HomeMy WebLinkAboutFP2006-500267...
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
P&Z CASE NO .: b (p -1,{; I
DATE SUBMITTED : i 1-I L-1 I D lP
CITY OF COLLEC E ST ATIO N
/'/,11111i11g & D t1'<·/01•11u·111 Serri.-o
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) 0 Minor
($300.00)
0 Amending ,:::A' Final 0 Vacating 0 Replat
($300 .001 >($400.001 -r-tss~ ($400.001 ($soo.oor
Is this plat in the ET J? ~Yes 0 No
~ ..f f:.X_Tf-A S~T *In cludes p ubl ic hea ring fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P&Z Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: . ..IL .$ 00 ~ Filing Fee (see above) NOTE : Multiple Sheets -$55.00 per additional sheet ~ ~SS Foi=2-
r/ /A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations -$100 (if applicable) .1-c. • ILi=l Tl ON~L
.J:!A Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). D~n:: .. £:_,\
..t!_JA Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicabl e/if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
_y_ Application completed in full.
*Copy of orig inal deed restrictions/covenants for eplats (if applicable). v Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed ylar original must be submitted after staff review .)
V Paid tax certificates from City of Coll ~ee St ion , Brazos County and College Station l.S .D .
v A copy of the attached checklist with I it s checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
~ Two (2) copies of public infrastructure ns associated with this plat (if applicable).
!YA. Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board , pleas e provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Date of Preapplication Conference:_--"--+---+--~----------....,------
NAME OF SUBDIVISION _.....,;'XAJ.'IY.,f.~L...l.....d~~r=:::=..--1.~~U:l..!~LO~'-L--!--!'...l!!l.d:'.'~!'.'.._--~-
SP ECIFIE D LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) -'-X..l'--'-'~...__.c=..__,__"'-"'-=--<.........,'-"-"'---'-=-'-=---
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER 'S INFORMATION (Primary Contac t for the Project ):
Name .. L. e.J,u'~
Street Address tf ttltO ·l)evJbvmJ fr i \/~
State 7 "1 tp4 '5' E-M ai I Address -'-"-'=----...LLL"""""""'--=..!....l"""--=-"---4-~LL!..>..c....:::.L. 6'wJ
Phone Numbe r -1.~lfz_ Fax Number
___.,.,......_~,........... ............ ~~----+-l~~---
PROPERTY OWNER 'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be iden tified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners): (.\ YV\ -h Pt / · I . {1.._· }. CA q -Name \.!J_J,,\.w1 A. ct....ll~ ffi{,,44 Vis 'iJ....a DM1no 1 l-(.;t1vi A )22.~3 ) ~ v 'd ~ J-e.~M\.ife.c:B . Tol\<l J lo4'r'+ L.e~~"'ffqu 1 ~clao tU.:12 u e.s, CA
C/02-IY>
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER 'S INFORMATION
Name ti· v ,-1 D.ev-eJ0011 ~t, Lfd . -Jee. Scli u j f =c P. e .
s tc eet Addce ss 2-100 ki~'jW\trC!lri ~ ,'2J1J.iti, fL. C ity C ~~~ ~Vl
State J2'-Zi J Code :J1C04) E-Mail Add ress j ,,-<.. ~ S .
Phone Num ber (11'f 7 Celt -] 14-? Fa x Num ber {'f 7q) --z&,4 -17 5'j
G/1 3/03
...
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? Yes __ No ~
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so , please provide the Volume and Page# __ _
Acreage -Total Property 5'1. 55'},IJ..l. Total# of Lots 3S-R-0-W Acreage q . b C\
Existing Use: '4'~l-IA,""'f Proposed Use : ~'aja.-f~~ fl5.ri 'de nfitL(
Number of Lots By Zoning District -N./A-I / __ _
__ / I ("~
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:'f4
1
{
Floodplain Acreage ___ O.=;_ ___ _
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable):
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason Fo
Pri l
Total Linear Fo otage of
Proposed Pub l ic:
4~S~ Streets
Sidewalks -Sanitary Sewer Lines
tt~Lt5 Water Lines
I~\) Channels
Storm Sewers -Bike Lanes I Paths
rkland Dedication due prior filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE: N
___ #of acres to be dedi ~ ed + $ development fee
___ # of acres in detention
___ # of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND :
___ #of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ ___ _
_______ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT M UST BE SU B MITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true ,
correct, and complete . The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified
final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictio ns associated with this plat.
1 1 2 /J 6'2
Date
6/13/'P
i.. .
CrrY oi: Cuu .ECE ST \T111 :--:
SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS
LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 13
FOLDED COPIES OF PLAT FOR REVIEW />/,1,111:•1.t. & IJ.-1.,.ffl1·•1.wu .Vnurs
)rj
I Q----
../ cr-
I P'
;o
1.
2 .
3 .
4 .
5 .
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
Mylar original of approved preliminary plat (Mylar must be on file or submitted before the final plat
will be reviewed).
Paid tax certificates .
Drawn on 24" x 36 " sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger.
Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject
property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north
arrow .
Title Block with the following information :
C1 q-
Name and address of subdivider, recorded ner, planner, engineer and survey or.
Proposed name of subdivision . (Subdi ·sion name & street names will be approved
through Brazos County 911.) (Replats ed to retain original subdivision name .)
[3'. Date of preparation .
[}' Engineer's scale in feet.
[].,. Total area intended to be de elo
6 . North Arrow .
7 . Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines .
8. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger .
9 . All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. rr---Ownership and Dedication
'>([r @ urveyor and/or Engine e[)
CT City Engineer (and City Planner , if a minor plat)
'-fJ" Planning and Zoning Com mission (delete if minor plat)
~ Brazos County Clerk
C}' Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
~ 10. If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject
6/13 10 3
property showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created .
11 . If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may
be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County , pursuant to the provisions of Section 21 .004 of the Texas Water Code .
12. Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway , if applicable , according to the most recent
available data .
13 . Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data .
14 . Matches the approved preliminary plat and/or master development plan .
4 nf.;;
15 . The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii,
area , center angle , degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following : (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming
a boundary with the subdivision , as well as, those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
./ca ~ Streets . Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
/0
/[j
~:
Qo--V-*~ )\./~ B
Public and private R.O .W . locations and widths . (All existing and proposed R.O .W .'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan .)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance .
Alleys .
Easements .
A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block .
Greenbelt area/park linkages/!)arkland dedication ( All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and R creation Board prior to P & Z Commission consideration .)
@" 16 . Construction documents for all public nfrastructure drawn on 24" x 36 " sheets and properly sealed
by a Licensed Texas Professional E gineer that include the following :
[3 Street, alley and sidewalk R ns, profiles and sections . One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or side lk layout of the subdivision . (may be combined with other
utilities).
Lf Sanitary sewer pla d profile showing depth and grades . One sheet must show the
overall sewer layou f the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas .)
CJ Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision .
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas .)
[Y Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and
drainage channels , with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas , and runoff
based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity . Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design & detention if used . One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the subdivision .
[3' Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P .E.
~ Drainage Report.
[d Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
12( 17. All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with
a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed .
Separate instrument easements must be filed prior or concurrently with Final Plat.
~ 18 . Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes ~No
Impact fees for R-1 , R-2, & R-3 zoned final plats , must be paid prior to filing .
~ 19 . Will any construction occur in TexDOT rights-of-way? ·~Yes D No
If yes, TexDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents .
NOTE: 1 . We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to
6/13/0 3
filing the plat at the Courthouse .
2 . If the construction area is greater than 5 acres , EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted
prior to issuance of a development perm it.
-.................... .._._ _______ C~JTIOF COLLEGE STATION
Plitnning 0-Development Services ---1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
Coll ege Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDU M
December 12, 2006
TO: M .L. Schehin, Owner via fax # 690 793
FROM: Crissy Hartl, Staff P lanner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 1 ) -Fina l Pla t
Staff reviewed tl1e above-mentione final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items iliat need to be addressed. C o mme nts fr o m E n g ineering Sta ff a nd Brazos
C o unty a r e n o t include d in this set of c o mme nts . W e will provide the m to yo u as soon as p ossible .
If all comments have been addressed and ilie following information submitted by Monday, December 18,
2006, 10:00 a.m., yo ur project will be placed on ilie next available P lanning and Zoning Commission meeting
scheduled for Thursday, January 4, 2006 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
One (1) 24"x36" copy of ilie revised fina l plat;
Sixteen (16) 11 "xl7" copies of the revised final plat;
The amount of must be paid and new certified tax certificates submitted prior to ilie filing
of ilie final plat;
One (1) copy of ilie digital fi le of ilie final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin @cstx .gov and
awelsh@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revi se d fina l p lat wiili ilie owner and County Judge's signatures
(will be required after ilie Cou nty's approval).
Upon receipt of ilie required documents for ilie Planning & Zoning meeting, yo ur project will be considered
formally filed wiili ilie City of College Station. Please note iliat if all comments have not been addressed, your
project will not be sc heduled for ilie Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed
on a future agenda once all ilie revisions have been made and ilie appropriate fees paid. Once yo ur item has
been schedul ed for ilie P&Z meeting, ilie agenda and staff report can be accessed at ilie following web site
on Monday ilie week of ilie P&Z meeting.
http://www.cstx.gov /home/index.as p?page=2481.
If you have any que s tions or need additional information, p lease call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: John A. Malley, via 48644 Vista Paolmino, La Quinta, CA 92253
Jennifer B . Todd, via 6454 Le Blanc Place, Rancho Palos Verd es, CA 90275
Joe Schultz , via fax# 764.7759
Gary Arnold, Brazos County Planning & Traffic, Via fax 775.0453
Case file #06-00500267
Home of Texas A&M U niversity
DATE , TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURA TION
PAGE (S)
RESULT
MODE
December 12, 2006
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION RE PORT
12/12 07:54
95902793
00 :00 :24
02
OK
STANDARD
ECM
enue, P.O. Box 9960
College ation, Texas 77 842
Phone 979 .764.3570 I Fax 979.7 64.3496
MEMORANDUM
TO;
FRO M;
SUBJECT:
M L. Schehin, Owner via fo x # 690 .2793
Crissy Hartl, Staff Planner
SADDLE CREEK PH 1 (FP) ~ Final Plat
TIME 12/12/2005 07 :54
NAM E
FA X
TEL
SER.# 000 L5J595800
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page i:s a list of staff review
comments detailing i tems that need to be address ed. Cotntnenb from Engineering Staff and Brazos
County are not included in this set of comments. We will provide them to you as soon as possible.
If all comments have been addressed and the following information submitted b y Mon day, December 18,
2006, 10:00 a.m., your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
scheduled for Thursday, January 4, 2006 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chamber:s, 1101 Te:Kas Avenue.
One (1) 24"x36 " copy of the revised final plat;
Sixteen (16) 11 "xl r copies of the revis ed final plat;
The amount of$ must b e paid and new certified tax certificates submitted prior to the filing
of the final p lat;
One (1) cop y of the digital file of the final plat o n diskette or e-mail to sgr:iffm@cstx .gov and
awelsh@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revis ed final plat with the:: owner and County Judge's signatures
(will be required after the County's approval).
1 r----........ ~ ..... ;_ .. "'c '-l.-... _ ...... __ ;..__...] __] ______ .. _ c __ .. 1. _ 'Y"'l1 _ ·-.. :. __ o >---, _ .. ~--.
DATE, TIME
FA X NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE (S)
RESULT
MODE
December 12, 2006
TRANSMISSION VERIF ICATION REPORT
12 /12 07:55
97547759
00:00:28
02
OK
STANDARD
ECM
1101 Te:s:as Avenue, P .O. Box 9960
College Station, Te:s:as 77842
Phone 979 .764.3 570 I Faz 979.764.'.)496
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
M.L. Sc::hc:hin, Ownc.r via fa,.. # 690 .2793
Crissy Hartl, Suff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 1 (FP) -Final Plat
TIME 12/12/2005 07:55
NAME
FA X
TEL
SER.# 000L5J595800
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. Tur: following pagr:: is a li:st of :staff review
comments detailing i tems that need to be addre ss ed Comments from Engineering Staff and Bra~os
County are not included in this set of comments. We will ptovide them to you as soon as possible.
lf all comments have been addressed and the following information submitted by Monday, December 18,
2006, 10:00 a.tn., your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
scheduled for Thursday, January 4, 2006 7:00 p .m . in the Ci.ty Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Te:&a.s Aven ue .
One (1 ) 24"x36 " copy of the revised final plat;
Si.1ct een (16) 11"x l7" copies of the revised final plat;
The amount of$ must be paid and new certified tax certificates submitted prior to the filing
of the final plat;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx.gov and
awelsh@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner and County Judge's signatures
(will be tequi.ted after the County's apptova.~-
rl" CnYOF COLLEGE S TAT l~:N~::::.:::::::.----------... ---PIAnning tr Development Servica --1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764 .3570 / Fax 979 .764.3496
M E MORANDU M
December 15, 2006
TO:
FROM:
M .L. Schehin, Owner via fax # 690.2793
Crissy Hartl, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 1 (F P) -Firl Pl at
Staff reviewe d the above-mentioned final plat l equested . The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items that need to be addr sed. If all comments have been addressed and the following
information submitted by Mond ay, Janu a 2, 2007 , 10:00 a.m ., your project will be placed on the next
available P lanning and Zoning Cammi sio meeting scheduled for Thurs d ay, Janu ary 18 , 2007 7:00 p .m . in
the Ci ty Hall Council Chambers, 1101 as Avenue.
One (1) 24"x36" copy of the revised fina l plat;
Sixteen (16 ) 11"xl7" copies of the revised final plat;
The amount of$ must be paid and new certified tax certificates submitted prior to the filin g
of the fina l plat;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on di skette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx .g ov
and awel sh @ cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revi sed fina l plat with the owner and County Judge's signatures
(will be required after the County's approval).
