HomeMy WebLinkAbout7 Trail PrioritiesDATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT :
CITY O F COLLEGE STAT ION
Planning & D evelop ment Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O . Box 9960
College Station , Texas 77842
Phone 979 .764 .3570 /Fax 979 .764 .3496
MEMORANDUM
November 3, 2014
Members of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board
Venessa Garza, AICP, Greenways Program Manager
Agenda Item #4 -Sidewalk projects and priorities
Item: Presentation, possible action , and discussion regarding a recommendation on new sidewalk projects
and priorities .
Background: Th is it em is before the Board to review and update new sidewalk project priorities for FY16.
Sidewalk projects are currently prioritized based on the methodology used during the creation of the
Bicycle, Pedestrian , and Greenways Master Plan and was also updated by the Board in July 2013 .
Factors Weight
Population Served (Population Density) 18
Safety (Automobile/Pedestrian Accidents) 18
Schools (Existing and Future) 18
Parks (Existing and Future) 13
Texas A&M University 10
Public Requests 10
Other Key Destinations (Shopping Centers, 7 Grocery Stores, Major Employers)
Bus Stops 6
100
A list of priorities was also finalized in July 2013 and updated in June 2014 with the addition of Texas
Avenue gaps. Staff is requesting a review to update the prioritized list based on projects that have been
funded and a recent Americans with Disabilities request for connectivity on Cross Street.
The current list approved by the Board includes (with their status in parentheses):
1 . Te>Eas A>r<enue gaps from University to l-lensel Street (funeleel project)
2. George Bush Drive East-Dominik Drive to University Oaks Blvd. (unfunded project)
3 . Dominik Dri•1e George Busl't Drive East to Regency Village Apartments (funeleel tl'trougl't
Community Development Block Grant Funes (CDBG))
4 . Dexter Drive -Winding Road to Gabbard Park (unfunded project with Southside Neighborhood
Plan sidewalk improvements)
5. Munson Avenue -connection to Harvey Road (unfunded project)
6. Dexter Drive -Gabbard Park to Llano Place (unfunded project with Southside Neighborhood Plan
sidewalk improvements)
I ?· Dominil< Drive Stallings Drive to Munson Avenue (funeleel tl'trougl't CDBG)
ll..Jl. Harvey Road -gaps from Texas Avenue to SH 6 (unfunded project)
9 . Scarlett O'Hara Drive -University Oaks Blvd . to Harvey Road (unfunded project)
10. Georgia Street -Holleman Drive to Nevada Street (unfunded project)
.:--5.glff proposes the following list:
_..l~ Cross Street -Dogwood Street to Nagle Street (ADA request)
I 2. George Bush Drive East -Dominik Drive to University Oaks Blvd.
3. Dexter Drive -Winding Road to Gabbard Park (Southside Neighborhood Plan)
4. Munson Avenue -connection to Harvey Road
I
. 5. Dexter Drive -Gabbard Park to Llano Place (South Knoll Neighborhood Plan)
6. Harvey Road -gaps from Texas Avenue to SH 6 _-'-"""',._..
7 . Scarlett O'Hara Drive -University Oaks Blvd . to Harvey Road
8. Georgia S lem · -to Nevada Street
9. Park Place -Timber Street to Texas Avenue
10. University Oaks Blvd. -Olympia Way to Stallings Drive
Staff also proposes the following groupings of projects based on Neighborhood Plans:
Southside NP :
Glade Reconstruction -Park Place to Hollemen Drive
Dexter Drive -Winding Road to Gabbard Park
Eastgate NP:
Foster Avenue -Lincoln Avenue to George Bush Drive East
Walton Drive -Foster Avenue to Francis Drive
Puryear Drive North -Walton Drive to James Parkway
Nunn Street -Lincoln Avenue to Walton Drive
South Knoll NP:
Dexter Drive -Gabbard Park to Llano Place
Caudill Street -Holleman Drive to Gunsmith Street
Haines Drive -Gabbard Park to Langford Street
Central College Station NP:
Southwood Drive -Valley View Drive to Todd Trail
Todd Trail -Southwood Drive to Rio Grande Blvd .
