HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments;a�l;� yl•;
k: I'
° I
4 i
I
4ANING
I:
GVFA% -> 9798221763 Page 2 of 5
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER (SP) — 04 -00500259
!0r'owide a general, note that all roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment
shlall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right -
bf -way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point
five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building
architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance.
Dumpster enclosure #175 next to the TGI Restaurant bldg. needs a 65ft. approach
or to be angled. All single dumpster enclosures need to have a 12x12 inside
dimension and the double enclosures need to have a 24x12 inside dimension. (Per
S "t t' S
f1 i
2.
l il.
'14
J ,
ii
Ij.�,I Its
� i i
• »11 it
I i
4
I I ,
to am a ion u ennte U=44
,
43..; Please a aware a the site plan cannot be stamped approved un i
Toned o ub'ect pro ert has been r C -1.
. f1.10 -foot P.U.E. is being shown going through Carrabba s restaurant as well as a
1` pokion of Building "B" on Sheet C1.0. Structures are not permitted to be located in s
^i° Yl #Easements
P ehies located in the Overlay District that has parking located in the front are
yeq ired to have a�20 -foot setback from the right - of - way to the parking area. It
'appears that you are only providing 19.5.
i 6.1"P parking legend reflects Restaurants w/o drive thru requires 100 (should say
with a drive thru).
12i7.1���Th� parking calculation for restaurants w/o a drive thru needs to be adjusted to 627
parking spaces. The total parking requirement should reflect 882.
8: E`YI: Please be: aware of Section 7.2.C.8 Parking is discouraged along entrance
drives and should be limited on major circulation aisles of large development and
;� major retail'centers..The main drive aisles along the fronts of buildings "B" & "C"
I1 and along the west side of "C" there is parking being proposed.
9. Sheets C1.1 &'C1.2 there is two sidewalks that are being proposed between
r parking spaces. This will require an end island on both sides of the sidewalks or
I' incorporate a sidewalk into an interior island.
10 The head in parking shown on Sheet C1.2 adjacent to the northeast side of the TGI
'l Friday's building is being show as having 14 parking spaces. There are actually15
parking spaces located here. This will require an interior island.
111 ` It a that on Sheet C1.3 that there are not enough fire hydrants for adequate
e' fre;coyerage as well as not meeting the fire hydrant separation requirement which
r I �s'3004eet. Please add an additional fire hydrant. It looks as if you could place one
;+ 1n ft�on�. of the! proposed Boston Pizza.
112: ' Show ire Department Connections on the site plans. Please be aware that the
Ire" 'FDD is required to be located within 150 -feet of a fire hydrant.
�13j� please be aware of Section 5.8 Overlay Districts (Signage & Building Colors)
114: Please be aware that any structures exceeding 30 - feet in height will need to meet
L' 1 Section D105 Aerial Apparatus Roads of the 2000 International Fire Code.
X $ignage is reviewe'd and approved separately.
NOTE: My changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and 'bubbled' on your plans. Any additional charges on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 5
11/15/2004
13:16
i .:,ll�
�J N'
i
L (
' � i
L
1M
[i i1ff
;a�l;� yl•;
k: I'
° I
4 i
I
4ANING
I:
GVFA% -> 9798221763 Page 2 of 5
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER (SP) — 04 -00500259
!0r'owide a general, note that all roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment
shlall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right -
bf -way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point
five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building
architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance.
Dumpster enclosure #175 next to the TGI Restaurant bldg. needs a 65ft. approach
or to be angled. All single dumpster enclosures need to have a 12x12 inside
dimension and the double enclosures need to have a 24x12 inside dimension. (Per
S "t t' S
f1 i
2.
l il.
'14
J ,
ii
Ij.�,I Its
� i i
• »11 it
I i
4
I I ,
to am a ion u ennte U=44
,
43..; Please a aware a the site plan cannot be stamped approved un i
Toned o ub'ect pro ert has been r C -1.
