HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-268 The BarracksDEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-268
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
llf~·mit-~d· l"ltwl1Jpmm1 .5rrri-a
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The Barracks 11 Phase 107
DATE OF ISSUE: 3/25/2015
OWNER:
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC
P.O . Box 262
Wellborn , TX 77881
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
General Parkway/Deacon Dr.
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Bee Creek Trib . "B"
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Full Development Permit
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made here in. If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-
iss ued.
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4 . Other perm its may have been required to fulfill local , state and federal requirements. Construction w ill be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Perm it s.
5. Stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing
dra inage fac ilities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along w ith Stormwater Pollut ion Prevention Plan
(SWP3) wil l be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site, it is the
Contractor's respons ibi lity to implement measures that will meet City , State, and Federal requirements .
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy .
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to , paint, oil ,
solvents , asphalt, concrete, mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited .
9. All construct ion shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above -named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station, as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed .
10 . Special Conditions :
I, _______________ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein .
Contractor Signature Date
Phone number E-mail
I hereby grant this perm it for development. Contact T<.yae{ Ko,'/( (1i7~) 71!-kf7/ , the Public Works
Inspector ass igned to this project 24 hours prior to beginning construction for scheduling required Inspect ions .
City Date
C ITY OF C OLI.EGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University•
(Check one) D Minor
($700)
CASE NO.:
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
D Amending
($700)
181 Final
($932)
D Vacating
($932)
D Replat
($932)
Is this plat in the ET J? D Yes [8] No Is this plat Commercial 0 or Residential [.8.J
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
g $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
tJ/EJ J 233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
~ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure , $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
/!Ue prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
~ Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
_!P ay not be adjusted or altered . Please attach pages if additional information is provided .
W"~ourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
~wo (2) copies of the grading , drainage , and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
@Awo (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
D Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
Vritle report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
urrent within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
' Paid tax certificates from City of College Station , Brazos County and College Station l.S .D .
[8] The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such . Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct , the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference
NAME OF PROJECT The Barracks fl Subdivision Phase 107
ADDRESS Intersection of Deacon Drive and General Parkway
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
East Side of Holleman Drive South between Cain Road and Rock Prairie Road
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Heath Phillips E-mail heath_superiorstructures@yahoo.co
Street Address P. 0 . Box 262
----------------------------------~
City Wellborn Zip Code _7_78_8_1 ___ _
Phone Number 979-229-5906 Fax Number 979-703-7903 ----------------
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORM 110N (All owners must be identified . Please -attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Heath Phillips Investments, LLC (Heath Phillips, manager) E-mail heath_ superiorstructures@yahoo.co
P.O. Box 262 Street Address
C ity Wellborn State Tx Zip Code 77881 ------
Phone Number 979-229-5906 Fax Number 979-703-7903
---------------~
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION :
Name Schultz Engineering , LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail joeschultz84@verizon .net
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive , Suite A
C ity College Station State TX Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ___ _
Phone Number 979 . 764 .3900 Fax Number 979 . 764 .3910 -----------------
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? [8] Yes D No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so , please provide the Volume ____ and Page No . __ _
Total Acreage _7_. 7_0_8 _______ _ Total No . of Lots 63 ------R-0-W Acreage 2.35 Acres
Existing Use _v_a_ca_n_t ___________ _ Proposed Use Townhouse Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 63 POD I
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.09 POD
Floodplain Acreage _N_o_n_e ________________________________ _
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? D Yes (g] No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made ,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
[8] Yes
D No
If yes , provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name : THE BARRACKS II (PP)
City Project Number (if known): 14-00900010
Date I Timeframe when submitted : 2/5/14
1/1 1 J ..-{ Q -\ s Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
NIA
Requested waiver to subdivision requlations and reason for same (if applicable):
NIA
Regarding the waiver request, explain how :
1. There are specia l circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subd ivis ion requlations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land .
NIA
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
NIA
3. The granting of the waiver w ill not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare , or injurious to other
property in the area , or to the City in administering subdivision regulations .
NIA
4 . The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
NIA
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. 0 An alte rn ative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or w ill be provided outside the right-of-way ;
2. D The presence of unique or unusual topographic , vegetative , or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comp rehensive Plan ;
3. 0 A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months ;
4 . D Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I
rural context ;
5 . D When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle , Pedestrian , and
Greenways Master Plan ;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. 0 The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria i n Platting and
Replatting w ithin Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO ; or
7 . n The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6 .6 ,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan .
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
t ----······························· ------·········································································-----~-····--J
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission .
Requested Over~ze Participation_N_o_n_e _____________________________ _
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
1895 ' Streets
3492 ' S idewalks
658' Sanitary Sewer Lines
1476' Water Lines
120' Channels
3405' Storm Sewers
0 Bike Lanes I Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE :
No . of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee -------
___ No . of acres in floodplain
No . of acres in detention ---
---No . of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND :
___ No . of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $
--------~
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ----
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true , correct, and complete. IF THIS APPL/CATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Signature and title Date r I
1/11 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No wo rk of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2 . The pe r mit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein .
3. If revoked , all wo rk must cease until permit is re-issued .
4 . Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued .
5. The pe rm it will exp ire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6 . Other permits may be required to fulfill local , state , and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP .
7 . If requ ired , Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction .
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compl iance .
9 . If, stormwater mitigation is required , including detention ponds proposed as part of th is project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken
to insure t hat all debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or
existing drainage facilities . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and app roved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply .
11 . The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents w ill comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Gu idelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accorda nce with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations .
12 . Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidd ing purposes
only . I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER , AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION , ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
ACCURATE.
----i*J..H-4:--7
Property Owner(s) I I Date
Engineer Certification:
1 /11
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds , proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence .
2 . I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local , State and Federal Permits prior to construct ion
includ ing NOi and SWPPP . Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES : i.e ., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation bas in.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Un ified
Design Guidelines . All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations .
4. I, THE ENGINEER , AGREE g~ ' ~ TIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS """' .,.. FOR THE DEVELOPME M • • ~~ ATION , ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
CURATE. //'0 ~···· •• .... <.Y ~ * •o o°o 1.t t;,?
*: c * i ,.,r-,.~·.c:. sEPH •• i>~"scI(lifff"' ~ Io r 15, t 4
'~ \. ~ 65889 ,Q /$.I Date ~AO,<> "•.'f:r. <l"' .• ~ !111 'l o~ \::eo ~ d
Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A. I, certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the
alterations or development covered by this permit , shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities .
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following :
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm .
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation . I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 6 of 9
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D . I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor , including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation . Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial i mprovement
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities , ductwork and basements , elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility , ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities , ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation , and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval :
1/11 Page 7 of 9
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch .
Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits . No scale required but include north arrow .
Title Block with the following information :
Name and address of subdivider , recorded owner , planner, engineer and surveyor.
Proposed name of subdivision . (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
~ Date of preparation .
~ Engineer's scale in feet.
~Total area intended to be developed .
North Arrow .
Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
If more than 1 sheet , an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
~ All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
vfil,. Ownership and Dedication
~ Surveyor and/or Engineer
~ City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat)
~ Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
~ Brazos County Clerk
D Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
-a-If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created .
~If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
_ _/Court of Brazos County , pursuant to the provisions of Section 21 .084 of the Texas Water Code .
~ Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available
data . ~ Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data .
~Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3 .E.2).
[8] The location and description with accurate dimensions , bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center
angle , degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following : (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision, as well as , those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
[8] [8]
1/11
Streets . Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O .W. locations and widths . (All existing and proposed R.O .W .'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan .)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance .
Page 8 of 9
Existing
~
~
~
~
Proposed
~
~ ~
~
Alleys .
Easements .
A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration .
~ Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following :
~ Street, alley and sidewalk plans , profiles and sections . One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision . (may be combined with other
utilities ).
~ Sewer Design Report.
~ Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades . One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision . (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the ut ility
master plan and any future growth areas .)
~ Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report .
~ Water li ne plan showing fire hydrants , valves , etc. with plan and profile lines show ing
depth and grades . One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision .
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas .)
~ Storm drainage system plan with contours , street profile , inlets , storm sewer and
drainage channels , with profiles and sections . Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff
based on 5 , 10 , 25 , 50 and 100 year rain intensity . Detailed drainage structure des ign,
channel li ning des ign & detention if used . One sheet must show the overall dra inage
layout of the subdiv ision.
~ Deta iled cost est imates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
~ Lette r of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
~ Dra inage Report with a Technical Design Summary .
~ Eros ion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
~ All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat w ith a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed .
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
fo r P&Z Commission consideration .
~ Are there impact fees associated with this development? ~ Yes 0 No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
~ W ill any cons t ruction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? 0 Yes ~ No
If yes , TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents .
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if ava ilable pr ior to filing
1/11
the plat at the Courthouse .
2 . If the construction area is greater than 5 acres , EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted pr ior to
issuance of a development permit.
Print Form :J
Page 9 or 9
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO . 14-268
C IT \' O F COLLE<;E STKl ION
Pl.:•11tint d-n~1:r!Dpm1111 5"1-im
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The Barracks 11 Phase 107
DATE OF ISSUE: 3/25/2015
OWNER:
Heath Phillips Investments , LLC
P.O. Box 262
Wellborn , TX 77881
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS :
SITE ADDRESS:
General Parkway/Deacon Dr.
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Bee Creek Trib . "B"
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Full Development Permit
1. No work beyond limits cove red in permit is author ized .
2. The perm it may be revoked if any false statements are made here in. If revoked , all work must cease unt il perm it is re -
issued .
3. The permit w ill expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance .
4. Other permits may have been required to fulfill local , state and federal requirements . Construction w ill be in
compliance w it h all necessary State and Federal Permits .
5. Stormwate r mi tigation , including detention ponds w ill be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ord inances of the C ity of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing
drainage facil ities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along w ith Stormwater Pollution Prevent ion Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site , it is the
Contractor 's responsibil ity to implement measures that will meet City , State , and Federal requirements .
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy .
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscap ing and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance , prio r to any operations of th is
permit. The cl eaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is str ictly proh ibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to , pa int, o il ,
solvents , asphalt , concrete , mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials w ith in the drip line of any tree requ ired to
remain is also prohibited .
9. A ll construct ion shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
proj ect and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Reg ulations
t hat app ly. Onl y those deviations from BCS Un ified Design Guidelines , Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed .
10 . Special Cond it ions :
l, __ __,~~-~_"'9_'/1_1¥_~_~_!._U_t...;_15 _____ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all condit ions here in. ,
Contractor Signature
(rn )2£s--w~
Phone nu m ber
Dat e! I
/...A:nf@/6a.D~~PIUT4 ~
E-mail
I hereby grant this perm it for development. Contact I<.nte / Koi'fc (q79) 717-,t71 , the Public Works
Inspector ass igned to th is project 24 hours prior to beg inn ing construction for scheduling required Inspect ions .
City Date
Through Tax Year
2014
Issued By:
TAX CERTIFICATE
KRISTEEN ROE , CTA PH# (979) 361-4470
I Certificate #
41209
Property Information
BRAZOS COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR
300 E. WM . J BRYAN PKWY
Property ID : 10406 Geo ID: 000701-00 46-0000
Legal Acres : 39.7229
BRYAN , TX 77803 Legal Desc: A000701 , CRAWFORD BURNETT ( ICL), TRACT 46 ,
39.7229ACRES
Situs: 3156 HAUPT (PVT) RD ,
OBA:
Exem tions :
Owner ID: 491664 100.00%
HEATH PHILLIPS INVESTMENTS LLC
4490 CASTLEGATE DR
For Entities
BRAZOS COUNTY
nformation Value I
Improvement HS
Improvement NH
Land HS :
COLLEGE STATION , TX 77845-3388 CITY OF COLL. STAT.
COLLEGE STATION ISO
EMG SVCS DIST #1
Z REFUND ENTITY
Current/Delinquent Taxes
S:
Land NHS :
Productivity Mark
Productivity Use ·
Assessed Value
et:
0
0
0
1,0 56 ,630
0
0
1,0 56 ,630
This is to certify that, after a careful check of the tax records of this office, the following delinquent taxes,
and any known costs and expenses as provided by Tax Code §33.48, are due on the described property fo
penalties, interest
r the following
taxing unit(s):
Year Entity
2014 COLLEGE STATION ISO
2014 BRAZOS COUNTY
2014 CITY OF COLL. STAT .
Totals :
Effective Date: 10/21/2014
Tax Certificate Issued for:
CITY OF COLL. STAT.
BRAZOS COUNTY
COLLEGE STATION ISO
Taxable
1,056 ,630
1,056 ,630
1,056 ,630
Tax Due
14 ,581 .49
5, 124 .66
4 ,781.25
24,487.40
Disc./P&I
0 .00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
Attorney Fee
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Due if paid by: 10/31/2014
. . · sued on real This certificate is is . 1 d
l It does not me u e
estate on Y· · onal property.
minerals and/or pers
Taxes Paid in 2014
0 .00
0.00
0.00
Total Due
14 ,581.49
5,124 .66
4 ,781 .25
24,487.40
24,487.40
taxes may become If applicable, the above-described property has/is receiving special appraisal based on its use, and additional rollback
due based on the provisions of the special appraisal (Comptroller Rule 9.3040) or property omitted from the appraisal r oll as described
under Tax Code Section 25.21 is not included in this certificate [Tax Code Section 31.0S(b)].
dicates that no Pursuant to Tax Code Section 31.08 , if a person transfers property accompanied by a tax certificate that erroneously in
delinquent taxes, penalties or interest are due a taxing unit on the property or that fails to include property because of
appraisal roll, the unit's tax lien on the property is extinguished and the purchaser of the property is absolved of liability
delinquent taxes, penalties or interest on the property or for taxes based on omitted property . The person who was liab
its omission from an
to the unit for
le for the tax for the
ear the tax was im osed or the ro e was omitted remains ersonall liable for the tax and for an enalties or inte rest.
A tax certificate issued through fraud or collusion is void.
This certificate does not clear abuse of granted exemptions as defined in Section 11 .43 Paragraph(1) of the Texas Prop erty Tax Code.
Date of Issue :
Requested By :
Fee Amount:
Reference #:
Signature of Authorized Officer of Collecting Office
4 10/21/201
SCHULTZ
10.00
ENGINEERING LLC
Page : 1OF1
True Automation, Inc.
-
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU
OF
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF SOLE MEMBER
OF
HEATH PHILLIPS INVESTMENTS, LLC
A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The unders igned , being the Sole Member named in Heath Phillips Investments , LLC 's
(hereinafter the "Company") Certificate of Formation filed with the Secretary of State of Texas ,
he reby adopts the following resolutions in lieu of an organ izational meeting of the Member.
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
RESOLVED , that the acknowledgment of filing issued by the Secretary of State of Texas ,
and t he certified copy of the Certificate of Formation filed on November 23 , 2009 , are accepted
and app roved in all respects; and the Secretary is directed to place same in t he Company record
book .
COMPANY AGREEMENT
RESOLVED , t hat the form of the company agreement fo r regu lat ing and managing
Company affairs subm itted to the unders igned is approved and adopted as the Company
Agree ment of the Company.
RESOLVED , that the secretary is directed to place the Company Agreement in the
Company reco rd book, and maintain a copy of the Company Agreement at the Company's
princ ipa l office .
PRINCIPAL OFFICE
RESOLVED , that the Company's princ ipal office be establ ished and ma inta ined at 4490
Cas tl egate Dri ve , College Station , Texas 77845 , and that meetings of the Member from t ime to
t ime may be he ld e ither at the Company's pri nc ipal office or at such other place as the Member
may select.
OFFICERS
RESOLVED , that the following persons were nominated to the office preceding their
name :
UNANIM OUS WRITIEN CONSENT IN LIE U OF ORGANIZATI ONAL MEETING PAGE 1 OF 4
Office
President
Secretary!Treasurer
Officeholder
Heath Phillips
Heath Phillips
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST CERTIFICATES
RESOLVED, that the specimen membership interest certificate proposed for use as the
Company's certificate for membership interest is adopted as the Company's form of Membership
Interest Certificate ; and
RESOLVED FURTHER , that the specimen Membership Interest Certificate be appended
to the minutes of the meeting .
COMPANY RECORD BOOK
RESOLVED , that the Company, through its secretary, shall maintain and authenticate in
the Company record book the appropriate business records, including but not limited to originals,
copies or certified copies of the Company's Certificate of Formation, the Acknowledgment of
Filing , the Company Agreement, the Membership Interest transfer ledger, minutes of the meetings
and of other proceedings of the Members, Managers, and any committee established by the
Managers; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the secretary is to maintain in the Company record book
records pertaining to the issuance and transfer of Membership Interest in the Membership Interest
Certificate stubs and Membership Interest transfer ledger respectively .
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST ISSUED
RESOLVED, that the Member be, and hereby is, authorized to issue from time to time
authorized Membership Interests of the Company for money paid, labor done , promissory note, or
personal property or real estate or leases thereof actually acquired and upon such terms as the
Member in the Member's discretion may determine; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, than an offer be issued to the following to purchase one hundred
percent (100%) of the Membership Interest of the Company in the percentages and for the
consideration indicated opposite each name:
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE20F4
Member's Name Member's Interest Consideration
Heath Phillips 100% $1 ,000 .00
RESOLVED , that the Member is authorized to issue addit ional Membership Interest to
appropriately qua li fied purchasers .
COMMENCING BUSINESS
RESOLVED , that consideration has been received for the issuance of Membership
Interest , and that the Company consequently is able to commence and transact business and to
incur indebtedness .
ORGANIZATIONAL EXPENSES
RESOLVED , that the Company treasurer be and hereby is authorized to pay all charges
and expenses inc ident to or arising out of the organization of and to reimburse any person who
has made any disbursement therefore .
BANK ACCOUNT
RESOLVED , that the treasurer be and hereby is authorized to open a bank account on the
Company's behalf with any banks the Member deems appropriate.
LICENSES AND PERMITS
RESOLVED, that Company officers are directed to obtain in the Company's name such
other licenses and tax permits as may be required for the conduct of Company business by any
federal , state, county, or municipal governmental statute, ordinance , or regulations, and are
directed and authorized to do all things necessary or convenient to qualify to transact Company
business in compliance with the laws and regulations of any appropriate federal , state , or
municipal governmental authority .
OTHER STATES
RESOLVED , that for the purpose of authorizing the Company to do business in any state ,
territory or dependency of the United States or any foreign country in which it is necessary or
exped ient for the Company to transact business, the proper Company officers are hereby
authorized to appoint and substitute all necessary agents or attorneys for service of process, to
designate and change the location of all necessary statutory offices and to make and file all
necessary certificates , reports , powers of attorney and other instruments as may be required by
the laws of such state, territory , dependency or country to authorize the Company to transact
bus iness therein .
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONA L MEETING PAGE30F4
FISCAL YEAR
RESOLVED , that the Company fiscal year shall begin on January 1, and end on
December 31 , subject to change by resolution , as appropriate, at the discretion of the Member.
CARRY ON BUSINESS
RESOLVED , that the signing of these minutes shall constitute full consent, confirmat ion ,
ratification , adopt ion and approval of the ho lding of the above meeting , the actions hereby taken ,
the resolutions herein adopted and waiver of notice of the meeting by the s ignatories .
Dated : November 23, 2009 <==~4
Heath Phill ips
A true copy of each of the following papers referred to in the foregoing minutes is appended
hereto :
Specimen Membership Interest Certificate
P:\Gentry\Phillips_Heath_lnvestmentsLLC _\Unanimous Written Consent_ OrgMtg .doc
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZAT IONA L MEETING PAGE40F4
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU
OF
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF SOLE MEMBER
OF
SUPERIOR STRUCTURES, LLC
A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The undersigned, being the So le Member named in Superior Structures , LLC's
(hereinafter the "Company") Certificate of Formation filed with the Secretary of State of Texas ,
hereby adopts the following resolutions in lieu of an organ izational meeting of the Member.
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
RESOLVED, that the acknowledgment of filing issued by the Secretary of State of Texas ,
and the certified copy of the Certificate of Formation filed on September 6, 2007 , are accepted
and approved in all respects; and the Secretary is directed to place same in the Company record
book.
COMPANY AGREEMENT
RESOLVED , that the form of the company agreement for regulating and manag in g
Company affairs submitted to the undersigned is approved and adopted as the Company
Agreement of the Company.
RESOLVED , that the secretary is directed to place the Company Agreement in the
Company record book, and maintain a copy of the Company Agreement at the Company's
principal office .
PRINCIPAL OFFICE
RESOLVED, that the Company's principal office be established and maintained at 4490
Castlegate Drive, College Station, Texas 77845, and that meetings of the Member from time to
time may be held either at the Company's princi pal office or at such other place as the Member
may se le ct.
OFFICERS
RESOLVED , that the following persons were nominated to the office preceding their
name:
UNANIMOUS WRITIEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE 1 OF 4
Office
President
Secretary IT reasurer
Officeholder
Heath Phillips
Heath Phillips
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST CERTIFICATES
RESOLVED , that the specimen membership interest certificate proposed for use as the
.Company's certificate for membership interest is adopted as the Company's form of Membership
Interest Certificate ; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the spec ime n Membership Interest Cert ifi cate be appended
to the minutes of the meeting .
COMPANY RECORD BOOK
RESOLVED, that the Company, through its secretary, shall maintain and authenticate in
the Company record book the appropriate business records, includ in g but not limited to originals ,
copies or certified copies of the Company's Certificate of Formation, the Acknowledgment of
Filing , the Company Agreement, the Membership Interest transfer ledger, minutes of the meetings
and of other proceedings of the Members, Managers, and any committee established by the
Managers ; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the secretary is to maintain in the Company record book
records pertaining to the issuance and transfer of Membership Interest in the Membership Interest
Certificate stubs and Membership Interest transfer ledger respectively.
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST ISSUED
RESOLVED , that the Member be , and hereby Is , authorized to issue from time to time
authorized Membership Interests of the Company for money paid, labor done, promissory note, or
personal property or real estate or leases thereof actually acquired and upon such terms as the
Member in the Member's discretion may determine; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, than an offer be issued to the following to purchase one hundred
percent (100%) of the Membership Interest of the Company in the percentages and for the
consideration indicated opposite each name:
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE2 OF 4
-··-· ----·-······-··-·----·······--··-···-··· .. ·--··---==========---------~
Member's Name Member's Interest Consideration
Heath Phillips 100% $1,000.00
RESOLVED, that the Member is authorized to issue add itional Membership Interest to
appropriately qualified purchasers .
COMMENCING BUSINESS
RESOLVED, that consideration has been received for the issuance of Membership
Interest, and that the Company consequently is able to commence and transact business and to
incur indebtedness.
ORGANIZATIONAL EXPENSES
RESOLVED , that the Company treasurer be and he reby is authorized to pay all charges
and expenses in cident to or arising out of the organizat ion of and to reimburse any person who
has made any disbursement therefore .
BANK ACCOUNT
RESOLVED, that the treasurer be and hereby is authorized to open a bank account on the
Company's behalf with any banks the Member deems appropriate .
LICENSES AND PERMITS
RESOLVED, that Company officers are directed to obtain in the Company's name such
other licenses and tax permits as may be required for the conduct of Company business by any
federal, state, county, or municipal governmental statute, ordinance , or regulations, and are
directed and authorized to do all things necessary or convenient to qualify to transact Company
business in compliance with the laws and regulations of any appropriate federal, state, or
municipal governmental authority.
OTHER STATES
RESOLVED, that for the purpose of authorizing the Company to do business in any state,
territory or dependency of the United States or any foreign country in which it is necessary or
expedient for the Company to transact business, the proper Company officers are hereby
authorized to appoint and substitute all necessary agents or attorneys for service of process, to
designate and change the location of all necessary statutory offices and to make and file all
necessary certificates, reports, powers of attorney and other instruments as may be required by
the laws of such state, territory, dependency or country to authorize the Company to transact
business therein .
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE 30F 4
FISCAL YEAR
RESOLVED, that the Company fiscal year shall beg in on January 1, and end on
December 31, subj ect to change by resolution, as appropriate , at the disc retion of the Member .
CARRY ON BUSINESS
RESOLVED , that the signing of these minutes shall const itute full consent, confirmation ,
ratification, adoption and approval of the holding of the above meeting , the actions hereby taken ,
the resolutions herein adopted and waiver of notice of the meeting by the signatories .
