HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-265CASE NO.:
C ITY or C ou..EGE STATI ON
Home of Texas A&M University " SITE PLAN APPLICATION
GENERAL
TIME: I DATE SUB~MIJTED :
........ ~~-----~
STAFF :
--+"lr-l---t------~
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$932 Site Pla11 Applicatio11 Fee. H /A D
D
D
$350 tfo11-Reside11tial A1 cl litectui al Standards I Nortligete Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). tJ. /A
$600 (111i11i111un 1) Deoelopnient Permit Applieatior'I I Publie lr'lfrastfuetufe Re¥iew ar'iel lr'lspeetior'I Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engi11eer's Estimate for publie infrBstrueture , $600 minimum (if fee is > $600 , tlie belenee is
dt:Je prior to tlie isst:Janee of ar'ly l'lar'ls Of ele¥elel'ffieflt l'Cfffiit). N/A
/ [9/ Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered .
vi ~ Six (6) folded copies of site plan .
~One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan.
D 0Re (1) ee13y ef ti'le fellewiflg fef Nefl Resieler'ltial AFCi'liteettJFBI StBndBrds bt1ilding review or Nortligete
Buildi11g Reoievv (if epplieable). t--l/A
D Buildi11g eleoetions to seale fef all buileliRgs .
D
D
A list of buildi11g n 1eteriels for all ft'JeBele ar'iel seFeefliflg .
Color samples for all builelil"lgs Of list eelers to be useel frol"l"I ti'le appre·v·eel eeler palette .
D Eledi011ic copy of Site Pla11 e-111ailed to csueleetdesign@esbc.gou.
/~ Two (2) copies of the grading , drainage , and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. ff Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
D Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the
proposed request (if applicable).
D Tlie etteelied Site Plar'I Non Residential Arei'liteetural Standards Building Revievv and Nortligate Building
Reoievv elieeklists (es epplieBble) vvith all itel"l"ls eheekeel off or a brief explanatior'I as to oo'l'ly they Bre not
ei'leelt off. t--1 /A
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference
NAME OF PROJECT College View High School
ADDRESS 1300 George Bush Drive, College Station, TX 77845
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) A000701 , Crawford Burnett (/CL), Tract 187
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Ben Lamons -VLK Architects E-mail blamons@vlkarchitects.com
Street Address 7915 FM 1960 West, Suite 214
City Houston State TX Zip Code _7_70_7_0 ____ _
Phone Number 281 .671 .2300 Fax Number 281 .271 .2313
---------------~
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION :
Name Jon Hall -College Station /SD E-mail jhall@csisd.org
Street Address 2000 Welsh Street
City College Station State TX Zip Code _7_78_4_5 ____ _
Phone Number 979. 764 .5443 Fax Number 979. 764 .5432
---------------~
Revised 9/14 Page 1 of 11
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER 'S I . .a MATION :
Name VLK Architects E-mail blamons@vlkarchitects.com
Street Add ress 7915 FM 1960 West, Suite 214
C ity Houston State TX Zip Code _7_70_7_0 ____ _
Phone Numbe r 281 .671 .2300 Fax Number 281 .671 .2313
----------------~ ---------------
0 THE R CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact):
Name E-mail
Street Address
City State _________ Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
Current zoning GS -General Suburban
Present use of property Institutional I Public
---------------------------------~
Proposed use of property Institutional I Public ----------------------------------
Number of parkin g spaces required Not covered in U.D .O. Number of parking spaces proposed 110 Reg,8 HC=118
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes l'X No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance . Notwithstanding any assertion made ,
vestin g is lim ited to that which is prov ided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior C ity platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
appl ication be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
I Yes
l'X No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
add iti onal sheets if necessary):
Project Name :
C ity Project Number (if known):
Date I Timeframe when submitted :
Rev ised 9/14 Page 2of11
MUL Tl-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage
Floodplain Acreage ____ _
Housing Units
#of 1 Bedroom Units ---
___ #of 2 Bedroom Units
#of 3 Bedroom Units ---
#of 4 Bedroom Units ---
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
# Bedrooms > 130 sq. ft . ---
#Bedrooms< 130 sq . ft . ---
PARKLAND DEDICATION
(Fees due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit)
#of Multi-Family Dwelling Units
x $1636 = $
# of acres in floodplain
#of acres in detention
#of acres in greenways
Date dedication approved by Parks &
____ Recreation Advisory Board
COMMERCIAL
Total Acreage _2._1_4_9 ___ _
Building Square Feet 56,006
Floodplain Acreage _o ____ _
* Projects that were vested prior to January 1, 2008, per Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government
Code may be assessed a different amount. Please contact city staff for additional information .
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true
and correct.
\O-t'7-14
Signature and title Date
Revised 9/14 Page 3of11
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein .
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued .
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance .
6 . Other permits may be required to fulfill local , state , and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP .
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to Jt>E'ti..lS b e 14 . L ot-4 1 AA'-.JoiZ.S (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PER T APPLICATION, ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE , AND
ACC RATE.
/0.1.l-(4--
Date
Engineer Certification:
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds , proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local , State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e ., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin .
3. The i nformation and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines . All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4. I E ENGINEER , AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, ANQ.~~~NTS
0 THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION , ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNmc;;eE:;··~~~ND
C URATE . #it / · . ., • I~ ~*.. · .• i t ...... : ................................ ~
Date
Revised 9/14
i ·~~~9.~!~~-~:~:.~~-~
~ 1~ TI689 :"!ij ~ ~ ... <::>/!ii#
'• 0~~}~G1sre.'?-_~··.-,.§'; ., '\S' .. . .. . .. ... ~'"::?'
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill /Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify , as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the
lopment covered by this permit , shall not:
(i) increase the Ba e Flood elevation ;
(ii) create additional a as of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(i ii) decrease the convey ce capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity f flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth off m the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood wate torage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance ea where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acce table compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances , Chapter 13 concernin encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities .
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in ection 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances .
Engineer Date
Initial
D *If latting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter lieu of certification .
Required for Site Plans, Fi I Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following:
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-fa ·1y structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the st cture or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm .
N/A
Enginee r Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
ction , improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation . I will apply for a varian to the Zoning Board of Adjustments .
Engineer Date
Revised 9/14 Page 5 of 11
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area {Elevation Certificate
required).
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential stru ure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one to above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during onstruction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures: N/A
E. I, -----------------"' certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-resid tial structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities , ductwork and basements, elevated at leas one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor
OR
I, , certify that th structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so th t the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and imp meable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loa and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified durin construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval :
Rev ised 9/14 Page 6of11
C ITY or C oUEGE STATJO
Home of Texas A&M Univmity 0
/
SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: --~ J heet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
·~A key map (not necessarily to scale). ~F-\MOE;}( 5MEEI
[8] Title block to include :
[8] Name , address , location , and legal description
~me , address , and telephone number of applicant
~me , address , and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
~ame , address , and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
[EJ)J ate of submittal
IEJ!rotal site area
~orth arrow.
efscale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
[8] Ownersh ip and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels.
O Hie tot!SI 1"1t:11T1ber of ITlt:Jlti falTlily bt:1ileliA~s aAel uAits te be eeAstrueteeJ eA O:ie J3reJ3eseeJ J3rejeet site . "tJ./A
O Hie eleAsity ef elwelliA~ uAits J3er sere eftl'le 13re13esea 13rejeet. NI A
~e gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If d ifferent uses are to be
located in a single building , show the location and size of the uses within the building . Building separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection . Ke.F. l...OCE. "i>MEEL
Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site:
Des ignate between existing and proposed
D Tl'le aeAs ity ef awell i A~ uAits 13e r acre ef tl'le 13re19esea 19rejeot. ~/A
[8] Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements .
~ildings (Ex isting and Proposed).
[8] Setbacks according to UDO , Article 5.
Geography
0 Water eouf8es. NI A.
~100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project s ite . Please note if there is none
on the site with confirming FEMA/FIRM map number.
[8] Existing topography (2 ' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information . (If plan has too much
information , show drainage on separate sheet.) REr. Lw•L S1-u:oe,s
[8] Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too
much information , show drainage on separate sheet.) REf. C.1v11... Sl-l f £""TS
Rev ised 9/14 Page 7 of 11
Streets, Parking, and Sidewalh
[g] Existing streets and sidewalks (R.O .W .).
[g] Existing Driveways, both opposite and adjacent to the site according to UDO , Article 7 .
[g] Proposed drives. Minimum drive aisle width according to UDO , Article 7
[g] Indicate proposed driveway throat length according to UDO, Article 7
[g] Proposed curb cuts .
[g] For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets , alleys , etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts .
[g] Proposed curb and pavement detail.
[g] A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception . (To include island ,
planting areas , access ways , dumpster locations , utility pads , etc.) No exception will be made for areas
designated as "reserved for future parking". Re.F. Livt L Si-tCE:I Cb.OZ.
[g] Proposed medians.
[g] Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
[g] Proposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities for non-residential buildings (UDO , Article 7).
[g] Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn , tabulated , and dimensioned .
[g] Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal.
[g] Handicap parking spaces .
[g] Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated according to UDO , Section 7 .2 or 7 .9 fornon-
residential buildings .
[g] Parking setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot as required.
[gj Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be
conflict with pedestrian or bike facilities, handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities , signs or other conflicts.
[g] Security gates , showing swing path and design specs with colors.
D Gt1eFar:eils . IAelt1ae aesi~A aAEl sale1'9. 't-4/A
[g] Traffic Impact Analysis for non-residential development (UDO, Article 7).
[g] Please note if none is required .
[g] Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O .W .? [g] Yes D No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application.
Easements and Utilities
[g] Easements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility, access , etc.) RE ~. L1v1L <':>1-1an L4.o\
[g] Utilities (noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site , including building
transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets .
D SeweF Desi~A Re19el'1: (if 01313lisaele). 't-J/A -R ef . lw11.. S.Ml&E"'\ L.'i.O\
[g] Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable).
,.. el.EL.. 'S.rla-t !S\Ol
[g] Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary .
[g] Meter locations , existing and proposed (must be located in public R.O .W . or public utility easement). R Ef EL.6'-· S~i:E1E:S10 \
[g] Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include
[g] Minimum water demands
[g] Maximum water demands
[g] Average water demands in gallons per minute , and
[g] Maximum sewer loadings in gallons per day
[g] Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? [g] Yes D No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application .
Rev ised 9/14 Page 8of11
Fire Protection
~ Show fire lanes . Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be
established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a
public street or highway .
~ Show proposed and existing fire hydrants . Fi re hydrants must be located on the same s ide of a major street as a
project , and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 ,
R-1A , or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street , highway or designated fire
lane . -RE"f. C.1v1L s HeE'"l C.t.t.of
NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City , and drives must have an all weather surface before a
build ing permit can be issued .
~ Will building be sprinkled? ~ Yes D No
If the decis ion to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved , then the plan must be resubmitted . If Yes ,
~ Show fire department connections . FDC 's should be within 100' of the fire hydrant. They shall be access ible from
the pa rking lot w ithout being blocked by parked cars or a structure . -Ri::~. L.1v11... SHEei L<-t.ot
Landscaping
~ Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance . The landscaping plan can be shown
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan . If requesting protected tree po ints , then those
trees need to be shown appropr iately barricaded on the landscape plan . Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in
easements .
Include information on the plans such as :
~ requ ired point calculations
~ add it iona l streetscape points required . Streetscape compliance is required on all streets .
IVl calcula ti ons for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree po ints will accrue toward total ~ landscaping points .)
~ proposed new plant ings with points earned
~ proposed locatio ns of new plantings
~ screen ing of park ing lots , 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen . (C.ou..Eu• 4£.-rA,•CfoJ tSD c><E"P7 1<>t4)
IVl screen ing of dumpsters , concrete reta ining walls , off street loading areas , utility connection points , o r other ~ areas potentially visually offensive .
~ ex isting landscap ing to remain
IVl show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan . Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are ~ up before the first development permit is issued .
~ Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ord inance .
~ Show irrigat ion system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requ irement w ill be met prior to issuance of C.
0 .) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping . Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must
include backflow prevention protection .
~ Is there any landscap ing in TxDOT R.O .W .? D Yes ~ No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of appl icat ion.
Other
D Common open spaces sites
~ Loading docks
D Detention ponds
~ Retaining walls
D Sites for sol id waste containers w ith screening . Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or
resident ial areas. Gates are discouraged and v isual screening is required . (M inimum 12 x 12 pad required .)
~ Are there impact fees associated with th is development? D Yes ~ No
NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately .
Revised 9/14 Page 9of1 1
Crrv OF C m .r .F G E STATION
Home o/Texas A&M U11ivmiry·
FOR OFFICE ,l!J>E ONLY C:.
CASE NO.: \ '--j -...2JQ J
DATE SUBMITTED: 11 ]2-E/C Lj
TIME : \\ · Q Q
STAFF : f\"(J --'----=--------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
O New Project Submittal
O Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . P&DS Project no .: W Existing Project Submittal. P&DS Project no .: \ L\ __,,, LLP c; ------
Project Name cs\ SD Go\ \-e~e V i (\A} rnCJ n __ s ~hDZ> \
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
O Comprehensive Plan Amendment
D Rezoning Application
O Conditional Use Permit
O Preliminary Plan
0 Final Plat
0 Development Plat
O Site Plan
O Special District Site Plan
D Special District Building I Sign
0 Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
O Non-Residential Architectural Standards
0 Irrigation Plan
D Variance Request
D Development Permit
0 Development Exaction Appeal
0 FEMA CLOMNCLOMR/LOMNLOMR
0 Grading Plan
D Other -Please specify below
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
O Comprehensive Plan Amendment
D TxDOT Driveway Permit
0 TxDOT Utility Permit
0
0
Drainage Letter or Report
Fire Flow Analysis
Special Instructions:
10/10
O Waterline Construction Documents
D
D
0
D
1-·~e Print Form
Sewerline Construction Documents
Street Construction Documents
Easement Application
Other -Please specify
CITY OF C OL.LE G E STATT O
Home of Texas A&M Universi ty"
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO .: \ Y -ZUJS
DATE SUBMITTED: I\ j 2 4/1 4
TIME : 'f-:~
STAFF : ...... A ..... i1~------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
D New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No .:
[8] Existing Project Submittal. Case No .: 14-00900265
Project Name CS/SD Center for Alternative Leaming Rebuild
Contact Name Veronica Morgan Phone Number 979-260-6963
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment
D Rezoning Application
D Conditional Use Permit
D Preliminary Plan
D Final Plat
D Development Plat
D Site Plan
D Special District Site Plan
D Special District Building I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
D Non-Residential Architectural Standards
D Irrigation Plan
D Variance Request
D Development Permit
D Development Exaction Appeal
D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
D Grading Plan
D Other -Please specify below
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit D Street Construction Documents
[8] Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions :
10/10 Print Form
MITCHELL
MM
MORGAN
To: City of College Station
3204 Earl Rudder Fwy S
College Station , TX 77845
(979) 260-6963 Phone
(979) 260 -3564 Fax
info@ mitchel landmorgan .com
www.mitchellandmorgan.com
Letter Of Transmittal
Date: 11/24/2014 Job: 1438
Attention: Danielle Singh , PE
Re: CSISD Center for Alternative Leaming
We are sending you : [i] Attached
0 Plans
0 Order
D Under separate cover via _____ the following:
0 Drawings 0 Prints 0 Samples D Specifications
0 Letter D Other ________________ _
Item Date #of Copies Description
1
2
3
4
10/7/2014
11/18/2014
11/19/2014
11/21/2014
Transmitted as checked below:
1
1
1
TxDOT Driveway Permit Application
Site Plan
Paving Plan
Response to Staff Comments
0 For approval 0 Approved as noted 0 Resubmit'---__ copies for approval
0 For your use 0 Approved as submitted 0 Submit copies for distribution
0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected copies
rXJ For review 0 Other ____________ _
Remarks:
If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at 979-260-6963.
Copy to: _F_il_e _____________ S i gned : Kerry Pillow
Cm OF CoIJ.EGE STATION
H~ ofTeua AON f.htitlmit].
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: I y -2 lP5
DATE SUBMITTED : a1C7I1 y.
TIME: 4: 3S
STAFF: Av:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITI AL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submitta l.
D New Project Submittal
0 Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . Case No.:
}21-Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: \ 4:-2Le <S
Project Name (,S \ S \:) (.,0 \ \eJ:?je V \ e\.)._) ffi '"jV\ Seb QD \
Contact Name ____ ..:.---_________ _ Phone Number
~----------~
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
0 Rezoning Application
D Conditional Use Permit
0 Preliminary Plan
O Final Plat
0 Development Plat
O SitePlan
0 Special District Site Plan
0 Special District Building I Sign
0 Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DQCUMENTS
0 Non-Residential Architectural Standards
0 Irrigation Plan
0 Variance Request
0 Development Permit
D Development Exaction Appeal
0 FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMNLOMR
0 Grading Plan
0 Other -Please specify below
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set
The following are included in the complete set:
0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
0 TxDOT Utility Permit D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
0 Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions :
10/10
MITCHELL 3204 Earl Rudder Fwy S
College Station , TX 77845
(979) 260-6963 Phone
(979) 260-3564 Fax
info@mitchellandmorgan.com
www.mitchellandmorgan .com
Letter Of Transmittal
MM Date: 12/17/2014 Job: 1438
MORGAN Attention: Kevin Ferrer, EIT
To: City of College Station Re: CSISD Center for Alternative Learning
We a re sending you: [i] Attached
(g] Plans
D Order
D Under separate cover via _____ the following :
D Drawings D Prints D Samples
D Letter D
Item Date # of Copies Description
1
2
3
12/17/2014
12/17/2014
12/17/2014
Transmitted as checked below:
5
3
1
Full Civil sets
C5.01 sheets
Demolition/erosion control sheet
D Specifications
~ For approval DD Approved as noted D Resubmit. ___ copies for approval
[i] For your use Approved as submitted D Submit copies for distribution
D As requested D Returned for corrections D Return corrected copies D For review D Other _____________ _
Remarks:
If you have any questions or comments , please contact us at 979-260-6963 .
Copy to: File Signed: ---------------James Batenhorst
CrTY oF C m.LEGE ST ATION
Home of Texas A&M Un iversity"
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
~ New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application. Case No.:
~~~~~~~~~ D Existing Project Submittal. Case No .:
Project Name CS/SD Center for Alternative Learning Rebuild
Contact Name Veronica Morgan Phone Number 979-260-6963
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment
D Rezon ing Application
D Conditional Use Perm it
D Prelim i nary Plan
D Final P lat
D Development Plat
D Site Plan
D Special District Site Plan
D Special District Bu ilding I Sign
D Landscape Plan
D
D
Non-Residential Architectural Standards
Irrigation Plan
D Variance Request
D
D
D
D
D
Development Permit
Development Exaction Appeal
FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
Grading Plan
Other -Please specify below
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment
~ TxDOT Driveway Permit
D TxDOT Utility Permit
D Drainage Letter or Report
D Fire Flow Analysis
Site Plan (11x17) and Paving Plan (11x17)
Special Instructions:
10/1 0
D Waterline Construction Documents
D Sewerline Construction Documents
D Street Construction Documents
D Easement Application
~ Other -Please specify
Print Form
MITCHELL
M M
3204 Earl Rudder Fwy S
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 260-6963 Phone
(979) 260-3564 Fax
info@mitchellandmorgan.com
www.mitchellandmorgan .com
Letter Of Transmittal
Date: 10/14/2014 Job: 1438
MORGAN Attention: Planning & Development Services
To: City of College Station Re: CSISD Center for Alternative Learning
We are sending you: [i] Attached D Under separate cover via _____ the following :
D Drawings D Prints D Samples D Specifications
D Letter
D Plans
D Order D Other ________________ ~
Item Date # of Copies Description
1
2
3
10/7/2014
10/13/2014
9/30/2014
1
1
1
TxDOT Driveway Permit Application
Site Plan
Paving Plan
Transmitted as checked below:
D For approval D Approved as noted D Resubmit ____ copies for approval
D For your use D Approved as submitted D Submit copies for distribution
D As requested D Returned for corrections D Return corrected copies
[X] For review D Other ____________ _
Remarks :
If you have any questions or comments , please contact us at 979-260-6963.
Copy to : Signed:
-------------~
MITCHELL
M M
MORGAN
To: City of College Station
3204 Earl Rudder Fwy S
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 260-6963 Phon e
(979) 260-3564 Fax
info@mitchellandmorgan .com
www.mitchellandmorgan .com
Letter Of Transmittal
Date: 1/30/2015 Job: 1438
Attention: Kevin Ferrer, EIT
Re: CSISD Center for Alternative Learning
l Y-ZlPS
o\/30/IS
3:SO
f\0
We are sending you: [i] Attached
0 Plans
0 Order
0 Under separate cover via _____ the following:
0 Drawings 0 Prints 0 Samples 0 Specifications
0 Letter 0 Other ________________ ~
Item Date # of Copies Description
1
2
3
1/30/2015
1/30/2015
1/30/2015
Transmitted as checked below:
1
1
8
Response to Staff Comments
Fireflow Report Addendum
Sheet C4.02 -WL-1 Reroute
0 For approval B Approved as noted 0 Resubmit ____ copies for approval
[i] For your use Approved as submitted 0 Submit copies for distribution
0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected copies 0 For review 0 Other ____________ _
Remarks:
Kevin,
Please see attached for the plans regarding the rerouting of the 8" waterline on the CAL
project.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at 979-260-6963.
Copy to: File Signed: --------------Kerry Pillow
CITY OF C m.LE GE STAT ION
Hom e o/Texas A&M University"
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO., tt/-~
DATE SUBMITTED : IL/J<{
TIME : ~! 15
STAFF : b.5t
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
0 New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . Case No .:
Existing Project Submittal. Case No .: 14-00900265
Project Name CS/SO Center for Alternative Learning Rebuild
Contact Name Veronica Morgan Phone Number 979-260-6963
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Non -Res idential Arch itectural Standards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
D Site Plan D Grading Plan
D Special District Site Plan D Other -Please specify below
D Special District Building I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are incl uded in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment [8J Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instruct ions:
10/10 Print Form
MITCHELL 3204 Earl Rudder Fwy S
Co ll ege Statio n . TX 77845
(979) 260-6963 Ph one
(979) 260-356 4 Fax
info@m itchellandmorgan .com
www.m itchellandmorgan .co m
Letter Of Transmittal
M M Date: 1/27/2015 Job: 1438
MORGAN Attention: Erika Bridges, EIT
To: City of College Station Re: CSISD Center for Alternative Learning
We are sending you: [i] Attached D Under separate cover via _____ the following:
D Drawings D Prints D Samples D Specifications
D Letter
D Plans
D Order D Other _________________ _
Item Date # of Copies Description
1
2
3
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
1/27/2015
Transmitted as checked below:
2
2
2
Sheet C4.01 -Site Utility
Sheet C4.02 -WL-1 Reroute
COCS Electrical Plan
D For approval DD Approved as noted D Resubm it~ __ copies for approval
[XJ For your use Approved as submitted D Submit cop i es for distribution
D As requested D Returned for corrections D Return corrected copies D For review D Other _____________ _
Remarks:
Erika ,
Please see attached for the plans regarding the rerouting of the 8" waterline on the CAL
project.
If you have any questions or comments , please contact us at 979-260-6963.
Copy to: Fi le Signed: Kerry Pillow
--------------~
Crrv OF CoUEGE STATION
H""" efTet111 Ad-M lJMJmit}•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: \y ~2 lfS
DATE SUBMITTED : 12-ll ~ I y
TIME : II : 00
STAFF: -1A~,~:::._ _____ _
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal .
0 New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . Case No.:
r::{ Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: \ y -2 LOS
Project Name C $ l SD Co\ ~ -ecoe \Ji f ,\J.J tb C()D SI X\ o o (
Contact Name -Phone Number
~----------~
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
O Comprehensive Plan Amendment
0 Rezoning Application
0 Conditional Use Permit
O Preliminary Plan
O Final Plat
0 Development Plat
O SitePlan
O Special District Site Plan
D Special District Building I Sign
0 Landscape Plan
INFBASTRUCTVRE AND ENGINEERING DQCUMENIS
O Non-Residential Architectural Standards
0 lnigation Plan
0 Variance Request
O Development Permit
D Development Exaction Appeal
0 FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMNLOMR
0 Grading Plan
0 Other -Please specify below
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set
The following are induded in the complete set:
0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 0 Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit 0 Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis 0 Other -Please specify
Special Instructions:
10/10
CITY OF Cou .EGE STATION
Home of Texas A &M University •
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CAS ENO .: \4-ZIPS
DATE SUBMITTED : tJ6 · \Q . \fi
TIME : \ \ -. 1-5
STAF F: ___,P\J~-------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANS MITT AL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
D New Proj ect Subm ittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . Case No .:
Qg Existing Project Submittal. Case No.: \L\,... Zl.P S
rtcon :ihDo \
Contact Name ---"-_,.,. ____________ _ Phone Number ,,..----------------
We are transm itt ing the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D
D
D
D
D
D g
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Rezon ing Application
Condit ional Use Perm it
Prelim in ary Plan
Final Plat
Development Plat
Site Plan >< ~
Special District Si te Plan
D Special District Bui lding I Sign
D Landscape Plan
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Non-Res idential Arch itectural Standards
Irrigation Plan
Variance Request
Development Permit
Development Exaction Appeal
FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
Grading Plan
Other -Please specify below
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehens"ive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Perm it D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Perm it D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analys is D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions :
10/10 Print Fo rm
VLK IARCHITECTS
TRANSMITTAL
Project: College Station ISD -Center for Alternative Learning
To : Jessica Bullock
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
Co ll ege Station, TX 77842
FOR YOUR:
D APPROVAL D SIGNATURE
THE FOLLOWING:
::J REVIEW I COMME T
_C_o~p_i _es ___ D_a_te ___ D_escriptio_n _____ _
4 219/15 Copies of A1 .01, as requested
--+-----
I
-~----------
COMMENTS :
COPIES TO : File
Architect's
Project No.:
Date:
1405.00
March 10, 2015
:J INFORMATION I FILES 0 DISTRIBUTION TO PARTIES
By : ~0sa leming
Project Coordinator
Member American Institute of Architects· 7915 F.M. 1960 West Suite 214 · Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300 . Fax 281.671.2313. www.vlkarchitecls.com
C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M Univerrity•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO .: 1Y. • 2!,t~
DATE SUBMITIED: o?)f &i r I s:
TIME : Mo: 0 0
STAFF : ~
-----~~~~~~~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANS MITT AL LETTER
Please check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
O New Project Submittal
D Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . Case No.:
Existing Project Submittal. Case No .: 14-00900265
Project Name CS/SD Center for Alternative Leaming Rebuild (College View High School)
Contact Name Veronica Morgan Phone Number 979-260-6963
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Non-Residential Architectural Standards
D Rezoning Application D Irrigation Plan
D Conditional Use Permit D Variance Request
D Preliminary Plan D Development Permit
D Final Plat D Development Exaction Appeal
D Development Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
D Site Plan D Grading Plan
D Special District Site Plan [8J Other -Please specify below
D Special District Building I Sign Civil Construction Plans to be included in the
D Landscape Plan Building Plans Approved Plans
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire Flow Analysis D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions:
10/10 Print Form
MITCHELL 3204 Earl Rudder Fwy S
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 260-6963 Phone
(979) 260-3564 Fax
info@mitchellandmorgan.com
www.mitchellandmorgan.com
Letter Of Transmittal
M M Date: 3/9/2015 Job: 1438
MORGAN Attention: Ben McCarty
To: City of College Station Re: CSISD College View High School
We are sending you: [i] Attached D Under separate cover via the following:
D Drawings ~ Plans D Prints D Samples D Specifications
D Letter D Order D Other
Item Date # of Copies Description
1
2
3/9/2015
3/9/2015
3
2
Civil Construction Planset
Copies of the Folded Site Plan (Sheet C2.01, C2.02, C2.03)
Transmitted as checked below:
[&I For approval DD Approved as noted D Resubmit~ ___ copies for approval
[ii For your use Approved as submitted DD Submit copies for distribution
D As requested D Returned for corrections Retum ____ corrected copies D For review D Other ____________ _
Remarks:
Ben,
We have attached copies of all the approved plans we have received on this project,
please include these sheets in the building plansets. Thanks.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at 979-260-6963.
