The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVAR2001-500138CITY OF COLLEGE STATION *** CUSTOMER RECEIPT *** OPER: GMESSARRA CT DRAWER: 1 DATE: 6/07/01 00 RECEIPT: 0234398 DESCRIPTION GTY AMOl..tIT TP TM 2001 500138 $75.00 •PL CK PLANNING & ZONIN CK: 1085 TENDER DETAIL CK 1085 $75. 00 DATE: 6/07/01 TIME: 11:44:39 TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $75. 00 AMOUNT TENDERED $75. 00 THANK YOU NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing to consider a variance for 400 Har- vey Road. Applicant is Bob Davis . The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the Col- lege Station City Hall , 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, July 10, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting . To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1- 800-735-2989 . For additional information , please contact me at (979) 764 -3570 . Jessica Jimmerson Staff Planner 6-27-01 CRlOOUOl CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Cash Receipts Batch Selection Type options, press Enter. l=Single payment entry 2=Multiple payment entry ?=Batch review 8=Batch totals 9=Batch post Opt Operator Date Nbr Type Count A CARTER 3/29/10 00 CT 8 A CARTER 3/30/10 00 CT 0 BMARTZ 3/29/10 00 CT 12 CRODRIQUEZ 3/29/10 00 PH 2 C2G CXUSER 3/29/1 0 98 IN 1 6=Batch Amount 7 ,394 .00 .00 1 ,299 .15 252 .85 112 .18 C2G-CXUSER 3/29/10 99 IN 472 74 ,365 .1 2 C2G-CXUSER 3/30/1 0 99 IN 40 5 ,454 .88 DCORNELL 3/29/10 00 CT 53 6 ,616.7 2 DCORNELL 3/30/10 00 CT 1 241. 30 DRALEY 3/29/10 60 PH 1 105 .46 FSC OTT 3/29/10 50 CT 27 807 .40 Jf ...IV(-'-'-' 08 :32:19 edit listing Status Error in batch In use Ready to post Ready to post Ready to post Balanced Error in batch In use In use Error in batch More ... F3=Exit FS=Refresh F6=0pen new batch F14=Work with submitted jobs F17=Subset F18=Work with output F20=0verride printer F24=More key s NOTIFICATION AREA 8-1 ~-..r C ity of College Station, Texas ~ PLANNING DIVISION FAZOLl'S RESTAURANT ~ NOT TO SCALE ZONING CASE: ZBA 07/10/01 IR @CW C'f1'1J'V &~rID &[p1JIB \%7@[1[? [p~~ [p [1£~£-1 PARKING LOT ISLANDS VARIANCE '" CHECK BY: DATE: __ _ MINUTES Zoning Board of Adjustment July 10, 2001 . CllY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 6:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chainnan Lewis, Sheffy & Alternate Members Birdwell, (J{)ss & Corley . MEMBERS ABSENT: Chainnan Hill & Richards . STAFF PRESENT: Staff Assistant Grace, Staff Planner Jimmerson, City Attorney Cargill, and Development Services Customer Service Representative Messarra. AgENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order-Explanation of functions of the Board. Acting Chairman Lewis called the meeting to order. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider any absence request forms. Mr. Goss made the motion to approve the absences of Board Members HiH & Richards. Mr. Birdwell seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (S-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Approval of minutes from May 1, 2001 meeting of the Board. Mr. Birdwell made the motion to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Corley seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (s.-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration of a parking island variance for 400 Harvey Road. I Applicant is Bob R Davis. Staff Planner Jimmerson stepped before the Board and presented the staff report. Ms. f unmerson told the Board that the applicant is requesting the variance to allow for two-(2) end islands to be permitted at less than the City requirement. According to the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance, the minimum end island is 180 sq. ft . measurement of end islands is generally from the outside of the curb . Variances of 52 sq. ft. and 32 sq. ft. to the 180 sq . ft. end island requirement are being requested . The applicant wishes to receive variances to the end island requirement to allow for a full C/O, or Certificate of Occupancy, to be issued . The site in question is in the Wolf Pen Creek Zoning District. This is one of several special districts in the City that requires approval of site plans by a specific review board . In this case, there is a two step process, the Design Review Board (DRB) reviews the site plan and the Planning & Zoning Commission (P&Z), approves the site plan. ZBAMinutes July 10. 