Upon receipt o f the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
considered formally fi led with the City of College Station. Please note that if all comments have not been
addressed, your project will not be scheduled for th e P lanning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your
project may be placed on a future agenda once all the revi sions have been made and the appropriate fees
paid. Once your item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and s taff report can be
accessed at the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting.
http://www.c s tx .gov/home /index .a s p?page=24 81.
If you have any questions or need additional information, plea se ca ll me at 979.764.3570 .
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: John A. Malley, via 48644 Vista Paolmino, La Quinta, CA 92253
Jennifer B. Todd, via 6454 Le Blanc Place, Rancho Palos Verdes , CA 90275
Joe Schultz, via fax# 764.7759
Gary Arnold, Brazos County Planning & Traffic, Via fax 775 .0453
Case file #06-00500267
DATE, TIME
FA X NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE (S)
RESULT
MODE
December 15 , 2006
TRANSMISSION VERIFI CATION REPORT
12 /15 11: 13
97750453
00:00:25
02
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TO:
FROM:
ML. Schehin, Owner via fa'.ll: # 690.2793
Crissy Ha.rtl, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 1 (FP) -Final Plat
TIME 12/15/2005 11:13
NAME
FA X
TEL SER.# 000L5J595800
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff t<w.iew
comments detailing items that need to be addressed If a.U comments have been addressed and the following
information submitted by Monday, Januaey 2, 2007, 10:00 a.ro., your project will be placed on the next
available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:00 p.m. in
the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
One (1) 24"x36" copy of the revised final plat;
Six teen (16) 11":d7" copies of the :i:evised final plat;
The amount of$ must be paid and new certified tax certificates submitted prior to the filing
of the final plat;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx.gov
and awelsh@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the .revised final plat with the owner and County Judge's signatures
(will be .t:equited after the County's app:tova~.
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
c:onsideted formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that if all comments have not been
addressed, yout project will not be scheduled for the Plannina-& Zonin" Comrni,.sion mPP.tin&. V "" ..
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
DATE, TIME
FA X NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE (S)
RESULT
MODE
December 15, 2006
'TO: M.L. Schehin, Ownet via fax # 690.2793
FROM: Crissy Hartl; Staff Planner
12 /15 11: 12
97547759
00:00:25
02
OK
STANDARD
EC
SUBJECT SADDLE CREEK PH 1 (FP) -Final Plat
TIME 12/15/2005 11:12
NAME
FAX
TEL
SER.# 000L5J595800
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as tequested. The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items that need to be addressed. If all comments have been addressed and the following
information submitted by Monday) January 2, 2007, 10:00 a.m., your ptoject will be placed on the ne~t
available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for Thutsday, January 18, 2007 7:00 p .m. in
the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
One (1) 24":33 6" copy of the revised final plat;
Sixteen (16) 11"x17" copies of the xevised final plat;
The amount of $ must be paid and new certified tax certificates submitted prior to the filing
of the final plat;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx.gov
and awelsh@csa.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner and County Judge's signatures
(will be required after the County's approval).
Upon receipt of the i:equired documents fot the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that if all <:Omments have not been
• ... · ' --1--.:i·-1-.J c~~ ~i,A "P1., ....... ;.,o-/Iv 7.o~ Commission meeting. Your
DATE, TIME
FA X NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE (S)
RESULT
MODE
TRANSMISSION VERIFICA TION REPORT
12/15 11: 11
95902793
00:00:23
02
OK
STA NDARD
ECM
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979 .764.3570 I Fax 979.764 . .3496
MEMORANDUM
TIME 12/15 /2005 11:11
NAME
FA X
TEL
SER.# 000 L5J59 5800
December 15 , 2006
TO:
FROM:
M .L. Schehin, Owner via fax # 690.2793
Crissy Hartl, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREEK PH 1 (PP) -Final Plat
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items th~t need to be addressed_ If all comments have been addressed and the following
information submitted by Monday1 January 2, 2007, 10:00 a.m., your project will be placed on the next
available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for Thutsday, Januaty 18, 2007 7:00 p.m. in
the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue.
One (1 ) 24"x36" copy of the .revi sed final plat;
Sixteen (16) 11"xl7" copies of the revised final plat;
The amount of$ must be paid and new certified tax certificates submitted prior to the filing
of the final plat;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to sgriffin@cstx.gov
and awelsh@cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revised final plat with the owner and County Judge's signatures
(will be required after the County's approval)-
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, yow: project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please. note that if all comments have not been
'_,__ -- -..l ----~ -~-;6 ~ .. ·~·m ~~+-ho c,.i.. ... r1,,1.,,:i fnr th e Plannino-& ZontnQ" Commission meetin_g. Your
Deborah Grace -Fwd: FW: Saddle Creek Phase 1
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Josh Norton
Grace, Deborah; Hartl , Crissy
4/3/2007 1 :57 PM
Fwd: FW: Saddle Creek Phase 1
>>>"Joe Schultz" <Joe @CDLBCS.com> 04/03/07 1:50 PM >>>
Josh,
Let me know if this will work
Joe
-----Orig inal Message -----
From : Gary Arnold [ma ilto: arno ld @co.bra zos.tx.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:46 PM
To: Joe Schultz
Subject: Saddle Creek Phase 1
Joe, On Tue. March27,2007 Brazos County Commissioner's Cou approved
the final plat of Saddle Creek Phase 1. We have a performanc bond on
Saddle Creek Partners ,LTD. by Developers Surety& Indemnicy Co. duly
licensed to conduct a general surety business in the state (Texas made
o ut to the Judge of Brazos County for $228,118.00 . The nd amount was
calculated off an engineers estimate provided by · ii D velopment,LTD .
Dated 3/20/07 signed and stamped by Kent Laza.T e are in our Saddle
Creek Phase 1 file at the Road and Bridge Dept. Gary Arnold
Page 1 of 1
fi le://C:\Doc um ents and Settin gs \dgrace.CSTX\Local Se ttings\Temp\XPgrp wi se \46 125 D 5... 4111/200 7
CIVIL ENGINEERING & DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL
Date: January 22 , 2007
To: Josh Norton
Development Services
City of College Station
From:
Subject:
Remarks:
Joe Schultz, P .E. ~
Civil Developmel(Ltd.
P.O. Box 11929
College Station, Texas 7784
Phone: (979) 764-7743
Water Line Drawings
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 1
Co ll ege Station , Texas
Attached are 2 copies of the waterline drawings for the above referenced
project.
APR -03 -2007 TU E 08 :51 AM
AP (, 3. 20 07 8: 46 AM
;.
.. BRAZOS COUNTY ·
ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT ·
Richard F. Vance, P.E., County Engineer
bdy Sim9. County Judge
No . 6463 P. 1
l.loyd W~~OTm •n n. Comm ission.,-ilrcciool I
t)11o11c P ~I~, Co"'..mini oqi:r Pl°"int:1 2
Kenny M$l.krd. Commluionor Plt>ol nct 3
Cal'cy Ca ulty, O>mmi a•i•>il<f 1'rccii><:t ~
March 29 , 2007
Civi l Development, ltd.
2033 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South
College Station , Texas 77840
Subject Final Plat of Saddle Creek Subd ivision Phase 1
60 .5.28 Acres , James C. Stuteville League, A-2
College Station ETJ , Brazos, County , Texas
Dear Sir:
On Tuesday, March 27, 2007, the Brazo~ County Co missioners' Court discussed and
approved the subject plat as subrnitted.
If further info rmation is re9uired , plea~e con.tact Lis at (979)822 -2127 .
Sincerely,
fJJJ.;. Vr~
Ric hard F. Vance, P.E.
County Engineer
Saddlu Cteel< Pn i-.rtnal plat
cc : Comm issioner Lloyd Wassermann, Pct 1
Office File(s) 1· ...•
. i ... ;,
2617 lli ¢\way21 We st Bryan, Texas 772 03 Oilloo (97 9)8;?.l-21 27 /Pax (979)775-04$3
P. 002/002
* C1vIL DEVELOPMENT, Lta. *
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
Remarks:
CIVIL ENGINEERING & DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL
January 3, 2007
Crissy Hartl
Development Services
City of College Station
Joe Schultz , P .E.~l
Civil Development,itd .
P.O . Box 11929
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone: (979) 764-7743
Rev ised Final Plat
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 1
College Station, Texas
Attached is 1 full-sized copy of the revised Final Plat. Revision s includ e
the items noted in Staff R ev iew Comments No. 2 concerning th e ad dition
of offsite easements and revising the pub lic drainage easements per the
County's request. A mylar original and the di gital file will b e submitted
upon final appro val.
If you have any questions , please give me a call .
. .
SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION , PHASE 1
FI N AL PL A T
R es ponse to E ngin ee ring Co mm e nt s No. 1
1. Please s ubmit fu ll set of construction documents: streets , dra inage , etc.
R esponse : Submitted.
2. Please submit drainage report.
R esponse: Submitted.
3. The reports and construction documents submittals should be the same for the county and College
Station .
R esponse: Noted.
4. (Sheet 4 & 5) Please verify that a flushing appurtenance is not needed at the low points in these lines.
R esponse : Th e BCS Des ign Guidelines indicate that a flushing velocity of 5 fps is needed to eliminate
sediments from accumulating in low points of a water sys tem. Th e re are two low points on th e Saddle
Creek system shown on Sheets 4 and 5 . Th e first is on the 12 " lin e between Prairie Court and High
M eadow Trail. Downstream of this low point are two fire hydrants, on e at th e intersection of Saddle
Creek Drive & High Meadow Trail, and th e other at th e end of High Meado w Trail. If both are turned
on for a combin ed jl.owrate of 2000 gpm, the velocity through th e ' line is 5 . 70 fp s .
The second low point is in the 3 " line on Prairie Court. Then is a blovv-off at the end of this lin e. If a
discharge of 125 gpm is re leased from th e blow-off, th velocity through the 3 " pipe is 5. 6 7 fps .
Obviously , greater discharges at e ith er of the locatio1 noted above will result in highe r flushing
velocities through the low points.
5. (Fire F low) Please verify that the fire flow test as done in accordan ce with the NFPA 29 1 Chapter 4
standards.
R esponse: Th e fire fl.o w tes t was conducted by Mr. St e ven Cast and observed by Mr. K ent Laza. Th e
flo w test was conducted in accordance with NFPA 291 Chapter 4 with one exc eption. NFPA r equires
that a minimum of two hy drants be used for the test -one to m easure the jl.owrat e and th e oth er to
m easure th e r es idua l pressure. Ther e is only one hy drant on the exis ting sy stem at Saddle Cr eek and it
was added sp ecifically for testing purposes . That hy drant was us ed to measure th e jl.owrate. R esidual
pres sure was gauged through a wat er fa ucet on a nearby res idence . It is our opinion th a t this
a lternative y ields a ve1 y s imilar result to th e procedure li s ted in NFPA 291.
6 . (Fire F low) A fire flow test wi ll need to be performed an d submitted upon com p letion of the line to
verify the con s h-ucted system meets the BCS minimum de s ign guideline requirements .
R esponse : A note has b een added to th e pla t.
7 . (Final P lat and Construction Documents) Bra zos County w ill need to review the final plat a s well a s the
full set of con str u ction documents and reports. We will fo rward the se as soon as we receive them from
th e county .
Response: No ted.
8. (F inal Pl at) Pl ea se add a note that d e fin es th e s lope a nd draina ge ease ment ma inte na nc e re s pon s ibilitie s .
It is m y und er s tandin g that the coun ty w ill not ma intain draina ge e a seme nt s ; th e re for e it may be
appropriate fo r the HOA to ma intain th es e.
R esp ons e : A note has been added to the p lat .
.. CA.a· ?1lrl
/bi• /fr(;\o
q·,4(
~
i::f C1vIL DEVELOPMENT, Lta. i::f
Date :
From:
Sub ject :
Remarks:
CI VI L E NGINEERING & DES IGN-BUILD SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL
December 18 , 2006
Crissy Hartl
Development Services
City of College Station
Joe Schultz, P .E . M_
Civil Developmeni fild .
P .O. Box 11929
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone: (979) 764-7743
Revised Final Plat
Saddle Creek Subdiv ision -Phase 1
College Station, Texas
The D eve loper requests this project be placed on the agenda for the P&Z
meeting scheduled for J anua ry 4, 2007.
Accompanying this transmittal are the following documents : Pf?_
• 1 full-si ze d copy of the revised Final Plat~ r<# l 1 (
• 16-1l x l7 copies of the revised Final PlaN U'-' -~
• 1 copy of the Street & Drainage Construction Drawin gs
• 1 copy of th e Drainage R eport
• Our Respons e to Staff R eview Comments No. 1
(dated 12 /12 /06)
• Our R es pon se to E ngin eeri ng R eview Co mm ents o . 1
(dated 12 /1 5/06)
Th e my lar ori ginal and di gital fil e w ill b e subm itt ed upon final approval.
t J )
'"J ( • 'I
F · tp rr
' ' \,, .. '
f"'\ ••• rt ' .. -'· \ \,.•·~
Planning:
Response to Staff Re v iew Comments N o. 1
Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 1
College Station, Texas
1 . A note has been added to the plat.
2. Boundary calls have been adjusted so boundary closes.
3. Th e Daugherty Tract is under contract to b e purchased by the
Developer and is now part of Phase 1.
BTU Comments:
1. Th e original Note 13 h as been deleted, an d Note 14 (no w Note 13) has
been reworded to clarify w h ere electrical service wi ll be p laced.
PLANNING
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: SA DDLE CREEK PH 1 (FP) -06-00500267
1. \.Vh o will b e maintaining the common areas? Please add a note to the plat with thi s d e tail .
2. Our GIS Staff has indicated that the m e te s and b o unds o f this plat d oes n o t clo se. Please adjust the plat
accordingly.
3. Please be advised that according to Section 12-I.1 o f the Ci ty's Subdivision R egula ti o n s requires that
every lo t in a rural residential subdivision must h ave access to a public or priva te stree t. It appears that
the D o ugh erty tract does not meet this req · Plea se revise to see that this lo t meets that standard.