Copy to: _F_ile _____________ Signed: Kerry Pillow
..
VLK j ARCHITECTS
TRANSMITTAL
Project: C~ll~on<?lCPet!JGA /i?nii~b ing • Architect 's
~ J Pmject No
To Theo R°"~tioo lodepeodeot School D~ e s.;s l cA-
~~i,o e ~::tioo , TX 77840 :l3 {.) l l be }:::.. I D•te
FOR YOUR:
1405 .00
February 27 ,
2014
D APPROVAL D SIGNATURE :J REVIEW I COMMENT 0 INFORMATION I FILES :J DISTRIBUTION TO
PARTIES
THE FOLLOWING :
Copies Date Description
9 12/18/14 full size sheet L 1.01
COMMEN TS:
College Station Independent School Dist..
2000 Welsh
College Station, TX 77840
Website: www.csisd.org
E-mail : trouse@csisd.org
COPIES TO :
THEoRousE
Coordinator of Construction
Fil e
Phone : 979-694-5634
Cell : 979-255-5357
.J
:J
::J
:J
.J By : Ben Lamons
Project Coordinator
Member American I nstitute of Arch i tects · 79 15 F.M. 1960 West Suite 214 . H ouston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300 ·Fax 281 671.2313 · www.v l karchitects.com
CITY OF COLL.E GE S TATIO: __________ ..., ....... ----Home of Texas A&M University •
MEMORANDUM
DATE : December 11 , 2014
TO: Ben Lamons , via ; blamons@vlkarchitects .com
FROM : Jessica Bullock , Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CSISD COLLEGE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed .
C ity of College Station Transmittal Letter
Two (2) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans and detail sheets
attached
Engineering Cost Estimate
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo, if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter
explaining the details . If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me
at 979 .764 .3757 .
Attachments : Staff review comments
PC : John Hall , College Station Independent School District, via ; jhall@cs isd .org
P&DS Project No. 14-00900265
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • l 101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE S1ATJON ·TEXAS · 77842
TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.7<14.3496
cstx.gov/devservices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: CSISD College View High School (SP) -14-00900265
PLANNING
1. The service drive on the SW side will need the length of the hammerhead will need to be
120' during phase II , for sufficient fire access .
2 . Please prov ide an explanation/survey to show the property line . What is shown does not
match what I can see . Understanding that what I see does not accurately depict what will
be on record , and explanation will be fine . Please also verify that the property line does not
go i nto TxDot ROW along George Bush Dr, where it runs along the island .
3 . When location of bike rack is determined , please include on sheet A 1.01.
4 . Please show driveway apron as identified in the site design standards .
5. For the Fire lane stripping detail on sheet A1 .01 , the lettering should be 4 ". The red strip
should rema in 8".
6 . Response to TxDot comments are still be reviewed and will follow .
7. Please note that any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the City
of College Station , must be expla ined in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by : Jessica Bullock Date : December 10 , 2014
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please verify streetscaping calculation . I show property frontage not including driveways as
424 ' along T imber, 194' along Holik , and 600 ' along George Bush Dr . This would mean 13
canopy trees along Timber, 6 along Holik and 24 along George Bush Dr . The only place
where additional trees would need to be added for streetscaping is along George Bush Dr.
These would need to be placed within same proximity the existing trees are to George Bush
Dr. The calculation for 300 additional points along the ROW can also be revised to take out
driveway spacing. Based on my calculations total points required is 13 ,968 .
2 . Planting not in the property lines cannot be counted towards po ints . This includes the crepe
myrtles along George Bush Drive and some trees along Timber. For existing trees , they can
rema i n shown on the plan , but they would not count towards point requirements . For the
new proposed plantings , please move them so the trunk is within the property li ne .
3. I am still unable to verify the count for crepe myrtles. Please e ither use a different symbol or
label which trees are crepe myrtles .
4 . W it h the next submittal , please include a request to have the trees next to the front of the
bu ild ing count toward streetscaping along George Bush Drive . The request should expla in
why these exemptions are necessary for the site .
Rev iewed by : Jessica Bullock Date : December 10 , 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 2
1. Response comment has been noted . Prior the submittal for approved plans , please make
su re t hat there 's a note next to the existing manhole on Ho li k St. stating that the private
sewer line terminates at this manhole and that the public sewer is beg inning here since the
Util ity sheet was not submitted during the last submittal.
2. Prov ide a note stating where the public storm sewer begins on the plans .
3. Please check the drainage area down on Halik Street , and acquire a dedicate drainage
easement for the proposed storm sewer line to the creek .
4 . Please provide an Engineering Cost estimate .
Reviewed by : Kevin Ferrer Date : December 10 , 2014
~. C ITY OF C OLLEGE S TATION _______________ ,.,,_
~ Home o/Texas A&M University • pC
-----------'=
MEMORANDUM
DATE : November 6 , 2014
TO : Ben Lamons , via; blamons@vlkarchitects.com
FROM : Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CSISD COLLEGE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . Please address the comments and
submit the following information for further staff review:
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments
Two (2) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (one set will
be returned to you , please submit additional copies if you want more than one
approved set);
Drainage Report
Two (2) 24 "x36 " revised site plans;
One (1) 24 "x36 " revised landscaping plan ;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter
explaining the details . If you have any questions or need additional information , please contact
Jessica Bullock at 979. 764 .3570 .
Attachments : Staff Review Comments
pc: John Hall , College Station Independent School District, via ; jhall@csisd .org
P&DS Project No. 14-00900265
Pla11niug & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • l I 0 I TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STAT IO N ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL. 979.764 .3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
est><. gov I de vs ervices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: CSISD College View High School (SP) 14-00900265
PLANNING
1. Please include site detail sheets with next submittal and add the curb detail to sheet A 1.01 .
2 . Please clarify phase lines. On sheet A 1.0 , it is not clear what is in phase II versus phase Ill.
3. Please show property line and easements .
4. Please revise the street labels to also show right-of-way widths on George Bush Drive ,
Timber Street, and Halik Street.
5. Please revise the curb radii on the proposed driveway to Halik . They should be between 25
and 30 feet.
6 . Are bike racks provided on site?
7. Please clarify the temporary fire lane by the Barbara Bush Center.
8. Please revise fire lane stripping to extend 100 feet from the driveway along George Bush
Drive . Also revise stripping details so the red stripe is 8".
9 . Please verify that signs are not in the right-of-way .
10. Provide a general note on the site plan that all roof and ground-mounted mechanical
equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public
right-of-way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot , measured from a point five
feet above grade . Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and
scale to maintain a unified appearance .
11 . Provide a general note on the site plan that states the following : Exterior building and site
lighting will meet the standards of Section 7 .11 of the Unified Development Ordinance . The
light source shall not project below an opaque housing and no fixture shall directly project
light horizontally. Fixtures will be mounted in such a manner that the projected cone of light
does not cross any property line.
12 . Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Rev iewed by: Jessica Bullock Date: 10/6/14
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please differentiate between existing and proposed trees.
2. Quantities provided in the table do not match what is shown on the site . Please only include
plantings within the borders of the site .
3. Please separate streetscaping points . 1 canopy tree is required ever 25 feet along George
Bush Drive and every 32 feet along Timber and Halik. 2 non-canopy trees can be
substituted for 1 canopy. These trees should be located within 50 feet of the property line .
4. Please show property line and easements on landscape plan.
5. Please show the barricade around the trees on the plan .
6 . To receive landscaping points for existing trees , all existing trees must be in good form and
condition and reasonably free of damage by insects and/or disease .
7 . Please add a general note that barricades will be in place prior to any activity on the
property including but not limited to grading .
8. Parking screening is required along 100% of George Bush Drive . Screening can be done
with plantings , berms , structural elements or a combination and a minimum of 3 feet above
parking lot elevation .
Reviewed by: Jessica Bullock Date : 10/6/14
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure
Principle Back Flow Device , or a Double-Check Back Flow Device , and installed as per City
Ord inance 2394.
2 . All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ord inance
2394 .
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Please provide a drainage study.
2 . I was curious why there 's a 6 feet drop for the flow lines for the grate inlet 1-9 at station
4+70 .10.
3. Please provide the fire flow demand & building type , and show the locat ion of the fire
hydrants on the site plan (sheet A 1.01 ).
4 . Please show the existing fire hydrants on Holik St. and Timber St. on the plans .
5. Provide an access easement for the sidewalk along George Bush Drive that is going
through the parking lot.
6 . GIS is showing a sewer line connecting to the building that is to be demolished and replaced
w ith parking & fire lane on Timber St. Please specify on the plans if it's being abandoned or
removed .
7. Please clearly label wh ich manholes the private sewer line is starting and ending .
Rev iewed by : Kevin Ferrer Date : 10/31 /14
TRANSPORTATION
1. Please revise and resubmit the driveway permit to comply with TxDOT comments .
Reviewed by : Danielle Singh , P.E. Transportation Planning Coord. Date : 10/28/14
TxDOT
1. Proposed med ian does not meet the TxDOT access management guidelines for a right-in I
right-out only access point , the median needs to be more substantial so there is no question
regarding the intended function of this access point , also required is a restriping eliminating
the left turn lane assuring south bound traffic no option to left i nto property from George
Bush Dr. Before access can be approved these revisions must be implemented into the
property's proposed plan and commercial access request. We look forward to rev iewing the
rev ised proposal for access on the land use I access change .
Reviewed by : Vincent Espinoza Date : 10/27/14
FIRE
1. Fire Lanes are covered but it is my understanding that the East end of the school is over 30 '
in height which will require an Aerial Access Easement. This AAE will need to start with i n 15 '
to 30 ' of the structure .
2. The Gate , near the Sou t h West corner of the building , will need a Knox Padlock
3 . The FDC may need to be remote due to elevation changes .
Reviewed by : Steve Smith Date : 10/29/14
SANITATION
1. The dumpster pads need to be turned 10-15 degrees clockwise in order to have a better
approach .
Rev iewed by: Wally Urrutia Date: 10/27/14
MEMORANDUM
DATE : October 23 , 2014
TO : Ben Lamons , via ; blamons@vlkarchitects.com
FROM : Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CSISD COLLEGE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL (SP)
Thank you for the submittal of your Site Plan application . Kevin Ferrer, Graduate Civil Eng ineer,
and I have been assigned to review this project. It is anticipated that the review will be
completed and any staff comments returned to you on or before Thursday , November 6 , 2014 . If
you have questions in the meantime , please feel free to contact us . /
PC : John Hall , College Station Independent School District, via ; jhall@csisd.org
P&DS Project No . 14-00900265
Pla11ni11g & Development Services
P.O . BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATION· TEXAS · 77842
TEL. 979 764 . .3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cst><.gov/devservices
/
\
. _._.,____ -
DATE :
TO :
FROM :
SUBJECT:
C ITY OF C OLLE GE STATION
Home ofTo:as A&M Uni versity "
MEMORANDUM
November 6 , 2014
Ben Lamons , via ; blamons@vlkarchitects .com
Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
-Hev-iro Bew~
r Sdafhl-k t-ol
CSISD COLLEGE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL (SP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . Please address the comments and
submit the following information for further staff review :
City of College Station Transmittal Letter;
Memo providing written responses to all of staff's comments
Two (2) complete sets of site civil construction documents for the proposed
development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (one set will
be returned to you , please submit addit ional copies if you want more than one
approved set);
Drainage Report
Two (2) 24 "x36 " revised site plans ;
One (1) 24 "x36 " revised landscaping plan ;
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . If there are
comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan , please attach a letter
explaining the details . If you have any questions or need additional information , please contact
Jessica Bullock at 979.764.3570 .
Attachments : Staff Review Comments
pc : John Hall , College Station Independent School District, via ; jhall@csisd .org
P&DS Project No . 14-00900265
Pla11ni11g Cr D evel opment Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 110 I TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STATION • TEXA':l • 77842
TEL. 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.3496
cstx. gov I devse rvices
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: CSISD College View High School (SP) 14-00900265
PLANNING
1. Please include site detail sheets with next submittal and add the curb detail to sheet A 1.01 .
2. Please clar ify phase lines . On sheetA1 .0 , it is not clear what is in phase II versus phase Ill.
3. Please show property line and easements .
4. Please rev ise the street labels to also show right-of-way widths on George Bush Drive ,
Timber Street , and Halik Street.
5. Please revise the curb radii on the proposed driveway to Halik . They should be between 25
and 30 feet.
6 . Are bike racks provided on si t e?
7 . Please clarify the temporary fire lane by the Barbara Bush Center.
8 . Please revise fire lane stripping to extend 100 feet from the driveway along George Bush l-Drive . Also revise stripping deta ils so the red stripe is 8". \! · Please verify that signs are not in the right-of-way .
. . Provide a general note on the site plan that all roof and ground-mounted mechanical
equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public
t JJ~ ~ right-of-way or residential district within 150 ' of the subject lot , measured from a point five
~ feet above grade . Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and
i scale to maintain a unified appearance . .h/ Provide a general note on the site plan that states the following: Exterior building and site
tf<J . lighting will meet the standards of Section 7.11 of the Unified Development Ordinance . The r./ ~ light source shall not project below an opaque housing and no fixture shall directly project tf. r light horizo ntally . Fixtures wi ll be mounted in such a manner that the projected cone of light
;W does not cross any property line.
12 . Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Reviewed by : Jessica Bullock Date : 10/6/14
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please differentiate between existing and proposed trees.
2 . Quantities provided in the table do not match what is shown on the site. Please only include
plantings within the borders of the site .
Please separate streetscaping points . 1 canopy tree is required ever 25 feet along George
Bush Drive and every 32 feet along Timber and Halik . 2 non-canopy trees can be
substituted for 1 canopy. These trees should be located within 50 feet of the property line .
4 . Please show property line and easements on landscape plan .
5. Please show the barricade around the trees on the plan .
6 . To receive landscaping points for existing trees , all existing trees must be in good form and
condition and reasonably free of damage by insects and/or disease .
7 . Please add a general note that barricades will be in place prior to any activity on the
property including but not limited to grading .
.,,,, ~ Parking sc reening is required along 100% of George Bush Drive . Screening can be done
with plantings , berms , structural elements or a combination and a minimum of 3 feet above
parking lot elevation .
Reviewed by : Jessica Bullock Date : 10/6/14
! )
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure
Principle Back Flow Device , or a Double-Check Back Flow Device , and installed as per City
Ord inance 2394 .
2 . All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City O rdinance
2394 .
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO . 1
1. Please provide a drainage study.
2. I was curious why there 's a 6 feet drop for the flow lines for the grate inlet 1-9 at station
4+70 .10.
3 . Please provide the fire flow demand & building type , and show the location of the fire
hydrants on the site plan (sheet A 1.01 ).
4 . Please show the existing fire hydrants on Holik St. and Timber St. on the plans.
5. Prov ide an access easement for the sidewalk along George Bush Drive that is going
thro ugh the parking lot.
6. G IS is showing a sewer line connecting to the building that is to be demolished and replaced
w ith parking & fire lane on Timber St. Please specify on the plans if it's being abandoned o r
removed .
7 . Please clearly label which manholes the private sewer line is starting and ending .
Rev iewed by : Kevin Ferrer Date : 10/31/14
TRANSPORTATION
1. Please revise and resubmit the driveway permit to comply with TxDOT comments .
Rev iewed by : Danielle Singh , P.E. Transportation Planning Coord. Date : 10/28/14
TxDOT
1. Proposed median does not meet the TxDOT access management guidelines for a right-in I
right -out only access po int , the median needs to be more substantial so there is no quest ion
regarding the intended function of this access point , also required is a restr iping eliminating
the left turn lane assuring south bound traffic no option to left into property from George
Bush Dr. Before access can be approved these revisions must be implemented into the
property 's proposed plan and commercial access request. We look forward to rev iewing the
revised proposal for access on the land use I access change .
Rev iewed by : Vincent Espinoza Date : 10/27/14
FIRE
1. Fire Lanes are covered but it is my understanding that the East end of the school is over 30 '
in height which will require an Aerial Access Easement. This AAE will need to start with in 15 '
to 30 ' of the structure.
2. The Gate , near the South West corner of the building , will need a Knox Padlock
3 . The FDC may need to be remote due to elevation changes.
Rev iewed by: Steve Sm ith Date : 10/29/14
I •
SANITATION
1. The dumpster pads need to be turned 10-15 degrees clockwise in order to have a better
approach .
Reviewed by : Wally Urrutia Date : 10/27 /14
J .
Google earth feet-...--------------------200 rreters·-----------------------------so
Go ogle earth feet•
1 -----------------------------------------------------700 rreters~1 ---------------------------------------------------200
Go gle earth feet~ ................................................................................... 500
rreters~ ................................................... -100
Go ogle earth feet...--------------------------700 rreters...------------------------200
Go o g le earth feet•, ----------------------------------------------------------1000 rreters 300
Kevin Ferrer
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave S .
College Station , TX 77842
MITCHELL
MM
MORGAN
Re: CSISD COLLEGE VIEW IDGH SCHOOL
Dear Kevin ,
January 30, 2015
Please see below for our response to the City of College Station Staff Comments that affected Mitchell &
Morgan 's civil sheets on this project:
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 3
Project: CSISD College View High School 14-00900265
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 3
Revised Water line
I . Provide the vertical curves for the water line on the profile and ensure it meets the minimum
radius of curvature.
RESPONSE:
Vertical curves have been added to P.L locations in line.
2. Provided an addendum for the water analysis report ensuring that it still meet the pressure and
velocity requirements.
RESPONSE:
Addendum letter is attached to these comments.
3. Include Inset "A" detail from the approved plan to this sheet.
RESPONSE:
Inset "A" added to this sheet.
1
3204 EARL RUDDER FWY. S. • CO LLEGE STATION, TX 77845 • T 979 .260 .6963 • F 979 .260.3564
CIVIL ENG INEERING • HYDRAULI CS • HYDROLOGY • UTI LI TIE S • STR EET S • SITE PLAN S • SUBDIVISIONS
1nfo@m1tchellandmorgan com • www m1tchellandmorgan com
4 . Remove the extra scale shown on the plans.
RESPONSE:
Scale removed.
5. The vertical clearance label around station 13+00 appears to not match the scaled clearance .
RESPONSE:
The 4.52' clearance is correct
6. Provide an additional 2 feet PUE to the 10 foot PUE on eastern side of the water line. So that
there 's a 5 .5 feet clearance with the water line center line with the PUE boundary .
RESPONSE:
The section of 8" WL from Sta 10+15 to 11+10.92 has not changed alignment from the
previously approved WL plan. This 10' PUE and WL location was chosen to protect existing
trees.
7 . FYI TCE Q chapter 290 page 61-62 , clause B (ii) and (iii). l believe TCEQ has some
recommendations regarding sewer lateral crossing above the water line? I have some concern s
regarding the sewer line possible leaking into the potable line since this sewer line is privatel y
maintained and might be damaged during the water line construction. Maybe adding a note to
center a pipe segment of the waterline with the center line of the sewer line would suffice?
RESPONSE:
Added note to the WL plan & profile to center one joint of pipe at the center of the sanitary line.
have any que stions or comments, please feel free to call our office at 979-260-6963 .
Veronica J .B. Mo g
Managing Partner
cc: F ile
M
2
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-265
CITYOFCOLLEGEST,\TION
PU,,niJtt & lln.JlJpinn11 c;...,u"
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A000701
Crawford Burnett (ICL)
Tract 187
DATE OF ISSUE: 12/18/2014
OWNER:
Jon Hall -College Station ISO
2000 Welsh Street
College Station, TX 77845
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
1300 George Bush Dr, College Station, TX 77845
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Wolf Pen Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Full Development Permit
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein . If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-
issued .
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4 . Other permits may have been required to fulfill local, state and federal requirements . Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits .
5. Stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing
drainage facilities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site , it is the
Contractor 's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City , State, and Federal requirements .
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy.
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance , prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to, paint, oil ,
solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited .
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station, as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed.
10 . Special Conditions : TXDOT permit has not been approved, prcoeed at own risk . Landscape plans have not been
approved, and needs to be address prior full building permit.
I, _______________ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions here in.
Contractor Signature Date
Phone number E~mail
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contact )edy Jo)'!t~ 111-l/S~l/ , the Public Works
Inspector assigned to this project 24 hours prior to beginning construction for scheduling required Inspections .
~ ~ ---'l~l--~'~---~~0~1¥~~~~~~ Cif;Eng~resentative Date
December 12, 2014
Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave S
College Station, Texas 77840
RE: College View High School
College Station ISD
VLK IARCHITECTS
1300 George Bush Dr.
College Stat i on, Texas 77840
Jessica Bullock,
The following are responses to comments generated from the City of College Station 's Site Plan
Review, received on December 10, 2014. Responses are in Italics.
PLANNING
1. The service drive on SW side will need the length of the hammerhead will need to be 120'
during phase II , for sufficient fire access .
The length of the hammerhead during phase II will be 120'. Please see attached revised
sheet A1 .01 for clarification between phase II and phase Ill servi ce drive .
2. Please provide an explanation/survey to show the property line . What is shown does not match
what I can see. Understanding that what I see does not accurately depict what will be on record,
an explanation will be fine . Please also verify that the property line does not go into TxDot ROW
along George Bush Dr where it runs along the island .
Please see attached survey to help clarify the property line .
3. When the location of the bike rack is determined, please include on sheet Al.01.
The bike rack has been located on the SW corner of the building. Please see attached revised
sheet A1 .01 .
4 . Please show driveway apron as identified in the site design standards.
Please see sheet C6 .02 for the driveway apron as identified in the site des ign standards.
Member American Institute of Architects . 7915 F.M. 1960 West Suite 214. Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300. Fax 281.671.2313. vlkarchitects .com
5. For the Fi r e lane stripping deta i l on sheet Al.01, the lettering should be 4". The red strip should
remain 8 11
•
The striping details have been revised to 4 " lettering and 8 " stripe will remain . Please see
attached revised sheet Al.01 .
6. Response to TxDOT comments are still being reviewed and will follow.
We respectfully request that the site development permit be released with the
understanding that construction of the driveways will not commence until TxDot approval
has been obtained.
7. Make sure the FDC is within 100 feet of a fire hydrant.
The proposed FDC location is located within 100 feet of the proposed hydrant location. The
proposed hydrant is located just across the service drive from the proposed FDC. Please see
two located on the attached revised sheet Al.01 .
8 . Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Please note the greenhouse location has moved at the owner's request. We have shown that
location with additional sidewalk to the new location of the greenhouse .
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please verify streetscaping calculation . I show property frontage not including driveways as 424'
along Timber, 194' along Halik and 600 ' along George Bush Dr . This would mean 13 canopy trees
along Timber, 6 along Halik and 24 along George Bush Dr . The only place where additional trees
would need to be added for streetscaping is along George Bush Dr . These would need to be
placed within the same proximity to the existing trees to George Bush Dr . The calculation for
300 additional points along the ROW can also be revised to take out driveway spacing . Based on
my calculations, total points required is 13 ,968.
The streetscaping calculations have been revised to the numbers listed in your comment
however, we still need to resolve the landscaping plan. We respectfully request that the site
development permit be released with the understanding that VLK Architects and the City of
College Station are still working on the landscaping requirements due to the complexity of
the development on the existing site.
Member American Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 214. Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281 .671.2300 ·Fax 281.671 .2313. vlkarchitects .com
2. Planting not in the property lines cannot be counted towards point. This includes the crepe
myrtles along George Bush Drive and some trees along Timber . For existing trees, they can
remain shown on the plan, but they would not count towards point requirements . For the new
proposed plantings, please move them so the trunk is within the property line .
These calculations have been revised to not i nclude planting not in the property lines
however, we still need to resolve the landscaping plan. We respectfully request that the site
development permit be released with the understanding that VLK Architects and the Ci ty of
College Station are sti ll working on the landscaping requirements due to the complexity of
the development on the existing site ..
3. I am still unable to ver ify the count for crepe myrtles. Please either use a different symbol or
label which trees are crepe myrtles .
The symbol for crepe myrtles will distinguish them apart from other trees upon submission of
the Landscaping plan.
4 . With the next submittal, please include a request to have the trees next to the front of the
bu i lding count toward streetscaping along George Bush Drive . The request should explain why
these exemptions are necessary for the site .
Please see attached letter requesting to have the trees next to the building along George
Bush count toward streetscaping .
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO . 2
1. Response comment has been noted . Prior to submittal for approved plans , please make sure
that there's a note next to the existing manhole on Halik St. stat i ng that the private sewer line
terminates at this manhole and that the public sewer is beginning here si nce the Utility sheet
was not submitted during the last submittal.
Please see public and private sanitary sewer designation shown on sheet C4.01 .
2. Provide a note stating where the public storm sewer begins on the plans .
Please see storm sewer designation shown on sheet CS .01 .
3. Please check the drainage area down on Halik Street, and acquire a dedicated drainage
easement for the proposed storm sewer line to the creek .
Please see the attached graphic showing the drainage area wh i ch flows to this new 10 foot
i nlet on Halik. This flowrates for the 10 & 100 year storm events are 0.3 cfs and 0.4 cfs,
respectively.
Please see attached blanket easement form for Lot 1, Block 1, CS/SD -Willow Branch &
Oakwood School sites We would prefer to dedicate a blanket easement now because we are
not confident this storm sewer line will not shift duri ng construction .
4 . Please provide an Engineering Cost estimate .
Please see the cost estimate attached.
Member American Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M. 1960 West Suite 214 ·Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281 .671 .2300. Fax 281.671 .2313 . vlkarchitects .com
If further information is required to address the above listed comments please do not hesitate to
contact the office.
Thank you,
~:J. -----Ben Lamons
Enc: Streetscape Request Letter, Engineer's Estimate, Easement Application, Holik Street Sketch, Replat,
Survey, C2.01, C2 .02, C2 .03, C3 .01 , C4.01, C6 .02 & Al.01
Member American Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M. 1960 West Suite 214. Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671 .2300. Fax 281 .671 .2313. vlkarchitects .com
December 11, 2014
Ms. Jessica Bullock
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station, Texas
P. 0 . Box 9960
College Stat ion, Texas 77842
Dear Ms . Bullock,
V L K JAl\CHITEC TS
VLK Architects, on behalf of College Station ISD asks that the following two requirements be waived
from enforcement on the above referenced project.
