Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAR2001-500263CI7Y Of COLLEGE STATION REPRINT ••• CUSTOKER RECEIPT ••• OPER: SS KITH Ci DR~WER: 1 DATE: 12/10/01 00 RECEIPT: 0066896 DESCRIPTION QTY 2001 500263 1 AKOUNT TP TK $150 .00 •PL CK CK: 2735 PLANNING 6c ZONIM TENDER DETAIL CK 2735 $150 .00 DATE: 12/10/01 iIKE : 13 :4&:4S TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $150.00 AKOUNT TENDERED s1se .00 THAMK YOU I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zonin B o/ · ~ hold a public hearing to con ~·d oard of Adjustment wi ll leman, lot 14, block 10 W I er a va'.1ance fo r 902 Hol- Applicant is Janette HopPer.oodson Village Subdivision. The hearing will be held in th . lege Station City Hall 1101; Council Room of the Col - p .m . meeting of the ,Bt> d exas Avenue at the 6 :00 2002 . ar on Tuesday, January 15, Any request for sign · t · impaired must be m~d eerp48ret1hve services for the hearing l'i ours before the · o make arrangements call (979) 764 3 meeting . 800-735-2989. -547 or (TDD) 1- For additional information 1 764-3570 . ' Pease contact me at (979) Jessica J imm erson Staff P lanner 12-26-01 Bryan-College Station Each Office lndependenlly Owned and Opera led Janette Hopper RE A LTO R", GR/, CRS,A BR 526 Uni versity Drive East , Suite 10 1-B . College Stati on , Texas 77840 Offi ce : (979) 764-6000 • Fax : (979) 485 _8567 Mobil e: (979) 777-3993 • Res : (97 9) 778_0220 E-Mail : jhopper@tapmls .co m www.jan etteho pper.co m Processing Cash Receipt Transactions For Garage City of College Station, Texas DEVELOPMENT REVIEW "©~ @&®®&00@ . 902 HOLLEMAN 11 Case: 01-263 ZBA MINUTES Zoning Board of Adjustment January 15, 2002 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 6:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Hill , Lewis , Sheffy, Birdwell & Richards . MEMBERS ABSENT: Alternate Members Goss, Corley & Allison, not needed . STAFF PRESENT: Staff Assistant Grace , Staff Planners Reeves & Hitchcock, Planning Intern Flannery, Assist. City Attorney Robinson, Senior Planner Kuenzel. AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order -Explanation of functions of the Board . Chairman Hill called the meeting to order. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: No request submitted . AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: from November 6, 2001. Consider any absence request forms. Consideration, discussion and possible action of meeting minutes Mr. Birdwell made the motion to approve the minutes . Mr. Richards seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: from December 4, 2001. Consideration, discussion and possible action of meeting minutes Mr. Lewis made the motion to approve the minutes . Mr. Birdwell seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM 5: Consideration, discussion and possible action of two front setback variances at 316 Pronghorn Loop lot 2 block 4, Steeplechase VI. Applicant is Oakwood Custom Homes. (01-208). Ms . Hitchcock, Staff Planner, stepped before the Board and gave a brief report on the case. This case had previously been heard and denied by the Board on October 10, 2001 . Mr. Richards asked if the applicant has provided any new information for them to consider. Ms. Hitchcock replied that nothing has been brought to staff's attention. Chairman Hill opened the public hearing for those wanting to speak in favor of the request . ZBAMinutes January 15, 2002 Page 1 o/5 Alton Ofczarzak, the applicant, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Chairman Hill . Mr. Ofczarzak handed the Board a copy of the survey showing how the curb line to the property was I-foot closer . That radius was used and that is why the encroachment happened . Mr. Ofczarzak explained the survey . Chairman Hill stated that he is not clear how the difference in the distance between the curb and the property line affected the outcome. Mr. Ofczarzak replied that is what was used to define the setbacks . Mr. Ofczarzak showed the Board a diagram of what the house would look if the encroachments were removed from the house . Mr. Ofczarzak told the Board that the way the home looked would