HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-21Cnv or C oll.Ec;E STATio:-:
Home ofTt.'<111 Ae·M Uni11m/1y• SITE PLAN APPLICATION
GENERAL
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$932 Site Plan Application Fee .
$350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable).
$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructu re , $600 minimum (if fee is > $600 , the balance is
e prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Appl ication completed in fu ll. Th is appl ication form provided by the City of College Station must be used
nd may not be adjusted or altered .
Fourteen (14) folded copies of site plan .
One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan .
One (1) copy of the following for Non-Residential Architectural Standards bu ilding review or Northgate
Building Review (if applicable).
D Build i ng elevations to scale for all bu il d ings.
D A list of building materials for all facade and screening .
D Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette.
D Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mailed to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov.
Two (2) copies of the grading , drainage, and e ros ion control plans with supporting drainage report .
Tw o (2) cop ies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporti ng documents (if applicable).
AO. D Traffic Impact Ana lysis or calculations of projected veh icle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
proposed request (if applicable).
l't'lD The attached Site Plan Non-Residential Arch itectural Standards Bu il ding Review and Northgate Building
Review checkl ists (as applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to w hy they are not
check off.
Date of Opti onal Preapplication o r Stormwater Management Conference ----------------
NAME O F PROJECT Jf r\O if1~N s NJ",,.n:~ '2.
0
1 ~ b.o.o \
ADDRESS 2."flf -12"~~ A..J<-. ~ 1 ~-+~ Zo1 t ,fftty= -S1eAron -fi 77~'H;;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block , Subdivision) Z.'J, lcCJ"~$ d.,f J k~rf ~~ ~11/'v•y J1 ·5f
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAG E R'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the proj ect):
Name '2!Mt A!> C'u.Jl\~r E-ma i l ___________ _
Street Address
City State ________ Zip Code ______ _
Phone Numbe r Fax Number
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION :
Name -1 MOjf~"'~ M 1.fiftSSo~j ~i.e,{ E-mail fiw;f,iMf fflcmfdSDl'i@j..,lli f. C.M
Street Address z~,, ~tc4'S A11t. ~-ti..-~ Z,,(
City C,rtt~t -S.f.t1iot'\. ) State ~?< ZipCode 71'6lf~
Phone Number "l7~ -,4'-; · 'f'5Dt> Fax Number -------------
1/11 Pag e 1 of 11
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION :
Name M tC[ (J/I(. 11$1't>W~ e. E-ma il
Street Address 'f10t2f u,.,l.o ,,f<.
City c.~. State _1X~----Zip Code 77g'/~
Phone Number 171-,, 1 · '3~ ";'S Fax Number
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact):
Name
Street Address
City State ________ Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
Current zon ing ---<gt--'-"-~~I ________________________________ _
Present use of property
Proposed use of property &hoe{
Number of parking spaces required f4 Numbe r of park i ng spaces proposed -~'~&f~----
l s t here Spec ial Fl ood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes ~No
T hi s i nformation is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
he lp determine if the app lication qualifies for vesting to a previous ord inance. Notwi thstanding any assertion made ,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or othe r appl icable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has rece ived prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ord i nance as appl icable?
I Yes
~No
If yes , provide informati on regard i ng the fi rst approved application and any re lated subsequent applications (provide
add itional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
C ity Project Number (in known):
Date I Timeframe when submitted:
1/11 Page 2of1 1
MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
Housing Units
# of 1 Bedroom Units ---
# of 2 Bedroom Un its ---
#of 3 Bedroom Units ---
#of 4 Bedroom Units ---
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
# Bedrooms = 132 sq . ft .
# Bed rooms < 132 sq . ft . ---
PARKLAND DEDICA TlON
(Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit)
#of Multi -Family Dwelling Units
x $1636 = $
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
#of acres in greenways
Date dedication approved by Pa rks &
____ Recreation Advisory Board
COMMERCIAL
Total Acreage
Bu ild ing Square Feet ___ _
Fl oodp lain Ac reage ____ _
* Projects that were vested prior to January 1, 2008 , per Chapter 245 of t he Texas Local Government
Code may be assessed a different amount. Please contact city staff for additional i nformation .
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated here in and exh ibits attached hereto are true
and correct.
Date I
1/1 1 Pa ge 3 of11
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start unti l a permit is issued .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein .
3 . If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4 . Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certifi cate of Occupancy is issued .
5. The permit will exp ire if no significant work is progress i ng within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local , state , and federal requirements . Owner will obtain or show
comp liance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP .
7 . If required , Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction .
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections requi red to verify
compliance .
9. If, stormwater mitigation is requ ired , inc l uding detention ponds proposed as part of this project , it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10 . In accordance w ith Chapter 13 of the Code of Ord i nances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or
existing drainage faci li ties . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications subm itted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the appl icable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11 . The i nformation and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code , Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidel ines Technical Specifications , and Standard Detai ls . All development has been designed i n
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulat ions.
12 . Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only . I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13 . I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION , ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE , AND
ACCURATE.
Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1/1 1
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormw ater mitigation , including detention ponds , proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence .
2 . I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local , State and Federal Permits prior to construct ion
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e ., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin .
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached pla ns and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Stat ion , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines . All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations .
4 . I , THE ENG INEER , AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR TH E DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION , ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
ACCURATE .
E~L.~
Page 4 of 11
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans , Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fiii / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A . I, _j~tf~frl-~'~L~. e~'&.~~~io_,J __ _ certify , as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the
alterations or development covered by this perm it , shall not:
(i ) inc rease the Base Flood elevation ;
(ii) c reate add iti ona l areas of Specia l Flood Hazard Area ;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Spec ial Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodw ay
and w here the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second . This area ca n
also be approximated to be either areas wi th in 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BF E to natu ral ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area w here the veloc ity of flow i n the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second w ithout acceptable compensat ion as set forth in the City of College Stati on Code of
O rdinances , Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area ; nor
(v) in c rease Base Flood veloc it ies .
:~~'."ji=pted by ordinance in Section 5 .113:.~~ ~; 13 Code of Oro inances .
Initia l
D * If a platti ng-status exemption to this requirement is asserted , provide written justification under separate
letter i n l ieu of certification .
Required for Site Plans , Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fiii /Grading Permits:
B. I , , cert ify to the followi ng :
(i ) tha t any nonres identi al or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on t his s ite as part of th is appli cat ion is
des igned to preve nt damage to the structure or its contents as a resul t of flooding from the 1 DO -year storm .
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C . I, , ce rt ify t hat the construction , i mp rovemen t, or fill c overed by t his
perm it sha ll not inc rease the base flood ele vat ion . I w ill apply for a variance to t he Zoning Board of Adjustments .
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 5 of 11
Required for all projects proposing structures i n Spec ial Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, i ncluding all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation . Requi red Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified duri ng construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial , i ndustrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the low est floor , includ i ng all
utilities , ductwork and basements , elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Eng i nee r I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure w ith its attendant utility , ductwork ,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the st ru ctu re and utilities , ductwork ,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and i mpermeable to the i nt ru sion of w ater in all
areas be low the Base Flood Elevation , and shall resist the structura l loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions .
Required Ele vation Ce rt ificates w ill be prov ided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post constr uction .
Eng i neer I Surveyo r Date
Cond itions or comments as part of approval :
1/11 Page 6of11
SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
~Sheet size -24" x 36" (mini mum ).
I:& A key map (not necessarily to scale).
~Title block to include :
~Name , address , locati on , and leg al description
~Name , address , and telephone number of applicant
~Name , address , and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
~ Name , address , and telephone number of architecUengineer (if d iffers from applicant)
-gi Date of submitta l
~ Total site area
@ North arrow.
fl] Scale should be largest standard engineering scale poss ible on sheet.
l8J Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels .
M-[] The total number of multi-fami ly buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site .
l\4L[J The density of dwe lling units per acre of the proposed project.
Da The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each . If different uses are to be
located in a single building , show the location and size of the uses within the building . Build ing separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection .
Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site:
Designate between ex isting and proposed
i\~D The dens ity of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
181 Phasing . Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements .
~ Buildings (Exi sting and Proposed).
[5ij Setbacks according to UDO , Art ic le 5 .
Geography
IS(] Water courses .
4\t.\Q 100 yr. floodpla in and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site . Please note if there is none
on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map number.
~E xisting topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertin ent drainage information . (If plan has too much
information , show drai nage on separate sheet.)
~ Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent dra inage information . (If plan has too
much information , show drainage on separate sheet.)
1111 Page 7 of11
Streets, Parking , and Sidewalks
~ Existing streets and sidewalks (R .O.W.).
(1$ Existing Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO, Article 7.
~ Proposed drives . Min i mum drive aisle width according to UDO , Article 7
r8J Indicate proposed driveway throat length accord i ng to UDO , Article 7
~ Proposed curb cuts .
0 For each proposed curb cut (includ ing driveways, streets, alleys , etc .) locate ex isting curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts .
ij(I Proposed curb and pavement detail.
~ A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception . (To include island,
planting areas , access ways , dumpster locations , utility pads , etc .) No exception will be made for areas
designated as "reserved for future parking".
~ Proposed medians.
@ Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
f\..O Proposed pedestrian /bike circulation and faci lities for non-residential buildings (UDO , Article 7).
~ Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn , tabulated, and dimensioned .
[25 Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal.
~ Hand icap parking spaces .
~ Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO , Section 7.2 or 7 .9 fornon -
residential bu ildings .
~ Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required .
~ D Wheelstops may be required when ca rs overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facil ities , handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities , signs or other confl icts .
"'t<l] Security gates , showing swing path and design specs with colors .
l\OLCJ Guardrails. Include design and co lors .
Al\[] Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Article 7).
D Please note if none is required .
~ Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W .? D Yes ~No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application .
Easements and Utilities
~ Easements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility , access , etc .)
~ Utilities (noting size and designate as ex isti ng or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site , in cluding bu ildi ng
transformer locations , above ground and underground service connections to buildings , and drainage inlets .
f\c..[] Sewer Des ign Report (if applicable).
J\A.O Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if appl icable).
~ Drainage Report with a Technical Des ign Summary .
~ Meter locat ions , ex isti ng and proposed (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement).
e& Provide a w ater and sanitary sewer legend to include
~ Min imu m water demands
~ Maximum water demands
~ Average water demands in gallons per minute , and
[Zi Maximum sewer lo ad i ngs i n gallons per day
15(1' Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes [5(J No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted wi th th is application .
1/11 Page 8of 11
Fire Protection
[ZJ Show fire lanes . Fire l anes with a min i mum of 20 feet in width with a min i mum he ight clearance of 14 feet must be
established if any port ion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb li ne or pavement edge of a
public street or highway.
~ Show proposed and ex ist ing fire hydrants . Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a
project , and shall be in a location approved by the City Enginee r. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1,
R-1 A , or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street , highway or designated fire
lane .
NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City , and drives must have an all weather surface before a
build ing perm it can be issued .
·KJ Will building be sprinkled? D Yes ~ No
If the dec ision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubm itted . If Yes ,
"......[] Show fire department connections . FDC's shou ld be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any
further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the park ing lot without being blocked by parked ca rs or
a structure .
Landscaping
ii(! Landscape plans as required i n Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance . The landscaping plan can be show n
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan . If requesting protected tree points , then those
trees need to be show n appropriate ly barricaded on the landscape plan . Attempt to reduce or elim i nate plantings in
easements .
Include information on the plans such as :
~ requ ired point ca lculations
~ additional streetscape points required . Streetscape compl iance is required on all streets .
~ calculations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
landscaping points .)
~ proposed new plantings with points earned
[Kl proposed locations of new plantings
~ screen i ng of parking lots , 50 % of all shrubs used for screening sha ll be evergreen . ru sc reen i ng of dumpsters , concrete reta i ning walls , off street loading areas , utility connection points , or other
areas potentially visually offens ive .
1KJ exis ti ng landscaping to remain
18) show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan . Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are
up before the first development permit is issued .
t-,'f] Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance .
~ Show i rr igati on system plan . (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C .
0 .) All plans must include i rrigation systems for landscapi ng . Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems fo r bui ldings and w i ll be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by appl icant and must
include backfl ow prevent ion protection .
~ Is there any landscap ing in TxDOT R.O.W.? D Yes g1' No
If yes , then TxDOT pe rmit must be submitted at the t ime of applicati on .
Other
(\«--0 Common open spaces sites
J\OI..(] Loading docks
~ Detention ponds
11."'-0 Retain ing w alls
~ Sites for so l id waste containe~s wi th screening ._ Locations ~f d~mpste~s are a.c~essible but not vis ible .from streets or
residentia l areas . Gates are discouraged and visual screening 1s required . (Min i mum 12 x 12 pad required .)
[j Are there impact fees associated w ith this development? D Yes [E" No
NOTE: Signs are to be perm itted separately .
1/11 Page 9 of 11
CITY 01 ·Coll.EGE STATJON
Home ofl'rxas A&M Unh•eniry•
NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 7 .9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
D Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
D Title block to include :
D Name, address, location , and legal description
D Name , address , and telephone number of applicant
D Name , address , and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
O Name , address , and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
0 Date of submittal
O Scale should be largest standard scale possible on sheet.
D List of colors from the City of College Station color pa lette to be utilized or proposed equivalents .
0 Color samples .
0 List of materials to be utilized.
O Elevations of each non-residential building and screening structure . Show placement of materials and colors on
the facades according to UDO Section 5.6.8 or 7 .9.
D Include the following dimensions:
O Total vertica l square footage minus openings (for each factade separately)
O Total vertical square footage of transparency (for each factade separately in Northgate)
O Total vertica l square footage of each building material (for each fa'1ade separately)
O Total vertica l square footage of each color (for each factade separately)
D Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings i n building plot to show material, colo r, and
architectural harmony.
1 /11 Page 10 of 11
C r n · or Cor.rnc;F. STA'f'TO , ·
Hnrnt of Tex& A&M Un ivmiry•
1/11
NORTHGATE BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 5.6. Design Districts, B. Northgate Districts (NG)
D She~J siz~;; 24 " ~ .36" !minlmumt
D Title block to include :
D Name, address, location, and legal description
D Name, address, and telephone number of applicant
D Name , address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
D Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
D Date of submittal
D Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
D List of colors from the City of College Station Northgate color palette to be utilized or proposed
equivalents with color samples .
D List of materials to be utilized .
D Elevations of each building and screening structure . Show placement of materials and colors
on the facades and identify public entrances .
Include the following dimensions :
D Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each fac;ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fac;ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fac;ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of transparency between zero and eight feet (0-8 ') above ground
level (for each non-residential fac;ade)
D Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material ,
color, and architectural harmony.
Aint Form Page 11 of 11
v--
C'ffY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M Uni versity •
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CA SE NO .: _...\4__.__-_..k~' ~~-
DATE SUBMITIED : OT tz<Oj 14
TIME : 8-j O
STAFF : ~A~:J~------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the opt ions below to clearly define the purpose of your subm ittal.
D New Project Subm ittal
D Incomplet e Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . Case No .:
Existing Project Submittal. Case No .: 14-900021
Project Nam e Traditions Montessorri School Site Plan
Contact Name Jeff Robertson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phone Number 979-693-3838
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We are transm itting the following for Planning & Development Services t o review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendmen t D Non-Residential Architectural St andards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditiona l Use Perm it D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
~ Site Pla n D Grading Plan
D Special D ist rict Site Plan D Other -Please specify below
D Special District Build ing I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendmen t D Waterline Construction Documen t s
D T xDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Ut ili ty Perm it D Street Construction Documents
D Drainag e Letter or Report D Easement Application
D F ire Flow Analysis D Ot her -Please spec ify
Sp eci al Instru ct ions :
10/10 Print Form
McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING /SURVEYJNG, INC.
April 25, 2014
Jenn i fer Paz
Staff Planner
1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 ·College Station , Tx . 77845 · (979) 693-3838
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station
Post Office Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
Engineer Reg. No. F-458
Survey Reg. No. 10 1033-00
Re.: Barron Crest Subdivision & Traditions Montessorri School Access Agreement
MBESI#: 1086-0001
COCS#: 14-00900038
Dear Ms_ Paz
Per your request, we have been working with the owners of the Traditions Mont essorri School site and
the Blake Cathey, owner of Barron Crest Subdivision, regarding the access to the school site along
proposed Crestmont Drive . Both parties agree that the proposed roadway alignment is acceptable as
shown on the school site plan and the Barron Crest Preliminary Plan. It is anticipated that construction
wi ll begin on this roadway as soon as the site plan is approved by the City . Furthermore, Mr. Cathey
agrees to allow access through his portion of the future ROW until the road becomes public via platting .
ubdivision
Sincerely,
Jeffery L. Robertson, P .E.
Barron Crest Subdivision -Traditions Montessorri School
Access Agreement
Page 1 of 1
..................................... ~~~~~~C~ITYOFCOll.EGESTATIONI ..... .-.-.-.-""'""'""' ............ ... Home a/Texas A&M University • •
MEMORANDUM
March 12 , 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School , via : traditionsmontessori@gmail.com
FROM : Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . Please address the comments and
submit the following information by any Monday at 10 :00 a.m . for further staff review :
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One (1) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached ;
One (1) 24 "x36 " revised site plans ;
One (1) 24 "x36" landscaping plan ;
One (1) 24 "x36 " grading and erosion control plan;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Jenifer Paz at 979 . 764 .3570 .
Attachments : Staff Review Comments
PC: McClure & Browne , via : jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com
P&DS Project No . 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P .0. BOX 9960 • 11 0 I TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXAS • 77842
TEL. 979.764 .35 7 0 ·FAX. 97 9 .76 4.3496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS N0.1
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) 14-00900021
PLANNING f ( /l:zj}(1.\\'Ylj
1. Provide a note with building setbacks for R Rural. See Revised Site Plan .
2. From our conversation on 3/5 , you indicated that the existing 500sf buildings would
be used for storage . Please provide clarification on the site plan. See Revised Site
Plan .
Parking for a school is 1 parking space per 1 OOsf. Please revise and provide
clarification on Note 4. Based on the total building area (2 ,580sf), this site is required
26 parking spaces . See Revised Site Plan. ri\ If modular buildings will be placed on site for this phase , please show where each U will be located . All structures are required to be shown on the site plan . See Revised
Site Plan.
5 . Clarify what portion of the fence will remain and where it is being proposed and
indicate the type of material is being proposed? Chain-linked fence is not a permitted
~aterial. See Revised Site Plan .
'\0"'/Please show where the hydrant is being relocated . See Revised Site Plan.
VI'. A temporary curb is required at the end of the street section . See Revised Site Plan.
8. There are concerns regarding vehicle queuing from Barron Road to the s ite , if there
is a drop-off/pick-up system for the school. How will vehicles turn around if there is
o parking available? See Revised Site Plan, a cul-de-sac has been added.
Sidewalks are required on both sides of local streets (Barron Crest Drive). Please
s ow sidewalks on site plan. See Rev ised Site Plan.
1 . ow will the construction of Barron Crest Drive occur on off-site property (Cathey
tract)? See agreement letter. Mr. Cathey is working with the school on this portion of
. Yfe road. J-1. If _the street is built in conjunction with the school , the raised median on Barron Road
·11 need to be modified to provide the left-turn lane. See Revised Site Plan .
. emove Note 15 . A fire lane will need to be provided on site . Fire will not serve from
/an Arterial Street (Barron Road). See Revised Site Plan .
v f 3 . The drive aisle to Barron Crest will need to be modified to reduce the radius for a fire
truck to access the site. Please keep in mind that driveway should be as far as
ossible from Barron Road . See Revised Site Plan.
4 . lease contact Wally Urrtuia with Sanitation, 764 -3841 , regarding how this site will
be serviced . Note 16 may need to be revised .
@ clarify where the sanitation container pad is located on the site . See Revised Site
Plan . ?QO ... c C\ \lUYI ---5{,v.eth.l t ~
Show all easem nts from Development Pl at. See Revised Site Plan .
17 Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed . Duly noted .
. Please not e that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by
the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3 , 2014
LANDSCAPING Please revise site layout on Landscape Plan .
. .
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron
Rd . being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous. Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet
the requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round). See revised plans .
2 . A Knox Box will be required for this site . No gates are being proposed that would
limit fire access.
3 . IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101)2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by: Steve Smith Date: March 3 , 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format ,
version of plat and I or site plan as soon as it is available . Email to :
wdavis@cstx.gov
2. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available .
This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of
transformers , and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure
to provide load data will result in construction delays and, due to clearance
requirements, could affect the final building footprint. Delivery time for transformers
and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks .
3. EASEMENTS : Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes and upon completion of project must provide descriptive easements for
electric infrastructure as designed by CSU .
4. EASEMENTS : Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure
as designed by CSU , as shown on plat or site plan .
5. If easements are existing , the developer will be responsible for locating easements
on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries .
6. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole
and all overheard primary lines, poles , guy wires and anchors on this
property.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design.
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation.
3. Developer provides 30 ' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs
riser.
4. Developer will intercept existing condui t at designated transformers or other existing
devices and extend as required .
5 . If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices ,
developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings , i.e . transformers , pull boxes , o r
other device , per CSU specs and design .
'II • ,
7 . Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design ,
Pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU .
8 . Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide
electrical service, i.e. transformers, pull boxes , or switchgears, all meter locations ,
and conduit routing as designed by CSU .
9 . To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979.764.6255 , Sam Weido at 979.764 .6314 , Eric Horton at 979 .764 .6280 , or
Weldon Davis at 979.764.5027.
Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez I Sam Weido I Eric Horton I Weldon Davis
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FA1\1ILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Child-Care Licensing Division
Attention Licensee:
Traditions Montessori School, LLC
902 NEAL ST
NAVASOTA,TX 77868-2518
Has been issued a LICENSE to operate:
Traditions Montessori School
2668 BARRON RD
COLLEGE STATION,TX 77845 -9166
as a Licensed Child Care Program caring for:
Total Capacity:
68
Ages:
Pre-Kindergarten (3 years -4 years)
School (5 years and older)
License Number: 1544220
This LICENSE is hereby issued: August 25, 2014
This Licen is va id until revoked or surrendered.
By:._~~;:..__,:__,:..ad/7~·-
Child-Care Licensing Staff
This license must be displayed in a prominent place where parents and. others may see it during operating hours.
This license is valid only for the location noted above and cannot be bought, sold or transferred.
This license is the property of the Department of Family and Protective Services and must be returned to the Child-Care
Licensing Division when it is no longer valid.
Attention Parents:
.To verify the status of this License or to check the compliance history, please .call your local licensing office or visit
www.txchildcaresearch.org.
Drainage Report
FO R
Traditions Montessori School
SITE PLAN
College Station, Texas
)UNE 2014
MBESI# 1000-0263
SUB MITIED BY:
HBMl:H McCL U RE & BROW E , ENGlNEERI G/SURVEYI N G , I N C. I r ~ 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103 · Co Uege Station , Tx . 77845 · (979) 693-3838 Eng ineer Reg . No . F-458
1314 10th Street , Suite 210 Huntsville , Tx . 77320 · (936) 294-9749 Survey Reg . No . 101033-00
Traditions Montessori School
Stormwater Management Technical Design Summary Report
MEES! No . 1000-0263
PART 1 -Executive Summary Report
Section 1 -Contact Information
Project Designer: McClure and Browne Engineering and Surveying, Inc .
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, TX 77845
979-693-3838
Project Developer: Traditions Montessori Sch oo l
2911 Texas Ave South, Ste 201
College Station , TX 77845
(979) 693-8500
Section 2 -General Information and Project Location
This development is a proposed parking lot expansion for an existing building that will be used as a
school. The development is entirely located within the city limits of Col lege Station .
The project site is in the Sprin g Creek watershed. According to the Flood insurance Rate Maps for
Brazos County, Texas and incorporated area, Map Number 48041C0325E effective May 16 , 2012 ; no
portion of this property is located in a I 00-year flood hazard area.
Section 3 -Detention Determination
A detention pond has been designed in the southeastern corner of the site to reduce the proposed
stormwater flowrates to existing flowrates. The pond is an earthen berm with a grate inlet outlet that
connects to an existing stormwater inlet on Barron Road. A summary of the results are as follows:
Storm Event
2
5
10
25
50
100
Post-Development (cfs)
12
13
12
15
19
22
Based on this results , the detention facility performs as required
Drainage Report
Traditions Montessori School
Pre-Development (cfs)
14
17
19
21
24
27
2
Section 4 -Reference
ExhibitA
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Drainage Report
Technical Design Summary
Drainage Area Maps
Runoff Calculations
Detention Pond Routing
Traditions Montessori School
3
Drainage Report
EXHIBIT A
Technical Design Summary
Traditions Mo ntessori Schoo l
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
The Cities of Bryan and College Station both require storm drainage design to follow these
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines. Paragraph C2 of Section Il l (Administration) requires
submittal of a drainage report in support of the drainage plan (stormwater management plan)
proposed in connection with land development projects, both site projects and subdivisions .
That report may be submitted as a traditional prose report, complete with applicable maps ,
graphs, tables and drawings, or it may take the form of a "Technical Design Summary ". The
format and content for such a summary report shall be in substantial conformance with the
description in this Append ix to those Guidel ines . In either format the report must answer the
questions (affirmative or negative) and provide , at minimum, the information prescribed in the
"Technical Design Summary" in this Appendix .