Reviewe d b y: Crissy Hartl D a te : D ecember 11 , 2006
1. The con struction d o cume tlus proj ect are still under review . P lease allow m ore time for
engineering to provid e comments. \Ve will forward them to you as soon as poss ible.
Rev iewed by: J ash Norton Date: D ecember 11 , 2006
BRAZOS COUNTY
1. P lea se all ow m ore time for the County to provide comments. \Ve will forwar d them to you as soon as
p ossible.
Reviewed by: Gary Arnold Date: D ecember 11 , 2006
BTU COMMENTS
1. Notes 13 and 14 are a little niisleading. The electric servic e for these lo ts will come from th e front of the
lots . However, we will u se some of tl1e sid e lot easements for some of our electric di stribution lin es.
R eviewed by: Randy Trimble Date: December 11 , 2006
NOTE: Any changes made to th e pl ans, th at have no t been req uested by the City o f Coll ege Stati o n, must be explai ned in yo ur nex t tra nsmi ttal
letter and "bubbled " on yo ur pl an s. Any additional changes on these pl ans th at have no t bee n po inted out to th e City, will constitu te a
completely new review. Pag e 2 o f 2
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
Saddle Creek Final Plat
1. P lease submit full se t of construction documents: streets, drainage, etc.
2 . Please submit drainage report.
3. The reports and construction document submittals should be the same for the county and College
Station .
4. (S heet 4 and 5) Please verify that a flu shing appurtenance is not n ee ded at the low p oints in these
lines.
5 . (Fire Flow) Plea se verify that the fire flow tes t was d o ne in accordance with the NFP A 291 Chapter
4 s tandards.
6. (Fire Flow) A fire flow test will need to be performed and submitted upon completion of the line to
verify the constructed system meets the BCS minimum design guideline requirements.
7. (Final Plat and Con struction Documents) Brazos County will need to review the final plat as well as
the full set of construction documents a d reports. \Ve will forward these as soon as we receive
them from the county.
8. (Final Plat) Please add a note th defines the slope and drainage easement maintenance
responsibilities. It is m y underst ding that the county will not maintain drainage easements;
therefore it may be appropri te fo the HOA to maintain these.
Reviewed by: Josh Nor ton Date: December 15, 2006
PLANNING
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: SADDLE CREEK PH 1 (FP) -06-00500267
1. The plat will be placed on the January 4•h meeting th the condition that the engineering
comments are addressed.
Reviewed by: Lindsay Boyer D ate: December 22, 2006
ENGINEERING
1. Off-site access easement for temporary turnaround and off-site PUE for water line at the
end of High Meadow Trail are required. Copies o f filed separate in struments for these
easements will be required prior to filin g of the plat.
2 . Brazos County requires public drainage easements size d at toe+ 30' for maintenance of
culverts crossing roadways.
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: December 21, 2006
Crrr OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning & Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue, P.O . Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDU M
LJecember ~2006
TO: M.L. Schehin, Owner via fax # 690 .27 93
FROM: Crissy Hartl, Staff P lanner
SUBJECT: SADDLE CREE K PH 1 (FP) -Fin al Pl at
---~ ............ ~.::-~· ·_·.
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as equested. The following page is a li s t of sta ff
review comments detailing items that need to addressed. The plat has been scheduled for the
January 4th Planning and Zoning Commission eeting, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers,
1101 Texas Avenue. However, the attached omments must still be addres se d before the plat will be
filed . Please revise and provide the foll · g:
One (1) 24"x36" copy of the revised final p lat;
New certified tax certificates submitted prior to the filing of the final plat;
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to
sgriffin @ cstx .gov and awe lsh @cstx.gov; and
The Mylar original of the revised final p lat with the owner and County Judge's
signatures (will b e required after the County's approval).
Upon receipt of the required d ocuments for the Planning & Zoning meeting, yo ur project will be
considered formally filed with the City of Coll ege Station . P lease note that if all comments have not
been addres se d, yo ur project will not b e considered complete. Once yo ur item has been scheduled
for the P&Z meeting, the agenda and staff report can be accessed at the fo ll owing web site on
Monday the week o f the P&Z meeting.
http://www.cstx.gov/home/index .as p?page=2481.
If yo u have any ques tions or n ee d additional informatio n , please call me at 979.764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: John A. Malley, via 48644 Vista Paolrnino, La Quinta, CA 92253
Jennifer B. Todd, via 6454 Le Blanc Place, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Joe Schultz, via fax# 764.7759
Case file #06-00500267
Project Manager: Crissy Hartl
Email: chartl@cstx.gov
Project Number: 06-00500267
STAFF REPORT
Report Date: December 14 , 2006
Meeting Date: January 4, 2006
Item: Presentation , possible action , and dis ~cs ·on on a final plat for Saddle Creek Phase 1
consist i ng of 35 lots on 59 .552 acres general! located at Stousland Road and Wade Road ,
west of FM 2154 in the City 's Extra-territori Jurisdiction .
Applicant: M.L. Schehin
Staff Recommendations: Staff ec mends approval of the final plat with the condition that
the attached Staff Review Com ts are addressed .
ET J Plats -Brazos County's comments and recommendations: None.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a final plat for Phase 1 of the Saddle Creek
Subdiv ision . Th is plat consists of 35 lots on 59 .552 acres and is the first final plat for this
subdivision .
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan projects Rural Density Residential
for a portion of this property . Our development policies would also designate the remaining
area as Rural Density Residential ; however, the City has no authority over land use in the ET J.
Wellborn Road is identified as a major arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. Saddle Creek Drive is
being designed and built as a rural collector . This final plat is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan , master plan and the recently approved preliminary plat.
Item Background: The Planning & Zoning Commission approved a master plan for Saddle
Creek on August 3, 2006 and recently approved a prelim inary plat on October 5, 2006 .
Budgetary & Financial Summary: None requested.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: Parks Board : Because this project is located in
the ET J , the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has no authority over the plat.
Commission Action Options: The Commiss ion has final authority over the final plat. The
options regarding the final plat are :
• Approval
• Den ial
Supporting Materials:
1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map
2 . Application
3. Copy of Final Plat (provided in packet)
4 . Staff Review Comments
Final Plats
Infrastructure Accepted or Bonded Q ~"~\ \L \
~..e,'-\: c\Dc:,"--C\_
Parkland Dedication Paid \\ \ £3-
Impact Fees Paid \\ \ £:\
\
Digital Filed ~ --t..S
Tax Certificate¥
,
)
' . . ,
CITY OF COLLE GE STATION
Pbt1t11i.ng d-lkutflipmmt Strvittt
MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, January 4, 2007
at 7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
...
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols , Harold Strong , Derek
Dictson, Marsha Sanford, Bill Davis, Glenn Schroeder and Dennis Christiansen.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None.
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Ben White.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Jennifer Reeves , Lindsay Boyer , Jason
Schubert, Grant Wencel and Crissy Hartl , Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka, Acting
Director Lance Simms , Planning Administrator Molly Hitchcock , Senior Assistant City
Engineer Alan Gibbs , Graduate Civil Engineers Carol Cotter and Josh Norton ,
Transportation Planner Ken Fogle , Staff Assistant Lisa Li dgren , City Attorney Harvey
Cargill, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson , G duate Civil Engineer Spencer
Thompson , Deputy City Manager Terry Child s and Information Services
Representative Bryan Cook.
1. Call meeting to order.
Chairman Nichols called the meeting
2. Hear Citizens.
No one spoke during the item.
3. Consent Agenda.
3 .1 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Duck Haven Phase
III , consisting of 16 lots on 21.92 acres , located at the southern end of Drake Drive ,
near the intersection of Drake Drive and Wellborn Road in the City's Extra-
Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Case #06-500219 (JP/CC)
3.2 Presentation, possible action , and discus sion on a final plat for Saddl e Creek Phase
1 consisting of 35 lots on 59.552 acres generally located at Stousland Road and
Wade Road , west of FM 2154 in the City 's Extra-territorial Jurisdiction. Case
#06-500267 (CH/JN)
Janu ary 4 , 2007 P&Z Regular M eeting Minutes Page I of 4
)
/
3 .3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion of a Final Plat for Shenandoah Phase
11 consisting of 32 lots on 9.296 acres located at 2051 Barron Road in the general
vicinity of Southern Plantation Drive and Newport Lane. Case #06-500268
(JS/JN)
3 .4 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Phase 2 & 3 of
Meadowcreek Subdivision, consisting of 79 lots on 17 .15 5 acres, generally located
on the south side of Koppe Bridge Road just west of the Wellborn Community in
the City's ETJ. Case #06-500269 (JR/CC)
3.5 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes .
*December 5, 2006, Special Workshop Meeting Minutes
* December 7, 2006, Workshop Meeting Minutes
* December 7, 2006, Regular Meeting Minutes
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Consent Agenda with the
correction to be made to the Decel}iber 7, 2006, Regular Meeting Minutes on
Regular Agenda Item 10 to sh ~ which Commissioner made the motion.
Commissioner Sanford seconde the motion, motion passed (7-0).
Regular Agenda
4 . Consideration, discussi , and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
No items were removed from the Consent Agenda.
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Master Plan for Great Oaks
consisting of 224.5 acres located at Rock Prairie Road West and Great Oaks Drive
in the City's Extra-territorial Jurisdiction. Case #06-500281 (CH)
Crissy Hartl, Staff Planner, presented the Master Plan and stated that it is in
compliance with the City's Subdivision Regulations, Unified Development
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Plat. Commissioner
Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Variance Request to Section 8-J ,
Blocks of the Subdivision Regulations and a presentation, possible action, and
discussion on a Preliminary Plat for Tower Point Subdivision consisting of 23 lots
on 128.28 acres located at 951 William D. Fitch Parkway in the general vicinity of
the northwest comer of the intersection of William D . Fitch Parkway and State
Highway 6. Case #06-500261 (LB/CC)
January 4 , 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4
Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner, presented the Variance Requests and Preliminary
Plat and recommended approval with the condition that staff comments are
addressed .
Commissioner Dictson motioned to approve the Variance Requests.
Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Preliminary Plat with the
condition that staff review comments be addressed. Commissioner Strong
seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action , and discussion on a Rep lat of Lot 19
of the Southwood Section 26 Subdivision consisting of 2 lots on 2 .1 acres located
at 1705 Valley View Drive in the general vicinity of the northwest comer of the
intersection of Texas Avenue and Valley View Drive. Case #06-500264
(LB/GW/CC)
8.
Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner, presented the Replat and stated that it is in
compliance with the City's Subdivision Regulations. Ms. Boyer recommended
approval of the Rep lat.
No one spoke at the public hearing .
Commissioner Dictson motione to approve the Replat. Commissioner
Sanford seconded the motion, otion passed (7-0).
Public hearing, present tio , possible action , and discussion on a Rezoning for
1701 Graham Road , fr M-1 , Light Industrial to C-1 , General Commercial ,
consisting of approximately 7.3 acres , and 1835 Graham Road , from M-1 , Light
Industrial to C-1, General Commercial , consisting of approximately 8.7 acres ,
located south of the intersection of Longmire Drive and Birmingham Drive . Case
#06-500266 (JR/CC)
Jennifer Reeves , Staff Planner, presented the Rezoning stating that it was m
compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and recommended approval.
Michael Countryman , 908 White Wing Lane , College Station, Tex as. Mr.
Countryman stated that he was new to this process and asked general questions
regarding the development.
Commissioner Sanford motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning to
City Council. Commissioner Strong seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given . A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be
given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an
agenda for a subsequent meeting.
January 4, 2 007 P&Z Re gular Meeting M inutes Page 3 of 4
,,. """' No additional items were discussed.
)
l ) -_.,,
10. The Planning & Zoning Commission may convene the executive session following
the regular meeting to discuss matters posted on the executive session agenda for
January 4, 2007 .
No additional action was taken.
11. Final action on executive session, if necessary.
It was not necessary for any final action to be taken.
12. Adjourn
Commissioner Davis motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Christiansen
seconded the motion, motion passed (7-0).
Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
Approved:
Jo~h::
Planning and Zoning Commission
Attest:
Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assist
Planning and Development Services
January 4 , 2007 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes P age 4 of 4
47
1.306 AC.
45
l .4%AC.
' s.ss·ss·11"E\ ''15.00'
51 ',~
1.()6 0£\C ':::-....
N65 '55'47"E --._
100 .00' '
)
55
J,{)97 AC
SC4 "24'49"W r rno_oo· ~TE MPORAR Y
-ACCESS EAS EM ENT
(SE E EXH IB IT A)
\_N85 "35'1 1"1/I/
l15 00'
LN04 "24'49"E fUT U Rf. DEVELOl'\lt:l'\T
SADD L E CRE.EK SUBDIV lSJON
RE:0.-1 01"359 .0i' ACRE TR ,-\CT
100.00'
FUTURE D£VE L OP ~tEl'\T
SADDLE CREEK SUBD IVISION
REM . OF 359 .07 ACRI ~ TRACT
TE M PORARY
ACC ESS EASEMENT
(SE E EXH IBI T B) ,,, D r ive Cree~~-.-~~----;),~ ~ $72 '36'49"W
100.00' ,~------! .-~~---1 1 I c2J -
,,-"'\ l •' ,,,. _,,,. I I ' \I
,,.."' I 1 I I 1
,,./' " , 73 \I I 7-t /' _,/ ~\, l'\1 l .l l h :\C. /,.. BLOCK 2 l ' 1 1.322 /IC. I I
72 l' l I, l
U l :i5 :\C I \ I \
1
1
1
1 l 1 I 111 I \ 11
CURVE T.A.8 L E
CURV E LENGTH RADIU S (!E LT!1 _ .AIJ GE_r·JT _ -~~.!S'.'.'L?._5 HORD BEf..R1 1·,G
c1 03 .2-J ' , e.(10.c ~~-~·.-1:.··=!~:· ···~·:..k . .::.~.' .. __ ,.._.-~_;_-~::.'_ ::;Q ·.-:_~r4 :-~·: _ ,_ ____ .s::. ___ l_ -~~~~~' 1 -:;i:-_~~-·_.L_;:·-~.~ .~:'./' ·1. ('.'· • " I . ;i:··· .: ,i' ·~-. ,'J
SCALE : 1 ""'150'
EXHIBI T C
TEM PORARY ACCESS
EASEMENTS
S/i.DDLE CREE K SUBO l\Jf$10N, PH.ASE 1
BRAZOS COUNTY , TEX AS
OWN:ER/DEYELGP£R;
Soddf.a Oeek ron ~ut, u ii:.
