Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4 COCS Spring Creek Cooporate CampusPage 1 of 2 A enda Item Cover Sheet Agenda Item # 11. 9 Regular Item x Consent Item Dlworkshop Item I tern Submitted By: Mark Smith, Public Works Council Meetin Date: July 26, 2001 Director Approval: Manager Approval: Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action approving an appropriation of $285,825 from the greenways acquisition funds to the Business Park Fund for greenways in the new business park. Item Summary: This action provides for the reimbursement of $285,852 of greenway bond funds into the Business Park Fund to pay for the portion of the Class "A" business park to be designated as a greenway. Item Background: City Council purchased real estate located at Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road on August 14, 2000, for development of a Class "A" type business park. A portion of that real estate purchase is designated as "greenway" in the Greenway Master Plan. A survey of the property indicates that there is a total of 357.07 acres, and that 102.09 of the acreage is located within the 100 year flood plain. The negotiated price, in coordination with the Economic Development Department, of the greenway acreage was $2,800 per acre. Budgetary and Financial Summary: The City's Bond Election of September 3, 1998 authorizes expenditure of bond funds for the acquisition of land for drainage control and greenbelt purposes. Funds are budgeted and available in the greenways acquisition funds. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that City Council approve the transfer of funds and officially designate the 102.09 acres surveyed, a Suburban Greenway. Suburban Greenways will connect users and their destinations such as neighborhood to other neighborhoods, to businesses, to parks or to schools. Council Action Options: http://agenda.cstx.gov/2001/010726/Greenway%20Fund%20Transfer%20ok/ Agenda%20It... 2/25/2019 1. Approve the expenditure of funds from the 1988 Bond Issue f or the acquisition of greenways in the new Business Park. 2. Deny approval of the fund transfer. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map Page 2 of2 http://agenda.cstx.gov/2 001/010 726/Greenway%20Fund%20Transfer%20ok/ Agenda%201t... 2/25/2019 0.7 Business Park Greenway v ~ Greenway Property s Suburban greenways will connect users and their destinations such as neighborhood to other neighborhoods , to businesses, to parks or to schools. Access points will be visible and may include lighting , signage, picnic areas or playgrounds. The width of a suburban greenway should be the entire floodplain, or if surrounding development is present, what can reasonably be obtained. The trails will serve a variety of recreational and transportation uses and will be relatively wide with a medium to hard surface . The trail itself, is the focus of the greenway. Channel improvements should only be made if necessary and using the softest techniques feasible. Bridge structures should provide grade separation for safe passage of users . ... R10581 Page 1 of 1 Current Owner Legal Description Exemptions Appraised COLLEGE STATION , C ITY OF (010359) A000901 THOMAS CARRUTHERS (ICL) & A005401 R EX 3 ,841 ,900 ATTN : ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT PO BOX 9973 STEVENSON , TRACT 3.10 , ACRES 384 .19 COLLEGE STATION .TX 77842-7973 Entities Homestead Cap C2 , G1 , S2 0 Situs Address -History Information SH-6 s 2007 2006 2005 2004 Imp HS $0 $0 $0 - Imp NHS $0 $0 $0 -Sales $0 Land HS $0 $0 - Date Volume Page Seller Name Land NHS $3,841,900 $5 ,762 ,850 $5 ,762 ,850 $895 ,700 08/14/2000 3900 230 THURMOND-WINDHAM Ag Mkt $0 $0 $0 - 04/30/19 84 677 676 MENLO PROPERTIES Ag Use $0 $0 $0 - Tim Mkt $0 $0 $0 - Tim Use $0 $0 $0 - HS Cap ---- Assessed $3 ,841 ,900 $5 ,762 ,850 $5 ,762,850 $895,700 Building Attributes Improvement Sketch Construction Foundation Exterior Interior Roof Flooring Heat/AC Baths Fireplace Year Built Rooms Bedrooms Improvements Type Description Area Year Built Eff Year Value Land Segments SPTB Description Area Market Ag Value EXP Exempt Property 384 .19000 3,841 ,900 0 •• The City of College Station, Texas P .O . Box 9960 • June 19 , 2001 Ms. Kim Foutz, Director Economic Development 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Embracing the Past, Ex ploring the Future. 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 • (979) 764-3500 www.ci.coll ege-station .tx.us RE : City of College Station Greenways OD Butler Tract Craegor Tract Dear Kim, Mark and I met with legal to discuss the above referenced economic development department projects. Roxanne has requested that we provide some language for the agreement with OD Butler. You will find my recommendations attached to this letter. We would also like to transfer the greenway funds to your department for purchase of the Craegor Tract. Negotiations for the Craegor parcels occurred prior to my acceptance of the Greenways Program Manager position. My files indicate that the asking price from the Greenways Bond funds was $3 ,000 per acre . David Mayo 's survey shows 102 .09 acres of greenway, which would total $306,270 . Please let me know ifthat was the understanding at the time of purchase. Sincerely, Greenways Program Manager Cc : Mark Smith Roxanne Nemcik Charles Cryan H o m e of Texas A&M U n ivers ity .. MEMOICANDUM Date: 06/19/2001 To: Roxanne Nemcik, Assistant City Attorney Cc: Mark Smith , Public Works Director Mark McAuliffe, Land Agent Kim Foutz , Economic Development Director From: Judith A. Downs RE: Greenways Properties owned or managed by Economic Development OD Butler Property-Intersection of 2818 and Wellborn Road, Contract language I'm not certain what contract language would assure protection of the greenway, and I hope that over time we can perfect what we would need to accomplish the intent of the Greenways Master Plan . Generally, I think that the contract should say that the parcel is designated as a "suburban greenway" in the master plan , and that it is the City's intent to preserve it for such a use . In designated greenways identified in the Greenways Master Plan for the City of College Station , the following provisions apply: (taken directly from the Plan) "Suburban greenways will connect users and their destinations such as neighborhood to other neighborhoods , to businesses, to parks or to schools. Access points will be visible and may indude lighting , signage , picnic areas or playgrounds . The width of a suburban greenway should be the entire floodplain , or if surrounding development is present, what can reasonably be obtained. The trails will serve a variety of recreational and transportation uses and will be relatively wide with a medium to hard surface. (As specified in the City's Subdivision Regulations). The trail itself, is the focus of the greenway. Channel improvements should only be made if necessary and using the softest techniques feasible . Bridge structures should provide grade separation for safe passage of users." I have also attached a "Stream Buffer Ordinance". I don't know if we want to get this stringent, but might want to say something about submission of a plan (since they apparently aren't required to plat), protection of trees during construction, or management and maintenance. I'll have to ask you to advise me in that regard . I wrote a letter to Kim dated March 19, 2001 that is induded here for your information. Craegor Tracts David Mayo's survey of the greenways contained within the Craegor properties total 102.09 acres. It is my understanding that Mark and Kim agreed to a price of $3 ,000 per acre for the Greenway. I can't remember what our final decision was regard i ng this property after our May 22 meeting. I recall that we agreed once the greenway funds were transferred, the property would contain a greenway 06/19/2001 MEMORANDUM : Greenways Properties owned or managed by Economic Development 2 "conservation" easement, and that no other action would be necessary at this time. I do have a survey from David Mayo that specifies the location and acreage of the greenway. Should this survey be recorded? Sorry that my memory isn't better. Please let me know if there is anything further I should do at this time, to assure the property is protected from development (other than trails) as specified in the Greenways Master Plan . I MINUTES Mayor Lynn Mcllhaney Mayor Pro Tempore Larry Mariott City Manager Thomas E. Brymer City Council James Massey Ron Silvia Winnie Garner Dennis Maloney Anne Hazen 'lege Station, Embracing the Past, J/oring the Future DRAFT MINUTES COLLEGE STATION CITY COUNCIL Workshop and Regular Meetings Thursday, July 26, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. College Station City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas Page 1 of 9 COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Mcllhaney, May or Pro Tern Mariott, Councilmembers Massey , Silvia, Hazen , Gamer, Maloney STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Brymer, Assistant City Manager Brown, City Secretary Hooks , City Attorney Cargill , Jr., Assistant to the City Manager Brandenburg , Fiscal Services Director Cryan, Strategic and Budget Manager Kersten, Fire Chief Giordano , Public Utilities Director Woody , MIS Director Burnside , As st. Public Communications Manager Roberts , Public Communications Director Cole , Human Resources Director O'Connell , Public Works Director Smith Mayor Mcllhaney opened the workshop meeting at 3 : 10 p.m . with all councilmembers present. Worksho A enda Item No. 1 --Discussion of consent a enda items listed for Re ular Council Meeting. 11.7: Bud et Amendment No. 2 authorizin an increase in a ro riation s of 8 519 760 . Staff explained that a portion of the budget increases are due to increased fuel cost and the cost allocated to the Emplo y ee Benefits Fund. Worksho A enda Item No. 2 --Presentation discussion and ossible action on the Strate ic MINUTES Plan. Council discussed Vision Statements No. 6 , No. 7, and No. 8. Council expressed the importance of ongoing communication with citizen committees on the comprehensive plan changes, development code changes , and strategic plans . Page 2 of9 Council requested information from staff on several items included in the implementation plans outlined in the strategic plan: o Sidewalk Retrofit Plan o Percentage of sales tax increases in City of Bryan from retail business o Analyze the type of businesses that are marketable o Process for negotiations on Convention and Visitors Bureau o Residential Development near middle school on Graham Road and future traffic issues o Unified Development Code completion timeline o National Fire Protection Association standards o Parks Maintenance Standards No action was taken. Council recessed for a short break. Council returned at 4:20 p.m. Workshop Agenda Item No. 3 --Budget Preview and Financial Forecast Discussion of this item was held following the regular meeting items. Worksho A enda Item No. 4 --Presentation discussion and ossible action on the Em lo ee Health Benefits Plan. Mayor Mcllhaney was not present during the discussion of this item. Mayor Pro Tern Mariott presided over this item. Human Resources Director Julie O'Connell and Susan Smith from Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool answered several questions from the Council about the structure of the medical benefits program . Ms. O'Connell discussed the national trends in health care and the average cost per employee . Some of the factors she identified for increased health cost included: Increased utilization Improved technology Increase in catastrophic cases Aging Population Staff recommended a one time transfer from operation funds for FY 01 ($500 ,000 ) and for FY 02 , increase contribution for employee coverage from $244 to $319 ($614 ,000). Also , included was a one time transfer to offset charge to employees for their own coverage, ($121 ,000). Ms. O'Connell discussed the FY 02 proposed pay plan dollars totaling $2 ,668 ,002 . She stated that the city has proposed to increase office visit co-payment from $10 to $30 and implement $100 deductive on prescriptions and increase co-payments to $10 /25 /40. Additionally , a proposal is being made in the budget to increase the dependent premiums in all categories. MINUTES Page 3of9 Councilmembers asked questions about the current benefits plan. No action was taken. Workshop Agenda Item No. 5 --Agenda Request by Councilmember This item was discussed following the regular meeting agenda. Worksho A enda Item No. 6 --Council Calendars This item was discussed following the regular meeting agenda. Worksho A enda Item No. 7 --Hear Visitors No one came forward to speak. Workshop Agenda Item No. 8 --Executive Session At 5:55 p.m., Mayor Mcllhaney returned to the meeting. She announced that the Council would convene into executive session pursuant to Sections 551.071 , 551.072 , 551.074 , and 551.086 of the Open Meetings Act to seek the advice of the city attorney , to consider the purchase of real property , the evaluation of public officer, and economic development negotiations. Consultation with Attorney { Gov 't Code Section 551.071}; possible action The City Council may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or settlement offer or attorney-client privileged information. Litigation is an ongoing process and questions may arise as to a litigation tactic or settlement offer, which needs to be discussed with the City Council. Upon occasion the City Council may need information from its attorney as to the status of a pending or contemplated litigation subject or settlement offer or attorne y -client privileged information. After executive session discussion , any final action or vote taken will be in public . The following subject(s) may be discussed: 1. Cause No. 43 ,098-85 , Brazo s County -Bryan v . College Station 2. Cause No . 96-03168 , Travis County -Bryan, et al. v . PUC (intervention) 3. Cause No. 97-02587 , Travis County -Bryan , et al. v. PU C (intervention) 4. Cause No. 98-13391 , Travis County-Bryan, et al. v. PUC (intervention) 5 . Cause No. 96-06940 , Travis County -Bryan, et al. v . P U C (inter vention) 6. Cause No. 97-07000 , Travis County-TMPA v . PUC (intervention) 7 . Cause No. 98-11817 , Travis County -TMPA v. PUC (intervention) 8. Cause No. GN002343 , Travis County -San Antonio v . PUC (intervention) 9. Cause No. GN002513 , Travis County -San Antonio v. PUC (intervention) 10 . Cause No. 49 ,367-CCL2 , Brazos County -Wilkerson v. College Station 11. Action No . 01-98-011056-CV , Court of Appeals Gold v. Co llege Station 12 . Docket Nos. TX96-2-000 and TX96 -2-001 , FERC -College Station , applicant 13 . Cause No. 50 ,813-85 , Brazos County -College Station v . Phillips Swager A ssoc iate s, Inc.; et al. 14 . Cause No . 51 ,822-CCl , Brazos County -Felder v . Colle ge Station 15. Cause No . 52 ,434-361 , Brazos County -College Station v. Wolf Pen Creek, Ltd ., et al. 16 . Cause No. 28 ,765 , Grimes County , Harold & Rosealice Trant vs Grimes County, City of College Station and City of Bryan 17. Lone Star Gas rate increase filed May 31 , 2001. l ,...AA1 1 1 r". • • __ ,_, ""\/' A 1 L .1..___ 0 /,....0 /,-.,('\('\"") MINUTES Page 4of9 Real Estate {G ov 't Code Section 551.072}; possible action The City Council may deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property if deliberation in an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the City in negotiations with a third person. After executive session discussion , any final action or vote taken will be in public. The following subject(s) may be discussed. 1. Greenway Acquisition of the Davis McGill property adjacent to Raintree Subdivision. 2. Possible purchase of land at Inlow Blvd ., Nagle Street, and South College/FM 308. Economic Incentive Negotiations {Gov't Code Section 551.086}; possible action The City Council may deliberate on commercial or financial information that the City Council has received from a business prospect that the City Council seeks to have locate , stay or expand in or near the city with which the City Council in conducting economic development negotiations may deliberate on an offer of financial or other incentives for a business prospect. After executive session discussion , any final action or vote taken will be in public. The following subject(s) may be discussed: 1. Hotel Conference Center Personnel {Gov't Code Section 551.074}; possible action The City Council may deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties , discipline , or dismissal of a public officer. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public . The following public officer(s) may be discussed : 1. City Manager's Evaluation Regular Meeting A enda Item No. 10: Mayor Mcllhaney opened the regular meeting at 7:05 p.m. with all councilmembers present. Pledge of Allegiance. Chaplain Danny Duron provided the invocation. Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation Department and employees of the Parks and Recreation Dept. were recognized for the 30th anniversary of the Department. Mayor Mcllhaney presented a recognition plaque to the Parks and Recreation Dept. Mayor Mcllhaney also recognized Mary Alice Beachy and Steve Beachy for their service to the Explorer Post 1077. Members of the Troupe were present to give thanks to Mr. and Ms. Beachy. Consent A enda 11 .1 Approved by common consent the minutes for City Council workshop and regular meeting July 12 , 2001. 11.2 Bid No. 01-69 -Approved by common consent a resolution approving a five (5) year agreement for the lease of slant-top , front-end loading refuse containers with Texas Commercial Waste for an annual estimated expenditure of $102 ,600.00. Funds available and budgeted in the Sanitation Fund , Commercial Collection Division. 11.3 Bid No. 01-78 -Approved by common consent an annual price agreement for concrete water meter boxes. Awarded to the lowest , responsible bidder meeting specifications , International/Hughes supply for an annual estimate of $75 ,870.50. Funds available in the Water/Wastewater Inventory Fund and charged to the project as used. --r A "'I 1 •·-• 0/1"\0 /,....(\()"') MINUTES Page 5of9 11.4 Approved by common consent Resolution No. 7-26-01-11.4 approving a 380 Economic Development Grant in the amount of $21,746.50 to Woodcreek Lodging, Inc. for privacy fence and improvements. 11.5 Approved by common consent Resolution No. 7-26-01-11.5 approving notices of sale , preliminary official statements , and related materials for the sale of "City of College Station, Texas Certificates of Obligation, series 2001 ", "City of College Station, Texas Utility System Revenue Bonds , Series 200 l ", and "City of College Station, Texas General Obligation Improvement Bonds , Series 2001 ", including selection of a date for opening bids. 11.6 Approved by common consent Resolution 7-26-01-11.6 approving a professional services contract with Malcolm Pirnie , Inc ., in the amount of $1 ,532 ,653.00, for engineering design and construction management pertaining to Phase II capital improvements for the City's Water Production System . Funds available and budgeted in the FY 1999-00 Water Revenue Bond Fund. 11.7 Approved by common consent the calling for a public hearing on August 9 , 2001 for Budget Amendment #2 to the City of College Station 2000-2001 Budget authorizing an increase in appropriations of$8,519 ,760 in various funds . Mayor Mcllhaney abstainedfrom the vote. 11.8 Approved by common consent a renewal agreement between the MSE Environmental, Inc. and the City of College Station for household hazardous waste collection in the amount of $120 ,000 . Funds available and budgeted in Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency. 11 .9 Approved by common consent authorizing an appropriation of $285 ,825 from the Greenways acquisition funds to the Business Park Fund for greenways in the new business park. 11.10 Approved by common consent authorizing the Mayor to sign Resolution No. 7-26-01-11.10 authorizing the application and acceptance for the FY 2001 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant in the amount of $22 ,380 on behalf of the City . Fire Chief David Giordano presented this item. The proposed agreement is an addendum to the 1999 agreement that permitted College Station Fire Department to occupy and respond with a structure fire engine from the facility . The addendum sets forth the operating guidelines, insurance requirements , and payment methods by which T AMU and the College Station Fire Department will perform through the contracting of Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Operations at Easterwood Airport. An increase of three firefighter positions will be required to staff the Aircraft firefighting unit. T AMU agreed to pay College Station $155 ,000 the first year with an annual increase of three percent for services the City of CS Fire Department will provide for Easterwood Airport. Councilman Silvia moved appro v al of the addendum to the existing interlocal agreement with T AMU for aircraft rescue and firefighting operations to be transferred to the College Station Fire Dept. Councilman Maloney seconded the motion which carried unanimously , 7-0. FOR: Mcllhaney , Mariott, Massey , Gamer, Silvia, Maloney, Hazen AGAINST: None MINUTES Page 6 of9 Re ular A enda Item No. 12.2 --Presentation discussion and ossible action on an Interlocal A reement with Texas A&M Universi TAMU for the construction of sidewalks around the rimeter of the main cam us on Geor e Bu h Driv Wellborn Road and Universi Drive. Mayor Pro Tern Mariott moved approval of the interlocal agreement with TAMU for construction of sidewalks around the perimeter of the main campus on George Bush Drive , Wellborn Road , and University Drive. Motion seconded by Councilman Silvia which carried unanimously, 7-0 . FOR: Mcllhaney, Mariott, Silvia, Hazen, Massey , Garner, Maloney AGAINST: None ,., ,...._,,.... J"'\1 1 . n 1,....n Jl""\AAri MINUTES Page 7 of9 Regular Agenda Item No. 12.3 --Discussion, and possible action regarding proposed facility names for Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. Ric Ploeger, Asst. Director of Parks and Recreation presented the recommendations of facility names for Veterans Park and Athletic Complex. A subcommittee, from members of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and the Veterans Memorial Committee developed the following recommendations of facility names . Veterans Parkway (main drive) Soccer Fields (13) Army Navy Marine Corps Coast Guard Merchant Marine Air Force Solider Patriot Airman Ranger Minuteman Medic Four Field Softball Complex (Eagle) Democracy Freedom Liberty Peace Five Field Softball Complex (Old Glory) -Honor -Courage -Loyalty -Duty -Service Pavilions American Pavilion Texas Pavilion Mayor Pro Tern Mariott moved approval of the staff recommendation. Motion was seconded by Councilman Maloney which carried unanimously , 7-0. FOR: Mcilhaney , Mariott, Massey, Maloney , Gamer, Silvia, Hazen AGAINST: None Council continued discussion of the workshop items not completed prior to executive session. Workshop Agenda Item No. 3 --Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the City's Financial Forecast and FY 02 Proposed Budget Preview. Budget and Strategic Planning Manager Jeff Kersten presented the city's financial forecast in each fund and an overview of assumptions for preparing the proposed FY 02 budget. Mr. Kersten described significant issues in the proposed budget such as the revenue estimates, monies for one time expenditures and ongoing expenditures, and sales tax growth . The proposed budget will be presented on August 9th council meeting and special budget workshops. No action was taken. Workshop Agenda Item No. 5 --Agenda Request by Councilmembers MINUTES Page 8 of9 Discussion and possible action on the creation of a Greenways Advisory Board. Mayor Pro Tern Mariott made a motion to not create a Greenways Advisory Board . Seconded by Councilman Gamer. Discussion was held by the council on the purpose or charge of a committee . Other comments related to utilizing the current Brazos Greenways Council as a "sounding board" on greenway issues related to the Greenway Plan. Councilman Mariott withdrew his motion. Councilman Gamer withdrew the second. Councilman Silvia made a motion to utilize the expertise of individuals who have a specialty in greenways when staff is working on certain projects. Also , council will place on future workshops on overall planning issues. Motion seconded by Councilman Gamer, which carried unanimously , 7-0. FOR: Mcllhaney , Mariott , Garner, Massey , Maloney , Silvia, Hazen AGAINST : None Worksho A enda Item No. 6 --Council Calendars Citizen Committee Orientation, 7/30 , 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Council Workshop and Regular Meetings , 8/9 , 8/23 Texas Transportation Summit, 8/15 -8/17 , Irving Joint Legislative Retreat-City of College Station , Bryan , Texas A&M , Brazos County , 8/30-8/31 , G. Rollie White Visitor 's Center Trip to Washington D.C., 9116 -9/18 Employee Banquet, 10 /26 , Brazos Center TML Annual Conference, 11 /28 -11 /30 , Houston Congress of Cities , 12/4 -12/8 , Atlanta, Georgia Legislative Committee meeting , Jul y 31 Discussion of workshop items concluded. At 8:50 p .m . Mayor Mcllhaney announced that the Council would recon vene into executive session pursuant to Sections 551.071 , 551.072 , 551.074 , and 551.086 of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advice of the city attorney , to consider the purchase ofreal property , the evaluation of L.L.6.~.11 -~.L-----.._/r'\ ______ ~IO /l""\l\A ____ _] __ /l"'\f'\/"\1 / __ MINUTES Page 9of9 public officer, and economic development negotiations. See executive session items on page 3 and 4. Regular Agenda Item No. 14 --Final action on executive session, if necessary. Council returned to open session at 12:05 a.m. Friday , July 27 , 2001. No action was taken . Regular Agenda Item No. 15 --Adjourn. .. -····· •••••• COMPLETE APPRAISAL IN A SUMMARY REPORT 234.81 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT 9, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, CURRENT OWNER BEING THE CREAGOR FAMILY -····· •••••• COMPLETE APPRAISAL IN A SUMMARY REPORT OF 234.81 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT 9, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, CURRENT OWNER BEING THE CREAGOR FAMILY " FOR MS. KIM FOUTZ, DIRECTOR ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P .0. BOX 9960 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 BY JOHN M. HAMILTON INCORPORATED 3131 BRIARCREST DRIVE, SUITE 111 BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 AS OF MAY 12, 2000 JOHN M. HAMILTON . MA I MICHAEL J . FLEMING. SRA June 13 , 2000 -····· •••••• JOHN M . HAMILTON INCORPORATED REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS Ms. Kim Foutz, Director Economic and Community Development City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Reference: Dear Ms . Foutz: 234.81 acres out of the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract 9, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, current owner being the Creagor Family As requested, we have inspected and appraised the above referenced property as of May 12 , 2000. As you have requested, this report has been prepared in a summary format. It is our opinion that as of May 12, 2000, the indicated market value for the subject property is as follows : ONE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1, 760,000.00) MARKET VALUE DEFINED "Market value," as used herein, is defined by the Appraisal Institute as , "The most probable price , as of a specified date , in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash , or in other precisely revealed terms , for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress ." Implicit iA this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 3131 BRI ARC REST DRI VE. SUITE 111 1979) 268 -0200 •FAX C979) 731 -8809 BRYAN , TX 7 7802 City of College Stat ion June 13 , 2000 -····· •••••• a) buyer and seller are typically motivated ; Page 2 b) both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what they consider the ir own best interest; c) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; d) payment is made in cash or its equivalent; e) financing, if any, is on terms generally available in the community at the specified date and typical for the property type in its locale; and f) the price represents a normal considerat ion for the property sold unaffected by special financing amounts and/or terms, serv ices, fees, costs, or credits incurred in the transaction. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL To arrive at an estimate of market value for a property, the appraiser must determine the typical purchaser who would be interested in that particular type of property. Market value is loosely defined as the most probable price in terms of money which a property should bring in a competit ive and open market for a reasonable time, and this price depends upon the typical purchaser's reaction to the various supply and demand factors which affect the property being appraised. Of significant importance are properties which are in competition with the subject. All of th is information must be derived from the market. The scope of the evaluation and valuation of the subject includes : a personal inspection of the subject property and its environs; review of surveys as available; research into market activity; review of market operating standards ; research into investor motivations and activities ; and analysis of the above . At the request of the client, this report has been prepared in a summary format. This report is prepared in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice und~the Departure provision and Standard 2 as revised and accepted on March 22, 1994. Based on the revised standards, this report falls into the category of a complete appraisal in a summary report. This report as defined in Standard Rule 2-2 of the USPAP is a summary appraisal report. Reliance on this report is limited to the client. As a summary report , vital information for form ing a valid and accurate opinion of value has been presented herein in a summarized format, but , the detailed information has been retained in the files of John M. Hamilton Inc. As such, this repqrt may not be fully understood by third parties without a review of the file material. -····· •••••• ------------------------------------- City of College Station June 13 , 2000 PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL Page 3 The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the fee simple interest of the property legally described as 234.81 acres out of the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract 9, College Station , Brazos County , Texas . INTENDED USE OF THE REPORT This appraisal report was requested by Ms. Kim Foutz to assist the City of College Station in the evaluation of the subject property for possible acquisition purposes. DATE OF THE VALUE ESTIMATE The effective date of this appraisal is May 12, 2000, and the date of the report is June 13, 2000 . SALES HISTORY According to the information available to our office, the subject property has not sold within the past three years. However, according to the information provided to our office the City of College Station and the current owners of the subject property are presently negotiating the sale of the property to the City of College Station. The reported prices that are currently being considered are $10 ,000 .00 per acre for the 145.8 acres which is outside of the floodplain area and $2,800.00 per acre for the 89 acres which is located within the floodplain area . These would provide for a total price for the subject property of $1 ,707,200.00 or an average of $7,271 .00 per acre . DISCUSSION OF THE APPRAISAL PROCESS The appraisal process is a systematic analysis of a property to determine its value in the specified tim~,.p~riod. The value of a property reflects and is influenced by the interaction of forces that motivate human activity. These forces are commonly divided into four major categories : economic circumstances, social trends, governmental controls and regulations, and environmental conditions . Thus, in order to estimate the value of a property, the appraiser interprets how the market views a property and the relat ing magn itude of the different forces acting upon the property. The process begins by defining the appraisal problem . This includes identification of the real estate arid the property rights to be appraised , specification of the use of the appraisal , definition of the value sought, specification of the date of the value estimate , description of the scope of the appraisal, and identification of limiting cond itions . City of College Station June 13 , 2000 -····· •••••• Page 4 The second step consists of gathering data on value influences and trends . This consists of gathering data related to the region, area, city, and neighborhood in which the subject is located . Specific data related to the property and its specific market segment, such as income and expense information, locational and physical characteristics, etc., are collected . Information relating to the supply and demand levels for the market as a whole and for the property type in particular is collected . This data forms the basis for the Highest and Best use analysis, as well as the valuation . The third step is to estimate the Highest and Best use of the property. The Highest and Best use analysis interprets the market forces that influence the subject and estimates from among all possible uses, the use to which the subject property will most likely be put. This is key to the appraisal process since the value of a property is dependent on its current and potential future uses. The Highest and Best use of the property as if it were vacant is assessed first; this is done to identify comparable properties and estimate the value of the land . Then, the Highest and Best use of the property as improved is assessed; this is done to identify comparable properties and determine whether the existing improvements should be retained, renovated or demolished. Typically, the next step is to estimate the value of the land . There are six procedures for estimating land values: sales comparison, allocation, extraction, subdivision development, land residual technique, and ground rent capitalization. The most commonly used of these is the sales comparison approach. After the land value is estimated, the value of the property as improved is estimated using the three approaches to value . These approaches are the Sales Comparison Approach, Cost Approach, and the Income Approach. Regardless of the approach utilized, the data under consideration is taken from the market in one form or another. One or more of these approaches may not be applicable in all assignments or may have reduced significance because of the nature of the property, the decision, or the available data . In the event that more than ont'approach is utilized, the value estimates arrived at from the different approaches are correlated into a single value estimate considered most appropriate for the subject property. The following is a brief discussion of each approach and its application . The Sales Comparison Approach is a method of estimating market value in which a subject property is compared with comparable properties that have recently sold. This process relies heavily upon the principle of substitution. Preferably, all properties utilized as comparable are in the same geographic area . . . ~ " One premise of the Sales Comparison Approach is that the market will determine a price for the subject property in the same manner that it determines the prices of comparable, competitive properties. City of College Station June 13, 2000 -····· •••••• Page 5 The sales are compared to the subject and adjustments for differences in location, time, terms of sale, or physical characteristics can be made use the subject as the standard of comparison. Most types of properties which are bought and sold can be analyzed using "common denominators" such as sales price per unit of size. Estimating the degree of comparability between two properties involves judgment about their similarity. Elements of comparison utilized in this judgment are (1) financing terms, (2) conditions of sale, (3) market conditions or time, (4) location, (5) physical characteristics , and (6) income characteristics, if any. Adjustments are made to the price of each comparable, as appropriate. The major strengths of this approach include the reflection of actual market transactions and the fact that the normal "common denominators" tend to be fairly easily determined. The potential weaknesses of this approach arise from the fact that the data is historical and "ideal" comparables are usually very difficult to find . The Cost Approach yields a value indication for a property by adding the land value to an estimate of the depreciated reproduction cost of the improvements. This approach recognizes that physical, functional, and external disadvantages will be recognized by the market and which may result in lower selling prices. The Cost Approach provides specific measures for these disadvantages, and anything that diminishes value is termed accrued depreciation. The land value is based upon a vacant site being utilized to its highest and best use. Generally speaking, the site value is estimated via the Sales Comparison Approach. Replacement cost, or reproduction cost new, is derived from reliable cost manuals and/or from interviews with reputable local contractors. Depreciation can be observed from rent loss or based upon an estimated cost-to-cure . In all cases, information concerning depreciation is developed from the market by observing comparable properties . .. ,,_. The Income Approach to value is applicable to income producing property and is practical in the appraisal of properties for which a rental market or a rental value can be identified. The Income Approach is an appraisal technique in which an appraiser derives a value indication for income producing property by converting anticipated benefits into property value . This process is accomplished by either capitalizing a single year's income expectancy or an annual average of several years' income expectancies at a market-derived capitalization rate or by discounting the annual cash flows for the holding period and the reversion at a specified yield rate . .. _ -" Chapitalizat 1 ion i~ the conbversfiontof eadr~i~d~s in_ttoban indicatiton ofh~alhue a~dh involvhes mu!dtiplyit~g 1 . t e annua net income y a ac or or 1v1 1ng 1 y some ra es w 1c we1g s sue cons1 era ions as risk, time, returns on investment, and returns of investment. • City of College Station June 13 , 2000 -····· •••••• Page 6 The appropriateness of this rate or factor is critical, and there are a number of techniques by which it may be developed. The net income attributable to the subject property is estimated by subtracting vacancy and collection loss, and expenses from the property's annual potential gross income . These figures are derived from the market comparison of properties similar to the subject. The reliability of the Income Approach is based upon a number of considerations which include the reliability of the estimate of income and expenses , the duration of the net annual income, the capitalization rate or factor used, and the method of capitalization used. The weaknesses of this approach lies in the estimation of income and expenses and the fact that not all properties are suitable for this approach. The strength of this approach is that it reflects typical investor considerations in purchasing and analyzing income producing properties . As the subject property is an effectively vacant tract of land, we have considered only the Sales Comparison Approach to value in our analysis. As indicated, the Cost Approach would involve improvements, and as the subject is considered to be effectively vacant, then it is our opinion that the Cost Approach to value is not pertinent or appropriate, and therefore, was not utilized . Also , as mentioned previously, the Income Approach is predicated on the property generating income . As the subject is unimproved, it is our opinion this approach is not applicable when estimating the value of a property of the subject's type . Therefore , it was also not utilized in this analysis . ESTIMATED REASONABLE EXPOSURE TIME The subject whole property's location within a developing portion of the City of College Station , with frontage on Greens Prairie Road is considered to provide it with good overall locational attributes. As such, it appears that a tract of this type could be expected to receive adequate market acceptance. Our analysis of current market trends and absorption rates for properties similar to the subject were considered to indicate a most probable marketing time of approximately 12 months. ,11-- CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal is subject to the following limiting conditions . The legal description furnished is assumed to be correct. We assume no responsibility for matters legal in character, nor do we render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be gqod . A,.ny existing liens and encumbrances have been disregarded and the property appraised as though free and clear under responsible ownership and competent management. City of College Station June 13 , 2000 -····· •••••• Page 7 We have made no survey and assume no responsibility in connection with such matters . We believe to be reliab le the information identified in this report as furnished by others , but we assume no responsibility for its accuracy. The construction and condition of the improvements mentioned in the body of this report are based on observation, and no engineering study has been made which would discover any latent defects . No certification as to any of the physical aspects could be given unless a proper engineering study was made . Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous substances , includ ing without limitation asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, or agricultural chemicals, which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental conditions , was not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become aware of such during the appraiser's inspection . The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated . The appraiser, however, is not qualified to test such substances or conditions. If the presence of such substances, such as asbestos, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, or other hazardous substances or environmental conditions, may affect the value of the property, the value estimated is predicated on the assumption that there is no such condition on or in the property or in such proximity thereto that it would cause a loss in value . No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, nor for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them . The distribution of the total valuation between land and improvements in this report applies only under the existing program of utilization . The separate valuations for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal , and are invalid if so used . We are not requ ired to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this appra isal with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have been made previously therefore. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not carry w ith it the right of publication . It may not be used for any purpose by anyone other than the addressee without the previous written consent of the'/'appraiser. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report will be conveyed to the public through advertis i ng , public relations , news , sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author, particularly as to valuation conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he is connected , or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or the MAI designation. " City of College Station June 13, 2000 NEIGHBORHOOD DATA BOUNDARIES North : South : East: West: LOCATION: MAJOR THOROUGHFARES: ACCESSIBILITY: DISTANCE FROM CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: PREDOMINANT TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: -····· •••••• Rock Prairie Road Page 8 Southerly boundary for the City of College Station Rock Prairie Road/ Peach Creek Road Texas Avenue (State Highway 6) The southeastern portion of the City of College Station. Texas Avenue/State Highway 6, Rock Prairie Road, and Greens Prairie Road The subject neighborhood is provided with good accessibility via the various roadways which either traverse or form the boundaries of the area . The City of College Station does not have a centralized business district, however, the majority of the commercial developments within the city are situated along the major thoroughfares. As a developing portion of the City of College Station, the subject neighborhood includes a combination of vacant effectively rural type areas and developed portions. The developed portions are primarily residentially oriented, with the supportive commercial uses scattered throughout the neighborhood on the area's primary thoroughfares. Additionally, College Station Medical Center is located on the southerly line of Rock Prairie Road, west of its intersection with State Highway 6. Furthermore, the City of College Station's Business Center is located within the southern portion of the subject neighborhood on State Highway 6, south of Greens Prairie Road. -····· •••••• ------------------------------ City of College Station June 13, 2000 SCHOOLS: ZONING : RELATIONSHIP TO GROWTH PATTERN OF CITY: CONCLUSIONS: SITE DATA LEGAL DESCRIPTION : LOCATION: LAND AREA: FRONTAGE: . " SHAPE: TOPOGRAPHY: Page 9 The subject neighborhood is situated within the College Station Independent School District which provides educational facilities for kindergarten through twelfth grade. The subject neighborhood is situated within the City of College Station, which enforces zoning regulations upon properties within its boundaries. The City of College Station is currently growing in a south to southeasterly direction. The subject neighborhood is considered to be located within the current growth pattern for the area. This area is considered to be enhanced by its location within the current pattern of the City of College Station. Therefore, based on this consideration, as well as the past favorable market acceptance for properties in this area, the subject neighborhood is expected to continue to receive favorable market acceptance into the foreseeable future. 234 .81 acres out of the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract 9, College Station, Brazos County, Texas. Northerly line of Greens Prairie Road, east of State Highway 6 234 .813 acres 2 ,591. 79 feet on Greens Prairie Road Irregular Gently rolling City of College Station June 13 , 2000 DRAINAGE : STREET TYPE : EASEMENTS : UTILITIES: ZONING : CURRENT USE : IMPROVEMENTS: .,~. " -····· •••••• Page 10 Based upon a physical inspection of the subject property's general area, drainage appears to be adequate . Greens Prairie Road is a two-lane, asphalt paved roadway with open ditch drainage. In addition to the typical utility easements for the area, the subject is reported to be encumbered by a 50-foot wide Southwestern Gas Pipeline Easement that is situated in the northerly and easterly portion of the parcel. The pipeline located in the easement is not currently reported to be active. Additionally, the subject is encumbered by a 30-foot wide Seminole Pipeline Easement which is reported to be active . Easements of these types are typical for a property of the subject's size and are not considered to be a particular detriment to marketability. The subject property has all public utilities available at the site . A-0, Agricultural Open District Agricultural/recreational The subject property is improved with a residence/storage building which contains 471 square feet, an old 938 square foot pole type barn, and a +/-1,380 square foot single family residence. However, the barn and residence/ storage building were considered to be in such poor overall condition that they have no contributory value to the whole property. Additionally, according to the information provided to our office by the owner of the subject property, if the City of College Station purchases it, they are going to remove the single family residence. Therefore, for the purposes of this appraisal this structure has not been given any consideration. As such, the subject is considered to be an effectively vacant tract of land. ~------- City of College Station June 13 , 2000 RESTRICTIONS : TAXES : FLOOD HAZARD : SOIL & SUBSOIL CONDITIONS : ADJACENT LOTS/IMPROVEMENTS North: South : ~ East: West: -····· •••••• No adverse restrictions noted . Page 11 The subject property is within the taxing jurisdict ion of the City of College Station, the College Station Independent School District and Brazos County. These entities had a 1999 total tax rate of $2 .5967 per $100.00 of valuation. The Brazos County Appraisal District currently caries the subject property as six parcels with a total of 234.4 acres , which has a total assessed market value of $834, 100.00. However, 204.40 acres of the subject property has an agricultural exemption, and as such, the Brazos County Appraisal District presently has an agricultural use value on the 204.40 acres of $13 ,290.00. Therefore, the current taxable value for the subject property is reported to be $198,850 .00, which indicates annual taxes of $5 ,163.54. According to the information provided to our office +/-89 acres out of the subject property is situated with in an identified flood hazard area. This factor is not considered to be a particular detriment to marketability for an agricultural/recreational tract , however, it could lim it the development potential for this portion of the subject. Therefore, this influence has been considered in our analysis . Appear to be typical of the area and provide an adequate foundation for construction . However, we have not been furnished with any so il or subso il maps/studies , nor is the responsibility for such accepted . Vacant land Portion of the Pebble Creek Development across Greens Prairie Road Portion of the Brazos Valley Sold Waste Management Agency's Land Fill Pebble Hills Estate Residential Development, currently under construction City of College Station June 13, 2000 ANALYSIS/CONCLUSIONS : HIGHEST AND BEST USE -····· •••••• Page 12 The subject property's location with frontage on Greens Prairie Road within a developing portion of the City of College Station is considered to provide it with good accessibility and visibility. However, the fact that a +/-89 acres out of the tract is located within a flood hazard area, is considered to, at least somewhat reduce its overall marketability. Additionally, the fact that the easterly sector of the tract adjoins a portion of the Brazos Valley Sold Waste Management Agency's Land Fill could reduce its marketability. Nevertheless, with the current market conditions the subject site could be expected to receive favorable overall market acceptance into the foreseeable future . According to the Appraisal Institute in The Appraisal of Real Estate (11th Edition), highest and best use may be defined as, "The use, from among reasonably probable and legal alternative uses , found to be physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest present land value." The crucial elements of this definition suggest that the highest and best use must be, "(1) physically possible, (2) legally permissible, (3) financially feasible , and (4) maximally productive." In conclusion, to be a highest and best use it must meet all four criteria . If the proposed highest and best use cannot meet all the criteria, i.e., it is financially feasible but not physically possible, then it must be disregarded. After considering the tract's location, physical features, and zoning, as well as the current trends within t~ immediate neighborhood, it is our opinion that the highest and best use of the subject whole property is speculative in nature , with a most probable future use for a multi-use development. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS AND VALUATION Sales Comparison Approach .. In reaching our opinion of the subject's value, the Brazos County Deed Records were searched for recent comparable land sales within the area. Our research revealed limited data for properties with similar physical and locational attributes, as compared to the subject. Therefore, it was necessary to utilize sales with diverse physical end locational characteristics that have occurred since 1996. City of College Station June 13, 2000 -····· •••••• -------------------- Page 13 Nevertheless, the data utilized in this analysis is considered to be the best available and indicative of current market trends. Also, real estate brokers active in the area were consulted as to their knowledge of properties currently offered on the market for sale which would be in competition with the subject property if it were offered for sale on the open market. The available market data was investigated, analyzed and compared to the similar and dissimilar characteristics. Then adjustments were made accordingly in reaching the value estimate by the Sales Comparison Approach . The following is a brief synopsis of the sales utilized in our analysis . (The detailed information for these sales is located in the Addenda of this report.) Subject Northerly line of Greens Prairie Road, N/A 234.81 N/A east of State Highway 6, College Station, Texas One Northeast corner of Earl Rudder July 1996 145.0 $5,000.00 Freeway and University Dr., Bryan & College Station, Texas Two South line of University Dr. & north line Aug.1998 153.10 $10,000.00 of Harvey Rd., east of Earl Rudder Freeway, College Station, Texas Three Northwest corner of University Dr. and Aug.1998 351.933 $10,000.00 F.M.158, Bryan, Texas Four North line of Greens Prairie Rd., west of Current 315.0 $12,500.00 State Highway 6, College Station, Texas Contract Five -~ West line of F.M. 158, south of Current +/-100 $11,000.00 Co erfield Dr. B an Texas Contract As is noted above, the sales price per acre ranges from $5,000.00 to $12,500 .00 . This relatively large range is considered to exemplify the diversity of the available market data . Market Data Number One sold at the lower end of the range due to the fact that the majority of the tract is impacted by the floodplain/floodway. The limited sales within the subject property's im.media!e area made it necessary to expand our market research area to include sales of as similar as possible properties that are located within competing portions of the Bryan/College Station area. Even after expanding our research area, the limited sales of similar properties which have occurred in the past ± four years made it necessary to utilize sales with diverse physical and locational characteristics. -····· •••••• --------------- City of College Station June 13, 2000 Page 14 Nevertheless, the data utilized within this analysis is considered to be the best available and to be indicative of current trends for tracts of the subject's type. Since no two properties are ever exactly alike, dissimilarities do exist, and the extent to which they affect sale price must be analyzed and allowances for these differences made. Components that affect the sale price of vacant land are numerous, but the most prominent are highest and best use, property rights conveyed, financing, date of sale, market conditions, size, location, and physical characteristics. Each of the comparables was carefully analyzed and adjusted appropriately as required . After analyzing the available market data, giving consideration to the subject property's physical and locational characteristics, as well as the current market trends in the area, it is our opinion that the indicated market value for the subject property is $7,500.00 per acre which is calculated as follows: 234 .81 acres@ $7,500.00 per acre= CERTIFICATION SAY: $1,761,075.00 $1, 760,000.00 The undersigned does hereby certify that, except as otherwise noted in this appraisal report : We have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this appraisal report . We have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this appraisal report or the parties t~olved. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained in this appraisal report upon which the analysis, opinions, and conclusions expressed herein are based, are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opin ions, and conclusions. • A Our compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses , opinions , or conclusions in, or the use of, this report . The appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan . City of College Station June 13, 2000 -····· •••••• Page 15 Our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed , and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared , in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute . We cert ify that the use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. No one other than the undersigned prepared the analyses, conclusions, and opinions concerning real estate that are set forth in this appraisal report. As of the date of this report, John M. Hamilton has completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. It is the intent of this appraisal report to be in compliance with the guidelines as specified by the client. Michael J. Fleming made a personal inspection of the general area of the property which is the subject of this appraisal report on May 12, 2000 . The value estimate contained herein is effective as of May 12, 2000. $1, 760,000.00 JOHN M. HA~ TON INCORPORATED " I -····· •••••• PRINCIPALS OF JOHN M. HAMILTON INCORPORATED John M. Hamilton is an independent real estate appraiser and consultant with offices located at 3131 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 111, Bryan, Texas 77802 . He has been actively engaged in the real estate profession since 197 4, and a partial resume of his qualifications is outlined as follows : 1. MAI -The Appraisal Institute 2. State Certified -General Real Estate Appraiser (TX-1322674-G) 3. Real Estate Broker -State of Texas 4. B.S. degree -Texas A&M University 5. Qualified in Federal District Court, Federal Bankruptcy Court -Southern (Houston), Northern (Ft. Worth), and Western (Austin/San Antonio) Districts, County and District Court as an expert witness in valuation of real property . 6 . Past Board Director -Appraisal Institute Chapter -Houston, Texas 7. Current member of the Review and Counseling Panel -Appraisal Institute The Appraisal Institute conducts a voluntary program of continuing education for its designated members. M.A.l.'s who meet the minimum standards of this program are awarded periodic educational certification. He is currently certified under this program . Michael J. Fleming is an independent real estate appraiser and consultant with offices located at 3131 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 111, Bryan, Texas 77802 . He has been actively engaged in the real estate profession since 1977, and a partial resume of his qualifications is outlined as follows: 1. State Certified -General Real Estate Appraiser (TX-1321752-G) 2. Real Estate Broker -State of Texas 3. B.S. degree -Texas Tech University 4. Qualified in Federal Bankruptcy Court (Southern District), County and District Civil Court of Law as an expert witness in valuation of real property . .. L __ _ -····· •••••• PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS The Adam Corporation Young Brothers CSL of Texas , Inc. Area Progress Corporation Allright Parking Centeq Financial Group Exxon Company USA Pool Company Westinghouse Waco Financial Corporation Rossco Holdings Dial Reit Womack and McClish , Attorneys Barron, Adler, Anderson & Poteet, Attorneys Rodgers, Miller, Ellison and Holt, Attorneys Davis and ,Q9vis, Attorneys Youngkin, Catlin , Bryan , Stacy and Dillard, Attorneys Payne, Watson, Kling, Miller & Malechek, Attorneys Bruchez, Goss , Thornton, Meronoff, Michel & Hawthorne, Attorneys " CORPORATE ATTORNEYS Bryan , Texas Bryan, Texas Bryan , Texas College Station , Texas Houston, Texas Houston , Texas Houston, Texas Houston, Texas Houston, Texas Waco, Texas Los Angeles , Californ ia Omaha, Nebraska Aust in, Texas Austin, Texas Bryan, Texas Bryan, Texas Bryan , Texas Bryan , Texas Bryan , Texas I -····· •••••• PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS First National Bank Liberty National Bank Bank One, Texas, NA First American Bank First Federal Savings Bank First National Bank Cleburne State Bank Compass Bank First Bank of Snook First Federal Mortgage Lending Nations Bank Bank One, Texas, NA Centex Home Equity First Federal Savings Hibernia National Bank Pacific Southwest Bank, F.S.B. First National Bank First State Bank Countrywide Home Loans First Republic Mortgage Fort Worth Mortgage Nations Bank Texas Capital Bank Texas Commerce Bank BankAmerican Housing Services Citizens State Bank First Bank of Navasota First Bank of Snook First State ,~nk of Temple Realty Services of Magna Mortgage Merchants National Bank Carteret Savings Bank Metropolitan Federal Bank Old Stone Bank Home Loan and Investment Bank First Tennessee Bank FINANCIAL -------- Anderson, Texas Austin, Texas Brenham, Texas Bryan, Texas Bryan, Texas Bryan , Texas Cleburne, Texas College Station, Texas College Station, Texas College Station, Texas College Station, Texas Dallas, Texas Dallas, Texas Dallas, Texas Dallas, Texas Dallas, Texas Franklin, Texas Granger, Texas Houston, Texas Houston, Texas Houston, Texas Houston, Texas Houston, Texas Houston, Texas Irving, Texas Marlin, Texas Navasota, Texas Snook, Texas Temple, Texas Hattiesburg, MS Cedar Rapids, Iowa Morristown, New Jersey Fargo, North Dakota Providence, Rhode Island Warwick, Rhode Island Memphis, Tennessee l ______ _ -····· •••••• PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS City of Austin Texas Democratic Party Texas Housing Authority Brazos County Appraisal District GOVERNMENTAL Brazos Valley Community Action Agency Brazos County Road & Bridge Department Bryan Independent School District City of Bryan Texas Department of Transportation City of College Station College Station Independent School District Texas A&M University System City of Houston Federal National Mortgage Association Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Washington County Appraisal District .. Austin , Texas Austin , Texas Austin, Texas Bryan , Texas Bryan , Texas Bryan, Texas Bryan , Texas Bryan , Texas Bryan, Texas College Station , Texas College Station , Texas College Station , Texas Houston, Texas Houston, Texas San Antonio , Houston, Dallas Brenham , Texas ADDENDA .. t Pebble Hilo, Ud. l!0.78 oc. -~';;;:?. -~, § I Vol . 3723, f'9a. J12 at JI~ T.xo1 C.ntroid Ronch Section One Vol . 981, Pg. 221 Manon l/lolet tr.o<iar ond SU.On Ct..90'" Helm Pebbl• Creek PhaH 1A Vol. 1224, Pg . 559 D ,/ II I' ,1 ;/ /. " ., I J /1 //:'/ / / . i :' / j I ;' / Bratot Valley Soltd Wast• ManoQement ,tqency 119.~ oc. .'. .' I I I I \. \ \ .. \. Vol . 12J1 , P9. 2118 \._;i " == =---.:= -·:.:·=:. ...... _ ... ____ """" DW4 ......... ...--. --. ..... .....,...., __ ..._ __ _ ------·--.......... · .. -·--.............. ---......... -... ------- JOE ORR, INC. ~•llltllllrlU 11'1 ,.... GM c.:Ll .,,..,...,... ... ,.,... Scale• 1 300' ~· I I FLOOD Z NE NOTATIONS : P\000 IOJC: efC IP'P::lll. P\.000 MlllJrlllD #IEJ4 ~.,I ~l\OCO., WtllP\.000 -...... ~~~-otion of l.PC Pipeline ~· ...... flood Zone • C1C.UD Ill.It at:111 ""'CT ::i:., __ --S1l/1"4 + + + LAND Till[ SURV(Y P\..U or • 234.84 ACRE TRACT r teiMAs CARUTt<RS LCl\CilL.. A-9 IRAZOS CO>ITY T XAS --------------- --PROPERTY ID AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 0PERTY. ID: R10710 )0090 1 -0058-0000 A000901 THOMAS CARRUTHERS lC L>, TRACT 58, ACRES 140.001 'RINTED: 0.3/IZl7/00 , VALUE CHG : L~/27/99 PROPERTY SITUS ADDRESS NBHD : 22000 GREENS PRAIRIE RD "ON ST. STYLE FOUNDATION >-t EATI NG /A.C. PLUMBING JATE PRICE EXT. FINISH FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL INT. FINISH BUILT INS SPRINKLERS SALES HISTORY DEED BOOK 1.0. 0 1849 CREAGOR, ROOMS CEILING HTS. FLOORING BEDROOMS DOCKS 350, 28 --·3 52 DEED BOOK PAGE 30B&313 JAMES CARLL TO POGRAPHY UTILITIES ACCESS ZONE OTHER SEGM ENT LO . TYPE . __ e ga 1 Acres DESCRIPTION 140.001 SPTB ~' METHOD CLASS eta -------OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS CREAGOR, J C FAMILY TRUST (122g 1 5l C/O MARlON V CREAGOR 31210 CREAGOR LN COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 IMPROVEMENT --TAXING ENTITIES C~1 s;:: C2 EXEMPTIONS ETCH --LAST APPRAISAL 01/\~1/00 APPRAISED VALUE THIS VALUE MAY NOT REPRESENT CURRENT YEAR CERTIFIED VALUE AREA AREA FACTOR 1'+0. 001 A ADJUST AREA UNIT PRICE "' ECON. YEAR COND-% BUILT ITION GOOD PHY % ECO N. FUN C. % % ADJUST "' MARKET VALUE ~ "'~ 420 1 t211Zl0 lul H Total 420, 000 VALUE AG VALUE 9 . 100 lot a l ~ ~ ~..21 k!0:-8'iljS ~ PROPERTY 10 AN D LE G AL DESCRIPTION ··r, PROPERTY SITUS ADDRESS .. ,,; T. STYL E FOUN D ATION I -, ~I NG ·A .C . ;"J.. • ..; .':!l~I~ . ' I f· PLUMBIN G I ;::·:·.\i;'.'}, ! r 1t :'. ::; r:~·c:: ::::: ~; =:~: :·h' ;z1/·:·)1'.1 ',,.,H,-., .. J .. '.)!: .. :> . ROO F STYLE ll' ... ·~.· ' O:f 11. ':•~ ·~ r..:; t - FLOORING fH •• 'H•J•,1.1_. r.1 ~ . ..:.~~ • . At.ES · ,. ~-,1V ,. .... \••'•:: ,.-••••. >~OGRAPHY . ·'l.1EN T ,!) TYPE PRI CE UTILITI ES DEED 3 00K l.D . A CCESS DESCR1PTI ON DEED B OOK PAGE ZONE TYPE · SPTB I ··." :1.~· .. ::: I D .!..•,;. OTH ER .,:·:., '!'."l,·:.i. -i i ' I i! u:: ·'' ~ ---- --OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS IMPROVEMENT --TAXING ENTITIES EXEMPTIONS ETCH --LAST APPRAISAL APPRAISED VALUE THIS VALUE MAY NOT REPRESENT CURRENT YEAR CERTIFIED VALUE 1 '.'.:~. on UNIT PR ICE ':'} '?.i i?I I{) ADJUST " PH Y % MAR K ET VALUE 7 s ' ~~: \~) iZ: ECON . FUNC . % % AG AG AG 1 'f'T I. METHOf) '~-~~-p~1C:~·~:· -·: Tot .,.:. VALUE AG VALUE ' r ·: ,-,_, . :.1 .. -:.< ,·" l ,· ... ,••.)· .. · -------PRO PERT Y ID A N D L EGAL DESC RIPTIO N 1JPF~ f·~TY . ID ;. R l 1Z17 l r., :")? \'., -' . f1 ;~ r.~ B :i: o ~; H ~1 ;::: ::i 1:.:: ;.:~ 1'.~ ~:~ ;··: ~; r ~·~ !~J 8 r~; .) ;:~ 1•:1 : ) :.~I .J T, , ::: i::: ·:~ ···~1·.JT L~c,: 'l:~~/1?1 7 /1Zt1:?i , '.J t-~~.-:. __ :c: c.:1 .. 1c; = 1 ;:::,.:~::7 /··:1 :·.:· PROPERT Y SITU S AD DR ESS NBHD: c:c~IZl'i.~I ZI .JC E NS PR AIPIE RD ::sr. STYLE FOUNDATION INT. FIN ISH ROOF ST YLE -'TING Ac Pl B I f'IRtf'lA:.1. '" .' . . UM ING """"''''' ';~I I p : ;,::: 8 ;::: --· :.. ~) 1{) .:T ~;SP : 0 2 ~~0 /0 C H .'II' 1.- :;•11,n• • ·1 ~ t -1/').<t..I"'; I'.! ·I l ~ h • t! I " ll(!•H•)f')US 1 ~r ){;f.S ·~ . .· · · ,.:,.:.,' · · . SALESHISTO v ·.,' '\ ~;.·'I , ·' ' °' • . ""0G RAPHY GMENT I D . TYPE PRI CE UTILITIE S DEED BOOK 1.0. DEED BOOK PAGE 0 .2 3 8 ~ "1 ~b C i:;:[:PC:Ji") F~. Ml i.:>!(1 [::1 .. ACCESS ZONE DESCRIPTION S PTB ~7:1 c METH O D OTHER CLASS - -- --OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS c· r··: r.·: r·1c;1::: t·:: • .J (.t !11 t:: ~::. :v! T c· ~ 1 !~) ~~: !_. ::~. ? .. ~, :.J c: (J 1._1 r· ~ -r \~' ~-;'. ri /;. .t. :t !\; !··; ... : ~: i r' ~-) ·;·· ('1 ~ -r· x ";'' ~j' 1::~. 6 .:·~ - - i·:.• - - TAXING ENTITIES .-...-:. -· .. -· ...... EXEMPTIONS ETCH - - L AST APPRA ISA L APPRAI SED VALUE :-• .\ ·.~ .. 1 • .'. THIS VALUE MAY NOT REPRESENT CURRENT YEAR CERTIFIED VALUE AREA AREA FACTOR ADJUST AREA UNIT PRICE YEAR COND · % BUILT IT ION GOOD PHY % ECON . FUNG . O/n O/o VALUE ...... ---------------m:Jill-[!!]illiillJI _______________ _ "·' OESC RIPTI TYPE SPTB "'·'' ARE A UNI T PRICE ,.;K, ,d,.. ADJUS T MARKET VALUE u';'E "'~~ UN ll'~nicE ~ OPE N-NnTJVE PA STU RE n2 .21 Dl ~ 1 0.0~ 5 00 0 3 0 . ~cs ;~1 n G5.~~ AG VALUE ! ·r o 4; ··" ------PROPERTY ID AND LEGAL DE~CRIPTIUN JP~RTV . I D: R923S8 - ·'.·9 0 l ··-1 ()1Z1'.j.S -00(, 1Z1 ni;,:i12:1/)•:) 0 l T!·1U Mn :3 en f~ h:UTi·i L'.. p·:; ~LJ TRACT 58.G, ACRE S 3~.J~g -~NTE D : 0 J/07/0 0 vn L UE CHG : 0 4 /0 1 /g? ' PROPERTY SITUS ADDRESS i'!BHD: ~:~'.1')00 _\EENS PRRIR IE (OFF OF> •' • ,lj ·IS T. STYLE FOUNDATION EXT. FINISH INT. FINI SH RO OF STYLE FLOORING t . ATINGI A.C. PLUMB ING l-lR[;'•1,....·.:;t.: !?'.rt . ltl ~ It~~ ;1.,1 ... ll(P'1riri1.1 5 il i i-: ~;i1r:l\1 <.;>,ilU l".t ; H'~ r.i uir .• 111·; [ll1CI':\: · t'"J '<f:-•,-..t;:;pt__ IT F RDM li.)il)0 C:1 QW)--00:::;e.---01~·)01?.1 PER .1::c·: -· SALES HISTORY · : ·. PRICE l POG RAPHY I UTILITIES ·G M ENT ID TYPE DEED B OOK l.D . .;:,~ 1 c.:.c;i C F: F.:'.. 1::-11:-:; (J r:;; • ACCESS ZONE DESCRIPTION TY PE DEED BOOK PAGE -;· I -:;· ......J .L .• _. Jf.iME f:J cnr~:.-:.._ SP TB ~~?i~L Mf:THOO OTHER CLASS n::::. ;:: - - ----uvvNER NAMt ANIJ AULJRES::. c: F1t:.nc c:i f~' M1ci RI ON 'J ( 1 c'.0'..'.', l 7 ) 31Z1 1Z1 C F'.Ef.1C3CJ I~ L!\l C:Cli ... L[C::f:: ::-·:1 1:1TIDt'-I, T!'. 77E~L 1'.":; ---TAX1m_, c.NTITic.::. EXEMPTIONS --LA::. I APPRAl::>AL ' ;;i i. / 121 l / 1;::1 ~'?I APPRAISED VALUE IMPROVEMENT ETCH THIS VALUE MAY NOT REPRESENT CURRENT YEAR CERTIFIED VALUE AREA AREA FACTOR UNIT PRICE Z~62E:-I .. FUNC UNIT PRICE .. ECON YEAR COND · % PHY % BUILT ITION GOOD AOJUST ,. Tota.l MARKET VALUE 10::.:, ·~:;.:.0 ECON . FUNC . % O/o •O USE 1Dl •O MtrH()Q n •G lJNH f'R1t:r r-_, ~s .. ~z 1 1~~ VALU E AG VALUE MARKET DATA NUMBER ONE -VACANT LAND CONSIDERATION: CASH EQUIVALENT: FINANCING : DATE OF SALE : RECORDING DATA: GRANT OR: GRANTEE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Size: Survey Name: Abstract No .: City: County: State: PROPERTY l.D .#: MAP l.D .#: LOCATION: FRONTAGE: SHAPE : ZONING: CURRENT USE: UTILITIES: $725,000.00; $5,000 .00 per acre N/A $575,000 .00 note to grantor, reported to be at market terms July 29, 1996 Volume 2653, Page 316, Brazos County Deed Records Bert Wheeler's, Inc. Jim Sowell Construction Co., Inc. 145 acre Richard Carter 8 Bryan and College Station Brazos Texas R39008, R10547, R99891, and R99892 264-380,264-378 ,267-378 Northeasterly corner of University Drive and the Earl Rudder Freeway On University Drive and on the Earl Rudder Freeway Irregular R-1, Single Family Residential in College Station and A-0, Agricultural Open in Bryan area Vacant All public utilities aVililable at the site. MARKET DATA NUMBER ONE -VACANT LAND -CONT'D FLOOD PLAIN : REMARKS: " A large portion of this tract appears to be located within a flood plain area , which includes some floodway . The grantee is proposing to construct a mixed use development on the tract. The reported cost to remove part of the tract from the flood hazard area is ±$500,000.00. MARKET DATA NUMBER TWO -VACANT LAND CONSIDERATION: CASH EQUIVALENT: FINANCING: DATE OF SALE : RECORDING DATA: GRANT OR: GRANTEE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Size : Survey Name: Abstract No .: City: County: State: PROPERTY l.D .#: MAP l.D .#: LOCATION: FRONTAGE: SHAPE: ZONING : CURR~F-JT USE : UTILITIES: $1 ,535,000 .00; $10,000 .00 per acre N/A Cash to Seller August27 , 1998 Volume 3237, Page 229 , Brazos County Deed Records Bert Wheeler's, Inc. City of College Station 153.10 acres Richard Carter 8 College Station Brazos Texas R103316 267-376, 267-378 , and 270-376 Southerly line of University Drive and northerly line of Harvey Road, east of the Earl Rudder Freeway (State Highway 6 East Bypass) ±2,000 feet on Harvey Road ±2, 100 feet n University Drive Rectangular M-1, Planned Industrial Vacant All public utilities available at the site . MARKET DATA NUMBER TWO -VACANT LAND -(CONT'D) FLOOD PLAIN : REMARKS : " Small portion along west line The City of College Station plans to construct baseball fields on the site . / .. · / .. -...::: ... ~ .... ~ ... . ., .... ~fr •• .,. ,/ - A(C(N(l' PaAICW4Qy I NC 58. S't ACA(S eeeee1 · eeeJ ·ee6e ----..... , ... ...... MARKET DATA NUMBER THREE -VACANT LAND CONSIDERATION: CASH EQUIVALENT: FINANCING: DATE OF SALE: RECORDING DATA: GRANT OR: GRANTEE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Size : Survey Name: Abstract No .: City: County: State: PROPERTY l.D.#: MAP l.D.#: LOCATION: FRONTAGE: SHAPE : ZONING : • A CURRENT USE : UTILITIES: $3,519,330 .00; $10 ,000 .00 per acre N/A 20% cash down ($750,000 .00), owner carries balance; terms not disclosed August27, 1998 Volume 3237, Page 233, Brazos County Deed Records M.D. Wheeler Ltd . of Texas Copperfield Ten, Ltd. 351 .933 acres Richard Carter and J. W. Scott 8 &49 Bryan Brazos Texas R104003 and R103319 267-378, 267-380, and 270-382 Northwest corner of University Drive (FM . 60) and F.M . 158 ±6,000 feet on University Drive ±3,900 feet on F.M . 158 Irregular A-0, Agricultural Open Park Hudson multi-use development All public utilities available at the site. MARKET DATA NUMBER THREE -VACANT LAND -(CONT'D) FLOOD PLAIN : REMARKS : .. Portion in Special Flood Hazard Copperfield Drive currently terminates at the north line of the tract adjacent to Bowen School. The F.M. 158 frontage wraps an electrical substation . -- '· ·, .·- ( I · .• : ·.=. :·. ·:: ~· ~- roMI L' PAAINEASHI P'.,. \ I )< ACRES '- 00<600 · 0001 -0000 ' .,_, -- I WA(,,l((R F'AHJ LY PAAfNERSHI P 6• oCAES 001a00 -ee02 -e 00_e __ /. ,· 111111•• . _, _, 264-3 76 MARKET DATA NUMBER FOUR -VACANT LAND CONSIDERATION : CASH EQUIVALENT: FINANCING : DATE OF SALE : RECORDING DAT A: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Size : Survey Name : Abstract No .: City : County: State: PROPERTY l.D .#: MAP l.D .#: LOCATION: FRONTAGE : SHAPE : ZONING : .. CURRENT USE: $3 ,937 ,500 .00 ; $12,500 .00 per acre N/A Cash to Seller Current contract (to close in July of 2000) N/A Timothy J . Crowley Wallace Phillips 315 .0 acres Robert Stevenson 54 College Station Brazos Texas Part of R13810 273-344, 273-342, 273-340, 276-344, & 276-342 Northerly line of Greens Prairie Road, west of State Highway 6 at the proposed northwesterly corner of Greens Prairie Road and the proposed State Highway 40 . Currently has frontage on Greens Prairie Road and will have frontage on State Highway 40 when the roadway is constructed. Basically rectangular A-0, Agricultural Open District Vacant land MARKET DATA NUMBER FOUR -VACANT LAND -CONT'D UTILITIES: FLOOD PLAIN : REMARKS : " All public utilities available in the area, however, public water and sewer service lines will have to be extended to the tract. The City of College Station is reportedly going to participate in the extension of the lines . A small portion of the tract appears to be located within a flood hazard area . The grantee is proposing to develop this tract with an upper end residential development. l .· •()U(,AL. ES THEA JANE GRA )03. CH ACRES 005•01 ·0025-0000 (~:~ .... r···· .1 ;.-·_) /~. . , : : '· / ,.· · ......... , . .~·--·---·-·--~· MARKET DATA NUMBER FIVE -VACANT LAND CONSIDERATION : CASH EQUIVALENT: FINANCING : DATE OF SALE : RECORDING DAT A: GRANT OR: GRANTEE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION Size : Lot: Block: Addition Name: City: County: State : PROPERTY l.D.#: MAP l.D .#: LOCATION : FRONTAGE: -11- SHAPE : ZONING: CURRENT USE: UJILITlfiS: $1, 100,000.00; $11,000.00 per acre N/A Owner financing Current Contract N/A Bryan Development, Ltd . Bryan Independent School District ±100 acres N/A N/A Park Hudson Bryan Brazos Texas N/A 264-376 F .M. 158, northwest of F .M. 60 F .M . 158 Irregular A-0 , Agricultural Open Vacant All public utilities available at the site . MARKET DATA NUMBER FIVE -VACANT LAND -(CONT'D) FLOOD PLAIN : REMARKS : Portion in Special Flood Hazard This tract is encumbered by being in the flood pla in, overhead utility easements and an oil well pad site. ' .. ' ( .. I ' :\ ', \ ' ......... . \ .... .I I ' I ... I ' ' ( / / .-.· ' -~. w.1.KER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP . ; "ltl14l WALKER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP' ·1 I 3• ACRES ' 00•600 -0001-0000 '. /\' .L ~ ,• ,,.I 64 ACRES / 002800-0002-0000_ -. ,· "llll•• IHE!iil!iiHiilU M A P " 264-3 76 234.81 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT 9, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS . ~I l ..... •. \ i i_ VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY LOOKING NORTH OFF GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD ...... VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY LOOKING NORTH OFF GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD 234 .81 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT 9, COLLEGE STATION , BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS VIEW OF BARN VIEW OF RESIDENCE/STORAGE BUILDING 234.81 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT 9, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS INTERIOR VIEW INTERIOR VIEW 234 .81 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT 9, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS ';~~~~~J!\?~~ ~- .. ;:. ~'f~ INTERIOR VIEW INTERIOR VIEW 234.81 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS CARUTHERS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT 9, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS .. ,..,_. VIEW LOOKING EAST ON GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD i ~ VIEW LOOKING WEST ON GREENS PRAIRIE ROAD ."' \ PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FOR 370 ACRES OF PROPERTY REFERRED TO AS THE CREAGOR-THURMOND TRACTS COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS Prepared for The City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Prepared by CSC Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc . 3407 Tabor Road Bryan, Texas 77808 June 14 , 2000 ~~1t~f#.t~~ StlPhell:iwetish Senior Scientist Senior Engineer csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thunnond Tracts TABLE OF CONTENTS Pag e 1.0 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES AND LIMITATIONS .................................. 1 2.0 DESCRIPTIVE OVERVIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ......................................................... 3 2 .1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY .................................................. 3 2 .2 DESCRIPTION OF GENERAL AREA IN WHICH SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ....................................................................................................................... 4 3 .0 HISTORICAL OWNERSHIP AND USE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY ....................................... 5 3 .1 PRIOR LAND UTILIZATION INDICATED BY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS ................. 5 3.2 CURRENT AND PRIOR OWNERSHIP OF SUBJECT PROPERTY INDICATED BY TITLE SEARCH AND INTERVIEWS ....................................................................... 7 3.3 OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF SUSPECT CONDIDONS .................................................................................................................. 8 4 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL SEITING ................................................................................................ 9 4 .1 TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY ................................................................................... 9 4 .2 SOIL TYPES AND PROPERTIES ................................................................................... 10 4 .3 SURF ACE WATER CHARACTERISTICS ............... ........ ....... ... . .. . ...... ........ ..... .. ........... 11 4 .4 GROUNDWATER ........................................................................................................... 12 4 .5 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE RECEPTORS ........................................................ 13 5 .0 VISUAL OBSERVATION OF SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA ......................................... 18 5 .1 OBSERVATION VISIT OF SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA ................................... 18 5 .2 INTERVIEWS WITH EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS .............................................. 19 5 .3 OBSERVED ADJACENT PROPERTY CONDillONS AND OPERATIONS ................. 19 5.4 OBSERVATION OF OIL AND GAS WELLS ................................................................. 20 6 .0 REGULATORY PROFILE ........................................................................................................ 22 6 .1 FEDERAL RECORDS/FILES .......................................................................................... 22 6 .2 STA TE RECORDS/FILES ............................................................................................... 23 6.3 WATER WELLS INDICATED BY STATE RECORDS/FILES ....................................... 25 6.4 LOCAL RECORDS/FILES OF SPILLS OR ACCIDENTS INVOLVING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND PROPERTY UTILITIES SERVICES .................................................................................................... 25 6 .5 STATE RECORDS OF HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES ................................... 26 7 .0 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION AND CONCLUSIONS ............................... 27 7 .1 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION .......................................................... 27 7 .2 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................. 27 8.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 29 11 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A -Figures Figure 1 -General Vicinity Map of Subject Property and Surrounding Area Figure 2 -Site Plan of Subject Property Figure 3 -Aerial Photograph ( 1994) of Subject Property and Surrounding Area Figure 4 -USGS Topographical Map of Subject Property and General Surrounding Area (Ferguson Crossing and Wellborn 7.5" Quadrangles) Figure 5 -Major Geologic Formations in Vicinity of Subject Property Figure 6 -Types of Surface Soils Across Subject Property and Surrounding Area Appendix B -Aerial Photographs for Subject Property and Surrounding Area Appendix C -Photographs of Subject Property and Related Descriptions Appendix D -Atlas Environmental Research Report of Oil & Gas Well Search and Water Well Search Appendix E-EDR Report of Regulatory Search and Related Correspondence 111 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CSC Engineering & Environmental Consultants , Inc. (CSC) conducted a Phase I environmental site assessment (ESA) of a portion of the property known as Creagor-Thurmond Tracts . The referenced subject property is located in the southeastern portion of College Station, Texas . More specifically, the Creagor-Thurmond Tracts are situated just north eas t of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road (see Figure 1 in Appendix A which contains all of the figures for this re port). General Description of Subject Property: No specific legal description of all of the various tracts comprising the subject property was available at th e time of this report . However, the subject property is reported to extend over a total area of approximately 370 acres . The general boundaries of the Creagor-Thurmond Tracts are depicted on the site plan (Figure 2) and a recent aerial view of the property (Figure 3). The Creagor-Thurmond Tracts are irregular in shape but extend over a distance of approximately 4 ,500 ft in a northwest-southeast direction and approximately 5,400 ft in a southwest- northeast direction . The approximate locations of the individual tracts that comprise the subject property are illustrated on the site map (Figure 2). As can be seen from Figure 2 , there are at least four tracts of land involved in the present study . Three of the tracts belong to the Creagor family and are referred to as Creagor Tracts I , II, and III on Figure 2 . Creagor Tracts I and II represent two separate but adjoining properties that front the eastern access road of State Highway 6 . The two tracts occupy areas of approximately 7.43 acres and 10 .01 acres , respectively, or a cumulative area of approximately 17.44 acres. The Creagor Tract Ill fronts Greens Prairie Road and consists of approximately 6 separate properties (Figure 2) that cumulatively cover an area of approximately 234 .84 acres. The fourth tract that is the subject of this Phase I ESA is referred to as the Thurmond Tract . The Thurmond Tract has a frontag e on the west access road of State Highway 6 of approximately 800 ft and extends in a westerly direction for approximately 4 ,500 ft . The area of the Thurm ond Tra ct is approximately 171 acres. A proposed development, "Pebble Hills Estates ," is situated between Creago r Tracts I/II and Crea gor Tract Ill, but is not part of the presently proposed assessment. Therefore, the three Creagor Tracts and the Thurmond Tract , which cumulatively consist of almost 370 acres , are the subject of the present assessment and will hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "subject property ." CSC understands that the subject property has mostl y consisted of wooded undeveloped land that may have been used as improved pasture or farmland in the recent past. A stream designated as Spring Creek flows through the central portion of the subject property from the southwest to the northeast . Current information does not indicate that the property has been the subject of any extensive industrial development in the past, although some previous energy industry exploration and production activities have occurred on the site . Scope of Assessment: This Phase I ESA presented in this report consisted of an analysis of available historical aerial photographs, visual inspection of the subject and adjacent properties , and a survey of relevant regulatory files. Identified previous owners and lessees of the property were interviewed as part of this Phase I ESA to attempt to identify past uses of the property which may have resulted in an environmental impact. Unfortunately, not all of the previous property owners were identified at the present time since a final abstract of title for the subject property has not been completed . Once an abstract of title for the property is completed and forwarded to CSC , we will review the abstract to identify if there are apparent previous uses of the property which may have produced an adverse environmental impact. Site Description and Field Observations: Observations of the site were conducted during an initial visit to the site on June 8, 2000 , by Rick Conlin of CSC and a follow-up visit on June I I, 2000. IV csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts The subject property largely consists of moderately to heavily wooded areas with dense underbrush (Photographs 1, 2, and 3 in Appendix C) which makes access to all areas of the subject property difficult. However, there are some clearings across the property (Photographs 4 and 5), some of which may have been used as old oilfield exploration sites (Photograph 4). However, we did not observe surface indications of past oilfield exploration activities, such as well heads, mud pit depressions , etc ., on the property except for possible rock-covered access roads to past drilling sites (Photograph 4). However, there is one current oil and gas exploration and production site (Union Pacific Resources ' Thompson-Marsh Unit No . 1) located on the subject property (Photograph 6). The surface of the current oil and gas production site appears to be relatively free of oil staining (except for very small areas). No indications of previous large spills or leaks were observed (Photograph 6). The storage tank battery at the site is bermed to contain possible future spills or leaks from the tanks (Photograph 6). The re are several small creeks o_r streams (Photog raph 7) that fl ow a cros s the s ubj ect prope rty, the major one of which is Spring Creek which flows through the c entral portion o the s ubj ect property . Spring Creek is relatively narrow, shallow, and sluggish during periods of low precipitation . There are also some isolated ponds situated at various locations on the subject property (Photograph 8). The water in the streams and ponds appears to be clean and exhibits some occasional algae growth. No surface sheens indicative of the presence of hydrocarbon substances were observed on the waters at the site. Also, the waterways were apparently clear of trash or rubbish that is sometimes indicative of random and illegal dumping at a site. In gene ral , e wate r does not appear to have .been neg ative ly impacted by e ithe r on-site or surrounding land usage . Some portions of the subject site have been developed as individual residential sites (Photographs 9 and 10). Two of these sites, including the Creagor residence (Photograph 9), appear to be currently occupied, whereas at least two other structures appear to have been smaller temporary structures that have apparently been abandoned (Photograph 10). The two abandoned buildings have small quantities of household and construction materials debris around the structures, including one 55-gallon drum (Photograph 10). Inspection of the drum indicated the presence of household trash . There was also a full 55-gallon drum present in the occupied residence in the south-central portion of the property . The label on the drum indicated that it contained a concrete curing compound . The drum was in good condition with no obvious leaks or spills associated with the drum . The center of the site is crossed by several roads . These roads range from unimproved dirt roads to roads having a gravel surface (Photograph 11). Cattle were observed grazing in the clearings of the wooded areas (Photograph 11). Potential On-Site Sources of Contamination: Exce pt for the production oi l well and related storage tank facilities present on the Thurmond Tract and the abandoned and plugged oil well on the Creator III Tract, no on-site sources of potential environmental contamination have b een identified during this Phase I ESA. Potential Off-Site Sources: No off-site sources of environmental contamination have been identified in the prescribed region surrounding the subject property, except for the currently operating Rock Prairie Road municipal solid waste landfill that adjoins the subject prop erty to the east. This landfill facility is expected to close in the next 4 to 5 years . Water Quality: There are no current sources of public water supply or monitor wells on the subject property . Although there is one private oilfield water supply well on the subject property, no water quality data for this well is publicly available . Therefore, th e re were no s pecific wate r quality data to be reviewed . At the Phase I level of assessment, a detailed evaluation of surface water, drinking water, and/or v csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts groundwater from past or current activities on the subject or neighboring properties 1s typically not performed . Recommendations Concerning Further Studies: Based upon the records review , historical aerial photographic review, interviews with property owners, and observations of the surface of the site during a site visit, CSC did NOT discover significant areas of hazardous wastes or hazardous substances spillage/leakage on the subject property that would warrant remedial action. However, the identification of a potential plugged and abandoned oil well in the southeastern portion of the subject property may warrant further study prior to the time that the property is developed and the on-going operation of the currently producing UPR oil well should be continually monitored . In addition , closure and post-closure operations of the nearby Rock Prairie Road Landfill should also be monitored when the landfill is closed. We also ecommend that consideration be given to performing a historical site survey, a focused threatened and endangered s ecies study_, and a wetlands de lin eation study . · Although aerial photographs were reviewed to provide some indication of past property usage , CSC nevertheless recommends that a knowledgeable professional review the formal abstract of title for the subject property, once it is completed . Such a review may provide an indication of activities conducted by previous property owners, lessors , or lessees which may have produced an adverse environmental impact to the subject property . Conclusions: CSC has reviewed the available information referenced in this Phase I ESA report and made observations during a site inspection of the subject property and surrounding area . Based upon that information and those observations , CSC has not uncovered evidence that would indicate that the subject property has suffered adverse environmental impact from operations previously conducted at the site or from activities associated with adjacent properties . Consequently , CSC believes that the likelihood that the subject property has experienced significant environmental impact from previous operations at the subject site is relatively low . Therefore, in accordance with the ASTM specifications of E 1517 , CSC can make the following statement: "CSC has performed a Phase I Environm ental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527 of the property described as the 370 acres referred to as the Creagor- Thurmond tracts : the property. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property." CSC does not recommend that a further Phase II investigation be conducted at this time. However, we do recommend that a limited follow-up investigation to the Phase I ESA be performed to identify the location of the plugged oil well believed to be on the subject property , to identify potential habitats of possible endangered or threatened species, such as the Navasota ladies ' -tresses, to locate any historically significant sites , and to delineate possible wetland areas th at may be impacted by development. The prosp ective purchaser and any financial parties participating in the transaction should recognize that there is an operating oil well on the subject property and that the subject property is located adjacent to a landfill . Consequently, depending upon the future operation of the oil well and the landfill , there is a small possibility that the subject prop erty may suffer adverse environmental impacts from future occurrences . Therefore, we recommend that the owner of the subject property monitor future activities both on the subject property and on adjacent properties with respect to possibl e future adverse environmental impacts . Limitations: The observations and findings presented in this report are based on reasonably ascertainable information compiled b y CSC during the Phase I ESA . Should additional information be Vl ,· csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts made available concerning past or present industrial, commercial, or residential practices or events that were not previously reviewed, that information should be forwarded to CSC to determine if additional or alternate conclusions and recommendations should be rendered . VII csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 1.0 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES AND LIMITATIONS 1bis document summarizes the observations and findings for a Phase I environmental site assessment (ESA) completed by CSC Engineering & Environmental Consultants , Inc . (CSC) for several tracts of property collectively referred to as the Creagor-Thurmond tracts . The tracts are located in the southeastern portion of College Station, Texas , as illustrated on Figure 1, General Vicinity Map of Subject Property and Surrounding Area in Appendix A (Appendix A contains all of the numbered figures for this report). All of the properties included in the Creagor-Thurmond Tracts are collectively refe rred to as the "subject property ." 1bis assessment was performed at the request of the City of College Station (City) in accordance with our proposal dated May 10 , 2000 , and accepted by the City of College Station on May 25, 2000 . The work procedures followed were in general conformance with those outlined in ASTM E 1527-97 , Standard Practice For Environmental Site Assessments : Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process . The work was performed for the City as part of an evaluation of potential environmental impacts to the subject property in connection with a real estate transaction . Assessment Objective. The objective of a Phase I ESA is to assess the potential for contamination of real property from existing or prior process and waste management operations which also includes a consideration of possible energy exploration activities . The scope of a Phase I ESA typically includes the following six principal tasks : • • • • • • Visual observation of the current condition of the subject and adjacent properties Review of historic information concerning past uses of the subject property and surrounding area Review of regulatory files maintained by relevant federal , state, and local environmental authorities concerning hazardous materials/hazardous waste operations which may have occurred either on the subject or on nearby properties Assessment of the potential effects of present and past practices with respect to hazardous materials handling and hazardous waste management Interviews with individuals knowledgeable about uses of the subject property Preparation of a summary report on the observations and findings compiled as part of the site visit, historical information review, regulatory file review , and interviews with owners/lessees of the subject property csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts The conclusions an:d recommendations presented in a Phase I ESA considered the inunediate planned use of the subject property by the prospective purchaser (if known at the time of the report) in addition to the past uses of the subject property. Therefore, recommendations for properties which have been utilized for industrial purposes in the past and which are projected to continue to be used for industrial purposes in the future will typically be formulated based upon less stringent criteria than would be employed for properties used for residential purposes . This distinction in evaluation criteria is recognized by state regulatory agencies . Many such agencies have promulgated risk reduction standards with variable criteria based upon whether the property being evaluated is used for industrial or residential purposes . Consequently, the possible future use of the subject property as an industrial manufacturing facility was considered in CSC's recommendations . Limitations. This report is intended only for the use of the City as the owner of the property . The contents of this report should not be relied upon by any other. parties without the express written consent of CSC. The findings presented in this report are relevant to the recent period of CSC's assessment and should not be relied upon to represent site conditions for dates in the distant future without further investigation of site conditions . Should additional information become available concerning past or present industrial , commercial , or residential practices, or other events that may have impacted the subject property, such information should be forwarded to CSC for evaluation and possible modification of the conclusions presented in this report . 2 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thunnond Tracts 2.0 DESCRIPTIVE OVERVIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Property Boundaries. As illustrated on Figure 1, the Creagor-Thunnond tracts are located near the northeastern corner of the intersection of Greens Prairie Road and State Highway 6 in College Station, Texas . The furthest limit of the property extends approximately 5,400 ft east of State Highway 6 and approximately 4 ,500 ft north of Greens Prairie Road . The subject property is located within the city limits of College Station, Brazos County, Texas . The approximate locations of the individual tracts that comprise the subject property are illustrated on the attached site map (Figure 2). As can be seen from Figure 2, there are at least four tracts of land involved in the present study. Three of the tracts belong to the Creagor family and are referred to as Creagor Tracts I , II, and Ill on Figure 2 . Creagor Tracts I and II represent two separate but adjoining properties that front the eastern access road of State Highway 6 . The two tracts occupy areas of approximately 7.43 acres and 10 .01 acres, resp ectively , or a cwnulative area of approximate ly 17.44 acres . The Creagor Trac t Ill fronts Greens Prairie Road and consists of approximately 6 separate properties (Figure 2) that cwnulatively cover an area of approximately 234.84 acres . The fourth tract that is the subject of this Phase I ESA is referred to as the Thurmond Tract . The Thurmond Tract has a frontage on the west access road of State Highway 6 of approximately 800 ft and extends in a westerly direction for approximately 4 ,200 ft . The area of the Thurmond Tract is approximately 171 acres . A proposed development, "Pebble Hills Estates ," is situated between Creag or Tracts 1111 and Creagor Tract Ill, but is not part of the presently proposed assessment. Therefore, the two Creagor Tract s and the Thurmond Tract which cwnulatively consist of almost 370 acres are the subject of the present assessment and will hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "subject property ." General Description of Subject Property. CSC understands that the subject property has mostly consisted of wooded undeveloped land that may have been used as improved pasture or farmland in the recent past. Current information does not indicate that the property has been the subject of any extensive industrial development in the past, although some current and previous energy industry exploration and production activities have occurred on the site . A more detailed physical description of the subject property, based upon observations made during CSC's site visit, is presented in Section 5 .0 of this report. 3 CSC Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF GENERAL AREA IN WHICH SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED The general boundaries of the subject property are depicted on the previously referenced Figures 1 and 2 and also on a recent aerial view of the area (Figure 3, Aerial Photograph (1994) of Subject Property and Surrounding Area ). The area around the subject property consists of the Pebble Creek residential subdivision to the south across Greens Prairie Road , by the wide State Highway 6 right-of-way to the west, by a church and the currently unoccupied Desert Hills care center or "hospital " to the north, and by the Rock Prairie Road municipal solid waste landfill to the east. A waterway known as Lick Creek forms a portion of th e northeastern boundary of the subject property and separates the prop erty from the Rock Prairie Road Landfill immediatel y adjoining the subject property to the northeast . A small stream known as Spring Creeks flows in a northeasterly direction through the site to join Lick Creek immediately to the southeast of the eastern boundary of the subject property . A more detailed physical description of the area surrounding the subject property, based upon observations made during CSC's site visit, is presented in Section 5 .0 of this report . 4 csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 3.0 HISTORICAL OWNERSHIP AND USE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Historical ownership and use of a subject property is typically investigated based upon one or more sources of information . One source of information is historical aerial photographs that extend back for a period of approximately 50 years or until the site was first developed . Since the subject property has apparently never been developed , CSC researched selected aerial photographs extending back in time approximately 40 years . Another source of information is interviews with previous owners , lessors , or lessees of the land, as determined from a review of the chain of title or abstract of title . The purpose of the interview is to determine activities that previously occurred on the subject property and may have impacted the property. No chain of title was available at the time of this report, but such a document can be reviewed at a later date when it becomes available. 3.1 PRIOR LAND UTILIZATION INDICATED BY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Prior land utilization of the subject property and surrounding area was determined based on review of available aerial photographs and maps generated from aerial photographs dating back approximately 40 years . The aerial photographs were obtained from Environmental Data Resources , Inc . (EDR). Aerial photographs from the years 1960 , 1974 , 1983 , and 1994 (Appendix E) were reviewed . Also reviewed were two U.S . Geologic Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle maps: the Ferguson Crossing quadrangle and the Wellborn quadrangle . The USGS topographical map for Ferguson Crossing was created based upon information provided by an aerial photograph originally taken in 1958, with the information being field verified in 1959 . Similar dates for the Wellborn map are 1960 and 1961. The information contained on both maps was later revised based upon 1977 aerial photographs and subsequently revised again based upon 1980 photographs . A brief description of the land development patterns indicated by individual photographic year or collection of photographic years is presented in the following paragraphs . 1958/1960 Photographs (USGS Quadrangle Maps) and 1960 Photograph. The USGS quadrangle maps developed from 1958 and 1960 photographs were reviewed along with a 1960 aerial photograph . The maps and photographs indicate that the surface of the subject and surrounding properties during the referenced time frame could be described as generally consisting of undeveloped woodlands with some occasional clearings or pastures used for animal grazing . The subject property is moderate to heavily wooded with clearings located on the Creagor I and Thurmond Tracts near Highway 6 in the northwestern portion of the property . There appears to be a small rural residence near Highway 6 on the Thurmond 5 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Tract . Otherwise, there are no observable distinctive features on the land to indicate any use other than as general grazing for ranching . The land areas surrounding the subject property also appear to be heavily wooded . The quadrangle maps indicate that State Highway 6 is present immediately west of the subject property . 1974 Photograph and 1977 Photographs (Revision of USGS Quadrangle Maps). The previously referenced USGS quadrangle maps were revi sed based upon 1977 aerial photographs . Basically, there are no major changes in the subj ect prop erty from the previous 1958 and 1960 photographs. Seve ral small dirt roads were noted on the 1974 photograph across the northwestern portion of the property . Also , what appears to be a large pond is situated in the southwestern corner of the subject property along th e current alignment of Greens Prairie Road. 1983 Photograph. The 1983 photograph agam shows the subject property to be mostly un- developed land except for some oil and gas exploration and production activities . The oil and gas exploration and production activities appear to be concentrated at two well sites on the subj ect property . The two well drilling sites are along a gravel road that extends from the Highway 6 access road in an easterly direction before turning south to a termination point in a clearing situated very near Greens Prairie Road . The northernmost drill site is located on the Thurmond Tract in the north-central portion of th e subject property and the southern site is located in th e clearing in the southeastern portion of the Creagor III Tract at the end of the previously described road . There is also a clearing in the wooded area on th e west side of the previously referenced road on the Creagor III Tract approximatel y 1,000 ft north of the southern drill site. The clearing is mostly vacant with the exception of what appears to be a tank truck. It is presumed that this clearing was used as a staging area for oilfield production equipment. The pond along Greens Prairie Road is no longer observable in the 1983 photograph but there is a new large stock pond at the east to south bend in the previously referenced road . Other additions to the subject property are th e Creagor Residence in the Creagor I Tract which appears much like it is at the present time . The re are no new distinct trails or roads on the subject prop erty ex cept for th e road to the Creagor resid ence and th e previously described oilfield road . There is no apparent evid ence of additional activity on the subj ect property other than animal grazing . There are also some developments observable on th e properties immediately surrounding th e subject property . Although most of the surrounding area is still largely undeveloped , th ere is a new apparent rural residence on the property immediately west of the Creagor III Tract. In addition, on th e property immediately east of the subject property there is construction activity associated with the Rock Prairie Road municipal landfill. Construction of the landfill is believed to have started in th e time period from 1979 to 1981 . Development of nearby properties for residential use is occurring on the land lying far to the southwest of Highway 6 and the subject property, particularly in the Nantucket subdivis ion . 6 f ~ . csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 1994 Photograph. In this photograph the property appears much as it did in the 1983 photograph except that there has been some expansion of the northernmost oil well drill site on the Thurmond Tract and some evidence of activity on the southernmost oil well site on the Creagor III Tract. Otherwise, there is very little apparent change to the subject property . There has been further development on the properties surrounding the subject property . The Rock Prairie Road Landfill to the east of the subject site has been greatly expanded . Also, the Desert Hills treatment center or hospital has been constructed on the property immediately to the north of the subject property . The property across Highway 6 to the west of the site has also been developed . A large water tower has been construction on the northwest corner of the intersection of State Highway 6 a.Ild Greens Prairie Road and a large fill area, possibly associated with the highway construction, is apparent along Spring Creek north of the water tower . South of the subject property and directly south of Greens Prairie Road are a large residential subdivision (Pebble Creek) and a small office building (CIC Corporation). 3.2 CURRENT AND PRIOR OWNERSHIP OF SUBJECT PROPERTY INDICATED BY TITLE SEARCH AND INTERVIEWS CSC was provided with various real property transfer documents concerning the subject property . These documents included a warranty deed with vendor 's lien, a partition deed, a release of easement, an oil and gas mineral lease, and a surface waiver by oil and gas lessee. Unfortunately , none of the referenced documents contained a chain-of-ownership for the subject property . No chain of title for the subject property was available at the time this report was prepared, and consequently, no record search of title to identify previous owners of the property could be performed . If a title search is performed and a formal abstract of title prepared prior to completion of any real estate transactions concerning the property, CSC should be contacted to review the abstract. The purpose of reviewing the abstract would be to identify previous site owners or uses of the property that may have produced an adverse environmental impact to the subject property . CSC learned in previous discussions with an owner of a portion of the subject property, Mr. Frank Thurmond, and in discussions with economic development staff of the City of College Station that the subject property has been owned for several decades by the Creagor and Thurmond families . Du~g that time no one knew of any waste disposal activities, environmental incidents, or accidents related to oil and gas operations that may have occurred at the subject property . To the best of the owners' knowledge, the subject property had always been used as grazing land for cattle, except for the limited oil and gas exploration activities at two well sites as previously discussed in the description of the 1983 photograph . 7 CSC Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 3.3 OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING POSSIBLE PRESENCE OF SUSPECT CONDITIONS Review of the historical aerial photographs and interviews with current property owners did not yield any obvious indications that previous site operations or uses of adjacent properties have produced adverse environmental impacts to the subject property. Also, with the exception of the two previously discussed well locations, CSC 's review of the available aerial photographs and the referenced interviews did not reveal that any additional oilfield activities had been conducted on the subject property . The aerial photographs did not indicate if there had been significant on-site waste disposal activities associated with the referenced oil and gas exploration and production activities on the subject site . 8 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The environmental setting of the subject property and general area was determined from th e United States Geological Survey topographic quadrangle maps (U .S . Department of the Interior, Geologica l Survey, 1959 and 1961), the Geologic Atlas of Texas (Bureau of Economic Geolo gy , 1974), th e Soil Survey of Brazos County (U.S . Department of Agriculture [USDA], 1958), th e EDR report, and conv ersations with local officials . 4.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY Topography. The major portion of the surface topography across the subj ect property and surrounding area is depicted on two U .S . Geological Survey topographical quadrangle maps . The two maps are entitled the Ferguson Crossing quadrangle (USGS , 1959 and 1980) and the Wellborn quadrangl e (USGS , 1961 and 1980). These two quadrangle maps were electronically combined to form Figure 4, USGS Topographical Map of Subject Prop erty and Gen eral Surroundin g Area (Fergu s on Cro ssing and Wellborn 7.5 Minute Quadrangles). The EDR supplied Topographic Map illustrated in Appendix E was also revi ewed, but the information was not as detailed for the subject site as were the USGS quadrangl e maps . Our review of the referenced documents and our observations of the subject property indicate that the topography is influenced by Spring Creek which flows from northwest to southeast through the subject property and joins with Lick Creek immediately east of the subject property . Lick Creek also forms a portion of the northeastern boundary of the subject property . The stream flows from an elevation of approximately EL 250 ft above mean sea level at the western boundary of the subject property to an elevation of approximately EL 240 ft near the southeastern corner . In general the ground surface elevations slope toward Spring Creek as it crosses the middle of the subject property. Thus , the ground surface elevations in both the northern and southern portions of the subject property slope from a high point of approximately EL 300 ft toward the elevation of Spring Creek at approximately EL 250 ft. However, the ground surface in the northeastern corner of the subject property and along the eastern boundary of the property slope in an easterly direction toward Lick Creek. Average slopes of the ground surface are in the range of approximately 1to2 percent but are significantly steeper along the banks of the creeks . 9 .· csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Geology. The geologic map for the subject property and surrounding area is presented in Figure 5, Major Geologic Formations in Vicinity of Subject Property . The subject property is located within the Wellborn Formation . The Wellborn Formation is a sequence of sandstone and clay that was formed during the Eocene period and is approximately 150 ft thick The Carlos Sandstone is typically situated at the top of the Wellborn Formation . The sandstone formations within the Wellborn Formation are typically massive in size and are composed of indurated, mediwn-grained, quartz that is locally silica cemented and form ledges . Otherwise, gray sandstone lenses are common throughout the remainder of the strata within the Wellborn Formation . The clay strata are chocolate colored, lignitic, and interbedded with fine-to mediwn- grained sand . 4.2 SOIL TYPES AND PROPERTIES According to the Soil Survey of Brazos County (USDA, 1958), and current information from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), several types of surface soils are predominate across the subject property as indicated on Figure 6, Types of Surface Soils Across Subject Property and Surrounding Area . The soil types present across the subject property are summarized below: NAME OF SOIL SERIES Burlewash fine sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes Derly-Rader complex, 0 to 1 percent slopes Koether-Rock Outcrop complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes Renburg loam fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes Sandow loam , frequently flooded Shiro loamy fine sand, 1 to 3 percent slopes Singleton fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Zulch fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes LETTER ABBREVIATION BwC De A KrD ReC Sa SkB SnB ZuB The majority of the subject site has surface soils in five of the named soil series : Singleton fine sandy loam (SnB); the Shiro loamy fine sand (SkB); the Sandow loam (Sa); the Derly-Rader complex (DeA); and Burlewash fine sandy loam (BwC). Each of these series is described separately in the following paragraphs . Soils of the Singleton series (SnB) reportedly consist of soils that are very slowly permeable, moderatel y deep , and moderately well drained . The Singleton series soils are fine , smectitic, thermic Udic Paleustalfs that form in tuffaceous sandstones and mudstones on slopes of 0% to 5%. In a representative 10 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts pedon, the surface layer is stated to be a fine sandy loam about 0 to 5 inches thick that is light brownish gray when moist, and strongly acidic . The subsoil is a very pale brown, fine sandy loam that exists at 5 to 9 inches below the surface . A dark brown , extremely hard clay is reportedly present at 9 to 20 inches below the surface . A hard, pale brown clay is stated to be found at 20 to 32 inches below the surface, and a pale brown clay loam layer reportedly extends from 32 to 38 inches below the surface . A white , weakly cemented sandstone containing lay ers of sandy clay loam reportedly extends from 38 to 60 inches below th e surface . Soils of the Shiro fine sandy loam senes (SnB) are moderately deep , well drained , slowly permeable soils formed in tuffaceous sandstone and mudstone . The soils are typically found on nearly level to gently sloping uplands . A typical pedon consists of 12 inches of pinkish-gray or pinkish-white loamy fine sand, followed by 18 inches of reddish-yellow to light gray clay overlying weakly cemented sandstone . The Sandow series (Sa) soils consist of loams that are frequently flooded . The soils are also described as very deep , moderately well drained, moderately slowly permeable soils which typically are present in the flood plains of streams . The soils form mainly in stratified loamy alluvium . Slopes are typically less than 1 percent but can range from 0 to 2 percent. The Derly-Rader complex (DeA) series consists of very dee p, poorly drained, very slowly permeable soils situated mainly on Pleistocene Ag e Terraces with slopes ranging from 0% to 1 %. A typical pedon consists of 8 inch es of grayish-brown to light brownish-gray silt loam , 4 inch es of light brownish- gray clay loam, and several feet of grayish-brown and light brownish-gray clay . The soils of the Burlewash (BwC) series on the subject property consists of fine sandy loams with surface slopes in the range of 1 to 5 percent. The Burlewash soils consist of moderately deep , well drained , very slowly permeable soils on uplands . These soils formed in materials weathered from tuffaceous sandstone or siltstone and have a paralithic contact at a depth of 20 to 40 inches . 4.3 SURFACE WATER CHARACTERISTICS There are several small bodies of surface water found on the subject property . As previously described, Spring Creek flows through the central portion of the property and Lick Creek forms a portion of the northeastern boundary of the site . In addition, several small ponds were also observed on the subject property during the site visit . The largest pond is located near the bend in the oilfield road by th e northeastern boundary of the subject property as described in the discussion of the 1983 aerial photograph . This large pond covers an area of approximately l acre . The surface of the waters of the creeks and th e ponds on the subject property appeared to be relatively clear and we did not observe an y hydrocarbon 11 csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts sheets, discolorations, or foreign matter on the surface of the water at the time of our site visit. Regional water flow is generally eastward toward Lick Creek and thence to the Navasota River. Review of the floodplain information in the area of the site (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], 1992) and the EDR Overview Map (Appendix E) indicates that two areas of the subject property are within the 100-year floodplain . The largest area within the floodplain is on either side of Spring Creek that has previously been described as flowing through the central portion of the subject property . The FEMA map notes that no base flood elevations have been determined for the Spring Creek floodplain. The FEMA map also indicates that a portion of the eastern area of the subject site lies within the 100-year floodplain of Lick Creek . 4.4 GROUNDWATER Regional Groundwater. Several geologic formations yiel d large quantities of water to wells in Brazos County . From oldest to youngest, the principal aquifers are the Wilcox Group, Carrizo Sand, Queen City Sand, Sparta Sand, terrace deposits , and floodplain alluvium . The primary source of groundwater in Brazos County is precipitation on the outcrops of the geologic formations . Groundwater in this area moves slowly-tens to hundreds of feet per year-und e r the influence of gravity from areas of recharge to areas of discharge . The regional direction of groundwater flow is northwest to east-southeast. Groundwater is naturally discharged through seeps and springs in the outcrop areas of the aquifers , by evaporation and transpiration when the water table is sufficiently close to the surface to be reached by plant or tree roots, and by seepage from serniconfining beds , or along faults into another aquifer having a lower pressure . Groundwater is discharged artificially through wells (Follett, 1974). The water wells for the Cities of Bryan and College Station are located approximately 14 miles northwest of the subject property, near Bryan Utilities Lake . The depths of these wells are in excess of 3,000 ft . An additional water well , having a depth of about 1,500 ft , is located on University Drive and Tarrow Street in College Station, but is rarely used . The screened formation of the aquifer for the Cities of Bryan and College Station water systems are the Carrizo Sand and the underlying Wilcox Group . These formations are in hydraulic continuity and function as a single aquifer. The Carrizo Sand is a fine-to coarse-grained sandstone that is poorl y sorted, friable, noncalcareous, and thickly bedded . The Wilcox Group includes both mudstones and sandstones . The sandstones in this group tend to be moderately well sorted and fine-to medium-grained (Follett, 197 4). Water in some rural locations is obtained from wells dug or drilled to a depth of 40 to I 00 ft in Quaternary alluvium and terrace deposits . The water in these wells is adequate for irrigation and livestock 12 csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts use but is generally high in dissolved mineral salts. Palatable water is reached at depths from 150 to 800 ft (US DA , 1958). Local Groundwater. There are no known groundwater supply or monitor wells on the subject property to determine the hydrologic profile or slope of the groundwater surface across the site . However, in the absence of specific site data, an assumption is typically made that the slope of the shallow groundwater surface parallels the slope of the surface topography . Since the surface grade in the area of the subject property is relatively shallow and slopes toward Spring Creek in the central portion of the site and toward Lick Creek in the northeastern portion of the site, it is assumed that local groundwater flows in similar directions . 4.5 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE RECEPTORS Endangered, Threatened, or Sensitive Species. General information concerning the presence of endangered , threatened, or sensitive species of plants or animals on the subject property was developed from communications with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Natural Resource Protection Division (TPWNRPD). The TPWNRPD indicated that there have be en no specific studies of which they are aware to indicate that sensitive species are located either on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The TPWNRPD provided us with a list of "rare species " in Brazos County as indicated in the accompanying Table I. The list was last updated on July 10 , 1999 . However, it is worth noting that the general area of the subject property has a high potential to contain threatened or endangered species , especially at sites along the numerous creeks in the area. Similar habitats at Lick Creek Park south of the subject property have known populations of (Navasota ladies ' - tresses (Spiranthes parksii) and Texas meadow rue (Thalictrum texanum). In addition , developed areas to the south of the subject property have encountered some endangered species and have required further evaluation studies and property development management plans and activities . In fact , some specific studies have been commissioned by the City of College Station to identify the presence of Navasota ladies ' - tresses plants (NLTs) on portions of the Business Center to the south of the subject property . Information provided by the referenced studies indicated that some specific NL Ts have been identified in the general area of the subject property and may be present on the subject property. In addition to the previously listed species of plants and animals , natural communities known to occur in Brazos County include rookeries of snowy egrets, little blue herons , and cattle egrets, although i;ione were specifically observed on the subject property . 13 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Table 1. General List of Threatened and Endangered Species in Brazos County SPECIES AMPHIBIANS Houston Toad (Bufo houstonensis) -endemic ; species sandy substrate, water in pools, ephemeral pool s, stock tanks ; breeds in spring especially after rains ; burrows in soil when inactive ; breeds February-June; associated with soi ls of the Sparta, Carrizo, Goliad, Queen City, Recklaw, W eches , and Willis geologic formations BIRDS Arctic Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus tundrius) -due to similar field characteristics, treat all Peregrine Falcons as federal listed Endangered; potential migrant Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leucocephalus) -found primarily near seacoasts, rivers , and large lakes ; nests in tall trees or on cliffs near water; communally roosts , especially in winter; hunts live prey, scavenges, and pirates food from other birds Henslow's Sparrow (Ammodramus henslowii) -wintering individuals (not flocks) found in weedy fields or cut-over areas where lots of bunch grasses occur along with vines and brambles; a key component is bare ground for running/walking Whooping Crane (Grus americana) -potential migrant Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) -forages in prairie ponds, flooded pastures or fields, ditches, and other shallow standing water, including salt-water; usually roosts communally in tall snags, sometimes in association with other wading birds (i .e. active heronries); breeds in Mexico and birds move into Gulf States in search of mud flats and other wetlands , even those associated with forested areas ; formerly nested in Texas, but no breeding records since 1960 FISHES Blue Sucker (Cycleptus elongatus) -usually inhabits channels and flowing pools with a moderate current; bottom type usually consists of exposed bedrock, perhaps in combination with hard clay, sand, and gravel; adults winter in deep pools and move upstream in spring to spawn on riffles Smalleye Shiner (Notropis buccula) -endemic to upper Brazos River system and its tributaries; apparently introduced into adjacent Colorado River drainage ; medium to large prairie streams with sandy substrate and turbid to clear warm water; presumably eats small aquatic invertebrates 14 FEDERAL STATUS LE E/SA LT-PDL LE STATE STATUS E T T E T T csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Table 1. Continued SPECIES MAMMALS Plains Spotted Skunk (Spilogale putorius interrupta) -catholic ; open fields , prairies , croplands, fence rows , farmyards , forest edges , and woodlands ; prefers wooded, brushy areas and tallgrass prame Rafinesque's Big-Eared Bat (Corynorhinus rafinesquii) -roosts in cavity trees of bottomland hardwoods , concrete culverts , and abandoned man-made structures Southeastern Myotis (Myotis austroriparius) -roosts in cavity trees of bottomland hardwoods , concrete culverts, and abandoned man-made structures REPTILES Alligator Snapping Turtle (Macroclemys temminckii) -deep water of rivers , canals, lakes, and oxbows ; also swamps , bayous, and ponds near deep running water; sometimes enters brackish coastal waters ; usually in water with mud bottom and abundant aquatic vegetation ; may migrate several miles along rivers ; active March-October; breeds April-October Louisiana Pine Snake (Pituophis melanoleucus ruthveni) -mixed deciduous-longleaf pine woodlands ; breeds April-S eptember Texas Garter Snake (Thamnophis sirtalis annectens) -wet or moist microhabitats are conducive to the species occurrence, but is not necessarily restricted to them ; hibernates underground or in or under surface cover; breeds March-August Texas Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma cornutum) -open , arid and semi- arid regions with sparse vegetation, including grass , cactus, scattered brush or scrubby trees ; soil may vary in texture from sandy to rocky ; burrows into soil, enters rodent burrows , or hides under rock when inactive ; breeds March-September Timber/Canebrake Rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus) -swamps, floodplains , upland pine and deciduous woodlands , riparian zones , abandoned farmland ; limestone bluffs , sandy soil or black clay ; prefers dense ground cover, i .e. grapevin es or palmetto VASCULAR PLANTS Branched gayfeather (Liatris cymosa) -somewhat barren grassland openings in post oak woodlands on tight clay , chalky , or gravelly soils , sometimes over Catahoula Formation ; flowering July-October 15 FEDERAL STATUS STATE STATUS T T T T T csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Table I . Continued FEDERAL SPECIES STA TVS VASCULAR PLANTS (continued) Navasota ladies'-tresses (Spiranthes parksil) -endemic; margins of LE and openings within post oak woodlands in sandy loams along intermittent tributaries of rivers ; flowering late October-ea rly November Small-headed pipewort (Eriocaulon koernickianum) -wet acid sands of upland seeps and bogs, often on sphagnum mats with little other vegetative cover; flowering/fruiting late May-late June Texas meadow rue (Thalictrum texanum) -endemic; mesic woodlands or forests , including wet ditches on partially shaded roadsides; flowering March-May Texas windmill-grass (Chloris texensis) -endemic ; sandy to sandy loam soils in open to sometimes barren areas in prairies and grasslands, including ditches and roadsides ; flowering in fall LE, LT -Federally Listed Endangered!Threatened PE , PT -Federally Proposed Endangered!Threatened E/SA, TISA -Federally Endangered!Threatened by Similarity of Appearance Cl -Federal Candidate, Category l ; information supports propos ing to li st as en dangered/threatened DL , PDL -Federally Delisted/Proposed Delisted E, T -State E ndangered!Threatened "blank" -Rare , but with no regulatory listing status STATE STATUS E Species appearing on these lists do not all share tlte same probability of occurrence. Some species are migrants or wintering residents only, or may be historic or considered extirpated. Wetlands. The National Wetlands Inventory Map Report provided by EDR that is contained in Appendi x E was consulted to determine if wetlands were present at the subject property . According to th e Soil Conservation Service's Hydric Soil List presented in the National Wetlands Inventory Map Report, all of the soils across the subject property are not considered to be hydric and therefore , based upon the hydric soil classification, no wetlands were identified on the portion of the subject prop erty. However, the National Wetlands Inventory Map did indicate that there are some isolated areas associated with drainage features and ponds and therefore may be indicative of the presence of wetlands . These areas are associated with either creeks or small stock ponds . The "creek " areas are pres ent along th e Spring Creek and Lick Creek channels through the center of the property and near the northeastern boundary of the property, respectively . Three other areas are believed to be associated with stock ponds that are either presently observable on the subject property or that may have existed in the past and hav e since been filled in . The largest of these pond areas is near the previously discussed I -acre pond near the 16 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts bend in the oilfield service road in the northeastern portion of the subject property . The other pond areas are situated in the north-central portion of the property . As seen from the map presented with EDR's National Wetland Inventory Map Report in Appendix E, the areas associated with the creeks are designated as PFOIA soils on the wetlands map. These PFOlA areas can be described as being of the Palustrine Subsystem (P), in a forested class (FO), of broad-leaved deciduous plants (1), with Temporarily Flooding (A). The areas associated with th e present or former ponds are designated as POWHh on the Wetlands Inventory Map . POWHh areas can be desc ribed as belonging to the Palustrine Subsystem (P), Open Water Class (OW), Permanentl y Flooded Water Regim e (H), with a Special Modifier of Dike/Impounded (h). The present and former ponds around which th e previously described soils are located were apparently man-made . We believe that the previously described areas associated with drainage features will not be disturbed by planned development of the subject property since these areas will be located within greenbelts that will be included m development plans . If any of the areas designated as possible wetland areas will be disturbed as part of site development, we recommend that a focused wetland delineation study be performed for the possible wetland areas that may be impacted by development. 