. f1.10 -foot P.U.E. is being shown going through Carrabba s restaurant as well as a
1` pokion of Building "B" on Sheet C1.0. Structures are not permitted to be located in s
^i° Yl #Easements
P ehies located in the Overlay District that has parking located in the front are
yeq ired to have a�20 -foot setback from the right - of - way to the parking area. It
'appears that you are only providing 19.5.
i 6.1"P parking legend reflects Restaurants w/o drive thru requires 100 (should say
with a drive thru).
12i7.1���Th� parking calculation for restaurants w/o a drive thru needs to be adjusted to 627
parking spaces. The total parking requirement should reflect 882.
8: E`YI: Please be: aware of Section 7.2.C.8 Parking is discouraged along entrance
drives and should be limited on major circulation aisles of large development and
;� major retail'centers..The main drive aisles along the fronts of buildings "B" & "C"
I1 and along the west side of "C" there is parking being proposed.
9. Sheets C1.1 &'C1.2 there is two sidewalks that are being proposed between
r parking spaces. This will require an end island on both sides of the sidewalks or
I' incorporate a sidewalk into an interior island.
10 The head in parking shown on Sheet C1.2 adjacent to the northeast side of the TGI
'l Friday's building is being show as having 14 parking spaces. There are actually15
parking spaces located here. This will require an interior island.
111 ` It a that on Sheet C1.3 that there are not enough fire hydrants for adequate
e' fre;coyerage as well as not meeting the fire hydrant separation requirement which
r I �s'3004eet. Please add an additional fire hydrant. It looks as if you could place one
;+ 1n ft�on�. of the! proposed Boston Pizza.
112: ' Show ire Department Connections on the site plans. Please be aware that the
Ire" 'FDD is required to be located within 150 -feet of a fire hydrant.
�13j� please be aware of Section 5.8 Overlay Districts (Signage & Building Colors)
114: Please be aware that any structures exceeding 30 - feet in height will need to meet
L' 1 Section D105 Aerial Apparatus Roads of the 2000 International Fire Code.
X $ignage is reviewe'd and approved separately.
NOTE: My changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and 'bubbled' on your plans. Any additional charges on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 5
11lI5/200;4 13.16 ! OTITFAX -> 9798221763 Page 3 of 5
II
LANDSCAPING /STREETSCAPING /BUFFER
16:' Provide a general note that 100% coverage . of groundcover, decorative paving,
:j' decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and
drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights -of -way, and adjacent property
xl� 'disturbed during construction.
„ ! i 17.Please delineate the property lines on the landscape plan.
18.' The required buffer between commercial and multi- family "Buffer A" is a 10 -foot
i! planted buffer and a six foot in wooden fence. It appears that there is only five feet
between the parking and the property line. This required 10 -foot planted buffer area
is not permitted to have any parking located in it.
i19' .,The required buffer between commercial and single family "Buffer C" is a 15 -foot
lanted buffer with a six foot masonry wall. It appears that from the property lines
6o
r i i +i i vn` on sheet S3.2 that the 15 -foot is not being provided. Please see Section 7.6
$ er!Requir'ements in the Unified Development Ordinance. The buffer is required
"alo g the entire property line between commercial and single family. It appears that
,;, icily 390 -feet is being shown on the plan and the actual length of the property
; boundary is 470 -feet which would require 19 minimum 2 -inch canopy trees and
' I ' 157 minimum 5- gallon shrubs. Parking is not allowed to be located in the required
i ,, r � .Duffer and a masonry wall will be required in stead of a wooden fence.
C ;2Oi'The amount of'street trees that are required is 46 not 45, please adjust.
i I ;j ? 1 21
�'Currently The proposal is for 101 canopy trees, however only 92 are being provided.
the landscape plan is not meeting the minimum point requirement for the
landscape calculation.
22' Please be aware of Section 7.9 Non residential Standards (Mechanical equipment
,j i'iScreening, Prohibited Materials and Building Mass & Design).
23' Please be aware of Section 7.10 Outdoor Lighting Standards.
24 Please be aware of Section 7.11 Outdoor Storage and Display. It appears that
Outdoor Season Sales will be located on the subject property. This will need to
comply.
� Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 11 -05 -04
( `ENGINEERING
It I
' 1 "The TxDOT'PL-rmiti.Application for two driveways will be forwarded to the state
office, however, please note the state Area Office has provided preliminary
!comments below. Additionally, Troy Rother with the City has met with Kurt Barnes
s
,,, the state District Office corresponded with Chuck Ellison the results of that
discuss: the Tarrow dd uld be constructed to a minor arteri
is
r. lanes), the developer shall provide signal improvemen s, and TxDOT will not grant
+' perm si sl sion for an additional signal between Tarrow Street East and Spring Loop.
i. Prior to site plan or construction plan approval, TxDOT permits including drives,
1. utilities, and signal modifications are required.
• i
I
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
transmittal letter and 'bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
will constitute a completely new review.
Page 3 of 5
II ! i��' .... ._.. ,.... _......., ....... .
1 2 I $ �3i OVFAX -> 9798221763
a
R .
2.:: The site plan shows off -site storm water improvements.
_ . , Ilowing the improvements is need from rd Smith
Page 4 of 5
A written agreement
I arty owner.
' �" !3' 3. t Provl e e ep h on the westernmost drive and depict the cross acces
�' ant. FYI the easement should be laced on the Final Plat.
4., Provide a fire flow analysis.
5.,� Provide a drainage report.
6 Provide a sanitary sewer analysis.
7 �Prokide a phasing plan.
; 8 oAsi8er prov expansion joints along easement boundaries through concrete
i
' ' 06rrlent for.future aintenance.
�j
y ,Cll 9, ,Depict and /or provide crossing utility detail information: C5.1 — Sta. 3+00 and 5+00,
} ,a i t
X5.(3 _ Sta. 3 +20, and C6.5 — Sta. 1+90 and 4 +20.
1d Clarify if existing sanit is to be exposed at proposed , Y � g ry headwall on C5.1. � P P P
ro
EQ posed w 44 e B iii ater and sewer crossings should be designed /noted in accordance with
O( )O (i.e. — 2 ft. minimum, cement stabilized sand, centered
'TC 290.
Joints; etc.): C5.2 — Sta. 1 +00, C6.4 — Sta. 0 +30 and 1 +90, C6.5 — Sta. 1+90, and
C6.7 - Sta. 0 +20.
For; proposed water under sanitary crossings should be designed /noted in
accordance with TCEQ 290.44(e)(B)(iv)(111) (i.e. — joint of DIP waterline): C6.1 —
Waterline 'A'.
13. C5.4 — Provide top of manhole elevations.
k r 14. C5.4 — Cement stabilized sand should be provided for all lines less than 3.5 feet of
,+
>; cover and provide DIP at drive crossing.
15. Deflect line where possible in accordance with guidelines to remove bends and
f possibly reduce excessive depths: C5.4, C6.2 — Sta. 0 +30 deflect over storm and
I .Sta: 4 +20, C6.3 — Sta. 8 +80, C6.4, C6.5, and C6.7 — Sta. 0+03 and 1+30.
16.C5.4 Provide 20 ft. wide easements for sewer lines with depths exceeding 8 ft.
This line should be shallowed as well and possibly avoiding the additional width.
( l w
Waterline is depicted as 8 in. vs. the Overall Plan depicts it as 12 in.
1 ;,1 ;11� .�,,Provtde:an'ar release valve around Sta. 0 +25 if deflected over storm.
1 C6': Provtde double 45 degree bends in lieu of a 90 degree bend.
Provide an air release valve in this high section of line.
;� I , l' ' 6. -' There appears to be a double labeling of waterline 'G'.
I� M PI e se clearly depict the fire lanes.
northwestem -most water main should have an extension to the adjacent
,
U�t � I , a 9
ll` i kq ,W6stern property.
F l . 24' The' southwestem -most water main should have an extension to the common
comer of the four properties.
25 C6.7 — Waterline 'G' should be shortened 40 ft. to minimize the length of the dead
4, end line.
26.An addition hydrant in the vicinity east of the eastern -most strip center is needed
i�t within the existing water main.
-�' 27. It appears that Waterline 'A' could be 45'd to the north approximately 60 ft. to the
" next row of islands and minimize the length of the 3 dead end lines.