Dated : September 7, 2007 ~;L{~
Heath Ph illip s
A true copy of each of the following papers referred to in the foregoing minutes is appended
hereto :
Specimen Membersh ip Interest Cert ificate
P:\Gentry\Ph illips_Heath_LLC_ 19097\Unanimous Written Consent_OrgMtg .doc
UNAN IMOUS WRITIEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE 4 OF 4
Brazos Co1111ty Abstract Co1npany
"1\tlore. Than 14 0 Year s o,(Title S e r vice "
P.O. Box 4704 Phone: (979) 731-1900 3800 Cross Park Drive
Bryan, Texas 77805-4704 Fax: (979) 731-1381 Bryan, Texas 77802
BCAC GF NO. BC1402926
Title Report Prepared 10/20/2014
for
Schultz Engineering, LLC
ATTN: Joe Schultz, P.E.
2730 Longmire, Suite A
College Station, TX 77845
0 Experie11ce Matters"
Brazos Cou11ty Abstract Co1npa11y
"lv!ore Than 140 Years of Titl e Service"
T ITLE REPORT
Effccti \'c Date: October 17, 2014 at 8:00 am
GFNO: BCl402926
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
All that certain lot, tract or parcel o f land lying and being s ituated in Brazos County, Texas. in
the Crawford Burnett Lcugue. Ab s tnict No. 7, College Station, Texas . Said tract being a
portion of the remainder or a called I 08 .88 acre tract as described by a Deed to Heath Phillips
Investment s. Ll .C. recorded in Volume 9627, page 73 OfTicial Records of Brazos County,
Texas .
Said trnct bdng more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at u Y~ inch iron rod found on the southwest line or Old Wellborn Road
marking the cast comer or said remainder or I 08.88 acre tract:
TH ENCE: N 47 ° 04' 17" W along the southwest line of Old Wellborn Road for a distance of
917.35 tcet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this herein described tract;
THENCE: through said remainder or I 08 .88 acre tract for the following calls:
S 42 ° 14' 17'' W for a distance of 644 .85 feet to the extension of the northeast line or
General Parkway (67' R.O.W.):
N 47 ° 45' 43" W ulong the northe<1 ~il line of General Parkway for a distance of 95.00 feel
to the beginning or a dock wise curve ha ving u rndius of'25.00 lcct:
Along sa id curve through a centrnl angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distnncc of 39 .27 feel
(chord bears: N 02 ° 45' 43" W -35.36 feet) to the end of suid curve;
N 42 ° 14' 17" I~ for u distance or 16 .51 lcet;
N 47 ° 45' 43" W for u distance of 50.00 ICct ;
,
S 42° 14' 17'' W for a distance or 16.51 (cet to the beginning of a clockwise curve having
a radius or25.00 ICet:
Along said curve through a central angle or 90 ° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 ICet
(chord bears: S 87° 14' 17'' W -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve on the northeast line
of General Parkway;
N 47° 45' 43" W along the northeast line of General Parkway for a distance of 65.00 feet
to the beginning or a clockwise curve having a radius of 25.00 feet;
Along said curve through u central angle of 90 ° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39 .27 feet
(chord bears : N 02° 45' 43" W -35.36 lcet) to the end of said curve:
N 47° 45' 43" W across the end or a 24· public alley for a distance of 24 .00 ICct to the
beginning of a clockwise curve having a radius of25.00 foet;
Along said curve through a centrul angle of 90 ° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet
(chord bcurs: S 87° 14' ( 7" W -35 .36 feet) to the end of said curve on the northeust line
ofGi.:ncral Parkway:
N 47° 45' 43" W along the northeast line of General Parkway for a distance of 65.00 feet
to the beginning of a clockwise curve having a radius or 25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90 ° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feel
(chord bears: N 02 " 45' 43" W -35 .36 feet) to the end or said curve on the extension of
the :;outhcast line of Deacon Drive West;
N 42 ° 14' 17" E for a distance of 21.50 feet;
N 47 ° 45' 35" W across Deacon Drive West for a distance of 85.00 foci;
THENCE: continuing through said ri.:maindcr or 108.88 acre tract and along the extension of
the northwest I inc or Deacon Dri VI.! West for the folio\\ in~ calls:
N 42 ° 14' 17'' E for a di!;tance of 140.54 fei.:t to the beginning or a counterclockwise curve
lrnving a radius or 532.50 feet:
Along suid curve through a central angle of 07 ° 0 l' IO" for an arc distance of 65.24 feet
(chord bears: N 38 ° 43' 42" E -65.20 feet) to the end of said curve;
N 35 ° 13' 07'' E for a distuncc of 260.61 ll!ct to the beginning of a clockwise curve having
a radius of617.50 foet:
Along. said curve through a central angle or 07° 01' 1 O" for an arc distance of 75.65 fi:et
(chord bears: N 38 ° 43' 42" E-75.61 !eel) to the end of said curve:
N 42 ° 14' 17'' E for a di stance of 40 .54 foet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25.00 feet:
Along said curve through a central angle of 89° 18' 34" for an arc distance of 38.97 feet
(chord bears : N 02 ° 25' 00" W -35.14 teet) to the end of said curve on the southwest line
of Old Wellborn Road marking the north corner of this herein described tract;
THENCE: S 47 ° 04' 17" E along the so uthwest line of old wellborn road for a distance of
574.21 feet to the .P.OlNT 01' lm!il.NNING containing 7.654 acres oflnnd, more or less.
NO TE -This Company docs not represent that the above acreage or square footage
calculations arc correct.
TITLE APPEARS TO BE VESTED IN:
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC
by Warrant y Deed\ ith Vendor's Lien from Arrcnia H. Ellis, Florence H. King, Lewis M.
Haupt. Ill and Lu!!lla H. Trotter. dated May 13. 2010, recorded in Volume 9627. page 73.
Olliciul Records or Brazos County, Texas.
SUB.JECT TO:
LIENS:
Deed of Trust. Security Agreement. FLxtures. l ~inancing Stmcmcnt and Assignment or Rents and
Leases dated May f 3. 20 I 0. executed by Heath Phillips Investments, LLC to Julius C. Dunlap,
Trustee, securing one note of even date payable to American Momentum Bank, in the principal
amount of $2,994.200.00, recorded in Volume 9627. page 80, Official Records or Brazos County.
Texas, and as modified rearranged and /or extended by instruments recorded in Volume I 0220.
page 151 and Volume 10470, page 133, Orticial Records of Brazos County, Texas. (covers
f 08.88 acres)
Deed ofTrusl, Security Agreement, Fixtures, Financing Statemen t and Assignment or Rents and
Leases datl.!d Octobl!r 4. 2011. executed by I leath Phillips Investments. LLC to Tom Gicscnschlag.
Trustee. securing one note or even dull! payable lo Greens Prairie Investors. Ltd., in the principal
amount of$2.600.000 .00. recorded in Volume 10364. pttgc 96. Oflicial Records orBraws County.
Texus. (covers I 08.88 acres)
ABSTRACTS Of .IUDGMENTS/FEDEl~AL AND/01~ STATE LIENS:
NON E OF RECORD
EASEMENTS:
Right -01:.wa y Easement from J . W. Mochas to Sincl<1ir Refining Company. dated September 6.
1947. recorded in Volume 132. page 68. Deed Records of Bra zos County, Tex<is.
Right-of:.Way Easement from P. D. Gandy cl ux to City of Bryan, dated December 22. 1949.
recorded in Volume 141, page 392. Dcc<l Records of Br.1zos County, Texas.
Right -01:.way Easement from Arrcnia Haupt Ellis ct a l to Wellborn Special Utility District. dated
May 12, 1999. recorded in Volume 3645. page 298. OITicial Rcconls of Brazos County. Texas.
Public Utility Easement l'rom Arrcnia 11. Ellis ct al to City of College Station. Texas. dated May
24. 2006, recorded in Volume 7233 , page 93, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Temporary Blanket Utility Easement from Heath Phillips Investments, LLC lo City of College
Stat ion. Texas, dated November I. 2011. recorded in Volume 10420, page 239, Official Records
of Brazos County. Texas.
OUTSTANDING MINERALS ANl>/01~ ltOYALTIES:
Royalty reservation in Deed from S. F. Machos ct al to P. D. Gandy. dated October 3, 1949.
recorded in Volume 140. page 614, Deed Records of Brazos County . Texas. Title to this
reservation has not been traced subsequent Lo the date of the above-cited instrument.
Mineral <UH.I groun<lwah.:r reservation in Deed from Arrcnh1 H. Ellis. ct al to I lcath Phillips
lnvc stmi.:nts . LLC. dated !\fay 13. 2010. recorded in Volume 9637. page 73. Official Records of
Bra 1..os Count y. Ti.:xas. T itle to this reser vation has not been trnccd subsequent to the <lute or the
above-cited instrumen t.
•'
OIL & GAS LEASES:
Estate created by Oil and Gas Leases from Florence Haupt King ct al to Baker Exploration
Company. dated December, 1993, recorded in Volume 2020. pages 93, 113, 122 and 140. Official
Records or Brazos County. Texas. Title to this lease has not been traced subsequent to the date of
the above-cited instrument.
Estate created by Oil and Gas Lease from Lewis M. Haupt to Baker Exploration Company, dated
Januar)' 5. 1994. recorded in Volume 2020. page 146, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Title to this lease has not been traced subsequent to the date ol'the above-cited instrument.
Estate cre1.11cd by Memorandums of Oil and Gas Lcasc(s) from Luella H. Troller, ct al to BRW
Lund Services. dated December 19.1012. recorded in Volume 11145, pages 9, 14, and 16, Ollicial
Records of Brazos County. Texas. Title to suid lease(s) has not been traced subsequent to the date
of the above-cited instrument.
lrnSTRICTIONS OF l~ECORD:
Restrictive covenants recorded in Volume 8986, page 115 and Volume 10671. page 145, 011icial
Records of Brazos County. Texas.
TAXES/ASSESSMENTS:
NONE REQUESTED
MISCELLANEOUS:
Terms. conditions and stipulations co1Huined in Bill of Sale for Water rights from Haupt Family
Purtncrship to the Haupt Waler Partnership. <late<l December 7, 2000, recorded in Volume 4012, page
288. Ofliciul Records of Brazos County. Texas.
The terms. conditions und stipulntions conrnincd in the Declanition of Covenants. Conditions an<l
Restrictions. executed by Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd .• dated March 3. 2009. recorded in Volume
8986. page 115 and amended in Volume 10671. page 145 and management certificate in Volume
9520. page 215, Oflicial Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Maintemmcc charge as set forth in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions executed
by Greens Prairie Investors. Ltd .. dated March 3. 2009, recorded in Volume 8986, page 115 and
amended in Volume 10671. page 145. Oflicial Records of Brazos County, Texas.
All leases. ~rants. e . ccptions or rcs1.:rvations of coul. lignite. oil. gas and other minerals. together with
all rights. privileges and immunities rclatini,; thereto. appearing in the Public Records. whether listed or
not. There muy be leases. grants. cxceplions or n.:scrvations of m incral interests that arc not listed.
THIS TITLE Rl~PORT IS ISSUED WITll THE EXPRESS UNDERSTANDING, EVIDENCED
BY THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAME THAT THE UNDERSIGNED, Brazos County
Abstract Company DOES NOT UNDERTAKE HEREIN TO GIVE OR EXPRESS ANY
OPINION AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY ABOVE
DESCRIBED, NOR AS TOTI-IE VALIDITY OF ANY OFTl-IE INSTRUMENTS REPORTED
HEREIN, INCLUDING TllE PURPORTED DEED(S) ESTABLISHING THE llECORD
OWNER(S) CITl~D ABOVE, BUT IS SIMPLY REPORTING BRIEFLY HEREIN AS TO THE
INSTRUMENTS FOUND OF RECOl~D PER.TAINING TO SAID PROPERTY, AND IT IS
EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THIS TITLE ll.EPORT IS NEITHER A
GUARANTY NOR WARRANTY OF THE TITLE. HY ACCEPTANCE OF THIS TITLE
REPORT IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE fSSUER HEREOF IS
EXPIU~SSLY LIMITED TO THE ACTUAL MONETARY CONSIDERA TfON PAID FOR
SAID REPORT BY Schultz Engineering, LLC. THIS SEARCH HAS BEEN LIMITED
TO THE ABOVE MATTERS AND TllE ABOVE TIME PERIOD; AND WE HAVE NOT
SEAll.CHIW FOR, NOR HAVE REFLECTED HEREIN, ANY EXAMINATION AS TO TAX
SUITS, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, CONFLICTS OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS WHICH
MAY AFFECT TITLE TO THE SUH.JECT PROPERTY. IF TITLE INSURANCE
COVERAGE, WHICH IS NOT PROVl[)ED HY THIS REPORT, IS NEEDED, SAID
COVEil.AGE IS AVAILAHLE THROUGH Tl-IE APPLICABLE PROMULGATED
POLICY(IES), AND AT A SPECIFIED RATE Pll.EMIUM.
Water System Report
for
The Barracks II Subdivision
Phase 107
College Station, Texas
October 2014
Prepared By:
Schultz Engineering, LLC
TBPE Firm Registration No. 12327
2730 Longmire, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
979.764.3900
F-12327
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
General Information
Location:
Gen eral Note:
Land Use:
Phase 107 is located northeast of Phase 106 and northwest of Phase 108
of the Barracks II Development. The Barracks II Subdivision is a 108-
acre development located midway between Rock Prairie Road and Cain
Road in south College Station . It is bounded on the west by Holleman
Drive South and on the east by Old Wellborn Road.
The water lines to serve these 63 residential lots will be a 6" line along
Kimber Lane, 6" line along Old Wellborn Road and a 6" & 12" line
along Deacon Drive. These lines will create a loop in the system. These
lines will connect to existing waterlines constructed in previous phases.
Single family residential
Design Criteria/ Analysis
Primary Wat er Supply: Existing 12" water line along Deacon Drive and existing 6" waterline
along Kimber Lane.
Existing System Pressure Tes ts:
Flow Hydrant -See Appendix A
Flowrate: 1,300 gpm
Static Pressure: 75 psi
Residual Pressure: 65 psi
Exhibits: Exhibit A-Water Layout
Appendix A -Hydrant Flow Test Results
Appendix B -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Domestic Demand
Appendix C -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Fire Flow Demand @ FH7
Appendix D -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Fire Flow Demand @ FH8
Fire Flow:
Domes tic Use
1,000 gpm for Single Family Residential
1.5 gpm per lot for Single Family Residential
Phases 107 -63 Lots= 94.5 gpm
Total Domestic Demand= 94.5 gpm
The proposed 12" & 6" waterlines are in accordance with the BCS Water
Design Guidelines. This report provides the results of the water system
analysis under the fire flow and domestic demand requirements, (1,552
gpm) which produced the lowest pressure in the system.
Conclusion
Summary of Calculations
Pressure 73.9
Domestic Demand Min.
Velocity Max 1.55
Pressure 51.5 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 7 Velocity Max 6.79
Pressure 53.3 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 8 Velocity Max 6.97
The minimum pressure (51.5 psi) for this system occurs when a Fire
Flow demand is set at Fire Hydrant Number 7. The Max Velocity for this
system occurs at the same demand when the velocity in Pipe P-76 has a
velocity of 6 .97 fps.
All of these pressures exceeds the 20 psi and 35 psi minimum pressure
requirements, respectively . The maximum pipe velocities are less than 12
fps .
The proposed 12" and 6" water lines meet or exceed all of the design
criteria for the City of College Station and the W ellbom Special Utility
District. It will provide adequate water pressure, flowrate and velocity
for both domestic and fire flow demands.
EXHIBIT A
WATER LAYOUT
APPENDIX A
WELLBORN SUD FLOW TEST REPORT
Appendix A
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC
FIRM #12327
WATER SYSTEM FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT
9-19-2013
Date:
Water System Owner: _Wellborn SUD __________________ _
The Barracks II Subdivision
Development Project:
Papa Bear Drive & Towers Parkway
Flow Test Location: ----------------------------
Nozzle size (in.): _2.5 __
60
Pitot Reading (psi): __ _
1300
Flowrate (gpm): ___ _
Discharge Coeff: (c) = 0.90
Flow rate Formula : Q=29.84cd 2 p112
c =discharge coeff.
d = orifice size (in)
P = pitot pressure (psi)
Hayes Lane and Papa Bear Drive
Pressure Gauge Location: ---------------------------
75
Static Pressure (psi):
65
Residual Pressure (psi):
3265
Computed Discharge at 20 psi Residual Pressure: QR= _____ _
Note: The flow test and report were prepared in accordance with NFPA 291.
Joe Schultz
Report Prepared by:
Ricky Flores
Others Present : Clenden Adams -Wellborn SUD_
_Britt Curless _______ _
APPENDIX B
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARY -DOMESTIC DEMAND
Pipe Number Length (ft)
EX -P-1 641
EX -P-2 736
EX-P-3 337
EX -P-4 95
P-1 368
EX -P-8 230
EX-P-10 431
EX -P-12 153
EX -P-13 2 26
P-12 343
P-8 418
P-7 298
P-6 9
P-5 398
P-2 100
P-3 30
EX -P-7 613
EX -P-6 618
EX -P-5 180
EX -P-9 254
EX -P-11 159
P-14 547
P-13 691
EX -P-14 96
P-10 48
P-11 43
P-4 40
P-9 48
P-RES 29
P-86 578
P-87 333
P-84 62
P-81 138
P-82 9
P-83 335
P-85 71
P-76 265
P-75 320
P-74 27
P-73 370
P-72 14
P-71 596
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Domestic Demand
Size (in) Material
Hazen -
Williams C
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s)
-68 0.43
-159 1.02
362 1.03
213 0 .6
213 0 .6
54 0.35
42 0.27
-6 0 .04
-6 0.04
-24 0 .15
-63 0.4
-118 0 .76
-148 0 .94
-148 0.94
65 0 .18
65 0 .18
-36 0.41
-57 0 .64
-149 0 .95
23 0.14
32 0.36
-18 0 .2
-57 0 .65
-92 1.04
-30 0.34
-55 0 .63
0 0
39 0.25
547 1.55
24 0 .27
-8 0 .09
0 0
29 0 .18
18 0 .12
18 0 .12
0 0
54 0 .62
44 0 .5
33 0.38
33 0 .38
33 0.38
2 0 .02
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Domestic Demand
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand
(gpm)
EX -J-1 306 .89 14
EX -J-2 306 .58 69
EX -J-3 302 26
EX -J-4 302 .5 0
J-1 302 .38 0
J-2 302 .15 0
J-3 301.66 11
EX -J-8 307 .8 48
EX -J-11 307.6 17
EX -J-13 306.7 0
J-12 305.69 18
J-9 305.41 0
J-8 303 .76 0
J-7 302 .7 0
FH -2 302 .66 0
FH -1 301.84 0
EX-J-7 305 .6 44
EX -J-6 304.31 0
J-14 307 so
FH-3 304 .86 39
J-13 304 .56 35
J-10 302 .84 32
J-11 304.36 32
J-4 301.64 0
J-15 305 .59 11
FH 6 302.48 32
J-83 304 .51 11
J-84 304 .9 0
J-81 304 .88 11
FH 5 304 .82 0
J-85 305.58 0
J-75 301.73 11
FH 8 299 .53 11
J-73 298 .61 0
J-72 302 .09 0
FH 7 302 .74 32
Pressure (ps i )
74 .3
74.4
76 .6
76 .3
76.4
76.4
76 .7
73 .9
74
74.3
74 .8
74.9
75 .6
76 .1
76 .2
76.6
74 .9
75 .5
74 .2
75 .1
75.4
76.1
75.4
76.7
74 .8
76 .2
75 .3
75 .1
75.1
75 .2
74 .8
76 .6
77.5
77 .9
76.4
76 .1
APPENDIX C
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARY-FIRE FLOW DEMAND@ FH7
Pipe
Length (ft)
Number
EX -P-1 641
EX -P-2 736
EX -P-3 337
EX-P-4 95
P-1 368
EX-P -8 230
EX-P -10 431
EX -P-12 153
EX-P -13 226
P-12 343
P-8 418
P-7 298
P-6 9
P-5 398
P-2 100
P-3 30
EX -P-7 613
EX-P-6 618
EX-P -5 180
EX -P-9 254
EX -P-11 159
P-14 547
P-13 691
EX-P -14 96
P-10 48
f'-11 43
L P-4 ( 40
P-9 48
P-RES 29
P-86 578
P-87 333
P-84 62
P-81 138
P-82 9
P-83 335
I P-85{ 71
P-76 265
P-75 320
P-74 27
P-73 370
P-72 14
P-71 596
Appendix C
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH -7)
Size (in) Material
Hazen -
Flow (gpm)
WilliamsC
8 PVC 150 -188
8 PVC 150 -329
12 PVC 150 1,192
12 PVC 150 967
12 PVC 150 967
8 PVC 150 175
8 PVC 150 229
8 PVC 150 240
8 PVC 150 240
8 PVC 150 222
8 PVC 150 139
8 PVC 150 128
8 PVC 150 -470
8 PVC 150 -470
12 PVC 150 497
12 PVC 150 497
6 PVC 150 -102
6 PVC 150 -73
8 PVC 150 -225
8 PVC 150 72
6 PVC 150 -28
6 PVC 150 -77
6 PVC 150 -116
6 PVC 150 -151
6 PVC 150 -598
6 PVC 150 -11
12 PVC 150 0
8 PVC 150 83
12 PVC 150 1,547
6 PVC 150 -20
6 PVC 150 -52
8 PVC 150 0
8 PVC 150 73
8 PVC 150 62
8 PVC 150 62
8 PVC 150 0
6 PVC 150 486
6 PVC 150 476
6 PVC 150 465
6 PVC 150 465
6 PVC 150 465
6 PVC 150 -566
Velocity (ft/s)
1.2
2 .1
3.38
2 .74
2.74
1.12
1.46
1.53
1.53
1.42
0 .89
0 .81
3
3
1.41
1.41
1 .16
0 .83
1.43
0.46
0 .32
0 .88
1.32
1.72
6 .79
0.13
0 /
0.53
4.39
0.23
0.59
0
0.46
0.4
0.4
lo I
5 .52
5.4
5 .28
5 .28
5.28
6.43
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH -7)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
EX-J-1 306 .89 14 55 .9
EX-J -2 306 .58 69 56 .2
EX -J-3 302 26 58 .8
EX -J-4 302.5 0 58 .2
J-1 302.38 0 58 .2
J-2 302 .15 0 58
J-3 301.66 11 58 .1
EX-J -8 307 .8 48 55 .5
EX -J-11 307 .6 17 55.4
EX -J-13 306.7 0 55.7
J-12 305 .69 18 56.1
J-9 305.41 0 56
J-8 303.76 0 56.7
J-7 302.7 0 57 .1
FH-2 302 .66 0 57 .1
FH -1 301.84 0 58.1
EX-J -7 305.6 44 56 .6
EX-J-6 304.31 0 57.3
J-14 307 so 55.7
FH -3 304 .86 39 56 .7
J-13 304.56 35 57.1
J-10 302 .84 32 56 .6
J-11 304.36 32 56.4
J-4 301.64 0 58.2
J-15 305 .59 11 56
FH 6 302.48 32 57.3
J-83 304 .51 11 56.4
J-84 304 .9 0 56 .2
J-81 304.88 11 56.3
FH 5 304 .82 0 56 .3
J-85 305 .58 0 56
J-75 301.73 11 56.4
FH 8 299 .53 11 55.4
J-73 298 .61 0 55 .6
J-72 302.09 0 51.9
FH 7 302 .74 1,032 51.S
APPENDIX D
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARY -FIRE FLOW DEMAND @ FHS
Pipe Length (ft)
Number
EX -P-1 641
EX-P-2 736
EX -P-3 337
EX-P-4 95
P-1 368
EX-P-8 230
EX -P-10 431
EX-P -12 153
EX-P -13 226
P-12 343
P-8 418
P-7 298
P-6 9
P-5 398
P-2 100
P-3 30
EX-P -7 613
EX -P-6 618
EX -P-5 180
EX-P-9 254
EX -P-11 159
P-14 547
P-13 691
EX -P-14 96
P-10 48
P-11 43
/P-4 f 40
P-9 48
P-RES 29
P-86 578
P-87 333
P-841 62
P-81 138
P-82 9
P-83 335
P-85 71
P-76 265
P-7 5 320
P-74 27
P-73 370
P-72 14
P-71 596
Appendix D
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH -8)
Size (in) Material Hazen-
Flow (gpm)
Williams C
8 PVC 150 -176
8 PVC 150 -319
12 PVC 150 1,202
12 PVC 150 997
12 PVC 150 997
8 PVC 150 162
8 PVC 150 209
8 PVC 150 210
8 PVC 150 210
8 PVC 150 192
8 PVC 150 116
8 PVC 150 98
8 PVC 150 -372
8 PVC 150 -372
12 PVC 150 625
12 PVC 150 625
6 PVC 150 -94
6 PVC 150 -64
8 PVC 150 -205
8 PVC 150 74
6 PVC 150 -18
6 PVC 150 -68
6 PVC 150 -107
6 PVC 150 -142
6 PVC 150 -470
6 PVC 150 -18
12 PVC 150 0
8 PVC 150 76
12 PVC 150 1,547
6 PVC 150 -13
6 PVC 150 -45
8 PVC 150 0
8 PVC 150 66
8 PVC 150 55
8 PVC 150 55
8 PVC 150 0
6 PVC 150 614
6 PVC 150 604
6 PVC 150 -407
6 PVC 150 -407
6 PVC 150 -407
6 PVC 150 -438
Velocity (ft/s)
1.12
2.04
3.41
2.83
2.83
1.04
1.33
1.34
1.34
1.23
0.74
0 .62
2.37
2 .37
1.77
1.77
1.07
0.72
1 .31
0.47
0 .21
0 .77
1.21
1.61
5 .33
0.21
Joi
0.49
4 .39
0 .15
0.5
oJ
0.42
0 .35
0 .35
J 01
6.97 -6 .85
4.62
4.62
4.62
4.97
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-8)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
EX -J-1 306.89 14 56
EX-J-2 306 .58 69 56 .3
EX-J-3 302 26 58 .8
EX -J-4 302.5 0 58 .2
J-1 302 .38 0 58.1
J-2 302.15 0 57.9
J-3 301.66 11 58.1
EX -J-8 307 .8 48 55 .5
EX-J-11 307.6 17 55.S
EX-J-13 306 .7 0 55.8
J-12 305.69 18 56 .2
J-9 305.41 0 56 .2
J-8 303 .76 0 56.9
J-7 302.7 0 57.3
FH-2 302 .66 0 57.3
FH -1 301.84 0 58
EX-J-7 305.6 44 56 .7
EX -J-6 304 .31 0 57.3
J-14 307 so 55 .7
FH-3 304 .86 39 56.8
J-13 304 .56 35 57 .2
J-10 302.84 32 57
J-11 304.36 32 56.6
J-4 301.64 0 58 .2
J-15 305 .59 11 56 .1
FH 6 302.48 32 57.4
J-83 304 .51 11 56 .6
J-84 304.9 0 56.4
J-81 304.88 11 56.4
FH 5 304 .82 0 56.4
J-85 305 .58 0 56 .1
J-75 301.73 11 55.4
FH 8 299 .53 1,011 53.3
J-73 298.61 0 53.8
J-72 302.09 0 54
FH 7 302.74 32 53 .8
Item
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No. 12327
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R . d E ' E . re ev1se ngmeer s shmate o onstruchon
Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Ouant itv
General Items
Mobilization , Overhead and Construction Staking LS I $ 20 ,000 .00
Topsoil Removal and Replacement , complete in place LS I $ 12 ,000 .00
Street Name Signs, compl ete in place EA 2 $ 350 .00
Stop Sign s, complete in place EA 2 $ 400 .00
Pavement Striping and Markings , complete in place LS I $ 2,000 .00
Erosion & Sediment Control -SWPPP Implementation & Maintenance , Silt Fence, LS l $ 5,000 .00 Construction Exit, Rock Filter Dam, etc ., complete in place
Hydroseed an d Hydromulch , complete in place SY 22 ,812 $ 0.50
General Items Subtotal
Street Construction Items Concrete Pavement .,
Excavation & Grading, complete in place LS 1 $ 30 ,000 .00
Mi xing & incorporation of lime , 6" deep , complete in place SY 3,999 $ 2.30
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 8" deep, complete in place SY 3,663 $ 2.90
Hydrated Lime, complete in place (27 lb/sy for 6" deep & 36 lb/sy for 8" deep) Ton 120 $ 180 .00
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb , complete in place SY 1,803 $ 32 .00
7" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 3,173 $ 35 .00
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Aprons -6" Thick w/ Monolithic Standard Gurb , SF 2,806 $ 4.50 complete in place
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Alleys -6" Thick, complete in place SF 13 ,153 $ 4.10
Concrete Sidewalk & Ramps -4" thick, complete in place SF 15 ,697 $ 3.60
ADA Ramps -Detectable Warning Surfaces , complete in place EA 6 $ 500.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal
Page 1of3
Total
$ 20 ,000 .00
$ 12,000 .00
$ 700 .00
$ 800.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 11 ,406 .00
$ 54,906.00
'
$ 30 ,000.00
$ 9,197 .70
$ 10,622 .70
$ 21 ,600.00
$ 57 ,696.00
$ 111 ,055 .00
$ 12,627 .00
$ 53 ,927 .30
$ 56 ,509 .20
$ 3,000 .00
$ 366,234.90
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R . d E ' E f t re t ev1se n2meer s s 1ma e o ons ruction
Item Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Ouantitv
Storm Sewer Construction Items
18 36" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 16 $ 62 .00 $ 992 .00
19 36" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Non-Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 994 $ 56 .00 $ 55 ,664.00
20 30" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 991 $ 75 .00 $ 74,340.00
21 30" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 351 $ 75 .00 $ 26,332.50
22 24" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 161 $ 55 .00 $ 8,855 .00
23 18" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 59 $ 30.00 $ 1,770.00
24 18" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 220 $ 40 .00 $ 8,800 .00
25 Curb Inlet -10' wide, complete in place EA 6 $ 3,500 .00 $ 21 ,000.00
26 Curb Inlet -5' wide, complete in place EA 2 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00
27 Inlet -3-V-4430 complete in place EA 1 $ 5,000 .00 $ 5,000.00
2 8 Inlet -V-4 33 0 complete in place EA 3 $ 3,500.00 $ 10,500.00
29 8'x5' Junction Box, complete in place EA 2 $ 3,500 .00 $ 7,000.00
30 8'x4' Junction Box, complete in place EA 3 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,000.00
31 TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 2,792 $ 2.00 $ 5,584 .60
32 18" S .E.T .s 6H:IV, complete in place EA 2 $ 1,250.00 $ 2,500.00
33 Channel Grading LS 1 $ 6,000 .00 $ 6,000.00
34 Ditch Grading, complete in place LS 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000 .00
Sto rm Sewer Construction Items S ubtotal $ 252,338.10
..
