HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-286FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO .: 1 4-2e~
DATE SUBMITTED : \I /2 '5 /lLl
CITY O F COLLEGE STAT ION
Horne of'fexas A&M Univmity•
TIME: ~\_··=2~0 ______ _
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
GENERAL
STAFF: _f\1~'---------
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
[8"] $932 Site Plan Application Fee .
[8"] $350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable).
[8"] $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure , $600 minimum (if fee is > $600 , the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
[8"] Application completed in full. Th is application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered .
[8"] Six (6) folded copies of site plan .
[8"] One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan .
[8"] One (1) copy of the following for Non-Residential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate
Build in g Review (if applicable).
~
~
[8"] Building elevations to scale for all buildings .
[8"] A list of build ing materials for all facade and screening .
[8"] Color samples for all bu ildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette .
~ Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mailed to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov.
Two (2) copies of the grading , drainage , and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report .
Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (i f applicable).
[8"] Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
proposed request (if applicable).
[8"] The attached Site Plan Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Rev iew and Northgate Building
Review checklists (as applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
check off.
Date of Optional Preappl ication or Stormwater Management Conference _______________ _
NAME OF PROJECT Jones Law Firm Office
--------------------------------~
ADDRESS 2800 Earl Rudder Freeway
LEGAL D ESCR I PTI 0 N (Lot , Block, Subdivision) =L.::..;ot;_1:....::E::....-'-'R=2-'-N.:....:o;_rt:..;_;h_.;.F_.:o;_re""-'s:;..:.t_.:S:....::u=b-='-d'"'-iv:....::is.:....:io'"'"'n ___________ _
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Steve Broussard -SteNt Assets, LLC E-mail ------------------
Street Address P.O. Box 9262 -----------------------------------
C ity Colleg e Station State Te x as Zip Code 77842 ---------------
Phone Number 713 -967-6573 Fax Number ----------------
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION :
Name SteNt Assets, LLC E-mail _________________ _
Street Address P.O. Bo x 9262 -----------------------------------
City College Station State _T_ex_a_s ______ Zip Code _7_78_4_2 ____ _
Phone Number 713-967-6573 Fax Number ----------------
Revised 4/14 Page 1 of 11
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER 'S INFORMATION :
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC -Deven Doyen, P.E. E-mai 1 deven@schultzengineeringllc .com
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station State Texas Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _
Phone Number 979. 764 .3900 Fax Number 979. 764 .3910 -----------------
0 THE R CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact):
Name NoackLittle -Chris Noack E-mail chris @noacklittle .com
Street Address 1300 Guadalupe St., Suite 101
City Austin State Texas Zip Code _7_8 _70_1 ____ _
Phone Numbe r 512.851 .1900 Fax Number 512 .851 .1901 --------------------------------
Current zoning _O_ffi_ic_e ___________________________________ _
Present use of property Vacant ----------------------------------
Proposed use of property Office/Medical Office
--------------------------------~
Number of park ing spaces required 30 Number of parking spaces proposed 11 PROP/ 19 EXIST
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes IX No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determ ine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance . Notwithstanding any assertion made ,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this applicat ion a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
app lication be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
I Yes
IX No
If yes , prov ide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (prov ide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name :
City Project Number (in known):
Date I T imeframe when submitted :
Revis ed 4/14 Pag e 2 of 11
MULTl-FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage _N_IA ____ _
Floodplain Acreage _N_IA ___ _
Housing Units _N_IA ____ _
#of 1 Bedroom Units ---
# of 2 Bedroom Units ---
# of 3 Bedroom Units ---
#of 4 Bedroom Un its ---
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
# Bedrooms = 132 sq . ft .
---
# Bedrooms < 132 sq . ft . ---
PARKLAND DEDICATION
(Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit)
#of Multi-Family Dwelling Units
NIA
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
# of acres in greenways
Date ded icat ion approved by Parks &
____ Recreation Advisory Board
COMMERCIAL
Total Acreage _0._3_7_7 ___ _
Building Square Feet _5~8_9 _8 __
Floodplain Acreage -"-0 ___ _
* Projects that were vested prior to January 1, 2008 , per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code may be assessed a different amount. Please contact city staff for additional information .
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true
and correct.