The Storm w ater Management Technical Design Summary Report shall include several parts
as listed be low. The information ca lled for in each part must be provided as applicable . In
addition to the requirements fo r the Executive Summary, this Appendix includes several
pages detai li ng the requirements for a Technical Design Summary Report as forms to be
completed . These are provided so that they may be copied and completed or scanned and
d igitized . In addition , electronic vers ions of the report forms may be obtained from the City.
Requirements for the means (medium) of submittal are the same as for a conventional report
as detailed in Section Ill of these Guidelines .
Note: Part 1 -Executive Summary must accompany any drainage report
required to be provided in connect ion with any land development project,
regardless of the format chosen for said report .
Note: Parts 2 through 6 are to be provided via the forms provided in this
Appendix. Brief statements should be included in the forms as requested ,
but additional information should be attached as necessary .
Part 1 -Executive Summary Report
Part 2 -Project Administration
Part 3 -Project Characteristics
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT
Part 1 -Executive Summary
This is to be a brief prose report that must address each of the seven areas listed below.
Ideally it will include one or more paragraphs about each item .
1. Name , address , and contact information of the engineer submitting the report, and
of the land owner and developer (or applicant if not the owner or developer). The
date of submitta l should also be included .
2 . Identification of the size and general nature of the proposed project , including any
proposed project phases . This paragraph should also include reference to
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 1 of 26 APPEND IX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised Aug ust 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
applications that are in process with either City : plat(s), site plans , zoning requests,
or clearing/grading permits, as well as reference to any application numbers or
codes assigned by the City to such request.
3 . The location of the project should be described . This should identify the Named
Regulatory Watershed(s) in which it is located , how the entire project area is
situated therein, whether the property straddles a watershed or basin divide , the
approximate acreage in each basin, and whether its position in the Watershed
dictates use of detention design . The approximate proportion of the property in the
city limits and within the ET J is to be identified, including whether the property
straddles city jurisdictional lines. If any portion of the property is in floodplains as
described in Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by FEMA that should be
disclosed .
4 . The hydrologic characteristics of the property are to be described in broad terms :
existing land cover; how and where stormwater drains to and from neighboring
properties; ponds or wetland areas that tend to detain or store stormwater ; existing
creeks, channels , and swales crossing or serving the property; all existing drainage
easements (or ROW) on the property, or on neighboring properties if they service
runoff to or from the property .
5 . The general plan for managing stormwater in the entire project area must be
outlined to include the approximate size, and extent of use, of any of the following
features : storm drains coupled with streets ; detent ion I retention facilities ; buried
conveyance conduit independent of streets ; swales or channels; bridges or culverts;
outfalls to principal watercourses or their tributaries ; and treatment(s) of existing
watercourses . Also, any plans for recla im ing land within floodplain areas must be
outli ned .
6. Coordination and permitting of stormwater matters must be addressed . This is to
include any specialized coordination that has occurred or is planned with other
entities (local, state, or fede ral). This may include agencies such as Brazos County
government , the Brazos River Authority , the Texas A&M University System , the
Texas Department of Transportation, the Texas Comm ission for Environmental
Quality , the US Army Corps of Eng inee rs, the US Environmental Protection Agency ,
et al. Mention must be made of any permits , agreements, or understandings that
pe rtain to the proj ect.
7 . Reference is to be made to the full drainage report (or the Technical Design
Summary Report) which the executive summary represents . The principal
elements of the main report (and its length), including any maps , drawings or
construction documents, should be itemized . An example statement might be:
"One __ -page drainage report dated one set of
construction drawings L__sheets) dated , and a
___ -page specifications document dated ____ comprise
the drainage report for this project."
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective Feb ruary 2007
Page 2 of 26 APPEND IX . D: TECH . DE SIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Start (Page 2.1)
Engineering and Design Professionals Information
Enginee ring Firm Name and Address : Jurisdiction
tii:{(vte ~ 3,..,,,.Jrt< Z"'j;~ r1.1q~~ "Y'"'J f.\c. City: __ Bryan
/,11,i l.bJ.e"teK , {tr lo3 _l(__ College Station
Date of Submittal : c .. 1&.;~ ~"' ;rv 11 fi/r.-j~ '2014
lead Eng i nee r's Name and C ont act lnfo.(phone, e-mail , fax): Other:
Jr.> tr tb~rk'"' 013-'~>'3' '\,..{~ ~ />\(<../,; t<e ~'"IU I\ f' WM
"-;;<
Supporting Engine ering I Consulti ng Fi rm(s): Other co ntacts:
~/ >:
Developer I Owner I Applic ant Informati on
Developer I Applicant Name and Address : Phone and e-mail :
-fr'()').."'"~ Ai •. fl-i"~"' er~( q-,1-(.,~) g.,-oo
Llfli fbM .l\ie S,.,._ ~ ~
c . ., , /1r 'frS.f 1'At;>jh~M/~"1,Jf;Sl!('j~4./l'\fri) CoM
Property Ow ner(s) if not Developer I Applicant (&address): Phone and e-ma il : -
;;<, /<
Project Identification
Development Name : "f'11.vi 1 ho<\.~ ()l~Sf,¢{\, '}:I., {
Is subject property a site project , a single -phase subdivision , or part of a multi-phase subdivisi on?
'51 !-e ~tzt If multi-phase , subject property is phase of
Legal descri pti o n of su bje ct p roperty (phase) o r Project Area :
(see Section 11 , Paragraph 8 -3 a)
l qb (J,-r~-, et+ j ~~ ~'~'\lb\~ {.( "'''; ,f-t;f
If subject p rope rty (ph ase) is second or la ter phase of a project , desc ri be gen era l sta tus of all
earlier phases . For most recent earlier phase Include s ubm itta l and review d ates .
x
General Location of Proje ct Ar ea , or su bj ect p rop erty (phase ):
1-hf~~ <c.R~r , g 1·1r.,,,f?.t ; hf'l<f s.f.cN! ffJf,t
In Ci ty Limits? Extraterritorial Juri sdiction (acreage):
Bryan : ac res . B ry an : Co llege Statio n:
C oll e ge Stat ion : Z.t16 a cres . Acrea ge Outside ET J:
STORMWATER DES IGN GU ID E LINES
Effect ive Febr uary 2007
Page 3 of 26 A PPEN DIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPE NDIX D -TECHNICAL DES IGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Prol e ct A dm inis t ration I Continued (pag e 2 .2)
Project Ide ntifi ca tion (con tinue d)
Roadways abutting or within Project Area or Abutting tracts, platted land , or built
subject property : developments :
bi\rt•f.. k4J tJ11)n~~~ LA.) -s~rr,,~ )'> -/1.... sil-e .
Named Regu latory Watercourse(s) & Watershed(s): Tr ibutary Basin(s ):
~(ft.'tq C;.(tf.:. P%1 l\.
Plat lnfonnatlon For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Prel iminary Plat ile Final Plat File #: x Date :
Name : Status and Vol /Pg :
If two plats , seco nd nam e; x File#:
Status : Date :
Zoning lnfonnatton For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Zoning Type : fl~<\ \._ xisting-o r Proposed? Case Code :
C ase Date Stat us:----
Zoning Type : /Existi ng or Proposed? Case Co de:
Case Da te at us:
Stonnwate r Man ag ement Planning For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
Pl anning Co nfe rence(s) & Date(s): Participants:
y· x
Preli min ary Report Re qu ired? Submitta l D ate Review Date
Rev iew Comments Addressed? Yes --No --In Writi ng? When?
Compliance With Preliminary Dra inage Report. Briefly describe (or attach documentati on
explaining ) any deviation(s) f rom provisions of Preli m inary Drainage Report , if any.
~
STO RMWATER DESIG N GUIDELINE S
Effe ctive February 2007
)\'
Pag e 4 of 26 A PPENDI X . D: TECH . DESIG N SU MM AR Y
As Re vi sed Aug ust 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Pro1ect Administration I Continued (pa ge 2 .3 )
Coordinati on For Project or Subject P rop erty (or Phase)
Note: For any Coordination of stormwater matters indicated below, attach documentation
describing a nd substantiaUng any agreements, understandings , con tracts , or approvals .
Coordination D ept. Contact: Date : Subject:
With Other
De p artments of
Juri sdi ctio n
City (Bryan or
College Station)
Coordination W ith Summarize need (s) & acti ons taken (incl ud e con tacts & dates):
Non-jurisdiction
City N eeded ?£
Yes __ No
Coordination with Su mmarize nee d(s) & act ions tak en (include cont acts & dates):
Brazos County
Needed?
Yes __ No 15.-
Coordination wi th Su mm arize need(s) & actions taken (incl ude con tacts & dates):
Tx DOT Needed?
Yes __ No li_
Coordination wi th S ummarize need(s) & actions taken (include cont acts & dates):
T AMUS Neede cl?
Yes _NoL
Permits For Project or Subject Property (or Phase)
As to stormwate r man agem ent, are permi ts required for the prop osed work fro m a ny of the entities
listed below? If so, sum marize sta tus of efforts toward t hat objective in spaces below.
Entity Permitted or
Approved?
US Army Crops of
Eng ineers
No l{_ Yes _
US Environmental
Protection A gency
No l;.__ Yes_
Texas Comm iss ion on
Envi ro nmental Q uality
No..4-Yes __
Brazos River
Authority
No _L Yes_
STORMWAT ER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Eff ect ive Febru ary 2007
Page 5 of 26
Status of Actions (i ncl ude dates)
APP ENDIX . D : T ECH . DESI GN SU MMARY
As Revis ed August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Proeertv Characteristics I Start (Page 3 .1 )
Natur e an d Scope of Proposed Wor k
Existing: Land p roposed for developm ent currentl y used , i ncluding ex tent of impervious cove r?
Site __ Redevelopment of one platted lot , or two or more adjoining platted lots .
Development __ Building on a single pl atted lot of un developed land .
Project __ Build ing on two or more platte d adjoin ing lots of unde vel op ed lan d .
(select all __ Build ing on a sing le lot , or adjoining lots, Wh ere proposed pl at w ill not form app licable) a new stree t (bu t may incl ud e RO W de dicat ion to exist ing streets).
~Other (explain): f)\Jtifopw\J-o:' ~;"'\!~ ~1.p/~ t f~ferfy•
Subdivision __ Co nstruction of street s and util ities to se rve one or more platted lots.
Development __ Construction of streets and util ities to serve one or more prop osed lot s on
Project land s represented by Qen ding Qlats .
Sit e Qro jects : bui lding use(s ). approx imate fl oo r space , impe rv io us cover ratio .
Describe Subdivisions : number of lots by general ty pe of use , linear f eet of streets and
Nature and dr ai~a g e ease me nts or RO ":D
-s.:.t.....f NfW (lARk,., /J-1 vhf;.ly s@Ntli--s fr, Size of frls~flj /lo.ist' ./t, be. v;e/.. '
ProQos ed i ~.1~t..J Cr t..,1/J.',T Project
ts any wo rk pla nned on land that is not platted If yes , explain : ~J..µ,( IA-r! ;1,/~ ,./\ r?vr.,.fi,. j or on land fo r whi ch pl atti ng is not pendi ng?
No ---2L_ Yes ~P~rtr---
FEMA Floodplalns
Is any part of subject prop erty abuttin g a Named Regulatory Waterco urse I No -2(_ Yes __ (Section II , Paragraph 8 1) or a tributary ther eof?
Is a ny part of subject property i n fl oo dplain I No K__ Yes Rate Ma p area of a FEMA-reg utated wa tercourse? --
Encro achment(s) Encroachment purpose(s ): __ Buil ding site (s) __ Road cross i ng(s) into Floodpl ain
__ Util ity crossi n~a i n): areas plan ned ?
No K-
Yes --
If fl oodp lai n areas n ot shown on Rate Maps , ha s w ork been done towa rd am e nding th e FEMA -
approv ed Floo d Stu x lowab le encroachme nts In p rop ose d areas? Explain.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUID ELIN ES
Effect iv e Fe bruary 20 07
Page 6 of 26 AP PEN DIX. D: TECH . DES IG N SUMM AR Y
As Revised A ugust 20 12
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~ertv Characteristics I Con tinue d (Page 3 2)
Hydrologlc Attributes of Subject Pr operty (or Phase)
Has an ea rli er hydrologic analysis been done for larger area including subject property ?
Yes Referen ce the study (&date) here , an d attach copy if not already i n City fi les.
--
Is the stormwa te r management plan for the prop erty in substantial conformance 'Nith the
earlier study? Yes No If not , explain how it differs .
l-If subject property is not part of m ulti-ph ase proj ect , de scribe stormwater man ageme nt
pl an for the property in Part 4 .
If property ~ part of m ulti -ph ase proj ect , provide ove rv iew of sto rm wate r man age ment p lan
fo r Project A rea here . In Part 4 describe ho w pla n fo r subject property 'Nill comply
therewit h.
I
Do existing topo g raph ic features on subject p roperty sto re or detain runoff? ___,X._ No --Yes
Describe the m (include approxi mate size, vol ume , ou tfall , model, etc).
~,
A ny known draina ge or f lo odi ng probl em s in areas near sub j ect property? -A No --Yes
Identify:
Ba sed on l ocat io n of stu dy pro pert y in a watershed , is Type 1 Detention (floo d control) nee de d?
(see Tab l e B-1 in A ppe ndix B)
.,A.__ De tention is re qu ired . --Nee d must be evaluat ed . __ De tention not required .
What deci si on has been rea c hed? By whom?
If the need for How was determination mad e?
Type 1 Detention
must be evaluated :
STORMWATE R DES IG N GUID ELI NES
Effec tive Feb ru ary 2007
Page 7 of 26 APP EN D IX . D : TECH . DESIG N S UMMARY
As Revi se d Au gust 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~ertv Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.3)
Hydrologic Attributes of Subj ec t Property (or Phase) (continued)
Does subject property straddle a Watershed o r Basin d iv id e? ~No __ Yes If yes ,
describe sp lits bel ow. In Part 4 describe design con ce pt for a dling thi s.
Watershed or Basin Large r acreage Lesser acrea ge
Above-Project Areas(Se ction II, P ar agrap h 8 3-a)
Do es Project Area (project or phase) rec eive runoff from uplan d areas? __ No --4 Yes
Size (s) of area(s) i n acres : 1) 4-.'1n 2) 3) 4)
Flow Characteristics (each instance) (overland sh ee t, shallow concentrated , recognizable
concentrated section(s), small creek (n on-regu latory ), regulatory W atercourse or tributary);
) O .. t...JAAJ (w t~ v.JN/o (!/.. f~re r he,
F low detenn ination : Outline hydrolog ic methods and ass umptions :
Does storm runoff drain fro m p ubl ic ea sements or ROW onto or ac ross subject prop erty?
No --Yes If yes, de sc r ibe facilities in easement or ROW:
Are chan ge s in ru noff characteristics su bje ct to change in f uh.J re? Explain
~.b~ f)A.;~/'flMl<'l.f-('c•l1.J v.;;~fl r; +t'\j ~~ ... -IJ:.1 ~11(" tr S . -rf v~ (Y'f'l'f,~ kJt'>i I/ Ji-1!)~
.Jo be. rlA1n#,.e~ ~et-· {if¥\'\+ 11nJ,;:,4<1Ct' l't'rJ~1tt'r'VIE11T').
Conveyance 'Pathways (Se cti on II , P aragraph C2)
M ust runo ff from ~tudy property Km across lowe r properties before reaching a Regulato ry
W aterco urse or tributary ? No Yes
Descri be length and characteristics of each convey ance path way(s). Include ownership of
property(i es). ~ ..C M.~·h:12. ~\ 11fe ~;/( "°' t'\
vJ&-'f)Mtµ.J 11.o A ,.J /,~j(._
Ai r<Jt1r t t "k ;i fA • ~Atf J i'~i~ (~~k
S TORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELI NES
Effect ive Fe brua ry 20 07
Pag e 8 of 26 APPENDIX . D : TECH . DESIG N SUMM ARY
As Rev ised Augu st 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -P ro f;!ertv Cha racte ristic s I Co ntinue d (Page 3.4)
Hydrologlc Attri bute s of Subject Property (or Phase) (con ti nued)
Conveyance Pathways (continued)
Do dra i nage If yes , for what part of length? ; % Creat ed by? __ p lat , or
ease me nts __ instru ment. If instrument{s), de sc ribe their pr ovis ions .
ex ist fo r any
part of ~(A pathway(s )?
No --
Yes --
W here ru noff must c ross lower pr op ert ies , de scrib e ch arac teristi cs of abutting lowe r
property(i es). (Exis ti ng waterco urs es? Ease ment o r Consent aquired?)
Pathway
Areas N~
Describ e an y built or improved draina ge facil iti es existing nea r th e p rop ert y (cu lv ert s.
br idges , line d chann els, buried cond uit , swa les, det ention ponds, et c).
&IJ--~J~r-&~ fl) (2 sl ·· ~)
~W'(;(r{ill. -Sy Af CA -;~ ~ •
Nearby
Drainage Do an y of these have hydrolog ic or hydra uli c infl u ence on propose d sto rm water Facilities des ign? ..JS.._ No __ Yes If yes , ex pla in :
STOR MWATER DE SIG N G UIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 9 of 26 APPEN DIX. D : TECH . DES IG N SUMMARY
As Re vised A ug us t 20 12
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceet and Design Parameters I Start (Page 4. 1)
Stonnwater Management Concept
Discharge(s) From Upland Area (s}
If runoff is to be received from upland areas , w hat design drain age features will b e used to
accommodate it and i nsu re it is not blocked by fu ture development? Describe for each area,
flow sect io n , or d ischarge po int.
N • .J,.,1,..-,,,f ~ a~,.Hy f''r""J .,, ,~" t . .Jr..-1 ,/ U .... loui!i--s k.;f .
0 -sl}oe Jr~r-~J e ekt> ~ ~i+e -t ~ri 't? ql\li4''.j J'~r/ifie'> s..iitl /6~ Je~d w i,.J;i.f/et:;I "~ .fk ff,'tl.t IA ~ j~ ~.;f IJ..ey ~ tl ~eJd.
Discharge(s) To Lower Property(ies) (S ection II, Paragraph E1)
Does proje ct ~u de dra i nage feat ures (ex ist ing or f uture ) p ropo sed to be co me pu blic v ia
p l att ing? No Yes Separate Instrument? No Yes
Per Guide li nes referen ce above , how wi ll Establish ing Ea sements (Scenario 1) runo ff be discharged to neighborin g K Pre -develo pm ent Release (Sce nario 2) property(ies )? Combination of th e two Scenarios --
Scen ario 1 : If ea sem ents are proposed , de sc ri be where needed , and provide status of acti ons
on each . (Attached Ex hibit # )
Scenario 2: Provi de general desc ripti on of how rele ase (s ) wi ll be m anag ed to pre-development
conditions (de ten t ion . sheet flo w . parti ally concentrate d , etc.). (Attache d Ex hibi t# __ )
uJ~J · ~ j,, Lv-1 .,;i&-J-1ih>
Combinati on: If c o mbination is p roposed , ex plain how discharge will differ from pre-
dev elopm ent condit ions at th e property line for each area (or poi nt ) of release .
If Scen ari o 2, or C ombinati on are to be used, h as proposed des ign bee n c oord in ated with
owner(s) of receiv in g property(ies)? ~ No --Yes Ex pla in a nd provide
documentation. iaiVll'~ \ ~~A-t fj*"°'" ~(. I~
STO RMWAT ER DESIGN GUIDELI NES
Effec t ive Fe bruary 2007
Pa ge 10 of 26 APPENDIX . D : TECH . DES IGN SU MM AR Y
As Re vise d A ug ust 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4-Drainage Concer;!t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.2)
Sto rm water Manageme nt Co ncept (continued)
Within Project Area Of Multi-P hase Project
Identify gaining Basin s or Watersheds and acres shifting :
Will project result
in shifting runoff
betwee n Basins or
be tween Wh at design a nd mi tig ation is us ed to co mpensat e for increas ed runoff
Watershed s? fr om gaini ng basin or w atershe d?
_l{_No
Yes --
How will runoff from Project 1. __ W ith facility(ies) i nvolving other dev elopment projects.
Area be mitigated to pre-2. __ Establishing features to se rve overal l Project Area . development conditions?
Select any or all of 1, 2 , 3. -X-On p hase (or site) project ba sis within Proj ec t Area .
and/or 3, and explain below.
1. Share d facility (type & loca ti on of facility ; design drainage area served ; relati ons hip to si ze of
Project Area): (Attached Ex hibit # )
2 . For Overall Project Area (type & locati on of faciliti es ): (Attac hed Exh ib it# __ )
3. By phase (or si te) proj ect: Desc ribe pl anned mitigati on measures for ph ases (or si tes) In
subseq uent questio ns of this Part.
Are aquati c echosystems p rop ose d? __ No --Yes In whi ch p hase (s) or
project (s}?
f'·
'O
(I) U) c (lJ Are other Best Management Practices for re ducing stormwater pollutan ts proposed ? ~ >-a: No Yes Sum mari ze ty pe of BMP and exte nt of use :
Ill ----
c
Cl ·;;:;
w a O z
l!<i If des ign of any run off.handling fac i li tie s devi ate f ro m provisions of B-CS Tec hn ical
Specifi cations, check ty pe facility(ie s) and exp lain in later questions .
Q) --Detention e lemen ts --Conduit elements --Channe l features ..
<( Swales Ditches In lets __ Vall ey gutte rs __ Outfalls ------
--C ulv ert f eatures __ Bridges Other
STO RM WATER DESIGN GUIDE LIN ES
Effec tive February 20 07
Page 11 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TE CH. DES IGN SU MMARY
As Revi sed A ugus t 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Dra ina ge Co nceet an d Design P aramete rs J Continu ed (Page 4 .3)
Stormwate r Management Concept (continued)
W ithin Pro ject Area Of Multi-Ph ase Project (con tinued)
Will Proj ect Area include bridge(s) or cu lvert(s)? -4---No __ Yes Identify type and
general siz e and In which phase(s).
If detentio n/retention serves (wi ll serve) overall Proje ct A rea , describe how it relates to subject
p hase or site project (phys ical loc ation , convey ance pathw ay(s). 9-0nstruction seq ue nce ):
r h 4 1le l r-r+~J Je-J~"J'~" fo1J 1v·rl ~\le ~•"' ~e J-fW:-4·"~-J . k!.'lf
kc cP>~l,J"q;/ •IM5 1w_ ~fo"''J /j ffi~te
Within Or Serving Subject Property {Phase , or Site)
If property part of l arger Pr oj e ct Area , is d es ign in su bstant ial co nform ance wi th earlier an alysis
and repo rt fo r l a rger area? __ Yes No , then summ ariz e the di fference(s):
Alf~
Identify w hether each of the types of drainag e fea tures listed below are includ ed , exte nt of use ,
and g en eral characteristics .
Typi cal sh ape? I Surfaces?
<'·
-0
Cl.I IJ> Steepest side sl o pes : I Usual front sl opes : 1 Usual back s lopes : (/)
::s QJ
(/) >-
Cl.I
I .s::. Flo w li ne sl opes : least Typical dista nce f rom travelway : g
-0 t ypi ca l greatest (Attached Exhibit # __ )
Cl.I u 0 "iii z
~ 71-Are l on gitud inal culv ert en ds in c om pli ance with B-CS Sta ndard Specifications?
Yes No , then ex plain :
<(
<I) At inte rs ect ions or otherwise , do vall ey gutters c ross arterial or colle ct or streets?
_Q Cl> No Yes If y es ex plain : a ~ ,_I -----
.s::. QJ
-IJ> ·3 : Are v alley gu tter s proposed to cros s any street away f rom an intersection? IJ> QJ
Ci)!§ 0 N o Y es Explain : (num ber of l oca t ions ?) ~ tn Z ----
ffiu ~ Cl.I c ,_ !1J
<(
-
STORMWATER DESI G N G UI DELINE S
Effect ive Feb ru ary 2 0 07
Page 12 of 26 A PPEND IX . D : TECH . DES IG N SU MMARY
As Revised Augu st 20 12
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DES IG N SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters j Continued (Page 4 .4)
Stormwa ter Manag em en t Co ncep t (c ontinued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property {Phase, or Site) (continued)
G utter line slopes : Least Usual G rea test
Are i nlets re cessed on arterial and collector stree ts ? --Yes No --If "no ",
identi fy where and why .
W ill Inlets capture 10-year des ign s!ormflow to prevent flood i ng of i nte rsections (arterial
with arterial or collector)? --Yes --No If no , ex plain where and why not.
<'-·
-0
Q)
If) W ill in let si ze and place m ent prevent exceeding all owable w ater spread fo r 10-year :::i .__
des ign sto rm throughout si te (or ph as e)? Yes No If no , exp lain . 2 ----:3
(])
-o ~ c -0 ro aJ Sag curves : Are inlets placed at low points? Yes No Are inlets and
..D 2 ----.__ ·-conduit sized to prevent 100-year stormflow from ponding at grea te r th an 24 Inches? :::i~
0 c Yes No Ex plain "no " answers. .r::. 8 ----
::: -3:
$
Q)
~ u;
Q) W ill 100-yr stormflow be contained in combination of ROW and buried co ndu it on .__
<( whole length of all st reets? Yes No If no, describe where and why . -- --
Do designs for curb. gutter, and in lets com ply wi th B-CS Te chnical S pecifi c ation s?
Yes --No If not , describe difference(s} and at tach just ification .
Are an y 12-inch laterals used? __ No --Yes Identify length(s ) an d where
used.
