Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
VAR2001-500248
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 111 CUSTOMER RECEIPT 111 OPER: SSMITH CT DRAWER: 1 DATE: 11/08/01 00 RECEIPT: 0038701 DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT TP TM 2001 500248 1 $75.00 •PL CK PLANNING & ZONIN TENDER DETAIL CK $75.00 DATE: 11/08/01 TIME: 17:51:01 TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $75.00 AllOUNT TENDERED $75.00 THANK YOU Using Payment Inquiry In Cash Receipt 4F J ©@O_Dv C-mYA'!J @(O)[lil ~~~& City of College Station, Texas DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REGENCY SOUTH R-1 24 ~@M ~~@@ W&l1l1~W ZBA BCAD_ID OWNER_NAME ADDRESS_1_ ADDRESS_2_ CITY STA R100817 REMY, THOMAS J & AURORA V & ALLISON C REMY 1711 DOE CRST SANANTONIO TX R100818 NOTO , DOUGLAS & MELINDA 211 JULIA ST NAVASOTA TX R100819 KING , ROBERT R & SUZANNE S 4519 11TH ST LUBBOCK TX R100821 LAS CASIT AS PROPERTIES LTD PO BOX 310327 NEW BRAUNFELS TX R100822 BRITTAIN, E DOUGLAS SR & CAROLYN 236 SH-46 W BOERNE TX R100823 DUDYCHA , DAVID W & ANNE M 1006 SONOMA CIR COLLEGE ST A TION TX R100824 ""' 1 '""'· I! ee~e~e e"' m ~"""~ 1 1 ~ 236 SH-46 W BOERNE TX R100825 1iiUi~1 iiRi 1 1 ~1 , • i8W8e•1e """ e"""~'" 236 SH-46 W BOERNE TX R100826 Bl't lW ' 't' 99 ° ?'' I E DOUGLAS & CAROLYN K BRITTAIN 236 HIGHWAY 46 W BOERNE TX R109349 THOMAS, GLENN D 111012TH MAN CIR COLLEGE ST A TION TX R109357 11111111 11!!1 , 1!!1 1!!1!"" l!!I 1110 12TH MAN CIR COLLEGE STATION TX R109358 .. 11 U!!llll!ll!l!!I , 1!!1 ~1!1 11 , .. 1110 12TH MAN CIR COLLEGE STATION TX R109359 illl 11 1 Il l I •1111111 i a 1110 12TH MAN CIR COLLEGE STATION TX R109360 ill 11 111-11 , 9 1!!111U• I 1110 12TH MAN CIR COLLEGE ST A TION TX R109361 II I SMAO , G&&IOh B 1110 12TH MAN CIR COLLEGE STATION TX R38873 BEACH , LOIS B & DANIEL B & CHERLY A BEACH 1816 BROTHERS BLVD APT · COLLEGE STATION TX R38875 ALEXANDER, BETTY S 1816 BROTHERS BLVD #3 COLLEGE STATION TX R38876 BECKER , DOUGLAS E & KRISTY L 1816 BROTHERS BLVD APT 5 COLLEGE ST A TION TX R38877 ZZGKE R, 660&&3 2 & I tiii:l8 12:' L 1816 BROTHERS BLVD APT 5 COLLEGE ST A TION TX R38879 WILLEMS , FREDERICK H & PATRICIA 2204 BENT OAK ST COLLEGE STATION TX R38880 "-ll!!l!l!flle, I "E"l!"le" " !: ""I ~1~1 "9 2204 BENT OAK ST COLLEGE STATION TX R38881 DEii ' 61 ; DEE l°t' 110 PERSHING AVE COLLEGE STATION TX R38882 OGDEE , RONALD G & KATHLEEN M 2702TED CIR HARLINGEN TX R38883 66&&1;4 to l•t\1!8 8 & I t PF I 11!!1!" IOI a 2702 TED CIR HARLINGEN TX R38884 BOROWIEC , JON B & EDWARD BOROWIEC & JOANNE BERGl\i 1816 BROTHERS BLVD APT · COLLEGE ST A TION TX R38885 ENTWISTLE , VIRGINIA K 1816 BROTHERS BLVD APT 13 COLLEGE STATION TX R38887 VESSALI I BEEJAN & JOHN LANGTREE 110 PERSHING AVE COLLEGE STATION TX R38888 l'il8/:lsl 1 9 55 1°'1 t JOHN LANGTREE 110 PERSHING AVE COLLEGE STATION TX R38889 .. liililQ I I ~iili IA•I I JOHN LANGTREE 110 PERSHING AVE COLLEGE STATION TX R38890 LUSCOMBE , JAMES A JR 2234 BROOKVIEW DR MC KINNEY TX R38891 MCNEAL, JAMES U 1816 BROTHERS BLVD APT 34 COLLE GE ST A TION TX R43408 LANDRY, LARRY PO BOX 3752 BRYAN TX RX10 RX11 S538700 ZIP 782481320 778883126 794164815 781310327 780068118 778457907 780068118 780068118 780068118 778458978 778458978 778458978 778458978 778458978 778458978 778455301 77845 778455301 778455301 778455587 778455587 778403010 785508589 785508589 778455301 778455308 778403010 778403010 778403010 750703848 778455323 778053752 .· :-,. ~ .... ~ ..... , ........ ~· MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: MINUTES Zoning Board of Adjustment December 4, 2001 CITY OF COLLEG~ STATION, TEXAS 6:00 P.M. Chairman Hill , Lewis, Sheffy, Birdwell & Richards. Alternate Member Goss & Corley, not needed . Alternate Member Allison was in the audience . Staff Assistant Grace, Staff Planners Jimmerson & Hitchcock, Assist . City Attorney Robinson, Senior Planner Kuenzel. Call to order -Explanation of functions of the Board . Chairman Hill called the meeting to order. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider any absence request forms. No request submitted . AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration, discussion and possible action to rehear the case for 316 Pronghorn Loop, lot 2, block 4, Steeplechase VI. Applicant is Oakwood Homes (01-208). Mr. Birdwell made the motion to rehear the case. Mr. Richards seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (5-0). Change to the agenda. Item No. 4 & 5 will switch order. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration, discussion and possible action to the proposed Unified Development Code. Ms. Kuenzel told the Board that she was not going repeat herself from the presentation she gave the Board November 6, 2001 unless there were specific questions . Ms . Kuenzel brought the Board up to date of the activities that have taken place this far . Ms . Kuenzel told the Board there would be a joint meeting with City Council and Planning Zoning in January . This would give the Board more time to discuss their input. Ms. Kuenzel told the Board that there were comments submitted to the Planning & Zoning from the ZBA but they have not been discussed yet. Mr. Birdwell asked that this item be placed back on the next agenda to give the Board the opportunity, should there be something else to report to P&Z . The Board asked that they be notified about any UDO meetings . ZBAMinutes December 4, 2001 Page 1 o/5 AGENDA ITEM 5: Consideration, discussion and possible action of a rear setback variance at 1816 Brothers Blvd., lots 31 & 32, block 1, Regency South. Applicant is Parviz Vessali. (01-248). Staff Planner Jimmerson stepped before the Board and presented the staff report . Ms . Jimmerson told the Board that the applicant is requesting the variance to legitimize the existing encroachment. The current requirement under the new PDD-H zoning that was approved in December 2000 is a 10- foot setback from the perimeter of the Subdivision . A perimeter setback of 4 Yi feet is being requested . The property is currently developed. Each lot has a townhouse style house . The back of each house extends approximately 5. 3 feet into the required setback. The applicant is requesting a variance of five and a half feet (or 55% variance) to the perimeter setback. 