Date
Rev ised 4/14 Pag e 3of11
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein .
3. If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-issued .
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued .
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progress ing within 24 months of issuance .
6. Other perm its may be required to fulfill local , state , and federal requ irements. Owner will obta in or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP .
7 . If required , Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction .
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance .
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required , includ ing detention ponds proposed as part of this project , it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentat ion shall not be deposited in city streets , or
existing dra inage facilities . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the appl icable codes and ord inances of the
City of Co ll ege Station shall apply .
11 . The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code , Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details . All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulat ions .
12 . Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only . I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contracto r signature on approved Development Permit.
13 . I, THE OWNER , AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION , ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
~A --.(J
Property Owner(s)
Engineer Certification:
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds , proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence .
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local , State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES : i.e ., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin .
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code , Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines . All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations .
4 . I, THE ENGINEER , AGRE ~~RTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPM ~~~lJ~_t\ICATION , ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE . c.} •• ··*· ··· ... U' •t.
f .· .. .. * ... . •. :: .. ~.~ .'!'..: ••••••.••.•• L···oovEN VEN · .....•.•.....
Engineer
Revised 4/14
Date
Page 4 of 11
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill /Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A . I, certify , as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the
alterations or development covered by this permit , shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second . This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ord i nances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area ; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocit ies .
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5 .11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances .
Engineer Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted , provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification .
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill/ Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following :
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm .
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, , cert ify that the construction , improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments .
Engineer Date
Revised 4/14 Page 5 of 11
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any res idential structure shall have the lowest floor , including all util ities , ductwork and any basement , at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation . Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ________________ , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial , industrial , or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor , including all
utilities , ductwork and basements , elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility , ductwork ,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork ,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation , and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions .
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval :
Revised 4/14 Page 6 of 11
CITY OF C OLI.EGE S TATIO
Homt o/Ttxas A&M University•
SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
~ Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
~ A key map (not necessarily to scale).
~ Title block to include :
~ Name , address, location , and legal description
~ Name , address, and telephone number of applicant
~ Name , address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
~ Name , address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
~ Date of submittal
~ Total site area
~ North arrow.
~ Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
~ Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels .
~ The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site .
D The density of dwell ing units per acre of the proposed project.
~ The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each . If different uses are to be
located in a single building , show the location and size of the uses within the building . Building separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection .
Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site:
Designate between existing and proposed
~ The dens ity of dwell ing units per acre of the proposed project.
~ Phasing . Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements .
~ Buildings (Existing and Proposed).
~ Setbacks according to UDO, Article 5.
Geography
~ Water courses .
~ 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site . Please note if there is none
on the site w ith confirming FEMNFIRM map number.
~ Existing topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information . (If plan has too much
information , show dra inage on separate sheet.)
~ Proposed grading (1' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information . (If plan has too
much information , show drainage on separate sheet.)
Revi sed 4/14 Pag e 7 of 11
Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks
[8] Existing streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.).
[8] Existing Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Article 7 .
[8] Proposed drives . Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO , Article 7
[8] Indicate proposed driveway throat length according to UDO , Article 7
[8] Proposed curb cuts .
[8] For each proposed curb cut (including driveways , streets, alleys , etc .) locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine separation d istances between existing and proposed curb cuts .
[8] Proposed curb and pavement detail.
[8] A 6" ra ised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island ,
plant ing areas , access ways , dumpster locations , utility pads , etc .) No exception will be made for areas
designated as "reserved for future parking ".
[8] Proposed medians .
[8] Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
[8] Proposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facil ities for non-residential buildings (UDO, Article 7).
[8] Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn , tabulated , and dimensioned .
[8] Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal.
[8] Handicap parking spaces .
[8] Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO , Section 7 .2 or 7 .9 fornon-
residential buildings .
[8] Parking setback from R.O .W. to curb of parking lot as required .
[8] Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities , handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities , signs or other confl icts .
~ Security gates , showing swing path and design specs with colors .
~ Guardrails . Include design and colors .
[8] Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Art icle 7).
[8] Please note if none is required .
[8] Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O .W.? O Yes [8] No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted with th is application .
Easements and Utilities
[8] Easements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility , access , etc.)