C'-·
-0 Pi pe runs between system I Typi ca l Q) II) Longest
U) Q) access poin ts (feet ): ::J >-
!1 Are junction bo x es used at eac h bend? --Yes --No If not , ex plai n whe re
and w hy .
<II
c
·-0 ~z
§~ £ . Are downstream soffits at o r bel ow upstream soffits? Least am oun t that hyd rau li c
Vl gra de line is below gutter lin e ~ Yes No __ If not , explai n where and why : --(system-wide):
STO RMWATE R DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effecti ve Februa ry 2007
Page 13 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMM ARY
As Re vi sed A ugust 2012
SECTION IX
APPEND IX 0 -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .5)
Stonnwatar Management Concept (continued)
With in Or Serving Subj ect Pro perty (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Describe watercourse(s), orsystem(s) receiving system d isch arge(s) be low
If) (include design discharge velocity , and angle betwe e n c onverging now lines). Q)
0 c 1) Wat ercourse (or system ), velocity , and angle? ro
(;)
.£
~
~o -g E 2) Watercourse (or system ), velocity, and angle? ::I ._
c .E :g .
o.E
0 c:
~-~ E Q) .!!!,. 3) Watercou rse (o r system ), vel ocity, and angle? Q) E ~ .., ro
~If)
If) Q) :I
c:'9 0
--> ~ E
"O a.
E -For each outfall above , w hat measures are ta ken to preve nt erosion or scour of .._ aJ
0 OJ receiv ing a nd all facilities at j uncture? -..c (j) If)
OJ 1) ~ ro 2) a..
Q)
Ill
c 3) E.
Are swa le(s) situated along propert y li nes betwe en properties? __ No Yes
Number of inst ances : Fo r each instance answer the followi ng question s.
Su rface t reatme nts (including low-fl o w flumes if any):
<'·
I/)
Qj
~ If)
-(I) Flow line s lo pes (minimum and m axim um): ~ >-
~ I
~o
If) z Outfall cha ra cterist ics for each (velo ci ty, convergent a ngle , & e nd treat men t). ;:J
~ If)
~
<( Wi ll 100-year d esi gn st o rm ru noff be conta ined within easement(s) or platted drainag e
ROW in all i nstances? --Ye s --No If "no " explain :
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELIN ES
Effect ive February 2007
Page 14 of 26 APP EN DIX . D : TECH . DESIGN S UMMAR Y
As Revi sed Aug ust 2 0 12
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Conti nue d (Page 4 .6)
Sto rmwa te r Man agement Concept (continued)
Within Or Serv ing Subject Property (Ph ase , or Site) (continued)
Are roadside ditches used? No __ Yes If so , provide the follo wing :
CJ) Is 25 -ye ar f low contained with 6 inches of freeboard througho ut? __ Yes No Q)
£. --
.B Are top of banks separated from roa d shoulders 2 feet or mo re? _._Yes No Ci --
Q) Are all ditc h sectio ns t rapezoidal and at least 1.5 feet dee p? --Yes --No
-a For any "no" answe r s provide location(s) and expl ain : CJ) -a rn
0 a::
If condu it is be ne ath a swale . prov ide t he foll owi ng informatio n (each i ns tan ce ).
Instance 1 Describe ge ner al location, approxim ate length :
If)
Q)
Is 100-yea r des ign flo w cont aine d in con duit/swale comb i nat ion? Yes No >-----
l w If "no" ex pla in :
c S pace for 100-ye ar storm flow? ROW Eas ement Width 0 ~ z CJ) Sw ale Surface type, min imum Conduit Type and size , mi nimum and ma ximum ~~ and maximum slo pes : slopes , de s ign storm :
0
C'· ~
.!!'. -a In lets Describ e how co nduit is load e d (from st reets/storm drain s, inlets by ty pe): <U rn c >-r: rn c
£. rn
0 ,_
c .E
Cl.I c Ac cess Descri be how ma intenan ce access is p rovi ded (to swale, into c ondu it): 0.. 0
0 :;::; -rn
0 E :l
~ .2
.!;;;
£ Q) Instance 2 Describe general location, approx im ate len gth :
-0 E Q) m If) If) :::>
Ill Q)
Is 100 -year desi gn flo w contained in con duit/sw ale com bin ati on? Yes N o c: "O
0 ·::;: ----
:g e If "no" expla in :
c 0..
:.0 Q) Spa ce for 100-year storm flow? R OW Eas ement Width E Q)
0 £.
0 Ill Sw ale Surface type , mini mum Co nduit Type and size , m inimum an d m aximu m -Q) ..... an d maxi mum slo pes : sl opes, design storm : :l ra -a ro c
0 0..
0 Q) In lets Desc ri be how con du it is loaded (fr om streets/storm drai ns, i nlets by type ): }! II)
c rn ~ ?:
CJ)
Q) Acces s Des cri be h ow maintenance access is provide d (to sw ale , In to condu it): ....
<(
STORM WATER D ES IGN G UIDE LINES
Effec tive Fe br uary 2007
Pag e 15 of 26 AP PEN DI X . D : TECH . DESIGN SU MMAR Y
As Rev ised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Co nce~t and D esign Parameters I Continued (P ag e 4 .7)
Stonnwater Management Concept (co ntinu ed)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or S i te) (contin ued)
If "yes " provide t he following information for each instance :
Instance 1 Describe general location, approx imate length , surfacing :
c:
"(ij
E ~ ,g w
:::: th Is 100-year de sig n f low contained i n swale? --Ye s --No Is swale wholly
0 ~ wi thin drainage RO W? Yes No Ex plain "no " answers : c: >-----
.; I
() Access Des cr ibe ho w maintenance access is provid e:
~ 0
N l nstance 2 Describe general l oc ation, approx imate le ngth, su rfacing:
-0
QJ
'L: <'·
::l Ill
..0 -c:
5 Q)
0 E ..c QJ
·3 Ill Is 100-year design f low conta i ned in swa le? Yes No Is swale wholly ro ----QJ wi thin drainage ROW? __ Yes No Expfa;in "no" answers : IJl 0 --QJ
(ij s ~o :=: a::'. Acce ss Des cribe how mai nte na nce acc ess is provided : s .2
:0
::l a.
Instance 31 4, etc. If swal es are used In m ore than two In stances, atta ch sheet
provid i ng all ab ove information for each instance .
"New0 channels: Will any area{s) of co nce ntrated flow be channelized (deepened ,
widened, or straightened ) o r otherwise alte red? No Yes If o nl y slightly
shaped , see "Swales" i n th is Part . If creating si de ban ks , p ro vid e information bel ow.
C'-·
Will design replicate natural c han ne l? If "no", for eac h instan ce -a c: Yes No QJ ~ describe sect ion shape & area , flow li n e slope (min . & max .), su rfaces, and 100-ye ar IJl
0 0. Q. >< des ign flow, and am ou nt of freeboa rd : 2 UJ a. In stance 1:
Cl! <fl c QJ
QJ >-
E
I
QJ
> Instance 2: 0 a. E o ·-z
1>1 Insta nce 3 :
()
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 16 of 26 A PPEND IX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .8)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Existing channe ls (small creeks}: Are these used? --No --Yes
If "yes" provide the information below.
Will small creeks and their floodplains rema in und isturbed? __ Yes No How
many disturbance instances? Identify each planned location-: -
For each location, describe length and general type of proposed improvement
(including floodp lain changes):
For each location , describe section shape & area , flo w line slope (min . & max .),
surfaces , and 100-year design flow .
...-
"O
QJ
:l c: :g Watercourses (an d tributaries): Aside from fringe changes , are Regulatory
0 Watercourses proposed to be altered ? __ No Yes Expla in below. ~ --
(/)
Submit full report describing proposed changes to Regulatory Watercourses . Address c
QJ exi sting and proposed section size and shape , surfaces, alignment , flo w line changes , E
QJ length affected , and capacity , and provide full documentation of analys is procedures > 0 and data . Is ful l report submitted? Yes No If "no" explain : .._ --a. ,.... c: -
Qj
c: c: rn All Proposed Channel Work : For all proposed channel work , provide information ..c:
0 requested i n next three boxes .
If design is to replicate natural channel , identify location and length he re , and describe
design in Special Design section of this Part of Re port .
Will 100 -year flow be contained with one foot of freeboard? --Yes --No If
not , identify location and expla in :
Are ROW I easements sized to contain channel and requ i red maintenance space?
--Yes --No If not , ident ify location(s) and exp lain :
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective Feb ruary 2007
Page 17 of 26 APPENDIX. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concegt and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .9)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
How many facilities for subject property project? l For each provide info . below.
For each dry-type facilitiy : Facility 1 Facility 2
Acres served & design volume+ 10% t;.lfo 6 .2..-ZAcf{
100-yr volume : free flow & plugged O. / {, o.io
Design discharge (10 yr & 25 yr) I z, ,,.
Spillway crest at 100-yr WSE? ___x_yes --no __ yes --no
Berms 6 inches above plugged WSE? ~yes --no __ yes --no
Explain any "no" answers:
en
(!)
>-
~1 For each facility what is 25-yr design Q , and design of outlet structure?
Facility 1: l~l~
0 z Facility 2 :
I Do outlets and spillways discharge into a public facility in easement or ROW?
Facility1 : X Yes __ No Facility2 : __ Yes __ No
C'· If "no" ex plain : "O
(!) en
0
0. e a... For each, what is velocity of 25-yr ~ign discharge at outlet? & at spillway? en
Facility1 : 5".ofr~ & "l-1 fS Faci lity 2 : & Q)
:E ·u Are energy dissipation measures used? No ~ Yes Describe type and ro --u. location : If ; J. c: 'f!'}(S? 0 0 ·.;::; c:
Q) a;
0
Q) For each, is spillway surface treatment other than concrete? ~r no , and describe: 4:
Facility 1: lir-Pr~ S"I...
Facility 2 :
For each , what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour at receiving facility?
Facility 1: f!eceivi"'S J.'r.,<:,/;ly is c."crk /,-...1A.
Facility 2 :
If berms are used give heights, slopes and surface treatments of sides.
Facility 1:
Facility 2 :
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 18 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHN1CAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainag e Conceot and Design Para mete rs I C on tin ued (P ag e 4.10 )
Sto rmwater Managem e n t Conc e pt (co n tinued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continu~
Do st ructures co mpl y with B-CS Specifica tions? ~r no , and exp lain if "no":
(/)
Facil ity 1;
Q)
:;::;
:.= .--
"(3 u ro Q) Fa cility 2: LL ::i c c:;:;
0 c
:;::; 0 c ()
Q) ~
di For ad diti on al fac iliti es prov ide all same info rmation on a separate sheet.
0
Are parking areas to be used for det ention? No --Yes W hat is
maximum dept h due to require d design storm?
Road s ide Ditches: Will cu lve rt s serve acc es s dri vew ays at roa dside ditches?
--No --Yes If "yes ", provide i nformation in next two boxes .
W ill 25-y r. flow p ass wi thout flow ing over driveway in all cases? --Ye s --No
W ithout causin g flowi ng or stand ing water on pu blic roa dway? --Yes --No
Designs & materials comp ly with 8-CS Tech nical S pecificati ons ? __ Yes --No
Exp lai n any "no" ans wers :
('..
(/)
Cl -~
(/) Ar e culv erts p ara lle l to pub lic ro ad way ali gnme nt? __ Yes No Explain: (/)
0 --0 (/)
(I) (I)
->-('O
I
> ·;:: Creeks at Private Drives: Do private dri veways, dri v es , or st ree ts cross drai nag e a. -ways that serve A bove-Proj ect areas or are In p ublic ease ments/ ROW? "' 'U 0 No Yes If "ye s" prov ide informat ion b elow. Q) z -- --~~ How many insta nces? Describe location and provide informat ion bel ow.
Q) Lo c ation 1: ~
::J
()
Q) Location 2: .....
<(
Loca tion 3 :
For eac h location enter valu e for : 1 2 3
Design ye ar passi ng without topin g travelway?
Water depth on travelway at 25-ye arfl ow?
Water depth o n trave lway al 100-year fl ow?
For more i nstances de scribe loca tion a nd sa me info rmation on separat e sheet.
STO RMWATER DES IGN GUIDE LIN ES
Effective F ebruary 2007
Page 19 of 26 APPEN DIX . D : TE CH . DES IGN SU MMARY
As Revi sed A ugust 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Dra i nage Co ncept and Des ign Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .11 )
Stormwate r Ma nagem ent Con cept (continued)
Within Or Serving Su bject Pro perty (Ph ase, or S ite) (contin ued)
._
Na med Regu la tory Water courses (&Tri butaries): Are culverts propo sed on these
facil ities? __ No __ Yes, the n provid e fu ll repo rt documenting assumptions ,
criteri a, analysis, computer programs , and st udy findings that sup port proposed
desig n(s). Is report prov ided? __ Yes __ No If "no ", explain :
Arterial or Major Collector Streets: Will cul v erts serve thes e ty pes of road wa ys?
__ No __ Yes How many Instances? __ _ For eac h identi fy the
location and p rovide the information below.
Instance 1:
In stance 2 :
Instanc e 3 :
Ye s or No for the 1 OD-year design flow : 2 3
Head water W SE 1 foot below lowest curb top ?
Spread of headwater withi n RO W or easemen t?
Is velocity limited per conditions (Tabl e C-11 )?
Ex plain any "no " ans wer(s):
Minor Collector or Local Streets: W ill c ulv erts se rv e th ese typ es of st reets?
__ No __ Yes How many inst ance s? for each identify the
location an d provid e th e i nformati on below:
Inst an ce 1 :
Instance 2 :
Instanc e 3:
For ea ch in sta nce en ter v al ue , or "yes " I "no" fo r. 2 3
Desig n yr. he ad w ater WS E 1 ft. be l ow cu rb top?
100-yr. max . depth at st reet crown 2 feet o r less?
Produ ct of veloci ty (fps) & depth at crown (ft)= ?
g Is velocity limited per conditio n s (Tabl e C-1 1 )?
Limit of dow n stream analysis (fe et)?
Ex plain any "no" answers :
STO RMWATER DES IGN G UIDE LI N ES
E ffect ive Fe brua ry 20 07
Pag e 20 of 26 APP EN DI X . D: T E C H . D ESI G N SUMMARY
A s Rev ise d A ug us t 201 2
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .12)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
All Proposed Culverts: For all proposed culvert facilities (except driveway/roadside
ditch intersects) provide information requested in next eight boxes .
Do culverts and travelways intersect at 90 degrees? Yes No If not , ----
id entify loca ti on(s) and intersect ang le(s), and justify the design(s):
Does drainage way alignment change with in or near limits of culvert and surfaced
approaches thereto? __ No --Yes If "yes '' identify location(s), describe
change(s), and justification :
Are flumes or conduit to discharge into culvert barrel(s)? __ No __ Yes If yes ,
identify location(s) and provide justification :
~
Are flumes or conduit to discharge into or near surfaced approaches to culvert ends?
"O No Yes If "yes" identify location(s), describe outfall design treatment(s): Q) ----::; c :g
0
~
(f)
t:::
Q) Is scour/erosion protection provided to ensure long term stab ili ty of culvert structural .?. ::; components , and surfacing at culvert ends? __ Yes __ No If "no " Id entify 0
locati ons and provide justification(s):
W ill 100-yr fl ow and spread of bac kwater be full y contained in street ROW , and /or
drainage easements/ ROW? __ Yes --No if not , why not?
Do appreciable hydraulic effects of any culvert extend dow ns tream or upstream to
neighbo ri ng land(s) not encompassed in subject property? --No --Yes If
"yes" describe location(s) and mitigation measu res :
Are al l culvert designs and materials in compliance with B-CS Tech . Specifi cations?
--Yes --No If not , ex plai n i n Special Design Secti on of this Part .
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective Feb rua ry 2007
Page 21 of 26 APPENDI X . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DES IGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Cohc e~t a nd Design Pa rameters I Continued (Page 4.1 3)
Storm water Manage ment Conce pt (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Ph ase, or Sit e) (continued)
Is a bridge included in plans for subject property project? --No --Yes
If "yes" provide the following information .
Name(s) and functional classificatio n of the roa dway(s)?
Wh at drainage way(s) is to be crossed?
U)
GI
Ol
"O
~
A fu l l report supporting all aspects of the pro posed bridge(s) (structural , geotechn ic al ,
hydrologic, and hydraulic fa ctors) must accom pa ny this summary report . Is the report
provided? --Yes --No If "no " explain:
Is a Stormwater Provide a general des cr i ption of planned techniques :
£ Pollutio n Prevention /,,,"'~fd. \ to Jl'~c~ t.iilf k f'e-~ t'ft s./Je: ~~ ~lY '~J iii Plan (SW3P) :::J
0 established for
iJ j f'h, ,,-~ f?/l>N!Ufllur"> .... proje ct constru lion? $
IV ~ No Yes ----
Special Designs -Non-Traditional Methods
Are any non-traditional methods (aquatic echosystems , wetland-type d etention, natural strea m
.Kation , BMP s f or wat er quality , etc .) prop os ed for any aspect of subject prope rty proj ect?
No __ Yes If "yes " list general type and location below.
Provide fu ll re port about the propose d special desi gn (s) i ncluding ratio nale for use and
expected benefits . Repo rt must substan tiate that sto rmwater management objectives will not
be compromised, and that maintenance cost will not exceed those of traditio na l des ign
soluti on(s). Is re port provided? --Yes --No If "no" explain :
ST ORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effec tive February 2007
Page 22 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMM A RY
As Re vised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce12t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .14)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Special Designs -Deviation From 8-CS Technical Specifications
If any design(s) or material(s) of traditional runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of
B -CS Technical Specifications, check type facility(ies) and ex plain by specific detail element.
--Detention elements __ Drain system elements --Channel features
Culvert features Swales Ditches Inlets Outfalls ----------
__ Valley gutters __ Bridges (explain in bridge report)
In table below briefly identify specific element, justification for deviation (s).
Specific Detail Element Justification for Deviation (attach additional sheets if needed)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Have elements been coordinated with the City Engineer or her/his designee? For each item
above provide "yes" or "n o ", action date, and staff name:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5 )
Design Parameters
Hydrology
Is a map(s) showing all Design Drainage Areas provided? --Yes --No
Briefly summarize the range of applications made of the Rational Formula:
What is the size and location of largest Design Drainage Area to which the Rational Formula
has been applied? ).'fp acres Location (or identifier)'.1 frcp ··
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effecti ve February 2007
Pag e 23 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DES IGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceet and Design Parameters j Continue d (Page 4.15 )
De sign Pa r ameters (continued)
Hydro logy (continued)
In making determinatio ns for tim e of concentration, was segment analysis used?
::&____No __ Yes In approximately what percent of Design Dra i nage Areas ? ---%
As to intensity-duration-frequency and rain depth criteria fo r determ inin g runoff fl ows, were any
criteria other tha n those provid ed in these Guidel ines us ed? _K__ No __ Yes If "y es "
identify type of data , source(s), and where applied :
Fo r each of the sto rmwa te r management featu res listed below id en tify t he storm ret LJrn
fre que nc ies (year) an alyzed (o r c hecked), and that used as the basis for design .
Featu re An alys is Year(s) Des ign Ye ar
Storm drain system for arterial and co llector streets
Storm drain system for local stree ts -
Open channels -Swale /buried cond uit combin ation in lie u of channel --· --
Swales
Road si de di tches and culverts serving the m -
De tentio n faciliti es: spillway crest an d its outfal l t, ~t fl), l-5' I ~il ,140 Z... f, fO, Z.5°1 -~, '4
De tent ion facilities : outlet and convey an ce structure(s) Z, ~1 tv , Z 5', ':i ,le.>o 4s-1d,tS', )i>,4e
Detention facilities : vo lu me when outlet plugge d f(l'O /tJ()
Culverts se rving priv ate drives or streets -
Cu lverts se rv ing p ub lic roadways
Bridges: provide i n bridge report.
__ .....,.
Hydraulics
W hat i s the range of design flow velocities as outlin ed below?
De sign flow v elocities ; Gutters Cond ui t Cu lve rts Swale s Cha nnels
Hi gh est (feet per se co nd ) -----
Lowest (fee t per sec ond ) -------
Streets and Storm Drai n Systems Provid e !he summary informatio n o utlin ed below:
Roughn ess coeffic ients used: Fo r street gutt ers :
Fo r con du it type(s) Coeffici ents :
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Pag e 24 of 26 AP PEND IX . D : TECH . DES IGN SU MMARY
As Rev i sed August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceet and Design Parameters I Co ntinue d (Page 4.16 )
De si gn Para meters (c ont i nued)
Hydraulics (continued)
Street and Sto nn Drain Sys tems (continued) NIA
For th e following , are assumptions ot her than all oWa ble per Guidelines?
Inlet coefficie nts? _j(_No --Yes Head and frictio n losse s -25._ No --Yes
Explain an y "yes " answer:
In condu it is v elocity g ene rally increased in the down stream direction? --Yes --No
Are elev ation drops pro vided at inlets, manholes, and ju nction box es? --Yes --No
Explain an y "no " answ ers :
Are hydraulic grade lines calculated and sho w n for des ig n storm ? --Yes --N o
For 100 -ye ar fl ow conditi ons? --Yes --No Ex plain any "no " a nswers :
Wh at tai lwater co nditions were ass umed at ou tfall point(s) of the storm dra i n sys te m? Identify
each loca ti on and exp lain :
'J \~ Open Channels If a HEC a nal ysi s is utilized , does it fo llow Se c Vl.F 5 a? __ Yes __ No
Ou tside of st raigh t sections, is flow reg ime within li m its of sub-c ritical flow? __ Yes __ No
If "no " li st locations and explain :
JJ\~ Culverts If plan s heets do not p ro v ide t he fo llow in g for each cu lve rt , describe it here
For each desig n di sch ar ge , will operatio n be outl et (barre l) co nt ro l or i nlet contro l?
Entrance , friction and exi t losses:
N~ Bridges Provide all in bridge report
STORMWATER DES IGN G UI DELINES
Effective Feb ruary 2007
Page 25 of 26 APP EN DIX . D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Re vise d A ug ust 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .17)
Design Parameters (continued)
Computer Software
What computer software has been used in the analysis and assessment of stormwater
management needs and/or the development of faci lity designs proposed for subject property
project? List them below, being sure to identify the software name and version , the date of the
version, any app licable patches and the publisher
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Requirements for submittal of construction drawings and specifications do not differ due to use of a
Technica l Design Summary Report . See Section Ill, Paragraph C3 .
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
Conclusions
Add any concluding information here :
Attestation
Provide attestation to the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing 6 Parts of this Technical
Design Summary Drainaae Report by signinQ and sealinQ below.
"This report (plan) for the drainage design of the development named in Part B was prepared
by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with provisions of the Bryan/College Station
Unified Drainage Design Guide lin es for the owners of the property. All licenses and permits
required by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage
improvements have been issued or fall under applicable general permits."
Lfc nWd Profes~i~nal Engineer
I
State of Te xas PE No . ~ 17'/t:'
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effecti ve Febru ary 2007
Page 26 of 26
(Affix Seal)
'• .._ ...... •
·'
APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
Drainage Report
Tradition Montessori School
EXHIBITB
Drainage Area Map
I I I
<t: I ' w 0 0:: w _,
<t: <t: D.. <t: '
I w 0 I-I w 0:: t:= z <t: C> _, I <t: •W z I w (.) <t: I '> w I ::;; z _,
0 I _,
<t: w <t: w <t: ~ iii I I-0 W I > I-' I 0 z 0:: w <t: 0 0 I I-:::> <t: 0:: D.. I-
NO. I AC . 0.4 1 0 .55 0 .9
Ex ~Q 5 .40 1 0 .00 0 .00 1 2 .16
4 .60 1 r-~ Prop 5.40 0 .35 0.45 2 .44
~
0 _,
u..
