HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-12...
CASE NO .: ..__
DI,\ TE SUBMITT ED: -+-_.__...._._,_"---
TIME : c:q; {0
CITY OP C OLLEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University • STAFF :~
(Check one) D Minor
($700)
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
D Amending
($700)
~Final
($9 32)
D Vacating
($932)
0Replat
($932)
Is this plat in the ET J? [8] Yes D No Is this plat Commercial D or Residential ~
. / MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
~ $700 -$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
D $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
D $600 (minimum) Development Permit Appl ication I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure , $600 minimum (if fee is > $600 , the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
~Applica ti on completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Stat ion must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered . Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
~Six (6 ) folded cop ies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
[8] Two (2) copies of the grading , drainage , and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
[8] Two (2 ) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
D Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
~ Title report for property current within ninety (90 ) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Cert ificate
current within ninety (90) days . The report must include applicable information such as ownership , liens ,
ncumbrances , etc .
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station , Brazos County and College Station l.S .D.
The attached Final Plat checkl ist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete . If the mylar is subm itted with the final plat application , it shall be cons idered a subm ittal for the
prel iminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such . Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct , the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optiona l Preappl ication or Stormwater Management Conference _N_YA ______________ _
NAME OF PROJECT Indian Lakes -Phase 19
ADDRESS Near intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Near inte rsection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove I
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Travis Martinek E-mail travis@clarkewyndham .com
St reet Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
C ity Bryan State Te x as Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
-----------------
Rev ised 4/14 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORM,£>; I ION (All owners must be identified. Please cittach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan state Texas Zip Code 77802 -------
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461 -----------------
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION :
Name McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc. E-mail Jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 -------
Phone Number (979) 693-3838 Fax Number (979) 693-2554
----------------~
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ~Yes D No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so , please provide the Volume __ N_'f,_'.4 __ and Page No . ---
NIA
Total No. of Lots 16 Total Acreage _3_4_.4_8_0 _______ _ ------R-0-W Acreage 6.228 --------
Existing Use _v_a_ca_n_t ___________ _ Proposed Use Single-Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA I NIA
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA
Floodplain Acreage _o_.o_o_o _________________________________ _
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes IX] No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made ,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law .
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
fXi Yes
I No
If yes , provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name : Indian Lakes Subdivision
City Project Number (if known): Unknown
Date I Timeframe when submitted : 2000
Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
NIA
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
NIA
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land .
NIA
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
NIA
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health , safety, or welfare , or injurious to other
property in the area , or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
Nia
4 . The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance .
NIA
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. n An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way ;
2 . [] The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative , or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. n A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months ;
4 . I Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I
rural context;
5. n When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle , Pedestrian , and
Greenways Master Plan ;
Rev ised 4/14 Page 3 of 9
6. rJ The proposed development is within an older res identia l subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting with in Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO ; or
7. n The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as des ignated by Map 6 .6 ,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification , in the City's Comprehensive Plan .
Detailed explanation of condition identified above :
N/A
NOTE : A wai ver to the s idewa lk requirements and fee in lieu of s idewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by t he Planning & Zoning Commission .
Requested Ove rsize ParticipationNIA
-----------------------~
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
NIA Streets
NIA S idewalks
NIA Sanitary Sewer Lines
NIA Water Lines
NIA Channe ls
NIA Sto rm Sewers
NIA Bike Lanes I Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE :
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
---
OR
No . of acres to be dedicated + $ __ N._'f,_~ __ development fee
No . of acres in floodplain
No . of acres in detention
No. of acres in greenways
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND :
NIA No . of SF Dwelling Units X $ NIA = $ NIA
-------
NIA (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Boa rd
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PR IOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepa red this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and ex hibits attached hereto are
true , correct, and complete . IF THIS APPL/CATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this applicati on must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
tha n one owne r, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above .
Signature an~ • Date
Rev ised 4/14 Page 4 of 9
Ex isting
[ZJ
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
[ZJ Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch .
[ZJ V icinity map wh ich includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
re lationsh ip to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
[ZJ Tit le Block w ith the fo llowing information :
[ZJ Name and address of subdiv ider , recorded owner, planner , engineer and surveyor.
[ZJ Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdiv ision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911 .)
[ZJ Date of preparat ion .
[ZJ Eng ineer's scale in feet.
[ZJ Tota l a rea intended to be developed.
[ZJ North Arrow .
[ZJ Subdivisio n boundary indicated by heavy lines .
[ZJ If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing ent ire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet pe r inch or
larger.
[ZJ All applicable certificat ions based on the type of final plat.
[ZJ Owne rship and Dedication
[ZJ Surveyor and/or Engineer
[ZJ City Engineer (and City Planner , if a minor plat )
[ZJ Plann in g and Zoning Comm ission (delete if mino r plat)
[ZJ Brazos County Clerk
[ZJ Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
[ZJ If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements , submit a survey of t he subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created .
[ZJ If us ing pr ivate septic systems , add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Un it under the provisions of the private fac ility regulations adop ted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County , pursuant to the provisions of Section 21 .084 of the Texas Water Code .
[ZJ Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway , if applicable , according to the most recent available
data.
[ZJ Lot corne r markers and survey monuments (by symbol ) and clearly tied to bas ic survey data .
lZJ Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Secti on 3.3.E.2 ).
[ZJ The location and description with accurate d imensions , bearings or deflection angles and radii , area , center
angle , degree of curvature , tangent distance and length of all curves fo r all of the
following : (Show existing items t hat are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary w ith the subdivision , as well as , those with in the subdiv ision).
Proposed
[ZJ Streets . Continuous or end in a cul -de-sac, stubbed out streets must end in to a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths . (All existing and proposed R.O .W .'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan .)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance .
Revised 4/14 Page 8 of 9
Existing
[ZJ
[ZJ
[ZJ
[ZJ
Proposed
[ZJ
[ZJ
[ZJ
[ZJ
Alleys.
Easements .
A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequent ially).
Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedica ti ons must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission cons ideration.
[ZJ Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following:
[ZJ Street , alley and sidewalk plans , profiles and sections . One sheet must show the overall
street , al ley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision . (may be combined with other
utilities ).
[ZJ Sewe r Design Report.
[ZJ Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas .)
[ZJ Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report .
[ZJ Water line plan showing fire hydrants , valves , etc . w it h plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades . One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subd iv ision .
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas .)
[ZJ Storm drainage system plan with contours , street profile , in lets , storm sewer and
drainage channels , with profiles and sections . Drainage and runoff areas , and runoff
based on 5 , 10 , 25 , 50 and 100 year rain intensity . Detailed drainage st ru cture design ,
channe l lining des ign & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drai nage
layout of the subdivis ion .
[ZJ Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
[ZJ Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I su rety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6 .
[ZJ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
[ZJ Eros ion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
[ZJ All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed.
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prio r to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration.
[ZJ Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes [ZJ No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
[ZJ W ill any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? D Yes [ZJ No
If yes , TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the co rr ected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available pr ior to filing
the plat at the Courthouse .
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres , EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted pri or to
issuance of a development permit.
Print Form
Revised 4/14 Page 9 of 9
I -r
TITLE REPORT
GF No.: 142426
Certification Date: December 29, 2014
Examiner: LBJ
Property Description:
Tract One: Fee Simple
Metes and bounds description of all that certa in tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in THE J .
M . BARRERA SURVEY, Abstract No. 69 , Brazos County , Texas . Said tract being the same tract of land
called 16 .67 acres as described by a Deed to Donald E. Feltz recorded in Volume 1190, Page 303 of the
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and being further described in Volume 292 , Page 18 of the
Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Sa id tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
Beginning at a 1/2 inch iron rod found on the West line of a ca lled 18.21 acre tract as described by a Deed
to Herbert Winfred Flanagan , Jr., recorded in Volume 1245 , Page 532 of the Official Public Records of
Brazos County , Texas , said iron rod found marking the Northeast corner of said 16.67 acre Feltz tract and
the Southeast corner of a called 16.68 acre tract as described by a Deed to Joe Restivo recorded in
Volume 3993, Page 58 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas , said Restivo tract being
further described in Volume 292 , Page 15 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas ;
THENCE : S 04 ° 17' 25" E along the common line of said 16.67 acre Feltz tract and said 18 .21 acre tract,
same being the West line of a 30.00 foot wide road easemen t as described in Volu me 292, Page 18 and
Volume 342, Page 800 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, for a distance of 713 .78 feet to a
1/2 inch iron rod found marking the Southeast comer of said 16 .67 acre Feltz tract and the Northeast
corner of a called 18 .307 acre tra ct as described by a Deed to Lubradford Properties , Ltd ., recorded in
Volume 3442, Page 39 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas;
THENCE: S 87° 34' 56 " W along the common line of said 16 .67 acre Feltz tract and said 18.307 acre tract
for a distance of 1037 .51 feet to a 1/2 inch iron rod found on the East line of a called 1037 .24 acre tract
described as Tract Two by a Deed to Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd ., recorde d in Volum e 4247 , Page
51 of the Official Publ ic Records of Brazos County, Texas, said iron rod found marking the Southwest
corne r of said 16 .67 acre Feltz tract and the Northwest corner of a called 17 .417 acre tract as described
by a Deed to Robert Allen Hall recorded in Volume 4673 , Pag e 259 of the Official Public Records of
Brazos County, Texas . said 17.417 acre tract being further described in Volume 498, Page 840 of the
Deed Records of Braz os County, Texas ;
THENCE: N 01° 03' 16 " Walong the common line of said 16.67 acre Feltz tract and said 1037.24 acre
tract for a distance of 713 .70 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod set marking the Northwest comer of this herein
described tract and the Southwest corner of said 16 .68 acre Restivo tract ;
THENCE: N 87° 35 ' 17" E along the common line of said 16 .67 acre Feltz tract and said 16 .68 acre
Restivo tract for a distance of997 .20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING containing 16 .66 acres of land.
more or less.
Tract Two: Easement
Being an easement th irty feet (30 ') in w idth through that 24.108 acre tract in the J . M. BARRERA
SURVEY, Abstract No . 69, Brazos County, Texas, described by Contract of Sa le to Anthony L. Restivo
recorded in Volume 249 , Page 305 , Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and tha t 126.45 acre tract
conveyed to Charles A. Ernst, et al, by Deed recorded in Volume 273, Page 846 , Deed Records of Brazos
Co unty, Texas , and ly ing along and fifteen (15') either side of the following described centerline:
BEG IN NING in the Southeast line of Deer Park Drive, S 81 ° 48' W 15 .0 ft . from an iron rod at the most
Northerly comer of the said Restivo 24 .108 acre tract in the Sterrett D . Smith Survey, A-210 in Brazos
County, Texas;
THENCE S 8° 12' E 1229 .7 ft parallel to and 15' from Restivo 's Northeast line to a point 15' inside t he said
Ern st 126.45 acre tract;
THENCE S 88 ° 54' E 245.6 ft. parallel to and 15' from Ernst North line;
THENCE S 1' 51' W 740 .0 ft. parallel to and 15' f rom the East line of the said Ernst 126.45 acre tract ;
THENCE N 88 ' 43' W 1024 .3 ft.;
THENCE S 1° 17' W 28.5 ft.;
THEN CE So• 33 ' E 713 .7 ft . to the end of this easement.
NOTE : The Company is prohibited from insuring the area or quantit y of land described herein .
Any statement in the above legal description of the ar ea or quantity of land is not a representation
that such area or quantity is correct, but is made only for informational and/or identification
purposes.
Title Vested In:
Smiling Mallard Deve lopment , Ltd .
Vesting Deed to own ers shown herein was dat ed June 3, 2008 and recorded in Volume 8765, Pag e 176 ,
Official Records , Brazos County , Texas.
Subject to:
Deed of Trust to secure a Note :
Grantor: Smiling Mallard Development , Ltd .
Trustee : David Zalman
Beneficiary : Prosperi ty Bank
Amount: $500,000 .00
Da ted : January 23 , 2013
Recorded : Volume 11148 , Page 115, Official Records, Brazos County , Texas . (M ultiple properties on
Lien)
Restrictions:
None of Record
Exceptions:
Ea sement:
From : A . L. Restivo
To : C. A . Ernst, et al
Da ted : August 6, 1970
Recorded: Volume 292 , Page 26, Deed Records, Brazos County , Texas .
Mineral Reservation in Deed :
By : Donald E. Feltz
To: Smiling Mallard Developm ent , Ltd.
Da ted : April 28 , 2004
Recorded : Volume 6011, Page 116, Official Records, Brazos County, Texas . Title to said Interest ha s not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesa id instrument.
Min eral Reservation in Deed :
By : M. H . Jone s
To : J. W . Batts
Dated : Ju ne 27, 1g45
Recorded: Volume 119 , Page 565 , Deed Records , Brazos County , Texas . Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid ins trument.
Mineral Reservation in Deed :
By : J . W . Batts , Jr.
To : Glenn E. Edling
Dated : March 31, 1952
Recorded : Volume 153 , Page 350 , De ed Records , Brazos County, Texas . Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the afo resa id ins trument.
Mineral Reservation in Deed :
By: Frances C. Janus , et al
To : Earl Newman
Dated : January 3, 1969
Recorded: Volume 275, Page 247 , Deed Records , Brazos County , Texas. Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the afo resa id instrument.
Oil and Gas Lease , and all terms , conditions and stipulations therein :
Lessor : Doanld E. Feltz, et ux
Lessee : Lometa Petroleum Corporation
Da ted : September 22, 1992
Recorded : Volume 1605 , Page 173, Official Records , Brazos County , Texas .
Amendment :
Dated : July 25 , 2003
Recorded : Volume 5797 , Page 173, Official Records, Brazos County , Texas .
Modified:
Dated : April 28, 2004
Recorded : Volume 6011 , page 135, Official Records , Brazos County , Texas . T itle to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid instrument.
Upon examination of the public records Brazo s County, Texas, we fin:! no exception to title of the
subject property other than those shovm above. This Title R eport is issued with the express
understanding, evidenced by acceptance of same, that the liability of the undersig ned is limited to
th e actual monetary consideration paid for s ame.
Universi t y Title Company
---~
l
,,
TITLE REPORT
GF No.: 142425
Certification Date: December 28 , 2014
Examiner: ARB
Property Description:
TRACT ONE : FEE SIMPLE
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF AL L THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING
SITUATED IN THE JOSE MARIA BARRERA SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 69 , BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS .
SAID TRACT BEING THE SAME TRACT OF LAND CALLED 16.68 ACRES AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED
TO JOE RESTIVO RECORDED 3993, PAGE 54 OF THE OFFI CIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF
BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS , SAID 16 .68 ACRE TRACT BEING FURT HER DESCRIBED IN VOLUME
292, PAGE 15 Of THE DEED RECORDS BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS.
SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS :
BEGINNING AT A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF DEER PARK SUBDIVISION
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 221 , PAGE 295 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF
BRAZOS COUNTY, T EXAS , SAID IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID 16 .68 ACRE TRACT AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A CALLED 1037 .24 ACRE TRACT
DESCRIBED AS TRACT TWO BY A DEED TO SMILING MALLARD DEVELOPMENT, LTD . RECORDED
IN VOLUME 4247, PAGE 51 OF THE OFFIC IAL PUB LI C RECORDS Of BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE : N 87° 00' 06 " E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 16.68 ACRE TRACT AND DEER
PARK SUBDIVISION, SAME BEING THE COMMON LINE OF THE JOSE MARIA BARRERRA SURVEY ,
A-69, AND T HE STERRETI D. SM ITH SURVEY , ABSTRACT NO . 210 , FOR A DISTANCE OF 868.08
FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 16.68
ACRE TRACT AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED 24 .108 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED
BY A DEED TO ANTHONY L. RESTIVO RECORDED IN VOLUME 249 , PAGE 305 OF THE DEED
RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS ;
THENCE : S 12 ° 00' 40" E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID 16 .68 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF
80 .06 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED
16 .67 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO A DO N ALD GENE ANDERSON RECORDED IN
VOLUME 342 , PAGE 800 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS;
THENCE: S 12° 03' 05" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 16.68 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 16.67
ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 669 .26 FEET TO A 1/2 IN CH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED 18.21 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO
HERBERT WINFRED FLANAGAN, JR., RECORDED IN VOLUME 1245, PAG E 532 OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC REC O RDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE : S 02 ° 14° 18" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 16 .68 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 18.21
ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 43 .61 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF A CALLED 16.66 ACRE TRACT AS DESCR IBED BY A DEED TO SMILING
MALLARD DEVELOPMENT , LTD. RECORDED IN VOLUME 6011 , PAGE 116 OF THE OFFICIAL
PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS;
THENCE : S 87° 35' 17" W ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 16 .68 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 16 .66
ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 997 .20 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE EAST
LINE OF SAID 1037.24 ACRE TRACT MARKING THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 16.68 ACRE
TRACT AND SAID 16 .66 ACRE TRACT;
THENCE : N 02° 07' 26" W ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 16 .68 ACRE TRACT AND SA ID
1037 .24 ACRE TRACT FOR A D ISTANCE OF 773.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 16 .725 ACRES OF LAND AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND JANUARY 2006 . SEE PLAT
PREPARED JANUARY 2006, FOR MORE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION . BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN
HEREIN IS BASED ON GRID NORTH AS ESTABLISHE D FORM CPS OBSERVATION.
TR A CT TWO : ACCE SS EA SEMENT
BEING AN EASEMENT TH IRTY FEET (30') IN WIDTH THROUGH THAT 24 .108 ACRE TRACT IN THE
I. M. BARRERA SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO . 69 , BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS , DESCRIBED BY
CONTRACT OF SALE TO ANTHONY L. RESTIVO RECORDED IN VOLUME 249 , PAGE 305, DEED
RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND THAT 126.45 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO
CHARLES A . ERNST , ET AL , BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 273 . PAGE 846 , DEED RECORDS
OF BRAZOS COUNTY , TEXAS, AND LYING ALONG AND FIFTEEN (15') EITHER SIDE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE :
BEGINNING IN THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF DEER PARK DRIVE , S 81 ° 48' W 15 .0 FT . FROM AN IRON
ROD AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF THE SAID RESTIVO 24.108 ACRE TRACT IN THE
STERRETT D. SMITH SURVEY, A-210 IN BRAZOS COUNTY , T EXAS ;
THENCE S 8° 12' E 1229.7 FT . PARALLEL TO AND 15' FRO M RESTIVO'S NORTHEAST LINE TO A
POINT 15' INSIDE THE SAID ERNST 126 .45 ACRE TRACT ;
THENCE S 88 ° 54' E 245 .6 FT. PARALLEL TO AND 15' FROM ERNST NORTH LINE;
THENCE S 1° 51 ' W 740 .0 FT . PARALLEL TO AND 15' FROM THE EAS T LI NE OF THE SAID ERNST
12 6.45 ACR E TRACT;
THENCE N 88 ° 43 ' 1024.3 FT .:
THENCE S 1° 17' W 28 .5 FT :
THENCE S 0° 33' E 713 . 7 FT TO THE END OF THIS EASEMENT .
NOTE: The Company is prohibited f r om insuring the ar ea or quantity of land described herein.
Any statement in the above legal descr iption of the area or quantity of land is not a r epresentation
that such area or quantity is correct, but is made only for i nformational and/or identification
pu r poses.
Title Veste d In :
Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd ., a Texas Lim ited Partnersh ip
Ve sting Deed to owners shown herein was dated June 3, 2008 and re co rd ed in Volume 8765 , Page 176,
Offici al Records , Bra zos County , Te xas.
Subject to:
Dee d of Trust to secure a Note:
Granter: Smiling Mallard Development , Ltd ., a Texas limited partnership
Trustee: David Zalman
Beneficiary: Prosperity Bank
Amount: $500,000 .00
Da ted : January 23 , 2013
Recorded : Volume 11148, Page 115, Official Records , Brazos County , Texas . (M ultiple pro perties on
Lien)
R estrictions:
None of Record
Exce ptions:
Ea sement:
From : A. L. Restivo
To : C. A . Ernst, et al
Da te d : August 6, 1970
Recorded : Volume 292 , Page 26, Deed Records, Bra zos County , Texas . (Tract 2)
Easement:
From : The Veteran's Land Board of th e State of Texas
To : Aqu ila Southwes1 Pipeline Corporation
Da ted : May 25, 1993
Recorded : Volume 1824, Page 238, Officia l Records, Brazos County , Texas .
Acce ss Easement Gra nted in Deed :
From: Charles Ernest, et al
To : The Veteran's Land Board of the State of Texas
Dated : September 8, 1970
Recorded : Vo lum e 292 , Page 15, Deed Records , Brazos Co unty , Texas .
Access Easement Granted in Deed:
From : Smiling Mallard Development
To : Partners in Habitat Preservation
Dated : December 27 , 2007
Recorded : Volume 8386 , Page 181 , Official Records , Brazos County, Texas.
Access Easement Granted in Deed:
From : Partners in Habitat Preservation
To: Smiling Mallard Development , Ltd .
Dated : June 3, 2008
Recorded: Volume 8765 , Page 176 , Official Records, Brazos County, Texas .
Mineral Deed :
By : The Veterans Land Board of the State of Te xas
To : Joe Restivo
Dated : September 30, 1992
Recorded : Vo lume 1612 , Page 254 , Official Records, Brazos County, Texas . Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid instrument.
Mineral Reservation in Deed:
By : M . H. Jones
To : J . W. Batts
Da ted: June 27, 1945
Recorded : Volume 119, Page 565 . Deed Records , Brazos County , Texas . Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the afo resaid instrument.
Minera l Reservation in Deed:
By : J . W . Batts , Jr.
To: Glenn E. Edl ing
Dated: Marc h 31, 1952
Recorded: Vo lume 153 , Page 350 , Deed Records , Bra zos County , Texas. Title to sa id interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the afo resaid instrument.
Mineral Reservation in Deed:
By : Frances C. James, et al
To : Earl Newman
Da ted : January 3, 1969
Recorded: Volume 275, Page 247, Deed Records , Brazos County, Texas . Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid instrument.
Mineral and Water Reservation in Deed:
By : Joe Restivo
To : Smiling Mallard Development , Ltd .
Dated : April 20, 2006
Recorded : Volume 7275 , Page 182, Official Records, Brazos County , Texas . Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the afo res ai d instrume nt.
Oil and Gas Lease , and all terms , conditions and stipulations therein :
Lessor: Joe Restivo , et ux
Lessee : Lometa Petroleum Corporation
Dated: September 22, 1992
Recorded: Volume 1605 , Page 205, Official Records, Brazos County, Texas . Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid instrument.
Oil and Gas Lease , and all terms , conditions and stipulations therein :
Lessor : Frances James Kimbrough
Lessee : Lometa Petroleum Corporation
Dated: September 29 , 1992
Recorded : Volume 1623 , Page 185, Official Records, Brazos County, Texas . Title to said interest ha s not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid instrument.
Oil and Gas Lease, and all terms , conditions and stipulations there in :
Lessor: J. W. James, Jr.
Lessee : Lometa Petroleum Corporation
Dated : September 29 , 1992
Recorded: Volume 1635 , Page 142, Official Records, Brazos County, Texas . Title to said intere st has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the afo resaid instrument.
Oil and Gas Lease , and all terms, conditions and stipulations therein:
Lessor: Waller Thomas Burns, II, Trustee
Lessee: Lometa Petroleum Corporation
Dated : March 4, 1993
Recorded : Volume 1760, Page 72 , Official Records, Brazos County , Texas . T itle to sa id interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid instrument.
Oil and Gas Lease, and all terms , conditions and stipulations t herein :
Lessor : Meredith H. James, Jr.
Lessee : Lometa Petroleum Corporation
Dated: September 30, 1992
Recorded : Volume 1645, Page 28 , Official Record s , Brazos County , Texa s. T itle to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid instrument.
Oil and Gas Lease , and all terms , conditions and stipulations therein :
Lessor: Harriett Cartwright
Lessee : Lometa Petroleum Corporation
Dated : January 8, 1993
Recorded: Volume 1698, Page 246 , Official Records, Brazos County, Texas . Title to said interest has not
been investigated subsequent to the date of the aforesaid instrument.
Upon examination of the public records Brazos County, Texas, we fin:! no exception to ti tle of the
subject property other than those shown above. This Titl e Report is issred with the express
understanding, evidenced by acceptance of same, that the liability of the undersigned is limited to
th e actual monetary consideration paid for same.
University Title Company
------~-----·--
TO :
CLARKE & WYNDHAM
REAL EST ATE INVESTMENT SERVICES
TRAVIS MARTINEK
3608 Eas t 29 th Street, Suite 100
Bryan , Texas 77802
O ffic e: (979 ) 846-4384 Fax : (979) 846-1461 Cell : (979) 229-9877
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
DATE :
Deborah Grace-Rosier 8/26/2015
COMPANY : TOTAL NO . OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:
FAX NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER :
RE:
Indian Lakes-Phase 19
FP'2 0\ s -q (j)O \ 2-
6'6/2.1.011 s
q·.so
M
0 URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE REC Y CLE
NOTES/COMMENTS :
Deborah,
Attached is the Final Plat for Indian Lakes Phase 19 , ready for filing . I've also attached an email from Wellborn
Water accepting the water lines . Also, can you send me a digital scan of the filed plat when available .
We are looking at closing on the first lot on Friday , if possible.
Let me know if you need anything further to get this plat filed.
Thanks!
Travis
CITY or Coli.EGE STATION
Hom e of Texas A&M Un iversity•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO .: # Jof5°-<qtJOOk:J..
DATE SUBMITTED : 7/<[ ft 5
TIME 11 :44
STAFF :
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your subm ittal.
D New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Proje ct Submittal -documents needed to complete an app li cation. Case No .: -·J Existing Project Submittal. Case No .: /5-JZ-
~-------~
Project Name ~b.~d-'-rM_'\L,._~e~"-~-~-' ~/l{~f,_A_1t!_f~_af _____________ _
Contact Name ~ .. ....,J,..,te,~f~~-"~fl~e;~~-~----------
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to rev iew and comment (c heck all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment
D Rezoning A pp lication
D Conditional Use Permit
D Preliminary Plan
• Final Plat
D Development Plat
D Site Plan
D Special District Site Plan
D Specia l District Building I Sign
D Lands cape Plan
D Non-Residential Arch itectural Standards
D Irrigation Plan
D Variance Request
D Deve lopment Permit
D Deve lopment Exaction Appeal
D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
D Grad ing Plan
D Other -Please specify below
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are in cluded in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterli ne Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Perm it D Street Construction Do cuments
D Dra inage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire F low Analys is D Other -Pl ease spec ify
Special Inst ructions:
10/10 Print Form
CITY OF Cou.EG E STATJON
Home ofTexm A &M University •
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO .: 15·-( z_
DATE SUBMITTED : {)2» \f?J . \ S
TIME : ...L\ ·_ • ..:__\ 0=------------
STAFF : ~A-:1~~-------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANS MITT AL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your subm ittal.