[8] Utilities (noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site , including bu il ding
t ransforme r locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings , and drainage inlets .
[8] Sewer Des ign Report (if applicable).
[8] Water Des ign Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable).
[8] Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary .
[8] Meter locations, exist i ng and proposed (must be located in public R.O.W. or publ ic utility easement).
[8] Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include
[8] Minimum water demands
[8] Maximum water demands
[8] Average water demands in gallons per minute , and
[8] Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per day
[8] Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O .W.? O Yes [8] No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application.
Revised 4/14 Pag e 8 of 11
Fire Protection
[8J Show fire lanes . Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be
established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a
public street or highway .
[8J Show proposed and existing fire hydrants . Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a
project , and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 ,
R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street , highway or designated fire
lane .
NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a
building permit can be issued .
[8J W ill building be sprinkled? D Yes [8J No
If the decis ion to sprink le is made after the site plan has been approved , then the plan must be resubmitted. If Yes ,
D Show fire department connections . FDC's should be within 100 ' of the fire hydrant. They shall be accessible from
the park ing lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure .
Landscaping
[8J Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance . The landscaping plan can be shown
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the or iginal site plan . If request ing protected tree po ints, then those
trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan . Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in
easements .
Include information on the plans such as :
[8J requ ired point calcu lations
[8J additional streetscape po ints requ ired . Streetscape compliance is required on all streets .
[8J calculat ions for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
landscap ing points .)
[8J proposed new plantings with points earned
[8J proposed locations of new plantings
[8J screen ing of parking lots , 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen .
[8J screening of dumpsters , concrete retaining walls , off street loading areas , utility connection points , or other
areas potentially v isually offensive .
[8J exist ing landscaping to remain
1v1 show ex ist ing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan . Protected points w ill only be awarded if barricades are ~ up before the first development permit is issued .
[8J Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ord inance .
[8J Show irrigat ion system plan . (or provide note on how irr igation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.
0 .) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems fo r buildings and will be sized by city accord ing to irr igation demand submitted by applicant and must
include backflow prevention protect ion .
[8J Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O .W.? D Yes [8J No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of app lication.
Other
~ Common open spaces sites
~ Loading docks
~ Detent ion ponds
Hl!l Retaining walls
[8J Sites for so li d waste containers with screen ing .. Locations of d~mpste r s are a .c~essible but not visible .from streets or
residentia l areas . Gates are discouraged and visual screening 1s required . (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required .)
tll{jt] Are there i mpact fees associated w ith this development? D Yes [8J No
NOTE : Signs are to be permitted separately .
Revised 4/14 Page 9 of 11
CITY OF Cm.LEGE STATION
Home a/Texas A&M Univmiry•
NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
~ Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
~ Title block to include :
~ Name , address , location, and legal description
~ Name , address , and telephone number of applicant
~ Name , address , and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
~ Name , address , and telephone number of architecUengineer (if differs from applicant)
~ Date of submittal
~ Scale should be largest standard scale possible on sheet.
~ List of colors from the City of College Station color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents.
~ Color samples.
~ List of materials to be utilized .
~ Elevations of each non-residential building and screening structure . Show placement of materials and colors on
the facades according to UDO Section 5.6 .B or 7 .9.
~ Include the following dimensions :
~ Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each fagade separately)
~ Total vertical square footage of transparency (for each fagade separately in Northgate)
~ Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fagade separately)
~ Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fagade separately)
~ Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in build ing plot to show material , color , and
architectural harmony .
Rev ised 4/14 Page 10 of 11
CITY OF C OLL.EGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M Univmity•
NORTHGATE BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 5.6. Design Districts, B. Northgate Districts (NG)
D Shee size ;; 24 " 2S .3Q'.'. (minimum).
D Title block to include:
Name, address , location , and legal description
Name, address , and telephone number of applicant
Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
Name , address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
Date of submittal
Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D List of colors from the City of College Station Northgate color palette to be utilized or proposed
equivalents with color samples.
D List of materials to be utilized .
D Elevations of each building and screening structure . Show placement of materials and colors
on the facades and identify public entrances .
Include the following dimensions :
D Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each fa9ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fa9ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fa9ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of transparency between zero and eight feet (0 -8') above ground
level (for each non-residential fa9ade)
D Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material ,
color, and architectural harmony .