1982 -Property zoned PUD#2 1983 -Property platted or subdivided into current configuration 1999 -Owner requested building permit 2000 -Early December, subdivision rezoned to PDD-H 2000 -Late December, final building inspection requested . The applicant states as a special condition that, "the original survey showed zero lot line " with no setbacks . The surveyor checked and confirmed that with City staff in 1999 . The applicant also states that, "there is a 15-foot utility easement beyond the property line making the distance of the structure from the neighbors property line 20 feet" (more than the now required IO-foot setback). The filed final plat of the property from 1983 does not discuss setback requirements . Generally setbacks are not shown on a plat. To determine the setbacks for a property requires reading the City's Zoning Ordinance. The survey that the owner mentions is most likely the independent survey of the property that was done when the property was purchased . Also, the location of an easement does not change the location of the property line with the duplexes to the east . A 15-foot utility easement does exist on the duplex side of the property line . Structures are not allowed in utility easements, therefore, in this instance there is at least 15-feet of separation between the duplex buildings and the subject properties . The applicant states as a hardship that, "based on the original survey the property is even five feet inside the building line at the rear of the property, in order to comply with the new ordinance the building has to be demolished". In conversation with the applicant it was mentioned that the main concern was the inability to obtain new financing . Staff has identified the following alternatives to granting the 5Yi-foot perimeter setback variance request : Do not grant the variance . The houses are already built. If the request were denied , to remove the encroachment, the property owner would be required, at a minimum, to remodel the house. Mr. Richards asked if it was the city's assumption at the time of issuing a building permit that it was a zero lot line . Ms . Jimmerson replied that was her understanding . ZBAMinutes December 4, 2001 Page2of5 Mr. Birdwell asked if the building permit actually showed the outline of the building within 5 Yi feet of the rear property line . Ms . Jimmerson replied that the sutvey in their packet was the same sutvey turned in with the building permit that was approved . The building setbacks were not shown because it was believed that there were no setback requirements . Chairman Hill asked at the time the duplexes were built there was a 15-foot rear setback on the building . Ms . Jimmerson replied yes . Chairman Hill asked if the other phase of the subdivision was part of this, would the setback have existed . Ms . Jimmerson replied no . However, that piece of property had already been developed as duplexes prior to the time these two buildings had been built. Ms . Jimmerson told the Board that the tract next to this subdivision was never rezoned to the PUD along with this development. It was planned to be a part of that development but it was never rezoned . So therefore the 15-feet setback was always in existence for this development. Chairman Hill asked Ms. Jimmerson if the construction of the townhomes were built in good faith based on the information provided by the staff to the applicant. Ms. Jimmerson replied that was correct, but unfortunately even with staff error as the applicant states, it is still the developer 's responsibility to be aware of the codes . Ms. Jimmerson stated that it is clearly written in that zoning district that there is a 15-foot perimeter setback. Mr. Lewis asked if any of the other townhomes in the development are in the same situation . Ms . Jimmerson replied that this is the only encroachment that the city is aware of The city became aware of it during the process to the new zoning district. At that time it was believed that these two townhomes had been built in compliance with the previous zoning and therefore were grandfathered . It was after the new rezoning that the applicant came in to work with staff that this particular issue was discovered . The townhomes had not met the previous zoning requirements and were then not grandfathered . Chairman Hill opened the public hearing for those wanting to speak in favor of the request. Fred Baylis, 324 Landsburg, stepped before the Board was sworn in by Chairman Hill . Mr. Baylis told the Board that he was there on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Baylis stated that the plat showing the duplex area behind this development as block two and that is the plat that the sutveyor and city staff worked from . The duplex area was done in early 1999 right before this development was rezoned . So the 15-foot setback only applied if it was on a perimeter of the subdivision and not on all the lots . If this were an interior lot the setback requirement would not be there . Mr. Baylis continued by explaining that the sutveyor and city staff was looking at a plat that was in the center of a subdivision , and so the perimeter 15-foot setback would not be applicable . The fact that the portion behind this development, at that time, and now, have been sold and developed in a separate subdivision is what made these two tracts on the perimeter as opposed to the interior . The zero lot line would have applied if block 2 had not been developed separately at a later time . Mr. Baylis told the Board that the applicant and sutveyor spent a lot of time with City staff making exactly sure they had their facts correct. Mr. Baylis ended by describing to the Board the property and its layout . There were continued discussions with Mr. Baylis concerning the events with this property and the platting . Mr. Birdwell questioned the platting of the property and asked should the plat have been an amending plat. Ms. Jimmerson replied that the area showed block 2 as a resetve area. When you come in to final plat a resetve area you are not required to show the entire original plat . Z.BA Minutes December 4, 200 I Page3 of5 Ms. Jimmerson told the Board it was not an amending plat but rather a final plat for the next phase of the development. Mr. Birdwell asked why is it not still a part of the same subdivision. Ms. Jimmerson replied that this particular plat was shown as a reserve area . Mr. Birdwell replied that reserve areas stay in the same subdivision they are in . They do not become a separate subdivision when they are divided . Ms . Jimmerson told the Board that she was not working on the case at that time but he was correct that is a standard . Ms . Jimmerson stated that if you have an unplatted area that is part of a larger area, that should be considered as a parent tract , then yes you are generally required to show the