D New P roject Subm ittal
D Incomp lete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an applicat ion. Case No .:
'ijJ Existing Project Submittal. Case No .: \ '5 --\?., --------~
--------~
Project Name \ \\J. \ 2¥\ L2t \<:.-CS ?'o \ 0\ -Contact Name ______________ _ Phone Number ____________ _
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Non-Residential Arch itectural Standards
D Rezoning Applicat ion D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Prelim inary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
D Site Plan D Grading Plan
D Specia l District Site Plan D Other -Please specify below
D Spec ial District Bu ilding I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Util ity Perm it D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions :
10/1 0 I. Print Form
TO :
CLARKE & WYNDHAM
REAL EST ATE INVESTMENT SERVICES
Mark Bombek
TRAVIS MARTINEK
3608 Eas t 29 th Street, Suite 100
Bryan , Texas 77802
Office: (97 9) 84 6-4384 Fax: (979) 846 -1461 Cell: (979) 229-9877
TRANSMITTAL SH E ET
DATE :
3/18/2015
COMPANY: TOTAL NO . OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER :
CS Ping & Dvlpmt Serv See below
FAX NUMBER : PHONE NUMBER :
RE:
Indian Lakes -Phase 19 Final Plat and Construction Plans
0 URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE
NOTES/COMMENTS:
Attached are the following :
• Response to staff comments
• 1 -24"x36" copy of the revised Final Plat
• 1 -24"x36" copy of the revised construction plans
• 1 -copy of the revised drainage report
TO :
CLARKE & WYNDHAM
REAL EST ATE INVESTMENT SERVICES
TRAVIS MARTINEK
3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
Bryan , Texas 7780 2
O ffic e: (979) 846-4384 Fax: (979) 846-1461 Ce ll : (979) 229-9877
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
DATE :
1/13/2015
COMPANY : TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER :
CS Ping & Dvlpmt Serv See below
FAX NUMBER : PHONE NUMBER:
RE :
Indian Lakes-Phase 19 Final Plat and Construction Plans
0 URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE REC Y CLE
NOTES/COMMENTS :
Attached are the following :
• Final Plat Application and Checklist
• Tax Certificates (3 total)
• Title Reports (4 total)
• Drainage Report
• 6 -24 "x36 " copies of the Final Plat
• 2 -24"x3 6" copies of the construction plans
DATE :
TO:
FROM :
April 1, 2015
C ITY OF C OILEGE S TATION
Home of Texas A &M University •
MEMORANDUM
Travis Martinek, via ; travis@clarkewyndham .com V
Mark Bombek , Staff Planner
SUBJECT: INDIAN LAKES PH 19 (FP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . Please address the comments and
submit the follow ing information for further staff review and to be scheduled for a future Planning
& Zon i ng Commission meeting :
One ( 1) 24 "x36 " copy of the rev ised final plat ;
Thirteen (13) 11 "x17" copies of the revised final plat ;
One (1) Mylar of the revised final plat (required after P&Z approval);
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to
pdsdigitalsubmittal@cstx .gov .
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting , your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station . Please note that this application will
expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the appl icant has not provided written response
comments and revised documents to t he Administrator that seek to address the staff review
comments conta ined here in . If all comments have not been addressed your project will not be
schedu led for a Planning & Zoning Commission meet i ng . Your project may be placed on a
future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees pa id . Once your
item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting , the agenda and staff report can be accessed at
the following web s ite on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting .
http ://www.cstx .gov/pz
Please note tha t a Mylar original of the revised final plat will be required after P&Z approval and
prior to the filing of the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call
me at 979.764 .3570 .
Attachm ents: Staff review comments
PC : Jeff Robertson , McClure & Browi e Engineering/Surveying , via;
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com V
P&DS Project No . 15-00900012
Pla11ni11g & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 ·l 10 J 'l1:XAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION · TEXAS · 77 842
TE L. 979 .764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.34 96
cst>t .gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: IND/AN LAKES PH 19 (FP) -15-00900012
PLANNING
1. Repeat-Provide a note to the Final Plat stating that lots 1 and 4 on Catori Cove and lots 5-
10 and 16 along Halon a Court should only take access from Catori Cove and Halona Court.
2. Please note that you may be required to submit paid tax certificates if they are not current
prior to the filing of your plat.
3. Please be aware that County response to comments are still being reviewed at this time .
Any further comments will be sent out as soon as possible .
Reviewed by : MARK BOMBEK Date : 03-25-2015
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
4 . Remove the 16 ' PUE shown on the Final Plat. FYI... The easement needs to be
dedicated by separate instrument or blanket easement and filed prior the approval of the
construction plans.
5. Please show the volume/page for the existing P.U.E.'s outside the Plat boundary. It
currently is shown as just P.U .E. which may be misinterpreted as it being dedicated with
this plat.
6 . The note regarding requirement of compaction of fill or engineered slab for lots that have
greater than 2 feet of fill still needs to be added on the Final Plat. Lot 11 appears to
going to have greaterthan 2 feet of fill , and possibly lot 10 , 12 , 14-16, and 5 . This note is
still required even if a building permit is not going to be required through the city of
College Station.
7 . Please double check your 100-storm year Intensity equation. I'm getting a different
value . Are you guys using B/CS 's Table C-1 when determining the Intensity? Or is
something else being used? Since all the years appear to follow the equation except for
the 100-year storm event.
8. Please update exhibit B-1 map . The delineation did not change from the previous report
but the area size appears to have been changed.
9. Exhibit C-3 appears to use a different wetted perimeter and areas for manning 's
equation compared the calculated values .
10 . Provide sealed engineer cost estimate , and letter regarding Acknowledging City
standards .
Reviewed by : Kevin Ferrer Date: March 27 , 2015
Home of Te x as A&M University
rt' q
.................. ______ ~~-----CIT Y OF COLLEGE STATION~------------------Hom e of Texas A&M Univmity • 1 $ $
j"M
MEMORANDUM
DATE : February 11, 2015
TO : Travis Martinek, via ; travis@clarkewyndham .com
FROM : Mark Bombek, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: INDIAN LAKES PH 19 (FP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information for further staff review and to be scheduled for a future Planning
& Zoning Commission meeting :
One (1) 24 "x36 " copy of the revised final plat;
One (1) revised set of construction documents;
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting, your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station. Please note that this application will
expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the applicant has not provided written response
comments and revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review
comments contained herein . If all comments have not been addressed your project will not be
scheduled for a Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Your project may be placed on a
future agenda once all the revisions have been made and the appropriate fees paid . Once your
item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting , the agenda and staff report can be accessed at
the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z meeting .
http://www.cstx.gov/pz
Please note that a Mylar original of the revised final plat will be required after P&Z approval and
prior to the filing of the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information , please call
me at 979.764.3570 .
PC: Jeff Robertson, McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying , via ;
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
P&DS Project No . 15-00900012
Attachments: Staff Review Comments
Planning e!r Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • l l 01 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842
TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979 .764.3496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Indian Lakes PH 19 (FP) (15-00900012)
PLANNING
1. Provide a note to the Final Plat stating that lots 1 and 4 on Catori Cove and lots 5-10 and lot
16 along Halona Court should only take access from Catori Cove and Halona Court .
2 . Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City
of College Station , must be explained in your next transmittal letter. Any additional changes
on these plans that the City has not been made aware of w ill constitute a completely new
review .
3. Please note that you may be required to submit paid tax certificates if they are not current
prior to the filing of your plat.
Reviewed by : Mark Bombek Date : 02-06-2015
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Show a Private drainage easement on the common area between lots 10 & 11 .
2 . Add a note stating whose responsib i lity it is to maintain and stating that fences ,
grading , and landscape cannot impede the flow of the private drainage easement.
3. Add a note regarding requirement for compaction of fill or engineered slab for
affected lots that have greater than 2 feet of fill on final plat and construction
documents. Also list the lots that would require this .
4 . Show the future 10 ' PUE along the rear of the PUE of Lot 11-16 totaling 20 ' PUE.
5 . Dedicate the 16 feet PUE easement outside the plat by separate instrument.
6. Please make sure that all lot numbers are labeled on the construction sheets .
7 . Move WS4 .01 to the common lot boundary.
8 . Provide a gate valve at the tee with the fire hydrant on Halona Court. Also please
confirm that the gate valve spacing between Catori Cove & Kachina Cove does not
exceed 800 '.
9 . Relocate WA-2 in such a way that the clearance between waterline 's center line &
the PUE 's boundary is at least 6 ' or provide additional easement.
1 O. It appears another drainage area (south of Holona Court) needs to be taken into
accounted for.
11 . Check your Rainfall Intensity's equation for the 100 storm event.
12 . Please provide calculations showing that the water surface elevation in the ditches
are at least 6 "below the top ditch during a 25-year storm .
13 . Culvert #1 requires a freeboard of at least 1' during a 100-year storm event.
14. Does the culvert analysis take into account the flow hindrance of the Rock Rip Rap
at the discharge location?
15. Specify the length type , and grade on profile for culvert 1 on C3 .1
16 . Provide Cost Estimate , and B/CS Standard details .
Reviewed by : Kevin Ferrer Date : February 5 , 2015
SANITATION
1. Sanitation is ok with this project.
Reviewed by : Wally Urrutia Date : January 28, 2015
COUNTY
Overall Comments :
1. Access concerns are considerable with the development of these phases.
Previous commitments need to be executed so that work by others in completing
Mesa Verde extension to SH 6 can commence . Please provide detailed estimate
of total number of lots to be developed.
2. Provide all approvals from City of College Station
Plat Comments :
3. Provide for Private Drainage Easement across back of Lots 11-6 .
Construction Plan Comments
4. Page C1 .1-Typical Section 1 (re: 75 ' ROW) -Provide 8" Flex Base; Show
Section as 34' Primed Base with 38' Subgrade Crown. Indicate Typical Section-
Chaco Canyon Drive.
5. Page C1 .1-Typical Section 2 (re : 70 ' ROW) -Provide 6 " Flex Base in Roadway
and 8" Flex Base at Cul-de-Sac; Show Section as 30 ' Primed Base with 34 '
Subgrade Crown. Indicate Typical Section-Catori Cove and Halona Court .
6 . Page C1 .1-Typical Section 3 (re : 100' ROW) -Provide 8" Flex Base ; Show
Section as 30' Primed Base with 34 ' Subgrade Crown . Add 6' Earthen Shoulder,
then 8' Front Slope and 19' Back Slope. Indicate Typical Section-Mesa Verde
Drive.
7. Page C1 .1-Modify Typical Shoulder Detail to be reflective of previous 3
comments .
8. Page C1 .2-Correct spelling of "Hay Bail" to "Hay Bale ".
9. Page C2 .1-Show existing 6 " Water Line and Rock Riprap near Kochina Cove
(from Phase 16).
10.Page C2 .1-Indicate Ditch Slope from Sta . 10+100 to Sta. 10+35/ Indicate Limits
of Rock Riprap
11 . Page C2.1-C/L elevation at Sta. 10+100 and Profile Grade of Mesa Verde Drive
do not match plans provided from Phase 16-Please verify that grades match and
that profile grade matches field conditions ...
12 . Provide Construction Details.
Drainage Report Comments :
13 . Page 7-There are flows from Phase 19 (depicted in Drainage Area 1) which flow
off property . Please analyze Post-Development Flows against Pre-Development
Flows for potential effect to adjacent property owner(s).
14 . Exhibit 8 -Drainage Area 1 is incorrectly sized (should be larger).
15 . Page 20 -Culverts in this phase do serve arterial or Major Collector Streets . Mesa
Verde and Chaco Canyon are both functionally classified as such .
16 . Page 26 -Conclusion should clarify any effects to downstream properties along
Deer Park (from Drainage Area 1 ).
Reviewed by : Alan Munger Date : 02 -09-2015
CITY OF C ol.LEGE ST ATION
_qq _______ _,__._..._.._______ Home of Texas A&M Uni versity "
arwd
MEMORANDUM
DATE : January 26 , 2015
TO : Travis Martinek , via ; travis@clarkewyndham .com /
FROM : Mark Bombek, Staff Planner
SUBJECT : INDIAN LAKES PH 19 (FP)
Thank you for the submittal of the required documents for your Final Plat -Residential
application . Kevin Ferrer, Graduate Engineer, and I have been assigned to review this project. It
is antici pated that the review will be completed and any staff comments returned to you on or
before Monday , February 9, 2015 . If you have questions in the meantime , please feel free to
contact us .
PC : Jeff Robertson , McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying , via ; /
jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com
P&DS Project No. 15-00900012
Pla11ni11g & D ev elopm en t Sei ·vices
P .O. BOX 996 0 • 1101 TEXA S AV ENUE · COLLEGE STATIO N · T EXA S . 77842
T EL. 979.76 4 . .357 0 ·FAX . 979.764 .34 96
cstx.gov/devserv ices
•.... -.............. ___________ C ITY OF C OT.LEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University "
JJ --
MEMORANDUM
DATE : January 16, 2015
TO : Travis Martinek , via; travis@clarkewyndham.com
FROM : Jason Schubert, AICP Principal Planner
SUBJECT: INDIAN LAKES PH 19 (FP)
I reviewed the above-mentioned Final Plat -Residential application and determined it to be
incomplete. The following is the preliminary list of items needed to complete the submittal.
Please submit the following information so this application can be forwarded for review:
Submit a water/fire flow report for the proposed plat. The area in this plat is not
part of the original Indian Lakes Master Plan approved in 2002 but part of the
Partners in Habitat Preservation Tract 1 Master Plan application that was
submitted in December 2007 and approved in February 2008 . Therefore, as
stated during the Preliminary Plan review, the water/fire flow requirements
adopted in 2004 apply to this plat.
Please be aware that if this application is not completed before Monday, March 2 , 2015 , it will
expire and a new application and fees will be necessary to continue the platting process .
If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me at 979.764.3570 .
PC : Jeff Robertson, McClure & Br9Wne Engineering/Surveying, via;
jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com -,/
P&DS Project No . 15-00900012
Pla11ni11g & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 11 0 1 TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXA S • 77842
TEL. 979.764 .. 35 7 0 ·FAX . 979.764.3496
cst>1.gov/devservices
\ INDIAN LAKES PHASE 19 -FINAL PLAT
RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
PLANNING
1. The Applicant intends to allow lot owners to choose where they wish to take access . Chaco
Canyon is not an arterial street; therefore , driveway access to this street is permitted . Please
note that the lots in Phase 20 , as shown on the approved Preliminary Plat , w ill be required to take
access from Chaco Canyon.
2. No comment.
3 . No comment.
ENGINEERING
1. See rev ised Final Plat.
2. See rev ised Final Plat.
3. This note has not been added . It is up to the builder , homeowner, and their engineer to
determine the requirements for the slab of the house in this subdivision since no building permits
w ill be required through the City of College Station . Additionally , no lots are intended to have fill
in excess of 2 feet.
4 . See rev ised Final Plat.
5. A temporary utility easement will be prov ided and filed of record prior to the recording of the Final
Plat. A permanent utility easement will be provided with the Final Plat for Phase 20 .
6. See revised construction plans .
7. See revised construction plans
8. A gate valve at the tee with the fire hydrant on Halona Court is shown on the construction plans .
Also , the gate valve spacing between Catori Cove and Kachina Cove measures to be less than
800 feet (approximately 624 feet).
9 . See rev ised construction plans .
10 . Water from Phase 19 that will drain to land south of Halona Court onto Phase 21 has been taken
into account in Phase 21 design .
11 . See revised drainage report .
12 . See revised drainage report.
13 . See revised construction plans and drainage calculations .
14 . Yes , Exhibit C-2 has Outfall Channel Design Criteria , but the culvert is in inlet control in all storm
events , so the outfall has little effect on it.
15 . See revised construction plans .
16 . See revised drainage report.
SANITATION
1. No comment.
BRAZOS COUNTY
1. The Applicant is in the process of developing towards multiple additional access points , Phase 19
and Phase 25 are extensions within this greater plan. The Applicant is in the process of
preparing additional phase submittals for further extensions to obtain additional access points .
The total number of lots planned for Indian Lakes is unknown since the Applicant is in the process
of acquiring or has acquired several additional tracts of land that have not been fully land-planned
to allow for preliminary lot counts to be determined .
3/18/2015 Page 1 of 2
INDIAN LAKES PHASE 19 -FINAL PLAT
2 . To be provided when available .
3 . Drainage is not antic ipated to run along these back lot lines . Drainage from these lots will flow to
the streets on either side of this block .
4 . See revised construction plans .
5. See revised construction plans . 8-inch crushed stone was not added to cul-de-sacs as the 6-inch
base ha s been used throughout the proje ct and in all other subdivisions around the county .
6 . See revised construction plans . The typical section has been revised to 30 foot primed based
and 42 ' subgrade to crown .
7. See revised construct ion plans .
8 . See rev ised construction plans .
9 . See rev ised construction plans .
10 . See revised construction plans.
11 . See revised construction plans . C/L ele vat ion at Station 10+00 is shown to be 292 .38 , which
matches plans from the previous phase (Phase 16). Previous plan s show a grade of 1.43% while
proposed plans show a grade of 1.60 % on Mesa Verde Dr ive . Revised plans show a Pl (no
curve) at Station 10+00 .
12 . See rev ised construction plans .
13 . Changes in post-development flows from Drainage Area 1 are negligible compared to pre-
development flows .
14 . See revised drainage map. Drainage Are a 1 has been increased to 2 .13 acres .
15 . See revised drainage report.
16 . See revised drainage report.
3/18/2015 Page 2 of 2
Zon i rtg D i !itri ct!i
R
E
RS
GS
R-18.
0
T
Ru11I
E $tttt:
Ruttlct d Subu bin
Gane al Subu ban
Single Family Res identiaJ
Duplex
Townhouse
R -4
R -6
MHP
0
SC
GC
Cl
B P
vr DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Multi-Famliy
igh Density Multi-Family
MenuftctUJ•d om• P11
O ffl e
Subu b a n Commerela l
Gene al Commercial
Commercial-Industrial
B usiness Par
BPI
NA P
C-3
M-1
M-2
C -U
R& D
P-M U D
Bu:siness Par Industrial
N atural Areas Protectl!'d
Light Comme1olll
I.lg ht l ndustti.I
Hvy lndu'i tri al
Colle1je and U niv INS ity
Research and Development
Planned Mixed-Use Dev elopment
INDIAN LAKES PH 19 Case :
15 -12
I I
POD
W PC
G-1
G-2
NG-3
ov
ROD
KO
\
I
Planned Dev elopment District
Wolf Pen Cu~E" Dev . Cotrid Cf
COie Olthgst•
Tunt ltlon1 I 0tt hg1t•
Res identlal Ofthg ate
Co id or Overlay
Redev elopment Distr ict
Kren Tap Over lay
FINA L P LAT
INOIAN LAKES PH 19 Case : FINA L P LAT
DEVELOPMENT REV IEW 15·12
INDIAN LAKES PH 19
4
2 3
13
12
Scale = 1: 564 (Feet)
1 N 03 ° 02' 35 " W 100
2 N 86 ° 57' 25 " E 250
3 N 03 ° 02' 35" W 400
4 N 86 ° 57' 25" E 254 .36
5 N 86 ° 58 ' 44" E 365.89
6 S 03 ° 02 ' 35 " E 399 .86
7 N 86 ° 57' 25 " E 367.74
8 S 03 ° 03' 28 " E 100
5 6
7 8
11
9 S 44 ° 32 ' 57'' W , ch 33 .72, r 25 .14 L
10 s 02 ° 42' 58 " w 556.47
11 s 86 ° 57' 25" w 1808.47
12 N 01 ° 25' 55" W 237 .83
13 N 63 ° 25' 25" W 501 .97
14 N 79 ° 08' 35" E, ch 666 .18 , r 2450 R
15 N 86 ° 57' 25" E 420 .88
Travis Martinek
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Travis,
Stephen Cast [wsud .sc@verizon.net]
Wednesday, August 26 , 2015 9 :15 AM
Travis Martinek
RE : Indian Lakes -Phase 19
Wellborn Special Utility District has inspected and approved the water lines in Indian Lakes , Phase 19 .
Stephen Cast
Wellborn SUD
-----Original Message-----
From : Travis Martinek [mailto :tmartinek@clarkewyndham.com ]
Sent: Monday, August 24 , 2015 9:39 PM
To : Stephen Cast <wsud .sc@verizon.net>; Julia Skrivanek <wsud .js@verizon .net >
Cc : Jeff Robertson <jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com >
Subject: Indian Lakes -Phase 19
Stephen ,
We have completed Indian Lakes Phase 19 and are preparing to file the plat on Wednesday. Can you reply to this email
stating your acceptance of the water lines for inclusion into the Wellborn Water system? I need this confirmation to file the
plat.
Jeff ... can you print out a copy of the plans and I will get them to Stephen for his records .
Thanks!
Travis Martinek
Clarke & Wyndham , Inc .
1
DRAINAGE REPORT
FOR
INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION
PHASE 19
December 2014
PREPARED FOR:
SMILING MA LLARD D EVELOPMENT, L TD .
3608 E AST 29 TH S TREET
B RYAN, T EXAS 77802
9 79-846-4384
MBESI No. 10620046
McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING/SURVEYING, INC.
1008 Wood creek Dr., Su ite 103 ·College Station , Tx. 77845 · (979) 693-3838 Engineer Reg . No . F-458
Survey Reg. No. 10 1033-00
Indian Lakes Subdivision, Phase 19
Stormwater Management Technical Design Summary Report
MEES! No. 10620046
PART 1-Executive Summary Report
Section 1 -Contact Information
Project Desi gner: McClure and Browne En gineering and Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, TX 77845
979-693-3838
Project Developer: Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
3608 East 29 1h Street
Bryan, Texas 77802
Section 2-General Information and Project Location
This development is the 19th phase of a multi-phase subdivision. Phase 19 consists of 16 lots. The
phase is located in the Indian Lakes Village which is down Arrington Rd. approximately 2 miles from
the Arrington Rd. William D . Fitch Pkwy intersection. Phase 19 lies in the northeast portion of the
subdivision near the intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Sundance Drive. The entire subdivision has
been analyzed in the initial drainage report submitted in September, 2000. The development is located
within the ETJ of College Station.
The project site is in the Peach Creek watershed. According to the Flood In surance Rate Maps for
Brazos County, Te xas and incorporated area, Map Number 48041C0350E effective May 16, 2012 ; no
portion of this property is located in a 100-year flood hazard area.
Culvert pipe and ditch sizing calculations are shown with this submittal.
The culverts and ditches peak runoffs were found using the Rational Method. A runoff coefficient ( c) of
0.50 was used for residential areas since all the lots have an area greater than 1 acre. The ditches along
the proposed roadways are uniform throughout the project. The ditch profiles along all propo se d
roadways were determined using the largest ditch drainage area found for Phase 19. The culverts and
ditches were analyzed using an Excel Spreadsheet which util izes Manning's Equation for the analysis.
Section 3 -Reference
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C-1
Exhibit C-2
Exhibit C-3
Technical De sign Summary
Drainage Area Map
Rational Method Calculations
Culvert Sizing Calculations
Ditch Capacity Calculations
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Ph ase 19
EXHIBITS
Drainage Repo1i
Indian Lakes, Phase 19
EXHIBIT A
Technical Design Summary
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
The Cities of Bryan and College Station both require storm drainage design to follow these
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines. Paragraph C2 of Section Ill (Administration) requires
submittal of a drainage report in support of the drainage plan (stormwater management plan)
proposed in connection with land development projects , both site projects and subdivisions.
That report may be subm it ted as a traditional prose report, complete with applicable maps,
graphs , tables and drawings , or it may take the form of a ''Technical Design Summary". The
format and content for such a summary report shall be in substant ial conformance with the
description in this Appendix to those Guidelines . In either format the report must answer the
questions (affirmative or negative) and prov ide, at m in imum, the information prescribed in the
''Technical Design Summary" in this Appendix .
The Stormwater Management Technical Design Summary Report shall include several parts
as listed below. The information called for in each part must be provided as applicable . In
addition to the requirements for the Executive Summary, this Appendix includes several
pages detail in g the requirements for a Technical Design Summary Report as forms to be
completed. These are prov ided so that they may be copied and completed or scanned and
digitized. In addition, electronic versions of the report forms may be obtained from the City.
Requirements for the means (medium) of submittal are the same as for a conventional report
as detailed in Section Ill of these Guidelines.
Note: Part 1 -Executive Summary must accompany any drainage report
required to be provided in connection with any land development project ,
regardless of the format chosen for said report .
Note: Parts 2 through 6 are to be provided via the forms provided in this
Appendix . Brief statements should be included in the forms as requested ,
but additional information should be attached as necessary.
Part 1 -Executive Summary Report
Part 2 -Project Administration
Part 3 -Project Characteristics
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT
Part 1 -Executive Summary
This is to be a brief prose report that must address eac h of the se ven areas listed below.
Ideally it will include one or more paragraphs ab out each item.
1. Name , address , and contact information of the engineer submi tting the report , and
of the land owner and developer (or applicant if not the owner or developer). The
date of submittal should also be included.
2 . Ident ificatio n of the size and gene ral nature of the proposed project , including any
proposed project phases. This paragraph should also include reference to
applications that are in process w it h either City : plat(s), site plans, zoning requests ,
STORMWAT ER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 1of26 APPENDIX . D : TEC H. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revis ed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPE NDI X D -TECH NI CAL DESIGN SUMMARY
or clearing/grading permits , as well as reference to any app lication numbers or
codes assigned by the City to such request.
3. The location of the project should be described. This should identify the Named
Regulatory Watershed(s) in which it is located, how the entire project area is
situated therein, whether the property straddles a watershed or basin divide , the
approximate acreage in each basin , and whether its position in the Watershed
dictates use of detention design. The approximate proportion of the property in the
city limits and withi n the ET J is to be identified , including whether the property
st radd les city jurisdictional lines . If any portion of the property is in floodplains as
described in Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by FEMA that should be
disclosed .