Water Construction Items '
35 12" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 253 $ 36.00 s 9,108 .00
36 6" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1327 $ 24.00 $ 31 ,848 .00
37 Connect to Existing 6" Water Line EA I $ 500.00 s 500 .00
38 Connect to Existing 12" Water Line EA I $ 500.00 $ 500 .00
39 Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert. extension), complete in place EA 2 s 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00
40 6"x 6" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 2 s 500.00 $ 1,000.00
41 12"x 6" M.J . Reducer, complete in place EA I s 500.00 s 500 .00
42 6" M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 3 $ 900.00 $ 2,700.00
43 6" x 45° M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 10 $ 400.00 $ 4,000.00
44 1.0" Water Service, 23 ft (6" Line) EA 1 s 750.00 $ 750 .00
45 1.5" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length= 2 ft) (6" Line) EA 10 $ 800 .00 s 8,000.00
46 1.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (6" Line) EA 15 s 1,200.00 s 18,000.00
47 1.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (12" Line) EA 4 s 1,300.00 s 5,200.00
Water Construction Items Subtotal $ 89,106.00
Page 2 of 3
rt em
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R . d E E f t fC t f ev1se n2meer s s 1ma e o ons rue 100
Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Ouantitv
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items
6" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 584 $ 24 .00 $ 14,016.00
8" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 74 $ 24 .00 $ 1,776 .00
4" Sewer Service-Single (avg. length = 4ft), complete in place EA 2 $ 300 .00 $ 600.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length = 4 ft), complete in place EA 20 $ 400.00 $ 8,0 00.00
4" Sewer Service-Single (avg length = 48 ft), complete in place EA 4 $ 850.00 $ 3,400.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length = 48 ft), complete in place EA 8 $ 950.00 $ 7,600.00
Complete 4" Sewer Service-Single (avg length = 4 ft), complete in place EA 1 $ 700 .00 $ 700.00
Tie-In to Existing 12" PVC Sewer Line, complete in place EA I $ 1,000 .00 $ 1,000 .00
Concrete Manhole -4' Dia -complete in place EA 3 $ 3,000 .00 $ 9,000.00
TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 658 $ 2.00 $ 1,316.00
Adjust Rim Elevation of existing Manhole, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 48,408.00
General Items Subtotal
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal
Water Construction Items Subtotal
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
$
$
$
$
$
$
54,906.00
366,234.90
252,338.10
89,106.00
48,408.00
810,993.00
-....,~{r/~r/)
P-12j21.
SCHULTZ ENGIN~N<j. LlCj
Page 3 of 3
....
. '
Item
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No.12327
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R . d E ' E f t fC t f ev1se n2meer s s 1ma e o ons rue 100
Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Quantity
General Items
Mobilization, Overhead and Construction Staking LS I $ 20,000 .00
Topsoil Removal and Replacement, complete in place LS I s 12 ,000.00
Street Name Signs, complete in place EA 2 $ 350 .00
Stop Signs, complete in pl ace EA 2 $ 400 .00
Pavement Striping and Markings, complete in place LS I $ 2,000.00
Erosion & Sediment Control -SWPPP Implementation & Maintenance, Silt Fence, LS I s 5,000.00 Construction Exit, Rock Filter Dam, etc., complete in place
Hydroseed and Hydromulch, complete in place SY 22 ,812 s 0.50
General Items Subtotal
' Street Construction Items Concrete Pavement
Excavation & Grading, complete in place LS I $ 30,000.00
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 6" deep, complete in place SY 3,999 s 2 .30
Mixing & incorporation of lime , 8" deep, complete in place SY 3,663 $ 2.90
Hydrated Lime, complete in place (27 lb /sy for 6" deep & 36 lb/s y for 8 11 deep) Ton 120 s 180 .00
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 1,803 s 36.00
7" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 3,173 s 40.00
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Aprons -611 Thick w/ Monolithic Standard Curb, SF 2,806 s 5 .50 complete in place
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Alleys -6" Thick, complete in place SF 13 ,153 s 4 .10
Concrete Sidewalk & Ramps -4" thick, complete in place SF 15,640 s 3.80
ADA Ramps -Detectable Warning Surfaces, complete in place EA 6 s 500.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal
Page 1of3
Total
$ 20 ,000.00
$ 12,000.00
$ 700.00
$ 800.00
s 5,000.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 11 ,406.00
$ 54,906.00
s 30,000.00
$ 9,197 .70
s 10,622 .70
$ 21 ,600.00
$ 64,908.00
$ 126 ,920.00
$ 15 ,433.00
$ 53,927.30
$ 59,432 .00
$ 3,000.00
$ 395,040.70
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R . d E ' E . fC ev1se n2meer s shmate o onstruchon
Item Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Ouantitv
Storm Sewer Constru ction Items
18 36" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 16 $ 62 .00 $ 992.00
19 36" HOP E Pipe, compl ete in place -Non-Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 994 $ 56 .00 $ 55 ,664 .00
20 30" RCP P ipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill , compl ete in place LF 991 $ 75 .00 $ 74,340.00
2 1 30" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 351 $ 75 .00 $ 26 ,332.50
22 24" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 161 $ 55.00 $ 8,855 .00
23 18" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 59 $ 30 .00 $ 1,770.00
24 18" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 220 $ 40 .00 $ 8,800.00
25 Curb Inlet -10' wide, complete in place EA 6 $ 3,500.00 $ 21 ,000.00
26 Curb Inlet -5' wide, complete in place EA 2 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00
27 Inlet -3 -V-4430 complete in place EA I $ 5,000.00 s 5,000.00
28 Inlet -2-V-4430 complete in place EA I $ 4,500.00 s 4,500.00
29 Inlet -V-4330 complete in place EA 2 $ 3,500.00 s 7,000.00
30 8'x5' Junction Box, complete in place EA 2 s 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00
31 8'x4' Junct ion Box, complete in place EA 3 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,000.00
32 TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 2,792 $ 2 .00 s 5,584 .60
33 18" S .E.T .s 6H:lV, complete in place EA 2 s 1,250 .00 s 2,500.00
34 Channel Grading LS 1 $ 6,000 .00 s 6,000.00
35 Ditch Grading, complete in place LS 1 $ 4 ,000.00 s 4,000.00
Storm Sewer Construction Items S ubtotal s 253,338.10
,,". Water Construction Items
36 12" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 253 $ 36.00 s 9,108 .00
37 6" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1257 s 24.00 s 30,168 .00
38
6" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Restrained Joint, Spacers & End Seals, LF 70 $ 45.00 s 3,150 .00
complete in place
39 14" Casing, complete in place LF 62 s 45.00 s 2,790 .00
40 Connect to Existing 6" Water Line EA I $ 500.00 s 500.00
41 Connect to Existing 12" Water Line EA I $ 500.00 s 500 .00
42 Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert. extension), complete in place EA 2 s 3,500.00 s 7,000 .00
43 6"x 6" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 2 s 500.00 s 1,000.00
44 12"x 6" M.J . Reducer, complete in place EA l $ 500.00 s 500.00
45 6" M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 3 s 900 .00 s 2,700.00
46 6" x 45 ° M.J . Bend, complete in place EA 10 s 400.00 s 4,000.00
47 l.O" Water Service, 23 ft (6" Line) EA l s 750.00 s 750 .00
48 1.5" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length = 2 ft) (6" Line) EA 10 s 800 .00 s 8,000.00
49 l.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length = 48 ft) (6 " Line) EA 15 $ 1,200.00 s 18 ,000.00
50 l.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length = 48 ft) (12" Line) EA 4 $ l ,300.00 s 5,200.00
Water Construction Items Subtotal s 93,366.00
Page 2 of 3
/
t •
Item
51
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R . d E I E f t fC t f ev1se ngmeer s s 1ma e o ODS rue IOD
Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Quantity
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items
6" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 584 $ 24 .00 $ 14,016.00
4" Sewer Service-Single (avg. length = 4ft), complete in place EA 2 $ 300 .00 $ 600.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length = 4 ft), complete in place EA 20 $ 400 .00 $ 8,00.0.00
4" Sewer Service-Single (avg length = 48 ft), complete in place EA 4 $ 850.00 $ 3,400.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length= 48 ft), complete in place EA 8 $ 950 .00 $ 7,600.00
Complete 4" Sewer Service-Single (avg length= 4 ft), complete in place EA 1 $ 700 .00 $ 700 .00
Tie-In to Exi sting 12" PVC Sewer Line, complete in place EA 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000 .00
Concrete Manhole -4' Dia -complete in place EA 3 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,000 .00
TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 584 $ 2.00 $ 1,168 .00
Water Tight Manhole Cover -Install on existing 18" Sewerline along Old Wellborn LS 2 $ 500 .00 $ 1,000 .00 Road, complete in place
Adjust Rim Elevation of existing Manhole, complete in place EA 2 $ 500 .00 $ 1,000.00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 47,484.00
General Items Subtotal $ 54,906.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal $ 395,040.70
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 253,338.10
Water Construction Items Subtotal $ 93,366.00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 47,484.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $ 844,134.80
f''-123~1
S.CfUJ~~ ~~NEERING. .U,C,
Page 3 of 3
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Stormwater Construction General Permit
The Notice of Intent (NOi) for the facility listed below was received on May 28, 2013 . The intent to discharge storm water associated with
construction activity under the terms and conditions imposed by the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) stormwater
construction general permit TXR.150000 is acknowledged. Your facility's TPDES construction stormwater general permit number is:
TXR15SI36
Coverage Effective: July 14, 2011
TCEQ's stormwater construction general permit requires certain stormwater pollution prevention and control measures , possible monitoring and
reporting, and periodic inspections. Among the conditions and requirements of this permit, you must have prepared and implemented a stormwater
pollution prevention plan (SWP3) that is tailored to your construction site. As a facility authorized to discharge under the stormwater construction
general permit, all terms and conditions must be complied with to maintain coverage and avoid possible penalties.
Project/Site Information:
RN106178635
THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION
3100 HAUPT RD
COLLEGE STATION , TX 77845
BRAZOS County
Operator:
CN603732991
HEATH PHILLIPS INVESTMENTS LLC
516 DEACON DR W
COLLEGE STATION , TX 77845
This permit expires on March 05 , 2018, unless otherwise amended. If you have any questions related to processing, you may contact the Storm water
Processing Center by email at swpermit @t ce q.texas .gov or by telephone at (512) 239-3700. For technical issues , you may contact the storrp.water
technical staff by email at swg p @tceq.texas .gov or by telephone at (512) 239-4671. Also, you may obtain information on the TCEQ web site at
http://www2.tce q.texas .gov/wq_dpa/index.cfm . A copy of this document should be kept with your SWP3.
Issued Date : May 28 , 2013 FOR THE COMMISSION
APPENDIX C1 ,' Barracks II Phases 107 Storm Sewer Pipe Design Analysis (10 yr Storm) HG10 Depth Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Size Length Slope No. (Inches) (feet) (%) Normal Depth Surcharged Q10 V10 Depth HG10 V10 (cfs) (fps) (feet) Slope (fps) Downstream Top Pipe Structure Elev. FL Upstream Top Pipe HG10 Structure Elev. FL Elev. Below Rlm (feet) 121 24 209.5 0.30 7.06 4.03 1.60 0.10% 2.25 5122 302.52 297.86 5121 302.74 298.49 299.97 2.46 128 18 112.0 0.30 7.99 6.22 1.30 0.58% 4.52 5129 301.39 297.13 5128 301.36 297.46 300.04 0.82 699 36 252.5 0.20 56.14 4.71 2.39 0.71% 7.95 OUT 294.50 292.60 5699 298.13 293.1 295.33 2.80 700 36 252.5 0.20 56.14 4.71 2.39 0.71% 7.95 5699 298.13 293.20 5700 299.08 293.71 296.22 2.86 701 30 71.1 0.30 49.68 5.34 2.25 1.46% 10.13 5700 299.08 294.21 5701 299.60 294.42 296.99 2.61 702 30 158.9 0.30 48.85 4.98 2.48 1.41% 9.96 5701 299.60 294.52 5702 300.50 295 297.83 2.67 703 30 130.5 0.74 39.29 4.60 2.36 0.91% 8.01 5702 300.50 295.10 5703 302.44 296.07 298.28 4.16 704 30 45.7 0.30 29.87 4.38 2.16 0.53% 6.09 5703 302.44 296.17 5704 302.55 296.3 298.51 4.04 705 30 83.9 0.30 28.46 3.77 2.10 0.48% 5.80 5704 302.55 296.40 5705 301.64 296.66 298.75 2.89 706 18 23.7 1.00 1.69 4.00 0.46 0.03% 0.96 5704 302.55 299.20 5706 300.94 299.44 299.95 0.99 710 18 11.5 0.30 8.16 6.33 1.21 0.60% 4.62 5700 299.08 295.21 5710 299.36 295.24 297.12 1.74 711 18 52.0 0.30 5.49 4.14 1.30 0.27% 3.11 5710 299.36 295.34 5711 299.68 295.5 297.65 1.53 712 18 23.7 4.55 1.04 6.10 0.39 0.01% 0.59 5701 299.60 296.41 5712 299.00 297.5 297.76 1.24 713 18 52.0 0.80 2.52 2.07 1.30 0.06% 1.43 5128 301.36 297.56 5713 301.35 297.98 300.14 0.71 720 24 181.9 0.30 7.88 3.11 2.37 0.12% 2.51 5702 300.50 295.10 5720 300.56 295.65 297.90 2.66 721 18 213.1 0.30 3.75 3.60 1.22 0.13% 2.12 5125 302.05 297.88 5721 301.72 298.52 299.65 2.07 730 30 184.3 0.39 11.57 4.18 1.82 0.08% 2.36 5703 302.44 296.17 5730 301.70 296.88 298.41 2.97 731 24 31.0 0.30 8.43 4.50 1.30 0.14% 2.68 5730 301.70 297.38 5731 301.61 297.48 298.99 2.12 733 24 31.0 0.30 5.47 3.07 1.39 0.06% 1.74 5121 302.57 298.59 5733 302.48 298.68 300.07 1.91 Notes 1. Friction losses and minor losses for 18" diameter pipe are computed as for a 15.6" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area. 2. Friction losses and minor losses for 24" diameter pipe are computed as for a 20.8" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area.
APPENDIX C1 .• Barracks II Phases 107 Storm Sewer Pipe Design Analysis (100 yr Storm) HG100 Depth Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Size Length Slope No. (Inches) (feet) (%) Normal Depth Surcharged Q100 V100 Depth HG100 V100 (cfs) (fps) (feet) Slope (fps) Downstream Top Pipe Structure Elev. FL Upstream Top Pipe HG100 Structure Elev. FL Elev. Below ROW (feet) 121 24 209.50 0.30 10.11 4.37 1.72 0.20% 3.22 S122 302.52 297.86 5121 302.74 298.49 302.50 0.57 128 18 112.00 0.30 10.10 7.61 1.30 0.92% 5.72 S129 301.39 297.13 5128 301.36 297.46 301.36 0.33 699 36 252.50 0.20 76.10 5.41 2.49 1.30% 10.77 OUT 294.50 292.60 5699 298.13 293.10 295.85 2.61 700 36 252.50 0.20 76.10 5.41 2.96 1.30% 10.77 S699 298.13 293.20 5700 299.08 293.71 297.54 1.87 701 30 71.14 0.30 66.60 6.78 2.50 2.63% 13.57 S700 299.08 294.21 5701 299.60 294.42 298.58 1.35 702 30 158.88 0.30 64.92 6.61 2.50 2.49% 13.23 5701 299.60 294.52 5702 300.50 295.00 300.33 0.50 703 30 130.54 0.74 50.25 5.12 2.50 1.49% 10.24 5702 300.50 295.10 5703 302.44 296.07 300.84 1.93 704 30 45.65 0.30 39.27 4.61 2.50 0.91% 8.00 5703 302.44 296.17 5704 302.55 296.30 301.09 1.79 705 30 83.88 0.30 37.20 3.94 2.50 0.82% 7.58 5704 302.55 296.40 5705 301.64 296.66 301.53 0.44 706 18 23.72 1.00 2.57 4.29 1.30 0.06% 1.46 5704 302.55 299.20 5706 300.94 299.44 301.13 0.14 710 18 11.51 0.30 12.10 9.12 1.30 1.32% 6.85 S700 299.08 295.21 5710 299.36 295.24 298.75 0.94 711 18 52.01 0.30 8.14 6.13 1.30 0.60% 4.61 5710 299.36 295.34 5711 299.68 295.50 299.61 0.40 712 18 23.68 4.55 2.54 6.24 1.12 0.06% 1.44 5701 299.60 296.41 5712 299.00 297.50 298.44 0.89 713 18 52.01 0.80 3.79 2.85 1.30 0.13% 2.15 S128 301.36 297.56 5713 301.35 297.98 301.35 0.33 720 24 181.93 0.30 12.64 3.26 2.50 0.31% 4.03 5702 300.50 295.10 5720 300.56 295.65 300.56 0.33 721 18 213.10 0.30 5.22 3.93 1.30 0.25% 2.96 5125 302.05 297.88 5721 301.72 298.52 301.72 0.33 730 30 184.32 0.39 17.21 4.35 2.50 0.18% 3.51 5703 302.44 296.17 5730 301.70 296.88 301.67 0.36 731 24 31.00 0.30 13.49 5.83 1.72 0.35% 4.30 5730 301.70 297.38 5731 301.61 297.48 301.61 0.33 733 24 31.00 0.30 10.41 4.50 1.72 0.21% 3.32 5121 302.57 298.59 5733 302.48 298.68 302.48 0.33 Notes 1. Friction losses and minor losses for 18" diameter pipe are computed as for a 15.6" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area. 2. Friction losses and minor losses for 24" diameter pipe are computed as for a 20.8" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area.