Todd Trail -Longmire Drive to Brothers Blvd.
11/2/2014
Sidewalk Priorities with Approved BPG Methodology (July 2013)
For FY16
Priority Street Name To
2 GEORGE BUSH DR E Dominik Drive
9GMINIK 9RW
3 DEXTER DR N Winding Road
4 MUNSON AVE connection to Harvey Road
5 DEXTER DRS Gabbard Park
9GMl~llK 9R E
6 HARVEY RD gaps from Texas Avenue
7 SCARLETI OHARA DR University Oaks Blvd
8 Georgia St Holleman Drive
(9 F ARK PLACE E Timber Street
10 Foster Ave Lincoln Avenue
11 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD W Olympia Way
9GMl~llK 9R SeetieA 3
12 FAIRVIEW AVE George Bush Drive
13 TIMBER ST Oakwood Intermediate School
14 WALTON DR Foster Avenue
15 ANDERSON ST Southwest Parkway
16 BRENTWOOD DR 200 foot connect ion to Texas Ave
17 Wellesley Ct Tarrow Street
18 James Parkway connection across Francis Drive
19 Gilchrist Ave Foster Avenue
20 Puryear Drive North Walton Drive
21 Nunn Street Lincoln Avenue
~ l,&JateF :i:eweF GeAAeeteF A13aFtRieRt feRi13le11
23 Phoenix St
24 SOUTHWEST PKWY E 1
25 Southwest Pkwy 3
26 Southland St
From Miles
University Oaks Blvd 0.12
G,Q9
Gabbard Park 0.25
0.04
Llano Place 0.11
~
SH 6 0 .82
Harvey Road 0.15
Nevada Street 0 .25
Texas Avenue 0.75
George Bush Drive East 0.62
Stalli ngs Drive 0 .14
~
Luther Street 0.39
Pa rk Place 0 .20
Francis Drive 0.52
Bee Creek Park 0 .17
0 .05
future development 0 .15
0 .03
Texas Avenue 0 .09
James Parkway 0.10
Walton Drive 0 .06
PaFI~ Plaee ~
0 .25
0.05
0 .08
0.20
Neighborhood
School Plan
Southside
South Knoll Area
¥es
Southside
Yes Southside
Eastgate
Eastgate
Southside
Yes Southside
Yes Eastgate
South Knoll Area
Eastgate
Yes Eastgate
Eastgate
Yes Eastgate
Eastgate
Se1:1tRsiele
Southside
Southside
South Knoll Area
Southside
Grid
Calculation
8.00
8-:00
8 .00
7.62
7.52
+.:4G
7.37
7 .17
7 .10
7 .09
7.06
7 .05
~
7 .00
7 .00
7 .00
7 .00
7 .00
7 .00
7.00
7 .00
7 .00
7 .00
+:oo
7 .00
7 .00
7.00
7 .00
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Funded through CDBG
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Funded through CDBG
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Funded through CDBG
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
Funded CDBG
Unfunded CDBG
Neighborhood Grid
Priority Street Name To From Miles School Plan Calculation
27 SOUTHWEST PKWY E 2 0 .04 Southside 7 .00
28 Nevada St 0 .19 Souths ide 6 .99
29 RHETI BUTLER DR 0.06 6.9S
30 CAUDILL ST Holleman Drive Gunsmith Street 0.20 Yes South Knoll Area 6.93 Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
31 Puryear Dr South 0.07 Eastgate 6.93
32 ELEANOR ST 0 .08 Souths ide 6 .92
33 Eisenhower St North 0.18 Eastgate 6.91 Unfunded CDBG
34 MANUEL DR 0.32 6.90
3S Montclair Avenue 0.40 Southside 6 .89
36 HOLLEMAN DR N 0 .17 6 .86
37 HAINES DR Gabbard Park Langford Street 0.27 Yes South Knoll Area 6.82 Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
38 NAGLE ST 0 .12 6 .77
39 HONDO DR 0 .21 Yes South Knoll Area 6 .76
40 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD E 0.44 6.7S
41 Live Oak St 0 .16 Eastgate 6.72 Unfunded CDBG