4. The hydro logic characteristics of the property are to be described in broad terms :
exist ing land cover ; how and where stormwater drains to and from ne ighboring
properties; ponds or wetland areas that tend to detain or store stormwater ; existing
creeks , channels , and swa les crossing or serving the property; all existing drainage
easements (or ROW) on the property, or on neighbo ri ng properties if they service
runoff to or from the property.
5 . The general plan for managing stormwater in the entire project area must be
outlined to include the approximate size , and extent of use, of any of the following
features: storm drains coupled with streets; detention I retention facilities ; buried
conveyance condu it independent of streets ; swales or channels; br idges or culverts;
outfalls to principal watercourses or their tributaries ; and treatment (s) of existing
watercourses. Also , any plans for reclaiming land w it hin floodplain areas must be
outlined.
6 . Coordination and permitting of stormwater matters must be addressed . This is to
include any specialized coordination that has occurred or is planned with other
entities (local , state , or federal). This may include agencies such as Brazos County
government , the Brazos River Authority , the Texas A&M U niversity System , the
Texas Department of Transportation , the Texas Commission for Environmental
Quality, the US Army Corps of Engineers , the US Enviro nmental Protection Agency ,
et al. Mention must be made of any permits , agreements , or understandings that
perta in to the project.
7. Reference is to be made to the full drainage report (or the Techn ica l Design
Summary Report ) which the executive summary represents . The principal
elements of the main report (and its length), including any maps , drawings or
construction documents , should be itemized. An example statement might be :
"One __ -pa ge drainage report dated one set of
construction drawings ( __ sheets) dated ____ , and a
___ -page specifications document dated ____ comprise
the drainage report for this project."
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 2 of 26 APPE NDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revi sed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Start (Page 2.1)
Engineering and Design Professionals Information
Engin eering Fir m Name and Address : Ju risd ict ion
C ity : Bryan
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying , Inc . x College Station 1008 Woodcreek Drive , Suite 103
College Station , Texas 77845 Date of Submittal :
(979)693 -3838
Lead Eng ineer's Name and Contact lnfo .(phone , e-mail , fa x): Other:
Jeffery L. Robertson , P.E .
Suppo rtin g Engi nee rin g I Co nsu lti ng Firm(s): Other contacts :
Developer I Owner I Applicant Information
Developer I Applicant Name and Address : Phone and e-mail :
Smiling Mallard Development , Ltd . (979) 846 -4384
3608 East 29th Street
Bryan , Texas 77802
Property Owner(s) if not Developer I Applicant (&address): Phone and e-mail :
Project Identification
Development Name : Indian Lakes , Phase 19
Is subject property a site project , a sing le-phase subdivision , or part of a multi-phase subdivision?
Mult i-phase Subdivision If mult i-phase , subject property is phase 19 of
Legal description of subject property (phase) or Project Area:
(see Section II , Paragraph B-3a )
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
If subject property (phase ) is second or later phase of a project , describe general status of all
earlier phases . For most recent earlier phase Include submittal and review dates .
The project is the 19th phase of a multi phase subdivision . At this time the first phase has
been built. Phase 1 was submitted in September, 2000 and consisted of 58 lots. The most
recent phase submitted was Ph. 25 .
Genera l Location of Proj ect Area , or subj ect property (phase ):
Project site is located near the intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Sundance Drive
in College Station , Texas .
In City Limits ? Extraterritorial Ju risdiction (acreage):
Bryan: acres . Bryan : College Station : 34 .48
College Stat ion: acres . Acreage Outsid e ET J :
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effectiv e February 2007
Pag e 3 of 26 APPENDI X. D : TEC H. DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revis ed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration Co ntinued (page 2 .2)
Project Identification (continued)
Roadways abutting or wi thin Project Area or
subject property:
Mesa Verde Drive
Abutt ing tracts, platted land , or built
developments :
Indian Lakes, Phase 16 & Un developed Land
Named Regulatory W atercourse (s) & Watershed(s): Tributary Bas in(s ):
Phase 19 is located in the Peach Creek Watershed . The nearest tributary is Peach Creek S .
Tributary 7.2 (See FEMA Map 48041C0350E).
Plat Information For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Preliminary Plat File#: ____ _ Final Plat File#: ______ Date : ____ _
Name : Pending Approval Status and Vol/Pg : Pending Approval
If two plats , sec
Status:
Zoning Information For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Zoning Type : Exist ing or Proposed? Case Code : _____ _
Case Dat e ____ _ Status :
Zoning Type : Existing or Proposed ? Case Code : _____ _
Case Date ____ _ Status :
Stormwater Management Planning For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
STORMWATE R DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effe ctiv e Feb ruary 2007
Part icipants:
Page 4 of 26
When? ____ _
APPENDI X. D : TEC H. DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revised Februarv 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration Con tinu ed (page 2.3)
Coordination For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Note: For any Coordination of stormwate r matters indicated be low , attach documentat ion
describing and substantiating any agreements , understandings, contra cts , or approva ls .
Coordination With
Non-jurisdiction
City Needed?
mmarize need(s) & actio ns taken (include contacts & dates):
Yes No x
Coordination with
Brazos County
Needed?
Yes No x
Coordi nat ion with
TxDOT Ne eded?
Yes No _x_
Coord inat ion with
T AMUS Needed?
Yes No x
Permits For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
As to stormwater management , are permits require d for the proposed work from any of the entities
listed bel ow? If so, summarize status of efforts toward that ob ·ective in s aces below .
Entity
US Army Crops of
Enginee rs
No x Yes
US Environmental
Protection Agency
No x Yes
Texas Comm iss ion on
Enviro nm ental Qua lity
No Yes x
Brazos Ri ver
Authority
No x Yes
Permitted or
A
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Status of Actions (i nclud e dates )
A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be
implemented prior to the start of construction
according to TPDES General Permit No . TXR150000 .
Page 5 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revi sed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Property Characteristics Start (Page 3.1)
Nature and Scope of Proposed Work
Existing : Land proposed for development currently used , includ in g extent of impervious cover?
Existing undeveloped land (Dense tree cover) . Existing impervious cover is
approximately 0 sf .
Site
Development
Project
(se lect all
appl icabl e)
Subdivision
Development
Project
Describe
Nature and
Size of
Proposed
Project
evelo ment of one platted lot , or two or more adjoining
__ Bu ilding on a · e platted lot of undeveloped la
_x_ Constru ction of streets and utilities to serve one or mo re platted lots .
__ Constructio n of streets and uti liti es to serve one or more proposed lots on
lands represented by pending plats .
Site projects : building use(s), approximate floor space , impervious cover ratio.
Subdivisions : number of lots by general type of use , linear feet of streets and
drai nag e easements or ROW .
This phase of the subdivision includes 16 lots . The development
consists of approximately 3 ,177 LF of streets with 16 ' PUE on each
side of the streets ROW .
Is any work planned on land that is not platted
or on land for wh ic h platti ng is not pending?
x No Yes
FEMA Floodplains
Is any part of subject property abutting a Named Regulatory Watercourse No x Yes
(Section II , Paragrap h B 1) or a trib utary th ereof?
Is any part of subject property in floodpla in
area of a FEMA-reg ul ated watercourse?
Encroachment(s )
into Floodplain
areas planned?
No x
No
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effe ctive Februa ry 2007
Pag e 6 of 26
Yes x
APPENDI X. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revis ed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Property Characteristics Continu ed (Pag e 3.2)
Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase)
Has an earlier hydro logic analysis bee n done for larger a rea i ncludi ng subject property?
Yes
x
No
Reference th e stud y (&date) he re , and attac h copy if no t already in City file s .
Indian Lakes Subdivision ; September , 2000
Is the stor mwater mana geme nt plan for the pro perty in sub stantia l co nfo rma nce wi th the
earl ie r stud y? Yes x No If no t , ex plai n how it d iffers .
·ect pro pe rt y is not part of multi-phase project , desc rib e storm wate r ma nag em e
plan for roperty in Part 4 .
If property is part !t i-phase project, provide overvie w of stormw ma nagement plan
fo r Project Area here . o perty w ill co m ply
th erewith .
Do ex ist ing topog raphic feat ures o n subj ect prope rt y sto re or de tain runo ff? _x_ No Yes
Des cri be them (inclu de appro ximate size , volume , o utfall , mode l , etc).
Any known dra inage or flooding prob lems in areas near subject pro perty? __ x _ No Yes
Ident ify:
Based on locatio n of stu dy prope rty in a watershed , is Type 1 Detention (f loo d contro l) needed?
(see Ta bl e B-1 in A ppe nd ix B)
__ De tent io n is re q uired . _x_ Need m ust be eva lua t ed . __ Dete nt ion not require d .
Wh at decis ion has been reac hed? By who m ?
Detention study during Phase 1.
If the need for How was dete rm in at ion made?
Type 1 Detention
m ust be eval uated : Detention was required and is provided for the entire
Indian Lakes Subdivision . However , Phase 19 does not require
any additional detention .
STO R MWAT ER DES IGN GU IDELINES
Effecti ve Febru ary 20 07
Pa ge 7 of 26 A PPEND IX. D : TECH. DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revi sed Februarv 200 9
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Property Characteristics I Co nt inu ed (Page 3.3)
Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) (continued)
Does subject prope rty straddle a Watershed or Basin divide? x No __ Yes If yes ,
describe splits below. In Part 4 describe desiqn co ncep t for ha ndlinq th is .
---Watershed or Basin Larger acreage Lesser ----:e -----------------------~
--t---._
--r----_
Above-Project Areas (Section II , Paragraph 8 3-a)
Does Proje ct Area (project or phase) receive runoff from up land areas? _x _ No __ Yes
Size(s )ofa rea(s)inacres : 1) 2) 3) 4) __ _
Flow Characteristics (each instance) (ove rland sheet , shallow concentrated , recognizable
concentrated section (s), small creek (no n-regu latory), regulatory Wate rco urse or tributary);
Overland flow to proposed ditch lines on Phase 19 streets .
Flow dete rm ination : Out li ne hydrologic methods and ass umptions :
The Rational Method was used for flow calculations and the post development
land was treated as large acre residential tracts.
Does storm runoff drain from public easements or ROW onto or across subje ct property?
_x_ No __ Yes If yes , describe fac ilities in easement or ROW :
Are changes in run off characteristics subj ect to c hange in futu re? Exp lain
No , upstream land is already developed .
Conveyance Pathways (Section II , Paragraph C2)
Mus t runoff from study property drain across lower prope rtie s before reaching a Regulatory
W ate rcourse or tributa ry? No x Yes
Describe le ng th and characteristics of each conveyance pathway(s ). Include ownership of
property(ies ).
Runoff from Ph . 19 will leave the phase and be discharged into existing
tributaries of Peach Creek . The property is a future phase
of t h e Indian Lakes Subdivision .
STORMWAT ER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Pag e 8 of 26 APPENDI X . D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised Februarv 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Property Characteristics Co ntin ued (Page 3.4)
Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) (continued)
Conveyan ce Pathways (continued)
Do d rainage
ea sements
exi st for any
pa rt of
pathway(s)?
es , for w hat part of length? % Created by? __ plat , or
instr ument. If instrume nt(s), describe their provisi o ns.
x No
Pathway
Areas
Nearby
Yes
W he re runo ff must c ro ss lo wer p e rt ies, descri be charac istics of ab utti ng lowe r
prope rt y(ies). (Existing watercourse Ea sement o r Co ent aq uired?)
Descri be an y bui lt or imp r ed drainage faci lities exis ting nea e property (c ulverts ,
brid g es , lin ed c ha nnels uried condui t , swales , dete ntion pon ds, tc).
Dra inage I'-::----.,,-,----,----...,.--,---,-----,-----------------~
Facilities Do any of these have hydrologic or hydra ulic influe nce on propose d stormwater
desig n? _x_ No __ Yes If yes, explain :
STORMWATER DESIG N GUIDELINES
Effective Feb ruary 2007
Page 9 of 26 APPE NDIX . D : TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Re v ised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Start (Page 4.1)
Stormwater Management Concept
Discharge(s) From Upland Area(s)
ff is to be re ce ived from upl and area s , what des ign drainage features will be used t
accomm it and insure it is not blocked by future developmen t? Describe fa
flow section , or 1 e point.
Discharge (s) To Lower Property(ies) (Section II , Paragraph E1)
Does project include drainage features (exi sting or future) proposed to become public via
platt ing? _x_ No __ Yes Separate Instrument? x No Yes
er Guide lines reference above , how will
ru ff be discharged to neighboring
prop (ies)?
__ Establish ing Easements (Scenario 1)
__ Pre-development Release (Scenari 2)
Combination of the two Scenari
Scenario 1. If easements are proposed , describe w he re needed , and prov ide stat
on each . (Atta ed Exhibit# )
Scenario 2: Provide general de ription of how release(s) wil e managed to pre-development
conditions (detention , sheet flow , p ially concentrated , et .. (Attached Exhib it# )
Combi nation : If combinat ion is pro sed , explain how d1 ha rge will differ from pre-
develo pment condit ions at the pr erty line for each area (o oint ) of re lease .
If Scenario 2, o ombinatio n are to be us ed , has proposed design bee n coor · ated with
owner(s) of r e iv ing property(ies)? No Yes Explain a nd pro · e
documen
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective Fe bruary 20 07
Page 10 of 26 APPENDI X. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revis ed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4 .2)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project
· gain ing Basins or Watersheds a nd acres shifting:
Will project resu lt
in shifting runoff
between Basins or 1------------=......_,,-----'7"""'=---.,----,--------,---~,----1
between
Watersheds?
x No
Yes
How will runoff from Project
Area be mitigated to pre-
development condi ti ons?
Select any or all of 1, 2 ,
and/or 3 , and explain be low .
1. __ With faci lity(ies ) involv ing other development proj ects .
2 . __ Establis hi ng features to serve overall Project Area .
3. _x_ On phase (or site) project basis within Project Area.
ared facilit (type & location of facil ity ; design drainage area served ; relationship to siz
Project : (Attach ed Ex hibit# )
2. For Overall Project Area
3. By phase (or site) project: Describe planned mitigation measures for phases (or s ites) in
subsequent questions of this Part.
aquat ic echosystems proposed ? No Yes
?
nt Practices for reducing stormwate
Su rize type of BMP and
If des ign of any runoff-handlin cilities dev iate from p isions of B-CS Technical
Specifications , check ty acility(ies) and ex plain in later q
Co nduit elements I features
__ Ditches __ In lets __ Valley gutters __
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effe ctive Februa ry 2007
________ Other
Page 11 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TEC H. DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revis ed Februarv 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Pag e 4.3)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Pro ject Area Of Multi-Phase Project (continued)
Will Project Area in clude bridge(s) or culvert(s)? __ No _x _ Yes Identify type and
general size and In which phase(s).
Culvert 11 -24 " RCP Pipe on Chaco Canyon Drive
Culvert 12 -24 " RCP Pipe on Halona Court
· /re tention serves (w ill serve) overall Project Area , describe how it relates t
phase or site pr · h sical location , conveyance pathway(s), constru · quence):
Ident ify whether each of the types of drainage features lis ted below are incl uded , extent of use ,
a nd general characteristics .
Typical shape?
V-Shape
Surfaces ?
Grass
Steepest side slopes:
4 :1
Usual front slopes: Usual back slopes:
4 :1 4 :1
Flow li ne slopes: least __ o_. 6_8_%_ Typical d is tance from travelway: 11 '
typ ical __ v_a _r i_· e_s_ greatest __ 2 _. ~93~%-(Attached Ex hib it# )
Are longitudinal cu lvert ends in compliance with B-CS Standard Specificatio ns?
x Yes No, then explain :
rsections or otherwise , do valley gutters cross arterial or co ll ector stre
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Yes If yes explain :
Pag e 12 of 26 APPENDI X. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.4)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase , or Site) (continued)
L..
Q.)
'§
Ol
""CJ~ c ""CJ
C1l Q.)
-e .~
~c 0 ..c (.) --·~
CJJ a;
~ u;
Q.)
4:
C:-·
""CJ
Q.)
CJJ CJJ
::::J Q.)
E >-~I CJJ
c ·-0 n u;
.!!!.
Usual
Are 1 ets recessed on arterial and collector streets?
identify here and why.
Greatest
Yes
Will inlets captu 10-year design stormflow to prevent flooding of · tersections (arterial
with arterial or colle or)? __ Yes __ No If no , expl · whe re and why not.
Will inlet s ize and placeme n revent exceeding allowa e water spread for 10-year
des ign storm throughout site ( hase)? __ Y No If no, explain.
Sag curves : Are inlets placed at low poi n '2 Yes No Are in lets and
condu it sized to prevent 100-yea r storm rom ponding at greater than 24 inches?
Yes No Explain "no " answe
Will 100-yr stormflow b ontained in combination of ROW a buried conduit on
whole le ngth of all str. ets? __ Yes __ No If no , des "be where and why.
for cu rb , gutter, and inlets comp ly with B-CS Tech nica l Specific ·ons?
No If not , describe difference(s) and attach j ustification .
any 12 -inch laterals used? No Yes
used .
Are downstream soffi at or below upstream soffits?
Yes __ N __ If not , explain w here and why:
If not , explain where
Leas ount that hydraulic
grade lin e · elow gutter line
(system-wide):
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effe ctive February 2007
Page 13 of 26 APPE NDI X. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Cont inued (Pag e 4.5)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase , or Site) (continued)
C'-·
CJ)
(j)
~CJ)
-a> jTI
.8
~ 0 ooz
:i i xi
CJ)
a>
Describe waterco urse(s ), or system(s) rece ivi ng system disc ha rge(s) below
(i ncl ud e design discharge velocity , and angle between co nvergi ng flow line
atercourse (or system), ve locity, and a ngl e?
For each outfall ab ov , wha t meas ures are tak en to eve nt erosion or sco ur of
receivi ng and al l iliti es at j un ct ure?
1 )
swale (s) situated a lo ng pro perty lines betwee n pro perties? No
Num r of instances: For each instance answer the fo llo wing questio
ments (incl ud ing low-flow fl umes if a ny ):
4: Wi ll 100 -yea r desi storm runoff be conta ined wi thin easement(s
ROW in a ll inst ces? Yes No If "no " exp lai n:
STORMWAT ER DES IG N GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 14 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.6)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase , or Site) (continued)
(/)
Q) .r:
~
0
Q)
:-£2
(/)
"O
C1l
0 a:::
(/)
Q)
>-
I
0 z
xj
C'-·
.!!].
Q) c c
C1l .r: u
c
Q)
0.
0 -0
:::J
-~
c
"O
Q)
(/)
:::J
(/) c
0
~ c
:.0
E
0 u -:::J
"O c
0 u
]l
C1l
~
(/)
Q)
~
(/)
Q) u c
C1l
Ul c
cu c
0
:E
"O
"O
C1l
>. c
C1l ._
0 -c
0
~
E ._
.2 c
Q)
E
C1l
(/)
Q)
"O ·::;:
0 .....
0.
w
Q) .r:
(/)
Q)
~
C1l
0.
Q)
(/)
c
~
Are roadside ditches used? __ No _x_ Yes If so , provide th e following :
Is 25-year flow contained with 6 inches of freeboard thro ughout? _x_ Yes
Are top of banks separated from road shoulders 2 feet or more? _x_ Yes
Are all ditch sections trapezoidal and at least 1.5 feet de ep? Yes
For any "no " answers provide location(s) and explain :
All Ditche s are V-shaped and a t least 2 ' deep
x
condu it is beneath a swa le , prov ide the following information (e ach instance).
Is 100-ye design flow contained in conduiUswale combination?
If "no " expla · :
r storm flow? ROW Easement
Swale Surface ty , m1n1mum Conduit Type and size , m inim
and maximum slopes : slopes , design storm :
Yes
ROW Easement Width
No
No
No
No
No
Conduit Type and size , m i
slopes , design storm :
um and maximum
Inlets De scribe ow conduit is lo aded (from streets/storm drains, inl
escribe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into condu
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 15 of26 APPENDI X. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revis ed February 2009
SECTI O N IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Cont in ued (Page 4 .7)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within O r Serving Subject Property (Phase , or Site) (continued)
c
~
E ~ e w -
"yes " provi de the follo wi ng infor mati on fo r eac h instance :
15 IJJ Is 100-year des ign w contained in swale?
c ~ withi n d rainage ROW . __ Yes __ No
.; I f--~~~~~...,-~~~~~~~~~~~~~---,,.£-~~~~~~~~~-----j
o Access
~ 0 ;z
] x I r-:-~~~...,---::-~-,-,--~~~--,-~~~---"<----r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--l
~ Instance 2 Describe genera l locati o n, ap
Q)
·c C'-·
:::J Ul
..a c
::; Q)
o E
£ ffi -~ ~
Ul '-
Q) 0
~~
Ul 0 =a: ~ -~
C'-·
l:l
Q)
Ul
..a
:::J
0..
c
~
0 0.. 0.. x e w
0..
Ul Ul c Q)
Q) >-
E
I
Q)
> 0
'--
0..
E 0 z
Q)
xJ c c
Cll
.!:: u
Is 100-year des ign f low co
within drainage ROW?
Is swale who ll y
w " channels: W ill an y area(s) of conce ntra ted fl ow be chan nelize d (deepene d
w ide or straightened) o r otherwise altered? __ No __ Yes If only s · tly
shaped , s "Swales " in thi s Part . If creating side banks , provide informat i elow .
Will des ign rep l1 e na tural channel? Yes No If "no " reach ins tance
descri be section sha & area , flow line slope (m in. & max.), s ces , and 100-year
design f low, and amo unt reeboard:
Instance 1:
Instance 2 :
Insta nce 3 :
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 16 of 26 APPEND IX. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised Februarv 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.8)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
W ithin Or Serving Subject Property (Phase , or Site) (c o nti nued )
-0
(!)
:::I c
No Yes
Wi smal l creeks and their f loodplains remain undisturbed? __ Yes __ No How
man d isturbance instances? Identify each planned location :
For eac h lac lio n, describe length and gene ral type of proposed improv,
(i ncludi ng floo la in c ha nges):
For each location , des ibe section shape & area , f low line sl e (min . & max .),
surfaces , and 100-year sign flow .
'E Watercourses (and tributaries): ide from fri e changes , are Regulatory
8 Waterco urses proposed to be altered . __ o __ Yes Explain below.
(/) c Subm it f ull report describing proposed c n s to Regu latory Watercourses . Address
~ existing and proposed sect ion size and sh e , surfaces , alignment , flow line changes ,
~ length affected , and capaci ty , and provid f documentation of ana lysis procedures e and data. Is full report submitted? No If "no " explain :
0.
E
If design is to replicate nat a l channel , ident ify locatio n a length here , and describe
design in Special Design ection of this Part of Repo rt .
Will 100-year flo be contained with one foot of freeboard?
not , ide ntify lac io n and exp la in :
No If
I easements sized to contain c hannel and required ma intenance spa e?
es No If not , identify locat ion(s ) and expla in:
STOR MWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective Feb ruary 2007
Pag e 17 of 26 APP ENDI X. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revi sed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.9)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase , or Site) (continued)
(/)
(1)
>-
I
C'-·
l:l
(1)
(/)
0
0.. e a...
(/)
(1)
:E
ow many facilities for subject property project? For each provide info. belo
For eac h facility what is 25-
Facility 1:
Facility 2:
__ yes
__ yes
Facility 2
no no
no no
Do outlets and spillways discharge 1 to a public fa 1l ity in easemen t or ROW?
Facility 1: __ Yes No Facilit 2: Yes No
If "no " explain:
For eac h , what is velocity of 25-yr desi discti rge at outlet? & at spillway?
Facility 1: & ----+--Faci · y 2: & ____ _
Are energy dissipation measures No Yes Describe type and
location:
For each, is spillway su es or no , and describe:
Facility 1:
Facility 2:
easures a re taken to prevent erosion or scour at rec ·ving facility?
If berm a re used give heights , slopes and surface treatments of sides .
Facili 1:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 18 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revi sed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continue d (Page 4 .10 )
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
W ithin O r Serving Subject Property (Phase , o r Site) (co ntinued)
tru ctu res comply w ith B-CS S pecifica ti ons? Yes or no , and ex plain if "no ":
Fac ility 1;
(fl
Q)
:;::;
:-=TI ~ Q) Fac ility 2: LL ::J c c:,.::::;
0 c
~ 0 c (..)
Q) ~
Fo r addition a l fac ilit ~d e all sa m e informatio n o n a se ~h eet. Qi
0 ~to be used for deten tion ? __ No _Yes ~
d ue to req uired desig n storm?
Roadside Ditches : W ill c ul ve rt s serve access drive ways at roa dside di tches?
No x Yes If "yes ", prov ide info rmation in next two boxes . ----
Will 25-yr. flow pass witho ut fl owing ove r driveway in all cases? x Yes No ----
W it ho ut ca usi ng flo win g or standing wa ter on pub lic roadway? x Yes No ----
Desig ns & materia ls comp ly with B-C S Technical S pec ifications? __ x _ Yes --No
Explai n a ny "no " a nswe rs :
C'·
(fl
Ol c
(fl Are culve rt s para ll el to pub lic roa dway al ign ment? __ Yes x No Explain: (fl
0 --
ti (fl
Q)
2 >-! xi Creeks at Private Drives: Do private dri veways , dr ive s , or streets cross drainage
Cll wa ~s tha t serve Above-Project areas or a re in public easements / RO W?
-0 0
Q) z __ No __ Yes If "yes " provide in fo rmation be low.
(fl
I
::J How man y instances? Describe location an d provide info rmation below. (fl
t
Q) Locatio n 1: 2:
::J
(..)
Q) Location 2 : .<
Locat io n 3 :
Fo r each location enter v alue for: 1 2 3
Des ig n year passi ng wi thou t top in g trave lway?
Water depth on trave lway at 25-year flow?
Wate r depth on tra v elwa y at 100-year fl o w?
For more instances desc ri be location and same info rm ation on separate s heet.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 19 of 26 APPEND IX. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Re v ised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Co nt inu ed (Page 4 .11)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within O r Serving Subject P roperty (Phase , o r Site) (continued)
Named Regulato!)l Watercourses (&Tributaries}: Are culverts proposed on t hese
faci li ties? x No __ Yes , t he n prov ide f u ll report docu m ent ing assumptio ns , --
criteria , a nalys is , computer programs , and study fi ndings tha t support proposed
des ign(s). Is report provided? __ Yes --No If "no ", exp lai n:
a; Arterial or Ma jor Collector Streets : W ill cu lverts serve t hese types of roadways?
(!) x No Yes How many instances? For each id ent ify the .c en ----
(!) location and provide the information below .
en rn Instance 1: (!) '--
>-~
x i~ Ins tance 2:
Instance 3:
c
.Q
Y es o r No for the 100-year design flow : a rn 1 2 3
z E
I ~ Headwater WSE 1 foot be low lowest curb top?