entire parent tract, at least on the preliminary, final plat or master development plan stage . It is not necessarily uncommon if you have a platted subdivision i.e. in Pebble Creek you have someone who needs to amend three lots . If that amendment only affects those three lots you would be allowed to come in with an amending plat for just those lots. It is really a case by case basis . In this particular instance this plat really shows the final plat for 34 lots and 2 reserve areas. One reserve tract is block 2 which is being discussed in this case, and the other area that is showed as reserve tract is down at the end of the cul- de-sac . Each of these has come in separately to final plat. Mr. Birdwell asked was it not true that when you plat a reserve area you don 't change the name of the subdivision . Ms . Jimmerson replied that is the requirement now but several years ago that was not a requirement. Mr. Birdwell questioned the blackline outside the border of the whole subdivision including the reserve areas . Mr. Birdwell stated that he wondered if technically, has block 2 been taken out of the subdivision. Mr. Birdwell asked if there was a different zoning on the two subdivisions . Ms . Jimmerson replied yes and stated that she thinks that is where the issue gets confusing . That area was shown on the final plat but the block 2 was never rezoned as part of the subdivision with the rest of Regency South. Block 2 never had the zoning as the rest of the subdivision. It did not proceed as part of the subdivision . It was merely shown on the final plat as a reserve area. Dension Henry, 2308 Yosmite, Bryan, Texas, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Chairman Hill . Mr. Henry told the Board that he is the surveyor of the property. Mr. Henry told the Board that when he ran into the encroachment he went to the title company and they reviewed all the information they had . It was determined according to their information there was no building lines. Chairman Hill asked what time frame that was . Mr. Henry replied that it was July 1999 . At that point Mr. Henry stated that he went and talked to city staff and was told according to the records there are no building lines required . Mr. Henry referred to the heavy black line shown on the plat and stated that it also indicates to him that this was one subdivision . Mr. Henry stated that when he went to survey the property for the final survey the building was built . Mr. Henry told the Board that he knew there were new staff members at the city and he thought he better have it reviewed again . It was then that it was discovered to have the encroachment. Chairman Hill asked Mr. Henry if he did the initial boundary survey . Mr. Henry replied yes . Mr. Henry ended buy telling the Board that he saw it as a separate subdivision. Parviz Vessali , the applicant, stepped before the Board and was sworn in by Chairman Hill . Mr. Vessali told the Board that he designed the two townhomes and asked the Board members to look at the floor plan . With no one else stepping forward to speak in favor or opposition of the request , Chairman Hill closed the public hearing . ZBAMinutes December 4, 2001 Page4o/5 Mr. Birdwell made the motion to authorize a variance to the minimum setback requirement from the terms of this ordinance as it will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the following special conditions: the building permit was issued by city with zero setback, setback issue further confused by phased development, and city staff confirmed zero setback to the builder in error; and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship to this applicant being: inability to manage the property to its highest and best use without a variance; and such that the spirit of this ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done subject to the following limitations : setback variance of 5 .5'. Mr. Lewis seconded the motion. Mr. Birdwell stated that he does not see how the Board could hold a person from managing his property when it is a result of admitted action on the part of the City. Mr. Birdwell added that he questioned if the proper steps were taken in separating one subdivision into two. Mr. Birdwell ended by saying that he felt it would be unreasonably not to grant the variance . Chairman Hill stated that there is a lot of confusion not only on the part of City staff but on the whole case. There were oversights by multiple individuals . No one person is held at fault and it would be unreasonable to deny the variance . Chairman Hill called for the vote. The Board voted (5~0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: items. Consideration, discussion and possible action on future agenda Chairman Hill asked that the UDO be placed on the January 15 agenda. AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned . APPROVED: ~·d«R7 Leslie Hill, Chairman ZBAMinutes December 4, 200 I Page5o/5 John A. Langtree 3327 Freshmeadows Drive Houston Texas 77063 December 4, 2001 To Zoning Board of Adjustment, I would like to apologize for not being able to attend tonight's Zoning Adjustment meeting. It is of concern to me as I am the owner of the properties located at 1816 Brothers Blvd. Lots 31and32. Whilst I am certain that the property architect, Mr. Parviz Vessali has a complete explanation and documentation of our stand point. I would just like to reiterate that all of the design was completed in good faith based on surveys that did not indicate the utility easement set back line . Therefore I would be most grateful if you, the Board, would be willing to grant a variance in this case . Should you wish to contact me, my telephone numbers are as follows: 713-753-4910 (business) 713-960-0850 (home) Thanking you in anticipation, Yours sincerely, P.02 The City of College Station, Texas Embracing the Past, Ex ploring the Future. P .O . Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • Coll ege Station, TX 77842 • (979) 764-3500 December 5, 2001 John A Langtree 3327 Freshmeadows Drive Houston, Texas 77063 www.ci .college-sta ti on.tx .us This letter is to confirm that the Zoning Board of Adjust variance for the property located at 1816 Brothers Blvd ., South, at their meeting December 4 , 2001. Sincerely, Deborah Grace Secretary to the ZBA Home of Texas A&M University December 5, 2001 Parviz Vessali 110 Perhing A venue College Station, Texas 77840-3010 This letter is to confirm that the Zoning Board of Adjustment approved the variance (5-0), for the property located at 1816 Brothers Blvd ., block 1, lots 31 & 32, Regency South at their meeting December 4 , 2001 . Sincerely, Deborah Grace Secretary to the ZBA •I •I . ' I• I' .. ' ' ·' .. · " .... ., ! . . ' .. ' .. , .. ,,;, j: I ' • t • · . • l .. ' .. I ' \ .. I . . ~ , : l·;·· .. , .:. ) .. JOHN LANGTREE Denson w. Henry Reg. Prof. Land Surveyor 2308 Yosemite Drive Bryan, Texas, 77803 Phone & Fax 979/778 2572 --- ----- 'f z. ,r I R. S. E"T" --'{. ___..