17 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 5.0 VISUAL OBSERVATION OF SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA 5.1 OBSERVATION VISIT OF SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA A visit to the subject property and the immediate surrounding area to make visual observations was conducted by Rick Conlin of CSC on June 8, 2000, with a follow-up visit on June 11 , 2000 . Visual observations were documented in the series of 11 photographs which are presented in Appendix C. The orientation (direction) of each numbered photograph of the property is illustrated on Figure 2 . The photo- graphs may be referenced for increased understanding of the following observations and . descriptions concerning the subject property. The subject property largely consists of moderately to heavily wooded areas with dense underbrush (Photographs 1, 2 , and 3 in Appendix C) which makes access to all areas of the subject property difficult. However, there are some clearings across the property (Photographs 4 and 5), some of which may have been used as old oilfield exploration sites (Photograph 4). However, we did not observe surface indications of past oilfield exploration activities , such as well heads , mud pit depressions , etc., on the property except for possible rock-covered access roads to past drilling sites (Photograph 4). However, there is one current oil and gas production site (Union Pacific Resources ' Thompson-Marsh Unit No . 1) located on the subject property (Photograph 6). The surface of the current oil and gas production site appears to be relatively free of oil staining (except for very small areas). No indications of previous large spills or leaks were observed (Photograph 6). The storage tank battery at the site is bermed to contain possible future spills or leaks from the tanks (Photograph 6). There are several small creeks or streams (Photograph 7) that flow across the subject property and some isolated ponds situated at various locations on the subject property (Photograph 8). The water in the streams and ponds appears to be clean and exhibits some occasional algae growth . The stream that traverses the central portion of the subject property is relatively narrow, shallow, and sluggish during periods of low precipitation . No surface sheens indicative of the presence of hydrocarbon substances were observed on the waters at the site . Also , the waterways were apparently clear of trash or rubbish that is sometimes indicative of random and illegal dumping at a site. In general, the water does not appear to have been negatively impacted by either on-site or surrounding land usage . 18 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Some portions of the subject site have been developed as individual residential sites (Photographs 9 and 10). Two of these sites, including the Creagor residence (Photograph 9), appear to be currently occupied, whereas at least two other structures appear to have been smaller temporary structures that have apparently been abandoned (Photograph 10). The two abandoned buildings have small quantities of household and construction materials debris around the structures, including one 55-gallon drum (Photograph 10). Inspection of the drum indicated the presence of household trash . There was also a full 55-gallon drum present in the occupied residence in the south-central portion of the property . The label on the drum indicated that it contained a concrete curing compound . The drum was in good condition with no obvious leaks or spills associated with the drum . The center of the site is crossed by several roads . These roads range from unimproved dirt roads to roads having a gravel surface (Photograph 11). Cattle were observed grazing in the clearings of the wooded areas (Photograph 11). 5.2 INTERVIEWS WITH EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS Mr. Frank Thurmond, owner of one of the tracts of land comprising the subject property, was interviewed to determine if there were any significant activities or events in the area that may have had an adverse environmental impact on the subject property . Examples of such activities or events are industrial activities , energy ex ploration op erations (e .g ., oil well blowouts , mud pits , etc .), on-site disposal or spills of significant quantities of wastes or chemicals , or other similar occurrences . In general , Mr. Thurmond stated that he knew of no activities or events in the area that might have had an adverse environmental impact to the subject property . 5.3 OBSERVED ADJACENT PROPERTY CONDITIONS AND OPERATIONS A survey of the adjacent properties and the general area was performed as part of the field observation of the subject property . Observations of adjacent property usage and conditions are summarized in the following paragraphs. The most recent aerial photograph of the subject property and the surrounding area (Appendix C) should be viewed to provide increased comprehension in connection with the following property descriptions . Property Usage -East and Northeast. The property immediately east and northeast of the subject property is occupied by the previously discussed Rock Prairie Road municipal landfill . The landfill is expected to operate for approximately 4 to 5 more years prior to being closed . A review of Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission records indicates that the landfill is not currently under any 19 csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts enforcement action and that it complies with existing Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Subtitle D regulations . Property Usage -South. Greens Prairie Road is located immediately south of th e subject property . The land across Greens Prairie Road has been developed for use as an office building (CIC Corporation), a subdivision of residential homes (Pebble Creek Subdivision), an elementary schoo l (Pebble Creek Elementary School of the College Station Independent School District), and an office park furth er south (Business Center at College Station). Property Usage -West and Southwest. A large area apparently used for a rural resi denc e is located immediately west of the southern portion of the subj ect property . A small stock pond is situated on this adjacent property. The land appears to consist of mostly woodlands with cleared areas apparently used primarily as pastures for cattle grazing . State Highway 6 is situated further to the west of the subject property . Properties located across Highway 6 from the subject property are apparently used for residential, light commercial, or agricultural purpo ses . Property Usage -North. The only properties located north of the subject property are currently occupied by a church and an unused medical facility (Forest Hills). These properties appear to be clean and well maintained with no obvious surface indications of waste disposal or spillage. Other lands north of th e subject property are heavily wooded undeveloped areas . Electrical Distribution Transformers. Observations were also made to determine if th ere were any electrical transformers on the subject site and within the areas immediately adjacent to the property boundaries . Electrical transformers , especially older transformers, can utilize insulating fluids containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), which can hav e an adverse env ironmental impact on a site should the insulating fluids leak or spill from the transformers . No transformers were observed on utility power line poles both within and near the subject property at the time of the site visit. 5.4 OBSERVATION OF OIL AND GAS WELLS A regulatory search of oil and gas well loc ations on the subject property or on adjacent properties was conducted by Atlas Environmental Research from Austin , Texas . The report of their research effort is contained in Appendix D, Atlas Environmental Research Report of Oil & Gas Well Search and Water Well Search . The Atlas Environmental Research (AER) report of research into the records of the Texas Railroad Commission (TRC) indicates that two oil/gas wells had been located on the subject property . One of the 20 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thunnond Tracts wells that is located in the north-central portion of the subject property on the Thurmond Tract is being operated by Union Pacific Resources and is called the Thompson-Marsh Unit No. 1 (Photograph 6, Appendix C). There are on-site crude oil and saltwater storage tanks associated with production activities of the well . The tanks are surrounded by an earthen containment berm . The site of the Thompson-Marsh Unit No . 1 appears to be relatively clean of oil staining, except for very small and isolated areas of less than 1 square foot , and well maintained. The second oil/gas well indicated by the TRC map on the subject property was previously discussed in Section 3.1 for the 1983 aerial photograph (Appendix B). The TRC documents indicate that the well was abandoned and plugged. Although CSC did not observe any obvious surface indications of oil/gas well or related field exploration or production activities at the time of the site visit (Photograph 4 , Appendix C), the previously discussed aerial photographs, previous surveys of the subject property, and the TRC map all indicate that the well was located in the present open clearing in the southeastern portion of the subject property . 21 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 6.0 REGULATORY PROFILE An electronic search of available environmental records , produced by federal, state, and local regulatory agencies , was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc . (EDR) for CSC. The report of this search is presented in Appendix E (Regulatory Search and Related Correspondence). The standard Yz to 1 mile ASTM search radius from the subject property used in compiling the environmental records report was increased to a minimum of a 1 mile search radius to account for the large size of the subject property . The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for ESAs, E 1527-97 . The regulatory information from the federal , state, and local regulatory agencies was reviewed by CSC for possible environmental concerns and is summarized in the following sections . 6.1 FEDERAL RECORDS/FILES CERCLIS AND CORRACTS. The U.S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation , and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) list. CERCLIS is a database used to catalogue sites that may have a potential for releasing hazardous substances into the environment. The EPA also maintains the CORRACTS list which is a compendium of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity . The CORRACTS report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that had corrective action activity . Neither the subject property nor properties within a 1 mile search radius appear on either of the two lists . The search radii are with respect to the center of the subject site. 8 NPL. The EPA also maintains the National Priorities List (NPL), a list of sites that have been determined to be potentially hazardous by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) or "Superfund" program and may be eligible for long-term remedial actions under Superfund . The search of regulatory information for this project indicated that neither the subject property nor the properties located within a 1 mile radius of the subject site are included on the NPL. RCRA Related Lists. The EPA also maintains an information database of facilities which are regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which was created to monitor generators of hazardous waste as well as companies which transported, stored, or disposed of hazardous waste (TSO facilities). The database includes the following sources : (1) the Resource Conservation and 22 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Recovery Information System (RCRIS-TSD, RCRIS-SQG, RCRIS-LQG); and the (2) RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAA TS). The RCRIS-SQG and the RCRIS-LQG contain sites registered as hazardous waste generators of both small (SQG) and large (LQG) quantities of hazardous waste . Neither the subject site nor any other properties within a I-mile radius of the subject property are listed as RCRA generators . The EPA also maintains three lists of facilities which are regulated und er the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which was created to monitor generators of hazardous waste as well as companies which treated , stored , or dispos ed of hazardous waste (TSD facilities). The three lists are as follows : (I) the RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS) List; (2) the RCRIS-TSD List which is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information List; and (3) the RCRA Correc tive Action Report (CORRACTS) List. The RAA TS lists RCRA facilities which either have a recorded violation of RCRA or which have initiated corrective actions under RCRA . More specifically, the list identifies facilities within the RCRA program that have deviated from regulations or provisions of compliance orders , consent agreements, consent decrees , or permit conditions. The subject property was the only location investigated with respect to the RAA TS . The subject property is not listed on the RAA TS list. The TSD List enumerates the treatment , storage, and disposal facilities regulated under RCRA . Neither the subj ect property nor the properti es situated within a I-mile radius of th e subject property are included on the TSD List . The RCRA Violation and Corrective Action List (CORRACTS) identifies facilities within the RCRA program that have deviated from regulations or provisions of compliance orders , consent agree- ments , consent dec rees , or permit conditions . Neither the subject site nor any other properties within a I- mile radius of th e subject site are listed on the CORRACTS list. 6.2 STA TE RECORDS/FILES USTs, ASTs, and LPSTs Lists. The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) (formerly Texas Water Commission): TNRCC maintains a list of all registered underground storage tanks (USTs), aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), and all reported leaking petroleum storage tanks (LPSTs) in the state of Texas . LPSTs are also sometimes referred to as leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs). Although there are no tanks listed as being on the subject property , three tanks (1 UST and 2 LUSTs) were listed within a Yi mile to 1 mile radius of the subject property. 23 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts The UST site was identified as the Spring Creek Exchange Building located at 1605 Greens Prairie Road west. There is no Spring Creek Exchange Building located along Greens Prairie Road across from the project site and we believe that an incorrect plotting address was given for this facility . In any event, the TNRCC report states that the tanks were removed from the ground and that there were no reported releases . One of the LUST sites is identified as the GTE Spring Creek Station. Curiously , the address of th e facility is listed as the same address for the previously discussed Spring Creek Exchange Building . This site is believed to be located on the west side of Highway 6 . The contamination at the site is described as "minor soil contamination " that does not require a Remedial Action Plan . The TNRCC 's case for the site has been closed. Therefore, this LUST facility is not believed to have had an adverse environmental impact to the subject site . The other LUST site is identified as the Ponderosa Texaco site . This site has been misplotted on the EDR map . The Ponderosa Texaco is situated approximatel y 2 to 3 miles northwest of the subject site and should not have had an environmental impact on the subject site. The subject property was the only site evaluated for the presence of ASTs . No ASTs were listed on the subject property . Landfill and Waste Management Lists. The TNRCC (formerly handled by the Texas Department of Health [TOH]) is also responsible for maintaining a list of sites which may have environmental impacts upon properties . The facilities identified as a landfill , waste processing facility , or sludge disposal facility (referred to as the "Landfill List") and closed and abandoned municipal solid waste landfills are documented in the CLI list. The subject property did not appear on the CLI list. However, one landfill , described as the Dr. L. G . Jones sanitary landfill is situated approximately Yi mile north of the northern boundary of the subject site and does appear on the state landfill list. However, conversations with Mr. Mark Smith , director of public works of the City of College Station, indicate that the Jones landfill has been "clean closed " and that the TNRCC has closed their files on the landfill and do not require any post- closure monitoring . Thus , there is no indication that the landfill has had an environmental impact on the subject property . The TNRCC also maintains a list of hazardous waste sites m the SHWS list , the waste management (WasteMgt) list, and the Industrial and Hazardous Waste Database (TX IHW). The state also lists cases of enforcement of multimedia contamination in the Multimedia Enforcement Cases list (TX MM). Spills of hazardous substances at a facility are tracked by the TX Spills list. Only the subject property was checked with respect to these lists . The subject property did not appear on any of these lists. 24 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Sites under the Texas Voluntary Cleanup Program are contained in the TX VCP list . Neither the subject property nor properties located within a I-mile search radius of the subject property appear on th e Voluntary Cleanup Program list . 6.3 WATER WELLS INDICATED BY STATE RECORDS/FILES The EDR search (Appendix E) did not indicate that the presence of public water wells on the subject property or in the immediate vicinity of the subject site . However, the AER report (Appendix D) did discover one water well on the subject property. That water well is situated in the north-central portion of the property and is owned by Union Pacific Resources . The purpose or use of the well is listed as "oilfield supply ." The well was completed in 1992 to a depth of approximately 650 ft , is slotted between 580 ft and 640 ft, and is reported to produce a yield of 100 gallons per minute. The well is not a public well and there is no water quality data available . There are some additional wells located immediately north and south of the subject property boundaries but these wells are also owned by oil companies (Galaxy Oil and UPR) and are believed to also be "oilfield supply" water wells . There are no indications in the state records that the water produced from an y of the referenced wells has been of poor quality or that the subject property has impacted an y of the water wells . 6.4 LOCAL RECORDS/FILES OF SPILLS OR ACCIDENTS INVOLVING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND PROPERTY UTILITIES SERVICES Civil Defense Office/Fire Marshal. Mr. DeMerle Wehmeyer, Emergency Management Coordinator for the Brazos County, was contacted to determine if there was a record of spills , releases , or · other incidents involving hazardous materials at the subject site . Mr. Wehmeyer stated in correspondence dated May 26 , 2000 (Appendix E) that the only reported incident of any hazardous material spills , releases , cleanups , or emergency responses happening near the subject property was a natural gas pipeline leak that occurred along Greens Prairie Road on May 13 , 1999 . The leak lasted only for a period of several hours . There is no present surface indication that the leak impacted the subject property . The area Civil Defense Office also maintains the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title III list of Tier 2 chemicals . SARA Title III requires private and public employers to submit a list of potentially hazardous substances (above a certain quantity) which are maintained on the premises . Mr. Wehmeyer stated that the subject property does not appear on the SARA Title III list . 25 csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal: The subject property is located within the College Station Utilities service area. We anticipate that the subject property will be serviced by the electrical system, water system, and the . sanitary and storm sewer systems of the City of College Station . 6.5 STATE RECORDS OF HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES The Texas Historical Sites Atlas of the Texas Historical Commission (THC) and the State Historic Preservation Offi cer of the THC were both consulted to determine if there were any sites of historical interest listed on the subject property . The Atlas contained no listed sites . In a letter response (Appendix E) dated June 7, 2000, the THC stated that there were "no cultural resources recorded within the proposed tract." However, the THC suggested the general area of the subject property "has the potential to contain archeological sites " and suggests that a qualified professional archeologist survey the tract. 26 CSC Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thunnond Tracts 7.0 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION AND CONCLUSIONS 7.1 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION Potential On-Site Sources. Except for the production oil well and related crude oil and saltwater storage tanks present on the Thurmond Tract and the abandoned and plugged oil well on the Creagor III Tract, no on-site sources of potential environmental contamination have been identified during this Phase I ESA. Potential Off-Site Sources. No off-site sources of environmental contamination have been identified in the prescribed region surrounding the subject property, except for the currently operating Rock Prairie Road municipal solid waste landfill which is expected to close in the next 4 to 5 years . 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Recommendations. Based upon the records review , historical aerial photographic review , interviews with property owners or managers , and observations of the surface of the site during an inspection, CSC did NOT discover significant areas of hazardous wastes or hazardous substances spillage/leakage on the subject property which would warrant remedial action . However, the identification of a potential plugged and abandoned oil well in the southeastern portion of the subject property and the identification of possible threatened or endangered species habitats may warrant further study prior to the time that the property is developed . Also , consideration should be given to continual monitoring of the on- going operation of the currently producing UPR oil well and the closure and post-closure operations of the nearby Rock Prairie Road Landfill when it is closed . We also recommend that consideration be given to performing a historical site survey, a focused threatened and en dangered species study , and a wetlands delineation study . Although aerial photographs were re viewed to provide some indication of past property usage , CSC nevertheless recommends that a knowledgeable profess ional review the formal abstract of title for the subject property, once it is completed . Such a review may provide an indication of activities conducted by previous property owners , lessors , or lessees which may have produced an adverse environmental impact to the subject property . 27 csc Phase I ESA -Creagor-Thurmond Tracts Conclusions. CSC has reviewed the available information referenced in this Phase I ESA report and made observations during a site inspection of the subject property and surrounding area. Based upon that information and those observations , CSC has not uncovered evidence that would indicate that the subject property has suffered adverse environmental impact from operations previously conducted at the site or from activities associated with cµljacent properties . Consequently, CSC believes that the likelihood that the subject property has experienced significant environmental impact from previous operations at the subject site is relatively low . Therefore, in accordance with the ASTM specifications of E 1517 , CSC can make the following statement: "CSC has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527 of the property described as the 370 acres referred to as the Creagor- Thurmond tracts : the property. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property ." CSC does not recommend that a further Phase II investigation be conducted at this time . However , we do recommend that a limited follow-up investigation to the Phase I ESA be performed to identify the location of the plugged oil well believed to be on the subject property, to identify potential habitats of possible endangered or threatened species , such as the Navasota ladies ' -tresses, to locate any historically significant sites , and to delineate possible wetland areas that may be impacted by development. The prospective purchaser and any financial parties participating in the transaction should recognize that there is an operating oil well on the subject prop erty and that the subject property is located adjacent to a landfill . Consequently , depending upon the future operation of the oil well and the landfill , there is a small possibility that the subject property may suffer adverse environmental impacts from future occurrences . Therefore , we recommend that the owner of the subject property monitor future activities both on the subject property and on adjacent properties with respect to possible future adverse environmental impacts . 28 csc Phase I ESA-Creagor-Thurmond Tracts 8.0 REFERENCES Bureau of Economic Geology . 1974 . Geologic Atlas of Texas, Austin Sheet (Scale 1:250,000). (2nd printing). The University of Texas at Austin , Austin, Texas . Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1992 . Flood Insurance Rate Map , Brazos County, Texas . Community Numbers 480083 and 481195 , Panel No . 205of250. Map Number 48041C0205 C . Effective Date: July 2, 1992 . Follett, C. R. 1974 . Groundwater Resources of Brazos and Burleson Counties , Texas . Report 185. Texas Water Development Board, Austin, Texas . U.S . Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1958 . Soil Conservation Survey . Soil Survey of Brazos County . U.S . Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.; plus 1994 updated information from the Soil Conservation Service in a personal communication . U.S . Department of the Interior, Geological Survey . 1959 (Photorevised 1980). U.S . Geological Survey . Ferguson Crossing Quadrangle . 7 .5 Minute Series (Topographic). U.S . Department of the Interior, Geological Survey . 1961 (Photorevised 1980). U .S . Geological Survey . Wellborn Quadrangle . 7 .5 Minute Series (Topographic). 29 APPENDIX A Figures •.· ... , Bwc· ;" ., .. ··' .. (·:· .. · \ •; . : .... ~ :: :. ::' ·. SkB EnglnlNJl'lng & Envlronmsntal · Consultants, Im:. ~ Cily of College Slalion ZuB SkB ·" . S nB . .. ,·.· ·' ~. ., .. Sn B SnB · Sn B BwC TYPES OF SURFACE SOILS ACROSS SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA PROJECT: 100035/130 LOCATION: COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS APPR: REV. DATE: DRAWN BY: AC SCALE: 1:20000 DA TE: 06/05/00 FIGURE NO.: 6 f ·.:-•. ....... APPENDIXB Aerial Photographs of Subject Property and Surrounding Area The EDR-Aerial Photography Print Service Creagorffhurmond Tracts TX State Hwy. 6/Greens Prairie College Station, TX 77845 May 25, 2000 Inquiry Number: 498716-7 R: Environmental :Data : Resources, Inc . • : an i!edrcompany The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road Southport, Connecticut 06490 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 -:.'" .... -:.:-·-~ . .,--·.~·-·~ ' . . ;j' .. ·' _,·'-.... ·- ..• J- .... ~: .. _; - t . ~ J.!/-' ._r.. ·.,. PL6~ :~\f3A .OOL= .. ~ :31\f8S ~ N \J " ,, ') ' ' ;:, •'' ,.I .,, . .; ·, '" ~·-~~: .• ·.'" •,·· ... ~ ...... ,. .. , . . . ·-·~ ·, . ·,. :;_.. -----z---- ·.~,,,,. ,,~;~ •-'·:)~~~. -< (/) m o )> )> ;:::or .. m . ~ ' :;·· ·':!' r- 0 0(1) >--f -f -m 0 z --..--z-- , .·;-: ------------- ------·-- Photograp h J. View of northwest portion of s ub1 ect prop erty looking east from across H ighwa y 6 Photog raph 2 View of so uthern boundary of prop e rty lookin g north from across G reens P rairie R oad APPENDIXC Photographs of Subject Property and Related Descriptions Photograph 3 . View along northern boundary of property looking south from entrance road to Desert Hills Hospital. Photog raph 4 . Vi e w of open field on Creagor Tract m southeastern area of site and probable site of abandoned and plugged oil well . Note that there are no apparent signs of the well casing, but there are rem nants of a gravel surface road that may have led to the si t e . Photograp h 5 . One of severa I o p e n fields across the site . TI1i s field is in the east centra I portion of th e si t e . Ph ot ograp h is lo oki ng southwest . Note boat stored in field Photogra ph 6 Vi ew o f UPR Thomp son-[Vlar s h Un it No . I storage faciliti es o n Thurmond Tract. View loo king ea st from west si d e of facilit y Not e that there are appa rentl y n o s i,gnificant areas of oi l staining observab le Photograph 7 . View of stream in southeastern portion of property looking west . Note relative clean liness of water. Photograph 8 . View of one of several small ponds scattered across the site . Note apparent clarity of water. Photograph 9 . View of north side of Creagor residence looking so~th . Photograph l 0 . View of one of several abandoned houses on subject property . House is in east central portion of property . View of north side of house lo oking west Note miscellaneous trash and 55-ga ll on drnm that is filled with household trash . ~. ~· ..>;. ' .... . ·--~.· .. ,..··:-;.· . .:.:.... Photograph 11 . View of road in eastern portion of si te lookin g southw est . Note co~s in background . APPENDIXD Atlas Environmental Research Report of Oil & Gas Well Search and Water Well Search 0 0 0 ~ -¢- • * * -. ~ ~- \ @ (!) @ 6 \ ~ ~ ., i • . 7 • ·,·:·•,..,: - State Hicjhwoy : • s ·lote Highway Proposed Location Cancelled Location Dry Hole Oil Gos Oil I Gos P!ugged Oi l Plugged Gos Plugged Oil I Gos injection or Disposal Storage Oil Storage Gos Storage Radioactive Injection or Disposal injection or Disposal I . 4 • .:o;ec ,1ori or Disposal . · RAI LROAD COMMISSION . OF TEXAS WELL LOCATION DAT ABASE . from from fr cm MAP LEGEND -.V Interstate Highway 1· I Form I Ro,.;ch. Rood · o. U.S. Highway C) Pork Rood WELL SYMBOLS Oil Gos Oil I Gos ~ Geothermal ~"o Brine Mining Injection wso Weter Supply WS. Wot er Supply from Oil ..~ Wot er Supply from Gos "5* Wot er Supply from Oil I Gos o•o Observation oe• Observation from Oil 08* Observ ation from Gos o~ Observation from Oil I Gos ~ Shut-in Oii ..c;i.. ' Shut-J.n Gos !$" ·core Test. (one .or more holes) 9 0 0 0 Sulfur Test (one . or more holes) Horizontal Orainhole · Directional Well Surface Location '· . . . Sidetrock Well Surfcce l..ocot!on ;.:~. ·'·. ,, . ·:-'-·. VERTICAL . ~ELL ~-.. ·•. .; DiRECTIONAL \ WELL . ·.-.... :; .· ··'. "·· •.··. -· .· ..... · . I . '• ·.· ~ ·: ... ; .. ··· . ·_· .. ·,·. -·:. ~. -.. • c s c · Engineeflng &: Envlranmen.·t.31 }-:-/(' Con~uflarits,.iiuf<.., 1t·Y::-." .... . -~ ·-' ~ . ~ : ..... ., -·~· May24, 2000 Mr. William A. Martin Assistant Director, State & Federal Review Section Archeology Division Texas Historical Commission P .O . Box 12257 1511 Colorado Street Austin, TX. 78711-2276 Re: Request for Information Concerning Historical Properties Which Could Be Present On A 370 Acre Tract Northeast of the Intersection of State Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road College Station, Brazos County, Texas Dear Mr . McKenzie: We are writing to solicit your assistance in obtaining information in connection with an environmental site assessment (ESA) that we have been asked to perform by the City of College Station for a tract of land located in College Station, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "subject property''). More specifically, we are interested in determining whether there is any information concerning the possible presence of sites of historical significance on the subject property. The subject property is located in the southeastern portion of College Station, Texas and the east-central portion of Brazos County, Texas. More specifically, the subject property is situated on the eastern side of State Highway 6 at the intersection with Greens Prairie Road . The property is approximately 370 acres in area and is irregularly shaped. The outer limits of the property boundaries extend approximately 4 ,750 ft north along State Highway 6 from the previously referenced intersection and approximately 5,800 ft east along Greens Prairie Road. A map illustrating the general layout of the subject property is attached to this letter. The City of College Station is considering utilizing the subject property for development of a business _center and is interested in protecting and preserving any sites of historical significance that might be present on the subject property. The development plans have not been finalized at the present time, but it is anticipated that structures (buildings), roadways, and green belt areas will be constructed on the subject property . We have looked at the map published on the internet home page of the Texas Historical Commission (THC) that illustrates the locations of historically significant sites in Brazos County. The subject map did not indicate any historically significantly sites on the subject property. 3407 Tabor Road Bryan, Texas 77808 Phone (979)778-2810 Fax (979) 778-0820 I cs I c Mr. William A. Martin May24, 2000 Please permit us to thank you in advance for your assistance in obtaining the requested information. Do not hesitate to call the undersigned by telephone at 778-2810 or by facsimile transmission at 778-0820 if you should have any questions or if you require any additional information . Kindest regards, CSC ENGINEERING & ENVJRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. ~~ M. Frederick ("Rick'') Conlin, Jr. P.E. MFC:mfc Attachment via: Facsimile Transmission (512-463-2530) and US Mail 2 The State Agency for Historic Preservation June 7, 2000 M. Frederick Conlin, Jr., P .E. CSC Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3407 Tabor Road Bryan, Texas 77808 GEORGE W . BUSH, GOVERNOR JOHN L NAU, ID, CHAIRMAN F. LAWERENCE OAKS, EXEClJTIVE DIRECTOR Re: Project review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Antiquities Code of Texas (EPA/City of Bryan) Dear Mr. Conlin : Thank you for your correspondence describing the above referenced project. This letter serves as comment on the proposed federal undertaking from the State Historic Preservation Officer, the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission. As the state agency responsible for administering the Antiquities Code of Texas, these comments also provide recommendations on compliance with state antiquities laws and regulations. The review staff, led by Bill Martin, has examined our records and finds that there are no cultural resources recorded within the proposed tract. However, to the best of our knowledge, the area has not been examined by a professional archeologist. We believe that the project area has the potential to contain archeological sites, some of which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places or for designation as State Archeological Landmarks. We recoffimend that a qualified professional archeologist survey the tract. The survey should be conducted using a survey methodology that conforms to the enclosed survey standards. A report of investigations should be produced in conformance with the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and submitted to this office for review. If this land is owned by the City of College Station, an Antiquities Permit must be secured from our office before fieldwork may begin . We look forward to further consultation with your office and hope to maintain a partnership that will foster effective historic preservation. Thank you for your cooperation in this federal and state review process, and for your efforts to preserve the irreplaceable heritage of Texas. If you have any questions concerning our review or if we can be of further assistance, please contact Bill Martin at 512/463-5867. Sincerely, ! . . ,~~4'~~-A.·~~. v' , , . . ~---_) for F. Lawerence Oaks, State Historic Preservation Officer FLO/warn Enclosure P.O. BOX 12276 • AUSTIN , TX 78711-2276 • 512/463-6100 • FAX 512/475-4872 • TDD l -800n35-2989 www.thcstate.bc.us • c s c May 24, 2000 Mr. Ed McKenzie Interjurisdictional Civil Defen se Emergency Management Coordinator County Courthouse, Suite 10 3 Bryan, Texas 77803 Re : Requ est for Information Concerning History of Spills in the Area of a 370 Acre Tract Northeast of th e Intersection of State Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road Dear Mr. McKenzie: We are writing to solicit your assistance in obtaining information in connection with an environmental site assessment (ESA) that we have been asked to perform by the City of College Station for a tract of land located in College Station, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "subject property"). More specifically, we are interested in determining whether any incidents involving hazardous materials may have occurred on or near the subject property. The subject property is located in the southeastern portion of College Station, Texas and the east-central portion of Brazos County, Texas . More specifically, the subject property is situated on the eastern side of State Highway 6 at the intersection with Greens Prairie Road . The property is approximately 370 acres in area and is irregularly shaped . The outer limits of the property boundaries extend approximately 4 ,750 ft north along State Highway 6 from the previously referenced intersection and approximately 5,800 ft east along Greens Prairie Road. A map illustrating th e general layout of the subject property is attached to this letter. We are interested in determining whether your files contain any records of hazardous material spills, releases, cleanups, emergency responses, or other incidents involving hazardous materials either at the subject property or in the area immediately surrounding the subject property . If possible, we would also like to determine whether any existing businesses near (within a Yi mile radius of) the subject property appear on the SARA Title III list. The presence of companies on the SARA Title III list would indicate that potentially hazardous substances (above a certain quantity) are maintained on the premises of the companies . However, to the best of our knowledge, the subject property has never been developed for industrial operations, although some oil and gas exploration activities may have occurred on the property 1 at one time. Please permit us to thank you in advance for your assistance in obtaining the requested information. Please do not hesitate to call the undersigned by telephone at 778-2810 or by facsimile transmission at 778-0820 if you should have any questions or if you require any additional information . Kindest regards, CSC ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. ~~ M. Frederick ("Rick") Conlin, Jr. P.E. MFC:mfc Attachment via: Hand Delivery 3407 Tabor Ro ad Bryan, Texas 77808 Phone(979)778-2810 Fax (979) 778-0820 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION . ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY STANDARDS FOR TEXAS The State Agency for Historic Preservation These minimum survey standards have been developed by the Archeology Division of the Texas Historical Commission in consultation with the Council of Texas Archeologists . The standards identify the least amount of work that will be considered acceptable for intensive archeological surveys of areas 200 acres or less. These standards are not intended to limit additional work (i.e., more shovel tests or backhoe trenches) that may be deemed necessary to identify archeological sites on the basis of the Area of Potential Effect, anticipated impacts, or the likelihood of encoun- tering significant cultural resources. Survey methodologies for project areas larger than 200 acres should be discussed with the Archeology Division prior to implementing the survey. MINIMUM SURVEY STANDARDS for Project Areas of 200 Acres or Less Transect Interval I Shovel Tests/ Acre 2 Project Area Size 1-10 acres 10-100 acres 100-200 acres No. of Shovel Tests to Define Site Boundaries 3 Average Rate of Survey (Acres/Person/Day) Backhoe Trenches/3 Acres 4 30m Shovel Tests/ Acre I/acre 1/2 acres 1/3 acres 6 20 1 1 Transect intervals should be reduced to 15 m in far West Texas (from the Pecos River west to El Paso). 2 Shovel tests must be dug whenever vegetation obscures surface visibility (except on slopes greater than 20%). Much of the eastern half of Texas is covered with vegetation, requiring shovel tests , whereas much of the western half has good ground surface visibility. However, any area in the state that has less than 30% ground surface visibility requires shovel tests. 3 Shovel tests are only necessary to define boundaries on sites with less than 30% ground surface visibility. 4 Backhoe trenches are required in alluvial settings in addition to shovel tests (trenches are estimated to have a length of 5 m). Archeology Division Texas Historical Commission P.O. Box 12276 Austin, TX 78711 n• c s c engineering & J=n'virOrlh'l~TJfal .:~·:-;: ·-, Cofrsultan!S ;' Inc } j,.,-:' > ' ; • ~ • o. '• -• • • ,. ~ •.,. r ,.,. ~ ~~· '. May24, 2000 Mr. Bill Seawell U.S . Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758-4455 Re: Request for Information Concerning Threatened or Endangered Species or Critical Habitats Areas For a 370 Acre Tract Northeast of the Intersection of State Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road College Station, Brazos County, Texas Dear Mr. McKenzie: We are writing to solicit your assistance in obtaining information in connection with an environmental site assessment (ESA) that we have been asked to perform by the City of College Station for a tract ofland located in College Station, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "subject property"). More specifically, we are interested in determining whether any site specific information exists concerning threatened or endangered species or critical habitats in the area of the subject property. The subject property is located in the southeastern portion of College Station, Texas and the east-central portion of Brazos County, Texas. More specifically, the subject property is situated on the eastern side of State Highway 6 at the intersection with Greens Prairie Road. The property is approximately 370 acres in area and is irregularly shaped. The outer limits of the property boundaries extend approximately 4,750 ft north along State Highway 6 from the previously referenced intersection and approximately 5,800 ft east along Greens Prairie Road. A map illustrating the general layout of the subject property is attached to this letter. The City of College Station is considering utilizing the subject property for development of a business center and is interested in protecting any threatened/endangered species or critical habitats that may be impacted by the proposed development. The development plans have not been finalized at the present time, but it is anticipated that structures (buildings), roadways, and green belt areas will be included. Please permit us to thank you in advance for your assistance in obtaining the requested information. Do not hesitate to call the undersigned by telephone at 778-2810 or by facsimile transmission at 778-0820 if you should have any questions or if you require any additional inforination . Kindest regards, CSC ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. 