be a hardship if the two corners were removed . Mr. Richards asked if the Pronghorn Loop home was being rented or owner occupied now . Mr. Ofczarzak replied that it is being rented . Mr. Richards asked if there was a reason that he did not follow the approved site plan . Mr. Ofczarzak replied that human error would be a factor . Mr. Richards ended by saying that he does not see any additional information on any special conditions or hardships . Mr. Lewis discussed the survey and what should ha ve taken place . With no one else stepping forward to speak in favor or opposition of the request , Chairman Hill closed the public hearing . Mr. Birdwell made a motion to authorize a variance to the minimum setback from the terms of this ordinance as it will not be contrary to the public interest , due to the following special conditions : the encroachment is about 2 sq . ft. out of 1600 sq . ft. in the front yard , the curving street made measurement of the setback difficult ; and because strict enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship to this applicant being : cloud on title and unusual appearance if the encroachment was removed; and such that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done subject to the following limitations : variance limited to encroachment shown on the application . Mr. Sheffy seconded the motion . Mr. Birdwell stated that he understands that he was stretching to find a special condition but the variances on both corners are a total of 2 -sq . ft . It is redicilous to have this cause a problem in selling the house . Mr. Richards stated that he sympathized with the whole situation. But as he stated in the last meeting, he is not personally as concerned about the amount of the variance as he is on how it occurred . Mr. Lewis stated that he is sympathetic and he does not think anyone wants a corner of the house to be knocked off Mr. Lewis stated that there are cul-de-sac lots all over town with curved lot lines and there is nothing special about that. Mr. Lewis stated that he wished this case had come back to the city after the new Unified Development Ordinance was adopted at which time the city staff will be able to grant very small variances . Mr . Lewis ended by saying that although he voted against this case last time he is inclined to vote in favor of it this time . Chairman Hill called for a vote. The Board voted (4-1). Mr. Richards voting against granting the variance. ZBAMinutes January 15, 2002 Page 2of5 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Consideration, discussion and possible action for a side setback variance request at 902 Holleman, lot 14, block 10, Woodson Village Phase I Subdivision. Applicant is Jeanette Hopper. (01-263). Staff Planner Reeves presented her staff report and told the Board that the applicant is requesting a 4 . 8" variance to legitimize a side setback variance . The special condition, the applicant states : " The drainage for this property appears to naturally flow from a southwesterly direction . Construction of a house on the lot disrupts the natural flow and causes the water to flow to the north of the property . The builder appears to have constructed the house on the far side of the lot to enable drainage of water, from this lot and the other properties behind and to the south of this lot , to drain between the pad site (which was built-up) for the house and adjoining lot (lot 13), and · onto the street. The builder apparently felt the house location was needed to avoid having the water drainage dump onto the adjoining lot ." As a hardship the applicant states that there would be water drainage problems for the adjoining lot. Ms . Reeves ended her staff report by showing the Board pictures of the property. Chairman Hill opened the public hearing for those wanting to speak in favor of the request. Steve Strong, the buyer of the home, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Chairman Hill . Mr. Strong told the Board that the owners of the home bought the house in 1995 for their daughter while she went to T AMU . The home has since been rented and the owners are ready to sell . Mr. Strong explained to the Board the existing encroachment and the drainage problems . Chairman Hill asked what bearing does the flooding in the backyard have on the variance . Mr. Strong replied that looking at the situation he believes the builder built the home where he did so there would be a drainage passageway. Mr. Birdwell questioned city staff not being able to write letters for such small encroachments . Senior Planner Kuenzel explained that the City Legal Department would only allow letters for 3" or less . With no one else stepping forward to speak in favor or opposition of the variance request, Chairman Hill closed the public hearing . Mr. Birdwell made the motion to authorize a variance to the minimum setback from the terms of this ordinance as it will not be contrary tot he public interest, due to the following special conditions : the house was apparently set to the south to improve drainage; and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship to this applicant being : no reasonable way to remove encroachment ; and such that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done subject to the following limitations : zero encroachment in the front and 4 .8" in the back. Mr. Sheffy seconded the motion . Mr. Birdwell stated that there should be no basis for a 3" rule . Variances that are small in relationship to the purpose and intent of the ordinance are not pragmatic. Chairman Hill called for a vote. The Board voted (5-0) to approve the variance. ZBAMinutes January 25, 2002 Page3 o/5 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Consideration, discussion and possible action of the proposed Unified Development Code. Senior Planner Kuenzel stepped before the Board and gave an update on the Unified Development Code . Ms . Kuenzel told the Board that currently the Board has submitted their comment as being able to approve variances of no more than I 0%. The current UDO authorizes 20%. Ms . Kuenzel pointed out to the Board that in Section 3.8 of the UDO the criteria for granting variances at staff level are different then ZBA. Ms. Kuenzel stated that when you read the criteria it is easier and would be easier to meet at the staff level then at a variance to the ZBA. Ms . Kuenzel told the Board that she states that because if staff denies a smaller variance it will be for a good reason and it will be even harder for the standards that the ZBA will have to find . In effect , even though staff does not make recommendations, if a case is forwarded to the ZBA for a full variance it will be forwarded with staff recommendations . If no reason was found under the lesser standard, then it will be very difficult to meet the greater standard of special conditions and hardships . In the UDO there is a reference to hardship but no reference to special conditions . So there would be no finding of a special condition at staff level. Mr. Richards stated in the future if staff approves or disapproves a variance, the Board would like to know . Ms . Kuenzel responded that has been noted . Mr. Richards questioned the reasoning for city staff's criteria for denying a variance would be different then the Board's criteria. Ms . Kuenzel replied that it would have to be a request that clearly went against the intent of the ordinance . Mr. Richards asked if hardships or special conditions fall into the policy for staff to deny or approve something . Ms . Kuenzel replied hardships would . Mr. Birdwell stated that a 20% margin is too much . Chairman Hill stated that his first thought when looking at the UDO that the Board should be given a 5% margin . The Board discussed what percent they should have authority. Chairman Hill asked if there were any opinion's from the Board members on whether they should ask for authority of 5 or 10%. The consensus of the Board is to keep the 10% as submitted . Mr. Birdwell asked what are the general comments from the Development Community . Ms. Kuenzel replied that the two main issues have to do with the new process and the comprehensive plan amendment. Chairman Hill stated that he would attend the next P&Z meeting , February 7 concerning