Item
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No.12327
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R · d E ' E · re ev1se n2meer s shmate o onstruchon
Description Unit Estimated U nit Price Ouantitv
General ltems
Mobilization, Overhead and Construction Staking LS I $ 20,000 .00
Topsoil Removal and Replacement, complete in place LS I $ 12 ,000 .00
Street Name Signs, complete in place EA 2 $ 350 .00
Stop S igns, complete in place EA 2 $ 400 .00
Pavement Striping and Markings, complete in place LS l $ 2,000 .00
Erosion & Sediment Control -SWPPP Implementation & Maintenance, Silt Fence, LS l $ 5,000 .00 Construction Ex it, Rock Filter Dam, etc., complete in place
Hydroseed and Hydromulch, complete in place SY 22 ,812 $ 0 .50
General Items Subtotal
Street Construction Items Concrete Pavement
'
Excavation & Grading, complete in place LS 1 $ 30,000 .00
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 6" deep, complete in place SY 3,999 $ 2 .30
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 8" deep, complete in place SY 3,663 $ 2 .90
Hydrated L ime, complete in place (27 lb/sy for 6" deep & 36 lb/sy for 8" deep) Ton 120 $ 180 .00
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 1,803 $ 32 .00
7" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 3,173 $ 35 .00
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Aprons -6" Thick w/ Monolithic Standard Curb, SF 2,806 $ 4 .50 complete in place
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Alleys -6" Thick, complete in place SF 13 ,153 $ 4 .10
Concrete Sidewalk & Ramps -4" thick, complete in place SF 15,697 $ 3 .60
ADA Ramps -Detectable Warning Surfaces, complete in place EA 6 $ 500.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement ltems Subtotal
Page 1of3
Total
$ 20,000.00
$ 12,000.00
$ 700.00
$ 800.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 11 ,406.00
$ 54,906.00
'·
' '
$ 30,000.00
$ 9,197 .70
$ 10,622 .70
$ 21 ,600.00
$ 57 ,696 .00
$ 111,055 .00
$ 12 ,627 .00
$ 53 ,927 .30
$ 56 ,509.20
$ 3,000.00
$ 366,234.90
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R · d E • Er t re t ev1se n2meer s s 1ma e o ons ruction
Item Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Ouantitv
Storm Sewer Construction Items
18 36" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 16 $ 62 .00 $ 992.00
19 36" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Non-Structural Backfill, complete in pl ace LF 994 $ 56 .00 $ 55 ,664 .00
20 30" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 991 $ 75 .00 $ 74,340.00
21 30" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 351 $ 75.00 $ 26,332 .50
22 24" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 161 $ 55 .00 $ 8,855 .00
23 18" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 59 $ 30 .00 $ 1,770 .00
24 18" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 220 $ 40.00 $ 8,800.00
25 Curb Inlet -10' wide, complete in place EA 6 $ 3,500.00 $ 21,000.00
26 Curb Inlet - 5' wide, complete in place EA 2 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00
27 Inlet -3-V-4430 complete in place EA I $ 5,000 .00 $ 5,000.00
28 Inlet -V-4330 complete in place EA 3 $ 3,500.00 $ 10,500.00
29 8'x5' Junction Box, complete in place EA 2 $ 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00
30 8'x4' Junction Box, complete in place EA 3 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,000.00
31 TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 2,792 $ 2.00 $ 5,584 .60
32 18" S.E.T.s 6H :lV, complete in place EA 2 $ 1,2 50 .00 $ 2,500.00
33 Channel Grading LS I $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00
34 Ditch Grading, complete in place LS 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 252,338.10
Water Construction Items "
35 12" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 253 $ 36.00 $ 9,108 .00
36 6" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1327 $ 24 .00 $ 31,848.00
37 Connect to Existing 6" Water Line EA 1 $ 500 .00 $ 500.00
38 Connect to Existing 12" Water Line EA 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00
39 Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert. extension), complete in place EA 2 $ 3,500.00 $ 7,000 .00
40 6"x 6" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
41 12"x 6" M.J. Reducer, complete in place EA I $ 500 .00 $ 500.00
42 6" M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 3 $ 900 .00 $ 2,700.00
43 6" x 45° M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 10 $ 400.00 $ 4,000.00
44 1.0" Water Service, 23 ft (6" Line) EA l $ 750 .00 $ 750 .00
45 1.5" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length = 2 ft) (6" Line) EA 10 $ 800 .00 $ 8,000 .00
46 1.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (6" Line) EA 15 $ 1,200.00 $ 18,000.00
47 1.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (12" Line) EA 4 $ 1,300.00 $ 5,2 00 .00
Water Construction Items Subtotal $ 89,106.00
Page 2 of 3
Item
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R . d E E f t re t ev1se ngmeer s s 1ma e o ons ruction
Description Unit Estimated Uni t Price Total Ouantitv
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items
6" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 584 $ 24 .00 $ 14,016.00
8" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 74 $ 24 .00 $ 1,776.00
4" Sewer Service-Si ngle (avg. length= 4ft), complete in place EA 2 $ 300.00 $ 600.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length = 4 ft), complete in place EA 20 $ 400 .00 $ 8,000.00
4" Sewer Service-Si ngle (avg length= 48 ft), complete in place EA 4 $ 850.00 $ 3,400.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length= 48 ft), complete in place EA 8 $ 950.00 $ 7,600.00
Complete 4" Sewer Service-Single (avg length= 4 ft), complete in place EA I $ 700.00 $ 700 .00
Tie-In to Existing 12" PVC Sewer Line, complete in place EA I $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Concrete Manhole -4' Dia -complete in place EA 3 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,000.00
TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 658 $ 2.00 $ 1,316.00
Adjust Rim Elevation of existing Manhole, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 48,408.00
General Items Subtotal $ 54,906.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal $ 366,234.90
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 252,338.10
Water Construction Items Subtotal $ 89,106.00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 48,408.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $ 810,993.00
~~ .. ·'I'!· ( r(' r-/ )
p:...12."321
SCHULTZ -~~N~N<h U,C i
Page 3 of 3
Sewer System Report
for
The Barracks II Subdivision
Phase 107
College Station, Texas
October 2014
Prepared By:
TBPE Firm No. 12327
P.O. Box 11995
College Station, TX 77842
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-3900
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Barracks II Subdivision is a 108-acre development in the area generally bounded by Wellborn
Road on the east, Holleman Drive South on the west, Cain Road to the north and Rock Prairie Road to
the south. It is zoned PDD and is comprised of a mixture of residential and commercial land uses.
There are 425 residential lots planned for the site and 25.3 acres of commercial property. The area
surrounding the site is generally undeveloped, with the exception of three residential developments
adjoining the tract on the south. The majority of the area between Cain Road and Rock Prairie Road
is described as General Suburban in the City's Comprehensive Plan, which implies that it is likely to
develop in a similar manner as The Barracks II Subdivision
Phases 100-108, 200 and 300 have been completed or are under construction. Phase 107 is unchanged
from the Preliminary Plat and will add 63 new lots. Exhibit A shows the lot and sewer layout for Phase
107
Sewer service to the area is provided by 18" and 12" lines running along Old Wellborn Road and along
the south property line of The Barracks Subdivision. These lines will be the primary outfall for this
development, but they are also intended to serve other adjoining tracts in the same sewer basin. These
adjoining areas are identified as:
CSISD Tract -23.50 acres
Mayo Tract -24.99 acres
Turner Tract (partial)-15.08 acres
Barger Tract (partial) -18.06 acres
All four of these tracts are presently zoned R except for the Turner Tract which is now zoned
Townhouse and General Suburban. None of these tracts affect this portion of the Sewer System.
Design Criteria:
Primary S ewer Outfall:
Domestic D emand:
Avg. Pop Density:
Average Flow:
P eaking Factor:
Comm ercia l Demand:
Avg. Pop Density:
Average Flow:
Peaking Factor:
Pipe:
Applicable Exhibits :
Phase 107 -Existing 12" sewer lines along Old Wellborn Road & Deacon
Drive
2.67 people per lot
100 gpd/cap or 267 gpd per lot
4
30 people per acre
50 gpd/cap or 1500 gpd per acre
4
PVC D3034 SDR 26
Exhibit A -Sewer Exhibit
Exhibit B -Sanitary Sewer Analysis Spreadsheet
Conclusion:
The sewer system shown in Exhibit A has been laid out using the criteria in the Bryan/College Station
Design Guidelines and TCEQ. It is analyzed assuming peak flow conditions when this portion of the
subdivision is fully developed . The spreadsheet in Exhibit B shows all lines depicted in Exhibit A to
be capable of carrying the flows that come to them under these conditions. This analysis will be used
as the basis for all subsequent sewer line designs in the subdivision. The system will function as
intended as long as the line sizes and slopes are equal to or greater than those shown herein. It should
be noted that any significant additional flow from off-site sources will likely exceed the capacity of
several lines, so careful study is advised of any changes to the contributing area.
EXHIBIT A
OVERALL SEWER SYSTEM LAYOUT
EXHIBIT B
SANITARY SEWER ANALYSIS SPREADSHEET
Line Contributing Flows
.... " ... .., ... ... "O e ::; u ·;;; = " " .,
" z .:: = ; < ... ~ " " ·:: $ ~ "O "" -e E "O
";;> " " " "6 ..,c e ·~ "O ~z
ci:: " .s " .,. e From To = u z r;; = .. e ·:: " :: = .:: 267 1200 1500 1050 -"'"' "" ·i:: c.
GPO per GPO per GPO per GPO per ~ = ;;> " " Lot Acre Acre Acre ~ u
MH # MH# Lots Acres Acres Acres GPD GPD
OFF MH 200 465 0 0 0 124,155
MH 200 MH 100 32 0 0 0 8,544 124,155
MH 100 MH 16 15 0 0 0 4,005 132,699
MH72 MH71 30 0 0 0 8,010 -
MH71 MH70 12 0 0 0 3,204 8,010
Exhibit B
The Barracks II Phases 107
Sewer Analysis Spreadsheet
Flow Ca lculations
Average Daily Flows Infiltration Peaking Peak Size Material (ADF) (10"/o ADF) Factor Flows
GPD CFS CFS CFS l in.)
124,155 0.192 1 0.0192 4.00 0.788 I ~ D3034
132,699 0 .2053 0.0205 4 .00 0.842 12 D3034
136,704 0.2115 0 .02 12 4.00 0.867 1: D3034
8,0 10 0.0124 0 .0012 4 .00 0.051 6 DJ034
11 ,214 0 .0174 0.0017 4 .00 0.071 6 D3034
Page I of I
Mannings n
0.013
0 .013
0.013
0.013
0 .013
Pipe Calculations
Min. Actual Slop e Manning Pipe Peak In side Design for Existing Friction Slope Slop e Flow Diameter Slope Peak or Designed Peak Flows C heck Depth Flows Systems
Inches % % % Inches
I 1.538 0.306 0.25 0.30 OK 5.40
11.538 0.22 1 0.25 0.22 OK 6.15
I 1.538 0.280 0.25 0.28 OK 5.83
5.793 0.626 0.80 0.80 OK 1.44
5.793 0.701 0.80 0 .80 OK 1.65
Line Contributing Flows
~ -; -; e -; e u ~ Q
; ... = o!: ~
c .. < ... Q .. .. .. ~ ::3 .. ~ .., ii'..,
~ e Q Q Q
~i::l e i :z .. ~ :z .. c .... Q e .., .. e From To ~ ..:: ;;; u eZ c ..
~ :; ~
267 1200 1500 1050 " ~ ii' "" ~ ·-c. GPO per GPO per GPO per GPO per Q i:: ;:i ~ c
Q
Lot Acre Acre Acre u
MH # MH# Lots Acres Acres Acres GPO GPO
OFF MH200 465 0 0 0 124,155 -
AH 200 MH 100 32 0 0 0 8,544 124,155
AH 100 MHl6 15 0 0 0 4,005 132 ,699
\1H 72 MH71 30 0 0 0 8,0 10
\1H 71 MH70 12 0 0 0 3,204 8,010
Exhibit B
The Barracks II Phases 107
Sewer Analysis Spreadsheet
Flow Calculations
Average Daily Flows Infiltration Peaking Peak Size Material (ADF) (10% ADF) Factor Flows
GPO CFS CFS CFS \in.)
124,155 0.1921 0.0192 4.00 0.788 12 03034
132,699 0.2 053 0.0205 4.00 0.842 12 03034
136,704 0.2 115 0.02 12 4.00 0.867 12 03034
8,010 0.0124 0.001 2 4 .00 0.051 6 03034
11 ,21 4 0.0174 0.00 17 4.00 0.071 6 03034
Page I of I
Mannings n
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.0 13
0.0 13
Pipe Calculations
Actual Slope Manning Min.Design Pipe Peak Inside for Existing or Friction S lope Slope Peak S lope Flow Diameter Designed Peak Flows Flows Check Depth Systems
Inches % % % Inches
11.5 38 0.306 0.25 0.30 OK 5.40
11.538 0.27 0 0.25 /'0.27 l OK 5.79
11.5 38 0.250 0.25 '-1.l.25/ OK 6.04
5.793 0.626 0.80 0.80 OK 1.44
5.793 0.70 1 0.80 0.80 OK 1.65
Water System Report
for
The Barracks II Subdivision
Phase 107
College Station, Texas
October 2014
Prepared Bv:
TBPE Firm Registration No. 12327
2730 Longmire, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
979 .764.3900
F-12327,
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING. LLC.
General Information
L oca tion:
General Note:
L and Us e:
Phase 107 is located northeast of Phase 106 and northwest of Phase 108
of the Barracks II Development. The Barracks II Subdivision is a 108-
acre development located midway between Rock Prairie Road and Cain
Road in south College Station. It is bounded on the west by Holleman
Drive South and on the east by Old Wellborn Road.
The water lines to serve these 63 residential lots will be a 6" line along
Kimber Lane, 6" line along Old Wellborn Road and a 6" & 12" line
along Deacon Drive. These lines will create a loop in the system. These
lines will connect to existing waterlines constructed in previous phases .
Single family residential
Design Criteria/ Analysis
Primary Wat er Supply: Existing 12 " water line along Deacon Drive and existing 6" waterline
along Kimber Lane .
Existing Sys tem Pressure Tes ts:
F lo w Hydra nt -S ee Appendix A
Flo wrate: 1,300 gpm
Static Pressure: 7 5 p s i
R esidual Press ure: 65 p s i
Ex hibits: Exhibit A -Water Layout
Appendix A -Hydrant Flow Test Results
Appendix B -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Domestic Demand
Appendix C -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Fire Flow Demand @ FH7
Appendix D -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Fire Flow Demand @ FH8
Fire Flow:
Domestic Use
1,000 gpm for Single Family Residential
1.5 gpm per lot for Single Family Residential
Phases 107 -63 Lots = 94.5 gpm
Total Domestic Demand = 94 .5 gpm
The proposed 12" & 6" waterlines are in accordance with the BCS Water
Design Guidelines. This report provides the results of the water system
analysis under the fire flow and domestic demand requirements , (1 ,552
gpm) which produced the lowest pressure in the system .
Conclusion
Summary of Calculations
Pressure 73.9
Domestic Demand Min.
Velocity Max 1.55
Pressure 51.S Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 7 Velocity Max 6.79
Pressure 53.3 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 8 Velocity Max 6.97
The minimum pressure (51.5 psi) for this system occurs when a Fire
Flow demand is set at Fire Hydrant Number 7. The Max Velocity for this
system occurs at the same demand when the velocity in Pipe P-76 has a
velocity of 6.97 fps .
All of these pressures exceeds the 20 psi and 35 psi minimum pressure
requirements , respectively . The maximum pipe velocities are less than 12
fps .
The proposed 12" and 6" water lines meet or exceed all of the design
criteria for the City of College Station and the W ellbom Special Utility
District. It will provide adequate water pressure, flowrate and velocity
for both domestic and fire flow demands .
EXHIBIT A
WATER LAYOUT
APPENDIX A
WELLBORN SUD FLOW TEST REPORT
Appendix A
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC
FIRM #12327
WATER SYSTEM FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT
9-19-2013
Date:
Water System Owner: _Wellborn SUD __________________ _
The Barracks II Subdivision
Development Project:
Papa Bear Drive & Towers Parkway
Flow Test Location : ---------------------------
Nozzle size (in .): _2.5 __
60
Pitot Reading (psi): __ _
1300
Flowrate (gpm): ___ _
Discharge Coeff: (c) = 0 .90
Flowrate Formula: Q=29.84cd 2 p112
c =discharge coeff.
d =orifice size (in)
P = pitot pressure (psi)
Hayes Lane and Papa Bear Drive
Pressure Gauge Location: ---------------------------
75
Static Pressure (psi):
65
Residual Pressure (psi):
3265
Computed Discharge at 20 psi Residual Pressure: QR = _____ _
Note: The flow test and report were prepared in accordance with NFPA 291.
Joe Schultz
Report Prepared by :
Ricky Flores
Others Present: Clenden Adams -Wellborn SUD _
_ Britt Curless _______ _
APPENDIX B
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARY -DOMESTIC DEMAND
Pi pe Number Length (ft)
EX -P-1 641
EX-P -2 736
EX -P-3 337
EX -P-4 95
P-1 368
EX -P-8 230
EX -P-10 431
EX -P-12 153
EX -P-13 226
P-12 343
P-8 418
P-7 298
P-6 9
P-5 398
P-2 100
P-3 30
EX -P-7 613
EX -P-6 618
EX -P-5 180
EX -P-9 254
EX -P-11 159
P-14 547
P-13 691
EX-P-14 96
P-10 48
P-11 43
P-4 40
P-9 48
P-RES 29
P-86 578
P-87 333
P-84 62
P-81 138
P-82 9
P-83 335
P-85 71
P-76 265
P-75 320
P-74 27
P-73 370
P-72 14
P-71 596
Appendix B
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Domestic Demand
Size (in) Material
Hazen -
WilliamsC
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
12 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
8 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
6 PVC 150
Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s)
-68 0.43
-159 1.02
362 1.03
213 0 .6
213 0 .6
54 0.35
42 0.27
-6 0 .04
-6 0 .04
-24 0.15
-63 0.4
-118 0 .76
-148 0 .94
-148 0.94
65 0 .18
65 0 .18
-36 0.41
-57 0.64
-149 0.95
23 0.14
32 0.36
-18 0 .2
-57 0.65
-92 1.04
-30 0.34
-55 0.63
0 0
39 0.25
547 1.55
24 0 .27
-8 0.09
0 0
29 0 .18
18 0 .12
18 0.12
0 0
54 0 .62
44 0 .5
33 0 .38
33 0.38
33 0.38
2 0 .02
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Domestic Demand
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand
(gpm)
EX-J -1 306 .89 14
EX -J-2 306.58 69
EX -J-3 302 26
EX -J-4 302.5 0
J-1 302.38 0
J-2 302 .15 0
J-3 301.66 11
EX -J-8 307 .8 48
EX -J-11 307 .6 17
EX-J-13 306 .7 0
J-12 305 .69 18
J-9 305 .41 0
J-8 303 .76 0
J-7 302 .7 0
FH -2 302 .66 0
FH -1 301.84 0
EX -J-7 305.6 44
EX-J-6 304.31 0
J-14 307 so
FH -3 304.86 39
J-13 304 .56 35
J-10 302.84 32
J-11 304.36 32
J-4 301.64 0
J-15 305.59 11
FH 6 302.48 32
J-83 304.51 11
J-84 304 .9 0
J-81 304.88 11
FH 5 304 .82 0
J-85 305 .58 0
J-75 301.73 11
FH 8 299 .53 11
J-73 298 .61 0
J-72 302.09 0
FH 7 302 .74 32
Pressure (psi)
74 .3
74 .4
76 .6
76 .3
76.4
76.4
76 .7
73 .9
74
74 .3
74.8
74 .9
75.6
76.1
76 .2
76 .6
74 .9
75.5
74.2
75 .1
75.4
76 .1
75.4
76.7
74 .8
76 .2
75 .3
75 .1
75 .1
75 .2
74 .8
76 .6
77 .5
77 .9
76.4
76.1
APPENDIX C
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARY-FIRE FLOW DEMAND@ FH7
Pipe
Length (ft)
Number
EX -P-1 641
EX -P-2 736
EX -P-3 337
EX-P-4 95
P-1 368
EX -P-8 230
EX -P-10 431
EX-P -12 153
EX-P-13 226
P-12 343
P-8 418
P-7 298
P-6 9
P-5 398
P-2 100
P-3 30
EX -P-7 613
EX-P-6 618
EX -P-5 180
EX-P -9 254
EX-P-11 159
P-14 547
P-13 691
EX -P-14 96
P-10 48
P-11 43
P-4 40
P-9 48
P-RES 29
P-86 578
P-87 333
P-84 62
P-81 138
P-82 9
P-83 335
P-85 71
P-76 265
P-75 320
P-74 27
P-73 370
P-72 14
P-71 596
Appendix C
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-7)
Size (in) Material
Hazen-
Flow (gpm)
Williams C
8 PVC 150 -188
8 PVC 150 -329
12 PVC 150 1,192
12 PVC 150 967
12 PVC 150 967
8 PVC 150 175
8 PVC 150 229
8 PVC 150 240
8 PVC 150 240
8 PVC 150 222
8 PVC 150 139
8 PVC 150 128
8 PVC 150 -470
8 PVC 150 -470
12 PVC 150 497
12 PVC 150 497
6 PVC 150 -102
6 PVC 150 -73
8 PVC 150 -225
8 PVC 150 72
6 PVC 150 -28
6 PVC 150 -77
6 PVC 150 -116
6 PVC 150 -151
6 PVC 150 -598
6 PVC 150 -11
12 PVC 150 0
8 PVC 150 83
12 PVC 150 1,547
6 PVC 150 -20
6 PVC 150 -52
8 PVC 150 0
8 PVC 150 73
8 PVC 150 62
8 PVC 150 62
8 PVC 150 0
6 PVC 150 486
6 PVC 150 476
6 PVC 150 465
6 PVC 150 465
6 PVC 150 465
6 PVC 150 -566
Velocity (ft/s)
1.2
2 .1
3.38
2.74
2 .74
1.12
1.46
1.53
1.53
1.42
0.89
0.81
3
3
1.41
1.41
1.16
0.83
1.43
0.46
0.32
0.88
1.32
1.72
6 .79
0.13
0
0.53
4 .39
0 .23
0.59
0
0.46
0.4
0.4
0
5 .52
5.4
5.28
5 .28
5 .28
6 .43
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH -7)
Junction
Demand Pressure Junction Elevation
(gpm) (psi)
EX-J-1 306 .89 14 55 .9
EX -J-2 306 .58 69 56.2
EX-J -3 302 26 58 .8
EX -J-4 302.5 0 58 .2
J-1 302 .38 0 58.2
J-2 302 .15 0 58
J-3 301.66 11 58 .1
EX-J -8 307 .8 48 55.5
EX -J-11 307.6 17 55.4
EX -J-13 306.7 0 55 .7
J-12 305 .69 18 56.1
J-9 305.41 0 56
J-8 303 .76 0 56 .7
J-7 302.7 0 57 .1
FH -2 302.66 0 57.1
FH -1 301 .84 0 58.1
EX-J-7 305 .6 44 56 .6
EX-J -6 304 .31 0 57.3
J-14 307 50 55.7
FH -3 304 .86 39 56.7
J-13 304.56 35 57.1
J-10 302 .84 32 56.6
J-11 304 .36 32 56 .4
J-4 301.64 0 58 .2
J-15 305 .59 11 56
FH 6 302.48 32 57.3
J-83 304.51 11 56.4
J-84 304 .9 0 56 .2
J-81 304.88 11 56.3
FH 5 304 .82 0 56 .3
J-85 305.58 0 56
J-75 301 .73 11 56.4
FH 8 299.53 11 55.4
J-73 298.61 0 55 .6
J-72 302.09 0 51.9
FH 7 302.74 1,032 51.5
APPENDIX D
WATERCAD ANALYSIS SUMMARY-FIRE FLOW DEMAND@ FHS
Pipe Length (ft)
Number
EX -P-1 641
EX -P-2 736
EX -P-3 337
EX-P-4 9S
P-1 368
EX -P-8 230
EX -P-10 431
EX -P-1 2 1S3
EX -P-13 226
P-12 343
P-8 418
P-7 298
P-6 9
P-S 398
P-2 100
P-3 30
EX -P-7 613
EX -P-6 618
EX -P-S 180
EX-P-9 2S4
EX-P-11 1S9
P-14 S47
P-13 691
EX -P-14 96
P-10 48
P-11 43
P-4 40
P-9 48
P-RES 29
P-86 S78
P-87 333
P-84 62
P-81 138
P-82 9
P-83 33S
P-8S 71
P-76 26S
P-7S 320
P-74 27
P-73 370
P-72 14
P-71 596
Appendix D
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-8)
Size (in) Material
Hazen-
Flow (gpm)
Williams C
8 PVC lSO -176
8 PVC lSO -319
12 PVC lSO 1,202
12 PVC lSO 997
12 PVC lSO 997
8 PVC lSO 162
8 PVC lSO 209
8 PVC lSO 210
8 PVC lSO 210
8 PVC lSO 192
8 PVC lSO 116
8 PVC lSO 98
8 PVC lSO -372
8 PVC lSO -372
12 PVC lSO 62S
12 PVC lSO 62S
6 PVC lSO -94
6 PVC lSO -64
8 PVC 150 -20S
8 PVC lSO 74
6 PVC lSO -18
6 PVC lSO -68
6 PVC lSO -107
6 PVC lSO -142
6 PVC lSO -470
6 PVC lSO -18
12 PVC lSO 0
8 PVC lSO 76
12 PVC lSO l,S47
6 PVC lSO -13
6 PVC lSO -4S
8 PVC lSO 0
8 PVC lSO 66
8 PVC lSO SS
8 PVC lSO SS
8 PVC lSO 0
6 PVC lSO 614
6 PVC lSO 604
6 PVC lSO -407
6 PVC lSO -407
6 PVC lSO -407
6 PVC lSO -438
Velocity (ft/s)
1.12
2.04
3.41
2 .83
2.83
1.04
1.33
1.34
1.34
1.23
0.74
0 .62
2.37
2.37
1 .77
1 .77
1.07
0 .72
1.31
0.47
0 .21
0.77
1.21
1.61
S.33
0 .21
0
0.49
4 .39
O.lS
o.s
0
0.42
0.3S
0.3S
0
6.97
6 .8S
4.62
4.62
4 .62
4.97
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH -8)
Junction
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
EX-J -1 306 .89 14 56
EX-J-2 306.58 69 56.3
EX-J-3 302 26 58 .8
EX -J-4 302 .5 0 58 .2
J-1 302.38 0 58 .1
J-2 302 .15 0 57 .9
J-3 301.66 11 58.1
EX -J-8 307.8 48 55 .5
EX -J-11 307 .6 17 55 .5
EX-J-13 306.7 0 55 .8
J-12 305 .69 18 56 .2
J-9 305.41 0 56.2
J-8 303 .76 0 56.9
J-7 302 .7 0 57 .3
FH -2 302.66 0 57 .3
FH-1 301.84 0 58
EX-J -7 305 .6 44 56 .7
EX -J-6 304 .31 0 57.3
J-14 307 so 55.7
FH -3 304 .86 39 56 .8
J-13 304.56 35 57 .2
J-10 302.84 32 57
J-11 304.36 32 56 .6
J-4 301.64 0 58 .2
J-15 305.59 11 56.1
FH 6 302.48 32 57.4
J-83 304.51 11 56 .6
J-84 304 .9 0 56.4
J-81 304.88 11 56.4
FH 5 304 .82 0 56.4
J-85 305 .58 0 56 .1
J-75 301.73 11 55.4
FH 8 299.53 1,011 53 .3
J-73 298.61 0 53 .8
J-72 302.09 0 54
FH 7 302 .74 32 53 .8
Sewer System Report
for
The Barracks II Subdivision
Phase 107
College Station, Texas
October 2014
Prepared By:
TBPE Firm No. 12327
P.O. Box 11995
College Station, TX 77842
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-3900
.._.""",. ,,1r.1 t
f"-12327
SCHULTZ ENGINEERtNG, LLC.