4
$ a! Reviewed by: Alan Gibbs Date: 11 -12 -04
.i r
NOTE. chan made to the plans, that have not been
Any 'changes p requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next
y „ transmittal letter and 'bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
f iAl constitute a completely new review.
Page 4 of 5
r i
15/2004 13:16 GYFAX -> 9798221763
� y l i l.;
" 1 i
e.�p, ?rt x" - dpi
r.1..,t
1 i� r
t �I
111 9 �r�
r
lr
i
r.F E
I� ,1
� rr 11
it
1.
Page 5 of 5
RICAL
Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design.
Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes
p ovideq by the city).;
evelope'r pro vides load data for project..
Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes.
Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for
electric lines to have temporary blanket easement released.
College Station Utilities will provide electric design plan to developer for the
installation of electric conduit.
To discuss any of the above electrical comments, please contact Sam Weido
at 979.764 -6314
, .
i Reviewed by:
1
TxDOT
Sam Weido
Date: 11 -4-04
1. Access driveways to University Drive (FM 60) must meet TxDOT's
°Regulations for Access to State Highways ". Regulations are primarily
based on posted speed limits and distances between proposed & adjacent
access points. Where posted speed limits are 50 MPH or greater the
required spacing between access points is required to be 425'.
2. Developer will be responsible for modifications to Traffic Signal Lights,
h1i through the City of College Station, for access @ this intersection location
' ;,arrow / South Tarrow Drive — private).
I Since roposed intermediate driveway has been shifted approximately 135'
I! east away from an exist'
� y mg median opening; a recommendation from the
7' District Traffic Section will be required before this proposed access can be
'approved.
�a4.. Appropriate data,will be required for any future permits @ this development
site.
�eviewed by:
Karl Nelson, Area Engineer Date: 11 -9-04
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a
l l J' Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double -Check Back Flow
Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394.
2., All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City
1A Ordinance 2394.
c � +
„�+ I NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be e)lained in your nerd
f ` iransmittel letter and - bubbled' on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,
`r A constitute a completely new review.
Page 5of5
'
It
t • ..
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 8
Project: UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER 1 -3 (SP) - 04- 00500259
PLANNING
1. The mechanical room's square footage seems to be pulled out of the calculations.
Please include in the total square footage.
2. Please reflect in the parking legend 109, 401 for total square footage divided by 250
= 438 parking spaces and 29,185 square feet (in excess of 25% of intense use)
divided by 65 = 449 parking spaces showing 887 total parking spaces required.
(Please see attached sheet for correcting the legend for each phase). Please call me
if you need clarification).
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: June 20, 2006
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: PUTZ -MEYER DRIVEWAY (SP) — 04 -220
Construction of any portion of a commercial site (such as a driveway) requires the
property to be platted, an approved site plan, and a development permit.
After review of the materials, staff has determined that this does not meet the
requirements for a complete site plan submittal. Additional plans and reports are
necessary for a complete submittal (e.g., signal modification, drainage report,
landscaping plan, color and material samples, water and sewer reports). A complete
site plan may be a phase of the overall plan but must include a building, parking, drive,
etc. The following comments do not constitute a complete review, but are provided for
general guidance.
ENGINEERING
1. The site plan shows off -site improvements. A written agreement allowing the
improvements is needed from the Richard Smith property owner.
2. Please submit a TxDOT permit application for any construction proposed within the
state right -of -way including the drive, utilities, and signal modification.
3. FYI for platting: The required throat depth for shopping centers is 130 feet. Please
provide the cross access easement to this point.
Reviewed by: Alan Gibbs Date: September 9, 2004
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
Page 2 of 2
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER (SP) - 04- 00500259
PLANNING
f1.
Per Section 7.5.C. Landscaping Requirements 1.d. states: Projects may be
phased with lines being drawn 20 -feet beyond any new site amenity. Please
adjust phase lines.
J2.
Please show phase lines on all site, utility, grading and landscape layouts.
3.
Each phase must be able to support its self. Please break down parking
requirements for each phase (parking required and provided).
.�4.
As previously stated in the first review please provide a general note that all
roof and ground- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view
or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right -of -way or residential
district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above
grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and
scale to maintain a unified appearance.
A.
