meet the current standards. RE: A1.0. 15851 Dallas Parkway 11. The entire site is one building plot. Suite 1060 12. Parking dimensions have been shown on the site plan. RE: A1.0. Addison, Texas 75001 13. Curb and pavement details and descriptions are shown on the attached civil 972 490 7292 V drawings. RE: C2 & C3. 972.490.7444 F 14. Dumpster dimensions have been increased as per current standards and enclosed with painted split face cmu walls with painted wood picket gates, RE: A1.0 & A5.4. 1111 North Loop West Suite 800 Houston, Texas 77008 713 869 1103 V August 30- response sheet.doc 713 869 5573 F Page 1 of 4 EIG EMTIIRE ARCHITECTS L 15. Existing building lease lines are indicated on A1.0. The building addition is entirely leased by the proposed "We- Rent -It" tenant. 16. For fire lane and hydrant locations, RE: C3 & C5. 17. Building elevations with material notes are in the drawings. RE: A2.0 and the attached material sample board for ease of cross - referencing. 18. Two bicycle racks have been shown on the site plan for a total of 12 available bikes each to be no greater than 150' from a building entry. RE: A1.0. 19. Building setback lines has been corrected, RE: A1.0. 20. For revised parking calculations, RE: A1.0. 21. Existing topography is best seen on the existing survey, RE: E -S. Proposed topography is best seen on the attached grading plan, RE: C4. 22. FIRM numbers are shown on the existing survey E -S and the A1.0. 23. Easements and utilities are on the civil drawings, RE: C5. 24. The current zoning is C -1, RE: A1.0. 25. The overall height of the buildings is indicated on A1.0, greater detail is shown on A2.0, A4.1 and A4.2 26. Signs are not a part of this permit, and will be permitted separately by the Owners Sign Vendor. RE: A1.0. Landscape / Streetscaping / Buffer 1. Landscape plans were not ready at this time, but will be submitted by Friday, Sept 2, by Bob Ruth — Landscape Architect. Engineering 1. The property should not require replatting because there are no pad sites or other ownership changes. 2. After site plan approval, but prior to development approval, easement documentation, replat if necessary, and cost estimates will be submitted by the Survey Engineer. 3. After site plan approval, but prior to development approval, the TX -DOT application with associated drawings will be submitted by the Civil Engineer. 4. There are no new connections or increased flow to the existing storm sewer system, RE: C5. 5. The development permit and supporting documents are attached. 6. A fire flow report can be provided if still neccessary. 15851 Dallas Parkway Electrical Suite 1060 1. -10. RE: Civil and electrical drawings. Addison, Texas 75001 972 490 7292 V TXDOT 972.490.7444 F 1.— 2. Throat distance of 55' -0" has been met as well as the 250' separation distance, : _ RE: A1.0. Please submit thru TX -DOT for approval, (preliminary discussions with 1111 North Loop West Terry Paholek — TX -DOT Engineer indicated no problem for approval of this drive). Site 800 Houston, Texas 77008 713 869 1103 V 713 869 5573 F August 30- response sheet.doc Page 2 of 4 I4 EICIITS V EMTURE ARCHITECTS LLP, Miscellaneous 1. For irrigation information, RE: Landscape drawings. 2. For backflow preventers, RE: plumbing drawings. Staff Review Comments 2 — response Planning 1. Hopefully, not too much additional material will be required to be submitted. Please elaborate as clearly as possible so we may submit the correct information in a timely manner. 2. There are no pad sites or pad buildings to be developed under this permit. 3. The drive -thru and previously identified pad sites are no longer part of this permit request. Future development of this area will be permitted, as required, and new calculations will be submitted. 4. Parking spaces have been corrected, RE: A1.0. 5. -9. The application and fee for the Administrative adjustment is attached. Parking end islands are all a minimum of 180 s.f. (with the exception of 2 end rows being only 175 s.f.). The parking setback of 10' along frontage property lines has been provided. RE: A1.0. 10. Painted directional arrows have been added throughout the site to help with traffic circulation identification. RE: A1.0. 11. Curb return radii for the proposed curb cut is shown on A1.0. The existing drive radii are also shown on A1.0. 12. There are no pad sites or pad buildings to be developed under this permit. 13. Curb and pavement details and descriptions are shown on the attached civil drawings. RE: C2 & C3. 14. -16. Dumpster dimensions have been increased as per current standards and enclosed with painted split face cmu walls with painted wood picket gates, RE: A1.0 & A5.4. 17. For fire lane and hydrant locations, RE: C3 & C5. 18. Building elevations with material notes are in the drawings. RE: A2.0 and the attached material sample board for ease of cross - referencing. 19. Existing topography is best seen on the existing survey, RE: E -S. Proposed topography is best seen on the attached grading plan, RE: C4. 20. Refer to the As -Built Survey, Sheet E -S for all adjacent property information. 