1. Parking Lot Screening
On previous CSISD projects it has been agreed to by the City to not require the District to
provide the required parking lot screening due to safety and secur ity of the campuses due to the
fact that th is screening provides places for individuals to hide who may be a threat to the
campus and its occupants. Further, the City of Co llege Station Police Department has agreed
that this requirement is a determent to the safety and security of schools.
2. Streetscap ing Requ irements
Due to Texas Department of Transportation Right of Way Easements along George Bush Drive
and that approximately the first 55 feet of the site is paved ; the project cannot comply with the
Streetscaping requirements. We ask that the existing line of mature trees located
approximate ly 60 feet from the property line and parallel to George Bush Drive be considered as
meet ing the street scaping requirements along George Bush Drive .
Thank you for your consideration of the se requests.
If you have any q uestions, please do not hesitate to call.
Me m be r Ame r ica n Ins t itut e of A r ch it ec t s · 20 44 5 St ate H ig hw ay 24 9 Su i te 350 . H ou st o n Texas 77070
Ph 28 1 .67 1 .23 00 . Fax 281 .67 1 .23 1 3 . vl ka r c hit ec ts .co m
December 12, 2014
Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave S
College Station, Texas 77840
RE : College View High School
College Station ISD
VLK !\R(l-llTE(TS
1300 George Bush Dr.
College Station, Texas 77840
Jessica Bullock,
The following are responses to comments generated from the City of College Station's Site Plan
Review, received on December 10, 2014. Responses are in Italics.
PLANNING
l. The service drive on SW side will need the length of the hammerhead will need to be 120'
during phase II, for sufficient fire access .
The length of the hammerhead during phase II will be 120'. Please see attached revised
sheet Al.01 for clarification between phase II and phase Ill service drive .
2. Please provide an explanation/survey to show the property line . What is shown does not match
what I can see . Understanding that what I see does not accurately depict what will be on record ,
an explanation will be fine . Please also verify that the property line does not go into TxDot ROW
along George Bush Dr where it runs along the island.
Please see attached survey to help clarify the property line .
3. When the location of the bike rack is determined, please include on sheet Al.01.
The bike rack has been located on the SW corner of the building. Please see attached revised
sheet Al.01.
4. Please show driveway apron as identified in the site design standards.
Please see sheet C6.02for the driveway apron as identified in the site design standards.
Member American Institute of Architects· 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 214. Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281 .671 .2300 ·Fax 281 .671 .2313. vlkarchitects .com
5 . For the Fire lane stripping detail on sheet Al.01, the lettering should be 4". The red strip should
remain 8".
The striping details have been revised to 4 " lettering and 8 11 stripe will remain. Please see
attached revised sheet Al.01 .
6. Response to TxDOT comments are still being reviewed and will follow .
We respectfully request that the site development permit be released with the
understanding that construction of the driveways will not commence until TxDot approval
has been obtained.
7. Make sure the FDC is within 100 feet of a fire hydrant.
The proposed FDC location is located within 100 feet of the proposed hydrant location. The
proposed hydrant is located just across the service drive from the proposed FDC. Please see
two located on the attached revised sheet Al .01 .
8 . Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Please note the greenhouse location has moved at the owner's request. We have shown that
location with additional sidewalk to the new location of the greenhouse .
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please verify streetscaping calculation . I show property frontage not including driveways as 424'
along Timber, 194' along Holik and 600 ' along George Bush Dr. This would mean 13 canopy trees
along Timber, 6 along Holik and 24 along George Bush Dr . The only place where additional trees
would need to be added for streetscaping is along George Bush Dr . These would need to be
placed within the same proximity to the existing trees to George Bush Dr. The calculation for
300 additional points along the ROW can also be revised to take out driveway spacing . Based on
my calculations, total points required is 13,968.
The streetscaping calculations have been revised to the numbers listed in your comment
however, we still need to resolve the landscaping plan. We respectfully request that the site
development permit be released with the understanding that VLK Architects and the City of
College Station are still working on the landscaping requirements due to the complexity of
the development on the existing site .
Member American Inst i tute of Architects. 7915 F.M. 1960 West Suite 214 ·Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671 .2300 ·Fax 281.671.2313 · vlkarchitects .com
2. Planting not in the property lines cannot be counted towards point. This includes the crepe
myrtles along George Bush Drive and some trees along Ti mber. For existing trees, they can
remain shown on the plan , but they would not count towards point requirements . For the new
proposed plantings, please move them so the trunk is within the property li ne .
These calculations have been revised to not include planting not in the property li nes
however, we still need to resolve the landscaping plan. We respectfully request that the site
development permit be released w i th the understanding that VLK Architects and the City of
College Station are still working on the landscaping requirements due to the complexity of
the development on the ex isting site ..
3. I am still unable to verify the count for crepe myrtles . Please either use a d ifferent symbol or
label which trees are crepe myrtles .
The symbol for crepe myrtles will distinguish them apart from other trees upon submission of
the Landscaping plan .
4 . With the next submittal, please include a request to have the trees next to the front of the
building count toward streetscap i ng along George Bush Drive . The request should explain why
t hese exemptions are necessary for the site .
Please see attached letter requesting to have the trees next to the building along George
Bush count toward streetscapi ng.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO . 2
1. Response comment has been noted . Prior to submittal for approved plans , please make sure
that there's a note next to the existing manhole on Halik St . stating that the private sewer line
terminates at this manhole and that the public sewer is beginning here si nce the Utility sheet
was not submitted during the last submittal.
Please see public and private sanitary sewer designation shown on sheet C4 .01 .
2. Provide a note stating where the public storm sewer begins on the plans .
Please see storm sewer designation shown on sheet CS .01 .
3. Please check the drainage area down on Halik Street, and acquire a dedicated drainage
easement for the proposed storm sewer line to the creek.
Please see the attached graphic showing the drainage area which flows to this new 10 foot
inlet on Halik. This flowrates for the 10 & 100 year storm events are 0.3 cfs and 0.4 cfs,
respectively .
Please see attached blanket easement form for Lot 1, Block 1, CS/SD-Willow Branch &
Oakwood School si tes We would prefer to dedicate a blanket easement now because we are
not confident this storm sewer line will not shift during construction .
4 . Please provide an Engineering Cost estimate .
Please see the cost estimate attached.
Member American Institute of Architects· 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 214. Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671 .2300 ·Fax 281.671 .2313 · vlkarchitects .com
If further information is required to address the above listed comments please do not hes itate to
contact the offic e.
Thank you ,
fS:J. -----Ben Lamons
Enc: Streetscape Request Letter, Engineer's Estimate, Easement Applicat ion , Halik Street Sketch , Replat,
Survey, C2 .01, C2 .02 , C2 .03 , C3 .01 , C4 .01 , C6.02 & A l.01
Member American Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 214. Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281 .671 .2300 ·Fax 281 .671 .2313. vlkarchitects .com
December 11, 2014
Ms . Jessica Bullock
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station, Texas
P. 0 . Box 9960
College Stat ion , Texas 77842
Dear Ms. Bullock,
V L K IARC HI TECTS
VLK Architects, on behalf of Co ll ege Station ISD asks that the following two requirements be waived
from enforcement on the above referenced project.
1. Parking Lot Screening
On previous CSISD projects it has been agreed to by the City to not require the District to
provide the required parking lot screening due to safety and security of the campuses due to the
fact that this screening provides places for individuals to hide who may be a threat to the
campus and its occupants . Further, the City of College Station Police Department has agreed
that this requirement is a determent to the safety and security of schools.
2. Streetscaping Requirements
Due to Texas Department of Transportation Right of Way Easements along George Bush Drive
and that approximately the first 55 feet of the site is paved ; the project cannot comply with the
Streetscaping requirements . We ask that the existing li ne of mature trees located
approximately 60 feet from the property line and parallel to George Bush Drive be considered as
meeting the street scap i ng requirements along George Bush Drive .
Thank you for your consideration of these requests .
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Memb e r A mer ican Institute of Architects· 20445 Stille H ighway 2 49 Suite 35 0. H ousto n Texas 77070
Ph 28 1.67 1 .2300 ·Fax 281.67 1 .23 1 3 . vl kar chitects.c om
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING
llCM
NO . QUANTITY UNIT
Public Waterline
1 372.5 LF
2 2 EA
3 1 EA
4 1 EA
5 1 EA
6 1 EA
7 1 EA
8 1 EA
9 2 EA
10 1 EA
11 1 EA
12 1 EA
13 1 EA
14 300 .4 LF
15 7 EA
16 382 .5 LF
11CM
NO . QUANTITY UNIT
Public Strom Drain
17 1 EA
18 125.5 LF
19 1 EA
20 1 EA
21 70.8 LF
22 125.5 LF
23 262 .5 SF
DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE
8" PVC Waterline CAWWA C900 Cl 200) $ 45 .00
8" M .J . Gate Valve & Box $ 1,250 .00
16"x8" M.J . Tee $ 1,200.00
8"x6" M.J. Tee $ 550.00
8"x4 " M.J. Tee $ 550.00
8"x6" M.J. Reduce r $ 550.00
8"x45 Degree M.J . Bend $ 550.00
8"x22 .5 Degree M.J . Bend $ 550 .00
8"x11 .25 Degree M.J. Bend $ 550.00
6" M.J. Gate Valve & Box w/ Locking lid $ 1,100.00
Meter Vault and 3" Water Meter Conection Fittings and Valves $ 12,500.00
Connection to existing system $ 2,000.00
Std . Fire Hydrant Assembly $ 3,500 .00
Structural Backfill $ 8.00
Thrust Blocks for Fittings $ 45 .00
1 rencn notect1on $ 5.00
Public Waterline Total :
DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE
1 O' Standard Recess ed Curb Inlet $ 3,500 .00
30" RCP $ 80 .00
Standard Junction Box 36" RCP $ 2 ,000 .00
30" Concrete Headwall with Energy Dissipater Blocks $ 2 ,500 .00
Structural Backfil l $ 8.00
Trench Protection $ 5.00
Street Repai r $ 10.00
Public Storm Drain Total :!
Total Public Improvements
~°))'''' .::--,,.,_~ '*'" "'•·· k--t.n't• ,:: c;_, •• •' .... v · 'I ;'. .... .. .. -tc ,,,
"•.. ···~ i1 : ............. ·~ '"'.......................... AN~
\':SS ........ 7isa9 /fE J I 11
~VERONICA J&.M~~ ...... ~ zj ( \4
l .>!\ Q /{ij~ '•.? • ~~G/STE.:-.~:._~r#.J' 'f:IAA jJii:;._.,//IA3: .,, s1(:;;;,f..~ ~t$ l~VV\~' i-rr:
'"'\: :<to ...
TOTAL COST
$ 16,762.50
$ 2,500 .00
$ 1,200.00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 1,100.00
$ 1, 100.00
$ 12,500.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 3,500.00
$ 2,403 .20
$ 315 .00
$ 1,912 .50
$ 48 ,043 .20
TOTAL COST
$ 3,500.00
$ 10,040.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 566.40
$ 627.50
$ 2,625.00
$ 19,233.90
$ 67,277.10
EASEMENT APPLICATION
To be filled in and submitted with construction plans and specifications for preliminary review
(Not to be used where City is purchasing property)
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF
PROCESSED BY : ____________ _ DEPT. _____ _ EXT. __ _
REQUESTED BY : ____________ _ DEPT. _____ _ EXT. __ _
ACCOUNTNO.-==---:--:--=--:-----:--:----:--:--(For ordering title work , appraisals , etc .)
PROJECT NAME : _________ _
PROJECT NO . _________ _
TYPE OF EASEMENT:
__ Public Utilities (PUE) L Temporary Blanket PUE
(prior to building permit) __
__ Electric Only
Water Only
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS :---------------------------
REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUIRED/GIVEN BY THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENTS:
Approval Required By :
(please initial)
___ Electric
___ Water/WW
___ Asst. City Engineer
___ Public Works
Approval Given By :
(ple ase initial)
___ Electric
Water/WW -===. Asst. City Engineer
Public Works
METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTION CHECKED FOR CLOSURE BY:--------------
(City Staff-Name/Dept.)
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Coul3be ~OU \ ':>D
(Names must be exactly as they appear on the deed)
ADDRESS : i't>l 'l W eA4 PHONE NUMBER: <011) /G:;4---54-co
C.t> e.. ~~ TX 11~
e furnish copies of all lien documents):
IF OWNER IS A CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, OR JOINT VENTURE (also see #5 below):
1. Sta te of Incorporation I Registration
2. Partners' Names (if appl icable)
3. Person Authorized to Sign
(Name and Title)
11h.S LS LEGAL DEPARTMENT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE FOLLOWING:
) f Oli' W ... ~ l U G-(Please check items that are attached) \.. /. r 1. A copy of a recent (within 90 days) deed or title insurance policy showing the names of the granters I owners ; and
~ t.JA 2. For unplatted property, s signed, sealed and dated metes and bounds description and a diagram of the property
showing the location of the easement; or
~ 3. For platted property, a copy of the plat showing the lot, block, subd ivisi on , and recording Information . 11 1 • ) ~ 4. For blanket easements, a signed, sealed and dated metes and bounds description and a diagram of the property.(W.Q;UiJ\Opl:tf UJ'A 5 . Corporate or partnership owners must furnish a copy of a corporate resolution or other proof of authority to sign on behalf
of the corporation , partnersh ip, or joint venture .
IX 6 . Name , address and phone number of person who is to receive the easement and be responsible for getting it executed :
I Sol\ Wtll 1 ~\i wats~ lo ~~ 11340 CcnctJ111-14q1
Any land acqws1lion resuhmg from Capilal Improvement Pro1ecls requires a meeting with the Legal Departmert .
- ----
= -...
... ---
' ' .... ---
' '
----
0.037 acres
'10-yr==0 .3 cfs
100-yr==0 .4 cfs
/
/
/ t\. ,.,--/ '\IA,
), '
-- --
,. -
- ----
/
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/
December 12, 2014
Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave S
College Station , Texas 77840
RE : College View High School
College Station ISO
VLK IARC lilTECTS
1300 George Bush Dr.
College Station, Texas 77840
Jessica Bullock,
The following are responses to comments generated from the City of College Station 's Site Plan
Review, received on December 10, 2014 . Responses are in Italics.
PLANNING ~ as ~ \,rie j ~rv1ce drive on SW side will need the length of the hammerhead will need to be 120'
during phase 11 , for sufficient fire access .
The length of the hammerhead during phase II will be 120'. Please see attached revised
sheet Al .01 for clarification between phase II and phase Ill service drive .
Please provide an explanation/survey to show the property line . What is shown doe s not match
what I can see . Understanding that what I see does not accurately depict what will be on record ,
an explanation will be fine. Please also verify that the property l i ne does not go into TxDot ROW
along George Bush Dr where it runs along the island .
Please see attached survey to help clarify the property line .
?~hen the location of the bike rack is determined, please include on sheet Al.01.
~ The bike rack has been located on the SW corner of the building. Please see attached revised
~~ <Q<';;:Y' / sheet Al .01.
41 Please show driveway apron as identified in the site design standards.
Please see sheet C6. 02 for the driveway apron as identified in the site design standards.
Member American Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 214 . Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281 .671 .2300 ·Fax 281.671.2313 · vlkarchitects .com
~the Fire lane stripping detail on sheet Al.01, the lettering should be 4". The red stri p should
remain 8".
The striping details have been revised to 4 " lettering and 8 " stripe will remain . Please see
attached revised sheet Al.01 .
---&. Response to TxDOT comments are still being reviewed and will follow .
We respectfully request that the site development permit be released with the
understanding that construction of the driveways will not commence until TxDot approval
/ has been obtained.
J/ Make sure the FDC is within 100 feet of a fire hydrant.
The proposed FDC location is located w i thin 100 feet of the proposed hydrant location . The
proposed hydrant is located just across the service drive from the proposed FDC. Please see
two located on the attached revised sheet Al .01 .
8. Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Stat ion must be explained in your next transmi t tal letter.
Please note the greenhouse location has moved at the owner's request. We have shown that
location with additional sidewalk to the new location of the greenhouse .
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please verify streetscaping calculation . I show property frontage not including driveways as 424 '
along Timbe r, 194' along Halik and 600 ' along George Bush Dr . This would mean 13 canopy trees
along Timber, 6 along Halik and 24 along George Bush Dr. The only place where additional trees
would need to be added for streetscaping is along George Bush Dr . These would need to be
placed with i n the same proximity to the existing trees to George Bush Dr . The calculat ion for
300 additional points along the ROW can also be revised to take out driveway spacing . Based on
my calculations , total points required is 13 ,968 .
The streetscaping calculations have been revised to the numbers listed in your comment
however, we still need to resolve the landscaping plan. We respectfully request that the site
development permit be released with the understanding that VLK Architects and the City of
College Station are still working on the landscaping requirements due to the complexity of
the development on the existing site .
Member American Institute of Architects . 791 S F.M. 1960 West Suite 214. Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671 .2300. Fax 281 .671.2313. vlkarchitects .com
2. Planting not in the property lines cannot be counted towards point. This includes the crepe
myrtles along George Bush Drive and some trees along Timber . For existing trees, they can
remain shown on the plan, but they would not count towards point requirements . For the new
proposed plantings, please move them so the trunk is within the property line .
These calculations have been revised to not include planting not in the property lines
however, we still need to resolve the landscaping plan. We respectfully request that the site
development permit be released with the understanding that VLK Architects and the City of
College Station are still working on the landscaping requirements due to the complexity of
the development on the existing site ..
3. I am still unable to verify the count for crepe myrtles. Please either use a different symbol or
label which trees are crepe myrtles.
The symbol for crepe myrtles will distinguish them apart from other trees upon subm ission of
the Landscaping plan .
4. With the next submittal, please include a request to have the trees next to the front of the
building count toward streetscaping along George Bush Drive . The request should explain why
these exemptions are necessary for the site .
Please see attached letter requesting to have the trees next to the building along George
Bush count toward streetscaping .
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO . 2
l. Response comment has been noted . Prior to submittal for approved plans , please make sure
that there 's a note next to the existing manhole on Halik St . stating that the private sewer line
terminates at this manhole and that the public sewer is beginning here since the Utility sheet
was not submitted during the last submittal.
Please see public and private sanitary sewer designation shown on sheet C4 .01 .
2. Provide a note stating where the public storm sewer begins on the plans .
Please see storm sewer designation shown on sheet CS .01 .
3. Please check the drainage area down on Halik Street, and acquire a dedicated drainage
easement for the proposed storm sewer line to the creek .
Please see the attached graphic showing the drainage area which flows to this new 10 foot
inlet on Halik. This flowrates for the 10 & 100 year storm events are 0.3 cfs and 0.4 cfs,
respectively .
Please see attached blanket easement form for Lot 1, Block 1, CS/SD -Willow Branch &
Oakwood School sites We would prefer to dedicate a blanket easement now because we are
not confident this storm sewer line will not shift duri ng construction .
4. Please provide an Engineering Cost estimate .
Please see the cost estimate attached.
Member American Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 214 . Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671 .2300. Fax 281.671.2313 · vlkarchitects .com
If further information is required to address the above listed comments please do not hesitate to
contact the office .
Thank you,
fS:J.
Ben Lamons
Enc: Streetscape Request Letter, Engineer's Estimate, Easement Application , Holik Street Sketch , Re plat,
Survey, C2 .01, C2 .02 , C2 .03 , C3.01, C4 .01 , C6 .02 & Al.01
Member Amer i can Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M. 1960 West Suite 214 . Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300. Fax 281.671 .2313 . vlkarchitects .com
December 11, 2014
Ms . Jessica Bullock
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station, Texas
P. 0 . Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Dear Ms . Bullock,
VLK IA~C HITECTS
VLK Architects, on behalf of College Station ISD asks that the following two requirements be waived
from enforcement on the above referenced project.
1. Parking Lot Screening
On previous CSISD projects it has been agreed to by the City to not require the District to
provide the required parking lot screening due to safety and security of the campuses due to the
fact that this screening provides places for individuals to hide who may be a threat to the
campus and its occupants . Further, the City of College Station Police Department has agreed
that this requirement is a determent to the safety and security of schools .
2. Streetscaping Requirements
Due to Texas Department of Transportation Right of Way Easements along George Bush Drive
and that approximately the first SS feet of the site is paved; the project cannot comply with the
Streetscaping requirements. We ask that the existing line of mature trees located
approximately 60 feet from the property line and parallel to George Bush Drive be considered as
meeting the street scap ing requirements along George Bush Drive .
Thank you for your consideration of these requests.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Memb e r Ame r ica n Institute of Architects · 20445 State H ig h way 2 49 Sui te 350 . H ousto n Texas 77070
Ph 28 1 .67 1 .2300 ·Fax 28 1 .67 1 .231 3 . vl k a r c hit ects.c om
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING
llCM
NO. QUANTITY UNIT
Public Waterline
1 372 .5 LF
2 2 EA
3 1 EA
4 1 EA
5 1 EA
6 1 EA
7 1 EA
8 1 EA
9 2 EA
10 1 EA
11 1 EA
12 1 EA
13 1 EA
14 30 0.4 LF
15 7 EA
16 382 .5 LF
lli:;m
NO. QUANTITY UNIT
Public Strom Drain
17 1 EA
18 125.5 LF
19 1 EA
20 1 EA
21 70.8 LF
22 125.5 LF
23 262 .5 SF
DESCRIPTION
8" PVC Waterline (AWWA C900 CL 200}
8" M .J. Gate Valve & Box
16"x8" M.J. Tee
8"x6" M.J. Tee
8"x4 " M.J. Tee
8"x6" M.J. Reducer
8"x45 Degree M .J . Bend
8"x22 .5 Degree M.J. Bend
8"x 11 .25 Degree M.J . Bend
6" M.J. Gate Va lve & Box w/ Locking Lid
Meter Vault and 3" Water Meter Conection Fitlinas and Valves
Connection to existina svstem
Std . Fire Hvdrant Assembly
Structural Backfill
Thrust Blocks for Fittinas
Trench Protection
Public Waterline Total:
DESCRIPTION
1 O' Standard Reces sed Curb Inlet
30" RCP
Standard Junction Box 36" RCP
30" Concrete Headwall with Enerav Dissipator Blocks
Structural Backfill
Trench Protection
Street Repair
Public Storm Drain Total :!
Total Public Improvements
~}1'''' .:;..,_~ '*'" ""·· :.f-i.n't • ::' ~ ··" ·· .. ..., .. , ;' .. ·· ·· ... ,, ... * ... ... * ~ i! : ................... "' :;··············""'' MORGAN~
\'iC"""716es /f§ J I 11
UNIT PRICE
$ 45.00
$ 1,250 .00
$ 1,200.00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 1,100.00
$ 12 500 .00
$ 2,000.00
$ 3 500 .00
$ 8 .00
$ 45 .00
$ 5.00
UNIT PRICE
$ 3,500 .00
$ 80 .00
$ 2,000 .00
$ 2 500 .00
$ 8 .00
$ 5.00
$ 10.00
~ VERONICA .~:~: ................ ~ zJ ( \4
'/.>!." Q:'YJ~ ''•~" ~~G1sre.:-,~:._~(:#'.,£ r: IA a JJJ_ V-'(/lti:3 .• , °S/ONA~ f(:.~ I ~VV\ 11' I Tl-
'"'\: :'lo.~
TOTAL COST
$ 16,762.50
$ 2,500.00
$ 1,200 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550 .00
$ 550.00
$ 550.00
$ 550.00
$ 1,1 00 .00
$ 1,100.00
$ 12,500.00
$ 2,000 .00
$ 3 ,500.00
$ 2,4 03 .20
$ 315.00
$ 1,912.50
$ 48 ,043.20
TOTAL COST
$ 3,500.00
$ 10,040.00
$ 2 000 .00
$ 2,500 .00
$ 566.40
$ 627 .50
$ 2,625.00
$ 19,233.90
$ 67,277.10
EASEMENT APPLICATION
To be filled in and submitted with construction plans and specifications for preliminary review
(Not to be used where City is purchasing property)
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF
DEPT. EXT. PROCESSED BY: ____________ _ -----------
REQUESTED BY: ____________ _ DEPT .. ______ _ EXT. __ _
ACCOUNTNO .~~--,-~~--,----,--,---,--,--
(For ordering title work , appraisals, etc .)
PROJECT NAME: ________ _
PROJECT NO . _________ ~
TYPE OF EASEMENT:
__ Public Utilities (PUE) L Temporary Blanket PUE
(prior to building permit) __
__ Electric Only
Water Only
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS :---------------------------
REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUIRED/GIVEN BY THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENTS:
Approval Required By:
(please initial)
___ Electric
___ Water/WW
___ Asst. City Engineer
Public Works ---
Approval Given By:
(please initial)
___ Electric
Water/WW
___ Asst. City Engineer
___ Public Works
METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTION CHECKED FOR CLOSURE BY: -------,(=C.,.,.ity--.S""'t....,aff,,..._--.N"""a-m-e"""/D""'"e-pt'"'.)----
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Ccv @e ~OU \ ':>D
(Names must be exactly as they appear on the deed)
ADDRESS : t4t>l "l W eA~ PHONE NUMBER: ~11) t~ --54co
~ Q..~~ TX 11~
ALL LENDERS (Plea e furnish copies of all lien documents):
IF OWNER IS A CORPORATION , PARTNERSHIP, OR JOINT VENTURE (also see #5 below):
1. State of Incorporation I Registration
2 . Partners' Names (if applicable)
3. Person Authorized to Sign
(Name and Title}
~5 'S LEGAL DEPARTMENT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE FOLLOWING:
1' 0~ yM l U G-(Please check items that are attached)
/. t 1. A copy of a recent (within 90 days) deed or title insurance policy showing the names of the grantors I owners ; and
'-......__.., t-.JA 2 . For unplatted property, s signed, sealed and dated metes and bounds description and a diagram of the property
showing the location of the easement; or
JjC 3. For platted property , a copy of the plat showing the lot, block , subdivision , and recording Information . 11 1 .~ )
j'j( 4. For blanket easements, a signed, sealed and dated metes and bounds description and a diagram of the property .(~ ~f~
~ 5. Corporate or partnership owners must furnish a copy of a corporate resolution or other proof of authority to sign on behalf
of the corporation , partnership, or joint venture .
6. Name , address and phone number of person who is to receive the easement and be responsible for getting it executed :
Any land acqws1/ion resuflmg from Capital Improvement Pro1ecls requires a meetmg with the Legal Departmerk..
/
/
/
'/ / / /
'<,./ / /
/
/
/
' / /
/
/,
-- - - -----
-' '
' ' ... - - -
--~ : : _-_- _---3-c\ 6--
... ' 0 - - -- --- -
--- -
---a--
- - - --
0.037 acres
10-yr=0 .3 cfs
100-yr=0.4 cfs
------
- - --
-- --
;--
November 24, 2014
Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave S
College Station, Texas 77840
RE: College View High School
College Station ISD
VLK IAR HITECTS
1300 George Bush Dr.
College Station , Texas 77840
Jessica Bullock,
The following are responses to comments generated from the City of College Station's Site Plan
Review, received on November 6, 2014. Responses are in Italics.