2001 Page 1 of4 The applicant came in last year and went through the site plan review process and gained approval of their proposed site plan. The original plan met the end island requirements. In the course of site inspections conducted during the development and building of the project, it was discovered that multiple changes had been made to the site, without the approval or knowledge of staff or the appropriate boards. In fact, the end island adjacent to the entrance of the drive--thru was installed in compliance with the originally approved site plan, but was later removed and rebuilt to less than the City standard. The widening of the exit of the drive--thru, and subsequent reduction of that end island , increases the number of vehicles, which may come into conflict at that location. The remaining site changes are site planning or aesthetics issues. Nonetheless, staff cannot issue a full Certificate of Occupancy if the approved site plan is not followed . The applicant is therefore required to go before the appropriate boards to gain approval of all the changes . In an effort to work with the applicant, the City did grant a temporary 60 day C/O, with the condition that all necessary approvals must be granted or the site must be brought into compliance with the originally approved site plan . The DRB has reviewed the issues over which they have purview and its recommending approval of them to the P&Z. The P&Z will hear the case after this Board makes its determination on the end island variance request. Thus, the applicant is requesting variances of 52 sq . ft. (28%), for the island at the exit of the drive-thru, and 32 sq . ft. (17%), for the island at the entry to the drive-thru , from the 180 sq. ft. end island requirement . The special condition stated by the applicant is , "to accommodate the efficient flow of traffic into and out of the drive-thru lane". The applicant states their hardship as, ''poor flow of traffic thru the drive-thru lane. Unnecessary cars waiting to get into and out of drive-thru lane". Alternatives found : 1. Redesign the end islands to meet the requirements , either by meeting the original site plan o r an alternative that meets the City standard. 2 . Request a reduced parking requirement to allow more room for the end islands . Mr. Birdwell asked how many parking spaces are required for the restaurant and how many actually exist. Ms. Jimmerson replied that there are 39 spaces required and there are 70 present . They could loose several parking spaces and still meet the required parking requirement. Ms. Junmerson stated that when Office Max was built there was additional parking built. Ms. Junmerson added that there is adequate landscaping on the site and it would not be affected by the change in the size of the end islands . Mr. Goss asked is the DRB in favor of the changes to the end islands. Ms. Jimmerson replied that the DRB can review the aesthetics of the islands but they do not have the authority to grant a variance to the end island requirement. Mr. Goss noted that it is written in the staff report that the DRB has reviewed the issues over which they have purview and it is recommending approval of them to P&Z. Mr. Goss asked is it the DRB's recommendation to P&Z to approve the changes. Ms. Jimmerson replied that they are in favor of the changes that went before them to review, but the end island requirement and a reduction in the end island requirement is not something they have the authority to review. ZBAMinutes July 10, 2001 Page2 of4 The other items such as sidewalks, landscaping, and the widening of the driveway was in the DRB's purview and authority . Mr. Goss asked if the DRB had any objection to the end islands . Ms . Jimmerson replied that they reviewed them along with several other items with staff's intent to get their recommendation on aesthetics and they recommended approval on everything including the end islands . Mr. Goss asked Ms . Jimmerson if she knew why the changes were made in the field . Ms . Jimmerson replied that she would have to leave that question for the applicant. She understood they had reasons for each of the changes made but why they did them without talking to staff she could not address . Acting Chairman Lewis opened the public hearing for those wanting to speak in favor of the request . Bob R . Davis, the applicant & owner, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Acting Chairman Lewis . Mr . Davis