15851 Dallas Parkway 21. The adjacent drives are noted on A1.0. Distances are not shown because we are not Boas 1060 requesting any new drives (other than the Texas Ave location) at this time. Addison, Texas 75001 22. Throat distance of 55' -0" has been met as well as the 250' separation distance, RE: 972 490 7292 V A1.0. Please submit thru TX -DOT for approval, (preliminary discussions with Terry 972 490.7444 F Paholek — TX -DOT Engineer indicated no problem for approval of this drive). 23. -24. Easements and utilities are on the civil drawings, RE: C5. 1111 North Loop West Suite 800 Houston, texas 77008 713 869 1103 V 713 869 5573 F August 30- response sheet.doc Page 3 of 4 14[IGIITS V ENTURE 41R.C14111C73 25. After site plan approval, but prior to development approval, the TX -DOT application with associated drawings will be submitted by the Civil Engineer. 27. The overall height of the buildings is indicated on A1.0, greater detail is shown on A2.0, A4.1 and A4.2 28. Roof equipment have been screened for the building addition by a parapet wall, with added fencing at the existing mechanical equipment behind the grocer. The note for screening roof and ground - mounted equipment has been added to A1.0 for any equipment still visible on the roof of the existing structure. My field visit indicated that no additional screening is needed per the requirements. 29. The access drive has been provided for future cross access between properties. The term easement is intentionally not used because that would require special recording. If necessary, an agreement between owners can be generated. 30. Signs are not a part of this permit, and will be permitted separately by the Owners Sign Vendor. RE: A1.0. 31. RE: reply to comment 1 of Staff Review Comments 2. ; 9 Thanks, 1 Michael Kravetz Project Administrator — Heights Venture Architects, LLP 713 - 869 -1103 x 6106 direct 281- 854 -6106 cell 713 299 -4520 e -mail michael.kravetz@hva.cc hva.cc 15851 Dallas Parkway Suite 1060 Addison, Texas 75001 972 490 7292 V 972.490.7444 F 1111 North loop West Suite 800 Houston, Texas 77008 713 869 1103 V 713 869 5573 F August 30- response sheet.doc Page 4 of 4 e • JUN -27 -2005 14:30 FROM: TO:7138695573 P.002/005 ' 05/27/2005 14:22 9797543496 COCS DEVELOPMENT SER PAGE 01/04 (1 151111114 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION pTA rr.50 iro 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.754.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM AMMMEMMIll DATE: June 27, 2005 TO: Michael Kravetz, via fax 713 -859 -5573 FROM: Lindsay Boyer, Project Manager SUBJECT; COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - Site Phan Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following Information for further staff review: One (f) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (please submit additional copies to be stamped for your records) One (1) 11x17 grading and erosion control plan • Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (please allow 4 weeks to process). • Please note that the Easement Dedication Sheet and the necessary documents are required prior to the issuance of a building porrnit. if there are comments that you are • not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a latter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 979164.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: David Cottrell investments, Inc via fax 71 3- 334 -4535 Case file #05- 00500106 Horne of Texas A&M University - JUN -27 -2005 14:31 FROM: T0:7132695573 P.003/005 06/27/2005 14:22 9797643496 COOS DEVELOPMENT SER PAGE kr2it94 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project; COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) — 05- 00500105 PLANNING 1. Please be aware that nitre to the lack of complete material for this submittal, additional comments may arise during future review of this site plan. Also, after 3 reviews, there will be additional fees for further redrew. 2. Please identify a adjacent and opposite drives on Valley View and dimension the distances for each driveway separation in compliance with our driveway tierptlkItiOr1 distances. Proposed additional entry drive on Valley View Drive does not meet our current regulations for opposite driveway locations. Any additional entrance must meat the requirements found in Article 7.0.3 of the College Station Unified Developrnent Ordinance (thus can be found on our website at http:// vwuw.cstu.gov/home/index.asp?eage = 418 ) for both opposite and adjacent driveway separation distances, 3. Proposed additional envy drive on Texas Avenue must be approved by TxDOT prior to any approval from the City (See TxDOT comments below). The throat depth for this entrance should meet standards for a major arterial (55'). if this entrance is to be pursued, please dimension the distance between all adjacent entrances in accordance with TxDOTs recommendation. 