4l TARROW STE 0 .20 6 .6S
( 42 !i\IRLINE DR Southwood Drive Shenandoah Drive 0.20 Central CS 6.SS Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
43 KYLE AV 0 .04 Eastgate 6.46
44 SOUTHWOOD DR Valley View Drive Todd Trail 0.40 Yes Central CS 6.4S
4S BA YOU WOODS DR 0 .17 6.43
GtJAQAbtJPE QR G-:M ¥es Sat,1tR KRall AFea 6,-39 Funded
46 TARROW ST 0.59 6 .21
47 ARGUELLO DR 0 .11 6.10
48 HENSEL DR 0.44 6 .03
S9 NUECES DR 0 .07 Yes South Knoll Area 6.02
so TODDTRLW Southwood Drive Rio Grande Blvd 0 .36 Yes Central CS 6 .00
Sl HENSEL ST 0 .13 6 .00
S2 HEARTHSTONE CR 0 .03 6 .00
S3 SAN SABA DR 0 .21 Central CS 6 .00 Unfunded CDBG
S4 VAL VERDE DR 0 .20 Central CS 6 .00
NGRMJl,NQ QR S ~ GeRtFal GS &,00 Funded
SS SHADY DR O.lS 6 .00
-
Neighborhood Grid
Priority Street Name To From Miles School Plan Calculation
56 NORMAND DR N Deacon Drive Ponderosa Drive 0.47 Central CS 6 .00 Unfunded CIP Project Sheet
57 ALLEY 0 .14 Central CS 6.00
58 TODD TRL E Longmire Drive Brothers Blvd 0.27 Yes Central CS 6.00
59 WEST RIDGE DR 0.09 Central CS 6 .00
60 SAN PEDRO DR 0.08 Central CS 6 .00
61 PEDERNALES DR 0 .05 Central CS 6 .00
62 Longmire Drive 0.35 5.76
63 DECATUR DR 0.17 5 .72
64 OLD WELLBORN RD 0.23 5.39
65 ROCK PRAIRIE RD W 2 .01 5.32
66 l&GN RD N 1.59 Yes 5.24
67 SOUTHERN PLANTATION DRE 0.46 5 .1 6
68 UNIVERSITY DR 1.67 5.01
69 SHADOWCREST DR 0.24 5.00
70 FOXFIRE DR 0.46 5 .00
71 WILDERNESS DR 0 .08 5 .00
72 BARRON CUT-OFF RD 1 0 .19 5 .00
73 Connector A 0.06 5 .00
74 SANDSTONE DR 0 .12 5 .00
75 NORTH GRAHAM RD 1 1.01 4 .98
NORTH DOWLING RD 1 1 .77 4 .73
ARBOLEDA DR 0.70 4 .66
RAINTREE DR 0.39 4 .50
GREENS PRAIRIE RD W 1 1 .63 Yes 4.47
BARRON CUT-OFF RD 2 0 .77 4.46
GREAT OAKS DR 0 .76 4.37
l&GN RDS 1.15 4.36
ROCK PRAIRIE RD E 1 3.13 4 .36
WILLIAM D FITCH PKWY 0 .78 4 .23
NORTH FOREST PKWY E 0 .54 4.22
ROYDER RD N 1 0 .90 Wellborn 4 .20
GREENS PRAIRIE RD W 2 0 .71 Wellborn 4.20
Neighborhood Grid
Priority Street Name To From Miles School Plan Calculation
GREENS PRAIRIE RD W 3 0 .52 4 .18
WALNUT RD 0.49 4 .00
SOAKS DR 0.65 4.00
GREENS PRAIRIE TRL E 0 .82 4 .00
GREENS PRAIRIE TRL W 0.45 Yes 4 .00
Live Oak St (Wellborn) 0 .37 Wellborn 4 .00
NORTH GRAHAM RD 2 0 .81 3 .89
ROYDER RD N 2 0 .70 3 .68
ARRINGTON RD 1.72 3.46
CAPSTONE DR 1.84 3.41
N DOWLING RD 0.57 3.37
NORTH DOWLING RD 2 1.22 3 .25
S DOWLING RD 0.85 3.03
BLUE RIDGE DR 0 .37 3.00
ROCK PRAIRIE RD E 2 3 .87 2.75
TIMBERLINE DR 0 .82 2.57
MESA VERDE Rd 2 .02 2.07
LONE STAR LN 1 1.00 2.00
LONE STAR LN 2 1.17 2.00
PEACH CREEK CUT OFF RD 1.61 2.00
PIPELINE RD 0 .80 2.00
LONE STAR LN 3 0 .69 2.00
HUNTERS CREEK RD 1.57 1.82
PEACH CREEK RD 3 .82 1.58
C ITY OF C o u .EGE STATJO:-<
Humr 1fT~:ds l46M Unitimi~v·
AGENDA
BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND GREENWAYS
ADVISORY BOARD
Monday January 5, 2015, 3:00 PM
City Hall 2nd Floor Conference Room
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas, 77840
1. Call to Order
2. Hear Visitors -At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address