- -------'I-, 1-1/J~ -- ::r -(- ~ k 't: t'-. ·~ v- " ....... -::;. () ,... \/) < 1/2..rrfFZ FND ---- IS . 'I..' ·;'~1~· . : ~ 2. STD ~ '< 'C> R. I K : i-1 OLf,S E VJ ...,..__LOT'~!.. ~ \'.>LOG "' 'IJ u.~· ~ ~ . ' rf ~~~~ o;;· "· .. ~ ~ ·-r ~ (,,~!:\"'t..~ N ; .. :. -----~ I" lu 1\.. "1 " ~ ~·~·-·~· -.-~2_0_._~~--.s . ' -:r: N 2>?."' \~· \~'' W-53.\0· ---V. ' ~ "> 0\ V) ~ ~ l V) ' t () ~ 0 ~ 't \\') ~ llJ ..J '° l_ ~ tu " \) ti. ~ f'-. " \) ~ fv) ' ~ ~ "' ~ ~ l.f} "" *' t!:J tu<'.:) ~~ V) tu ~ ¥ \] ·~ 5~ ~ C!l • 'I 2. ,, 11c_ F1-...\D , ,, ~ . <o' ---- -== TO El\.l\ A.T 5Ro\\-\ER? r:it>tJLEVAR..D (MJN 30· W1De PA tf£0€NT..) le I~ l!>i-\Oi~E fl...~ Bbtl L.E VAR.J? ~o' ?R_l :VATE AtL't:.S~ ~ ?uf,uL tif\L , ESIY\ I. BasAd on FIA Flood Insurance Rata Ma p, Cbmmunity Panel 48041C0182 C for Brazos County, Texas, the following described ·property is not located with- in a designated 100 Year Fre quen cy Flood Plain. I certify that I have made an on the ground s urvey of property described as follows: Lots T hirty-one (31) and thirty-two (32), Bloc1~ One (1), RE GENC Y SOUTH, an addition to .the City of Colle ge Station, Brazo s County, Texas, acc ordin g to Re~lat recorded in Volume 605, Page 775 Official Records of Brazos Count y , Texas (ORBCT). Hes trictions for said addition are recorded in Vol . 605, Page 775, Vol. 601, Pa~e 579, Vol. 1171, Pa ge 4 24 ORBCT. I further certify that this P lat correctly repre se nts the facts found at the time of the survey and there are no encroahments, except as shown and all im p ro v e ment s are located with- j n the buu nd arv .of the .~ro µe rt y , exce1:it as shown. ·-. . . STAFF REPORT ZBA Meeting Date: 12-4-01 Prepared by: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 11-27-01 Email: jjimmers@ci .college-station .tx.us APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: PURPOSE: Parvis Vessali Perimeter Setback Variance 1816 Brothers Blvd. #31 & #32, two lots out of the Regency South Subdivision. To legitimize the existing encroachments. GENERAL INFORMATION Status of Applicant: Property Owner: Applicable Ordinance Section: Property Owner/Property Manager Parvis Vessali/ John Langtree Exhibit C of the Ordinance Amendment Rezoning the property to PDD-H PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Zoning and Land Use: Subject Property: Zoned PDD-H, Planned Development District for Housing , and developed as single family attached housing. North, West & South: Zoned PDD-H, Planned Development District for Hous ing , East: Frontage: Access: Topography & Vegetation: Flood Plain: and developed as single family housing. Zoned R-2, Duplex, and developed as such . Approx. 26.5 feet of frontage on each lot along the private road maintained by the Regency South Homeowners Association . Each lot has a driveway onto the private road , this road takes access off of Brothers Blvd . Relatively flat. None on these lots . O:\GROUP\DEVE _ SER\JES\pro_iects\zba\1816 brothers present.DOC Page I of3 Alternatives: Staff has identified the following alternatives to granting the five and a half-foot perimeter setback variance request: 1. Do not grant the variance. The houses are already built. If the request were denied, to remove the encroachment, the property owner would be required, at a minimum , to remodel the house. SPECIAL INFORMATION Ordinance Intent: Building setback requirements usually allow for some degree of control over population density, access to light and air, and fire protection. These standards are typically justified on the basis of the protection of property values. Other Information: The setback required at the time the building permit was issued , under the old PUD#2 zoning district (Planned Unit Development District with a maximum density of 15 dwelling units per acre.), was 15 feet from the perimeter of the Subdivision. Number of Property Owners Notified: 17 Responses Received: Two calls of inquiry were received by staff. ATTACHMENTS Location Map Application Site Plan O:\GROUP\DEVE _ SER\TES\projects\zba\ 18 16 broth ers present.DOC Page 3 of3 VARIANCE INFORMATION Setback Required: The current requirement under the new PDD-H zoning that was approved in December of 2000 is a 10 foot setback from the perimeter of the Subdivision. Setback Requested: A perimeter setback of 4 1/2 feet is being requested. Case Overview: ANALYSIS The property is currently developed. Each lot has a town home style house. The back of each house extends approximately 5.3 feet into the required setback. The applicant is requesting a variance of five and a half feet (or a 55% variance) to the perimeter setback. 1982 -Property zoned to PUD #2 1983 -Property platted or subdivided into current configuration 1999 -Owner requested building permit 2000 -Early December, subdivision rezoned to PDD-H 2000 -Late December, final building inspection requested Special Conditions: The applicant states as a special condition that, "The original survey showed "zero lot line" with no setbacks. The surveyor checked and confirmed that with City staff in 1999." The applicant also states that , "There is a 15-foot utility easement beyond the property line making the distance of the structure from the neighbors property line 20 feet (more than the now required 10-foot setback.)" Hardships: Please be aware that the filed final plat of the property from 1983 does not discuss setback requirements. Generally setbacks are not shown on a plat. To determine the setbacks for a property requires reading the City's Zoning Ordinance. The survey that the owner mentions is most likely the independent survey of the property that was done when the property was purchased. Also, the location of an easement does not change the location of the property line. The applicant's property does share a common lot line with the duplexes to the east. A 15-foot utility easement does exist on the duplex side of the property line. Structures are not allowed in utility easements, therefore in this instance there is at least 15-feet of separation between the duplex buildings and the subject properties . The fact of the matter is that a special condition must be a unique circumstance