Ud!Q 04nhl.~3 Cr.
CtA t g• "SU1~, h: :'':'r '~
i ?I G) f.fl C,-7l 4 1
PREPARED BY :
1'.l'C;vn.~~ I.1'.*
'"•· , "• I• I : <I , , < ~
""-""-
FU T URE D E V E L O P l\'1 E~T
SA DDLE C REE K SUBDIV ISI O N
RE\'1. OF 359.07 ACRE TRACT
""-sss ~35·1 1 "E
S04 °24'49"W
16 .00'
161 PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT
. (SEE. EXHIBIT A) ',,,:·79'\
""-;(
BLOCK3 )-
51 I
1.060 AC. I
::-" I , ""-I "~""-I "'::-v "-
50 )
1.074 AC. I
N85°35'11 "W
37.79.
I /'.~
FU T U RE DEV ELOPMENT
SADDLE CR EEK SUBOlVl SIO
R E!vl. OF 359.07 ACR E TRACT
I
I
I
I ~~
1
1 BLOCK4 ',,
; 53 ""-
I
..J
( 1.099 AC. ~ ""'
SCALE: 1"=60'
EXHIBIT B
PUBUC UTILITY
EASEMENT
SAD DLE CREEK S UB DIVISION, PKASE 1
BRAZ OS COUNTY, f <C)(AS
PREPAR£:0 SY :
OWN ER /OEVHO PER: ? CJ\?l, .IJr.vno, >. ..PMENT:, , • , Lu._ 'R'
Sodd I• Craek Porl n ars. Li d .
..,_.,O i t r.l ..,ood Dr . :· ·1 • , ''•'"I · •I •, •· •
(ulle~ti '.H !l llnn . 11C )'~~,r., L • •• ~
19'9) r.-:.~1 •. ~< n
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SADDLECREEK PH 1 06-267
FINAL[ij
PLAT
1 ~1 =='*-=-=~==~====D=E=V=EL=O=P=M=E=N=T=R=E=Vl=E=W~a:.=.======SA=D=D=L=E=C=R=EE=K=P=H==1======~====06=-=26=7==============~~
THE STATE OF TEXAS §
TE!\'IPORARY
ACCESS EASEMENT S
i=e: Ir;· ~:;:.:o;c r;.
b.AZJS CKriTi
!l:; a
~:=.:ore_£~
COUNTY OF BRAZOS § ~~:e1P~ L~G~~ 313719
!.\t;1
KNOW ALL JHEN BY THE.SE PRESENTS: .. :.11 Greer.
That, S add le Creek Pa r tners, Ltd. (Gran t o r ) of the County of Brazos, Stale of Texas, have granted,
ba rga in ed, and conveyed, an d by these presents, do grant, bargain, and convey unto tbe Grantee., the owners
or holders of any po rtion of the Tnitial Proper'y as des rr ibed in • addle Creek Subdivision, Phase l,
90. 757 aci·cs reC{)tde-d a t Vo[ume 758 ~, Page 120, Officia ecords of Brazos Cou n ty, Texas ,. ils successors
an d assigns, Temporary Access Easements fo r th e purpo -of provi ding access on and across a certai.n tr-act of
lan d as more particularly desc rib ed on Exhibit C. situated n Brazos County . Texas, and described as follov ... ·s:
0.264 ACRE TE:\'IPO Y ACCESS EASEMl:NT
JAMES C . STUTEVI LE LEAGUE, A-.:?16
BR.\Z.OS CO
AND
0.20 1 ACRE TEM.POR.\.RY ACCESS E.ASE ME:"IT
JAl\U:S C. STUTEVILLE LE.AGLE, A-216
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
Said Temporary Access Easements being more particularly desc.ribed by the Metes and Bounds
Description attached hereto and incorporated herei n by reference Exhi bits A & B.
His specifically understo od that the Public shall be granted free ingress , egress and regress to and from
sai d s trip of lan d for the purpose of access. as shall be necessary and convenient at all times.
Upon the filing of a Final. Plat in the Official Records of Brazos County for the land up o n w hi ch either
oflhese Temporary Access Easements are loca ted, tlien s aid easement(s) shall be rele ased.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD , for the purposes aforesaid, the prem ises abo\'c described.
WITNESS (n1y) (ou r) hand(s ) at Co ll ege Station , T exas , this &_ day of ~t?C/ I ,20 0 7 .
. • f1 mc : :\!.I.. Schehin. f\·f :rnaging Partner
Sa ddle Creek P a11n crs. Ltd.
T HE ST A TE OF TE . AS
C OL 1\'TY OF BRAZOS
BEFORE ME, the undersigned autho ri ty, a Notary Public in and for Brazos County, Texas on this day
persona ll y appeared l\·f. L. Schehin, l\1a11 ag i ng Partner,. Sa ddl e Creek P a r tne r , ltd . known to me to be the
person whose narne is su bscribed to the fo regoing [nstrnmcn t, and acknowledged to me tha t (he), (s he)
executed the same fo r the pur poses and consideration therein expressed.
GIVEN UNDE R MY HAN D AND SEAL OF OFFICE , this ~y of~ .2on.
DAWN L. HOVE R
MY COMMISS ION EXPIRES
May 17, 2010
COUNTY, TEXAS
4-k~5
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
F L i:a or .\ECIJ?"'
(.RAZOS .::ouri t
APr 16r200l (\t
As a
~'.ecord!!J32
Cuct.;tient Nu~lier: .W .. 1'; ?4..,
KNOW ALL MEN BY T HESE PRESENTS, rhat Saddle Creek Partners Ltd. (h.crcinut'ter
CEii led "Grantors), in consideration of one dollar ($1 .00) and other good an{h0J-H1ab le cons ideratiml p5li:i
by \\. ELlBOR SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT (hereinafter called "Gr .p.t~eJr. ti eDe re e i1~~7 f , d
sufficicm:y of which is hereby acknowlcdgi.:r.I. r.loc:s hereby 6'Tan t. barguin , se ll. tnmster nd convey to
said Gran ti.:c. its successors. and as igns. a pcq)(:tual easement wilh the righ t o -1 ~ 'tP 'onstruct, in s tall
and lay and thereafter use. operate. inspect. repuir. maintain. replace. and remow water distribution lines
and appunename, O\'er and aero .. 90.757 :Jere. or land. more particul ar ly de . cribed in trumet\t recordcJ
in Vol. 7 581 , Page 120, D eed Re ·ords, l3rn zos Coun ty. T exas. together \\ilh the right of inr:.rress and
egress over Granters adjacent lands for the purpose for which the abo\·e ment ioned right~ are granted.
The easement hereby granted s hall b · 16 feet in width as hown and described on Exhibils "A'' and "13".
Tl1e consideration recited here in s hall constitute payment in foll for all damuges sustained by
Grantors by reason of the in!;tallation o f ihe structures refem~d to herein an d the Grantee will maintElin
such easement in a state of good repair and cftir:icncy so that no unr easonable duma!!es will resu lt from its
u se to Gnintors' premises. This Agreement together 'vith other prmisions of this grant shall constitute a
covenant runnin g with the land for the bern;lit of the Grantee. its successors. and assigns. /;~/
IN WfTNESS WEREOF the said Grnntors haYc executed tl11s instrumrnl thi s ____f_g_ day of
/~#£( '; 1 20~ I ,
STA TE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF BRAZOS
BEFORE !'.·IE, the undersigned, a Notary Publlc in and for said County and State on this day personall y
appeared ~1.L Schehi n known ro me to be ihe person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing
in strument. and acknowledged lo me thal he c:.xe utec.l the same fo r the purpo ses and considerat ion therein
~~~-/~
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OfFICEfrrns I~ day of.+-f~~~:::So_ __
20./!..2_. '''''!/11,,,, I ~~--.. DAWN L HOVER
ft.~/J MY COM MIS SION EXPIRES ~~_;; .... ,~~, May 17, 2010 ,,,,,?f.,,,'<..''
'··-. -··-.... --··· ................. ---·----..
c;XH\~l.T A
C & C Surveying? Inc.
7424 !<M. 1488, Suite A
Magnolia., Texas 77354
Office: 281-259-4377 Mctro; 281 -356-5172 Metro Fax.: 28 1-356-1935
Metes and Bounds
0.26 it A cre T emporary Acc~s Easement
Jam ~s Stuteville Lesgue, A-216
Bu:•.os County, Te:xa.s
Beim~ a 0 .264 acre tract of land situaled in the James C. Stuteville League, AbscracJ Nwtib er
216, in B,.azas County, Texas, and being QrLl of and a part of a called 359.0 7 acre tract described
in a . reed recorded in Volum e 7427, Page 198. of the Official Public Rec:ords of Br(IZos C..ounty ,
Texa. :; s aid G.2M acre being moro particularly descn"bed as foflcws with al f b earings based 011
the n-corded dee.d;
CO!i.IMENCING at a i/2 inch. iron rod, foun d for the Northwest oorner of a cal.led 12.9075 acre
tract descri b ed ~n a deed rccon:lcd in Volume 7427, Pa ge 210, of said Official Public Reco rds,
same being in the &st right-of·way line of Stousla.nd width varie s, and proceeding:
TIIlt fCB along the N orth line of lho l.2.9075 acre ct and the North Ifne of the 359.07 acre
tract, the following bearings and distances:
N 60°33'05" E, a distance or 125.00 feet. o a 5/8 inch iron rod;
S 29°19'17" E, a distance of70.00 feet, a 518 in.ch irun rod;
N 60°33'05~ E. a distance of 302.39 fi l, to a 5/8 inc h iron rnd;
S 4 7°16'25" E, a distance o f729.43 et, to a S/8 inch iron rod ; and
S 84°18'22" E, a d istance 521.l eet, to a point;
THENCE severing th~ 359.07 acre c the fo llowing calls:
S 14°01 '42" W, a distanoe of326S& feet;
around a curve to the left,. with a central angle of 14°10'5 5", a radi us of235 .00 foe t, a n
a.re lc:igth of 58. I 7 feet. and a. chord which beaJs S 48°56'06P. W, 58.02 feet;
S 51"54'1JH E , adistanceof70.21 feet;
arouud a curve to the left, \\-'ith a central angle of 85°31 '34", a ra dius o f 25 .16 feet, an arc
lengft of37.56. feet, and a chord which bears S 04°04'42" E. 34. l 7 feet;
along a curve to the right, with a central angle of !3°59'3 3", a radius of8SO.OO feet , an
arc kr gth of207.58 feet, and a chord which bears S 39QS 9'26;. E, 207.07 fee t;
S 32°59'40" E, a di~rance of94.7l feet;
N 5 7°00'20" E, a distance of8l .56 foc:t;
S 87°22'15" E , a distance ·of 465.32 feet;
S 02"37'45~ W, a.distance of 50.00 feet ;
S 07°48'43 " W , a distmce of 166. to fe et;
S 28"06'31 NW, a dfstBnoe of 134.88 feet ;
S 61°53 '29 '" E, a d~"'tlnce of54.49 feet;
S 83" 18'19" E, a distance of 124.92 fee t;
N 48"1 6'47~ 13, a distance of 119.85 fee t;
N 4 7°2 1 '34" E, a dist.ance .of 125 .09 foet ;
N 59°57'43" E. a distance of 74. 34 feet;
S 75°51. '3 9" E, a distance of 112.41 feet;
N 76 °57 '53" E, a dis!apcc of78.59 feet ;
$ 82"05'30," E, a distance o f185 .1 l feet;
N 70°50'32" E, a distance of95 .0l feet;.
S 29°47~5 '' E, a distance of98.59 feet;
S 88"56'35" E, a distance of290.50 feet; and
S 78°53'45" E" a distance of145.99 foe~ to a point;
Tiff. NCE S 04°24'49~ W, a distanccof295.01 feet, continuing to sever the 359.07 acre tract. to
a po i lt for the Northwest comer and POINT OF BEGINNING of the het-e1n described tract;
THE'lCE S 85°35'1 l" E. a distao.cc of 115 .00 feet, continuing to sever !he 359 .07 acre tract, to a
poin1 for the Northeast corner -0fthe herein described tract;
THE'lfCE S 04"24'49" W, a distance of 100.00 feet, continuing to sever the 359.07 acre tract, to
a po1 :1t for the Southeast corner of the herein desc.ribed tract;
THE~JCE, N 85°35'1 l '' W, a distance Gf l 15 .00 feet, continuing to sever the 359.07 acre tract. to
a poi:·Lt for the Southwest corner ofl:he berelli described tract;
THENCE N 04"24'49" E, a distance of 100.00 feet, continuing. tu sever the 359.07 acre tract,
back '.o the POINT OF BEGINNING and containi.ng 0.264 acre of land.
~p~~~,f~•io~landS
06-0M• ;>!T:silef.u::me:t>tl
OJ/lli{t:
2
-·-------..... ----------··-·-··· ................ -·· .. ··~ .. -.... --· --··· ......... --······· _ ........... .
EXHtBl\ "".B
C & C Surveying, Inc.