1>\.'al~~~- M. Frederick ("Rick") Conlin, Jr. P.E. MFC:mfc Attachment .. _,; via: Facsimile Transmission (512-490-0974) and US Mail 3407 Tabor Road Bryan , Texas 77808 Phone (979) 778-2810 Fax(979)778-0820 U:>/O:IS /UU U!j :~l t' . .U. IJ l lJ IJ21 3407 DeMerfe Wehmeyer ll'lte~urisdictional Coordinator BRAZOS CNTY 9-1-1 DIST. • John Blackburn Bryan Coordinetor Brazos County Emergency Management 300 E. 26th St. Bryan, T•as 77803 (:379) 361-4140 Fax (979) 821-3407 Mr. M . Frederick Conlin , J r . P.E . CSC Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. ~001 Steve Beachy Colloge Station Coordinator Chris Meyer TAMU Coordinalor May 26, 2000 Re : Request for information conceming history of spills at the intersection of Green Prairie Road and Texas State Highway 6 i n south Brazos Cour.ty . The property i~ approximately 370 acres area and is irre9ularly shaped on the eastern side of Highway 6 . Dear Mr. Conlin : This office has a sing !e report of an incid~n! in the area in which you are interested . The Incident occurred on May 13, 1999 . Shortly before 1 O AM, a gas leak was reported from a pipeline on the north side of Greens Prairie Road across from the Pebble Creek subdivision . A construction worker for Texcon, a Bryan-based utilities construction company punctured a Seminole pipeline . The area was cordoned off an~ approximately 200 residents from the Pebble Creek subdivision were evacuated briefly . We have no other report on file of any hazardous ma terial spills , releases . clean u ps, or emergency response activities having occurred at the above referenced site or the immediate vicinity _ We can make no assurances as to what may have occl.i rred that was not r eported to this office . In addition, we cannot address any incidents that may have occurred pr ior to this office becoming the repository for such information . You may wish to contacl the Hazard Communications Branch of the Texas Health Department (512-834-6600) and/or t he Environmental Site Assessrrent Division of the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commissiori in Austin (512·239·2512) for any informatio1' that they may have available . If we can be of further assistance, please contact us . Sincerely , ·~'Vl;d, lWi~ DeMerle Wehmeyer Emergency Management Coordinator Brazos County ------------Assessment, Compliance and Permitting Support ------------ May 25 , 2000 Rick Conlin CSC Engineering & Environemtnal Consultants , Inc. 3407 Tabor Rd . Bryan , Texas 77808 Dear Mr. Conlin , Re : Water Well Search Creagor!Thurmond Tracts NE of Hwy. 6 & Greens Prairie Brazos County, Texas Atlas Job# 00-05-075 Atlas Environmental Research has performed a water well search for the above referenced site using the records of the Texas Water Develop ment Board (TWDB) and the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). Includ ed in this report you will find a complete well listing sorted by the different types of files in th e state's wat er well system . You will also find a map delineating water wells within the area of review and copies of all available drillers logs. Please do not hesitate to call me at 800-940-0977 if you have any questions concerning this project or questions concerning Atlas' water well research protocol. Thank you for utilizing Atlas' research services to meet your environmental information needs. I look forward to being of service to you in the future . Sincerely , (ef~- /s:ott Anderson Research Consultant Enclosures/SA/ -------------------ATLAS E. R., Inc .---------'------------ 95 14 Mc Ne il Rood, Su it e 2 0 1 8 00 .9 4 00977 5 12 .339 .4155 Austin, Texas 78 758 FAX 5 12 .339 .441 3 -· Atlas E. R. Water Well Search Creagor!Thurmond Tracts NE of Hwy. 6 & Greens Prairi e Rd . Brazos County, Texas Atlas Job # 00-05-075 Atlas Environm ental Research has located 19 water v-.iells in the area of review. In addition , 3 v-.iells sho'Ml as "Location Unkno'Ml" could not be accurately located wth information prov ided by the driller. They have been included for you review. Located Water Wells -0 Plotted Water Wells - 4 59-30-6C 59-30-6E 59-30-6F 59-31 -1N Partially Numbered Water Wells -18 59-30-6(1) 2 Wells 59-30-6(2) 59-30-6(3) 59-30-6(4) 2 Wells 59-31 -4(5) 59-31-4(6) 2 Wells 59-31-4(7) 2 Wells 59-31-4(8) 2 Wells 59-31-4(9) 2 Wells 59-30-6( 1 O) Location Unkno'Ml 59-30-6(11) Location Unkno'Ml 59-31-4(12) Location Unkno'Ml Unnumbered Water Wells -0 These v-.iells have been labeled on the attached map wth the final portion of the state v-.iell number. This portion of the state v-.iell number has also been highlighted on the corresponding drillers log . The information for each USGS quadrangle utilized for the v-.iell location map is listed below. Quadrangle Fergusons Crossing , Texas Wellborn , Texas 1959 (Photorevised 1980) 1961 (Photorevised 1980) Quadrangle Scale : 1 :24 ,000 ; 1 inch = 2 ,000 feet Contour Interval 10 Feet 10 Feet Send oriainal copy by certifled .. n to the Tt!x•• W•ter Develop.ent Board P. O. lox 13087 Auatin, Ten• 78711 State of T•••• llATEll I/ELL Ul'OtT Por 1VDI ."•• 0017 Wall Mo •. '. ·:. : ' · ~~:~::d7° ...,~ l)OllHER1 ~ ;"=') ,/ • Peraon having well drilled ___ _,,,'7"~~-~M._,:"~=-':-~--------~Addreaa.--:::-.,.--..,---=::=-------==..,-----=:-:""""<"- (H-) (Street or RFD) (Clty) (Stata) Landovner __________ (~N=-... -~)----------------'Addrooa._,(~S-tr_o_o_t_o_r~llF==D~)-------~(c"""1t~y-.)------,,(S~t~a~t-o~)- ---------'•ile1 in ·'N"'.~E=-.-~s~.w"'.--e-t_c...,. :--direction from'----~'--~T-ovn'-~---- Loc ate by •ketch .. p •howing landaarka • road•, creek•, hlway nu.her, etc.* c . / ' . ~! .. -. ) I sq -;z: r -z.O or North 1 Civa legal location vith dlatance• and d1rectloft1 froa adjacent aection.m or survey linea. Labor ____________ _ League --------- 'Block. ___________ _ Survey. ________ _ Abstract No •. _____________________ _ (NII\; NE\; Sii\; SE\;) of Sectloa. ______________ _ J)~RJ: (Check): ~ Deepening ~USE (Check): ~ lnduatrlal Munlclpal _:;~ I/ELL (Check): ~ Driven Dug Reconditionina Pluggln1 Irrigation Teat Well Other Cab lo .Jetted 6)1/ELL LOG : ! ~ _ Di-.eter of hole. _ _,(O_ow.._~ ___ ln. Depth dr1lled __ ~,Z~?~$1.___ft. Depth of completed vell. __ _.4a?<...:::..:::c....---'ft. Dato drllled/;l-7.:J.-/ 0 ft.above All aeuurementa aade from--------ground level. To ft. Use reverie CCMPLETIOll (Check) : Straight well Gravel packed Under remaed 8) I/ATER LEVEL : of Other Static level. _____ ft. below land surface Date. _____ _ Ar te•ian pre11ure ___ lb1. per •quare inch Date _____ _ Caetna; ~ Type : Old Nev Steel Other Ceae.nted fro. Q ft. to .zE_g_ ft 11) I/ELL TESTS : Waa a pu111p teat aadet Ho If yea, J>y wbo.t Y1eld : _____ _,,P" vith. _____ ft. drowdown' after __ hra . Baller teat____gP" vith'-____ ft.duvdovn after ___ hra . Arte1ian flow _____ P'" Depth to pump bowls, cylinder, jet, etc. , _________ ft.1-_ _:T:_:°""'=..:e.:.r::.•t::.u:.:r:_:e:_..:o::_f_v:.:•:.:t:.:e:.:r=================== belov land •urface . 12) I/ATER QUALITY ; Wa• a cheaical analy1i1 .. dot YOI No Did any atrata contain \lnde1irable water? Yea No . ttach electric log, che:.ical analyai1, and other pertinent infor-..tion, if .vailable. *Additional inatructiona on reverie aide. Send original copy by certified mail to the State of Texas WATER WELL REPORT For TOWR use only Well No. S"')-30--(.§:----- Texas OeJMrtment of Water Resources P. 0 . Box 13087 ATTENTION OWNER: Confidentiality Privilegs Notict1 on Reverse Sidtl Located on mep,_,-l~s;'!"-.. s ___ _ A.cetv9d ; A'6 ·):L. Auttln, T•••• 78711 11 OWNER --~C~i~t~i_e~s~S~c=rv~i_c~e~s~·~In=c~·~----Address -------------------------------(Nam•) 2) LOCATION OF WELL : '? county _ _.B .... r..,.a ... ~..,,o...,s'----------·~L~-----m iles In (StrHt or RFD> de')(,~ ~! '.~Pl ----"'$'-------~irection from {,_.=N,,.,,/!.t....,°'?-"""'-',dg}"""::....<"",Ji.lLA.,.""'_....,,._ __ ~-- (N .E ., S .W ., etc.) (Town) 0 Legal description : Driller must complete the legal description to the right with distance and direction from two intersecting sec- tion or survev. lines, or he must locate and identify the . well on an of/icial Quarter-or Half-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and attach the map 10 this form . Section No. ______ BloCk No. _____ ToVK1ship ---------- Abstract No. _______ Survey Name ________________ _ D istance and direction from two intersecting section or survey lines ________ _ 3) TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): 5) DRILLING METHOO (Check): ftNewWell Kl Dom .. tic 0 Industrial D Public Supply Kl Mud Rotary 0 Air Hammer 0 Driven 0 Bored 0 Reconditioning 0 Deepening 0 Plugging D Irrigation 0 Test Well D Other-----· I 0 Air Rotary D Cable Tool 0 Jetted D Other ____ _ 6) WELL LOG : DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION : Dia. (in.) From (ft.) To (ft.) Oopen Hole 0 Straight Wall 0 Underreamed ?.1 Surface [JI: Gravel Packed • 0 Other Date drilled 2/llf/81 If Gravel Pocked give interval ••• from _ __.Q._ __ lt. to ~-3~2~0~-h . From (ft.) 0 If ?? 101 11 .l 16<'3 , ?8 189 no ?!'.''.\ ??R To (ft.I /.J. 27 101 111 16!J 173 lAo 210 241 ??.0 ?01 Description and color of format ion material t .nn «ni 1 clay nh" 1 o sand shale sand shale sand streaky sand sand Bl CASING, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: Dia. New Steel, Plastic, etc. Setting (ft.) Gage (in.) "' Perl ., Slotted, etc. Casin· Used Screen Mgf., if commercial From I To Scree. J.l A) n </~ ~<A J. d.r. /.UI' !/ .. .:.s; fta /) .~2LJ 4-ti "''" <,. J lln .d,.ff<d <,.,,}(. Jf'o ::1.,..,.... ;/. tJ .. ,. ti II /h {) 4</.o CEMENTING DATA 2<n 320 shale Ce mented lrom __________ ft . tO----------ft. JUL 2 6 1982 L;K / I l.J ,,,, (Use reverse side if necessary) 13) WATER QUALITY : Did you knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable water7 0 Yes !iCl No If yes, submit "'REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER"' Type of water7 goou Depth of strata 278-293 Was 1 chemical analysis made7 D Yes KJ No Method used----------------------- Cemented by----------------------- (Company or lndlvidu•I) 9) WATER LEVEL : Static level 6,5 ft. below land surface Date 2/14/81 Artesian flow _____ gpm . Oat•-------- 10) PACKERS : Type Depth 11) TYPE PUMP: DTurbine 0Jet D Submersible 0Cylind.,. OOther _____________________ _ Depth to pump bowls, cylinder, jet, etc., _________ h . 12) WELL TESTS : D Type Test : D Pump D Bailer ~Jetted ·o Estimated Yield : 35 gpm with __gQ__ft . drawdown aft.,. 4-hrs. I hereby certify that this well was drilled by me (or under my supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief . ·. (c\ NAME .T a mes 0, S j e<rert Water Well Drillers Reg istr ation No . 'tff>~ ~,; '\$') {Ty~ or Pr int) ADDRESS ~. ') "Rnx 7213 / Brvan .~ii;~ " 77301 """}/ (St<-t f'" ,/f ' _/ (City) ~ '2> (Stoto) l')j " (Zip> ISignedl h · I'~-I~./~ ~-"--' SIEGERT l1A~~'t.'3. n/\ .... {.S _ • .,._<) --<~~ ,;f-1 (W1forwe1rbr11y ~mpl\,'IJN•m•l,."\ • Cf\"> Please att~electric log, chemical analysis, and other per1inent information, if available . ""'\) • ,,~<.f\ • ,('if.I : TDWR ·0392 (Rev, 1 ·12·791 DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOUR CE'S r.OPY ,.u . Send original copy by State of Texas For TDWR use only certified m•il to the WATER WELL REPORT Well No. s~~3o::iiE TeJCas D~rtm.nt of W•ter Resources Loaited on mep .,~ P. 0 . Box 13087 ATTENTION OWNER : Confidentiality Privilege Notice on Reverse Side Austin, Texas 78711 Received: ~ 1) OWNER (].a.fa.XI (d,-L Address c:m., (StrMtor RFD} (City) ~~Zip) 2) LOCATION OF WELL : ~ s direction from~ county Bntzoa miles in (N .E ., S.W .• etc.) {Town) 0 Legal description : Driller must complete the legal description to the right Section No. Block No. Township with distance end direction from two intersecting sec- Abstract No. Survey Name tion or surve~ lines, or he must locate and identify the well on an of icial Quarter-or Half-Scale Texas County Distance and direction from two intersecting section or survey lines General Highway Map and attach the map to this form . w See attached map . .llF \0 OJ.l 5~ -~-&.It 31 TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Chock): 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check): !JI New Well 0 Deepening C:X:Dom estic 0 Industrial 0 Public Supply 1:2:Mud Rotary OAirHammer D Driven 0 Bored 0 Reconditioning 0 Plugging D Irrigation 0 Test Well 0 Other DAir Rotary 0 Cable Tool 0 Jetted OOther 6) WELL LOG: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION : Dia. (in.) From (It .) To (It.) 0 Open Hole 0 Straight Wall 0 Underreamed .,. Surface lJ(\IJ. llCJ Gravel Packed • 0 Other 6L25L81 -0 404 Dato drilled If Gravel Packed give interval •.• from h.to h From To Description and color of formation 81 CASING, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA : (It.) (ft.) material 0 2 to-P clay Dia . New Steel, Plastic, etc. Setting (ltJ Gage (in.I or Pert •• Slotted, etc. Casir ::> '-l4 •"-'•tone Used Screen Mgf .• if commercial From I To Sere< * 1AA --~---4 JI ........ -~ __ ,, ---~~-n i.t.nJJ. 108 ll8 streakT sand 4 Ill nv.. •1 "+.+AA •--"11ll. ~ ua 110 eubetone l~ lQO BtreAJrv sand ion ??n _ ........ ??Q 24'> AtrAakv tlrlllirur ?4'> ~ subetone ~ 180 streAh drlllirur ~n lir\lJ. -.... ,.,..,, CEMENTING DATA Cemented from h .to f · Method used Cemented by (Company or lndlvkjual) 9) WATER LEVEL : Static level ft . below land surface Date Artesian flow gpm. Date in lli' rrn ~ n wt ~ I'~ I n ~, ------! 10) PACKERS: Depth ; Type LIU CJ rm-11 ' ~ o l~BZ --UL-I I . vr VI; 1'; L,, l.~l9'U ·li• -~ 111 TYPE PUMP : DTurbine OJet 0 Submersible 0 Cylinder OOther (Use reverse side if necessary) Depth to pump bowls, cylinder, jet. etc., It. 13) WATER OUAL>TY : Did you knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable 12) WELL TESTS: water7 0Yes liil No 0TypeTest: If yes. submit .. REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER .. OPump 0 Bailer 0Jetted 0 Estimated Type of water? good Depth of strata lJ0-380 Yield: 15 gpm with ____ ft. dra~r~r:-~~~~--.. --hrs. Was a chem teal analysis made7 0Yes Ill No I hereby certify that this well was drilled by me (or under my supervision) and that SEP l O 1982 each and all of the statements herein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. NAME Jaaes o. Siegert (Ty~ or Print) Water Well Dr illers Registration No . 897 Lh / I UYYr\ ADD RES~~. 'i Box 7::>8 , ~ Texaa 77801 ~trooto~~ . (City) (State) (Zip) (Signed) 'G-"77.J~ ~ ~ ~ f.!!roERT VATKR WELLS, 00. (Mter Well Dr~I (Comp•ny Nem•) Please att electric log, chemit1( analysis, and o ther pertinent inf~rmation, if available. -TDWR-0392 (Rev. t 12·79) DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES COPY Send original copy by certified mail to the T exa.s DeSMrtment of Wat et' Resources P. 0 . Box 13087 Austin. Texas 78711 State of Texas WATER WELL REPORT ATTENTION OWNER: Confidentiality Privilege Notice on Reverse Side Tex•• W•ter Well Drillers Board P . 0 . Box 13087 Austin. Texas 78711 OWN~A MA 7Y7 - 11 I J ., Fl ~ / (Nom e) / Address ~OJ....La.___....au;4~/..Lo~~P~-eoo..·<-5.__.5'---1,.-HL<--<-t:!-<"_.,.-/='-------- 1srre-et or AF D) . 7 (Chy) (St•t•) (Z i p) 21 LOCATION!JF WELL: L-f County I" Cl~ ~ ~ 5 directi on from _,L=_,o"'-L/,~'/__..c,/.,7:....:•_·Jj'<:...._.f'-c;;=-~f_,.1~' q......,1 ------'-----m ile s in (N .E .• S .W ., etc.> (Town) 0 Legal description: Driller must complete the legal description to the r ight wit h d istance and direction from two intersect ing sec- t ion o r survey lines, o r he must locate and ide ntify the w ell o n an off icial Quarte r-o r Half-Scale Tex as County General Hi gh..:Vay Ma p and attach the map to this fo rm. Section No. ______ Block No. _____ T o wnship---------- Abstract No . _______ Survey Name----------------- Di st a nce and direct ion from t\IVO intersecting secti o n o r survey lin es ________ _ Qll,, See attached map. 1\/\ Q lJ ..,~ 5"1 -"2. 'f -'-A h 31 TYPE OF WORK (Ch eck ): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check ): 5) DRILLING METHOD (Ch ec k ): ~We ll ~e s tic 0 Industrial 0 Pu b lic Supply .erM°ud Rotary 0 A ir H amm e r 0 Drive n D Bore d I l f1 uconclitinni110 0 Deepen ing I ·1 Ph1oo i nu I l lrrin111i o n [] Tust Wull r l Othor ____ _ 0 Air Ao tury rJ Cohlu Too l Cl Ju11ud 0 Othur ____ _ GI W E LL LOG : D ate drilled From (It.) To (lo .I DIAMETER OF HOLE Oia. (i n.) FTom (ft.) To (ft.) Surfoco Oescffr>tion and c olor of format ion rnntur iul 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION : 0 Open Hole 0 Gravol Pockud 0 Stra ight W:~ /J 0 ).lnderreamed 001hcr K..-Lfu"<K& r I . If Gravel Packed give interval ... from _____ ft . to-----ft . 8) CASING, BLANK PIPE , ANO WELL SCREEN OATA : I)-_J ,Y,.;--AL // Oia(,N~D Stee~detc . 1---~:_-"'~L-f'L~~~u~~:_---==-----r------~r 1 ,._-Pert.~. etc. Setting (ft.) Gage l-----~----1Casin~ _')Q ,~ -~ ) /) 0 ,; ,o _ <;,.. ..,., ,/ on . Used _, Screen Mgf .• i f c ommercial From I To Screer CE MENTING DATA ,, •. ""'""• ~/!','" ..?£ 5__ Metho d u sed _,,....., . "~"'"'i31s~e-~ ... d . ~or l nd ivid ft. 9) WATER LEVEL : Static level / {z 'J ft. be low la nd surfac e O at •---~---- Artesian flow _____ g p m. Date _______ _ 10) PACKERS : Type D ep1h n -.... ..., L::J n II I .JL ~"A 19w..~--~~~u_JU~4-----------------------­flV\J • ~ JQJ -- ---11) TYPE PUMP : 0 Cylinder 1..1[:.r 1. ur . -DTurb i ne 0Jet esubmersible OOther _____________________ _ (Use reverse sid e if necessary} Dept h to pump bowls, c y linde r, je t, e t c ., ---------"· 13) WATER QUALITY : D id y o u knowingl y pene trate any strata which contai ned undes ir a bl e 12) WELL TESTS: wa t er? 0 Yes 0 No If y es. submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER " 0 Type Test : 0 Pump 0 Ba il er 0 Estimated T y pe of water? ________ Depth of strata-------- Was a chemical analysis made? 0 Yes ~ Yield:-----gpm with ____ ft . drawdo wn after __ hrs. I hereby certify that this wel) was drilled by me (or under my supervis ion) and that /l each and al) of the Slatements 1herei~ are true to the best of my knowledge and belief . coMPANY NAMJ.12 r le s-do/la'//~ we11 Driller 's License No . _ ___,/'--'lu.-J?,,_,_OL_ ______ _ ADDRESS ;f';/-s-?'drt;3:! /[_V/7 ~ ~ 7 7 )?0 ~ ,47 ~treet O< RFD) 0 (Signed)/·~--~ Y · ....__ (Licensed Wf'fer Well Orlll:r'f (S tate) fli p) (Signed) __ --:-------------------1'"--- Please attach electric log, chemical analysis, and other pertinent information. if available . fA9gt11er•d Dr i ll•r Tr•inee) For TDWR £!'tf~'lff . .1 l• ~:~~:~-o ~roar'~C~f.:"-- Town OJ!>2 (Rov . 5 27 8 2 ) -----· DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES COPY Send original COffi by certlned mall to: TNRCC, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, TX 78711 ·3087 State of Texas Tena Water Well Drttlen Board ATTENTION OWNER: ConfldtKllllllty P.O. Box 13087 ~Holk» on l#vw• Sic» WELL REPORT Auetln, Tena 71711 OWNER UHIO! eACiric RESOURCES ADDRESS E 0 BOX i, ~C? UUDULHH ~MU tlAte) 7 ooe 9' • (Name) (Street or ( 2) LOCATION 01rrzw ' County 6 mllea In E direction from COLLRGE SU?IOH UKIOI PACIFIC FRKKKAll CRKAGOR WL f'lE. sw, etc.) DELTA lOffownJ Ortner muet complete the legal desalpdon below with distance and direction from two lntersec11ng aectlon or survey Unea, or he must locate and ldendly the well on an olftdal Ouatter· or Hall-Scale Texas County Geooral HIQhway Map and attach the map to this form. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section No. Block No. Township Abstract No. Survey Name Distance and dlreellon from two Intersecting secllon or survey lines 0 si:E ATTACHED MAP HORTH: 3035 WEST: 9615 KSTllUK: 345 3) TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): 0 OILFLD rJPPLY 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check): 0 Driven DNtftWeU 0Deepenlng 0 Do!neatlc Olnduatrial Monltor Publlc Supply 0 ~Rotary OAJrHammer 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Raoondldonlng DPtuoolno 0 lrrlQadon OTaatWeU 0 Injection 0 o.watertno 0 r Aotaty 0 CableTool o~ 6) WELL LOG: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Date OrlUlng : Ola. (In .) From (It) To(tl.) 00penHole O~gh!Wall 0 Underreamed Started Ol £03£9419_ 6.5 Surface 650 0 Gravel Pad<ed 00ther Completed Ol l04 l94 19 _ II Gravel Packed give Interval .•• from 9 11. to a 11. From (It.) To (It.) Description and color or lormatlon material 8) CASINO, BLANK PIPE, AND WEU SCREEN DATA: n-1n rr.1v New Steel, Ptastlc, etc. Setttng(fl.) Gage Dia. or Perl., Slotted, etc. casuno 30-(0 SARO (In.) Used Screen Mlg ., II commercial From To Screen 40-230 CLAY p llKi CASTllG n Hn 230-250 SAllD n n . 250-300 CLAY n n 300-310 SARO p ~ ~ T.0'!1'1'11n ~'n '" n~n 310-560 CLAY .-··., i"~ i i~) 1, ~ 11 \ ,• -• !I 15 n n ~ 560-620 ~um I U.J_ LS ~ ~ IJ IJ P9) U~ENTINQ DATA (Rule 287.44(1)) 0 0 620-650 rr.n I \l I -Celfiented from 0 11. ID 1511. No. or Sacka Used 16 ·--!I IJ h' ; i ;) . j94 It. to ---11. No. of Sacka Used . " (Use revers• $/de If nt1ce$$1Vf) Method used SLURH 13) TYPE PUMP: -~xAs WAH:.R co r ~MlSSl~ted by J & 6 WAtBR WBLLS 0 Turb11141 0 Jet 0 5$>merslble Cylinder b Other 10) SURFACE COMPLETION Depth IO pump bowts, cylinder, jet, etc., HI 11. 0 Specified Surfaoe Slab Installed [Rule 287.44(2XA)) 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed (Rule 287.44(3)(A)) 14) WEU TESTS: 0 Pttpu Adapter Uaed [Rule 287.44(3)(8)) Type Teat 0 Pump 0 Baller oJred 0 Estlmated 0 lJJrtNed Alternative Procedure Used (Rule 287.71) Yleld: ~~gpmwlth 11. drawdown alter hrs. N/l'I 11) WATER LEVEL: 15) WATER QUALITY: Static level 6 0 It. below land surface Date Ol LOH94 Did yoo knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undeslrable Artesian now gpm. Date conadtuenta? 110 Dvn ONo If yea, aubmlt "REPORT Of UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) PACKERS: Type . Depth Type or water? Depth or strata 11171\DO • < . Was a chemical analysis made? Dvn ONo .. -- llli'/IDO tt~ hereby certify that this well was drllled by me (or under my supervision) and that eacll and all of the atatementa herein are true to the beat ol my knowledge and belief. 1 understand IBl !allure IO complete Items 1 thru 15 wtU result In the log(s) being returned for compledon and resubmlttal . . OMPANYNAME ~ t S i!?ER iELLS WEU DRILLER'S LICENSE NO. . Lt&XJ'J (Type Of print) c .... ":SS e. 0. BOX 625 BELLULLK ~orRFD)L. (City) (s1aT~ i}4;118 lgned) ~ A>11&.. ~ (Signed) (Licensed Well Ortner) (Reglstentd Ortner Trainee) ease •!tach electrlc log, chemk:al analysis, and other pertinent lnlormadon, 11 avallable. I For TNRCC use only: Well no. Located on map n 1 ;(/, b RCC-0199 (Rev. 05-18·90) TNRCCCOPY ~\ Send orlglnal aipy by oerdlled mall to: Texn W•ter CommlMlon, P.O. Box 13087, AU8tln, Texa 71711 ATTENTION OWNER: Confldendalty State of Texas THaa W•ter Well Drlllen Board P.O. Box 13087 ~ Nr.fk» on RtwerN Side WELL REPORT Austin, T•ue 71711 OWNER UIIOK E•CIEIC RESOURCES ADDRESS e o BOX 2! ~~ eutDULEUI i~ ?f: HlO~~~Ol (Name) (Stree or D ( Stale) ( p 2) LOCATION OF WELL: . County BRAZOS . 6 mllel In E direction from COLLEGE STATION UHIOH PACIFIC FREEKA!I CREAGOR iL l (NE, SW, etc.) DELTA 101 (Town) Driller mu .. complete the leoaf desalpdon below with distance and direction from two Intersecting section or survey Unes, or he must locate and ldendfy the weU on an omclal Quarter-or Hall-Scale Texas County G~ Highway Mep and attach the map ID this form. 0 LEOAL DESCRIPTION: Section No. Block No. Township Abstract No. survey Name Distance and direction from two Intersecting aecdon or survey lines 0XsE! ATTACHED MAP NORTH: 3035 WEST: 9615 MSTHUK: 3452 3) TYPE OF WORK (Cheek): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): OILFLD SUtf LY 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check): 0 Driven owrwe11 0Deepenlng 0 Domestic Olnduatrlal O Monitor Public supply ~~ Aotaiy OAJrHammer 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Reoondltlonlng 0Plugglng 0 lrrlgaUon OTestWell 0 Injection 0 De-Watering Air Rotaiy 0 cableTool 0 Other 8) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPlETION: Date OrlUlng : Dia. (In .) From (It.) To (It) 00penHole [}itralght Wall 0 Underrearned Started Olt04t94 19-6.5 SUr1ace 650 0 Gravel Packed OO!hef Completed Olt06t94 19-If Gravel Packed give Interval ••. from n It. ID n It From (It) To (It) Description and color of formation material 8) CASINO, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: n-1n ruv New Steel, Plastic, etc. Setting (It) Gage Dia. or Pert., Slotted , etc. Casdng 30-40 SAHD (In.) Used Screen Mfg., If commercial From To Screen 4o-no CLAY P4 lfEi CASIHG 0 560 230 -250 SAND 0 0 250-300 CLAY 0 0 -300-310 SAND P4 SLOTTED ~60 620 020 310-560 CLAY . .-•-"'"'•,,_ I ) .. ,,} i,.J I \\/ 12 r--.... 0 0 ' -560-620 mm i U l (~ l ~~, L~ .J \.'.Jai Lu •iff 1No DATA [Rule 287.44(1)] 0 0 620-650 er.AV i n -i-J from 0 ll 1D-1Lll No. of Sacks Used 10 J.._J '---' ~ f I i ·' ~ 1994 fl ID __ It No. of Sacks Used n (USB fflVflfSB slclfl If 1"18C8SSBr)') Melhoduaed SL!IU? 13) TYPE PUMP: 0 JFJl)S WATER ~OMMl~by J & S il?ER iBLLS 0 Turbine 0 Jet 0 S>ubmeraJble 0 Othef 1~ SURFACECOMPLETION Deplh 1D pump bowls, cylinder. jet, etc., 252 It 0 Specified SUrface Slab Installed (Rule 287.44(2}(A)] 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed (Rule 287.44(3)(A)) 14) WELL TESTS: ~fl!'"• Adapter Used (Rule 287.44(3)(8)) Type Teat 0 Pump 0 Baller OJened 0 Eadmated Approved Altemallve Procedure Used (Rule 287.71) Yield : 8, gpmwllh It. drawdown alter hrs. n1 l'I 11) WATER LEVEL: 15) WATER OUAUTY: Static level 60 . It below land surface Date 01/06/94 Did you knowlngly penetrate any strata which contained undealrable ArteaJan flow gpm. Date con1d1Uen11? HO 0 Yea ONo If yea, aubmlt "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER-12) PACKERS: Type Oeplh Type of water? Depth Of Strata HEOPR 15 Was a chemical analysis made? Dvea ONo NROPR 560 I hereby cer1!fy that this well was drilled by me (or under my supervision) and that eech and all of the 1tatemen11 herein are true ID the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 understand that failure ID complete Items 1 thru 15 will result In the log(s) being returned for compledon and reaubmlttal. · · COMPANY NAME J & S WATER WELLS WELL DRILLER'S LICENSE NO. 003q\J (Type or print) __J_ ,ll""'qESS /} ...-.P . ..o-?BOX 675 BELLVILLE 'l'X 77418 (Signed) I fi_ .( ~ ?/ (z or RFD) (Clty) (State) (Zip) \ _; ./ ~ (Signed) w-• (Licensed Well Driller) (Reglstenld Driller Tralnee) Please •ttach 91ecll1c log. chemical analysis, and other pertinent lnfoonadon, If avallable. I For TWC uee only : WelNo. Located on map 5"' • ~() • ~ TWC 0199 (Rev. 05-18 ·90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY ~\ • ~ERAL HIGHWAY MAP ~AZOS COUNTY TEXAS _ .... •TE 0£PARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION l"UHSJOff An:itt P\.NMHG DfY!SIOH ·~,..."""nc :PARTMEKT OF TRANSPORTATION :'£DCRAl HIGHWAY AOMtMSTRATlOH ---. 44 I "' ' -1980 ----_____ .. ____ _._··-- .. + + ,,_, ' '-i . ..-1'.·~-, ,' , .... .;. I ; ,,'. I ·, >_ "' ...... -.l•TO~f· ... --ln J_ I I ·I - ; ' + I II e T W A I M . . c • • • ---------:::::::--.. _______ _ , ..... - '· .. "' . ,.-Tex• Water Well Drlll«8 Board ATJEHT::ON OwNER: Ccnlk»otlalty State of Texas P.O. Box 13087 ~ Nt:Jll<» on RwerN Sic» WELL REPORT Austin, Tuae 71711 OWNER UIIOI PACIFIC RESOURCES ADORESS P .0. BOX 7, ACC? f!IlDRILBm!I iORTH ·. 1lsiatei 7, 1~1%J01 (Name) (sireet or RFD) (City) 2) LOCATION 6tMU.l.: 12 SE COLLEGE STATIOI C<lt.nty UUOI P,~GUIG . nrn uuf'8"'" dlrec1lon from (NE, SW, e4C.) DELTA 101 {T<Mn) Driller must complete the legal desci1ptton below wtlh distance and clrecllon from two lnlenledlng eec1bl or auMI)' Ines, or he must local& and ldenttfy lhe weU on an otndal Quartar-or Hall-Scale Texas County General Highway Mep and 8llaCh 1he map ID lhla lorm. 0 LEOAl. DESCRIPTION: Section No. Block No. Township Abstract No. survey Name ~!BnCe and direction from two lnlllrSedfng section or survey llnes 0 SEE ATTACHED MAP HORTH: 3035 iEST: 9615 MSTliUM: 2915 3) TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): OILFLD SUPPLY 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check): 0 Orlven OAi..We11 0Deepeolng 00omes11c 0 lnc:lJslrial 0Mon111Jr 0 Pubic SUpply q~Aotaty OAJrHammer 0 Jetl8d 0 Bored 0 Recoodltlonlng 0Pt>gglng 0 lnigadon OTestWell 0 lnjec1lon 0 Oe-Wal811ng 0 Air Rotary 0 cableTool 0 Other 6) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION·: Date Drillng: 10/26/92 Dia. (In.) From(ft.) To(ft.) 00penHole cj l6tra1ght Wall 0Underreamed "'J OJU 0 Gravel Packed OOlher Slar18d 10728192 19-surface Complel8d 19-If Gravel Packed give lnt181V81 ••• from 0 ft. ID n ft. From (ft.) To(ft.) Desa1ptlon and color of formallon material 8) CASING, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: 0-3 SURFACE 645-650 CLAY New Steel, Plas lie, elC. Selllng(ft.) Gage rau l.IJAI Dia or Perf., Sloll9d, etc. casttng "'II'\ r''ll ....... r,;"lr.-~--(In.) Used Saeen Mfg ., It commerdal From To Screen ... ~"' _..,.j&J ;::'1 l5 ® t.S 11 1r1 rs r-:·-, ti\ n I'll ,.., n-P4 !IKi CASING 0 580 . .. ·-·" l II J -II I 0 0 0"'"".""' "'"' ...... .., WUUlo' . j f l \/ I I r -JU 0 0 -11'\I'\ "''" ... , .. ·"'"' ., ........ , ... ..., •.) l~~j P4 SLOTTED 580 640 0,0 "11 !'1 "'"" /1t n,.., -'°' '1\0 0..1¥ tio\~UIJ "\t " I IA ,... • -0 0 .... ,...,. "'"'"' T~YAC-111~-0 '"' ..... ---9) CDIEHTINQ DATA (Rule 287.44(1)] 0 • >VV "AU~ -•• ·~ 'Wlif tt< GUMMf~~rrur 0 ft.ID__lLrt. "• ........... Ceroon1ed from No. of Sacks Used 10 HV J"" 1.Ulll --·· ~A/It " . ,. .. --ft.ID ___ ft. No . of Sacks Used n """ U~J "u"w {lM ffJVflfSB side If f'IBCtlSSBry} SLURRI · Method used 13) TYPE PUMP: Cemented by J & S WATER iELLS 0 Turbine 0 Jet d SUbmerslble 0 Cytlnd« 0 Other 10) SURFACE COMPLETION Deplh ID pump bowls, cy11nder,jet, ele~ 2Io ft. 0 Sped1led Sur1aoe Slab Installed [Rule 287 .44(2)(A)) . 0 Sped1led Steel SleeYe Installed [Rule 287.44(3)(A)) 14) WEU TESTS: II).~tless Adapter Used (Rule 287.44(3)(9)) Type Test 0 Pump 0 Balle< QJetl8d 0 Esllmal8d 0 Approved AltemllllYe Procedure Used [Rule 287.71] Yleld: 100 gpm wt1h H/M ft. drawdown after hrs. 11) WATER LEVEL: 15) WATER OUAUTY: Slallc level 40 ft. below land surface Date 10/28/92 Did you ~ penetrale arry atrata whldl contained undeslrable ccnslltuents? • Artesian lk:Mr gpm. Date Dves ONo If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) PACKERS: Type Deplh Type of water? Deplh of atrala liEOPR. 15 was a d1emlcal ana1ys1s made? DYff ONo liEOPR. 580 reby c:er1lfy lhat 1hls we1 WU drilled by me (or under my 9Up8fVleion) and !hat each and all of 1he 11atementa herein are true ID 1he best of my knowledge and beflef. 1 understand . lallute ID complete hems 1 lhru 15 wUI reut In 1he log(a) being returned tor completion and resubmlual. l.IPAHYNAME J & S iATER iELLS 1994 WELL DRILLER'S LICENSE NO. (Type or print) lflJ:.SS P. 0. BOX 67 5 BELLVILLE , TX 77418 r J /1~5or P-1 f'" (City) (Stal8) (Zip) Md) (Signed) ~Md Well DrllRltf" ~ -( Reglstere<f Driller T ralnee) se atlad1 electJic log, lllBlysls, and Olh« pef1lnent lnlorrnal!on, It avalla,ble. I For TWC use only: WelNo. Located on map 'i..'1 1 '1.0. b. >-012 (Rev. 05-18-00) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY • • • AY MAP UNTY HIGHWAYS lrfATIOH I llMSOOOI SPORTATIOH TllATIOM '"'·-· -- • • • .. # 0 + ............... • 0 + ... ; .. 'T r "· J.. I . . . . I • . ' 0 • c 0 u ===-.:;:----__ ,..___ -·--- • ·~ ·' .' I ... •--· ·-·=-.::: .-·· (( .' r:;'f ., + l-j -- j !' .. .,_ : . \'-.--. ' ' ,_ ATTENTION OWNER: Conldentlalty State of Texas Tua Wider Well Dffllers Board P.O. Box 13087 ~ NotJt:. on,__ Sldfl WELL REPORT Au.tin, Texu 71711 ~· OWNER EXXOH CO ll s A ADORESS p 0 BOX 4342 HOIIS!O! u 212104342 (Name) (Slr8et or RFD) (City) (Stale) (Zip) 2) ~~TION ~f AYrrP-: 13 SE COLLEGE STATION mlesln direction from . EXXON McCOLLOUGH-B!SEY (NE, SW, etc.) !!BORS 255CTown) Driller must complete !he legal desa1pdon below with distance and dlrecllon from !WO lnl8fSecl!ng MCtlon or survey Ines, or he must locat& and ldendfy the well on an omdal Quarter. or Half-Scale Texas County G-m Highway Map and attach 1he map ID fn lorm. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec1!on No. Block No. Township Abstract No. Survey Name Distance and direction from two Intersecting section or 1Urvey llnes 0 BEE ATTACHED MAP li ORTH: 3035 iEST: 96 20 MSTIHJK: 32 57 3) TYPE OF WORK (Cheet): 4) PROPOSED USE (Cheek): OIL FLD Stt!?LY 5) DRILLING MEnfOD (Checlc): 0 Driven O"W'WeH 0DeepenJng 0 Domestic 0 Industrial 0 Monitor Pubic Supply O~Aotary OAJr~ 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Reconditioning 0Plugglng 0 lrrlgallon OTestWell 0 .;ectlon 0 De-watering 0 Air Rotary 0 CableTool Dou- 6) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Date DrlUlng : Dia. (In.) From(lt.) To(lt.) 00penHole CEStra1ght wai1 0Underreamed Started 0811 9193 19-6.5 Surface 690 0 Gravel Paduld 0 Oltl9f Completed 08f20193 19-It Gravel Packed give Interval ••• from n rt. ID n rt. From (It) To(lt.) Descri pdon and color of formation material 8) CASINO, BLANK PIPE, AND WEU SCREEN DATA: 0-2 SIJRFln' New Steel. Plastic, etc. Settfng(lt.) Gage Dia. or Pert., Slotted, etc. casdng 2-15 RED CLAY (In .) Used Screen Mfg., It commerdal From To Screen 15 -30 BROi! CLAY P4 !Ei C!Sil!G 0 460 30-90 SAND P4 480 540 90-460 CLAY n ~ H:r~l?.MM f1l p .~ 580 60 0 " 460 -480 SA ND ;:::~ Us \..!'.] l.§ u Li .5 F I SLOTTE D 460 480 .0 20 480-540 CLAY P. J SLOTT ED 540 580 .02 0 54 0-580 SAN D & RO CK Nnv 1 ~ 1qq~ 9) CEMENTINQ DATA (Rule 287.44{1)) 600 620 .020 580 -600 CLAY ~ 0 ls 10 Cemented from It. ID rt. No . ol Sadls Used 600 -620 HH n & ROCK TCV1'C' wnrn MnAw SSION ft. to It No. ol Sacks Used n 6 20-690 CLAY & R<N.ffl rwerse side If nt1CSssary)" '"' '1 " 1 '- 1 ' \JU 111 '" 1 Method used S[,IIRU 13) TYPE PUMP: Cemented by J & S iATER i ~I,I ,S 0 Turbine 0 Jet 0 Submefslble 0 Cylinder 0 Other 10) SURFACE COMPLETlON Depth 1D pump bowls, cyUnder, jet, etc., 320 It 0 Specllled Surface Slab lnslalled (Rule 287.«{2XA}] 0 Specllled Steel Sleeve Installed [Rule 287.44{3)(A}] 14) WEU TESTS: 0 i!~ Adapter Used (Rule 287.44{3)(9)) Type Test 0 Pump 0 Baller D-j8tted 0 Estimated 0 Approved Altemat!ve Procedure Used [Rule 287.71] Yleld : 60 gpm wf1h N1M It drawdown after hrs . 11) WATER LEVEL: 15) WATER QUALITY: Static level 120 ft. belCNI land Surface Date 08/20 /93 Did you knowingly penetrate erry strata which coolalned undesJrable Artesian now gpm . Date coosd~m? NO Dves ONo tt yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) PACKERS: Type Depth Type or water? Depth of strata llROPR. 15 Was a chemical analysis made? DYes ONo REOPR 460 I hereby certify Iha! this wen was drilled by me (or under my supeMslon) and 1hat -=ti and all of 1he statements herein are trve ID the best ot my knowledge and belle!. I understand · 1ha1 failure 1D complete Items 1 1hru 15 wlll result In the log( s) being relUmed ro.-complellon and r9$Jbmjtlal. COMPANY NAME J & S WATER i ELLS WEll DRILLER'S LICENS£ NO. 1994 {Type or print) A,..-"'ESS P. C. B~X 675 ~ J BEL VILLE TX 774 18 (j Ji'f .. torV L (City) (State) (Zip) (Signed) j 5 -'A-(Signed) J. -~-.. --Well Drlller) Y (Reglstenld Driller Trainee) Please attach elec1rlc log , lcal analysis, and other per1lnent lnformallon, ~ avallable. For TWC use only: . Wei No. l.ocaJed on map CL 'J.O. b TWC-0199 (Re v . 05-18 ·90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY ... , ... ,, ---=-' ·~ I I : -1: __ ,! i..: " ~-=·- • --- --· \ I • • • --··-------·-·:-:::,. __ _ ------ • • 4 I 0 I • • . . I T .,./-.. . ~.,j .• ! ~ / \ ; I I ~ ... _,,,..,. ...... kl ... _&11 + ? " • • • 0 • NOI J A dVI • • I --:: --· Send original copy by oerUlled mall 10: Texu Water CommlMk>n, P.O. Box 13087, Au8tln, T•XM 71711 ATTENTION OWNER: Ccnffdflntlalty State of Texas Texu Water Well Drtllera Board P.O. Box 13087 ~Nodal on Rsverst1 Side WELL REPORT Au.Un, Texu 71711 - OWNER UIIQI PACIFIC R~KS ADOAESS p' O ' f B~Jt or RFD) ro1;J~p11 fl l610!P00l (State) ( p) 2) LOCATION OF WELL: COLLEGE ST!TIOI County BRAZOS . 1 miles i1 IB dlrec11on from UJIOI PACIFIC BUGBll JOIBS it 1 (NE, SW, etc.) PlTTBRSOI {lownl DriDer muet complete the legal desa1pllon below with dls1anc:e and direction from two ilteBecllng section or survey Dnes, or he must local& and Identify the well on an omdal ~r-or Half-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and attach the map to !tis loon. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section No. Block No . Township Abstract No . Survey Name Distance and dlredfon from two lnlef'S&Ctlng sedlon or survey lines 0 F£E ATTACHED MAP IORTH: 3035 iEST: 9620 lfSTIUlf: 2267 3) TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): 0 OILPLD S~PLY S) OAILLINQ METHOD (Check): 0 Driven oc; 0Deepenlng (]Domestic (] lndusllial l.4oni1Dr Publlc Supply D-Jt"d Rotary 0 AlrHamrM< 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 onlng 0Ptugglng (] Irrigation (]Test Well (] llie<:tlon 0 O&-Waterlng 0 Air Aotaty 0 CsbleTool (] Other 6) WELL LOG: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Date Drilling: Dia. (In.) From (It) To (It) 00penHole ~ghtwall 0Underreamed Started 96f 98f 91 19-'r; Surface un 0 Gravel Packed OOlher Completed 06fHf 91 19-If Gravel Packed give Interval .••. from 0 It.ID 0 It From (It) To (It) Description and color of formation material 8) CASINO, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: New Steel, Plasllc, etc. Setting (It) Gage ••• A9 ow r lllil'll PAP ,,.y 11 w Dia. or Perl., Slotted, etc. Casting V J.J ••u•• ... v ............... ""' ,,_,n 'nn '~'-'n' UTII (In .) Used Screen Mfg., If commercial From To Screen 'n-H' rT.lV 'n~-qo rr.n P4 nv l'Hrn: a ~2n ,..,_Hn '1vn t Pnrr P2 ~20 m 1'n-1a1; ruv n n ,Cl,_'lllO t'lvn Dnl"Y lfTY II? ~1.o,,1m ~?~ ~n~ n?n ~1u_11n f'T lV n n ·--,, n_, ,,., •urn ..--r:J rn , i? n 11 r ~ F"Q DATA '""" 287."(1)) 0 0 ...... ..,. 0 I~ tlrJ ~ Li \1.1 ... "" ,.. , .. led from g It to 15 It No . of Sacks Used 10 ·-. . .. ... ....... n I ., ........ ,,., It to It No. of Sacks Used • '"""' .... --··-~ ~tn-i;?n nwn rr :!'~ilri ·::;rsesldelffl60e ~f=" p 9. 'i iqq Method used stUiiY 13) TYPE PUMP: Cemented by J t S iA!Bi iELLS 0 Turbine (]Jet o ~bmerslble o Cyilm 0 Other TEXAS WA rn CO i•W SSIQ&J SURFACECOMPLETlON Depth ID pump bowls, cylinder, jet, etc., 3ee It 0 Specl1'led Surface Slab Installed (Rule 287 .44{2)(A)) 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed [Rule 287.44(3)(A)J 14) WEU TESTS: 0 llitless Adapter Used (Rule 287.44{3)(9)] Type Test 0 Pump 0 Baller (]Jelled 0 Estimated 0 roved Altematfve Procedure Used (Rule 287.71] Yield : •• gpm w ith ltd~after hrs . . , .. 11) WATER LEVEL: ·--w 15) WATER QUALITY: Static level SS It below land surface Date 06ll2l91 Did you knowingly penetrate arrt strata which contained undesirable cons!! tuents? Arteslan flow gpm. Date (] Yea ONo!O If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABl.E WATER" 12) PACKERS: Type Depth Type of water? Depth or strata n>MP ,.. was a chemical analysis made? Oves (]No ·--.. iereby oerUly that this wen was drilled by me (or under my supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 understand at failure to complete Items 1 lhru 15 will result In the log(s) being reb.Jmed for completion and resubmlttal. )MP.ANY NAME •. • t' Dl '°""· '"'" t' WEU DRILLER'S LICENSE NO. . . 3039 /J~ .. 17~'"9 -- ":SS """VTr r V on ?1111 /M~~~ . -(Qfy) (State) {Zip) ~ --·~· ~ gned) (Signed) / {Lioensed Well Dr1Uet) - (Registered Dr1DerTralnee) oase attach elecb1c log, chemk:al analysis, and other per!lnent Information, If avallable. I For lWC use only : Well No. Located on map P}. JO• b. VD-012 (Rev. 05-18-90) ~~-TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY ,.1'181 OOf1Y by cerUlled mall ID: Texaa Water Commi..lon, P.O. Box 13087, AU.Un, TeXH 71711 . rTEHTION OWNER: Ccnlld9ntlalty ~Nodt:aon ~Side State of Texas WELL REPORT Texaa Water Welt Drtllen Boerd P.O. Box 13087 Austin, TeXH 71711 OWNER ~Ul~IOJ-.l-l'P-'"lc~u ..... 1c~u~~~,/IJM~~s.,__ ____ _ ADDRESS p' O' 8M:lt or RFD) 2) LOCATION OF WELL: County BUZOS -----=!=--------mires 1n _ __.::;S.::..E ____ c11rect1on from ---'C<.!:0.=,,LL:..:Ec=.;GE:.....:..;ST=l:=:Tic.::0-=-1,.....------- guGUl JOIES iL l (NE, SW, etc.) PlTT!lSOI 1fown) UIIOI PACIFIC Drille< muat complete the legal deso1pllon below with distance and direction from two lnt&rsecllng section or SU'Y8Y Anes, or he must locate and ldendfy the well on an otndal Quarter-or Half-Scale Texas County~ Highway Map and anach the map ID this loon. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section No. ----Block No. ___ Township ------Abstract No. Survey Name Distance and direction from two lntersectlng section or survey lines ------------------------------ QSEE ATTACHED MAP IOiTH: 3035 VEST: 9620 l!STIUI!: 2268 3) TYPE OF WORK (Ch.ck): 0 t;ew Well 0 Deepening 0 ~ldonlng 0 Plugglng 4) PROPOSED USE (Clwck): 0 Domestic 0 lndustr1al 0 lrrigadon OTestWell 0 JJ,ltJrLD SUB~bllc Supply 0 Injection 0 0.-WatBrlng 5) DRILLING METHOD {Check): 0 Dr!Yen ~ Rotary 0 Air Hammer 0 Jelled 0 Bored cf '>Jr Rotary 0 cable Tool 0 Other ---- 6) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Date Orlnlng: Dia. (In .) From (It) To (It) 0 Open tble (Jftralght wall 0Underreamad Slarted -~o 6i..i/~e~a ,,_,,, 9~1-19 _ ......... & .... ...._ ~-~__:;Suc.:;;..;.:rface:.:c:.._+-_.~ .... :n.l<.-n_-1 0 Gravel Packed 0 Otha< ------------- Completed 96I13 I 91 19_ If Gravel Padled give lntetval ••• from ---.0--ft.ID---10~ ft. From (It.) To (It.) " ............. . ~ ·--- 1_1n rr.1v 1?n-·u~ ruv Hft_rftl\ ,.,.., .,,,. ''" ""v Description and color ot formation material 8) CASINO, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: Dia. (In.) DI DA D?~ ll A ~~' ~ ~ ~ u w ~ UL New or Used Steel. Plastlc, etc. Perf~ Slotted, etc. Screen Mfg., If c:ommerdal nv r1u1r. lii::,...•'"·-DATA [Rule 267.44{1)] I~ ~tad from 9 It. ID -H-ll Setdng (It.) From To Hn n Hn 1~n ~nn ,,, HR un Hn cnn 525 600 No . ot Sacks Used Gage Casdng Screen n1n n1n .020 18 . No . ot Sacks Used . ~ ft.ID ___ ll ~~~-~~~ ~;~ (Usereverseslde/fnecessary} ~tt-' ;::: ;:S l:j91 Methodused --!S!..+.Litteif*i+-Y------------- 13) TYPE PUMP: Cemented by --cJr+-t -&5-lif*1"1fB*lli-li~Bc+raaf,!i6C---------- 0 Turbine D Jet D fUbmerslble l=l ~~ Af ER C 011m 1 j :;_3_J UJ ~ 0 Other-------------------1uj SURFACECOMPLETION Depth to pump bowls, cytlnder, jet, etc., ---J~e~ef----It. 0 Specified Surface Slab Installed [Rule 267.44{2)(A)) 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed (Rule 267.44(3){A)) 0 Pltless Adapter Used [Rule 267.44(3)(8)] dlfiprtNed Altematlve Procedure Used [Rule 287.71] 14) WELL TESTS: Type Test 0 Pump 0 Bailer 0 Jetted 0 Esdmated Yield : ___ gpm with ---,.--It. drawbn after ____ hrs. H Jr /V 15) WATER QUALITY: Did you knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undeslrable consdlUents? IO 0 Yea 0 NO If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" Type ot water? ------Depth ot strata ------- was a dlemlcal analysis made? 0 Yes 0 No 11) WATER LEVEL: Stade level --~14~0~ It. below land surface Artesian now gpm. 12) PACKERS: Type Date Date 06/ll/91 Depth HI\ I hereby certify that this well was drilled by me (or under my supervision) and that each and allot the statements herein are true ID the best of my ~ledge and belle!. I understand lha1 lallure ID complete Items 1 thru 15 will result In the log( s) being returned for compledon and resubmlttal. WELL DRILLER'S UC£NSE NO. ,503C\ ------~--=-------- ULLVILft§ry) (sine) 7(Mp~I {Signed) (Reglster9d Driller Tralnee) Please attach elecb1c log, chemical analysis, and other pertinent fnlormatfon, If available. I For TWC use only : Well No. ___ _ Locate<! on map 5£'2, Jt). (, (1.\ WWD-012 {Rev. 0>18-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY ----: :·GOVERNMENTRECORDS SEARCHED {DATA CURRENCYTRACKING -- . . .. .. . . . . .. .... . . ·.··· .· .· CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity . Date of Government Version : 09/07/99 Date Made Active at EDR: 10/28/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery lnfonnation System Source : EPNNTIS Telephone : 800-424-9346 Date of Data Arrival at EDR : 09/13/99 Elapsed ASTM days : 45 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/13/00 Resource Conservation and Recovery lnfonnation System . RCRIS includes selective information on sites which generate , transport, store , treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Date of Government Version : 12/22/99 Date Made Active at EDR : 03/23/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Source: EPNNTIS Telephone: 202-260-2342 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/07/00 Elapsed ASTM days : 76 Date of Last EDR Contact : 03/01/00 Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances . Date of Government Version : 01/06/00 Date Made Active at EDR : 02/08/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENT AL RECORDS BRS : Biennial Reporting System Source : EPNNTIS Telephone : 800-424 -9346 Date of Data Arrival at EDR : 01/31/00 Elapsed ASTM days : 8 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/31/00 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collect s data on the generation and management of hazardous was1e . BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities . Date of Government Version : 12/31/97 Database Release Frequency: Biennially CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Source : EPA Regional Offices Telephone : Varies Date of Last EDR Contact : 12/20/99 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/00 Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites . Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters . Date of Government Version : Varies Database Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Source: NTIS Telephone: 703-416-0223 Date of Last EDR Contact: Varies Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Record of Decision . ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version : 01/31/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact : 04/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact : 07/10/00 TC498716.1 s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FINDS: Facility Index Sys1em/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report Source : EPA Telephone : N/A Faci lity Index System . FINDS contains both faci lity informat ion and 'pointers' to other sou rces that contain more detail. EDA includes the follow ing FINDS databases in t his report : PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval Sys1em), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes). FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental s1atutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 10/13/99 Date of Last EDA Contact 03/29/00 Database Release Frequency : Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDA Contact : 07/10/00 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Source : U.S . Department of Transportation Telephone : 202-366-4526 Hazardous Materials Incident Report System . HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT . Date of Government Versio n: 06/30/99 Database Release Frequency: Annually ML TS: Material Licensing Tracking System Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone : 301-415-7169 Date of Last EDA Contact: 03/15/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDA Contact : 04/24/00 ML TS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8 , 100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements . To maintain currency, EDA contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis . Date of Government Version: 10/29/99 Database Release Frequency : Quarterly MINES : Mines Master Index File Source : Department of Labor , Mine Safety and Health Admini strati on Telephone : 303-23 1-5959 Date of Government Version : 08/01/98 Database Release Frequency : Semi -Annually NPL LI E NS: Federal Superfund Liens Source : EPA Telephone : 205 -564-4267 Date of Last EDA Contact : 04/10/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDA Contact: 07/10/00 Date of La st EDA Contact : 04/03/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDA Contact: 07/03/00 Federal Superfund Liens . Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to fil e liens against rea l property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or w hen the property owner receives notification of potential liability. USEPA compi les a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens . Date of Government Version : 10/15/91 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned PADS: PCB Activity Database System Source : EPA Telephone : 202 -260-3936 Date of Last EDA Contact: 02/24/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact : 05/22/00 PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators , transporters, commercial starers and/or brokers and disposers o f PCB 's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities . Date of Government Version: 10/01 /99 Database Release Freque ncy : No Update Planned RAATS : RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Sou rce : EPA Telephone : 202 -564-4104 Date of Last EDA Contact : 03/16/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDA Contact : 05/15/00 RCR A Administration Action Tracking System . RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes adminis1rative and civil actions brought by the EPA . For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued . EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update t he information contained in t he database . Date of Government Version : 04/17/95 Date of Last EDA Contact : 03/13/00 Database Release Freque ncy : No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDA Contact : 06/12/00 TC498716 .1 s Page GR<? GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/DATA CURRENCYTRACl<iNG . . . . . . . . . . . . .·. <· .. · . .:···· . . . .·· TRIS : Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source : EPA Telephone : 202-260-1531 Toxic Release Inventory System . TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title Ill Section 313. Date of Government Version : 12/31 /97 Database Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Source: EPA Telephone : 202 -260-1444 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/27/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/00 Toxic Substances Control Act . TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version : 12/31 /94 Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years STATE OF TEXAS ASTM STANDARD RECORDS SHWS: State Superfund Registry Source : Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Telephone : 512-239 -5680 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/03/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/00 State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS . These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties . Available information varies by state . Date of Government Vers ion : 12/15/99 Date Made Active at EDR : 02/16/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/18/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 29 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/18/00 LF : Permitted Solid Waste Facilities Source : Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commi ssion Telephone : 512 -239-6786 Solid Wa ste Facilities/Landfill Sites . SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state . Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites . Date of Government Version: 03/01/00 Date Made Active at EDA: 04/07/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/13/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 25 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/28/00 CU: Closed Landfill Inventory Source : Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Telephone : 512 -239-6016 Closed and abandoned landfills (permitted as well as unauthorized) across the state of Texas . Date of Government Version : 10/01/97 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 10/09/98 Date Made Active at EDR : 12/09/98 Elapsed ASTM days: 61 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/06/00 LUST: Lea king Petroleum Storage Tank Database Source: Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Telephone: 512 -239-2200 Leaki ng Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents . Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version : 01/03/00 Date of Data Arrival at EDR : 02/09/00 Date Mad e Active at EDR: 03/20/00 Elapsed ASTM days : 40 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/31/00 TC498716 .1s Page GR-4 AIRS: Current Emission lnvemory Data Source: Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Telephone: N/A The database lists by company, along with their actual emissions , the TNRCC air accounts that emit EPA criteria pollutants. Date of Government Version : 10/07/99 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually EDR PROPRIETARY DATABASES Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/17/00 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/00 Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites: The existence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. ©Copyright 1993 Real Property Scan, Inc . For a technical description of the types of hazards wh ich may be found at such sites. contact your EDR customer service representative. Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan, Inc. The information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by entities other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of this report, Real Property Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid . No claim is made for the actual existence of toxins at any site. This report does not constitute a legal opinion . HISTORICAL AND OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be c omplete. Fo r example, the e xiste nce of wetland s information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are in c luded . Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily me an that w etla nds do not ex ist in the area covered by the report . Oil/Gas Pipelines/Electrical Transmission Lines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1 :100,000-Scale Maps . It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but pri marily gas p ipelines and electrical transmission lines . Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children . While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those bu ildings and facil ities -schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers , and nursing homes -where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. Thi s data, available in se lect counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in March 1997 from the U .S . Fish and Wildl ife Service. Water Dams: National Inventory of Dams Source : Federal Emergency Management Agency Telephone: 202-646-2801 National co mputer database of more than 74 ,000 da m s maintained by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. TC498716.1s Page GR-6 . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · Geoctiec1< ®-F>Hvs1cAL:sE#tNC2 souRc·e AohE:NouiVi TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS CREAGOR{fHURMOND TRACTS TX STATE HWY. 6/GREENS PRAIRIE COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): 30 .572300 -30' 34' 20 .3" 96 .255798 -96' 15' 20 .9" Zone 14 763194.2 3385228 .8 EDR 's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum has been developed to assist the environmental professional with the collection of physical setting source information in accordance with ASTM 1527-97, Section 7 .2.3 . Section 7.2.3 requires that a current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent, such as the USGS Digital Elevation Model) be reviewed . It also requires that one or more additional physical setting sources be sought when (1) conditions have been identified in which hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely to migrate to or from the property, and (2) more information than is provided in the current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent) is generally obtained, pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice, to assess the impact of migration of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Such additional physical setting sources generally include information about the topographic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, and geologic characteristics of a site, and wells in the area . Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components : 1. Groundwater flow direction , and 2. Groundwater flow velocity . Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography , hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells . Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. EDR 's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration . TC498716.1s Page A -1 GEOCHEC~ -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION · Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information , hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial ground water flow . This information ca n be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property , what downgradient sites might be impacted . USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE Target Property : 2430096-E3 WELLBORN , TX Source : USGS 7.5 min quad index GENERAL TOPOGRAPHIC GRADIENT AT TARGET PROPERTY Target Property : General East Source: General Topographic Gradient has been determined from the USGS 1 Degree Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow . Su ch hydrologic information can be used to ass ist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contam in ated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bod ies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property County BRAZOS, TX Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area : NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Property WELLBORN HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION FEMA 03 Flood Data Electronic Coverage YES 48041 C0205C I CWPP Not Reported NWI Electronic Coverage NO Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist th e environmental profess io nal in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated propertie s or , should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted . TC4987 16 .1 s Page A-2 .. . ... {/GEOCHECk®-PHYSJCAL •SETTING .SOURCESUMMARY -- ·.·>: .·.· .. ·.··.·:-·· ... . . . . . . . Site-Specific Hydrogeologlcal Data*: Search Radius: 2.0 miles Status : Not found AQUIFLOW"' Search Radius : 2.000 Miles. EDA has developed the AOUIFLOW Information System to prov ide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points . EDA has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table . MAPID Not Reported LOCATION FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data If such data are not reasonably ascertainable , it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification , rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information . In general , contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils . GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring . ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT Geologic Code: Era: System: Series: Te2 Cenozoic Tertiary Eocene Claiborne Group GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Category: Stratified Sequence Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source : P.G . Schruben , R.E. Arndt and W .J . Bawiec , Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1 :2,500,000 Scale -a digital representation of the 197 4 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS -11 (1994). DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U .S . Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative So il Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape . Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service ST ATSGO data. • "':9==!'.~~R~eanZ,~~~i':;~~!'°~~-(~'Rc-"L'.s\<'=:: All of ... infonnotion rod ci>r0ons ~ .-e flOSO olf>eciled EPA repor"(sj , ...nch -~ ..-- TC498716 .1 s Page A -3 .· -. ·.·. . -._ . . ·. -. . -:-:-· .. -:-:. : · .. ·-.· ···.· .. · · GEOCHEC~>~ PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE <SUMM.ARV / Soil Surface Texture : Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class : fine sandy loam Class D -Very slow i nfiltration rates . Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Moderately well drained. Soils have a layer of low hydraulic conductivity, wet state high in the profile . Depth to water table is 3 to 6 feet. Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel : HIGH Depth to Bedrock Min: > 20 inches Depth to Bedrock Max: > 40 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeabilit~ Rate (in/hr) 1 Oinches 9inches fine sandy loam Sitt -Clay COURSE-GRAINED Max : 2.00 Materials (more SOILS.Sands, Min : 0.60 than 35 pct. Sands with passing No . fines, Clayey 200), Silty sand . Soils . COURSE-GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines , Sitty Sand. 2 9inches 20inches clay A-7-6 FINE -GRAINED Max : 0 .06 SOILS , Sitts Min : 0 .00 and Clays (liquid limit 50% or more), Fat Clav . 3 20inches 32inches clay A-7 -6 FINE-GRA IN ED Max : 0.06 SOILS, Silts Min : 0.00 and Clays (liquid limit 50% or more), Fat Clay . 4 32inches 38inches clay loam Sitt-Clay COURSE -GRAINED Max : 0.20 Materials (m ore SOILS , Sands , Min : 0.06 than 35 pct. Sands with passing No . fines , Clayey 200). Clayey sand . Soils . 5 38inches 60inches weathered Not reported Not reported Max : 0 .60 bedrock Min : 0.01 TC498716 .1 s Page A-4 GEOCHECK® -PHYSICAL SEITINtfSOURCE>$UMIViARY .. OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Based on Soil Conservation Service ST A TSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may appear within the general area of target property . Soil Surface Textures : loamy fine sand loam clay loam stony -loamy sand Surficial Soil Types: loamy fine sand loam clay loam stony -loamy sand Shallow Soil Types : loamy fine sand Deeper Soil Types: sandy clay loam stratified clay loam unweathered bedrock ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES .. .. According to ASTM E 1527-97, Section 7 .2.2 , "one or more additional state or local sources of environmental records may be checked, in the discretion of the environmental professional, to enhance and supplement federal and state sources ... Factors to consider in determining which local or additional state records , if any, should be checked include (1) whether they are reasonably ascertainable , (2) whether they are sufficiently useful, accurate , and complete in light of the objective of the records review (see 7 .1.1 ), and (3) whether they are obtained, pursuant to local , good commercial or customary practice ." One of the record sources listed in Section 7 .2 .2 is water well information. Water well information can be used to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact groundwater flow direction , and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells . WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE Federal USGS Federal FROS PWS State Database SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) 1 .000 Nearest PWS within 1 mile 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION MAPID WELL ID No Wells Found FEDERAL FROS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION MAPID WELL ID No PWS System Found Note : PWS System location is not always the same as well location . LOCATION FROM TP LOCATION FROM TP TC498716 .1 s Page A-5 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . ·. GEOCHECK® ·~··PHYSJCAL •sen-1NG :soll~cE.:$u~~!v •. ····:·····:· ••.•. · .. ·.···•·•·•···· :.·: .. ·.···:·::.:·:.· •···· STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION MAPID WELL ID No Wells Found LOCATION FROMTP TC498716 .1 s Page A -6 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP -498716.1 s ; ..... / ~. ________ ,.- 112 N Major Roads ; \I Contour Lines @ WaterWells ® Public Watl!Jr Supply Wells t Groundwater Flow Direction @ Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater <Im> Closest Hydrogeological Data • Oil or gas wells @:D Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location @D Groundwater Flow Varies at Location • Cluster of Multiple Icons TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS: CITY/STA TE/ZIP: LAT/LONG: Creagor/Thurmond Tracts 1X State Hwy. 6/Greens Prairie College Station 1X n845 30.5723196.2558 (in certain Texas countie&) CUSTOMER: CONTACT: INQUIRY#: DATE: CSC Eng. & Envl.Cons, Inc Rick Conln 498716.1s May 23, 2000 8:55 am 2Mitll AREA RADON INFORMATION EPA Radon Zone for BRAZOS County: 3 Note : Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/l. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/l. : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/l. Zip Code : 77845 Number of sites tested : 4 Area Living Area -1st Floor Living Area -2nd Floor Basement Average Activity 1.750 pCi/L Not Reported Not Reported % <4 pCi/L 75% Not Reported Not Reported % 4 -20 pCi/L 25% Not Reported Not Reported % >20 pCi/L 0% Not Reported Not Reported TC498716 .1 s Page A -8 .. PHYSiCAL SETTING SOURCE RECORD$ SEARCHED > HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: Nat ional Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in selec1 counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in March 1997 from the U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service . HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLow™ Information System Source : EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR ha s developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific po ints . EDR has reviewed report s submitted to regulat ory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information . GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source : P.G . Schruben, R.E . Arndt and W.J . Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U .S. a11 :2,500,000 Scale -A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map , USGS Digital Data Series DDS -11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database The U.S . Department of Agricutture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SGS) leads the national Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting , storing , maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States . A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape . Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps . ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source : EPNOffice of Drinking Water Telephone : 202-260-2805 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System . A PWS is any water system whi ch provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually . PWSs provide water from wells , rivers and other sources . PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source : EPNOffice of Drinking Water Telephone : 202-260-2805 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Syste ms from th e Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: In November 1971 the United States Geolog ical Survey (USGS) implemented a national water resource information tracking system . This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on more than 900 ,000 wells, springs , and other sources of groundwater. TC498716.1 s Page A -9 PHYS1CAL <$ETTING SOtJRCE :RECORDS SEARCHED STATE RECORDS Texas Groundwater Database Source : Texas Water Development Board Telephone : 512-936-0837 Texas Oil and Gas Wells: Inventory of oil and gas we lls in select Texas counties Source : Texas Railroad Comm ission Texas Public Water Supply Database on Ground and Surface Water Source: Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Texas Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence District Water Well Database Source : Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence District Texas Water Development Board Groundwater Database Source: Texas Water Development Board Telephone : 512-936-0833 RADON Area Radon Information: The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey . The study covers the years 1986 -1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research instrtutions. EPA Radon Zones: Section s 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels . OTHER Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source : Department of Commerce, National Ocean ic and Atmo spheric Administration TC498716 .1 s Page A -1C The EDR-National Wetland Inventory Map Report Creagorffhurmond Tracts TX State Hwy. 6/Greens Prairie College Station, TX 77845 May 25, 2000 Inquiry Number: 498716-4 R : Environmental :Data : Resources, Inc . • : an.=tedrcompany The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road Southport, Connecticut 06490 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Aerial Photography Print Service Envirornnental Data Resources, Irx:. 's (EDR) Aerial Photography Print Service is a screening tool designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities . ASTM E 1527-97, Section 7 .3 on Historical Use Information, identifies the prior use requirements for a Phase I environmental site assessment. The ASTiv[ standard requires a review of reasonably ascertainable standard historical sowces. Reasonably ascertainable means information that is publicly available, obtainable from a source with reasonable time and cost constraints, and practically reviewable. To meet the prior use requirements of AS1M E 1527-97, Section 7 .3 .2, the following standard historical sources may be used: aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, property tax files, land title records (although these cannot be the sole historical source consulted), topographic maps, city directories, building department records, or zoning/land use records . AS1M E 1527-97 requires "All obvious uses of the property shall be identified.from the present, back to the property's obvious.first developed use. or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. This task requires rf?\,iewing only as many of the standard historical sources as are necessary, and that are reasonab(v ascertainable and like(v to be use.fill. "(ASTM E 1527-97, Section 7 .3.2, page 11. Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs are a valuable historical resource for documenting past land use and can be particularly helpful when other historical sources (such as city directories or fire insurance maps) are not reasonably ascertainable. The EDR Aerial Photograph Print Service includes a search of aerial photograph collections flown by public and private agencies for the state of Texas. EDR's professional field-based researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs at approximately ten year intervals. Please call EDR Nationwide Customer Service at 1-800-352-0050 (8a.m-8pm EST) with questions or comments about your report. Thank you for your business .' Disclaimer Copyright and Trademark .Notice This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION. W.4RRANTIES AS TO NON-INFRINGE'v!ENT OF THIRD PARTY RIGHTS, ACCURACY, VALIDITY, COMPLETENESS. SC:ITABILITY, CONDITION, QUALITY. MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED OR REFERENCED THEREIN OR USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION THEREOF. ALL RISK IS ASSUAfED BY THE USER . Xo liability to anyone is assumed, whether arising out of errors or omissions, negligence, accident or any other cause, for any loss or damage, including, without limitation. special, incidental. consequential. or exemplary damages . Entire contents copyright 2000 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc . .-1.11 rights reserved. Reprod11ction in any media or format, in whole or in part. of any report or map of Environmenral Data Resources, Inc .. or its affi liates. is prohibited witho11t prior written permission. EDR and the edr logos are trademarks of Environmental Data Reso11rces. Inc. or its affiliates . A.II other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Use of such trademarks does not constitute an endorsement by Environmental Data Resources. Inc ., or its affiliates. of the organizations claiming Oll'nership thereof or the information obtained from such organi=ations and contained herein. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. National Wetland Inventory Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) National Wetland Inventory Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property, and its surrounding area, resulting from past activities. ASTM E 1527-97, Section 7.3.2 on historical use information identifies the prior use requirements for a Phase I environmental site assessment. The ASTM Standard requires a review of reasonably ascertainable standard historical sources. Reasonably ascertainable is defined as information that is publicly available, obtainable from a source with reasonable time and cost constraints, and pra ctica lly re viewable. To meet the prior use requirements of ASTM E 1527-97, the following standard historical sources may be used: city directories, fire insurance maps, aerial photographs, wetland maps, topographic maps, property tax files, land title records (although these cannot be the sole historical source consulted), building department records or zoning land use records. Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) National Wetland Inventory Report provides timely and valuable wetland classification information. EDR's National Wetland Inventory Map Report includes a search of public national wetland map collections. National Wetland Inventory Maps are produced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a sub-department of the U.S . Department of the Interior. In 1974, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service developed a criteria for wetland classification with four long range objectives. • • • • to describe ecological units that have certain homogeneous natural attributes . to arrange these units in a system that will aid decisions about resource management, to furnish units for inventory and mapping, and to provide uniformity in concepts and terminology throughout the U.S . High altitude infrared photographs , soil maps, topographic maps and site visits are the methods used to gather data for the productions of these maps. In the infrared photos, wetlands appear as different colors and these wetlands are then classified by type. Using a hierarchical classification, the maps identify wetland and deep water habitats according to : • • • • • system subsystem class subclass modifiers (as defined by Cowardin, et al. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS 79/31. 1979.) The classification sys tem consists of five systems 1. marine 2 . estuarine 3. riverine 4. lacustrine 5. palustrine The ~ne system consists C?f deep _ w~ter tidal habits and adjac:ent tidal wetlands. The riverine system consists of all wetlands contained w1thm a channel. The lacustnne systems includes all nontidal wetlands related to sw~mps, bogs & marshes. The estuarine system consists of deep water tidal habitats and where ocean water 1s diluted by fresh.""'.ate~. The palusti;in~ system includes non-tidal wetlands dominated by trees and shrubs and where salinity is below .5% m tidal areas . All of these systems are divided in subsystems and then further divided into class. SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CLASS Sulx:ln.~s SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CLASS Subcln.~s SUBSYSTEM CLASS . Subcln.~s ,.,, National Wetland Inveniory Map Report [(ey !VI-MARINE 1-SUBTIDAL 2 ·INTERTIDAL RB-ROCK UH-UNCONSOLIDATED All-AQUATIC BED IWnEEF OW-OPEN WATEll I All-AQUATIC llEI> IWHEEF llS -l{()CKY s11onE US-UNCONSOLll>i\TEI> llOTfOM llOlTOM Unknown llo1to111 SllOllE I llcclrnck 2 Rubhlc nil-ROCK nonoM I Bedrock 2 Ruhhlc I Cnhhlc-Grnvcl I Algal I Coral 2 Sand J Rooted Vascular 3 Won11 3 Mud .'\ Unknown 4 Orgnnic Suhmcrgcnt E • ESTUARINE 1 • SUBTIOAL I Algal I Coral I l!cdrock I Coht>lc -Gravcl :i nnotcd va,cular J Worm 2 Ruhlile 2 Sn11d .'\ Unknown Suhnrcrgcnt 3 Mud 4 Organic SYMBOLOGY EXAMPLE SYSTEM I SUBSYSTEM /..-<CLASS EM~ SUBCLASS . WATEA REGIME Uf'l.ANO (NON-WETLAND! UH-UNCONSOLIDATED All-AQUA TIC llED IH'-REEF OW -OPEN \V !\TEil I HOTTOM Unknown llottorn I Cobhlc·Gravcl I i\lgnl 2 l\lollnsk 2 Snnd :I noolcd Yn.~nilnr :I Worn1 : R20WH )----!LINEAR DEEl'WATEA HABITAT) 3 Mud 4 r:Jonting Vnsculnr 4 Organic .~ Unknown S11h111crgcn1 6 Unknown Surfncc 2 ·INTERTIDAL AA -AQUATIC BED Rr-REEF Sil. STREAl\ll!Ell l(S.nocK y SllOIW llS ·llNCONSOLllJATED EM-EMERGENT SS-SCRUB SllllUB PO -FORESTED I Algnl 2 l\folhrsk 3 Rooll'd Yn.,culnr :I Worm 4 Floating va~cular 5 Unknown Suhmcrgcnl 6 Unknown Surface I C'uhhle· Grnl'cl 2 Sand :I Mud 4 Organic I Bedrock 2 Hubble SllOHE I Cohhlc· Gravel 2 Sand JMucl 4 Organic I l'ersislf:nl 2 Nonpcrsistcnl I Brnacl-Lcal'cd I llrnad -Leal'Cd lJeciduous Deciduous 2 Ncedlc-Lcnved 2 Needle· Leaved Deciduous Deciduous 3 llroad-Lenved 3 Brond-Lcavcd Evergn.-cn El'crgrcen 4 Needle-Leaved 4 Nccdle -Lc:ivcd Evergreen Evergreen 5 Dend 5 Dead 6 Deciduous 6 Dcciduo11s 7 Evergreen 7 Evergreen SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CLASS Subcla~s SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CLASS Subcl:i.~s SUBSYSTEM CLASS Subclnss R ·RIVERINE 1-TIDAL 2 ·LOWER PERENNIAL 3 ·UPPER PERENNIAL 4 • INT ERM ITT ENT 5 ·UNKNOWN PERENNIAL Rll-ROCK UB -UNCONSOLIDATEI> •sB -STREAMllED All -i\{)LJATIC llED l(S .IHJCKY US -UNCONSOLll>ATED ··Ervt .EMEl(GENT BOTfOM BOTTOM I llcclro rk 2 Rubble f Cobble-Gravel 2 Sand 3 Mud 4 Organic 1 llcclmrk 2 Ruhhlc J Cobble -Gravel 4 Snnd :iMucl Ci Orgnnic 7 Vegc tnt cd SHORE SHORE I Al!!al I lkclrnck 2 Aquatic Moss 2 nuhhle J Rooted Vasrnlar 4 f'lnaling Vam1lar S Unknown Sub111crgc111 (,Unknown Snrfa'c I Cohhlc-Grnvcl 2 Snll(I 3 Mud 4 Organic S Vcgct:llcd 2 Nonpersislcnl • STREAMllEI> is lin1i1ccl to TIDAL and INTElll'MITENT SUBSYSTEMS. and co111priscs the only CLASS in the INTERMrtTENT SUBSYSTEM. ••EMERGENT is limited to TllJAL nnd LOWER PERENNIAL SUBSYSTEMS. L · LACUSTRINE I· LIMNETIC Rll-ROCK BOTTOM I Rcdrock 2 Rubble UB-UNCONSOLIDATED BOTTOM I Cohble -Grnvcl 2 Sand J Mud 4 Organic AB-AQUATIC IJEIJ I Algal 2 Aquatic Moss J Rootl•d Vnsculnr 4 f'lonting Vam1lnr :i Unknown Sub1ncrgent 6 Unknown Surfucc OW-Ol'EN WATEIV Unknown llollo111 RB -ROCK UB -UNCONSOLllJATED AB -AQUATIC RS-ROCKY SllORE BOTTOM BOTTOM BED I llctlrock 2 Rubble I Cobblc-Grnvcl 2 Sand J Mud 4 Organic I Algal 2 Aquati c Moss J n1M1lcd V1t~culnr 4 Flonling Vascular I Bedrock 2 Ruhhlc 5 Unknown Sub111crgcnl 6 Unknown Surface 2-LITTORAL US-UNCONSOLIDATED EM-EMERGENT SllORE I Cohhlc -Gravcl 2 S11111l J Mud 4 Orgnnic 5 Vcgctntcd 2 Nonpcrsistcnl OW-OPEN WATEIV Unknown 110110111 . OW -OPEN WA TERI Unknown ll ouom SUBSYS'ir.:M CLASS Rll --ROCK UB--UNCONSOLIDATE[) BOTI'OM HOTIOM 00110111 Subcla~s I Flc<lnx:k 2 Rubble 3 Mud 4 Organic I Cohhlc-Gravel 2 Sand AB -AQUA TIC BED I Algnl 2 Aquntic Mo~s :i Rontc1I Va.~cular 4 l'lnnling Vascular 5 Unknown Suhtnergcnl 6 Unknown Surface US --U NCONSOLI I >ATED SllORE I Cohhle -Gravcl 2 San1I 3 Mml ii Organic 5 Vt~gctared r .1 P -PALUSTIUNE ML --MOSS - LICllEN 11\fo ~s 2 Lich en EM --EMEl{GENT I Persi stent 2 Nonpcrsistcnt MOUIFIEHS SS --SCRUB -Slmun I llrnml -Len ve<l Dcci1luous 2 Needle-Leaved Deci1l11ous :l Broad· Leaved Evergreen 4 Needle-Leaved Evergreen .'i lka<l 6 Deciduous 7 Evergreen In order to 111ore adeqtmtcly de~crihc wetland and dcepwater habitats one or 111me or the walt•r n.•girnc . waler d1e111i stry , 1'0--l'ORESTED OW -OPEN WATER/ Unknown I llmad-Leavc<l Deciduous 2 Ncc<lle-Lcnvc<l Deciduous 3 llrnn1l -Lcnved Evergreen 4 Needle-Leaved Evergreen 5 Demi 6 Deciduous 7 Evergreen soil , or special 111o<lificrs may l>c npplie<l nl the class or lower levl'I in the hicrnrcl1y . The ranncd 11111dilicr 111ay also he applied to the cwlngkal systcrn . WATtm 1rnc:11\rn Non· Tidal A Tc111pornrily Flooded 11 l'enn :mently l'lno<letl II Salur:ttc<l J lntcrmlllcntly l'loodc<l C Scnsonnlly Flooded K Artificially l'loo<letl J) Sea.mnally Flo1Xlc<V W lntennillcntly Wdl l>rnincd FlootlaVJ"c111pornry E Sca.~onally Flooded/ Y .'ia1urntcd/Sc111ipcnnanen1/ Satunitctl Scnsonnl F Scmipcm10ncntly Z lntennittcntly Flooded Exposcd/Pcnnancnt G lntennillenlly U Unknown Exposed Source: U.S. Department or the Interior Fish Md Wll<llire Service National Wctlnnds Inventory Tidal K Ar1ificially Flooded • S Ternpornry-Tidal L Suhtidnl •R Seasonal-Tidal M Irregularly fapnsetl *T Se111ipcnn:u1cnt -Tidal N Regularly l'lnodcd V l\·r111 ;111rnt -Titlal I' Irregularly l'l1Xltletl U Unknown ; •These wnter regimes nre only usecl in tidally innucnccd, frcshwntcr systems. WATEH CllEl\llSTHY SOIL Sl'ECl/\L l\IOIJIFIEHS Coastal llalinlty Inland Salinity pll l\lo1liricrs for nll l'rcsh Wnlcr I I lyperhaline 7 I lypcrsalinc g Organic h Beaver 2 Eulmlinc ll Eu~alinc n Acid n Minernl ti l'n11iully l>rnined/Ditched 3 Mlxohaline (Brackish) 9 Miwsalinc t Circ1111111cutrnl r Fanned 4 l'nlyhaline 0 l'resh i Alkaline h l>ikccVl111pnun<lc1I 5 l\ksohaline r Artilicial Subs1r:11c (i<Jlignhnlim: s Spoil 0 Fresh x Excnvale<l Quadrangle Relation Chart Inquiry# yq fJ7 Jl;-l{ -~ i I j I 305 ~-' ("\ <:...\ _; .,fl -~ ~.) "'\, ' ! ' \ "'·-- ll8f us; 32' "=--,.....-.,-'->%.:;:,: .... :·····-::.-.·-~ .. , l _., Sca1e: 1 "=4000' • :-.=... :+;;+ = --------+----------------' :..==:.:.-- ~~ ~~ ==-~~-~ --6 :.-::-. .:::.:: J / • I -;- • , '( s • • I -;- mm • • .. ... ~, I • ------ I . ·-...:..:.. .. ,- \. \ ... ' ,4 -~1.'.? • • • 0 .. ...... -"'1 · 0 .. . . md ·orlgl nal coPr by oetUlled mall IO: T exu W.t• Comm a..Jon, P.O. Box 1 3087, A U9tln, T exu 71711 t'.--.... -------"""'-UH blade Irr.. -· tf~ Tuu Wat• Well Dr111en Board ATT~H OWNER: Conlfdflndalty State of Texas P.O. Box 13087 Pmlhitj. Node» on Rtlw1:w SI~ WE LL REPORT Auatln, Texaa 78711 ... OWNER UNIO N BCIFIC RE S S J R ~ES ADDRESS p .c. BQY. 7, lCCI fl 7 1 DRI~~l!~ iQRTH H 71 (Name) (Street°' RFD) (City) (State) (Zip) 2) LOCATION OF WELL: BRAZ OS 6 w BR YAN County t!nil:,, nCir !C ' {Jlllea In direction from uu EN-P .~OGG (~SW, etc.) D E~ Drill er muat complete the legal desalptlon below with distance and dlr&Ction from two lntersecllng section °' survey li nes, °' he must locate and ldentlly the well on an omclal Quarter-°' Half-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and atlaeh the map ID this loon. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section No. Block No. TCM'TlShlp Abstract No. survey Name Distance~ dlrectfon from two lntersectlng ~on°' survey lines 0 SEEATTiCHEOMAP NORTH: 303 5 F ~'!'· ..,v ... ?&1 5 MSTNUM : 3) TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Cheek): OIL FLD SUP PLY 5) OAILLING METHOD (Check): 0 Driven 0NewWell Nw 0Deepenlng 0 Domestic 0 Industrial 0Monltor 0 PublJc supply D M.JdRO~ 0 AlrlianvMr 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Rea>ndltlonlng 0Pluoglng 0 lrrlgadon OTest W &U 0 lnj&ctlon 0 O&-Wat&l1ng 0 Air AotarY ... 0 CableTool 0 Other 6) WELL LOG: DIAM ETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION : Date Drill ing : Dia. (In .) From(IL) To(IL) 00penHole 0 Straight viii 0Underreamed Started 10/~?J...9 .~surface c!O 0 Gravel Paclled 0 Other Completed 10/Gill If Gravel Paclled give Interval ••• from IL id) IL 0 From(tt.) To(ft.) Descliptlon and cola< o t formation material 8) CASING, B LANK PIPE, ANO WELL SCREEN DATA: ~-3 SU~FAC~ ~ r? d 3W l ll. C l? New Steel, Plastic, e tc. Setllng(tt.) Gage Dia ()( Perl., Slotted , e tc. Castlng 3-10 CUY LJ I l5 lli.J lS u \!! ;~ I " ·l (In.) Used Screen Mfg., If commercial From To Screen .... ~ 10-D SAND di j I II I ! 4 N3i O SIN G 0 520 i:;-qV LLA! ·-"If'\~-. L""'. 0 0 -,u-o ~A!HJ I J .]J 0 0 b~-2 c J CLAY ! ~ SLOTTED 520 580 .oU-LijlJ SA1~J rr:Yti~ 11111-r--. _ 0 0 m-m CLA! "LI . lA..',VJ i'.li .';'.~!ON 9 ) CEM ENTING DATA (Rule 287 .44{1)] 0 0 4UU -m SA!D Cemented from IL~ ___ tt. N<i:ot Sacks U~&d W-5 ~0 CGAY tt.ID ___ tt. No . of Sacks Used J00-580 7W rwerse sic1e 1t necessary) Method used q ,r;;i;y 13) TYPE PUMP: Cemented by J i s nm 1HM 0 Turbine 0 Jet 0 SUbm&rsi~ 0 Cylinder 0 Othef 10} SURFACE CO MP LETION Depth ID pump bowls , cyl inder, jet, etc., 28 ~ 0 Spedlled Surface Slab Installed (Rule 287 .44{2)(A)] 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed (Rule 287.44(3)(A)) 14) WELL TESTS: 0 P1tless AW' Used (Rule 287.44(3)(9)) Type Test 0 Pump 0 Baller 0Jetted 1 0 Es timated ' 0 Approved Alternative Procedure Used (R ule 287.71 J Ylekl : gpm'ft'YJ 1f1f ~rawdown after hrs . 11) WATER LEVEL: k!': 10 /l 15) WATER QUALITY: Static level tt. belbiot land surtace Date Dkl you knowingly penetrate 9l1Y strata which contained undesJ rable Artesian now gpm . Date constltuents? NO Ovea ONo If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) P ACKERS: Type Depth . Type ot water? Depth of strata Y80PR . 15 Was a chemical analysis made? OYes ONo NE OPR. 52 0 ~reby C8<11ty that th is well was dril led by me (OI' under my supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true ID the best ot my lcnowledge and belief. I understand it !allure ID complete Items 1 ttvu 15 will result In the log(s) being returned lor completlon and resubmlttal. tMPANYNAME J & S wATE ~ IElL S WELL DR ILLER'S LICENSE NO. 1934 (Type °' print) .--ss p. 0 . BOX 6i 5 . BELL '/IL LE TX 77418 r I /!tr5°'P-I L~ (Clty) (State) (Zip) gned) (Signed) ;~n"IJ._•~-~ Well Urlllei"Y (Registered Dr111er Trainee) 1ase atlaeh electrlc log, lcaJ analysis, and other pertinent i nlormallon, It avaJlable. I FOi' TWC use only : Wei No. Located on map f'l. l/,lf ND-012 (Rev. OS.18-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY ~"\ 10 1( ( 61 ,#lilied mall to: T •XU Water CommlMlon. P.O. Box 13087, Austin. T•xu 1m1 -- ft{NER: CcnlldMtlalty State of Texas Texu Water Well Ot1llerl Board P.O. Box 13087 ~ on FklWJr.• SI<# WELL REPORT Au8tln. T ena 71711 - OWNER llHIOS E~CIFir RESDPRC~~ ADOAESS : Q BDi ' ~r·~ 2~!£QQ i tEa1~ i n ~1H n 16JOJQnjiJ (Name) (Street 0< RFD) (City) (State) (Zip) , LOCATION ~~A-rep.: 6 i BRYAN County "· . miles In direction from UNION ? .~CIFI C OLDEN PAl!LL i!LL 2 (NE, SW, etc.) ~KLH 63 (Town) ,ri fle< muat complete the legal deSCtiptlon below with distance and direction from two lntersealng section 0< survey lines, 0< he must locate and Identify the well on an otndal tuar1er-°'Half-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and attach the map 1D this form . 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section No. Block No. Township Abstract No. Survey Name Distance and direction from two Intersecting section 0< survey lines 0 SEE A TT ACHED MAP NOR TH: 303 5 WEST: 9·1 · o_, MSTllU!!: 2888 I TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): ;ILFLD SJ PPL Y 5) DfULLINO METHOD (Check): 0 Driven D~erwe11 0Deepenlng 00omest1c Olnduslrlal 0 t.4onitof 0 Public Supply 0 t/tJd Rotaty 0 AlrHammer 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Reconditioning OPlugglng 0 lnigaUon OTestWell 0 Injection 0 De-Watenng 0 Air Rotaty 0 cableTool 0 Other I WELL LOG: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: 'a te Drilllng: Dia. (In.) From(lt.) To(lt.) 00pen Hole G5tra1011t wa11 0 Underreamed Started jQ/(~/9' 19-6. 5 Surface 61C 0 Gravel Pad\ed 00ther Completed 10£07192 19-If Gravel Packed give lntefVal ..• from D It. 1D ~ It. From(lt.) To(lt.) Description and color of formation material 8) CASINO, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: ~,.4 . ~;:H ~r>. ;R o -~1 n r u 1 New Steel, Plastlc, etc. Setting (It.) Gage Dia. Of Perl ., Slotted, etc. casting ~-lC ~~Al -.... (In .) Used Screen Mfg ., If commercial From To Screen : 0-20 s.~:rn D I I? n ;~ f5' n 11!? ;,:: r-~ P4 E 'i CASIN G 0 520 20-260 CLAY ,, "i '--" = u I.:/ II.: I fl i 0 0 2cC-2 80 SAND i.J Ll II I ~ 0 -v ~Q -320 CUY .J. ~. ; ·-100") l~..I PA . ' s~·:m rn 520 580 .02 0 j2Q -34 0 SAN ~ ·~v 0 0 340-42 0 CLAY 9) C£MEHTINO DATA (Rule 287 .44{1)) 0 0 420-4 60 SAND ttXA~ ti1irri:-o "·"~ ••• ~-CAlnlented from Q tt.10_1.5.._tt. No. or Sacks Used 10 4~0 -~JO CLAY -• "''--"~J 111 'i J ·_;:'Jl'-1 lt.1D ___ lt. No. of Sacks Used 0 5DO-SSO SAND (US6 reverse side If neoessary} Method used ~L QR P Y 3) TYPE PUMP: CAlnlented by .r & S w!IER w~r.r.s 0 Turbine 0 Jet 0 ~bmersJble 0 Cylinder 0 Other 10) SURFACE CO MPLETION Depth 1D pump bowls, cylinder, jet. etc., '1 1 It. 0 Speci1'.ed Surfaat Slab Installed [Rule 287.44{2)(A)) 0 Speci1'.ed Steel Sleeve Installed (Rule 287.44{3)(A)) 4) WELL TESTS: O .mess Adapter Used [Rule 287.44(3)(8)) Type Test 0 Pump 0 Balle< D~ned 0 Estimated 0 Approved Altema!lve Procedure Used (Rule 287.71] " Yleld: ic c gpm with Hf!{ It. drawdown after hrs . 11) W ATER LEVEL: 5) WATER QUALITY: Static level 80 rt below land surface Date lQ/07/92 Did you knowingly penetrate any strata whldl contained undesJrab!e ArtesJ an now gpm . Date constituents? NO 0 Yea ONo If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) PACKERS: Type Depth Type of water? Depth of strata NKOPR. 15 Wa!J a c:tiemlcal analysis made? DYes ONo li EOPR. 52 0 eby certify that !his wen was drilled by me (0< under my supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true 1D the best of my knowledge and belle!. I understand lailure 1D complete Items 1 lhru 15 will result In the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. IPANYNAME J & S iATER i EL LS WEU MILLER'S LICENSE NO. 1994 (Type 0< print) RESS :: (\ ...... 801 675 I .I a!:~7!~L E '!X 77 418 (}# (Street'f-1 L (City) (State) (Zip) ..... p ~ '.11 .-. (SlgMd) J. nl'~ (LJCensed Well Drlt"er) (Registered Drl!19r Trainee) WI attach electric chemical analysis, and other pertinent lnlormadon, 11 avallable. I F0< TWC use only: Well No. Located on map 5"11, 1l. ~ >-012 (Rev. 05-18-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY • • • '· __ ... _ + • • ··. '· i - -.,..tj --,·· ...-- I -· ! • A I " . . • ' 0 .. c 0 • • ---::.:::.-=..--=..: .. =--· - Jliial copy by c:ef1flled mall 10: Texa• W•t« Commi..lon, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Tex.u 78711 ATTEN'TJON OWNER: (,anflden/Ja1ty State of Texas h, Tuu Watw Well Dr11i.ts Board P.O. Box 13067 ~rlvltl~ Nork» on RBYIKS41 Sli:JB WELL REPORT Au.Un, Texu 78711 irr.t::v 1nvrr.1t11u I .. H1n1nnn1 OWNER OHIO! DlCI~IC 2ES002CES ADDRESS II 11 ll11Y 7 ~·· '!'Y (Name) (Sroo<~Rrl (""') (State) (Zip) 2) LOCAT!O~wr 'Zf"LL: 3 dlr 11on from COLLEGE SUTIOK County ZO mllea In E UNIOI PACIFIC McCOLLOUGH-OLDEI iLl (NE. SW, etc.) / H. L. 10 (Town) Driller muet complete the legal description below wt th distance and direction from two Intersecting section or surv~ he must locate and identify the well on an omdal Quarter· or Half-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and attach the map 10 this form. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section No . Block No. Township Abstract No . Survey Name Distance and dlrecdon from two Intersecting secdon or survey lines a SEE A TT ACHED MAP HORTH : 3035 iEST: 9615 MSTHUM: 3075 3) TYPE OF WORK (Ch.ck): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): OILFLD SUPPLY 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check): 0 Driven °H'j-WeU 0Deepenlng 0 Domestic 0 lndusb1al 0Monitor 0 Public Supply ~~ Rotaiy 0 ,.;rHammer 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Reconditioning OPtugglng 0 ln1gation OTestWeH 0 ln}ectlon 0 D&-Watering Air Rotaiy 0 CabjeTool 0 Other 6) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Date Drilling: Dia. (In.) From (It) To(ft) 0 Open Hole [SiStraJght Wall 0 Underreamed Started 03tl9/93 19-6.5 Surface 610 0 Gravel Packed 0 Other Completed 03/20/93 19_ If Gravel Packed give Interval ... from ' ft tc n ft From(lt.) To(ft) Desctlptlon and color of formation material 8) CASINO, BLANK PIPE, ANO WELL SCREEN DATA: n-A ~nn1r11 ttn-~on ~urn New Steel, Plastic, etc. Setting (IL) Gage Dia. or Perl., Slotted , etc. casting 4-10 iHITg rr.u 580-610 rr.1y (In .) Used Screen Mfg ., If commercial From To Screen 10-120 GRAY CLAY & ROCKS P4 Noi CASIRG 0 460 120-180 SAND r-,...., .