Sprea d of headwater w ithi n RO W or easement?
E ('-· C1l Is velo c ity lim ited pe r conditions (Table C-11 )? en en
gi "O Exp lain any "no " answer(s ): ·-c ~ C1l
0 c
'--0 u :p
>-C1l C1l (.)
3 ..Q
"O (!)
C1l .0
0 ·-'--'--
Minor Collector or Local Streets : W ill c ulverts serve these types of streets?
(.) (.) No x Yes How ma ny instances? 2 fo r each identify the ·-en -(!) ----.g "O location a nd provide the information below:
a. (!) ....., a. Insta nce 1: Cu l vert #1 o n Chaco Canyon Dr ive C1lb
"O >-Instan ce 2: Culvert #2 on Halona Court (!) c
~ C1l -Insta nce 3 : 2 0 ...._ en
(!) (!)
Fo r each in stance ente r va lu e , or "yes " I "no" fo r :4 2'. (.) 1 2 3 ::Jc
(.) C1l Design yr . headwater WSE 1 ft . below curb top? Yes (!) u; Yes '--c <l'. ·-100-yr. ma x . depth at street crown 2 feet or less? Yes ~ Yes
0 Prod uct of ve locity (fps) & depth at cro w n (ft)=? 0 E 0
'--Yes 0 Is velocity lim ited per conditions (Table C-11 )? Yes ~
Lim it of down stream ana lys is (feet)? 50 ' 5 0 '
Ex p lai n any "no " an swers :
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELI NES
Effectiv e Feb ruary 2007
Page 20 of 26 APPEND IX. D : TECH . DESI GN SUMMAR Y
As Revised Feb ruarv 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -D rainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.12)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
W ithin O r Se rving Subject Prop erty (Ph ase , or S ite) (co nt inued)
All Proposed Culverts : For a ll proposed culvert faci li ties (except drivewa y/roadside
ditch intersects) provide info rmation req uested in next eight boxes .
Do culverts and travelways intersect at 90 degrees? x Yes No If not , ----
identify location(s) and intersect angle(s), and justify the design(s):
Does drainage way ali gnment change w ithi n or nea r lim its of c ulvert and surfaced
approaches the reto? _x_ No --Yes If "yes " identify location(s), describe
change(s), and justification :
Are flu mes or conduit to discharge into culvert barre l(s)? ____!:______No __ Yes If yes ,
identify locatio n(s) a nd pro v ide justificatio n:
-Are f lumes or co ndui t to discharge into or near surfaced approaches to cu lvert ends?
"O x No Yes If "yes " identify location (s), describe outfall design treatment(s): Q.) ----:::i c
~
0 u
(/)
t
Q.)
Is scour/erosion protect ion provided to e nsure long te rm stabi li ty of culvert structura l .2:
:::i components, and surfacing at culvert e nd s? x Yes No If "no " Identify u ----locations and provide justification (s):
Will 100-yr flow and spread of backwater be fully co nta ined in street ROW , and/or
drainage easements / ROW? _x_ Yes --No if not, why not?
Do appreciable hydra ulic effects of any cul vert exten d downstream or upstream to
neighbo ring land(s) not encompassed in subje ct property? x No Yes If ----"yes " describe location(s) and mitigation measures :
Are a ll cu lvert des igns and materials in compliance with B-CS Tech. Specifications? x Yes No If not , explain in Special Design Section of this Part. ----
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective Febru ary 200 7
Pag e 21 of 26 APPEND IX. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revis ed February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.13)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase , or Site) (continued)
.£
Cll
::i a ....
(l)
1il s
bridge included in plans for subject property project? No Yes
If "ye " rovide the follo wing informati on.
A ful l report supporting a l spects of t he proposed bridge (s t ruct ural , geotechn ical ,
hydrologic, and hydr 1c factors) must acco mpany this summa
provided? No If "no" exp lain :
Is a Stormwater
Poll ut ion Prevention
Plan (SW3P )
established for
project co nstru ction?
No x Yes
Provi de a general description of planned techniques :
Hay Bale Barriers and Rock Dams will serve as t he
main protection against stormwat e r p ollution . The
Contractor shall use any other means necessary
throughout construction .
Speci a l Designs -Non-Traditional Methods
Are any non-traditional methods (aqua tic echosystems , wetland -type detention , natural stream
repl ication, BMPs for water qua lity, etc .) proposed for any aspect of subject property proje ct ?
x No Yes If "yes " list ge neral type and lo cation belo w .
STORMWAT ER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effectiv e February 2007
Page 22 of 26 APPENDI X. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4 .14)
Stormwater Management Concept {continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property {Phase , or Site) {continued)
ecial Designs -Deviation From B-CS Technical Specifications
If a design(s) or material(s) of traditional runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of
8 -CS chnical Specifications , check type facility(ies ) and explain by specific detail eleme .
De tion elements __ Drain system elements __ Channel features
Cu Ive Swales Ditches Inlets tfalls
__ Valley gu __ Bridges (explain in bridge report)
ntify specific element , justification for deviation(s).
1)
2 )
3 )
4 )
5)
Have elements been co inated with the City Engineer or her/his des1 ee? For each item
above provide "yes " no", action date , and staff name :
1)
2 )
3 )
4 )
Design Parameters
Hydrology
Is a map (s) showing all Design Drainage Areas provided? x Yes No
Briefly summarize the range of applications made of the Rational Formula:
For the Rational Formula we assumed residentia l areas had a
runoff coefficient of 0.5 for large residentia l or estate lots.
What is the size and location of largest Design Drainage Area to which the Rational Formula
has been applied? 4. oo acres Location (or identifier): Ditch Line Culvert #1
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 23 of 26 APPE ND IX . D TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .15)
Design Parameters (continued)
Hydrology (continued)
In making determinations fo r time of concentration , was segment analysis used?
x No Yes In approximately what percent of Design Dra inage Areas? %
As to intensity-duration-frequency and rain depth criteria for determin ing runoff flows , were any
criteria other than those prov ided in these Guide li nes used? _x_ No Yes If "yes " --iden t ify type of data , so u rce (s), and where applied :
For each of the stormwater management features listed below identify the storm return
frequenc ies (year) analyzed (or checked ), and that used as the bas is for design .
Feature Ana lys is Year(s) Des ign Y ear
~tern for arterial and collector streets -------Storm dra in system for .-,ets -----------Open channels -~
Swale /bu ri ed condu i ~a"on in lie u of channel ---------~ --------Roads ide ditches and c ulverts serv ing them 2,5,1 0 ,2 5,50,1 00 2 5 & 1 00
~ilities : sp i llway crest and its outfall
Detentio n facilitie~d conveyance st ructure (s) --------Detention facilities : volume when ~ed ------~
Culverts serving private d riv es or~ -----r--.
Cu lverts serv ing ~ ~ays --------~vide in bridge report. --------Hydraulics
What is the range of des ig n flow velocit ies as outl ined below?
Design f low velocities ; 2 5 y ear Gutters Conduit Culverts Swales Channels
H ighest (feet per second)
Lowest (feet per seco nd)
Streets and Storm Drain Systems
Rough ness coeffic ients used :
For conduit type(s) RC P 0 .0 14
STORMWATER DESIGN G U IDELI NES
Effectiv e February 2007
1 0 .50
7 .81
Provide the summary information outlin ed below :
For street gutters :
Page 24 of 26
NA
Co efficients :
APPEN DIX . D : TECH . DESIG N SUMMAR Y
As Rev ised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.16)
Design Parameters (continued)
Hydraulics (continued)
eet and Storm Drain Systems (co nti nu ed)
For th allowing, are assumptions other than allowable per Guidel ines?
Inlet coe 1 · nts? No Yes Head and friction losses
Yes No
Yes No
Explain any "no " answers :
Yes No
s were assumed at outfall point (s) of the storm
eac h location and pla in:
Open Channels If a HEC analysis is ut ilized, does it follow Sec Vl.F .5.a? Yes No
Outside of straight sections , is flow regime with in limi ts of s ub-crit ical flow? _x _ Yes No
If "no " list locations and explain :
Culverts If plan sheets do not provide the fol lowi ng for each culvert , describe it here .
For each design discharge , will operation be outlet (barrel) con trol or inlet control?
All culverts will be inlet controlled .
Entrance , friction and exit losses :
A 0.5 entrance and exit loss coefficients are used for sloped end treatments
and square edged headwalls with wingwa l ls .
Bridges Provide all in bridge report
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effe cti ve Febru ary 2007
Page 25 of 26 APPENDIX . D : TECH. DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revised Februarv 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .17)
Design Parameters (continued)
Computer Software
What computer software has been used in th e a na lysis a nd assessment of stormwater
management needs and /or the development of facil ity designs proposed for subject property
pro je ct? List the m below, being sure to id entify the software name and versio n, the date of the
version , any applica bl e patches and the publisher
Open Office Calculator Spreadsheet
Part 5 -Plans and S~ecifications
Requirements for submitta l of construction drawings and specifications do not differ due to use of a
Tec hni cal Des ign Summary Report. See Section Ill , Paragraph C3 .
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
Conclusions
Add any concluding in formation here :
The Indian Lakes Subdi vision , Phase 19 will have no advers e impact to downstream
properties and conforms to the overall subdivision re p ort .
Attestation
Provid e attestatio n to the accuracy and com ple te ness of the forego ing 6 Parts of th is Technical
Desian Summarv Drai naae Report bv s iani na and sealinq belo w .
"This report (plan) fo r the drainage design of the development nam ed in Part B was prepared
by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with provisions of the Bryan/College Station
Unified Drainage Design Guidelines for the owners of the property. All licenses and p ermits
requ ire d by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage
improvements have been issued or fall under applicable general permits ." _,._ .............. ,,,, ' PL --·j;OF •• " ~f th (Affix Seal) ; ,,,_~}····:···'·~{ \) I ft~ ~It ,. ("~...-'~ ·:115' 1
\ ......_ f -· f' * ... ~{f ... ,, 1 ~ I t f ~ * : f/.\ "· *,. J Lice e fessio nal Engin eer I"·· .. ~ ...................... : .... ~ ~J!:FFERY L. !=IOBERrSoN ;
State of Te x as PE No . qq'EJ_t;
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELI N ES
Effective Febru a ry 2007
Pa ge 26 of 26
.,. ... :..· ........... ·;.~: ....... : ... ·j
t1 -o \ 9 4 7 .,. 5 /c .. ,
f -~ ...... t.1 .-.,. -<'.."' .. ·.,~".;
--,-~' •• --C"~"'I '-~"" •• • ... -
'·
APPEND IX . D : TECH . DESIG N SUMMARY
As Revis ed Februarv 2009
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes, Phase 19
EXHIBITB
Drainage Area Map
EXHIBIT C-1
Rational Method Calculations
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
<( ~ w 0 0 0:: w ...J ...J
<( <( 0.. <( LL
w w 0 j:: t-0
(!) 0:: ...J z <( z
<( <( w z w () ~ i= > w ::E z ...J ...J
<( w <( 0 w <( 0:: (!) ~ iii t-ow > t-Wz
0 zo:: w <( 0 >w 0 t-:::> <( 0:: 0.. t-0...J
NO . AC. 0.4 0 .5 0.9 ft.
1.0 2.10 0.00 2 .10 0 .00 1.05 318.3
2.0 4 .00 0 .00 4 .00 0 .00 2 .00 7 70 .3
3 .0 2 .16 0 .00 2 .16 0 .00 1 .08 770 .3
4 .0 2 .92 0 .00 2.92 0 .00 1.46 396 .0
. EXHIBIT C-1
Rational Formula Drainage Area Calculations
Indian Lakes Phase 19
~
0 ~ ~ ...J
LL 0 0
0 ...J ...J
z LL LL >-
~ 0:: J: 0:: t-u 0 0 w t-w t-
0:: ...J t-(!) t-...J 0 t-
0 w_, t-z t-...J ...J w > <( =>w :::> <( w iii C/l N Ill
0 LL (!) ...J (!)LL > () :::> N 0 Ill 0
ft. ft. ft. ftls min min In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs
6 .4 4 96.8 6.0 1 .5 9.1 10.0 6.33 6 .6 7.7 8 .08
11 .8 779 .3 14.6 1 .3 19.5 1 9 .5 4 .50 9 .0 5 .6 11 .12
11 .8 737 .3 11 . 7 1 .3 1 9 .6 19 .6 4 .48 4 .8 5 .5 5 .98
5.6 402.4 4 .3 1.2 11 .1 11.1 6 .02 8 .8 7 .3 10 .72
0
0 Ill 0 0 0
0 ..... Ill N :il Ill 0 0 ..... 0 N 0 0 .....
In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs
8.6 9 .07 9.86 10.35 11.15 11 .7 1 12.53 13 .15
6 .3 12 .60 7 .22 14.44 8 .19 16.39 9 .25 18 .51
6 .3 6 .78 7 .20 7 .77 8 .16 8.82 9 .22 9 .96
8 .2 12 .04 9.43 13.76 10 .66 15 .57 11 .9 9 17.50
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Ph ase 19
EXHIBIT C-2
Culvert Sizing Calculations
Culvert #1
Culvert Description
24 " RCP
at Intersection
of Mesa Verde
Drive and Chaco
Canyon Drive
Cul ve rt Design Criteria
Circular
Pipe No.
Dia . (ft.) Pipes
2.00 1
Culvert Analysis Calculations
Total Flow per Critica l
Design Flow Pipe Depth (ft .)
Storm (cfs) (cfs) de
5 11 .12 11.12 1.20
10 12.60 12 .60 1.30
25 14.44 14.44 1.35
50 16 .39 16 .39 1.45
100 16 .51 18 .51 1.55
n
0.014
Normal
Depth
(ft .)
0.82
0.87
0.95
1.02
1.10
EXHIBIT C-2
CULVERT ANALYSIS
Indian Lakes Phase 19 -Culvert #1
E Lhi~
i HWi :-1 ;----~ To p of Roa d / ELh o
~~ TW --- --
"'-ELo
_/----- - ---
ELi Pro posed Culv ert ~
Outfall Channel Design Criteri a
Invert Outlet Cu lvert Top Lt. Side Rt. Side Bottom
Elev. (Eli) Elev . (Elo) Length Slope of Slope Slope Slope Width n
(ft.) (ft.) (ft .) (fVft) Road ke I (fVft) (?:1) (?:1) (ft)
280 .75 279 .50 55 .00 0.0227 284 .00 0.50 I 0.0100 4 .00 4 .00 0.00 0.024
HEADWATER CALCULATIO NS Control Type Outlet
INLET CO NTROL OUTLET CONTROL HW of Velocity Freeboard
HWi/D HWi ELhi TW de (de+ D)/2 ho H ELho Elev . Control (fps) (ft .)
0.91 1.82 282 .57 0.88 1.20 1.60 1.60 0.45 281 .55 282 .57 Inlet 9.23 1.43
0.96 1.93 262 .68 0 .92 1.30 1.65 1.65 0 .57 281 .72 282 .68 Inlet 9.54 1.32
1.04 2.07 262 .82 0.97 1.35 1.68 1.68 0 .75 281.93 282 .82 Inlet 9.88 1.18
1.13 2.25 283 .00 1.02 1.45 1.73 1.73 0 .97 282 .19 283 .00 Inlet 10 .19 1.00
1.24 2.47 283.22 1.07 1.55 1.78 1.78 1.23 282 .51 283 .22 Inlet 10 .50 0.78
Culve rt #2
Culvert Description
24" RCP
at Intersection
o f Chaco C anyon
Drive and Halona
Co urt
Culvert Desiqn Criteria
Circula r
Pipe No .
D ia . (ft .) Pipes
2 .00 1
Culvert Analysis Calculations
Total Fl o w per Critical
Design Flow Pipe Depth (ft .)
Storm (cfs) (cfs) de
5 5 .98 5.98 0 .80
10 6 .78 6 .78 0 .90
25 7 .77 7 .77 1.00
50 8.82 8.82 1.05
100 9 .96 9 .96 1.15
n
0 .014
No rm al
Depth
(ft )
0 .59
0 .62
0 .67
0 .72
0.77
Inve rt
Elev . (Eli)
(ft.)
283.43
EXHIBIT C-2
CULVERT ANALYSIS
Indian Lakes Phase 19 -Culvert #2
EL hi ~ Top of Road / ELho
HWi ~1;---------~~ ~--__/------------~
EL i Pro posed Cul ve rt _=-> - - - --,
"-ELo
Outfall Channel Design Criteria
Outlet Culvert To p Lt . Side Rt. Side Botto m
Elev. (Elo) Length Slope of Slope S lope Slope W idth n
(ft) (ft .) (ft/ft) Road ke I (ft/ft) (?:1) (?:1) (ft .)
2 83 .13 58 .00 0.0052 286 .26 0 .50 I 0 .0100 4 .00 4 .00 0.00 0 .024
H EA DW ATER CA LC U LATI O NS Control Type Outlet
INLET CO NTRO L OUTL ET CO NTROL HW of Vel ocity Freeboard
HWi/D HWi ELhi TW de (de+ D)/2 ho H EL ho Elev . Co ntro l (fps ) (ft .)
0 .79 1.58 285.01 0 .70 0 .80 1.40 1.40 0 .13 284.66 285 .01 Inlet 7 .81 1.25
0 .81 1.61 285.04 0 .73 0 .90 1.45 1.45 0 .17 284 .75 285 .04 Inlet 8 .10 1.22
0 .83 1.65 285.08 0 .76 1.00 1.50 1.50 0 .22 284 .85 285 .08 Inlet 8 .38 1.18
0 .85 1.71 285 .14 0 .80 1.05 1.53 1.53 0 .29 284 .94 285 .14 Inlet 8 .68 1.12
0 .88 1.77 285 .20 0 .84 1.15 1.58 1.58 0 .36 285.07 285 .20 Inlet 8 .98 1.06
Drainage Repo rt
Indi an Lakes , Ph ase 19
EXHIBIT C-3
Ditch Capacity Calculations
Area= 23 .75 sf
Wetted Perimeter = 1 9 .66 ft
Hy d . Ra d iu s = 1 .21 ft
12'
·-& •
I~~ 8 ' 11'
Ex . Groun
Salvage Topsoil
4" Th ick ness (min .)
PROPOSED ROADSIDE DITCH CAPACITY
NTS
Qcapacity = 1.49
0 .035
l 23 75i2/3l )1h 23. 75 0 .0068 = 94.6 cfs
Qactual = 18.51 cfs ( 100 year -Drainage Area /12 -Largest Runoff Rate Phase 19 )
EXHIBI T C-3
Ditch Capacity
IND/AN LAKES, PHASE 19
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
~ 1008 Woode~ o n·..,, Sui~ 10J, Coll~~ stobon, TX 778-15
!NB u ,cwRE • BROWN£ £NGtN££111NG/SUR """"-INC.
• (979) 69.J-.JBJB Fox: (979) 69.J-255~
firm R~. No. F--158
DRAINAGE REPORT
FOR
INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION
PHASE 19
March 2015
PREPA RED FOR:
SMILING MALLARD DEVELOPMENT, L TD .
3608 EAST 29 TH STREET
BRYAN, TEXAS 77802
9 79-846 -4384
MBESI No . 10620046
~ McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING/SURVEYING, INC. ~;II 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 ·College Station , Tx .. 77845 · (979) 693-3838 Engineer Reg. No . F-458
. · Survey Reg . No . 101033-00
Indian Lakes Subdivision, Phase 19
Stormwater Management Technical Design Summary Report
MEES! No. 10620046
PART I -Executive Summary Report
Section 1 -Contact Information
Project Designer: McClure and Browne Engineering and Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive , Suite 103
College Station, TX 77845
979-693-3838
Project Developer: Smiling Mallard De ve lopment, Ltd.
3608 East 29tb Street
Bryan, Texas 7780 2
Section 2 -General Information and Project Location
This development is the 19 th phase of a multi-phase subdivision. Phase 19 consists of 16 lots . The
phase is located in the Indian Lakes Village which is down Arrington Rd. approximately 2 miles from
the Arrington Rd. William D . Fitch Pkwy intersection. Phase 19 lies in the northeast portion of the
subdivision near the intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove. The entire subdivision has
been analyzed in the initial drainage report submitted in September, 2000. The development is located
within the ETJ of College Station.
The project site is in the Peach Creek watershed. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps for
Brazos County, Texas and incorporated area, Map Number 48041C0350E effective May 16 , 2012; no
portion of this property is located in a 100-year flood hazard area.
Culvert pipe and ditch sizing calculations are shown with this submittal.
A small portion of this phase drains to the north into a tributary in the Deer Park Subdivision. This area
is identified as Drainage Area #1 on Exhi bit B. -There is no planned detention of this drainage since it is
small in nature and discharges directly into an ex istin g creek channel. The existing and proposed
conditions are as follows:
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phas e 19
Drainage Area 1 Analysis
Storm Event Post Development Flow Pre Development Flow Difference
2-year 6.7 cfs 5.4 cfs 1.30 cfs
5-year 8.19 cfs 6.55 cfs 1.64 cfs
10-year 9.20 cfs 7.36 cfs 1.84 cfs
25-year 10.50 cfs 8.40 cfs 2.10 cfs
50 -year 11.87 cfs 9.50 cfs 2.37 cfs
100-year 12.15 cfs 9.72 cfs 2.43 cfs
The culverts and ditches peak runoffs were found using the Rational Method. A runoff coefficient ( c) of
0 .50 was used for residential areas since all the lots have an area greater than 1 acre . The ditches along
the proposed roadways are uniform throughout the project. The ditch profiles along all proposed
roadways were determined using the largest ditch drainage area found for Phase 19. The culverts and
ditches were analyzed using an Exce l Spreadsheet which utilizes Manning's Equation for the analysis.
Section 3 -Reference
ExhibitA
Exhib it B
Exhibit C-1
Exhibit C-2
Exhib it C-3
Technical Design Summary
Drainage Area Map
Rational Method Calculations
Culvert Sizing Calculations
Ditch Capacity Calculations
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
EXHIBITS
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
EXHIBIT A
Technical Design Summary
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
The Cities of Bryan and College Station both require storm drainage design to follow these
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines . Paragraph C2 of Section Ill (Administration) requires
submittal of a drainage report in support of the drainage plan (stormwater management plan)
proposed in connection with land development projects , both site projects and subdivisions.
That report may be submitted as a traditional prose report , complete with applicable maps ,
graphs , tables and drawings , or it may take the form of a "Technical Design Summary". The
format and content for such a summary report shall be in substantial conformance with the
description in this Appendix to those Guidelines . In either format the report must answer the
questions (affirmative or negative) and provide , at minimum , the information prescribed in the
'Technical Design Summary" in this Appendix .
The Stormwater Management Technical Des ign Summary Report shall include several parts
as listed below . The information called for in each part must be provided as applicable . In
addition to the requirements for the Executive Summary , this Appendix includes several
pages detailing the requirements for a Technical Design Summary Report as forms to be
completed . These are provided so that they may be copied and completed or scanned and
digitized. In addition , electronic versions of the report forms may be obtained from the City .
Requirements for the means (medium) of submittal are the same as for a conventional report
as detailed in Section Ill of these Guidelines .
Note: Part 1 -Executive Summary must accompany any drainage report
requi red to be provided in connection with any land development project ,
regardless of the format chosen for said report .
Note: Parts 2 through 6 are to be provided via the forms provided in this
Appendix . Brief statements should be included in the forms as requested ,
but additional information should be attached as necessary.
Part 1 -Executive Summary Report
Part 2 -Project Administration
Part 3 -Project Characteristics
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT
Part 1 -Executive Summary
This is to be a brief prose report that must address each of the seven areas listed below.
Ideally it will include one or more paragraphs about each item .
1. Name , address , and contact information of the engineer submitting the report , and
of the land owner and developer (or applicant if not the owner or developer). The
date of submittal should also be included .
2 . Identification of the size and general nature of the proposed project , including any
proposed project phases . This paragraph should also include reference to
applications that are in process with either City : plat(s), site plans , zoning requests ,
STO RMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective Febru ary 20 07
Page 1 of 26 APPENDI X . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
A s Rev ised Februa ry 200 9
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
or clearing/grading permits , as well as reference to any application numbers or
codes assigned by the City to such request.
3. The location of the project should be described . This should identify the Named
Regulatory Watershed(s) in which it is located , how the entire project area is
situated therein , whether the property straddles a watershed or basin divide , the
approximate acreage in each basin , and whether its position in the Watershed
dictates use of detention design . The approximate proportion of the property in the
city limits and within the ET J is to be identified , including whether the property
st raddles city jurisdictional lines . If any portion of the property is in floodplains as
described in Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by FEMA that should be
disclosed.
4 . The hydrologic characteristics of the property are to be described in broad terms :
existing land cover ; how and where stormwater drains to and from neighboring
properties ; ponds or wetland areas that tend to detain or store stormwater ; existing
creeks , channels , and swales crossing or serving the property ; all existing drainage
easements (or ROW) on the property , or on neighboring properties if they service
runoff to or from the property.
5. The general plan for managing stormwater in the entire project area must be
outlined to include the approximate size , and extent of use , of any of the following
features : storm drains coupled with streets ; detention I retention facilities; buried
conveyance conduit indepen dent of streets ; swales or channels; bridges or culverts ;
outfalls to principal watercourses or their tributaries ; and treatment(s) of existing
watercourses . Also , any plans for reclaiming land within floodplain areas must be
outlined .
6 . Coordination and pe r mitting of stormwater matters must be addressed . This is to
inc lude any specialized coordination that has occu rred or is planned with other
entities (local , state , or federal). This may include agencies such as Brazos County
government, the Brazos River Authority , the Texas A&M University System , the
Texas Department of Transportation , the Texas Commission for Environmental
Quality , the US Army Corps of Engineers , the US Environmental Protection Agency ,
et al. Mention must be made of any permits , agreements , or understandings that
pertain to the project.
7 . Reference is to be made to the full drainage report (or the Technical Design
Summary Report) which the executive summary represents . The principal
elements of the main report (and its length), including any maps , drawings or
construction docume nts , should be itemized . An example statement might be :
"One __ -page drainage report dated one set of
construction drawings (_sheets) dated , and a
___ -page specifications document dated comprise
the drainage report for this project."
