HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Comments�b�lo�b 1
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
September 3, 2004
TO: Phi -Ton Investments, LLP, via fax 979.695.2941
FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: DOVE CROSSING (PP) - Preliminary Plat
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned preliminary plat as requested. The following page
is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please
resubmit the requested items once all comments have been addressed. Once the
requested items and information are resubmitted, you will be scheduled for the next
available Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting, located in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
Ten (10) copies of the revised preliminary plat; and,
One (1) Mylar original of the revised preliminary plat.
One (1) copy of the digital file of the preliminary plat on diskette or e-mail
to nmanhart@cstx.gov
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project
will be considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that if all
comments have not been addressed, your project will be pulled from the scheduled
Planning & Zoning Commission agenda. Your project may be placed on a future
agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please call Spencer Thompson
or myself at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Joe Schultz, P.E., Texcon, via fax 979.764.7759
Case file #04- 00500213
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
1 of 3
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: DOVE CROSSING (PP) - 04- 00500213
ENGINEERING
1. The plat must be at a minimum scale of 1"=100', or a variance must be requested.
Water and sewer have not been reviewed with this plat because of the current
scale.
2. This development is required to make provisions for extensions of water and sewer
to surrounding areas. See previous comment.
3. Please dimension the alley right -of -way and pavement width. The minimum right -of-
way is 24'.
4. A handicap ramp and sidewalk must be provided to the pedestrian access way
shown from Neelley Lane to the CSISD property. Please also show sidewalk in
access way.
5. Please note that lots 13, 14, Block 2 will incur a side street setback on the side of
the property located adjacent to the public access way, per Section 8 -K.2 of the
Subdivision Regulations.
6. Please add a note to the plat that Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 3 are to take access to Neelley
Lane.
7. In addition please show proposed use of Lot 7, Block 3. If this is a proposed
residential lot, please see LIDO concerning residential access to collectors.
8. Please note that temporary turn - arounds may be required where streets have a lot
fronting on it. This may affect your phase lines.
9. Please show floodplain per Alexandria Preliminary Plat or obtain model and show
accordingly.
10. Detention is proposed in greenway and storm water detention area for Alexandria.
This development cannot increase the 100 -year flood for this branch of Lick Creek.
How do you propose to achieve this? A model is required to show compliance with
City ordinances.
11.A drainage easement will be required for the development of the adjacent property
for detention.
12. It appears that the proposed detention pond meets the requirement for
"development," as defined in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The UDO
clearly states that a plat is required for development on a parcel not previously,
legally platted.
13.A sewer model is required for this development. The model should show that each
phase can stand on its own and that the entire development works.
14.A water model is required for this development. Each phase must stand on its own.
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of 3
15. Concerning OP, the required water model must demonstrate that the subdivision
meets all engineering requirements with whatever line is required.
16. Lots 1 -21, Block 1 and lots 1 -4, Block 2 should sewer to the 92 -01 Sewer Impact
Fee line.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson & Jennifer Prochazka Date: August 30, 2004
ELECTRICAL
1. Will need 20 ft. Public Utility Easement along the property line adjacent to school
property for the extension of a powerline to provide service to property. Easement
will be needed the complete distance with Phase 1 of development.
2. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design.
3. Developer installs street lights per city spec and design.
4. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2000 version of plat and /or site plan email to
tmichals -cstx.gov
5. Once autocad master plan is provided we will do a master electric plan for the
development showing necessary electric infrastructure and street lighting.
6. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric
lines (including street lights).
7. To discuss any of the above electrical comments, please contact Tony Michalsky
at 979.764.3438.
Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky Date: 8 -27 -04
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your
next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out
to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
3 of 3
Response to Staff Review Comments No. 2
Dove Crossing
Engineering:
2 copies of the revised fire flow analysis are being submitted. The proposed
waterlines have been evaluated with 1,000 gpm to each hydrant. The maximum
velocity in any of the waterlines for all scenarios has also been provided.
2. A sewer analysis will be prepared to confirm capacity in the existing sewer line.
3. Note 10 has been revised.
4. BFEs from the McClure Engineering Drainage Study have been added to the Plat
and the 100 -year floodplain limits adjusted to match the BFE data. The
floodplain limits do not encroach on any of the Dove Crossing residential lots.
5. This has been noted in Note 14 on the Plat.
Sep 27 04 10:16a TEXCON ENGINEERING 9797647759
Response to Staff Review Comments No. 1
Dove Crossing
Engineering:
1. The Preliminary Plat has been drawn at a scale of 1 " =100' and is now on 2 sheets.
2. Water and sewer lines have been extended to the adjoining properties. Two
copies of the Preliminary Utility Plan for this subdivision have also been provided
to assist in the review of the water and sewer lines.
3. The alleys have been dimensioned.
4. The handicap ramp and sidewalk are shown.
5. Lots I3 & 14, Block 2, are 7.75 feet wider than the adjacent lots to allow for the
side street setback.
6. Note has been added as Note #9.
7. Lot 7, Block 3, has a 25 feet wide portion which adjoins Neelley Lane. Access to
this lot will be from Neelley Lane.
8. Noted. Location of temporary turnarounds will be shown with the final plats and
construction drawings.