PLANNING
1. Please include site detail sheets with next submittal and add the curb detail to sheet Al.01.
Site detail sheets have been included with this submittal Please see attached sheets Al.01,
Al.02, Al .03, Al.OS and Al.06. The curb detail is drawing 4/Al .02.
2. Please clarify phase lines. On sheet Al.01, it is not clear what is in phase II versus phase Ill.
~ eerV1 ~ {w Fire lane will be included in Phase II with building. Please see attached revised sheets Al.010
Ar-ve o"'"' ·--:>O' (.)II' u)'l\ 0 eed d &Al .01 .
SCe ~~ Please show property line and easements . ~e. ~ The property line has been included on the site plan . Please see attached revised sheet
~ ~ / Al.01. There is a blanket easement in place during construction and a plat will be filed upon
~~ eJI ~ completion of construction.
( V . /) V P lease revise the street labels to also show right-of-way widths on George Bush Drive , Timber
Street, and Halik Street.
The street labels for George Bush Drive, Timber Street, and Halik Street have been revised to
show right-of-way widths. Please see attached revised sheet Al.01.
Member American Institute of Architects · 7915 FM . 1960 West Suite 214 . Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281 671.2300 ·Fax 281 671.2313. vlkarch1tects.com
./.Please revise the curb radii on the proposed driveway to Holik. They should be between 25 and
30feet.
The curb on the proposed driveway to Holik has been revised to 20' radii. In house, we have
la id templates over to confirm the fire truck has access. Please see attached revised sheet
A l.01 .
· n ~ e e.cJ 6. Are bi ke racks provided on site?
ll"1 a:tk\ a; . '-7 / The bike rack detail has been provided, location pending per owner.~
:::.....0 ~ i<l . V P lease clarify the temporary fire lane by the Barbara Bush Center.
The temporary fire lane by the Barbara Bush Center was requested by Eric Dotson during the
Preapplication Conference as a temporary access during construction.
8. Please revise fire lane stripping to extend 100 feet from the driveway along George Bush Drive .
Also revise stripping deta i ls so the red strip is 8".
The fire lane stripping currently extends 100' from the driveway along George Bush Drive in
the SW direction. The striping details have been revised to 8 ". Please see attached revised
sheet Al.01 .
{¥""Please verify that signs are not in the right -of-way .
. / Proposed monument sign is not in the right-of-way.
W" Provide a general note on the site plan that all roof and ground-mounted mechanical equipment
shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right-of-way or
res idential district w ithin 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade.
Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a
un ified appearance .
Roof and ground-mounted mechanical equipment is not required to be screened from view
per meeting with Jessica Bullock on 11/21/2014.
u/Provide a general note o n the site plan that states the follow i ng : Exterior building and site
lighting will meet the standards of Section 7.11 of the Unified Development Ord i nance . The light
sou rce shall not project below an opaque housing and no fixture shall directly project light
horizontally. Fixtures will be mounted in such a manner that the proj ected cone of light does not
cross and property line.
Exterior building and site lighting is not required to meet the standards of Section 7.11 of the
UDO per meeting with Jessica Bullock on 11/21/2014. "2 . Please note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
All changes made have been requested by the City of College Station. Any further changes
not requested by the City of College Station will be brought to your attention.
Member American Institute of Architects· 7915 F.M 1960 West Suite 214 ·Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671 .2300. Fax 281.671 .2313. vlkarch1tects .com
'
•
/6
LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER
1. Please differentiate between existing and proposed trees.
Please refer to the Landscaping Point Calculation for graphic legend. Please see attached
revised sheet Ll.01.
2. Quantities provided in the table do not match what is shown on the site. Please only i nclude
plantings within the borders of the site .
<::-3.
The quantities have been revised to match what is shown on the site. Please see attached
revised sheet Ll.01.
Please separate streetscaping points . 1 canopy tree is required every 25 feet along George Bush
Drive and every 32 feet along Timber and Halik. 2 non -canopy trees can be substituted for 1
canopy. These trees should be located within 50 feet of the property line .
The streetscaping points have been broken out to show the different requirements along the
two groups of streets. Please see attached revised sheet Ll .01.
4. Please show property line and easements on landscape plan.
The property line has been included on the landscape plan. Please see attached revised sheet
Ll.01. There is a blanket easement in place during construction and a plat will be filed upon
/ completion of construction.
t¥ Please show the barricade around the trees on the plan .
Barricades have been shown around the trees on the landscape plan. Please see attached
revised sheet Ll.01 . ~To receive landscaping points for existing trees, all existing trees must be in good form and
condition and reasonably free of damage by insects and/or disease .
An Arborist has visited the site and confirmed the health of the existing trees used for
/ landscaping points.
rY. Please add a general note that barricades will be in place prior to any activity on the property
i ncluding but not limited to grading.
A general note indicating that barricades will be in place prior to any activity on the property
has been included in the drawings. Please see attached revised sheet Ll.01
8. Parking screening is required along 100% of George Bush Drive . Screening can be done with
plantings, berms, structural elements or a combination and a minimum of 3 feet above parking
lot elevation .
Screening is not possible as the landscape buffer between the existing parking and George
Bush Drive is within the right-of-way. In addition, screening is a safety and security concern
of College Station ISO and College Station Police Department. We respectfully request to be
exempt from this requirement.
Member American Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M 1960 West Suite 214 ·Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281 671 2300 ·Fax 281.671 .2313 · vlkarch1tects .corn
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure
Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double-Check Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance
2394.
An irrigation system shall be designed to meet the requirements of City Ordinance 2394 and
installed by a certified installer.
2. All Back Flow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394.
An irrigation system shall be installed and tested by a certified installer to meet the
requirements of City Ordinance 2394.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Please provide a drainage study.
Please find the drainage report attached to this letter.
2. I was curious why there's a 6 feet drop for the flow lines for the grate inlet 1-9 at station
4+70.10.
The drop was necessary to not have excessive velocities in the storm drain. The existing and
proposed grades are s teep in this area and the drop allows the velocities in the pipe to not
exceed 15 fps .
3. Please provide the fire flow demand & building type, and show the location of the fire hydrants
on the site plan (sheet Al.01).
The fire flow demand and building type have been provided. The location of the proposed
fire hydrants has been shown. Please see attached revised sheet Al.01.
4. Please show the existing fire hydrants on Halik St. and Timber St . on the plans.
The existing fire hydrants have been shown . Please see attached revised sheet Al.01 .
5. Provide an access easement for the sidewalk along George Bush Drive that is going through the
parki ng lot.
There is a blanket easement in place during construction and a plat will be f iled upon
completion of construction.
6. GIS is showing a sewer line connecting to the building that is to be demolished and replaced
with parking & fire lane on Timber St. Please specify on the plans if it's being abandoned or
removed .
The abandonment or removal of this sewer line will be at the discretion of the contractor as
to which method best suits the contractor's scope of work.
7. Please clearly label which manholes the private sewer line is starting and ending.
All sanitary sewer lines on this project are private. The private sewer line terminates at the
existing manhole on Holik Street.
Member AmertCan Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M . 1960 West Su i te 214 . Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300. Fax 281.671 .2313 · vlkarch1tects.com
TRANSPORTATION
1. Please revise and resubmit the driveway permit to comply with TxDOT comments.
The driveway permit has been revised and resubmitted.
TxDOT
1. Proposed median does not meet the TxDOT access management guidelines for a right-in I right-
out only access point, the median needs to be more substantial so there is no question
regarding the intended function of this access point , also required is a restriping eliminating the
left turn lane assuring south bound traffic no option to left into the property from George Bush
Dr. Before access can be approved these revisions must be implemented into the property's
proposed plan and commercial access request. We look forward to reviewing the revised
proposal for access on the land use I access change .
FIRE
The driveway permit has been revised and resubmitted as per your request. Please see the
enclosed resubmittal.
1. Fire Lanes are covered but it is my understanding that the East end of the school is over 30' in
height which will require an Aerial Access Easement. This AAE will need to start within 15 ' to 30'
ofthe structure.
Per a conversation with Steve Smith at the Fire Marshall's office, the Fire Marshall is OK with
access to the roof of the structure on the western side through the gated yard area. The
yard area has been partially striped as "Fire Lane " and a knox padlock will be provided on
the gate. Please see attached revised sheet Al.03.
2. The Gate , near the South West corner of the building will need a Knox Padlock.
The gates near the SW corner of the building will have a Knox Padlock. Please see attached
sheet Al.06.
The FDC nay need to be remote due to elevation changes .
From the grading plan, the fire lane adjacent to the FDC is approximately 327.15. The
sidewalk elevation below the FDC is at 327.98. Wi th these spot elevations the grade change
f OC... at the FDC location does not seem to be an issue.
( SANITA~
~ i.:;/'he dumpster pads need to be turned 10-15 degrees clockwise in order to have a better ~~ approach.
J /1<J'\.I
, l..v' The dumpster pads have been rotated 10 degrees clockwise as requested. Please see
f<O«' attached revised sheet Al.01.
n<e.. ~(CU'\-.
Member American Institute of Architects· 7915 FM . 1960 West Suite 214. Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300 ·Fax 281 671 .2313 · vlkarch1tects.com
If further information is required to address the above listed comments please do not hesitate to
contact the office.
Thank you ,
'8,p. ---Ben amons
Enc: C2 .0l, C2 .02, C2.03, C3 .01, CS .01, Ll .01, Al.010, Al.01, Al.02, Al.03, Al.OS and Al.06
Member American Institute of Architects. 7915 F.M 1960 West Suite 214 ·Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281 671.2300. Fax 281 671.2313 · vlkarch1tects.com
3. Please check the drainage area down on Holik Street, and acquire a dedicated drainage
easement for the proposed storm sewer line to the creek.
Addressed in previous submittal.
4. Please provide an Engineering Cost estimate .
Addressed in previous submittal.
If further information is required to address the above listed comments please do not hesitate to
contact the office .
Thank you,
~:J. -----Ben Lamons
Enc: Streetscape Request Letter, Ll.01
Member American Institute of Architects • 7915 F.M. 1960 West Suite 214 • Houston Texas .77070
Ph 281.671.2300 ·Fax 281.671.2313 • vfkarchitects.com
,
December 11, 2014
Ms. Jessica Bullock
Planning & Development Services
City of College Station, Texas
P. 0. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Dear Ms. Bullock,
V L K !1\RCHITECTS
VLK Architects, on behalf of College Station ISD asks that the following two requirements be waived
from enforcement on the above referenced project.
1. Parking Lot Screening
On previous CSISD projects it has been agreed to by the City to not require the District to
provide the required parking lot screening due to safety and security of the campuses due to the
fact that this screening provides places for individuals to hide who may be a threat to the
campus and its occupants . Further, the City of College Station Police Department has agreed
that this requirement is a determent to the safety and security of schools .
2. Streetscap i ng Requirements
Due to Texas Department of Transportation Right of Way Easements along George Bush Drive
and that approximately the first 55 feet of the site is paved; the project cannot comply with the
Streetscaping requirements. We ask that the existing line of mature t rees located
approximately 60 feet from t he property line and parallel to George Bush Drive be considered as
meeting the street scaping requirements along George Bush Drive.
Thank you for your consideration of these requests.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Member Ame r ican I nst itu te of Architec t s . 20445 St ate Highway 249 Suite 350 . H ouston Texas 77070 ....... ~.-.
Ph 28 1 .671.2300 . Fax 281.671 .2313 . vl k architects .co m
January 7, 2015
Jessica Bullock, Staff Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave S
College Station, Texas 77840
RE: College View High School
College Station ISO
VLK IARCHITECTS
1300 George Bush Dr.
College Station, Texas 77840
Jessica Bullock,
The following are responses to Landscaping/Streetscaping/Buffer comments generated from
the City of College Station's Site Plan Review, received on December 10, 2014. Responses are in
Italics.
PLANNING
y The service drive on SW side will need the length of the hammerhead will need to be 120'
during phase II, for sufficient fire access .
/ Addressed in previous submittal.
l/2 . Please provide an explanation/survey to show the property line . What is shown does not match
what I can see . Understanding that what I see does not accurately depict what will be on record,
an explanation will be fine. Please also verify that the property line does not go into TxDot ROW
along George Bush Dr where it runs along the island.
Addressed in previous submittal.
When the location of the bike rack is determined, please include on sheet Al.01.
Addressed in previous submittal.
Please show driveway apron as identified in the site design standards.
Addressed in previous submittal.
~For the Fire lane stripping detail on sheet Al.01, the lettering should be 4". The red strip should
remain 8".
/ Addressed in previous submittal.
Response to TxDOT comments are still being reviewed and will follow.
Addressed in previous submittal.
Member Amerlcan Institute of Architects· 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 214 . Ho u ston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300 ·Fax 281.671.2313 . vlkarchitects.com
~Make sure the FDC is within 100 feet of a fire hydrant.
Addressed in previous submittal.
s /r1ease note that any changes made to the plans that have not been requested by the City of
College Station must be explained in your next transmittal letter.
Noted.
LAN DSCAPING/STREETSCAPI NG/BUF FER V Please verify streetscaping calculation . I show property frontage not including driveways as 424'
along Timber, 194' along Holik and 600' along George Bush Dr. This would mean 13 canopy trees
along Timber, 6 along Holik and 24 along George Bush Dr . The only place where additional trees
would need to be added for streetscaping is along George Bush Dr. These would need to be
placed w ith i n the same proximity to the existing trees to George Bush Dr . The calculation for
300 additional points along the ROW can also be revised to take out driveway spacing . Based on
my calculations, total points required is 13,968.
Please find the revised Landscape Plan attached. The streetscaping calculations have been
revised to the numbers listed in your comment above. Please see the revised Landscape Plan
attached on sheet Ll .01 .
2. Planting not in the property l ines cannot be counted towards point. This includes the crepe
myrtles along George Bush Drive and some trees along Timber. For existing trees, they can
remain shown on the plan, but they would not count towards point requirements. For the new
proposed plantings, please move them so the trunk is within the property line .
These calculations have been revised to not include planting not in the property lines. Please
see the revised Landscape Plan attached on sheet Ll.01.
I am still unable to verify the count for crepe myrtles. Please either use a different symbol or
label which trees are crepe myrtles.
The symbol for crepe myrtles distinguishes them apart from o t her trees. Please see the
revised Landscape Plan attached on sheet Ll .01. Y With the next submittal, please include a request to have the trees next to the front of the
building count toward stree t scaping along George Bush Drive . The request should explain why
these exemptions are necessary for the site.
Please see attached letter requesting to have the trees next to the building along George
Bush count toward streetscaping.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO . 2
1. Response comment has been noted . Prior to submittal for approved plans, please make sure
that the re's a note next to the existing manhole on Halik St . stating that the private sewer line
termina t es at this manhole and that the public sewer is beginning here since the Utility sheet
was not submitted during the last submittal.
Addr essed in previous submittal.
2. Provide a note stating where the public storm sewer begins on the plans .
Addr essed in previous submittal.
Member American Institute of Architects· 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 2 14 ·Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300. Fax 281.671.2313 . vlkarchitects.com
ENGINE ER'S ESTIMATE August 11 , 2016
CEN TE R FOR ALTERNATIV E LEARNING
llt:M
NO . QUANTITY UN IT DESCRIPTION UNI T PRIC E
Public Wat erline
1 688 .7 LF 8" PVC W aterl ine (AWW A C90 0 C L 200) $ 45.00
2 2 EA 8" M.J . Gate Va lve & Box $ 1,250.00
3 1 EA 16"x8" Tapp inq Slee ve & Va lve $ 4,000.00
4 1 EA 8"x6" M.J. Tee $ 550.00
5 1 EA 8"x4" M.J. Tee $ 55 0.00
6 1 EA 8"x6 " M.J . Reduce r $ 550 .00
7 7 EA 8"x45 Deqree M.J. Bend $ 55 0.00
8 2 EA 8"x22.5 Deqree M.J . Bend $ 550.00
9 1 EA 6" M.J . Gate Val ve & Box w/ Locki nq lid $ 1,100.00
10 1 EA Meter Vault an d 3" W ater Meter Co nec tion Fittinq s and Valves $ 12,500 .00
11 1 EA Co nn ec tio n to existinq svs tem $ 2,000.00
12 1 EA Std. Fire Hvdran t A ssemb ly $ 3,500.00
13 6 12 LF Stru ctural Backfill $ 8.00
14 11 EA Thru st Bl oc ks for Fittin qs $ 45.00
15 688 .7 LF T renc h Protectio n $ 5.00
Pub l ic Wa t erlin e Total :
11l::M
NO . QUANTITY UNI T DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE
Public Storm Drain
16 1 EA 1 O' St and ard Reces sed Curb In let $ 3,500.00
17 125 .5 LF 30" RCP $ 80.00
18 1 EA 30" Concrete Hea dwall with En erg y Dissipator Bl ocks $ 2,500.00
19 70.8 LF Structural Backfil l $ 8.00
20 125.5 LF Trenc h Protec tio n $ 5.00
21 262.5 SF Stree t Repa ir $ 10.00
Public Storm Drain Total :I
QUAN TITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE
1 6 EA Handica Ram s $
2 13 71 .0 S F Sid ewal k $
Public Si dew alk Total :I
Total Public Improvements
_ ............ ,,,,,,,,
__ ... ~ OF T~~ \\\ -=---,,,_~ ................ -4.s-,,,
,:: ':i .... * · ... ~ ,, ~*... ... * 'l ti!* : ............. ~ ~ ..... ~ ................... ORGAN~ ~ VERO~~<?.~.~:~:.~ ....... :'cr"~
TOTA L COS T
$ 30,99 1.50
$ 2,500.00
$ 4,000.00
$ 55 0.00
$ 55 0.00
$ 550.00
$ 3,850.00
$ 1,100 .00
$ 1,100 .00
$ 12,500.00
$ 2,000 .00
$ 3 ,500 .00
$ 4 ,8 96.00
$ 495.00
$ 3,44 3.50
$ 72 ,026 .00
TOTAL COST
$ 3,500.00
$ 10,04 0.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 566.40
$ 62 7.50
$ 2,625.00
$ 17,23 3.90
TOTAL COST
5,4 00.00
6,855 .00
$ 12,255 .00
$ 101 ,514.90
~ ..... ~.... 77689 .: !JJ , ~ ~... <:) ... !:!J ~ Jt ll1,0~· .. ~?G1 s 1 . ~"~°&~ nt\IJ\1' f-W\-3 .,, ~.s. ......... ~.:
,,, S'/QN ~ --'"'"1
E NGINEER'S ESTIMATE
CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE LE A RNING
llCM
NO. QUANTITY UNIT
Public Waterline
1 372.5 LF
2 2 EA
3 1 EA
4 1 EA
5 1 EA
6 1 EA
7 1 EA
8 1 EA
9 2 EA
10 1 EA
11 1 EA
12 1 EA
13 1 EA
14 300.4 LF
15 7 EA
16 382.5 LF
llCM
NO. QUANTITY UNIT
Public Strom Drain
17 1 EA
18 125.5 LF
19 1 EA
20 1 EA
21 70.8 LF
22 125.5 LF
23 262.5 SF
DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE
8" PVC Waterline (AWWA C900 CL 200) $ 45.00
8" M.J . Gate Valve & Box $ 1 250.00
16"x8" M .J . Tee $ 1,200.00
8"x6" M .J. Tee $ 550.00
B"x4" M .J. Tee $ 550.00
B"x6" M .J . Reducer $ 550.00
B"x45 Degree M .J . Bend $ 550.00
8"x22.5 Degree M .J. Bend $ 550.00
8"x11 .25 Degree M.J . Bend $ 550.00
6" M .J . Gate Valve & Box w/ Lockino Lid $ 1 100.00
Meter Vault and 3" Water Meter Conection Fittinos and Valves $ 12,500.00
Connection to existina svstem $ 2,000.00
Std. Fire Hydrant Assemblv $ 3 ,500.00
Structural Backfill $ 8 .00
Thrust Blocks for Fittings $ 45.00
1 rench Protection $ 5.00
Public Waterline Total :
DESCRI PTION UNIT PRICE
1 O' Standard Recessed Curb Inlet $ 3 ,500.00
30" RCP $ 80 .00
Standard Junction Box 36" RCP $ 2,000.00
30" Concrete Headwall with Enerov Dissipator Blocks $ 2 500.00
Structural Backfill $ 8 .00
Trench Protection $ 5 .00
Street Repair $ 10.00
Public Storm Drain Total:I
Total Public Improvements
~~\~,, .:"A.,_~ '*'" ""·· k-1.n 't• ::' c_, ··" .... ...,. ,, ;' * .·· ... -tr '1. .,.... ....~
~ : ................... ,,, ;..................... MORGAN ~
\'i~ .......... 77ee9 /fE J I 1 1 r-r ~VERONICA~:~: ................ ~ ~ ( lA _
"~... <:> /YJ~ ''••a · ~~G1sre.~"::._~&~; r:i A t JJ.J,~(/lti:3 '' S10N°A\. f(;.":_/ I it.AV' qt\ -,r:
'"~ :-..."""
TOTAL COST
$ 16 762.50
$ 2 500.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 550.00
$ 550.00
$ 550.00
$ 550.00
$ 550.00
$ 1, 100.00
$ 1,1 00.00
$ 12,500.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 3 ,500.00
$ 2,4 03.20
$ 315.00
$ 1,912.50
$ 48,043.20
TOTAL COST
$ 3 ,500.00
$ 10,040.00
$ 2 000.00
$ 2 ,500.00
$ 566.40
$ 627.50
$ 2 ,625.00
$ 19,233.90
$ 67,277.10
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by a Pressure -Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure
Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double-Check Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance
2394.
An irrigation system shall be designed to meet the requirements of City Ordinance 2394 and
installed by a certified installer.
2. All Back Flow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394.
An irrigation system shall be installed and tested by a certified installer to meet the
requirements of City Ordinance 2394.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
_>:' Please provide a drainage study.
Please find the drainage report attached to this letter.
)/. I was curious why there's a 6 feet drop for the flow lines for the grate inlet 1-9 at station
4+70.10.
The drop was necessary to not have excessive velocities in the storm drain. The existing and
proposed grades are steep in this area and the drop allows the velocities in the pipe to not
exceed 15 fps .
/.Please provi de the fire flow demand & building type, and show the location of the fire hydrants
on the site plan (sheet Al.01).
/
&
The fire flow demand and building type have been provided. The location of the proposed
fire hydrants has been shown. Please see attached revised sheet Al.01.
Please show the existing fire hydrants on Holik St. and Timber St. on the plans.
The existing fire hydrants have been shown. Please see attached revised sheet Al.01 .
Provide an access easement for the sidewalk along George Bush Drive that is going through the
parking lot.
There is a blanket easement in place during construction and a plat will be filed upon
completion of construction.
GIS is showing a sewer line connecting to the building that is to be demolished and replaced
with parking & fire lane on Timber St. Please specify on the plans if it's being abandoned or
removed.
The abandonment or removal of this sewer line will be at the discretion of the contractor as
to which method best suits the contractor's scope of work.
Please clearly label which manholes the private sewer line is starting and ending.
All sanitary sewer lines on this project are private. The private sewer line terminates at the
existing manhole on Halik Street.
Member American Institute of Architec t s. 7915 F.M . 1960 West Suite 214 ·Houston Texas 77070
Ph 281.671.2300. Fax 281.671 .2313. vlkarch i tects .com
464
DRAINAGE TABLES -ROUND GRATES (CONTINUED)
Grate Manhole Col< Basin Sq. In ,
Option Grote Dia . Grote Thk. Openi ng Perimeter
1266M 31 9/16 1 1/8 18:1 99 1266
1811M 31 11/16 1 5/16 240 100 1230, 1232, 1234, 1820, 1825, V-1600-4, V-17 00-4 . V-7032
V-3601J.4 31 7/8 1 3/8 350 100 1230, 1232, 1234, 1820, 1825, V-1600-4 , V-1700-4 , V-7032
8025MVH 31 15/16 1 3/8 209 100 ADA 8027
1480M1 31 15/16 1 1/2 262 101 ADA , DNW 1320, 1322, 1480, 2810, V-1419, V-1420, V-1432
132 0M 32 1 1/2 360 101 Cross bar 1320, 1322, 1480, 2810, V-1419, V-1420, V-1432
1322M 32 i 1/2 240 101 1320
1480M 3:1 1 1/2 275 101 Non·Troffic 1320, 1322 , 1480, 2810 , V-1419, V-1420. V-1432
8028MVH 32 1/4 1 3/8 209 101 ADA 8027
28 80M 32 3/4 2 2419 103 2880Z TF
V-7069 33 3/4 1 3/8 236 106 ADA V-7069·1
V-3610-6 33 7/8 1 1/2 350 106 V-1610-6
1330 M 35 375 110 1330
1585M 36 1 1/2 400 113 1585, 1586
8029MVH 37 1/4 1 1/2 308 117 ADA
V-360(}-$ 38 480 119 V-160 (}-5, V-1700-5
1580M 38 1/2 1 1/2 468 121 Heavy du ty & Extra Heavy duty 1581 , 1821, 2815
1580M 2 38 1/2 1 1/2 304 1?1 ADA 1581 , 1821 , 2815
V-36 10-7 39 5/8 1 1/2 516 125 V-1610-7
1843M 1 44 1/8 639 139 1843, 1845
V-36 10-8 45 5/8 1 1/2 810 143 V-1611}-8
V-3600-6 50 1/4 760 158 V-160CJ.<>, V-170CJ.<>
DRAINAGE TABLES -CATCH BASIN GRATES
EJIW is co ntinu ally adding new construction castings and drainage grates to our product offering. Please
con sult with your EJ IW represe ntative or emai l us at ejiwsa les@ejiw.co m to request a sales drawing not shown
in this ca talog .
Grate Sq . In. 3-Sided 4-Sided Grate De scription Frame Option
Option Opening Perimeter Per imeter
5000M3 10 58 81 Restricted Flow, DNW 5000, 5020 , 5080
V-5 70 8 33 28 38 V-5708
8201 M 50 41 55 ADA 8201, 8301
51 00M2 50 66 3/8 88 1/2 Restricted Flow (variable) 5100 , 5125
V-5713 55 40 54 V-5613 , V-5713
V-5712 66 ~ .'46' 36 48 V-5712
7797M 70 41 54 7797
V-5714 76 44 58 V-5714
V-5716 90 48 64 V-5716
7720M 100 48 68 7720
770 0M2' 100 59 83 Vane, DNW 7700
770 0M3' 100 59 83 Bi-directiona l Vane, DNW 7700
V-5720-80 105 59 79 ADA V-5620 , V-5720
580 0M 1 112 51 73 5150
Note: All dimensions o re in inches .