0 z :5 :r a:: I-w C> >z o ~
EXHIBIT C-1
Rational Formula Drainage Area Calculations
Traditions Montessori School
I I ! ~ ' 0 ~ ~ ' _,
I I I u.. 0 0 ' 0 _,
1 i
I
u.. ~ I z I I :5 0:: :r I 0:: I ! (3 0 I 0 w I-I ~ ::J
I-
I 0:: _, I-C> 0 I-
I .!:! I I w _, I-z _, w > <t: :::> w ':::> <t: w I "' I/) "' I 0 U.. e>_,l e>u.. > (.) i :::> ~ 0 ! !!?
i
' I
'
I 0 "' "' I 0 0 ' "' "' 0 I ~ ' ~ 0
ft. !ft. ft. I ft. ft/s l min l min 1ln/Hr cts !In/Hr jets l ln/Hr l ets !In/Hr l ets
100 .0 1 1.0 . 1.0 1 1.0 0 .7 1 2 .4 110 .0 I 6 .33 1 13 .7 1 7.7 116 .6 1 8 .6 1 18.7 1 9.9 1 21 .3
-100.o l 1.0 1 1-:0l 0.7 ! 2 .4 110.0 l 6 .33 i 15.4 1 7 .7 118.8 1 8 .6 1 21 .0 I 9.9 1 24 .0 1.0 '
I
I
I
I 0
0 I 0 0 0 "' 0 0 !!? 0 ~
l ln/Hr ,cts l ln/Hr l ets
11.1 24.1 I
11 .1 2 7.2 1
12.5 1 27.1
12 .5 1 30 .5
6/5/2 01 4
d ra.xls
Ex hibit C-1
EXHIBIT "D-1" PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING Traditions Montessori School ID.A. # ID.A. # Pof!d Routing_ ~VENI::= j 2 ~ I c: .S::. 0 I 0 0 Q..I W I + W ~ Z I c: -0 §! in g> I iD + q ;::: ... ...J~ ... a. ~ c:I -O· + ..... "~I ~ o ~ e o. + c;j tj 't §~ o~ :c a. 01 El NI N a o..wl 1-0.. l Q ! -15.4~ --1 ---·1 --I -+. f -I '· f j i 10.ol - --~. --r--~ I I 1.01 I ' • Tc inc D.A. # )( (!) ~3.7/ ~ (!) ...J ~ <( I-I-IJ) 0 >< I-w Time f .. cfsi-~ cfs l-cfs ] cfs cfs ft i· cfs -~ -0.0 -.9.:Ql_ _ 1.54 . -. a.OD] -O.Oo ·---o.oo -. 324.o -- .o.oo .... _ ~-9:!:!.~. . g.oo 1 . .Qj !·5 1.5: 4.~2 1.0?t 1.ti1 0.23 _ 324.1 ___ 0.23! ____ 1.4' --~ 2.0 3 1 311 7.70 3 91 I 5.69 0.89 324.3 0.89' 2:7f 2.74 -";-4.61 -4.6 -10.7~ --:"36 -1~1 1.63. -324.31 - -1.63,--4.1) --. 4.11 , ____ 4.0 -62 -6.2 ._13.86 --1402 19.14 2.561 ~ ~ - -~~ ~481 . -"O I,Zl 7.7J 16.94. 20.67 27 ~~1 3.60 324.5i . --~ i 6.9 ___ 6.851 ---~ _ 9.2 _ ~---2002, 28.55 __ 37.61 4.53 3246: t ~-I_ 8.~ 8.22, 1.0 10.8 10.8. 23.10. 37.43 48.57 5.51 324.6 5.57 T 9.6 9.59 -I -·-t ·----I ' ---- ---3180 12.3 12.~ 26.10 471QI 60.53 . 6 . .71 324.7 1 6~.?1 J. .11.0 .. 19.~ -13.9 13.9 -_ 29.26 -57.43 73.28 ?-93 324.7 l -7.93 __ : ___ 12.31 ___ 12.33 15.4 15.4 30.03 68.28 86.69 9.20 324.8 9.20 i -~ 13.70 14.6 14.6, __ 28.49_ 11.6a 98.311-· 10.31L--324_9 ·-10.31 --~----iMl _13.02 1?.Qi 1~·9, 1~J1l ~1 84.o5 12~.i 11.06 _ 324.9 __ 11.06 __ L _ 12.3 12.33 ---13.0. --~ ---~ -25.41 _ 87.96 111.00; 11.52 -324.9, !!.52 -j' __ -!.:!.:6;. !1 .. 65, ~ 12.3 12.3 -23.87 89.87 113.37 !.:1_.75 324.91 l 11.75 11.0 __ 10.96, -1IQ1. 11.6. 11.6 .. 22.33 90.1.~_ !.:!l,74 . 1178.·. 325.of l' ~!·.?~: 1Q.~I 1_g.28 ~ 10.8 10.8 20.79 -~--112.51 11.66 -324.9 1!:66 ------9.6 9.59 17.0l 10.01 10.0 19.25 87.12 109.97 11~? 324.91 -11.42 _____ __J __ 8.9 ___ 8.91 __ ~ 9.2 9.2 !7·?1.1 ~4.2! 106.371 11.081 _. 324.9 ____ 11.08 I 8.2 8.22 -~ -8.5 ---~ 16.17 -80.61 101.921 . 10.66: 3E9T 12:66 ---t---7.5 -7.54 ~200 !..:I 1.1 .. _ 14.63: __ 76.45 96.78i _ 1.Q,!?I _ 324.9j _ 10.11 __ ~---6.9 __ 6.85 6.9 6.9 1_~.09t 71.83 ~1.0~t ~ -~ l 9.62 I ~2 ~? _ _ __ 6.2. _ 6.2 _____ 11.55 __ 66 8~ _ 84.9.2 -· _ 9.04 324.81 r 9.04 ____ +-__ 5.~ __ 5.48 23.Qj 5.4 ~~ 10.01 61.57 78.40 8.42 324.8 '-~ -8.42 -1 4.8, 4.80 ~40t i~. i:§ 8.47 §§.05[ 71.§~ ?_77 324~ ; 7.771 ~!c ~!1_, 25:.QJ ~1_1 3.9 6.93 50.33! 64.52 7.09 32'!._? l 7.09' --· -~ -3.43 26.01 ~-1-r ~:~ 5.391 44.46! 57.26 6.40 324.71 i 6.401 2.71 2-?i 2701 ~2.3 2.3 3.851 38.461 49.85. 5.70, 324.61 j 5701 : 2.1 2 06 --.12 1.5 ?.311 -~2.35 -42,~1 -4.981 _3246 _ - _4.98 -i -1.4' -·---·1.37 P~KF_~ws 0.011 _ -~8! ~7L~6~ 34661-~251 -32~5 ~25 I 011 o.69 I 15 15 i .4 ! 12 I 325.0 12 I 14 I 14 0.00 indicates inital condition dra.xls Exhibit D-1
Q
Tc
inc
D.A. #
0.
0 ....
0.
18.8
10.0
1.0
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
D.A. # I Pond Rou~ing
0 w z
iii
::!:
0 u
-t -
.-1 +I C ' +I
.E !
-t
Traditions Montessori School
EVENT= J
c a + c -0 i ~I
5
.... + c a
1
+----t-t·---~-+
0 w
(/)
...J 0
<( 0..
I-0
0 ct:
I-0..
j
C>
...J ;?;
<( I-
I-~
)( 0 x
Q) I-w
Tim~ j
-~
cfs~ cfs .. cfs --i cfs cfs cfs ft I cfs cfs __ c_fs_
o .o o .o 1.88 o.oo o.oo o.oo -~24 .o1 __ 1__ o .oo ···-_o ._o o .oo
!:2i
2 .0 i
-~1 ·-:;-:g . 5 .63 " - . !.30 1.88 0 .29 324.1 . 0 .29 1.7 1.66
~-3 .8 9 .38 i ---4 .83 [ 6 .92 1.04 1 32'!_:~l -c 1.04 3 .3 3 .32
3 .o : ~ 5 .6 .. 13 .13 ! 10 .31 i 14 .21 ~~5 j 324.4 1.95 5 .o 4 .98
_ 4 .o : 7~5 7 .5 16 .88 17 .26 . 23.44 3.o9 ___ 324.5 _ 1 3 .09 1 6 .6 6 .65
§.:2 + 9.4 9.4 2D.63 ---~ 34 .13 4 .20 1 324.5 I ~.20 L-8 .3 8.31
6 .0 !1 .3 . 11 .3 24.3sT 35 .64 ' 46 .36 5.36]-324.6 . 5 .36 ; 100 9 .97
7.01 _ 13 .1 1 13 .1 28 .13 . 46.68 1 60.01 6 .66 ! . 324.7 1 6 .66 : r--11 .6 , 11 .63
8 ~ 15.0 I. 15 0~1 31 .88 : 5866 1 u 7 4 .81 8.07 : ·--324 7 __J 8 .o7 · ----,--13 .3 j
9 .0 1 H 16.9 i 35 .63 1 71.40 . 90 .54 9 .57 , . 324.8 j 9 .57 15 .0
10 .0
1
1B.B'. 36.56 f 84.74 107 .02 11 .14 1 324.9 j 11 .14 T 15 _5 ,
!¥ol1 o _ -17-.8-: · -17 .8 ~4 .69 L 00.3 0' 121 .3Q 12 .50 1 __ 325.()l 12 .50 __ T--15.at
120 ·1K·9· 16 .9 __ 32 .81 ;. ~o5 .91 i _ 130.99 12 .5_4.1' 325.o i· 1254 I }5.0j
130 -1s>~ 15.9 -30 .94 :·1. _ 113.93 ! 138.73 ~ 325.o 1 12 :40 - -T -.. ~ 14 .12
14.0 15 .0 + 15.0 -~.06 : . 120.29 1 _ _!44.8? ~ --325.0 i 12 .29 l _13,.....3, ___ 13 ___ .2_9
13.29
14 .95
16.62
15.79
14.95
15.o 14_1 · 14 .1 27 .19 124 .94 : 149.36 12 .21 325.o l 12 .21 12.5 12.46
16 .0 .'!~·!I 13.1 25.31 ~ 127 .8 21 152.13 --12 .16 . 325.o l 12.16 -1 11 .6 11 .6 3
17 .0 12 .2 t' 12 .2 23.44 .. 128.86 : 153.13 12 .14 -. 325:01 12 .14 10 .8 1080
rn .o 11 .3 11 .3 -_21 :5 6 . _ 127 .ij _ 152.30 _ 12 .15 ---325.o 12.15 -· -·. -· ___ 10_.o - - -9-.9-7
2
1
0
9 ._0
0
-T9PJ_4~ 10.3 19 .69 , _ 1. 25 .15 ! 149.55i_ 12 .20 325.0 12.20 9 .1 9 .14
-9.4 _1 7 .8'!] '!20 .26 . 144.84 1 12 .29 325.0 12 .29 8 .3 8 .31
21 .0 8.4 , 8.4 15 .94 113.25 138.07 : 12.41 325.0 12.41 --t -~ ~-7 .5 ] 7.48
22.0 z 5 1 7 .5 14.06 -104:as· 129.19 '. 12 .57 -· 325.0 -~-12 .57 6.6 1 6 .65
23 .o 6 .6 6 .6 12 .19 93.71 118.11 1 12 .20 325.o j 1220 - -58 i 582
.
24 _00 1 5 &'c 5 .6 10.31 .§..1;831 1o5FoJ 11 .04 324.9 :_ -11 :04 _5 ~ 4 :98
4 .7 4 .7 8.44 74.31 94 .14 1 9 .92 324 .8 1 9.92 1 ! 4 .2 4 .15
26 .Q+ ~&~ 3 .8 -H 6.56 J 65.09 82 ~7 5 1 8 .~~1-3?_4_&~ . 8 .83 ! --1 3 .3 3 .32
?_7 :2_1 2 .8
1
2 8 -4 .69 56.11 1 7 1.65 I.I[_ 32 4 7 1
1
: 7 .77 1 I 251 2 .49
.28 .0 1 1.9 281 £.32 1 60 .80 6.74' 324 .7 6 .74 j
1
I~ 1 .66
29 .o 09 · o.94 38.691 so.13 1'"7 2; 324 .6 5 .72
1
o.8
1
0 .83
PEAK FL~WS 19 1 19 ; -· 1 13 --1-3~5~~ 13 i 17 ~ ·17 .
0.00 indicates inital condition
dra .x ls
Exhibit 0 -1
Qp
Tc
inc
D.A. # D.A. #
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
I Pond Routing _
Traditions Montessori School
c:
0
15 1
~I
EVENT=
c:
0 t.
3:! .,....
+ c:
(/)
N
10 J
0 w c: (/)
.2 ...I 0 .,.... -om ~a. + c:> 1-0 c: o..!!! 00::: o a.w 1 1-a.
L D.!'. #_ t
I
~ I
[ ___ 18.7
I 10.0 --,-·
i
(!)
...I~ ~ I-
I-~ ox
I-w
Time
0 .0
1.0
2 .0
3 .0
4 .0
5 .0 j
6.0
cfs J _cfs_ I ~ cfs cfs cfs ft I cfs ~ _cf~-
0 .0 ~ 2 .10 0.00 0 .00 0.00 324.0 0.00 __ -9_:~-000
2 .1 ~ 6 .31 1.45 2.10 0 .33 -32'!._! 0 .33 --Hr--1.87
4 .2 ~-_10.5~ 5.47 7.77 1.15 324.3 1.15 ___ 3 .7 , 3 .73
6 .3 ~ 14 .73 11 .65 15 .99 2.17 324.4 2 .17 5 .6 5 .60
8.4 8 .4 . 18 .94 19.47 --26 .39 3.46 1--324.5 -3.46 7 .5 7.46
10 .5 10 _5 t 23 .15 29 _20 1 38.42 ~ 324 .6 4 .61 [ -----9 .3 9 .33
-12.6 TI]I
7
' 27 .36 4 0.49 ! --52 .35 5 .93
1
324 6 1 I 5 .93 --~ --11:19
7 .0
8 .0
9 .0
14 .7 illT 31.57 53.03 1 67 .85 7.41 ~ 324.7 ,_] __ 7.41 1 13 .1 13 .06
16.8 16.8 35 78 [ 66.59 , 84 60 [ 9 01 1 3248 1 l 9 .01 14 .9 14.92
10 .0
11 .0
12 .0
13.0
18 .9 18 .9 -. 3 9 .99 [ -_ 80.97 102 .36 1
-10 .70 \ 324.9 ~ -10 .70 16 .8 16.79
21 .0 21.0 41 .04 i 96.02 120 96 ' 12.47 325.0 12.47 j 18 .~ 18.65
20 .0 20 .0 38 9ij _ 112.20 137.o§j_ _ 12.43 ---325.0 -12.43 r -17.7 , -~.72
18 .9 18 .9 36 .83 ! 126.79 151 .1i l 12 .17 325.0 12 .17 ·------!165 ... 889 1 1165 .. 78~5
17 .9 17 .9 _l_~.7~[ 139.72 -163.62 _ 11 .95 -325.0 11.95 s-91
14.0 16 .8
15 .0 15.8 -------
16.0 14 .7
17 .0 13 .7
~-12 .6
~ 11 .6
20.0 10 .5 ~-±_.!.Q.f 9 .5
22 .0 . 8.4
23 .0 7.4
.
240 i 6 .3
25 .0 5 .3
26 .0 4.2 1
270 , ~~;
16.8 32 .62 l 150.94 174.45 11 .75 324.9 11 .75 -----~ _ _._!_'!.92
15:8 30.52 ' 160.39 183 .57 11 .59 324 .9 11 .59 14.0 13 .99
14 .7
13 .7
12 .6
11 .6
10.5
9 .5
8.4
7.4
6 .3
~ 4 .2 ;
111
.1.:_!j
1.1
-------28.41 168.00 190.91 11.45 324 .9 11.45 ---13.1 13.06 ----26 .31 173 .70 196.41 11 .36 324 .9 i 11 .36 12 .1 12.12
24 .20 177.43 200.01 ·-11 .29 ~ -324 .9 1-~-_11 .29 --11 .2 --11:19
22 .10 -179 .Tij ~:63 .!_1.26 ~ _!_1.26 , --10 .3 , 10.26
19 .99 178.67 ; 201 .21 11 .27 . 324.9 11 .271 __ j__ 9.3 1 ____ ~33
17 .89 176.04 : 198.67 -11 .31 1 324.9 1131 : t---8.4 8 .39
157~ -171 .~ -193.93 !_!.40 -~324 .9 --11.40 7 .5 7.46
13.68 1 163.86 !~~1+ 11 .53 324 .9 --~~ -i---___ .4§5 -:~5 6.53
11 .58 1 _ 154._!'!. 177 .54 11 .i7_ 324 .9 11 .70 5.60
9.47 141 .90 165.72 11 .91 325 .0 11 .91 4 .66 ------------7 .37 , 127 .03 151 .37 12 .17 325 .0 i 12 .17 ~.7 , 3 .73
~ 26: __ _1"69 .441 134.39 12 .~~I 325.0 I 12.48 2 8 . 2 80
~·~1 1
PEAK FLOWS -I
~~~l ¥~;;, 1:::~ 1:::, ;;~~· 1-1-12!~:1 . f' •..... ~~1 _ ~:~
--l -1 12 I 325.0 i i 19 + 19 --1 21·--T-21
0 .00 ind icates inital condition
dra .xls
Exhibit D-1
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
Traditions Montessori School
(!)
...J ~
<( I-
I-~
0 ><
I-w
_ Time -1 ~f~ _ I cfs -d-cfs ~ cfs i cfs I cfs _ _!!_7\T cfs I i cfs nrJ-cfs ~~i --~-~~I ¥,~, ~.~~ ~} %~ ;;;i i I~ ~~~~·. --. -~ ~:~~
2 o
0
I ~.~1 4 .~ -12 .02 629 . 1.29 ' 3243
1
1.29 ! 4c3 [ 4.26
• I ?.2 16.83 13.40 2.46 2.46 6.4 -· 6 .39
4.0 ~9 6 9 .6 21 .63 22 .57 30.23 L ~~83 + 3 .83
1
-~1 8 .5 8 .52
~-.QI 12:0 . _ 26 .4~ 33 .89 44.21 --5 .16 • 324.6 : L • 5 .16 u•-10.7 10 .65
~ 14.4 31 .25 46.94 60.33 ' 6 .69 324.7 ! 6 .69 ; 12 .8 12.78
?-O j -!~&L 16 .8 36J56 _ 61.40
1
78 .19 ~ ~ _
1
B
0
.. 42 o3 ~ _ -·-· ~-14 .91
8 .0 , 19.2 ' 19 .2 40.86 7700 : 97.46 10.23 1 ~~~l :t?.:..0 1 :tI.c.Q~
_ 9 .o / -~1 .~1· ~~ 45 .67 93.51 ... 111.86 1211~ .. 325.o j 12 .~ _ L ~-19 .11
10.0 -24 IDB 24 .0 . 46 .87 114.40 139.18 12 .39 1 325.0 12.39 I 21 .3 ! 21 .30
11 .0
0
1 22 .8 44.47 131 .29 _ 161 .21 L 1 1~
~ -21 .6 42.07 -_ 158.52 181 .76 ' 11 .62 1 324.9 l 11 .62 1 ------· 19 .2 19J2
__ _i3 .o l 20.4 20.4 39.66 118.03 , 200.58 11 .28 ; 324.9 11 .28 18 .1 1811
_14_.o; 19.2 19 .2 j 37 .26 19~ 217 .69 10 97
2
i 324.9 -~0 .97 -_ 1 17 .04
15.0 1 18.0 18 .0 J 34.85 211 .55! 233.00 324 .9 10.72 16.0 15.98
16.0 16.8 -. 16.8 [ -32.45 1 . 220 .07 . 246:41 . -_!143.217~1 325.5 1 1317 ----14 .9 14.91
---!?~ 15 .6 ~~§] 223.95 252.52 . 325.6 , --J4.281 -13 .8 13 .85
~ 14.4 14.4 ! -. 224 .89 -254 .00 1 . -325 .6 :___ 1 4 .55 1 i 12 .8 1 12 .78
19.o 13 .2 · · 13.2! -25 .2~! 223 ~97 ' 252.54 14.29 325 .6 1 14.29 , 11 .1 11 .12
20.0 -1 ~.Q [_ 12.0 J 22 .84 221 .85 249 .20 1
1
3
2
.. 6
8
8
5 1
__ 325 .6 -~I -1
1
__
2
3_..6
8
_8
5
1--_ _ __ 10~ .. _§7 10.65
22.0 9 .6 9 .6 18.03 215 .62 . 239.41 11 .89 , 325.0 11 .89 8 .5 8 .52
21 .0 1H 10 ~ m ~ ~1".~?1 244.68 -="' 325.5 . _ _ _ 9 .59
23.0 · 8.4 a.41 15.62 211 .97 j 233 .65 ; io.84 1 324 .9 1 !0.84
1
_ i 7 .5 -· 7.46
24 .0 7 .2 7 .2 13.22 206 .01 ' 227 .59 10 .79 ' ~~~-~ 10 7
44
9 1 _ I 6 .4 6 .39
25.0 .6.Qi ~.Q 1 10 .82 197 .34 219 .23 1 10 .94 324.9 , 5.3 1 5 .33
26.0 4 .8 i 4 .8 : _ 8.41 1 !~~-~7 1 20?.16 1 f1.:t ~ 324.9 1 -I 43 ; 4 .26
27 .0 3 .6 3 .6 ' 6 .01 1 171 .50 194.29 1 :J1}~i 324 .9 11 .39 I 3 .2 3 .20
28.0 2:4 1 2.4 3.61 i i54.11 t 177 .51 1 11 .7l .324 .91 j-~--ji 2.1 2 .13
2~0 l 1.2 1 1.2 , 1.20 133.61 15 7 .72 1 12 .06 325 .0~ 12 .061 _ ---. 1.1 1.07
PEAK FLOWS I I
------1-24 24 t 15 I 325.s 15 1 I 21 ·-r 21
0.00 indicates inital condition
dra .xls
Exhibit D-1
D.A. # D.A. #
EXHIBIT "D-1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
j Pond Rou~ing
I 0 1 W · z
iii
:?;
0
()
.... + c: +,
.E
Traditions Montessori School
so I ----r-·
0 w c: en .~I ....1 0 ...... -oiii l <(D.. + c: ~. ~ 0 a ~w i ~&:
D.A.#
>< Q)
Qp _· j 21.2 ;
Tc 10.0 1
J
1 ~ ~ ------~---~ t ----·--l_i_ ----t------+
I I '
24.1 I
1o:Of
inc 1.0
Time I cfs ~ cfs cfs I cfs ! cfs I
o.o j --o .o Q:_O! --~J±) o.oo 1 o.OQ.J
~1 .0 2 .7 2 .7 8 .15 1.87 2.72 j
2 .0 --~ --5.4 13 .59 ~ --7.16 -~9 -9.?L
3 .0 8 .2 8 .2 19 02 ' 15 .23 20 .75 1
4 .0 . 10.9 10 .9 24.46 25.83 -34.25 -
5 .0 13.6 13 .6 29 .89 38 .81 50.29 _,
¥o1 -~~:~1 -· -~:~ ~-~ ~~:~~~ . ~~ fITT 21 .7 21 .7 46.19 87 .91 110.94 a ---24.5 24.5 51 .63 1 109.14 134.11
10.0 1 27 .2 27 .2 -· 52.99 1 -= 136.77 ·_-160.77 1
11.0 25.8 25 .8 50 .27 !66 80 ~~-?~L
0 . 24.5 1---24.5 , 47.55 195.11 217 .07 1
0 23.1 ! 23.·1"1 44.83 217 .69 2 42.66
14 0 1 21.7 21.7 42 .12 230 .3 1 ~_ 262 .52
0 20.4 20.4 39.40 236 .60 , -272.43
16.cir 19.o 19 .o 36 .68 238 .87 216.00
17 .0 17.7 =-17.7 1 33 .97 1 238 .59 -275 .55
18.0 1~~1 16 .3 j 31 .25 ' 236 .68 272 .55
19.0 14.9 ' 149 1 28.53 233 .74 267 .93 1
20 0 ----~~ 13.6 1--13 6 ,. -_2 5:81 23615 -· 26228 f
?1 .0 1_?.2 12 .2 1 23 .10 226 .14 ~55 :97 '
. -22 .0. i--10 .9 --.1.. 20 .~ 221 .87 249.24 i 23 .0 , 9 .5 9 .5 17.66 217.43 1 242 .25 1
24 o ' 8.2 §.~ 14.94 212 88 1 235 .09 .
6 .8 6 .8 12 .23 206 .25 1__ 227 .82 1
. -5.4 [ -~-"! . 9 .51 I . 196.57 : 21·8.48
27 .0 1 4 .1 4 .1 6 .79 ; 183.72 1' 206 .08 ! PEAK~WS 27 ul . 27 ~t ~:l :~~~1 :;~~~1
0.00 indicates inital cond itio n
cfs 1 ft I cfs
J· -·-r-----0.00 " _ 324.Q I o .oo ..
0.43 1 . -324.2 _J_ __ 2:£.
1.43 . 324.3 t .... 1.43 ,_
_2 .76 __ 324.4 -· __ 2 .76 1 -
4 .21 324.5 4 .21
5 .74 --324.6 1 . 5 .74 1 .
7.491 324.7 L _ 7 .49 1_
--~ .. 324.8 ; j_ __ 9.43
!!:5?J ?.24.9 i I !1 :5~;
14.4 14.45
16 .9 16.86
19.3 19 .26
21 .7 21 .67
cfs , cfs
2'Q j ---o:oo
1.:±__ 2.41
4 .8 4 .82
1 .2 T 22
9 .6 9 .63
12 .0 12 .04
r
12.00 ' 325.0 12 .00
__ 12.48 ' --325.0 -i-12.48 ----.---------
11.48 324.9 11.48'
10 .98 324.9 ,__ -10.98 °
12.49 325.0 12.49
16.11 ] __ 325.6 16.11
~---325.6 17 .91
18 .5_~l 325.I:L 18 .56
18.48 ' 325.7 ! 18.48
17 .94 1
. 325 .6 ! 17 .94
17 .09 325.6 17 .09 -------16.06 325 .6 16 .06
14 .91 325.6 14 .9!!
13 .68 325.6 ~ 13 .68 :
12.41 325.0 -_ 12.41 [__ -
11 .11 324.9 1 !.:1 1 1· 1 10 .79 324.9 i 10.79 ,
10 .96 324.9 10.96 1
11 .18 324.9 11 .18
:::1 ;~:~I + ::~
,. -~ •. 7 t -,~ -I
24 .1 24 .08 ---22 .9 22 .87
21 .7 21 .67
20 .§1 20.47
19.3L ·19.26
~ 18 .06
16 .9 16.86
15 .7
14.4
13 .2
12 .0 1---10 .8
15 .65
14.45
13 .24
12 .04
10 .84
l---~
1 -~ .[ i~
~H 6 ~1-
+ '
3 51
f ~
24·-f
dra .xls
Ex hibit D-1
9 .63
8.43
7 .22
6 .02
4.82
3 .61
2.41
1.20
24
. 10 .A.#
:it I ..r:
Q.
ta ...
