The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVAR2001-500151NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING : The College Station Zoning Board of Adjus tm ent will hold a public hearing to consider a variance fo r 4 714 St Andrews Drive. Applicant is Aggieland Builders. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the Col- lege Station City Hall , 110 1 Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, August 7, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive seNices for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting . To make arrangements ca ll (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1- 800-735-2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner 7-25-01 599 Leg al Notices 699 Legal Notices CITY OF COLLEGE STATION R E P R I N T *** CUSTOMER RECEIPT *** OPER: GMESSARRA CT DRAWER: 1 DATE: 7 /05/01 00 RECEIPT: 0256062 DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT TP TM 2001 500151 $75. 00 IPL CK PLANNING & ZONIN CK: 2094 TENDER DETAIL CK 2091+ $75. 00 DATE: 7/05/01 TIME: 10:08:32 TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $75. 00 AMOUNT TENDERED $75. 00 THANK YOU HT135MHT SunGard, HTE Select Version 6.0.7 HTE Inc Application Menu 3/30 /10 08 :32:05 Select one of the following: 2 . Building Permits 3 . Cash Receipts 4 . Asset Management II 5 . Fixed Assets 6. Fleet Management 7 . GMBA (Accounting) 9. Accounts Receivable 10 . Business Licenses 11 . Payroll/Personnel 90. Sign off Selection == > 3 F3=Exit FS=Refresh F18=Work with output F6=Display messages 12 . Purchasing/Inventory 15. Work Orders/Facility Mgmt 16 . Code Enforcement 17 . Planning & Engineering 22 . Extended reporting 23 . Customer Informat i on Systems 24 . Land/Parcel Management 29 . Global Financials Version : 6.0 .7 .0 .01 Date in stalled : 02/06/2010 F14=Work with submitted jobs + HT135MCR CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Cash Rec. Processing Menu-user 1 0 8 :3 2 :12 Select one of the following: 1. Cash rec eipts entry 2 . Cash re ceipts edit l i sting 3 . Cash receipts posting 4 . Create LOCKBOX payment batch 5 . Payment inquiry 6. File Maintenance Menu 7 . Demand Report Menu 8 . Reverse Payment Menu 10. VSI i nterfac e defaults 90 . Sign off Selection == > 1 F3=Exit FS=Refresh Fl8=Work with output F6=Display messages 18 . Custom Options Menu Version : 6 .0 .7 .0.01 Date in stalled : 02/06/2010 F14=Work with submitted jobs NOTIFICATION AREA 9 10 II 12 City of College Station , Texas PLANNING DIVISION 4714 ST. ANDREW DR. 8 9 10 II 12 -A ~ NOT Iii TO ~SCALE ZONING 8 9 9 A-0 10 10 II II 12 12 ZBA 08/07/01 I SETBACK VARIANCE CASE: CHECK BY: __ _ DATE: MINUTES Zoning Board of Adjustment August 7, 2001 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 6:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman Birdwell , Sheffy, Richards & Alternate Members Corley & Allison. MEMBERS ABSENT: Regular Members, Chairman Hill & Lewis . Alternate Member Goss, not needed . STAFF PRESENT: Staff Assistant Grace, Staff Planners Reeves & Hitchcock, City Attorney Cargill . AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order-Explanation of functions of the Board . Acting Chairman Birdwell called the meeting to order. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Oath of Office -Dick Birdwell. Staff Assistant Grace administered Oath of Office to Mr. Birdwell . AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consider Absence Request from meeting-Chairman Hill & Lewis. Mr. Richards made the motion to approve both absences. Mr. Sheffy seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration of the July 10, 2001 meeting minutes. Mr. Sheffy made the motion to approve the minutes. Mr. Corley seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM 5: Consideration of a rear setback variance at 4714 St. Andrews Drive, lot 42, block 9, Pebble Creek 3-B. Applicant is Larry Pierson. Staff Planner Reeves stepped before the Board and presented the staff report. Ms. Reeves told the Board that this case involves the property owner, who is proposing to build a detached garage of 22 ' x 25' into the 20 ' rear setback. The owner's desire to construct this is because he intends to close in the existing garage for living quarters for his mother-in-law. The applicant is requesting a rear setback variance of 9 . 5 '. ZBAMinutes August 7, 2001 Page I of 4 The applicant has stated no special conditions, other than the desire to build a detached garage . The applicant stated that his hardship is, that, "the new structure would have to be constructed flush with the existing garage, which would not look as well from the street . It would also eliminate the walkway gate to the backyard . Without the variance the car access to the street would be more difficult". The property owner identified the following alternative . To attach the new garage to the existing garage and narrow the proposed width, making the parking of two large vehicles difficult. It may also necessitate a wider driveway and the loss of esthetically appealing and beneficial trees. Ms . Reeves ended her report by showing the Board pictures of the property. Acting Chairman Birdwell asked Ms. Reeves how many responses did she receive from citizens that were in favor of the request. Ms . Reeves answered that there was one who spoke in favor, one who spoke in opposition and 9 were just calls due to the public hearing sign in the front yard . They had no comment either for or against. Mr. Sheffy asked if the one against the variance had a specific reason. Ms. Reeves replied that the reason given was they did not feel they needed another garage. The specifics of the case were not given. Acting Chairman Birdwell opened the public hearing for those wanting to speak in favor or the request. Tony Jones, 3205 Earl Rudder South, approached the Board and was sworn in by Acting Chairman Birdwell . Mr. Jones told the Board that he was there on behalf of the Pierson's because he built their house originally. Mr. Jones explained that the renovations are to allow the in-laws to move in. The Architectural Control Committee for Pebble Creek has approved the plans. Mr. Jones stated that there are no main hardships except not being able to use the building the way they want to use it . Mr. Jones explained that Mr. & Mrs. Pierson are retired and it would be an inconvenience for them to rebuild . Mr. Jones added that the new addition would set back into the easement 9 Yi feet. All the utilities are in the 10-foot setback so they would not encroach into that portion of the rear setback. The house directly behind the garage itself is turned to face St. Andrews and there are no window protrusions . Mr. Jones ended by telling the Board that Mr. Pierson has spoken to all the surrounding neighbors and they did not have any verbal objections . Jean Ringer, 4717 St. Andrews, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Acting Chairman Birdwell. Ms . Ringer told the Board that she lives directly across the street and she had no objections to the variance . Larry Pierson, the applicant, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Acting Chairman Birdwell . Mr. Pierson told the Board the mother-in-law did have a stroke and so there is a real need to keep her from climbing stairs . With no one else stepping forward to speak in favor or opposition of the request Acting Chairman Birdwell closed the public hearing . ZBAMinutes August 7, 2001 Page2of4 Mr. Sheffy made the motion to authorize a variance to the minimum setback from the terms of this ordinance as it will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the following special condition : the addition would not take away from the appearance of the lot; and such that the spirit of the ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done. Mr. Allison seconded the motion. Mr. Corley stated that he is in favor of granting the variance but he thinks a condition needs to be stated other than the appearance . Mr. Corley offered an irregular lay out of the lot as a special condition. Mr. Sheffy agreed to amend his motion to read : the lot is i"egular and the rear of the lot is not clearly defined. _Acting Chairman Birdwell read the motion and added the limitation being 9-Yi foot variance . With no other discussion of the motion, Acting Chairman Birdwell called for a vote. The Board voted (5-0) to approve the variance. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Consideration of a rear setback variance at 2341 Pintail Loop, lot 16, block 1, Steeplechase V. Applicant is Stylecraft Builders. Staff Planner Hitchcock stepped before the Board and presented the staff report . Ms . Hitchcock told the Board that the variance is to legalize an error made when changes to the site were made in the field . This case involves an error made when the builder changed the approved site plan. When the house was designed , the developer/builder was not aware that there was a light pole by the property. When the pole was discovered in the field , the house and driveway were built opposite from how they were planned to sit on the site . After construction, it was discovered that the back comer of the house was built 23 .58 feet from the rear property line . Thus the applicant is requesting a rear setback variance of 1.42 feet . The applicant offers the special condition that they were not aware of the light pole at the end of the driveway until they were ready to build . The applicant says that if he had not moved the house, the driveway would have been in conflict with the light pole. The construction of the home is complete and ready to close . Staff has identified that removal of the encroachment is the only alternative to a variance for the house to be in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance . Ms . Hitchcock ended by showing the Board pictures of the property . Acting Chairman Birdwell opened the public hearing for those wanting to speak in favor of the request . Tim Pickering, the applicant, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Acting Chairman Birdwell . Mr. Pickering told the Board that when the forms were set for the house it was discovered that if the forms were set as on the plan, the light pole was going to be in the middle of the driveway . So in their attempt to rectify the problem in the field they ended up going over the lot line . It was not until the final survey was done that they knew they had an encroachment and he immediately called the city . Mr. Richards asked Mr. Pickering if he had an approved site plan for the house as it is built now. Mr. Pickering replied that he shifted the location of the house in the field . Mr. Richards asked if anyone visited the lot before the site plan was drawn and construction was started . Mr. Richards added that he drove by the property and the lamp pole is the first thing you see . Mr. Pickering stated that when he first started building in that subdivision the lamp poles were not in place . ZBAMinutes August 7, 200 I Page3of4 They were placed after he had already started homes on that street. Mr. Pickering stated that he has nothing to do with the plans and drawings . Mr. Richards stated that there seem to be a series of things that happened and very few or none of which apply to the city ordinances . With no one steppin g forward to speak in opposition to the request , Actin g Chairman Birdwell closed the public hearing . Mr. Richards made the motion to deny a variance to the minimum setback from the terns of this ordinance as it will be contrary to the public interest due to the lack of any special conditions , and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would not result in unnecessary hardship to this applicant, and such that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done. Mr. Sheffy seconded the motion . Mr. Birdwell stated that he understood Mr. Richards 's opinion , but he personally thinks the variance should be granted . The variance is 1.4 feet and this is something city staff should have authority to handle without having a hearing . Mr. Birdwell stated that the solution is to cut some of the house off and that is certainly an unreasonable thing to do . Mr. Birdwell stated that from his own personal experience in the past, city staff could write a letter stating that they are not going to enforce the encroachment. Mr. Birdwell ended by saying that he agrees that ·builders· should not do these type things without checking . There is not doubt the builder is at fault. Mr. Richards stated his concerns are with the way it happened and what happened . It was a series of events that any one of which could have stopped the encroachment from ever happening . Mr. Corley stated that he agreed that it is clearly in violation and it is ridiculous not to grant it. There are no special conditions or hardships and that is what they are looking for. Acting Chairman Birdwell called the vote from Mr. Richards's motion. The board voted (4-1) to deny the variance. Acting Chairman Birdwell voting against the denial. AGENDA ITEM NO 7: Future agenda items No items were addressed . AGENDA ITEM NO 8: Adjourn. Acting Chairman Birdwell adjourned the meeting . APPROVED: ,;u:J?~ ATIEST:" rU ~ Leslie Hill, Chairman ZBA Minldes August 7, 2001 Page 4 of 4 ' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASENO.: Of-151 . DATE SUBMIITED: 7-5-o I \O~ ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: L Filing Fee of$75 .00 . V Application completed in full. ~Request form completed in full. £Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as site plans, elevation drawings, sign details and floor plans. The Zoning Official shall inform the applicant of any extra materials required. APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name AGt.1tlA-Nol Bu..ilclt~& -r~IJL.j ...Sot.J'i5/{!j~3 . Mailing Address ~~OS Z.~ /(u..ddu..,;--;/A.t~~ City D~?Ji-S'10t.i-t.~ State /K Zip Code 7 7& ifS" E-Mail Address ------------ Phone Number q 7 9 _, ~ 93 t.f-9 9 Fax Number ----------------- PROPER1Y OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name~L_A_A_~_y-t--:P~tt_~~S-~-~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~ Mailing Address t/:714 .S:/.. ~t..ul-5 fu-City Cklit~~ State 7X Zip Code 77 9 t/_s-' E-Mail Address ------------ Phone Number t:/79 -~90()8 ~7 LOCATION OF PROPER1Y: Address L/ 711./. 61. ~ t:w s fu Lot 4~ Block CJ Subdivision Description if there is no Lot, Block and Subdivision --------------------- Action Requested: (Circle One) CS:ack Vari-:iee) Parking Variance Sign Variance Appeal of Zoning Official 's Interpretation Special Exception Other ---------~ Current Zoning of Subject Property ___,l{'--"-=t.::..;;.S.:::....::.:td=~:::...:.=::....t.l-"";,;__,""""'------------------- Applicable Ordinance Section J), -I The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct and complete. ~ 7-05-l!