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Barracks II Subdivision is a 108-acre development in the area generally bounded by Wellborn
Road on the east, Holleman Drive South on the west, Cain Road to the north and Rock Prairie Road to
the south. It is zoned PDD and is comprised of a mixture of residential and commercial land uses.
There are 425 residential lots planned for the site and 25.3 acres of commercial property. The area
surrounding the site is generally undeveloped, with the exception of three residential developments
adjoining the tract on the south. The majority of the area between Cain Road and Rock Prairie Road
is described as General Suburban in the City's Comprehensive Plan, which implies that it is likely to
develop in a similar manner as The Barracks II Subdivision
Phases 100-108, 200 and 300 have been completed or are under construction. Phase 107 is unchanged
from the Preliminary Plat and will add 63 new lots. Exhibit A shows the lot and sewer layout for Phase
107
Sewer service to the area is provided by 18" and 12" lines running along Old Wellborn Road and along
the south property line of The Barracks Subdivision. These lines will be the primary outfall for this
development, but they are also intended to serve other adjoining tracts in the same sewer basin. These
adjoining areas are identified as:
CSISD Tract -23.50 acres
Mayo Tract -24 .99 acres
Turner Tract (partial)-15.08 acres
Barger Tract (partial) -18.06 acres
All four of these tracts are presently zoned R except for the Turner Tract which is now zoned
Townhouse and General Suburban. None of these tracts affect this portion of the Sewer System.
Design Criteria:
Primary Sewer Outfall:
Domestic Demand:
Avg. Pop Density:
Average Flow:
Peaking Factor:
Commercial Demand:
Avg. Pop Density:
Average Flow:
Peaking Factor:
Pipe:
Applicable Exhibits:
Phase 107 -Existing 12" sewer lines along Old Wellborn Road & Deacon
Drive
2.67 people per lot
100 gpd/cap or 267 gpd per lot
4
30 people per acre
50 gpd/cap or 1500 gpd per acre
4
PVC D3034 SDR 26
Exhibit A -Sewer Exhibit
Exhibit B -Sanitary Sewer Analysis Spreadsheet
Conclusion:
The sewer system shown in Exhibit A has been laid out using the criteria in the Bryan/College Station
Design Guidelines and TCEQ. It is analyzed assuming peak flow conditions when this portion of the
subdivision is fully developed. The spreadsheet in Exhibit B shows all lines depicted in Exhibit A to
be capable of carrying the flows that come to them under these conditions. This analysis will be used
as the basis for all subsequent sewer line designs in the subdivision. The system will function as
intended as long as the line sizes and slopes are equal to or greater than those shown herein. It should
be noted that any significant additional flow from off-site sources will likely exceed the capacity of
several lines, so careful study is advised of any changes to the contributing area.
EXHIBfT A
OVERALL SEWER SYSTEM LAYOUT
EXHIBIT B
SANITARY SEWER ANALYSIS SPREADSHEET
Line Con tri b utin2 F lows
,?;;> Oi Oi 13
Oi ·5 u ~ " <= u c ..: "' c .. < .. " .. .. .. ... p .. ·.c "C ~ "C
~ 13 .:! " " " ~Q 13 ~ z .. ii: z .. gf ..,. " 13 "C .. 13 From T o IX r;; u .:: f ~ c " ; t
267 1200 1500 1050 ... = ~
~ ..c "' ·-"" GPD per GPD per G PD per GPD pet " ~;:::, ii: " Lo t Acre Acre Acre u
MH # MH # Lots Acres Acres Acres GPO GPO
OFF MH200 465 0 0 0 124 ,155 -
ilH 200 MH 100 32 0 0 0 8,544 124,155
ilH 100 MH 16 15 0 0 0 4,00 5 132 ,699
MH72 MH 7 1 30 0 0 0 8,0 10 -
MH 7 1 MH70 12 0 0 0 3,204 8,0 10
ExhibitB
T he Barracks II Phases 107
Sewe r Analysis Spread sheet
Flow Calculations
Ave r age Dail y Flows Infil tration Peaking Peak
(ADF) (10% ADF) Factor F low s Size Material
GP O CFS CFS CFS (in.)
124,155 0.1921 0.0 192 4 .00 0.788 12 0 3034
132,699 0.2053 0.0205 4.00 0.8 42 12 0 3034
136,7 04 0.2 11 5 0.02 12 4.00 0.867 12 0 3034
8,0 10 0.0 124 0.00 12 4.00 0.051 6 03034
11 ,2 14 0.0 174 0.00 17 4.00 0.07 1 6 03034
Page I of I
Mannings n
0.0 13
0.0 13
0.0 13
0.0 13
0.0 13
P ipe Calcul ations
Actual Slope
ln side M anni ng Min .Des ign for Existing or Pipe Peak
Fr iction Slope Slope Peak Slope F low Di ameter Design ed Peak Flow s Flows Check De pth Sys te ms
Inches % % % In ches
11.538 0.306 0.25 0.30 OK 5.40
11.538 0.270 0.2 5 0.2 7 OK 5.79
11.538 0.250 0.25 0.25 OK 6.04
5.793 0.626 0.8 0 0.80 OK 1.44
5.793 0.70 1 0.80 0.80 OK 1.65
C ITY OF C on.EGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University"
(Check one) D Minor
($700)
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
D Amending
($700)
[gj Final
($932)
D Vacating
($932)
0Replat
($932)
Is this plat in the ET J? D Yes [8] No Is this plat Commercial D or Residential [81
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
g$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
,.VE] J233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
~ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure , $600 minimum (if fee is > $600 , the balance is
_,llue prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
~ Application completed in full . Th is application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
-,ay not be adjusted or altered . Please attach pages if additional information is provided .
~~ourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
~wo (2) copies of the grading , drainage , and erosion control plans with supporting dra inage report .
@/l"wo (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
D Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
~itle report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
y urrent within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership , liens,
/encumbrances, etc .
•18] Paid tax certificates from City of College Station , Brazos County and College Station l.S .D.
[8] The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat appl ication will be cons idered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct , the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference
NAME OF PROJECT The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107
ADDRESS Intersection of Deacon Drive and General Parkway
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
East Side of Holleman Drive South between Cain Road and Rock Prairie Road
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Heath Phillips E-mail heath_superiorstructures@yahoo.co
Street Address P. 0 . Box 262
~-----------------------~
I
C ity Wellborn Zip Code _7_78_8_1 ___ _
Phone Number 979-229 -5906 Fax Number 979 -703-7903 ----------~--------------~
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PR~PERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must ,be identified . Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Heath Phillips Investments, LLC (Heath Phillips, manager) E-mail heath_ superiorstructures@yahoo.co
P .O. Box 262 Street Address
City Wellborn State Tx Zip Code 77881 ------
Phone Number 979-229-5906 Fax Number 979-703-7903
---------------~
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION :
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail joeschultz84@verizon .net
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 ------
Phone Number 979.764 .3900 Fax Number 979.764 .3910 -----------------
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? [g] Yes 0 No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so , please provide the Volume ____ and Page No. __ _
Total No. of Lots 63 ------R-0-W Acreage 2.24 Acres Total Acreage _7._6_5_4 _______ _
Existing Use Vacant
-------------~
Proposed Use Townhouse Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 63 I POD
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.09 I POD I __ _ __ / __ _
Floodplain Acreage None ----------------------------------
1 s there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? D Yes IXj No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made ,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
181 Yes
IJ No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: THE BARRACKS II (PP)
City Project Number (if known): 14-00900010
Date I Timeframe when submitted: 2/5/14
1/11 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable)
YA ------~
Re uested wa iver to subd iv ision re ulations and reason for same if a licable :
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special c ircumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision re ulations will de rive the a licant of the reasonable use of his land .
YA
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. T he granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health , safety , or welfare , or inj uri ous to ot her
property in the area , or to the City in administering subd ivision regulations .
4. The granting of the wa iver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance .
YA
Fee in lieu of s idewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable ):
1. O An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way ;
2. O The presence of un ique or unusual topographic, vegetative , or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the s idewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feas ible or is not in keep ing w ith the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan ;
3. D A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imm inent shall
mean t he project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. O Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan w ith an estate I
rural context;
5. O When a sidewa lk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle , Pedestrian , and
Greenways Master Plan ;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
--- -_________ __,_
6 . D The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO ; or
7. D The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6 .6 ,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification , in the City's Comprehensive Plan .
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
t --··················· ---
NOTE : A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission .
Requested Oversize Part ic ipation None
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
1895' Streets
3492 ' Sidewalks
658' Sanitary Sewer Lines
1476' Water Lines
120' Channels
3405' Storm Sewers
0 Bike Lanes I Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE :
___ No . of acres to be dedicated + $ ____ development fee
___ No . of acres in floodplain
No . of acres in detention ---
---No . of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND :
No . of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $
~---~-------
(date) Approved by Parks & Rec reation Advisory Board ----
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and cerlifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true , correct, and complete. IF THIS APPL/CATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title reporl are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Signature and t itle Dater I
1/11 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued .
2 . The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued .
4 . Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued .
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6 . Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements . Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP .
7. If required , Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction .
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9 . If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or
existing drainage facilities . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply .
11 . The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12 . Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only . I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13 . I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
---l(;Jff-~7
Date~ / Property Owner(s)
Engineer Certification:
1/11
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds , proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence .
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local , State and Federal Permits prior to construct ion
including NOi and SWPPP . Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES : i.e ., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER , AGREE.,,.~~r~v THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPME~~~~~ATION , ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
CURATE. J?'0 ~···· *0 000
•. ~'I 1
.0B * fdo '· oa -/: f~
*: "c-;<:(1 4 ~ ~· ..... "SEP~tr·:·sc1~itilfr· .. ~ I 0 ,. I 5, I
~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
En ~?~··;:; 65889,Q./;Jj Date
0 ",<\ ···fGJ Tt:-:~~"0 ~ • ..;,
Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify , as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the
alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area ;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second . This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ord inances , Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area ; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities .
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification .
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following :
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm .
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction , improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments .
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 6 of 9
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial , or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor , including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility , ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre -
pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval :
1/11 Page 7 of 9
Existing
[8]
1/1 1
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
[8] Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch .
[8] V ic inity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits . No scale required but include north arrow.
[8] Tit le Block with the following information :
[8] Name and address of subdivide r, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor.
[8] Proposed name of subdivision . (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
[8] Date of preparation .
[8] Engineer's scale in feet.
[8] Total area intended to be developed .
[8] North Arrow .
[8] Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
[8] If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
[8] A ll applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
[8] Ownership and Dedication
[8] Surveyor and/or Engineer
[8] City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat)
[8] Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
[8] Brazos County Clerk
O Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
0 If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created .
D If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County , pursuant to the provisions of Section 21 .084 of the Texas Water Code .
[8] Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent ava ilable
data .
Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data .
Matches the approved prel iminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2).
The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii , area , center
angle, degree of curvature , tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existi ng items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary w ith the subdiv ision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Proposed
[8] Streets . Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac , stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O .W . locations and widths . (All existing and proposed R.O .W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan .)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance .
Page 8 of 9
Existing
[8J
[8J
[8J
lg]
Proposed
[g]
[g]
[g]
[g]
Alleys.
Easements .
A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages . All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
[g] Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following :
[g] Street, alley and sidewalk plans , profiles and sections . One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other
utilities).
Sewer Design Report.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades .
overall sewer layout of the subdivision . (Utilities of sufficient
master plan and any future growth areas .)
Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
One sheet must show the
size/depth to meet the utility
Water line plan showing fire hydrants , valves , etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades . One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision .
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas .)
Storm drainage system plan with contours , street profile, inlets , storm sewer and
drainage channels , with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas , and runoff
based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design & detention if used . One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the subdivision .
[g] Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
[g] Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8 .6.
[g] Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary .
[g] Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
[g] All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat w ith a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed.
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration .
[8J Are there impact fees associated with this development? [8J Yes 0 No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
[8J Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? 0 Yes [g] No
If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
1/11
the plat at the Courthouse.
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
Page 9 or 9
Drainage Report
for
The Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
College Station, Texas
October 2014
Owner/Developer:
Heath Phillips Investments , LLC
3302 General Parkway
College Station, TX 77845
Prepared By:
Schultz Engineering, LLC
TBPE Firm No. 12327
P.O. Box 11995
College Station, TX 77842
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER
Drainage Report -Executive Summary
The Barracks II Subdivision, Phases 107
College Station, Texas
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
P.O. Box 11995
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone: (979) 764-3900
Fax: (979) 764-3910
OWNER/DEVELOPER
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC
3302 General Parkway
College Station, TX 77845
Phone: (979) 690-5000
GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
This project consists of the development of Phase 107 of the Barracks II Subdivision in College Station. Phase 107
is a townhouse residential development, which will include the construction of utility and roadway infrastructure.
Location:
Description:
• A rea:
• Proposed Land Use :
• #of Lots:
• Existing Land Use :
• Land Description:
Primary Drainage Facility:
Flood Haz ard Information:
FEMAFIRM:
Floodplain:
Phase 107 is located northeast of Phase 106 and northwest of Phase 108 of the
Barracks II Development. The Barracks II Subdivision is a 108-acre
development located midway between Rock Prairie Road and Cain Road in .
south College Station. It is bounded on the west by Holleman Drive South and
on the east by Old Wellborn Road.
7.654 Acres
Townhouse Residential
63 lots
Vacant
The terrain slopes generally towards the north.
Tributary B.3 of Bee Creek
#48041C0305F, Dated April 2, 2014
None of this phase of the development lies within the floodplain.
HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS
The existing site is cleared. The elevations range from 303 to 299, sloping generally in a northerly direction. The
majority of the runoff will be directed to the roadways and the proposed storm sewer system and will discharge into
Old Wellborn Road roadside ditch. The stormwater detention facility drainage report prepared by Kimley-Horn has
been revised to evaluate the proposed drainage of the site and to address the increase in peak flow resulting from this
development. The remaining runoff will be directed to the roadways and the proposed storm sewer system and will
discharge into the existing detention facilities on Lot 1, Block 28 Phase 300 of The Barracks II Subdivision.
~ti~te_!!', ~s ~no ff ~ow ~ in~ T~bu~ l?.3_ of Bee Cree_k.
GENERALSTORMWATERPLAN
The drainage plan for this development will involve the installation of storm sewer pipes and inlets , which will
collect and convey a portion of the runoff into the existing storm sewer system and then to the existing detention
pond. This development will also discharge into the existing drainage ditch along Old Wellborn Road which will
collect and convey the runoff downstream. The runoff that is collected by the existing detention ponds and the Old
Wellborn Road ditch will be di scharged into tributary B .3 of Bee Creek.
The detention pond analysis and design for this phase is covered under the drainage report titled, "The Barracks
Detention Facility Design City of College Station, Texas, Dated July 2012" prepared by K.imley-Horn and as
modified in September 2013 and as revised in the report submitted in September 2014. This revised report will take
into account the development of the adjacent tract to the north which has been acquired and will become part of the
Barracks.
COORDINATION & STORMWATERPERMITTING
This project has a Notice of Intent filed with the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality. No other permits
are anticipated for this project.
DRAINAGE DESIGN
General Information:
Street Design:
Tc Methodology:
Tc Minimum:
Design Storm Event:
Pipe Materials:
Manning 's n Values :
Runoff Coefficients:
Design Constraints:
Stormwater runoff from Phase 107 of the subdivision will be collected by a
storm sewer system. The location of the drainage areas for evaluation of the
gutter.depth check, inlet sizing, pipe evaluation and channel sizing are shown on
Exhibit A & B. Refer to Exhibit B for the locations of the inlets and storm
sewer pipes.
Kimber Lane:
Standard Cross-Section (3% cross-slope, 27' B-B Residential Roadway)
Lay down and standard curb and gutter on residential streets
D eacon Drive:
Collector Street Cross-Section (3% cross-slope, 48' B-B)
Standard Curb and gutter
Concrete Pavement
Standard recessed curb inlets (5' & 10' in length)
TR55
10 Minutes
10 year design storm & 100 year analysis for residential and collector streets &
storm sewer
Class III RCP , Profile Gasket in accordance with AS1M C443 , AS1M C76 and
Corrugated HDPE Storm Sewer Pipe with smooth interior
0.013 for pipes
O.Q18 for Streets
0.75 for developed lots
0.45 for undeveloped land
Max. water depth in gutter: 4.5" or 0.375' for the 10 year design storm for
residential and collector streets
Min. pipe flow velocity: 2.5 fps
Max. pipe flow velocity: 15 fps
100-yr storm runoff maintained within the ROW (3" above curb)
D esign Software:
Design Res ults:
Detention Analysis:
Applicable Exhibits :
CONCLUSION
25% reduction of cross-sectional area of pipes less than 24" in diameter
Min. 1' freeboard for the 10 year design storm depth of flow
Excel Spreadsheets, Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D 2013 ,
& Autodesk Civil 3D Storm Sewer Analysis.
The software was used to compute pipe capacities, flow rates and velocities,
compute hydraulic grade line elevations, headwater elevations, gutter depth &
inlet sizing.
The requirement for a 25% reduction in cross sectional area of pipes 24" in
diameter or less is achieved by using internal pipe diameters that are less than
the standard diameter. The 24" diameter pipe areas were reduced by 25% and a
20.6" diameter pipe was used in the analysis and the 18" diameter pipe areas
were reduced by 25% and a 15.6" diameter pipe was used in the analysis.
The data presented in the Appendices indicates the gutter depth, inlet sizing,
pipe sizes and channel sizing is in accordance with the requirements of and the
City of College Station.
Runoff from the Barracks II Subdivision was previously studied and detention
ponds were designed for the entire development including this phase. See the
drainage report titled, ''The Barracks Detention Facility Design City of College
Station, Texas, Dated July 2012" and as modified in September 2013 and by a
revised design being prepared by Kimley-Horn submitted in September 2014.
Sheet 05 , "Proposed Condition Drainage Area Map'', from the Kimley-Horn
September 2014 "Modifications to The Barracks Detention Facility" de sign
shows Drainage Area Cl, 18.56 acres of the project area discharging into the
Old Wellborn Road right of way. With the final design of Phase 107 and 108
the computed area discharging into the Old Wellborn Road right of way is 18.56
acres . Since this matches the area shown by K.imley-Horn the existing detention
facilities for The Barracks are adequate for this phase of the subdivision and no
additional pond construction or modifications are necessary.
Exhibit A -Drainage Area Map
Exhibit B -Drainage Plan
Appendix Al -Drainage Area Summary
Appendix Bl -Depth of Flow in Gutter
Appendix B2 -Storm Sewer Inlet Summary
Appendix Cl -Storm Sewer Pipe Summary
Appendix D -Technical Design Summary
The storm sewer, inlets & channel drainage system for Phase 107 of the Barracks II Subdivision will function within
the requirements and restrictions of the BCS Design Guidelines. The existing detention facilities are adequate for
this phase of the subdivision and no additional pond construction or modifications are necessary
CERTIFICATION
I, Jo seph P . Schultz, Licensed Professional Engineer No . 65889 , State of Texas, certify that this report for the
drainage design for The Barracks II, Phase 107, was prepared by me in accordance with the requirements of the
Bryan/College Station Unified Drainage Design Guidelines for the owners of the property. All licenses and permits
required by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage improvements have been
issued.
EXHIBIT A
DRAINAGE AREA MAP
APPENDIX Al
DRAINAGE AREA SUMMARY
APPENDIXA1
Barracks II Phases 107
Drainage Ar ea Summarv
Area#
700
700A
7008
701
70 1A
70 18
702
702A
702 8
703
703A
703 8
704
704A
70 48
705
706
707
707A
707 8
708
708A
7088
709
709A
7098
71 0
711
712
713
The Ratio nal Me thod :
Q=CIA
Q =Flow (cfs)
A = Area (acres)
C = Runoff Coeff.