Cl
0 ...
"O ~i
~ -·· i
inc I _ TimiE 0 .0 ·--
1 .0
2 .0 • ... -~
I -~~'.~~
8 .0
9 .0
10 .0 1
11 .0
12 .0
13.0
140 :
0 .00 ind icates inital condition
EXHIBIT "D -1"
PROPOSED DETENTION POND ROUTING
Traditions Montessori School
dra .xls
Ex hibi t D-1
LETTER OF COMPLETION
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
Dear Sir :
DATE: 8· 1i .. f y
The purpose of our letter is to request that the following listed improvements be
approved and accepted as being constructed under City inspection and completed
according to plans and specifications as approved and required by the City of College
Station , Texas . This approval and acceptance by the City is requested in order that we
may finalize any subcontracts and to affirm their warranty on the work . This approval
and acceptance by the City of the improvements listed below does hereby void the letter
of guarantee tor the listed improvements on the above reference:~:
The one-year warranty is hereby affirmed and agreed to by.....,~..._.-"'-"---------
and by their subcontractors as indicated by signatures below . '
WORK COMPLETED
7\x~t) 51 G\eAA) iU t_,5
ii Ltf] \\ be?
WARRANTY DATE
~:UQ:::~~.Jf{..Y!!LW2.>tf J~~tractor 6 ~ .s . (n07tr uch 01 In{_,,
Phone Number: 0 (PJ ilfv /13&
Address : {Jo f?DK Cf1:JS
fJ ft{CI o TR 17'UJ U
Signature•'f/Jilil?oJ..{)/'JO 1ZJ
Revised 1131107
Item# I
1
2
3
4
5
6 -· 7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
Barron Crest Roadway and Sewer Line
MBESI PROJ #: 1086-0001
Engineer's Opinion of Preliminary of Project Costs
September 15, 2014
Descri ption Uni t Quant ity Unit Price
Paving Construction
ROW Preparation (remove fence , remove concrete, r emove L .S. 1.00 $5 ,500 .00 existing gravel. etc.)
Remove Existin~ Concrete in Barron Road Median SY 73 .00 $15 .00
Concrete for N ew Left Turn Bay SY 445.00 $50 .00
Traffic Control for Left Turn Construction L.S . 1.00 $5 ,500 .00
Earthwork C .Y. 150 $12.00
6" Lime Stabilized Subgrade (6% by weight) S .Y . 453 $5.00
6 " Crushed Limestone Base S.Y. 230 $11.00
2" HMAC Surface Course (including prime coat) S.Y. 230 $13 .00
Concrete Curb and Gutter (all types) L .F . 182 $11.50
6 " Reinforced Concrete Pavement S.Y . 108 $45.00
4 " Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk S .F. 563 $4 .00
Sidewalk Ramos EACH 2 $750 .00
Traffic Control on Barron Road L.S . 1 $1 750 .00
Paving Subtotal
Water S stem Construction
13 Relocate Existin Fire H drant L .S . 1 $2,000.00
14 Relocate Existin Water Meter L.S . 1 $750.00
Water S stem Subtotal
1 of2
Total
$5 ,500.00
$1 095.00
$22 250.00
$5,500 .00
$1.800 .00
$2,265.00
$2,530 .00
$2,990 .00
$2,093 .00
$4,860 .00
$2,252 .00
$1 ,500 .00
$1,750.00
$56,385
$2,000 .00
$750.00
$2 750
Item# I
15
16
17
18
19
20
14" Stl. Casin
Barron Crest Roadway and Sewer Line
MBESI PROJ #: 1086-0001
Engineer's Opinion of Preliminary of Project Costs
September 15, 2014
Descri,elion Unit guantity Unit Price
Sewer S stem Construction
with 6" PVC Pi e installed b wet bore L.F. 100 $180.00
4' diam. Manole EACH 1 $2,500.00
L.S. 1 $750.00
L.F. 30 $11.00
V.F. l $300.00
Trench Safe sewer L .F . 30 $1.00
Sewer S stem Subtotal
Erosion Control Construction
Total
$18,000.00
$2,500 .00
$750.00
$330 .00
$300 .00
$30 .00
$21 910
Erosion Control Plan & Sedimentation Control (per Item
21 106) (includes silt fencing, construction exits, straw bale
barriers, inlet protection, grass seeding, and any other
sedimentation control devices
L.S. 1 2,500.00 2,500
Erosion Control Subtotal $2 ,500
T OT AL CONSTRUCTION COST $83,545
The above construction estimate is based on the engineer's preliminary opinion of probable construction costs. This
estimate constitutes our best judgment at this time. Please note that the engineer does not have any control over contractor
or supplier ___ ,,,,,,
-• :\'t.. OF TE:_ '' ---:\\>-. ........... ~ ••
+ ~ J I ; C? ... ··*··· .. 0' • ~ 7ti , -tr ... . .. *. ;ti) · 1/fj!tf ! .t:.L1/J~ ....... ~~!.'f.~::. ~
Je Robert on, P .E. ~J.~f.~~-~X .. ~· ... ~~.~~~J:?~~~
'~\ 94745 /e;:
• 0 ·. ( <'~ .·~/,
'• /<"\~·· •• :crNS~ . ...-~J
2 of2
•, SS' ........... <\~c, -
,,-.. 1DNAL '"' -• ,,,,,,.--
S P: Filin of Final Plats -Le tte r s of Co m l etion 10/01/10
Engineering Inspector/Date: J\r)'l\()~.-('
Project Engineer/Date: ~~IV l ~ q/17 f[L\
DP Number: [L\ -D Z.\ /' 1
Inspectors shall acquire written (i.e. email) punchlist comments and subsequently written
confirmation from the following contacts before forwarding Letter of Completion to development
review engineer:
VErosion/Drainage: Donnie Willis (0: 764-6375, C: 229 -7632)
~S Water Services -General: Cha r le s "Butch" Willis (0: 764-3435, C: 777 -1202)
• Water -coordinate fire flow analyses (or the design engineer for non-city utilities)
and confirm test results meets min requirements with the dev review engineer
(specifi c hydrants to t est, if simu ltaneou s, and min allowable flow)
• Sanitary
i'f1:_cs Water Service -Liftstation: Dou g Wall ace (0: 764 -6333 )
fl fr'CS Electric and Streetlig h ts: Gilbert Martin ez (0 : 764 -62 55)
f/frJ-BTU Electric and Streetlights: Soni a Creda (0 : 821 -5770)
John Fontinoe or Randy Trimble (0: 821-5728)
Confirm with developm e nt review engineer tha t service agreement is in place with BT U
/rf;tNon-City Utility Service Provider s: (Wellborn Water SUD, Brushy Creek SUD, Wickson
Creek SUD, etc) confirm with development review engineer that infrastructure is complete
and for outstanding issues,
N..ff"Digital Constrution Pictures: From contractor on CD -R, Inspector to confirm and file
V Record Drawings: (2 Red -Lined Copie s) for all Public Inf r astructu r e with the
following attestation :
"I, General Contracto r for development, certify that the
improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and that said improvements are
shown substantially hereon. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, that the
materials of construction a nd sizes of manufa ctured items, if any are stated correctly
hereon."
General Contractor
~ord Drawi ngs: (2 Red -Li ned Copies ) for Public Drai nage I nf rastructur e includin g
Private Deten tio n Fa cilities wit h th e fo llowi ng attest atio ns:
"I hereby attest that I am familiar with the approved drainage plan and associated
construction drawings and furthermore, attest that the drainage facilities have been
constructed within dimensional tolerances prescribed by the Bryan & College station
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines and in accordance with the approved construction
plans or amendments thereto approved by the City of College Station."
(affix seal) Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Texas No. ___ _
"I certify that the subdivision improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and
that said improvements are substantially as shown hereon. I further certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that the materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any,
are stated correctly hereon." ·
General Contractor
. \.
Inspectors to re view Red -lin ed Record Drawings, upon accepta bl e co nfi r mation of drawings,
ins pector to :
V file one set of Record Drawings in Public Works files, and
~forward one set of Record Drawings to Jeffery Speed (CSU)
I nspectors should forward Letters of Completion to the development review engineer that
rev iewed and stamped the construction plans after confirming:
v the date on the Letter of Completion Warranty should reflect the date when all associated
yunchlist items are completed, and
V the Owner is shall be listed as the one affirming the one -year warranty
Dev_elopment review engineer to:
o Add Dev Permit Numbe r t o Letter of Comp letion
o stam p the Letter of Complet ion t o confirm by initiali ng that the fi nal plat is filed (o r myl ar
is ready t o be fil ed), all nece ssary easements (including offsite) have been filed, and
blanket easement issues are resolved, and
o initial and route the Final Plat mylar for filing . (Note if the developer provided surety the
plat it may have been filed ahead of construction.)
Deborah Grace-Rosier (Planning) to file the Final Plat utilizes a coversheet to confirm:
o infrastructure is accepted by Letter of Completion -or-Surety is provided and acceptable,
o sign ed and notarized mylar of final pla t ,
o parkland dedication has been paid,
o digital file of final plat is provided,
o a current paid tax certifica te has been submitted, and
Developme nt re view engineer, upon the filing of Final Pla t , stamp the Letter of Completion
w ith the new stamp and verify -initial -n/a the Final Plat was filed, offsite easements have been
filed, we have all necessary easements, etc -and then forward the Letter of Completion to Alan
Gibbs (City Engineer) for final signature.
Carol (Sr. Asst. City Engineer) to:
o enter t he engin ee r's est im at e and Lette r of Com plet ion da te into Inspecti on Li st
o forwa rd hard o r iginal of finalized Letter of Completion to Mandi Alford (P&DS).
Mandi to: verify
o signatures on the Letter of Completion,
o forward scanned copy of Letter of Completion and associated Engineers Estimate to the
owner, developer, contractor, Terry Boriskie (Building), Ben McCarty (Building), Janet
Dudding (Accounting), Jeffery Speed (CSU), Stephen Maldonado Sr. (CSU), Diane
Broadhurst (CSU), Charles "Butch" Willis (CSU), Sue Hosea (CSU), Carol Cotter
(Engineering), Alan Gibbs (Engineering) and Deborah Grace-Rosier (Planning),
o if don't have email addresses, mail copies to the owner and contractor, and
o place the original in Development Permit file.
Deborah to place a hard copy of the Letter of Completion in the associated Planning Final Plat file.
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-21C
CITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
i¥'1mti~ & l>nrWpmntl .'k-n;M
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Traditions Montessori School
Lot 1
DATE OF ISSUE: 06/20/14
OWNER:
Traditions Montesorri School
2911 Texas Ave
College Station , Texas 77845
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
2666 Barron Road
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Spring Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Full Development Permit
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein . If revoked , all work must cease until perm it is re-
issued .
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4 . Other permits may have been required to fulfill local , state and federal requirements. Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Perm its .
5. Stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing
drainage facilities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site , it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State , and Federal requirements.
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy .
8 . All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance , prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to , paint , oil ,
solvents , asphalt , concrete , mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited .
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines , Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed.
10 . Special Conditions :
I, _______________ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein .
Phone number
\J ' ,-.-.
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contact~ \ ,@t t"\ "'\ ~ -oz...q 7-I the Public Works
lnsp or a e to this project 24 hours prior to beginning construction for scheduling required Inspections .
Date
Attachment I ---~ --.. ----.--.. -.._:,:~~=---::
~ -~~--~ --
·-----
TPDES Genera l Pennit TXR 15 0000
CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTICE
FOR THE
Texas Commission on Environment.al Quality (TCEQ)
Storm Water Program
TPDES GENERAL PERMIT TXR150000
The following information is posted in compliance with Part II.D.1. of the TCEQ General Permit Number
TXR.l 50000 for discharges of storm water runoff from construction sites . Additional information regarding the
TCEQ storm w ater permit pro gram may be found on the internet at:
Contact Name and Phone Number: E~lrt~ 'fct\ct~ot-CL °111 ·<64CP-3l3'?
--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~-
Project Description :
hysical address or description of the site 's
ocation , est imated start date and proj ected end
ate, or date that disturbed soils will be
tabilized)
fr ad.J tl v ris ~tesso r ·,
Schoo\
lJarro \\ (l«c&_
CQ(\e e ~fidion U /l~l/O
--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ......... ~~~--~~~~-
For Construction Sites Authorized Under Part II. 0 .1. the following certification must be completed:
I 6al {\e.. PaJ.~ (T y ped or Printed Nrun e Per-.on Completing Tb.i< Certifi cati on) certify under penalty of
law that I have read and understand the eligib ility requirements for claiming an authorization by waiver under Part
Il .D . l . of TPDES General Pennit TXRI 50000 and agree to comply wi th the terms of this permit. Construction
activities at this.site sh~ll <?ccur wi:hinA tWf period list~d in Ap~di!A..q[t/ie TPDES general perrnit for ~his
county, that penod begrnmng on l../J. ~ · C;:t. and ending on -+ ·::;)LJ. -.t=.'{ I understan d that if construction
activities continue past this period, all storm w ater runoff must be authorized under a separate provision of this
general permit. A copy of this signed notice is supplied to the operator of the MS4 if di scharges enter an MS4
system . I am aware there are significant penalties for p rovi ding false i nformation or for conducting unauthorized
discharges, including the possibility of fin and imprisonment for knowing violations .
-0~·~~-·I~~~~~
Date
Page 32
1 • d Xl::l .:l 13r ~3Sl::l l dH
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO . 14-21 B
CITY OF COLLEGE S TA'IlON
P"1rt11111f. 0-DralopmAl Sm>itTt
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Traditions Montessori School
Lot 1
DATE OF ISSUE: 6/1 <V1 4
OWNER:
Traditions Montessori School
2911 Texas Ave
College Station , Tx 77845
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
2666 Barron Road
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Spring Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Clearing and Grading Permit
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2 . The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein . If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-
issued.
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance .
4. Other perm its may have been required to fulfill local , state and federal requirements . Construction w ill be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits .
5 . Stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing
drainage facilities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site , it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City , State , and Federal requirements .
7 . All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy.
8. All trees requ ired to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to , paint, oil ,
solvents , asphalt, concrete , mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited.
9 . All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines , Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed .
10 . Special Conditions : ***TCEQ PHASE II RULES IN EFFECT***
1 1J~Z_tJ_'.}~{_o_N_J~f,_,.u..-_'-'_,J-_,·_c..._..,_~ __ ... _· __ ,the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein .
~oJg~
9"71 ;p'-/l, 1l1 (p
Phone number E-mail
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO . 14-21A
CITY O F C OLLEGE S·rA flON
ll!J111ti'¢ cf [h'f'li;pmnrl S,.,.-1."toYI
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Traditions Montessori School
Lot 1
DATE OF ISSUE: 05/30/14
OWNER:
Traditions Montesorri School
2911 Texas Ave
College Stat ion , Texas 77845
SITE ADDRESS:
2666 Barron Road
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Spring Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Development Permit
CONDITIONS:
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2. The perm it may be revoked if any false statements are made herein . If revoked , all work must cease until perm it is re-
issued.
3. The permit w ill expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance .
4 . Other perm its may have been requ ired to fulfill local , state and federal requirements . Construct ion w ill be in
compliance w ith all necessary State and Federal Permits .
5. Stormwater mit igation , including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing
drainage facilities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) w ill be kept and mainta ined on -site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed eros ion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site , it is the
Contractor's respons ibili ty to implement measures that will meet City , State , and Federal requirements .
7. All disturbed areas w ill be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy .
8. All trees requ ired to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City 's Unified Development Ordinance , prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to , paint, oil ,
solvents , asphalt , concrete , mortar , or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited .
9. All construct ion shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and spec ifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines , Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed .
10 . Special Cond itions :**** PERMT FOR SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION ONLY****
I, fU ~ co-,..,sf/tJA c/....,_, j:.___ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply w ith all conditions herein .
Contractor Signature Date /
C/41"'-<_ e ks IAJ~. ;; {7--
Phone number E-ma il
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contac ~fW' "\'11)-~'1,Z , the Publ ic Works
l nsR tor assigned to this project 24 hours prior to beg inning construction for scheduling required Inspections .
Date
Traditions Montessorri School Site Plan
MBESI PROJ #: 1086-0001
Engineer's Opinion of Preliminary of Project Costs
July 2, 2014
Item# I Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
Street Pavin g Construction
1 4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk S.F.
2 Sidewalk Ram s EACH
1 of2
625 $4 .00 $2 ,500 .00
2 $750 .00 $1 ,500.00
Paving Subtotal $4 ,000
Construction Total $4,000
_,,,,, ..
,.• OF-.,, -:\'" !£: • --'\~ ': •••••••• J,-, '•
-0 .. ··· * •.:.':/J' • :' .. "( .... " .... ···.p. ••
'rr ! \ \-tt 1 : ............................. '
~J.~f-X~.~X .. ~· ... ~~.~~~.~?~~~
,-o\ 94745 :"0::11 ·~···.( <;)/{:]~ 1t :;;<'-"'· •. 1 C[Nc::..\; •• • --~ • •<;~·· ...... ,.,_ • vs' ···········<~'-' -,,-.. 10NAL '--'_,.• ,,,,,, ....
It em # I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Traditions Montessorri School Site Plan
MB ESI PROJ #: I 086-0001
E ngineer's Opinion of Preliminary of Project Costs
May 13, 20 14
Description Unit Quanti ty Unit Pri ce
S treet Paving Construction
ROW Prep aration (remove fence , remove concrete, remove L.S. 0.20 $5 ,500.00 existing gravel , etc.)
Remove Existing Concrete in Barron Road Med ian SY 73.00 $15 .00
Left Turn Bay on Barron Road (subgrade, concrete, and SY 234.00 striping) $6 5.00
Stabilized Subgrade (L ime, Crushed Stone, or Cement S.Y . 53 7 Sand)(Earth work is su bs id iary to this item) $5 .00
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement S.Y . 455 $45.00
4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk S.F. 845 $4.00
Sidewalk Ramps EACH 3 $750.00
Traffic Control on Barron Road L.S. 1 $5 ,500.00
P aving Subtotal
Wate r Syste m Construction
Tota l
$1 , 100 .00
$1 ,095.00
$15 ,2 10.00
$2 ,685.0 0
$20 ,475 .00
$3,3 80.00
$2,250 .00
$5 ,500.00
$51 ,695
9 I Relocate Existing Fire Hydrant I LS. I 1 1 $2 ,000.00 $2 ,000.00
10 I Relocate Existing Water Meter I LS. I l I $750.00 $750 .00
Water System Sub total $2,7 50
Sewer L in e Construction
Sewer Line Bore (incl ues boring, carrier pipe, casing pipe,
11 manhole, and all items necessary to comp lete construction L.S . 1.00 $2 0,000 .00 $2 0,000 .00
and cleanup)
1 Sewer Con struction Total $2 0,000
I of 2
Con struction To ta l $74,445
•''''''
---( OF t. '' --'\\:>-\ ••••••••. tx-'••
-0 .·· * ~.':fs • "' . . "*··· ··.-er •, "*/ \-er , : ............................. '
~J.~f.~~.~:r: .. ~· ... ~?.~~~.~?.~~~
r.-o• • " ' -;:} ... 9 4 7 4 5 ... {jj "
• 0 · .. < <:<::> ••• &:i " 't ;;0~·· •• : CENS~/ ~ J •,S's ···········x...~c, -
''
1
0NAL --,,,,,,,••
Jeffery L. Robertson , P .E .
Vice-President Engineering
M cClure & Browne Engi ne ering/Surv eying , Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive , Ste . 103
College Station , Tx 77845
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX : (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information conta ined in th is transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is intended only f,
use of the recipient named above . If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above , please notify me and delete th
transm ission . Thank you .
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying , Inc., upon release of these electron
files is no longer responsible for the ir use or modification . The user of the attached electronic med ia accepts full respons ibility and liability for ar
consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data .
2
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Jeff Robertson <jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com >
Friday, June 20, 2014 8:13 AM
Carol Cotter
Subject: Re : Field Notes for Easement on Traditions Montessorri
20140620075645828.pdf Attachments:
Carol ,
Kevin made some changes to the exhibit to better match the rotation of the deed. The drawings are not typically
sealed but are included as page 1 of 2 in the easement document. Page 2 being the sealed field notes. See
attached document. Let me know if you have any questions .
Thanks
Jeff
On 6/19 /2014 4:31 PM , Carol Cotter wrote:
Thanks Jeff. The diagram also need to be sealed .
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:38 PM
To: Carol Cotter; Jenifer Paz
Subject: Field Notes for Easement on Traditions Montessorri
Carol ,
Here are the field notes for the electric easement. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks ,
Jeff
--------Original Message --------
Subject:esmt
Date:Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15 :35:56 -0500
From:Kevin McClure <kevinm @mcclurebrowne.com>
To:JeffRobertson <jeffr@McClureBrowne.com>
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
1
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jeff,
Alan Gibbs
Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:25 PM
Carol Cotter; Fred Surovik ; Ben Accurso ; Keith Tinker ; 'Jeff Robertson';
'elaine@bvsin c.biz'
Sewer Bore Repair -Barron at Field Stone
As you are aware the recent bore was on grade with the 18" waterline, and the bore needs to be
repaired ASAP, ideally today for the bore walls stability. An acceptable bore repair method Ricky
Pa9i asota, Jr. discussed with Keith Tinker includes using a steel plate against the bore face in
the pit with grout and vent pipes through the plate. Before plating the bore, it should be re -
confirmed that the center of the waterline is free and clean of dirt. Cement stabilized sand
should be placed and tamped to backfill and brace the plate before pumping the pressurized
flowable grout . Due to the bore being performed from upstream to downstream -where the bore
soffi t at the pit is the highest point in the bore, so the vent pipe should be at the top and just
through the plate. The grout should be pumped until it fills the bore and forces the grout out
the vent above the cement sand -then both pipes can be cut off at the top of the cement sand.
To enable the grout and cement sand to cure a minimum of seven days without disturbance, the
boring equipment and operations should not be placed back in the pit until this time has elapsed.
Please let us know ASAP if this is the method you would like BVS Inc to use. Additionally, BVS
Inc should contact both Keith Tinker (Engineering c:777 -0292) and Ben Accurso (Water c:571-7720)
to be able to inspect the bore repair.
Thanks,
Alan
Alan Gibbs, P.E., CFM
City Engineer
City of College Station
1
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Carol ,
Do es this look better?
Jeff
Jeffery L. Robertson , P.E .
Vice-President Engineering
Jeff Robertson <jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com>
Monday, June 16, 2014 4:54 PM
Carol Cotter
Updated Sidewalk Ramps at Barroncrest
McClure & Browne Engi neering/Surveying, Inc .
1008 Woodcreek Drive , Ste . 103
College Station , Tx 77845
1
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX : (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is intended only f,
use of the recipient named above . If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intend ed recip ient named above , please notify me and delete th
transmission . Thank you .
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES : is understood and ag reed that McClure & Browne Engineering /Surveying , Inc., upon release of these electron
files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic med ia accepts full respons ibility and liability for ar
consequences arisi ng out of the use of this electronic data .
2
Carol Cotter
From: Carol Cotter
Sent:
To:
Friday, June 06, 2014 11 :00 AM
'Jeff Robertson '
Cc: Alan Gibbs ; Jenifer Paz
Subject: RE : Traditions Montessori School Development Plat
Hi Jeff,
Since I am out next week, I wanted to give your project a quick review. These are some of my comments, but Planning
still needs to reveiw;
Is there not a better design for the sidewalk ramps? The north ramp lets out in the curb return . Danielle Singh is willing
to discuss options with you .
Provide street names and block numbers for signs
Verify Weldon is okay with the 10' PUE width, he had asked for 20' -will need easement dedication documents
Remove crush rock from Detail A-A, unless geotech design
Jenifer Paz also mentioned issues with fire lane turn around that need to be worked out.
It seems like the water service lin e could be shifted to a better location, not under all that pavement and meter out of
sidewalk.
Site Plan set needs to include all sheets, even those already approved in the sewer construction set.
Carol
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 4 :56 PM
To: Jenifer Paz
Cc: Carol Cotter; Deborah Grace-Rosier
Subject: Re : Traditions Montessori School Development Plat
OK, we'll get it to you in the morning.
Thanks
Jeff
On 6/5/2014 4:54 PM , Jenifer Paz wrote :
Jeff,
I just wanted to touch base on the Deve lopment Plat. The mylar needs to be submitted so that it
can be fi led . We file pl ats on Friday, so if it 's possible for you to have a mylar ready by
tomorro w early afternoon we can file it.
I will be out tomorrow through next Wednesday, but Carol will ensure that it is filed if we have it
in the office early tomorrow.
Let me know.
Jenifer Paz
Staff Planner
Planning & Deve lopment Services
1
•-........ ..,. ___________ c 1TY OF C oll.EGE S TATIONl _______________ .., ..