Revised 4/14 L Print Form j Page 11 of 11
PLANN IN G
STAF F REVIEW COMMENTS N0.1
Jones Law Firm Office-NRA Rev iew
I 4-00900286
/ 1 _, On the east and west facades, only the brick portion cou nts as the fat;ade. Please revise
U plans to show 2 elements of architectura l re lief. The canop y on the east elevatio~ounts as
element. -~ t~e.r 0CECied r::er-an;uJs wu-h H P-0 . ~
Please provide a note that all s ignage wi l be pe rmitted separately. or your knowledge
signage will not be permitted on the structure that extends from the roof. NOTED ON
REVISED ELEVATIONS THAT SIGNAGE WILL BE PERM/TED SEPRATEL Y.
Reviewed by: Jessica Bullock Date: December 15 , 2014
DATE :
TO :
FROM :
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
December 16, 2014
Steve Broussard , SteNt Assests , via USPS ; P.O . Box 9262 College Station , TX
77845
Jessica Bullock , Staff Planner
JONES LAW FIRM OFFICE (NRA)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . Please address the comments and
subm it the following information for further staff review :
__ One (1) revised set of elevation drawings
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised elevations , please attach a letter
explaining the details . If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me
at 979 .764.3570.
Attachments : Staff review comments
PC: Deven Doyen , Schultz Engineering , LLC , via ; deven@schultzengineeringllc .com
Chris Noack , Noacklittle, via ; chris@noacklittle.com
P&DS Project No . 14-00900286
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • LI O! TEXAS AVENUE · CO LLEGE SH.TION ·TEXAS · 77842
TEL. 979.76 4.3570 ·FAX. 979.76 4 .3496
cstx.gov/devservices
PLANNING
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Jones Law Firm Office -NRA Review
14-00900286
1. On the east and west facades, only the brick portion counts as the fa<;ade. Please revise
plans to show 2 elements of architectural relief. The canopy on the east elevation counts as
1 element.
2 . Please provide a note that all signage will be permitted separately. For your knowledge
signage will not be permitted on the structure that extends from the roof.
Reviewed by: Jessica Bullock Date: December 15, 2014
•
.,....,.,...,.,..,. _________ ~C ITY or C ou.EGE STATIONJ -----------------Home o/Texas A&M Univers;ry • ,..
DATE :
TO :
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
December 1, 2014
Steve Broussard , SteNt Assests , via USPS ; P.O . Box 9262 College Station , TX
77845
Jessica Bullock , Staff Planner
JONES LAW FIRM OFFICE (NRA)
Thank you for the submittal of your Non-Res idential Architectural Standards application . I have
been ass igned to review this project and it is anticipated that the review will be completed and
any staff comments returned to you on or before Monday , December 15 , 2014 . If you have
quest ions in the meantime , please feel free to contact me .
PC : Deven Doyen , Schultz Engineering , LLC , via; deven@schultzengineeringllc.com
Chris Noack , Noacklittle, via ; chris@noacklittle .com
P&DS Project No . 14-00900286
Pla11ni11g & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 110 1 TEXAS AVENUE· COLLEGE STATI ON · TE.}\AS • 77842
TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cst>t.gov/devservices
~hultz Engin eering , LLC
December 30 , 2014
Jessica Bullock
Staff Planner
Development Services
City of College Station
College Station, Texas
Re: Jones Law Firm Office (NRA) 14-00900286
Dear Ms . Bullock:
Attach i s the response to comments for the NRA and the following:
• 1 ~ Set of Elevation Drawings
Sincerely,
~J,'~-
Deven L. Doyen:;!{.