the Boards comments on the UDO . ZBAMinutes January 15, 2002 Page 4of5 • AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: items. Consideration, discussion and possible action on future agenda Mr. Birdwell asked to place an item to discuss the Boards regular meeting time. Chairman Hill asked to have the UDO placed back on the February 5 agenda. That would give the Board time to add any additional comments before Chairman Hill attended the February 7 P&Z meeting . Chairman Hill asked to add on the next agenda a discussion by Legal on the term de-rninimus. AGENDA ITEM NO. 9: Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned . APPROVED: Leslie Hill, Chairman a~ Deborah Grace, Staff Assistant ZBAMinutes January 15, 2002 Page5of5 01 /17 /U~ 11:14 TR AN SMISSION OK T X /RX NO. CO NNE CTION T EL CO NN ECTION ID START T H IE USAGE THIE PAGES RES ULT *************************** *** ACTI VITY REPORT *** *************************** 0771 9p4858567 01 /17 11 :14 00 '26 1 OK The Ci!_y of College Station, Texas Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. P.O . Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 • (979) 764-3500 January 17, 2002 Janette Hopper RE/MAXB/CS 526 University Drive East STE 101-B College Station, Texas 77840 www .ci . college-station. tx. us This letter is to confirm that the Zoning Board of Adjustment approved the 4 .8" side setback variance request for 902 Holleman at their meeting January 15 , 2002 . Deborah Grace Secretary to the ZBA Home of Texas A&M University 902 Holleman Slide 1 (title) The applicant is requesting a 4.8" variance to the side setback for 902 Holleman Drive to legalize an encroachment. Slide 2 (SAM) The subject property is located within the Woodson Village Subdivision, which is in an R-1 Single Family Residential zoning District. According to the zoning ordinance, property in an R-1 district is required to have a minimum side setback of 7.5 ft. SPECIAL CONDITION/ HARDSHIP For a special condition, the applicant states: "The drainage for this property appears to naturally flow from a southwesterly direction. Construct10n of a house on the lot disrupts the natural flow and causes the water to flow to the north of the property. The builder appears to have constructed the house on the far side of tlie lot to enable draina_ge of water, from this lot and the other properties behind and to the south of~this lot, to drain between the pad site (wliich was built-up) for the house and adjoining lot (Lot 13), and onto the street. The builder apparently felt the house location was needed to avoid having the water drainage dump onto the adjoining lot". As a hardship the applicant states that there would be water drainage problems for the adjoimng lot. ALTERNATIVES: The applicant offered no alternatives. The Board may grant or deny this variance. Removal of the encroachment is the only alternative to a variance for the house to be in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. I would like to remind the Board that variances run with the land special conditions must relate to the particular property, and the hardship should be a direct result of the special condition. ORDINANCE INTENT: Building setback requirements usually allow for some degree of control over population density, access to light and air, and fire protection. These standards are typically justified on the basis of the protection of property values. There has been one phone inquiry :-- / ---- Chy Ordinance Q l 638 Deed Rest. 316/689 Record docurnents Fer American Title Co. CF 013424 -- I '.3 I I r-~·°'D -----., II BL.-OGK I 0 \ . L.