HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-82CASE NO.:
TIME :
STAFF:
C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home ofTtxas A&M Univmity • *-"~"-------~
(Check one) 0 Minor
($700)
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
0 Amending
($700)
~nal
($932)
0 Vacating
($932)
0Replat
($932)
Is this plat in the ET J? O Yes ~ No Is this plat Commercial D or Residential IZJ
/ MINIMUM SUBMITI AL REQUIREMENTS:
·~ $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
tUf~33 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
~ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
_,..0tl e prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
c[8f" Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
.1411 ay not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
~ Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
~ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
~ Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
~ _9o py of original deed restrictions/covenants for re plats (if applicable).
~Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
/ ~cumbrances , etc.
/~ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station l.S.D.
~ The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such . Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference __ N .... 0_*--------------
NAME OF PROJECT The Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 & 106
ADDRESS Intersection of Deacon Drive and General Parkway
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
East Side of Holleman Drive South between Cain Road and Rock Prairie Road
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Heath Phillips E-mail heath_superiorstructures@yahoo.co
Street Address P.O . Box 262
----------------------------------~
City Wellborn Zip Code 77881 ------
Phone Number 979-229-5906 Fax Number 979-703-7903 ----------------
1/11 Page 1 of9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Heath Phillips Investments, LLC (Heath Phillips, manager) E-mail heath_ superiorstructures@yahoo.co
P.O. Box 262 Street Address
City Wellborn State Tx Zip Code 77881 ------
Phone Number 979-229-5906 Fax Number 979-703-7903 -----------------
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION :
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail ;oeschultz84@verizon.net
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 ------
Phone Number 979. 764 .3900 Fax Number 979. 764 .3910
----------------~
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? l8j Yes D No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so , please provide the Volume ____ and Page No. __ _
Total No. of Lots 80 ------R-0-W Acreage 4 . 79 Acres Total Acreage 13.14 ----------
Existing Use _v._a_ca_n_t ___________ _ Proposed Use Townhouse Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 80 I POD
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.08 POD ___ , __ _
Floodplain Acreage None -----------------------------------
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes IX No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is lim ited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
IX Yes
I No
If yes , provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
add itional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: THE BARRACKS II (PP)
City Project Number (if known): 14-00900010
Date I Timeframe when submitted : 2/5/14
1/11 Page 2 of9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if appl icable):
Requested wa iver to subdivision re ulations and reason for same if a plicable ): ...:=;..:;;.t..'--~~~~~~~~~~~~
Regarding the waiver request , explain how :
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land . ..:..___;,_;:_....:;__;_:_~~~~~~~~~~~~
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health , safety, or welfare , or inj urious to other
property in the area , or to the City in administering subdivision regulations .
[M ----.I
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance . r --1
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. I An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way ;
2. I The presence of unique or unusual topographic , vegetative , or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan ;
3. I A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imm inent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months ;
4 . r Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I
rural context;
5. I When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle , Pedestrian , and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. I The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. I The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation None
~-~-----------------------------
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
3408' Streets
6816' Sidewalks
2075' Sanitary Sewer Lines
3397' Water Lines
0 Channels
2998' Storm Sewers
1692' Bike Lanes I Paths ---
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE :
D.Sfe No. of acres to be dedicated+$ so,ooo development fee
___ No. of acres in floodplain
___ No. of acres in detention
___ No. of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
__ No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ ---= $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ----
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, co"ect, and complete. IF THIS APPL/CAT/ON IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Signature and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit m\')y be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required , including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details . All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations .
12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER , AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE , AND
ACCURATE.
--~t~~ -~~0_/1_~~~~-
Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1/11
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds , proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence .
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES : i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City~~ ation, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All devel ifi"ftl~'f~ ~signed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Stati ifflp•Stat anCf~li C!I Regulations.
4. I , THE ENGINEER , AGR~ ~AN · TIF\ 1ftl , TALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPM tlf• J • . blGAi ~. ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
Acc TE ~ ••••••••••••••• r~ .. §QJ~.YHL .... ~ ~· "-~,
• g 65889 /0 fj ~·.'f.C?ts -rs?;<:;9··~;; ~ -5 r / f
~~~4-U-=--H-~~~?1-~~r.1 0~-.~~~·~.~~-4~v~-~-·~
''(). f.,.: \-· ~ D t ..;.\ ... ,_:_ .. :~_,;;;,...... a e
Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify , as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the
alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation ;
(ii) create add itional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area ;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances , Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities .
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engine er Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification .
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following :
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm .
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I , , certify that the construction , improvement, or fill covered by this
perm it shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 6 of9
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval :
1/11 Page 7 of 9
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
~ Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch.
~ Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
~ Title Block with the following information:
~ Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor.
~ Proposed name of subdivision . (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
~ Date of preparation.
~ Engineer's scale in feet.
~ Total area intended to be developed.
~ North Arrow.
~ Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
~ If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
~ All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
~ Ownership and Dedication
~ Surveyor and/or Engineer
~ City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat)
~ Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
~ Brazos County Clerk
lfld-Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
~ If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
tf/l; If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
~ Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available
data.
Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data.
Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3 .E.2).
The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center
angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
~
1/11
~ Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O.W . locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan .)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
Page 8 of9
Existing
fgJ
fgJ
fgJ
fgJ
Proposed
fgJ
18]
~
18]
Alleys.
Easements.
A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration .
18] Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following:
18] Street , alley and sidewalk plans , profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other
utilities).
18] Sewer Design Report.
18] Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision . (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the util ity
master plan and any future growth areas.)
18] Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
18] Water line plan showing fire hydrants , valves , etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas.)
IZ] Storm drainage system plan with contours , street profile , inlets, storm sewer and
drainage channels , with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas , and runoff
based on 5, 10, 25 , 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed dra inage structure design ,
channel lining design & detention if used . One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the subdivision .
IZJ Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
IZJ Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I su rety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
IZJ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
IZJ Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans ).
IZ! All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate whe re the separate instrument easements were filed .
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to be ing scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration .
18] Are there impact fees associated with this development? IZl Yes D No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
IZl Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? D Yes 18] No
If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
1/11
the plat at the Courthouse.
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres , EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
Print Form
Pag e 9 or9
Brazos County Abstract Company
''More Than 140 Years of Title Service"
P.O. Box 4704 Phone: (979) 731-1900 3800 Cross Park Drive
Bryan, Texas 77805-4704 Fax: (979) 731-1381 Bryan, Texas 77802
BCAC GF NO. BC1401759
Title Report Prepared 3/13/2014
for
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC
P. 0. Box 262
Wellborn, TX 77881
Dev en Doyen, P .E.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, TX 77845
"Experience Matters"
Brazos County Abstract Company
''l11fore Than 140 Years of Title Service"
TITLE REPORT
Effective Date: March 12, 2014 at 8:00 am
GFNO: BC1401759
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
All that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land lying and being situated in Brazos County, Texas,
and being situated in the CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, Abstract No. 7, College
Station, Texas, said tract being a portion of the remainder of a called l 08.88 acre tract
described by a deed to Heath Phillips lnvestments, LLC recorded in Volume 9627, page 73,
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described by
metes and bounds as follows:
COMMENCING at a 1/2 inch iron rod found on the southwest line of a called 29 .17 5 acre
tract described in a Deed to Heath Phillips Investments, LLC recorded in Volume 11623, page
227 , Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, marking the north corner of THE
BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION, Phase 300, according to plat recorded in Volume 11209,
page 184, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas for reference a Yi inch iron rod found
marking the west corner of said Phase 300 bears: S 42° 14' 17" W for a distance of 1135.25
feet;
THENCE S 47° 45' 43" E along the common line of said remainder of 108.88 acre tract and
said Phase 300 for a distance of 416.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this herein
described tract;
THENCE through said remainder of 108.88 acre tract and along the northerly lines of future