told the Board that the two islands were constructed without knowledge on their part that there was a requirement of 180-sq . ft. per island . Mr. Davis explained that the changes started with the widening of the drive-thru . The reason the changes and need came about is due to the sandwich line being added to the menu . It requires about 5 minutes preparation time for a sandwich . In order not to block the drive-thru they wanted to have the customer pull forward and their food would be brought to them . The widening would allow traffic to go around . Mr. Davis told the Board that there was a lot of dialog with the city and when he discussed the widening of the drive-thru and the need for it there was not a mention of the island at the end . When Office Max was built as one project, all the parking lot and parking spaces where in place and a pad site was left . In order for the drive-thru to be added they had to make the changes . Mr. Davis added that he could understand how it looked as if the islands were constructed and then removed . Mr. Davis referred to a handout given to the Board Members and explained the islands and landscaping . Mr. Davis explained that 35-40% of their business goes through the drive-thru and they are trying to make it as easy as possible . Mr. Davis ended by telling the Board that they in no way tried to circumvent the parking islands and he spared no expense to contribute to the overall appearance of Wolf Pen Creek . He understands the area as being ·a focal point for the community . Mr. Goss questioned the 70 parking spaces available and the requirement for only 39 . Mr. Davis told the Board when Office Max was developed it was all one piece of land and that included the property Fazoli's is on now. The Fazoli's property was subdivided so it could be sold separately . Mr. Davis told the Board that they do have a parking agreement with Office Max. Mr. Goss asked Mr. Davis if the Board was to deny the variance what would it cost him to replace the end islands to the city standard . Mr. Davis replied his best estimate would be 2 to 3 thousand dollars. Mr. Goss asked Mr. Davis if the DRB had any problem with the size of the islands . Mr. Davis replied that obviously the DRB 's concern was the landscaping . When the DRB made the recommendation to the ZBA to grant the variance they were aware that the islands did not meet city code. With no one else stepping forward to speak in favor or opposition of the variance, Acting Chairman Lewis closed the public hearing ZBA Minutes July 10 , 2001 Page 3 of4 Mr. Goss asked city staff if they have evidence that the islands were built correctly and then changed because the applicant stated that they were not built correctly to begin with . Ms . Jimmerson replied that she based her report on information she had received from the inspector. Acting Chairman Lewis asked Ms. Jimmerson ifthe ORB was making a recommendation to the ZBA or just to P&Z . Ms. Jimmerson replied that this issue was brought up after the primary concerns of ORB were addressed . A motion was made that they would recommend approval to the ZBA, P&Z and anyone who would have authority over the issue . The ordinance intent was left for the ZBA to decide . Acting Chairman Lewis stated that the ORB was aware that the decision was then directed to the ZBA. Ms . Jimmerson replied that was correct. Mr. Birdwell made the motion to deny a variance to the parking island requirements from the terms of this ordinance as it will be contrary to the public interest due to the lack of any special conditions, and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would not result in unnecessary hardship to this applicant , and such that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done . Mr. Goss seconded the motion. Mr. Birdwell stated that there is no way under the rules of the Board that this variance can be granted . The only hardship is financial. This can be resolved very easily by eliminating one parking space and moving a curb over Mr. Goss stated that he struggled to find a hardship other than financial himself. Acting Chairman Lewis stated that the site is beautiful. There is not much to be gained by the city for denying the variance other than the Board has rules they have to follow . Acting Chairman Lewis called for the vote. The Board voted (5-0) to deny the variance. AGENDA ITEM 5: Future Agenda Items . No items were discussed . AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Adjourn. Mr. Goss made the motion to adjourn . ZBAMinutes APPROVED: Dick Birdwell, Acting Chairman 8/7/01 July 10, 2001 Page 4 of 4 ~1 2""W LOT 1 THE BOARD WA LK VOL 498, PAGE .327 NOW OR FORMERLY sec OLLEGE STATION PARTN.:.::E~R,;:;:.S _,L:.!:TD~.