STORMWATER DESIG N GUIDELINES
Effective February 200 7
Page 2 of 26 APPENDIX. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Start (Page 2 .1)
Engineering and Design Profess ionals Information
Enginee ring Firm Nam e a nd A ddress: Ju ri sdicti on
City : Brya n
McC lure & Browne Eng i neer i ng/Surveying, I n c. x Co lle ge Stat io n 1008 Woodc r eek Drive, Suite 103
Col lege Station , Texas 77845 Date of Sub m ittal :
(979)693 -3838
Lead E ngin eer's Na me a nd C ont act ln fo .(pho ne , e-m ai l , fax ): Ot her:
Jeffery L . Robertson, P .E .
Su ppo rt ing Eng in ee ring I C onsu lt ing Firm (s): Other contacts :
Developer I Owner I Aoolicant Info rmation
Devel ope r I A p p licant Na me and A ddress: Pho ne and e-ma il :
Smiling Ma l la r d Dev e l o p men t, Lt d. (979) 846-438 4
3608 Ea s t 29th St r eet
Bryan, T exas 77802
Prope rty Owne r(s) if not De v elop er I Ap pl ican t (&address): Phon e and e-m a il :
Project Identification
Devel op m en t Na me: I ndi an Lakes, Phase 19
Is subje ct propert y a site proj ect , a sin gle-phase su bdivision , or part of a m ulti -ph ase s ubd iv is io n?
Mul ti-phase S u bdi vi sion If m u lti -phase, s ubj ect p rope rt y is pha se 19 of
Legal des cr ipti on of subject pro perty (phase) or Project Area:
(see Se ct io n II , Parag raph B-3a)
Indian Lakes, Phase 1 9
If subje ct pro perty (pha se) is sec o nd o r later phase of a p roject , describe gene ra l statu s of all
earlier phases . For most rece nt earlier ph ase Inclu de su bmitta l and re v iew dates.
The project is the 19th phase of a multi phase subdivision . At this time the first phase has
been built . Phase 1 wa s submitted in September, 2000 and consisted of 58 lots. The most
recent phase submitted was Ph . 25 .
General Locati on of Project Area , o r su bj ect pro pe rty (ph ase):
Project site is located near the intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Sundance Drive
in Coll e ge Station, Texas.
In C ity Li m its? Extrate rr it orial Juri sd iction (acrea ge):
Brya n : ac res. Bryan : Co ll ege Stati o n: 34 .4 8
Colle ge Station : acres . Acreage Ou ts ide ET J :
STORMW ATER DES IGN GUIDE LIN ES
Effe ctive February 200 7
Page 3 of 26 APP ENDI X. D TEC H. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -P roject Administ ration I Continu ed (page 2 .2)
Project Identification (continued)
Roadways abutting or wi t h in P ro ject Area or Abu tt in g t racts , platted la nd , or b uilt
s ubject p roperty : de ve lop me nts:
Mesa Verde Drive Indian Lakes, Phase 16 & Undeveloped Land
Nam ed Regulatory W atercourse (s) & Watershed (s): T ri bu tary Bas in(s):
The nearest tributary is Peach Creek S. Phase 19 is located in the Peach Creek Watershed.
Tributary 7.2 (See FEMA Map 48041C03SOE) .
Plat Information For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
P re li m inary Plat F il e#: Final Plat F ile#: Date :
Name : Pending Approval Status an d Vol /Pg : Pending Approval
If two plats , second name : F il e#:
Statu s : Da te :
Zoning Information For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Z onin g Type : Ex is t in g or Proposed? Case Co de:
Case Date Status :
Z on ing Type : Ex ist ing or Proposed ? Case Cod e:
Case Date Statu s:
Stormwater Management Planning For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
P la n n ing Confere nce(s ) & Date (s): Participants :
Pre lim in ary Report Re quired? Su b mi tta l Date Re v ie w Da te
Re v iew Comments Ad dressed? Y es --No --In W riti ng? Wh en?
Complian ce With Prelimina ry Drainage Re po rt. Bri efl y descri be (or atta ch do cumentation
ex pl ai n ing ) any de v iatio n (s) from prov isi on s of Pre li minary Dra in age Report , if any .
STOR MWATER DES IG N GU IDELINES
Effective February 200 7
Pag e 4 of 26 A PPEN DIX . D: TEC H. DESIG N SUMMARY
As Rev ised Fe bruary 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Pa rt 2 -P ro ject Administratio n I Continued (page 2 .3)
Coordination For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Note: Fo r any Coordination of stormwater matters indicated below, attach documentation
describing and substantiating any agreements , understandings , co ntracts , or approvals .
Coord ina t ion Dept. Contact: Date: Subject:
With Other
Departments of
J uris dict ion
City (Bryan or
Co lle ge Station )
Coordination With Summarize need(s) & actions taken (i nclude contacts & dates ):
Non-juris d iction
City Needed?
Ye s No x ----
Coordination with Summarize need (s) & act ions taken (i nclude contacts & dates):
Brazos County
Needed?
Y es No x ----
Coordin ation with Summarize need {s) & act ions taken (include contacts & dates ):
TxDOT Needed?
Yes No x
----
Coord ina tion with Summarize need(s) & actions ta ken (i nclude contacts & dates):
TAMUS Needed?
Yes No x -- --
Pe rm its Fo r Proj ect o r S ubject Prope rty (o r Phase)
As to stormwater management , are perm its required for the proposed work from any of the entities
listed below ? If so , summarize status of efforts toward that ob ie cti ve in spaces below.
Entity Permi tted or Status of A ctions (include dates) Approved?
US Army Crops of
Eng ineers
No x Ye s ---
US Environmental
Protection Agency
No x Yes ---
Texas Com mission on A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be
Environmental Quality implemented prior to the start of construction
No Yes x according to TPDES General Permit No . TXRlSOOOO . ----
Brazos Rive r
Authority
No x Yes ---
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective Feb ruary 2007
Page 5 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~ert:i Characteristics I Start (Page 3.1)
Nature and Scope of Proposed Work
Existing: Land proposed for development currently used , incl ud ing extent of imperv ious cover?
Existing undeveloped land (Dense tree cover) . Existing impervious cover is
approximately O sf.
Site __ Redevelopment of one platted lot , or two or more adjqining platted lots .
Develop ment __ Building on a single platted lot of undeveloped land.
Project __ Building on two or more platted adjoin ing lots of undeveloped land .
(select all __ Building on a single lot , or adjoining lots , where proposed plat will not form applicable) a new street (but may include ROW dedicatio n to existing streets).
__ Other (explain):
Subdivision _x_ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more platted lots.
Development __ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more proposed lots on
Project lands represented by pending plats .
Site projects : building use(s), approximate fl oor space , impervious cover ratio .
Describe Subdivisions : number of lots by general type of use , linear feet of streets and
Nature and drainage easements or ROW.
Size of This phase of the subdivision includes 16 lots. The development
Progosed consists of approximately 3 ,177 LF of streets with 16' PUE on each
Project side of the streets ROW.
Is any work planned on land that is not platted If yes , explain :
or on land for which platting is not pending?
x No Yes ----
FEMA Floodplains
Is any part of subject property abutting a Named Regulatory Watercou rse I No_x_ Yes __ (Se ction II , Paragraph B1) or a trib utary thereof?
Is any part of subject property in floodplain
!No_ Yes x Rate Map 48041C0350E
area of a FEMA-regu lated watercourse? --
Encroachment(s) Encroachment purpose(s): __ Building site (s) __ Road crossing(s) into Floodplain
areas plan ned? __ Utility crossing(s) __ Other (ex plain ):
No x --
Yes --
If floodplain areas not shown on Rate Maps , has work been done toward amending the FEMA-
approved Flood Study to define allowable encroachments in proposed areas? Explain .
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective Februa ry 2007
Page 6 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Pa rt 3 -Pro~ert~ Cha racteristics I Cont inu ed (Page 3.2)
Hydrologic Attr ib utes of Subject Property (or Phase)
Has an earlier hydrol ogic analysis been done for larger area inclu d ing subject p roperty?
Yes Reference the study (&date) here , and attach copy if not a lready in City files .
Indian Lakes Subdivision; September , 2000 x --
Is the stormwater management plan for the property in su bstantial con fo rmance with the
earlier study? Yes x No If not , ex plai n ho w it differs .
No If subject property is not part of multi-phase project , descri be stormwater management
pl an for the p rop erty in Part 4 .
--If property is part of mu lti -phase project , pro v ide overview of stormwater management p lan
for Project Are a here . In Part 4 describe how plan for subject property will comply
therewith .
Do exist ing topograp hic features on subject property store or detai n runoff? _x_ No --Yes
Describe th em (inc lude approx imate size , vo lume , o utfall , model , etc).
Any kn own drainage or flooding problems in areas near subject pro perty? __ x _ No --Yes
Identify :
Based on location of study property in a watershed , is Typ e 1 Deten t io n (flood control) needed?
(see Tab le B-1 in A pp endix B)
__ Detention is required . x Need must be evaluated. __ Detention not requ ired . --
What decision has been reached? By whom?
De t ention s t udy during Phase 1 .
If the nee d for How w as determination made ?
Type 1 Detenti on
Detention was required and is provided for the entire must be evaluated :
Indian Lakes Subdivision. However , Phase 19 does not require
any additional detention .
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Pag e 7 of 26 APPENDI X. D: TEC H. DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Rev ised Feb ruary 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~ert~ Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.3)
Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) (continued)
x No Yes Does subject property straddle a Watershed or Basin d ivide? ----If yes ,
describe spl its below. In Part 4 describe design concept for handl inQ this .
Watershed or Basin Larger acreage Lesser acreage
Above-Project Areas (Section II , Paragraph 83-a)
Does Proj ect Area (project or phase ) receive runoff from upland areas? x No --Yes
Size (s) of area(s) in acres : 1) 2) 3) 4)
Flow Characteristics (each instance ) (overland sheet , shallow concentrated , recognizable
concentrated section (s), small creek (non -regulatory ), regulatory Watercourse or tributary);
Overland flo w to propo s ed d i tch lines on Pha s e 19 streets .
F low determination : Outline hydrologic methods and assumptions:
The Rational Method was u sed for flow calculat i ons and the post de v elopment
l and was treated as large acre residential t racts.
Does storm runoff dra in from public easements or ROW onto or across subject property?
_x_ No __ Yes If yes , describe fac il ities in easement or ROW:
Are changes in runoff characteristics subject to change in future? Explain
No, upstream land is al r eady developed.
Conveyance Pathways (Section II , Paragraph C2 )
Must run off from study property drain across lower properties before reaching a Regulatory
Waterco urse or tributary? No x Ye s
Describe length and characteristics of each conveyance pathway(s). Include ownership of
prope rty(ies).
Runoff fro m Ph . 19 wil l l eave the phase and be d ischarged into existing
t ri butaries of Peach Cr e e k. The property is a future phase
o f the Indian Lakes Subdivisio n.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effe ctive Feb ruary 20 07
Pag e 8 of 26 APPENDI X . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revised February 200 9
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~erty Characteristics I Contin ue d (Page 3.4)
Hydrologic Attributes of Subject Property (or Phase) (continued)
Co nveyan ce Pathways (con t inued )
Do dra inage If yes , for what part of length? % Created by? __ plat , or
ea s ements i nstrument. If instrument(s), describe their provisi o ns.
exist fo r any --
pa rt of
pathway (s)?
x No --
Y es --
Where runoff m ust c ro ss lower pro p erti es , describe c h aracteristic s of a b utti ng lower
property (ies). (Ex isting watercourses? Easement or Consen t aqui red?)
Pathway
A rea s
Describe any bui lt or improved drainage f a c ilities exist ing near the property (culverts ,
brid g e s , li ned chan nels , burie d co ndu it , sw a les , dete nt io n po nds , etc).
Nea rby
Drai nag e Do any of these have hydrolog ic or hyd ra u lic influence on proposed stormwate r Fac ilities design? x No Yes If yes , exp la in : ----
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELI NES
Effective Febr uary 200 7
Page 9 of 26 APPENDI X. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised Febr ua ry 200 9
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Start (Page 4 .1)
Stormwater Management Concept
Discharge (s) From Upland Area(s)
If runoff is to be received from upland areas , what design drainage features w ill be used to
accommodate it and insure it is not blocked by future development? Describe for each area ,
flow sect ion , or discharge point.
Discharge(s) To Lower Property(ies) (Section 11 , Paragraph E1)
Does project include dra in age features (existing or future ) proposed to become publ ic via
platting? x No Yes Separate Instrument? x No Yes ----
Per Gu idelines reference above , how will Establishing Easements (Scenario 1) runoff be d ischarged to neighboring --
property(ies )? --Pre-development Release (Scenario 2)
Combination of the two Scenarios --
Scenario 1: If easements are proposed , describe where needed , and provide status of actions
on each . (Attached Exhibit# )
Scenario 2 : Provide genera l description of how release (s) will be managed to pre-development
cond itions (detention , sheet flow , partially concentrated , etc.). (Attached Exhibit# )
Comb ination : If combinat ion is proposed , explain how discharge wi ll differ from pre-
development cond itions at t he property line for each area (or po int) of release .
If Scenario 2 , or Combination are to be used , has proposed design been coordinated with
owner(s) of receiving property (i es)? No --Yes Ex plain and provide
documentation.
STORMWAT ER DESIGN GUIDELIN ES
Effective Feb ruary 200 7
Page 10 of 26 APPEND IX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revise d Fe bruary 200 9
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .2)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project
Identify gaining Basins or Watersheds and acres shifting :
Will project result
in shifting runoff
between Basins or
between What design and mitigation is used to compensate for increased runoff
Watersheds? from gaining basin or watershed? x No --
Yes --
How will runoff from Project 1. __ With facility(ies ) involv ing other development projects .
Area be mitigated to pre-2 . __ Establishing features to serve overall Project Area . development conditions?
Select any or all of 1, 2 , 3. _x_ On phase (or site) project basis within Project Area .
and/or 3 , and explain below .
1. Shared facility (type & location of facility ; design drainage area served ; re lationship to size of
Project Area): (Atta ched Exhibit# )
2. For Ove rall Project Area (ty pe & location of facilities ): (Attached Exh ibit# )
3. By phase (or site) project: Describe planned mitigation measures for phases (or sites ) in
subsequent questions of this Part .
Are aquatic echosystems proposed? __ No --Yes In which phase(s) or
project(s)?
C"-·
" Q) rJ) c Q)
Are other Best Management Practices for reducing stormwater pollutants proposed? c >-rn
Cl.. No Yes Summarize type of BMP and extent of use : -- --rJ) c
.!21
rJ)
Q) 0 0 z ro
xi If design of any runoff-handling facil ities deviate from prov isions of B-CS Tech nical ·0
Q) Specifications , check type facility(ies ) and explain in later questions . a.
(/) Detention elements Conduit elements Channel features Q) ---- --.._
<t: Swales Ditches Inlets __ Valley gutters __ Outfalls -- -- --
--Culvert features __ Bridges Other
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Pag e 11 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 200 9
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .3)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project (continued)
Will Proj ect Area include bridge (s) or culvert(s )? __ No _x_ Y es Identify type and
general size and In wh ich phase (s).
Culvert #1 -24" RCP Pipe on Chaco Canyon Drive
Culvert #2 -1 8" RCP Pipe on Halona Court
If detention /retention serves (will serve) overall Project Area , describe how it relates to subject
phase or site project (physical location , conveyance pathway(s), construction sequence ):
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase , or Site)
If prope rt y part of larger Proj ect Area , is design in substantial conformance with earli er analysis
and repo rt for larger area? __ Yes No , then summarize the difference (s):
Ident ify whether each of t he types of dra inage fea t ures listed below a re included , extent of use ,
and general character istics .
Typical shape? I Surfaces?
C'· V-Shape Grass
"O
a.> CJ) Steepest side slopes : Usual front slopes : Usual back slopes : CJ)
::i a.>
CJ) >-4 :1 4:1 4 :1
a.> xi .c Flow line slopes : least 0 .68% Typical d istance from travelway : 11' ~
"O Varies (Attac hed Exhibit# )
a.> typical greatest 2.93%
~ 0
CJ) z
"O
I
C1l
0 Are long itudina l culvert ends in compliance with B-CS Standard Specifications? .....
a.> x Yes No , then expla in: ~
CJ) At intersectio ns or otherwise , do va lle y gutters cross arte ri al or co ll ector st reets?
..0 a.> No Yes If yes ex pla in : ::; ('· >---
0 "O
I
.c a.>
...... CJ)
·-::i 3: ..... Are valley gutters proposed to cross any street away from an intersection ? CJ) a.> ............
a.> :; 0 No Yes Ex pla in: (number of locations ?) ~ oi z ----
~~x i ..... C1l
<(
STORMWA TER DES IGN GUID ELI NES
Effe ctive February 20 07
Page 12 of 26 APP ENDIX . D: TECH . DESI GN SUMMAR Y
As Revi se d February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.4)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
C'-·
-0
ClJ
(/) (/)
:::::s ClJ
E >-
i I
(/)
c
Gutter line slopes : Least Usual Greatest
Are inlets recessed on arterial and collector streets? __ Yes
identify where and why.
__ No If "no ",
W ill inlets capture 10 -year design stormflow to prevent flooding of intersections (arterial
with arterial or collector)? __ Yes __ No If no , explain where and why not.
W ill inlet size and placement prevent exceeding allowable water spread for 10 -year
design storm throughout s ite (or phase)? __ Yes __ No If no , explain.
Sag curves : Are inlets placed at low points? __ Yes __ No Are inlets and
conduit sized to prevent 100-year stormflow from ponding at greater than 24 inches?
__ Yes __ No Explain "no " answers .
Will 100-yr stormflow be contained in combination of ROW and buried conduit on
whole length of all streets? __ Y es __ No If no , describe where and why.
Do designs for curb , gutter, and inlets comply with B-CS Technical Specifications?
___ Yes __ No If not , describe difference(s) and attach justification .
Are any 12-inch laterals used?
used .
No __ Yes Identify length (s) and where
Pipe runs between system I Typical Longest
access points (feet): ----------
Are junction boxes used at each bend?
and why.
Yes No If not, explain where
ro o i ~, r-----------------------,--------------i en Are downstream soffits at or below upstream soffits? Least amount that hydraulic
.!!!. Yes __ No __ If not , explain where and why: grade line is below gutter line
(system -wide ):
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 13 of2 6 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised Feb ruary 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .5)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
<ii'
QJ
() c
C1l u;
c
QJ .._
~ 0 al E
:::J .._
.!: .E c .
0 .E
~-~
E <llE
QJ
-C1l ~rJ)
rJl QJ
c~ ·-> ~ e
"O a.
E m
0 QJ
-..c CJ) rJl
Describe watercourse(s), or system(s) receiving system discharge(s) below
(include des ign discharge velocity , and angle between converging flow lines).
1) Watercourse (or system), velocity , and angle?
2) Watercourse (or system ), velocity , and angle?
3) Watercourse (or system), velocity , and angle?
For each outfall above , what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour of
receiving and a ll facilities at juncture?
QJ 1)
(ii .._
C1l g-2)
rJl
c ~ 3)
C'-·
rJl
Qi
~ rJl
-QJ
rJl >-
~ I .8
al 0
rJl z
:::J
~x i
rJl
QJ
.:x:
A re swale (s ) situated along property li nes between properti es? __ No __ Y es
Number of instances : For each instance answer the following questi ons .
Surface treatments (including low-flow flumes if any):
Flow line slopes (m i nimum and maximum):
Outfall characteristics for each (velocity , convergent angle , & end treatment).
Will 100-year design storm runoff be contained within easement(s) or platted drainage
ROW in all instances? __ Y es __ No If "no" explain:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effe ctive Feb ru ary 2 007
Pag e 14 of 26 APPEND IX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters / Continued (Page 4 .6)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Are roadside ditches used? --No _x_ Yes If so , provide the following:
rJ) Is 25 -year flow contained with 6 in ches of freeboard throughout? _x_ Yes No Ql ..c --
.B Are top of banks separated from road shoulders 2 feet or more? _x_ Yes No
Ci --
Are all ditch sections trapezoida l and at least 1.5 fee t deep? Yes x No Ql ----
"O For any "no " answers provide location (s) and expla in : '(ii
"O All Ditches are V-shaped and at least 2 ' deep C1l
0
0:::
If conduit is beneath a swale , provide the follow in g informat ion (each instance).
Instance 1 Describe general location , approximate length :
rJ)
Ql
>-Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? --Yes --No
I Vi' If "no " explain :
Ql u c Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Easement Width 0 C1l z u;
Swale Surface type , minimum Conduit Type and size , mini mum and maximum xJ
c
(ii and maximum slopes : slopes , design storm : c
0
~· :E
"O rJ) "O Qi C1l Inlets Describe how conduit is lo aded (from streets/storm drains , inlets by type): c :>. c
C1l c
..c C1l
u ..__
c E
Ql c Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swa le , into conduit): a. 0 0 -~ ....
0 E :J ..__
.~ E -c c ·-Instance 2 Describe general location , approximate length : Ql
"O E Ql C1l rJ) rJ) :J
rJ) Ql
Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? c :2 --Y es --No
0 > If "no " explain : ~ 0 ..__
c a.
..0 Q)
E Ql Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Ease ment Wid th
0 ..c
u rJ) Swale Surface type , m in imum Conduit Type and size , mi nimum and maximum
~ Ql
:J ro and max im um slopes: slopes , des ign storm :
"O ..__
c C1l
0 a.
~ Ql Inle ts Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains , inlets by type ): rJ) ~ c C1l ~ $:
rJ)
Ql Acces s Desc ribe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into conduit): ..__
<(
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effect ive Februa ry 2007
Page 15 of26 APPENDI X. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised Feb ruary 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters J Continued (Page 4. 7)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
If "yes " provide the following information for each instance :
Instance 1 Describe general location , approximate length , surfacing :
c
.!!!
E 0.. x
0 w
~
~ vi Is 100-year des ign flow contained in swale? --Yes --No Is swale wholly
0 Q) within drainage ROW? Yes No Explain "no " answers : c >---2
I
--
Q)
> 'Qi Access Describe how maintenance access is provide : ()
Q)
'-0
~ z :::J
1 x I Instance 2 Describe general location , approximate length , surfacing :
Q)
·;:: C'·
:::J rJl .a c
:J Q)
0 E
£ Q)
rJl Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? Y es No Is swale wholly '3: C1l -- --Q) w ithin drainage ROW? __ Yes No Explain "no " answers : rJl '---Q) 0 ro s $:
rJl 0 -0:: Access Describe how maintenance access is provided : -s: .~
2.i
:::J
0..
Instance 3, 4, etc. If swales are used in more than two instances, attach sheet
providing all above information for each instance .
"New" channels: Will any area(s) of concentrated flow be channel ized (deepene d ,
widened , or stra ightened) or otherwise altered? --No --Yes If only slightly
shaped , see "Swales" in this Part . If creating side banks , provide information below .
C'·
"O c Will design replicate natural channel? Yes No If "no", for each instance Q) ~ ----rJl describe section shape & area , flow line slope (min . & max .), surfaces , and 100-year 0 0.. 0.. x design flow , and amount of freeboard: e w
0.. Instance 1:
rJl rJl c Q)
Q) >-
E I Q)
> In stance 2: 0
0..
E 0
·-z -
xi
Q)
c Instance 3 : c
C1l ..c: u
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective Februa ry 2007
Page 16 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Cont inued (Page 4 .8)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
W ithin Or Serving Subjec t Property (Phase , or Site) (con t inued)
Ex ist ing channels {small creeks}: Are th ese used? --No --Yes
If "yes " pro v ide the information below.
Will sm all creeks a nd their f lood plains re ma in und ist urbed? __ Yes --No Ho w
many disturbance instances? Identify ea ch planned location :
For each locat ion , descri be le ng th and gene ral type of proposed im provement
(inclu d ing flo odp la in changes ):
For each location , describe section s ha pe & area , f low line slope (m in . & max .),
surfaces , and 100 -year design f low .
'O
Q)
::J c
~ Watercourses {and tributaries}: As ide from fr inge c hanges , are Regulatory
0 Waterco urses pro posed t o be altered? __ No Yes Ex plain below . ~ --
IJl c Subm it f ull report describing pro posed changes to Regu latory W at ercourses . Address
Q) ex isting and proposed section size and shape , s urfa ce s , alig nment , fl ow line changes , E
Q) length affe cted , a nd capacity , a nd prov ide full documentation of anal ysis pro c edures > 0 and data . Is full report subm itted ? Y es No If "no" ex plain : a. --
E --Q) c c
C1l All Proposed Ch a nnel Work: For all pro posed channe l work , provide i nformation .r::.
0 requested in ne xt three boxes .
If design is to replicate natu ral chan nel , identify locati on and length here , and describe
des ign in Sp ecia l Des ign sectio n of this Part of Rep o rt .
Will 100-year flow be con t ained w ith one foot of freeb oard ? --Yes --No If
not, ide ntify locati o n and ex pla in :
A re ROW I easeme nts sized to contain c hannel and re q uired mai nten ance space?
--Yes --No If not , identify loca tio n(s ) and ex pl ai n:
STOR MWAT ER DE SIG N GUIDELIN ES
Effective Febru ary 20 07
Page 17 of 26 APPE NDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Rev ised Feb ru ary 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .9)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
How many faci li ties for subject property project? For each provide info . below .
For each dry-type facilit iy: Facility 1 Facility 2
Acres served & design volume + 10 %
100 -yr volume : free flow & plugged
Design discharge (1 0 yr & 25 yr)
Spillway crest at 100-yr WSE? __ yes --no __ yes --no
Berms 6 inches above plugged WSE? __ yes --no __ yes --no
Ex p lain any "no " a nswers :
rJl
Q)
>-
I For each facil ity w hat is 25 -yr design Q , and design of o utlet structure ?
Facility 1:
0 z Faci lity 2 :
xi Do outlets and sp illways discharge into a publ ic faci lity in easement or ROW?
Facil ity 1: __ Y es No Facility 2 : Y es No ------C'-· If "no " explain : -a
Q)
rJl
0 a.
0 .._
0.. For each , what is velocity of 25 -yr design d ischarge at outlet? & at spillway?
rJl
Q) Facility 1: & Facility 2 : & ~
'l) Are energy d iss ipa ti on measu res used ? No Yes Describe type and C1l ----
LL location:
c
0
~
Q)
al
0
Q) For each , is spillwa y surface treatment other than concrete ? Y es or no , and describe : .._
<{
Faci lity 1:
Facility 2 :
For each , what m easures a re taken to prevent erosion or scou r at rece iving fac ility?
Fac il ity 1:
Facility 2 :
If berms are used g ive heights , slopes and surface treatme nt s of sides .