related to a physical characteristic of the property itself. The application states as a hardship that, " Based on the original survey the property is even five feet inside the building line at the rear of the property, in order to comply with the new ordinance the building has to be demolished." In conversation with the applicant it was mentioned that the main concern was the inability to obtain new financing. O:\GROUP\DEVE SER\fES\projects\zba\18 16 brothers present.DOC -Page 2 of3 STAFF REPORT ZBA Meeting Date: 12-4-01 Prepared by: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 11-27-01 Email: jj immers@ci .college-stat ion . tx. us APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: PURPOSE: Parvis Vessali Perimeter Setback Variance 1816 Brothers Blvd. #31 & #32 , two lots out of the Regency South Subdivision. To legitimize the existing encroachments. GENERAL INFORMATION Status of Applicant: Property Owner: Applicable Ordinance Section: Property Owner/Property Manager Parvis Vessali/ John Langtree Exhibit C of the Ordinance Amendment Rezoning the property to PDD-H PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Zoning and Land Use: Subject Property: Zoned PDD-H, Planned Development District for Hous ing, and developed as single family attached housing . North, West & South: Zoned PDD-H, Planned Development District for Housing , East: Frontage: Access: Topography & Vegetation: Flood Plain: J :\PZTEX1\PZ05655.DOC and developed as single family housing. Zoned R-2, Duplex , and developed as such. Approx. 26 .5 feet of frontage on each lot along the private road maintained by the Regency South Homeowners Association. Each lot has a driveway onto the private road , this road takes access off of Brothers Blvd . Relatively flat. None on these lots . Page I of3 VARIANCE INFORMATION Setback Required: The current requirement under the new PDD-H zoning that was approved in December of 2000 is a 10 foot setback from the perimeter of the Subdivision. Setback Requested: A perimeter setback of 4 1/2 feet is being requested. Case Overview: ANALYSIS The property is currently developed. Each lot has a townhome style house. The back of each house extends approximately 5 .3 feet into the required setback. The applicant is requesting a variance of five and a half feet (or a 55% variance) to the perimeter setback. 1982 -Property zoned to PUD #2 1983 -Property platted or subdivided into current configuration 1999 -Owner requested building permit 2000 -Early December, subdivision rezoned to PDD-H 2000 -Late December, final building inspection requested Special Conditions: The applicant states as a special condition that, "The original survey showed "zero lot line" with no setbacks. The surveyor checked and confirmed that with City staff in 1999." The applicant also states that, "There is a 15-foot utility easement beyond the property line making the distance of the structure from the neighbors property line 20 feet (more than the now required 10-foot setback.)" Hardships: J:\PZTEXT\PZ05655 .DOC Please be aware that the filed final plat of the property from 1983 does not discuss setback requirements . Generally setbacks are not shown on a plat. To determine the setbacks for a property requires reading the City's Zoning Ordinance . The survey that the owner mentions is most likely the independent survey of the property that was done when the property was purchased. Also, the location of an easement does not change the location of the property line. The applicant's property does share a common lot line with the duplexes to the east. A 15-foot utility easement does exist on the duplex side of the property line. Structures are not allowed in utility easements, therefore in this instance there is at least 15-feet of separation between the duplex buildings and the subject properties. The fact of the matter is that a special condition must be a unique circumstance related to a physical characteristic of the property itself. The application states as a hardship that, " Based on the original survey the property is even five feet inside the building line at the rear of the property, in order to comply with the new ordinance the building has to be demolished." In conversation with the applicant it was mentioned that the main concern was the inability to obtain new financing . Page 2 of 3 Alternatives: Staff has identified the following alternatives to granting the five and a half-foot perimeter setback variance request: 1. Do not grant the variance. The houses are already built. If the request were denied, to remove the encroachment, the property owner would be required, at a minimum , to remodel the house. SPECIAL INFORMATION Ordinance Intent: Building setback requirements usually allow for some degree of control over population density, access to light and air , and fire protection . These standards are typically justified on the basis of the protection of property values. Other Information: The setback required at the time the building permit was issued , under the old PUD#2 zoning district (Planned Unit Development District with a maximum density of 15 dwelling units per acre.), was 15 feet from the perimeter of the Subdivision . Number of Property Owners Notified: 17 Responses Received: Two calls of inquiry were received by staff. ATTACHMENTS Location Map Application Site Plan J :\PZTEXT\PZ05655.DOC Page 3 of3 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: 61-24'8 DATE SUBMITTED: I 4 ;c;opm c:;;'AS' ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~j'iling Fee of $75.00. _V_ A Application completed in full . ~Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as site plans, elevation drawings, sign details and floor plans . The Zoning Official shall inform' the applicant of any extra materials required. APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name PA JC!..\)\ Z, \.\E.SSAL \ MailingAddress \\0 PE.&.4"2\-\\NC:Q A\\tC: City___,C,......c........:....•_,.~.r...· _____ _ State =rh Zip Code "11 '&'40 -~C\C E-Mail Address fijr\liz..@. t'>'G"fb e.~. C,t)tyn Phone Number ~'t3-'r) 1=<o4-Co'80-Z Fax Number (q 1-'"l) 3-G»4 -J-'ifz:t. PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name ..\c" ~ LA,.).,,\ &, 1]2 B'&' Mailing Address \\0 pee..SH1tJ.L., ,A:\\ E City C.. S. State =rx Zip Code 51-«0 E-Mail Address ___________ _ Phone Number ('\'T'\) 1-G:4-(dfo8 Fax Number (g 1-9) 3-G:>4-~~Zf LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Address \~ ((o BeontE.2..