----·-~-------------· -
East Jordon Iron Works, Inc. 800 .626.4653 www.ejiw.con1
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING
'"'"' NO . QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST
Public Waterline
1 688 .7 LF 8" PVC Waterline {AVVWA C900 CL 200) $ 45 .00 $ 30 991 .50
2 2 EA 8" M.J . Gate Valve & Box $ 1,250.00 $ 2 500.00
3 1 EA 16"x8" Tapping Sleeve & Valve $ 4 000 .00 $ 4,000.00
4 1 EA B"x6" M .J. Tee $ 550.00 $ 550.00
5 1 EA 8"x4" M.J. Tee $ 550 .00 $ 550.00
6 1 EA 8"x6" M .J . Reducer $ 550.00 $ 550.00
7 7 EA 8"x45 Decree M.J . Bend $ 550.00 $ 3 850.00
8 2 EA 8"x22.5 Degree M .J. Bend $ 550.00 $ 1 100.00
9 1 EA 6" M.J . Gate Valve & Box w/ Locking Lid $ 1100.00 $ 1100.00
10 1 EA Meter Vault and 3" Water Meter Conectlon Fittlnos and Valves $ 12 500 .00 $ 12 500.00
11 1 EA Connection to existing system $ 2 000 .00 $ 2 000.00
12 1 EA Std . Fire Hydrant Assembly $ 3 500.00 $ 3 500.00
1"3 612 LF Structural Backfi ll $ 8.00 $ 4 896.00
14 11 EA Thrust Blocks for Flttinas $ 45 .00 $ 495.00
15 688 .7 LF I rencn Protection $ 5.00 $ 3,443.50
Public Waterllne Total: $ 72,026.00
llCIYI
NO. QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST
Public Storm Crain
16 1 EA 1 O' Standard Recessed Curb Inlet $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
17 125.5 LF 30"RCP $ 80 .00 $ 10,040.00
18 1 EA 30" Concrete Headwall with Energy Disslpalor Blocks $ 2,500 .00 $ 2,500.00
19 70.8 LF Structural Backfill $ 8.0-0 $ 566.40
20 125.5 LF Trench Protection $ 5 .0U $ 627 .50
21 282 .5 SF Street Reoair $ 10.00 $ 2,625.00
Public Storm Drain Total:! $ i 7,233.90
Total Public Improvements $ 89,259.90
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 14-265
CITY OF COLL EGE STATION
Pl"•mi~ cf Dr-wf{lpm,.111 _t;,.,.,.U.,,
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A000701
Crawford Burnett (ICL)
Tract 187
DATE OF ISSUE: 12/18/2014
OWNER:
Jon Hall -College Station ISO
2000 Welsh Street
College Station , TX 77845
SITE ADDRESS:
1300 George Bush Dr, College Station, TX 77845
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Wolf Pen Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Development Permit
CONDITIONS:
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-
issued .
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance .
4. Other permits may have been required to fulfill local, state and federal requirements . Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits.
5. Stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing
drainage facilities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site, it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State, and Federal requirements .
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy .
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as, but not limited to, paint, oil ,
solvents, asphalt, concrete, mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited .
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed.
10. Special Conditions : TXDOT permit has not been approved, prcoeed at own risk . Landscape plans have not been
approved , and needs to be address prior full building permit.
l ,~6~--{LJ_c__ __ S_A_Y-!_f:_S" _______ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein .
Contractor Signature
Z-IO-Sb 3 -2.~a 9
Phone number E~mail
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contact Jedy Jow~S 111-l/S~l/ , the Public Works
Inspector assigned to this project 24 hours prior to beginning construction for scheduling required Inspections .
Ci{t;,g~resentative ll -/~ -:l.Ollf
Date
t I
City of College Station
Development Services
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Attn: Ke v in Ferrer
MITCHELL
M M
MORGAN
RE: Fire Flow Status, Center for Alternative Learning Project
Dear Kevin ,
30 January 2015
The following fire flow information is being provided for the Center for Alternative Learning (CAL)
buildin g construction on George Bush Drive in College Station.
A 396 LF 8"waterline was designed to meet the need s of CAL. The waterline was later rerouted due to a
conflict with a portable building that will be needed as a temporary facility during construction. A new
waterline placement was designed but required an increase in pipe length. The length of the rerouted
waterline is 703 LF.
As s hown in the previous water model dated October 2014 for this project, the 396 LF meets the
requirements set in the BCS design standards for pressures and velocities . The worst case scenario
model ed for CAL was fire flow of 1250 GPM placed at nodes C.A.L.-3 & 4 during peak day demand.
This scenario was modified by increas in g the length of the 8" WL to 703 LF. Attached are the re s ults
Uunction & node s) from this model. As you can see the press ure s lightly decrease, and there was no
change in velocities of the pipe . The proposed waterline reroute will meet the BCS des ign requirements of
12 ft/sec ve lociti es maximum and 20 psi pressure minimum .
Cc : file
et me kno w if you have any questiog.,ico-''~o:'\''''''
--~E. F r~ \\ ?-<..~ ............ ~.., •• , ;' ~ .... * ··· .. IS' ,, OU , ,, it / "· i< II [*: .... ,,, ,, ..... : .......................... : ..... ~
~ VERONICA J.B. MORGAN ~ l ..... , ........................... : ..... ~
\ ~\ 77689 /$;
11 0". ~ <),•'kl~ ftt~"·~<}ISTE'i':~··&~ .:' ''\~s1Q"NAL. €.~--5
-n~lf-\44-3
320 4 EARL RUDDER FWY . S. • COL LEGE STATIO N, TX 778 4 5 • T 979 .260 .6963 • F 97 9.260.3564
CIVIL ENGINEERIN G • HYDR AULI CS • HYD ROLOGY • UTILITIE S • ST REET S • SITE PLAN S • SUBDIV ISIONS
info@m1tchellandmorgan com • wwwm1tchellandmorgan com
EXHIBIT A
M ike URBAN N ode I d entifi er s
D es cription: Steady State Analys i s-Ex i sting peak d ay demand on the system with CSISD -
Center for Alternative Leaming demand with wate rli ne increased to 703 L.F ., and
1250 gpm fire flow added to nodes C .A .L.-3 and C.A.L.-4
Node Results
Name Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
508 12.891 7 1.87743
567 4 .182 76 .00895
572 0 75 .79523
573 5 .156 75.81062
591 0 74 .1 2515
601 7 .505 76 .13941
604 5.271 76 .28098
611 0 7 3 .26386
614 0 .974 70 .62386
615 0 70 .98313
643 0 67 .4 3 726
647 5 .042 59 .8242
651 0 68 .82667
657 7 .162 64 .71566
659 10.313 56 .49503
665 3 .953 68.04424
673 2.349 66 .88825
674 5.844 60 .68788
677 3 .266 59 .99247
684 4 .87 60 .87565
702 23.661 64 .48981
C.A.L.-1 0 59 .1366
C.A.L.-2 143 53 .96941
C.A.L.-3 1250 53 .3316
C.A.L.-4 1250 61.44328
J-023 0 63 .2758
J-024 0 59 .33034
J-025 0 60 .54472
CSISD-C e n te r for Alt e rn ative Le a rn ing Ex h ibit A
• • I I
EXHIBITB
MikeURB ~N Link Identifiers
Description: Steady State Analysis-Existin g peak day demand on the system with CSISD-
Center for A lternative Leaming demand with waterl in e inc reased to 70 3 L.F ., and
1250 gp m fire flow add e d to nodes C .A.L.-3 and C.A.L.-4
-
Link Results
Name Diameter (in) Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction
(ft/s) (ft) (millift) Factor
108 8 2 .603449 6.856911 90 0 .043433
110 8 2 .521168 6 .461048 90 0 .043641
121 6 1.223366 1.044889 140 0.022481
135 6 2.65177 9 .924785 90 0 .045447
16 8 3.301372 8.758062 100 0 .034499
2080 8 1 .985207 4 .149461 90 0 .045204
2087 6 0 .989822 0.809724 130 0 .0266 12
23 -A 6 3.160399 6.060151 140 0 .019537
23-B 6 3 .160399 6 .060241 140 0.019537
2459 0 .75 0 .600946 5 .914154 100 0.065915
2460 6 1 .14131 2 .082678 90 0 .05 1484
2461 6 1.105845 1.964489 90 0.051727
2588-A 16 2 .354735 1.488214 120 0.023046
2588-B 16 2.354735 1.487894 120 0.023042
26 6 0 .97877 0 .689802 140 0 .023186
2631 6 1.409723 1.358778 140 0 .022016
27 6 0 .989822 1.599858 90 0.05258
28 8 2.084615 2 .804093 140 0 .020778
3350 1 6 2 .172949 1 .282537 120 0 .023 3 23
3351-A 1 6 2 .79112 1 2 .038996 120 0 .022474
3351-B 16 0 .568318 0.070815 150 0 .018826
3351-C 16 1.4263 0.588081 120 0 .024822
3351-D 16 1 .4263 0 .588087 120 0 .024822
3830 6 2 .084615 6 .355893 90 0.047095
3831 6 1.067598 1.514213 100 0.042778
3835 6 0 .989822 1.600068 90 0 .052587
456 6 2 .003346 2 .605064 140 0 .020901
64 6 0.97877 0 .691369 140 0.023238
849 6 1.315686 2 .229791 100 0 .041478
850 6 1 .260426 2 .503127 90 0 .050734
854 8 2 .148601 3 .953179 100 0 .036764
865 8 2 .541982 6 .558892 90 0 .043579
CSISD -Ce nte r for Altern a t iv e Learning Ex hibi t B
\ • I '
EXHIBITB
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Link Results
Diameter (in) Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction Name (ft/s) (ft) (millift) Factor
866 8 2 .574892 5 .526754 100 0 .035789
867 6 1.14655 1.723796 100 0 .042224
98 8 2 .622795 5 .718907 100 0 .035693
C.A.L.-FH 8 7 .978474 21.18485 150 0 .014288
C.A.L.-WL 8 8.891212 25 .8908 150 0 .014061
CSISD -Center fo r Alternative Learning Ex hibit B
' .
EXHIBITC
MikeURBAN Layout
Description: Steady State Analysis-Existing peak day demand on the system with CSISD-
Center for Alternative Leaming demand with waterline increased to 703 L.F., and
1250 gpm fire flow added to nodes C.A.L.-3 and C.A.L.-4
C.A.L.o{ C.A.L.l
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit C
COLLEGE STATION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING REBUILD
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS
November 2014
Prepared for:
COLLEGE STATION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
1812 WELSH AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION , TX 77840
Submitted to
OLLEGE TA I N
rl. e heart of th~ Rmarch Valley
By
MITCHELL
MORGAN
ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS
3204 EARL RUDDER FREEWAY SOUTH
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845
OFFICE (979) 260-6963
FAX (979) 260-3564
CERTIFICATION
This report for the drainage design for the Center for Alternative Learning Rebui ld was
prepared under my supervision in accordance with provisions of the Bryan/College Station
Unified Drainage Design Guidelines for the owners of the property . All licenses and
permits required by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed
drainage improvements have been issued . _ ...... ,,,,,,,
.:-~~OF /€ \\'
ZA.,_'i-, ........... ~-'l ltl
.:' CO;) _... *. ·· .. IS' I ;'•/ ...... ,l 1.~.i ....................... :: ... ~.\
~ VERONICA J.B. MORGAN i'.
Veronica JB rg .E. ~ .. ~\ ......... 77689"''')$'l
Registered Profess al Engineer ~1,1b·· .. -?~ «,Q/'JiJ J
St t f T N 77689 I ~ "· "°G/STE~ ·" ~ -a e o exas o . 11 ~s." ............. ~0:
''\\°SIONA\..€ __ : \\,,'\,, ...... ~
Firm #F-1443 (t ...-U-14
INTRODUCTION
Center for Alternative Learning Rebuild
Drainage Analysis
The purpose of this drainage report is to present an analysis of the necessary drainage
infrastructure for the Center for Alternative Learning (CAL) rebuild, (formally known as Timber
Academy and the City of College Station Conference Center) located on the block adjacent to
George Bush Drive , Holik Street and Timber Street.
GENERAL LOCATION & DESCRIPTION
Located on the eastern corner of the intersection at George Bush Drive and Bizzel/Timber, the
Center for Alternative Learning (CAL) rebuild property consists of an approximately 15 acre tract
bounded by Timber Street on the west , George Bush Drive on the north , Oakwood School on
the south and Holik Street on the east as seen in Exhibit 1. Prior to demolition , the site
contained the COCS Conference Center, a portion of the Barbara Bush Parent Center, and
Timber Academy . The project will be redeveloped into a two-story learning center, adjacent to
the remainder of the Barbara Bush Parent Center and Oakwood Intermediate School. No
portion of the property lies within the regulatory 100-year floodplain per the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel 48041C0305E , with an
effective date of May 16 , 2012 (Exhibit 1A).
The overall storm drain layout for the site can be seen on Exhibit 2 .
DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
All drainage design is in accordance with the Bryan/College Station USDG . As such:
• Design rainstorm events consist of the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-and 100-year, 24 hour duration
hypothetical frequency storm events in order to analyze the effectiveness of the storm water
facilities as well as capture conservative peak flow values.
• Initial flow calculations are based on the Rational Method (used to determine if detention is
necessary .)
• Detention and hydrograph data were computed using HEC-HMS .
• The target peak runoff rate for the post-development condition is that of the pre-
development peak flow rates at the study confluence.
PRIMARY DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION
The CAL Rebuild project is located within the Wolf Pen Creek Watershed . Currently , there are
no offsite drainage areas that flow through the site. All onsite drainage currently flows to two
outfall points (Study Points "OUT1" and "OUT2"). OUT1 discharges to George Bush Drive ,
while OUT2 discharges to Wolf Pen Creek .
STORMWATER RUNOFF ANALYSIS ON-SITE STORM SEWER SYSTEM
Pre-Development Drainage Basin
The pre-development areas for the CAL rebuild project consist of 1 O drainage subbasins as
seen in Exhibit 3 . This exhibit illustrates the total area contained within each of these drainage
subbasins. It is important to note that the existing site has a high percent of impervious cover.
Subbasins E-DA 1, 2 , 3, and 8 all drain to the existing gutterlines of Timber and George Bush
Center for Alternative Leaming, CS/SD
Drainage Report
Drive and ultimately flow to Study Point OUT1 which is a 15 foot curb inlet on George Bush
Drive discharging directly into Wolf Pen Creek . All other drainage basins with the exception of
E-DA-9 and E-DA-4 flow to an onsite storm sewer system or overland flow to Holik Street and to
Study Point OUT3 in Wolf Pen Creek. Drainage area E-DA-4 flows to an existing 5 foot inlet in
the parking lot near Holik Street and to OUT2 in Wolf Pen Creek . And E-DA-9 flows south down
Timber Street and does not contribute to Wolf Pen Creek . These subbasins were used to
compute storm water discharge for the pre-development conditions . The discharge flows for the
2 , 5, 10, 25 , 50, and 100 year storm events were computed using the Rational method and are
seen in Exhibit 5.
Post-Development Drainage Basin
The post-development drainage areas for the CAL rebuild project consists of 20 subbasins as
seen in Exhibit 4 . The discharge flows for the 2, 5, 10 , 25 , 50 , and 100 year storm events were
computed for each of these subbasins using the Rational method and are seen in Exhibit 5.
Drainage areas P-DA-1 , 2, 3, 3A and 4 all drain to George Bush Drive and then to OUT1 .
Drainage area P-DA-16 drains to 1-13 and then to OUT2 while drainage area P-DA-5 drains to
the underground detention pond and ultimately to OUT3. All remaining drainage basins drain to
the underground drainage system being constructed with the CAL project between the CAL and
Oakwood schools and then undetained to OUT3 .
There is an existing underground drainage system between the Oakwood and old Conference
Center building but when looking at the 10-100 year flows to that system, calculations show it is
severely undersized. With such a small area between the buildings and this area being a major
corridor for underground and overland relief of stormwater this project upsized this storm line to
carry through the 100 year storm event.
As stated earlier this project currently has a great deal of impervious cover on the site . As such
much of the flow will be leaving the site undetained . Both OUT1 and OUT2 will not have any
detention provided for flow exiting the site in those directions . All flows in those directions have
been significantly reduced due to the regrading of the site and shifting of storm flows in other
directions. Table 1 below shows the flows for all storm events both pre-and post-development
to these 2 outfall locations .
2-YRQ 10-YR Q 25-YR Q 50-YR Q 100-YR Q
OUTFALLS PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST
OUT1 8.4 7.2 11.4 9.71 13 11.1 14.7 12.6 16.5 14.1
OUT2 3.6 1.2 5.0 1.6 5.7 1.8 6.4 2.1 7.2 2.3
Table 1 -Pre-and Post-Development Flows
As seen in Table 1, the runoff contributing to outfalls OUT1 and OUT2 for the post-developed
condition is less than the runoff contributing to these outfall locations in the pre-developed
scenario. The runoff from the remaining drainage areas does increase runoff amounts which
required the need for underground detention . This is mainly due to the amount of impervious
area that was added in drainage areas E-DA-3 and E-DA-6. The sizing of the underground
detention is discussed later in this report .
Center for Alternative Leaming, CS/SD
Drainage Report
2
Storm Sewer System
The storm sewer system designed for CAL consists of one major run of storm sewer pipe . The
pipe sizes were determined using Exhibit 6 . This spreadsheet illustrates the pipe calculations
used to size the storm drain system on the project. The calculations use the Manning 's
Formula , and utilizes the flow at each pipe segment to optimize the slope and size of each pipe
segment. The pipe calculations can be seen for both the 10-year and 100-year storm events in
both Exhibits 6 and 7. As seen on these exhibits, the pipes range in size from 8 to 30 inches to
facilitate collection of the storm water for the 100-year event. Thi s design well exceeds the City •
of College Station standards . This was intentional to assure there would be no concerns with
the building finished floor elevations vs . flooding depths over storm inlets g iven the proximity of
the storm sewer to the buildings. This storm sewer will be privately owned and maintained by
CSISD .
The CAL rebuild project includes 9 grate inlets and one new curb inlet on Holik Street. In
addition, one existing curb inlet (1-13) in the parking lot near Holik Street was checked for
capacity to assure its size is sufficient to handle the flows directed to it.
All inlets were sized using both the 10-year and 100-year storm events . Exhibits 8 and 9 show
each grate inlet as well as the flow directed to it under each storm event. All depths calculated
over these storm inlets was less than an 8 inch ponded depth during the 10-year and 100-year
storm events . It should be noted , there is no flow to in let 1-3 . That is because inlet 1-3 which
has a top of grate elevation 1 foot higher th an inlet 1-2 will only receive flow if 1-2 becomes
clogged and reaches a depth of 12 inches . This extra grate was added , to an already required
junction box , because of the proximity of the doorways into the school building and the
emergency services area .
In addition to sizing the storm sewer piping and inlets, hydraulic grade lines (HGL) were
calculated to illustrate the water level in these pipe systems during the 10-and 100-year events .
As seen in Exhibits 10 and 11 , the HGL elevations are below the proposed ground elevations
which can be seen on Exhibit 2.
These HGL 's were computed using the soffit elevation of 298.50 at the 30 -inch pipe at Wolf Pen
Creek for the 10-year storm event and 303ft which is the 100-year floodplain elevation at the
discharge location in the creek , which can be seen on Exhibit 1A. In addition , the flows used
per pipe were the unadjusted flows shown on Exhibits 6 and 7 for the 10-year and 100-year
events .
Underground Detention System
The underground detention system consists of five 48 -i nch HOPE pipes , approximately 40 feet
in length each , embedded in cement stabilized backfill. The increased runoff from the
development drains to the underground detention system and is controlled by an outlet orifice
consisting of a 1/4"' steel plate with a 6"x5 " rectangular orifice opening in the plate . The plate is
to be bolted into place over a 12 " outlet pipe. In addition , a grate inlet is located at the
downstream end of the detention pipe system to provide for an emergency release of
stormwater, if the outlet orifice becomes clogged. This emergency outflow grate is set just
downstream of the detention pond header pipe and is set at elevation 317 .97ft with a flowline of
310 .97ft .
From this detention pond header, the 12-inch PVC and then 30-inch RCP storm sewer carries
the outflow to Wolf Pen Creek and the study point OUT3 . At Wolf Pen Creek all three outfalls
will converge (OUT1, OUT2 and OUT3)
Center for Alternative Leaming, CS/SO
Drainage Report
3
The USACE HEC-HMS flood hydrograph program was used to create hydrographs for each
storm event for all existing and proposed drainage areas . Also modeled in HEC-HMS was the
underground detention system or pond. These hydrographs were routed through HEC-HMS ,
with the results shown in Appendix A . As seen in Table 2 below , the total post-detention peak
runoff at the discharge location in Wolf Pen Creek where all three outfalls converge
approximates existing flows are less than the existing peak runoff, showing that the
underground detention has effectively detained the runoff to below pre-existing rates .
Table 2: HEC-HMS Model Results
Pre vs. Post Discharge @ Wolf Pen Creek
(OUTl + OUT2 + OUT3)
Pond Existing Proposed Difference
5-YR 28 .9 28.6 -0.3
10-YR 32.4 32 -0 .4
25-YR 37 .9 37.4 -0 .5
50-YR 42 .3 41 .7 -0 .6
100-YR 46 .5 45 .8 -0 .7
* Flows in units of cfs .
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
The Center for Alternative Learning (CAL) project discharges to 3 study points , OUT1 , OUT2
and OUT3 . As seen in Table 1, the proposed stormwater discharge from OUT1 and OUT2
study points are less than predevelopment flowrates . The project has designed an underground
detention facility to accommodate the increases seen at study point OUT3 . As seen in Table 2 ,
the underground detention has effectively reduced the discharge from OUT3 to below
predevelopment rates. The CAL site will not cause an increase in runoff to any of the outfall
locations and the internal storm sewer system has been designed in accordance with the
Bryan/College Station USDG .
Center for Alternative Leaming, CS/SD
Drainage Report
4
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT 1:
EXHIBIT 1A:
EXHIBIT 2:
EXHIBIT 3 :
EXHIBIT 4:
EXHIBIT 5 :
EXHIBIT 6:
EXHIBIT 7 :
EXHIBIT 8 :
EXHIBIT 9:
EXHIBIT 10:
EXHIBIT 11:
APPENDIX A:
Site & Storm Sewer Layout
General Location Map -FEMA Firmette
Storm Drain Layout Sheet 1 of 2
Existing Drainage Area Map
Proposed Drainage Area Map
Rational Formula Calculations
Pipe Capacity Calculations -10-year Design Storm
Pipe Capacity Calculations -100-year Design Storm
Inlet Capacity Calculations -10-year Design Storm
Inlet Capacity Calculations -100-year Design Storm
Hydraulic Grade Line Calculations -10-year Design Storm
Hydraulic Grade Line Calculations -100-year Design Storm
HEC-HMS Results
Center for Alternative Leaming, CS/SD
Drainage Report
5
MAP SCALE 1" = 1000'
PANEL 0305F J
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
BRAZOS CO UNTY,
TEXA S
AN D INC ORPORATE D AREAS
PANEL 305 OF 475
(SE E MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LA YOUl)
~
COM MUNITY
BRAZOS COUNTY 461195 0305
BRYAN , CITY OF 480062 0305
COLLEGE STATION , CITY OF 480083 0305
Notice to U11 r: The Map Numbu shown be low ahould be
used when piec ing map orders ; the Community Number
shown above sho uld be used on lnaurance applications tor the
subject commun ity.
MAP NUMBER
48041C0305F
MAP REVISED
APRIL 2, 2014
Federal E me r gency Ma nagement Agency
This is an official copy of a portion of t he above refere nced flood map. It
~1--H----".----.<-->.,~-->,~--.'----->,--,,£-=-'l was extracted using F-MITOn-Line. This map does not reftect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent t o the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about Nati onal F lood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov
!Exhibit 1A
< w a:: < l'.5 Q Q w z w I-
C> a:: < 0.. z <
< < ..J 0 w 0
z ..J I/) ..J :E ..J
:;;: < I/) w w < I-< > > I-a:: ~ a:: w < 0 Q C> Q 0.. I-
NO. AC . 0.40 0 .7 0.95
EDA-1 0.08 0.00 0 .00 0.08 0.07
EDA-2 0 17 o nn n nn 017 0.16
ED A-3 1.58 0.94 0 .00 0 .64 0.98
EDA-4 0.74 0.22 0 .00 0 .51 0 .58
EDA-5 0.52 0.07 0.00 0 .45 0.46
EOA-6 1.08 0 .97 (l .00 0.10 0 .49
EDA-7 1.27 1.01 0.00 0.26 0.65
EDA-8 0 .11 0 .00 0.00 0 .11 0 .11
EDA-9 0 .14 0 .00 0.00 0.14 0.13
EDA-10 1.87 0 .00 0 .00 1.87 1.78
PDA-1 0 .08 0 .00 0.00 0.08 0 .07
f'UA-2 0 .17 0.00 0 .00 0 17 0 .16
PDA-3 1.0 1 0.46 0.00 0.55 0 .71
PDA-4 0 .27 0 .13 0 .00 0 .14 0.19
P DA-5 0 .64 0.00 0 .00 0.64 0 .60
PDA-6 1.17 1.04 0 .00 0 .13 0.54
P DA-6a 0.32 0.00 0.00 0 .32 0.31
PDA-6 0 0 .06 0 .00 0 .00 0 .06 0 .06
PD A-6c 0 .63 0 .63 0 .00 0 .00 0 .25
PDA-7 0 .03 0 .00 0.00 0 .03 0.03
P DA-8 0.11 0.0 1 0.00 0 .09 0.09
P11A-9 006 n n? 0.00 n nA 004
PD A-10 0 .06 0 .02 0.00 0 .04 0 .04
PDA-11 0.09 0 .05 0.00 0.03 0.05
P DA-12 0 .08 0.04 0.00 0.04 0 .06
PDA~13 0 .09 0 .04 0.00 0.04 0.06
PD A-14 0.58 0.32 0.00 0.26 0.38
PDA-15A 0.16 o:oo 0.00 016 0 .15
P DA-16 0.25 0.09 0.00 0.16 0.19
PDA-150 0 .15 0 .00 0 .00 0 .15 0 .15
P DA-15C 0.15 0 .00 0.00 0.15 0 .14
PDA-1 50 0 ,48 0 .00 n nn n AA "-"'""
EX HIBIT 5
Rational Formula Drainag e Area Calculatio ns
CSISD-Cente r for Alternative Learning
:!: :!:
0 0 :!: :!: ..J ..J ... ... 0 0
Q Q ..J ..J z z ... ... ~ :3 i= :3 a:: J: a:: " w I-w u I-" a:: Cl a:: ..J I= Cl I= ..J 0 J I-
~z ~ ..J ::J z ::J ..J ..J w w .. I/) N o~ o~ (!) ~ (!) ~ > () ::J !::! 0
ft . ft . ft . ft ft/s min min In/Hr cfs
100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 2.4 10.0 6 .33 0.5
?nr Q ?n 10 1 0 07 47 10.0 " ...... 1,0
300.0 11 .0 180.0 2 .0 1.6 5.1 10.0 6 .33 6 .2
100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 2 .4 10.0 6 .33 3.6
100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 2.4 10.0 6.33 2 .9
"<nn .o "" 15n n 12 0 1.4 ".4 10 Q 633 3 1
100 .0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 .7 2.4 10 .0 6 .33 4 .1
100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 2.4 10 .0 6 .33 0 .7
100 .0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 .7 2.4 10 .0 6.33 0 .8
100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 .7 2 .4 10.0 6 .33 11 .2
100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 .7 2.4 10 .0 6.33 0.5
?nr .0 ?n 1 0 1 0 07 47 10.0 6,33 1.0
300.0 11 .0 180 .0 2.0 1.6 5.1 10.0 6 .33 4 .5
90.0 8 .0 160.0 2 .0 2.2 1.9 10.0 6 .33 1.2
1.0 1.0 180.0 3.0 2.6 1.2 10.0 6 .33 3.8
1.0 1.0 210.0 40 2 .7 1 3 10 Q 6 .33 3.4
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.4 0.0 10.0 6.33 1.9
1.0 1.0 1.0 1 .0 10 .4 0 .0 10 .0 6 .33 0.4
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10 .4 0.0 10.0 6.33 1.6
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.4 0 .0 10.0 6 .33 0 .2
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10 .4 0 .0 10.0 6 .33 0.6
10 1.0 10 1 0 104 nn 10,0 6,33 0 .3
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.4 0.0 10 .0 6 .33 0.3
1.0 1.0 1.0 1 .0 10.4 0 .0 10.0 6 .33 0 .3
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.4 0 .0 10 .0 6 .33 0.4
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.4 0.0 10.0 6 .33 0.4
15 1.0 12.0 175.0 3.0 2 .3 2 .4 10 .0 6 .33 2.4
1.0 1.0 ·85.2 0.9 ?n 0 ,7 10,0 ·6.33 0,9
1.0 1.0 129.0 7 .2 4 .7 0 .5 10 .0 6 .33 1.2
1.0 1.0 114.9 1.1 2.0 1.0 10.0 6.33 0 .9
1.0 1.0 116.9 1.2 2 .0 1.0 10.0 6.33 0 .9
1.0 1.Q 182.Q 1.8 2 ,0 1.5 10 0 6 .33 2 .9
Exhib it 5
0
0 ID 0 0 0 0 0 "' N 0 "' 0 0 ~ !::! 0 !!! 0 ~
In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs
8 .6 0.6 9 .9 0.7 11.1 0.8 12.5 0.9
8.6 1.4 9.9 1.6 1 1.1 1.8 12.5 2 .0
8 .6 8 .5 9.9 9.7 11 .1 10.9 12.5 12.3
8 .6 5 .0 9.9 5.7 1 1.1 6 .4 12.5 7 .2
8 .6 3.9 9 .9 4 .5 11.1 5.1 12.5 5.7
86 .4? QQ 48 11 .1 5.4 12.5 6 .1
8 .6 5.6 9.9 6.4 11 .1 7 .3 12.5 8 .2
8 .6 0 .9 9.9 1.0 11 .1 1.2 12.5 1.3
8 .6 1.2 9.9 1.3 11 .1 1.5 12 .5 1.7
8 .6 15.3 9.9 17.5 11 1 1Q A 1? "-22 .3.