The parking calculation for restaurants w/o a drive thru needs to be adjusted
to 627 parking spaces. The total parking requirement should reflect 882.
./6.
As previously stated in the first review sheet C1.1 is still proposing a sidewalk
between parking spaces. This will require an end island on both sides of the
sidewalks or incorporate a sidewalk into an interior island.
2 7.
FDC 's are required to be located within 150 -feet of a fire hydrant. It appears
that Building "B" (FDC 28b) is not meeting this requirement. Please be aware
that if the proper water pressures and fire wall requirements are not being
met an additional FDC may be required.
'
Sheet C -1, Building "C" - The FDC is not located adjacent to a fire lane. If the
existing main drive is marked as fire lane please delineate this on the site
plan. Per the Fire Marshals office (Steve Smith), please relocate the FDC to
the west side or south end of the building. The FDC cannot be located in a
drive thru. All three main drives off of University Drive will be required to be
striped for fire lane.
,/9.
It does not appear that a fire lane is being provided on the west end of
Building "A" and "B ". Fire lanes will be required. Please show fire lanes on the
site plans.
LANDSCAPE
0.
The property lines on the landscape plan do not match the ones on the site
plan. This will affect the layout in referencing the buffer comments on the
previous review.
/1 .
Please be aware that the triangular portion of the subject property that is
currently going through a rezoning process from R -1 Single Family to C -2
General Commercial will give you more room to work with. However, the
rezoning will not preclude you from the buffer requirement between C -1 and
R -1 which is a masonry wall and a 15 -foot buffer with required plantings.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 4
w
Section 7.6 Buffer Requirements 4.Substitutions (e). States: Walls may
be substituted with fences if the required buffer yard area and plantings are
doubled. (f) States: Walls and fences may be omitted if the required buffer
yard area and plantings are tripled. It appears that the subject property has
the room for option (e).
12. As previously stated in the first review of comments Buffer "C" is required
along the entire property line between commercial and single family. It
appears that only 390 -feet is being shown on the buffer legend and the actual
length of the property boundary is 470 -feet, which would require 19 minimum
2 -inch canopy trees and 157 minimum 5- gallon shrubs. Please make this
f adjustment.
13. As previously stated in the first review of comments the required buffer
between commercial and multi - family Buffer A" is a 10 -foot planted buffer and
a six foot in wooden fence. It appears that there is still only five feet between
the parking and the property line. This required 10 -foot planted buffer area is
not permitted to have any parking located in it. Please make the appropriate
/ adjustment.
/ 4. Buffer "A" is 262' long divided by 25 = 10.48, which will require 11 canopy
trees in this buffer. Please make this adjustment.
15. This development is now being submitted with three phases. Therefore the
phase lines will need to be shown on the landscape plan as they are on the
site plans. Each phase will need to have it's own area calculation
requirements. Please provide required and provided points for each phase.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 12 -09 -04
ENGINEERING
1O. Phase 2 - requires TxDOT permit approval for all proposed work within the
State ROW of FM 60. Discussions are underway with Brian Woods the
Engineer.
(D IDistrict
Phase 2 - The site plan shows off -site storm water improvements. A written
agreement allowing the improvements is needed from the Richard Smith
property owner.
Phase 1 - At all public water and sewer crossings provide a minimum of 12
inches of cement stabilized sand beyond each joint ASTM 2241 sewer, and
note that each associated water line should also have a 20 foot joint centered
on the crossing.
V 4. Phase 2 - Clarify if existing sanitary is to be exposed at proposed headwall on
C5.1.
Phase 1 - C,5.4,— Cement stabilized sand should be provided for all lines less
than 3.5 feet of cover and provide DIP at drive crossing.
C,
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 3 of 4
/6. Phase 1 - Deflect line where possible in accordance with guidelines to
remove bends and possibly reduce excessive depths: C6.2 — Sta. 0 +30
deflect over storm and Sta. 4 +20, and C6.7 — Sta. 0 +03.
✓ 7. Phase 1 - C6.2 — Waterline 'B' is depicted as 8 in. vs. the Overall Plan
V/ incorrectly depicts it as 12 in.
8- Phase 1 — Provide air release valves on high portions of line on C6.2 and
C6.5.