the Board on issues not already scheduled on today's agenda. The citizen presentations
will be l i mited to three minutes in o r der to accommodate everyone who w ishes to address
the Board and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Board w i ll
receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on
a future agenda for discussion . (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your
name and address for the record.) ~-
• 3. Co 1 deration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting Minutes. I) ·
~~ ~~ December 1 , 2014
4 . Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian
Standards Contained in the Non-Residential Architectural Standards .
5. Presentati on, possible action, and discussion regarding T r ail Project Priori ti es.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding Plan of Work.
7 . Presen t ation and discussion r egard i ng the Bicycle, Pedestri an, and Greenways Advisory
Board calendar of upcoming meetings.
• January 5, 2014 "' Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting "' City Hall, Counc il
Chambers"' 6:00 p.m.
• January 15, 2014 "' Planning and Zoning Commiss ion Meeting "' City Hall,
Council Chambers"' 6 :00 p.m .
• February 2, 2014"' Bicycle, Pedestrian , and Greenways Advisory Board "' City
Hall, Council Chambers"' 3 :00 p.m.
8 . Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Advisory Board Member may inqu i re about a subject for which notice has not
been given . A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy
may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an
agenda for a subsequent meeting. vY
9. Adjourn . {~
Notice i s hereby given that a Regular Meeti ng of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board of the City of College Station,
Texas will be held on Monday January 5, 2015 at 3:00 p.m . in the City Hall 2 •• Floor Conference Room, 1101 Texas Avenue, College
Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit : See Agenda
This building is wheelchair accessible . Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made
48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3541 or (TDD) 1 -800-735-2989. Agendas may be v i ewed
on www.cstx.gov.
MINUTES
CrrY ur Co1..Lr'GF.S·m T ION
Houu ofTexas .A d-1\,/ University'* BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND GREENWAYS
ADVISORY BOARD
MEMBERS PRESENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
VISITORS PRESENT:
Monday December 1, 2014 3:00 PM
College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas, 77840
Chairman Blanche Brick, James Batenhorst, Scott Shafer, Robert Lightfoot,
Brandon Boatcall ie, Phillip Lasley and Jon Denton
Greenways Program Manager Venessa Garza and Board Secretary Kristen
Hejny
Dr. Teresa Qu 's Class, Br ad McCaleb with the Metropolitan Planning
Or ganization (MPO)
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to Order.
Chairman Brick called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Hear Visitors
There were visitors available to speak with the Board on Agenda Item No. 4 and Agenda Item No . 5 .