8 .6 0 .6 9.9 0.7 11 .1 0.8 12 .5 0 .9
A I: 14 9 9 1.6 11 .1 1.8 12 .5 2.0
8 .6 6 .11 9 .9 7 .0 1 1.1 7 .9 12 .5 8 .9
8 .6 1.6 9 .9 1.8 11 .1 2 .1 12.5 2.3
8 .6 5.2 9 .9 6.0 11.1 6 .7 12.5 7.6
A I: "'"" 99 53 11 1 "n 12.5 67
8 .6 2 .6 9.9 3.0 11 .1 3.4 12.5 3.8
8.6 0.5 9 .9 0.6 11.1 0.7 12.5 0.7
8 .6 2.2 9.9 2 .5 11 .1 2.8 12 .5 3.2
8 .6 0.2 9.9 0.3 11 .1 0.3 12.5 03
8 .6 0.8 9 .9 0.9 11 .1 1.0 12.5 1.1
8 .6 0.4 9.9 0,4 1 1.1 0 .5 12 .5 0 .6
8 .6 0.4 9.9 0.4 11 .1 0.5 12.5 0.6
8.6 0 .5 9.9 0.5 11 .1 0 .6 12.5 0.7
8 .6 0.5 9 .9 0 .6 11 .1 0.6 12.5 0.7
8.6 0 .5 9.9 0.6 1 1.1 0 .7 12.5 0.7
8 .6 3.2 9 .9 3.7 11.1 4 .2 12.5 4.7
8.6 1 3 99 1:5 11 .1 1 .7 ·12 .5 1.9
8 .6 1.6 9 .9 1.8 11.1 2 .1 12.5 2.3
8 .6 1.3 9.9 1.4 11.1 1.6 12.5 1.8
8 .6 1.2 9 .9 1.4 11 .1 1.5 12 .5 1.7
8 .6 3.9 9 .9 4 .5 1 1.1 5.1 12 .5 5.7
EXHIBIT6 Pipe Capacity Calculations CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning 10-year Design Storm I ~ I I;' -c: fi: I . ·~ ~ I [? s ~ ·;; ~ I ~ t: .. • -( I-~ "'·-1 Q ~ o fooo Q 'C i::i ~ 0.1 -~ •. e ..,,. ·~' u -~ g,, I VJ g,, ~··'+--I = ·-'C ..... -00 t; "O ·-t ' = Q ' ' ' c fo-= fo-.,J .:: = = ~ Q.,, o. I Q -, • .• ·• , ·-fo--~ ~ ._, rl.) '-"-·-00 ';.. .. CJ ~ ~ ~ fo-.~-g~ .2, ~~It:~.,.\ ..JI~~~ @ z o o ... ~ =£ "O Q .s ·c: .e-"· ... ~I = ~ -... -fo-fo-f>-o i::i ;;i IJ,. < z IJ,. IJ,. Q.,, •), ' > ' u .,J fo-fo-# # Ac. min yr cfs cfs # cfs % % ·.lllc fps I cfs ft. min min PDA-5 ~ Pond o.60 10.0 10 5.2 6.5 1 6.5 1.01 !2.150 ,:16 7.7 j 9.5 30 0.06 10.06 PDA-6b 1-2 0.06 10.0 10 0.5 0.6 1 0.6 0.28 11.000 :' .. '•-.' 3.5 I 1.2 90 0.43 10.43 PDA-7 1-3 0.12 10.2 10 1.0 1.3 1 1.3 0.34 11.000 1q. 4.0 2.2 10 0.04 10.19 PDA-8 PDA-7 0.09 10.0 10 0.8 1.0 1 1.0 0.20 11.000 .··. 1. 0 4.0 I 2.2 37 0.15 10.15 PDA-9 1-5 0.04 10.0 10 0.4 0.5 1 0.5 0.16 11.000 ,fJ, 3.5 1.2 11 0.05 10.05 PDA-10 1-6 0.04 10.0 10 0.4 0.5 1 0.5 0.15 11.000 · 8 3.5 1.2 22 0.11 10.11 PDA-12 1-8 0.06 10.0 10 0.5 0.6 1 0.6 0.25 1.000 i·g 3.5 1.2 42 0.20 10.20 PDA-13 1-9 0.06 10.0 10 0.5 0.6 1 0.6 0.27 1.000 . ·a· 3.5 1.2 30 0. 14 10.14 1-1 1-2 0.31 10.0 10 2.7 3.3 1 3.3 0.26 1.000 1$. 5.3 6.5 37 0.12 10.12 1-2 1-3 0.90 10.4 10 7.7 9.6 1 9.6 0.83 1.740 18 7.9 13.9 55 0.12 10.55 1-3 JB-4 1.02 10.5 10 8.6 10.8 1 10.8 0.23 1.000. 24 7.2 22.7 70 0.16 10.71 JB-4 1-5 1.43 10.7 10 12.0 15.0 1 15.0 0.43 1.000 . 24· 7.2 22.7 43 0.10 10.81 1-5 1-6 1.47 10.8 10 12.3 15.4 1 15.4 0.46 1.000 24· 7.2 22.7 56 0.13 10.94 1-6 JB-7 1.51 10.9 10 12.6 15.7 1 15.7 0.48 1.000 . .24 7.2 22.7 38 0.09 11.03 JB-7 1-8 1.51 11.0 10 12.6 15.7 1 15.7 0.48 1.000 24 7.2 22.7 32 0.07 11.10 1-8 1-9 1.62 11.1 10 13.4 16.8 1 16.8 0.55 1.150 '24 7.7 24.3 109 0.23 11.33 1-9 1-10 1.68 11.3 10 13.8 17.2 1 17.2 0.58 1.220 AM 8.0 25.0 87 0.18 11.52 1-10 1-11 1.68 11.5 10 13.7 13.7 1 13.7 0.11 1.000 ; .. ~ 8.4 41.1 73 0.15 11.66 1-11 Out3 2.06 11.7 10 16.7 16.7 1 16.7 0.16 2.000 .''30 11.8 58.2 134 0.19 11.85 Exhibit 6
EXHIBIT7 Pipe Capacity Calculations CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning 100-year Design Storm I ""' j , ... ., j' .. . . ··(.t Q I '"··'· I ~ ~ ~r: i. i ·-= 1.c· ·, I fl} bl> I : ;'·'." -.~," : ~ ·-4,,> ~ I . i . < E ~ ,,,.e-§-1 j' IG> 0 E--u Q"O Q G>""' -·G> IS :z: ~ -G> Q, 00 ' Q. ~·· ··;· = ' ·-"O ...J ...J 00 t; ~ il'.: t = Q ''-"' C fo-I fo-= E--:z: < = .:. <;; .... ""' Q : t;j ·: .>:;. ·c:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ... E--.!!.'! "O ,.. = Q ,.. :;: . G> ,.1·.'· ; = :z: • > r;;;,', ...J Cl) = .. .... . .. -' " -Q, = ~ :z: 0 0 rJ G> = ..!: "O Q ..!: ·;:: .e-" . . . f;i;1 = ~ ' a.. rJ -E--E--E--Q ::;i""' < :z:""' ""' Q.. ::, > u ...J E--E--# # Ac. min yr cfs cfs # ds % I % :ji,t_'J; fps cfs ft. I min min -I I ·~ "'' PDA-5 Pond 0.60 10.0 100 7.6 9.5 1 9.5 2.13 2.150 : ~~~ 7.7 9.5 30 0.06 10.06 PDA-6b 1-2 0.06 10.0 100 0.7 0.9 1 0.9 0.58 1.000 18, 3.5 1.2 90 0.43 10.43 PDA-7 1-3 0.12 10.2 100 1.5 1.9 1 1.9 0.71 11.000 "'IO 4.0 2.2 10 0.04 10.19 PDA-8 PDA-7 0.09 10.0 100 1.1 1.4 1 1.4 0.43 1.000 ., • .,. 4.0 2.2 37 0.15 10.15 PDA-9 1-5 0.04 10.0 100 0.6 0.7 1 0.7 0.33 1.000 :~·. 3.5 1.2 11 I 0.05 10.05 PDA-10 1-6 0.04 10.0 100 0.6 0.7 1 0.7 0.32 1.000 ·~ 3.5 1.2 221 0.11 10.11 PDA-12 1-8 0.06 10.0 100 0.7 0.9 1 0.9 0.52 1.000 '.f8 3.5 1.2 42 0.20 10.20 PDA-13 1-9 0.06 10.0 100 0.7 0.9 1 0.9 0.58 1.000~;8 3.5 1.2 30 0.14 10.14 1-1 1-2 0.31 10.0 100 3.8 4.8 1 4.8 0.55 1.000: 15, 5.3 6.5 37 0.12 10.12 1-2 1-3 0.90 10.4 100 11.1 13.9 1 13.9 1.74 1.740. •· 7.9 13.9 55 0.12 10.55 1-3 JB-4 1.02 10.5 100 12.5 I 15.7 1 15.7 0.48 1.000 ~; 7.2 22.7 70 I 0.16 10.71 JB-4 1-5 1.43 10.7 100 17.4 21.7 1 21.7 0.92 1.000 :-;24. 7.2 22.7 43 0.10 10.81 1-5 1-6 1.47 10.8 100 17.9 ! 22.3 1 22.3 0.97 1.000 24 7.2 22.7 56 0.13 10.94 1-6 JB-7 1.51 10.9 100 18.3 I 22.9 1 22.9 1.02 1.000 24. 7.2 22.7 381 0.09 11.03 JB-7 1-8 1.51 11.0 100 18.2 I 22.8 1 22.8 1.01 1.000 24 7.2 22.7 32 0.07 11.10 1-8 1-9 1.62 11.1 100 19.5 I 24.4 1 24.4 1.16 1.150 .• ~ 1.1 24_3 109 0.23 11.33 1-9 1-10 1.68 11.3 100 20.0 ·1 25.1 1 25.1 1.2211.220 ·24 8.0 25.0 87 0.18 11.52 1-10 1-11 1.68 11.5 100 19.9 19.9 1 19.9 0.23 1.000 :30 8.4 41.1 73 0.15 11.66 1-11 Out3 2.06 11.7 100 24.2 24.2 1 24.2 0.35 2.000 30 11.8 58.2 134 0.19 11.85 Exhibit 7
EXHIBITB
CS ISO -C enter for Alterna ti ve Learning
INLET CAPACITY
10-YEAR STORM
SUM PUr<AI C
1-1
Q= 2 .65 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 3.31 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5724-1 EJIW
Open Area
Selected= 1.86 ft 2
T/G= 327 .15 ft
h =I 0.141ft
WSE= 327 .29 ft
1-3
Q= 0.00 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 0.00 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5712-ADA EJIW
Open Area
Selected= 0 .30 ft 2
T/G= 327 .01 ft
h =I o.001ft
WSE= 327 .01 ft
1-6
Q= 0 .13 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 0 .16 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5712 EJIW
Open Area
Selected= 0 .46 ft 2
T/G= 324 .72 ft
h =I o.011ft
WSE= 324 .73 ft
1-9
Q= 0 .52 cfs
clog= 25 %
Q clogged= 0 .65 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5712 EJIW
Open Area
Selected= 0 .46 ft 2
T/G= 324 .56 ft
h =I 0.09jft
WSE-324 .65 ft
1-12
Q= 0 .12 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 0 .15 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5712 EJIW
Open Area
Selected= 0 .46 ft 2
T/G= 318 .02 ft
h =I o.oo jft
WSE-318 .02 ft
Note *
Recessed inlets curt> opening =
Height of curt> +depression
y = 6"+4"=equal 10"
1-2
Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
Inlet Se lected=
Open Area
Selected=
T/G=
h-1
WSE=
1-5
Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
Inlet Selected=
Open Area
Se lected=
T/G=
h-1
WSE=
1-8
Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
Inlet Selected=
Open Area
Selected=
T/G=
h-1
WSE-
1-1 0
Q=
clog=
Q dogged=
Inlet Se lected=
Open Area
Selected=
T/G=
h =I
WSE=
SUMP CURB:
Q = 3.0*L Y'1.5
L= Q/(3 .0Y1 .5)
SUMP GRATE:
Q = 4.82*A*h'0.5
A = Q/(4 .82Y0.5)
I
1u Yea r :>tonn 1
4.64 cfs
25%
5.80 cfs
V-5726 EJIW
2 .23 tt2
326 .00 ft
0.29 1ft
326 .29 ft
0 .30 cfs
25%
0 .37 cfs
V-5712 EJIW
0.46 ft 2
326.56 ft
O.D3 1ft
326.59 ft
0 .32 cfs
25%
0 .40 cfs
V-57 12 EJIW
0 .46 ft 2
324 .96 ft
0.031 ft
324 .99 ft
0 .13 cfs
25%
0 .17 cfs
V-5712 EJIW
0.46 ft2
315.32 ft
o.011ft
315 .33 ft
I
sUMPi.URB (recessed 1 110 Year stonn1
1-11
Q = 3 .25 cfs
clog= 10 %
Q clogged= 3 .57 cfs
y= 0.83 ft
L=I 1.57jft
1-13 (Chec kl
Ex hibit 8
Q= 1.61 cfs
clog= 10%
Q dogged= 1.77 cfs
y= 0 .83 ft
L=I o.1a1ft
SUMP CURB:
Q = 3.0*L Y'1 .5
L= Q/(3 .0Y1 .5)
EXHIBIT9
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning
INLET CAPACITY
100-YEAR STORM
Sl.JM,.GRAre
1-1
Q= 3 .84 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 4.80 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5724-1 EJIW
Open Area
Selected= 1.86 fl2
TIG= 327.15 fl
h =I 0.29jtt
WSE= 327.44 fl
1-3
Q= 0.00 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 0 .00 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5712-ADA EJIW
Open Area
Selected= 0 .30 fl2
T/G= 327 .01 fl
h =I o.oo jtt
WSE= 327 .01 fl
I~
Q= 0.19 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 0 .24 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5712 EJIW
Open Area
Selected= 0.46 fl2
TIG= 324.72 fl
h =I o.011 f1
WSE= 324 .73 fl
1-9
Q= 0.76 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 0 .95 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5 712 EJI W
Open Area
Selected= 0.46 fl2
T/G= 324 .56 fl
h-1 o.1&lfl
WSE= 32 4.74 fl
1-12
Q= 0 .24 cfs
clog= 25%
Q clogged= 0 .29 cfs
Inlet Selected= V-5712 EJ IW
Open Area
Selected= 0 .46 fl2
TIG= 318.02 fl
h -I o.021f1
WSE= 318.04 fl
Note*
Recessed inlets curb opening =
Height of curb +depression
y = 6"+4"=equal 1 o·
SU M CURB
1-11
Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
y=
(NCessed )
4.71 cfs
10%
5 .18 cfs
0 .83 fl
L-l.__ __ 2_.2_.alfl
1-2 -Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
Inlet Selected=
Open Area
Se lected=
T/G=
h-1
WSE-
1-5
~
Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
Inlet Selected=
Open Area
Selected=
TIG=
h =I
WSE-
1-9
~
Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
Inlet Selected=
Open Area
Selected=
TI G=
h-1
WSE-
1-10 -
Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
Inlet Selected=
Open Area
Selected=
T/G=
h-1
WSE-
-
SUMP CURB.
Q = 3.0*L )t•1 .5
L= Q/(3 .0)t•1.5)
SUMP GRATE:
Q = 4.82*A*h•0 .5
A= Q/(4 .82)t•0.5)
1-13 (Checkl
Q=
clog=
Q clogged=
y=
I
1100 Year stonnl
6 .73 cfs
25 %
8.41 cfs
V-5726 EJIW
2 .23 fl2
326 .00 fl
0.6 11fl
326 .61 fl
0 .43 cfs
25 %
0 .54 cfs
V-5712 EJIW
0 .46 fl2
326 .56 fl
0.06 1fl
326 .62 fl
0 .46 cfs
25 %
0 .58 cfs
V-5712 EJIW
0 .46 fl2
324.96 fl
0.071fl
325 .03 fl
0 .19 cfs
25 %
0 .24 cfs
V-5712 EJIW
0.46 112
315.32 fl
o.011f1
315 .33 fl
I
(100 Yea r tonn)
2 .33 cfs
10%
2.56 cfs
0 .83 fl
L=._I ___ 1_.1 _.3'11
SUMP CURB:
Q = 3.0*L y1 .5
L= Q/(3 .0)t•1 .5)
Exhi bit 9
APPENDIX A
CAL
EXISTING CONDITIONS HEC-HMS DIAGRAM
studyf't
A ppe ndi x A
CAL
PROPOSED CONDITIONS HEC-HMS DIAGRAM
Appendix A
CAL
5-YR EXISTING DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: ES
Start of Run: 16Sep 1986, 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sep1986, 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014, 20: 16: 20
Basin Model: ExistingSystem
Show Elements: All Element ~
Hydro logic Drainage Area
Element (MI2)
RearOfBldg 0.004481
FrontOfBldg 0.004170
StudyPt 0.008651
Meteorologic Model: 5 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Volume Units: @ IN Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic v I
Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume
(CFS) (IN)
14.5 16Sep1986, 12:07 4.74
14.4 16Sep1986, 12:07 5.31
28.9 16Sep1986, 12:07 5.01
A ppe ndi x A
CAL
5 YEAR EXISTING OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Junction 'StudyPt' Results ror Run 'E5'
30
I I I I
I I
I I
I
I 25
20 l -~ -+
I ------+----,____ -
I ~
I I I
~ 15
I
10 I----t -11 I--... ---
1
-l I
I r\---
I -,_.,-~jJ ~~ -0
00 :00 03 :00 06 :00 09 :00 12:00
16Sep1986
15:00 18:00 21 :00 00 :01
I I
Legend (Compute Time : 18Sep2014, 20: 16:20)
--Run:E5 ElemertSTLOYPT Resul:O\.C11ow ---Rt-n:E5 Elemert:REAROfBLI)G Resul:Oti11ow
----- -Run:E5 ElemertFRONTOfBLOO Resul: Otiflow
Appendix A
CAL
5-YR PROPOSED DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: PS
Start of Run: 16Sep 1986, 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sepl 986, 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014, 20: 16: 48
Basin Model: Proposed System
Meteorologic Model: 5 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Show Elements: All Elements3 Volume Units: @ IN Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic v I
Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
RearOfBldg 0.005107 16.7 16Sepl 986, 12:07 4.84
Front Of Bldg 0.003094 10.7 16Sepl 986, 12:07 5.29
ProposedBldg 0.000670 2.5 16Sepl 986, 12:07 6.19
Pondl 0.000670 1.5 16Sepl 986, 12: 16 6.19
Study Pt 0.008871 28.6 16Sepl 986, 12:07 5.10
Appendi x A
CAL
5 YEAR PROPOSED OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Junctio n 'Stu dyPt ' Re sults f or Run 'P5 '
25
20
~ 15
10
+
--RinPS Elemert:STl.()YPT Resi.«:Wflow
------Riil:PS Elemert:FRONTOfBLOO Resul:Wflow
t
09 :00 12:00
16Sep1 986
15:00
+ - + -
18:00 21 :00
---RinPS Element:REAROfBLOO Resi.«:Wflow
---· RinPS Element:POtCI Resul:Wflow
Appendi x A
00 :01
I
i::-u.
0 ~
Ol
Cl
!!
0
1i5
~
~
~ ;:;::
0.030
0.025
0.020
0.015
O.Q10
0.005
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
00:00
I
I
__,.
I
I I
03 :00 06 :00
Legend (Compute Time : 185ep20 14, 20: 16:48)
- -- - - -R1.11:P5 ElemertPON01 Resut:storage
--R1.11:P5 ElemertPON01 Result:Outflow
CAL
DETENTION POND SUMMARY
FOR 5-YR STORM
Reservoir 'Pond 1' Results for Run "P5'
I
~
n i II
II I
" II
II
I ~ ----~-------
I
r
I
09 :00
11
1 l r I
l l
I I
\
\
\
I
12 :00
16Sep1986
+ -
I I I
15:00 18 :00 21 :OO
Rl.nPS BemertPOND1 Resut:Pool Elevellon
- --R1.11:P5 BemertPOND1 Result :COl!Dned Flow
Appendix A
313.00
312 .70
312 .40
g
312 .10 > Q)
ITi
311 .80
311 .50
311 .20
-
00 :00
I
CAL
10-YR EXISTING DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: E 1 O
Start of Run: 16Sep 1986 J 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sep1986J 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014 J 20: 17: 22
Basin Model: Existing System
Meteorologic Model: 10 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Show Elements: All Elements v I Volume Units: @ IN 0 AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic ~J I
Hydro logic Drainage Area Peak Discharge T ime of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
Rear Of Bldg 0.004481 16.3 16Sep 1986) 12:07 5.81
FrontOfBldg 0.004170 16.0 16Sep 1986) 12:07 6.40
StudyPt 0.008651 32.4 16Sep 1986) 12:07 6.09
App e ndi x A
CAL
10 YEAR EXISTING OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Junction 'StudyPt' Results for Run 'E 1 O'
30 l +
25
20
~ 15
10
+
09 :00
--R\nE10 Elemert:STUOYPT Res<.t:O\.lflow
------R<.n:E10 Elemert:FRONTOfBUXl ResUl:O\.lftow
12:00
16Sep1986
15:00
t
18:00
t
+
l
21 :OO
- - -R\nE10 Elemerl:flEAROFBlOO Res<.t:O\.lflow
Appendix A
00 :01
I
CAL
10-YR PROPOSED DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: P 10
Start of Run: 16Sep 1986, 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sep1986, 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014, 20: 17: 4 7
Basin Model: ProposedSystem
Meteorologic Model: 10 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Show Elements: j All Elements ,3 Volume Units: @ IN Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic v I
Hydro logic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
RearOfBldg 0.005107 18.8 16Sepl 986, 12:07 5.92
FrontOfBldg 0.003094 11.9 16Sepl 986, 12:07 6.38
ProposedBldg 0.000670 2.8 16Sepl 986, 12:07 7.32
Pondl 0.000670 1.6 16Sepl 986, 12: 17 7.32
StudyPt 0.008871 32.0 16Sepl 986, 12:07 6.18
Append ix A
CAL
10 YEAR PROPOSED OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Junction 'StudyPt' Results for Run 'P 1 O'
35
30
25
20
./!?
~
~ 15 +
10 +
t
--Rl.n:P10 ElemertSTUOYPT ResUl:Oli1low
• • • • • • Run:P10 Elemert :FRONTOFBLOO ResUl:O\Aflow
t-
i
+
09 :00 12:00
16Sep1986
15:00
+
+
I
I
18:00
I
r
~
l
1
I
r
21 :OO
---R""P10 Elemert REAROFBLDG ResUl:Ot.tflow
-• -· Run:P10 Elemert: PON01 ResUl:O\Aflow
Appendix A
00 :01
I
CAL
DETENTION POND SUMMARY
FOR 10-YR STORM
Reservoir "Pond 1" Results for Run 'P 1 O"
0.030-1-----+------1r------+-------+1+-------1r------+-----+-----4-313 .05
---·-+-------+-~312.71 f 0.025
~ 0.020 '-312.37 €
Q) ~
g' 0.015 ---_____ _,__ ___ ....._ __ ...._ ___ -~ ----~ 312 .03 w
~ 0.010 .... 311.69
3 .o~---------Jfi ___ l ______ _
~ ~
2.0
~ 1.5 ~
~
0 u: 1.0
0.5
0.0
00 :00 03 :00 06 :00
I
Legend (Compute Time : !8Sep2014, 20 :17 :47)
-- - - --Rll1:P10 Elemert:PQN)1 Resuft :storage
--Rll1:P10 Elemenl:PQN)1 Resuft :Ot.tflow
09 :00
II
I\ ll
12 :00
16Sep1986
+
15 :00
+
+-
18:00 21 :00
Run:P10 Element :POllD1 Resuft:Pool Elevation
---Run:P10 Elemenl :POllD1 Resuft :Cotril:Wled Flow
Appendix A
00 :00
I
CAL
25-YR EXISTING DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: E25
Start of Run: 16Sep 1986, 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sepl 986, 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014, 20: 18: 14
Basin Model: ExistingSystem
Meteorologic Model: 25 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Show Elements: All Elements _::j Volume Units: ® IN Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic ~I
Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharg e Time of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
RearOfBldg 0.004481 19.2 16Sepl 986, 12:07 6.85
FrontOf Bldg 0.004170 18.7 16Sepl 986, 12:07 7.45
StudyPt 0.008651 37.9 16Sepl 986, 12:07 7.14
Appe ndi x A
'
CAL
25 YEAR EXISTING OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Junction 'StudyPt' Results ror Run 'E25"
40
35 + + +
30 t l
25 +
~ 20
~ u:
15
~ ,,
1,
..