/ Signature and Title Date ZBA APPLICATION ZBAAPP .DOC 3125199 1of2 VARIANCE REQUEST FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: ___ _ The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested : WE-Jl.e?'-es-f ~~c ~ ~~ ~o ' 'le l O ~ '' This variance is necessary due to the following special conditions: Tt:> ~ d:k 1 {)c_efa.cud ~azjd The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: ~ The facts stated in this application are true and correct. VARIANCE REQUEST VARIANCE.DOC 3f2S/99 Date 2of2 ·., ... , H ','')'_ ....... ' ' ,., ,· F -The following restrictions shall apply to accessory buildings, structures or uses other than garages, carports and Jiving quarters for family or servants: a minimum rear setback of 15 feet is required; and a maximum building eaves height of 8 feet is allowed. The following restrictions shall apply to garages and carports: a minimum rear setback of 20 ti · ired; and a minimum side street setback of 20 feet is required for garages or carports that face onto side streets. The following restrictions shall apply to accessory buildings or structures used for living quarters for family or servants: a minimum rear setback as stated in Table A above for the district in which the accessory building or structure is located is required ; and a maximum size not to exceed 25% of the area of the principal structure is allowed . On lots with approved rear access all setbacks shall be measured from the nearest boundary of the access easement or alley. On all other lots rear setbacks shall be measured from the rear property line. In no event shall more than 30% of the rear yard area (that portion of the yard between th e rear setback line of the principal structure and the rear property line) be covered with accessory buildings, structures or uses . G -The m ax imum building height may exceed 35' if all setbacks observe an additional setback of 2' for every foot above 3 5 ' of building height. H -Minimum rear setback may be reduced to 15 feet when parking is provided in the front yard or side y ard . I -Minimum Density of 12 DU/Acre required. J -If structure is higher than 50 feet a 25 ' setback from public Right of Way is required . DU-Dwelling Unit. DU/Acre -Dwelling Units per acre, in the zone, under one ownership excluding streets, parks, etc. Min. Lot W idth -Lot Width at front setback line. (As amended by Ordinance No. 2183 dated June 13 , 1996) 7nnin o Orciinance Page 7 -53 PRESENTATION ZBA 4714 St. Andrews Slide 1 (title) Larry Pierson is requesting a nine and half foot variance into the rear setback of 4714 St. Andrews Drive (1 Slide 2 (SAM) The subject property is located in the Pebble Creek Subdivision. This is in an R-1 Single Family Residential zoning district. According to the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance, property in an R-1 zoning district is required to have a minimum rear setbac.k,. of25' feet. Garages and Carports have a minimum rear setback of ~' feet. The applicant is wanting to construct a detached garage of '.2i x 25' into the 20' rear setback, which would be encroaching 9 and half feet into the rear setback. Slide 3 (survey/site plan) CASE OVERVIEW The applicant is proposing this 22' x 25' detached garage so he can close in his existing garage for living quarters for his mother-inlaw. The applicant has stated no special condition, other than the desire to build a detached garage. For a hardship the applicant states" that the new structure would have to be constructed flush with the existing garage, which would not look as well from the street. It would also eliminate the walkway gate to the back yard. Without the variance the car access to the street would be more difficult". As far as alternatives the applicant states that to attach the new garage to the existing garage & narrow the proposed width, which would make the parking of two large vehicles difficult. It may also necessitate a wider driveway and the loss of esthetically appealing and beneficial trees. Ordinance Intent Building setback requirements usually allow for some degree of control over population density, access to light and air, and fire protection. These standards are typically justified on the basis of the protection of property values. Just a Reminder To justify a variance, the difficulty must be due to unique circumstances involving the particular property. The unique circumstances must relate to the particular property for which relief is sought, not to the owner's personal situation. The exceptional circumstances must cause the owner's unnecessary hardship -i.e., must create the inability to make reasonable use of the property in accord with the literal requirements of the law. \ l . . l . I have had 1S people contact me, were mquires, one etter 1n favor of the variance, and one person spoke against it. Owner's Notified: 22 Responses Received: As of date of staff report , we have had one contact by phone . ATTACHMENTS Location Map Aoolication Site Plan 0 : \group\deve _ ser\stfrpt\zngstfrpt\honda. doc ------------ \ I \ d I I \ \ I I ! c c I ..... ' ' .... ' .. v .. •· =Q ' -~ ell ! '. \ --------)'---l e>' _ ... --\ Ul ::: ~I ''° -t \f' G1 J ''l" j : '1 () I I \ ~~ . ,...,11L :;,.:::.t ?-' ., ·,ii \I " '-9 J~ I 7 I I \...I -"<f f'. o<i --.Q t · I 11 M;', ~~-0 / I ~ ' I I It) ,r L _ ~ I i ~ I . I . .J _, ' . j ?·:'.'.· L.. ----=---_,--·-I \!-o'' t -:-,3•-0'' I I f -I l '::>I P-. '~ D < -. l.11-JE I ' I ~T) ·,) ,..... • f .,. DISTRICT USE SCHEDULE -TABLE A Dist. Min. Lot Min. Lot Min . Lot Min. Front Min . Side Min . Side Min . Rear Max. Max . Net Area/DU Width De pth Setback Setback St. Setback Setback Height DU/AC RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS A-0 5 ac res 50' 20' 15' 35' R-1 5,000 SF 50' 100' 25 '(D ) 7.5'(C) 15'(F) 25'(F) 2.5 story/35' 8.0 R-lA 4 ,00 0 SF none none 25'(D) 7.5'(C) 15'(F) 20'(F) 2.5 story/35' 10.0 R-lB 8,00 0 SF none none 25'(D) 7.5'(C) 15'(F) 25'(F) 2.5 story/35 ' 6 .0 R-2 3,5 00 SF 35'(E) 100' 25'(D) 7.5'(C) 15'(F) 20'(F)(H) 2 .5 story/35' 12 .0 R-3 2,00 0 SF 20' 100' 25'(D) (A)~ 15'(F) 20'(F) 35' 14 .0 R-4 25'(D) (A)(B) 15 ' 25'(F) 2.5 story/35' 16.0 R-5 25'(D) (A)(B) 15' 20'(F) 45' 24 .0 R-6 Lot area, setbacks , height determined by site plan review; density above 24 DU/acre determined by City Council R-7 See Mobile Home Park Ordinance. NG-3 No Minimum 15' 60' no max.(I) PUD Sec. 7 .19 for restrictions . A-OX 2 .0 Acres 50' 15' 15' 25' 35 ' A-OR 1 Acre 50' 25' 25' 50' 35' 1.0 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS C-N Sec. 7.10 24' Sec. 7.10 25' (A)(B) 15 ' 15' A-P,C-1,C-2*,C-3,CB 24' 100' 25' (A)(B) 15' 15' NG-1 O'(J) (B) O' 15' NG-2 O'(J) (B) O' 15' C-PUD Sec . 7 .20 for restrictions. *When C-2 abuts single family residential, duplex, or townhouse development or zoning districts . M-1 M-2 24' 100' 100' 200' 25' 40' 15' INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS 25' 25' (A)(B) (A)(B) 15 ' 25' 40' 15' 15' 35' 50' None(J) 35'(G) A -A minimum side setback of 7.5 feet is required for each building or group of contiguous buildings . B -Lot Line construction on interior lots is allowed where access to the rear of the building is provided on the site or by dedicated right-of-way or easement. C -Zero lot line constructi on of residence is all owed where property on both sides of lot line is owned and/or developed s imultaneou sly by si ngle party. Development under lot line construction requires prior approval by the Zoning Official. In no case shall a single family residence or duplex be built within 15 feet of another build- ing . D -Minimum front setback may be reduced to 15 feet when approved rear access is provided, or when side yard or rear yard parking is provi ded . E -The minimum lot width for duplex dwelling may be reduced to 30 ft./DU when all required off-street parking is provided in the rear or side yard . Zoning Ordinance Page 7 -52 t.,. , ' .,> ·}~-:. . .. This is to correct the meeting date and time. July 25, 2001 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: VARIANCE request/or 4714 ST ANDREWS DR. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a variance request for the following property: Apolicant: PIERSON, LARRY Subject Property: 4714 ST ANDREWS DR (See attached location map.) Proposed Variance: Rear Setback The Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 7, 2001 at 6:00 o.m. to consider the request. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas. All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject property have received notification of this request . Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional infonnation, contact the City Planning Office, (979) 764-3570. JENNIFER REEVES Staff Planner .. > .... '· . •I . . • , . .... " .. ' .. . . .. -{ ~ ... .. I ' .. \ ; • • • , t " .. t . ./ ... ,. 1; .j ". •, .. . . ... ; .. . ·-. -; . . .. ,. r . I • ·r· .·., , . .. .., Jr .. •' ' r . . r' I ' ....... ,, .··- . ; l, . ·' .. ~ 'l :·. l .. • . . . ... . ) . , . ''. . .. .. ' ... l \ '• " I , . . ) . " July 25, 2001 TO WHOM IT .M4Y CONCERN: Re: VARIANCE request for 4714 ST ANDREWS DR. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a variance request for the following property: Applicant: PIERSON, LARRY Subject Propertv: 4714 ST ANDREWS DR (See attached location map.) Proposed Variance: Rear Setback The Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 25, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. to consider the request. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas . All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject property have received notification of this request . Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989 . For additional i:nfonnation, contact the City Planning Office, (979) 764-3570. JENNIFER REEVES Staff Planner ;· . ' J •... ·,, .. '" :-. · .. ' ; , . ' .• . ·"' ... .. ·' . ' ' ' ,, .. ' ,· . ' . ./ ' . .. ., . ,, . ' . Na an A rpsso n er9960 Check type of mail Of service : Affix Stamp Here . . .0. ox (If issued as a -. . College Station, TX 77842 D Certified D Recorded Deliv ery (Internati onal) certifica te of mailing, ::::--~-,~-·-·---0 COD D Registered or fo r additional " ~£ sr,,. ~~ "; ----· D Del ivery Confi rmation D Return Receipt fo r Merchandise copies o f this bill) --~~i : D Express Mail D Signature Confirmation Postmark and ,., ............ '-"..i Date of Receiot ~ ~? ~L ~ ~~O 1 2 t ~~ : 1 .5 Q = i 01-151 - , St reet , and PO Add ress Postage Fee Handli ng ~R Davis M. Young C harge PBMtTtR ... 'ee * - Pebble Creek Representative ll_, TV 708'738 U.S. POSTAGE * -* 4500 Pebble Creek Parkway - College Station, Texas 77845 01-151 Jim Keblinger Pebble Creek Representative 1005 Muirfield Village College Station, Texas n845 01-151 ::.. ~ ~ Stephen D. Meyerkorth -·-> Cl) 4 709 St. Andrews Drive ·--y .. College Station, Texas 77845 CJ) Q Ill c c a: ~ ·-"""' -·-"Cl Cl) ""' 01-151 .. ~ c .. ::s Robert E. & Carole A Jolmson c -: -t,) .... o-:c .. qi 4711 St. Andrews Drive ·-.. .. a: .. ; Cl) College Station, Texas 77845 re -E .. ~ ... 0 ~ a: -.. (.) ~· ·-01-151 .... n.~ ~.!_"Qd' c Cl) a. John W. & Beverly B Preiss {.;. y rl II,~~ 0 .. en {}-_::J 4 713 St. Andrews Drive ,3] ... _ ~H .. ~~~6 >-l'J College Station, Texas 77845 .. c ,_ -\~ ~,~ ... .... > ·-·-cn 01-151 -~ s~ . ... Howard A Jr . & Eugenia Murray 4 715 St Andrews Drive 11e of receiving employ ee) Th e ful l de cla rati on of value is requ ired on a I domestic and international registere d mail. The maximum indem nity payable for the College Station, Texas 77845 reco nstruction of non ne gotiable documen ts un der Express Mail document reconstruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to Y)l_~/f' additiona l limitat ion s for multiple pieces lost or damag es in a single cat astrophic occurrence . The maximum indemnity payable I I on Expre ss Ma il merc hand ise ins urance is $5 00 , bu t optio nal Express Ma il Service merchan dise Ins urance is availa ble for up to \0 $5,00 0 to some, but not all coun tries . The maximum indemnity payable is $25 ,000 for registere d mai l. See Domestic Mail Manual R9 00, S91 3 , an d S921 for limita tions of coverage on insured and CO D mail. See International Mail Manual for limitations of cove raoe on intern atio na l mall. Sp ecial han dlin o charoes ap ply only to Standard Mal l (A ) an d Stan dard Mall (8) parcel•. PS Form 3877, August 2000 Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen 62 c i~ a nd Addre ss of Send er ITV OF COLLEGE STATION P.O. Box 9980 -G~lege-Station TX n842 • • A..6:-1-.... ,_'"'_"' 01-151 Ulman D & Sylvia E . McMullen P.O. Box ll291 College Station, Texas 77842 01-141 Larry J. Ringer 4 717 St. Andrews Drive College Station, Texas 77845 Larry G. & Vrrginia C Pierson 4 714 St. Andrews Drive College Station, Texas 77845 01-151 Michael E. & Linda C. Wilson 4 710 St. Andrews Drive College Station, Texas 77845 01-151 Anna M, Stephen L Price & Mildred Stark 4719 St. Andrews Drive Colle!!e Station. Texas 77845 01-151 Junutbula N & Aruna J. Reddy 4 712 St. Andrews Drive College Station, Texas 77845 .......... _ -,, --·--- ~Q PS Form 3877, August 2000 Check ty pe of mail or se rv ice : Affix Sta mp Here (If issued a s a .. O Certif ied 0 Recorded Deliv e ry (International) certificate o f mailing, ..,. --_,.., ~-···--, 0 COD 0 Registered or for additional --~l ,~ ..... __ _. __ , 0 Delivery Confi rmation 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise copies of this b ill) \-~~~ s ~~ l .. 0 Express Mail 0 S ignature C o nfirmation Pos tmark an d ~ : . 0 Insured Date of Receiot -~ ~~--5 0 -* - Arl rl r•«•• Na me, Street, an d PO Add ress Postage Fee Ha ndling I ~u ~~ ~ ~·o ~ :It r~ : 1 . ;: i Charge - : PBM£TEA l : I ,. ,,_ 70SH38 U.S. POUAG · * - I - >o .. .. .. -> ·-·-Cl.I -u ~. en ~ Ql c c Q a: l"I ·--·-"g Cl) -.. .. "' c .... :I c -~ ,.. u .... o-:c ii;; " ·-.. .... a: .. :;::: U) ltL -E -&;;: :.: -0 u a: .. " ·-(J & ~~ c Q) a. 0 .. Cl) C;)-_:s t~ , JUL'~ .... 1rR >o "' nL' l; .. c I .. --' > .:::· ~ \.. 'OOI) ·-"' ~ 'J 8/ 0 (Name of receiving employ ee) Th e fu ll declaration of va lu e is req uired on a I do mes tic and int ernat io nal regis tered ma il. The maximum indemnity payable for the recons tru cti on of nonneg otia ble documen ts un de r Express Mail documen t recons truc tion insurance is $500 per piece subject to TVLW add itional li mitations for mu ltiple pi ec es lo st or damag es in a si ng le cata strophi c occ urre nce. Th e maxi mum indemnity payable on Expres s Ma il merchand ise ins ura nce is $5 00 , bu t optio na l Express Mail Se rv ice merchandise insurance is available for up to $5,000 to some , but not all co untries . Th e maximu m inde mnity payable is $25 ,000 for registered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual R900 , S9 13 , and S921 fo r lim itatio ns of cov era ge on insu red and COD mail. See International Mail Manual for lim itations of co ver age on intern atio nal mail . Special han dli no charoes ao olv onlv to St andard Mail (A) and Sta ndar d Mail (B) parcels . Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen 62-DG N'emi bfee'dtf.~~E STATION P.O . Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 01 -151 Joel L & Janice G. Rogers 4701 Camargo Court College Stati on, Texas 77845 01-151 Domingo A & Barbara C Olivares P.O. Box 6361 Bryan , Texas 77805 01-151 Robert A & Judith C Hall 3802 Windridge Bryan, Texas 77802 01-151 David F. & Josephine L King 4703 Camargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 01-151 Mike & Diane Speed 4705 Camargo Court College Stati on, Texas 77845 01-151 Larry D & Jeanne A Ent 4 707 Camargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 0 P'Vorm 3877 , Augu st 2000 Check type of mail or service : Affix Stamp He re (If issued as a certificate of mailing, or for additional copi es of this bill) O Cert ified 0 COD 0 Recorded Delivery (International) 0 Registered O Del ivery Confirmation O Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchand ise 0 Signatu re Confirmation Postmark and Date of Receiot O Insured •e, Street, and PO Address (;j rt! \\ '· ... Po stag e Fee -~ C:TA4 .... --''· ~'"~ ~ ~ . ~26 ~)<, ,_ ~uu~ / f;;rJS -- Hand ling I Charge I R !e >. .. .... .. ~ ~ ;: > (I) ·-~ CJ en Q QI c c a: l'I ·-""' ... ·-"O (I) .. .. ftl c .. = c -~ .. CJ .... o-:c .. Q,) ·-.... a: .. ·-(/) .L ... -E -0 ·-rX .. " u ·-.,, c (I) a. 0 .. VI C.,\-_::s .. >. ftl .. c ... .~-> ·-fl) -0 Varna of recei ving employ ee) The full de cla ration of val ue is requ ired on a I dom es tic and international registered ma il. The max imum indemnity payable for the recon struction of nonneg otiab le doc um ents unde r Express Mail docu ment reco nst ruc tion insurance is $500 per piece subje ct to ?m CJ-ff additional li mitations for mu ltiple pie ces lost or damages in a si ngle catastro ph ic occ urrence . Th e maxi mum in demn ity payable on Express Mail merchand ise insuran ce is $500 , but op ti onal Expres s Ma il Service merc hand ise insura nce is ava il abl e for up to $5 ,000 to some , but not all coun tries . The maxi mum ind em nity pa yab le is $2 5,000 fo r re gistered mail. See Domestic Ma il Man ual R90 0, S9 13, and S9 21 fo r li mitations of coverage on insu red and COD mail. See Intern a tional Mail Manual for limitation s of cov eraoe on internationa l mall. Sp ecial handl ino charaes app lv onlv to Stan dard Mail (Al and Stand ard Mail (Bl parce ls. Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen N86'2~dd ress of Sender Check type of mail or service: Affix Stamp He re CITY OF COLLEGE STATION (If issued as a -t...._•, .. .. O Certified 0 Record ed Delivery (International) certificate of mailing, ~· .. ~~.(~";.!!" -::; P.O. Box 9960 0 COD 0 Registered or for additional 0 Delivery Confirmat ion 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise copies of th is bill) Colleoe Station , TX n842 0 Express Mail 0 Signature Confirmation Postmark and I ; ~ IA * 0 Insured Date of Receiot ~u ~~ ~ ~:o ~ 2 ) m : 1 .0 0 = i --I . .. .. . .. ··,me, Street , and PO Ad dress Postage Fee Handlil RR Chargl Fee PBMll'ER • -- 01-151 • 'Pllll 708i7l8 U.S. POSTAGE • Ralph T. & Patricia A Smith -• -- 4 712 Camargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 01-151 Michael A & Frankie Hitt 4 710 Carmargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 ~ 01 -151 ~ .... ~ Michael J. & Kristi A Clark > -·-cu 4 706 Camargo Court -u ~-. ai ·~· cu College Station, Texas 77845 c c Q r:c n ·-~ ·-"CS G) -01-151 .... .. "' c .. :I David A & Linda J Shaw c _ ... ... u .... o-:c .. Q) 4 708 Camargo Court ·-.. .. r:c .. ·-Ill College Station, Texas 77845 ft! .... -E .. .::: ... 0 u r:c .. (,) -·-4l ~~ c G) a. 12 ~ 0 .. en ~ Tiii C)-_:I I~~ uuc... \~ ~ .... 13 26 t~ ~ CV .. c I '2oov i Ill ~; > ·-14 \ \. ·-en ~ '--'~I "' 15 -t Tota!IJ Jumber of Pieces Tota l Number of Pieces (:iSm~ The full declaration of value is required on a I domestic and international registered mail. The maximum Indemnity payable for the Liste oy Sender Received at Post Offic e rec on str uctio n of nonn egotiabl e docu ments un der Exp ress Mai l docu ment reco nstructio n insu rance is $500 per piece subject to ~r add iti ona l li mit ati ons fo r mu ltiple pi eces lost or damage s in a single catastrophic occurrence. The maximum indemnity payable on Exp re ss Ma il me rc hand ise ins ura nce is $50 0, but option al Express Ma il Serv ice me rchandise insu rance is available for up to $5,000 to some , bu t not all cou ntrie s. The maximum ind emn ity payab le is $25,000 for registere d mail. See Domestic Mail Manu al A900 , S913 , and S921 for li mitations of co ver age on insured and COD mail. Se e International Mail Ma nualfor li mitations of cov eraqe on internationa l ma il. Spe cial han dlin q cha rqes appl y only to Stan dard Mail (A ) and Standard Mail (B) parce l•. PS Form 3877, August 2000 Complete by Typewri ter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen ~Address of Send er CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P.O . Box 9960 College Station , TX n842 I 01-151 Joel L & Janice G. Rogers 4 70 l Camargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 01-151 Domingo A & Barbara C Olivares P.O . Box 6361 Bryan , Texas 77805 01-151 Robert A & Judith C Hall 3802 Windridge Brvan. Texas 77802 01-151 DavidF . & Josephine L King 4703 Camargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 01-151 Mike & Diane Speed 4705 Camargo Court r.ollel!e Station. Texas 77845 01-151 Larry D & Jeanne A Ent 4 707 Camargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 10\al J' .. U lllU~I V I I IQ""""" G,~ .. Rece ived at Po st Office PS Fo rm 3877, August 2000 Ch eck type of mail or service : Affix Stamp Here (If issued as a certifica te of mailing, o r for additional copies o f this bill) D Certified 0 COD D Recorded De livery (Inte rnat ional) D Registered D Del ivery Confi rmation D Express M ail D Return Receipt for M e rchandise D S ignature C onfirma ti o n Postmark and Date of Receint D Insured ne, St reet , and PO Address e of re ceiving employee) Postage Fee Handli ng Charge f ~ .... \ Actua if Reg -'(""()-110/ ~~ ( S\)" 0~ ~~'t~ ~ \'' >Joo .... ~') ~ \~ - c o--.... ft! E .. ·-c 0 c-,,. .. c::--> ·--... ,,. ~ ~ ~ ·-> ·-Cl) -(,) ~- en ~ Qj c c Q a: ~ ·-.,.. .~ ·-,, G> -.... ... "' c .... ::s -;: ,.. (,) .... :c .. Q> .. ... a: ·-en ... -... :: ... 0 (,) a: (,) t'I GI a. .. en _::s .... "' c -~ .... ·-en The full declaration of value is required on a I domestic and international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the reconstruction of nonnegotia ble documents under Express Mail document reconstruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to additional li mit atio ns for multiple pieces los t or damages in a single catastrophic occurrence . The maximum indemnity payable on Expre ss Ma il mercha ndise insura nce is $500 , bu t optional Express Mail Service merchandise insurance is available for up to $5,000 to som e, but not all countries . The maximum indemnity payable is $25 ,000 for registered mail . See Domestic Ma il Manual R900, S913, and S921 for limita tions of coverage on insured and COD mail. See International Mail Manual for limitations of coveraqe on in tern ational mail. Sp ecial han dli nq cha rqes app ly only to Standa rd Mail (A) and Standard Mail (Bl parcels . Complete by Ty pewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen 62·DG h&GE STATION ··-tf .... NCCff¥8Fe0@~ Check type of mail or service : Affix Stamp Here ~ ;s,~~lt!:,ur--_:; P.O. Box 9960 O Certified 0 (If issue d as a Recorded D elivery (International) certificate of mailing, ~ i." f College Station, TX 77842 0 COD 0 Registered or for additional 'om: . O Delivery Confirmation 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise copies of this bill) j<> ~~ ~ 6'..0 ~ 2t /, l, = 1 .5 0 ,: i 0 Express Mail 0 S ignature Confirmation Postmark and Date of Receiot I PBMlnR • -01-151 Handling • 1me , Street, and PO Address Postage Fee Charge T'll! 70U7l8 u.a. POSTAGE • Davis M. Young -• - Pebble Creek Representative ... 