✓ 9. All Phases - Consider providing expansion joints along easement boundaries
through concrete pavement for future maintenance.
Reviewed by: Alan Gibbs
Date: 12 -10 -04
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 4 of 4
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3
Project: UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER (SP) - 04- 00500259
PLANNING
1. Phase I Building "C" on the site plan reflects 10,000 square feet. The actual total is
9420. The legend is correct. The actual bolded number on the site plan needs to be
adjusted.
J2. Sheet LS1 legend reflects for Phase III -B 203 linear feet of buffer between C -1 and
R -1. This would leave 277 linear feet of buffer between C -1 and R -1 for Phase III -A.
This would require 22 canopy trees and 186 shrubs. Please reflect this in the
legend.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 12 -16 -04
ENGINEERING
1. Phase 2 - requires TxDOT permit approval for all proposed work within the State
ROW of FM 60. Discussions are underway with Brian Woods the District Engineer.
2. Phase 2 - The site plan shows off -site storm water improvements. A written
agreement allowing the improvements is needed from the Richard Smith property
owner.
3. Phase 1 - At all public water and sewer crossings, each associated water line should
also have a 20 foot joint centered on the crossing.
4. Phase 1 - C5.4 — Cement stabilized sand should be provided for all lines less than
3.5 feet of cover and provide DIP at drive crossing.
Reviewed by: Alan Gibbs Date: 12 -20 -04
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 5
Project: UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER PH.1 (SP) - 04- 00500259
FYI: (Since the last submittal there have been significant changes to the site layout that
have not been bubbled with no explanation. Please identify all of the changes with your
next submittal.) The following are comments identified by staff.
PLANNING
JI. It appears that there may be some proposed outdoor seating area outside if the
6,504 s.f. restaurant. Please be aware that any outdoor seating areas are required to
be counted toward the parking calculations in the parking legend.
Z2.,e Sheet C1.0 Please identify Building A with the square footage.
Though the proposed parking is exceeding the parking requirements, if you could
please delineate the 25% restaurant/bar parking calculations in the parking legend.
4. Per Wally Urrutia Sanitation Superintendent the dumpster location between the
11,288 s.f. and the 6,504 s.f. restaurant looks like the angle needs to be turned 20 to
30 degrees counter clockwise on this particular enclosure in order for us to have a
clear approach. (764 -3841)
✓5 TGI Fridays will need to relocate the FDC within 100 feet of the fire hydrant.
Please be aware that the proposed buildings will need to meet the 2003 Building
Code.
What are the plans for building's A & B in Phase III? Will they be sprinklered or will
fire wall protection be provided?
Reviewed by:
ENGINEERING
Jennifer Reeves
Date: 07 -11 -05
1. TxDOT Driveway Application — FYI, the application has been forwarded for State
review.
2. TxDOT Utility Application — Please provide a plan and profile of the proposed storm
sewer. Additionally, note and depict the proposed sidewalk extending into the State
ROW.
3. Drainage Report — FYI, the report is stamped
not required to be evaluated for detention).
4. Site Plan — Please clarify the proposed
elevations, etc.
5. Construction Plans — Sht. 5.1, Sta. 2 +50 —
crossing.
reviewed and filed (the 2 -yr storm is
retaining wall details, location, and
Provide TCEQ separation specs at
6. Construction Plans — Sht. 6.3, Sta. 6 +65 — Provide bend in waterline after the fire
hydrant tee.
7. Construction Plans — Sht. 6.3, Sta. 8 +75 — Provide a bend instead of deflection due
to change in horizontal, as well as vertical.
Reviewed by: Alan Gibbs Date: 07 -12 -05
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 6
Project: UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER PH. 1 -3 (SP) - 04- 00500259
PLANNING
1. The temporary curbing will also be required between phases 2a, 2b and 3. Please
note clearly on the site plan.
2. All dumpster proposed pad enclosures located will be required to be screened with a
6 foot solid fence instead of a masonry wall or relocated.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 10 -06 -05
ENGINEERING
1. No comment.
Reviewed by: Alan Gibbs Date: 10 -12 -05
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review. 2 of 2