-1---....a 124.42' EX ISTING DUMPSTER w/SCREENING FENCE & CONSTRUCT SOLID 1---"°""-o WALL GATE OF El.EC. TRANS. P INSTALL TWO CONDUITS FOR ELECTRICAL GEORGE BUSH DRIVE EAST {0.562 ACRES) {MINOR ARTER IA L) ./ ,- NOW OR FORMERLY AUSTACO, INC . VOL. 498, PAGE 160 ZONFn WPr. N 44°14'7" Wr 349.sz:.._ ~ _ LOT 2 NOW OR FOR~ THE BOARD WALK THE RICHARD SMITH CO . VO L. 498, PAGE .327 VOL. 498, PAGE .3 27 71"'\r..IC"f'I \A/Of"" DURAB LE MATER IALS ~ \ \ LACOUR SUBDIVISION • . PHASE ONE NOW OR FORMERLY \ • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION VOLUME 2608, PAGE 207 ZONED WP C \ \ 5 . 1 00 ACRE TRACT \ \\<~~~ ' i \ \ ·,., ~ \\ l I 0 o~ ~~ga \ \ ·i~\~ . -1)";~ \ ~ );~ ~ \ \ ~ PROPOSED ARIABLE WlDTH kc S EASEMENT -- UTIUiY DEMANDS iYPE MIN. SEWER (gpd) O WATER (gpm) O IRR IGAT ION (gpd) 0 1J. I~=·· FAZOLl'S RESTAURANT 3662 S.f . (1-STORY) tN ~----- 1 1 ALONG HARlof:Y RO ________ J , , TIE TO LINE LOT 1 THE BOARD WALK VOL. 496, PAGE 327 ~· ' -3/8" u u ,, ~-~-~f l.NfQsct.ef RESCRlL....,_ ,_'-- .'I. \< ,, ~ llUllpiHG ~ .... ----~~---~ ... _______ _,, JNSTAU. Tv.o CONDUITS FOR ELECTRICAL I GEORGE BUSH DRIVE EAST (0.562 ACRES) {MINOR ARTERIAL) NOW OR f'ORMERL Y AUSTACO, INC. VOL . 496, PAGE 160 ZONED 'MlC SITE PLAN . SCALE: 1 • • 30' · '"'ft ·z = - -~ - - . ....... u ~ --- LOT 2 NOW OR f'ORMERL v- THE BOARD WAU< THE ~ARO SMITH CO . ~. 4ij8, PAGE 327 VOL. 4i8, PAGE 327 ZONED ~c o~:l~ ~0o.JL 5 / Y-/ '00 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: 0 J-3 8 DATE SUBMIITED: --O lf ~L/5'4-M ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION h iling Fee of$75 .00 . _V_ A Application oompleted in full . MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: £Request form completed in full . __ Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as site plans, elevation drawings, s ign details and floor plans . The Zoning Official shall inform the applicant of any extra materials required . APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name BoB R. DA\/\ S Mailing Address B \ .\ fi2 R E:ST OAv< ~ CR City \NA l-u State T ~ Zip Code ] (o I l 1... E-Mail Address ----------- Phone Number 2-~4 -SS5 -4S4S Fax Number Z~Cf -&G,G,-S3>S °?;> PROPERlY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name f3o6 f2.. \)AVIS ( g \NB D VR.oPE-R.\tes"j MailingAddress 6\4 t=0ReIT OAv<S (,:( City__._W-'---A_"-_O _____ _ State }"~ Zip Code I v I I 2-E-Mail Address ----------- Phone Number 1.S-4-5 SS -4545 Fax Number ZS--4-(,G.G,-S-s s~ LOCATION OF PROPERlY: Address 4o 0 k\-AR \f t:?i {2. \) ( FA-z...o L'' s) Lot Block Subdivision DescriptionifthereisnoLot,BlockandSubdivision LORl'Jeg (SG:.) D~ Geo~6G BuS'H ~-, AN() \-tA-fe.Vt;'f gn Action Requested: (Circle One) Current Zoning of Subject Property Applicable Ordinance Section Setback Variance Parking Variance Sign Variance Appeal of Zoning Official 's Interpretation Special Exception ®. sa.~N?f (:;DTA6E RtQ(-<1/lEM~, otJ (/A-a.L<11'.}G, Lfr r l ~LA-NOS The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct and complete. ~/ ~~ -67~ _lP_,__\1_16_,__\ ------ Signature and'fii~ Date ZBA APPUCA TION ZBAAPP .DOC 3/'lS/99 1 of2 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: ___ _ DATE SUBMIITED: VARIANCE REQUEST 1he following specific variation from the ordinance is requested: A1.-t-o~ ~oR.(~\S '-ANOS AT :nte t=t-Jt> ~c:; PAA.\.-('1tJ6. (&J'-05 TD Be Cv...«.?;)11 \>tflltS'J~tvAls .. Du.""K"1Dt:: c(.,(,12,e. D1M'ENHO.-VS wct--t<-D 'P.>~ AWR.0'1.1Mlt7--eLJ1 to'k 6~ This variance is necessary due to the following special conditions: \o f\CC..OMoD~ nte l::"FPtCAeu .. 1 l:::'L-£1~ OF TAAi:t=1c_ IA.TTO AND D14T 1he unnecessary hardship (s) involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship is/are: ~o~~ FUJw <9F \12.AFP1c... ntR.lA \\-+E. DR\ve nfe.l-i Ll\NE ' lANl\Jef0<;~'1 C..AA._c, WAll11Jfu TO 6e=r lN'TO J\N<:> ¢?<.-CT eF DR.,ve ~ LANE The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following facts : T~C2 tS'LA.VO..S tAJ Qu.eiTlotJ w1 \..\... t5e LAND&CA(?