I = Rainfall Inten sity (in/hr)
Area, A c tc
(acres) (min)
0.85 0.75 10.0
0.49 0 .75 10.0
0.36 0 .75 10.0
0.39 0.75 10.0
0.28 0.75 10 .0
0.10 0.75 10 .0
0.59 0.75 10.0
0.35 0.75 10 .0
0.24 0.75 10.0
0.27 0.75 10.0
0.11 0.75 10.0
0 .17 0.75 10.0
0.85 0.75 10.0
0.34 0.75 10.0
0 .51 0 .75 10.0
0.41 0.75 10.0
1.00 0.65 10.0
1.35 0.75 10.0
0.94 0.75 10.0
0 .41 0.75 10.0
0.51 0.75 10 .0
0 .27 0.75 10 .0
0 .24 0.75 10.0
1.31 0.75 10.0
0 .8 7 0 .75 10 .0
0 .44 0 .75 10 .0
0.54 0.75 10.0
0.40 0.75 10.0
0.26 0.75 10.0
0.16 0.75 10.0
I = b I (tc+d)8
le =Time of concentrati on (min)
10 year storm 100 year stor m
110
(in/hr)
8.635
8.63 5
8.63 5
8 .635
8.635
8 .635
8.635
8.63 5
8.635
8.635
8.63 5
8.635
8.635
8.63 5
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8 .63 5
8.635
8 .635
8 .635
8 .635
8 .635
8 .635
8.635
8 .635
8.635
8.635
1$. :":''
'" .• a10 l ~('(cfs)
•r? .• 5.50~$
'(?" d
lk; 3.17
fi. / 2 .33 : '
if» 2.53 '; ..
1':.' . 1.8 1
,,~,r •: 0.65 .<.
<~:;-h
I;;; 3.82.·
.,.
1 ·~~:. . 2.21,:,;
1£ 1.55 .,,
::. 1.75 -'
~·· I'~".· 0.71 ·'
I ~. 1.10
iZ 5.50
:i 2.20
•.,; 3.30
"'' •2.6§
l ;t .. 5.61
·"' 8.74
f,-ifi--: •
p.09 /
2.66 '
;·
~ 3.30 .·
1.75
F<u " .. 1.55 ...
8.48
M ~-
5.63
Jt; 2 .85
3.50
. 2.59 '
1,, ..... ~
1.68
~~l 1.04
le= U(V *60)
L = Le ngth (ft
1100
(in/hr)
11.639
11.639
11.639
11.639
11 .63 9
11 .639
11.639
11.639
11 .6 39
11 .639
11.63 9
11.63 9
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
11.639
11.639
11.639
11 .639
11.639
11 .6 39
11 .6 39
11 .639
11 .63 9
11.639
11.639
11 .639
11.639
11 .639
V =Velocity (ft/sec)
·-,. ~?£, ,,..1: 't. • ~.· .. :' _ •. , a100 ,
"-<" ' ;,.
,E( <;fs )':.
•.t 1.42 £
I ~:;-~; 4 .28~~
c,J .1 4,'~·
1 .. .-?, 3 ,40¥.~
2 .4 4 ·.~
J.7 ·.11-,, : o.81 · ~
:·': '5 ,15
''';3.06.''.'{ ,. , . 2 .10 '
·2 ,36 ... --·
I ;· · o.9e ~'1
-~""' r 1.48 ·'.
7 .42 '~~
.
··2 .97
It''-4 .45 .. "'·
"··
1.-•• t:. 3 .58 ..
~~'!:1.st 1 '·
. ;~~11 .78 ;
,;?". 8.i1 ::}:
+~· " -~
;c 3.58 .
·4,45
2 .3 6 "
2 :10 .li.
11 .441?.
7 .5 9 > ,,.
,3 .84 -
4 .71 '
.. 3-.49 ~
~
2.27
·>
1
" :~: 1.40 f.:
APPENDIX Bl
DEPTH OF FLOW IN GUTTER
.. i
APPENDIXB1
Barracks II Phases 107
Depth of Flow i n Gutter
(Refe r to Exhibit B for Gutter Locations)
Gutter/Inlet A
Location Area# (acres)
8121A 703A 0.110
8121 8 7038 0.170
8 128A 700A 0.490
51 28 B 7008 0 .360
8710A 705 0 .410
8711 A 706 1.000
8713A 701A 0 .280
8713 8 7018 0 .100
8730A 708A 0.270
5730 B 7088 0 .240
8731 A 709A 0 .870
8731 8 7098 0.440
S733A 704A 0 .340
5733 B 7048 0 .510
Tran sverse !Crown\ slope Cft/ftl
27 street = 0.0300
38 street = 0.0300
c Slope le
(ft/ft) (min)
0.75 0 .0060 10.000
0 .75 0 .0070 10.000
0 .75 0 .0060 10 .000
0 .75 0 .0070 10.000
0 .75 0 .0101 10.000
0 .65 0 .0060 10.000
0.75 0 .0060 10 .000
0 .75 0 .0070 10.000
0.75 0 .0095 10.000
0 .75 0 .0060 10.000
0 .75 0 .0095 10.000
0 .75 0 .0060 10.000
0.75 0.0060 10.000
0 .75 0 .0070 10.000
Straight Crown Flow (Solved to find actual depth of flow In gutter. yl:
Q = 0.56 * (z/n) * S 112 * y813 ¢ y ={QI (0.56 • (z/n) • S 112]}318
n =Roughness Coefficient= 0 .018
S = Street/Gutter Slope (ft/ft)
y = Depth of flow at inlet (ft)
z = Reciprocal of crown slope: 27' street = 33
10-year storm
1,. Q,. Q 10 +bypass
(In/hr) (els) (els) (ft)
6 .327 0.71 . 0 .170
6 .327 1.10 -0.194
6 .327 3.17 0.298
6.327 2.33 0 .258
6 .327 2.66 0 .253
6.327 5.61 . 0 .369
6 .327 1.81 . 0 .241
6.327 0 .65 . 0 .159
6 .327 1.75 . 0.218
6 .327 1.55 0 .228
6.327 5 .63 . 0 .339
6 .327 2 .85 0 .286
6 .327 2 .20 -0 .260
6 .327 3 .30 . 0 .294
Standard Curb · 10-yr storm max design depth· 4 .5"
Y10..c:tu.i v
(In) (fps)
2 .04 1.48
2.33 1.75
3 .57 2.15
3 .09 2.11
3 .03 2.50
4 .42 2 .48
2.90 1.87
1.91 1.53
2.62 2 .20
2.73 1.80
4 .06 2.95
3.43 2.09
3 .1 1 1.96
3.52 2.30
Barracks II Phases 107
Depth of Flow in Gutter
(Refer to Exhibit B for Gutter Locations)
Gutter/Inlet A
Location Area# (acres )
S121 A 703A 0.110
S121 8 7038 0 .170
S128A 700A 0.490
S128 8 7008 0 .360
S710A 705 0.410
S711 A 706 1.000
S713A 701A 0.280
S7138 7018 0 .100
S730A 708A 0.270
S730 8 7086 0 .240
S731 A 709A 0 .870
S731 8 7096 0.440
S733A 704A 0.340
S733 8 7048 0 .510
Transverse (Crown! slope (fVftl
27 street = 0.0300
38 street = 0.030 0
Slope le c
(Wit) (min)
0 .75 0 .0060 10.000
0 .75 0.0070 10.000
0 .75 0.0060 10.000
0 .75 0 .0070 10.000
0.75 0.0101 10.000
0 .65 0 .0060 10.000
0 .75 0 .0060 10.000
0 .75 0.0070 10.000
0 .75 0 .0095 10.000
0 .75 0 .0060 10.000
0 .75 0 .0095 10.000
0.75 0.0060 10.000
0 .75 0.0060 10 .000
0 .75 0.0070 10.000
Straight Cr own Flow (Solved to f i nd actual depth of flow in gutter. yl ;
Q = o.56 • (z/n) • s 112 • y813 q y = {Q / [0.56 • (z/n) • S 112)}318
n =Roughness Coefficient= 0.018
S = StreeVGutter Slope (!Vft)
y = Depth of flow at inlet (ft)
z = Reciprocal of crown slope : 27' street= 33
1100 Q 100
(In/hr) (cfs)
11 .639 0 .96
11 .639 1.48
11 .639 4 .28
11.639 3 .14
11.639 3.58
11.639 7 .57
11 .639 2 .44
11 .639 0.87
11.639 2.36
11.639 2 .10
11.639 7.59
11 .639 3.84
11 .639 2 .97
11 .639 4.45
APPENDIXB1
100-year storm 100-year storm
Q100 + bypass Y100 Allowable v Top of Gutter Gutter ROW Free board
(cfs) (ft) (In) Depth (fps) Curb FL Runoff, Elev. Elev. ft.
0.190 2.28 8" 1.59 302.57 302.07 302.26 302.80 0.54
-0 .2 17 2 .61 8" 1.88 302.57 302.07 302.29 302.80 0 .51
0 .333 4 .00 8" 2.32 301 .36 300.86 301.19 301 .59 0 .40
-0 .288 3.46 8" 2.27 301 .36 300.86 301 .15 301.59 0 .44
-0 .282 3 .39 8" 2.69 299 .36 298.86 299.15 299.59 0 .45
-0 .412 4 .95 8" 2.67 299 .68 299 .18 299 .59 299 .91 0.32
0 .270 3.24 8" 2.01 301 .35 300.85 301.12 301 .58 0 .46
-0 .178 2 .14 8" 1.65 301 .35 300.85 301 .03 301.58 0 .55
-0 .244 2.93 8" 2 .37 301.70 301.20 301 .44 301 .93 0.49
-0 .255 3.06 8" 1.94 301 .70 301 .20 301.45 301 .93 0 .48
-0 .379 4 .55 8" 3.18 301.61 301 .11 301.48 301 .84 0 .35
-0 .320 3.84 8" 2 .25 301 .61 301 .11 301 .43 301.84 0.41
-0 .290 3.48 8" 2 .11 302.48 301.98 302.27 302.71 0 .44
-0.328 3.94 8" 2.48 302.48 301 .98 302 .31 302.71 0 .40
APPENDIXB2
STORM SEWER INLET SUMMARY
APPENDIX 82
Barracks II Phases 107
Storm Sewer Inlets on Grade -Design Analysis
Inlet
No.
S710
S7 11
Length
ft .
10
10
Street
Slope
1.01%
0 .60%
Assume 10% clogging for design
Se= Sx + (a/w)* Eo
Eo= Ow/O = 1 - [ 1 -W/T]2 ·57
L =Kc*Oo .47*s0 ·3*(1 /( n *Se) )°"6
010
cf s
2.66
5.61
L 10, ft .
Design
11.19
13 .61
W = Width of Depressed Gutter (ft) = 2
Sx=Cross flow of Road Surface 0.03
T=Total Spread of water in gutter (ft) 12.5
a=Gutter depression depth (ft)= 0.33
n=Manning's Roughness Coefficient= 0.018
Kc= 0.6
Ow=Flow in w idth , W
E=Efficiency of inlet or percentage of interception
S=Longitudinal Slope
Li=Curb opening length
Se = Sx + (a/w)* Eo
Eo= Ow/O = 1 - [ 1 -W/Tf67
0.091412
0.372194
Bypass
cfs
0.05
0.52
0100
cfs
3.58
7.57
L 100 , ft .
Design
12 .88
15.66
Bypass
cf s
0 .24
1.21
APPENDIX 82
Barracks II Phases 107
Storm Sewer Inlets in Sump -Design Analysis
Inlet Area# Inlet Type 010 010 010
No . cfs ft. in .
S121 703 5 1.75 0 .256 3.07
S128 700 10 5.50 0.346 4.16
S713 701 10 2.53 0.206 2.47
S730 708 5 3.30 0 .391 4.69
S731 709 10 8.48 0.462 5.55
S733 704 10 5.50 0 .346 4.16
*ROW elevation is 8" above gutter line so 100-yr storm runoff is contained within ROW
Assume 10% clogging for design
Appendix 82
Grate Inlet Design Summary
Grate Actual
Design Ag
Inlet Grate Ag Contribut Clogging K:alculateCI
Number Size ing Area Aa
Ctfl % Ctfl
. S702 V -4430 Gutter Inlet 1.84 710 25 1.38
S705 V-4430 Gutter Inlet 1.84 711 25 1.38
S720 3 -V-4430 Gutter Inlet 5.52 707 25 4.14
S721 V-4430 Gutter Inlet 1.84 702 25 1.38
0100 0100 0100*
cfs ft. in .
2 .36 0 .312 3.75
7.42 0.423 5 .07
3.40 0 .251 3.02
4.45 0.477 5 .73
11.44 0.564 6.77
7.42 0.423 5.07
10-Year Storm 100-Year Storm
010 Depth, y 0100 Depth, y
(cfs) (ft) (in) (cfs) (ft) (in)
3 .50 0 .28 3.32 4.71 0 .50 6.02
2 .59 0 .15 1.82 3.49 0 .28 3.31
8 .74 0.19 2 .30 11.78 0 .35 4 .18
3 .82 0 .33 3.96 5.15 0 .60 7.19
APPENDIX Cl
STORM SEWER PIPE SUMMARY
APPENDIXC1 Barracks II Phases 107 Storm Sewer Pipe Design Analysis (10 yr Storm) HG10 Depth Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Size Length Slope No. (Inches) (feet) (%) Normal Depth Surcharaed Q10 V10 Depth HG10 V10 (cfs) (fps) (feet) Slope (fps) Downstream Top Pipe Structure Elev. FL Upstream Top Pipe HG10 Structure Elev. FL Elev. Below Rim (feel) 121 24 209.5 0.30 7.06 4.03 1.60 0.10% 2.25 5122 302.52 297.86 5121 302.74 298.49 299.97 2.46 128 18 112.0 0.30 7.99 6.22 1.30 0.58% 4.52 5129 301.39 297.13 5128 301.36 297.46 300.04 0.82 699 36 300.0 0.20 56.14 4.71 2.39 0.71% 7.95 OUT 294.50 292.24 5699 297.57 292.84 295.21 2.36 700 36 385.0 0.20 56.14 4.71 2.39 0.71% 7.95 5699 297.57 292.94 5700 299.08 293.71 296.22 2.86 701 30 71.1 0.30 49.68 5.34 2.25 1.46% 10.13 5700 299.08 294.21 5701 299.60 294.42 296.99 2.61 702 30 158.9 0.30 48.85 4.98 2.48 1.41% 9.96 5701 299.60 294.52 5702 300.50 295 297.83 2.67 703 30 130.5 0.74 39.29 4.60 2.36 0.91% 8.01 5702 300.50 295.10 5703 302.44 296.07 298.28 4.16 704 30 45.7 0.30 29.87 4.38 2.16 0.53% 6.09 5703 302.44 296.17 5704 302.55 296.3 298.51 4.04 705 30 83.9 0.30 28.46 3.77 2.10 0.48% 5.80 5704 302.55 296.40 5705 301.64 296.66 298.75 2.89 706 18 23.7 1.00 1.69 4.00 0.46 0.03% 0.96 5704 302.55 299.20 5706 300.94 299.44 299.95 0.99 710 18 11.5 0.30 8.16 6.33 1.21 0.60% 4.62 5700 299.08 295.21 5710 299.36 295.24 297.12 1.74 711 18 52.0 0.30 5.49 4.14 1.30 0.27% 3.11 5710 299.36 295.34 5711 299.68 295.5 297.65 1.53 712 18 23.7 4.55 1.04 6.10 0.39 0.01% 0.59 5701 299.60 296.41 5712 299.00 297.5 297.76 1.24 713 18 52.0 0.30 2.50 1.89 1.30 0.06% 1.42 5128 301.36 297.56 5713 301.35 297.72 300.15 0.70 720 24 181.9 0.30 7.88 3.11 2.37 0.12% 2.51 5702 300.50 295.10 5720 300.56 295.65 297.90 2.66 721 18 213.1 0.30 3.75 3.60 1.22 0.13% 2.12 5125 302.05 297.88 5721 301.72 298.52 299.65 2.07 730 30 184.3 0.39 11.57 4.18 1.82 0.08% 2.36 5703 302.44 296.17 5730 301.70 296.88 298.41 2.97 731 24 31.0 0.30 8.43 4.50 1.30 0.14% 2.68 5730 301.70 297.38 5731 301.61 297.48 298.99 2.12 733 24 31.0 0.30 5.47 3.07 1.39 0.06% 1.74 5121 302.57 298.59 5733 302.48 298.68 300.07 1.91 Notes 1. Friction losses and minor losses for 18" diameter pipe are computed as for a 15.6" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area. 2. Friction losses and minor losses for 24" diameter pipe are computed as for a 20.8" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area.
A PPE NDI XC1
Barracks II Phases 10 7
Storm Sew e r Pi pe Desi gn Analysis (100 yr Storm)
HG100
Depth
P ip e Pi p e P ipe P ipe
Siz e Length S lope No. (Inches) (feet) (%)
Normal Depth S urcharged
Q 100 V100 Depth HG100 V100
(cfs) (fps) (feetl Slope (fps)
Downstream
To p P ipe
Struct ure Elev. FL
Upstream
Top Pipe HG1 00
Structure Elev. FL Elev.
Below
ROW
(feet)
121 24 209.50 0.30 10.11 4.37 1.72 0 .20% 3 .22 S122 302.52 297.86 5121 302.74 298.49 302.50 0 .57
128 18 112.00 0 .30 10.10 7 .6 1 1.30 0 .92% 5.72 S129 301 .39 297.13 5128 301.36 297.46 301.36 0 .33
699 36 300.00 0 .20 76.10 5.41 2.49 1.30% 10.77 OUT 294.50 292.24 5699 297.57 292.84 295.87 2.03
700 36 385.00 0.20 76.10 5.41 2.96 1.30% 10.77 S699 297.57 292.94 S700 299.08 293.71 297.54 1.87
701 30 7 1.14 0.30 66.60 6 .78 2 .50 2 .63% 13.57 S700 299.08 294.21 5701 299.60 294.42 298.56 1.35
702 30 158.88 0 .30 64.92 6 .61 2 .50 2.49% 13.23 5701 299 .60 294 .52 5702 300.50 295 .00 300.33 0 .50
703 30 130.54 0.74 50.25 5.12 2.50 1.49% 10.24 5702 300 .50 295.10 5703 302.44 296.07 300.84 1.93
704 30 45.65 0 .30 39.27 4.61 2 .50 0 .91% 8.00 5703 302.44 296 .17 5704 302.55 296.30 301 .09 1.79
705 30 83.88 0 .30 37.20 3 .94 2 .50 0 .82% 7 .58 5704 302.55 296.40 5705 301 .64 296 .66 301 .53 0.44
706 18 23 .72 1 .00 2 .57 4 .29 1.30 0 .06% 1.46 S704 302.55 299.20 S706 300.94 299 .44 301 .13 0 .14
710 18 11 .51 0 .30 12.10 9.12 1.30 1.32% 6.85 S700 299.08 295.21 5710 299.36 295.24 298.75 0.94
71 1 18 52.01 0 .30 8.14 6.13 1.30 0 .60% 4 .61 5710 299.36 295.34 5711 299.68 295 .50 299.61 0.40
712 18 23.68 4 .55 2.54 6.24 1.12 0.06% 1.44 5701 299 .60 296.41 5712 299.00 297.50 298.44 0.89
713 18 52.0 1 0 .30 4.28 3.23 1.30 0 .17% 2.42 5128 301.36 297.56 5713 301.35 297.72 301 .35 0.33
720 24 181 .93 0.30 12.64 3.26 2.50 0 .31% 4.03 5702 300 .50 295.10 5720 300.56 295.65 300.56 0 .33
721 18 213.10 0 .30 5.22 3.93 1.30 0 .25% 2 .96 5125 302 .05 297.88 5721 301.72 298.52 301.72 0 .33
730 30 184 .32 0 .39 17.21 4.35 2 .50 0.18% 3.51 5703 302.44 296.17 5730 301 .70 296 .88 301 .67 0 .36
731 24 31 .00 0 .30 13.49 5.83 1.72 0.35% 4 .30 S730 301.70 297.38 5731 301.61 297.48 301.61 0 .33
733 24 31 .00 0 .30 10.41 4 .50 1.72 0 .21% 3.32 5121 302.57 298 .59 5733 302.48 298 .68 302.48 0 .33
Notes
1. Friction losses and minor losses for 18" diameter pipe are computed as for a 15.6" diameter pipe which represents a 25% redu ctio n in pipe flow area.
2. Friction losses and minor losses for 24" d iameter pipe are computed as for a 20.8 " diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area.
APPENDIXD
TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
The Cities of Bryan and College Station both require storm drainage design to follow t hese
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines. Paragraph C2 of Section Ill (Administration) requires
submittal of a drainage report in support of the drainage plan (stormwater management plan)
proposed in connection with land development projects , both site projects and subdivisions.
That report may be submitted as a traditional prose report, complete with applicable maps ,
graphs, tables and drawings, or it may take the form of a "Technical Design Summary". The
format and content for such a summary report shall be in substantial conformance with the
description in this Appendix to those Guidelines. In either format the report must answer the
questions (affirmative or negative) and provide , at minimum, the information prescribed in the
"Technical Design Summary" in this Appendix.
The Stormwater Management Technical Des ign Summary Report shall include several parts
as listed below. The information called for in each part must be provided as applicable . In
addition to the requirements for the Executive Summary, this Appendix includes several
pages detailing the requirements for a Technical Design Summary Report as forms to be
completed . These are provided so that they may be copied and completed or scanned and
digitized. In addition, electronic versions of the report forms may be obtained from the City.
Requ irements for the means (medium) of submittal are the same as for a conventional report
as detailed in Section Ill of these Guidelines .
Note: Part 1 -Executive Summary must accompany any drainage report
required to be provided in connection with any land development project ,
regardless of the format chosen for said report.
Note: Parts 2 through 6 are to be provided via the forms provided in this
· Appendix. Brief statements should be included in the forms as requested ,
but additional information should be attached as necessary.
Part 1 -Executive Summary Report
Part 2 -Project Administration
Part 3 -Project Characteristics
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT
Part 1 -Executive Summary
This is to be a brief prose report that must address each of the seven areas listed below.
Ideally it will include one or more paragraphs about each item.
1. Name, address, and contact information of the engineer submitting the report , and
of the land owner and developer (or applicant if not the owner or developer). The
date of submittal should also be included.
2. Identification of the size and general nature of the proposed project, including any
proposed project phases. This paragraph should also include reference to
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effecti ve February 2007
Page 1of26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
applications that are in process with either City: plat(s), site plans, zoning requests,
or clearing/grading permits, as well as reference to any application numbers or
codes assigned by the City to such request.
3. The location of the project should be described. This should identify the Named
Regulatory Watershed(s) in which it is located, how the entire project area is
situated therein , whether the property straddles a watershed or basin divide, the
approximate acreage in each basin, and whether its position in the Watershed
dictates use of detention design. The approximate proportion of the property in the
city limits and within the ET J is to be identified, including whether the property
straddles city jurisdictional lines. If any portion of the property is in floodplains as
· described in Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by FEMA that should be
disclosed .
4. The hydrologic characteristics of the property are to be described in broad terms:
existing land cover; how and where stormwater drains to and from neighboring
properties; ponds or wetland areas that tend to detain or store stormwater; existing
creeks, channels, and swales crossing or serving the property; all existing drainage
easements (or ROW) on the property, or on neighboring properties if they service
runoff to or from the property.
5. The general plan for managing stormwater in the entire project area mt:Jst be
outlined to include the approximate size, and extent of use, of any of the following
features: storm drains coupled with streets; detention I retention facilities; buried
conveyance conduit independent of streets; swales or channels ; bridges or culverts;
outfalls to principal watercourses or their tributaries; and treatment(s) of existing
watercourses . Also, any plans for reclaiming land within floodplain areas must be
outlined.
6. Coordination and permitting of stormwater matters must be addressed. This is to
include any specialized coordination that has occurred or is planned with other
entities (local, state, or federal). This may include agencies such as Brazos County
government, the Brazos River Authority, the Texas A&M University System, the
Texas Department of Transportation , the Texas Commission for Environmental
Quality, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Environmental Protection Agency,
et al. Mention must be made of any permits, agreements , or understandings that
pertain to the project.
7. Reference is to be made to the full drainage report (or the Technical Design
Summary Report) which the executive summary represents. The principal
elements of the main report (and its length), including any maps, drawings or
construction documents , should be itemized. An example statement might be:
"One __ -page drainage report dated , one set of
construction drawings ( sheets) dated , and a
___ -page specifications document dated ____ comprise
the drainage report for this project."