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting
Minutes.
Board Member Denton motioned to approve the meeting Minutes, from October 6, 2014. The motion was
seconded by Board Member Batenhorst and was approved (7-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Bike
Share Program.
Dr. Teresa Qu's PLAN 674: Transportation Systems Analysis class was available to share their
research and finding on their Bike Share Travel Demand Analysis.
Board Member Boatcallie asked if the projected results versus the actual results with the existing
program showed any anticipated results.
Dr. Qu explained that there is no true comparison between the projected and actual results of
the study because of the short and long term trips. However, bike sharing has quadrupled in the
year 2014.
Board Member Lasley asked if the optimal solution to biking was found to be round trip biking or
a one-way program.
Dr. Qu explained that a one -way program is more convenient, but round trip biking makes more
sense.
Mr. Boatcallie asked how the group proposes to balance too many or not enough bikes at stations.
Dr. Qu stated that the study proposed 19 stations which should make the program workable and
keep the bike distribution even.
Board Member Shafer asked how the class determined their attractor and generator locations for
the analysis .
Dr. Qu said that the locations were based on a 2012 report done on this area and also based on
the functionality of the area.
Board Member Lasley asked if any estimations were taken into account based on future
developments planned for the Northgate area .
Dr. Qu stated that the class used the available data for new and planned developments in that
area for the study.
Mr. Lasley asked that other areas be studied for a Bike Sharing Program.
Chairman Brick asked if the Board could be presented with a cost to do a city -wide feasibility
study for a bike share program.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the Draft
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Bicycle and Pedestrian Strategies.
Brad McCaleb was available to share an update on the 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan;
the proposed Memorandum of Understanding for a regional bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
coordination program; and an adopted funding policy for bicycle and pedestrian only projects ..
Mr. Boatcallie asked if the proposition one projections for funding are still accurate .
Mr. Mccaleb explained that they are still accurate.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding Plan of
Work.
This item was tabled due to time constraints and will be presented at a later meet i ng.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Presentation and discussion regarding the Bicycle, Pedestrian,
and Greenways Advisory Board calendar of upcoming meetings.
• December 4, 2014 "' Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting "' City Hall, Council
Chambers"' 6:00 p.m.
• January 5, 2014 "' Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board "' City Hall, 2 nd
Floor Conference Room"' 3:00 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items -A Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board Member may inquire about a subject for
which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the
recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal
to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
No future agenda items were mentioned.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9: Adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 4: 50 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Blanche Brick, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
January 5, 2015
C ITY OF COLLEGE STATI O N
Planning & Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979 .764 .3570 I Fax 979.764 .3496
MEMORANDUM
Members of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board
Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Standards Contained in the Non-Residential
Architectural Standards
Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding existing bicycle and pedestrian standards
contained in the non -residential architectural standards.
Background: An item within the 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work included a review of
the existing Non -Residential Architecture (NRA) Standards contained in the Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO) to evaluate if updates are needed to reflect current practices and allow more flexibility
in design . Staff has held multiple workshop meetings with the Commission, local architects, and the
development community to summarize the existing standards and seek input on potential revisions.
Though non -architectural types of standards are contained in the NRA section, the impetus for the
changes largely relate to concerns about the effect the requirements have on building design.
As the amendment would alter how the bicycle and pedestrian standards apply to projects subject to NRA,
the UDO requires the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board to provide a recommendation
regarding the ordinance to the Planning & Zoning Commission. As ordinance language has not been
drafted yet, the purpose of this item is to provide an overview of the existing bicycle and pedestrian
standards and outline the anticipated approach to the revisions . An item to consider proposed revisions
will be scheduled for a future Board meeting, likely in March .
The NRA Standards were initially implemented in 2003 with the adoption of the UDO and expanded in
2004 to their current scope . The Northgate districts are exempt from the NRA standards as they have their
own architectural , bicycle, pedestrian, and other zoning requirements. Changes proposed with this will
only seek to revise NRA Standards and will not change any of the standards for the Northgate districts .