~. P4 m 500 1 80-300 CLAY ff ;_) I ? I f;;: 15 . I 14 11 I 1 p ~ R .--..... 540 560 -,00-320 SARO ,1 n ~ "-" L:: u p41.J LS ! SOOTTKD 160 480 .020 3?.0-460 CLAY .. -..1_~ P• LsrloTTED 500 540 .020 460-HO rnm /YI J4. Y l ' 1Y 9B CEMOOINGDATA (Rule 267 .44(1)) 560 580 .020 480-~oo rr.1v Cemented from a ft10-15._ft No . of SacXs Used 10 500-540 rnm ' ~nr.:s 1 tX.4 S VJt.Tr:.-:> r ~Y,~l !S W~ ftto ___ ft No . or Sacks Used n 540-550 CLAY {Use reverse sld6 /f nec6ssary} -· ·.• used SlillRRY 13) TYPE PUMP: Cemented by J & S ilTER iELLS 0 Turbine 0 Jet DSSubmerslble 0 Cylinder 0 Other 10) SURFACE COMPLETION Depth 10 pump bowls, cylinder, )et. etc., 280 ft 0 Specified Surface Slab Installed (Rule 267.44(2)(A)] 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed [Rule 267.44{3)(A)] 14) WEU TESTS: ~filtless Adapter Used (Rule 267.44(3)(8)] Type Test 0 Pump D Baller qietted 0 Estimated Approved Alternative Procedure Used (R~ 267.71] Yield : gpm wtth ft drawdown after hrs . 11111 ~/~ 11) WATER LEVEL: 15) WATER QUALITY: Static level 50 ft below land s urfaQ! Date 03 /20/93 Did you knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable Artesian now gpm . Date cons ti ll.lents? HO 0 Yee 0No If yes, submit "RE POAT~ UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) PACKERS: Type Depth Type or water7 Depth of strata ll&OPR 15 Wa!J a chemical analysis made? 0 Yes 0No R&OPR 460 reby certify that this well was drilled by me (or under my supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true 10 the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand failure to complete Items 1 lhru 15 will result In the log(s) being returned for completion and resubmlttal. llPANY NAME J i S iAIBR iELLS WELL DRILLER'S LICENSE NO. --··· 3Q~ (Type or print) ~F.SS ~ BBLLYILLB IX 11418 (City) (State) (Zip) ned) (Sign.ct) (Licensed Well Driller) (Registered Driller TraJ1ee) 1se attach electr1c log, chemical analysis, and other pertinent lnfonnation, If avaJlable . I For TWC use only : WellNo. Located on map 01,11! ~ l[)--012 (Rev . 05-18-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY b\ ~· tr.d origlnal copy by cef111\ed mall 10: Tena Water Comm'-lon, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Taxu 78711 .. ATTENTION OWNER: CcnlfdBntJalty State of Texas Tena Water Well Drillers Board P.O. Box 13087 /-rlv/16(1#1 Notlofl on ReWKSS Side WELL REPORT Au.Un, Texas 78711 '>WNER llHIQi e!CifIC RESOURCES ADDRESS E 0 BOI 2 ICC? EI VIORILBal= i~~ 'I~S1a1ei7'10~1 (Name) (Sir~! 0< RFD) ty 2) LOCATION fi'HmLL: 3 E COLLEGE STATIOK County miles In direction from OHIO! PACIFIC l!cCOLLOUGH-OLDEK iL2 (NE, SW, etc.) K .L. 10 (Town) Driller must comple!e !he legal desalptlon beloW wittl distance and direction from rwo Intersecting section or wrvey lines, or he must locate and ldentlfy !he well on an omdal Quarter-or Half-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and attach !he map to ttlls form . 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Section No. Bloc!< No. Township Abstract No. Survey Name Distance and direction from two ln~lng ~on or survey lines d<SEE ATTACHED MAP HOR TH: 3035 iEST: 9615 l!STRUI!: 3074 3) TYPE OF WORK (Checl(): 4) PROPOS£0 USE (Cheek): OILFLD SUtjLY 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check): 0 Drlven DfrtWWell 0Deepenlng 0Domestlc Olndustrlal 0 Monitor Public Supply ~~ Rotaty OAJrHammer 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Rerondltlonlng OP1uoglng 0 ln1gadon OTestWell 0 Injection 0 Oe-Watenng AJr Rotaty 0 GableTool 0 Other 6) WELL LOG: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION : Date Drilling: Ola. (In .) From (It) To (It) 0Open1-ble (]j>tralght wall 0 Underreamed Started 03£19£93 19-6.5 Surface 570 0 Gravel ?a<:k&d 0 Other Completed 03/20/93 19_ 11 Gravel PacXed give In terval •.. from n It. to g It. From (It) To (It) Description and color of formation material 8) CASING, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: n-l~n rr.1v N-Slee!, Plastic, e tc. setting (rt) Gage ~un t Pnrr ~nn-~An ~ivn Ola. or Pert., Slotted, etc. Castlng 350-360 CLAY 540-550 rnm MIYRn (In .) Used Screen Mfg ., If commercial From To Screen 360-370 SAKO MIXED 550-555 SAND t ROCK P4 NEi 'lrnir. 0 400 370-390 SA!iD 555-570 SHELL P4 440 ~nn 'q0-395 CLAY n n - ,15-440 SAND !GOOD I P4 n n ,~gn 400 Hn n?n 440-460 CLAY i--"1 i t (Fj 12 :-i pf,r i? ~nrn •nn •An n'n 460-465 S~!iD !GO ODI ; UJ. LS (!) 1.5 !_! '~) 0C£'!'~tfr1Na DATA [Rule 287 .44(1)) 0 0 465-oo cr.u I 1l ~ ~iedtrom 0 lttc~lt. No . of Sacks Used 19 470-47~ mm fr.oon i ~ --Mf\V 1 7 ·;GG 7< =-~· ft.to ___ It No . of Sacks Used n ,. .. ·-I ~ _. ·• • . 475-500 CLAY (Use reverse sidB If necss.saty} Me!hod used ~ r rr '' 7 . - 13) TYPE PUMP: TFX ti ~ 'tJ .~ T :~ -:;, '.~,,.\~'l '""~edby J & ~ iA~SR iEbbS 0 Turbine 0 Jet 0 S>ubmersJble 0 dyirooe< "-• . . -' . '•. • ."I .. ,.) \ • • 4 0 Other 10) SURFACE COMPLETION Oeplh 1D pump bowls. cyt lnder, )el, etc., JOO It. 0 Specified Surface Slab Ins taJ led (Rule 287 .44(2)(A)) 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed (Rule 287.44(3)(A)) 14) WELL TESTS: ~[p!less Adapter Used [Rule 287 .44(3)(8)) Type Test 0 Pump 0 Baller o.rened 0 Estlmated App!'u.'ed Alternative Procedure Used (Rule 287.71) Yleld : gpmwlttl It. drawdown after hrs . au HI'! 11) WATER LEVEL: 15) WATER OUALTTY: s tatlc level 80 tt. below land surface Date OJL20L2J Did you knowingly penetrate any strata whldl contaJned undesJrable Artesian flow gpm. Dale constl ruents? NO 0 Yes ONo 11 yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) PACKERS: Type Oep!h Type of water? Oepttl of strata 11111\DD 1 ~ was a dlemlcaJ analysis made? 0 Yes ONo UnDD Ann ·reby certify !hat !his well was drilled by me (or under my supervision) and !hat each and all or tt1e statements herein are true 10 !he bes! or my knowledge and belief. I understand : !allure 1D complere Items 1 thru 15 will result In !he log(s) being re!Umed tor completlon and resubmlttaJ . , 3D!l9 l.lPANYNAME J i S iA!ER iELLS WELL DRILLER'S LICENSE NO . --~ ... ~ ~r,r.m.r.s 'PX 11418 (City) (State) (Zip) ined) ~ . ( tr or RFD) - (SlgM(f) (Ucensed Well Driller) (ReglstMld Driller Trainee) ise anacn electrlc log, chemical analysis, and ottler pertjnent lnl'onnatlon, 11 avallable. I For TWC use only : w.ll No. Located on map r.i ll.L/ 10-012 (Rev . OS.18-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY b\ • GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP OOA7f'\C ('('\1 INTV J , I • 0 + :\., +-·-· .'> . I I •·• ·I •.• I ~· : . ·I - ,.,:..,-~~by oerUlled mall ID: THU Water Commlaalon, P.O. Box 13087, Au.tin, TaXM 71711 ATTENTION OWNER: Ccnfldtlntlalty ~Nolle» on RBVflf"9 Sir» State of Texas WELL REPORT THu Water Well Drtllen Board P.O. Box 13087 ' I Auatln, THU 71711 ADDRESS D n qnv 7 /. /.,M~H 'illlV'?ll 'l'V i~tntnnn7 (Street" ~z-D (City) ~ (Zip) 3 mllesln lfE I /dlrectlontrom co~ ---'------- 2) LOCATION OF WEU: County BRAZOS UlfIOlf HCIFIC 1! c COLL OU G H -TERRY iLl (NE, SW, etc.)~ ,V (Town) Drille< must complets the legal deso1ptlon below with distance and direction lrom two lntersedlng sectlon or surveyanes, or t locat& and ldentlfy the well on an otndal Quarter-or Halt-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and attach the map to this loon. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section No . Block No . Township Abstract No. Survey Name Olslance and dlr9Ctlon from two lnte<sedlng section or survey llnes -----------.1--/_,,,,_/'------------------ 0 l>EE ATTACHED MAP N C ~TH: UttS WEST: 9615 l!STNUI!: 3088 3) TYPE OF WORK (CMek): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): 0 Domestic 0 Industrial OI LFL D SUP?~Y 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check): 0 Driven 0 W Well 0 O&ep&nlng 0 Rea:>ndltlonlng 0 P1uoglng 0 lrrlgatlon OTestWell 0 Manito< 0 Public Supply 0 ln}ectkln 0 Ce-Watering 0 ~ Rotary 0 Air Hammer 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Air Rotary 0 cable Tool 0 Other---- 6) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Date DriUl ng: Dia (In.) From (ft) To (ft) O Open HOie OSltraJghl wai1 0 Underreamed Started 0J/l1 / 9 J 19 -..._.........,. 65 _ __....__;.Su_rface __ -1-__.6-'-7 0=-----f 0 Gravel Packed 0 Other -------------- Completed g 410 11 93 19 -t-----+-----1-------i 11 Gravel Pad(ed give Interval ••• from __ _,,n.__ ft. to 0 ft From (ft) To(ft.) Description and color of formatlon materlal 8) CASING, BLANK PIPE, AND WEU SCREEN DATA: New Dia. or &-10 VF.J.T.O'il ('LAV (in .) Used I H 00 BT.OE CLAY P4 100-1 20 sum ~ re:> ~. r-• ..., ..,~.?4 1?0-un rr.iv il OJ 12 /[;-; I? II \Y! /D If 1 Steel, Plastic, etc. Pert., Slotted, etc. Screen Mfg., If commercial NEi CASI!fG --~&l~~;nL-~-&~R!n.._..~~1.ll.IL..wn ______________ 1Y_!!µ_,_1 __ ~_t~'j~J ~ CEMENTINGDATA [Rule 287.44(1)) Hn -~1n ru v Cementedlrom O ft to ----1.5.. ft. m-~'n rnrn l l:.X-AS ;!:i t'.Tt -R fYi ·M"'.i SS I O ~~ ___ tt.to ___ tt. Setllng (ft) From To 0 520 560 620 0 0 520 560 620 660 0 0 No. of Sacks Used No . of Sacks Used Gage Castlng Screen 10 n S&0-&20 CLAY 13) TYPE PUMP: {Use reverse side If necessary) Me!tlod used --S ... LU~R-4-iY+--------------­ eementoo by _ _.,_J~&-S.....,..iAwT~ER..-VE~L~L~S--------- 0 Turbine 0 Jet 0 ~bmersJble 0 Cytlnd&r 0 Other __________________ ~ Depth to pump bowls, cylinder, jet, etc .. 280 n. 14) WELL TESTS: Type Test Y\etd : 0 Pu m p ---111-111 gpm w ith 15) WATER QUALITY: 0 Baller 0 Jytt&d 0 E stlmated -,..N.., 1 ~.----ft. drawdown aner hr s . Old you knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable constttuents? li O 0 Yes 0 No If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" Type of wate<? Depth of strata ------- w~ a dl&mlcal analysis made? 0 Yes 0 No 10) SURFACE COMPLETION 11) 0 Specified SUrface Slab Installed [Rule 287 .44{2}{A)) 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed [Rule 287.44(3){A)) 0 n "ss Adapter Used [Rule 287.44(3)(8)) 0 Apprcved AJt&ma!lve Procedure Us&d (Rule 287.71) WATER LEVEL: s taJic level 50 ft. below land surface Date ArtesJ an flow gpm. Date 12) PACKERS: Type KEOPR . lfEOPR. 04/01/93 Depth 15 520 1reby oerUfy that this well was drilled by me (or under my supervlsJon) and that each and al l of the statements herein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand t lallure ID oomplets lt&ms 1 thru 15 will result In the log(s) being rebJmed for oompletlon and resubmlttal . WEU DRILLER'S LICENSE NO. 3039 (Reglst8f'ed Driller Trainee) ase atlaeh electric log , chemical analysis, and other pe<tfnent lnfomlatlon, If available. I For TWC uw only : Well No . ___ _ Located on map f'l. J},\.\ vo-012 {Rev. 05-1&-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY COf1'f by cetll l'ied mall ID: Tena W•ter Commission, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Te na 78711 J(TION OWN ER : CcnfJdentJalty St ate of Texa s Tuu W•tw Well Drill•n 8oM1,.; P.O. Box 13087 . tv~ /\lotia on F#ver~ Sldtl WELL REPOR T Auetln, THU 78711 1' OWNER UNIOH e~rIEIC RESOURCES ADDRESS e o BOX 1 !CC! E!!'D~IL&QI: iOR!H IX 16101 0001 (Name) (Street or RFD) (Clty) (State) (Zip) ., LOCATIO'\~f: 'Zf"U.: 3 HE CO LLEGE SUTIOH County ZO miles In direction from JYIOH PACIFIC MCCOLLOUGH-TERRY iLJ (NE, SW, etc.) (Town) Driller muet complete the legal desoipdon below with distance and direction from two Intersecting section or survey Qnes , or he must locate and ldeodfy the wen on an official Q\;arter-or Half-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and attach the map ID this form . 0 LEGAL 0£SCRIPTION: Section No. Block No. Township Abstract No. Survey Name Distance and dlredfon from two lntersectlng s&etlon or survey lines 0 SEE A TT ACHED MAP HORTH: 3035 HST: Scl 5 KS THUK: 308 6 3) TYPE Of' WORK (Cheek): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): OILFLD SUPPLY 5) DfULLJ NQ METHOD (Check): 0 Drtven D:(j-wei.r 0Deepenlng 0 Domestk: 0Jndusb1al 0Monltor 0 Public Supply 9l MJd Rotary 0 >J r Hammer 0 Jetted 0 Bored 0 Rerondili onlng 0Ptugglng 0 lrrlgaUon OTestWeH 0 Injection 0 Oe-Waterlng 0 Air Rotary 0 cableTod 0 Other 6) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Da :e DriH lng : Dia (In .) From (It) To (It) 00penHole !SJ Straight Wall 0 Underreamed Started 03£31193 19-6.5 Surface 590 0 Gravel Packed 00ther Cooipleted Q4l01 l93 19_ If Gravel Packed give Interval .•• from n It ID 0 It From(lt.) To(ft.) Desct!ptlon and color ol lormatlon mate rial 8) CASINO, BLANK PIPE, AND WEU. SCREEN DATA: 0-100 :"'IV ~lli n ~lllU.1, Pnrr A?n-un ~lln .r. New Steel, Plastk:, etc. Settlng (ft.) Gage Dia or Perf., Sloned, etc. casdng 300-Jl G SAND 480-500 SAND MIXED (In .) Used Screen Mfg ., if commerdal From To Screen 310-3E ~ SHELL 500-580 SAND !GOODI P4 li Ei CASIRG 0 500 360-3 8~ SAND MIXED 580-590 SHELL & BROKEN ROCK 0 0 380-41 0 BROKER ROCl & SAND 0 0 -10-42 0 BROKEH ROCK & SHELL P4 SLOTTED 500 580 .020 420-435 S!HD MIXED ,.....--., ~. 0 0 435-445 CLAY ;: 0 J I? 1-..: Ir r. lfJ T2' ,~EHTINQ DATA [Rule 287.44{1)} 0 0 ,, U5-45 ~ sun KTX RD iGOODI :1 n·1 L...: I.::_) e: u .• '--' 1Jt"ted from 0 rt.ID_li_tt. No . ol Sacks Used 10 4~~-46 C ~l!Ff,L i~.~ r,.J i l ft.ID ___ lt No . ol Sacks Used a 460-47 0 SAND (Use reverse si de If nectJssary) MAY 1 7 1( 93 ~used ~T.!l H V 13) TYPE PUMP: ~tedby ,I a ~ DUR i%[,S 0 Turbine 0 Jet DSSubmersible rra .~nif# ri: .. ") · :,,-_,~ • 0 Other · .. '. ;;._ ! ~ r_. ..' .11'! '.iJ ! S ~Oj ~RF ACE CO MP LETION Depth ID pump bowls , cyli nder, jet, etc ., lOQ ft. O Specified Surface Slab Installed (Rule 287.44(2)(A)] 0 Specified Steel Sleeve Installed (Rule 287 .44(3)(A)) 14) WEU. TESTS: gHtless Adapter Used [Rule 287 .44(3)(B)J Type Tes t 0 Pump 0 Baller ~ened 0 Estimated 0 Approved Altematlve Procedure Used (R ule 287 .71 1 Yield : 80 gpmwlth NtM It drawdown alter hrs . 11) WATER LEVEL: 15) WATER QUALITY: Stalk: level 10 0 ft. below land surface Date 04/01/93 Did yoo knowingly penetrate any strata which contained undesirable Artesian now gpm. Date consdtuents? NO DYH 0No If yes, submit "REPORT a: UNDESIRABLE WATE~ 12) PACKERS: Type Depth Type or water? Depth ol strata !80PR. 15 Was a c:hernlcal analys is made? 0 Yes ONo !BOPR. 500 er eby certify that this weU was drilled by me (or under rrry supervision) and that each and all ol the statements herein are true ID the bes t ol rrry knowledge and belief. I understand I! failure ID c:otr.plete Items 1 thru 15 will result In the log(s) being returned lor completion and resubmlttal. lMPANYNAME J & S iATER iELLS WELL DRI LLER'S LICEN SE NO. -~:5~ (Type or print) >OOESS /P. 0 BOX 615 BELLVIL LE TX 77 418 ~£,~ ~or RFD)~ (Clty) (State) (Zip) Ig o. I .; ... (Signed) l'V ,,....(Lfcensed Well Driller) (Regls!e<'ed Driller Trainee) ~ase attach electric log, chemical analysis, and other pertinent Information, If avaJlable . I For lWC use only : Well No. Located on map >'t.[J.Lf N0-<112 (Rev. OS.1&-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY -· ; (.,. ....... "' GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP BRAZOS COUNTY TEXAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ANO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TllAllPOllTATIOH Pl.AHHIHO OMSIOH U.S. OEPARTMEHT Of TRANSf'ORTATION -··-" ~1-.:= .. ~~~ ·--~, -" . 1980 _.,... ..... .... __________ _ ___ ..__ ___ ._, ........ _.__ __ ._....._... ........... ~ ...... -......... ,_.,_.._ .... , ( .,. .. , .J . I .y + I "i" ·I ··• 1 -- -· ~. r ' I • : ' ...... '· .!. I • A I H ' . . ' . . c • " + ----------N -·-----.. ·-·-"'- \,,-- '·' /'. 'STATE OF TEXAS WATER WELL REfORT -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ti mmER: .COLLEGE STATION LANDFILL ADDRESS: CITY: COLLEGE STATION STATE: TX ZIP: 77840 21 LOCATION OF WELL: #1 County: BRAZOS Coll tiJe~tktf&FdJYfJi!" from HllY. 6 on COlX'lty Rd. 125; well on West sir'.e of --------------------------------------------------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------_EGAL DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED MAP -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7----------------------31 TYPE OF WORK: NEii WELL 41 PROPOSED USE: MONITOR Sl DRILLIN6 METHOD: AIR ROTARY/HAMMER ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------bl ~ELL LOS: 89061 DATE DRILLED: 03/01/89 GEGLGG!CAL DESCRIPTION: FROM TO DESCRIPTION 0 9 CLAY-BROWN 9 23 CLAY-BROWN; SAl'{)Y 23 45 SHALE-GRAY DIAMETER OF HOLE 71 BOREHOLE METHOD: DIAMETER FROM TO a· o 45 GRAVEL PACKED IF 6RAVEL... FROM 1 FT. TO 45 FT. FROM FT. TO FT. Bl CASING, BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: DIA NEW/USED DESCRIPTION FROM TO 4• N PVC CASING +1.5 45 4• N PVC, FACTORY SLOTTED 20 45 91 CEMENTING DATA: Ceaented from 0 FT. TO 1 FT. 6A6E CASING SCREEN SCH 40 .010 YCl..CLAY -1 FT. TO 17 FT. GRAYa -17 to 45 Method used: GROUT Ce~ented by: VIRDELL DRILLIN6 INC 101 SURFACE COMPLETION: APP. ALTER. PROCO. 111 WATER LEVEL: ST•mr 1 EY'' · N/A FT DAT'"· ~ ~ ~ U \{j ~ tr\: ______ ::'.~~'.:~-'.~~:'. ______ '.'.'.: ___ :::~:---i~~--~--~---------: __ :: __ ~------12) PACKERS: ~~~=----------------~=~~ A p R 1 4 19 8 9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------====================---==if.~~~1'.{;l:~-~'.,_;~~~~~~~~~~~~-------13l TYPE PUMP: 14l WELL TEST: DEPTH TO PUMP: YIELD: 0 6Pl1 llITH FT DRAWDOWN AFTER HRS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------151 ~ATER QUALITY: TYPE OF WATER: DEPTH OF STRATA: NO CHEMICAL ANALYSIS MADE NO STRATA OF UNDESIRABLE WATER PENETRATED ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------COMPANY NAl'IE: VIRDELL DRILLING INC. WATER WELL DRILLER'S LICENSE NO.~ 2940-W : FOR TDWR USE ONLY . ADDRESS: 111 E. GRAYSON ST. CITY: LLANO STATE: TX ZIP CODE: 78643 : WELL NO. _s-CJ -51 -'+ ($\'~ : LOCATED ON llAP __ _ nEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS DRILLED BY ME (QR UNDER MY SUPERVISIONI AND THAT EACH AND ALL OF THE STATEMENTS HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF llY KNOWLED5E AND BELIEF. I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THRLJ 12 WILL RESULT IN THE LOE!Sl BEIN5 RETURNED FOR COMPLETION AND RESUBMITTAL. (s1"nEd1~~ \/..A..l>.li-'' . I ~ 11\, '1 «: (~!gnedl (REGISTERED DRILLER TRAINEE! / . - ·. 0 TO~EKA I I ( + c -'--..-.. r \ Send 0: .y by cier!llled malj.Rl-"'reXM Weter CommlMlon, P.O. Box 13087, AU.Un, TOM 71711 Pkltl# II# blade We. -' · 1;-: .tc.;>N OWNER: ·~ry State of Texas TeXM Water W.a Drillera 8oans P.O. Box 13087 ~~NotJc. on ~-SI<» WELL REPORT Auatln, Texu 71711 , .L,..; ,/nVTT.HH 111'19"11 1) OWNER Ull!Olf PACIFIC RESOURCES ADDRESS P n 11n1 1 ---"' 1'1 n1 nnn"T ·r'-. (Name) )7RFD) ) (State) (Zip) f :~OCATIO~fl~~LL: ' miles In SB dlr---~-COLLEGE SUTIOI . County ORIOi PICIFIC ALLEI 11 WELL fl (NE, -:sw, etc.) "]?' B & P 78 (Town) Oril""-m-m"" '""" do.alpl!oo ...,.,..,~ ~""" •""""' lrom""' •-~-~he~'"'""'"""-~ .... , oo ~ """"' Quarter-°' Half-Scale Texas County Gener>il Highway Map and anach Ille map ID !his form . 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec11on No . Block No. Township Abstract . survey Name Distance and dlreClfon from two lnters&ctlng sectfon °' survey lines / ~ i!J SEE ATTACHED MAP IORTH: 3035 iBST: 9615 KS THUM: 3063 3) TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): OILFLD SUPPLY 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check): 0 Driven (if'-Well 0Deepenlng 0Domesllc 01ndustr1al 0Monltor O Publlc supp1y ~ MJd Rotary 0 Air Hanmer 0 J41tted 0 Bored 0 Reconditioning 0Plugglng 0 ln1gaUon OTestWell 0 Injection 00.-Warsrtng Air Rotary 0 CableTool 0 Olher 6) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Date DriHlng : Dia. (In .) Frotn (It.) To (IL) 00penHole (i Straight Wall 0 Underreamed Started 03ll5l2J 19-6.5 surface 410 0 Gravel Packed OO!her Completed 03[16/93 19-If Gravel Packed give Interval ••• from 0 It. ID 0 It. From(lt.) To(lt.) Description and color of fotrnatfon material 8) CASINO, BUNK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: 0-210 SUD CLAY Rocr SllF.T.T, &n0-41n ~um tr.nnnl New Steel, Plasllc, etc. Setting (It.) Gage Dia. ()( Perl., Slotted, etc. casting 270-280 SHELL 410-450 S!lfD (in .) Used Screen Mfg., If c:ommerdal Frotn To Screen 2 8 0-290 S!!ID 450-460 SAND MIXED F4 !Bi CASI!G . 0 320 BO-JOO SHELL '60-470 SHELL & BROKE! ROCK P4 340 390 JOO-JlO Sl!D MIXED (GOOD) 0 0 310 :-320 SH3LL P4 SLOTTED -320 340 020 350 SUD IGOODI Pf SLOTTED HO 4~0 020 -J~0-370 SABO MIXED l :; I S" f I'·' I , u S ~~~~DATA [Rule 287 .44{1 )) 0 0 310-380 SHELL j -.. L:J ~ L ft. ID 15 It. No. of Sacks Used 10 . ,.., n ·~; fJmr' a 380-395 SABO (HARDI ? l I L.J ft. to It. No. of Sacks Used n 395-400 BROIEI ROC«l*'&SittPsldelf116aJssatyJ MAY l 7 i9 ~thod used SLIIRU I) TYPE PUMP: Cemented by J ' S ilf~R iELLS 0 Turbine 0 Jet [] SUbmerslble 0 eyiim.;~S 'NATE -~ --- . . . 1:1 1 1'1 ~.((!E 0 Other . '-' ·'10)'' COMPLETION Depth 10 pump bowls, cytlnder,jet, etc., 320 It. 0 Speci1led Surface Slab Installed [Rule 287.44{2)(A)] 0 Speci1led Steel SleeY8 Installed (Rule 287.44{3XA)] ) WELL TESTS: ifflt!ess Adapter Used (Rule 287.44{3)(B)J Type Test 0Pump 0 Baller lfflJened 0 Estimated 0 Approved Alternative Procedure Used (Rule 287.7 1] Y"tekl : l: 6 8 gpm wtth li f M ft. drawdown after hrs . 11) WATER LEVEL: • WATER QUALITY: Static level 90 ft. below land surface Date 03/16/93 Did you knowingly penetrate arry strata which contained undeslrable Artesian now gpm. Date constituents? !!O Dvea ONo If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) PACKERS: Type Depth Type of water? Depth of 11rata llROPR 1~ Was a chemical analysis made? DYes ONo llROPl! 320 Y certify that this wen was drllled by me (ot under my supervision) and that each and all of Ille statements herein are true ID the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand ure ID complete Items 1 thru 15 will result In Ille log(s) being returned for complellon and resubmltlal. 'NY NAME J & S WATER WELLS WEU DRILU:R'S LICENSE NO. 19~~ (Type ()( print) 'SS P. 0. BOl.. 67.i -,I ~ BELLVILL E 'PY 7HU (78/! °'JD)~-/( t-_ (City) • (State) (Zip) I}. (Signed) II --~~Well Drlller) ,, (Registered Drilklr T ralnee) attach electric log, analysis, and other perUnent Information. If available. I Fot TWC use only: WelNo. Located on map ·:51.ll;~ 12 (Rev. 05-18-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY ·-W•IW Commi.alon, P.O. Box 13087, Au.Un, T•XM 78711 -.. .••• ~: CcnffdBntlalry State of Texas TH .. Watw W811 Dr111en Boatd P.O. Box 13087 .. lti.~Nodctl on R6VfKS41 Sldtl WELL REPORT Au.tin, TH .. 71711 ·---.. OWNER UHIOH PACIFIC RESOURCES ADDRESS P.O. BOX i, ACC! e!YLDRILE~ll iOR!H n l61ouoo1 (Name} (Street or RFD} (City} (State} p} 2, LOCATIONJfHmLL: 4 SE COLLEGE STATIO! County !ilfftl!! P*CffIC . wBL"L'f direction from xttEI II (NE. SW, etc.} .H & P 78 (TCNtn} Drillef must complete the legal desafptlon below with distance and direction from two lnters&dlng section or survey Unes , or he must locat& and ldentlfy the well on an omdat Quarter-or Half-Scale Texas County General Highway Map and attach the map ID this loon. 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section No. Bled( No. Township Abstract No. Survey Name Dlstance and direction from two lnterwctlng S&Cllon or survey tines d SEE ATTACHED MAP HORTH: 3035 WEST: 9615 MSTRUM: 3073 3) TYPE OF WORK (Check}: 4) PROPOSED USE (Ch8ck): OILFLD SUPPLY 5) DRILLING METHOD (Check}: 0 Driven OiVewWell 0Deepenlng 0 Domestic 0tndustr1al 0Monltc< 0 Public Supply £iRMxl Rotaty 0 Air Hammer 0 Jelled 0 Bored 0 Recondltlonlng 0Plugglng 0 lrrlgadon OTestWell 0 Injection 0 De-Wal811ng 0 Air Rotary 0 cable Toof 0 Other 6) WELL LOO: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) BOREHOLE COMPLETION: Date Drilling: 03/17/93 Dia. (In .} From (It} To (It} 0 Open I-tile ~Straight Wall 0 Underreamed Started 19-D.l Surface b;u 0 Gravel Packed 0 Other Completed 03/18 /93 19_ If Gravel Packed give Interval ... from 0 II. ID 0 II. From(lt.} To(fl} Description and color of formation material 8) CASINO, BLAN K PIPE, ANO WELL SCREEN DATA: 0-415 SAMO, SHELL & ROCK 530-540 SAliD MIX New Steel, Plastic, etc. Setting (It} Gage 41H~O SHELL Dia or P&rf., Slotted , etc. Castlng 540-570 SAND (In .} Used Screen Mfg., if commercial From To Screen ~~u-;q u ~AllU ;1 0-~10 SAND P4 HE'i CASING 0 3JO HV-HV ~!It.LILI DlU-blU ~lltl.il.i P4 340 420 ~cu-~ I U ~AJIU lllaJI UI P4 440 570 -·1-HU ~U~Li P4 SLOTTED 320 340 .020 -·"U -J UU ~AllU ll!AKUJ P4 SL OTTED 420 440 020 lUU-HU Ol\Vf.t:H KOCK & SA!iD 9) CEMENTING DATA [Rule 287 .44{1}) 570 610 llU-Jll LL.Al .---. r.J fr\ ~ q ~o II. ID ___.15_ fl No. of Sacks Used 10 ;1;-;Jo SA!iD '. c IC'. I ln I n L.5 L: 1 II. ID fl No. of Sacks Used ~J0-53 0 BROKEN RO({{;sereversesldelfnecessary) .n Me~~.l S~llRRY -- 13) T YPE PUMP: ....J __, MA 1 7 1 ~ted by J & s i!7ER rn.r.s 0 Turt>lne 0 Jet 0 Submerslble 0 Cylinder 0 Other 10) SURFACE CO M PLETlOH 300 TEX~S V I" r e, r ·~~~~~ (Rule 287.44(2}(A}) Depth to pump bowb, cyl inder, jet. etc., fl I ' .._ . JI""'\ , 1_ r, \.: l; ,., ' Slab Installed 0 Specffied Steel Sleeve Installed [Rule 287.44{3)(A}) 14) WEU TESTS: ~f'llless Adapter Used (Rule 287.44(3)(6)] Type Test 0 Pump 0 Baller [JI Jetted 0 Estlmated 0 Approved Alternative Procedure Used [Rule 267.71) Yleld : 150 gpmwttti HI M It. drawdown alter hrs . 11} WATER LEVEL: 15) WATER QUALITY: Static level 60 fl below land surface Date 03/18/93 Did you knowl'JloY penetrate any strata whld'I contained undeslrable Artesian flow gpm. Date constl llJents? 0 Yea ONo If yes, submit "REPORT a= UNDESIRABLE WATER" 12) PACKERS : Type Depth Type of water? Depth o f strata HEOPR. 15 Was a d'lemlcal analysis made? DYes ONo llEOPR. 320 ·eby certify that this well was drifted by me (or under my supervision) and that each and all of the statements he<eln are true IO the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand failure ID complete Items 1 thru 15 will result In the log( s} being returned tor completlon and resubmlttal . ~PANY NAME J & S WATER 'iELLS WELL DRILLER'S LICENSE NO . 1994 (Type or print} ~ESS P. 0. BOX 675 J j BELLVILLE TX 77418 (r~ f ~Rrn; ~-I! L~ (Clty} (State} (Zip) n.._, (Slgn.ci) (t.: ldtW W&lf Driller) y (Registered DrillerTraJnee) se attach electric log, chemical ysls, and other pertinent lnformatlon, If available. I For TWC use only : Well No. Located on mapf.:l; l l. ~ D-012 (Rev . 05-18-90) TEXAS WATER COMMISSION COPY GENERAL HIGHWAY. MAP BRAZOS COUNTY TEXAS ............. STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ANO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ~TATIOH l'\AHHINO OIVISIOll . U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ltDlf!Al HIOHWAY AOM0111TAATIOH r..t:--·r-.. -~ ~'-:;-,,.;,' • • 1980 ---... ~-----~-·--::-.::=:.·.:-------------------.. ......................... _ .... , . , ...... .... ...... / ... _::..~·~·-... .J •. I W A I N I Ill t r 0 • ' 0 u + ,..._._ ________ _ ---·-.. -··-·-·- Send Ofiginal copy by cer1ified r elurn receipl requesled mnil lo: TDLR, P.O. Box 12157, A u stin, TX 78711 ATTENTION OWNER : Confide11tiality Privilege Notice on reverse side ol Well Owner's copy (pink) State of Texas W EL L R EPOR T Texas Department ot Licensing & Regulation P.O . Box 12157 Austin, TX 78711 512-463-7880 -K~ /j . ~ ~ A l~ OWNER /),,, (11V'{,/ L 1 /1l~J...11 iA11) f\DDV,t;," S . f l/_) ~ · v.i.. ~.d_,./~ ..-:ngtJ'_'] _(/).._ ---. ;-·tN..rrc)-£};11 17 fh1,fr-~>~-i::;2 t-t-" V . -~·lr~~:.~D) ·• --· -.<t:i~> ,. . ~~~ (Z ip) ADDREsigF :VE~.,L'S ~OCATION: I; I I ),-/ I',_ J r-< • / /? J / (,_/ ,,,,... ,.-.J. ong. Lat . ll"' Counly _-a .4 ~C' · tf/VR,/lf ;,'f--tfl'J.Y o---" ( /L (~~1 -TA /;.'If')"__) rl) ..., f. \"' (Slrccl ,RFDor other) (Crly) /(Sl 1lc) (Zrp) Grrd 11 -27 -; Q -,,? ·-Q 2) (4) PROPOSEDUSE(Check): 0Monitor O EnvironmenlalSoilBoring [j·D0meslic 3) TYPE OF_ WORK (Check): [§-~·W e ll O Deepening 5) O Reconditioning D Plugging O Industri al O lrrig::ition O Injection O PublicSupply O De-watering O Teslwell If Public Supply well, were plans submilled to lhe TNRCC? O Yes O No 6) WELL LOG: DIAMETER OF HOLE Dia.(in .) From (fl.) To (fl.) Date Drlllln~: --Y C ~,. Started <'/-- / ~ 19 /,) 0< Surface ,') _ > Completed J.-;!C 19 }5' From (ft.) To (ft.) Description and color ot formation material (Use reverse side of Well Owner's copy, if necess ary) 13) 0 Well plugg.:d within 48 '""'"' Casini? ten in wdl : Ccmcnt.1,<!ntonit.: pl:i c.:d in wdl : Sad:s us.:d : From (ft) To (fi) From (n) To (ll) 14) TYPEPUMP: ~rsible O Cyti1der O Turbine O Othe'------------.,..--,:------- Deplh lo pump bowls , cylinder, jel , elc ., ~ Q It. 15) WELL TESTS : Typelest : O Pump O ~iler Yield : / C:-gpm with . /[) (3--:kttcd 0 Estirnilled fl. drawdown a ft e r / 16) WATER QUALITY : Did you knowingly penelrale any strat a which contai ned undc ~ir<ible consl ituenls? hrs. 0 Yes ~-ye s, s ubmit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER" Type of waler? Dcplhofslrala~ W asachemicalanatysism::ide? 0 Yes B'No 7) DRILLING METHOD (C~k): 0 Driven O Air Rotary (2]~d R otary O Bored O Air Hammer O Cable Tool O Jelled O 01her ___________ ~ 8) Borehole Completion (Check): O Open H o le • O Straight W all O Underrea med O Gravel Packed O Olher -----..,...,-...,,.---·i) \ ..... -tr Gravel Packed give interval from , 5:°L fl . lo -~O~-~~~--fl. CASING, BLANK P IPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA : New Steel, Pl astic , etc. Selling (rt .) Gage Dia . or Perf., Slolled. etc. Ca sti ng (in .) U sed Screen Mfg ., ii commercial From To Screen <)_ Jll t 'L:c . -I /,.. 5 d__ .,J1J ~ ... /,,fh j /...,.:::.:.. 'X ( ·-, () /(j. J..L_ 9) CEMENTING DATA Cemented from () fllo~(?~ __ ft . No .olsacks u sed ____ _ ____ rt.lo ft . No .olsac ksused ____ _ Melhodused Cemenledby Di slance lo seplic system fieldlinesorolherconcentraled con tamination fS V ft . Mc lhod olverific::i tion olabovedislance --=r4.,.f~<--------- 10 )SURFAC OMPLETION Specified Surface Slab In stalled 0 Specified Sleet Sleeve Installed O Pitless Adapter U sed 0 Approved Alt ern ative Procedure Used 11) WATER LEVEL: Sl alic lev el W ft. below land surface Ar1esian Oow ________ gpm . 12) PACKERS : Type ""Date Dale _____ _ . Deplh I certify that I drilled !h is well (or lhe well was drilled under my direct supervision) and Iha! each and all of the slalemenls herein are !rue and correct. I understand !hat failure to complete items 11hr_u 1,P will re:ull i~ the l~:(s) being relur;,ed lor _c~~pletion and resubmiltal . . ~ ,/, , . COMPANY NAME t -Y1ii<-.rv / ,t/ td/ :Y . e l J ,u WELL DRILLER'S LICENSE NO. /. ') ti£ JtJ T (Type or prinl) I > . ~ESS <)J) \-(-a!Wc ~1~1 ct r/2/JA. o/ / ~lor~L// C9~l (Signed) ~M.t7_,L--~ /~~ , (State) ~ 7 '2/?--tJf ~ (Zip) (Signed) --~ (Licensed Well Dri ll er) ,,.... Please attach electric log, chemical analysis . and other pertinent infonnation, if available. (Register ed Driller Trainee) I TDLR FORM 001WWD (4/98) White -TDLR Yellow -DRILLER Pink -WELL OWNER Qo\ Send original c opy by certified ret urn receipt req uested mail to: T DL R, P.O . Bo x 12157, Au stin, TX 78711 A TT ENTION OWN ER: Confiden tiality State o f Texas Texas Departmen t of Licensing & Privilege Notice on roverse sido Regul atio n of Well Owner's copy (pink} WELL REPORT P.O. B o x 12157 Austin, TX 78711 -- ( 512-463-7880 1) OWNER Grand Operating ADDRESS 1530 3 Dallas Pkwy #1 0 10 Ad dison. Tx 7500 1 (Narre) {Street or RFD) {City) (State) (Zip) 2) ADDRES~OF WELL'S LOCATION : 3 Miles of Co llege Station. Texas Long. Lat. County razos East {Streel.RFDorother) (City) (Slate) (Zip) Grid# 59-30 -6 3) TYPE OF W ORK (Check): (4 ) PROPOSED USE (Check): 0Monilor O Environment a l Soil Boring ~Domest ic 5) ~ NewWell O Deepening O Industrial O Irrigation O Injection O PublicSupply O De-watering O Testwell O Reconditioning O Plugging If Public Supply well, were p lans submitted to the TNRCC? 0 Yes QNo 6) WELL LOG: DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) DRILLING METHOD (Check ): O Driven Date Drilling : Dia . (in .) From{lt .) To(ft .) O Air Rotary JD Mud Rotary O Bored Started 2-26-19 99 H Surface 42 0 O Air Hammer O Cable Tool O Jetted 3-2-19 9 9 • Completed O 01her N From (ft.) To (ft .) Description and color of formation material 8) B orehole Complet ion (Check): O Open Hole O Straight Wall 0 2 Topsoil . O Underreamcd 00 Gravel Packed O Other ---- ~·-· . ---· .. ... -· " G1;.1vol Packed uivo inl<t1VOJI hrnn IU II. to 920 ti . 2 60 Clay 6 0 114 Shale CA SING, BLANK PI PE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: _ll4 ___ __126..__ _____ st.reaky __ sand ____________ New Steel. P lastic, olc . Solling(JI.) Gago 1 '" ??R Shale Dia . or Perl ., Slolled. etc. Ca sling 228 300 Streakv Sand {in .) Used Screen Mfg .. if commercial From To Screen ".\0 0 113 Shale 4 N PVC Well Casing 0 230 313 1 70 Sand 4 N PVC Screen 230 320 .0 14 1?0 "l'>'i Shale 4 N PVC Blank 320 355 '..-1 'i 'i 170 ~<>nrl 4 N r v L !:>creen J.'.>.'.> ]/U ."0 14 I 1Q'i Shale q N r vL n.tanK _j/U 4LU 9) CEMENTING D ATA 'iY'> 1.00 ~:n1it Cemeotedfrom 0 ft.to 10 ft . No . o( sacks used 2 (Use reverse side of Well Owner's copy, if necessary} ft .to ft . No . of sacks used 13)0 Well plugg~d within 48 hours Method used Pressure Siegert Water Wells, Inc. Casing l~n in wdl: c~m.:nl.'l~nlonil~ pla .:~<I in wdl: s'""' us.:d : Cemented by From {fl) To {ft) From (ft) . , . -... Distance to septic system field lines or olher conoenlraled contamination 150 ft . To {II) Method of verification of above dislance Landowner 14) TYPE PUMP: 10) SU RFACE CO M PLETION 0 Turbine o~ 0 Submersible 0 Cyfnder 0 Specified Surface Slab Installed []j 01her Did Not Set Flhm> !KJ Specified Steel Sleeve Installed Oeplh to pump bowls, cylinder , jel . elc ., fl. O P~lessAdap l erUsed 15) WELL TESTS : 0 Approved Alternative Procedure U sed Type lest: 0 PulJ1l 0 Bailer KJ JeHed O Estimated 11) W ATER LEVEL : Yield: 40 gpm wilh 166 fl. drawdown afler 2 hrs . Slalic level 74 fl. be low land surface Dale 3-2-99 16 ) W ATER QUA LITY : Artesian now gpm. Dale Did you knowingly penelrale any strata which contained undesirable consliluenls? 12) PAC K ERS : Type Depth 0 Yes fJ No If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNj1[~~~ATER" Typeofwater? Good Depthofstrala Was a chemical analysis made? 0Yes [XI No I certify thal I drilled lhis well (or the well was drilled under my direcl supervision) and lhat each and all of lhe sl atemenls herein are true and correct. I understand thal failure to complete items 1 l hru 16 will resull in lhe log{s) being returned for completion and resubmillal. r 0 MPANY N AME Siegert Water Wells, (Type or print) Inc. W ELL DRILLER'S LICENSE NO. 9252PW ADDRESS 4411 Burt Rd. Bryan, Texas 77807 f_}At:;<JA {Str~torRFD) (City) {S1ale) (Zip) (Signed) ~,-e~ (Signed) ----!/ {Licensett'Well Driller) ' {Registered Driller Trainee) i Please attach electric l o g , chemical analy sis, a n d other pertinent I nformation, If a v allable. TDLR FORM 001WWD (4/98) White· TDLR Yellow· DRILLER Pink· WEL L OWNER .d onginal copy by certified return receipt requested mail to: TNRCC, MC 177, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, TX 78711-3087 l ATTENTION OWNE"' """'""'"'''> State of Texas Texas Water Well Drillers Advisory Council Privilege Notice on on reverse side MC177 of Well Owner's copy (pink) WE LL RE PORT P.O. Box 13087 Austir., r.< 78711-3087 512-239-0530 , 1) OWNER Darwin Wittneben ADDRESS li3 Lynn Dr If 33. Brvan. TX 77801 (Name) (Street or RFD) (City) (State) ·Zip) 't 2) ADDRESS OF WELL : of College Station, TX 59-31-4 County BrnzQs 5 miles southeast GRID# ... · (Street. RFD or other) (City) (State) (Zip) 3) TYPE OF WORK (Check): 4) PROPOSED USE (Check): O Monitor ~ Environmental Soil Boring XX Dom estic 5) 4;XNewWell :::::J Deepening C Industrial CJ Irrigation O Injection C Public Supply O De-watering O Testwell = Reconditioning :::::J Plugging If Public Supply well. were plans submitted to the TNRCC? O Yes 0 No • 6) WELL LOG : DIAMETER OF HOLE 7) DRILLING METHOD (Check): O Driven Date Drilling : Dia .(in.) From (ft.) To{ft.) O AirRotary Kl Mud Rotary O Bored Started 9L8 19~7 fi ~ Surface 743 O AirHammer O Cable Tool O Jetted Completed 9L9 19..9.l_ 3 7/8 2L..1 11') C: Other N' From (ft.) To (ft) Description and color of formation material 8) Borehole Completion (Check): O Open Hole O Straight Wall 0-? tnn.::ni 1 O Underreamed O Gravel Pa cked 2tJ Other telescope 2-21 clav If Gravel Packed give interval ... from ft . to ft. 21-39 shale CASING , BLANK PIPE, AND WELL SCREEN DATA: 1Q-'il !':tr?;ikv s;ind New Steel. Plastic, etc. Setting{ft.) Gage 'i1-Q9 sh::il e Dia. or Pert ., Slotted, etc. Casting QQ-lQ.R c:trP.'l.kV s:>nrl (in.) Used Screen Mfg., if commercial From To 2:reen 198-?11 !=:h::>l p 4 N PVC Well Casing +l 243 ?11-?1.R c:trP;ikv c:::inrl 2~ N PVC Blank 235 250 218-230 shale 2~ N PVC Slotted Screen 250 290 .010 230-235 streaky sand 2~ N PVC Blank 29 0 315 '35-257 shale 9) CEMENTING DATA [Rule 338 .44( 1 )] !..57-264 sandy shale Cemented from 0 ft. to 243 It. No . of sacks used 17 264-276 streakv sand ft. to ft. No . of sacks used 276-289 sandy shale Method used Pressure 289-315 shale Cemented by Siegert Water Wells 1 Inc. (Use reverse side of Well Owner's copy. if necessary) Distance to septic system field line s or other concentrated contaminatio n 150ft. 13) TYPE PUMP: Method of verification of above distance land owner = Turbine O Jet 00 Submersible C Cylinder =Other 10) SURFACE COMPLETION Depth to pump bowts . cyli nder. jet . etc .. 200 ft. ~Specified Surface Slab Installed [Rule 338.44(2){A)] O Specified Steel Sleeve Installed [Rule 338.44{3){A)] 14) WELL TESTS : O Pitless Adapter Used [Rule 338.44{3){b)] Type test: O Pump O Bai ler [1j Jetted O Estimated O Approved Alt ernative Procedure Used [Rule 338.71] Yield : 20 gpm with 78 ft . drawdcwn after 2 hrs . 11) WATER LEVEL: Static level 90 ft . below land surface Date 9/9/97 15) WATER QUALITY : Artesian flow gpm . Date Did you knowingly penetrate any strata which contained und esirable constituents? =Yes ~o If yes, submit "REPORT OF UNDESIRABLE WATER' 12) PACKERS : Type Depth Type of water? good Depth of strata 264-289 1-K Was a chemical analysis made? CJ Yes :ex No I hereby certify that this well was drilled by me {or under my supervision) and that each and all of the statements herein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that failure to complete items 1 thru 15 will result in th e log{s) being returned for completion and resubmittal. COMPANY NAME Siegert Water Wells, Inc. WELL DRILLER 'S LICENSE NO. 0897WI ) {Type or print) -ooRE'.tj_ 44ti Burt Road Brvan /) TX 77807 .-.rfiM/J--{City) u~s;~%Z--{Zip) {Signed) !J · (Signed) ~ I {Gcensed)"ell Driller) ' {Regis!ired Driller Trainee) Please attach electric log, chemical analysis, and other pertinent information, if available. TNRCC ·0199 (Rev . 05 -21-96 1 White -TNRCC Yellow -DRILLER Pink -WELL OWNER ~2\ APPENDIXE EDR Report of Regulatory Search and Related Correspondence The EDR-Radius Map with GeoCheck® Creagor/Thurmond Tracts TX State Hwy. 6/Greens Prairie College Station, TX 77845 Inquiry Number: 498716.ls May 23, 2000 ®:Environmental :Data : Resources, Inc . • : an .£edrcompany The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road Southport, Connecticut 06490 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edmet.com ~'--~~~~~~~~T_A_B_L_E_o_F_c~O-N~T~E~N-T_s~··~-·-· ~-'-·~·-·~···-·•"--''I SECTION PAGE Executive Summary_______________________________________________________ ES1 Overview Map ______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Detail Map ____________________________ .__________________________________ 3 Map Findings Summary ____________________________________________________ 4 Map Findings ____________________________________________________________ 5 Orphan Summary ________________________________________________________ . 9 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum. _________________________________________ . A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary ___________________________________________ . A-2 Physical Setting Source Map ________________________________________________ A-7 Physical Setting Source Map Findings________________________________________ A-8 Physical Setting Source Records Searched ____________________________________ . A-9 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any que sti ons or comments. Disclaimer and Other Information This Report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources and Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) makes no representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, reliability, quality, suitability, or completeness of said information or the information contained in this report. The customer shall assume full responsibility for the use of this report. NO WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, SHALL APPLY AND EDR SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF SUCH WARRANTIES . IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. COPYRIGHT (C) 2000 BY ENVIRONMENT AL DAT A RESOURCES , INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Unless otherwise indicated, all trademarks used herein are the property of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. TC498716 .1s Page 1 ~~~~~~~~~~E_x_E_c_u_·T_iv_E~s_u_M_M_A_R_v~~--'-~~~~···_·_·.···_.'I A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources , Inc . (EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental S ite Assessments, E 1527-97 . Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user. TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS TX STATE HWY . 6/GREENS PRAIRIE COLLEGE STATION , TX 77845 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): 30 .572300 -30 · 34 ' 20.3" Longitude (West): 96.255800 -95 • 15' 20 .9" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 14 UTM X (Meters): 763194 .2 UTM Y (Meters): 3385228 .8 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property : 2430096-E3 WELLBORN , TX Source: USGS 7 .5 min quad index TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. SURROUNDING SITES: DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR 's search of availab le ( "reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the ASTM E 1527-97 search radius around the target property for the following Databases : FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL: _________________________ National Priority List Delisted NPL: ________________ NPL Deletions CERCLIS: ____________________ Comprehensive Environmental Response , Compensation , and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP: _______________ Comprehensive Environmental Response , Compensation, and Liability Information System CORRACTS: _________________ Corrective Action Report RCRIS-TSD: _________________ . Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-LOG: _________________ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-SQG: _________________ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System ERNS : _______________________ Emergency Response Notification System STATE ASTM STANDARD SHWS: _______________________ State Haz . Waste CLI: __________________________ MSW Closed and Abandoned Landfills FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENT Al CONSENT: ___________________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees TC 498716 .1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 ~~~~~~~~~~-E_x_E_c_u_T_1v_E_s_u_M~M_A_R_Y~~~~~~~~--'·1 ROD: _________________________ ROD FINDS: _______________________ Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report HMIRS: _______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System MLTS : ________________________ Material Licensing Tracking System MINES=----------------------· Mines Master Index File NPL Lien: ____________________ NPL Liens PADS: _______________________ PCB Activity Database System RAATS: ______________________ RCRA Administrat ive Action Trac king System TRIS: _________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA : _______________________ . Toxic Substances Control Act STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST: _________________________ Petroleum Storage Tank Database TX Spills: ____________________ TX Spills TX VCP: ______________________ Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission TX MM: _______________________ Multi Media Enforcement Cases TX IHW: ______________________ Industrial & Hazardous Waster Database WasteMgt: _________ ----------WasteMgt AIRS: ________________________ Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsyst e m EDR PROPRIETARY DAT ABASES Coal Gas: ____________________ Former Manufactured gas (Coal Gas) Sites . SURROUNDING SITES : DATABASES WITH MAPPED SITES Unmapped (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis . Elevations have been determined from the USGS 1 degree Dig ital Elevation Model and should be eva luated on a relat ive (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of clos e proximity should be field verified . EDR 's definition of a site with an elevation equal to th e targ et property includes a tolerance of +/-1 o feet. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the targ et property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property {by more than 1 O feet). Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Rad ius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed . Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases . STATE ASTM STANDARD SWF/LF: Th e Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contai n an inve ntory of so lid wast e disposal fac ilities or landfills in a particular state . The data come from the Texa s Natural Resour ce Conservation Commission's permitted Solid Waste Facilities list. A revi ew of the SWF/LF list , as provided by EDR , and dated 03/01/2000 has reve aled t hat the re is 1 SWF/LF site within approximately 1 mile of the target property . Equal/Higher Elevation Not report ed Address Dist/ Dir MaplD Page 1.6M S OF COLLEGE STATI 1/2 -1 WNW 2 6 TC498716 .1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 . . . . . .. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY } ·. .. . ... LUST: The Leaking Underground Sto rage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents . The data come from the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 's Leaking Petroleum Storage Tank Database. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/03/2000 has revealed that there are 2 LUST sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property . Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page PONDEROSA TEXACO(FORMER ) GTE SPRING CREEK STATION 3700 S HWY 6 1605 GREENS PRAIRIE RD 1/2-1 SSW 3 1/2 -1 s 4 UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs . USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission 's Petroleum Storage Tank Database . A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR , and dated 01/03/2000 has revealed that there is 1 UST site w ith in approximately 1 mile of the target property. 7 8 Equal/Higher Elevation SPRING CREEK EXCH BLDG Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page 1605 GREENS PRAIRIE RD 1/2 -1 SE 1 5 TC4987 16.1 s E XECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 . •· . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information , the following sites were not mapped: Site Name 450'0FF FM2118 , 3050'NW HOPES CRK RD , 2.75M W OF C 2.75MI SE SH6/LOOP507 INTRSC ,ADJ NW SIDE GREENS PR CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE #8000 ARC/AMS , INC . 7-11 STORE #26108 PLANTATION STORE TEXAS AVE TIGERLAND EXPRESS EXPRESS MART #103 DOUGLASS NISSAN RAYCO OIL COMPANY TEXAS A&M UNIV. THE BODY SHOP RESEARCH FACILITY HEAT TRANSFER RESEARCH , INC . ELECTRONIC SENSORS AND SYSTEMS DIVISION TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY HUBBELL CUSTOM MARBLE RESIMAR CORPORATION CONTINENTAL EXPRESS CLL TEXAS A&M AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENTAL STAT 0 .5 Ml , 3RD CR ON RT 1688 E OF COLLEGE STATION FM 60 AT VET SCHOOL 3 Ml SE OF SOMEWHERE IN COLLEGE STATION WELBORN RD S OF Database(s) SWF/LF SWF/LF LUST LUST LUST LUST LUST UST UST AST TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW TXIHW AIRS AIRS AIRS AIRS AIRS TC498716 .1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 ·1 OVERVIEW MAP -498716.1 s -CSC Eng. & Envl.Cons, Inc * Target Property • Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property Coal Gasification Sites Crf requested) National Priority List Sites Landfill Sites TARGET PROPERTY: Creagor/Thurmond Tracts 0 N Power transmission fi nes N Oil & Gas pipelines ~ 100-year flood zone ~ 500-year flood zone 1/~ CUSTOMER: ADDRESS: CITY/STA TE/ZIP: LAT/LONG : TX State Hwy . 6/Greens Prairie College Station TX 77845 30 .5723196.2558 CONTACT: INQUIRY//: DATE: D CSC Eng. & Envl.Cons, Inc RlckConln 498716 .15 May 23, 2000 8:54 am 1 lollle• DETAIL MAP • 498716.1 s • CSC Eng. & Envl.Cons, Inc * Target Property • Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property .1 Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) • Sensitive Receptors f: j National Priority List Sites -Landfill Sites TARGET PROPERTY: CreagorfThurmcmd Tracts * D N Power transmission lines N Oil & Gas pipelines ~ 100-year flood zone ~ 500-year flood zone 1N6 CUSTOMER: ADDRESS : CITY/STA TE/ZIP: LAT/LONG : TX State Hwy. 6/'Greens Prairie College Station TX 77845 30 .5723196.2558 CONTACT: INQUIRY#: DATE: 1 .. CSC Eng. & Envl.Cons, Inc RlckConln 498716.1s May 23, 2000 8:54 am ~· ... .. .. ·. •· /. / X)I .. MAP .FINDINGS SUMMARY -. . · ..... • •·• ·. ·. " . .· .·· .. · ... ·· Search Target Distance Total Database Property {Miles) < 1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 -1 > 1 Plotted FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CERCLIS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CERC-NFRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RCRIS-TSD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 EANS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 STATE ASTM STANDARD State Haz. Waste 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 State Landfill 1.000 0 0 0 1 NA 1 cu 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 LUST 1.000 0 0 0 2 NA 2 UST 1.000 0 0 0 1 NA 1 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENT AL CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 FINDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 HMIRS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 MLTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 MINES 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 NPL Liens 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 PADS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 RAATS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 TRIS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 TSCA 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 TX Spills 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 TXVCP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 Tx Multimedia 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 Tx Ind Haz Waste 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 WasteMgt 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 AIRS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NA 0 EDR PROPRIETARY DATABASES Coal Gas 1.000-0 0 0 0 NA 0 AQUIFLOW -see EDA Physical Setting Source Addendum TP -Target Property NR =Not Requested at this Search Distance • Sites may be listed in more than one database TC498716.1s Page 4 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft .) Elevation Site ~ -_- . •·· . . -MAP FJNDiNGS . --_ . ·-<I EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Coal Gas Site Search: No site was found in a search of Real Property Sean's ENVIROHAZ database. 1 SE 1/2-1 2923 Higher SPRING CREEK EXCH BLDG 1605 GREENS PRAIRIE RD W COLLEGE STATION, TX 77804 UST: Fac ility ID: 0033474 Tank ID: Tank Installer: Not reported Tank Emptied : No Capacity: · 4000 Tank Material of Construction : Pipe Material of Construction : Other Materials of Construction : Tank Status : Tank Construction & Containment: Pipe Construction & Containment : Other Construction & Containment: Tank Substance Stored : Other Substance Stored : Tank Release Detection : Pipe Re lease Detection : Othe r Release Detection : Tank Corrosion Protection : Pipe Corrosion Protection : Pipe Corrosion Protection II : Other Corrosion Protection : Spill and Overfill Protection : Spill and Overfill Protection II : Vapor Recovery Equipment Status : Equipment Installed Date: Equ ipment Installer: Contractor Registration Number: Tank Registration Date: Installer License Number: Fa c il it y ID: Tan k ID: 0033474 1A Tank Installer: Not reported Tank Emptied : No Capacity: 4000 Tank Material of Construction : Pipe Material of Construction : Other Materials of Construction : Tank Status: Tank Construction & Containment: Pipe Construction & Containment: Other Construction & Containment: Tank Substance Stored: Other Substance Stored: Tank Release Detection: Pipe Release Detection : Pipe Release Detection II : Other Release Detection : Customer ID : Installation Date: Tank Tested : Status Date: Unit ID: Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Steel Not reported Removed from the Ground Not reported Not reported Not reported Diesel Not reported None No ne Not reported None Cathodic Protect ion System Noncorrodible Material (e .g . FRP) Not reported Un k nown/None Tight-Fill Fitting Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 12/03/86 Not reported Customer ID : Installation Date: Tank Tested : Status Date: Unit ID: Fiberglass-Reinforc ed Plastic (FRP) Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Not reported In Use Double Wall Double Wall Double Wall Diesel Not reported Interstitial Monitoring for Double Wall USTs Line Leak Detectors Tightness Testing Automatic Mon . UST 01164 01/01/85 No 09/01/91 00088499 01164 09/01/91 No Not reported 00088500 U001266623 N/A TC498716.1s Page 5 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft .} · .... ·1 Elevation Site 2 WNW 1/2-1 3502 Higher SPRING CREEK EXCH BLDG (Continued} Tank Corrosion Protection : Pipe Corrosion Protection : Pipe Corrosion Protection II : Other Corrosion Protection : Spill and Overfill Protection : Spill and Overfill Protection II : Vapor Recovery Equipment Status : Equipment Installed Date : Equ ipment Installer: Cont ractor Registration Number: Tan k Registration Date: Installer License Number: Noncorrodible Material (e.g . FRP) Not reported Noncorrodible Materi al (e .g . FRP) Not reported Automatic Overfill Device -Shut-Off Valve Tight -Fill Fitting Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 12/03/86 Not reported 1.6M S OF COLLEGE STATION, NE OF SH 6. COLLEGE STATION, TX LF : Facility ID : Populat ion Served : Area Served• Tons per Day: Yards per Day : Est imated Cleanup Date : Removal Status : Engin eer: Status Date : Bus ine ss Type : Organic Acres : Facility Status : Amendment: Recieved Date: Region : Region Code: Extra Territorial Jurisdiction : lat/Long: Applicant Name: Applicant Address : Applicant Telephone : River Basin Code: Respons ible Engenier: Start Date : County Name : County Code: County: County Name: County Gov't Code : Co unty Region : Fips County Code: Owner Name: Owner Address : 419 30000 COLLEGE STATION 75 0 .00 19770301 PERMIT #419 ISSUED 8/23/76 Not reported Not reported CITY 15.00 GRANDFATHER SITE Not reported 03/31/1975 STATE 9 N/A 30• 34.40" o-/ 96-16.20 ' o- COLLEGE STATION , CITY OF PO BOX 9960 COLLEGE STATION , TX 77840 (713} 846-8868 12 Not reported Not reported Brazos 21 21 Brazos 13 9 Not reported DR . LG. JONES 900 S HEREFORD COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 Facility Type : SANITARY LANDFILL, DAILY COYER REQUIRED (POPULATION EQUIVALENT SERVED EXCEEDS 5000 PEOPLE} Permit Status: Permit Combined With Another Permit EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SWF/LF U001266623 S103220666 N/A TC498716.1 s Page 6 -~- Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft .) Elevation Site ~··.···· (Continued) Facility ID: Population Served : Area Served : Tons per Day: Yards per Day: Estimated Cleanup Date : Removal Status : Engineer: Status Date : Business Type: Organic Acres: Facility Status: Amendment: Recieved Date: Region : Region Code: Extra Territorial Jurisdiction : laVLong: Applicant Name: Applicant Address : Applicant Telephone: River Basin Code : Responsible Engenier: Start Date: County Name: County Code : County: County Name: County Gov't Code: County Region : Fips County Code: Owner Name: Owner Address : ·. MAPFINDiNGS 419 28000 COLLEGE STATION 85 0 .00 19770301 Not reported Not reported 12/04/1996 CITY 50.30 GRANDFATHER SITE A 05/26/1978 STATE 9 N/A 30· 34.45. o-/ 96" 16.00· o- COLLEGE STATION , CITY OF PO BOX9960 COLLEGE STATION , TX 77840 (713) 846-8868 12 Not reported 12/04/1996 Brazos 21 21 Brazos 13 9 Not reported DR. LG. JONES PO BOXJ COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 ·.·· 1 Facility Type: SAN.IT ARY LANDFILL, DAILY COVER REQUIRED (POPULATION EQUIVALENT SERVED EXCEEDS 5000 PEOPLE) 3 SSW 1/2-1 4047 Higher Permit Status : Closed Site Permit Issued (Final Cover Complete) PONDEROSA TEXACO(FORMER) 3700 S HWY 6 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LUST S103220666 S104158458 N/A TC498716 .1 s Page 7 .-. Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft .) ij :: · .. ... . . . > : : MAP ANDIN(2S :· •. :::: .·. ·: ..... <, EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 4 South 1/2-1 4792 Higher PONDEROSA TEXACO(FORMER) (Continued) LUST : Facility ID : Data Entry Date : PST Coordinator: Region : Leaking Tank#: Responsible Party: RP Contact : RP Address : RP Telephone : Location : County Code: Priority: Status: 0001318 6(7/95 AIP/RPR/AES/ERN 09 109464 H & M WHOLESALE JAMES BOEDECKER 1214 S COLLEGE AVE BRYAN, TX 77803 409/779-3008 3700S HWY6 021 Discovery Date : 1/9/95 Lead Office : 1/2/1 P/1 APR Coordinator: AIP Region City ID : WACO GW IMPACTED, NO APPARENT THREATS OR IMPACTS TO RECEPTORS INCIDENT REPORTED , INITIAL DIRECTIVES NOT YET ISSUED GTE SPRING CREEK STATION 1605 GREENS PRAIRIE RD W COLLEGE STATION, TX LUST LUST: Faci lity ID : Data Entry Date : PST Coordinator: Region : Leaking Tank #: Responsible Party: RP Contact : RP Address : RP Telephone : Location : County Code: Priority: Status: 0033474 12/9/91 HMW 09 100166 GTE SOUTHWEST INC KEN BEARD 290 E CARPENTER FWY IRVING, TX 75062 214/717-7840 GREEN PRAIRIE RD 021 Discovery Date : 8/26/91 Lead Office : DISTRICT LEAD APR Coordinator : HELEN WELCH Region City ID : WACO MINOR SOIL CONTAMINATION -DOES NOT REQUIRE A RAP FINAL CONCURRENCE ISSUED, CASE CLOSED S104158458 S104173587 N/A TC498716.1s Page 8 .. ~ / ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDRID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) Fac ili ty ID COLLEGE STATION S102749735 RAYCO OIL COMPANY FM 158 TX IHW TXT COLLEGE STATION S103499490 CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE #8000 HWY21 LUST 0010358 COLLEGE STATION S102753113 TEXAS A&M UNIV . HIGHWA Y 21 w TXIHW TXD COLLEGE STATION U003373180 TIGERLAND EXPRESS 12727 FM 2154 77845 UST 0070845 COLLEGE STATION S104297297 450 '0FF FM2118 , 3050'NW HOPES CRK RD , SWF /LF 01216 2.75MWOFC COLLEGE ST A TION S10378 1593 0.5 Ml, 3RD CR ON RT 1688 E OF COLLEGE AIRS STATION COLLEGE ST A TION S103784367 FM 60 AT VET SCHOOL AIRS COLLEGE STATION S103606394 THE BODY SHOP HIGHWAY 60 W TXIHW TXD COLLEGE STATION S103613601 RESEARCH FACILITY 2881 F AND B RD 77845 TXIHW TXR COLLEGE STATION S103610291 HEAT TRANSFER RESEARCH, INC. BLDG . 1297 FISH TANK RD . TXIHW TXD COLLEGE STATION S104173580 ARC/AMS , INC . 3001 E BYPASS 77845 LUST 0004121 COLLEGE STATION S103601362 ELECTRONIC SENSORS AND SYSTEMS DIVISION 2501 E BYPASS 77845 TXIHW TXD COLLEGE STATION A100121010 DOUGLASS NISSAN 1001 E BYPASS HWY 6 77845 AST 0070057 COLLEGE STATION S103606289 TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY 2655 DAIRY CENTER AD 77845 TX IHW TXD COLLEGE STATION S103603176 HUBBELL CUSTOM MARBLE GRAHAM RD . TXIHW TXD COLLEGE ST A TION S102742064 RESIMAA CORPORATION 5AGRAHAM RD 77845 TXIHW TXD COLLEGE STATION S102758833 CONTINENTAL EXPRESS CLL 3 MCKENZIE BLVD . 77845 TXIHW TXD COLLEGE STATION S103498306 7·11 STORE#26108 1714 SOUTHWEST PKWY LUST 0007230 COLLEGE STATION S104173579 PLANTATION STORE 1804 S PLANTATION DR LUST 0001312 COLLEGE STATION S104273202 TEXAS A&M AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENTAL STAT 100 RESEARCH PKWY STE 150 77845 TXIHW TXD COLLEGE STATION S103783901 3MISEOF AIRS COLLEGE STATION S103221764 2.75MI SE SH6/LOOP507 INTRSC ,ADJ NW SIDE SWF/LF 1444 GREENS PR COLLEGE STATION S103781591 SOMEWHERE IN COLLEGE STATION AIRS COLLEGE STATION S104271921 TEXAS AVE LUST COLLEGE STATION U003529578 EXPRESS MART #103 3998 TEXAS AVES 77845 UST 0071658 COLLEGE STATION S103784635 WELBORN RD S OF AIRS TC498716 .1 s Page 9 .. GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA ·CURRENCY T.RACKING :, .. '•,·. ){ .. ·:· .. ·.:··. :· .... ··.·:-:· · .. : ·.· · ... ·.··: .. :.: .:"" ........ · :> · ... · .·.·. : .. ·. ·::.·.-·.·.· .. · .· .. ·.-:. . . .... : .... : : .... , ..... :: .. ·: ... · :.:.>:.... . . To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required . Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this EDR report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating requirement of the ASTM standard . FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RECORDS NPL: National Priority List Source : EPA Telephone : N/A National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Supertund Program . N PL srtes may encompass relatively larg e areas . As such , EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1 ,000 NPL srte boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC). Date of Government Version : 02/04/00 Date Made Active at EDA: 03/15/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DELISTED NPL: NPL Deletions Source : EPA Telephone: N/A Date of Data Arrival at EDA: 02/07/00 Elapsed ASTM days : 37 Date of Last EDR Contact : 02/07/00 The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollu1ion Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425 .(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate . Date of Government Version : 11/08/99 Date Made Active at EDR : 03/15/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR : 02/07/00 Elapsed ASTM days : 37 Date of Last EDR Contact : 02/08/00 CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation , and Liability Information System Source : EPA Telephone : 703-4 13-0223 CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste srtes that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalrties, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Re sponse , Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains srtes which are erther proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and srtes which are in the screening and assessment phase fo r possible inclusion on the NPL Date of Government Version : 02/14/00 Date of Data Arrival at EDR : 03/02/00 Date Made Active at EDR : 03/15/00 Elapsed ASTM days : 13 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact : 02/28/00 CERCLIS-NFRAP: No Further Remedial Action Planned Source : EPA Telephone : 703-413-0223 As of February 1995, CERCLIS srtes designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned " (NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS . NFRAP srtes may be sites where , following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly withou1 the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration . EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future . This policy change is part of the EPA 's Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites . Date of Government Version : 02/14/00 Date Made Active at EDA: 03/15/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDA: 03/02/00 Elapsed ASTM days : 13 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/28/00 TC498716.1 s Page GR - - Agenda Item Cover Sheet Agenda Item #14.6 x Regular Item Consent Item Workshop Item Item Submitted By: K . Foutz, Director of Economic Dev. Council Meeting Date: July 13 , 2000 Director Approval: · City Manager Approval: . Item: Discussion and possible action on a real estate contract between the City of College Station and Susan Cheryl Creagor Helm, individually and as Independent Co -Trustee of the James Carll Creagor Family Trust, Nancy Creagor, George Creagor, James Michael Creagor, Marion Violet Worsham Creagor, individually and as Independent Co-Trustee of the James Carll Creagor Family Trust. Item Summary: The real estate contract provides for purchase of approximately 251 acres generally located at the corner of Greens Prairie Road and State Highway 6. This site acquisition is for future development of a 339 acre Class "A" type business park. The parties of the real estate contract agree that the purchase price for the Creagor property is $2,161,690.00 . The appraised value of the J ~I Creagor property is $2,110,000. ~l.I (fl-Co./2_,., Item Background: In its Strategic Planning process, City Council identified the need to develop plans for future business parks in College Station to increase the diversity of the College Station economy. These plans include acquisition, master planning, development, recruitment and retention for a new Class "A" and Class "B" business park (Vision Statement 7, Strategy lb). Staff is currently negotiating on land for a Class "B" Park. Budgetary and Financial Summary: The total proposed purchase price is $2,161,690.00 and would be funded from the Electric and Water Utility Working Capital. A budget amendment authorizing appropriation of funds for this project will be presented at a future City Council meeting. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that City Council approve the real estate contract contingent upon simultaneous closing of the Thurmond/Windham property. http://www2 .ei .college-station .tx .us/counci1Agendas/2000/000713/14 .6 .htm 12/8/2002 From: To: Date: Subject: Charles Cryan Judy Downs 6/20/01 3:02PM Re : Greenways Bond fund Page 1 'I I I'll save you a little time, the council did not authorize the use of greenways funds for acquisition of any of the business park land. We will need to take an item to council to authorize the use of the bonds authorized for Greenways to purchase land that the city would like to dedicate for greenways. I should have just told you that and not sent you on a wild goose chase. I visited with bond council and he indicates that we we can do it just as a council action item. I would even suggest that it be done as a consent item . There are other issues related to this item , and I'm not the one to determine whether we should do this or not. I'm just giving you the process that needs to be followed to get it done, if we decide to do it. >>> Judy Downs 06/20/01 09 :41 AM >>> I still haven't been able to find anything . The last agenda item where it was even discussed was when Mitchell and Morgan was hired for consulting services. The minutes say that the real estate closings were held on 8/14/2000 . Would the council have addressed the funds before that occurred? The 7 /13/2000 minutes only say that "a budget amendment authorizing appropriation of funds for this project will be presented at a future City Council meeting". CC: Mark Smith Katie Fritz -Re: [Fwd : Creager Tract across from Pebble Creek] From: To: Date: Subject: Katie Fritz Mark Smith 3/15/00 10 :43AM Re : [Fwd : Creager Tract across from Pebble Creek] Ed Hard wants to talk to you about the bridge stuff before you talk to Mrs . Creager. He says that we usually don't buy the piece of property before the road/bridge construction is done . We might have to cut out the part where the road/bridge is and wait until the developer puts it in and take it back as a dedication . Or there needs to be some type of agreement with the developer to participate in the cost of the bridge/road since it is vital to his development and not an issue for greenways. The complication comes in that no agreement can be made on the road/bridge probably until someone has an approved Master Plan or Plat. This one doesn't look so easy . Maybe you can tell Mrs . Creager that the city will offer her $2 ,500-2,700 per acre for the greenways land except for the 5-1 O? acres where the road/bridge goes and that will need to be sold to the developer and then we can deal with the developer about that section? I don't know, just a thought. Talk to Ed . The section with the road/bridge is kind of a critical link to the area where spring creek and lick creek join . We would probably want at least a trail crossing there . Katie Fritz Greenways Program Manager Page 1 I Katie Fritz -Re : [Fwd : Creagor Tract across from Pebble Creek] From: To: Date: Subject: Mike, Edwin Hard Katie Fritz ; Michael G . Hester, P.E.; Natalie Ruiz ; Willie Pankonien 3/15/00 9 :33AM Re : [Fwd : Creagor Tract across from Pebble Creek] The discussions we have at to this point have been very preliminary in nature . Be aware that the City's Thoroughfare Plan shows two roadways going through this tract -the Pebble Creek parkway extension as well as an east-west collector. The location of these two roadways on the Creagar tract will have to be coordiinated with where they are shown on the approved Master Development Plan for Pebble Hills . Ed >»"Michael G . Hester, P.E." <hec@gkg .net> 03/14/00 08:46AM »> Hi! Willie Pankonien , Webcon , Inc ., 764 .5666 is interested in developing the 200 acre Creagor tract located along Greens Prairie Road accross from Pebble Creek . Mr. Pankonien recently spoke with Mrs. Creagor and she stated that she has been in discussion with the City pertaining to roadways and linear parks. Could you update me on the discussions of the roadways and parks to this point or point me in the direction to obtain this information . If necessary we could have a pre development meeting? Thank You , Michael G . Hester, P.E. 979 .693 .1100 Page 1 I I Katie Fritz -[Fwd : Creager Tract across from Pebble Creek] From: To: Date : Subject: Katie Fritz Mark Smith 3/14/00 3:34PM [Fwd : Creager Tract across from Pebble Creek] This is the original message from Mike Hester. I will meet with Ed Hard tomorrow . I met with Mrs. Creager today and got 3 additional maps (two are survey plats and one has detailed elevations and landmarks) from her. I will label the maps and leave them on top of my desk. She wants to meet with you next week on Monday afternoon , or anytime Tuesday or Thursday and go over the greenways stuff. She is looking for a little more than $2 ,200 per acre . That number is what the city paid her for the land to straighten out Lick Creek by the landfill. I told her the bridge was an issue as well and she understood . The bridge is an issue with all the developers too . She has been telling the developers that the city might be willing to pay for not more than 30% of the bridge . She thought you said that and I think that must be coming from Ed Hard because I don't remember us talking about the bridge to her. I suggest you talk to Ed before you meet with her. I will try to go over this with Ed tomorrow. Mike Hester will also be setting up a pre-development meeting with Development Serv ices . He wanted to know if Parks would take greenways for park dedication and I said that he has to ask Parks but they will not take the whole dedication in floodplain area . Katie Fritz Greenways Program Manager Page 1 I Katie Fritz -(Fwd : Creagor Tract across from Pebble Creek] From: "Michael G . Hester, P.E." <hec@gkg .net> To: Edwin Hard <ehard@ci.college-station .tx .us>, Katie Fritz <kfritz@ci.college-station .tx .us>, Natalie Ruiz <nruiz@ci.college-station.tx .us>, Willie Pankonien <kemilimo@tca .net> Date: 3/14/00 8 :44AM Subject: [Fwd : Creagor Tract across from Pebble Creek] Hi! Willie Pankonien , Webcon , Inc .. 764 .5666 is interested in developing the 200 acre Creagor tract located along Greens Prairie Road accross from Pebble Creek. Mr. Pankonien recently spoke with Mrs . Creagor and she stated that she has been in discussion with the City pertaining to roadways and linear parks . Could you update me on the discussions of the roadways and parks to this point or po int me in the direction to obtain this information . If necessary we could have a pre development meeting? Thank You , Michae l G . Hester, P.E. 979 .693 .1100 Page 1 [Katie Fritz -Re : Creagor Tract across from Pebble Creek From: To: Date: Subject: "Natalie Ruiz " <NRUIZ@ci .college-station .tx .us> <hec@gkg.net> 3/13/00 1 :52PM Re : Creagor Tract across from Pebble Creek I know that Edwin has been working on thoroughfare alignment in this area (actually , the area bound by Greens Prairie, Rock Prairie and Hwy . 6). I've copied him on th is e-mail so that he knows you're interested . Katie Fritz in Public Works is the Greenways coordinator for the City and I think she's been working with Mrs . Creagor on purchasing some greenways . However , Katie 's last day is Friday and I'm not sure that we've been able to find a replacement. You should touch base with Katie th is week to see what (if anything ) we've agreed to in terms of the Greenway area . »>"Michael G . Hester, P.E." <hec@gkg .net> 03/13/00 01 :43PM »> Natalie , The Creagor tract is about 200 acres across Greens Prair ie Road from Pebble Creek , adjacent to the landfill and Pebble Hills . There is a lot of flood plain on the tract and the Cities through unfair plan has numerous roadways traversing it. Ms. Creagor has stated that she has spoken to City officials about the amount of Linear Park along Lick Creek and the alignment of the roadways through the site??? Have you been involved with th is or do you know anything about it. If not can you find out and get everyone together and set up a a pre development meeting asap . Please let me know. Mike Hester 693 .1100 CC: "Edw in Hard " < EHAR D. City#032#Hall. City#032#of#032#College#032#Station@ci . college-station . tx . us> Page 1 I Katie Fritz -Meeting with Legal Yesterday From: To: Subject: Katie Fritz Mark Smith Meeting with Legal Yesterday Mark, I am very frustrated after my meeting with Legal yesterday afternoon . I was scheduled to meet with Jan Schwartz and John Hamilton to go over his questions about the property appraisals he was working on. These were appraisals that were supposedly ordered on February 23rd . When I got to the meeting, John only had the information on the Craegor property that I had delivered to his office on February 14th, before Legal said that they wanted to order all appraisals for greenways. Jan had the folder of maps and information that I had brought to Legal on February 23rd before Roxanne's meeting with John Hamilton on scheduling and ordering appraisals . So, all this time that we had been waiting for appraisals, they had never been ordered . Then Roxanne and Harvey joined the meeting . I didn 't know that they were coming or what they wanted to discuss . Then the bombardment from Roxanne began . She said that better maps for the appraisals were needed . Specific survey maps with meets and bounds and ground stake surveys should be required from property owners . If they want to sell, they should pay for the surveys before we do appraisals; Legal doesn't want to pay for them . Only if we really want to buy the property should we pay for surveys. I said that the Craegor property had a better map than the one they turned in and I could ask for a copy of it. I wasn't sure if it was a survey map or not but it did have landmarks and measurements and I would check . She said that wasn't good enough , to ask for the survey map . She decided to poorly describe and draw a survey map and tell me that any engineer should know what one looks like. Then Roxanne went on to say that we shouldn't buy the flood plain from the property owners because it was worthless to everyone including the developer. She said that we should wait until the property owner sells the wliole thing to the developer and make the developer dedicate the property to us. Never pay for it. We would have the property in one year or so . And make him put in the bridge over Spring creek before we take that section, which could be several years . John Hamilton pointed out that if we buy the floodplain from the property owner before the sale of other property it would be assessed as floodplain and very low value . If we have to buy the floodplain from the developer who owns the whole piece we have to pay "part of the whole" and the assessed market value . We can ask him to dedicate it, but if he refuses we have to pay the higher value or take it by condemnation . I told them that the floodplain does have some value as a greenway and that we could put trails in it even if it is floodplain. I also said that the Craegors were waiting on the City's greenway proposal before they sell the property to the developer. The Craegors were told, as I understood the process, that we would get a land appraisal and then make them a proposal that would include options to donate/dedicate the property for a tax deduction or that we would offer a price per acre . This proposal would be subject to City Council approval if over $15,000 total. Roxanne said that we should really tell the Craegors we weren't interested in the property and wait to deal with the developer. If we needed to go back and talk with them that we should ask for the survey map/ground stakes to be put out and then just ask what amount per acre she is looking for and discuss if we just want to go ahead and negotiate from that point!? Ok, I will now look like the biggest fool on the planet once I go back and say " The City changed its mind in the last 4 weeks on how we approach priority #2 greenway property . We don't need a land appraisal and make proposals . We now tell you we don't want it and get your developer to donate it or go to condemnation . Or we just say "Let's make a deal!" after you pay for a survey that we won't use any way unless we don't like your price or you won't agree to ours .???? Roxanne also said that we need to schedule what properties we will be dealing with three to six months in P ~ge 1 l I Katie Fritz -Meeting with Legal Yesterday advance even if we don't know when they will walk in the door (like the Craegors did) or when the first pre-development meeting will be . We can't expect appraisals to be done in one or two month time periods , Legal and Land Appraisers are busy people . I am angry and frustrated . I have only worked with Legal in a professional manner. How am I supposed to do my job when the rules or guidelines keep changing? This shouldn't be this hard . I don't appreciate being talked to in a degrading manner like I was a child and that had no clue what I'm doing. Roxanne clearly does not understand the purpose of the Greenways program and what we are trying to accomplish . She does not understand or care that we have pressure from citizens and city council to acquire greenways as quickly as possible . Harvey 's only comment was "Aren't you glad your moving to Kansas?" I wanted to set the city up on its way to purchasing several portions of the Greenway before I left , but apparently Legal thinks I should just leave now . What do I do now? And what do we tell the 3 projects we have pending? Let me know . Page 2 I Public Works o Administration o Engineering o Facility Maintenance o Fleet o Sanitation o Streets/ Drainage o Traffic Signals To: ts\~ 'l;;<..>-t :z" at: ~~"""'''° !>-.~1")0~ (company name) This FAX is being sent to you from: M.c.1V1-\... ~~ This Jax contains 2 pages including the cover sheet, please call if you didn't receive all the information. Additional Comments: \ - City of College Station Public Works Department : .• f P.O. Box 9960 :· 2613 S. Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840 (979) 764-3690 FAX: (979) 764-3489 :• '• ' \.• ... °' .''t " I' ~ 1 1 '/ ' · .. ~j?/01 _.,, I r ' ~'f-"O~ d ~1.i>d, ffiP"llf.' ~s.. "":''tf!(YI ~ ~411 >161VC) / l > \.· ..• •. 'fr , .. i '. ..· .•. ; I Agenda Item Cover Sheet x Regular Item Consent Item I· ~Workshop Item Item Submitted By: Council Meeting Da Director Approval: City Manager Appr i a~o;; l Ul ,L. I Agenda Item #14 .6 I Item: Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a request for a rezooing for the New College Station Business Center, approximately 339 acres located near the northeast intersection of State Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road, from C-1, R-1, R-2, and A-0 to M-1, Planned industrial. (00-185) Item Summary: The City Council recently purchased this property with the intent of developing a new business park in this location. While this proposal does not match the Land Use Plan for this area, the decision of the Council to purchase the property for this purpose is a decision to amend the Land Use Plan. The next small area planning project will be in this area to determine what other adjustments, if any, will be necessary to the Land Use and Thoroughfare Plans . Another area of the Comprehensive Plan, the Greenways Master Plan, is also being addressed with this project. A large portion of the property will be a dedicated greenway. These areas will also serve a secondary purpose of buffering much of the proposed business park from surrounding land uses. Item Background: The subject property was annexed in 1983 and 1995 . The property is currently surrounded by the landfill to the east, residential development and the existing business center to the south across Greens Prairie Road, SH6 and mostly vacant land to the west, and a church and undeveloped land to the north. Related Advisory Board Actions: The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this request on November 16th, 2000. The Commission recommends approval of the rezoning. Meeting minutes are attached. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Council Action Options: 1. Approval of rezoning as submitted. 2. Approval with phys ical conditions that will mitigate negative impacts . 3. Denial. 4. Denial without prejudice (waives 180-day waiting period). 5 . Table indefinitely. 6. Defer action to a specified date. http://cityneUCouncil%20Agendas/2000/001214/Husiness%20Center%200K/Husiness%20Center%20Coversheet.htm 06/20/2001 ... ---o----- Su pporting Mater ials: 1. Infrastructure and Facilities 2. New Business Center Surrow1ding Land Use Graphic 3. P&Z Meetin Minutes from November 16th 2000 4 . Rezoning Ordinance http://cityneUCouncil%20Agendas/2000/001214/Business%20Center%200K/Business%20Center%20Coversheet.htm 06/20/2001 Agenda Item Cover Sheet Regular Item Consent Item Workshop Item Item Submitted By: Council Meeting D Director Approval: lcity Manager Approval: 0 Page 1 of2 I~ Agenda Item #14.6 Item: Discussion and possible action on a real estate contract between the City of College Station and Susan Cheryl Creagor Helm, individually and as Independent Co-Trustee of the James Carll Creagor Family Trust, Nancy Creagor, George Creagor, James Michael Creagor, Marion Violet Worsham Creagor, individually and as Independent Co-Trustee of the James Carll Creagor Family Trust. Item Summary: The real estate contract provides for purchase of approximately 251 acres generally located at the corner of Greens Prairie Road and State Highway 6. This site acquisition is for future development of a 339 acre Class "A" type business park. The parties of the real estate contract agree that the purchase price for the Creagor property is $2,161,690.00. The appraised value of the Creagor property is $2,110,000. Item Background: In its Strategic Planning process, City Council identified the need to develop plans for future business parks in College Station to increase the diversity of the College Station economy. These plans include acquisition, master planning, development, recruitment and retention for a new Class "A" and Class "B" business park (Vision Statement 7, Strategy lb). Staff is currently negotiating on land for a Class "B" Park. Budgetary and Financial Summary: The total proposed purchase price is $2,161,690.00 and would be funded from the Electric and Water Utility Working Capital. A budget amendment authorizing appropriation of funds for this project will be presented at a future City Council meeting . Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that City Council approve the real estate contract contingent upon simultaneous closing of the Thurmond/Windham property. Council Action Options: http ://cityneUCouncil%20Agendas/2000/000713/l 4. 6 .htm 06/19/2001 - 1. Approve real estate contract 2. Disapprove real estate contract. 3. Amend and approve the real estate contract Supporting Materials: 1. Real Estate Contract 2 . Surve 3. Location Map http://cityneUCouncil%20Agendas/2000/000713/l 4 .6 .htrn Page 2 of2 06/19/2001 I Agenda Item Cover Sheet Agenda Item #10. 7 Regular Item 0 Consent Item Workshop Item Item Submitted By: r of Economic Development Council Meeting Date: Director Approval: City Manager Approval: Item: Presentation, discussion and possible action on a consulting services contract with Mitchell & Morgan, L.L.P. to develop a master plan for the new class "A" business park in an amount not to exceed $116,164.00. This is Vision Statement #7, Strategy #lb "Develop New Business Parks." Funds are available and budgeted in the Business Park Fund. Item Summary: Proposals for master planning the new class "A" business park were sent to 29 consulting firms. Three consulting firms (Mitchell & Morgan, Urban Design Group, and Ash & Brown Engineering) responded. A staff committee evaluated and ranked the proposals and as a result, Mitchell and Morgan Engineers was selected as the most qualified firm . This proposal provides for a ten month process and addresses the critical areas outlined in the request for proposals. The project scope includes: • Develop covenants and restrictions • Develop a minimum of three conceptual layouts • Develop a comprehensive master plan including preliminary plat; infrastructure service plan; concept alternatives for landscaping, pedestrian routes, amenities, and connections to greenways; • Develop preliminary cost estimates • Conduct additional environmental evaluation concerning Navasota Ladies Tresses and oil and gas sites • Develop presentation materials and graphics • Work with 4B Corporation and make City Council presentation Due to the complexity of planning a Class "A" business park focusing on technology companies, Mitchell & Morgan has proposed to partner with Knudson & Associates (planners and landscaping), Berg-Oliver Associates (environmental), and Joe Orr Inc. (surveying). Additionally, the Economic Development Department plans to retain a separate consulting firm experienced with site selection and planning for high-tech businesses to assist the City in reviewing drafts of the master plan. Item Background: City Council entered into rnal estate contracts on July 13, 2000 for the purchase of 340 acres located at Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road for the purpose of developing a new class "A" business park. Real estate closings were held on August 14, 2000. The master planning process is the first step in preparing the property for development and is a key milestone for accomplishing the above- referenced City Council Strategy. http://citynet/Council%20Agendas/2001/010322/Husiness%20Park%20Maste1%20Plan/rtp%20coversheettinal.htm 06/20/2001 .\ ) ., J Budgetary and Financial Summary: The total cost for the master planning services as proposed by Mitchell & Morgan will not exceed $116,164.00. Funds are available and budgeted in the Business Park Fund for this project. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval as presented . Council Action Options: 1. Approve consulting contract 2. Disapprove consulting contract 3 . Modify and approve consulting contract Supporting Materials: 1 . Resolution 2. Location Map http://citynet/Council%20Agendas/200I10 I 0322/Business%20Park"/o20Master°/o2 0Plan/rtj:>%20coversheetfinal.htm 06/20/2001 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item Cover Sheet Agenda Item # 11. 9 Regular Item x Consent Item '¥-iur kshop Item !council Meeting Date: llJuly 26 , 2001 Director Approval: Manager Approva · Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action approving an appropriation of $285,825 from the greenways acquisition funds to the Business Park Fund for greenways in the new business park. Item Summary: This action provides for the reimbursement of $285,852 of greenway bond funds into the Business Park Fund to pay for the portion of the Class "A" business park to be designated as a greenway. Item Background: City Council purchased real estate located at Highway 6 and Greens Prairie Road on August 14, 2000, for development of a Class "A" type business park. A portion of that real estate purchase is designated as "greenway" in the Greenway Master Plan. A survey of the property indicates that there is a total of 357.07 acres, and that 102.09 of the acreage is located within the 100 year flood plain. The negotiated price, in coordination with the Economic Development Department, of the greenway acreage was $2,800 per acre. Budgetary and Financial Summary: The City's Bond Election of September 3, 1998 authorizes expenditure of bond funds for the acquisition of land for drainage control and greenbelt purposes. Funds are budgeted and available in the greenways acquisition funds. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that City Council approve the transfer of funds and officially designate the 102.09 acres surveyed, a Suburban Greenway. Suburban Greenways will connect users and their destinations such as neighborhood to other neighborhoods, to businesses, to parks or to schools. file ://P:\GROUP\AGEN-CAL\Council agendas\Comp lete\2 001 \010726\Greenway Fund T... 5/20 /2008 Page 2 of2 Council Action Options: 1. Approve the expenditure of funds from the 1988 Bond Issue for the acquisition of greenways in the new Business Park. 2. Deny approval of the fund transfer. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map file://P :\GROUP\AGEN -CAL\Council agendas\Cornp lete\2001 \010726 \Greenway Fund T... 5/20/2008