~ BLVD. #" 3\ ~ -41=~"2- Lot 3 I f ~2-Block Subdivision J2.E6ieJ.lC'-? <;Q\' TH Description if there is no Lot, Block and Subdivision Action Requested: (Circle One) Current Zoning of Subject Property Applicable Ordinance Section PDP aeo1A1AtJc/T GENERAL VARIAN CE REQUEST Genvar.doc 8/20/0 I Parking Variance Sign Variance Appeal of Zoning Official's Interpretation Special Exception Other ------------- I of2 .· . , ,. I, · l ' ,. i . \, I ; ' ' I I . ~ .. . f • 1., i. '+" I .. • ~ I ,, .. - '. '· , • '' t ,. I • > GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested : ~~A"'1&.E ,..~e f,UILt:>\,.J~., '?Er 6A~K. t.IJJE. \r.l 'T\-\E es:::"~ F~l"r\ This variance is necessary due to the following special conditions : Special Condition Definition: To justify a variance, the difficulty must be due to unique circumstances involving the particular property. The unique circumstances must be related to a physical characteristic of the property itself, not to the owner's personal situation. This is because regardless of ownership, the variance will run with the land . Example: A creek bisecting a lot, a smaller buildable area than is seen on surrounding lots, specimen trees. Note: A cul-de-sac is a standard street layout in College Station. The shape of standard cul-de-sac lots are generally not special conditions . -r .. ue oe.1l.-z\JJAk &va..v E ~ . .c::. \.\E!Jc:..w" D t The unnecessary hardship (s) involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship is/are : Hardship Definition: The inability to make reasonable use of the property in accord with the literal requirements of the law. The hardship must be a direct result of the special condition. Example: A hardship of a creek bisecting a lot could be the reduction of the buildable area on the lot, when compared to neighboring properties . 54.f?ED c0k\ -r\.\E cf!.l&:.1NAL h\.lrl.\lE'°< \~~ f\z.of'l{rZ.\'1 \2 8\IEf\) 5 \ -o" tA}~lbe 11-\G pUlLt>ltJl-i. l.\~E AT -rblG f!:GAI?.. or =tl4~ f'r2D PER-1'(' l A oz_pQ\2. -ro C.0Mf?L'i' WCf\4 :f\4£ t..\~\rJ 012.DtrJA~ -r):\te E)\l'\L..t>p.\ tq \4A47 'fo B' 'Dt;Mo L\?\-\6D · The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following facts: \ " _.., j\-\e:e.~ \? A \C2 -o \J\tLll'\' i!A.~r;mi:,NT ee'fo..JD -r~e feoPL?rt.1)' LHI fG . H\ A.~\ JJ t:.t -r \1 E. 'I> t ~TA"'1 ?6 oF 11\ Ci: $'1}'?_\l C -C11 fUi' f' (Z.oM -rH €' ~' l1 ~ e;,s.ue.. '? f'f?.oPE'rtTY L\uE 20'-d' (mo'2S -nu •. >J 'ffiE ~ow ~·~ H>'-O" ~~1" ~AC:.""-./) The iplicant has repar this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached her d complete . .. GENERAL VARIANCE REQUEST Genvar.doc 8120 /0 I 2 of2 BEE~AN VESSALI & JOHN LANGTREE ./ Denson w. Henry Reg. Prof. Land surveyor 2308 Yosemite Drive Bryan, Texas, 77803 Phone & Fax 409/778-2572 . ·~ -------------:----£...~ ·'E;,,,..~p._0...,1 ----· --_..,\,, t;' I 'J ';, 11 \(?. --•.. ··---. •\)' .• '" "' 1.. --··-30 ~ ~"-----0 ftl~ 'Ii' \'l. © --'f~o --..... "' ~ L.O\ 32. '° LOT 1.1 "' ~ Loi 3. I ~ BlOC..\l. l '\);) I I ~ ~\ll .. s " ' ' ~ ~ • ' " " ~ \n :<: "' SCPtlt ~ i 1 ' ~ 2.o I --· ·---~ ~ ~2·1s'to"W--;:§i\~,Z:' \'/--- l \V. y,.LO ~'4\:> ~TO ENI' '°IT 5R,on.\E.1Z....S /3LVO (1>1 11'1 3t/ Wt9/Z P~l/eO E"ll.//) \81~ ~RCTHelZ.~ 1?.1..vD 3o' pg \YA-TE= AlGG<:.S ~ 'PO~U(_ lJT\L .. GSMT No n;; : 64s t ~ t> P-/3 E ,r/ 1t:..1 1./ 6 "5> ·-pt. ;P. / Based on FIA Flood Insurance Rate Map , Community Panel 48041C0182 for Brazos County, Texas, the following descrioed property is not located wi thin a desig n ated 100 Year Frequency F lood Plain. I certify that I have made an on the g round survey of p roperhy described as follows: Lot Thirty-two (32), Block One (l) RE GEN CY SOUTH, an add ition to the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas, accordin;J toR<p1at recorded in Volume 605, Page 775 Official Records of ~razes County, 'l'exas ( ORBCT) . Restrictions for said addition are recorded in Volume 605, Page 775, Volume 601, Page 579, Vo l~me 1171, Page 424 ORBCT. I further certify that this Plat correctly re presents the facts found at the time of the survey , and there are no encroachments, except as shown, and all improvements are located within the boundary of the property, except as shown. / Surveyed By: ~~ H~;y~ Land Surveyor July 6, 1999 e g~ 1~3 29 3 sc•,ts: 1'';.2v' Denson w. Hen r }'. Req . Prof . Land Surveyor 2308 Yosemite Drive Bryan, Texas, 77€03 PhonB & Fax 409/778-2572 tt.. [' I'-, \,D t.r} ~ ~ (() \ l :( 4-) . 'I. ' ~ ~ ·~ ..... 1' ~ IV) I:. ' /'-.. "-lo . t.o·T "?,; "' ~ t3t,..C.:C:K. \ I/) l 'Ii,' t IZ-F r-H) '1 '' \Z-~~0 7 \ -• . ---r It' l 3~ W--2'<. .f;fj' N 32° ; """"'--ro ' t.t-.~T A.,T ~R Yf, ... {:.;:I!.._:~. j3!.,.\;';.::; (,1•.f;,' ., 3D' J/..,'!!/'5 pPifED J5iyr') \81~ 6lt..Dl4 t:"l t.J ,EL \/[) 2 .... • r-·1,." .. ..,..(: _Y_.; l ';(... l • f'\ \. -vllL. cS.tv\.1: •1".lt:?r-,,.3: f5i1·":,lf~ o/=· C'.l:=,,t;i-;'.:.:,/l)!.J-;.. .. -f ··~c .... A !-- Based o .n F1A Flood Tn 0 urance Rate Map, Commur:i t.y Panel 48041C0182 C for Brd%o& ~aunty, T exa s , t~e ~olloving de sc ribet pr opert y is not located :;it.t·iin 1ci cJeti i '.~nated 100 Yea r ~·re <..J uency Plo od .Plain. l certify that I have made ~n on the gr ound ~urvey of property de ~c rthed dG follows: Lot Thirty- Onc ( J 1:) Bluel ~ One ( l) Rc;,;em.:y S outh, an a<Jdi ti on to the city of College Station, Brazos Co unty, Texa~ accordiu~ to Plat recorded in Volume 605 P~~e 77~ Official Recor d s of Braz os County , T ~Adti (ORBCT). Restric~ions for s~ia ad dition are recorded in Volume 605 , Page 775, Volumo 601, Pa g e 57q; Vnl 11111"" 1171, Page 421 CRBCT . I further certi'fy that thk s Plat correctl y reprPsants the f acts fou n d at the time of the survey,: and ther e are no encroachmf'.'nts, exce j,:t as shown, and all improvements are located within the 1::-011nrl ci ry ·~1f the property, except as shm·m . Surveye~ By: ./auAEJ4 &V I </R.J~- D~nso11 W. Henry, Reg . Pr.ff. July 6, 1999 ./";/ (..../" L a nd Surveyor ·11-3293 ol -YG q3tJ fl Ito /t; I JOHN LANGTREE 'f z. •' I R. > E1" 1/z.'' IR.. FN D Denson w. Henry Reg. Prof. Land Surveyor 2308 Yosemite Drive Bryan, Texas, 77803 Phone & Fax 979/778 2572 - u.~· . ~· ...... ~---- r.: 2 o .i> . (_oN C..'_~. ~ . D.IL · • ~ -- () ~ l.. I:) ..__, V') ...... ----~~~-0 ~-. z. i.." 'I z. ,, ':ft: N .:!> t • I ~' I?/ W -S 3. ID· " ~ ~ \() ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .;... tq 111 ~ . <o' ro EN r A. T 5RO\\-\E ~~ ~C>IJLEVAK.D ( MJN 30 ' w I De PA v&.o €HT.) \el~ ~~l!H~Ef\.