74:24 F.M. 14 88, Suite A
Magnolia, Tell$ 77354
Office : 2&\-259-4377 Metto: 281-3:56-5172 Metro Fax: 281-356-193·5
Metes and Bounds
0.2(11 Acre Temporary Access Easement
Jam es Stuteville League., A-llei
Bnt:ros County~ Texas
!Jein:r a ().201 acre tract of land si.tuated in the James C Stuteville [.eLlgue, Abstract Number
116, in Brazos CoW'lty. Te~as, and being ou:l of and a part of a called 359.07 acre tract descn'bed
in a deed recorrkd in Volume 7427, Page 198, tJf the Official Public Records of Brazos County.
Teg;s; said 0.201 ac.re being more parlir;ularly dt!,S<:ribfxl as folloW$ 'Wi.th all bearings based on
the r .~rded deed;
COidMENCING at a 112 inch iron rod, found for the N west corner o f a called 12.9075 acre
tract descri bed in a deed recorded m VoJumc 7427, Page I 0, of said Official Public Records,
sam« being in the East iight-0f-way line ofStousland R ~ width varies, and proceeding:
THE:\TCE along the North Line of the 12.9075 acre ct and the North line of the 359.07 a.ere
lract the fol lowing bearings and distances:
N 60°33'05" E, a distance ofl2SM tec a 5/& inch irQD rod;
S 29e>l 9'17" E, a distance of 70.00 fe . to a 5/8 inch iron rod;
N 60°33'05" E , a distance of 30 .39 t, to a 5/8 inch inm ro<l;
S 47e>l6'25'' E, a distanc e of 729. eet, w a SJ8 in.ch iron rod; and
S 84°18'22fl E, a distance of 521. feet, to a point;
THE :lfCE severing the 359.07 ~tract, the following calls:
S 14°01 '42" W, a dis.lance of326.58 foet;
arciunda curve to the left, with a central angle of 14°10'55\ a radii.is of 235 .0{) feet, an
arc lrn gth of58.17 fci;:t, <Ind a chord ~"tllch beat:S S 48°56'0611 W, 58 .02 feet;
S 51"54'13 " E,, a distmceof70.21 feet;
around a curve to the left, with a central angle of85°31 '34", a radius of25.I6 feet, an arc
len gt'ii ofJ7.56 feet, and a chord which bears S 04-"04'42" E, 34.17 fee~
along a curve to the right, with a.central angle of13°59'33 ", a radius of850.00 feet, a:n
arc Jn gth of207.58 feet, and a chord which bean; S 39°59'26" E. 207.07 feet;
S 32°59'40" E, a disumce of94.7 1 feet;
N 57°00'20" E, a d istance of81.56 feet;
S 87°22'15" E, a distance of465.32 fee~
S 02"3 7'45" W, a distance of 5{).00 feet ;
S 07"48'43M W, a distance of 166.10 feet;
S 28"06'31" W, a distance of 134 .88 feet;
S 61"S3 '29" E, a distance of 54 .49 feel;
S 83"18.'19* E, a distance of 124.92 feet;
N 48°16'47'' E,, a .distance of 119.85 feet;
N 47.,21 '34. E, a distance of 12 5.09 feet;
N 59°57'43" E , a distmce of74.34 foc:t;
S 75°51'39" E. a distance of 112.41 feet;
N 76°57'53" E, a d istmlce of78.59 feet;
S 82°05'30" E, a disbmce of l85 . l 1 feet;
-----------
N 70.:.50•32R E, a distance of95.0 l feet;
S 2.9°4 7'0Y E, a distance .of 98.59 feet;
S 88°56'35" E-, a distance of290.50 feet; a:nd
s w>53•45u E, a distance of l 45.99 feet. to a point;
THENCE continuing, to sever the 359.07 acre tract, th e following bearings and distances:
S 04°24'49" W, a distance of380.00 feet;
N 85°35'l 1" W , a distance of72.50 feet;
S 04°24'49" W, a distance of 175.00 feet; and
S 00°1 S140u W, a distance of 149.00 feet, to a point;
TiffNCE continuing to sever the 359.07 acre tract, the following call s:
S &1°00'43" W, a distam:c: ofi5.53 feet:;
N8l 0 02'37" W, a distanceof218.00 feet;
S .S0°23'21" W, a distance of 154.27 feet; and
S 72°02'45" W, a distance of206.91 feet, to a point;
THE-~CE 0C1nti11uing to sever the 359.07 acre tract, und a curve to the left, having a central
angk of2°0&'281\ a radius of 800.00 feet, an arc l gth of29.S.9 fee t, and a chord which bears
N 16,18'58" W, 29.89 feet,. to a point for the Sou east comer and PO!N'I OF BEGINNING of
the ~=rein described tract;
THE:'<lCE S 72°36'48" W, a distance of I
a. poi 11t for the South-.vest ,comer of the h
.00 feet, continuing IQ sever the 359.07 acre tract, to
m described tract;
TI{ENCE continuing to sever · ic 359 7 acre tract, around a curve lo the left, having a central
angle : of 6 °4 1 '02". a radius of 70 .0 eet, an arc Len gth of 81.66 feet, and a chord which bears
N 20''43'43" W, B 1.61 feet. to a -· for the Northwest comer of the herein described tract;
1HE '.~CE N 65°S5i4r E. a distance o( 100.00 feet, e<;1ntimring tc> sever the 359 .. 07 acre tract, to
a pob t for the Nartheast comer of the herein described tract;
TIIE.:'.~CE continuing to sever the 359.07 acre tract, around a curve lo the right, having a central
afigkof6°41'02·, a radius of800.00 feet, en are length of9J .32 feet,. and a chord which bears
S 20::~3 '43" E, 93.27 feet, back to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.20 I acre of
land.
2
... ·-------~-......... ,. -·. -·---· ...................... -. -··-·-. ---.... "'~''"'. ·---·-----~-·-·--...... -.--
~X\-\\Y>\\ A
C & C Surveying, Inc.
7424 F .M. 14&8, S\lile A
Ma.gnnfi.'11, TCXlUI 773 54
Office : 28 l-2594317 Mi::tiv : 2!!1-356-5172 Metro Fax: 281 -356-1935
Metes and Bounds
0.01-l Acre Pu b lic Utility Easement
Jam HS Stuteville LeJtgue. A-216
Brans Con.nty, Te:t.1ui
Br;;in g a 0. 014 acre tract of land situated in the JamrI:.s C. Stuteville League, Abs tract Nwnber
116, ,·n Brazos County, Texas ; and being OUI of and a po.rJ of a called 359. 0 7 acre tract described
in a ci'ed re.oord?d i:JT. Vol1Lme 1427, Page 198, of the 0.ffidal Public &:cords o[Br(lZas Cuunty.
Te.ra.1; sai.d 0. 014 acre befng more particularly described <JS follows with all bearings based on
the r1:cordM deed;
COMMENCING at a 1/2 inch iron rod, found for the Northwest comer of a called 12. 9075 acre
tract ,lescribed in a deed recorded in Volume 7427, Page 210, of said Official Public Records,
sarm: [)eing in the Ea.st right-of-way line of Stoosland Road, width vane , and proceeding:
THENCE along rhc North 1. ioe of. !be.12 .9075 acre tr.act <11J*North .l inc of the 359.01 acre
tract, he following bearings and distances :
N 60°33'05" E, a distance of 1.25 .00 feet, to a. SIB i h iron. rod;
S 29°19'l 7" E, a di$bi.n<:c ttf70.00 feet, to a 5/8 i h iron rod;
N 60°33'05" E, a distance of 302"39 feet, ton 51 inch iron rod~
S 47°1612511 E, a: distance of729.43 feet, to a 8 inch iron rod; and
S 84°18'22" E, a distance of 521.10 feet, to potnt;
THENCE SC\'ering t11c 359-07 anre tract, the t wing calls:
S 14"01 '42" W, a djstance of326.58 ~t;
around a cw:ve to .the left, v.-ith a central angle of 14°10'55'", a radius of235 _0 0 feet. an
arc length of 58.17 feet, a.nd a chord which bears S 48°56'06" W , 58 .02 feet;
S 51°54;13" E. a distance-0f70.2I feet;
around a curve to the left, with a central anglc of 85°3134'", a radius of 2.5 . 16 feet, an arc
length 007.56 feet, and a chord which bears S 04°04'42'1 E, J4. l7 feet;
along 11 curve to the right with a central imgle of 13"'59'33", a radius of 850.00 feet, an
arc len .~ of 207_58 feet, and ac;hord which bean> S 39"59'26" E, 207.07 feet';
S 32'>59•40• E, ti distance of94.7l feet;
N 57°00'20" E, a distance of 81.56 feet;
S 87°22'15" E, a distance of 465.32 feet;
S 021)37'45" W. a distance of 50.00 feet;
S 07°48'43" W, a distance of i66. l0· feet;
S 28°06'3 l " W, a distance of l 34.88 feet;
S 61°53'29" E, a distance of 54A9 feet;
S 83°18'19 " E, a distance:. of l24_!}Z f~t;
N 4 go l 6'4 7" .E, a distance of 119. &5 feet;
N 47°21 '34" E. a dislM<.'.C of125.09 feet;
N 59'°57'4 3" E. a distance of74.34 feet;
S 75°51'39" E, a dfatance of 112.41 feet;
N 76°57'53" E, a distance of 78.59 fee~
S 82°05'30" E, a distance of 185.1 l feet ;
.N '70°50'32'' E. a distance of95.0l feet;
S 29°47'05" E, a disWice of98.59 feet;
S S8"56'35" E. a distll1l.cc of290.50 feet ; and
s 78°53'45'1 E, a distance or 145 .99 feet, to li point;
TIIE ~CE S 04°"24'49 M W, a distance of294.00 feet, continuing to sevCT the 359 .07 acre ttact, to
a poht for the Northwest comer and POINr OF BEGINNlNG of the hercin deseribed trnc1 ;
lHE~-l'CE S 85°35'11" E. a distance of 37.79 feet. continuing to sever the 359.07 acre tract, to a
point for the Northeast comc:t" of the herein described tract;
THE'~CE S 04"24'49" W , a distance of 16.00 feet, continuing to sever the 159.07 aere tract, to a
point for t1ic So.uthe:lst comer of the herein described tract;
THENCE N 85°35'1 [fl W, a distance of37.79 f~r, oontim,ring to sever the 359.07 ac re tra.ct, to a
point ·~or the Southwest comer of the herein described tract;
Tlia.CE N 04~4'49" E, adisc:ainceof 16 .0-0 feet. continuing to se\'etthe 359 .07 acre trac, back
to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0 .014 acre of land.
G:,~~~~~~fess;~ l=dS
06-084.c ~ .U.E.
0312'.lm
-·-
2
--·
eyor, Number4141
--~----
Water System Report
for
Saddle Creek Subdivision
College Station, Texas
November 2006
Prepared By:
Civil Development , Ltd.
2900 Longmire Drive , Suite K
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-7743
u/-;,_o/o°Jf
General Information
locatio n :
Genera l Not e:
l and Use:
Design Criteria
Saddle Creek Subdivision is located in so uthern Brazos County, near the
intersection of Wade Road and Stousland Road .
There are 35 lots in the subdivision.
Single Family Resid ential
WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Primary Wat er Supply: Existing 12" line along Stousland Road operated by Wellborn SUD.
Domestic D emand:
Avg. Pop D ensity:
Average Flow:
Peaking Factor:
Pea k Flow:
Design Flow:
Fire Demand:
Fire Flo w:
Pipe:
Roughness Coejf:
Hydra ulic Software:
2.67 people per lot
100 gpd/cap or 267 gpd per lot = 0.18 gpm per lot
4
0 .74 gpm per lot
1.50 gpm per lot
1000 gpm at most hydraulically remote point
PVC DR-14 C909
150 (Hazen Williams)
Haestad Methods WaterCAD v.6 .0
Ex isting System Press ure Tests
Flow Hydra nt: Fire Hydrant on Stousland Road, south of Wacle Road .
Flowrate: 1300 gpm /
Guage location : 5401 Stousland Road (hose bib on side of ouse)
Static Pressure: 78 psi (180 ft water)
Residual Pressure: 75 psi (173 ft water)
Applicable Exhibits : Exhibit B -Flow Test Repo
Water System Analysis Summarv
Crit eria Required As Loc ation Designed
Min . Pressure -fire (psi) 20 75.56 SC 101 *
Max. Velocity (fps) 12 2 .93 PlO l
Max. Length of 6 " pipe (ft)
(connected to 2: 8 "o n both 1500 NA
e nds)
Max L ength of 6" pipe (ft) 800 NA (not co nnected on both ends)
Max. Length of 3 "pipe (ft) 500 270
Note: The lowest water pressure occurred at SCJO J. Th e nearest fire hydrant to
that point is at SC I FH 1. That is th e lo cation where a 1000 gpm fire demand was
added for modeling purposes.
Applicable Exhibits : Exhibit A -Water System Sc he matic
C onclusion
Exhibit C -Sununary of Results -Domesti c Flow
Exhibit D -Summary of Results -Fire Flow
The proposed water system for Saddle Creek Subdivision meets or exceeds all of
the design criteria for the City of Co ll ege Station. It will provide adeq uate water
pressure and flow for both domestic and fire demands.