4500 Pebble Creek Parkway Colle_ge Station .. Texas 77845 01-151 Jim Keblinger Pebble Creek Representative 1005 Muirfield Village College Station., Texas 77845 01-151 >- Stephen D. Meyerkorth .. .... .. - 4 709 St. Andrews Drive > = ·-41 College Station. Texas 77845 -(,) ... m Q (II c c r:c 01-151 l"I ·-.... Robert E. & Carole A Johnson ·-i;, a> --... ... ~1 10~ "' "' c ... :I 4 711 St. AndrewsDrive c -~ r u -College Station, Texas 77845 '( % " ~ o-::c ·.: GI ·-.. ... r:c ,~~ ... ·-/1.!.J m ... -Cl) 11.:.1 ('{.:J' C'\ 1 E--0 ,;: -01-151 j \ '1 u r:c ~"'~ .. (.) John W. & Beverly B Preiss ·-(J ~ ~'--~~ ~ C: Q) a. 4713 St. Andrews Drive -~ ... ti) College Station., Texas 77845 _:i .... >-"' 01-151 .. c > .~' Howard A Jr . & Eugenia Murray ·-ti) 4 715 St Andrews Drive - College Station., Texas 77845 0 1e of receiving employee) The full declaration of value is required on a I domestic and international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the \'i~' Hece1veo at t-ost u mce reconstruction of nonnegotiable documents under Express Mail document reconstruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to additional limitations for multiple pieces lost or damages in a single catastrophic occurrence. The maximum indemnity payable on Express Mail merchandise insurance is $500, but op tion al Express Mail Service merchand ise insurance is available for up to $5,000 to some, but not all countries. The maximum indemnity payab le is $25,000 for registered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual R900 , S913 , and S921 for limitations of coverage on insured and COD mail. See International Ma il Manual for limitations of coveraae on internatio nal mail. Soecial handlina charaes aoolv onlv to Standard Mail (Al and Standard Mail lBl oarcel•. PS Form 3877 Au ust 2000 g Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen Name and A,.:tj .o t:Jof996Q Check type of mail or service : Affix Stamp Here ~--.-.. ~----..;.. (If issued as a ~ -~-, -. College Station, TX 77842 D Certified D Recorded Delivery (International) certificate of mailing, ';;-~~ ~ ~.!----·· ~ I.... f 0 COD D Registered or for additional -tj I • D Delivery Confirmation D Return Receipt for Merchandise copies of this bill) 0 ~~'i -• n Fvnn::!J~J::. M~i l D Signature Confirmation Postmark and ju ~~~ ~ ~O ~ 1 t rr~ : 1 .5 0 ;: i D ate of Receiot 01 -151 ame , Street , and PO Address Postage Fee Handling Actua P8MTlA ' : Ulman D & Sylvia E. McMullen Charge if Reg Tlll 70S'7l8 U.S. POSTAGE • -P.O. Box 11291 . College Station, Texas 77842 - 01-141 Larry J. Ringer 4 717 St. Andrews Drive College Station, Texas 77845 Larry G. & Virginia C Pierson 4 714 St. An drews Drive >-. .. .... College Station, Texas 77845 -· -> ~ ·-G> 01 -151 -t.> ,.. Michael E. & Linda C. Wilson Ol Q Q,I c c a: 4 710 St. Andrews Drive l"I ·-~ ·-'C G> -College Station, Texas 77845 .... .. "' c .... :I c -;: -t.> .... 01 -151 o-::c .ii;, " ·-.. .... a: Anna M, Stephen L Price & Mildred Stark .... ·-Cl) ti! .... - 4719 St. An drews Drive 1@ IO~ E--.. ,;.: -0 u a: College Station, Texas 77845 ~# .. (,) ·-4l ''''( \ \,... \-i-' c G> a. I ~ < 0 .. en 01-151 ' c-~ ~" ~h I -.. Junuthula N & Arona J. Reddy >-"' .. :P) .. c 4712 St. Andrews Drive ~ \SY ;: .... College Stati on, Texas 77845 ·-·-tA -- 10 1 0 t:Qole•~• Total Number of Pieces Postmaste r, Per (Name of receiving employ ee) The full declara tion of value is re qui red on a I domestic and internatio na l registe red mail. The maxi mum indemnity payable for the der Received at Post Office reconstruction of nonnegoti ab le doc um ents und er Express Mail docu ment rec on struction insurance is $500 per piece subject to add itional limitati ons fo r mu lti ple pieces lost or damag es in a sin gle cat astro ph ic occurrence . The maximum ind em nity payable on Expre ss Mail merchand ise insuran ce is $500 , but op tio nal Expr ess Ma il Servic e merchan dise insurance is available for up to $5 ,000 to some , bu t not all co un tries . Th e maxi mum Indemnity pa ya ble is $2 5,000 for regis tered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual R900 , $913, and S921 for limita tio ns of cove ra ge on insure d and COD ma il. See Intern ational Mail Manual for limitations of cove raae on int ernat ion al mail. Soe ci al ha nd li na charae s aoo lv onlv to Stand ar d Mail (Al and Standard Mail (Bl oarcels . PS Form 3877, August 2000 Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen 62-DG Net~~reoU .. ~E STATION 11 12 13 14 15 P.O . Box 9960 College Station , TX 77842 01-151 Ralph T . & Patricia A Smith 4 712 Camargo Court College Stati on, Texas 77845 01-151 Michael A & Frnakie Hitt 4 710 Cannargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 01 -151 Michael J. & Kristi A. Clark 4 706 Camargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 01 -151 David A & Linda J Shaw 4 708 Camargo Court College Station, Texas 77845 + Total NJ"ber of Pieces Total Number of Pieces Listed l Sender Received at Post Office ~~~ PS Form 3 •1, August 2 000 Check ty pe of mail Of se rvic e: D Certified 0 COD D Delivery Confirmation D Express Mail n Insured D Recorded Delivery (International) D Registered D Return Receipt for Merchandise D Signature Confirmation 1e, Stre et, and PO Add re ss Posta ge Affi x Stamp Here (If issued as a certificate of mailing, or for additional copies of th is bill) Postmark and Date of Receint Fee Handling Charge Actual Valu if Registers ~ IO~ r-.:,, 'l..J.i( \1'1. IC!J , \-f' ~\ ;Loi/ ~ ,-·'0y r-- > .. .. ~. -~ = > GI -~ t> ~ Q w c c a: "' -'" ·-"C Cl> ... .. .. Ill c .. ~ c ~~ -(,) .. o-:c ·a; GI ·-.. .. a: .. ·-I/I ~ .... -E t--t; 0 ·-a: .. u u ·-Ch c GI a. 0 .. en (;;)-,__::J .... > "' .. c w ..... > ·-·-en -0 Postmaster, Per (Name of receiving employee) The full dec laration of value is requ ire d on a I domestic and international registere d mail. The max imum indemnity payable for the rec on stru ction of nonn egoti ab le docum ents under Express Mai l doc um ent re co nstru ctio n insur ance is $500 per piece subject to add iti ona l limita ti ons for mu ltipl e piece s lost or damage s in a sin gle catas tro phic occu rr ence . The maximum indemnity payable on Expres s Ma il merchand ise insuran ce is $500 , but opt iona l Expr es s Mail Serv ice merc hand ise insu rance is availa ble for up to $5 ,000 to some , bu t not all coun t ries . The ma xim um ind emnity pa yab le is $25,000 for registered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual A900 , S913 , and S921 for lim itat io ns of cov erag e on insured and COD ma il. See In terna tio nal Mail Manual for lim itations of cove raa e on international mai l. So ecia l han dli na ch ara es aool v on lv to Stand ard Mail !Al and Standard Mail (8 ) parcels . Complete by Typewriter, Ink, or Ball Point Pen BCAD_ID R92976 R92975 R92974 R92973 R92986 R92972 R92990 R92987 R92971 R92988 R92995 R92991 R9i970 R92994 R92993 R92992 R93002 R93001 R92999 R93000 SITUS_NUM 4709 4711 4713 4715 4708 4717 4714 4710 4719 4712 4701 4709 4801 4703 4705 4707 4712 4710 4706 4708 SITUS_STR SITUS_CITY STANDREWSD STANDREWSO ST ANDREWS D STANDREWSD ST ANDREWS D ST ANDREWS D STANDREWSD STANDREWSD STANDREWSD STANDREWSD CAMARGO CT CAMARGO CT ST ANDREWS D CAMARGO CT CAMARGO CT CAMARGO CT CAMARGO CT CAMARGO CT CAMARGO CT CAMARGO CT OWNER_NAME MEYERKORTH, STEPHEN D JOHNSON , ROBERT E & CAROLE A PREISS , JOHN WILLIAM & MURRAY., HOWARD A JR & EUGENIA MCMULl!.EN , ULMAN D & SYLVIA E RINGER , LARRY J PIERS€>N , LARRY G & VIRGINIA C WILSGN , MICHAELE & LINDA C PRICi, ANNA M & REDl'Y, JUNUTHULA N & ROGliRS, JOE L & JANICE G OLIVA.RES , DOMINGO A & BARBARA C HALL1 ROBERT A & JUDITH C KIN~ DAVID F & JOSEPHINE L SPEED, MIKE & DIANE ENT! LARRY D & JEANNE A SMITH , RALPH T & PATRICIA A HITT, MICHAEL ALFORD & FRANKIE Cu.RK, MICHAEL J & KRISTI A SHAW, DAVID A & LINDA J .. . ,. ·.