Facility 1:
Facil ity 2 :
STORMWAT E R DESIGN GUID ELI N ES
Effective February 20 07
Page 18 of 26 APPENDI X . D : TECH . DESI G N SUMMARY
As Revi sed Feb ruary 20 09
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Con tinued (Page 4 .10)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
With in O r Se rv ing Subj ec t Prop e rt y (Phase, or S ite ) (c ontinued)
Do structures comp ly with B-CS Specifications? Yes or no , and ex pl ain if "no ":
Facility 1;
Vl
Q)
:;:;
=~ ~ Q) Facility 2: LL :J c c:.;:::;
0 c :.;:::; 0 c ()
Q) ~
Q) For additi o nal faci li ties provide all same informatio n o n a separate sheet.
0
Are parking areas to be used for detention? __ No --Yes What is
maximum depth due to required design storm?
Roadsid e D itc hes : Will culverts serve access driveways at roadside ditches?
No x Yes If "yes ", provide information in next two boxes . ----
Will 25-yr. flow pass without flowing over driveway in al l cases? x Yes No ----
W ithout causing flowing or standing water on public roadway? x Yes No ----
Designs & materials comply with B-CS Technical Specificati ons? _x_ Yes --No
Explain a ny "no " answers :
C'-·
Vl
O"> c ·u;
Are culverts parallel to public roadway alignment? __ Yes x No Explain: Vl
0 --..._
Vl ()
Q) Q) ...... >-! xj Creeks at Pri va te Dri v es : Do private driveways , dri ves , or streets cross drainage
rn wa~s that serve Above-Project areas or are in public easements/ ROW?
""O 0
Q) z __ No __ Yes If "yes " provide information below .
Vl
I :J How many instances? Describe location and prov ide information below. Vl
t:::
Q) Location 1: ~
:J
()
Q) Location 2: ..._
<(
Location 3:
For each location enter value for: 1 2 3
Design year passing without toping travelway?
Water depth on travelway at 25 -year flow?
Water depth on trave lway at 100 -year flow?
For more instances describe location and same information on separate sheet.
STORMWA TER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 19 of 26 AP PENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised Feb ruary 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce12t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .11)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Named Regulatorv Watercourses {&Tributaries): Are culverts proposed on these
facilities? x No __ Yes , then provide full report documenting assumptions , --
criteria , analysis , computer programs , and study findings that support proposed
design(s). Is report provided? __ Yes --No If "no '', explain :
~ Arterial or Major Collector Streets: W ill culverts serve these types of roadways? Q)
(])
No Y es How many instances? For each identify the .c _x_ 2 en --
(]) location and provide the information below.
en rn Instance 1: 24 11 Mesa Verde Drive and Chaco Canyon Drive (]) '-RCP at >-~
xJ ~ In stance 2: 18 11 RCP at Chaco Canyon Drive and Halona Court
Instance 3: c
0
0 :g Y es or No for the 100-year design flow : 1 2 3
z E
I .... Headwater WSE 1 foot below lowest curb top? ..E Yes Yes ·~ Spread of headwater within ROW or easement? Yes Yes E C'-· rn Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C-11 )? Yes Yes en en g>-o Explain any "no " answer(s): ·-c ~ rn
0 c '-0 (.) +='
>-rn rn u
$: .Q
-0 (]) rn .o Minor Collector or Local Streets : W ill culverts serve these types of streets? 0 ·-'-'-
(.) (.) x No Yes How many instances? for each identify the ·-en ---(]) .g -0 location and provide the information be low:
Q. (])
.... Q. Instance 1: rn ]:;>
-0 >-Instance 2 : (]) c
~ rn -Instance 3 : en o
t en
(]) (])
For each instance enter value , or "yes " I "no " for: .!:'. (.) 1 2 3 :J c u rn Design yr . headwater WSE 1 ft . below curb top? (]) Cii '-c
<( ·-100-yr. max. depth at street crown 2 feet or less? (])
'-0 Product of velocity (fps ) & depth at crown (ft) = ? E
'-
0 Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C-11 )? ~
Limit of down stream ana ly sis (feet)?
Explai n any "no " answers:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 20 07
Pag e 20 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DES IGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 200 9
SE C TIO N IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Pa rt 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Param eters I Co ntinued (Page 4 .12)
Sto rmwater Management Concept (continued)
Within O r Serving Su bj ect Prope rty (Ph ase , or S ite) (conti nue d)
All Pro posed Culverts: For all proposed cu lvert faci lities (ex cept driveway/roadside
ditch intersects) provide information requeste d in next eight bo x es .
Do cu lverts and travelways inte r sect at 90 degrees? x Yes No If not , ----identify location (s) and intersect angle (s), and justify th e des ign (s):
Does drainage way alignment change wit hin or near lim its of cu lvert and surfaced
approaches thereto? _x_ No --Y es If "yes " identify location (s), describe
change (s), and j ustificat ion :
A re flumes or conduit to d ischa rge in to culvert ba rrel (s)? x No Y es If yes , ----
identi fy location (s) and prov ide justifi cation :
:0
Are flumes or conduit to d ischarge into or near surfaced approaches to culvert ends?
x No Y es If "yes " identif y location (s), describe outfall design t reatmen t(s): QJ ----
::i c:
~
0
~
en
t::'.
QJ
Is scour/eros ion protection prov ide d to ensu re long term stab ility of cul v ert structu ral ..?:
::i co m ponents , and su rfacing at cu lve rt ends ? x Y es No If "no " Identi fy 0 ----locations and provide justification (s):
Wi ll 100-yr flow and spread of backwater be fu ll y contained in street ROW , and /o r
drainage easements / ROW? _x_ Y es --No if not , w hy not?
Do appreciable hydrau li c effects of any culvert extend downst ream or u pstrea m to
ne ighboring land (s) not encompassed in subj ect property? x No Y es If -- --"yes " describe location (s) a nd mitigation measu res :
Are all cu lvert designs and m aterials in compl ia nce with B-C S Tech . Speci fi cations ?
x Y es No If not , ex pla in in Special D es ig n Section of t his Part. ----
STORMWATER DE SIGN GUIDELINES
Effec ti ve Feb ruar y 20 07
Pa ge 21 of 26 APPE NDI X. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMAR Y
As Revis ed Febru ary 200 9
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .13)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Is a bridge included in plans for subject property project? --No --Yes
If "yes " provide the following information.
Name(s) and functional classification of the roadway(s )?
What drainage way (s) is to be crossed?
U>
Q)
OJ
"O ·;::
CD
A full report supporting all aspects of the proposed bridge (s) (structural , geotechnical ,
hydrologic , and hydraulic factors ) must accompany this summary report. Is the report
prov ided? --Yes --No If "no " explain :
Is a Stormwater Provide a general description of planned techniques :
~ Pollution Prevention Hay Bale Barriers and Rock Dams will serve as the ro Plan (SW3P) main protection against stormwater pollution. The ::J a estab li shed for Contractor shall use any other mean s necessary ..... project construction ? Q) throughout construction. ro s No x Yes ----
Specia l Designs -Non-Traditional Methods
Are a ny non-traditional methods (aquatic echosystems , wetland -type detention , natural stream
rep lication , BMPs for wate r quality , etc.) proposed for any aspect of subject property project?
x No Yes If "yes " list general type and location below. ----
Provide full report about the proposed special des ign (s) including ra ti onale for use and
expected benefits . Report must substantiate that stormwater management objectives w ill not
be compromised , and that maintenance cost w ill not ex ceed those of traditional des ign
so lution (s). Is report prov ided?
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELI N ES
Effective Fe bruary 2007
Yes ----
Page 22 of 26
No If "no " ex plain :
APPENDIX . D : TECH . DESIG N S UMMARY
As Re v ise d Febru ary 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Con t inu ed (Pa ge 4.1 4 )
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Wi t h i n Or Serv ing Subject Property (Phase , or Site) (con ti nued)
Special Des ign s -Dev iation From 8 -CS Technical Specifications
If a ny d esign(s) o r material(s) of trad iti o nal run off-handling faci lit ies deviate fro m provisions of
B-C S T echnica l Sp ecifications , check t y pe faci lity(ies) and ex p la in by specific deta il e lement.
--Detention e lements __ D rain system elements --Channel features
Culvert features Swa les Ditches Inlets Outfalls ---- ------
__ Valley gutters __ Bridges (explain in bridge repo rt)
In ta bl e below briefl y identify specific e lement, j ustification for deviation(s).
S pecific Deta il Element Justification for D eviation (attach additi o nal sheets if needed)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5 )
Ha ve e lements be e n coo rd i na te d w ith the City Engin eer or her/hi s desig nee? For each item
ab ove provide "yes" or "no", action date , and staff name :
1)
2 )
3)
4 )
5)
Design Parameters
Hydrology
Is a map(s) showi ng all Design Drainage Areas p rovided? x Yes No ----
Briefl y summarize the range of ap p lications made of the Rational Formula :
For the Rational Formula we assumed residential areas had a
runoff coefficient of 0.5 for large residentia l or estate lots.
What is the size a nd location of largest Design Drainage Area to wh ich the Rational Formula
has b e en app lied ? 4.00 acres Location (or identifier): Ditch Line Culvert #1
STORM W ATER DESIG N GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TEC H. DES IGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage ConceQt and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .15)
Design Parameters (continued)
Hydrology (continued)
In making determinations for time of concentration , was segment analysis used?
x No Yes In approximately what percent of Design Drainage Areas? %
As to intensity-duration-frequency and rain depth criteria for determining runoff flows , were any
criteria other than those provided in these Guidelines used? _x_ No --Yes If "yes "
identify type of data , source(s), and where applied :
For each of the stormwater management features listed be lo w identify the storm return
frequencies (year) analyzed (or checked), and that used as the basis for design .
Feature Analysis Year(s) Design Year
Storm drain system for arterial and collector streets
Storm drain system for local streets
Open channels
Swale/b uried conduit combi nation in lieu of channel
Swales
Roadside ditches and culverts serving them 2,5,1 0,2 5 ,50,1 00 2 5 & 1 00
Detention facilities : spillway crest and its outfall
Detention facilities : outlet and conveyance structure(s)
Detention facilities: volume when outlet plugged
Culverts serving private drives or streets
Culverts serving pub li c roadways
Bridges : provide in bridge report .
Hydraulics
What is the range of design flow velocities as outlined below?
Design flow velocities ; 25 year Gutters Conduit Culverts Swales Channels
Highest (feet per second ) 9 .88
Lowest (feet per second ) 8 .38
Streets and Storm Drain Systems Provide the summary information outlined below :
Roughness coefficients used :
For conduit type(s) RC P 0.0 14
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effect ive February 2007
For street gutters:
Page 24 of 26
NA
Coefficients:
APPEND IX . D: TEC H. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised February 2009
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Co ntinu ed (Page 4 .16)
Design Parameters (con t inued)
Hydra ulics (continued )
St reet and Storm Dra in System s (c o nt inued)
For the following , are as sumptions ot her than al lo wable per Guidel ines?
Inlet c oefficie nts? No Ye s Head and fricti on lo sses No Yes -- ---- --
Explain any "yes " answer:
In conduit is vel oc ity generally increased i n the do w nstream di rection? Y es No ----
Are e levation dro ps provided at in lets , manholes , and junctio n boxes? --Yes --No
Ex pl ain any "no " a nswers :
Are hy draulic grad e lines cal cul ated and s how n for des ig n storm ? --Ye s --No
For 100-year fl ow cond itions? --Yes --No Explain any "no " answers :
W hat ta ilwater cond it ion s we re assumed at outfa ll point(s) of the storm dra in system? Identify
ea ch location a nd explai n :
Open Channel s If a HEC analys is is util ized , does it fo llow Sec Vl.F.5.a? --Y es --No
Outside of straig ht secti o ns , is flo w regime w ith in limits of su b-crit ical flow? _x _ Y es __ No
If "no " list locatio ns and ex plain :
Culverts If pla n sheets do not prov ide the fol lowing fo r eac h culvert , describe it here .
For each des ign d is cha rg e , w ill operat io n be outlet (ba rrel ) contro l or i nlet co ntro l?
All culverts will be inlet controlled.
En t rance , frictio n and ex it los ses :
A 0 .5 entrance and exit loss coefficients are
and square edged headwalls with wingwalls.
B ridges Provide all in b ridg e report
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 25 of 26
used f or sloped end treatments
APPEND IX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised Feb ruary 200 9
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce12t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.17)
Design Parameters (continued)
Computer Software
What computer software has been used in the analysis and assessment of stormwater
management needs and/or the development of facility designs proposed for subject property
project? List them be low , being sure to identify the software name and version, the date of the
version , any applicable patches and the publisher
Open Office Calculator Spreadsheet
Part 5 -Plans and S12ecifications
Requirements for submittal of construction drawings and specifications do not differ due to use of a
Technical Design Summary Report. See Section 111 , Paragraph C3 .
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
Conclusions
Add any concluding information here:
The Indian Lakes Subdivision , Phase 19 will have no adverse impact to downstream
properties and con f orms to the overall subdivision r eport .
Attestation
Provide attestation to the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing 6 Parts of this Technical
Design Summary Drainage Report by signing and sea li ng below .
"This report (plan) for the drainage design of the development named in Part B was prepared
by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with provisions of the Bryan/College Station
Unified Drainage Design Guidelines for the owners of the property. All licenses and permits
required by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage
improvements have been issued or fall under applicable genera l permits." __ .... , ,,.._, e '~ . ---<.OF 1i;-'' ' ~ (Affix Seal) ; ,.. ~ ~ ............. i~ l } l,; ,,.. C., ~·" I ·.;'{ · I
"'*: . ··""J ~ """ , ;-* .... ~ ;,".,. ··f '•
Licer e ~rofessional Engineer ~··:·: .. }J.1 ..... :7::!?.'. .. :.~ ~
State of Te x as PE No . ~~1~S
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 26 of 26
r ,ltffc. · .Y L. R0i3EF\. SOil I r···:··· ....................... ~
't ·0.... 9 ·1 7 4 5 /!k 1 f -f-t-J :'. (/,-.,. ,r<:~ ,.•:.~ .:. . .. • ••... 1 .......... ,~
APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised February 2009
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
EXHIBITB
Drainage Area Map
EXHIBIT C-1
Rational Method Calculations
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
<( s w Cl 0 a:: w -I -I
<( <( ll. <( LL
w w 0 i== I-Cl a:: -I 2 <( 2 Cl <( Ill 2 Ill (.) :) I <( > Ill 2 z -I Cl -I a:: I-
~ <( Ill <( Vi Ill ~ w Cl I-Cl Ill > >2 0 2 a:: Ill <( 0
Cl I-::::> <( a:: ll. I-o~
NO. AC. 0 .4 0.5 0 .9 ft.
1-Prop 2 .13 0 .00 2.13 0 .00 1 .07 338.9
2 .0 4 .23 0 .00 4 .23 0 .00 2 .12 339.9
3 .0 2 .16 0 .00 2.16 0 .00 1 .08 340.9
4.0 2 .13 0 .00 2 .13 0 .00 1 .07 341 .9
1-Ex 2 .13 2 .13 0 .00 0 .00 0 .85 343.9
EXHIBIT C-1
Rational Formula Drainage Area Calculations
Indian Lakes Phase 19
s
0 s s -I
LL 0 0
Cl -I -I z LL LL t :) a:: I a::
Ill I-(.) 0 0 Ill I-I-a:: -I I-Cl I= -I 0 ti w -I I-2 ::::> -I -I Ill
> <( ::::> w Ill iii (/) IN Lt>
0 LL Cl -I Cl ;'t > (.) ::::> £;! a !!? cr
ft . ft . ft . ft/s min min In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs
6 .8 525 .0 5 .6 1 .4 9 .9 10.0 6 .33 6 .7 7.7 8 .19
7.8 526.0 6 .6 1.6 9 .3 10.0 6 .33 13.4 7 .7 16.27
8 .8 527.0 7.6 1 .7 8 .7 10.0 6 .33 6 .8 7.7 8 .31
9 .8 528.0 8 .6 1 .8 8.3 10.0 6 .33 6 .7 7 .7 8 .19
11 .8 530.0 10.6 1 .9 7 .5 10.0 6 .33 5 .4 7 .7 6.55
0
0 Lt> 0 0 0
0 .,... Lt> IN 0 Lt> 0 .,...
!:: 0 £;! 0 !!? cr !:: cr
In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs
8.6 9 .20 9 .86 10.50 11.15 11 .87 11.41 12 .15
8 .6 18.26 9.86 20 .86 11 .15 23.58 11.41 24 .13
8 .6 9 .33 9 .86 10.65 11 .15 12.04 11.41 12.32
8 .6 9 .20 9 .86 10.50 11 .15 11 .87 11.41 12 .15
8.6 7 .36 9 .86 8.40 11 .15 9.50 11.41 9 .72
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
EXHIBIT C-2
Culvert Sizing Calculations
Culvert #1
Culve rt Description
24" RCP
at Inte rsecti on
of Mesa Ve rd e
Dri ve and Chaco
Canyon Drive
Culvert Deslan Criteria
Circular
Pipe No .
Dia. (ft .\ Pio es
2.00 1
Culvert Analvsis Calculations
T ota l Fl ow per Criti ca l
Des ign Fl ow Pipe Depth {ft .}
Storm lcfs\ lcfs\ de
5 16 .27 16.27 1.45
10 18 .26 18.26 1.53
25 20.86 20 .8 6 1.65
50 23.58 23 .58 1.75
100 24 .13 24 .13 1.75
Elhi = Hwi + Eli
ho= TW or (de+ 0)/2 (Whichever is Gre ater)
n
0 .012
Norm al
Depth
(ft .\
1.01
1.09
1.18
1.28
1.31
EXHIBI T C-2
C ULVE RT ANALYS IS
Indian Lakes Phase 19 -Culvert #1
EL hi .V----Top of Road / ELho
HWi :?::""""t; ------~~
~--,,---------:::.--TW
___/' _.,,.....-----
ELi Proposed Cu lvert
Outfa I Channe Des1an Cntena
In vert Outl et Culvert Top Lt . Side Rt. Sid e
El ev. (Eli) El ev. (ELo) Le ngth Slope of Slope Slope Sl ope
(ft.\ (ft .) (ft .) (ft/ft) Road ke I (ft/ft\ (?:1) (?:1)
280 .50 279 .50 60.00 0 .0167 284 .26 0.50 I 0 .0100 4 .00 4.00
HEADWATER CALCULATIONS
INLET CONTROL
HWi/D HWi ELhi
1.12 2.25 282 .75
1.23 2.45 282 .9 5
1.38 2.75 283 .25
1.56 3 .11 283 .61
1.59 3 .19 283 .69
H = [1 +ke+((29'(n'2tl)/R'1 .33)]'((v'2)/2g)
Elho = Ela + H + ho
TW de
1.01 1.45
1.06 1.53
1.11 1.65
1.17 1.75
1.18 1.75
OUTLET CONTROL
(de+ D\/2 ho H EL ho
1.73 1.73 0 .89 282 .11
1.77 1.77 1 .12 282 .38
1.83 1.83 1.46 282 .78
1 .88 1.88 1.87 283.24
1.88 1.88 1.95 283 .33
ELo
Botto m
Width n
(ft.)
0 .00 0.024
Control Type Outl et
HW of Velocity Freeboard
El ev. Control (fp s) (ft.)
282 .75 Inl et 10.17 1.51
282 .95 Inlet 10.46 1.3 1
283 .25 Inlet 10.78 1.01
283 .61 Inlet 11 .06 0.65
283.69 Inlet 11.11 0 .57
Culvert #2
Cul ve rt Descri pt ion
18" RCP
at Intersecti o n
of Ch aco Canyon
Drive and Halo na
Court
Cu vert Des1Qn Cntena
Circular
Pipe No .
Di a. lft .l Pioes
1.50 1
I . I . Cu vert Anaivs1s Ca c u at1ons
T otal Fl ow per Criti cal
Des ign Fl ow Pipe Depth (ft.)
Storm (cfs) (cfs) de
5 8.31 8.31 1.10
10 9 .33 9 .33 1.15
25 10.65 10 .65 1.25
50 12 .04 12 .04 1.30
100 12.32 12 .32 1.30
Elhi = Hwi + Eli
ho = TW or (d e + D)/2 (Whichever is Greater)
n
0 .012
Norma l
Depth
(fl.)
0 .70
0 .74
0.80
0.85
0.86
EX HI BIT C-2
CU LVERT ANALYSIS
Indian Lakes Phase 19 -Culvert #2
~ Top of R oad / ELho '"'J::-z1 ;;--------~ ll H
E LI
. _/---- - - - -_:::.? - - - - ---TW
P roposed Culvert
Outfall C hannel Desi n Criteria
In vert Outlet Culvert Top Lt . Side Rt. Side Bottom
El ev . (EL Q El ev. (EL o) Length Slope of Slope Slope Sl ope Width
!ft .) !ft .) !ft.) (ft/ft) Road ke I ft /ft 7 :1 7:1 ft .
284 .00 283 .73 47.00 0 .0057 287 .54 0 .50 I 0 .0100 4 .00 4 .00 0 .00
HEADWATER CALCULATIONS Contro l
INLET CONTROL
HWi/D HWi ELhi
1.17 1.75 285 .75
1.28 1.92 285 .92
1.44 2.17 286 .17
1.64 2.46 286.46
1.68 2 .53 286 .53
H = [1 +ke+((29.(n '2)'L)/R'1.33)r((v•2)/2g)
Elho=Elo+H+ho
TW de
0 .78 1.10
0 .82 1.15
0 .86 1 .25
0 .91 1.30
0 .91 1.30
OUTLET CONTROL HW
(de+ Dl/2 ho H EL ho El ev.
1.30 1.30 0 .76 285 .79 285 .79
1.33 1.33 0 .96 286.02 286 .02
1.38 1.38 1.26 286.36 286 .36
1.40 1.40 1.60 286 .73 286 .73
1.40 1.40 1.68 286.81 286 .81
n
0 .024
Type
of
Control
Outlet
Outlet
Ou tl et
Ou tl et
Ou tl et
Outlet
Velocity
(fosl
5 .98
6.42
6.77
7.40
7 .57
ELo
Freeboard
!ft.)
1.75
1.52
1 .18
0 .81
0 .73
3/17/2015
c ul-p.xls
Exh ibit C-2
Drainage Report
Indian Lakes , Phase 19
EXHIBIT C -3
Ditch Capacity Calculations
Area= 23 . 75 sf
Wetted Perimeter = 19 .66 ft
Hyd . Radius = 1.21 ft
Salvage Topsoil
4" Thickness (min.)
PROPOSED ROADSIDE DITCH CAPACITY
NTS
Q 'ty 1.49 capac1 = 0.035
( 1 s aothr )1h 16.80 \ 0.0068 = 57 .9 cfs
Qactual = 18.51 cfs (100 year -Drainage Area #2 -Largest Runoff Rate Phase 19)
EXHIBIT C-3
Ditch Capacity
IND/AN LAKES, PHASE 19
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
~ 1008 _,_ Orfvrl, Sult• 10.J. Col. Station, TX 771U5 ~ M<CLURE ~ BROWN£ ENGIN££RHKJ/SVfM>1NG. ""
• (979) 6!J.J-J8J8 Fox: (979) 69.J-2554
Fnn ~· No. F--1511
WATER REPORT
FOR
Indian Lakes Subdivision
Phase XIX & XXI
Brazos Coµnty, Texas
JANUARY 2015
MBESI# 1062-0046
IMm M c CLURE & BROWNE ENGINEE R ING /SURVEYING, INC. ~ ;H 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 · Co ll ege Station , Tx. 77845 · (979) 693-3838 Eng ineer Reg . No . F-458
Survey Reg . No . 101033--00
WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
for
INDIAN LAKES PHASE XIX & XXI
General Information
Anticipated land use: Residential
Anticipated number of lots: 28 lots
Notes on surrounding developme nt: This development is loc ated near the existing Phase
16 oflndian Lakes in South Brazos County .
Water System Analysis
Primary water s upply lin e: Existing 12" line on Indi an Lakes Drive
& 8" line on Mesa Verde Drive
Software model:
Average daily flow:
PIP E2 000 (Kentucky Pipe etwo rk Model)
1.5 gpd per lot
Estimated fire demand: 1,000 gpm (at Junction J-31)
PVC (C 909) Pipe material:
Conclusion :
Applicable Exhibits:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhib it C
The proposed water system exceeds the requirements of TCEQ
and the City of College Station
Schematic Water System Layout
Static Flo w Analysis
Fire F lo w Analysis
Indian Lakes, Ph ase XIX & XXI
MBESI #10 620046
Exhibit B
Static Flow Results
Indian Lakes, Phase XIX & XXI
MBESI #10620046
Exhibit B
Static Flow Results
* * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 5 * * * * * * * * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Pipe Network Modeling Software
Copyrighted by KYPIPE LLC
Version 5 -February 2010
*
*
*
*
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Date & Time : Wed Jan 21 15 :49 :44 2015
Master File : f :\1062 -clarke & wyndham inc\0046 -indian lakes phase
xix\docs\static .KYP\static .P2K
************************************************
S U M M A R Y 0 F 0 R I G I N A L D A T A
************************************************
u N I T s s p E C I F I E D
FLOWRATE ............ gallons/minute
HEAD (HGL) .......... feet
PRESSURE ............ psig
p I p E L I N E D A T A
STATUS CODE : xx -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
p I p E NODE NAMES LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR
N A M E lll #2 (ft) (in) CO EFF . LOSS COEFF .