Home of Texas A&M Univmity 0 ==
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 2014
TO: Traditions Montessori School , via : traditionsmontessori@gmail.com
FROM : Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL {SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of reviews . If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal, another $932 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3) reviews . Please address the comments and submit the following information by any
Monday at 10:00 a .m . for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter
One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents
one (1) revised site plans
One (1) landscaping plan
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details . If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me
at 979 .764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC : McClure & Browne, via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com ;
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATI ON · TEXAS · 77 842
TEL 97 9.76 4.35 7 0 ·FAX. 97 9 .76 4 .3496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) -14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Per Sanitation , a 300-gallon container will be required for this site . Please provide a 1 O'x1 O' pad
and enclosure detail. See revised site plan .
2. The open side of the dumpster enclosure must not face the public ROW. Please relocate the
dumpster so the open side faces the school. See revised site plan .
3. The actual modular building must be shown on the site plan. Show the size and placement of each
building, as well as the accessibility to each building . See revised site plan .
4 . Show 20' PUEs that will be dedicated on the development plat. See revised site plan .
5. Existing trees within detention pond cannot count towards landscape points. This area is proposed
to be graded . Provide alternative to satisfy landscape point requirement. See revised site plan .
6. Please show barricade detail for trees that exist and will be protected. Provide a note that
barricades will be placed prior to any activity on the property including, but not limited to , grading .
Existing trees are no longer being counted for landscaping .
7 . There are 37 Indian Hawthorns shown . Please revise landscape point tabulation . See revised site
plan .
8 . Previous comments from Electrical were not addressed . See revised site plan.
9. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans . Any
additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a
completely new review .
Reviewed by : Jenifer Paz Date : May 13 , 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Sidewalk on western side of Crestmont Drive needs to include dual ambulatory ramps for
crossing Cresmont and Baron Roads , a crosswalk across Barron Road , and connecting
ramp on south side of Barron at Fieldstone. Sanitary sewer extension should take the into
consideration in case cone heights need to be shortened . See revised site plan.
2. Median in Baron should include pedestrian crossing/refuge with crosswalk . See revised
plans .
3. Unless you have more of a recommendation from a geotech report , the crushed stone
options should be removed from the "Typical 27' Pavement Section " and the Section A-A
Detail provided on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet. What is difference between this
and our standard detail that is also included? See revised plans. The notes have been
removed .
4 . Street name and regulatory signage needs to be included with construction of Crestmont.
Proved location, Standard Detail and block numbers for signs . Contact Robin Krause for
rkrause@cstx .gov block ranges . See revised plans. The sign detail has been added .
5. End of Road signs need to be included . See revised plans.
6. Water service should be taken from the 6" fire hydrant lead to eliminate need for cutting
pavement on Barron Road . See revised plans.
7. Add inlet protection to inlets on west side of Crestmont. These inlets are not currently
depicted on Erosion Control Plan . See revised plans .
8. Revised Drainage Report was not included with the re-submittal package as indicated in
response to comments . See revised Drainage Report .
9. Provide flow lines on detention pond discharge pipe . See revised plans .
10. Existing inlets are not depicted on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet. See revised
plans .
Following comments were previously provided via email regarding sewer line construction . They
have been addressed but are begin provided for formal recording .
11. Confirm that the slope proposed with this first piece of the sewer extension still allows for
future extension to serve future Barron Crest lots while meeting design slope and depth
minimums. Revised plans take this into account.
12 . Provide a cost estimate for sewer line , will also need for street and sidewalks/ramps .
Previously submitted.
13 . Provide Letter Acknowledging City Standards. Previously submitted .
14 . Add the following, or I can note when stamping ; A note has been added .
Reference to encasement detail or reference to casing spacers .
A call to indicate that the 12x15 PUE covering upstream manhole is proposed .
Reviewed by : Carol Cotter Date : May 14 , 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. The following easements are existing :
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire , anchor and transformer pole and all
overheard primary lines , poles , guy wires and anchors on this property . See revised
plans .
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron Rd .
being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous . Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet the
requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round). Revised site plan has a fire lane
shown .
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site . No gates are proposed.
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 )2012 shall apply to this site Duly noted .
Reviewed by : Steve Smith Date : 03/14/2014
Jeffery L
1 of2
On 5/12/2014 5:54 PM, Carol Cotter wrote:
Jeff,
Confirm that the slope proposed with this first piece of the sewer extension still allows for future
extension to serve future Barron Crest lots while meeting design slope and depth minimums. Yes, the
slope of the proposed sewer li ne wi II adequately serve the lots in Phase 1 of Barron Crest using design
slopes and minimum depths.
Provide a cost estimate for sewer line, will also need for street and sidewalks/ramps . See attached.
Provide Letter Acknowledging City Standards. See attached .
Add the following, or I can note when stamping ;
Reference to encasement detai I or reference to casing spacers . See revised drawing.
Call to indicate that the 12x15 PUE covering upstream manhole is proposed . There is a 20' PUE
there already. The plan has been updated accordingly.
That should do it.
These comments will also appear on the formal comments returned with the overall Site Plan .
~carol
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 11:05 AM
To: Carol Cotter
Subject: Sewer line on Barron
Carol,
------------------
Here is the updated sewer plan sheet for the Montessorri Schoo l. Let me know if this is ok and I'll
bring you some plans for stamping.
Thanks
Jeff
Jeffery L. Robertson , P. E.
V ice -Pres ident Eng ineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive , Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX : (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
a bout: bl ank
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is
intended only for use of the recipient named above. If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above,
please notify me and delete this transmission. Thank you .
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, nc ., upon release of
these electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification. The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility
and liability for any consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data .
5/13/201410:14 AM
• .> •
Reviewed by : Jenifer Paz Date: March 3 , 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO . 1
1. What is purpose of skewed alignment of Barron Crest? From construction plans
submitted , it appears that the intersection will still align w ith Fieldstone with this
removed . Please remove . Barron Crest has been skewed to line up with Fieldstone
Place and to avoid and existing inlet and power pole. r@ Barron Crest construction needs to include left turn mod ifications to median in
Barron Road . See Revise Site Plan package.
3. Provide plan and profile for portion of Barron Crest to be constructed with this -:Z
project. See Revised Site Plan package . ~ ·
4 . Sidewalks are required on both sides of Barron Crest. See Revised Site Plan .--
5. Add silt fence , inlet protection and construction exit to Erosion Control Plan . See
Grading and Erosion Control Plan.
6. Show where and how hydrant will be located . With modification to alignment of
Barron Crest intersection , hydrant may be able to be angled over with services off
the hydrant lead . This would eliminate removal and repair of pavement in Baron
Road . See Revised Site Plan. Hydrant has been relocated without disturbing
existing pavement.
7. Entire panel of concrete would need to be replaced to repair Barron Road . See
Revised Site Plan .
8. Show limits of bore pit. Will street pavement have to be removed? Notes and
general details will have to be included to define any repairs . See Revised Site Plan
package.
9. Include Traffic Control Plan for street construction and for water and sanitary
construction that will impact traffic flow on Baron . See Revised Site Plan package.
10 Confirm that the sewer pipe is 110 feet but stationing is 100 feet. See Revised plans.
how utility line conflicts in sanitary sewer profile. See revised plans.
lease revisit drainage map delineation . Confirm that the northern quarter of basin
o should be included . See revised Drainage Report.
13 . ls the future phase (modular building) included in runoff calculations/detention pond
sizing? Yes the modular building is included. Any future development on this site
will require another study of the detention pond capacity.
'1 14 . Exhibit C-1 i n drainage report does not appear to account for the parking lot
• pavement. See revised Drainage Report.
15 . What is overflow path if grate inlet gets blocked/plugged? The stormwater will spill
out into the Barron Road ROW and enter the storm inlet(s) there.
16 . Provide a detail for connection of 18-inch detention pond outfall pipe to storm
junction box or call out Standard Manhole Tie-in detail S3 -01 . See revised site plan .
Reviewed by : Carol Cotter Date : March 12 , 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. What is purpose of skewed alignment of Barron Crest? From construction plans
submitted, it appears that the intersection w i ll still align with Fieldstone with this
removed . Please remove .
2 . Barron Crest construction needs to include left turn modifications to median in
Barron Road .
3 . Provide plan and profile for portion of Barron Crest to be constructed with this
project.
4 . Sidewalks are required on both sides of Barron Crest.
5 . Add silt fence , inlet protection and construction exit to Erosion Control Plan .
6 . Show where and how hydrant will be located . With modification to alignment of
Barron Crest intersection , hydrant may be able to be angled over with services off
the hydrant lead . This would eliminate removal and repair of pavement in Baron
Road.
7 . Entire panel of concrete would need to be replaced to repair Barron Road .
8. Show limits of bore pit. Will street pavement have to be removed? Notes and
general details will have to be included to define any repairs .
9. Include Traffic Control Plan for street construction and for water and sanitary
construction that will impact traffic flow on Baron .
10 . Confirm that the sewer pipe is 110 feet but stationing is 100 feet.
11 . Show utility line conflicts in sanitary sewer profile .
12 . Please revisit drainage map delineation . Confirm that the northern quarter of basin
should be included . See revised report.
13 . ls the future phase (modular building) included in runoff calculations/detention pond
sizing? See revised report . The modular building and revised parking lot have been
included.
14 . Exhibit C-1 in drainage report does not appear to account for the parking lot
pavement. See revised report.
15 . What is overflow path if grate inlet gets blocked/plugged? The detention pond will
spill into the Barron Road ROW in the case of blockage.
16 . Provide a detail for connection of 18 -inch detention pond outfall pipe to storm
junction box or call out Standard Manhole Tie -in detail S3 -01 .
Reviewed by : Carol Cotter Date : March 12 , 2014
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron
Rd . being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous . Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn -a-round but the road will need to meet
the requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn -a-Round).
2 . A Knox Box will be required for this site .
3 . IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101)2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by : Steve Smith Date : March 3 , 2014
Carol Cotter
From:
Sent:
To:
Alan Gibbs
Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6 : 13 PM
Carol Cotter
Subject: FW: Barron Road sewer line
·---------------'·-·
From: Alan Gibbs
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 2:02 PM
To: 'Jeff Robertson'; Blake Cathey
Subject: RE: Barron Road sewer line
Jeff,
Sounds good. Thanks.
Alan
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:18 PM
To: Alan Gibbs; Blake Cathey
Subject: Re: Barron Road sewer line
Alan,
The bore pit will be on the north side. The receiving manhole receiving pit will require removal/replacement of
some sidewalk. We'll add some notes and get a revised copy back to you along with a traffic control plan.
Thanks
Jeff
On 2/5/2014 5 :50 PM, Alan Gibbs wrote :
Jeff,
A few comments:
1. I presume the bore pit will be on the north, and the rece1v1ng pit on the
south. Have you laid out the receiving pit to determine if it can be
constructed without removing street pavement? Notes and general details may
be warranted to define repairs -possibly street pavement, sidewalk, ramp,
etc.
2. The apparent proximity of this receiving pit will require a traffic control
plan, possibly including a lane closure.
3. Please confirm that the pipe is 110 LF but the stationing is 100 ft.
4. Please confirm both depth and clearance, and depict the northern storm sewer
inlet this line appears to be proposed to align with.
As previously noted, I have separated this sewer development permit application from
the full site plan. The single development permit fee that was paid will cover both
(essentially this sewer permit fee was waived). With these approved changes, re-
submit four sealed sewer and traffic control sets for stamping.
Let me know if you have questions.
1
Thanks,
Alan
------------------
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 2:03 PM
To: Alan Gibbs
Subject: Re: Barron Road sewer line
Alan,
Yes , we shot it back in November. Top/Manhole= 325.43' Depth= 10.11'
Thanks
Jeff
On 2/5/2014 1 :04 PM, Alan Gibbs wrote:
Jeff,
Did you survey to confirm the exist Sta. 11+00 manhole flowline of
315.32'?
Alan
-----------------------------
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto:jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 3:14 PM
To: Alan Gibbs
Subject: Barron Road sewer line
Alan,
Any word on the Barron Road sewer line? Sorry to pester.
Thanks
Jeff
Jeffery L. Robertson , P. E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste . 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be
confident ial. Th is material is intended only for use of the recipient named above . If the reader or other recipient
of this material is not the intended recipient named above, please notify me and de lete this transmiss ion. Thank
you.
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne
Engineering/Surveying , Inc ., upon release of these electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or
modification . The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility and liability for any
consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data .
2
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University®
Jeffery L. Robertson , P .E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste. 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This
materia l is intended on ly for use of the recipient named above . If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended
recipient named above , please notify me and delete this transmission . Thank you .
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying , Inc ., upon
release of these electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification . The user of the attached electronic media
accepts full responsibil ity and liability for any consequences ar ising out of the use of this electronic data .
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
Jeffery L. Robertson, P .E .
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc .
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste . 103
College Station , Tx 77845
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX: (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is intended only
fo r use of the recipient named above . If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above, please notify me and
delete this transmission . Thank you .
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES : is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Eng ineering/Surveying , Inc., upon release of these
electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification . The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibil ity and liability for
any consequences ari sing out of the use of this electronic data .
3
----
... -.
---
\) \)
I•-~,' ~l i
.
'J .. -·
·-, ,;
'
. ., -·
I
1 '
•"";
/
~ ... '
_,
-·t
" {; '· 'I
~.!J.! L ·-· l ......
'~ ..
'")
-' ' _;.-...
""' /'"\
..... --.,.
"'
. ; .. :
\,
r· ,i..l
.~.
I
j...,.
-
)
·1 ,. """-; /) ---.
' .. --
\ . ..,
: .. ~ {...., ... _ .. •
.... -)
' -
l/ .. ,.
, ... , ..
.; i/ p··· I
~"' :1
~ ..
i .. --... . ~~;
----
C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M Univers ity"
MEMORANDUM
DATE : May 15, 2014
TO : Traditions Montessori School , via : t raditionsmontessori@gmail.com
FROM : Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal , another $932 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3) reviews . Please address the comments and submit the following information by any
Monday at 10:00 a .m . for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter
One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents
one (1) revised site plans
One (1) landscaping plan
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter
explaining the details . If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me
at 979 .764 .3570 .
Attachments : Staff review comments
PC : McClure & Browne , via : jeffr@mcclu rebrowne .com ;
P&DS Project No . 14-00900021
Planning & Developm ent Services
P .O. ROX 9960 • 1101 TEXA S AVE NUE · COLL EGE STA I'!ON ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL. 979.764 .35 7 0 ·FAX. 979.764 . .34%
csbt.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) -14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Per Sanitation , a 300 -gallon container will be requ ired for this site . Please provide a 1 O'x1 O' pad
and enclosure detail.
2. The open side of the dumpster enclosure must not face the public ROW . Please relocate the
dumpster so the open side faces the school.
3. The actual modular building must be shown on the site plan . Show the size and placement of each
build ing , as well as the accessibility to each building .
4. Show 20 ' PUEs that will be dedicated on the development plat.
5. Existing trees within detention pond cannot count towards landscape points. This area is proposed
to be graded . Provide alternative to satisfy landscape point requirement.
6 . Please show barricade detail for trees that exist and will be protected. Provide a note that
barricades will be placed prior to any activity on the property including , but not lim ited to , grading .
7. There are 37 Indian Hawthorns shown . Please revise landscape point tabulation .
8 . Prev ious comments from Electrical were not addressed .
9 . Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled " on your plans . Any
add it ional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will const itute a
completely new review .
Reviewed by : Jenifer Paz Date : May 13, 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Sidewalk on western side of Crestmont Drive needs to include dual ambulatory ramps for
crossing Cresmont and Baron Roads , a crosswalk across Barron Road , and connecting
ramp on south side of Barron at Fieldstone . Sanitary sewer extension should take the into
consideration in case cone heights need to be shortened.
2 . Median in Baron should include pedestrian crossing/refuge with crosswalk .
3. Unless you have more of a recommendation from a geotech report , the crushed stone
opt ions should be removed from the "Typical 27' Pavement Section " and the Section A-A
Detail provided on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet. What is difference between this
and our standard detail that is also included?
4 . Street name and regulatory signage needs to be included with construction of Crestmont.
Proved location , Standard Detail and block numbers for signs . Contact Robin Krause for
rkrause@cstx .gov block ranges .
5. End of Road signs need to be included .
6. Water service should be taken from the 6" fire hydrant lead to eliminate need for cutting
pavement on Barron Road .
7. Add inlet protection to inlets on west side of Crestmont. These inlets are not currently
dep icted on Erosion Control Plan.
8 . Rev ised Drainage Report was not included with the re-submittal package as indicated in
response to comments .
9 . Provide flow lines on detention pond discharge pipe.
10 . Existing inlets are not depicted on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet.
Following comments were previously provided via email regarding sewer line construction . They
have been addressed but are begin provided for formal recording .
11. Confirm that the slope proposed with this first piece of the sewer extension still allows for
future extension to serve future Barron Crest lots while meeting design slope and depth
minimums .
12 . Provide a cost estimate for sewer line , will also need for street and sidewalks/ramps.
13 . Provide Letter Acknowledging City Standards.
14 . Add the following , or I can note when stamping;
Reference to encasement detail or reference to casing spacers.
A call to indicate that the 12x15 PUE covering upstream manhole is proposed .
Reviewed by : Carol Cotter Date: May 14, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. The following easements are existing :
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire , anchor and transformer pole and all
overheard primary lines , poles , guy wires and anchors on this property .
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron Rd.
being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous . Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet the
requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round).
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site .
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 )2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by : Steve Smith Date : 03/14/2014
C ITY O F C O U_EG E S TATION[ ~------_ ............................. ... Home of Texas A&M Uni vrnity " ""'
MEMORANDUM
March 12 , 2014
TO : Traditions Montessori School , via : traditionsmontessori@gmail.com
FROM: Jenifer Paz , Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review :
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One (1) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached;
One (1) 24 "x36 " revised site plans ;
One (1) 24 "x36 " landscaping plan ;
One (1) 24 "x36 " grading and erosion control plan ;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explain ing the details. If you have any questions or need additional information , please contact
Jenifer Paz at 979 .764 .3570 .
Attachments : Staff Review Comments
PC : McClure & Browne , via : jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning dr D evelopm ent S ervices
P.O. BOX 9'!60 • l lO l TEXAS AVENUE ·COLLEGE STATION ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL 979.7 64.35 7 0 •FAX. 97 9.7 64.34%
cstH.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) 14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Provide a note with building setbacks for R Rural.
2. From our conversation on 3/5, you indicated that the existing 500sf buildings would
be used for storage . Please provide clarification on the site plan.
3. Parking for a school is 1 parking space per 1 OOsf. Please revise and provide
clarification on Note 4. Based on the total building area (2 ,580sf), this site is required
26 parking spaces .
4. If modular buildings will be placed on site for this phase , please show where each
will be located. All structures are required to be shown on the site plan .
5. Clarify what portion of the fence will remain and where it is being proposed and
indicate the type of material is being proposed? Chain-linked fence is not a permitted
material.
6. Please show where the hydrant is being relocated .
7. A temporary curb is required at the end of the street section .
8. There are concerns regarding vehicle queuing from Barron Road to the site , if there
is a drop-off/pick-up system for the school. How will vehicles turn around if there is
no parking available?
9 . Sidewalks are required on both sides of local streets (Barron Crest Drive). Please
show sidewalks on site plan .
10 . How will the construction of Barron Crest Drive occur on off-site property (Cathey
tract)?
11 . If the street is built in conjunction with the school , the raised median on Barron Road
will need to be modified to provide the left-turn lane.
12 . Remove Note 15. A fire lane will need to be provided on site . Fire will not serve from
an Arterial Street (Barron Road).
13 . The drive aisle to Barron Crest will need to be modified to reduce the radius for a fire
truck to access the site. Please keep in mind that driveway should be as far as
possible from Barron Road.
14. Please contact Wally Urrtuia with Sanitation, 764-3841, regarding how this site will
be serviced . Note 16 may need to be revised .
15 . Clarify where the sanitation container pad is located on the site.
16. Show all easements from Development Plat.
17 . Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed.
18. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by
the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by : Jenifer Paz Date: March 3 , 2014
LANDSCAPING Please revise site layout on Landscape Plan .
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date : March 3, 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. What is purpose of skewed alignment of Barron Crest? From construction plans
submitted, it appears that the intersection will still align with Fieldstone with this
removed . Please remove.
2 . Barron Crest construction needs to include left turn modifications to median in
Barron Road .
3. Provide plan and profile for portion of Barron Crest to be constructed with this
project.
4. Sidewalks are required on both sides of Barron Crest.
5. Add silt fence, inlet protection and construction exit to Erosion Control Plan .
6. Show where and how hydrant will be located. With modification to alignment of
Barron Crest intersection, hydrant may be able to be angled over with services off
the hydrant lead. This would eliminate removal and repair of pavement in Baron
Road.
7. Entire panel of concrete would need to be replaced to repair Barron Road.
8. Show limits of bore pit. Will street pavement have to be removed? Notes and
general details will have to be included to define any repairs.
9. Include Traffic Control Plan for street construction and for water and sanitary
construction that will impact traffic flow on Baron.
10 . Confirm that the sewer pipe is 110 feet but stationing is 100 feet.
11 . Show utility line conflicts in sanitary sewer profile .
12 . Please revisit drainage map delineation . Confirm that the northern quarter of basin
should be included.
13. ls the future phase (modular building) included in runoff calculations/detention pond
sizing?
14. Exhibit C-1 in drainage report does not appear to account for the parking lot
pavement.
15 . What is overflow path if grate inlet gets blocked/plugged?
16 . Provide a detail for connection of 18-inch detention pond outfall pipe to storm
junction box or call out Standard Manhole Tie-in detail S3-01.
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: March 12, 2014
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron
Rd . being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous . Barron Crest Dr . can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet
the requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round).
2. A Knox Box will be required for this site.
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101)2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by : Steve Smith Date: March 3, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital , AutoCAD dwg fo rmat ,
version of plat and I or s ite plan as soon as it is available . Email to :
wdavis@cstx .gov
2 . LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available .
This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of
transforme rs , and other equipment , requ ired to provide service to the project. Failure
to provide load data will result in construction delays and , due to clearance
requirements , could affect the final building footprint. Delivery time for transformers
and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks .
3. EASEMENTS : Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes and upon completion of project must provide descriptive easements for
electric infrastructure as designed by CSU.
4 . EASEMENTS : Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure
as designed by CSU, as shown on plat or site plan .
5. If easements are existing , the developer will be responsible for locating easements
on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries .
6. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole
and all overheard primary lines, poles, guy wires and anchors on this
property.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and des ign.
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation .
3. Developer provides 30' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs
rise r.
4 . Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or othe r exist ing
devices and extend as required.
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices ,
developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings , i.e . transformers , pull boxes , or
othe r device , per CSU specs and design .
7 . Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design ,
Pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU .
8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical fac ilities necessary to provide
electrical service, i.e . transformers , pull boxes , or switchgears , all meter locations ,
and conduit routing as designed by CSU .
9. To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979 .764 .6255 , Sam Weide at 979.764 .6314 , Eric Horton at 979 .764 .6280 , or
We ldon Dav is at 979 .764.5027 .
Reviewed by: G ilbert Martinez I Sam Weide I Eric Horton I Weldon Davis
Alan Gibbs
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Danielle,
Jeff Robertson Lieffr@mcclurebrowne .com]
Friday , June 06 , 2014 2:38 PM~
Carol Cotter
·Alan Gibbs ; Jenifer Paz ; Dian Bethke
Re: Traditions Montessori Sch De opment Plat
10000263-Dn3. PDF
Here is the updated ramp configuration for Barron/Crestmont per our conversation. Will this work?
Thanks
Jeff
On 6/6/2014 10:59 AM, Carol Cotter wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Since I am out next week, I wanted to give your project a quick review. These are some of my
comments, but Planning still needs to reveiw;
I
Is there not a better design for the sidewalk ramps? The north ramp lets out in the curb return. Danielle
Singh is willing to discuss options with you.
Provide street names and block numbers for signs
Verify Weldon is okay with the 10' PUE w idth, he had asked for 20' -wil l need easement dedication
documents
Remove crush rock from Deta i l A-A, unless geotech design
Jenifer Paz also mentioned issues with fire lane turn around that need to be worked out.
It seems like the water service line cou ld be shifted to a better location, not under all that pavement and
meter out of sidewalk.
Site Pl an set needs to include all sheets, even those already appro ve d in the sewe r construction set.
Carol
From: Jeff Robertson [mailto :jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 4:56 PM
To: Jenifer Paz
Cc: Carol Cotter; Deborah Grace-Rosier
Subject: Re : Traditions Montessori School Development Plat
OK , we'll get it to yo u in the morning.
Thanks
Jeff
On 6/5/2014 4:54 PM , Jenifer Paz wrote :
Jeff,
I just wanted to touch base on the Development Plat. The mylar need s to be
submitted so that it can be filed. We file plats on Friday, so if it 's possible for yo u
to have a mylar ready by tomorrow early afternoon we can file it.
1
I will be out tomorrow through next Wednesday , but Carol will ensure that it is
filed if we have it in the office early tomorrow.
Let me know.
Jenifer Paz
Staff Planner
Planning & Development Services
CITY o F C ou.EGE. S rATION
H"°"" ofT=r Ad-M 01fi~i;ry •
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
Jeffery L. Robertson , P.E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying, Inc .
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste . 103
College Station, Tx 77845
PH : (979) 693-3838
FX : (979) 693-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This
material is intended only for use of the recipient named above . If the reader or other recip ient of this material is not the intended
recip ient named above , please notify me and delete this transmission . Thank you .