10
\ -1 l
r'
J1 \ I I -+
I \ I _j.~~~-1.~~~'"""'SE:~-~-~-=-~-~--==r~r-l/__jl __ ,_'_-~-=-~-;=-==-~-~-=~==;::==-=-~=-=-=i=-=-~==~ 0
00 :00 03 :00 06 :00 09 :00
I
L"llend (Compute Tine : 16Sep2011, 20 :18 :11)
--Rt.ll:E2S Element:STUOYPT Rest.«:Oliflow
----• • Rt.ll:E2S Element:FRONTOfBLOO Rost.«:Oliflow
12 :00
16Sep1986
15 :00 18 :00 21 :OO
- - -Rt.ll:E2S Element:RfAROFBLOO Rest.«:Oliflow
Appendix A
00 :01
I
CAL
25-YR PROPOSED DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: P25
Start of Run: 16Sep 1 986, 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sep1986, 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014, 20: 18: 43
Basin Model: ProposedSystem
Meteorologic Model: 25 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
---,
Show Elements: All Element ~ Volume Units: @ IN Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic v I
Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
RearOfBldg 0.005107 22.1 16Sep1986, 12:07 6.95
FrontOfBldg 0.003094 13.8 16Sep1986, 12:07 7.43
ProposedBldg 0.000670 3.2 16Sep1986, 12:07 8.39
Pondl 0.000670 1.8 16Sep1986, 12: 18 8.39
Study Pt 0.008871 37.4 16Sep1986, 12:07 7.23
Appen di x A
CAL
25 YEAR PROPOSED OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Junction 'St udyPt" Results ror Run 'P25'
40
35
30 +
25
~ 20 +
~ ;;:
15
r
10 t
--R\xl:P25 Element:STOOYPT Resul:O\.tflow
• • •••• R\xl:P25 Element:fRON TOfBLOO Resul:O\.tflow
I
t
I
~
+
09 :00 12:00
16Sep1986
15:00
+
t
18:00
l
+
+
+
21 :00
- - -Run:P25 Elemenl:RfAROfBL OO Resul:O\.tflow
-• -· Run:P25 Element:POK>1 Resul:O\.tflow
Append ix A
00 :01
I
CAL
DETENTION POND SUMMARY
FOR 25-YR STORM
0 .045
0.040
0.035
E o .o3o u ~ 0.025
-t
Q)
~ 0.020
0 (ii 0.015
0.010
0.005
0.000
3 .5
3.0
2.5
2.0
~
~ 1 .5
Li:
1 .0
0 .5
00 :00 03:00 06:00
I
Legend (Compute Time : 185ep2014, 20 :18:43)
- -----Run:P2S ElemertPQllD1 Resul:storage
--Run:P2S ElemertPOllD1 Resul:Outflow
Reservoir 'Pond 1" Results for Run 'P25'
09:00 12:00
16Sep1906
+-
+-
15 :00 10 :00 21:00
Run:P2S Elemert :POllC>1 ResutPool Elevlllion
---Run:P2S Elemert :POllC>1 ResutCombined Flow
Appendix A
314 .00
313 .67
313 .33
313 .00
312 .67 g
312 .33 ~ m
312 .00
311 .67
311 .33
311 .00
00:00
I
CAL
50-YR EXISTING DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: E50
Start of Run: 16Sep 1986) 00 : 00
End of Run: 17Sep1986) 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014) 20: 19: 13
Basin Model: ExistingSystem
Meteorologic Model: 50 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Show Elements: I All Elements ~ Volume Units: @ I N Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic lv]I
Hydrologic Dr a in age Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
RearOfBldg 0.004481 21.6 16Sep1986) 12:07 8 .20
FrontOfBldg 0.004170 20 .7 16Sep1986) 12:07 8.82
Study Pt 0.008651 42.3 16Sep1986) 12:07 8.50
Append ix A
45
40
35
30
25
E
~ 20 ;;::
15
10
CAL
50 YEAR EXISTING OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
t
"t
+-
+-
..
+-
Junction •studyPt' Results ror Run 'E50 '
+ +
+
+ +
t
t
I t
1
L
o .l...-~-....---=--,......-=====:::;:::=.:.::::::_J__:::::::::::==::::=~:=:=::==~===:===J
00 :00 03:00 06 :00 09 :00
I
Le~end (C~e Time : 18Sep201i, 20:19:13)
--Rtn:ESO Elemenl:STUDYPT ReslA:OIJflow
------Rtn:ESO Elemenl:FRONTOFBLOO Res<Ao.tf1ow
12 :00
16Sep1986
15:00 18 :00 21 :00
- --Rtn:ESO ElemertREAROFBLOO Res<Ao.tflow
Appendix A
00 :01
I
CAL
50-YR PROPOSED DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: P50
Start of Run: 16Sep 1 986, 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sep1986, 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014, 20: 19:40
Basin Model: ProposedSystem
Meteorologic Model: 50 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Show Elements: Al~lements ~I Volume Units: @ IN Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydro logic v I
Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
RearOfBldg 0.005107 24.7 16Sep1986, 12:07 8.31
Front Of Bldg 0.003094 15.4 16Sep1986, 12:07 8.80
ProposedBldg 0.000670 3.5 16Sep1986, 12:07 9.79
Pondl 0.000670 1.9 16Sep1986, 12: 18 9.79
StudyPt 0.008871 41.7 16Sep1986, 12:07 8.59
A p pendi x A
CAL
50 YEAR PROPOSED OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Jun cti on 'Stu dyPt" Res ult s ror Run 'P50 '
45
40
35
30
25
l!1 ~
~ 20 <;::
15 ...
10
09 :00
--R\Jn:PSO Element:STLOYPT Res<.t:Ooiflow
------R\Jn:PSO Element:FRON TOfBLOO ReslAl:OtJflow
12:00
1 6Sep1 986
15:00
...
...
1 8:00
t
-1-
~
l
~
21 :00
---R\Jn:PSO Elemert:RfAROFBLOO Res<.t:OtJflow
---· Ro.n:P50 Elemerl:POND1 Res<.t:OtJ flow
Appe nd ix A
00:01
I
0.04
E u 0.03 :;.
Q)
Cl
~ 0.02
0
(jj
+
CAL
DETENTION POND SUMMARY
FOR 50-YR STORM
Reservoir 'Pond 1" Results for Run 'P50"
+
+
+
+
...
313 .80
313 .10 g
iii
312.40 iij
0.01 -i-----r-----<1-------t-----.r-"\"---l------+-----+-----·t-311 .70
o .oo~---~----~---~---~--------~---~----~311 .00
4 .0~---~-----------------------------~
3.5 --+-+--+ ---
3.0 --+-
2.5 +
~ 2.0
~ Li: 1.5
1.0 + +
0.5 +
o.o~==~==:=;:=====:=;;:::::::___.----==:;::::=====:;::===r===~
00 :00 03 :00 06 :00 09 :00
I
Legend (Compute T1111e: 18Sep2014, 20 :19 :40 )
---- --Rl.fl:PSO Element:POllD1 ReslA :Slorage
--Rl.fl: PSO Element: POllD1 ReslA : Otiftow
12 :00
16Sep1986
15:00 18 :00 21 :00
Run :PSO Element:POND1 ReslA:Pool Elevation
---Run:PSO Element:POND1 ReslA:Combined Flow
Appendix A
00 :00
I
l
CAL
100-YR EXISTING DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: E 100
Start of Run: 16Sep 1 986, 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sep1986, 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014, 20: 20: 11
Basin Model: ExistingSystem
Meteorologic Model: 100 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Show Elements : All Elements v I Volume Units: @ IN Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic fvJI
Hydrologic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
RearOfBldg 0.004481 23.8 1 6Sep1986, 12:07 9.37
FrontOfBldg 0.004170 22 .7 1 6Sep1986, 12:07 10.00
StudyPt 0.008651 46.5 1 6Sep1986, 12:07 9.68
Append ix A
50
45
40
35
30
~ 25
~ ;;:
20
1 5
10
CAL
100 YEAR EXISTING OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Jun ction 'Stu dyPt' Re sults for Run 'E 100 '
+
+
+
+
'
+ ~
I I
11 ii ---+----+
+
I
+-
+-+ -
+-
I
+ l
-+----1-
. } \ ~ t -1------+-~-~"f, =-~-;;:-~-:::'---:;,;, __ -::!/ I .. \._r------;------·-
00 :00 03:00 06:00 09 :00 12:00 15 :00 18 :00 21 :OO
I 16Sep1 98 6
Legend (Compute rune: 18Sep2014, 20:20: 11)
--Ro.n:E100 Element:STUOYPT Resul:Oo.tflow ---Ro.n:E100 Element:RE AROFBLOO Resul:Oo.t flow
------Ro.n:E1 00 Elemenl:fRONT OFBLOO Resul :O..C flow
Ap p e ndi x A
00 :01
I
CAL
100-YR PROPOSED DISCHARGE SUMMARY
Project: Cal Simulation Run: P 100
Start of Run: 16Sep 1986 > 00: 00
End of Run: 17Sep1986> 00:00
Compute Time: 18Sep2014 > 20: 20: 44
Basin Model: ProposedSystem
Meteorologic Model: 100 YR STORM
Control Specifications: HYDROLOGY
Show Elements: All Elements ~ Volume Units: @ IN Q AC-FT Sorting: I Hydrologic v I
Hydro logic Drainage Area Peak Discharge Time of Peak Volume
Element (MI2) (CFS) (IN)
RearOfBldg 0.005107 27.2 16Sep1986> 12:07 9.48
FrontOfBldg 0.003094 16.9 16Sep1986> 12:07 9.98
Proposed Bldg 0.000670 3.8 16Sep1986> 12:07 10.99
Pondl 0.000670 2.0 16Sep1986> 12: 19 10.99
StudyPt 0.008871 45.8 16Sep1986> 12:07 9.77
A ppe ndi x A
CAL
100 YEAR PROPOSED OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH
Junction 'StudyPt" Results tor Run 'P 1 00 '
50
45 T
40
35 ..
30
~ 25
~ u:
20 ~
15 I-+
I
10 ~
I
t
1
11
1
I
It
11
I.I
~1 r:r
~ :1 l••I Ii\!.;
l' ·1
1/ \1 /, ·I
+
..
I t
_'_J: "\ /: \\
0 .J., -----=~ ..... ==n;<i~:o~;;_ :::-~=~1.::::::-.~::L°~ ,' ....::~?.=:::~:::::~=~,.,:~.~r--".U:F...-.-r.
I
00 :00 09 :00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21 :oo 03 :00 06:00
I 16Sep1986
Legend (Compute Tme: 18Sep2011, 20:20 :11)
--RlXl:P100 Elemert:S TUOYPT Resl.t:Oliflow ---Rui:P100 Elemert:REAROfBLOO Resul:O\t11ow
• ·---• Rui:P100 Elemert:fRONTOfBLOO Resl.t:Oliflow -• -· Rui:P100 Elemert:f'Ollll1 Resl.t:Oliflow
Append ix A
I
00 :01
I
CAL
DETENTION POND SUMMARY
FOR 100-YR STORM
0.06
0.05
I=' 0.04 ...._
u
~ 0.03 Q)
Cl
!!
B 0.02 -CJ)
0.01
0.00
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
I ~ 2.0 t ~
~ 1.5 -... Li:
1 .0 ...
0.5 -+
0.0
00 :00 03 :00 06 :00
I
Legend (Compute Tme : IBSep20 14, 20 :20:44)
------RlJ'l :P100 Element:POl\01 Result: storage
--RlJ'l :P100 Element :POl\01 Result:Outflow
Reservoir 'Pond 1" Results for Run "P 1 DD"
09 :00 12 :00
16Sep1986
15:00
l
18:00 21 :00
RlJ'l:P100 Element :POND1 Result:Pool Elevllllion
- --RlJ'l:P100 Element :POND1 Restk.Cornbned Flow
Appendix A
315.00
314 .33
313.67
g
-313.00 ~ w
312 .33
311 .67
311 .00
00 :00
I
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO . 14-265
Crrv OF C OLL EGE ST ATI ON
P!,;11111i11$ t} lln'tllipmrnt ."Wn iM
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A000701
Crawford Burnett (ICL)
Tract 187
DATE OF ISSUE: 12/18/2014
OWNER:
Jon Hall -College Station ISO
2000 Welsh Street
College Station, TX 77845
SITE ADDRESS:
1300 George Bush Dr, College Station , TX 77845
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Wolf Pen Creek
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Development Permit
CONDITIONS:
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein . If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-
issued.
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
4 . Other permits may have been required to fulfill local, state and federal requirements . Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits.
5 . Stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing
drainage facilities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site , it is the
Contractor 's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State, and Federal requirements .
7 . All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy .
8 . All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as, but not limited to , paint , oil ,
solvents , asphalt, concrete , mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited .
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station, as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines, Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed .
10. Special Conditions : TXDOT permit has not been approved, prcoeed at own risk . Landscape plans have not been
approved , and needs to be address prior full building permit.
l ,_,,.E~rz..=1....;c..=-..... &---"'-'-"'1::'~7 ,..../ £_ .... S" _____ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein .
Contractor Signature Date~ /'
-z, 10 -Sb3 -Zto °t
Phone number E-mail
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contact Jed7 Jo )'tt ~ 111-l/S'jl/ , the Public Works
Inspector assigned to this project 24 hours prior to beginning construction for scheduling required Inspections .
ll -/~ -).OJlf
Ci Date
Danielle Singh , P.E.
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station , TX 77842
MITCHELL
M M
MORGAN
Re: CSISD COLLEGE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL (CAL) -TxDOT PERMIT
Dear Danielle ,
November 21 , 2014
Please see below for our response to the TxDOT comments for the CSISD College View
High School (CAL) TxDOT permit:
TxDOT
1. Proposed median does not meet the TxDOT access management guidelines for a
right-in I right-out only access point, the median needs to be more substantial so there
is no question regarding the intended function of this access point , also required is a
restriping eliminating the left turn lane assuring south bound traffic no option to left into
property from George Bush Or . Before access can be approved these revisions must
be implemented into the property 's proposed plan and commercial acces s
request. We look forward to reviewing the revised proposal for access on the land us e
I access change .
Response: The median has been modified to be more substantial to direct
users in a manner that discourages left in/left out movements. Becaus~ of the
limited throat depth available, we had to remove two existing parking spaces to
modify the driveway median as shown. It was also our understanding in a
previous meeting with TxDOT that they had agreed to restripe George Bush
Drive as to not allow the left in movement.
If o have any questions or comments , please feel free to call our office at 979-260 -6963 .
Veronica J . . or
Manag ing Partner
Cc : File
----J
) PE , CFM
3204 EARL RUDDER FWY. S. • COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 • T 979 .260 .6963 • F 979 .260.3564
CIVIL ENGINEERING • HYDRAULICS • HYDROLOGY • UTILITIES STREETS • SITE PLANS • SUBDIVISIONS
info@m1tchellandmorgan com • www.m1tchellandmorgan com
Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities
on Highway Right of Way
PERMIT NUMBER:
GPS* ROADWAY
REQUESTOR LATITUDE, LONGITUDE HWY NAME FM
30°36 '45.49"N , 96°19 '48.90 FOR TxDOT'S USE
CONTROL
NAME College Station Independent School District SECTION
MAILING ADDRESS 2000 Welsh
CITY , STATE , ZIP College Station , Texas 77840
PHONE NUMBER Theo Rouse 979-694-5634
•GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM COORDINATES AT INTERSECTION OF DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE llVITH ABUTIING ROADWAY
Form 1058
(Rev . 05 /13 )
Page 1of 2
2347
The Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the State , hereby authorizes College Station Independent School District ,
hereinafter called the Permittee , to 0 construct I ~ reconstruct a School (residential , convenience
store , retail mall , farm , etc.) access driveway on the highway right of way abutting highway number FM2347 in Brazos County
County , located approximately 340-feet southwest of the intersection of George Bush Drive (FM2347) and Halik Street
USE ADDITIONAL SH EETS AS NEEDED
Subject to the Access Driveway Policy described on page 2 and the following :
1. The undersigned hereby agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in this permit for construction and maintenance
of an access driveway on the state highway right of way .
2 . Design of facilities shall be as follows and/or as shown on sketch on page 2 and is subject to conditions stated below :
We are requesting to modify the existing driveway located approximately 340-feet southwest of the intersection of George
Bush Drive (FM2347) and Halik Street by adding a median that will limit the drivers to right-in right-out maneuvers only.
Please see the attached site plan for the driveway layout and the construction plan sheet with the construction details.
All construction of materials shall be subject to inspection and approva l by the State .
3. Maintenance of facilit ies constructed hereunder shall be the responsibility of the Permittee , and the State reserves the right to
require any changes, maintenance or repairs as may be necessary to provide protection of life or property on or adjacent to the
highway . Changes in design will be made only with approval of the State .
4. The Permittee shall hold harmless the State and its duly appointed agents and employees against any action for personal injury or
property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit.
5. Except for regulatory and guide signs at county roads and city streets , the Permittee shall not erect any sign on or extending over
any portion of the highway right of way , and vehicle service fixtures such as fuel pumps , vendor stands , or tanks and shall be
located at least 12 feet from the right of way line to ensure that any vehicle services from these fixtures will be off the highway right
of way .
6. The State reserves the right to require a new access driveway permit in the event of a material change in land use or change in
driveway traffic volume or vehicle types .
7. This permit will become null and void if the above-referenced driveway facilities are not constructed within six (6) months from the
issuance date of this permit.
8. The Permittee will contact the State 's representative----------------------------
telephone , ( ) , at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to beginning the work authorized by this permit.
9 . The requesting Permittee will be provided instructions on the appeal process if this permit request is denied by the State .
Date of Issuance
The undersigned hereby agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set fort
access driveway on the highway right of way .
State Authorized Representative
Date : / t) /Y / t.j Signed :
1 -----;n=-:::-:-::.t-:i:f-:-'.:::--::-c"'=-::r--t:cw~n~e~r~s~r~e=pr~e~s~e=nt~a7-ti~ve~):---~
'Fonn 10 58 (Rev . 05 /1 3)
Page 2 of 2
Access Driveway Policy
Title 43 Texas Administrative Code (Transportation), Chapter 11 (Design), Subchapter C (Access Connections To State Highways) and
the "Access Management Manual" establish policy for the granting of access and the design , materials , and construction of driveways
connecting to state highways . All driveway facilities must follow this policy .
TxDOT Driveway Permit Request Contact
For a local contact for your TxDOT Driveway Permit Request visit: http ://www .txdot.gov/inside-txdot/district .html. You can click on the
section of the map closest to your location to find the local TxDOT office . You can also click on the drop down box below the map to
find the district for your county.
Sketch of Installation
(Use additional sheets as needed}
..
COLLEGE STATION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTR ICT
CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING
WATER LINE ANALYSIS
October 2014
PR EPARE D FOR :
COLLEGE STATION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
1812 WELSH AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840
Submitted to
LLEGE TA I N
1l f heart of tht Rmarch Vall~
By
MITCHELL
MORGAN
ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS
3204 EARL RUDDER FREEWAY SOUTH
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845
OFFICE (979) 260-6963
FAX (979) 260-3564
CERTIFICATION
This report for the water design for The CSISD-Center or Alternative Learning in College
Station , Texas, was prepared under my supervision in accordance with provisions of the
Bryan/College Station Unified D~~r,uidelines for the owners of the property .
............ '"'' ---~€.OF r~ l\
: "\~ ············ :.t ..... ,
-<":) •• ··*.· ... --.IS\, : ...• •• ••• -tr ,l ~..... .....~ ~······························· .. ·····~ ~ VERONICA J.B. MORGAN I 1.·······································it ~ l \ 77689 .if£ J ~l1~· ... '9~G ,,«,<:)_ .• ·~.f ,ey(C, 'ff I ;r.,. ... /STE .... ·,..~,, '\S's ············· ~v: ,,,,!ONAL ~ .... --=-
''''''''"'-Jb.,.-._ Veronica J .B. Morgan , P.E ., C.F .M. t1Zt(-rr/#~
Registered Professional Engineer
State of Texas No. 77689
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Page 1
INTRODUCTION
WATERLINE ANALYSIS
CSISD-CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE LEARNING
OCTOBER 2014
The College Station Independent School District Center for Alternative Learning (CAL) will be
located in College Station , Te xas, at the address 1300 George Bush Drive, College Station, Texas
77840 . Prior to demolition, the site contained the City of College Station Conference Center, a
portion of the Barbara Bush Parent Center, the Venture and Leap Buildings and Timber Academy .
The project will be redeveloped into a two-story 56 ,006 square foot building for an alternative
learning center, adjacent to the Barbara Bush Parent Center and Oakwood Intermediate School.
The proposed development will be located on the A000701, Crawford Burnett (ICL), Tract 187 .
The tract is bounded by George Bush Drive to the northwest, Timber Street to the southwest, Hal ik
Street to the northeast, and Oakwood Intermediate School to the southeast. The utility plan is
provided in Exhibit 1.
FIRE FLOW DESIGN CRITERIA
An updated City of College Station system MikeURBAN model was used to model hydraulic events
on the existing distribution system . Select Node and Link labels located near the proposed project
can be seen on Exhibits 2 & 3 respective ly. In order to determine if this model is repetitive, two
calibrat ion runs were performed :
• Run 1 -Peak Day Conditions without CAL Development (Exhibit 4A&B)
• Run 2 -Peak Day Conditions without CAL Development and 1300 GPM Fire Flow at Node
J-025 (Exhibit SA&B)
The results from these runs were compared to the fire flow pressure test performed by the City of
College Station Utilities Department (Exhibit 6). College Station Utilities performed the fire flow
test during the 9 a.m . hour. In order to closely replicate actual system conditions during the field
tests, RUNS 1 & 2 were modeled using the system average day demands .
Utiliz ing results obta ined from RUN 1, static pressure at Node J-024 was found. Shown on Table
1, the modeled pressure is slightly below actual observed pressures during field testing . A
simulated fire flow of 1300 gpm was then added to Node J-025 (RUN 2). The mode led residua l
pressure (79 .19 psi) results were slightly higher than the actual observed residual pressure (76 psi).
A comparison of measured and modeled values for the fire flow calibration run can be found on
Table 1 :
CSISD-Cente r for Alterna tive Learning Pa ge 2
,\
FLOW HYDRANT
Measured Modeled
No de Number J-025
Nozzle size 2 .5
Pitot rea d in in PSI 60 7 3 .33
F l ow in G.P .M. 1300 1300
STATIC HYDRANT
Measured Modeled
Node Num b er J-024
Static PS I 80 79.9
Residua l PSI 76 7 9 .19
Tabl e 1
Fire Flow of 1300 gpm placed at Node J-025 and
Corresponding Pressure Measured at Node J-024
Since the model returned values relatively similar, or conservative, to those actually observed during
the calibration event it is considered a reasonable base model. This base mode l was used to
determ ine CAL's effects on the system during Average , Peak and Fire Flow conditions.
CAL DEMANDS
Water demands for CAL were determined by the project MEP, Estes, McClure & Associates, Inc.
Using the fixture unit count method for the proposed schoo l, the average day demand was 35.75
GPM . The Peak Day demand from this fixture unit method is calculated as 143 gpm .
CAL FIRE FLOWS
CAL will be a 56,006 SF school fac ility and be constructed using Type 11-B construction. Using Table
B 105 .1 of t h e International Fire Code 2012 (Exhibit 7) t he requ ired fire f low fo r a building this size
and construction type is 5,000 GPM. Since the struct u re will ha ve a fire suppression system, the
required fire flow can be d ecreased by 50% resulti n g in a req u ired fire flow of 2,500 gpm
min imum.
Two different fire flow simulations were modeled to better understand the system under different
fire flow conditions . For the first simula t ion, the requ ired f ire f lo w was split between Nodes C.A.L.-
3 and C.A.L.-4 during peak day demand. Results from this simula ti on can be seen on Exhibit 10
A&B . The second simu lation had the requ ired fire flow evenly d istributed among three nodes : J-
023, C.A.L.-3, and C.A.L.-4 . Results from this simu lation can be seen on Exhibit 11 A&B.
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM UPGRADES
CAL currently has availab le a 6 inch waterline in Timber Street to connect to for a fire hydrant run
to the rear of the CAL bu ilding where the Fire Department Connection (FDC) will be located. This 6
inch line when mode led was u nable to handle the ·required fire fl ows for the b uilding . As a resu lt
CAL will require the construction of approximately 360 LF of 8" PVC waterline (C.A.L-WL & C.A.L.-
FH) connected to the existing 16 inch waterline along George Bush Drive wit h in the CAL parking
lot A fire hydrant w ill be placed at the end of this extens ion (Node C.A.L.-3). Another fire hydrant
CSISD -Center for Alternative Learning Page 3
"
placed will be placed at Node C.A.L.-4, connecting directly to the existing 16 inch waterline
running parallel to George Bush Drive. With the addition of these two fire hydrants the building will
be adequately covered in compliance with the City of College Station Fire Department building
coverage and Engineering waterline design guidelines.
CONCLUSION
Average Day and Peak Day system performance with the proposed CAL demands can be seen on
Exhibits 8A&B and 9A&B respectively . In all scenarios, the 20 psi minimum pressure and velocities
at or below 12 ft/sec guidelines have been met. The model results show that with the system
upgrades as proposed the system can sufficiently serve the domestic and fire flow needs of CAL .