-OT I~ 15 '" '" IN ~el I I I I I I --Z,'6L -~ _,_ ------ N 16·0,·,1 ·1: !!: ltt.0·31,'I!: ~01 HOL-L-EMAN DRIVE 'o· •.o .w. rcx 1'1..AT All of l..ot Number Fourtee (14), Block Number Ten (!O), WOODSON VILl .. AGE FIFTH INSTALLMENT, S!.CTJON ONE, an addition to the City of College Station, Bru.os County, Texas, according to the plat recorded ln Volume 316, p~g• 3,3, Deed Records o! 8razos County, Texas. • • I, James W. MacArthur, Registered Profc$Sional L4nd Surveyor, No. 2089, do hereby cel'llfy that th.is plat correctly represents a Survey, on the ground, mf.de by me or un~er my dl r~ctlon June 9, 199, • This plat was prepared for the purpose ol Title Survey for Truitt & Burns. '"'·769 .. -- ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~,.Filing Fee of $150.00. ~,Application completed in tun _ /', 30PrY1 _ v_ A Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as site plans, elevation drawings, sign details and floor plans. The Zoning Official shall inform the applicant of any extra materials required . APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name tl. e, rt\ · ~ Mailing Address -"4<~L-J:&L.Ll4LJLJ.~~"'4'-~~....:_J.....c..._.:..._+.--~~~:::::::......lJ::...:6~l --..!!=-L-.------ City ( ~-~-;!-AL~Ld..££1,,..L-..._ I 7 f fA Phone Number ___ _.__.___..__...-+----+-= ·-- PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Y'f\ U: ruL ~cL Mailing Address -L!:!;.;x_-=-:· 3~t ~'i~-"-l....!!!~~:...!..:~=.....~__JL.=-!l....£....--3...~--...:;.._-------- City--"~~~£.L..=------State Zip Code _ _.__.,......._....__.__-._3=----1 ...... 1 .... f ___ _ ~rev @ ~), rr, t..P"M.d E-Mail Address Phone Number ;2.)JI ::53()-~L5 Fax Number .;J'J/-5 &K-051./tJ LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Address q Q~_--J"-!Jo~"J:L.L.!_~~~---------r------.:----------- Lot /if Block __ } _D ___ Subdivision_ "'~~~~~:!.!_---LL~~s.£1l~:___------- Description if there is no Lot, Block and Subdivision ----------------- Action Requested: (Circle One) G;lback Varian~ Parking Variance Sign Variance Current Zoning of Subject Property -/ Applicable Ordinance Section SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST SIGNVAR.DOC 12/0312001 Z.BR Appeal of Zoning Official 's Inte rpretation Special Exception Other--------~-- I of 2 GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested: ":/.)flJ ttd4:.c~£ I This variance is necessary due to the following special conditions: Special Condition Definition: To justify a variance, the difficulty must be due to unique circumstances involving the particular property. The unique circumstances must be related to a physical characteristic of the property itself, not to the owner's personal situation. This is because regardless of ownership, the variance will run with the land. Example: A creek bisecting a lot, a smaller buildable area than is seen on surrounding lots, specimen trees. Note: A cul-de-sac is a standard street layout in College Station. The shape of standard cul-de-sac lots are generally not special co~ditions . .L2f:!& at(~W°,.2 . · The unnecessary bnrdship (s) involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship is/are; Hardship Definition: The inability to make reasonable use of the property in accord with the literal requirements of the law. The hardship must be a direct result of the special condition .. Example: A hardship of a creek bisecting a lot could be ·the reduction of the buildable area on the lot, when compared to neighboring properties. The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: Yztl~e_ A 'rlu,¥{( This variance will not be contrar to the public interest by virtue of the following facts: The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibit.'> attached hereto are true, correct (lltd complete. GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST Gcnvar.doc 12/1012001 Date ll>-/0 -(J/ 2of2 . . GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST Attachment 1 Side set back line on the south side of Lot 14, Block 10 , Woodson Village Fifth Installment, Section 1, City of College Station, known as 902 Holleman, variance of 0 inches to 4 .8 inches along the existing house structure . Attachment 2 The house on this lot was constructed in 1994 . The current owner purchased the house in 1995 to provide housing for their daughter to attend A&M. The drainage for this property appears to naturally flow from a southeast to northwesterly direction . Construction of a house on the lot disrupts the natural flow and causes the water to flow to the north of the property . The builder appears to have constructed the house on the far south side of the lot to enable drainage of water, from this lot and the other