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 2 of26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Start (Page 2.1)
·~·, J~.-; .. :,.'. , En,g,neering and'De$ign Pr9fessjqria1slnforrriation.~.· ~.;. · .,., ;,n.:.,.~f;: '."
Eng in eering Firm Name and Address: Jurisd iction
Schultz Engineering, LLC City: Bryan
P.O. Box 11995 ./ College Station
College Station, Tx 77842 Date of Submittal :
August2014
Lead Engineer's Name and Contact lnfo.(phone , e-mail, fax): Other:
Joseph P. Schultz, PE email: joeschultz84@verizon.net
Phone: 764-3900 fax: 764-3910
Supporting Eng in eering I Consulting Firm(s): Other contacts:
nla
.
' '.;"! ~"· " '•
.•.. ·, Developer I Owner I Applicant Information ·: ' ~-' ,, .. : ;•<'?'"· ,,c '
Developer I Applicant Name and Address: Phone and e-mail:
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC 9 79-690-5000
3302 General Parkway
College Station, TX 77845
Property Owner(s) if not Developer I Applicant (&address): Phone and e-mail:
--.i; . <.~ ' • O'••[i\.' ' .. , . ProJe~t Identification : ' ;· ·. .. ;· ,· ;, "
.~ ····i;:: ·,
I ' "
. , . .~ .
..
' ',' j, ·::.' .:;, . .,.-',.-;,.' .:<4';--..:,_· '· ,.,• '.
Development Name: The Barracks II Subdivision, Phases 107
Is subject property a site project, a single-phase subdivision, or part of a multi-phase subdivision?
Multi-Phase Subdivision If multi-phase, subject property is phase 8 of 13
Legal description of subject property (phase) or Project Area:
(see Section II , Paragraph B-3a)
Crawford Burnett League, A-7
If subj ect property (phase) is second or later phase of a project, describe general status of all
earlier phases. For most recent earlier phase Include submittal and review dates.
Housing construction is complete and on-going in the previous phases (Sections 103, 104, 105, 106, 108 &
300)
General Location of Project Area, or subject property (phase):
Between Old Welborn Road and Holleman Dr. South, North of Rock Prairie Road West and South of Cain
Rd.
In City Limits? Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (acreage):
Bryan: acres . Bryan : College Station:
College Station: 7.654 acres. Acreage Outside ET J:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELl~ES
Effective February 2007
Page 3 of26 APPENDIX. D : TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Continued (page 2.2)
" ·· ,· · tiL .... ' .· .: · .::: _:; » ProJec,t J~en!ific*ioh (c~ntin~e,d f ; :·:. ,' :;>> ··>,~:· ~·. :: '.":,.~,:' ,
Roadways abutting or within Project Area or Abutting tracts, platted land, or built
subject property : developments:
Old Wellborn Rd.
Holleman Drive South
The Barracks Section 106
Named .Regulatory Watercourse(s) & Watershed(s): Tributary Basin(s):
Bee Creek Trib B.3
;· > •t .·,;• J .. ". .IJ,: .. ! "· '. ·~ , '. I;'. ' > "l ' I~-~, -'.~\ >'
Plat lnformatio~ For Projector Subject Property (or Phase) .. · · ..
Preliminary Plat File#: l4-oo 9oooio
Name: THE BARRACKS II (PP)
Final Plat File#: NIA Date : June 2014 ------
Status and Vol/Pg: submitted with this project
If two plats, second name: File #: ____ _
Status: Date: ----
Zoning Type: PDD
Case Date ____ _
Existing or Proposed? Existing
Status:
Case Code : -----
Zoning Type: Existing or Proposed? Case Code : ____ _
Case Date ____ _ Status:
Planning Conference(s) & Date(s): Participants:
NIA
Preliminary Report Required? NIA Submittal Date _____ Review Date ____ _
Review Comments Addressed? Yes __ No__ In Writing? When? -----
Compliance With Preliminary Drainage Report. Briefly describe (or attach documentation
explaining) any deviation(s) from provisions of Preliminary Drainage Report, if any.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 4 of26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Continued (page 2.3)
·~ '· ..,, ·, , . ' ;;;s'. -~ , coor~ir:-at.~qn· J;6r firoJect ·~r ·.~tillj~cJ Propel-fy. (or Pha~~) !I'; .. ''' •i'.
f ;:/'·~',;.,•,
Note: For any Coordination of stormwater matters indicated below, attach documentation
describing and substantiating any agreements , understandings, contracts , or approvals.
Coordination
Dept. Contact: Date : Subject:
'
With Other
Departments of
Jurisdiction
City (Bryan or
College Station)
Coordination With Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
Non-jurisdiction
City Needed?
Yes No ,/ ----
Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
Brazos County
Needed?
Yes --No _{_
Coordination with Summarize need(s) & acti ons taken (include contacts & dates):
TxDOT Needed?
Yes No ,/ --
Coordination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
TAMUS Needed?
Yes No ,/ --
·" . ··~ '·' Permits For, Proj~ct or S4,bjijd Prop~rty · {or Pha;;~),' ·"'~,". •·:r' .. -:~4~:t <
,. • , "~. .·! .,·ii • -,~ ;..\" , ' ' . . . '< ~
As to stormwater management, are permits required for the proposed work from any of the entities
listed below? If so , summarize status of efforts toward that objective in spaces below.
Entity Permitted or
Approved?
US Army Crops of Permitted Engineers
No Yes ,/ --
US Environmental
Protection Agency
No ,/ Yes ---
Texas Comm ission on Approved Env ironmental Quality
No Yes ,/ --
Brazos River
Authority
No _L_ Yes -
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Status of Actions (include dates)
Permit approved.
N Oi for entire Subdivision
Page 5 of26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro12ert~ Characteristics I Start (Page 3.1 )
. ' Nature and Scope o(ProposedyYork
,
. ,. .. . ,.,
Existing: Land proposed for development currently used , including extent of impervious cover?
Proposed development is residential s ubdivision. Hig h density. Impervious cover= 75 %
Site __ Redevelopment of one platted lot, or two or more adjoining platted lots.
Development __ Building on a single pla tted lot of ur:ideveloped land .
Project __ Bu ilding on two or more platted adjoining lots of undeveloped land .
(select all __ Building on a single lot , or adjoining lots, where proposed plat will not form app li cable) a new street (but may include ROW dedication to existing streets).
__ Other (explain):
Subdivision __ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more platted lots.
Development _!.__ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more proposed lots on
Project lands represented by pending plats .
Site projects: building use(s), approximate floor space , impervious cover ratio .
Describe Subdivisions: number of lots by general type of use , linear feet of streets and
Nature and drainage easemen t s or ROW .
Size of 63 lots. Approx imately 1890' of S treets.
Pro~osed
Project 2.24 ac. -ROW
Is any work planned on land that is not platted If yes, expla i n:
or on land for which platting is not pending?
./ No Yes ----
· .. ·'•C " '1' ..
FEMA Floodplains >
Is any part of subject property abutting a Named Regulatory Watercourse I N y ./
(Section II, Paragraph B1) or a tributary thereof? 0 --es --
Is any part of subject property in floodplain I No_!_ Yes Rate Map area of a FEMA-regulated watercourse? --
Encroachment(s) Encroachment purpose(s): __ Building site(s) __ Road crossing(s) into Floodpla in
areas planned? __ Utility crossing(s) __ Other (explain):
No ./ --
Yes --
If floodplain areas not shown on Rate Maps , has work been done toward amending the FEMA-
app roved Flood Study to define allowable encroachments in proposed areas? Explain.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 6 of26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SU M MARY
Part 3 -P ro ~e rt~ C ha racteristics I Continued (Page 3 .2)
Hyd rologi c Attributes of S ubject Property (or Ph ase) "
...
,.
. ' . "
Has an earlier hydrologic analysis been done for larger area including subject property?
Yes Reference the study (&date) here , and attach copy if not already in City files.
./ Kimley-Horn Study (July 2012 & Revised September 2013) -Analyzed downstream flooding --potential and detention pond design.
Is the stormwater management plan for the property in substantial conformance with the
earl ier study? Yes -./ -No --If not, explain how it differs.
No If subject property is not part of multi-phase project, describe stormwater management
plan for the property in Part 4 .
--If property is part of multi-phase project , provide overview of stormwater management plan
for Project A rea here. In Part 4 describe how plan for subject property will comply
therewith .
Do existing topographic features on subject property store or detain runoff? _L_ No --Yes
Describe them (include approximate size, volume, outfall , model, etc).
Any known dra inage or flooding problems in areas near subject property? __ No ./ Yes
Identify :
The area around Cain Road and Old Wellborn Road.
Based on location of study property in a watershed, is Type 1 Detenti o n (flood control) needed?
(see Tab le B-1 in Appendix B) A lready Provided in previous phase
_!_Detention is required . --Need must be evaluated. __ Detention not required .
What decision has been reached? By whom?
If the need for How was determination made?
Type 1 Detention
must be evaluated:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 7 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -ProQert~ Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.3)
' . . ., " " '' . ' ~;.:..:: •,.. .. / Hydrologic Attributes of Subject PropertY (or Phase) (continued) .,
·"
Does subject property straddle a Watershed or Basin divide? _:{__No -·--Yes If yes,
describe splits below. In Part 4 describe design concept for handling this.
Watershed or Basin Larger acreage Lesser acreage
Above-Project Areas(Section II, Paragraph B3-a)
Does Project Area (project or phase) receive runoff from upland areas? __ No _{_ Yes
Size(s) of area(s) in acres: 1) 2.52 2) 3) 4)
Flow Characteristics (each instance) (overland sheet , shallow concentrated , recognizable
concentrated section(s), small creek (non-regulatory), regulatory Watercourse or tributary);
Each instance is overland sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow.
Flow determination: Outline hydrologic methods and assumptions:
Rational Equation. C-va lues
0. 75 for D eveloped Lot Areas, 0. 65 for Developed Park Areas, 0.45 for Un developed Areas
Does storm runoff drain from public easements or ROW onto or across subject property?
./ No --Yes If yes, describe facilities in easement or ROW :
Are changes in runoff characteristics subject to change in future? Explain
Yes. As adjoining tracts develop and install detention ponds, their outflows will be conveyed through
this tract by the proposed storm sewer.
Conveyance Pathways (Section II , Paragraph C2)
Must runoff from study property drain across lower properties before reaching a Regulatory
Watercourse or tributary? ./ No Yes
Describe length and characteristics of each conveyance pathway(s). Include ownership of
property(ies).
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effectiv e February 2007
Page 8 of26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D-TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Property Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.4)
· · · • Hydrologic.Attri_b~tes of Subject Property (or _Phase) (continueti)-·. __ · ,
Conveyance Pathways (continued)
Do drainage If yes, for what part of length? % Created by? __ plat, or
easements __ instrument. If instrument(s), describe their provisions .
exist for any
part of
pathway(s)?
_:[___No
Yes
Pathway
Areas
Where runoff must cross lower properties , describe characteristics of abutting lower
property(ies). (Existing watercourses? Easement or Consent aquired?)
Existing watercourse crosses the downstream properties. See Kimley Horn Report
Describe any built or improved drainage facilities existing near the prop,erty (culverts,
bridges , lined channels , buried conduit, swales, detention ponds, etc).
Detention Ponds constructed with previous phases.
Nearby
Drainage '1--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---i
Facilities Do any of these have hydrologic or hydraulic influence on proposed stormwater
design? __ No _L Yes If yes, explain:
S ee Kimley Horn Report, Phase JOO Report by Phillips Engineering and Phases 101 -104 &
300 Report by Goodwin-Lasiter, Inc.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 9 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Start (Page 4 .1)
·-:· ··.-
Discharge{s) From Upland Area{s)
If runoff is to be received from upland areas , what design drainage features will be used to
accommodate it and insure it is not blocked by future development? Describe for each area,
flow section , or discharge point.
Runoff from upland areas will be captured in publicly owned storm dra in systems as the subdivision
de velops.
Discharge{s) To Lower Property{ies) (Section II , Paragraph E1)
Does project include drainage features (existing or future) proposed to become public via
platting? __ No _:{__Yes Separate Instrument? ./ No _ Yes
Per Guidelines reference above, how will
runoff be discharged to neighboring
property(ies)?
__ Establishing Easements (Scenario 1)
__y{_ Pre-development Release (Scenario 2)
__ Combination of the two Scenarios
Scenario 1: If easements are proposed, describe where needed , and provide status of actions
on each. (Attached Exhibit# )
Scenario 2: Provide general description of how release(s) will be managed to pre-development
conditions (detention , sheet flow, partially concentrated , etc.). (Attached Exh ibit# )
D eten tion Pond.
Combination : If comb ination is proposed , explain how discharge will differ from pre-
development cond itions at the property line for each area (or point ) of release .
If Scenario 2, or Combination are to be used , has proposed design been coord inated with
owner(s) of receiving property(ies)? ./ No __ Yes Explain and provide
documentati on.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effectiv e February 2007
Page 10 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.2)
.. : Stormwater N!anagement Concept {~e>n~nued) · . . , .: . , ,;. 1
Within ' Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project
Will project result
in shifting runoff
Identify gaining Basins or Watersheds and acres shifting:
between Basins or 1-----------------------------1
between
Watersheds?
What design and mitigation is used to compensate for increased runoff
from gaining basin or watershed?
./ No
Yes
How will runoff from Project
Area be mitigated to pre-
development conditions?
Select any or all of 1, 2,
and/or 3, and explain below.
1. __ With facility(ies) involving other development projects.
2. _L Establishing features to serve overall Project A _rea.
3. ~On phase (or site) project basis within Project Area.
1. Shared facility (type & location of facility; design drainage area served; relationship to size of
Project Area): (Attached Exhibit# )
2 . For Overall Project Area (type & location of facilities): (Attached Exhibit #A )
Existing detention ponds will serve the proposed development
3. By phase (or site) project: Describe planned mitigation measures for phases (or sites) in
subsequent questions of this Part.
Are aquatic echosystems proposed? __ No
project(s)?
__ Yes In which phase(s) or
Are other Best Management Practices for reducing stormwater pollutants proposed?
__ No ./ Yes Summarize type of BMP and extent of use:
Silt fences, construction exits, rock check dams, seeding and erosion matting.
If design of any runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of B-CS Technical
Specifications, check type facility(ies) and explain in later questions.
__ Detention elements __ Conduit elements __ Channel features
__ Swales __ Ditches __ Inlets __ Valley gutters __ Outfalls
__ Culvert features __ Bridges Other
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 11 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4-Dr,atnage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.3)
' st~nnvvater Managemenrcorifept <~n.~nued) .. ,.-_· ,,,.::· ., ·
Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project {continued)
Will Project Area include bridge(s) or culvert(s)? _{_No __ Yes Identify type and
general size and In which phase(s).
If detention/retention serves (will serve) overall Project Area, describe how it relates to subject
phase or site project (physical location , conveyance pathway(s), construction sequence):
The detention ponds constructed with the previous phases will serve this phase. Runoff will enter the
pond through the underground storm drains.
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site)
If property part of larger Project Area, is design in substantial conformance with earlier analysis
and report for larger area? _:/_____Yes No, then summarize the difference(s):
Identify whether each of the types of drainage features listed below are included , extent of use,
and general characteristics.
(/)
..0 Q)
~ ~ >-' .!: Q)
:!: ~I' ~ ....
(/) Q)
Q) g 0
~~z,
Q) c .... Ctl
<{
Typical shape?
V-Channel I Surfaces?
Grass Lined
Steepest side slopes:
2:1
Usual front slopes:
2:1
Usual back slopes:
4:1
Flow line slopes : least_l_.o_o __ _ Typical distance from travelway:
typical_l_.o_o __ greatest_5_.o_o __ _ (Attached Exhibit #B )
Are longitudinal culvert ends in compliance with B-CS Standard Specifications?
./ Yes No, then explain:
At intersections or otherwise, do valley gutters cross arterial or collector streets?
./ No __ Yes If yes explain:
Are valley gutters proposed to cross any street away from an intersection?
./ No __ Yes Explain: (number of locations?)
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 12 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters J Continued (Page 4.4)
' . :· .· stormwate_r ManagementConcept t~11tinued). · ., :.. .., _
Within Or Serving Subject Property {Phase, or Site) {continued)
C:-· "C
Q)
(/)
::J
'-~
::J
C>
-c-c "C ro a>
.0 ~
'-·-5 E ~ 0 ;:; (.)
-~-
C:-· "C
Q) (/)
(/) Q)
::J >-E 2.t l ~
(/)
c ·-0 ~z
Gutter line slopes : Least 0.60 Usual 0.60 Greatest 1.01
Are inlets recessed on arterial and collector streets? _:f_ Yes
ide nti fy where and why .
__ No If "no",
Will inlets capture 10-year design stormflow to prevent flooding of intersections (arterial
with arterial or collector)? _:f_ Yes __ No If no, explain where and w hy not.
Will inlet size and placement prevent exceeding allowable water spread for 10-year
des ign storm throughout site (or phase)? ~Yes __ No If no , explain.
Sag curves: Are i nlets placed at low points? _:f_ Yes __ No Are inlets and
conduit sized to prevent 100-year stormflow from ponding at greater than 24 inches?
_:f_ Yes __ No Explain "no " answers.
W ill 100-yr stormflow be contained in combination of ROW and buried conduit on
whole length of all streets? ~Yes __ No If no , describe where and why .
Do designs for curb , gutter, and inlets comply with B-CS Technical Specifications?
../ Yes __ No If not, describe difference(s) and attach justification .
Are any 12-inch laterals used? _:f_ No
used.
__ Yes Identify length(s) and where
Pipe runs between system I Typical 135' Longest 809'
access points (feet): ----------
Are junction boxes used at each bend? _:/__Yes
and why .
__ No If not, expla in where
"C_§ I 1--------------------,---,------------~
cn Are downstream soffits at or below upstream soffits? Least amount that hydraulic
!!2. Yes ../ No __ If not , explain where and why : grade line is below gutter line
(system-wide):
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 13 of 26
0.71' (10-YrStorm)
APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
Ii'
• •
•
•
•
·• -.,
.,,
•
•
•
·• ...
• ...
• -
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .5)
' ' ' . ~torniwater Management Concept (ccinti .m.ied)
,, .
. .. ~,:: ..
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
(j)
Describe watercourse(s), or system(s) receiving system discharge(s) below
Q) (include design discharge velocity , and angle between converging flow lines).
(.) c 1) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle? ro -Cf) c Bee Creek Trib B.3 @ 0°, < 2 fps
Q) .....
.......... 0 -g E 2) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle?
:J ..... c 0 ·-._ -c . o.E (.) c -·-.......... E a> Cf)
a> E ::=-3) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle? -ro Jg Cf) Cf)
~ Q) :J
c :-Q 0
·-> ~ e
"O a.
E-For each outfall above, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour of ..... Q)
0 Q) receiving and all facilities at juncture? -..c Cf) Cf)
Q) 1) Outfall from this development will occur into downstream pipes from prev. phases -ro ..... ro
2) a.
Q)
Cf)
c 3) ~
Are swale(s) situated along property lines between properties? __.:f..__ No --Yes
Number of instances: For each instance answer the following questions.
Surface treatments (including low-flow flumes if any):
C'-·
Cf) -• Q)
~Cf)
-Q) Flow line slopes (minimum and maximum): Cf)>-c ~ I
"O 0 ~z Outfall characteristics for each (velocity, convergent angle , & end treatment). :J
~v'I
Cf)
Q) ..... Will 100-year design storm runoff be contained within easement(s) or platted drai nage ~
ROW in all instances? --Yes --No If "no" explain:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 14 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.6)
1 ~-·' 'Stormwater Man~gement cC,ncept {co~tinued) •. ·•
' : ~.: ·::~·, ~ ·,~ .. ::,) '
.. . " . : . " . . . . . .
Within Or Serving Subject Property {Phase, or Site) {continued)
Are roadside ditches used? --No _L_ Yes If so, provide the following:
(/)
Q) Is 25-year flow contained with 6 inches of freeboard throughout? ~Yes No .c --
(.) Are top of banks separated from road shoulders 2 feet or more? __ Yes ~ No -i:5 Are all ditch sections trapezoidal and at least 1.5 feet deep? Yes _L No Q) --
"'C For any "no" answers provide location(s) and explain: 'Ci)
"'C The existing ditch along Old Welborn Road is a V-Channe! that does not allow for the ditch to ro
0 ~ be trapezoidal or to be separated from the road shoulders.
If conduit is beneath a swale, provide the following information (each instance).
Instance 1 Describe general location, approximate length:
(/)
Q)
Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? Yes No >-----I~ If "no" explain:
c Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Easement Width 0 ro z -(/) Swale Surface type, minimum Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum "''~ and maximum slopes: slopes, design storm:
0 :;::;
C'-· 'C (/)
Qi "'C Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains, inlets by type): ro c >. c ro c
.c ro
(.) L..
c .E
Q) c Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into conduit): 0. 0 0 :;::; -ro 0 E
:::l L..
~ .E c c Instance 2 Describe general location, approximate length: Q)
"'C E Q) ro (/) (/) :::l
(/) Q)
Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination? Yes No c "'C ·::;:: ----0 If "no" explain: :;::; 0 ro L..
c 0.
ii -Q) Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Easement Width E Q)
0 .c
(.) (/) Swale Surface type, minimum Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum -Q) ·s -and maximum slopes: slopes, design storm: ro 'O L.. c ro
0 0.
(.) Q) Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains, inlets by type): .._ (/) Q)
Cii c
!: ~
(/)
Q)
Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale, into conduit): L..
4:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 15 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .7)
··· . ,-,:· ··· ,:; ·~ .. -s~~rmYt(at~r Nlanagemeri(~9ncept <~o~~l.nued) ifi:·,""·:,.,.. .. _,;;0"~·,;:;:
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
c:::
"(ii c. E >< ,gw
If "yes" provide the following information for each instance:
Instance 1 Describe general location , approximate length , surfacing :
:i:: (/) Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? __ Yes __ No Is swale wholly
g a> within drainage ROW? __ Yes __ No Explain "no" answers:
.; ,..I f--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_,
u Access Describe how maintenance access is provide:
~ 0 'S z
] .,,, f--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-1
.., Instance 2 Describe general location , approximate length, surfacing :
Q)
·;:: C'-·
:::I (/)
..c c
-Q) i5 E ..c: Q)
~ ~ Q)
(/) ._
Q) 0
~~
0::: ~ -~
::0
C'-·
"O
:::I
0.
c::: Q) (/) <ll
0 -0. 0.
0 >< ._ w
0.
(/) (/) -Q) c::: >-Q)
E
I
Q)
> 0 ._
0.
E 0 z
Q) .,,, c::: c:::
<ll ..c:
0
Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? __ Yes __ No Is swale wholly
within drainage ROW? __ Yes __ No Explain "no" answers:
Access Describe how maintenance access is provided:
Instance 3, 4, etc. If swales are used in more than two instances, attach sheet
providing all above information for each instance.
"New" channels: Will any area(s) of concentrated flow be channelized (deepened,
widened, or straightened) or otherwise altered? __ No __ Yes If only slightly
shaped , see "Swales" in this Part. If creating side banks, provide information below.
Will design replicate natural channel? __ Yes __ No If "no", for each instance
describe section shape & area , flow line slope (min. & max,), surfaces, and 100-year
design flow, and amount of freeboard:
Instance 1:
Instance 2:
Instance 3:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 16 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage ConceQt and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.8)
I> , '' '· Sttirmwater Management Con'c~pt (cot1tinued) ·,·I
I·!': ' : ' ' '''': •c· -5~, ;;;.:./,', .' <, '. . ' .: ,.· ··.'. _, . .. , "
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Existing channels {small creeks}: Are these used? _:/_ No --Yes
If "y es" provide the information below.
Will small creeks and their floodplains remain undisturbed? __ Yes No How
many disturbance instances? Identify each planned location:
For each location , describe length and general type of proposed improvement
(including floodplain changes):
For each location , describe section shape & area , flow line slope (min. & max.),
surfaces, and 100-year design flow .
........