Exhibit D
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Water System Analysis -Junction Summary
Fire Flow Conditions
-~--;,-e~:t:n--:-Demand ---H~~adu~!Z-1--Pr::~~;e ---
-------f ---(t!i-I -T9Pn1l -------(ft)---1---iPsil __ _
SC1 FH1 284 1,003.0 459.72 76 .03
SC1 FH2 276 0 .0 459 .72 79.49
SC1 FH3
SC1 FH4
SC1FH5
SC101
SC102
SC103
SC104
SC105
273 6.0
273 0.0
282 0.0
286 0.0
275 7.5
274 9.0
273 4 .5
275 4.5
459 .72 80 .78
459 .72 80 .78
459 .72 76.89
460.65 75.56
459 .72 79 .92
459.65 80 .32
459 .72 80 .78
459 .72 79.92
Lowest Pressure = 75.56
Label
P101
P102
P10 3
P104
P105
P106
P107
P108
P109
Exhibit E
Saddle Creek Subdivis ion
Water System Analys is -Pipe Summary
Fire Flow Conditions
--------Material Williams C ---l --------
(ft) (in) I (gpm) (fVs)
446 12 PVC 150 -1,034 .50 2.93
898 12 PVC 150 -31 .50 0 .09
103 12 PVC 150 -31 .50 0 .09
264 3 PVC 150 9 .00 0.41
610 12 PVC 150 15 .00 0 .04
796 12 PVC 150 -9 .00 0 .03
23 8 PVC 150 0 .00 0 .00
994 8 PVC 150 0.00
I
0 .00
634 12 PVC 150 -4 .50 0 .01
Highest Velocity 2.9 3
EXHIBIT
A
SADDLE CREEK, PHASE 1
WATER SYS T EM SCHEMATI C
I
* Gvn. DEvnoPMENT. Lu.*
n q owM.!!"•''1 • ''f'""'"'11.n..i·.,,. f"'
;><l()h t onqw "' n ••. , .. Sv•I•· K
1 , 11··'1· ~;r ''" r •• "'"' 1;-11-1'i ...
I I I II• • 1 1 '· • I • I'··•.• ' lo1I• o't [ •. ._1', ~ ~ i•I.
• ' '• • r ~ .-,.1 -; : ·I I ,. " ~ · • ~ ( ,.: ; -; r,.,
3 00
0 w
t-
(/) w
t-
15 0 0
SC AL [ I ~.J ~-E E T
300
Exhibit B
Water System Flow Test Report
Date: November 16, 2006
Water System Owner: Wellborn Special Utility District
Development Project: Saddle Creek Subdivision
Flow Test Location : Fire Hydrant @ 5401 Stousland
Nozzle size (in .): 2.5 Discharge Coef: (c): 0.9 ----
Pitot Reading (ps i): 60 2 1/2 Flowrate formula : Q =29 .84cd p
c =discharge coef.
d =orifi ce size (in)
p = pitot pressure (psi)
Flo wrate (gp m): 1300 computed
~~~~~~~~
Pressure G ua ge Location : Hose Bib on House at 5401 Straub
Static (psi): 78
Residual (ps i): 75
Report prepared by:
Kent Laza
printed nam e
Others present: Steven Cast
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Label
SC1 FH1
SC1 FH2
SC1 FH3
SC1 FH4
SC1 FH5
SC101
SC102
SC103
SC104
SC105
Exhibit C
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Water System Analysis
Static Flow Conditions
,,_ ~v ~tion
(ft)
284
276
273
273
282
286
275
274
273
275
Dema nd
-
(gpm)
3
0
6
0
0
0
7.5
9
4 .5
4 .5
·-------·1---Hydraulic P
Grade ressure
·--------·---
(ft) (psi)
466.00 78.74
465.99 82.20
465 .99 83 .50
465 .99 83 .50
465 .99 79 .60
466.00 77.88
465 .99 82 .63
465 .92 83 .04
465 .99 83 .50
465 .99 82 .63
Lowest Pressure in Ph 2 & 3 = 77 .88
Note : The lowest pressures shown above represent the most hydraulically remote
location in the Ph 1 system . The nearest fire hydrant is SC1 FH1. This is the
location where a 1000 gpm fire demand is placed for model ing purposes .
Exhibit D
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Water System Analysis -Junction Summary
Fire Flow Conditions
·-------
Label Elevation Demand Hydraul ic Pressure Grade -
(ft) (gpm) (ft) (psi)
SC1 FH1 284 1,003 .0 459 .72 76 .03
SC1 FH2 276 0 .0 459 .72 79.49
SC1 FH3 273 6 .0 459 .72 80 .78
SC1 FH4 273 0 .0 459 .72 80 .78
SC1 FH5 282 0 .0 459 .72 76.89
SC101 286 0 .0 460.65 7 5.56
SC 10 2 275 7 .5 459.72 79 .92
SC103 274 9 .0 459.65 80 .32
SC104 273 4 .5 459 .72 80 .78
SC105 275 4 .5 459 .72 79 .92
Lowest Pressure = 75 .56
Labe l
P10 1
P10 2
P10 3
P10 4
P10 5
P10 6
P10 7
P108
P10 9
Exhibit E
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Water System Analysis -Pipe Summary
Fire Flow Conditions
446 12 PV C 150 -1,034 .50 2.93
898 12 PVC 150 -31 .50 0 .09
10 3 12 PVC 150 -31 .50 0 .09
264 3 PVC 150 9 .00 0.41
6 10 12 PV C 150 15 .00 0 .04
796 12 PV C 150 -9.00 0 .03
2 3 8 PV C 150 0 .00 0 .00
994 8 PVC 150 0 .00 0.00
634 12 PVC 150 -4.50 0 .01
Highest Velocity = 2 .93
Water System Report
for
Saddle Creek Subdivision
College Station, Texas
November 2006
Prepared By:
Civil Development, Ltd.
2900 Longmire Drive , Suite K
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-7743
11/Ao/o'Jf
Genera l Information
Location:
General Not e:
Land Use:
Design Criteria
Saddle Creek Subdivision is located in so uth e rn Brazos Co unty , near th e
inte rsection of Wad e Ro ad and Stousland Road .
There are 35 lots in th e subdivision .
Single Family Re s identi a l
WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Primary Wat er Supply: Existing 12 " line along Stousland Road operated by Wellbo rn SUD .
D omes tic D emand:
Avg. Pop D ensity:
Average Flow :
P eaking Factor:
P ea k Flo w:
D es ign Flow :
Fire D emand:
Fire Flo w:
Pip e:
R oughness Coeff:
Hydraulic S oftware:
2.67 people per lot
100 gpd/cap or 267 gpd p er lot = 0.18 gpm per lot
4
0 .74 gpm per lot
1.50 gpm per lot
1000 gpm at most hydraulically remote point
PVC DR-14 C909
150 (Hazen Williams)
Haestad Method s Wate rCAD v.6 .0
Existing System Press ure Tests
Flow Hydrant : Fire Hydrant on Stousland Road , south of Wade Road .
Flowrate: 1300 gpm
Guage Location: 5401 Stousland Road (hose bib on side of house)
Static Pressure: 78 psi (180 ft water)
Residual Pressu re: 75 psi (173 ft water)
Applicable Exhibits: Exhibit B -Flow Test Report
Water System Ana lysis Summary
Criteria Re quired As Locatio n Desi n ed
Min. Press ure -fire (psi) 20 75.56 SClOl *
Max. Ve lo c ity (fps) 12 2.93 PlOl
Max. Length of 6" pipe (ft)
(connected to 2'._ 8 "on both 1500 NA
e nds)
Max L ength of 6 "pipe (ft) 800 NA (not connected on both ends)
Max. Len gth of 3 "pip e (ft) 500 270
Note: Th e lowes t water pressure occurred at SC 101 . The nearest fire hy drant to
that point is at SCI FHJ. That is the lo ca tion w h ere a 1000 gpmfire demand was
added for modeling purposes.
Appli cable Exhibits: Exhibit A -Water System Schematic
Concl us ion
Exhibit C -Summary of Res u lts -Domestic Flow
Exhibit D -Summary of Resu lts -Fire Flow
The proposed water system for Saddle Creek Subdivision mee ts or exceeds all of
th e design criteria for the City of Co llege Stati n . It will provide adeq uate water
pressure and flow for both domestic and fire d iands .
EXHIBIT
A
SADDLE CREEK , PHASE 1
WA TE R SYS TEM SC HEMATI C
I
* CMI.DnrnOPMENT. Lu..* e r.it ENGfll([Cl.IOI() J. OE~IGN.f!IUU)Sf:CI.\•:~~
2900 l.nnyrn 1n• Dn\1> Su•1i• K
COUP<jf'! S !ill ll"f'l. l r.•!'I.<. i7!~1')
P 0 ll o .. 1 1 !12~. (;nll••o"' S l:il "°J'' J , .• ,,,., ··,..1 .
1 Ct79176<1 ·77~] f ·,_. 1!1T'.117r;,: i;"i';•
.... -···------------. ---------------------·----
150 0 30 0
SCALE I N FEET
Exhibit B
Water System Flow Test Report
Date: November 16, 2006
Water System Owner: Wellborn Special Utility District
Development Project: Saddle Creek Subdivision
Flow Test Location: Fire Hydrant @ 5401 Stousland
Nozzle size (in .): 2.5
Pitot Reading (psi): 60
Flowrate (gpm): 1300 computed
-~~~~~~~
Discharge Coef: (c): 0.9 ----
Flowrate formula: Q =29 .84cd2p 112
c =discharge coef.
d =orifice size (in)
p = pitot press re (psi)
Pressure Guage Location : Hose Bib on House at 5401 Straub
Static (psi): 78
Residual (psi): 75
Report prepared by:
Kent Laza
printed name
Others present: Steven Cast
-----------~
Exhibit C
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Water System Analysis
Static Flow Cond itions
f-El•;::loo
...
Label Demand Hydraulic Pressure Grade ----· ------------~-------
(gpm) (ft) (psi)
SC1 FH 1 I 284 3 466 .00 78 .74
SC1 FH2 276 0 465 .99 82.20
SC1 FH3 273 6 465 .99 83.50
SC1 FH4 273 0 465.99 83 .50
SC1 FH5 282 0 465 .99 79 .60
SC101 286 0 466 .00 77 .88
SC102 275 7 .5 465 .99 82 .63
SC103 274 9 465 .92 83 .04
SC104 273 4 .5 465 .99 83.50
SC105 275 4 .5 465 .99 82 .63
Lowest Press ure in Ph 2 & 3 = 77.88
Note : The lo w est pressures shown abo ve represen t the mo st hydra uli cally remote
locatio n in the Ph 1 system . The nearest fire hydran t is SC1 FH 1. Th is is the
loca tion wh ere a 10 00 gpm fire deman d is placed for modeling purposes .
Drainage R eport
for
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Phase 1
Brazos County, Texas
D ecemb er 2 00 6
D evelo p e r:
Saddl e Creek Partners , Ltd.
4440 B en twoo d Dri v e
Colle ge Station, T ex as 778 4 5
(979) 6 90 -264 2
P repare d B y:
Civil D eve lopment, Ltd.
2900 Longmi re Drive, Sui te K
Col leg e Station , Texas 77 845
(97 9) 764 -77 4 3
Drainage Report
for
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Phase 1
Brazos County, Texas
December 2006
Developer:
Saddle Creek Partners , Ltd.
4440 Bentwood Drive
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 690-2642
Prepared By:
Civil Development, Ltd.
2900 Longmire Drive , Suite K
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-7743
DRAINAGE REPORT
SADDLE CREEK SUBDIVISION -PHASE 1
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to give the design information of the proposed culverts and
drainage channels for the Saddle Creek Subdivision, Phase 1.
GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The project consists of approximately 60 acres of a 3 76 acre tract located south of Wellborn
on FM 2154 adjacent to the Duck Haven Subdivision in Brazos County, Texas. The site
currently is pastureland with some scattered trees and wooded areas. The existing ground
elevations range from Elevation 260 to Elevation 294. The general location of the project
site is shown on the vici nity map in Exhibi t A.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
The runo ff from the project site drains into Boggy Creek and its tributaries, and then
ultimately into the Brazos River. The site is not located in a Special Flood Hazard Area
according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map prepared by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency for Brazos County, Texas and incorporated areas dated July 2, 1992 ,
panel numb ers 48041 C0200-C and 48041C02l5-C.
DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE PATTERNS
The storm water runoff from the site flows in a southerly direction where it flows into
Boggy Creek and its tributaries, through the abandoned railroad right-of-way, and then onto
the adjacent property.
DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
The design parameters for the culverts and drainage channels are as follows:
• The Rational Method is utiliz ed to detennine peak stonn water runoff rates for the both
Culvert Nos. l & 2 and Drainage Channel No . l designs, which all have drainage basins
less than 50 acres in size. The HEC-l computer program is utilized to determine peak
storm water runoff rates for drainage basins greater than 50 acres in size; therefore, this
method is used for th e d esign of Culvert No. 3 .
• Design Stom1 Frequency
Culvert & Drainage Channel 25-and l 00-year stonn events
• Runoff Coefficients (Refer to Appendix A for Weight ed C Ca lcul ations)
Woods C = 0 .30
Grass & pastureland C = 0.40
Residential Lots (I acre minimum) C = 0.50
Farmstead C = 0 .65
Imp ervio us Areas (Wat e r, ro ad s, oi l we ll s it e) C = 0 .90
• Runoff Curve Number (CN) -Culvert No. 3
The Brazos County Soil Survey shows the soils in the area to be classified as
hydrologic Group C & D soils. The post-deve lopment CN is based on the
development of Phases 1, 2 & 3 of the subdivision within the Culvert No. 3 drainage
area. The CN calculations are found in Appendix C.
• Rainfall Intensity equations and values for Brazos County can be found in Table 1.
• Time of Concentration, tc -For drainage basins using the Rational Equation, calculations
are based on the method found in the TR-55 publication . Refer to Table 2 for the
equations and Appendix A for data and calculations . The runoff flow paths used for
calculating the post-development times of concentration are shown in Exhibit A. For
drainage basins using the HEC-1 computer program, the lag method is used for
estimating the time-of-concentration . Refer to Table 3 for the equations and Appendix C
for data and calculations.
STORM WATER RUNOFF DETERMINATION
The peak runoff values were determined in accordance with the criteria presented in the
previous section for the 25 and 100-year storm events. The runoff coefficients are based on
the future development of this tract. The peak runoff values used for calculating the
allowable post-development runoff conditions are shown in Table 3. These values are based
on the runoff coefficients given previously. The post-development drainage areas are
shown on Exhibit A.