<a> IN A MA.N/IJER 1he facts stated in this application are true and correct. &e(!kM -t?uwv Applicant VARIANCE REQUEST V ARIANCE.IX>C 3n.S/99 r;6/o1 Date lofl STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Jessica Jimmerson ZBA Meeting Date: 7-10-01 APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: PURPOSE: Bob Davis for Fazoli's Restaurant Variances of 52 SF and 32 SF to the 180 SF end island requirement are being requested. 400 Harvey Rd. To allow for two end islands to be permitted at less than the City requirement. GENERAL INFORMATION Status of Applicant: Property Owner Property Owner: Bob R. Davis with Fazoli's Restaurant Applicable Ordinance Section: Section 9.2.A.6 of the Zoning Ordinance states that, "A raised island, encompassing not less than one hundred eighty (180) square feet in area, shall be located at both ends of every interior parking row and at both ends of every peripheral parking row , regardless of the length of the row ." PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Zoning and Land Use: Subject Property: Is zoned WPC, Wolf Pen Creek, and currently developed as a North: West: East: South: Frontage: Access: Topography & Vegetation: Flood Plain: restaurant. Is zoned R-6 , High Density Apartments and developed as such. Is zoned WPC and developed as a fast food restaurant. Is zoned WPC and developed as an office supply store. Is zoned WPC and will be developed as an urban greenway. The property has approximately180 feet of frontage on Harvey Rd. and approximately 340 feet of frontage on George Bush Dr. East. The property has access from George Bush Dr. East. The natural grading of the property is relatively flat, slop ing slightly toward the floodplain at the south end of the property. There are, however, several man-made berms that were installed for screening purposes , during development of the site. A portion of the parking lot at the south end of the property does lie within the 100-year flood plain. 0 :\group \deve _ ser\s tfrpt\zngstfrpt\honda.doc VARIANCE INFORMATION Required: Requested: Case Overview: According to the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance, the minimum end island is 180 SF. Measurement of end islands is generally from the outside of the curb . Variances of 52 SF and 32 SF to the 180 SF end island requirement are being requested. The applicants wish to receive variances to the end island requirement to allow for a full C/O, or Certificate of Occupancy, to be issued. As stated above, the site in question is in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning district. This is one of several special districts in the City that requires approval of site plans by a specific review board. In this case, there is a two step process, the Design Review Board, or ORB, reviews the s ite plan and the Planning and Zoning Commission, or P&Z, approves the site plan. The applicants came in last year and went through the site plan review process and gained approval of their proposed site plan . The original plan met the end island requirements. In the course of site inspections conducted during the development and building of the project, it was discovered that multiple changes had been made to the site, without the approval or knowledge of staff or the appropriate boards. In fact, the end island adjacent to the entrance of the drive-thru was installed in compliance with the originally approved site plan, but was later removed and rebuilt to less than the City standard. The widening of the exit of the drive-thru, and subsequent reduction of that end island, increases the number of vehicles, which may come into conflict at that location . The remaining site changes are site planning or aesthetics issues. Nonetheless, staff cannot issue a full Certificate of Occupancy if the approved site plan is not followed. The applicant is therefore required to go before the appropriate boards to gain approval of the all the changes. In an effort to work with the applicant, the City did grant a temporary 60 day C/O, with the condition that all necessary approvals must be granted or the site must be brought into compliance with the originally approved site plan. The ORB has reviewed the issues over which they have purview and is recommending approval of them to the P& Z. The P&Z will hear the case after this Board makes its determination on the end island variance request. Thus, the applicant is requesting variances of 52 SF (28%), for the island at the exit of the drive-thru, and 32 SF (17%), for the island at the entry to the drive-thru, from the 180 SF end island requirement O :\group\deve _ ser\s t frpt\zngstfrpt\honda .d oc ANALYSIS Special Conditions: Hardships: Alternatives: SPECIAL INFORMATION Ordinance Intent: Number of Property The special condition stated by the applicant is, "To accommodate the efficient flow of traffic into and out of the drive-thru lane.' The applicant states their hardship as, "Poor flow of traffic thru the drive-thru lane . Unnecessary cars waiting to get into and out of drive-thru lane ." The following alternatives have been found . 