Civil Engineer
P.O . Box 11995 • College Station , Texas 77842
schultzengineeringllc.com
Office: 979 .764 .3900
Fax: 979 .764.39 10
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M Univmity•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO .: I<{ -Q.tS (o
DATE SUBMITIED: W -.S \ -\ 4
TIME : d :. L.._\L-\
STAFF : CD
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
D New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . Case No .:
[8] Existing Proj ect Submittal. Case No .: 14-00900286
Project Name Jones Law Firm Office (NRA)
Contact Name _D_e_ve_n_D_o.._ve_n __________ _ Phone Number _9_79_._76-'--4_.3"'--9'--'0'""""0 ________ _
We are transm itt ing the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment [8] Non-Residential Architectural Standards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
D Site Plan D Grading Plan
D Special District Site Plan [8] Other -Please specify below
D Special D istrict Building I Sign Response to Comments
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Perm it D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions:
10/10 I[ Print Form
CITY oF Coll.EGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University"
FOR OFFICE USE ONL)'
CASENO .: 111-x~
DATE SUB M ITTE D : /-o/-15
T IME : j~;
STAFF :~
~~~~~~~~~
P LANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Plea se check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
D New Project Submittal
D Inc omplete Proj ect Subm ittal -do c uments needed to complete an applicatio n . Case No .:
D Exi sting Project Submittal. Case No.: 14-Q_~~
Project Name :J:) 'f'...eS ( 0. A_;..,_) W rY\
We are transmitting the fo ll ow ing for Pl ann ing & Developmen t Services t o review and com m en t (check all that app ly):
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Comprehens ive Plan Amendment
Rez oning Appl icati on
Master Development Plan
Pr eliminary Plat
Final Pl at
Developmen t Plat
Site Plan
Special Distr ict Site Plan
Spec ial District Building I Sig n
Lan ds cape Plan
INFRASTR UC T UR E AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
~ Non-Res id ent ial Arc hitectural Standa rds
[J ' Irrigati on Plan
D
D
0
0
D
D
Varian ce Request
Develo pment Permit
Conditi onal Use Permit
FEMA C LO MA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
Grading Plan
Other -Pl ease specify below
All infrastructu re documents mu s t b e subm itted as a comp le te set.
Th e follo wing are include d in the complete set:
D Co mprehensive Pla n Amendme nt D Waterli ne Cons truc tion Documen ts
D TxDOT Driveway Perm it D Sewerlin e Construct ion Documents
D Tx DOT Ut ility Perm it D Street Co nstruction Documents
0 Dra inage Le tt er or Report D Easem ent Appl icati on
D F ire Flow Anal ysi s D Other -Pl ease speci fy
Sp ecial Instructions:
10/10
Jessica Bullock
From: Jessica Bullock
Sent:
To:
Wednesday, January 07 , 2015 8:29 AM
'Chris Noack AIA '
Subject: RE : Conceptual Design fo r North Forest Office Park -Lot 1E -R2
Chris,
I hope your holidays were good as well! In regards to the signage you are correct that the permit will look at the specific
signage design . As far as location, attached signage it is really up to the owner where it is placed . This case was special
in that there will be signage placed on the upper wall. In this case, having signage placed on that wall will be
permitted. The NRA approval does not lock in that location. Meaning that if the owner wanted to change location of
signage, revisions to the plans would not be needed .
Let me know if you have any other questions,
Jessica Bullock
Staff Plann e r
Plan nin g & De v el opmen t Se rvi ces
City o f Colleg e Station
P.O. Bo x 9960
1101 Texas Avenue
Coll e ge Station, TX 7784 2
O f fic e : 979 .7 64 .35 70
Fa x: 979.764 .3496
Emai l: jbullock@cs tx .gov
Webs ite: www.cs tx.gov
From: Chris Noack AIA [mailto :chris@noacklittle .com]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8 :50 AM
To: Jessica Bullock
Subject: Fwd: Conceptual Design for North Forest Office Park -Lot 1E -R2
J ess ica, I hop e yo u had a good holiday .
I have one more fo llowup que stion so I can clarify for the building owner:
It is my understandin g th at the Planning Review I NRA approval means the des ign m eet s the A R requirements
and a ppro ve s the location s of signage shown on the el ev ations.
For the futur e signage p ermits (the separate permits you note below), thes e p ermits w ill be fo r specific signag e
de si gn (s ize , sign construction, illumination, color, etc) for each sign location that h as alread y been appro ved by
the N RA revi ew.
1
Is my understanding correct?
Chris Noack, AIA
Follow us on Twitter!