4. What are pad sites A & S7 If these are not to be developed at the time of the rest of the site, phasing lines should be noted. If these are to be separate rota, the property must be replotted. Please be aware that each pad site must meet standards individually, i.e. parking, landscaping, etc. Phase lines should be drawn 20' from any site improvements being made. 5. Any alterations to anything on the site must meet current standards. Parking that is altered because of the curb cuts must meet size and island requirements. This includes raised 6' monolithic curbing and landscaped end islands of 180 square feet, es wall as 180 S.F. interior 'islands for every group of 15 interior parking spaces. (Article 7.2. address off- Street parkin requirements), islands should also be landscaped, grassed. or have enhanced paving. End island requirements are also required for the new parking provided by the proposed outdoor storage area, and next to the new dumpster location to end that row of perking. 6. Outdoor storage area next to current Tractor Supply lease space has not been previously approved. Please define if this area is an outdoor sales area or storage. Both areas count towards square footage for parking requirements. Permanent outdoor sales areas must be enclosed by a minimum 6' screen or wall, and may not exceed 1,000 S.F. or 10% of total site area. They also must comply with setbacks. See comment below for regulations regarding outdoor storage area. 7. The proposed additional outdoor storage may not bo located within the building setback. The fence must completely obstruct the view of anything inside it (i.e. nothing inside the enclosure may be taller than the fence or wall), and outdoor storage must be fenced or wailed by a Solid wood fence or masonry wall not shorter than 6 feet and not higher than 8 feat. Also, a chain link fence is not an approved screening method. This area must also be irrducieti towards rte square rootage for parking requirements. 8. Provide a general Rate that all roof and ground - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right -of -way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance. NOTE; Any chanties made to the pions, that hove not hpvn requested by the City of C011eoe Station, much be regololned in your next transmittal letter arrd "bubbled" on your plan; Any additional diatom no these plans that hava not been pointed out • • to the unity, will constitute a completely new ravtew, • Page 2/14 • • SUN -27 -2005 14:31 FROM: TO:7138695573 P.004/005 06/27/2005 14:22 9797643496 COOS DEVELOPMENT SER PAGE 83/84 • 9. Curb return radii for driveways should be between 20 and 30 -feet Please indicate the proposed radii. • 10. Parking should be completely within the boundaries, for example, parking located In Pad Site B would count towards parking for that site, unless pad site boundary is redrawn. 11. This entire property is considered one building plot Please make a note on the Site Plan that this site, pad sites A and B are considered to be one building plot for the purposes of signage and Non- Residential Architectural standards. 12. Please provide typical dimension for parking space size, driveway widths, and Islands_ Our ordinance requires 9' x 20' parking spaces, and it appears spaces along the Valley View • Drive do not meet thls. 9' x 18' spaces can be used If they abUt a landscaped Island of 01 least 4' depth. Also the parking along Pad Site A will require wheelistops or a 4' landscape island. 13. Please provide curb and pavement details. gent standards for concrete are 5" (6" for firelanes and new dumpster approach) with 44 bar, 18" on canter. Asphalt standards are 1.5" of asphalt on 6" of limestone base. 14. dumpster location is fine, Please provide dimensions of dumpster enclosure. Minimum inside dimensions are 12' x 12' with a 12' clear opening for all gates for a single dumpster. Also, provide details for masonry screening. Will this be painted, etc? 15. Please show how the building lease spaces will be configured, sq. footage, and the proposed use for each. Be aware that any use with outdoor storage may only have that storage if the storage area is Tess than 50% of its lease space in a 0-1 zoning district. 16. Please Show all existing and proposed fire lanes, hydrants, and FDCs (Fire Department Connections) 17. Architectural elevations and material samples must be reviewed prier to the issuance of a building permit for compliance with the Non - residential Architectural Standards, located in Article 7.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. 18. Please provide location of require lalcycle parking, This site is required 8 bicycle parking spaces dispersed so that no lease space is further than 150 -feet from bicycle facilities. • • 19. Please show correct building setback lines.. Setback for C-1 are as follows: • Front 25' • Rear; 15' • • Side street: 15' 20. Current parking ratios are 1 car /250 S.F. of retail space, including outdoor storage and sates area. Please calculate required spaces accordingly. 21. Please indicate topography, this may be included in the drainage and grading plan. 22, Please note on the site plan any floodplain. if there is none, please reference the FEMA1FIRNI map number. 23. Please show all easements and utilities. 24. Please Show current zoning of the property. 25. Please provide the overall height of the building, including parapets. 26. Sigrtee are permitted separately. Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer Date: June 22, 2005 • LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPINGIRU FFER 1_ I_andscapaag plan must he approved prior to site plan approval. Reviewed by Lindsay Boyer Date: June 22, 2005 NOTE Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Stetson, must be explained In your nod tranom ittol tatter and "bubbled' on your plan. Any addltlonoI chongoo on thee plank that trava not been pentad out to the City, v lI constitute a cornpietety new review. Page 3of4 JUN -27 -2005 14:32 FROM: TQ:7139695573 P.005/005 • 06/27/2005 14:22 9797643496 COOS DEVELOPMENT SER PAGE 04!04 ENGINEERING 1. As shown, the propertywil need to be replatted. 2. With the replat, public sanitary sewer infrastructure is required to be extended to each lot. Engineered construction documents are required for public: inrrtscslruclure, as weU 6$ tOst estimates. . TxDOT permits will be required for driveway and any utility connections in TxDOT ROW. The permit applications are submitted through the City of College Station and 4 copies of each application and supporting documents are required. 4_ The proposed storm sewer system will be limited to the i0 -year stern if connecting to City system. 6. A development perrnit aportosttlon is required with supporting documents. 6. Provide fire flow report, Reviewed by Carol Cotter Date: June 26, 2005 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer installs conduit per city soscs. and reign - 2, City of College Station to provide design plan for conduit installation, 3. Developer provides 30' of IMC or rigid conduit for riser poles. 4. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design. 5. Developer installs pull boxes as per oily specs and design.(puli boxes provided by the dty). 6. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 version of plat and/or site plan email to • • sweido@cstx.gov. • 7. Developer provides load data for project. 8. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. 9. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure a3 installed for electric lines 10. To discuss any of the above electrical comments, please contact Sam Weido at 979.764.6314. Reviewed by: Sam Weido Date: 8-21 -05 • TxDOT 1. Recommend minimum spacing of 250' between proposed & adjacent existing driveways (33 MPH). Shared access @ existing driveways is preferred. Additional necornmendations may be forwarded oer District review. 2. Appropriate data will be required for any future permits © this site. Reviewed By Kari Nelson Date: June 27, 2005 MISCELLANEOUS 1, Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double -Check Back Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. All BackRow devices must be installed and tested upon instetlatiort as per City Ordinance 2394. pgne Any changes made lb the plans. that have not been requested by the Gty of College Station, must be epplained in your next tranornittal loiter and 'bubbled on your puns. My additional changes on these plans that have not been polntarl nut to the Clty, will consstute a completely new review, Page 4 of 4 7/25/2005 4:40 PM GWFAX -> 7138695573 Page 1 of 3 cfrff "141111 CITY OF COI.T.FLJE STATION Planning & Development Service 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM July 25, 2005 TO: Michael Kravetz, via fax 713.869.5573 FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Manager SUBJECT: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - Site Plan Staff reviewed the above - mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $200 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached. Completed Administrative Adjustment application TxDOT Permit Development Permit Application and supporting documents Easement Dedication Sheet and required documents (http://www.cstx.gov/docs/easement_dedication.pdf) If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Lindsay Boyer at 979.764.3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: David Cottrell Investments, Inc., via fax 713.334.4535 Case file #05- 00500106 Home of Texas A &M University 7/25/2005 4:40 PM GWFAX -> 7138695573 Page 2 of 3 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: COLLEGE STATION SHOPPING PLAZA (SP) - 05- 00500106 PLANNING 1. Please be aware that due to the lack of complete material for this submittal, additional comments may arise during future review of this site plan. Also, after 3 reviews, there will be additional fees for further review (repeat comment). ~ 21 If Pad Sites A is to be developed at a future time, please remove grey "screened" site 1-1 details from the site plan.- These will be reviewed when this site is to be developed. Phase lines should be drawn 20' away from any site improvement on the main site, and the area to be developed at a future time must be grassed, and curbing provided (knock -off curbing is allowed if it is indeed temporary until the site is developed) separating it from the main site. The Pad Site lines and any phase lines do not have to be the same (as it appears you will be developing the parking and landscaping for Pad Site containing the coffee shop at the time of the entire development, however all phases must be able to stand alone to meet all regulations, as do all pad sites – this includes parking as well as landscaping. Any site improvements NOT to be done at the time of this site plan should be placed in a Phase 2. For Pad Sites, redrawing the lines for Pad Site B (the coffee shop) to exclude the excess parking provided with that site will help the parking deficiency for the main site. Also, both pad sites are labeled 'B' on the site plan, please correct. 