~ &bllLEVAR..P ·~o' ?R,1 'vA1E. Att.'C.':>~ ~ f'U~\.IL UTIL . ESIY\ r. Bas~d on FIA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel 48041 C0182 c for Brazos County, Texas, the following described property is not located with- in a designated 100 Year Frequency Flood Plain. I certify that I have made an on the ground survey of property described as follo ws: Lots Thi rty-one (31) and thirty-two (32), Block One (1), REGEN CY SOUTH, an addition to .the City ot College Station, Brazos County, Texa s , acc ording to Re~lat recorded in Volume 605, Page 775 Official Records of Braz o s County, Texas (ORBCT). Hestrictions for said addition are recorded in Vol. 605 , Page 775, Vol. 601, Page 579, Vol. 1171, Page 4 24 ORBCT. I further certify that this Pl at correctly represents the facts found at the time of the survey and there are no encroahments, except as shown and all im p roveme n ts are located with- in the boundary t\f. the i.~roperty, exceL:it as shown. Surveyed By: ~~ t{j r ~ Denson w. Henry, rof. Land Surveyor No 3293 October 27 , 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Name/Firm : T €XA'7 ¥1'1tfl-f?tlM.Toe5 Address: /f[) ~JIM}(9 Ji4 Date: LI /I 'l / C J r , Phone: 'JU,~ u<jtJ <j &. ~. LL 3--?=?l-0 -3o to I Fax: 1~4= _ -:f Y z..1 We are transmitting the foll o win g for Development Servic es to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): • D -Master Deve lopment Pl an 0 Preliminary Plat D Final Plat 0 FEMA. CLOMNCLOMR/LOMA/LOMR J&'.l. Site Plan D Grading Plan 0 Landscape Plan 0 Irrigation Plan D Building Construction Documents wl D R edlines w/ D Redlines w/ D R edlines w/ D Redlines wl D Redlines w/ 0 Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ 0 Redlines w/ D Redlines INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The followin g are included in the compl ete set: D Waterline Cons truction D ocument s w/ D R edlin es D Sewerline Co n struction Docum ent s w/O Redlines D Drainage Construction D oc ument s w/ D Redlines D . Street Construction Doc uments w/ D R edlines D Easement application with met es & bounds d ecsription D Drainage Lett er or Report w/ D Redlines 0 Fire Flow Analysis w/ D Redlines Special Instructions : /?fi?i&tJC'I 5Mrlf Lo75 -# 31 e: -3Z rRANSMITIAL LEITER TRANSMIT.DOC 10/17/0 1 D Development Permit App. 0 Conditional Use Permit D R ez oning Applic atio n li;i Variance Request D Other -Please sp ecify D TxDOT Driveway Permit D TxDOT Utility P ermi t D Other -Please sp eci fy I o f I 62-DG NarrerPfePUOr:.reeGE STATION Check type of mail or service: Affix Stamp Here (If issued as a I ir ~ . •. • P.O Box 996 0 D Certified D Recorded Delivery (International) certificate of mailing, '-= -.ti:...:.... ,, D COD D Registered or for additional ~"~£ s, ~r r--* -· College Station , TX 77842 D Delivery Confirmation D Return Receipt for Merchandise copies of this bill) v .. ,,, ~ * D Express Mail D Signature Confirmation Postmark and ~ , Ila, * * Date of Receiot lu ltaY J 9'().,.t ~t ~ ., : 1 .5 Q -,, -Handling A< -• 01-248 me , Street, and PO Address Postage Fee • Charge if PBMfllA • Thomas, Aurora & Allison Remy • ., ll 7114367 U.S . POSTAGI • 1711 Doe Crest -• San Antonio, Texas 78248-1320 • 01-248 Douglas & Melinda Noto 211 Julia Street Navasota, Texas 77868-3126 01-248 >i Robert R & Suzanne S King ... .... .. - 4519 11th Street > ;;' ·-Cl.I Lubbock, Texas 79416-4815 -t> ~ Q Cll c c a: 01-248 ~ ·-""' ·-Cl.I Las Casitas Properties Inc. .... 'ti .. ~ c .. ::s P.O. Box 310327 c -~ .... (,) .... o-... Cll New Braunfels, Texas 78313-0237 ·-... :c .. a: .. ::: Ill .IV_ .... I E -0 ·-a: 01-248 .. u u ·-() E Doulgas Sr & Carolyn Brittain c Cl.I Q. 236 SH-46 W 0 .. en ~ _:S Boerne, Texas 78006-8118 .... I >i CV ... c 01-248 ; ,=::' David W & Anne M Dudycha ·-"' - 1006 Sonoma Circle Q College Station, Texas 77845-7907 Jme o f receiving employee) The full declaration of value is required on a I domestic and international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the , --·--· . ·---··--.......................... ..., reconstruction of nonnegotiable documents under Express Mail document reconstruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to additional limitations for multiple pieces lost or damages in a single catastrophic occurrence . The maximum indemnity payable \g on Express Mail merchandise insurance is $500 , but optional Express Mail Service merchandise insurance is available for up to $5 ,000 to some , but not all countries . The maximum indemnity payable is $25 ,000 for registered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual R900 , S913, and S921 for limitations of coverage on insured and COD mail. See International Mail Manus/for limitations of coverace on international mail. Soecial handlinc charces aoolv onlv to Standard Mail (Al and Standard Mail (Bl oarcels . r,..,mnlatA hu T u naw ritor lnlc nr Rs:1ll Pnint PP-n Nae£a@GJdress of Sender CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P.0 Box 9960 Colleo e Station , TX 77842 01-248 Glenn D Thomas 1110 12th Man Circle College Station, Texas 77845-8978 01-248 Lois, Daniel & Cheryl Beach 1816 Brothers# 1 College Station, Texas 77840-5301 01-248 Betty S. Alexander 1816 Brothers Blvd . # 3 College Station, Texas 77845 01-248 Douglas E & Krystal L Becker 1816 Brothers Blvd. # 5 College Station, Texas 77845-5301 01-248 Frederick H & Patricia Willems 2204 Bent Oak Street C'.ollel!e Station. Texas 77845-5587 01-248 Ronald G & Kathleen M Ogdee 2702 Ted Circle Harlingen, Texas78550-8589 Rece1vea at l"Ost vmce Check type of mail or service: Affix Stamp Here (If issued as a certificate of mailing, or for additional copies of this bill) '? Ei~2.ft¥_.=' :J .,, .... . D Certified 0 COD D Recorded Delivery (International) D Registered .. __,. .,, D Delivery Confirmation D Express Mail D Return Receipt for Merchandise D Signature Confirmation Postmark and Date of Receiot .. ...,"o "1.1'~~/j ..., 'O ~" l'~1' ~g MQl 1 9'0.J 2 I~ • • :\50:: Name, Street, and PO Address Postage Fee • • Handling Act PB Charge if R METIA --------+----+----+--=--+--""" 7114367 U.S. POSTAGE ! I lame of receivi't11ployee) •' ~ .. .... -· --.: > <l> ·--(,) en Q GI c c a: I"\ ·--·-~ Cl) ... .. ltl c .... :I c ~~ ~ CJ ... o-:c .. <II ·-:i. .... a: ... ·-Ill ~ .... -E ~o .:.: a: .. 