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-1 VP -2 J -1 7830 .00 8 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P -2 J -1 J -7 2199 .52 12.00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-3 J -2 J-3 3660 .00 12 .00 138 . 9145 0 .00
P-4 J-3 J-18 1196 .76 12 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-5 J-4 J-2 1590 .00 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-6 J-5 J-4 5614.00 6 .00 138 . 9145 0 .00
P-7 J-6 J-5 220 .00 6 .00 138 . 9145 0 .00
P -8 J -3 J -6 3088 .00 6 .00 138.9145 0 .00
P-9 J-7 J-2 4360 .48 12 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-10 J-7 J-8 3387 .00 8 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-11 J-8 J-9 621 .00 8 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-12 J-8 J-10 356 .00 6 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-13 J-9 J-11 322 .00 6 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-14 J-3 J-12 635 .00 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-15 J -12 J-13 656 .00 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-16 J-12 J-19 66 .16 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-17 J-13 J-17 565 .00 6 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-18 J-13 J-14 807 .00 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-19 J-14 J-15 182 .00 4 .00 123 .9145 0 .00
P-20 J-14 J-16 302 .00 4 .00 123 .9145 0 .00
P-21 VP-1 J-18 156 .66 12 .00 140.0000 0 .00
P -22 J -18 J-20 120 .00 6 .00 140.0000 0 .00
P -23 J-20 J-21 400 .00 4.00 140 .0000 0 .00
P -24 J-9 J-22 224 .75 8 .00 138.9145 0 .00
P-25 J -22 J-23 325 .00 4.00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-26 J-22 J-24 67 6 . 00 8.00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-27 J-24 J-26 244 .00 8.00 138 . 9145 0 .00
P -28 J-26 J -28
P-29 J-26 J-31
P-30 J -28 J -25
P-31 J-28 J-29
P-32 J -29 J -27
P-33 J -31 J -30
P U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T D A
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE VP -1
HEAD FLOWRATE
(ft) (gpm)
219 .23 0 .00
180 .00 1500 .00
77 .61 3000 .00
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE VP -2
HEAD FLOW RATE
(ft) (gpm)
219 .23 0 .00
180 .00 1500 .00
77 . 61 3000 .00
N 0 D E D A T A
NODE
NAME
NODE
TITLE
EXTERNAL
DEMAND
(gpm)
J -1 0 .00
J-2 0 .00
J -3 0 .00
J-4 0 .00
J-5 15 .00
J -6 0 .00
J-7 0 .00
J -8 0 .00
J -9 0 .00
J-10 6 .00
J-11 6 .00
J -12 4 .50
J -13 7 .50
J -14 4 .50
J -15 6 .00
J -16 4 .50
J -17 4 .50
J -18 0 .00
J-19 0.00
J -20 3 .00
J-21 6 .00
J-22 0 .00
J -23 6 .00
J-24 0 .00
J -25 0 .00
J-26 0 .00
J -27 6 .00
J-28 0 .00
J -29 9 .00
J -30 6 .00
J -31 9 .00
VP-1
VP-2
562 .00
124 .12
342 .00
114 . 45
119 .78
102 .63
T A
DESCRIBED BY
EFFICIENCY
(%)
75 .00
75 .00
75 .00
DESCRIBED BY
EFFICIENCY
(%)
75 .00
75 .00
75 .00
JUNCTION
ELEVATION
(ft)
287 .00
278 .00
263 .00
266 .00
247 .00
246 .00
285 .00
294 .00
292.00
296 .00
294 .00
253.00
250 .00
242.00
240 .00
252 .00
240 .00
241.00
251. 00
247 .00
240 .00
295 .00
291.00
283 .00
278 .00
286 .00
291. 00
281 .00
295.00
293 .00
296 . 00
239 .00
285 .00
8 .00 138 .9145
6 .00 138 .9145
8 .00 138 .9145
6 .00 138 . 9145
6 .00 138 .9145
6 .00 138.9145
THE FOLLOWING DATA :
THE FOLLOWING DATA :
EXTERNAL
GRADE
(ft)
239 .00
285 .00
0 .00
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0 .00
(ID= 1)
(ID= 2)
0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A
OUTPUT S ELECTI ON : AL L RE SULTS ARE I NCLUDED IN
MA XIMUM AND MI NI MUM PRESSURES
TH E TABULA TE D OUTPUT
5
MAX IMU M AND MI NI MUM VELOCITI ES 5
MAX IM UM AND MI NI MUM HEAD LOS S /1000 5
S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N
NUMBER OF P I PES ................... (p) 33
NUMBER OF END NODES ............... (j) 31
NUMB ER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ........... (1) 1
NUMB ER OF SUPPLY NODES ............ (f) 2
NUMB ER OF SUPPLY ZO NE S ............ (z) 1
Case : 0
RESULTS OB TAINED AFTER 20 TRIALS : ACCURACY 0 .00006
S I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N (L A B E L)
p I p E L I N E R E s u L T s
STATUS COD E : xx -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
p I p E NODE NUMBERS FLOW RATE HEAD MINO R LINE
N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LO SS VELO .
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft/s)
HL+ML/ HL/
1000 1000
(f t/ft) (ft/ft )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P -1 VP -2 J -1 103 .50 1 .90 0 .00 0 .66 0 .24 0 .24
P -2 J -1 J -7 103 .50 0 .07 0 .00 0 .29 0 .03 0 .03
P -3 J -2 J -3 47 .51 0 .03 0 .00 0 .13 0 .01 0 .0 1
P -4 J-3 J -18 9 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .03 0 .00 0 .00
P -5 J -4 J -2 -7 .99 0 .00 0 .00 0 .05 0 .00 0 .00
P -6 J -5 J -4 -7 .99 0 .05 0 .0 0 0 .09 0 .01 0 .01
P-7 J -6 J -5 7 .01 0 .00 0 .00 0 .08 0 .01 0 .01
P-8 J -3 J -6 7 .01 0 .02 0 .00 0 .08 0 .01 0 .01
P -9 J -7 J -2 55 .50 0 .05 0 .00 0 .16 0 .01 0 .01
P -10 J -7 J-8 48 .00 0 .20 0 .00 0 .31 0 .06 0 .06
P -11 J -8 J -9 42 .00 0 .03 0 .00 0 .27 0 .05 0 .05
P -12 J -8 J -10 6 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .07 0 .01 0 .01
P -13 J -9 J -11 6 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .07 0 .01 0 .01
P -14 J -3 J -12 31 .50 0 .02 0 .00 0 .20 0 .03 0 .03
P -15 J -12 J -13 27 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .17 0 .02 0 .02
P -16 J -12 J -19 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P -17 J -13 J -17 4 .50 0 .00 0 .00 0 .05 0 .00 0 .00
P -18 J -13 J -1 4 15 .00 0 .01 0 .0 0 0 .10 0 .01 0 .01
P -1 9 J -14 J -15 6 .00 0 .01 0 .0 0 0 .15 0 .04 0 .0 4
P -20 J -1 4 J -16 4 .50 0 .01 0 .0 0 0 .11 0 .03 0 .03
P -21 VP -1 J -18 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P -22 J -18 J -20 9 .00 0 .00 0 .0 0 0 .10 0 .01 0 .0 1
P -23 J -20 J -21 6 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .15 0 .0 4 0 .04
P-24 J -9 J -22 36 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .23 0 .03 0 .03
P-25 J -22 J -23 6 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .15 0 .04 0 .04
P-26 J-22 J -24 30 .00 0 .02 0 .00 0 .19 0 .02 0 .02
P -27 J -24 J -26 30 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .19 0 .02 0 .02
P -28 J -26 J -28 15 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .10 0 .01 0 .01
P -29 J -26 J-31 15 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .17 0 .03 0 .03
P-30 J -28 J-25 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P-31 J -28 J-29 15 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .17 0 .03 0 .03
P-32 J -29 J -27 6 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .07 0 .01 0 .01
P-33 J -31 J -30 6 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.07 0 .01 0 .01
p u M P/L 0 s s E L E M E N T R E s u L T s
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC-USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS
NPSH
NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY PO WER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES
Avail.
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (%) (Hp) ($) ($)
(ft)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Device "VP-1 " is closed
VP -1 0 .00 0 .00 262 .91 0 .0 75 .00 0 . 0 .0 0 .0 ** **
33 .2
VP -2 103 .50 0 .00 218 .95 219 .0 75 .00 0. 0 .0 0 .0 ** **
33 .2
N 0 D E R E S U L T S
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J -1 0 .00 502 .06 287 .00 215 .06 93 .19
J -2 0 .00 501 .9 4 278 .00 223 .94 97 .04
J -3 0 .00 501 .91 263.00 238 .91 103 .53
J -4 0 .00 501 .93 266 .00 235 .93 102 .24
J -5 15 .00 501.89 247 .00 254 .89 llO . 45
J -6 0 .00 501.89 246 .00 255 .89 l10 . 88
J -7 0 .00 501 .98 285 .00 216 .98 9 4.03
J -8 0 .00 501 .79 294 .00 207 .79 90 .04
J -9 0 .00 501 .76 292.00 209 .76 90 .90
J -10 6 .00 501 .78 296.00 205 .78 89 .17
J -11 6 .00 501 .76 294 .00 207 .76 90 .03
J -12 4 .50 501 .89 253 .00 248 .89 107 .85
J-13 7 .50 501 .88 250 .00 251 .88 109 .15
J -14 4.50 501 .87 242 .00 259 .87 l12 . 61
J -15 6 .00 501 .87 240 .00 261 .87 113 .47
J -16 4 .50 501 .87 252 .00 249 .87 108 .27
J -17 4 .50 501. 88 240 .00 261 .88 113 .48
J -18 0 .00 501 .9 1 241 .00 260 .91 l13 .06
J -19 0 .00 501.89 251 .00 250 .89 108 . 72
J -20 3 .00 501 .91 247 .00 254 .91 110 .46
J -21 6 .00 501.89 240 .00 261 .89 l13 .49
J -22 0 .00 501 .75 295 .00 206 .75 89 .59
J-23 6 .00 501 .74 291 .00 210 .74 91. 32
J -24 0 .00 501 .73 283 .00 218 .73 94 .78
J-25 0 .00 501 . 72 278 .00 223. 72 96 . 95
J -26 0 .00 501 .73 286 .00 215 .73 93 .48
J -27 6 .00 501 . 72 291 .00 210 . 72 91 . 31
J -28 0 .00 501 . 72 281.00 220 . 72 95 .65
J -29 9 .00 501 . 72 295 .00 206 . 72 89 .58
J -30 6 .00 501 . 72 293 .00 208 . 72 90 .45
J -31 9.00 501 . 72 296 . 00 205 . 72 89 .15
VP -1 501 .91 239 .00 262 .91 113 .93
VP -2 503 .95 285 .00 218 .95 94 .88
M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S
p R E s s u R E s
JU NCT ION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
(psi) (psi)
------------------------------------------
VP -1 113 . 93 J-31 89 .15
J-21 113 .49 J -10 89 .17
J-17 113 . 48 J -29 89 .58
J -15 113 .47 J -22 89 .59
J -1 8 113 .06 J-11 90 .03
v E L 0 c I T I E s
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s)
------------------------------------------
P-1 0 .66 P -4 0 .03
P-10 0 .31 P-5 0 .05
P-2 0 .29 P-17 0 .05
P -11 0 .27 P-12 0 .07
P-24 0 .23 P -13 0 .07
H L + M L I 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER HL+ML/1000 NUMBER HL+ML/1000
(ft/ft) (ft/ft)
------------------------------------------
P-1 0 .24 P-4 0 .00
P-10 0 .06 P-5 0 .00
P-11 0 .05 P -17 0 .00
P -19 0 .04 P-33 0 .01
P-25 0 .04 P -12 0 .01
H L I 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER HL/1000 NUMBER HL/1000
(ft/ft) (ft/ft)
------------------------------------------
P-1 0 .24 P -4 0 .00
P -10 0 .06 P-5 0 .00
P-11 0 .05 P-17 0 .00
P-19 0 .04 P-33 0 .01
P-25 0 .04 P-12 0 .01
S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE
NAME
VP-2
NET SYSTEM INFLOW
NET SYSTEM OU TFLOW
NET SYSTEM DEMAND
FLOW RATE
(gpm)
103 .50
103 .50
0 .00
103 .50
NODE
TITLE
***** HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED *****
Exhibit C
Fire Flow Results
Indian Lakes , Phase XIX & XXI
MB ES I # I 0620046
Exhibit C
Fire Flow Results
* * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 5 * * * * * * * * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Pipe Network Modeling Software
Copyrighted by KYPIPE LLC
Version 5 -February 2010
*
*
*
*
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Date & Time : Wed Jan 21 16 :07 :01 2015
Master File : f :\1062 -clarke & wyndham inc\0046 -indian lakes phase xix\docs\fire .KYP\fire .P2K
************************************************
S U M M A R Y 0 F 0 R I G I N A L D A T A
************************************************
u N I T s s p E c I F I E D
FLOWRATE ............ gallons/minute
HEAD (HGL) .......... feet
PRESSURE ............ psig
p I p E L I N E D A T A
STATUS CODE : xx -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
p I p E NODE NAMES LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR
N A M E #1 #2 (ft ) (in) COEFF . LOSS COEFF .
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-1 VP -2 J-1 7830 .00 8 .00 138 . 9145 0 .00
P -2 J -1 J -7 2199 .52 12.00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-3 J -2 J-3 3660 .00 12 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-4 J -3 J-18 1196 . 76 12 .00 140 .0000 0.00
P-5 J -4 J -2 1590 .00 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P -6 J -5 J -4 5614 .00 6 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-7 J -6 J -5 220 .00 6 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P -8 J -3 J -6 3088 .00 6 .00 138 . 9145 0 .00
P-9 J-7 J -2 4360 . 48 12 .00 138 .9 14 5 0 .00
P -10 J -7 J -8 3387 .00 8 .00 138 . 9145 0 .00
P -11 J -8 J-9 621 .00 8 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P -12 J-8 J-10 356 .00 6 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P -13 J -9 J-11 322 .00 6 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P -14 J-3 J-12 635 .00 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-15 J-12 J-13 656 .00 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P -16 J-12 J-19 66 .16 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P -17 J -13 J-17 565 .00 6 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-18 J-13 J-14 807 .00 8 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P -19 J-14 J-15 182 .00 4 .00 123 .9 14 5 0 .00
P-20 J-14 J -16 302 .00 4 .00 123 .9145 0 .00
P -21 VP -1 J-18 156 .66 12 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P-22 J-18 J-20 120 .00 6 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P -23 J -20 J-21 400 .00 4 .00 140 .0000 0 .00
P -24 J -9 J-22 224 .75 8 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-25 J-22 J -23 325 .00 4 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-26 J -22 J -24 67 6 . 00 8 .00 138 .9 1 45 0 .00
P-27 J-24 J-26 244 .00 8 .00 138 .9145 0 .00
P-28 J -26 J-28 562 .00 8 .00 138 . 9145 0 .00
P -29 J -26 J -31
P -30 J -28 J -25
P -31 J -28 J -29
P-32 J -29 J -27
P -33 J -3 1 J -30
P U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T D A
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NOD E VP -1
HEA D FLOWRA TE
(ft ) (gpm )
219 .23 0 .00
180 .00 1500 .00
77 .61 3000 .00
THERE I S A DEVI CE AT NOD E VP -2
HEA D FLO WRATE
(ft ) (gpm)
219 .23 0 .00
180 .00 1500 .00
77 .6 1 3000 .00
N 0 D E D A T A
NODE
NAME
NOD E
TITLE
EX TERNAL
DEMAND
(gpm )
J -1 0 .00
J -2 0 .00
J -3 0 .00
J -4 0 .00
J -5 15 .00
J -6 0 .00
J -7 0 .00
J -8 0 .00
J -9 0 .00
J -10 6 .00
J -11 6 .00
J -12 4 .50
J -13 7 .50
J -14 4 .50
J -15 6 .00
J -16 4 .50
J -17 4 .50
J -18 0 .00
J -19 0 .00
J -20 3 .00
J -2 1 6 .00
J -22 0 .00
J -23 6 .00
J -24 0 .00
J -25 0 .00
J -26 0 .00
J -27 6 .00
J -28 0 .00
J -29 9 .00
J -30 6 .00
J -31 1009 .00
VP-1
VP -2
124 .12
342 .00
114 .96
119 .29
102 .63
T A
DESCRIBED BY
EFFI CIENCY
(%)
75 .00
75 .00
75 .00
DES CRIB ED BY
EF FICIENCY
(%)
75 .00
75 .00
75 .00
JUNCTION
ELEVATIO N
(ft )
287 .00
278 .00
263 .00
266 .00
247 .00
246 .00
285 .00
294 .00
292 .00
296 . 00
294 .00
253 .00
250 .00
242 .00
240 .00
252 .00
240 .00
241 .00
251 .00
247 .00
240 .00
295 .00
29 1 .00
283 .00
278 .00
286 .00
291 .00
281 .00
295 .00
293 .00
296 .00
239 .00
285 .00
6 .00 138 .9 1 45
8 .00 138 .9 14 5
6 .00 138 .9 14 5
6 .00 138 . 9 1 4 5
6 .00 138 .9 14 5
THE FOLLOWIN G DATA :
THE FOL LOWING DATA :
EXTERNAL
GRAD E
(f t )
239 .00
285 .00
0 .00
0 .00
0 .00
0 .00
0 .00
(ID= 1 )
(ID= 2)
0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A
OUTPUT SELEC T ION : ALL RE SULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT
MAX IM UM AND MI NI MUM PRESSURE S 5
MAX IM UM AND MI NI MUM VELOCIT IES 5
MAXI MUM AND MINIMUM HEAD LOSS/1000 5
S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N
NUMBER OF PIPES ................... (p) 33
NUMBER OF END NODES ............... (j) 31
NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ........... (1) 1
NUMBER OF SUPPLY NOD E S ............ (f) 2
NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZON ES ............ (z) 1
Case : 0
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 6 TRIALS : ACCURACY 0 .00001
S I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N (L A B E L )
p I p E L I N E R E s u L T s
STATUS COD E : xx -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALV E
p I p E NODE NUMBERS FLOW RATE HEAD MINOR LINE HL+M L / HL/
N A M E #1 #2 LOSS LOSS VELO . 1 000 1000
(gpm ) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft ) (ft/f t)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-1 VP -2 J -1 588 .90 47 .45 0 .00 3 .76 6 .06 6 .06
P -2 J -1 J -7 588 .90 1. 85 0 .00 1. 67 0 .84 0 .84
P -3 J -2 J -3 -423 .61 1. 67 0 .00 1.20 0 . 46 0 . 4 6
P -4 J -3 J -18 -505 .60 0 .75 0 .00 1. 43 0 .63 0 .63
P -5 J-4 J -2 35 .49 0 .05 0 .00 0 .23 0 .03 0 .03
P -6 J -5 J -4 35 .49 0 .76 0 .0 0 0 .40 0 .1 4 0 .14
P -7 J -6 J -5 50 .49 0 .06 0 .00 0 .57 0 .26 0 .26
P-8 J -3 J -6 50 .49 0 .80 0 .00 0 .57 0 .26 0 .26
P-9 J -7 J-2 -459 .10 2 .31 0 .00 1. 30 0 .53 0 .53
P -10 J-7 J -8 1048 .00 59 .69 0 .00 6 .69 17 . 62 17 . 62
P-11 J -8 J -9 1042 .00 10 .83 0 .00 6 .65 1 7 .44 17 .44
P -12 J -8 J -10 6 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .07 0 .01 0 .01
P-13 J -9 J -11 6 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .07 0 .01 0 .01
P -14 J-3 J -12 31. 50 0 .02 0 .00 0 .20 0 .03 0 .03
P -15 J -12 J -13 27 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .17 0 .02 0 .02
P-16 J-12 J -19 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P-17 J -13 J -17 4 .50 0 .00 0 .00 0 .05 0 .00 0 .00
P -18 J-13 J -14 15 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .10 0 .01 0 .01
P -19 J -14 J -1 5 6 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .15 0 .04 0 .04
P -20 J -1 4 J -16 4 .50 0 .01 0 .0 0 0 .11 0 .03 0 .03
P-21 VP -1 J-18 514 .60 0 .10 0 .0 0 1 .46 0 .65 0 .65
P-22 J-18 J -20 9 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .10 0 .01 0 .01
P-23 J -20 J -21 6 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .15 0 .04 0 .04
P -24 J-9 J-22 1036 .00 3 .88 0 .00 6 .61 17 .25 17 .25
P -25 J-22 J -23 6 .00 0 .01 0 .00 0 .15 0 .04 0 .04
P -26 J -22 J -24 1030 .00 11 .54 0 .00 6 .57 17 .07 17 .07
P -27 J -24 J -26 1030 .00 4 .16 0 .00 6 .57 17 .07 17 .07
P -28 J -26 J -28 15 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .10 0 .01 0 .01
P -29 J -26 J-31 1015 .00 8 .37 0 .00 11 . 52 67 .42 67 .42
P -30 J-28 J -25 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P -31 J -28 J -29 15 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .17 0 .03 0 .03
P -32 J -29 J -27 6 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .07 0 .01 0 .01
P -33 J -31 J -30 6 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .07 0 .01 0 .0 1
p u M P/L 0 s s E L E M E N T R E s u L T s
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC -USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS
NPSH
NAME FLO WRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY PO WE R COST COST PARALLEL SERIES
Avail .
(gpm) (ft) (f t) (ft) ( % ) (Hp ) ($) ( $)
(ft)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VP -1 514 .60 0 .00 213 .82 213 . 8 75 .00 0 . 0 .0 0 .0 ** **
33 .2
VP -2 588 .90 0 .00 212 .29 212 .3 75 .00 0 . 0 .0 0 .0 ** **
33 .2
N 0 D E R E S U L T S
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HE AD PRESSURE
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J -1 0 .00 449 .84 287 .00 162 .84 70 .56
J -2 0 .00 450 .30 278 .00 172 . 30 7 4 .66
J -3 0 .00 451 .97 263 .00 1 88 .97 8 1. 89
J -4 0 .00 450 .35 266 .00 1 84 .35 79 .89
J -5 15 .00 451 .11 247 .00 204 . 11 88 .45
J -6 0 .00 451 .17 246 .00 205 . 17 88 .91
J -7 0 .00 447 .99 285 .00 162 .99 70 .63
J -8 0 .00 388 .30 294 .00 94 .30 40 .86
J -9 0 .00 377 .47 292 .00 85 .47 37 .04
J -10 6 .00 388 .30 296 .00 92 .30 40 .00
J -11 6 .00 377 .47 294 .00 83 .47 36 .17
J -12 4 .50 451 .96 253 .00 198 .96 86 . 21
J -13 7 .50 451 .9 4 250 .00 201 .94 87 .51
J -14 4 .50 451 .9 4 242 .00 209 .94 90 .97
J -15 6 .00 451 .93 240 .00 21 1. 93 91 .84
J -16 4 .50 451 .93 252 .00 199 .93 86 .64
J -17 4 .50 451 .9 4 240 .00 211 .94 9 1. 84
J -18 0 .00 452 . 72 241 .00 2 11.72 91 .75
J -19 0 .00 451 .96 251 .00 200 . 96 87 .08
J -20 3 .00 4 52 . 72 247 .00 205 . 72 89 .14
J -21 6 .00 452 .70 240 .00 2 1 2 .70 92 .17
J -22 0 .00 373 .60 295 .00 78 .60 34 .06
J -23 6 .00 373 .58 291. 00 82 .58 35 .79
J -24 0 .00 362 .06 283 .00 79 .06 34 .26
J -25 0 .00 357 .89 278 .00 79 .89 34 . 62
J -26 0 .00 357 .90 286 .00 71 .90 31.15
J -27 6 .00 357 .89 291 .00 66 .89 28 .98
J -28 0 .00 357 .89 281.00 76 . 89 33 .32
J -29 9 .00 357 .89 295 .00 62 .89 27 .25
J -30 6 .00 349 .53 293 .00 56 .53 2 4 .50
J -31 1009 .00 349 .53 296 .00 53 .53 23 .20
VP -1 452 .82 239 .00 2 1 3 .82 92 .66
VP -2 497 .29 285 .00 2 1 2 .29 9 1 .99
M A X I M U M A N D M I N I M U M V A L U E S
P R E S S U R E S
JUNCTION MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUM BE R PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSURES
(psi) (psi)
------------------------------------------
VP-1 92 .66 J -31 23 .20
J -21 92 .17 J -30 24 .50
VP-2 91 .99 J -29 27 .25
J -17 91 .84 J-27 28.98
J -15 91 .84 J -26 31 .15
v E L 0 c I T I E s
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s)
------------------------------------------
P -29 1 1. 52 P -17 0 .05
P -10 6 .69 P-12 0 .07
P -11 6 .65 P -13 0 .07
P -24 6 .61 P -32 0 .07
P -26 6 .57 P -33 0 .07
H L + M L I 1 0 0 0
P I PE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NU MBER HL+ML/1000 NUMBER HL+ML/1000
(ft/ft) (ft/ft)
------------------------------------------
P -29 67 .42 P -17 0 .00
P -10 17 . 62 P -33 0 .01
P -11 17 .44 P-12 0 .01
P -24 17 .25 P -13 0 .01
P -26 17 .07 P-32 0 .01
H L I 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMB ER HL/1000 NUMBER HL/1000
(ft/ft) (ft/ft)
------------------------------------------
P -29 67 .42 P -17 0 .00
P -10 17 . 62 P-33 0 .01
P -1 1 17 .44 P-12 0 .01
P -24 17 . 25 P-13 0 .01
P -26 17 .07 P-32 0 .01
S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS I NTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NET
NET
NET
NODE
NAME
VP -1
VP -2
SYSTEM
SYST EM
SYSTEM
INFLOW
OUTFLOW
DEMAND
FLOWRATE
(gpm)
514 .60
588 .90
1103 .50
0 .00
1103 . 50
NODE
TITLE
***** HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED *****
SANITATION
1 . Sanitation is ok with this project.
Reviewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: January 28 , 2015
COUNTY
Overall Comments:
1. Access concerns are considerable with the development of these phases .
Previous commitments need to be executed so that work by others in completing
Mesa Verde extension to SH 6 can commence . Please provide detailed estimate
of total number of lots to be developed .
2 . Provide all approvals from City of College Station
Plat Comments :
3 . Provide for Private Drainage Easement across back of Lots 11 -6 .
Construction Plan Comments
4 . Page C 1.1-Typical Section 1 (re: 75 ' ROW) -Provide 8" Flex Base ; Show
Section as 34 ' Primed Base with 38 ' Subgrade Crown . Indicate Typical Section -
Chaco Canyon Drive .
5 . Page C1 .1-Typical Section 2 (re : 70 ' ROW) -Provide 6 " Flex Base in Roadway
and 8" Flex Base at Cul-de-Sac ; Show Section as 30 ' Primed Base with 34'
Subgrade Crown. Indicate Typical Section-Catori Cove and Halona Court.
6 . Page C1 .1-Typical Section 3 (re: 100 ' ROW) -Provide 8" Flex Base ; Show
Section as 30 ' Primed Base with 34 ' Subgrade Crown. Add 6' Earthen Shoulder,
then 8 ' Front Slope and 19 ' Back Slope . Indicate Typical Section -Mesa Verde
Drive .
7 . Page C1 .1-Modify Typical Shoulder Detail to be reflective of previous 3
comments .
8 . Page C1 .2-Correct spelling of "Hay Bail " to "Hay Bale ".