TABLE 1 -Rainfall Intensity Calculations
Rainfall Intensity Va l ues (in/hr)
Storm le =
Event 10 min
Is 7.693
110 8.635
'2s 9.861
lso 11 .148
1100 11 .639
Brazos County :
5 year storm 10 year storm
b = 76 b = 80
d= 8.5 d= 8.5
e= 0 .785 e= 0.763
I = b I (tc+d)e
I = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr)
tc = L/(V*60 )
tc = Time of concentration (min)
L = Length (ft)
V = Velocity (ft/se c)
25 year storm 50 vear storm
b = 98
100 year storm
b = 96 b= 89
d= 8.5 d = 8 .5 d = 8.0
e= 0 .754 e = 0.745 e = 0 .730
(Data taken from TxDOT Hydraulics Manual)
TABLE 2 -Ti m e of C once n tratio n (tc) Equatio n s & Ca lcul ations -TR SS Method
Th e time of concentration was de termined using methods found in TR-55 , "Urba n
Hy drology for Small Wat ersh eds." The equations are as follows:
Time of Conc entration:
For Sheet Flow:
For Sha llow Concentrated Flow :
Tc= T1 (s hecl flow)+ T1(conccnlralcd shcel fl ow)
whe re : T, =Travel Time, minutes
whe re : T , = travel time , hours
n =Manning 's roughness coefficient
L = flow le ng th , feet
P2 = 2-year, 24-hour rainfall = 4 .5"
s = land s lope , ft/ft
T, = LI (60*V)
where : T, =travel time , minutes
V =Velocity, fps (See Fig 3-1, Appendix A)
L = flow length , feet
Refer to Appendix A for data and ca lculations. Refe r to Exhibit A for flow paths us ed to
calculate the times of concentration .
TABLE 3 -Time of Con ce nt ration (tc) Eq u ati ons & Ca lcul ations -Lag Method
Th e Lag Method equations are as follows:
L = t o.s (S+l)o.1
(1900)Y0·5
s = 1000 -10
CN
Tc= 5/3*(L)
where : L =time lag , hours
C = hydraulic length, feet
S = maximum retention
Y = slope , percent
where: S = maximum retention
CN = Curve Number
where: L = time lag , hours
Tc = time of conce ntration, hours
R efer to Appendix Cfor data and ca lculations . Refer to Exhibit A for flow paths us ed to
calculate the hy draulic lengths .
TABLE 4 -Post Deve lop m e n t Runoff Data
Area 25-year sto rm 100-year storm
Cu lvert/ c t c
C hannel No. Area# A l2s 0 2s 1100 0100
(acres) (m in) (in/hr) (cfs) (in/hr) (cfs)
Culvert No. 1 211 17 .45 0.44 41 .5 4.660 35 .78 5.562 42.70 --- ---------
Culvert No . 2 210 9.67 0.47 37 .2 4.987 22.66 5.943 27.01 ------
Channe l No. 1 208,210 12.37 0.48 39.4 4 .813 28.58 5.741 34.09
Drainage Area Tc Lag Cu l vert No . CN
Area (acres) (s q . m i.) (hrs) (hrs)
Culvert No . 3 202 100.60 0 .157 78.4 1.616 0.970
203 87 .56 0.137 77 .9 1.794 1.07 6
CULVERT AND DRAINAGE CHANNEL DES I GN
The roadw ay c ul verts vv e re des ig ned to pass the runoff fr om th e 25-yea r sto1111 eve nt without
th e runoff ove rtoppin g th e road . S ince there is onl y o ne point o l in g ress a nd eg ress to th e
subdivision with this phase, the culverts are also designed to pass the runoff for the I 00-year
event without overtopping the road. The data and a nalysis of the culveris are shown in
Appendix B . Locations of the culve1is are shown on Exhibit A.
Drainage Channel No. 1 is a grass-lined channel proposed to transmit runoff from th e Prairie
Dawn Court right-of-way ditches to the existing drainage which ultimately flows into a
tributary of Boggy Creek. The channel is a trapezoidal ditch 18" in depth , 4H: l V side
slopes, and a l O' bottom width with a 0 .5% slope. The location of this channel is shown on
Exhibit A, and design data is summarized in Appendix B.
CONCLUSIONS
The culverts and drainage channel constructed for this project will adequately handle the
design storm water runoff and direct it into the existing drainages . These structures have
been designed to meet the requirements of Brazos County.
APPENDIX A
Time of Concentration Data & Calculations
Weighted C Value Data & Calculations
Saddle Creek Subdivis io n . Phase 1
T, Ca lculations-Post Development
Drai n age Areas 208 & 210
Sheet Fl ow : n= 0 .24 (dense grass)
P= 4 .5
L= 300 Slope= 0 .0250
T,= 0 .007(L 'n)0
• 0.442 hours= 26 .5 min
(P)o.s.(S)0 '
Concentrated Flow 1: V= 2.5 fps (unpaved)
L= 170 Slope= 0.0250
T,= U (60"V) 1.1 min
Concentrated Flow 2 : V= 1.55 fps (unpaved)
L= 790 Slope= 0 .0090
T,= U (60"V) 8.5 min
Flow Through Culverts : V= 2.05 fps
L= 135 Slope= 0 .0100
T,= U(60"V) 1.1 min
Drain age Area 21 O 1r.= 37 .2 min
Concentrated Flow 2: V= 2.2 fps (unpaved)
L= 289 Slope= 0.0120
T,= U(60'V) 2.2 min
Drainage Areas 208+210 1r.= 39.4 min
Drai nage Area 2 11
Sheet Flow: n=
P=
L= 272 Slope= 0 .0340
T,= 0 .007(L 'nt• 0 .361 hours= 21 .7 min
(P)o '"(S)"'
Concentrated Flow 1: V = 2.65 fps (unpaved)
L= 290 Slope= 0.0270
T,= U(60'V) 1.8 min
Concentrated Flow 2: V= 2.10'fps (unpaved)
L= 230 Slope= 0 .0170
T,= U(60"V) 1.8 min
Concentrated Flow 3: V= 3 .25 fps (unpaved)
L= 170 Slope= 0.0410
T1= U (60"V) 0 .9 min
Concentrated Flow 4 : V= 1.15 fps (unpa ved)
L= 1055 Slope= 0 .0050
Ti= U(60"V) 15 .3 min
I T,= 41.5 min
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Phase 1
Weighted C Numbl9r Calculations
Drainage Area -210
Area -Ac . 9 .67
sq . mi. 0 .0151
Land Use Area -Ac .
Residential District 7 .69
Impervious Area (oil/ga : 0 .00
Farmstead 0 .00
Woods 0.44
Pasture 1.54
Water 0 .00
Paved Roads 0.00
Gravel Roads 0.00
Total -C 9 .67
Drainage Area -211
Area -Ac . 17.45
sq . mi . 0 .0273
Land Use Area -Ac .
Resident ia l District 4.48
Impervious Area (oil/ga : 0 .00
Farmstead 0.00
Woods 1.51
Pasture 10 .56
Water 0 .00
Paved Roads 0.90
Grav el Roads 0 .00
Total -C 17.45
Drainage Area -208+210
Area -Ac .
sq. mi.
Land Use
12 .37
0.01 93
Resid ential Distri ct
Impervio us Area (oil/ga :
Farmstead
Woods
Pasture
Wate r
Pa ved Roads
Grav e l Roads
To ta l -C
Area -Ac.
10.39
0 .00
0.00
0.44
1.54
0 .00
0.00
0.00
12 .37
Q
0 .50
0 .90
0 .65
0 .30
0.40
0 .90
0 .9 0
0 .90
Q
0.50
0.90
0 .65
0 .30
0.40
0 .90
0 .90
0 .90
Q
0 .50
0 .90
0 .65
0 .30
0.40
0 .90
0 .90
0 .90
Weighted
Q
0.40
0 .00
0 .00
0 .01
0 .06
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0.47
Weighted
Q
0.13
0 .00
0 .00
0 .03
0 .24
0 .00
0 .05
0 .00
0.44
Weight ed
Q
0.42
0.00
0 .00
0.01
0 .05
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0 4 8
APPENDIXB
Culvert & Channel Design Data & Calculations
Saddle C reek Subdivision
Phase 1
Culvert Summa ry
Culvert #of Si ze Le ngth Slope
No . Barrel s
(in) (ft) (%)
1 3 24 70 .0 0 .50 ---·-·--------
2 2 24 70 .0 0 .71 --·---------------
•3 5 60 110.0 0 .50
Inlet Invert
Elev
(ft)
282.00 ----
272.00 ---
264.55
• HEC-1 computer mod el was used to compu te peak runoff.
O utlet Top of Road
25-year storm 100 -y ear storm
Invert Elev Des ign Flow V2s HW Design Flow V,oo HW
(ft) (ft) (cfs) (f p s) (ft) (cfs) (fps) (ft)
281.65 285.97 35 .78 3.8 284 .7 42 .70 4.5 285.2 ---
271 .50 275 .80 22 .66 3.6 274 .5 27 .01 4 .3 274 .9 -----
264 .00 270 .80 409 4 .2 269 .9 552 5 .6 270 .7
Culver t 1 -25 Year Storm
Culvert Calculator
Ent ered Data:
Shape .......................... .
Number of Barrels .............. .
Solving for .................... .
Chart Number ................... .
Scale Number ................... .
Chart Description .............. .
Scale Description .............. .
Overtopping .................... .
Flowrate ....................... .
Manning' s n .................... .
Roadway Elevation .............. .
Inlet Elevation ................ .
Outle t Elevation ............... .
Diameter ....................... .
Length ......................... .
Entrance Loss .................. .
Tailwater ...................... .
Computed Results:
Headwater ...................... .
Slope .......................... .
Velocity ....................... .
Circular
3
Headwater
2
3
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT
PIPE PROJECTING FR OM FILL
Off
35 .7800 cfs
0.0240
285.9700 ft
282.0000 ft
281 .6 500 ft
24.0000 in
70.0000 ft
0 .8000
2.0000 ft
284.7131 ft Outlet Control
0.0050 ft/ft
3.7964 fps
Culvert 1 -100 Year Storm
Cu l ver t Calculator
Entered Data:
Shape .......................... .
Number of Barrels .............. .
Solving for .................... .
Chart Number ................... .
Scale Number ................... .
Chart Description .............. .
Scale Description .............. .
Overtopping .................... .
Flowrate ....................... .
Manning's n .................... .
Roadway Elevation .............. .
Inlet Elevation ................ .
Outlet Elevation ............... .
Diameter ....................... .
Length ......................... .
Entrance Loss .................. .
Tailwater ...................... .
Computed Results:
Headwater ...................... .
Slope .......................... .
Ve l oc ity ....................... .
Saddle Creek S ubd i v i s i o n -Ph ase 1
B~azos Co u n t y , Te x a s
Circular
3
Headwater
2
3
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT
PIPE PROJECTING FROM FILL
Off
42.7000 cfs
0 .0240
285.9700 ft
282.0000 ft
281.6500 ft
24 .0000 in
70 .000 0 ft
0 .8000
2.0000 ft
285.1641 ft Ou tl et Control
0 .0050 ft/ft
4.5306 fps
Cul v ert 2 -25 Year Storm
Cul v ert Calc ula t o r
Entered Data :
Shape .......................... .
Number of Barrels .............. .
Solving for .................... .
Chart Number ................... .
Scale Number ................... .
Chart Description .............. .
Scale Description .............. .
Overtopping .................... .
Flowrate ....................... .
Manning' s n .................... .
Roadway Elevation .............. .
Inlet Elevation ................ .
Outlet Elevation ............... .
Diameter ....................... .
Length ......................... .
Entrance Loss .................. .
Tailwater ...................... .
Computed Results:
Headwater ...................... .
Slope .......................... .
Velocity ....................... .
Circular
2
Headwater
2
3
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CUL VERT
PIPE PROJECTING FR OM FILL
Off
22.6600 cfs
0 .0 2 40
275 .8000 ft
272.0000 ft
271. 5000 ft
24 .0000 in
70 .0000 ft
0.8000
2.0000 ft
274 .4719 ft Inlet Co ntrol
0.0071 ft/ft
3.6065 fps
Culvert 2 -100 Year Storm
Culv ert Calculator
Entered Data:
Shape .......................... .
Number of Barrels .............. .
Solving for .................... .
Chart Number ................... .
Scale Number ................... .
Chart Description .............. .
Scale Description .............. .
Ov ertopping .................... .
Flowrate ....................... .
Manning's n .................... .
Roadway Elevation .............. .
Inlet Elevation ................ .
Outlet Elevation ............... .
Diameter ....................... .
Length ......................... .
Entrance Loss .................. .
Tailwater ...................... .
Computed Results:
Headwate r ...................... .
Slope .......................... .
Velocit y ....................... .
Sadd l e Cr eek S u b d iv i s i on -Pha se 1
Braz os Co u nt y, Texas
Circular
2
Headwater
2
3
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CUL VERT
PIPE PROJECTING FROM FILL
Off
27.0100 cfs
0.0240
2 7 5 .8000 ft
272.0000 ft
271 .5000 ft
24.0000 in
70.0000 ft
0 .8000
2 .0000 ft
27 4 .8631 ft Outl et Con t rol
0 .007 1 ft /ft
4 .298 8 fps
Culvert 3 -25 Year Storm
Culvert Calculator
Ent ered Data:
Shape .......................... .
Number of Barrels .............. .
Solving for .................... .
Chart Number .................. · ..
Scale Number ................... .
Chart Description .............. .
Scale Description .............. .
Overtopping .................... .
Flowrate ....................... .
Manning ' s n .................... .
Roadway Elevation .............. .
Inlet Elevation ................ .
Outlet Elevation ............... .
Diameter ....................... .
Length ......................... .
Entrance Loss .................. .
Tailwater ...................... .
Computed Results :
Headwater ...................... .
Slope .......................... .
Velocity ....................... .
Circular
5
Headwater
2
3
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT
PIPE PROJECTING FROM FILL
Off
409.0000 cfs
0 .0240
270 .8000 ft
264.5500 ft
264.0000 ft
60 .0000 in
110.0000 ft
0 .8000
5.0000 ft
269.8535 ft Outlet Co ntrol
0 .0050 ft/ft
4 .1660 fps
Culvert 3 -100 Year Storm
Culver t Calculator
Entered Data :
Shape .......................... .