@Noacklittle
Noacklittle
architecture and interiors
1300 Guadalupe St., Suite 101
Austin , TX 78701
P 512 .851 .1900 ext 201
Return on Imagination
Begin forwarded message :
From: Chris Noack AIA <chris@noacklittle.com>
Subject: Re: Conceptual Design for North Forest Office Park -Lot 1 E-R2
Date: December 23, 2014 at 7:58:17 PM CST
To: Jessica Bullock <jbullock@cstx.gov>
Jessica,
Thank you for your consideratio n ! We will make the revision you ask on Monday, 12/29/14,
print the copies and send to your office.
Have a Merry Christmas!
Chris Noack, AIA
Follow us on Twitter!
@Noacklittle
Noacklittle
architecture and interiors
1300 Guadalupe St., Suite 101
Austin , TX 78701
P 512 .851 .1900 ext 201
Return on Imagination
On Dec 23, 2014 , at 4:53 PM, Jessica Bullock <jbullock@cstx.gov> wrote :
Chris,
I took a look at what you sent today and I will honor the communication with
Morgan . The only revision I ask is that you include the note all sheets that all signage
w i ll be permitted separately. Please submit 2 sets of the NRA documents for
stamping. One will be returned to you. If you would like more copies feel free to
submit additional copies for stamping.
2
Let me know if you have any other questions,
Jessica Bullock
Staff Planner
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station. TX 77842
Office: 979 .7 64.3570
Fa x: 979.764 .3496
Email: jbullock@cstx.gov
Website: www.cstx.gov
From: Chris Noack AIA [mailto :chris@noacklittle .com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 10:25 AM
To: Jessica Bullock
Cc: Crystal Derkowski; Terrence Newton
Subject: Fwd: Conceptual Design for North Forest Office Park -Lot 1E-R2
Jessica,
Thank you for the phone visit this morning to clarify the Planning Review
comments for Jones Law Firm Office (14-00900286).
Back in April I May of this year I was communicating with Morgan Hester.
Morgan reviewed our conceptual design work and I asked for her input regarding
compliance with AR requirements , signage, etc. The future owner wanted to
confirm that we could get to something that met their goals before purchasing the
lot. I have attached the referenced exhibit to this email.
The design has been refined since the conceptual design, and the position of some
elements adjusted , but we tried to stay reasonably faithful to the concept. The
primary wall material did change from stone to brick.
Please review this information. I am available for a phone visit at your earliest
convemence.
M y office number is below, my cell is 512-289-1502.
Best,
Chris
[see attached file : CJone Law -CS Planner Review Notes -May 2014.pdf]
Chris Noack , AIA
Follow us on Twitter!
@Noacklittle
3
Noacklittle
architecture and interiors
1300 Guadalupe St., Suite 101
Austin , TX 78701
P 512 .851.1900 ext 201
Return on Imagination
Begin forwarded message :
From: Morgan Hester <mhester@cstx .gov>
Subject: RE: Conceptual Design for North Forest Office
Park -Lot 1 E-R2
Date: May 20, 2014 at 2:37: 11 PM CDT
To: 'Chris Noack AIA' <chris@noacklittle.com>
Chris,
You are correct on all counts! Thank you for double
checking.
I've talked with my supervisor about your project and
depending on the timing, I MIGHT be the one to review, but
if not, I will be working closely with whichever planner is
assigned to review.
Thank you!
Morgan Hester
Staff Planner
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station
P.O . Box 9960
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77842
Office : 979 .7 64 .3570
Fax: 979.764 .3496
Email: mhester@cstx.gov
Website: www.cstx.gov
[see attached file : imageOOl.png]
C ity of College Station : 75th Anniversary
From: Chris Noack AIA [mailto:chris@noacklittle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 1:28 PM
To: Morgan Hester
Subject: Re: Conceptual Design for North Forest Office Park -Lot 1E-R2
4
Morgan,
Thank you for your email , and our phone visit last week.
Following our phone call , these are my understandings :
1. The lot is internal to the overall development, and NO portion
of the lot faces the ROW. Therefore the linear footage that the
number of architectural features is calculated on is 60 feet , not 45
feet.
2. The number of architectural features shown on each elevation
(see attachment) appear to satisfy the minimum requirements.
So , this Conceptual Design does not appear to have any major
flaws regarding architectural features , massing, etc . The illustration
contains materials, however these are very preliminary, and likel y
to change. If my client decides to move forward with the lot
purchase and design, I will update you as the elevations and
material choices are refined to confirm compliance with the NRA
Standards.