properties behind and to the south of this lot , to drain between the pad site (which was built-up) for the house and the adjoining lot (Lot13), and onto the street. The builder apparently felt the house location was needed to avoid having the water drainage dump onto the adjoining lot. Attachment 3 The variance is minimal, and it enables water from this lot and adjoining properties to drain water to the street without flowing onto Lot 13 . FACSIMILE COVER SHEIT CI'IY ·or COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764-3570 I Fax (979)764-3496 · Date: \ -<q,-O ~ # of pages including cover:L If you did not receive a complete fax,, please call our offi"ce immediately for a new transmittal T0:260..f"\R..M&~ COMPANY: ___________________ ~ PHO NE:_....>.,;;(9:......:7-=9"""--) 7=--=6=--=4:........;-3=-=5:......:.7-=0- COMPANY: _____ --"-C-'-'ity_.,__o_fCo_l_le ...... &~e_Sta_ti_on _______ _ REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review D Replay ASAP D FYI ·' ------------------------~ V.L / VO / V" VO : 'i.L TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CON ECTIO ID UHVHLUPMHNT SVCS *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 0647 9p4858567 START TIME 01 /08 08: 40 USAGE TI 1E 01 ' 24 PAGES 4 RESULT OK l4]001 . . I GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST Attachment 1 Side set back line on the south side of Lot 14, Block 10 , Woodson Village Fifth Installment, Section 1, City of College Station, known as 902 Holleman, variance of 0 inches to 4 .8 inches along the existing house structure . Attachment 2 The house on this lot was constructed in 1994 . The current owner purchased the house in 1995 to provide housing for their daughter to attend A&M. The drainage for this property appears to naturally flow from a southeast to northwesterly direction. Construction of a house on the lot disrupts the natural flow and causes the water to flow to the north of the property . The builder appears to have constructed the house on the far south side of the lot to enable drainage of water, from this lot and the other properties behind and to the south of this lot , to drain between the pad site (which was built-up) for the house and the adjoining lot (Lot13), and onto the street. The builder apparently felt the house location was needed to avoid having the water drainage dump onto the adjoining lot. Attachment 3 The variance is minimal , and it enables water from this lot and adjoining properties to drain water to the street without flowing onto Lot 13 . ,---- / -- Chy Ordinance Q l 638 Deed Rest. 316/689 Record documents i::er American Title Co. CF #13424 --- 13 ----2''6 L --:...:.._ r-~.°'° ----.. II Bt...OCK 10 \. L.OT I~ I I I _,_ N 16"0'''1'C It ltAD•:)1:!' It go1 HOL..LEMAN DRIVE UA.IPHIC. ~ .. = == 0 IO 10 ---,~~ .... \jf.j.~lf:I r~on:rrv ~It"> ·~~c: l'l..A(CP rc.K rLJ.T 1 15 & IN P'Efl I I I I I I ------- ----------------- AU of Lot Number Fourtee (14), Block Number Ten (!O), WOODSON Vll.l.AGE FIFTH INSTAl.LMENT, Sl!.CTION ONE, an addltlon to the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas, according to th• phi.t recorded In Volume 316, page 3'3, Deed Records o! Brazos County, Texas. • • I, James W. MacArthur, Registered Profenional Ulnd Surveyor, No. 2089, do hereby certify that this plat correctly represents a Survey, on the ground, made by me or under my di~~c;tion June 9, 199-'· This plat was prepared for the purpose o! Title Survey for Truitt « Burns. IJ95-769 There are no visiblcr encro11chmcnts other than those shown hereon. 62-DG Namtft'Vt5~5d(5t1:~G E STATION Check type of mail 0t service : Affi x Stamp Here t"''-~~~~I ~ * (If issued as a * "> ~ ~,/;, -· P.0 Box 9960 D Certified D Recorded Delivery (International) certificate of mailing, * 0 COD D Registered or for additional , ~-* College Station , TX na42 D Delivery Confirmation D Return Receipt for Merchandise copies of this bill) l" DEC 27'01 'il~~Jn = 1.5 0 -• -• D Express Mail D Signature Confirmation Postmark and -• -Date of Receint PB ... mt . • • Handling Ac T' ll • 01-263 , Street, and PO Address Postage Fee 7114167 U.S. POITAQI • Charge ifF -.. Della Person --1205 Orr Street A:-t~ 10,~ College Station, Texas 77840-4453 w~~ ~ '{!