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying , Inc ., upon
release of these electronic files is no longer responsible for their use or modification . The user of the attached electronic media
accepts full responsibil ity and liability for any consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data .
City of College Station
Home of Texas A&M University ®
Jeffery L. Robertson, P. E.
Vice-President Engineering
McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying , Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Ste . 103
College Station , Tx 77845
PH : (979) 693-3838
2
FX : (979) ~93-2554
jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: The information contained in this transmission is considered by the sender to be confidential. This material is intended only f•
use of the recipient named above . If the reader or other recipient of this material is not the intended recipient named above , please notify me and dele·
this transmission . Thank you .
AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC FILES: is understood and agreed that McClure & Browne Engineering/Surveying , Inc., upon release of the~
electronic files is no longer responsible for the ir use or modification . The user of the attached electronic media accepts full responsibility and liability f,
any consequences arising out of the use of this electronic data .
3
HBMl:H McCLURE & BROWNE ENGI N EERI N G/SUR V EYING, INC.
~ 1008 Woodcreek Dr., Sui te 103 ·Co ll ege Station , Tx. 77845 · (979) 693-3838 Engineer Reg . No . F-458
Survey Reg . No . 101033-00
May 13 , 2014
Ms . Carol Cotter, PE
City of College Station
Post Office Box 9960
College Station , TX 77842
Re .: LETTER ACKNOWLEDGING CITY STANDARDS
Traditions Montessorri School
MBESI No . 1000-0263
Dear Ms . Cotter:
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the construction plans for the street , drainage ,
water, sidewalk , and sanitary sewer for the above-referenced project, to the best of my
knowledge , do not deviate from the B/CS Design Guideline Manual except as follows :
I also acknowledge , to the best of my knowledge, that the details provided in the const r uction
plans are in accordance with the Bryan/College Station Standard Details .
rel y~'*--
•'''''' .•;t_ OF re_''' ,,:'-0~~-···············~0' '• , .· ·. .. , * .· ·. * • '*/ \tr ' # ............................. I.
~ J.~rx~.~: ... ~· ... ~~.~~~~?~~ ~
F.-D" • " 1.-;g\ 94745 .:1;;,
t o···< <:::>.··w , tt :;<\~·· •• : C[NS\> ~ ,:'
t\ J's ···········\..~G • \\ 10NAL .• ,,,,,,, .. •
J
[HB McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING/SlJRVEYING , IN C.
1008 Woodcreek" Dr., Suite 103 ·College Station , Tx. ·17345 · (919) 693-3838 Engineer Reg . No. F-458
1314 10th Street , Suite 210 ·Huntsville. Tx. 77320 · (936) 294-9749 Survey R eg . No . 101033--00
February 21, 2014
Carol Cotter, PE
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station
Post Office Box 9960
College Station, TX 77842
Re.: Traditions Montessori School
MBESI#: 1000-0263
Dear Mrs. Cotter:
We have prepared a hydraulic model of the existing and proposed water system in the vicinity of the
Traditions Montessori School site to determine the ability of the existing system to provide fire
protection for the proposed development.
The hydraulic model for this development was combined with an existing model for the Sonoma
development located across Barron Road . There is an existing fire hydrant located at the southwest
corner of the subject property that was used for static and fire flow analysis. The static model was run
using 1.5 gpm per connection for the Sonoma property. The static pressure for the hydrant during this
test was 87.6 psi.
In order to determine the required fire flow for the proposed development, Table 8105. 1 from the
International Fire Code. The proposed building size is 1,080 sf (existing building) and 1,500 sf (future
modular building)_ According to the chart, the site will require 1,500 gpm during fire flow conditions.
The model was ran again with fire demands placed at the existing hydrant. During fire flow conditions,
the pressure dropped to 84.9 psi. Therefore, we conclude that thl existing system is more than
adequate to provide fire flow for the proposed development.
Sincerely,
Traditions Montessori School
Water Report Letter
Page 1 of 1
Static Model Results
KYPIPE5
Pipe Network Modeling Software
Copyrighted by KYPIPE LL C
Version 5 -rebruary 2010
********"********j
Da te & Time: Mo n F'eb 2 4 10:42:23 201 4
Master File : f:\1 0 00 -miscel l aneous\0263 -traditions monte ssori sch o ol\docs\1000063-stat .KYP \1000 063-stat .P2K
S U M M A R Y o r O RIGINA L D A T A
U N I T S SPECIFIED
F'LOWRATE ........ ... . gallons/minute
HEAD (HGL) .......... -feet
PRESS URE ............ • p sig
PIPELI NE D A T A
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOS ED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
NODE NAMES DI AMETER ROUGHN ESS MIN OR P I P E
N A M E ffl #2
LENGTH
(ft ) (in) COEFF . LOSS COEFF.
P -1 VP -2 VP-1 695. 41 18.00 130. 0000 1. 04
P-2 J-3 J-2 316 .70 8.00 140. 0000 0 .57
P-3 J-3 J -4 341. 31 8. 00 140. 0000 0.17
P-4 J -4 J-6 310 .21 8.00 140 . 0000 0 .17
P-5 J-5 J -17 320 .89 6.00 140.0000 0.17
P-6 J-5 J -8 426.00 6 .00 140.0000 1. 44
P-7 J -6 J-13 305.52 8.00 140. 000 0 0 .17
P-8 J -7 J-9 170.45 8 .00 140.0000 0.00
P-9 J-7 J-8 518.43 6.00 140.0000 14 .30
P-10 J -8 J-6 274.88 6.00 110.0000 0 .57
P-11 J-9 J-5 1 97 .72 8 .00 140. 000 0 0.00
P-12 J -9 J -10 175 . 92 8 .00 140. 000 0 0.00
P-13 J-1 1 J-7 38 4. 71 8.00 140 .0000 0.17
P-14 J -11 J-12 32 4.67 3.00 140 . 0000 0 .17
P-15 J -13 J-11 544.82 8.00 140.0000 1. 44
P-16 J -1 3 J-15 21 9.27 8 .00 140. 0000 1. 4 4
P-1 7 J -15 J -14 43.33 8.00 140.0000 0.00
P-18 J -1 5 J -16 45 0 .00 3 .00 140. 000 0 0 .17
P-19 VP-1 J-1 54.25 18.00 130 .0000 0.17
P-20 J-1 J-3 229. 45 8 .00 140. 0000 0 .57
P-2 1 J-17 J -4 661. 82 6 .00 140. 0000 1. 84
P U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T DA TA
THERE IS A DEVI CE AT NO DE VP-1 DESCR IBED BY TH E FOLLOWING DATA : (ID= 1)
HEAD FLOW RATE EFFICIENCY
(ft) (gpm) (%)
175.38 0.0 0 75.00
17 3 .08 14 05. 00 75.00
1 67 . 05 281 0.00 75 .00
TH ERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE VP-2 DESCRIBED BY TH E F'OLLOWIN G DATA: (ID= 2)
HEAD FLOW RATE EF'FICIEN CY
(ft ) (gpm) (%)
189.23 0.00 75.00
1 8 4 .62 1350 . 00 75.00
172. 57
N 0 D E D A T A
NODE
NAME
J-1
J-2
J-3
J-4
J -5
J-6
J-7
J-8
J-9
J -10
J -11
J-12
J-13
J -14
J-15
J-16
J-17
VP -1
VP-2
NODE
TITLE
2700 .00
EXTERNAL
DEMAND
(gpm)
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N DAT A
75.00
JUNCTION
ELEVATION
(ft)
327 .00
328.00
309.00
3 1 9.00
326.00
315.00
316 .00
321 .00
320.00
319.00
307.00
303 .00
3 1 2.00
309 .00
309.00
305.00
333 .00
327 .00
340.00
EXTERNAL
GRADE
(ft)
327.00
340.00
OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RES ULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSURES 5
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VELO CITIES 5
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM HEAD LOSS/1000 5
s y s 'f E M c 0 N F I G u R A T I 0 N
NUMBER OF PIPES .......•.•••••.•... {p) -2 1
NUMBER OF END NODES .......•....... { j ) 17
NUMBER Of PRIMARY LOOPS ...•....... (1) 3
NUMBER Of SUPPLY NODES ....•....... ( f) 2
NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZO NES ...•••..•... (z)
case: 0
RESULTS OBTAINED AFTER 20 TRIALS: ACCURACY -1.17284
""**WARNING*"",,,_
THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TRIALS WERE EXECUTED
ACCURACY WAS NOT ATTAI NED -SEE USERS MANUAL:: TIME/CASE ~
S I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N (L A B E L)
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS CODE:
p p E
N A M E
P-1
P-2
P-3
XX -CLOSED PIPE
NODE NUMBERS
u #2
VP-2
J-3
J -3
VP -1
J -2
J-4
CV -CHECK VALVE
FLOWRATE
(gpm)
0.00
0.00
0.00
HEAD MINO R
LOSS LOSS
(ft) I ft)
0.00 0 .00
0 .00 0 .00
0.00 0.00
1.000
LINE HL+ML/
VELO . 1000
{ft/s) (ft/ft)
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HL/
1000
(ft/ft )
0.00
0.00
0 .00
P-4 J-4 J-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-5 J-5 J-17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-6 J-5 J-8 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00
P-7 J-6 J-13 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-8 J-7 J-9 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-9 J-7 J -8 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-10 J-8 J -6 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00
P-11 J-9 J-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-12 J-9 J -10 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00
P-13 J-11 J-7 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-14 J -11 J-12 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00
P-15 J-13 J-11 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00
P-16 J-13 J-15 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-17 J-15 J-14 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-18 J-15 J-16 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-19 VP-1 J -1 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-20 J-1 J -3 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-21 J-17 J-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P U M P/L 0 S s E L E M E N T R E s u L T s
INLET OUTLET PUMP EFFIC-USEFUL INCRE MTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH
NAME FLOWRATE HEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avail.
(gpm) (ft) (ft) I ftl (%) (Hp) ($) ($) (ft)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Device "VP-1 " is closed
VP-1 0 .00 0 .00 202 .23 0.0 75 .00 0. 0.0 0.0 33.2
VP-2 0.00 0.00 189.23 189. 2 75.00 o. 0 .0 0.0 33.2
N 0 D E R E s u L T s
NODE NODE EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NO DE
NAME TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
(gpm) (ft) (ft ) (ft) (psi)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J-1 0 .00 529 .23 327 .00 202 .23 87.63
J-2 0 .00 529 .23 328 .00 201.23 87.20
J-3 0 .00 529.23 309 .00 220 .23 95. 43
J-4 0.00 529 .23 3 1 9 .00 2 1 0.23 91.10
J-5 0.00 529 .23 326.00 203.23 88 .07
J-6 0.00 529 .23 315 .00 2 14.23 92.83
J-7 0.00 529 .23 316 .00 213. 23 92. 40
J-8 0.00 529 .23 321 .0 0 208.23 90.23
J-9 0.00 529 . 23 320 .00 209.23 90.67
J -10 0.00 529 .23 319 .00 2 10.23 91.10
J-11 0.00 529.23 307.00 222.23 96.30
J-12 0.00 529.23 303.00 226.23 98.03
J-13 0 .00 529.23 312.00 217. 23 94 .13
J -14 0.00 529.23 309.00 220.23 95. 43
J-15 0.00 529.23 309 .00 220.23 95. 43
J-16 0.00 5 2 9.23 305.00 224 .23 97.17
J-17 0.00 529 .23 333 .00 1 96.23 85.03
VP-1 529.23 327.00 202.23 87 . 63
VP-2 529.23 34 0.00 189.23 82 .00
M A X I M U M A N D M I N J M U M V A L U E s
p R E S S U R E s
J UNCTION MAXlMUM JUN CTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESSURES NUMBER PRESSUR ES
(psi l (psi l
------------------------------------------
J-12 98.03 VP-2 82 .00
J -1 6 97 .1 7 J-17 85 .03
J-11 96.30 J-2 87 . 20
J-3 95 . 4 3 J-1 87 .63
J-1 1 95 .1 3 VP-1 87 .63
V E L 0 C I T I E s
P IPE MAX IMUM PI PE MIN IMUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/s) (ft/s)
------------------------------------------
P-10 0.00 P-6 0.00
P-7 0.00 P-4 0.00
P-13 0.00 P-8 0.00
P-15 0.00 P-11 0.00
P-5 0.00 P-9 0.00
H L + M L 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER HL+ML/1000 NUMBER HL+ML/1000
I ft/ft) I ft/ftl
------------------------------------------
P-10 0.00 P-6 0.00
P-15 0.00 P-4 0.00
P-7 0.00 P-8 0.00
P-13 0.00 P-11 0.00
P-9 0.00 P-5 0 .00
H L 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMB ER HL/1000 NUMBER HL /1000
(ft/ft) I ft/ft l
------------------------------------------
P-10 0.00 P-6 0 .00
P-15 0.00 P-4 0.00
P-13 0.00 P-8 0.00
P-7 0.00 P-11 0.00
P-5 0 .00 P-9 0.00
SUM MAR Y 0 F INFL OWS A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS I NTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO SUPPLY NODES
NODE
NAME
VP-2
NET SYS TEM INFLOW
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW
NET SYSTEM DEMAND
FLOW RATE
(gpm)
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
NODE
TITLE
***** HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS COMPLETED ****:l
Fire Flow Results
KYPIPE5
Pipe Ne lwork Modeling Software
Copyrighted by KYPIPE LLC
Version 5 -February 2010
Date & Time: Mon Feb 24 10:56:47 2014
Master File : f :\1000 - miscellaneous\0263 -tradi tions montessori school\docs\1000063-fire.KYP\1000063-fire.P2K
**********************************~*************
SUMMARY 0 F 0 R I G I N A L DAT A
U N I T S S P E C I f I E D
FLOWRATE . . . . . . . . . . . . = gallons/minute
HEAD (HGL) .......... -feet
PRESSURE ............ -psig
PIPELINE D A T A
STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PI PE CV -CH ECK VALVE
NODE NAMES LENGTH DIAME:TER ROUGHNESS MINOR P l P E
N A M E #1 #2 (ft I (in I COE:FF. LOSS COE ff.
P-1 VP-2 VP-1 695. 41 18.00 130.0000 1. 04
P-2 J-3 J -2 316.70 8 .00 140 .0000 0.57
P-3 J -3 J -4 341. 31 8 .00 140 . 0000 0.17
P-4 J -4 J -6 310.21 8 .00 140. 0000 0 .17
P-5 J-5 J -17 320.89 6 .00 140.0000 0 .17
P-6 J-5 J-8 426. 00 6.00 140. 0000 1. 44
P-7 J -6 J-13 305.52 8.00 140 .0000 0.17
P-8 J-7 J -9 170.45 8 .00 140.0000 0 .00
P-9 J -7 J -8 518.43 6 .00 140 .0000 14 .30
P-10 J-8 J-6 274 .88 6.00 140.0000 0 .57
P -11 J-9 J -5 197. 72 8 .00 140. 0000 0.00
P-1 2 J-9 J-10 175. 92 8.00 140 . 0000 0 .00
P-13 J-11 J -7 384. 71 8.00 140. 0000 0 .17
P-14 J-11 J-12 324.67 3 .0D 140.0000 0 .17
P-15 J-13 J-11 544.82 8 .00 140. 0000 1.44
P-16 J-13 J-15 219.27 8.00 140.0000 1 .44
P-17 J -1 5 J-14 43 .33 8 .00 140.0000 0.00
P-18 J -1 5 J-1 6 450 .00 3.00 140.0000 0 .17
P-19 VP-1 J-1 54.25 18 .00 130.0000 0 .17
P-20 J-1 J-3 229. 4 5 8.00 140.0000 0 .57
P-21 J-17 J -4 661.82 6.00 140.0000 1. 8 4
P U M P/L 0 S S E L E M E N T D A T A
THERE IS A DEVICE AT NODE VP-1 DESCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING DATA : (ID = 1)
HEAD FLOWRATE E:FFIC IEN CY
(ft) (gpm) (%)
175. 38 0.00 75.00
173 .08 1 4 05 .00 75.00
167.05 28 10 .00 75.00
THE:RE: IS A DEVICE: AT NODE VP-2 DESCRIBED BY THE FOLLOWING DATA : (ID = 2 )
HEAD FLOWRATE EfflCIENCY
(ft ) (gpm) (%)
189.23 0 .00 75.00
184.62 1350 .00 75.00
17 2 . 57
N 0 D E D A T A
NODE
NAME
J-1
J -2
J-3
J-4
J-5
J-6
J -7
J-8
J-9
J -10
J -11
J -1 2
J -13
J -11
J -15
J -16
J-17
VP -1
VP-2
NODE
TITLE
2700.00
EXTERNAL
DEMAND
(gpm)
150 0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0 .00
0 .00
0 .00
0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A
75 .00
JUNCTION
ELEVATION
(ft)
327 .00
328.00
309.00
3 19.00
326.00
315.00
3 1 6.00
321. 00
320.00
3 1 9 .00
307 .00
303.00
312.00
309.00
309 .00
305.00
333.00
327.00
340.00
EXTERNAL
GRADE
(ft)
327.00
340 .00
OUTP UT SE LECTION: AL L RES ULT S ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM PRESSU RES 5
MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM VELOCITIES 5
MAXIMUM AND MINIM UM HEAD LOS S /l 000 5
S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N
NUMBER OF PIPES ................... (p) 2 1
NUMBER OF END NODES ............... ( j) 17
NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ........... (1) 3
NUMBER OF SUPPLY NOD ES ............ (f ) -2
NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZO NE S ............ (z ) -1
Ca se : 0
RESULTS OBTAIN ED AFTER 19 TR I ALS : ACCURACY 0 .00000
SIMULATI O N DESCRIPTIO N (L A B E L)
p I P E L I N E R E s u L T s
STATUS CODE: xx -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE
p I p E NODE NUMBERS FLOWRATE HEAD MINOR LINE
N A M E Hl H2 LOSS LOSS VELO.
(gpm) (ft ) (ft) ( ft/s )
HL•ML/ HL/
1000 1 0 00
(ft/ft) (ft/ft )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P-1 VP-2 VP-1 1500.00 0 .52 0.06 1 .89 0 .83 0.75
P-2 J-3 J -2 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00
P-3 J-3 J -4 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-4 J -4 J -6 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-5 J -5 J -17 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P-6 J -5 J-8 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .0 0 0 .00 0.00
P-7 J -6 J -1 3 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00
P-8 J -7 J-9 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P-9 J-7 J-8 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-10 J-8 J-6 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-11 J-9 J-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-12 J-9 J-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00
P-13 J-11 J -7 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0.00
P-14 J -11 J-12 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-15 J -1 3 J-11 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00
P-16 J-13 J-15 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P-17 J -15 J -14 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00
P-18 J-15 J-16 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P-19 VP-1 J-1 1500.00 0.04 0.01 1.89 0.92 0. 75
P-20 J-1 J-3 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00
P-21 J-17 J-4 0 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00
P U M P/L 0 S s E L E M E N T R E s u L T s
INLET OUT LET PUMP Ef"FIC-USEFUL INCREMTL TOTAL #PUMPS #PUMPS NPSH
NAME tLOWRATE llEAD HEAD HEAD ENCY POWER COST COST PARALLEL SERIES Avai I.
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft ) (%) (H p) ($) ($) (fl)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Device "V P-1" is closed
VP-1 0.00 0.00 196.04 0.0 75.00 0. 0 .0 0.0 33.2
VP -2 1500 .00 0.00 183.62 1 83 .6 75 .00 0. 0.0 0 .0 33.2
N 0 D E R E s u L T s
NODE NOD E EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC NODE PRESSURE NODE
NAME TTTLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J-1 1500.00 522.99 327 .00 1 95.99 84.93
J-2 0.00 522.99 328.00 194.99 84 .50
J-3 0.00 522.99 309 .00 213.99 92 .73
J-4 0 .00 522 .99 319.00 203.99 88 .40
J -5 0 .00 522 .99 326.00 196.99 85.36
J-6 0 .00 522 .99 315.00 207 .99 90 .13
J -7 0.00 522.99 316.00 206 .99 89 . 70
J -8 0.00 522.99 321 . 00 201. 99 87.53
J-9 0.00 522 .99 320.00 202.99 87 .96
J-10 0.00 522.99 319. 00 203 .99 88. 40
J-11 0.00 522.99 307.00 215 .99 9 3 .60
J-12 0 .00 522.99 303.00 219.99 95.33
J -1 3 0.00 522 .99 312.00 210 .99 91. 43
J-14 0.00 522.99 309 .00 213 .99 92. 7 3
J-15 0 .00 522 .99 309.00 213. 99 92 .73
J -16 0 .00 522.99 305.00 217. 99 9 4. 4 6
J-17 0 .00 522.99 333.00 1 89.99 82 .33
VP -I 523.04 327.00 196. 0 4 84.95
VP-2 523.62 340.00 183.62 79. 57
M A X I M U M AN D M I N 1 M UM V A L U E S
p R E S S U R E S
JUNCTTON MAXIMUM JUNCTION MINIMUM
NUMBER PRESS URES NUMBER PRESSURES
(ps i ) !psi)
------------------------------------------
J -1 2 95 .33 VP-2 79 .57
J -16 94 . 4 6 J -17 82 .33
J-11 93.60 J-2 84 .50
J -3 92 .73 J -1 84.93
J-14 92 .73 VP -1 04.95
V E L 0 C I T I E s
PI PE MAXIMUM PIPE MINI MUM
NUMBER VELOCITY NUMBER VELOCITY
(ft/S ) (ft/s)
------------------------------------------
P-1 1.89 P -6 0 .00
P-19 1.09 P-4 0 .00
P-1 0 0.00 P-8 0 .00
P-7 0.00 P-11 0 .00
P-13 0.00 P-9 0.00
H L + M L I 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PI PE MINI MUM
NUMBER HL+ML/1000 NUM BER HL+ML/1000
(ft /ft ) (ft/ft)
------------------------------------------
P-19 0.92 P-6 0 .00
P-1 0.83 P-4 0.00
P-10 0.00 P-8 0.00
P-15 0.00 P-11 0 .00
P-7 0 .00 P-5 0.00
H L 1 0 0 0
PIPE MAXIMUM PIPE MINIMUM
NUMBER HL /1000 NUMBER HL/1 000
(f t /ft ) (ft/ft)
------------------------------------------
P-1 0.75 P-6 0.00
P-19 0. 75 P-4 0 .00
P-10 0 .00 P-8 0 .00
P-7 0.00 P-11 0 .00
P-13 0.00 P-9 0.00
S U M M A R Y o r INfL O WS A N D 0 U T f L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM SUPPLY NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS f'ROM THE SYSTEM INT O S UPPLY NODES
NODE
NAME
FLOW RATE
(gpm)
VP-2 1500.00
NET SYSTEM I NFLOW 1500.00
NET SYSTE:M OUTFLOW 0. 00
NET SYSTE M DEMAND 1500 .00
NO DE
TITLE
••••• HYDRAU LI C ANALYSIS COMPLETE D , ....
CITY or-Coll.EGE STATio~
Home ofTtxat A&M Univemty• SITE P N APPLICATION
ENERAL
MINIMUM S BMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~932 Site Plan Application Fee .
M D $350 Non-Residential Architectural Stand rds I Northgate Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). W $600 (minimum} Development Permit Ap lication I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600 , the balance is
~e prior to the issuance of any plans or evelopment permit}.
W" Application completed in full . This appl' ation form provided by the City of College Station must be used
,..find may not be adjusted or altered .
~~Fourteen (14) folded copies of site plan .
\!~One (1} folded copy of the landscape pla .
t'\4l O One (1) copy of the following for Non-Re idential Architectural Standards building review or Northgate
Building Review (if applicable).
D Building elevations to scale for all uildings.
O A list of building materials for all fa ade and screening.
O Color samples for all buildings or Ii t colors to be used from the approved color palette .
D Electronic copy of Site Plan e-mail to csuelectdesign@cstx.gov.
,..~
~ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, nd erosion control plans wtth supporting drainage report .
~Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructu plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
A°'-D Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations o projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA Is not necessary for the
proposed request (if applicable).
rA.[J The attached Site Plan Non-Residential chitectural Standards Building Review and Northgate Bu ilding
Review checklists (as applicable) with al items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
check off.
NAME OF PROJECT
ADDRESS 2. ~If -12,c~.r,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) i-::.~;.___:,-=---=--=-=c..;._..:...:_-L::l"'-=L-L---'-_..:....-=~--'~=":..:..r~v..:....~,J........~_::::_j~
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMA ION (Primary contact for the project):
Name ( A~ (\)Jl\~r-E-mail-------------
Street Address
City -------------+----State ________ Zip Code ______ _
Phone Number ----------+------Fax Number -------------
City ---"""'-'=~--1..=...:.L.=:..!.------f---State --1?< Zip Code 71 ~ tf~
Phone Number ---"'--~-----+------Fax Number ------------~
1/11 Page 1 of 11
' • •
-
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name M eCI lJll 1 lSl'O\J~ e E-mail Jtltr e..ttlll.Jwe b101cM e .eo,.,
Street Address 'f /M 4 U-J. "t ,, k.