1. Redesign the end islands to meet the requirements, either by meeting the original site plan or an alternative that meets the City standard . 2. Request a reduced parking requirement to allow more room for the end islands. The intent of the ordinance is twofold. First and foremost , end islands provide a buffer between traffic aisles and possibly conflicting vehicular movement , such as backing maneuvers. This issue is of great concern on all sites with the potential for multiple vehicular interactions, especially near a site's access drive. The second reason for end islands is aesthetics. The end island requirement is one of the tools used in the City's Zoning Ordinance break up the monotony of a sea of pavement found in some parking lots . Owners Notified: 6 Responses Received: None ATTACHMENTS Location Map Application Site Plan O :\group\deve _ ser\stfrpt\zngstfrpt\honda .doc ~rn(Sl d Address of Sender Check type of mail or service : Affix Stamp Here (If is sued as a certificate of ma iling, or for additional copies of th is bill) CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P.O. Box 9960 15 Colle e Station , TX 77842 01-138 Bob R. & Erin Davis P.O. Box 564 \Vaco, Texas67603 01-138 Austaco, Inc . 500 N Capital of Texas Hwy Austin, Texas 78746 01-138 The Richard Smith Company 3743 Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77802 01-138 Texas Energy Solutions Inc. 209 University Drive E STE College Station, Texas 77840 01-138 Bellaire Capital Partnership LP 3901 Bellaire Blvd Houston, Texas 77025-1119 Total Number of Pieces Total Number of Pieces Received at Post Od ice '""' ~"" PS Form 3877 , August 2000 D Ce rtifi ed 0 COD D Delivery Confirmati o n D Express Mail D Insured D Recorded Delivery (Inte rnat ional) D Reg iste red D Return Recei pt for Merchandise D S ignature Confirmatio n Postmark and Date of Recei t 1me, Stree t, and PO Ad dress Post ag e Fee Hand Char RR Fee - \ \1 _vPy \Oo/t> 5i-y--~ ~' ~~t ~ ., The full de clara tion of value is required on a I domestic ana international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the rec on structio n of nonnegotia bl e docu ment s under Express Mail documen t reconst ruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to add ition al limitatio ns for mu lti ple pieces los t or damages in a si ngle catas trophic occurrence. The maximum indemnity payable on Expres s Ma il merchandise insurance is $500 , but optional Express Mail Service merchandise insurance is available for up to $5,000 to some , but not all countries . The maximum indemnity payable is $25 ,000 for reg istered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual A900 , S913 , and S921 for limitations of coverage on insured and COD mail. See International Mail Manual tor lim itations of covera e on internatio nal mail. S ecial handlin char es a I onl to Standard Mail A and Standard Mail B arcels . Complete by Typewriter, In k, or Ball Po int Pen r ~. I-. .;. ;i j ... . , I June 27, 2001 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Variance request for 400 Harvey Road . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a variance request for the following property: Applicant: Bob Davis Subject Property: 400 HARVEY RD (See attached location map.) Proposed Variance: Parking Island The Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 10, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. to consider the variance . The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South) College Station, Texas . All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject property have received notification of this request . Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (409) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, contact the City Planning Office) (409) 764-3570. Jessica Jimmerson Staff Planner 1' : , •.i v~ .. ·" 'I , ., . r, -.";,, ... .. , '· . '. ;_. :!