Number of Barrels .............. .
Solving for .................... .
Chart Number ................... .
Scale Number ................... .
Chart Description .............. .
Scale Description .............. .
Overtopping .................... .
Flowrate ....................... .
Manning' s n .................... .
Roadway Elevation .............. .
Inlet Elev ation ................ .
Outlet Elevation ............... .
Diameter ....................... .
Length ......................... .
Entrance Loss .................. .
Tailwater ...................... .
Compute d Results:
Headwater ...................... .
Slope .......................... .
Ve locity ....................... .
Saddle Cr e e k S u bdivision -Ph ase 1
Brazos Co u n t y , Texas
Circular
5
Headwater
2
3
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT
PI PE PROJECTING FROM FILL
Off
552.0000 cfs
0 .0 240
270.8000 ft
264.5500 ft
264 .000 0 ft
60 .000 0 in
110. 0000 ft
0 .8000
5 .0000 ft
270.7066 ft Inlet Control
0.0050 ft/ft
5.6226 fps
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Phase 1
Channel Summary
Bottom Side
Chann el No . W idth Slopes
(i n) (H :V)
Channel 1 120 4 :1
Slope
25-year storm
Design Flow Depth
(%) (cfs) (in)
0 .50 28 .58 100 .7
100-year storm Channel
V2s Des ign Fl ow Depth V100 Lining
(f ps) (cfs) (in) (fp s ) Material
2.4 34 .09 11 .8 2 .5 Gra ss
Channel 1 -25 Year Storm
Channel Calculator
Given Input Data:
Shape .......................... .
Solving for .................... .
Flowrate ....................... .
Slope .......................... .
Manning's n .................... .
Height ......................... .
Bottom width ................... .
Left slope ..................... .
Right slope .................... .
Computed Results:
Depth .......................... .
Velocity ....................... .
Full Flowrate .................. .
Flow area ...................... .
Flow perimeter ................. .
Hydraulic radius ............... .
Top width ...................... .
Area ........................... .
Perimeter ...................... .
Percent full ................... .
Trape zoidal
Depth of Flow
28.5800 cfs
0.0050 ft/ft
0 .0350
18.0000 in
120.0000 in
0.2500 ft/ft (V/H)
0.2500 ft/ft (V/H)
10.7056 in
2 .3610 fps
75.5126 cfs
12.1049 ft2
208.2807 in
8.3691 in
205.6448 in
24.0000 ft2
268.4318 in
59 .4 756 %
Channel 1 -100 Year Storm
Channel Calculator
Given Input Data:
Shape .......................... .
Solving for .................... .
Flowrate ....................... .
Slope .......................... .
Manning's n .................... .
Height ......................... .
Bottom width ................... .
Left slope ..................... .
Right slope .................... .
Computed Results :
Depth .......................... .
Velocity ....................... .
Full Flowrate .................. .
Flow area ...................... .
Flow perimeter ................. .
Hydraulic radius ............... .
Top width ...................... .
Area ........................... .
Perimeter ...................... .
Percent full ................... .
Saddle Creek Subdi v ision -Ph ase 1
Bra zo s Co u nt y , Texas
Trapezoidal
Depth of Flow
34.0900 cfs
0.0050 ft/ft
0.0350
18.0000 in
120.0000 in
0.2500 ft/ft (V/H)
0 .2500 ft/ft (V/H)
11. 7880 in
2.4914 fps
75.5126 cfs
13. 6833 ft2
217 .2067 in
9.0715 in
214.3044 in
24.0000 ft2
268.4318 in
65 .4892 %
APPENDIXC
Culvert No. 3 HEC-1 Design Data & Calculations
Saddle Creek Subdivision
Phase 1
Lag Method Calculations for Culvert No. 3
Drainage
Area
202 --
203
The Lag Method :
L = f o.s (S+l)o.1
(1900)Y0·5
s = 1000 -10
CN
Tc= 5/3*(L)
Lag e s
(hrs) (feet)
0 .970 4250 2 .76 --
1.076 4240 2 .84
where: L =time lag, hou rs
C =hydraulic length , feet
S = maximum retention
Y =s lope , percent
where : S = maximum rete ntio n
CN =C urve Number
where : L = time la g , hours
Tc= time of concentrati on , hours
y
(%)
1 .2
1 .0
CN Tc
(hrs)
784 1.61 6
77.9 1.794
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 1
SCS Curve Number Calculations
Culvert No. 3 Evaluation
Drainage Area -202 Drainage Area -203
Area -Ac '. 100 .60 Area -Ac. 87 .56
sq . m i. 0 .1572 sq . mi . 0.1368
T = c 1.616 hrs T = c 1.794 hrs
Lag , L = 0 .970 hrs Lag , L = 1.076 hrs
Soil Area Weighted So il Area Weighted
Land Use ~ (acres) CN II CN Land Use ~ (acres) CN II CN
Residential District c 8 .97 79 7.0 Residential D istrict c 15.11 79 13.6
Residential District D 9 .81 84 8 .2 Residential D istrict D 18.31 84 17 .6
Impervious Area c 0.00 89 0.0 Impervious Area c 0 .00 89 0 .0
Impervious Area D 2 .29 91 2.1 Impervious Area D 0 .00 91 0 .0
Farmstead c 0 .00 82 0.0 Farmstead c 0.00 82 0.0
Farmstead D 0 .21 86 0 .2 Farmstead D 0.00 86 0.0
Woods c 0 .54 73 0.4 Woods c 1.98 73 1.7
Woods D 7 .06 79 5.5 Woods D 2.65 79 2.4
Pasture c 5 .34 79 4.2 Pasture c 11.48 79 10.4
Pasture D 65.07 84 54 .3 Pasture D 31 .29 84 30 .0
·Water c 0 .00 98 0.0 Water c 0.00 98 0 .0
Water D 0.87 98 0 .8 Water D 0 .23 98 0.3
Paved Roads c 0 .00 92 0.0 Paved Roads c 2 .95 92 3 .1
Paved Roads D 0.00 93 0.0 Paved Roads D 0.80 93 0 .8
Gravel Roads c 0.23 89 0.2 Grave l Roads c 1.10 89 1 .1
Gravel Roads D 0 .21 91 0 .2 Gravel Roads D 1.66 9 1 Ll
Total -CN II 100 .6 83 .2 Total -CN II 87 .6 82 .7
Av erage Runoff condition CN = 78.4 Average Runoff condition CN = 77.9
C NI= 67 .2 CNI= 66 .7
ARC CN = CN I+ 0 .70(CN II -CN I) ARC CN = CN I+ 0.70(CN II -CN I)
~ECl S/N : 1343001909 HMVersion: 6.33 Data File: C :\WINDOWS \TEMP \-vbhll08 .TMP CULVERT NO. 3 ANALYSIS
~~y~~~~~********************************* ***************************************
* * *
F~OO D HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-1) * * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS *
MAY 1991 * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER *
VERSION 4.0 .lE * * 609 SECOND STREET *
* * DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 *
RUN DATE 12/06/2006 TIME 16 :12:06 * * (9 16 ) 756 -1104 *
* * *
. ~, .. ~~********************************** ***************************************
x x xxxxxxx xxxxx x
x x x x x xx
x x x x x
xxxxxxx xx xx x xxxxx x
x x x x x
x x x x x x
x x xxxxxxx xxxxx xxx
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Full Microcomputer Implementation
by
Haestad Methods, Inc .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
37 Brookside Road * Waterbury, Connecticut 06708 * (203) 755-1666
THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-1 KNOWN AS HECl (JAN 73), HEClGS, HEClDB, AND HEClKW.
THE DEFINITI ONS OF VARIABLES -RTIMP-AND -RTIOR-HAVE CHANGED FROM THOSE USED WITH THE 1973-STYLE INPUT STRUCTURE.
TH E DEFINITION OF -AMSKK-ON RM-CARD WAS CHANGED WITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS IS THE FORTRAN77 VERSION
NEW OPTIONS: DAMBREAK OUT FLOW SUBMERGENCE , SINGLE EVENT DAMAGE CALCULATION , DSS:WRITE STAGE FREQUENCY,
DS S:READ TIME SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN AND AMPT INFILTRATION
KINEMATIC WAVE : NEW FINITE DIFFERENCE ALGORITHM
HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 1 LINE ID ....... 1 ....... 2 ....... 3 ....... 4 ....... 5 ....... 6 ....... 7 ....... 8 ....... 9 ...... 10 1 ID Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 1 2 IT 3 05DEC06 0 300 3 IO 5 0 4 JR PREC 11. 20 8.80 5 PG 1 6 KK DA202 7 KM Drainage Area 202 8 KO 22 9 BA .1572 10 IN 30 05DEC06 0 11 PC .005 .010 .015 .020 .025 .031 .037 .043 .050 .057 12 PC .064 . 072 .081 . 091 .102 .114 .128 .146 .189 .217 13 PC .250 .298 .500 .702 .750 .783 . 811 .834 . 854 .872 14 PC .886 .898 . 910 .919 .928 .936 . 943 .950 .957 .963 15 PC .969 .975 .981 .986 .991 .996 1.000 16 LS 78.4 17 UD 0.970 18 KK DA203 19 KM Drainage Area 203 20 KO 22 21 BA .1368 22 IN 30 05DEC06 0 23 PC .005 .010 .015 .020 .025 .031 .037 .043 .050 .057 24 PC .064 . 072 .081 . 091 .102 .114 .128 .146 .189 .217 25 PC .250 . 298 .500 .702 .750 .783 . 811 .834 .854 .872 26 PC .886 .898 .910 .919 .928 .936 .943 .950 .957 .963 27 PC . 969 .975 .981 .986 .991 .996 1.000 28 LS 77.9 29 UD 0.1076 30 KK C3 31 KM Culvert 3 32 KO 22 33 HC 2 34 zz
H!:':C"! SiN : 1343001909 HMVersi o n: 6.3 3 Data File: C:\WINDOWS \TEMP \-vbhll08 .TMP
*~**~~***********************************
*
?LOO D HYD ROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-1) *
MA Y 1991 *
VERSI ON 4.0.lE *
*
RUN DAT E 1 2/06 /2006 TIME 16:12:06 *
*
~***.************************************
3 IO
Saddle Creek Subdivision -Phase 1
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT
I PLOT
QSCAL
HYDROG RAPH TIME DATA
5 PRINT CONTROL
0 PLOT CONTROL
0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
NMIN 3 MINUTES IN COMPUTATION INTERVAL
JP
JR
IDATE 5DEC 6 STARTING DATE
ITIME 0000 STARTING TIME
NQ 300 NUMBER OF HYDROGRAPH
NDDATE 5DEC 6 ENDING DATE
NDTIME 1457 ENDING TIME
I CENT 19 CENTURY MARK
COMPUTATION INTERVAL
TOTAL TIME BASE
0.05 HOURS
14.95 HOURS
ENG L IS H UNITS
DRAINAGE AREA
PRECIPITATION DEPTH
LENGTH, ELEVATION
FL OW
STORAGE VOLUME
SURFACE AREA
TEMPERATURE
MULTI-PLAN OPTION
NP LAN
MU LTI-RATI O OPTI ON
SQUARE MILES
INCHES
FEET
CUBIC FEET PER SEC OND
ACRE-FEET
ACRES
DEGREES FAHRENHEIT
1 NUMBER OF PLANS
RA T IOS OF PRE CIP I TATI ON
11.2 0 8 .8 0
ORDINATES
***************************************
* *
* U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS *
* HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER *
* 609 SECOND STREET *
* DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 *
* (916) 756-1104 *
* *
***************************************
.. ~ *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
**************
*
o KK * DA202 *
* *
**************
8 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL
I PLOT 0 PLOT CONTROL
QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
IPNCH 0 PUNCH COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH
IOUT 22 SAVE HYDROGRAPH ON THIS UNIT
ISAVl 1 FIRST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED
ISAV2 300 LAST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED
TIMINT 0.050 TIME INTERVAL IN HOURS
~~* *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
**************
* *
2.8 KK * DA203 *
*
**************
20 KO OUTPUT CONTROL VARIAB LES
IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL
I PLOT 0 PLOT CONTROL
QSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
IPNCH 0 PUNCH COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH
IOUT 22 SAVE HYDROGRAPH ON THIS UNIT
ISAVl 1 FIRST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED
ISAV2 300 LAST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED
TIMINT 0.050 TIME INTERVAL IN HOURS
~*~ ~** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
~·O KK
**************
* *
* C3 *
* *
**************
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL
I PLOT
QSCAL
IPNCH
IOUT
ISAVl
ISAV2
TIMINT
0 PLOT CONTROL
0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
0 PUNCH COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH
22 SAVE HYDROGRAPH ON THIS UNIT
1 FIRST ORD INATE PUNCHED OR SAVED
300 LAST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED
0.050 TIME INTERVAL IN HOURS
O?ERi-\TION
'1YDR OG R.l>.PH AT
i-iY DROG RA PH AT
2 COM BI NED AT
PEAK FLOW AND STAGE (END-OF-PERIOD) SUMMARY FOR MULTIPLE PLAN-RATIO ECONOMIC COMPUTATIONS
FLOWS IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, AREA IN SQUARE MILES
TIME TO PEAK IN HOURS
RATIOS APPLIED TO PRECIPITATION
STATION AREA PLAN RATIO l RATIO 2
11. 20 8.80
DA202 0.16 l FLOW 283. 209 .
TIME 12.10 12.1 0
DA203 0 .14 l FLOW 363. 273 .
TIME 11 . 50 11. 50
C3 0.29 l FLOW 552 . 409.
TIME 11. 50 11. 50
••• ~O RMA L END OF HEC-1 ***
EXHIBIT A
Post-Development Drainage Area Map