City C.l. State 'fX ,
Zip Code 77'6'1_~
Phone Number 174' • '"'\ '3 -~t ~'S Fax Number
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contac ):
Name E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
;
I!/
Current zoning g," ""'-I --.~~---------+--------~~__.,,~~----------~
: Present use of property --'ol!~'"-'-------r-------------'--------------
Proposed use of property ~-~1 tt
Number of parking spaces required ,.,. Number of pa ~es proposed I if f -~~---~
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zore AE on FEMA FIRM paneli) oh the property? I Yes . ~ • !'
!)?No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
he lp determine if the application qualifies for vesti 19 to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made ,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Cha~ter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law .
Is this application a continuation of a project that l1as received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ord inancE as applicable?
I Yes
~No
If yes , provide information regarding the first app1 oved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
City Project Number (in known):
Date I Timeframe when submitted:
1/11 Page 2of 11
MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
Housing Units
___ # of 1 Bedroom Units
# of 2 Bedroom Units ---
# of 3 Bedroom Units ---
___ # of 4 Bedroom Units
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
# Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft . ---
# Bedrooms < 132 sq . ft. ---
PARKLAND DEDICA 110N
(Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit)
#of Multi-Family OY/elling Units
x $1636 = $ --------
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
# of acres in greenways
Date dedication approved by Parks &
___ Recreation Advisory Board
COMMERCIAL
Total Acrea~e
Building Square Feet ----
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
* Projects that were vested prior to Janu ry 1, 2008, per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code may be assessed a different am unt. Please contact city staff for additional information .
The applicant has prepared this application and ertifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true
andco"ect.
1/11 Page 3of11
-----------------
CERTIFICATIONS RE UIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued .
2 . The permit may be revoked if any false state ents are made herein.
3. If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re -issued .
4. Development shall not be used or occupied u til a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is rogressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local , tate, and federal requirements 1 Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Fed ral Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP.
7. If required , Elevation Certificates will be provi ed with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction. , .
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City represe tatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required , includin detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the cons ction sequence of the project.
10 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, er sion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or
existing drainage facilities . All development all be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the a ve named project. All of tt1' applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply. · ·
11 . The information and conclusions contained i the attached plans and suppot\ing documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College ation, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, nd Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and or inances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations .
12. Release of plans to (name or finn) is authorized for bidding purposes
only . I understand that final approval and rel ase of plans and developmentfor construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Developm nt Permit
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HE~EIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATI N , ARE , TO THE BEST 0 MiY' KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
ACCURATE. i ~
Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1/11
1. The project has been designed to ensure hat stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds , proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in th construction sequence. , .
2 . I will obtain or can show compliance with II necessary Local , State al)d frederal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will n t preclude compliance with Tf>[;)ES : i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin .
3. The information and conclusions contain d in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of Colleg Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has een designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State a d Federal Regulations .
4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CE TIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AP LIGATION , ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
ACCURATE.
PC:lyti 4 uf 11
The following CERTIFICATIONS ap ly to development lri Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Const uctlon Plans, Fiii /Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the
alterations or development covered by this ermit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flodd Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to at part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the B se Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either are s within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BF to natural ground is 18 inches· or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area w ere the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptab compensation as set forth in.the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning e croachment into the Speci~I F.lood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinan in Section 5.11 .3a of C
Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to t is requirement is asserted
letter in lieu of certification .
. t .
"
·c1e written justification under separate
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Con
B. I, , certify to the following:·
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family s ucture on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the struc ure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 1 DO-year storm .
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway En roachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elev tion . I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments .
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 5 of1 1
-----
Required for all projects proposing struct11res in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D . I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowE st floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flo :id Elevation . Required Elevation Certificates will be provided w ith
elevations certified during construction (forms iat slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------+-, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-re~ idential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed t' be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities , ductwork ,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, ands ~all resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions .
Required Elevation Certificates will be provid ~d with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval :
1/11 Pag e 6of1 1
SITE PLA MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL Cl ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BU NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
0. Sheet size -24 " x 36" (m inimum).
L& A key map (not necessarily to scale).
~ Title block to include :
l2f Name , address , location , and legal desc ption
~Name, address, and telephone number o applicant
~Name , address, and telephone number o developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
~ Name, address , and telephone number o architect/eng ineer (if differs from applicant)
~ Date of submittal
~Total s ite area
QQ. North arrow.
0 Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
181 Ownership and current zoning of parcel and II abutting parcels .
M-0 The total number of multi-family buildings an units to be constructed on the proposed project site .
NLO The density of dwelling units per acre of the reposed project.
Da The gross square footage of all buildings a structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be
located in a single bu ilding, show the locat on and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protect on .
Locations of the following on or adjacent to t e subject site:
Des ignate between existing and proposed
,\t.L[J The density of dwelling units per acre of the reposed project.
i&I Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand lone to meet ordinance requirements .
~ Buildings (Ex isting and Proposed).
[Sia Setbacks according to UDO, Article 5.
Geography
1)(1 Water courses .
l\tA[J 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable on or adjacent to the proposed project site. Please note if the re is non e
on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map umber.
~Existing topography (2' max or spot elevati ns) and other pertinent drainage Information. (If plan has too mu ch
information , show drainage on separate she .)
~ Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed ors ot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too
much information, show drainage on separat sheet.)
1/11 1-'ag e I of 11
Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks
~ Existing streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.).
(2$ Existing Driveways, both opposite and adjacen to the site according to UDO, Article 7.
~Proposed drives . Minimum drive aisle width ac ording to UDO, Article 7
rgi Indicate proposed driveway throat length acco ing to UDO, Article 7
~ Proposed curb cuts.
~For each proposed curb cut (including driv ways, streets , alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine se , aration distances between existing and proposed curb cuts.
~ Proposed curb and pavement detail.
~A 6" raised curb is required around all ed es of all parts of all paved areas without exception . (To include island ,
planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) No exception will be made for areas
designated as "reserved for future parking .
rg Proposed medians.
@ Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
"...[] Proposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facili ies for non-residential buildings (UDO, Article 7).
[3ij Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces rawn, tabulated, and dimensioned.
[2S Designate number of parking spaces requ red by ordinance and provided by proposal.
~ Handicap parking spaces.
~ Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with quare footage calculated according to UDO, Section 7.2 or 7.9 fornon-
residential buildings .
~ Parking setback from R.O .W. to curb of parki lot as required.
~ D Wheelstops may be required when cars ove ang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handi ap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts .
{\~ Security gates, showing swing path and desig specs with colors.
I\~ Guardrails. Include design and colors .
Al\[] Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential de lopment (UDO, Article 7).
D Please note if none is required.
~ Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes ~ No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted ith this application .
Easements and Utilities
CB Easements -clearly designate as existing or reposed and type (utility, access, etc.)
[}?l Utilities (noting size and designate as existin or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building
transformer locations, above ground and und rground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets .
flc..O Sewer Design Report (if applicable).
MO Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Repo (if applicable).
~ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Su mary.
&;I Meter locations, existing and proposed (mus be located in public R.o ~w. or public utility easement).
~ Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend t
~ Minimum water demands
~ Maximum water demands
~ Average water demands in gallons per
[ZI Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per ay
Da-Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O .W .? D Yes ~No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitte with this application .
1/11 Pa ge 8 of 11
Fire Protection
[Xf Show fire lanes . Fire lanes with a minimum o 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be
established if any portion of the proposed str cture is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a
public street or highway.
[11 Show proposed and existing fire hydrants . Fi e hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a
project, and shall be in a location approved b the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 ,
R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire ydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire
lane.
NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and acce ted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface before a
building permit can be issued.
·KJ Will building be sprinkled? O Yes SZl No
If the decision to sprinkle is made after the sit plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted . If Yes ,
I\~ Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any
further than 300' apart, and they shall be ccessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked ca rs or
a structure .
Landscaping
~ Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of th Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those
trees need to be shown appropriately barrica ed on the landscape plan . Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in
easements .
Include information on the plans such as :
~ required point calculations
~ additional streetscape points required . Str etscape compliance is required on all streets.
~ calculations for # of street trees require and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
landscaping points .)
~ proposed new plantings with points earne
[Kl proposed locations of new plantings
~ screening of parking lots, 50% of all shru s used for screening shall be evergreen.
~ screening of dumpsters , concrete retain ng walls, off street loading areas, utility connection po ints , or other
areas potentially visually offensive.
l&J existing landscaping to remain
18] show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are
up before the first development permit is i sued.
t-.,'[] Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unifi d Development Ordinance.
~ Show irrigation system plan . (or provide note n how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C .
0.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems for buildings and will be sized by ity according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must
include backflow prevention protection .
i2SJ Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? O Yes gf No
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application .
Other
(\C....0 Common open spaces sites
M[J Loading docks
~ Detention ponds
A"-0 Retaining walls
-vt.D Sites fo~ solid waste containe~s with screeni g._ Locations ~f d~mpste:s are a~~essible but not visible .from streets or
residential areas . Gates are discouraged an visual screening rs required. (M1mmum 12 x 12 pad required .)
[il Are there impact fees associated with this de elopment? O Yes [8' No
NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately.
1/1 1 Page 9of11
CITY OF COll.l..i(;E STATION
Home of1aas Ad-M Univmi1y"
NRA BUILDING R VIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL Cl ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BU NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-esidential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
0 Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
0 Title block to include :
D Name , address, location, and legal d scription
D Name, address, and telephone num er of applicant
D Name, address, and telephone num r of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
D Name, address, and telephone num r of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
D Date of submittal
D Scale should be largest standard scale po ible on sheet.
D List of colors from the City of College Stati n color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents .
D Color samples .
D List of materials to be utilized.
D Elevations of each non-residential buildin and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on
the facades according to UDO Section 5.6. or 7.9 .
D Include the following dimensions :
D Total vertical square footage minus penings (for each factade separately)
D Total vertical square footage oftran parency (for each factade separately in Northgate)
D Total vertical square footage of eac building material (for each fa9ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of eac color (for each fa<tade separately)
D Graphic representation and/or descriptio of existing buildings in building plot to show material , colo r , and
architectural harmony.
1/11 Page 10of11
, ..
CrrY oF Cou .EGF. SrATTO~
Home o/T"""'· A&M Univenity •
1/11
NORTHGATE BUILDIN REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY RDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT OT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 5.6. Design Districts, B. Northgate Dlsb"lcts (NG)
t
D She~t ~ihg ;; 24" ~ 3§3..~ tmlnimum ..
D Title block to include:
Name, address, location, and leg I description
Name, address, and telephone n mber of applicant
Name, address, and telephone n mber of developer/owner {if differs from applicant)
Name, address, and telephone n mber of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
Date of submittal
ngineering scale possible on sheet.
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
Scale should be largest standard
List of colors from the City of Coll
equivalents with color samples.
e Station Northgate color palette to be utilized or proposed
D List of materials to be utilized .
D Elevations of each building ands reening structure. Show placement of materials and colors
on the facades and identify publi entrances.
Include the following dimensions:
D Total vertical square footage min s openings (for each fa~ade separately)
O Total vertical square footage of e ch building material (for each fa~de separately)
D Total vertical square footage of e ch color (for each fa~ade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of tr nsparency between zero and eight feet (0-8') above ground
level (for each non-residential fa~ de)
D Graphic representation and/or de cription of existing buildings in building plot to show material ,
color, and architectural harmony.
Page 11 of 11
•""'lllg""'""'""""----------~Cr TY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M Univ ersity •
_.._....~~;:;,_.-
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 15, 2014
TO : Traditions Montessori School , via: traditionsmontessori@gmail.com ~
FROM : Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third
and final review by staff for this round of rev iews . If all items have not been addressed on the
next submittal , another $932 processing fee w ill need to be submitted for the subsequent set of
three (3 ) reviews . Please address the comments and submit the following information by any
Monday at 10:00 a .m . for further staff review:
C ity of College Station Transmittal Letter
One (1) complete set of site civil construction documents
one (1) revised site plans
One (1) landscaping plan
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter
explaining the details . If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me
at 979 .764.3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
PC : McClure & Browne, v ia : jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com ; /
P&DS Project No. 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION · TEXAS · 77842
TEL 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) -14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Per Sanitation , a 300-gallon container will be required for this site . Please provide a 1 O'x1 O' pad
and enclosure detail.
2 . The open side of the dumpster enclosure must not face the public ROW. Please relocate the
dumpster so the open side faces the school.
3. The actual modular building must be shown on the site plan . Show the size and placement of each
building, as well as the accessibility to each building .
4. Show 20' PUEs that will be dedicated on the development plat.
5. Existing trees within detention pond cannot count towards landscape points . This area is proposed
to be graded . Provide alternative to satisfy landscape point requirement.
6. Please show barricade detail for trees that exist and will be protected . Provide a note that
barricades will be placed prior to any activity on the property including, but not limited to , grading.
7. There are 37 Indian Hawthorns shown. Please revise landscape point tabulation .
8. Previous comments from Electrical were not addressed .
9. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the C ity of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled " on your plans. Any
additional changes on these plans that the City has not been made aware of will constitute a
completely new review.
Reviewed by : Jenifer Paz Date : May13,2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Sidewalk on western side of Crestmont Drive needs to include dual ambulatory ramps for
crossing Cresmont and Baron Roads , a crosswalk across Barron Road, and connecting
ramp on south side of Barron at Fieldstone . Sanitary sewer extension should take the into
consideration in case cone heights need to be shortened .
2. Median in Baron should include pedestrian crossing/refuge with crosswalk.
3 . Unless you have more of a recommendation from a geotech report , the crushed stone
options should be removed from the "Typical 27' Pavement Section" and the Section A-A
Detail provided on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet. What is difference between this
and our standard detail that is also included?
4. Street name and regulatory signage needs to be included with construction of Crestmont.
Proved location , Standard Detail and block numbers for signs . Contact Robin Krause for
rkrause@cstx .gov block ranges .
5. End of Road signs need to be included .
6. Water service should be taken from the 6" fire hydrant lead to eliminate need for cutting
pavement on Barron Road .
7. Add inlet protection to inlets on west side of Crestmont. These inlets are not currently
depicted on Erosion Control Plan.
8. Revised Drainage Report was not included with the re-submittal package as indicated in
response to comments .
9. Provide flow lines on detention pond discharge pipe .
10. Existing inlets are not depicted on the Baron Crest and Sewer Line Sheet.
Following comments were previously provided via email regarding sewer line construction. They
have been addressed but are begin provided for formal recording.
11 . Confirm that the slope proposed with this first piece of the sewer extension still allows for
future extension to serve future Barron Crest lots while meeting design slope and depth
minimums .
12 . Provide a cost estimate for sewer line , will also need for street and sidewalks/ramps.
13 . Provide Letter Acknowledging City Standards .
14 . Add the following , or I can note when stamping;
Reference to encasement detail or reference to casing spacers .
A call to indicate that the 12x15 PUE covering upstream manhole is proposed .
Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: May 14, 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. The following easements are existing :
• A 20 ' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire , anchor and transformer pole and all
overheard primary lines , poles , guy wires and anchors on this property .
FIRE
1. A fire Lane in the drive/parking area will be needed for this location due to Barron Rd .
being a Major Collector. Blocking a Major Collector for Fire activities would be
hazardous . Barron Crest Dr. can be the turn-a-round but the road will need to meet the
requirements of IFC 2012 (Fire Access Turn-a-Round).
2 . A Knox Box will be required for this site .
3. IFC 2012 and Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 )2012 shall apply to this site
Reviewed by : Steve Smith Date: 03/14/2014
March 12, 2014
0.
Traditions Montes · s h . . . son c ool , via: trad1t1onsmontessori@gmail.com i.---"
Jenifer Paz , Staff Planner FRO M:
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . Please address the comments and
submit the following information by any Monday at 10 :00 a.m. for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One (1) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached ;
One (1) 24"x36 " revised site plans;
One (1) 24"x36 " landscaping plan ;
One (1) 24 "x36" grading and erosion control plan ;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details . If you have any questions or need additional information , please contact
Jenifer Paz at 979 .764 .3570 .
Attachments : Staff Review Comments
PC : McClure & Browne , via : jeffr@mcc lurebrowne .com ~
P&DS Project No . 14-00900021
Planning & Developmen t Services
PU. BOX 9960 • l 10.1 TEXA.S AVENUE · COLLEGE STA'T10N ·TEXAS · 77842
TEL. 97 9.764.3570 ·FAX . 979.76 U496
cstx .gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) 14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Provide a note with building setbacks for R Rural.
2. From our conversation on 3/5, you indicated that the existing 500sf buildings would
be used for storage . Please provide clarification on the site plan.
3 . Parking for a school is 1 parking space per 1 OOsf . Please revise and provide
clarification on Note 4 . Based on the total building area (2 ,580sf), this site is required
26 parking spaces .
4. If modular buildings will be placed on site for this phase, please s how where each
will be located . All structures are required to be shown on the site plan .
5. Clarify what portion of the fence will remain and where it is being proposed and
indicate the type of material is being proposed? Chain-linked fence is not a permitted
material.
6 . Please show where the hydrant is being relocated .
7. A temporary curb is required at the end of the street section .
8. There are concerns regarding vehicle queuing from Barron Road to the s ite , if there
is a drop-off/pick-up system for the school. How will vehicles turn a round if there is
no parking available?
9. Sidewalks are required on both sides of local streets (Barron Crest Drive). Please
show sidewalks on site plan .
10. How will the construction of Barron Crest Drive occur on off-site property (Cathey
tract)?
11. If the street is built in conjunction with the school, the raised median on Barron Road
will need to be modified to provide the left-turn lane .
12 . Remove Note 15. A fire lane will need to be provided on site. Fire will not serve from
an Arterial Street (Barron Road).
13 . The drive aisle to Barron Crest will need to be mod ified to reduce the radius for a fire
truck to access the site . Please keep in mind that driveway shou ld be as far as
possible from Barron Road.
14 . Please contact Wally Urrtuia with Sanitation , 764-3841 , regarding how this site will
be serviced . Note 16 may need to be revised .
15. Clarify where the sanitation container pad is located on the site .
16. Show all easements from Development Plat.
17 .Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed.
18. Please note that any changes made to the plans t hat have not been requested by
the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter .
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3, 2014
LANDSCAPING Please revise site layout on Landscape Plan .
Reviewed by : Jenifer Paz Date: March 3 , 2014
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: Traditions Montessori School (SP) 14-00900021
PLANNING
1. Provide a note with building setbacks for R Rural.
2. From our conversation on 3/5, you indicated that the existing 500sf buildings would
be used for storage . Please provide clarification on the site plan.
3. Parking for a school is 1 parking space per 1 OOsf. Please revise and provide
clarification on Note 4. Based on the total building area (2 ,580sf), this site is required
26 parking spaces .
4 . If modular buildings will be placed on site for this phase , please show where each
will be located . All structures are required to be shown on the site plan .
5. Clarify what portion of the fence will remain and where it is being proposed and
indicate the type of material is being proposed? Chain-linked fence is not a permitted
material.
6 . Please show where the hydrant is being relocated .
7 . A temporary curb is required at the end of the street section.
8 . There are concerns regarding vehicle queuing from Barron Road to the site , if there
is a drop-off/pick-up system for the school. How will vehicles turn around if there is
no parking available?
9. Sidewalks are required on both sides of local streets (Barron Crest Drive). Please
show sidewalks on site plan .
10. How will the construction of Barron Crest Drive occur on off-site property (Cathey
tract)?
11. If the street is built in conjunction with the school, the raised median on Barron Road
will need to be modified to provide the left-turn lane .
12 . Remove Note 15 . A fire lane will need to be provided on site. Fire will not serve from
an Arterial Street (Barron Road).
13. The drive aisle to Barron Crest will need to be modified to reduce the radius for a fire
truck to access the site . Please keep in mind that driveway should be as far as
possible from Barron Road .
14 . Please contact Wally Urrtuia with Sanitation , 764-3841 , regarding how this site will
be serviced . Note 16 may need to be revised .
15. Clarify where the sanitation container pad is located on the site .
16 . Show all easements from Development Plat.
17 . Site Plan cannot be approved until Plat is filed .
18 . Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by
the City of College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: March 3 , 2014
LANDSCAPING Please revise site layout on Landscape Plan .
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date : March 3 , 2014
ELECTRICAL COMMENTS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
1. SITE PLAN/PLAT: Developer will provide CSU with a digital, AutoCAD dwg format,
version of plat and I or site plan as soon as it is available. Email to :
wdavis@cstx .gov
2. LOAD DATA: The developer will provide load data to CSU as soon as it is available .
This information is critical for CSU to accurately determine the size and number of
transformers, and other equipment, required to provide service to the project. Failure
to provide load data will result in construction delays and, due to clearance
requirements, could affect the final building footprint. Delivery time for transformers
and other equipment not in stock is approximate 26 weeks .
3. EASEMENTS: Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction
purposes and upon completion of project must provide descriptive easements for
electric infrastructure as designed by CSU .
4 . EASEMENTS: Developer provides descriptive easements for electric infrastructure
as designed by CSU , as shown on plat or site plan .
5. If easements are existing, the developer will be responsible for locating easements
on site to insure that electrical infrastructure is installed within easement boundaries.
6. The following easements are existing:
• A 20' easement, 1 O' each side of the guy wire, anchor and transformer pole
and all overheard primary lines, poles, guy wires and anchors on this
property.
GENERAL ELECTRICAL COMMENTS
1. Developer installs conduit per CSU specs and design .
2. CSU will provide drawings for electrical installation.
3. Developer provides 30 ' of rigid or IMC conduit for each riser conduit. CSU installs
riser.
4. Developer will intercept existing conduit at designated transformers or other existing
devices and extend as required .
5. If conduit does not exist at designated transformer or other existing devices ,
developer will furnish and install conduit as shown on CSU electrical layout.
6. Developer pours electric device pads or footings, i.e . transformers, pull boxes , or
other device, per CSU specs and design .
7. Developer installs pull boxes and secondary pedestals per CSU specs and design ,
Pull boxes and secondary pedestals provided by CSU .
8. Final site plan must show all proposed electrical facilities necessary to provide
electrical service, i.e . transformers , pull boxes , or switchgears , all meter locations ,
and conduit routing as designed by CSU .
9 . To discuss any of the above electrical comments please contact Gilbert Martinez at
979.764 .6255, Sam Weido at 979 .764 .6314 , Eric Horton at 979.764.6280 , or
Weldon Davis at 979.764 .5027.
Reviewed by: Gilbert Martinez I Sam Weido I Eric Horton I Weldon Davis
C ITY OF C OL.LEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M Univmity 0
MEMORANDUM
February 25 , 2014
TO : Traditions Montessori School , via: traditionsmontessori@gmail.com~
FROM : Jenifer Paz , Staff Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Thank you for the submittal of the required documents for your SITE PLAN -COMMERCIAL
application. Carol Cotter, Senior Assistant City Engineer, and I have been assigned to review
this project. It is anticipated that the review will be completed and any staff comments returned
to you on or before Tuesday , March 11, 2014 . If you have questions in the meantime , please
feel free to contact us .
PC : McClure & Browne , via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com /
P&DS Project No . 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P .O . BOX <l')60 • l 101 TEXAS AVE:.JUE • COU.F.CF STAT ION • T1X'\S • 77842
CITY OF Cou.EGE STATION
Hom e o/Texas A&M University "
MEMORANDUM
January 31, 2014
TO : Traditions Montessori School , via: tradit i onsmontessori@gma i l.co ~
FROM : Jason Schubert, ACP , Principal Planner
SUBJECT: TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
I reviewed the above-mentioned SITE PLAN -COMMERCIAL application and determined it to
be incomplete . The following is the preliminary list of items needed to complete the submittal.
Please submit the following information so this application can be forwarded for review :
The property is a tract of land and is required to be platted for development.
Submit a plat application for review. If the entire 2 .96-acre tract will be included
as one lot , a Development Plat application can be submitted . If subdividing the
2 .96 -acre tract into more than one lot , a Preliminary Plan application followed
by a Final Plat application would be required ; and
A fire flow report for the proposed site .
Please be aware that if this application is not completed before Monday, April 7 , 2014 , it will
expire and a new application and fees will be necessary to continue the development process .
If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me at 979 .764 .3570
PC : McClure & Browne , via: jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com /
P&DS Project No . 14-00900021 V
Planning & Development Services
l'.O. BOX 9'060 • I l 0 l TEXAS AVENUE • C O!. LECE STAT IO N • T l· XA'.' • 77842
TEL. ')79.7 64 .3570 ·FA X. 97') 764 54%
C IT Y OF C OllEGE S TAT IO N
Hom e of Texas A&M Un iversi ty "
MEMORANDUM
March 12 , 2014
TO : Traditions Montessori School , via : trad it ionsmontessor i@gma il.com ~
FROM : Jenifer Paz , Staff Planner
SUBJECT : TRADITIONS MONTESSORI SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and
submit the following information by any Monday at 10:00 a.m. for further staff review :
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments (identify the specific
page that each comment was addressed on or the reason for not addressing the
comment);
One (1) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached ;
One (1) 24 "x36 " revised site plans;
One (1) 24 "x36 " landscaping plan ;
One (1) 24 "x36 " grading and erosion control plan ;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein. If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter
explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information , please contact
Jenifer Paz at 979.764.3570 .
Attachments : Staff Review Comments
PC : McClure & Browne , via : jeffr@mcclurebrowne .com 1----
P&DS Project No . 14-00900021
Planning & Development Services
P 0. BOX 9%0 ·J101 T EXAS AVENUE · COLLE\;E STATI ON · TEXAS · 778'-12
TEL 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764 .:)4%
cstx.gov/devservices