·· , . ~. . . ;, !'' 4'.'j. :', ! .... ·· ;.1.· '• t'-' ... .... , • ..... "· .:~ , .•• • .1 ... ·~ .~ • ,,I', ' -:~ •" I I '· • ( l ~ ··' . ' ,,, .... l t ~ " .... .. .. I. " . .. ., . ' i .. ~ •· .4 " ·:· " ' ! .. , ; ._,. ~~· I .•. ' (. I ,, ' I . l ' ... .. .• . . . -.. ; ~:. i . •' ~ I " . . ' ; ... .• ) r . . : , ,.I • , .·~ I : (" ; ' , . .. "·"' i) ·, . ' ". , ; . .. . ,, . OWNER_ADD3 OWNER_ CITY owt SITUS_ADD OWNER_ZU WACO TX HARVEYRD 67603 COLLEGE STATION TX WOLF PEN CREEK CORRIDOR 77842 BLDG#2 AUSTIN TX 310 HARVEY RD 78746 BRYAN TX 308 HARVEY RD 77802 COLLEGE STATION TX 401 HARVEY RO 77840 3901 BELLAIRE BLVD HOUSTON TX 1704 GEORGE BUSH DR E 77025-1119 " •.· .. ... '' ·. .. .. -. ,. • ' f'. ) . •. t· \. . .... L:. ,. ·. BCAO_ll OWNER_NAME R98549 DAVIS, BOB R & ERIN R98548 COLLEGE STATION , CITY OF R16332 TACO BELL C/O AUSTACO, INC R18333 RICHARD SMtTH COMPANY, THE R13253 R25437 TEXAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC R86751 BELLAIRE CAPITAL PARTNERSHIP LP OWNER_AOD1 POBOX564 ATTN: ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT A FRANCHISEE OF TACO BELL CORP 3743 TEXAS AVENUE 209 UNIVERSITY DRE, SUITE B C/O CENTER AMERICA OWNER_ADD2 POBOX9973 500 N CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY PROPERTY TRUST ... .· _, ·- ". •' .· Issue Date Expiration Date Parcel Number . Property Address Subdivision Name Legal Description Property Zoning Owner ... Contractor Application number Description of Work Construction type . Occupancy type Flood Zone . . . . Special conditions c1 cy o:r: cu.L.Lc::~c:: .::> L..aL....Lv.u 1101 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH COLLEGE STATION TX 77842 TEMPORARY CO T E M P 0 R A R Y 6/07/01 8/06/01 378400-0000-0000 400 HARVEY RD COLLEGE STATION TX 77840 LACOUR PHS 1 LACOUR PHS 1, LOT lA, 1.901 ACRES WOLF PEN CREEK CORRIDOR sec COLLEGE STATION PARTNERS EMBREE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC 800 480-2626 01-00000500 000 000 COMMERCIAL, AMUSEMENT/SOCIAL/RECREATION TYPE IVU-UNPROTECTED BUSINESS TEMPORARY AND CONDITIONAL CO FOR 60 DAYS PENDING APPROVAL OF THE REVISED SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN BY OF THE Approved 1) WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN REVIEW BOARD, 2) ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND 3) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IF THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS NOT APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO REDEVELOP THE SITE TO THE ORIGINAL APPROVED SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN. Building o~ VOID UNLESS SIGNED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL Issue Date Parcel Number Property Address Subdivision Name Legal Description Property Zoning Owner ... Contractor Application number Description of Work Construction type . Occupancy type Flood Zone . . . . Special conditions City of College Station 1101 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH COLLEGE STATION TX 77842 T E M P 0 R A R Y C 0 P E R M A N E N T 6/07/01 378400-0000-0000 400 HARVEY RD COLLEGE STATION TX 77840 LACOUR PHS 1 LACOUR PHS 1, LOT lA, 1.901 ACRES WOLF PEN CREEK CORRIDOR REMBRO PROPERTIES EMBREE CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC 800 480-2626 01-00000500 000 000 COMMERCIAL, AMUSEMENT/SOCIAL/RECREATION TYPE IVU-UNPROTECTED BUSINESS TEMPORARY AND CONDITIONAL CO FOR 60 DAYS PENDING APPROVAL OF THE REVISED SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN BY OF THE Approved 1) WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN REVIEW BOARD, 2) ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND 3) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IF THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS NOT APPROVED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO REDEVELOP THE SITE TO THE ORIGINAL APPROVED SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLAN. Building Official VOID UNLESS SIGNED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment wtll hold a public hearing to consider a variance for 400 Har- vey Road. Applicant is Bob Davis. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the Col- lege Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, July 1 o, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1- 800-735-2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. Jessica Jimmerson Staff Planner 6-27-01