I have marked up the attached PDF to clarify and document the
concept design we discussed. Thanks for your time.
Best,
Chris
[see attached file : Clone Law-CS Planner Review Notes -May
2014.pdf]
Chris Noack, AIA
Follow us on Twitter!
@Noacklittle
Noacklittle
architecture and inte ri ors
1300 Guadalupe St., Sui te 101
Au stin, T X 78701
P 5 12 .85 1.1900 ext 201
Return on Ima ginati on
On May 14 , 2014 , at 1 :00 PM, Morgan Hester
<mhester@ cstx.gov> wrote:
Good afternoon, Chris!
I was able to download the file -thank you for checking on
that. I'm in and out of my office all day for meetings, so I
apologize for not being able to call you back!
5
In response to your questions:
Signs
o The taller sign (Chad Jones) would be
considered attached signage .
o You are correct, attached signage is based on
the linear footage of the primary entry frn;ade
x 2.5. This area can be divided up however
desired. We have many businesses that take
the total square footage and divide it up into
multiple signs on different wall planes.
NRA (Non-Residential Architectural) Standards
o Per the UDO, there is a requirement for each
frn;ade to provide at least 2 architectural
features every 45' if facing the ROW and every
60' for all others. In this case, the 2 features
every 60' will apply. Because th is is not scaled ,
I was not able to check to see if this was met
for each fac;ade, but I have provided some
comments to what I was able to review.
•View A
• Features that will apply for
satisfying this requirement include
the recessed wall p lanes and
pilasters .
• Additional features will need to
be provided . This could be
something as simple as pilasters
adhered to the wall face or
canopies over the w indows.
•View B
• The same comments as above
apply.
• Keep in mind that the gutters (I
think those are gutters?) will not
apply as architectural features.
• ViewC
• The recession and awning over
the door will count for 2
•View D
features. Keep in mind that 2
different features will need to be
provided every 60' feet. If the
length of the fac;ade does not
hit 120' (meaning not another full
60'), then 2 features will be
sufficient. This goes for all
facades.
• Same comments as above.
I hope all of that makes sense! I will call you tomorrow to
d iscuss. I really like the style of the building!
6
' .
Of course, parking will need to be accommodated on site (if
all necessary parking cannot be contained within the
property, there are other options) and landscaping
requirements will have to be met.
Thank you for sending this over for a quick look over!
Morgan Hester
Staff Planner
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77842
Office: 979 .7 64.3570
Fax : 979.764.3496
Email : mhester@cstx .gov
Website : www.cstx.gov
<image001 .png>
Cit y of College Station : 75th Anniversary
From: Chris Noack AIA [mailto:chris@noacklittle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 2:41 PM
To: Morgan Hester
Subject: Conceptual Design for North Forest Office Park -Lot 1E-R2
Morgan,
Thank you for your time on the phone last week to answer my
que stion about roof requirements in the College Station
Development Ordinance . We have completed a Conceptual Design
for a potential new office building at North Forrest Professional
Park, Lot 1E-R2.
I'd appreciate your feedback of the Conceptual Design Set, dated
05 .09 .2014 . Below is a summary of my presentation to my client.
At the end of this email , I've included several initial questions I
like your guidance on.
Here is a link to download the
document: https://www.dropbox .com/s/yceigitnn908pdr/14012%2
0Chad%20J ones%20Law%200ffice%20Conceptual %20Design%
20copy%20w %20ht-mtl%20markup.pdf
Overall Goals:
Professional office w/ potential shell tenant space I future office
growth
Create presence for the building I visibility as lot is at back of
property. Create signage opportunity in an integrated way.
7
Provide daylighting to law office interior.
Allow for collaboration in office environment, legal staff do
some private work I some collaborative work.
Building Plan:
Single story, approximately 5500 -5,800 sf.
(The 3 attorney's offices and business offices are
shown a little too small. The back wall of the offices will move
back several feet to provide the space programmed . The final size
as proposed is closer to the 5,800 sf end of the range.)
2 distinct portions, designed can be merged into 1 office in
future.