~ ... ' . .. .. ":'• ·1 '·, .... .. ' . .. f ...... ; .. ' • . . ' ~ • ~ ., . : ~ .. ·.'-1 :· • • . \ .. \ . . . ·:--·if' I ' ·.· ,• '• ': I I ·,· ,·.f ·, , . .. -. ... ... ... · . .· OWNER_ADD1 4 709 ST ANDREWS 4711 ST ANDREWS DR BEVERLY A BROWN PREISS 4715 ST ANDREWS DR PO BOX 11291 4717 ST ANDREWS DR 4714 ST ANDREWS OR 4710 ST ANDREWS DR STEPHEN L & MILDRED E STARK ARUNA J REDDY 4701 CAMARGO CT PO BOX6361 3802 WINDRIDGE 4703 CAMARGO CT 4705 CAMARGO CT 4707 CAMARGO CT 4712 CAMARGO CT 4710 CAMARGO CT 4706 CAMARGO CT 4708 CAMARGO CT OWNER_ADD2 4713 ST ANDREWS DR 4719 ST ANDREWS DR 4712 ST ANDREWS DR ,. ' . ' .· '-1 • .' .: ~ ,. • . ' . ,., '·· ..... : .' ....... ... r· r • -~ ., .. ,; ,·· ' : : :,: .•,.. ·, .... " . ,. '.• ,t. , ... , ' , ' ~. : . ... r. . .· ~ .. ·. -... '• ': ·,. .. . . . /' (, ·.·, : ·~.: .·. .. ,. l r ' . ·. :'-; ,:. OWNER_ CITY COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION BRYAN BRYAN COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION OWf\ SITUS_ADD TX 4709 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4711 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4713 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4715 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4708 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4717 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4714 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4710 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4719 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4712 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4701 CAMARGO CT TX 4709 CAMARGO CT TX 4801 ST ANDREWS DR TX 4703 CAMARGO CT TX 4705 CAMARGO CT TX 4707 CAMARGO CT TX 4712 CAMARGO CT TX 4710 CAMARGO CT TX 4706 CAMARGO CT TX 4708 CAMARGO CT OWNER_ZIP 77845 77845 77845 77845 77842 na40 77845 77845 77845 77840 77845 77805 77802 77845 77845 77845 77845 77845 77845 77845 LEGAL NOTICE DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, JULY 25 , 2001 ONLY BILL TO: Deborah Grace The City of College Station P .O . Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Master Card 5478 9900 0018 2794 Expires March 04 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing to consider a variance for 4714 St Andrews Drive. Applicant is Aggieland Builders. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall , 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6 :00 p .m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, August 7, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting . To make arrangements call (409) 764-3547 or {TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, please contact me at {409) 764-3570 . Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner •' y ,., , : ·~ f j -I ' ~ .... , ' ' ! .,: ·-., ' .. ; f i ' ·~ • l ~ tj···, \ " -• I ~ -· '.., ~ i .• i .. ,,. -~ .. ; ; ;• f .~· )', Ji ~ ._ . ·' ti! ( ,_ .. ' i " •l ' r • .. . -. . . ', . .. t ' . ' \.: ; " " ' ' .- ( .. j• : .~ ' ; t . . ( . ' , I .··:.·. ' ' I ( . . , -. ! · . ' ' ) • > ' ' ·-- DISTRICT USE SCHEDULE -TABLE A Dist. Min. Lot Min. Lot Min . Lot Min. Front Min. Side Min. Side Min . Rear Max . Max. Net Area/DU Width Depth Setback Setback St. Setback Setback Height DU/ AC RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS A-0 5 acres 50' 20' 15' 35' R-1 5,000 SF 50' 100' 25'(D) 7.5'(C) 15'(F) 25'(F) 2 .5 story/35' 8 .0 R-IA 4,000 SF none none 25'(0) 7.5'(C) 15'(F) 20'(F) 2 .5 story/35' 10 .0 R-IB 8,000 SF none none 25'(D) 7 .5'(C) 15'(F) 25'(F) 2.5 story/35' 6 .0 R-2 3,500 SF 35'(E) 100' 25'(D) 7.5'(C) 15'(F) 20'(F)(H) 2 .5 story/35' 12 .0 R-3 2,000 SF 20' 100' 25'(D) (A)~ 15'(F) 20'(F) 35' 14 .0 R-4 25'(0) (A)(B) 15' 25'(F) 2 .5 story/35' 16 .0 R-5 25'(0) (A)(B) 15' 20'(F) 45' 24 .0 R-6 Lot area, setbacks, height determined by site plan review; density above 24 DU/acre determined by City Council R-7 See Mobile Home Park Ordinance. NG-3 No Minimum 15' 60' no max.(I) PUD Sec. 7 .19 for restrictions . A-OX 2 .0 Acres 50 ' 15' 15' 25 ' 35 ' A-OR I Acre 50 ' 25' 25' 50' 35 ' 1.0 C-N Sec. 7.10 24' Sec. 7.10 A-P,C-l,C-2*,C-3,CB 24' 100' NG-I NG-2 C-PUD Sec. 7.20 for restrictions. COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS 25 ' 25' O'(J) O'(J) (A)(B) (A)(B) (B) (B) 15' 15' O' O' 15' 15' 15' 15' *When C-2 abuts singl e family residential, duplex, or townhouse development or zoning districts . M-1 M-2 24' 100' 100' 200' 25' 40' 15' INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS 25' 25' (AXB) (A)(B) 15' 25' 40' 15' 15' 35' 50' None(J) 35'(G) A - A minimum side setback of 7 .5 feet is required for each building or group of contiguous buildings. B -Lot Line construction on interior lots is allowed where access to !he rear of the building is provided on the site or by dedicated right-of-way or easement. C -Zero lot line construction of residence is allowed where property on both sides of lot line is owned and/or developed simultaneously by single party . Development under lot line construction requires prior approval by the Zoning Official. In no case shall a single family residence or duplex be built within 15 feet of another build- ing . D -Minimum front setback may be reduced to 15 feet when approved rear access is provided, or when side yard or rear yard parking is provided. E -The minimum lot width for duplex dwelling may be reduced to 30 ft.IOU when all required off-street parking is provided in the rear or side yard. · Zoning Ordinance Page 7 -52 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing to consider a variance for 4714 St Andrews Drive. Applicant is Aggieland Builders. I The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the Col- lege Station City Hall , 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, August 7 , 2001 . Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1- 800-735-2989 . For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner PURCHASER SIGN HERE x .... 7-25-01 REFERENCE NO, ~OllOICHECK NO. REOIOEPT. SEAV!R SALES SLIP I MERCHANT COPY I . 132 .THE URBAN LAWYER VOL. 31 , No. I WINTER 1999 are really so severe as to justify wholesale abandonment of variances or whether some solution to the difficulties may be found in the existing law. The "unnecessary hardship" criterion for determining whether or not a variance should be granted is well-established in the law, 36 and should, it has been observed, be strictly applied in order that zoning does not become so riddled with exceptions as to be ineffective. 