- 01-263 -11 ~,' ~ 0 Dwight & Barbara Butler lt":>\ ,(\\) j 1203 Orr Street '--' ~v' College Station, Texas 77840-4453 \ \:• 01-263 Phillip B . Goode >o .. ... 1201 Orr Street .. --·= College Station, Texas 77840-4453 > GI ·-~ 0 en Q <;) 01-263 c c a: l"I ·-'" - William Eldridge Patton II ·-'ts Cl> ... .. 1101 WindingRoad ~ c ... ::i c -~ ~ u .... College Station. Texas 77840-4429 0--:r: .. GI ·-.. .. a: .... ·-U) m .... -01-263 E--i.; -0 CJ a: Dan A & Nancy F Beyer .. (,) ·-(c• 15590 CR 22 c Cl> a. Sinton, Texas 78387 0 .. en ... -_:s ... >o C'C 01-263 .. c ,._ -.... Raharnin Seliktar > ·- 476 Sabine Avenue ·-en - Wynnewood, PA 19096-1402 a I OU:!I NUI 11Ut21 UI r 1ovi;::i.;, ............ ·-···--· -· . ----.ame of receiving employee) The full declaration of value is required on a I domestic and international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the Listed by Sender Received at Post Office reconstruct ion of nonnegotiable documents under Express Mail document reconstruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to 0 Y~,M,., additional limitations for multiple pieces lost or damages in a single catastrophic occurrence . The maximum indemnity payable ~x on Express Mail merchandise insurance is $500, but optional Express Mail Service merchandise insurance is available for up to $5,000 to some, but not all countries. The maximum indemnity payable is $25 ,000 for registered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual R900 , S913, and S921 for lim itations of coverage on insured and COD mail. See International Mail Manual for limitations of coveraae on international mail. Soecial handlina charaes aoolv onlv to Standard Mail fAl and Standard Mail (8) oarcels . . PS Form 3877, August 2000 Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen NaS2aDGJdre ss of Se nde r CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P.O Box 9960 College Station , TX 77842 01-263 Lee A Fedora & Lisa A Kovar 4083 Seaton Road Temple, Texas 76501-7231 01 -263 James E. Jr & R Renee Trevathan 20523 Riverside Pines Drive Humble, Texas 77346-1643 01 -263 Hugh T. Freebaim Living Trust 3607 Deer Road Brenham. Texas 77833-6761 Bobby Mueller 1000 Holleman Drive College Station, Texas 77840-4404 o\-~\e? Michael J Kovar 906 Holleman Drive 1'.ollelle Station. Texas 77840-4444 01-263 RY W & Kay P Ferrell 701 W Nash Drive Kaufman, Texas 75142-1841 Total Number of Pieces I Uli:ll .... UllllJO I ...... ·---- ('"' ''''°"' Received at Post Off ice )1j ~ r~77 Augu st 2000 Check ty pe of ma il or se rvi ce: Affix Stamp Here (If issued as a certificate of mailing, or for additional copies of this bill) O Certified 0 CO D 0 Recorded Delivery (International) 0 Registered O Delivery Co nfirmation 0 Express Mail 0 Retu rn Receipt for Merchandise 0 Sign atu re Confi rmation Postmark and Da te of Receiot 0 Insured ne, Street, and PO Address Postage Fee Handling Charge I \' ........ L4" I ,,. c o-·-... m E .. ·-c g_ - ~ .. > ·--Q ~ .. .... .. ~ > ,;;;' ·-Cl.I -(.) en Q QI s: c a: I'\ ·-"" ·-i;, Cl) .... .. ~ c ... = -~ ,.., (,) .... :c 'i;. Q) .. ... a: ·-Ill ... -.. ;.: -0 u a: 0 Cl,) Cl.I 11. .. en _:!I -l'C c .::::' en ,Name of receiving employee) The full declaration of value is required on a I domestic and international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the fa reconstruction of nonnegotiable documents under Express Mail document reconstruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to ~ additional limitations for multiple pieces lost or damages in a single catastrophic occurrence . The maximum indemnity payable • / on Express Mail merchandise insurance is $500, but optional Express Mail Service merchandise insurance is available for up to J. ,' 1nf'{Ji.r.... $5,000 to some, but not all countries . The maximum indemnity payable is $25,000 for registered mail. See Domestic Ma il VM V fie>' Manual R900 , S913 , and S921 for limitations of coverage on insured and COD mail See International Marl Manual for hm ltat 1ons of coverage on International mail. Special handling charges apply