9 . Page C2 .1-Show existing 6 " Water Line and Rock Riprap near Kochina Cove
(from Phase 16).
10 . Page C2.1-Indicate Ditch Slope from Sta. 10+100 to Sta . 10+35/ Indicate Limits
of Rock Riprap
11 . Page C2 .1-C/L elevation at Sta. 10+100 and Profile Grade of Mesa Verde Drive
do not match plans provided from Phase 16-Please verify that grades match and
that profile grade matches field conditions ...
12 . Provide Construction Details .
Drainage Report Comments :
13 . Page 7-There are flows from Phase 19 (depicted in Drainage Area 1) which flow
off property . Please analyze Post-Development Flows against Pre-Development
Flows for potential effect to adjacent property owner(s).
14 . Exhibit B-Drainage Area 1 is incorrectly sized (should be larger).
15 . Page 20-Culverts in this phase do serve arterial or Major Collector Streets . Mesa
Verde and Chaco Canyon are both functionally class ified as such .
16 . Page 26-Conclusion should clarify any effects to downstream properties along
Deer Park (from Drainage Area 1 ).
Reviewed by: Alan Munger Date : 02-09-2015
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Show a Private drainage easement on the common area between lots 10 & 11.
2. Add a note stating whose responsibility it is to maintain and stating that fences, grading ,
and landscape cannot impede the flow of the private drainage easement.
3 . Add a note regarding requirement for compaction of fill or engineered slab for affected
lots that have greater than 2 feet of fill on final plat and construction documents . Also list
the lots that would require this.
4 . Show the future 1 O' PUE along the rear of the PUE of Lot 11-16 totaling 20' PUE .
5. Please make sure that all lot numbers are labeled on the construction sheets .
6 . Move WS4.01 to the common lot boundary .
7 . Provide a gate valve at the tee with the fire hydrant on Halona Court. Also please
confirm that the gate valve spacing between Catori Cove & Kachina Cove does not
exceed 800'.
8. Relocate WA-2 in such a way that the clearance between waterline 's center line & the
PUE 's boundary is at least 6 ' or provide additional easement.
9 . It appears another drainage area (south of Holona Court) needs to be taken into
accounted for.
10 . Please provide calculations showing that the water surface elevation in the ditches are
at least 6 "below the top ditch during a 25-year storm .
11 . Culvert #1 requires a freeboard of at least 1' during a 100-year storm event.
12 . Does the culvert analysis take into account the flow hindrance of the Rock Rip Rap at
the discharge location?
13. Specify the length type , and grade on profile for culvert 1 on C3 .1
14 . Provide Cost Estimate , and B/CS Standard details .
Reviewed by : Kevin Ferrer Date: February 5, 2015
Do ·: Bk Vol
0 1237847 OF.'. 12835
Easement Agreement for Utilities & Infrastructure
Notice of confidentiality rights: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strike any or all of
the following information from any instrument that transfers an interest in real property before it
is filed for record in the public records: your Social Security number or yo ur driver's license
number.
Date: July g 2015
Grantor: SMILING MALLARD DEVELOPMENT, LTD., a Texas limited partnership, and
PAUL CLARKE , individually
Grantor 's Mailing Address: 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100, Bryan , Brazos County, TX 77802
Grantee (i ndividuall y and collectively) and Grantee's Mailing Addresses:
BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES
205 E. 28th Street
Bryan , Texas 77 803
WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT
41 I 8 Greens Prairie Road
College Station, Texas 77845
VERIZON
301 Industrial Boulevard
Bryan, Texas 77803
ATMOS ENE RGY
297 N. Earl Rudder Freeway
Bryan, Texas 77802
SUDDEN LINK
4114 E. 29th Street
Bryan, Texas 77802
COUNTY OF BRAZOS , TEXAS -ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT
26 1 7 Highway 2 I West
Bryan, Texas 77803
Easement Property: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Easement Purpose : For the installation, construction, operation, maintenance , replacement, repair ,
upgrade , and removal of the following utility infrastructure and related facilities thereto
(collectively, the "Facilities"): Electric transmission and distributi on lines; Water lines , Gas
lines, connecting Jines , access facilities , and related equipment; Television, telephone , and
{00334498}
F's
1E:6
Doc Bk Vol pg
0 1237847 OR 12 8Z5 187
communications lines; Drainage ditches, drainage pipes and all other drainage structures.
Consideration : Good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged
by Grantor.
Reservations from Conveyance: As provided in Paragraph 3 below .
Exceptions to Warranty: This conveyance is made by Grantor and accepted by Grantee subject to any
and all existing easements, covenants, rights-of-way, conditions, restrictions, outstanding mineral
interests and royalty interests , if any, relating to the Easement Property, to the extent, and only to
the extent, that the same shall be in force and effect, and either shown of record in the Office of
the County Clerk of Brazos County or that may be apparent on the Easement Property .
Grant of Easement'. Grantor, for the Consideration and subject to the Reservations from Conveyance and
Exceptions to Warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to Grantee and Grantee 's successors and
assigns an easement under and across the Easement Property for the Easement Purpose, together
with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any way belonging (collectively, the
"Easement"), to have and to hold the Easement to Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns
forever. Grantor binds Grantor and Grantor 's successors and assigns to warrant and forever
defend the title to the Easement in Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns against every
person whomsoever lawfull y claiming or to claim the Easement or any part of the Easement,
except as to the Reservation s from Conveyance and Exceptions to Warranty, to the extent that
such claim arises by, through , or under Granter but not otherwise .
Terms and Conditions : The following terms and conditions apply to the Easement granted by this
agreement:
1. Character of Easement. The Easement is nonexclusive and irrevocable. The Easement is
for the benefit of Grantee and Grantee's successors, and assigns (as applicable, the "Holder''). The
Easement granted herein is "in gross" in that there is no benefited property . Nevertheless, the Easement
rights granted herein shall pass to Grantee 's successors and ass igns, subject to all of the terms hereof.
The Easement shall not be construed in any manner to create or grant any rights to the public ge nerall y, to
any other person or entity , or to the owner of any other property to use or enter upon the Easement
Property .
2. Duration of Easement . The term of the Easement will expire when Easement and
Facilities provided for herein are dedicated to the public pursuan t to a recorded subdivision plat of the
Easement Property .
3. Reservation of Rights . Holder's right to use the Easement Property is nonexclusive, and
Grantor reserves for Grantor and Grantor's heirs , successors, and assigns the right to us e all or part of the
Easement Property in conjunction with Holder as long as such use by Grantor and Grantor's heirs ,
successors , and assigns does not reasonably interfere with the use of the Easement Property by Holder fo r
the Easement Purpose, and the right to convey to others the right to us e all or part of the Easement
Prope rty in conjunction with Holder, as lon g as such further conveyance is subject to the terms of this
agreement
{00334498} 2
Do 1: Bk \io l i )12 3 7 ~4 7 OR 1283 5
4. Improvement and Maintenance of Easement Property. Improvement and maintenance
of the Easement Property and the Facilities will be at the sole expense of Holder. Holder has the
reasonable right to cut, trim and control the growth of trees and other vegetation on and in the Easement
Property. Holder must maintain the Easement Property in a neat and clean condition. Holder has the right
to construct, install, maintain, replace, and remove the Facilities under or across any portion of the
Easement Property . All matters concerning the Facilities and their configuration, construction,
installation, maintenance, replacement, and removal are at Holder's reasonable discretion, subject to
performance of Holder 's obligations under this agreement.
S. Equitable Rights of Enforcement. This Easement may be enforced by restraining orders
and injunctions (temporary or pennanent) prohibiting interference and commanding compliance.
Restraining orders and injunctions will be obtainable on proof of the existence of interference or
threatened interference, without the necessity of proof of inadequacy of legal remedies or irreparable
hann, and will be obtainable only by the parties to or those benefited by this agreement; provided,
however, that the act of obtaining an injunction or restraining order will not be deemed to be an election
of remedies or a waiver of any other rights or remedies available at law or in equity.
6 . Dedication to the Public. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is agreed that Grantor or the
owner of any part of Grantor's property adjacent to the Easement Property have the right to dedicate any
and all of the Easement Property to a public entity or public utility service provider and/or to convey any
or all of the improvements and facilities constructed within the Easement Property to a public entity or
public utility service provider; provided any such dedication or conveyance shall be subject to the
reservations , terms, conditions and exceptions set forth herein.
7. Attorney's Fees . If any party retains an attorney to enforce this agreement, the party
prevailing in litigation is entitled to recover reasonable attorney 's fees and court and other costs .
8. Binding Effect. This agreement binds and inures to the benefit of the parties and their
respective successors and permitted assigns.
9. Choice of Law. This agreement will be construed under the laws of the state of Texas,
without regard to choice-of-law rules of any jurisdiction. Venue is in the county or counties in which the
Easement Property is located.
I 0 . Waiver of Default. It is not a waiver of or consent to default if the nondefaulting party
fails to declare immediately a default or delays in taking any action. Pursuit of any remedies set forth in
this agreement does not preclude pursuit of other remedies in this agreement or provided by law.
11 . Entire Agreement. This agreement and any exhibits are the entire agreement of the
parties concerning the Easement Property and the grant of the Easement by Grantor to Grantee . There are
no representations, agreements, warranties, or promises, and neither party is relying on any statements or
representations of any agent of the other party, that are not expressl y set forth in this agreement and any
exhibits .
12 . Legal Co nstruction . If any provision in this agreement is for any reason unenforceable,
to the extent the unenforceability does not destroy the basis of the bargain among the parties , the
unenforceability will not affect any other provision hereof, and this agreement will be construed as if the
{00334498} 3
....... I.:'
188
Doc Bk Vol Ps
1:!1237347 OR 12835 189
unenforceable provision had never been a part of the agreement. Whenever context requires, the singular
will include the plural and neuter include the masculine or feminine gender, and vice versa. Article and
section headings in this agreement are for reference only and are not intended to restrict or define the text
of any section . This agreement will not be consfrued more or less favorably between the parties by reason
of authorship or origin of language .
13. Notices. Any notice required or pennitted under this agreement must be in writing. Any
notice required by this agreement will be deemed to be delivered (whether actually received or not) when
deposited with the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested,
and addressed to the intended recipient at the address shown in this agreement. Notice may also be given
by regular mail , personal delivery, courier delivery , facsimile transmission, or other commercially
reasonable means and will be effective when actually received . Any address for notice may be changed
by written notice delivered as provided herein.
14. Rec itals. Any recitals in this agreement are represented by the parties to be accurate,
and constitute a part of the substantive agreement.
15 . Time . Time is of the essence . Unless otherwise specified, all references to "days" mean
calendar days . Business days exclude Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays . If the date for
performance of any obligation falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal public holiday, the date for
performance will be the next following regular business day .
{00334498 }
SMILING MALLARD DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
a Texas limited partnership
By: Smiling Mallard Management, LLC
a Texas limited liability company,
its general partner
By: lf/~
4
THE ST A TE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF BRAZOS §
(ACKNOWLEDGMENT)
Doc Bk Vol p9 01237847 OR 12835 190
This instrument was acknowledged before me on thecMl'\dday of July, 2015, by Paul Clarke,
individually and as Manager of Smiling Mallard Management, LLC, General Partner of SMILING
MALLARD DEVELOPMENT, LTD., on behalf of the partnership . ~~·......,...,.... IL 4'-'.!~ ,g.~,, Angela Mncle ----------------
~'~ _;,: ~Y cemm1saoon Ex.eire• Notary Public, State of Texas ~or#... 0&101m1s
{00334498 } 5
Colt~ 17.~I Ac.
Trod I of Tract Four
Smiling Maflorcl
O•ve!opment. Ltd .
• V.8765. P. 176
18.3<>f Acre
Pav/ etorf<•
V.12330. P.214-
LEGEND
cUfNt oaT,.. !WJIUS
Cl 5·0126" 4-1-4.00·
450.00'
CURVE rABL£
LEtl<lll1 T~ cHOllD BRC.
30 .11· 19 .87'
s ()'09°15" Vf
41 .14' 20.56' H aoo·1s· E
L9 L8 c+
I
I
__ J
f6. 725 Acres (rrocl Thre•)
sm;/ing Mofford o.velopment Ltd.
V.8765. P.176
----------------------
UNE rABLE
~E aEAAlHC o!STl'ICE
LI S 2'24'28" E 55.62'
l1 s 8733'12" 'II 1.2.51
1..3 s 2'17'03" E 29.80'
L4 H 8734'37" E 1.32'
S 2'24'28" E 128.26'
ctlORD DIST·
u;
s 8859°4&0 'II 1e.oo'
39.691
41 .12'
33.53'
L6
L7 H 2'24°28" 'II 214.88'
LB S 1•45•47" E 1s.01"
S X42'6B• W
1Jj8 .07'
C2 5·07"26"
C3 8._-14·25" 1Jj.00' 36.76" 22.61' H 44"50'11" E
C4 81·sr~· 9 .00' 1:z.87' 7.821 s 4;r4f61" 'II
11.eo' ,~---~· . pag< t of 3 McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING/SURVEYING, INC • 1008 Woodcreek OriY•, Sd;te 103 • Coffege station, rexa• 77845 • (979) 693-3838
The record t>eor\ng" and octuol m~red
d\,\onc•' to U.. tound tron f')d!I o1onQ \h•
od}o1n109 pho!iH of 1nd10t'I to\te9 SUbdtvb\OO
were u•ed os th• bowl• of the beor\ng
'Y'\em sho'«T' on \h\9 plo\.
0 -1/2" """ Rod found
p,o.a. -eundlng setback Liile
P .Q.C. -Potnl of eommench"il
p.O.E. -put>'\c oromoge Ememenl
P.U .E. -public UURty to-emerA
l-9
~·-
t ... :•
.:.~J
· .. l C:· . ~ ()
. .;. ,-,
·..J
.....
,,)
(<:)<:..
(~J 0
(}1 ~ ..
EXHIBIT "A"
FIELD NOTES
PUBLIC UTILITY EASE!vffiNT
0.4244 ACRES
Page 2 of3
Being all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the J .M . BARRERA SURVEY,
Abstract No. 69, Brazos County, Texas and being part of the called 1·6.66 acre Tract 1 of Tract Two, part
of the called 16. 725 acre Tract Three, and part of the called 17.41 acre Tract 1 of Tract Four all
described in the deed from Partners in Habitat Preservation, LLC to Smiling Mallard Development Ltd.
recorded in Volume 8765, Page 176 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas (O .R.B .C .), and
part of the 18.304 acre tract described in the deed from Brierpatch, Ltd . to Paul Clarke recorded in
Volume 12330, Page 214 (O.R.B.C .), and being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING : at a found 112-incb iron rod marking the northeast corner of the called 16.66 acre
tract, the southeast corner of the called 16 .725 acre tract, said iron rod also being in the west line of a 30-
foot wide Easement described in Volume 296 , Page 248 of the Brazos County Deed Record (B.C.D .R.),
from whence a found 1/2-incb iron rod marking the southeast corner of the called 16.66 acre tract bears
S 04° 16 ' 49" Wat a distance of713 .62 feet for reference;
THENCE: N 87° 35' 26" E along the common line of the called 16.66 and 16.725 acre tracts for a .
distance of286.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINN1NG;
THENCE : S 02° 42' 58" W into the interior of the said 16 .66 acre tract for a distance of 619.68 feet to
the Point of Curvature of a curve to the left;
THENCE : 39 .71 feet along the arc of said curve having a central angle of 05° 07' 26", a radius of 444.00
feet, a tangent of 19.87 feet and a long chord bearing S 00° 09 ' 15" Wat a distance of 39.69 feet to the
Point of Tangency;
THENCE : S 02° 24 ' 28" E for a distance of 56.62 feet for corner in the south line of the called 16.66
acre tract and the north line of the before-mentioned 30-foot wide easement (296/248);
THENCE : S 87° 33' 12" W along the co=on line of the called 16.66 acre tract and the said easement
for a distance of 1.25 feet to a found 112-inch iron rod marking the northeast corner of the called 17.41
acre tract and the lower northwest comer of the said easement (29612 48);
THENCE : S 02° 17 ' 03 " E along the east line of the called 17.41 acre tract and the west line of said
easement (296/248) for a distance of 29 .80 feet to a found 112-inch iron rod marking the northwest
corner of the said 18.304 acre Clarke tract and the lower southwest corner of the before-mentioned 30-
foot wide easement (296/248);
THENCE : N 87° 34 ' 37" E along the north line of the said 18.30 4 acre tract and the south line of the said
easement (296/248) for a distance of 1.32 feet for comer;
THENCE : S 02° 24' 28" E into the interior of the said 18 .304 acre tract for a distance of 128.26 feet for
corner;
THENCE: S 86° 59' 48" W, 1.29 feet cross the west line of the said 18.304 acre tract and continue into
the said 17.41 acre tract for a total distance of 16 .00 feet for comer;
THENCE : N 02° 24 ' 28 " W through the said 17.41 acre tract and into the before-said 16 .66 acre tract for
a distance of214.86 feet to the Point of Curvature ofa curve to the right;
THENCE : 41.14 feet along the arc of said curve having a central angle of 05 ° 07' 26", a radius of 460.00
feet, a tangent of 20.58 feet and a long chord bearing N 00 ° 09 ' 15" Eat a distance of 41.12 feet to the
Point of Tangency;
THENCE : N 02° 42' 58" E continuing through the said 16.66 acre tract and into the said 16.725 acre
tract for a distance of 877 .7 6 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve to the right;
THENCE : 36.76 feet along the arc of said curve having a central angle of 84° 14 ' 26", a radius of 25 .00
feet, a tangent of 22:61 feet and a long chord bearing N 44° 50 ' 11" E at a distance of 33.53 feet for
corner;
E>k Vol
0~'. 128 35
EXH IBIT "A"
TIIENCE : S 01° 45' 47" E for a distance of 16.0 1 feet for comer;
Page 3 of3
Bk Vol
%: 1'.![3:0
THENCE: 12.87 feet in a counter-clockwise direction along the arc of a curve having a central angle of
81° 57' 46", a radius of9 .00 feet, a tangent of7.82 feet and a long chord bearing S 43° 41 ' 5l"W at a .
distance of 11.80 feet to the Point of Tangency;
For further information see survey
plat prepared with this description.
Fil"d r -or ~·,,,-ord ei;:AZos CO UNTY in:
On: Jul 27,·;nF t
--·-' a 08:.58A
As (\ ~
Doi:umen t Number:
Amou nt
48 .0(i
f.f\AZOS COIJHTY
as stamPed hereon b~ m•~.
Karen M•:Quei=n' Brazos Counb Cler k
P.f.:l\ZO S CO!JrlT Y
f'g
193
CASE NO .:
DATE SUBMITTED : -t-..__...__.__..._.'---
TIME : t?/; ( 0
CITY OP COLIEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University •
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
STAFF:~
(Check one) 0 Minor
($700)
0 Amending
($700)
~Final
($932)
0 Vacating
($932)
0Replat
($932)
Is this plat in the ET J? [81 Yes D No Is this plat Commercial D or Residential ~
. / MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
't8J $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
D $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
D $600 (min imum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure , $600 minimum (if fee is > $600 , the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development perm it).
~Appl i cat i on completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered . Please attach pages if additional information is prov ided .
~Six (6) folded cop ies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
[g] Two (2) copies of the grading , drainage , and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
[g] Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
D Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
~ Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days . The report must include applicable in formation such as ownership , liens,
ncumbrances , etc.
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station , Brazos County and College Station l.S.D .
The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why th ey are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application w ill be cons idere d
complete . If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application , it shall be cons idered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such . Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference _N_YA ______________ _
NAME OF PROJECT Indian Lakes -Phase 19
ADDRESS Near intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Nea r intersection of Mesa Verde Drive and Kachina Cove
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Travis Martinek E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
C ity Bryan State Te x as Zip Code 77802 ------
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461 ----------------
Rev ised 4/14 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMAl ION (All owners must be identified . Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
St re et Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
C ity Bryan state Te x as Zip Code 77802 -------
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461 -----------------
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION :
Name McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc. E-mail Jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 -------
Phone Number (979) 693-3838 Fax Number (979) 693-2554
----------------~
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for th is property? [g] Yes D No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume __ N_l"._:4 __ and Page No . _N_YA_
Total Acreage _34_._4_80 _______ _ Total No . of Lots 16 ------R-0-W Acreage _6._2_2_8 ____ _
Existing Use _V_a_ca_n_t ___________ _ Proposed Use Single-Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zon ing District NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA I NIA
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
NIA I NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA
Floodplain Acreage _o._o_o_o _______________________________ _
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes l°X No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and w ill be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance . Notwithstanding any assertion made ,
vesting is lim ited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law .
Is this application a contin uation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are request in g the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
l°X Yes
I No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
add itional sheets if necessary):
Project Name : Indian Lakes Subdivision
City Project Number (if known): Unknown
Date I Timeframe when submitted : 2000
Rev ised 4/14 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
NIA
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
NIA
Regarding the waiver request , explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of th e
subd ivis ion regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of h is land .
NIA
2. The wa ive r is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantia l property right of the appl icant.
NIA
3. The granting of the waiver w ill not be detrimental to the publ ic health , safety , or welfare , or injurious to othe r
property in the area , or to the City in administering subdivision regulations .
Nia
4 . The granting of the wa iver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
NIA
Fee in lieu of sidewa lk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. r; An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way ;
2. I The presence of unique or unusual topographic , vegetative , or other natural cond itions exist so that st ri ct
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan ;
3 . I · A cap ital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the requ ired sidewalk . Imminent sha ll
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12 ) months;
4 . I Exist ing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan w ith an estate I
rura l context;
5. I When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle , Pedestrian , and
Greenways Master Plan ;
Revised 4/14 Page 3 of 9
6. r The proposed development is within an older residential subdi vision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting with in Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO ; or
7 . r The proposed development co ntains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6 ,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functiona l Classification , in the City's Comprehensive Plan .
Detailed explanation of condition identified above :
N/A
NOTE : A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission .
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
NIA Streets
NIA Sidewalks
NIA Sanitary Sewer Lines
NIA Water Lines
NIA Channels
NIA Storm Sewers
NIA Bike Lanes I Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to fil in g the Final Plat:
ACREAGE :
NIA
NIA
NIA
No. of acres to be dedicated+$ __ N_'!._:4 __ development fee
No . of acres in floodplain
No . of acres in detention
_N_'!._:4_ No. of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND :
NIA No . of SF Dwelling Units X $ NIA = $ NIA
NIA (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete . IF THIS APPL/CAT/ON JS FILED BY A N YONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above .
Signature an~ Date
Rev ised 4/14 Page 4 of 9
Existing
[8]
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
[8] Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch .
[8] Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow .
[8] Title Block with the following information :
[8] Name and address of subdivider , recorded owner , planner , engineer and surveyor.
[8] Proposed name of subdivision . (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County911 .)
[8] Date of preparation .
[8] Engineer's scale in feet.
[8] Total area intended to be developed .
[8] North Arrow .
[8] Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines .
[8] If more than 1 sheet , an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
[8] All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
[8] Ownership and Dedication
[8] Surveyor and/or Engineer
[8] City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat)
[8] Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
[8] Brazos County Clerk
[8] Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
[8] If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements , submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created .
[8] If using pr ivate septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Comm issioner's
Court of Brazos County , pursuant to the provisions of Section 21 .084 of the Texas Water Code .
[8] Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway , if applicable , according to the most recent available
data .
[8] Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data .
[8] Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E .2 ).
The location and description with accurate dimensions , bearings or deflection angles and radii , area , cente r
angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following : (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision , as well as , those within the subdivision).
Proposed
[8] Streets . Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a te mp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O .W. locations and widths . (All existing and proposed R.O .W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan .)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance .
Rev ised 4/14 Page 8 of 9
Existing
~
~
~
~
Proposed
~
~
~
~
Alleys .
Easements .
A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially ).
Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages . All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission cons ideration.
~-Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36 " sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following :
~ Street, alley and sidewalk plans , profiles and sections . One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision . (may be combined with other
utilities).
~ Sewer Design Report.
~ Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades . One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision . (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the ut ility
master plan and any future growth areas.)
~ Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
~ Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves , etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subd ivision .
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas .)
~ Storm drainage system plan with contours , street profile , inlets , storm sewer and
drainage channels , with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas , and runoff
based on 5, 10 , 25 , 50 and 100 year rain intensity . Detailed drainage structure design ,
channel lining design & detention if used . One sheet must show the overall dra inage
layout of the subdivision.
~ Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
~ Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8 .6 .
~ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary .
~ Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
~ All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat w ith a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed .
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being sched uled
for P&Z Commission consideration .
~ Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes [g] No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
~ Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? D Yes ~ No
If yes , TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
the plat at the Courthouse .
2 . If the construction area is greater than 5 acres , EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted pr ior to
issuance of a development permit.
_ Print f()rrn
Revised 4/14 Page 9 of 9
CITY OF COTJ.EG E STATTO ~
Homt: of Texas A&M U11ivmiry"
CASE :O~:R OFFICE 15~
DATE SUBMITTED : 6ij aj 15
TIME : 2:00
STAFF : ~K!--+'~-------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your subm ittal.
New Project Submittal D
D Incomplete Pro1ect Submittal -documents needed to comolete an application . P&DS Project no .:
( Existing Project Submittal. P&DS Project no .: ,. -
ProjectName \ryli0v(1 LA.~ Ph \Cj
Contact Name Phone Number _____________ _
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Non-Residential Architectural Standards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMNCLOMR/LOMNLOMR
D Site Plan D Grading Plan
D Special District Site Plan D Other -Please specify below
D Special District Building I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are inc luded in the complete set:
O Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit 0 Sewerline Construction Documents
O TxDOT Utility Perm it 0 Street Construction Documents
O Drainage Letter or Report 0 Easement Application
O Fire Flow Analysis ~ Other -Please specify
Special Instructions:
10/10
TO :
CLARKE & WYNDHAM
REAL EST ATE INVESTMENT SERVICES
TRAVIS MARTINEK
3608 East 29 th Street, Sui te 100
Brya n , Texas 77 802
Office: (979) 846-4384 Fax : (979) 846 -1461 Ce ll: (979) 229-9877
TRANSMITTAL SHEET
DATE :
Jason Schubert 1/22/2015
COMPANY : TOTAL NO . OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:
See be low
FAX NUMBER : PHONE NUMBER:
RE :
Indian Lakes-Phases 19 & 21
0 URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE
NOTES/COMMENTS:
Jason ,
Attached is the water report for Indian Lakes Phases 19 and 21 . Let me know if you have any questions .
Thanks ,
Travis