Included below is a summary of the bicycle and pedestrian standards contained in the current NRA
Standards:
Summary of Bicycle and Pedestrian Standards Contained in the NRA Standards
Applicability -The Non-Residential Architectural (NRA) Standards section applies to the development,
redevelopment and fa~ade changes to all non-residential buildings with the following specific exceptions :
• Zoning : Developments in the following zoning districts are exempt from the requirements: BPI
Business Park Industrial, M -1 Light Industrial, M -2 Heavy Industrial , R&D Research & Development,
NG-1 Core Northgate, NG-2 Transitional Northgate, NG-3 Residential Northgate, and BP Business Park
is also exempt except for the buildings along the periphery of a BP district.
• Uses : These uses are exempt from the requirements regardless of the zoning district in which they
are located: Churches, Primary & Secondary Educational Facilities (schools), Municipal Industrial
Facilities, and private utility buildings that are screened from public or private rights-of-way. f'. IL
Bicycle Facilities -
• #1-CA.t-A'yL ~~~. i v//~c.l oi Stf~~,,
• Number Required
o Each building is to have bike racks capable of storing at least 4 bicycles .
o Multi-tenant centers that have over 50,000 gross square feet must have bike racks for at least
8 bicycles and no tenant entrance is to be farther than 150 feet from a bike rack .
o In the newly adopted MU Mixed-Use district, there must be bike facilities for at least 1 bike
per 15,000 square feet of non-residential use and one for every 2 dwelling units. /}ft f Hil I·~ y ~'(J(
. ,v\,\L~ (/l~xV:'.v,. Design ~· yt()J"• o~ o The minimum pad area for bike facilities is 9 feet by 6 feet . \\lc>VI o Bike racks are to have at least 3 feet of separation from buildings, landscaping, and other site
features or conflicts.
o Bike facilities must support a bicycle frame at two points. The City's Site Design Standards
specify an inverted U bike rack as the standard to be provided.
Pedestrian Facilities -
• In developments and building plots over 50,000 gross square feet, pedestrian walkways of at least 5
feet in width are to connect the public street sidewalks, transit stops, parking areas, and other
buildings. Walkways within a parking lot are to be clearly desienated using brick pavers or stamped
dyed concrete pattern. -:1Jpt-Af)f\ i~SIU'I -'#c ·\-,r.ic4 ~.{.u) v-Jid.t.$ -h ,
In developments and building plots over 50,000 gross square feet, a 10-foot sidewalk is required along t"l\)trrP~ ri--
the full front of any fa~ade facing a pu.blic right-of-way. Pad sites of a dev~lopment are .exemp! from, ;J.J_, ..1 •.
this requirement. ~~ l"'iSl~v-ttJ.~-~ ,,-\ tJ!desti.i~ tl..C.:f;~1;~' s·r1'·t<W"~
• In developments and building plots over 150,000 gross square feet, a plaza area of at least 500 square \:
-~ feet is to be provided that provides 3 different types hardscape elements such as seating or lt1nllsc•11e 41 .{_:.,___~
planters. ~l:k 1 ·r
• In SC Suburban Commercial districts, pedestrian connections are to be provided to atljacent ~ ~
residential areas . 5~
• In the newly adopted MU Mixed -Use district, sidewalks of at least 8 feet are to be provided along all .J.
public rights-of-way, streets, and public ways adjacent to and within the developmentJf Yf J.. ·
~ e+~t: £1 ti 1 1 \ o-k--
\ ~ l\p~ t~ l~· ~ ~lA.Vk A~
~~peel~ vv:>L4 -
• )~
~ vfT"-.
p~~
Sot+
DATE:
C ITY OF C OLLEGE S TATION
Planning & Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979 .764.3570 I Fax 979.764 .3496
MEMORANDUM
December 18, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Members of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board
Venessa Garza, AICP, Greenways Program Manager
SUBJECT: Trail Project Priorities
Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding Trail Project Priorities .