Law office zones
Public -facing street
Staff -central and rear
Central work area has clerestory above for light and
unifies the high wall element.
Central work area walls are not full-height -5 ' or
6 ' -allow light in, provides privacy, allows some collaboration
Common table in middle (standing height
recommended)
Common -rear
Break Room &Patio connected to allow space to be
used together, and patio to be close to kitchen
Shell medical proportioned to contain 6-7 exam rooms, 2 or 1
dr offices (see sample plan)
Parking need is 24 spaces (28 spaces if all medica l)
Exterior -A:
Tall wall with signage -wraps into law firm entry
Left -office
conference rooms at front
staff work area in center I under clerestory
Medical to right w/ own entrance
Exterior materials: stone , stucco , wood siding (note: all material
selections are preliminary)
Exterior -B:
This side -tall wall w/ sign to get above plastic surgery
building
Windows along side of medical space are optional -can be
upper window with area below designed for future lower window.
Exterior -C:
Exterior wall folds down on this side to become patio roof
Patio structure uses closely spaced small columns to screen
view of backside of neighbor.
Window as back of medical side are optional , can be set up for
future windows (same as the side).
8
. '
4 r f t
Exterior -D:
Attorney's offices
Workroom
Backside of clerestory
Potential Value Engineering I Cost Reduction:
Limit clerestory glass to street side
Eliminate side I rear windows in shell medical
U se stucco I wood on sides I rear (reduce masonry)
City of College Station Preliminary Review Questions:
1. Sign locations -due to position on property , signage
directl y over front of building provides no real v isibility for
Client. Proposed signage includes:
1. Major "Chad Jones Law" sign on north side of
lobby wall. Intention is to make visible to
southbound traffic on Earl Rudder.
2. Future tenant signage "Signage" over shell space.
3. CJL logo I limited signage on south side of entry
wall (visibility for traffic coming from south side of
internal parking lot.
2 . Confirm signage Limit: 2.5 sf x linear foot of entry.
3 . Any other issues or concerns identified during review?
Thanks for your time!
Be st ,
Chris Noack, AIA
Follow us on Twitter!
@Noacklittle
Noack Little
architecture and interiors
1300 Guadalupe St., Suite 101
Austin, TX 78701
P 512 .851 .1900 ext 201
Return on Imagi nation
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M Un ivers ity ®
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
9
f I t ~
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
10
lcl
, ..... .. ~-,.,
~~ ' .
..,
...
• j
..~ ,_,v•,~·i j ..... ~~
,o-i "' .. t m\/os
~ ' ~ ....
~ ' ·'~\ ,.;, , .. t .••
~--::I SALO'Tf
·'
Chad Jones La on· View "A" W ice 05.09.2014
I
l'ROGRess l>OCUNENT
·NoT FOR REGULATORY
APPROVAL. PERMfT, OR
CQNSTRUCTION.
CHRISM. NOACK
TX1~
.,,
~~~ .. i;j
,.. ,, '. t.65 .,. •111 .,_,,,, /4f#ir4•
..ao-r o ...& FL· • · ~ · -S A I'-. ,.._, 0,
. Noacklittle
archi tecture and interiors
~
1-to,-
Chad Jones Law Office
View 11 8 11 05.09.2014
loG
t•t es•-.wsc '"' -------40'
~ .•. "' ,.,..0
PROmU:ss ~lilElft
NoT FOR .REGlMTORY
APAAOVN., PERMIT. OR
CONSTRUct!OM.
CHRISM. NOACK
TX 1.5390
Noacklittle
archi tecture and interiors
PS
t-10,-oJ fl..•.w • .,_ .._,,c.. ...... o
Chad Jones Law Office
View "C" 05.09.2014
PROGR£SS DOCUMEMT
~w~r~~~~i~~~
CONSTRUCT IOI'!,
CHfWlM.~
Tx16J96
Noacklittle
arcr11 tecture and interiors
Chad Jones Law Office .. ~ ~
View "D" 05.09.2014 . "
!'~DOCUMENT
NOTFOR REGUUITORY
APPROVAL, PERMIT; Of!
<;ONS'rRUCTION.
C}IA°ISM.11().l,~
"[)(1539Q
Noacklittle
archi t ecture and interiors
;>;-