9. The floodplain limits from the Alexandria Subdivision Master Preliminary Plat
have been shown, as well as the floodplain limits from the Drainage Report for
the Alexandria Subdivision.
10. There are approximately 2.9 acres in the proposed detention area which can be
excavated for a detention pond. A model will be provided to show how this
detention will comply with City Ordinances. Until the model can be completed,
temporary detention ponds will be constructed for Phases l & 2 of the
subdivision. The locations of these ponds will be at the 2 existing ponds shown
on the plat. This is noted on the plat as Note #1 3.
11. The Developer is in the process of purchasing the adjacent property from Mr.
Froehling. This area has been added to the plat, and Mr. Froehling is shown as an
Owner for this subdivision since the land acquisition is not yet complete.
12. The detention area has been included within the limits of the plat.
13. A sewer report for the subdivision will be provided.
14. A water report with a fire flow analysis will be provided for each phase of the
subdivision.
15. The fire flow analysis demonstrates that the waterlines as proposed will meet the
engineering requirements. The existing lines at Eagle and Alexandria are 12" in
diameter. This plat proposes 8" lines to connect to the future extension of the
existing 12" lines.
16. It is proposed that all of the Phase 1 lots sewer to the impact Fee line. As shown
in the sewer report, the sewer line stub to this site has adequate capacity.
p.2
_Electrical:
1. This casement has been shown. Refer to Note 411 Cor more inforniation.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: DOVE CROSSING (PP) - 04- 00500213
ENGINEERING
1. The fire flow analysis must provide a minimum 1,000 gpm to each hydrant. In
addition, velocity is a component of the report and must be reported with the
other data.
2. The sewer line along Graham Road is the 92 -01 Impact Fee Line approved
by ordinance. The line was designed and constructed for a specific area as
contained in the ordinance. All connections to the line and users in the Fee
Area are required to pay the adopted impact fee rate. It appears
approximately 20 lots of Dove Crossing are in the Fee Area. In order to
permit additional flow into the Fee Line a sewer analysis would have to
confirm that there is adequate additional capacity in the line per the adopted
Land Use Study of the Impact Fee Area.
3. Due to the previous comment, Note 10 can not be approved at this time.
4. The flood study should have BFEs associated with cross sections. The
floodplain boundary should relate to this data.
5. Please note, the City is currently adopting new standards for street design
and street construction. Minimum requirements will change when these
standards are adopted.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson & Jennifer Prochazka Date: October 4,
2004
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: DOVE CROSSING (PP) - 04- 00500213
ENGINEERING
1. The fire flow analysis must provide a minimum 1,000 gpm to each hydrant. In
addition, velocity is a component of the report and must be reported with the
other data.
2. The sewer line along Graham Road is the 92 -01 Impact Fee Line approved
by ordinance. The line was designed and constructed for a specific area as
contained in the ordinance. All connections to the line and users in the Fee
Area are required to pay the adopted impact fee rate. It appears
approximately 20 lots of Dove Crossing are in the Fee Area. In order to
permit additional flow into the Fee Line a sewer analysis would have to
confirm that there is adequate additional capacity in the line per the adopted
Land Use Study of the Impact Fee Area.
3. Due to the previous comment, Note 10 can not be approved at this time.
4. The flood study should have BFEs associated with cross sections. The
floodplain boundary should relate to this data.
5. Please note, the City is currently adopting new standards for street design
and street construction. Minimum requirements will change when these
standards are adopted.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson & Jennifer Prochazka Date: October 4,
2004
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764 -3570 / Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
October 4, 2004
TO: Phi -Ton Investments, LLP, via fax 979.695.2941
FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: DOVE CROSSING - Preliminary Plat
Staff reviewed the above - mentioned preliminary plat as requested. The following page
is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please
address the comments and submit the following information by Monday, October 18,
2004 at 10:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting scheduled for October 28, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
Ten (10) copies of the revised preliminary plat; and,
One (1) Mylar original of the revised preliminary plat.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at
979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Joe Schultz, P.E., Texcon, via fax 979.764.7759
Case file #04- 00500213
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on
these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
1 of 2
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: DOVE CROSSING (PP) - 04- 00500213
ENGINEERING
1. The fire flow analysis must provide a minimum 1,000 gpm to each hydrant. In
addition, velocity is a component of the report and must be reported with the other
data.
2. The sewer line along Graham Road is the 92 -01 Impact Fee Line approved by
ordinance. The line was designed and constructed for a specific area as contained
in the ordinance. All connections to the line and users in the Fee Area are required
to pay the adopted impact fee rate. It appears approximately 20 lots of Dove
Crossing are in the Fee Area. In order to permit additional flow into the Fee Line a
sewer analysis would have to confirm that there is adequate additional capacity in
the line per the adopted Land Use Study of the Impact Fee Area.
3. Due to the previous comment, Note 10 can not be approved at this time.
4. The flood study should have BFEs associated with cross sections. The floodplain
boundary should relate to this data.
5. Please note, the City is currently adopting new standards for street design and
street construction. Minimum requirements will change when these standards are
adopted.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson & Jennifer Prochazka Date: October 4, 2004
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on
these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review.
2 of2