Background: This item is before the Board to review and update trail project priorities for FY16 . Trail
projects are currently prioritized based on the methodology used during the creation of the Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. This list was reviewed last year based on their short (0-10 years),
near (11-20 years) and long term (21 -30 years) prioritization . All projects were reviewed and a top 3 list
was determined based on the following criteria:
1. Ownership -Higher priority to City owned property or existing easements
2. Immediacy of Development in the surrounding area -Higher priority to areas where residential
development will occur in the next few years
3. Other factors considered :
a. Safety
b. Connectivity to Schools and Parks
c. Regional Connectivity
The Board's top priorities and other changes consisted of the following :
Map ID Name Miles Priority Type Notes
A College Avenue Side Path 0.79 Short-term ROW To be funded with MPO FY19
B Bee Creek West Trail 0.42 Short-term purchase Submitted Unfunded project
required
c Spring Creek Trail 3.49 Short-term City owned Submitted Unfunded project
• Harvey Road/SH 6 Connector -From short-term to near-term
• Wolf Pen Creek Extension -From short-term to near-term
• Appomattox Extension -From near-term to short-term
• Bee Creek Central Park-From short-term to near-term
Attached is a trail projects map and spreadsheet with corresponding trail projects with additional
information . The Board will be asked to provide up to two more projects to the short list for submission
in the FY16 CIP budget process.
Attachments(s):
1. Trail Projects Map
2. Trail Project List
~~ The City _of Co_llege Station
,,, ....... a. •• '°"'"'"'sm~·· Trail Projects
Legend
Multi-use Path Proposed
Bike Lane Existi ng
--Bike Lane Funded .... Bike Lane Proposed
Bike Route Existing .... Bike Route Proposed
Multi-use Path Existing --Multi-use Path Funded
Grade Separation Existing --Grade Separation Funded .... Grade Separation Proposed
.! CSISD Schools
.. CSISD Property
.. College Station Parks
.. College Station Greenway
. -
College Station Property
College Station City Lim its
Bryan City Limits
l. _, College Station ET J
I
,
I ,
~
• 0 ·-..
f
0. ~ -•
• j
0\57 t
I • •
' I
..................... , .
• •
•
• •
• • • • •• •
..
;
I
t
,
•I
' I
'
\
......
' "' I -"
...... ...
r ',. 1
" I
. ....... .
~.
I
' "
,
#
" ,' .... . .. ... -~ .•
" • "~---
Th e accuracy of this data is li mited to the validity and accuracy of
available data , and therefore the city makes no representation or
warranties as to the accuracy of th e data . My party using the data
does so at their own risk. This data is produced pursuant to th e Texas
Public Information Act. For specific questions regarding this plan
contact PlannWlg and Development Services .