only to Standard Mail (A) and Standard Mai l (B) oarcels Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen --Address of Send er CITY OF COLLEGE STATI ON P.O Box 996 0 Colleg e Station , TX 7784 2 01-263 B urns, Michael, Janet & Kelly 12315 Huntington Field Drive Houston, Texas 77099-3711 01 -263 Carl & Jennifer Collins 613 San Benito College Station, Texas 77845-6503 01 -263 Crystal Littlefield & Deborah Gagliardi 5712 Cherrywood Lane Arlington, Texas 76016-1501 01-263 Kevin Roy P ond RR 1Box472 Wolfforth, Texas 79382-9727 01 -263 Dube Family Limited Partnership A TIN: Mark Dube 9129 Symphonic Lane Houston, Texas 77040-2472 14 15 T~;of Pieces Total Number of Pieces Lisle nder Received at Post Office nN. ~ ... J -PS Fo rm 3877, August 2000 Chec k type of mail or serv ice: Affi x Stamp Here ~ Gi$1'~~,l ':tr-. (If issued as a " .... ~ 4 -O Certified 0 Recorded Delivery (International) certificate of mailing, 0 COD 0 Registered or for additional v ,~ f DEC 21'0 t 3 ) 111/'• ~I = 125 -O Delivery Co nfirm ation 0 Ret urn Receipt for Merchandise copies of this bill) -0 Express Mail 0 S ignatu re C onfirmation Pos tmark and -0 Insured Da te of Receiot P8MHH >, Street, and PO Address Postage Fee Handling Actual\ TV 7114167 U.S. POSTAGt Charge if Regi ~ - """""" / I-'""-·-=-' ,, ·L , \~ ~ I I ., Ji}) -· \ . >-. ~ ~ ·-·-> Cll ·--u ~- CJ! Q Iii s:: c a: 0 ·-""'f ·-"g Cll -.... .. co c .... :I c --... u .... o-:z:: .. ~ ·-.. .... a: .... :: m -,,, E .. ,;,: ... 0 u a: .. (.) ·-di c Cll a. 0 .. en Q-_:s .... >-. tC .. c "' ·-> ·-en -... Postmaster, Per (Name of receiving employee) The full declaration of value is required on a I domestic and international registered ma il. The maximum indemnity payable for the reconstruction of nonnegotiable documents under Express Mail document reconstruct ion insurance is $500 per piece subject to YlrH· }Pko. additional limitations for multiple pieces lost or damages in a single catastrophic occurrence . The maximum indemn ity payable on Express Mail merchandise insurance is $500 , but optional Express Mail Service merchandise insurance is available for up to $5 ,000 to some , but not all countries . The maximum indemnity payable is $25 ,000 for registered mai l. See Domestic Ma il Manual R900, S913 , and S921 for lim itations of coverage on insured and COD mail . See International Ma il Manual tor li mitatio ns of coveraQe on international mail. Special handlinQ charQes apply only to Standard Ma il (A ) and Standard Mail (B ) parce ls. Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen * * * * * * * * * .. • * • December 26 , 2001 . TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Variance request/or 902 Holleman Drive NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a variance request for the following property: Applicant: JANETTE M HOPPER Subject Property: 902 HOLLEMAN DR (See attached location map.) Proposed Variance: Side setback The Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. to consider the request. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas . All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject property have received notification of this request. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting . To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989 . For additional information , contact the City Planning Office, (979) 764-3570 . Jessica Jimmerson Staff Planner _._, _.,, _..,...,._. _..., • ..,v •'~" ... vtV I l"S VVV"1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will Mid a public hearing to consider a variance for 9~~ ~ol­ leman, lot 14, block 1 o, Woodson Village Subd1v1s1on. Applicant is Janette Hopper. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the Col- le ~e StatiQn City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, January 15, 2002. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting . To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1- 8(10· 735-2989 . For additional information, please contact me at (979) 7€4-3570. Jessica Jimmerson St.3.ff Planner Al.ITT1.NO. UAN. CLASS ., S2115'f Jl: OTAKE OSEND ..,!_j I: L_ __ _ ---------------------·~r:J