" a>
::::l
.~ c Watercourses {and tributaries}: Aside from fringe changes, are Regulatory
0 Watercourses proposed to be altered? _:/_No Yes Explain below. (.) ---en -Submit full report describing proposed changes to Regulatory Watercourses. Address c a> existing and proposed section size and shape , surfaces, alignment, flow line changes, E a> length affected , and capacity, and provide full documentation of analysis procedures > 0 and data . Is full report submitted? Yes No If "no" explain: .... --a.
E -a> c c ro All Proposed Channel Work: For all proposed channel work, provide information ..c
() requested in next three boxes.
If design is to replicate natural channel , identify location and length here , and describe
design in Special Design section of this Part of Report.
Will 100-year flow be contained with one foot of freeboard? --Yes --No If
not, identify location and explain:
Are ROW I easements sized to contain channel and required maintenance space?
--Yes --No If not, identify location(s) and explain:
' ..... ~';> -
-~ .. ·
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 17 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUM M ARY
Pa rt 4 -Dra in age Co n ce~t and De s ig n P a rameters J Continued (Page 4.9)
. ., ·. . ,. ., .
St,ormw ater Mana gement Co ncept (co11tinu ed) '. ,_ ..• ., "" ' ' .. ,~
W ithin Or Servi ng S ubject Pro perty (Phase, or Si te) (c o ntinued)
How many facilities for subject property project? For each provide info. below.
For each dry-type facilitiy: Facility 1 Facility 2
Acres served & design volume+ 10%
100-yr volume: free flow & plugged
Design discharge (10 yr & 25 yr)
Spillway crest at 100-yr WSE? __ yes --no __ yes --no
Berms 6 inches above plugged WSE? __ .yes --no __ yes --no
Explain any "no" answers:
(/)
Q) >-
I For each facility what is 25-yr design Q, and design of outlet structure?
Facility 1:
0 z Facility 2:
"'I Do outlets and spillways discharge into a public facility in easement or ROW?
Facility 1: __ Yes No Facility 2: Yes No ------~· If "no " explain: "'C
Q)
(/)
0
0.
0 .... a... For each, what is velocity of 25-yr design discharge at outlet? & at spillway?
(/)
Q) Facility 1: & Facility 2: & E
'(3 Are energy dissipation measures used? No Yes Describe type and ca ----
LL location:
c
0
~ c
Q) -Q)
0
Q) For each, is spillway surface treatment other than concrete? Yes or no, and describe: ....
<(
Facility 1:
Facility 2:
For each, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour at receiving facility?
Facility 1:
Facility 2:
If berms are used give heights, slopes and surface treatments of sides.
Facility 1:
Facility 2:
STORMWATER DESIG N GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 18 of 26 APPE ND IX. D: TECH. DESIG N SUMMARY
As Revised ~ugust 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage ConceQt and Design Parameters I Continued (.Page 4.10)
, ·,. . . ,.. .· .. •. " . i·. . ., ' . • ,,, '
StOrmwater Managemerit ;Con~ept (cont!nued). · ;'. · :· · ·:~ < ._ .. ·'"-·, ·
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Do structures comply with B-CS Specifications? Yes or no , and expla in if "no":
Cl)
Facili ty 1;
~ = ::0-~ Q) Faci li ty 2: u. ::J c c:;:::;
0 c
:;:::; 0 c (.)
Q) -Q) For additional facilities provide all same information on a separate sheet.
0
Are parking areas to be used for detention? __ No --Yes What is
maximum depth due to required design storm?
Roadside Ditches: Will culverts serve access driveways at roadside ditches?
--No --Yes If "yes", provide information in next two boxes .
W ill 25-yr. flow pass without flowing over driveway in all cases? --Yes --No
W ithout causing flowing or standing water on public roadway? --Yes --No
Designs & materials comply with B-CS Technical Specifications? __ Yes --No
Explai n any "no" answers :
('-·
Cl)
O'l c
'(ii
Are culverts parallel to public roadway alignment? __ Yes No Explain : Cl)
0 --.... Cl) (.)
Q) Q) ->-ro
I > ·;:: Creeks at Private Drives: Do private driveways , drives , or streets cross drainage a. -ways that serve Above-Project areas or are in public easements/ ROW? ro
-0 0 No Yes If "yes" provide information below. Q) z ----~ ..,, How many instances? Describe location and prov ide information below.
Q) Location 1: ~
::J
(.)
Q) Location 2: ....
<(
Location 3:
For each location enter value for: 1 2 3
Design year passing without t o ping travelway?
Water depth on travelway at 25-year flow?
Water depth on travelway at 100-year flow?
For more instances describe location and same information on separate sheet.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 19 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Pa rt 4 -Dra i nage Conce~t an d Desig n Parameters j Con tin ued (P age 4.11 )
'; . ~. ·, Stormwater Manage ment · Co ~cept (conti nued ) ~-'. .. .. :', . ···-,,:.:·.,· '
Within O r Se rving S ubj ect Pro pe rty (Phase , o r S ite) (co nti nued)
Named Regu la to~ Watercou rs es {&T ri bu tari es}: Are culverts proposed on these
facilities? _:/__No __ Yes , then provide full report documenting assumptions,
criteria , analysis, computer programs, and study findings that support proposed
design(s). Is report provided? __ Yes --No If "no", exp lain:
........ Arterial or Major Collector Streets: Will culverts serve these types of roadways? -Q)
Q) _L_ No __ Yes How many instances? For each identify the ~
C/)
Q) location and provide the information below. -C/) co Instance 1: Q) '-
>-~
I ~ Instance 2:
Instance 3:
c
0 :;:::; Yes or No for the 100-year design flow: 1 2 3 0 co z E
~1 ~ Headwater WSE 1 foot below lowest curb top?
Spread of headwater within ROW or easement?
E C'-· co Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C-11 )? C/) C/)
g>-o Explain any "no" answer(s): ·-c ~co
0 c '-0
() :;:::;
>-co co ()
:;: _Q
-0 Q) co .0 Min o r Coll ec to r or Local St ree ts: Will culverts serve these types of streets? 0 ·-~ t5 No Yes How many instances? for each identify the ·-C/) -Q) ----.g -0 location and provide the information bel ow: a. Q)
-a. co~ Instance 1:
-0 >-Instance 2: Q) c
C/) co
:::::i.._
Instance 3: C/) 0
t C/)
Q) Q)
For each instance enter value, or "yes" I "no" for: ~ () 1 2 3 ::::Jc () co
Design yr. headwater WSE 1 ft. below curb top? -Q) C/) '-c <( ·-100-yr. max. depth at street crown 2 feet or less? Q)
'-0 Product of velocity (fps) & de pth at crown (ft) = ? E
'-~ Is velocity limited per conditi o ns (Table C-11 )? .......
Limit of down stream analys is (feet)?
Explain any "no" answers: '
STORMW AT ER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 200 7
Page 20 of 26 AP PENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce1;2t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.12)
, ' . "'
·:. :·
Stormwater Management Concept _(eoritinued) t;.; ; .... <(; . ->"' . . ' -~-. • "
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
All Proposed Culverts: For all proposed culvert facilities (except driveway/roadside
ditch intersects) provide information requested in next eight boxes.
Do culverts and travelways intersect at 90 degrees? Yes No If not, ----identify location(s) and intersect angle{s), and justify the design(s):
Does drainage way alignment change within or near limits of culvert and surfaced
approaches thereto? __ No --Yes If "yes" identify location(s), describe
change(s), and justification:
Are flumes or conduit to discharge into culvert barrel(s)? __ No __ Yes If yes,
identify location(s) and provide justification:
-Are flumes or conduit to discharge into or near surfaced approaches to culvert ends?
"C No Yes If "yes" identify location(s), describe outfall design treatment(s): Q) ----:l c :;::; c
0 .s
Cf)
t:::
Q)
Is scour/erosion protection provided to ensure long term stability of culvert structural > :;
0 components, and surfacing at culvert ends? __ Yes __ No If "no" Identify
locations and provide justification(s):
Will 100-yr flow and spread of backwater be fully contained in street ROW , and/or
drainage easements/ ROW? __ Yes --No if not, why not?
Do appreciable hydraulic effects of any culvert extend downstream or upstream to
neighboring land(s) not encompassed in subject property? --No --Yes If
"yes" describe location(s) and mitigation measures:
Are all culvert designs and materials in compliance with 8-CS Tech . Specifications?
--Yes --No If not, expla in in Special Design Section of this Part.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 21of26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
·sECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Pa rt 4 -Drai nag e Concegt and Design Parame te rs I Continued (Page 4.13)
...
St ormwate r ManagemE!nt Concept (&>n.tin ued} :;."'· . . ';.., -' -. . . -,,,
W ithin Or Servi ng Subject P roperty (Phas e, o r Site) (c o ntin ued )
Is a bridge included in plans for subject property proj ect? _L No --Yes
If "yes" provide the following information .
Name(s) and functio nal classification of the roadway(s)?
What drainage way(s) is to be crossed?
(j)'
Q)
Cl
"O ·;::::: co
A full re port supporting all aspects of the pro posed bridge(s) (structural , geotechn ical ,
hydrologic, and hydraulic factors) must accompany th is summary report . Is the report
prov ided ? --Yes --No If "no" explain:
Is a Stormwater Provide a general description of planned techn iques:
>. Po ll ution Prevention rock rip rap, silt fence installation and inlet protection :-= ro Plan (SW3P) :::::! a established for
L.. proj ect construction? Q) -ro
~ --No _L Yes
Spec ial Designs -Non-Tra d itional Methods
Are any non-traditional methods (aquatic echosystems , wetla nd-type dete ntion , natural stream
replication , BMPs for water quality, etc.) proposed for any aspect of subject property project?
_L No --Yes If "yes" list general type and location be low .
Provide full report about th e proposed special design(s) including rati o nale for use and
expected benefits. Report must substa ntiate that stormwater managem e nt objectives w ill not
be comprom ised , and that maintenan ce cost wi ll not exceed those of traditional design
solution(s). Is re port provided? --Yes --No If "no" explain:
STORMW AT ER DES IGN GUIDELI NES
Effecti ve Fe br uary 2007
Pa ge 22 of 26 AP PENDIX . D: TECH . DESI G N SUMMA RY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPEND IX D -TECHN ICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 - D rain age Conce12t a nd Des ig n Pa ra mete rs I Continued (Page 4.14)
I» 'i.
, · S to rmw at~r .M an a g ement Co ncept (con tinued)
. --, .,, ~ ':{ ..
W ithin Or Serving Subject P roperty (P hase, or Site) (contin ued)
Special Design s -Deviation From B-CS Technical Spec ifications
If any design(s) or material(s) of traditional runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of
B-CS Technical Specifications, check type facility(ies) and explain by specific detail element.
--Detention elements __ Drain system elements --Channel features
Culvert features --Swales --Ditches --Inlets __ Outfalls --
__ Valley gutters __ Bridges (explain in bridge report)
In table below briefly identify specific element, justification for deviation(s).
Specific Detail Element Justification for Deviation (attach additional sheets if needed)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Have elements been coordinated with the City E ng ineer or her/his designee? For each item
above provide "yes" or "no", action date, and staff name: ..
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
.... ·W-~
Desig!l Parameters
~ " -" .. 1·-. -. c>. -.·; ·•Ii-.
Hydrology
Is a map(s) showing all Design Drainage Areas provided?. _L Yes --No
Briefly summarize the range of applications made of the Rational Formula:
Pipe Design, Inlet Design and Gutter Depth Check
What is the size and location of largest Design Drainage Area to which the Rational Formula
has been applied? 4.64 acres Location (or identifier): 816
STORMWATER DESIG N GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUM MARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conceet and Design Pa r amete rs I Continued (Page 4.15)
. . ·. ,. . ; ......
. c}~ ·•,;;;, . ' j" <~ D e,s i gn ;p~ram e te rs {c onti nu e~)'t ... -·· .. :; .; ., ~-. ·,. ·.' \ ~-. --, .
Hyd ro logy {continued )
In making determinations for time of concentration, was segment analysis used?
No ./ Yes In approximately what percent of Design Drainage Areas? 100 %
As to inte nsity-duration-frequency and rain depth criteria for dete rmining runoff flows , were any
criteria other than those provided in these Guidelines used? _L_ No Yes If "yes"
identify type of data , source(s), and where applied :
For each of the stormwater management features l isted below identify the storm return
frequencies (year) analyzed (or checked), and that used as th e basis for design .
Feature A nalysis Year(s) Design Year
Storm drain system for arterial and collector streets 10 & 100 10
Storm drain system for local streets 10 & 100 10
Open c hannels NIA NIA
Swale/buried conduit combinati o n in lieu of channe l NIA NIA
Swales NIA NIA
Roadside ditches and culverts serving them NIA NIA
Detention facilities: spillway crest and its outfall NIA NIA
Detenti on facilities: outlet an d conveyance structure(s) NIA NIA
Detention facilities: volume when outlet plugged NIA NIA
Culverts serving private dri v es o r streets NIA NIA
Culverts serving public roadways NIA NIA
Bridges: provide in bridge report. NIA NIA
Hydraulics
What is the range of design flow velocities as outlined below?
Design fl ow velocities; G utters Conduit Culverts Swales Channels
Highest (feet per second) 3.18 9.12 NIA NIA NIA
Lowest (feet per second) 1.48 1.89 NIA NIA NIA
Streets and Sto rm Drain Sys t ems Provide the summary information outlined below:
Roughness coefficients used: For street gutters: 0.018
For con duit type(s) RCP HDPE Coefficients: 0.013 0.013
STORMWATE R DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 24 of 26 A PP ENDI X. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUM MARY
Pa rt 4 - Drainage Conce~t and Design Paramete rs I Continued (Page 4.16)
'!/', De s ig n Paramete rs (co nti nu ed)
, .,
' ·-·.: ,,,..,, " ·:·>\ ..
!· ·\; ·"''
Hydra u lics (co ntin ued )
Street and Storm Drai n Systems (contin ued)
For the following, are assumptions other than allowable per Guidelines?
Inlet coefficients? _L No --Yes Head and friction losses ./ No Yes --
Explain any "yes" answer:
In conduit is velocity generally increased in the downstream directi o n? _L Yes --No
Are elev ation drops provided at inlets, manholes, and junction boxes? _L Yes --No
Explain any "no" answers:
Are hydraulic grade lines calculated and shown for design storm? ./ Yes No --
For 100-year flow conditions? _L Yes --No Explain any "no" answers:
What tailwater conditions were assumed at outfall point(s) of t he storm drain system? Identify
each location and explain:
Yes, the storm drain system was designed taking into account a tail water of 292.0'.
Open Channels If a HEC analysis is utilized, does it follow Sec Vl.F.5.a? __ Yes __ No
Outside of straight sections, is flow regime within li mits of sub -critical flow? __ Yes __ No
If "no" list locations and explain:
Culverts If plan sheets do no t provide the foll owing for each culvert, describe it here.
For each design discharge, w ill operati on be outlet (barrel) co ntrol or inlet control?
Entrance, friction and exit losses:
Bridges Provide all in bridge report
STORMW AT ER DESIGN GUIDELINE S
Effective February 2007
Page 25 of 26 APPE NDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
I
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.17)
Design Parameters(continue~)· ~
Computer Software
What computer software has been used in the analysis and assessment of stormwater
management needs and/or the development of facility designs proposed for subject, property
project? List them below, being sure to identify the software name and version , the date of the
version, any applicable patches and the publisher
Excel spreadsheets, Autodesk Civil 3D Storm Sewer Analysis and Hydrojlow
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Requirements for submittal of construction drawings and specifications do not differ due to use of a
Technical Design Summary Report . See Section Ill, Paragraph C3.
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
Conclusions
Add any concluding information here : . . . . . . The storm sewer system and detention facilities are designed in
accordance with the BCS Drainage Design Guidelines.
Attestation
Provide attestation to the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing 6 Parts of this Technical
Desi n Summa Draina e Re ort b si nin and .seal in below.
State of Texas PE No. {,ff:, g 1'
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 26 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
r
j
Item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No. 12327
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
Revised Ene:ineer's Estimate of Construction
Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Ouantitv
General Items
Mobilization, Overhead and Construction Staking LS 1 $ 20,000.00
Topsoil Removal and Replacement, complete in place LS 1 s 12 ,000.00
Street Name Signs, complete in place EA 2 $ 350 .00
Stop Signs, complete in place EA 2 $ 400 .00
Pavement Striping and Markings , complete in place LS 1 $ 2,000 .00
Erosion & Sediment Control -SWPPP Implementation & Maintenance, Silt Fence, LS 1 s 5,000 .00 Construction Exit, Rock Filter Darn, etc ., complete in place
Hydroseed and Hydromulch, complete in place SY 22 ,812 $ 0.50
General Items Subtotal
Street Construction Items Concrete Pavement
Excavation & Grading, complete in place LS 1 $ 30,000.00
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 6" deep, complete in place SY 3,999 $ 2 .30
Mixing & incorporation oflime, 8" deep, complete in place SY 3,663 s 2 .90
Hydrated Lime, complete in place (27 lb/sy for 6" deep & 36 lb/sy for 8" deep) Ton 120 $ 180.00
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 1,803 s 36.00
7" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 3,173 s 40.00
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Aprons -6" Thick w/ Monolithic Standard Curb, SF 2,806 $ 5.50 complete in place
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Alleys -6" Thick, complete in place SF 13,153 $ 4.10
Concrete Sidewalk & Ramps -4" thick, complete in place SF 15,640 s 3 .80
ADA Ramps -Detectable Warning Surfaces, complete in place EA 6 s 500 .00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal
Page 1of3
Total
$ 20,000.00
$ 12 ,000.00
$ 700.00
$ 800.00
s 5,000.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 11 ,406 .00
$ 54,906.00
s 30,000.00
$ 9,197.70
s 10,622 .70
$ 21 ,600.00
s 64,908 .00
$ 126,920 .00
$ 15 ,433 .00
$ 53 ,927.30
s 59,432 .00
s 3,000.00
$ 395,040.70
,
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
Revised Engmeer's Estimate of Construction
Item De scription
Storm Sewer Construction Items
18 36" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill , complete in place
19 36" HOPE P ipe , complete in place -Non-Structural Backfill, complete in place
20 30" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place
21 30" HDPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill , complete in place
22 24" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place
23 18" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place
24 18" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place
25 Curb Inlet -10 ' wide, complete in place
26 Curb Inlet -5' wide, complete in place
27 Inlet -3-V-4430 complete in place
28 Inlet-2-V-4430 complete in place
29 Inlet -V-4330 complete in place
30 8'x5' Junction Box, complete in place
31 8'x4' Junction Box, complete in place
32 TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place
33 18" S.E.T .s 6H :lV, complete in place
34 Channel Grading
35 Ditch Grading, complete in place
Unit
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
LF
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
LF
EA
LS
LS
Estimated
Ouantitv
16
994
991
351
161
59
220
6
2
2
2
3
2,792
2
Unit Price
$ 62.00 $
$ 56 .00 $
$ 75 .00 $
$ 75 .00 $
$ 55 .00 $
$ 30.00 $
$ 40.00 $
$ 3,500 .00 $
$ 2,500 .00 $
$ 5,000 .00 $
$ 4,500 .00 $
$ 3,500.00 $
$ 3,500.00 $
$ 3,000 .00 $
$ 2.00 $
$ 1,250 .00 $
$ 6,000 .00 $
$ 4,000 .00 $
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $
'1'. Water Con'sfr~~tion lti~s'
' ·~· • • j
36 12" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place
37 6" C900 Water Pipe w /tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place
38 6" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Restrained Joint, Spacers & End Seals,
complete in place
39 14" Casing, complete in place
40 Connect to Existing 6" Water Line
41 Connect to Existing 12" Water Line
42 Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert . extension), complete in place
43 6"x 6" M.J . Tee, complete in place
44 12"x 6" M.J . Reducer, complete in place
45 6" M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place
46 6" x 45° M.J . Bend, complete in place
47 1.0" Water Service, 23 ft (6" Line)
48 1.5" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length= 2 ft) (6" Line)
49 1.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (6" Line)
50 1.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (12" Line)
Page 2 of 3
LF 253 $ 36.00 $
LF 1257 $ 24 .00 $
LF 70 $ 45 .00 $
LF 62 $ 45 .00 $
EA $ 500 .00 $
EA $ 500.00 $
EA 2 $ 3,500.00 $
EA 2 $ 500 .00 $
EA $ 500 .00 $
EA 3 $ 900.00 $
EA 10 $ 400.00 $
EA $ 750 .00 $
EA 10 $ 800 .00 $
EA 15 $ 1,200 .00 $
EA 4 $ 1,300.00 $
Water Construction Items Subtotal $
Total
992 .00
55 ,664 .00
74,340 .00
26,33 2 .50
8,855.00
1,770 .00
8,800 .00
21 ,000.00
5,000.00
5,000 .00
4,500 .00
7,000 .00
7,000 .00
9,000 .00
5,584.60
2,500 .00
6,000 .00
4,000.00
253,338.10
9,108 .00
30,168 .00
3,150 .00
2,790 .00
500 .00
500.00
7,000.00
1,000 .00
500 .00
2,700.00
4,000 .00
750 .00
8,000 .00
18,000.00
5,200 .00
93,366.00
' r
Item
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 107
R . d E ' E f t re t f ev1se ngmeer s s 1ma e o ons rue 100
Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Quantity
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items
6" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 584 $ 24 .00 $ 14,016.00
8" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 74 $ 24 .00 $ 1,776.00
4" Sewer Service-Single (avg. length = 4ft), complete in place EA 2 $ 300 .00 $ 600.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length = 4 ft), complete in place EA 20 $ 400 .00 $ 8,000.00
4" Sewer Service-Single (avg length= 48 ft), complete in place EA 4 $ 850.00 $ 3,400.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length= 48 ft), complete in place EA 8 $ 950.00 $ 7,600.00
Complete 4" Sewer Service-Single (avg length= 4 ft), complete in place EA 1 $ 700.00 $ 700.00
Tie-In to Existing 12" PVC Sewer Line, complete in place EA 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Concrete Manhole -4' Dia -complete in place EA 3 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,000.00
TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 658 $ 2.00 $ 1,316.00
Water Tight Manhole Cover -Install on existing 18" Sewerline along Old Wellborn LS 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 Road, complete in place
Adjust Rim Elevation of existing Manhole, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal s 49,408.00
General Items S ubtotal $ 54,906.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Su btotal s 395,040.70
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal s 253,338.10
Water Construction Items Subtotal s 93,366.00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal s 49,408.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $ 846,058.80
f-1.X,27
.SCHVLTZ EttGl~~!NG. ·u,ai
Page 3 of 3
APPENDIXB2
Barracks II Phases 107
Storm Sewer Inlets in Sump -Design Analysis
Inlet Area# Inlet Type 010 010 010
No . cfs ft. in.
S121 703 5 1.75 0 .256 3.07
S128 700 10 5.50 0 .346 4 .16
S713 701 10 2.53 0 .206 2.47
S730 708 5 3.30 0 .391 4 .69
S731 709 10 8.48 0.462 5 .55
S733 704 10 5.50 0 .346 4 .16
*ROW elevation is 8" above gutter line so 100-yr storm runoff is contained within ROW
Assume 10% clogging for design
Appendix 82
Grate Inlet Design Summary
Grate Actual
Design Ag
Inlet Grate Ag Contribut Clogging Calculatec
Number Size ing Area Ag
ctt2> % ctt2>
S702 V-4430 Gutter Inlet 1.84 710 25 1.38
S705 V-4430 Gutter Inlet 1.84 711 25 1.38
S720 3 -V-4430 Gutter Inlet 5 .52 707 25 4 .14
S721 2 -V-4430 Gutter Inlet 3 .68 702 25 2 .76
0100 0100 0100*
cfs ft . in.
2 .36 0 .312 3.75
7.42 0.423 5.07
3.40 0 .251 3 .02
4.45 0.477 5.73
11 .44 0 .564 6 .77
7.42 0.423 5 .07
10-Year Storm 100-Year Storm
a10 Depth, y a100 Depth, y
(cfs) (ft) (in) (cfs) (ft) (in)
3 .50 0.28 3 .32 4 .71 0 .50 6 .02
2 .59 0.15 1.82 3.49 0 .28 3.31
8 .74 0 .19 2 .30 11 .78 0 .35 4 .18
3 .82 0 .08 0 .99 5.15 0 .15 1.80