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Page 4
,,
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 3
EXHIBIT 4A
EXHIBIT 4B
EXHIBIT SA
EXHIBIT SB
EXHIBIT 6
EXHIBIT 7
EXHIBIT SA
EXHIBIT SB
EXHIBIT 9A
EXHIBIT 98
EXHIBIT 10A
EXHIBIT 108
EXHIBIT 11A
EXHIBIT 11B
Utility Plan
MikeURBAN Node Locations
MikeURBAN Link Locations
Average Day System Dynamics Node Results
Average Day System Dynamic s Link Results
Average Day Calibration Run with Fire Flow at J-025 Node Results
Average Day Calibration Run with Fire Flow at J-025 Link Results
Node J-025 Flow Test
IFC Fire Flow Table
Average Day Demands with System Improvements Node Resu lts
Average Day Demands with System Improvements Link Results
Peak Day Demands with System Improvements Node Results
Peak Day Demands with System Improvements Link Results
Peak Day Demands and Fire Flow with System Improvements (Nodes CAL-3 &
CAL-4) Node Re sults
Peak Day Demands and Fire Flow with System Improvements (Nodes CAL-3 &
CAL-4) Link Results
Peak Day Demands and Fire Flo w with System Improvements (Nodes J-023,
CA L-3 , & CAL-4) Link Res ults
Peak Day Demands and Fire Flow with System Improvements Nodes J-023, CAL-
3, & CAL-4) Link Results
CSISD -Center for Alternative Learning Page 5
EXHIBIT 2
MikeURBAN Node Identifiers
Description: Select MikeURBAN Node Locations
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 2
EXHIBIT 3
Mike URBAN Link Identifiers
Description: Select MikeURBAN Link Locations
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 3
EXHIBIT 4A
MikeURBAN Node Identifiers
Description: Steady St ate Anal ys is-Average Day D emand on Exi sting Sys tem
Node Results
Name
Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
508 3.22275 91.14093
567 1.0455 93.3026
572 0 92 .98977
573 1.289 92 .98132
591 0 91.37807
601 1.87625 92.81099
604 1.31775 92 .81004
611 0 90.67873
614 0.2435 88.08528
615 0 88.44802
643 0 85.45837
647 1.2605 80 .41084
651 0 86.46796
657 1.7905 83 .1592
659 2 .57825 76 .97074
665 0 .98825 85 .50809
673 0 .58725 84 .21248
674 1.461 79 .94653
677 0 .8165 79.23856
684 1.2175 80 .03337
702 5 .91525 83.21359
C.A.L.-1 0 79 .76063
C.A.L.-2 0 82 .2781
C.A.L.-3 0 81.88813
C.A.L.-4 0 82 .05659
J-023 0 83 .75366
J-024 0 79.90053
J-025 0 80.02349
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 4A
EXHIBIT4B
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Description: Steady State Analysis-Average Day Demand on Existin g System
Link Results
Name Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction
(in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift) Factor
108 8 0 .041759 0 .003224 90 0 .079366
110 8 0 .062329 0.006901 90 0 .076265
121 6 0.194315 0 .034072 140 0 .029057
135 6 0.376775 0.267321 90 0 .060635
16 8 0.212165 0.054256 100 0 .051748
2080 8 0.008163 0 90 0
2087 6 0 .365677 0.128298 130 0 .030894
23-A 6 0.541488 0 .230974 140 0.025365
23-B 6 0 .541488 0.231313 140 0 .025403
2459 0 .75 0.063133 0 .091097 100 0.091993
2460 6 0 .070363 0 .012158 90 0 .079071
2461 6 0.058163 0 .008454 90 0.080473
2588-A 16 0.922026 0.261909 120 0.026454
2588-B 16 0.922026 0 .262106 120 0 .026474
26 6 0.36844 0.11702 140 0 .027758
2631 6 0.156298 0 .023125 140 0 .030481
27 6 0.365677 0 .252952 90 0.060911
28 8 0 .310277 0 .082404 140 0 .027562
3350 16 0 .948119 0.27613 120 0 .026376
3351-A 16 0.843868 0.223487 120 0 .026948
3351-B 16 0 .843867 0 .147092 150 0 .017736
3351 -C 16 0 .843867 0 .222509 120 0 .02683
3351-D 16 0 .843867 0 .222464 120 0 .026825
3830 6 0 .310277 0 .186777 90 0 .062471
3831 6 0 .272662 0 .120986 100 0.052401
3835 6 0.365677 0 .252559 90 0 .060817
456 6 0.330594 0 .092603 140 0 .027283
64 6 0 .36844 0 .113138 140 0.026837
849 6 0 .171235 0 .051156 100 0.056178
850 6 0 .1 8505 0 .071661 90 0 .067384
854 8 0 .168609 0.035457 100 0 .053547
865 8 0.197531 0 .058758 90 0 .064654
866 8 0 .189303 0 .04398 100 0.052691
867 6 0 .076886 0 .011585 100 0 .063103
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 48
Name
98
C.A.L.-FH
C.A.L.-WL
EXHIBIT4B
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Link Results
Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness
(in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift)
8 0 .177327 0 .038461 100
8 3 .38E -08 0 150
8 3 .28E -06 0 150
CSISD -Ce nter fo r Alternative Learning
Friction
Factor
0 .052512
0
0
Ex hibit 4 8
EXHIBIT SA
MikeURBAN Node Identifiers
Des cription: Steady State Analys i s-Calibration run , 1300 gpm fire flo w placed at node J-025
and residual pressure measured at node J-024 during Average D ay D emand on
Exi sting System .
Node Results
Name Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
508 3.22275 90.52787
567 1.0455 92 .5639
572 0 92 .23837
573 1.289 92 .231
591 0 90 .44557
601 1.87625 92 .08323
604 1.31775 92 .08865
611 0 89 .24388
614 0.2435 86 .506
615 0 86 .85785
643 0 82.4754
647 1.2605 79 .70017
651 0 84 .32285
657 1.7905 79 .24432
659 2 .57825 76 .27298
665 0.98825 83 .60236
673 0.58725 82 .48528
674 1.461 74 .12666
677 0 .8165 73.50551
684 1.2175 74.88306
702 5.91525 80.73854
C.A.L.-1 0 79.05456
C.A.L.-2 0 81.57203
C.A.L.-3 0 81.18206
C.A.L.-4 0 81.37113
J-023 0 83 .10529
J-024 0 79 .19179
J-025 1300 73 .33995
CSISD -Center fo r Altern ative Le a rning Exhibit SA
EXHIBIT SB
MikeURBAN L ink Id entifiers
D es cription: Stead y State Anal ysi s -Calib ration run , 1300 gp m fue flow pl aced at node J-025
and res idual pr essure measured at n od e J -024 during Av erage Day De mand on
Ex i sting Syste m.
Link Results
Name Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction
(in) (ft/s) (ft} (millift) Factor
108 8 0.591561 0.440801 90 0.05408
110 8 0 .612131 0 .469673 90 0 .053815
121 6 3 .526235 7.423256 140 0 .019223
135 6 1.866416 5.178869 90 0 .047871
16 8 0 .527655 0 .293512 100 0 .04526
2080 8 0.654171 0 .531414 90 0.053314
2087 6 1.926984 2 .78093 130 0.024115
23-A 6 8 .038713 34.14833 140 0 .017016
23 -B 6 6 .712597 24 .45489 140 0 .017476
2459 0 .75 0.499531 4.199717 100 0 .067742
2460 6 1 .302445 2.659773 90 0 .050487
2461 6 1 .299037 2.647 111 90 0 .050511
2588-A 16 1 .165313 0.404363 1 20 0 .025569
2588-B 16 1.165313 0.405969 120 0.02567
26 6 1.924221 2.420466 140 0 .02105
2631 6 0 .648514 0 .322601 140 0 .024699
27 6 1.926984 5.494435 90 0 .047645
28 8 3 .223258 6 .285 3 11 140 0 .01948
3350 16 1.260624 0 .467895 1 20 0 .02528 1
3351-A 16 0 .032857 0 1 20 0
3351 -B 1 6 0.032857 0 .000377 1 50 0 .029959
3351 -C 16 0 .032857 0 .000475 120 0 .03776 1
3351 -D 16 0 .032857 0 .000545 120 0 .043367
3830 6 3 .223258 14.24609 90 0 .0441 5 3
3831 6 1.75002 1 3.781877 100 0 .039763
3835 6 1.926984 5.494216 90 0 .0 4 7644
456 6 3.20294 6 .21 2136 140 0 .0 19498
64 6 1.924221 2 .41774 2 140 0 .02 1026
849 6 3 .549315 14.01076 100 0 .035812
850 6 3 .5355 16 .90699 90 0 .04355 3
854 8 1.786233 2 .807907 100 0 .037783
865 8 0 .429757 0 .24 23 78 90 0 .0563 43
CSISD -Ce nter fo r Alternative Lea rning Ex hibit S B
Name
866
867
98
C.A.L.-FH
C.A .L.-WL
EXHIBIT SB
MikeURBAN L ink Identifiers
Link Results
Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness
(in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift)
8 0 .437985 0 .207799 100
6 0 .123171 0 .027732 100
8 0 .44996 0 .219013 100
8 5 .31E -08 0 1 50
8 2 .05E -07 0 1 50
CSISD -Ce nte r for Alte rn ati v e Le a rning
Friction
Factor
0.046507
0 .058858
0 .046442
0
0
Ex hibit SB
,'
Exhibit 6-
System Field Test Results
:College SlcaJion Utilitie'
Reliable, Affordable, Communit Owned
Date test completed Wednesday September 17, 2014
Time completed 9:45 A.M.
Test completed by Jeff Boriski
Witness Howard Mitchell and Eugene Marshall
I
FLOW HYDRANT
Location 106 Holik
Nozzle size 2.5
Hydrant number J-025
Pitot reading in PSI 60
Flow in G .P .M. 1300
STATIC HYDRANT
Location 101 Lee
Hydrant number J-024
Static PSI 80
Residual PSI 76
,__J
Comments Requested
Ex hibit 6
APPENDIX B
TABLE B105 .1
MINIMUM REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW AND FLOW DURATION FOR BUILDINGS
FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA (square feet) FIRE-FLOW FLOW DURATION
Type IA and 18' Type llA and lllA' Type IV and V-A' Type 118 and 1118' TypeV-8' (gallons per minute)• (hours)
0-22 ,700 0-12 .700 0-8.200 0-5,900 0-3 ,600 l.500
22.701 -30 ,200 12,701 -17.000 8,201-10 ,900 5.901-7 ,900 3,601 -4,800 1.750
30 ,201 -38 , 700 17,001 -21 ,800 10 ,901 -12,900 7,901 -9,800 4,801 -6,200 2,000
2 38,701-48 .300 21.801 -24 .200 12 ,901 -17,400 9.801 -12 ,600 6,201 -7,700 2,250
48 ,301 -59 .000 24,201 -33,200 17 ,401 -21.300 12,601-15.400 7.701 -9,400 2,500
59,001 -70 ,900 33 ,201 -39,700 21,301 -25,500 15,401 -18 ,400 9,401 -11,300 2.750
70,901 -83 ,700 39,701 -47 ,100 25 ,501 -30.100 18,401 -21.800 11 ,301 -13,400 3,000
83,701 -97 ,700 47,101 -54 ,900 30 , 101 -35.200 21,801 -25 ,900 13 ,401 -15,600 3,250
3 97.701 -112 ,700 54,901 -63,400 35,201 -40,600 25,901 -29,300 15,601-18,000 3,500
112 .701 -128 ,700 63 ,401 -72 ,400 40 ,601 -46,400 29.301 -33,500 18 ,001 -20.600 3.750
128 ,701-145 ,900 72.401 -82, l 00 46.401 -52,500 33,501 -37,900 20 .601 -23,300 4.000
145,901 -164 ,200 82 , 101 -92 ,400 52,501 -59,100 37,901 -42 , 700 23 .301-26,300 4,250
164 ,201-183.400 92 ,401 -103 ,100 59 .101 -66,000 42 ,701 -47 ,700 26 ,301 -29,300 4,500
183 ,401-203 ,700 103 ,101 -114,600 66 ,001 -73 ,300 47 ,701 -53,000 29 ,301 -32,600 4,750
203, 701 -225 ,200 114 ,601 -126.700 73 .301 -81 ,100 53,001 -58,600 32 .601 -36,000 5,000
225.201 -247 .700 126 .701 -139 ,400 81,101 -89,200 58 ,601 -65.400 36 ,001 -39,600 5,250
247,701 -271 ,200 139 ,401-152,600 89 .201 -97,700 65,401 -70,600 39,601-43,400 5,500
271,201 -295 ,900 152 ,601 -166,500 97,701 -106,500 70,601 -77,000 43 ,401 -47,400 5,750
295,901 -Greater 166,50 I -Greater 106 ,501 -115 ,800 77.001 -83 , 700 47 ,401 -51.500 6,000 4
--115 ,801 -125,500 83 ,701 -90,600 51,501 -55,700 6,250
--125 .501 -135,500 90 ,601 -97 ,900 55 , 701 -60,200 6,500
--135 ,501-145 ,800 97 ,901 -106 ,800 60 .201-64,800 6.750
--145 ,801 -156,700 106,801 -113 ,200 64 ,801 -69,600 7,000
--156,701 -167 ,900 113 ,201 -121,300 69 ,601-74,600 7,250
--167,901 -179 ,400 121 ,301 -129,600 74 ,601 -79,800 7,500
--179 ,401-191,400 129,601 -138,300 79,801-85,100 7,750
--191 , 401 -Greater 138 ,301 -Greater 85 , 101 -Greater 8,000
For SI : I square foot -0.0929 m2 . I gallon per minute • 3.785 U m. I pound per square inch • 6 .895 kPa .
a. Typ es of constru ction are based on the lntem aCional Building Code .
b. Measured at 20 psi residu al press ure .
Ex hibit 7
446 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE •
EXHIBIT SA
MikeURBAN Node Identifiers
Description: Steady State Anal ys is -Ex ist in g average day dem and on the system with CSISD-
Center for Alternative Learning dem and a dded
Node Results
Name Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
508 3 .22275 91.03932
567 1 .0455 93.21866
572 0 92.90683
573 1.289 92.89859
591 0 91.294
601 1.87625 92 .73207
604 1.31775 92 .73205
611 0 90.59162
614 0.2435 87.9973
615 0 88.35993
643 0 85 .36335
647 1.2605 80.28718
651 0 86.37648
657 1 .7905 83 .06024
659 2 .57825 76 .84698
665 0.98825 85.41752
673 0.58725 84 .12267
674 1.461 79 .83895
677 0 .8165 79.13113
684 1.2175 79 .92695
702 5 .91525 83 .1114
C.A.L.-1 0 79 .63686
C.A.L.-2 35 .75 82 .15039
C.A.L.-3 0 81.76042
C.A.L.-4 0 81.93481
J-023 0 83 .63544
J-024 0 79.77684
J-025 0 79.91324
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit SA
EXHIBIT 8B
MikeURBAN L ink Identifiers
D es cription: Steady State Analysis-Existing average day dem and on th e system with CSIS D-
Cente r fo r A lte rnative Leaming d em and ad d ed
Link Results
Name Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction
(in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift) Factor
108 8 0 .198396 0 .058301 90 0 .063592
110 8 0 .177825 0.047495 90 0 .064484
121 6 0 .148748 0 .020443 140 0 .029752
135 6 0 .301699 0.177187 90 0 .062681
16 8 0 .043952 0 .002987 100 0 .066375
2080 8 0.16868 0.04207 90 0 .063481
2087 6 0.337299 0 .110031 130 0 .031141
23-A 6 0 .436339 0 .154834 140 0.026186
23-B 6 0.436339 0 .154964 140 0.026208
2459 0 .75 0 .047014 0.052649 100 0 .095875
2460 6 0 .101314 0 .023531 90 0 .073816
2461 6 0 .089366 0 .018367 90 0 .074052
2588-A 16 0 .919382 0.260879 120 0 .026501
2588-B 16 0 .919382 0 .260135 120 0 .026426
26 6 0 .340062 0 .092384 140 0.025724
2631 6 0 .102271 0 .010542 140 0 .032454
27 6 0 .337299 0 .218156 90 0 .061743
28 8 0 .250696 0 .055478 140 0 .028424
3350 16 0 .937878 0 .2705 1 6 1 20 0 .026407
3351-A 16 0 .856011 0 .228624 120 0 .026791
3351-B 16 0 .798964 0 .132967 150 0 .017886
3351-C 16 0 .798964 0 .201144 1 20 0 .027057
3351-0 16 0 .798964 0 .201017 120 0 .02704
3830 6 0 .250696 0.125733 90 0 .064418
3831 6 0 .243153 0 .097837 100 0 .053284
3835 6 0 .337299 0 .217832 90 0 .061652
456 6 0.271013 0 .06407 140 0 .028088
64 6 0 .340062 0.097699 140 0 .027204
849 6 0 .125667 0 .028914 100 0.058955
850 6 0 .139483 0 .04238 90 0 .070142
854 8 0 .108968 0 .015683 100 0.056704
865 8 0 .02105 0 90 0
866 8 0 .012823 0 .001476 100 0 .385346
CSISD -Center for Alternative Learning Ex hibit SB
Name
867
98
C.A.L.-FH
C.A.L.-WL
EXHIBIT 8B
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Link Results
Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness
(in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift)
6 0 .06469 1 0 .001921 100
8 0.000847 0 .001068 100
8 3.21E-06 0 150
8 0.228187 0 .029242 150
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning
Friction
Factor
0 .014779
63 .8799 1
0
0 .024111
Exhibit 88
EXHIBIT 9A
MikeURBAN Node Identifiers
Description: Steady State Analysis-Ex isting p eak day demand on th e system with CS I SD-
Center for Alte rnati ve Leaming demand added
Node Resu Its
Name Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
508 12 .891 78 .81644
567 4 .182 81.84978
572 0 81.58012
573 5 .156 81.58332
591 0 79.92628
601 7 .505 81.65953
604 5 .271 81.72998
611 0 79 .11002
614 0.974 76.48295
615 0 76 .84319
643 0 73 .56509
647 5 .042 67 .57499
651 0 74.73604
657 7 .162 71.08646
659 10.313 64.11324
665 3 .953 73 .81535
673 2.349 72.55225
674 5.844 67.53958
677 3.266 66.83436
684 4.87 67 .64958
702 23.661 70 .93759
C.A.L.-1 0 66 .92783
C.A.L.-2 143 69 .39381
C.A.L.-3 0 69 .00385
C.A.L.-4 0 69 .24245
J-023 0 70 .97307
J-024 0 67.06146
J-025 0 67 .54544
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 9A
EXHIBIT 9B
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Description: Steady State Analys is-Existin g Peak Day demand on the system with CSIS D -
Center for Alternative Leaming demand ad ded
Link Results
Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction Name (in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift) Factor
108 8 1.675799 3 .032416 90 0 .046359
110 8 1.593519 2.762525 90 0.046707
121 6 0.504253 0.202163 140 0 .025601
135 6 1.670398 4 .216955 90 0.048665
16 8 2.268328 4.370818 100 0 .036471
2080 8 1.26719 1.807362 90 0 .048323
2087 6 0.802453 0 .548879 130 0 .027447
23-A 6 1.641254 1.80079 140 0 .021526
23-B 6 1.641254 1.800989 140 0 .021528
2459 0.75 0.8407 2.400413 100 0 .01367
2460 6 0 .524901 0.494148 90 0.057751
2461 6 0.493182 0.440359 90 0.058297
2588-A 16 0.245442 0 .022484 120 0 .032047
2588-B 16 0 .245442 0.022663 120 0.032303
26 6 0 .791401 0 .465 140 0 .023906
2631 6 0.442587 0.158981 140 0.026134
27 6 0.802453 1 .084727 90 0.054242
28 8 1 .284583 1.143901 140 0 .022321
3350 16 0 .19966 0 .015405 120 0 .033181
3351-A 16 0 .468198 0 .075138 120 0 .029432
3351-B 16 0 .240013 0.014314 150 0.021336
3351-C 16 0.240013 0.021681 120 0.032317
3351-D 16 0 .240013 0.021659 120 0.032284
3830 6 1.284583 2 .592787 90 0 .050594
3831 6 0.805339 0.898378 100 0 .044602
3835 6 0.802453 1.084952 90 0 .054253
456 6 1.203315 1.013474 140 0.022538
64 6 0.791401 0 .466481 140 0 .023983
849 6 0 .596573 0 .51538 100 0 .046629
850 6 0.541312 0.523203 90 0.057495
854 8 1.249849 1.449297 100 0 .039832
865 8 1.71857 3 .176619 90 0 .046177
866 8 1.75148 2.70759 100 0.037894
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 9B
EXHIBIT 9B
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Link Results
Name Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction
(in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift) Factor
867 6 0 .773871 0 .834467 100 0 .044867
98 8 1 .799382 2.846099 100 0 .037739
C.A.L.-FH 8 3.36E -06 0 150 0
C.A.L.-WL 8 0.91274 0.382108 150 0 .019692
CSISD -Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 9B
EXHIBIT lOA
MikeURBAN Node I denti fi ers
Description: Steady State Analysis -Existing peak day demand on the system wi th CSISD-
Center for Alternative Learning demand and 125 0 gpm fire flow ad ded to nodes
C .A.L.-3 and C .A.L.-4
Node Results
Name Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
508 12 .891 71.87743
567 4 .182 76 .00895
572 0 75 .79523
573 5 .156 75 .81062
591 0 74 .1 2515
601 7.505 76.13941
604 5 .271 76 .28098
611 0 73 .26386
614 0 .974 70 .62386
615 0 70.98313
643 0 67 .43727
647 5 .042 59 .8242
651 0 68 .82667
657 7.162 64 .71566
659 10.313 56 .49504
665 3 .953 68 .04424
673 2 .349 66 .88827
674 5 .844 60.68788
677 3 .266 59.99247
684 4 .87 60.87565
702 23.661 64 .48981
C.A.L.-1 0 59 .1366
C.A.L.-2 143 58 .16513
C.A.L.-3 1250 57 .2859
C.A.L.-4 1250 61.44328
J-023 0 63 .2758
J-024 0 59 .33034
J-025 0 60.54472
CSISD-C e nter for Altern a tive Le a rning Ex hib it lO A
EXHIBIT lOB
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Description: Steady State Analys is-Ex isting pe ak d ay demand on the system with CSIS D -
Center for Alternative Learning demand and 1250 gpm fire flow add ed to nodes
C .A.L.-3 and C.A.L.-4
Link Results
Name Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction
(in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift) Factor
108 8 2 .603448 6 .856911 90 0.043433
110 8 2.521168 6.460946 90 0 .04364
121 6 1.223366 1.044889 140 0 .022481
135 6 2 .65177 9.924881 90 0.045447
16 8 3.301372 8 .758145 100 0 .0345
2080 8 1.985207 4 .149461 90 0.045204
2087 6 0 .989822 0 .809724 130 0.026612
23-A 6 3 .160399 6.060151 140 0.019537
23-B 6 3 .160399 6 .060241 140 0 .019537
2459 0 .75 0.600946 5.914154 100 0 .065915
2460 6 1.14131 2 .082874 90 0 .051488
2461 6 1.105845 1.964489 90 0 .051727
2588-A 16 2.354736 1.488386 120 0 .023049
2588-B 16 2 .354736 1.487894 120 0 .023041
26 6 0.97877 0.689802 140 0.023186
2631 6 1.409724 1 .35876 140 0 .022016
27 6 0 .989822 1.599858 90 0 .05258
28 8 2 .084615 2.804184 140 0.020778
3350 16 2.17295 1.282465 120 0.023322
3351-A 16 2 .791121 2 .038996 120 0.022474
3351-B 16 0 .568319 0 .070815 150 0.018826
3351-C 16 1.4263 0.588081 120 0.024822
3351-0 16 1.4263 0.588087 120 0 .024822
3830 6 2 .084615 6 .355665 90 0 .047094
3831 6 1.067598 1.514213 100 0 .042778
3835 6 0.989822 1.600068 90 0 .052587
456 6 2 .003346 2.605064 140 0 .020901
64 6 0.97877 0.691369 140 0.023238
849 6 1.315686 2.229791 100 0 .041478
850 6 1.260425 2.503127 90 0.050734
854 8 2 .148601 3.953094 100 0.036764
865 8 2 .541982 6.558892 90 0 .043579
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 108
Name Diameter
(in)
866 8
867 6
98 8
C.A.L.-FH 8
C.A.L.-WL 8
EXHIBIT lOB
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Link Results
Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction
(ft/s) (ft) (millift) Factor
2 .574892 5 .526754 100 0.035789
1.14655 1.723796 100 0 .042224
2 .622794 5.718907 100 0.035693
7 .978474 21 .18481 150 0.014288
8 .891212 25 .89078 150 0.014061
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit lOB
EXHIBIT llA
MikeURBAN N ode I dentifiers
D es cription: Steady State Analys is-Ex isting peak day demand on the system with CSISD-
Center for Alternative Leaming demand and 833 .3 gpm fi re flow added to nodes
C .A.L.-3 , C .A.L.-4 and , J-023.
Node Resu Its
Name Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
508 12 .891 7 1 .8 3 825
567 4 .182 76 .00105
572 0 75 .78921
573 5 .1 56 75 .80468
591 0 74 .12164
601 7 .505 76 .13526
604 5 .27 1 76 .27733
611 0 73 .26729
614 0 .974 70 .62927
615 0 70 .98869
643 0 67.45699
647 5 .042 59 .88812
651 0 68 .83985
657 7 .162 64 .74265
659 10.313 56 .55648
665 3 .953 68 .05946
673 2 .349 66 .90504
674 5 .844 60 .72937
677 3 .266 60 .03379
684 4 .87 60 .9157
702 2 3 .661 64.52391
C.A.L.-1 0 59 .20131
C.A.L.-2 143 59 .91241
C.A.L.-3 833 .3 59 .29157
C.A.L.-4 833 .3 6 1 .47792
J-023 8 3 3 .3 6 3 .21323
J-024 0 59 .3939
J-025 0 60 .58995
CSISD -Ce nter fo r Al te rn a tive Le a rning Ex h ib it llA
EXHIBIT llB
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Description: Steady State Analy si s-Exi sting peak day demand on th e sy stem with CSISD-
C enter for Alternative Learning demand and 833.3 gpm fire flow added to nodes
C .A.L.-3 , C .A.L.-4 and , J-023 .
Link Results
Name Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness Friction
(in) (ft/s) (ft} (millift) Factor
108 8 2.625705 6.965868 90 0 .043379
110 8 2.543425 6.566998 90 0 .043583
121 6 1.213344 1.030124 140 0.022531
135 6 2 .633534 9 .798828 90 0 .045494
16 8 3.308525 8.793238 100 0 .034488
2080 8 2.005355 4 .227512 90 0.045133
2087 6 0 .96297 0 .769365 130 0.026715
23-A 6 3 .130351 5 .953975 140 0.019565
23-B 6 3 .130351 5 .953656 140 0.019564
2459 0 .75 0 .599669 5 .890844 100 0.065935
2460 6 1.148157 2.106013 90 0 .051441
2461 6 1.112671 1.986937 90 0.051678
2588-A 16 2.331178 1.460753 120 0.023081
2588-B 16 2.331178 1.46129 120 0 .023089
26 6 0.951918 0 .655928 140 0 .023308
2631 6 1.396348 1.335022 140 0 .022047
27 6 0 .96297 1.520433 90 0 .052795
28 8 2 .064589 2 .754488 140 0.020808
3350 16 2.151273 1.258927 120 0.023358
3351-A 16 2.763338 2 .001106 120 0 .022502
3351-B 16 1.205462 0 .284956 150 0 .016838
3351-C 16 0.124231 0.006409 120 0 .03566
3351-D 16 1.453923 0 .609382 120 0 .024753
3830 6 2 .064589 6.243143 90 0 .047162
3831 6 1.059385 1.492769 100 0.042829
3835 6 0.96297 1.520617 90 0.052802
456 6 1.98332 2.557055 140 0 .020932
64 6 0 .951918 0.656632 140 0 .023333
849 6 1.305664 2.198444 100 0.041525
850 6 1 .250403 2.466141 90 0 .050789
854 8 2 .142194 3 .93136 100 0 .036781
865 8 2 .547026 6 .584599 90 0 .043577
CSISD-Center for Alternative Learning Exhibit 118
Name
866
867
98
C.A.L.-FH
C.A.L.-WL
EXHIBIT llB
MikeURBAN Link Identifiers
Link Results
Diameter Velocity Headloss/1000 Roughness
(in) (ft/s) (ft) (millift)
8 2.579935 5.546679 100
6 1.150298 1.73343 100
8 2 .627838 5 .739206 100
8 5 .318769 9 .996941 150
8 6 .231507 13.40467 150
CSISD -Center for Alternative Learning
Friction
Factor
0.035777
0.042183
0 .035682
0 .015172
0 .014821
Exhibit 118