" ,
Trail Project List
January 2015
A
B
c
Number
Name
College Avenue Side Path
Bee Creek West
Spring Creek
Name
1 Burton Creek Trib C -TAMU
2 University Town Center Connector
3 Connector A
4 Carters Creek
5 Gulf States Utilities Easement
6 Harvey Road/SH 6 Connector
7 WPC Connector
8 Mall Connector
9 Wolf Pen Creek Extension
10 Appomattox Connector
11 SH 6 Connector
12 Bee Creek -Central Park Connector
13 Lemontree Park Connector
14 John Crompton Park
15 Harvey Mitchell Pkwy S
16 Bee Creek East
17 Bee Creek Central
18 Bee Creek Central -South
19 SH 6 Connector 3
20 Southwood Park Loop
Miles BPG Plan Priority Type Notes
0 .79 Short-term ROW To be funded w ith MPO FY19
0.42 Short-term purchase required Submitted Unfunded project
3.49 Short-term City owned Submitted Unfunded project
Miles BPG Plan Priority Type Notes
1.47 None TAMU ownership
0 .16 Short-term purchase required with development
0.17 Near-term purchase requ i red
9 .73 Long-term partial ownership/easement
8 .84 Near-term partial ownership/easement
0.17 Near-term ROW changed from sho r t -term
0.08 Short-term purchase required
0.39 Near-term purchase required
0.24 Near-term purchase required changed from short-term
0.22 Short-term partial easement changed from near-term
1.57 Short-term ROW
1.21 Near-term City owned changed from short-term
0.10 Near-term purchase required
0 .39 Short-term partial ownership
0 .95 Near-term ROW
1.06 Near-term purchase required
0 .57 Near-term City owned
0 .97 Near-term purchase required
0 .29 Near-term ROW
1.77 Near-term ROW
Number Name Miles BPG Plan Priority Type Notes
21 Lick Creek North 0 .84 Near-term purchase required
22 Lick Creek 14 0.91 Long -term purchase required
23 Lick Creek 11 0 .81 Long -term easement/with PDD
24 Lick Creek 10 0 .78 Long -term purchase required
25 Spring Creek Trib 7 0.38 Long -term partial City owned/easement
26 William D Fitch Parkway Connector 3.05 Long -term ROW
27 Alum Creek 3.03 Long -term partial City owned/easement
Trail Project List
January 2015
A
B
c
Number
Name
Col l ege Avenue Side Path
Bee Creek West
Spr i ng Creek
Name
1 Burton Creek Trib C -TAMU
2 University Town Center Connector
3 Connector A
'4 !C arters Creek ---.......,,
~~wl 5 )'.j ulf States Utilities Easement -f'.oiih~
6 Harvey Road/SH 6 Connector
7 WPC Connector
8 Mall Connector
~l g Wolf Pen Creek Extension -GiW1iit
10 Appomattox Connector
lJl-\,\ 111 SH 6 Connector S!fi
~ ... k \1 2 l3ee Creek -Central Pa ~4>nnecto &
13 Lemontree Park Connector ., f) -"' A ,_ .... _ r~-~~ -~ -~
15 Harvey Mitchell Pkwy S
l 16 Bee .Creek East -
17 Bee Creek Cent r al
18 Bee Creek Central -South
19 SH 6 Connector 3
~,~ Southwood Park Loop
Miles BPG Plan Priority
0 .79 Short-term
0.42 Short-term
3.49 Short-term
Miles BPG Plan Priority
1.47 None
0.16 Short-term
0.17 Near-term
l-9-..Z 3 Long -term
re~~ Near-term
0 .17 Near-term
0 .08 Short-term
0.39 Near-term
0.24 Near-term
0 .22 Short-term
1.57 Short-term
'lt-1.21 Near-term
0 .10 Near-term
0 .39 Short-term
0 .95 Near-term
1.06 Near-term
0.57 Near-term
0 .97 Near-term
0 .29 Near-term
1.77 Near-term
Type
ROW
purchase required
City owned
Type
TAMU ownership
purchase required
purchase required
partial ownersh i p/easement
partial ownership/easement
ROW
purchase required
purchase required
purchase required
partial easement
ROW
City owned
purchase required
partial ownership
ROW
purchase required
City owned
purchase requ i red
ROW
ROW
St-:ce-
Notes
cl~~ c~~
C\Sf'\Y\ecl .e-t.rS~
To be funded with MPO FY19
Submitted Unfu nded project
Submitted Un fu nded project
Notes
w ith developme nt
changed from short-term
changed from short-term
changed from near-term
changed from short-term
Number Name Miles BPG Plan Priority Type Notes
21 Lick Creek North 0.84 Near-term purchase required
22 Lick Creek 14 0.91 Long-term purchase required
23 Lick Creek 11 0 .81 Long-term easement/with POD
24 Lick Creek 10 0.78 Long -term purchase required
25 Spring Creek Trib 7 0.38 Long-term partial City owned/easement
26 William D Fitch Parkway Connector 3.05 Long-term ROW
27 Alum Creek 3.03 Long-term partial City owned/easement