0 u ·-di c <l> a. 0 .. fl) "'\.. ,__::s .... ~ " .. c .... .... > ·-·-fl) -Ill The full declaration of value is required on a I domestic and international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the reconstruction of nonnegotiable documents under Express Ma il document reconstruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to additional limitat ions for multiple pieces lost or damages in a single catastrophic occurrence. The maximum indemnity payable on Express Mail merchandise insurance is $500, but op tional Express Mail Service m~rchandise insurance Is available for up to $5 ,000 to some , but not all countries . The maximum indemnity payable is $25,000 for registered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual R900 , S913 , and S921 for limitations of coverage on insured and COD ma il. See International Mail Manual for limitations of coveraae on internatio nal ma il. Soecial handling charaes aoolv onlv to Standard Mail (A) and Standard Mail (B) oarcels . \ l \ .•· ~ie00Address of Sender CITY OF COLLEGE STATION I "T 15 P.0 Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 01-248 Jon & Edward Borowiec Joanne Bergman 1816 Brothers Blvd. #12 CoUege Station, Texas 77845-5301 01-248 Virginia K. Entwistle 1816 Brothers Blvd# 13 College Station, Texas 77845-5308 01-248 Vessali, Beejan & John Langtree 110 Pershing Avenue College Station, Texas 77840-3010 01-248 James U McNeal 1816 Brothers Blvd.# 34 College Station. Texas 77845-5323 01-248 Larry Landry P .O . Box 3752 Bryan, Texas 77805-3752. Total N~r of Pieces Total Number of Pieces Received at Post Office lc:=der ~ Check type of mail or service : Affix Stamp Here -;~'§§§?.:J~ * (If issued as a I,.=:;;;;;;-~ ~;'~ ~--_ '!,._ ! 0 Certified 0 Recorded Delivery (International) certifica te of mailing, £, ,. ~" ~~~ * 0 COO 0 Registered or for additional " \. () 'f ._~ r-* ..., .I'~ ~~ * O Delivery Confirmation O Return Receipt for Merchandise copies of this bill) -v ,.. ~·~ ::_ 1 l s; =. !* -~~§~~-nx_:u_rre_e~_s_M_a_ii _____ o __ s_ig_n_a_tu_re_c_o_n_f_irm_at-,.io_n ___ -t=b=~=~e~lm=0a~/~~=:.,.c~=~"";n_,_t __ ~---F. MOY 1 9'().j z) w <ii * 1me , Street , and PO Address Postage Fee Handling Actual \/ PB * Charge ifRegist MEUA U.S. POSTAGE : --------+-----t------t--~--t--~ T'll J 114367 I Postmaster, Per (Name of receiving employee) - >o ~ ~ ~ -> ·-GI -0 -· m ·-Ill c c Q a: a ·-.... ·-i:s GI .... .. .. ns c .. ::s c -"' u -0 lo..: ::c .. GI ·-.. .. a: .. ::::: II> ·~ --... .:: -0 u a: .. u ·-..., c GI a. 0 .. en ,_~ _::s .... >o CV .. c ... . ~· > ·-fl) -.... The full declaration of value is requ ired on a I domestic and international registered mail. The maximum indemnity payable for the reconstruction of nonnegotiable documents under Express Mail document reconstruction insurance is $500 per piece subject to additional limitations for multiple pieces lost or damages in a single catastrophic occurrence. The maximum in demn ity payable on Express Mail merchandise insurance is $500 , but optional Express Mail Service merchandise insurance is available for up to $5 ,000 to some , but not all countries . The max imum indemnity payable is $25 ,000 for registered mail. See Domestic Mail Manual R900 , S913 , and S921 for limitations of coverage on insured and COD mail. See Internatio na l Mail Manual for limitations of coveraae on international mail. Soecial handlina charaes aoolv onlv to Standard Mail (A) and Standard Mail (8 ) parcel•. ,... ___ ,_._ ku Tu ... .a• .. r1t.a.r In.,. nr Rall Pnint PAn LEGAL NOTICE DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2001 ONLY BILL TO: Deborah Grace The City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 MasterCard # 5478-9900-0018-2794 Expires March 2004 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing to consider a variance for 1816 Brothers Blvd ., lots 31 & 32, block 1, Regency South. Applicant is Parvis Vessali . The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6 :00 p .m. meeting of the Board on Tuesday, December 4, 2001 Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting . To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989 . For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570 . Jessica Jimmerson Staff Planner . ' . ' ·' .. • l '•' ' 1 : .. ,. .. ~ 1 .... ~ ,:il-nml },~Q; ~ i ~ -~--"'' ~~-.ll/_ <\k41<E'~ ~-~. l.i~ ~ ... fi'tfO. ~;s;i;:~ '.t-~"''" .... ~i: ..... 11~: ~'.!!r '!lt~!! ~ •. , ·r•~ i'rt1'1 1t i5lt -----"----~ ¥. ~U~.3 P.-~i0'.2: ' ._,., -:; Ill .. ~ ' J : I, __ J~t ., ... ..... .,-,· ~· ~~ 'l: 1,.-- •t '\.. ,,._ ;10: .... ,, t<'<·L~-: -~ -"i;t,i t . ' l. ~ . ~ ' ~ ·~' 2 ..... '\': ... ~ ~ .......... 1~·-·~· ', -, ), . ,.... !.· ·~ • .- ';. ... ;--~· ,. ~ ~ ~ !%· ' .. ' .. < -, . ' :; ' .i; ' "' . .J. -..: ;;. n ~ r::: .... ~ .. ' ,, • i;.. t ' . ·~ , ::{. •. , -· A U G -1 0 -0 0 12 :~6 PM D E H S OH H E NR Y Bl!EJAN VESSALt i. JO'Hr; LAtiGTREE 'Denson w. Renry Reg. Prof. Land surveyor 2308 Yosemite 'Orivo Bryan, T exas, 77803 Phone & Fax 409/778-2572 ~ £..~ ·'E;..-v.-P!A-, ----. ·· · ----· •\)~'"" e.~ • w' 'J.." 'Ii \tl--- 30 ~ II.~ ----0 ftl-~ \l{\i 0---- --~tl,O ---.... ,... ~ 'O 1..0i S'Z. S\ LOT " ~ ~ Loi ..; &oG"9 I ~ I I < . \ij l ' ~ s ' ~ ~ • ' " " "" ~ ~ "' .ScAL€: '. \ ,, .., .2.0 1 • ~--~. ~ ~?.1 16't~"~-2~t'li' ,~--; ~ l~ f~ . . -r~ti ~ TO eN'f" Aii lb~Offi ~il..$ ~I.VD. (hi/IN .jf>' WI~~ PIWi!!O ~11./r) 1e1~ et~n{efl.~ t?.t..vD ;,o· Pl2.\VAT& Al~S ~ Pu~U(. OT\t... GSMT J./e-re. : 6..as.,? t> ~ 13e~ 1e.1t16"5-~t.R r Based on 'P'IA Flood Insurance Rate M1:1p, coaununity · Panel 4804.1C018_2 tor BrazQs county, Texas; the following descrioed property is not located ttith:f n a deoigrta.ted 100 Year l'requ t-ncy Plood Plain. r certify th.at I hav~ made an on the 9rouud ~urvey of property described as followa 1 Lot Thirty-two (32), Block one (l) REGENCY SOUTH, an addition to the City of College Station, Bra.zoE> County, ·Texas, accordin;i to P.1a·t recorded in Volume 605, Page 7?5 Official Records of Brazow County, Ti<Jx.a 's ( ORIIC'!') , Re•trictions !or •ai~ addition ~re recorded in Volume ~05, Page ?75, Volume 601, Pa;e 5i9 1 Volume llil, Pe;e 424 ORDCT. l rurth¥r certi!y that .this Plat correctly re9resents the facte tound at the time of the aurv~y, and there dro no encroachmenta, except as eho~n, and all improvements are located ~ithin the boundary of the property, except as sho wn . Surveyed By : ~~;;!~~d July 6, 1999 R~of. Lan Surveyor #3293 11 1 1 5 /~UUl 14 :J~ ¥AA ~7 ~ 77 4 UU 5 J tALiL t NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing to consider a variance for 1816 Brothers Blvd., lots 31 & 32 , block 1, Regency South . Applicant is Parvis Vessali. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the Col - lege Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 6:00 p.m . meeting of the Board on Tuesday, December 4 , 2001 · Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1- 800-735-2989 . For additional information, please contact me at {979) 764-3570. Jessica Jimmerson Staff Planner 11-21-01 lf&j UU l/UUl INITIALS