37 It is submitted that the unnecessary hardship standard contains within itself a requirement which, if applied with reasonable strictness, would eliminate many situations of too great leniency in awarding variances. -t iS_jyell recognized that one component of the unnecessary hardship equir~meri{_!.S :thatthe hardship. affect only the property in question, -,, ~P~ .,, e f'rf~ire' ~eighborhood or a wide area, because in the situations of br'?_3der effect •. the problem should be solved by legislation rather than·. y pecill administrative relief;·38 To justify a variance, the diffi- culty must be due to unique circumstances involving the particular .. -9 • P!~~ ·. L Thus, a landowner whose property is affected by unpleasant odors in the neighborhood and who therefore seeks to put his property to commercial rather than residential use, has been denied a variance from the residential-only zoning because the undesirable smell existed throughout the area, not merely on the applicant's property.40 On the other hand, if the property is largely surrounded by business uses and is itself bisected by the line dividing commercial from residential use, it may be found to pose a situation of sufficiently exceptional circum- 36 . See supra notes 5 and 6 and accompanying text. As to the lower standard sometimes applied where an area variance, rather than a use variance, is sought. See supra note 19 . 37 . Bryden, supra note 21, at 779 . See generally Roger M . Anderson, The Board of Zoning Appeals-Villain or Victim?, 13 SYRACUSE L. REV . 353 (1962); Shapiro, supra note 5, at 9 . 38 . Note, Administrative Discretion in Zoning, 82 HARV. L. REV . 668 , 671-72 ( 1969). 39 . Reps , supra note 2, at 283 and 285-88 . 40 . People ex rel. Arverne Bay Constr. Co . v . Murdock, 247 A .D . 889, 286 N .Y . Supp . 785 (1936), ajf'd, 271 N .Y . 631, 3 N .E . 2d 457 (1936) (odors emanaed from an incinerator and from a creek used as outlet for a sewer). Cf Hickox v . Griffin, 298 N .Y. 365, 83 N .E. 2d 836 (1949) (university sought to use country estate as part of Its campus ; no showing of singular disadvantage to the particular property); Ostrove v . Cohen, 269 A .D . 1054, 58 N.Y .S.2d 900 (N .Y. App . Div . 1945), leave to appeal denied, 279 A .D . 818, 60 N.Y.S.2d 295 (N.Y. App . Div . 1946) (general restriction should not be destroyed by piecemeal exemptions); Levy v. Board of Standards and Appeals, 267 N . Y . 347, 196 N .E. 284 (1935) (premises might be incapable of earning profit unless used for gas station, but this does not justify variance based on conditions found throughout neighborhood); Young Women's Hebrew Ass'n v . Board of Stan- dards & Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270, 194 N .E . 751 ( 1935) (general deterioration of neigh- borhood docs not justify variance). THE "UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES" RULE IN ZONING VARIANCES 133 stances to justify a variance.41 What are usually required are some highly unusual physical conditions, such as irregularity of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical circumstances such as the presence of a hill or ravine. 42 Exceptional soil conditions can satisfy the require- ment but only if they are confined largely to the property in question 43 bl . and do not extend throughout the general area. If the pro em-causing circumstances apply to the whole area, the solution lies in legislative amendment of the zoning law, which is beyond the power of the board of appeals.44 The unique circumstances must relate to lh:e Par!i:1t!ar_:property1fo - which relief is sought, not to the owner's personal situatio!l:-Nor can they relate to adjoining property, as where the applica'i'it establishes hard- ship as to one lot and therefore seeks a variance as to an adjacent piece ofland.46 The exceptional circumstances must cause the owner's unnec- essary hardship-i.e., must create the inability to make reasonable use of the property in accord with the literal requirements of the law. 47 This •'unique circumstances'' limitation on the unnecessary hardship requirement has been traced to the original purpose of variances- to provide the possibility of relief where particular conditions render application of a zoning law so harsh as to raise constitutional problems, such as the argument that the government is in reality "taking" the 41. 165 Augusta St. v. Collins, 9 N.J. 259, 87 A .2d 889 (1952) (with strong dissent). Cf Hammond v . Board of Appeals, 257 . Mass .. 446 •. 448 , 154 N.E . 82, 83 (1926) (court decides that grant of vanance to residence in mixed area of h.omes and stores, located near several nonconfonning business uses, and incapable of being rented as a residence "cannot quite be said" to be unwarranted). . 42 . See Zoning Variance Administration in Vermont , supra note 25, at 379 (dis- cussing Vermont statutes). 43. See Bickriell Realty Co. v . Bd . of Appeal , 330 Ma ss . 676, 116 N.E .2d 570 (1953) (whole neighborhood was filled-in swamp ; pilings were thus necessary to sup- port any structure). . . . 44. Shapiro, supra note 5, at 7 (applic~nt must in effect sh ow that the variance will not give him an advantage over his neighbors). 45. Planning Bd. v . Bd . of Appeals, 338 Mass . 160, 154 N :E .2~ 349 (1958 ) (variance should be denied where applicant 's landlord would not give him new lease for his business and he thus sought to use another lot in same neighborhood). Cf Ciry of Baltimore v. Polakoff, 233 Md. 1, 194 A.2d 819 (1 963 ) (not enough that variance would be profitable convenience for property owner). 46. See Hurley v. Kolligan , 333 Mass . 170, 139 N .E .2d 920 (1955); Brackett v. Bd . of Appeal, 311 Mass . 52, 39 N .E .2d 956 (1942) ~in both of which the court held that a variance was not justified by hardship to a business property when the owner of that property sought the variance in order to expand the business onto a nearby lot located in a nonbusiness district). 47 . See Cow Hollow Improv. Club v . DiBene , 245 Cal. App . 2d. 160, 53 Cal. Rptr. 610 (Cal . Dist. Ct. App. 1966~ (applying San Francis~o Muruc1pal Code and denying variance for use of property m single-family residential zone so that tt could be put to two-family use). MEMORANDUM To: THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, 1EXAS ATTN: J ENNIFER REEVES, STAFF P LANNER FROM: HOWARD A. MURRAY JR. 4715 ST. ANDREWS DR. COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 SUBJECT: VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 4714 ST. ANDREWS DR. DATE: 07/28/01 cc: LARRY AND VIRGINIA PIE RSO N I am unabl e to attend th e public h earing sche dul ed for 7 August 2001. I request yo u approve Mr. and Mrs. Pi erson's requ es t for a varian ce. In my opinion, th e request is reasonable. • • • • I do n ot b elie ve this variance w ill h ave a d ownward affect on future val ues of property in th e neighborhood. The P ierson lot does not follow th e stan dard layout, and in my opinion, th e need for approval of a fo rmal r equ es t for variance is n ot necessary. It is unlikely this request will o pen 'Pandora's b ox', as th e Pi erson 's lot configuration is n o t replicated in th e subdivision. Neighborhood aesthetics wi ll n o t b e effe cted b y th e Piers on's proposed addition . Thank you for yo ur co nsid erati on of my views on th e su bj ect. R}~~~ -{!/t,.tra~ a-;