3. Parking ratio for free standing restaurants with drive -thru is 1 space /100 s.f.. Please adjust required parking ratio for Pad Site B accordingly. 4. Please correct the number of provided parking spaces for all the sites. The main site .. parking provided says 268. I think this should be 468? .T -• 5. ; Please submit application for administrative adjustment for the number of parking spaces required. This reduction in the number of parking spaces is being provided so that a reorganization of the parking lot will be able to meet all end island requirements (minimum 180 s.f. for each end of a parking row), and increase the parking setback to 10' as required by the Unified Development Ordinance (Article 7, Section 9*) 6. As indicated above, the required parking setback along the ROW is 10'. Please reorganize the parking to meet this ordinance. One solution would be to provided parallel parking along the ROW where parking must be removed to meet this setback in order to gain lost spaces back. 7. All parking rows should have end islands. In the rear of the new retail addition there appears to be a short row of 3 spaces that do not have both end islands. 8. All parking end islands should meet or exceed 180 s.f. for a single row of parking or 360 s.f. for a double row. 9. Any parking spaces adjacent to the ROW may only have 7 contiguous spaces. Sets of seven may be separated by a 18' x 20' island. Keep this in mind when reorganizing the parking. 10. Please depict painted arrows for traffic circulation indicating one way parking. 11. Please provide curb retum radii for all driveways. 21 This entire property is considered one building plot. Please make a note on the Site plan that this site, pad sites A and B are considered to be one building plot for the purposes of signagp and Non- Residgntial Architectural , andards, (repeat comment). 13.; Please provide curb and pavement details. Current standards for concrete are 5' (6" for firelanes and dumpster approaches), with #4 bar, 18" on center. Asphalt standards are 1.5" of asphalt on 6" of limestone base (repeat comment). NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 3 7/25/20.05 4:40 PM GWFAX -> 7138695573 Page 3 of 3 a. .. 14.`Dumpster locations have been approved by sanitation, however, all dumpster routes must be paved to firelane standards. You may wish to consolidate dumpsters to reduce the amount of firelane paving. F lq Please provide screening details for dumpster. Verify that the clear inside dimensions (inside of bollards) of the dumpster enclosures are 12' x 12' for single dumpsters or 12' x 24' for double dumpster enclosures. There must also be a 12' clear entrance between the gates for the trucks to be able collect (repeat comment). 16. Also, gates for dumpster enclosures must not block any parking. The gate for the enclosure in front of the proposed outdoor storage for the new retail space will block parking. This parking spot could be converted to an island to solve this problem. 17. Please show all existing and proposed fire lanes, hydrants, and FDCs (Fire Department Connections). (repeat comment) _ - � —fo+twT SAL. plrG, -- 18. Architectural elevations and material samples must be reviewed prior to the issuance of a building permit for compliance with the Non - residential Architectural Standards, located in Article 7.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. (repeat comment) Please advise if elevations will be submitted with building plans, or site plan. 19. Please indicate topography, this may be included in the required drainage and grading plan (repeat comment). 20. Please provide zoning for all abutting properties. 21. Please provide driveway separation distances for all opposite and adjacent driveways. 22. Minimum throat depth for the proposed driveway must be 55' at a minimum. It appears that it is approximately 53' at the first point of conflict. 23. Please locate all utilities and meters either on the site plan or on a utility plan. Be aware that all meters must be located in the ROW or in a PUE. 24. Please provide water and sanitary sewer legend. 25. Please provide TxDOT permit for proposed driveway. Our office will route the permit. 26. Provide overall height of building on the site plan (repeat comment). G r >tir. 27. Please provide a landscaping plan (repeat comment). 28. Provide a general note that all roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right-of-way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance (repeat comment). Please provide an access easement between the restaurant pad site and the Chinese restaurant. The easement should be located between the two properties somewhere _ parallel to Texas Avenue for future driveway consolidation. 30. Please make a note that all signs are permitted separately, or remove any signage proposed from the site plan. 31. Further submittal must also address previous applicable engineering and electrical comments. Reviewed by: LINDSAY BOYER Date: July 21, 2005 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 3