rights-of-way for Deacon Drive West, General Parkway, Tang Cake Drive and a public alley
for the following calls:
N 42° 14' 17" E for a distance of 67.00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of39.27 feet (chord
bears: N 87° 14' 17" E -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
N 42° 14' 17" E for a distance of 21 .50 feet;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 85 .00 feet;
S 42° 14' 17" W for a distance of 21.50 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of 25 .00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: S 02° 45' 43" E -35 .36 feet) to the end of said curve;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 65.00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: N 87° 14' 17" E-35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of24.00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears : S 02° 45' 43" E -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 65.00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of 25 .00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of39.27 feet (chord
bears: N 87° 14' 17" E -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
N 42° 14' 17" E for a distance of 16.51 feet;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 50.00 feet ;
S 42° 14' 17" W for a distance of 16.51 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of 25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of39.27 feet (chord
bears: S 02° 45' 43" E-35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
S 4 7° 45' 43" E for a distance of 190 .00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: N 87° 14' 17" E-35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
N 42° 14' 17" E for a distance of 16 .50 feet ;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 50.00 feet;
S 42° 14' 17" W for a distance of 16.50 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25 .00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: S 02° 45' 43" E -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 65 .00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25 .00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: N 87° 14' 17" E -35 .36 feet) to the end of said curve;
. S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 24.00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25 .00 feet ;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears S 02° 45' 43" E -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 65.00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of 25 .00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: N87°14' 17"E-35.36feet)totheendofsaidcurve;
N 42° 14' 17" E for a distance of 139.0 l feet;
S 4 7° 45' 43" E for a distance of 67 .00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of 25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: S 02° 45' 43" E -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
S 47° 45' 43" E for a distance of 253.37 feet to the end of an existing 24.00 foot wide alley as
depicted on the plat of The Barracks II Subdivision, Phase 102, recorded in Volume 11646,
page 167, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas;
THENCE along the common line of said remainder of 108.88 acre tract and said Phase 102
for the following calls:
S 42° 14' 17" W across the end of said alley for a distance of 24.00 feet to the beginning of a
clockwise curve having a radius of 25 .00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: S 02° 45' 43" E -35 .36 feet) to the end of said curve on the northwest line of another
24' alley;
S 42° 14' 17" W along the northwest line of said alley for a distance of 65 .00 feet to the
beginning of a clockwise curve having a radius of 25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: S 87° 14' 17" W -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve on the northeast line of General
Parkway (67' R .O.W.);
N 47° 45' 43" W along the northeast line of General Parkway for a distance of 111.79 feet;
S 42° 14' 17" W across the end of General Parkway, at 67.00 feet pass the north comer of
Parkland Area No. 7 as reflected on said plat of The Barracks Il Subdivision, Phase 100
(10570/293), continue on for a total distance of 180.01 feet to an angle point in the northwest
line of said Parkland Area No. 7;
THENCE along the common line of said remainder of 108.88 acre tract and said Parkland
Area No. 7 for the following calls:
N 47° 45' 43" W for a distance of3.50 feet;
S 42° 14' 17" W, at 36.00 feet pass the west comer of said Parkland Area No. 7, continue on
for a total distance of 86.00 feet to the southwest line of Travis Cole Avenue (50' R.O.W.);
THENCE S 47° 45' 43" E along the southwest line of Travis Cole Avenue for a distance of
88.00 feet to the beginning of a clockwise curve having a radius of25.00 feet;
THENCE along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39 .27
feet (chord bears: S 02° 45' 43" E-35.36 feet) to the end of said curve on the northwest line
of Capps Drive (50' R.O.W.);
THENCE S 42° 14' 17" W along the northwest line of Capps Drive for a distance of 171.71
feet to the southwest comer of this herein described tract;
THENCE N 47° 45' 43" W through said remainder of 108.88 acre tract for a distance of
613 .00 feet to the southeast line of Parkland Area No. 5 as reflect on said plat of The Barracks
Il Subdivision, Phase 100 (10570/293);
THENCE along the common line of said remainder of l 08.88 acre tract and said Parkland
Area No. 5 for the following calls:
N 42° 14' 17" E for a distance of 70. 70 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of 90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: N 02° 45' 43" W -35 .36 feet) to the end of said curve;
N 47° 45' 43" W for a distance of 228.00 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve
having a radius of 25.00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: S 87° 14' 17" W -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
S 42° 14' 17" W for a distance of 107 .00 feet;
THENCE through said remainder of 108.88 acre tract for the following calls:
N 47° 45' 43" W for a distance of 125.00 feet to the beginning of a clockwise curve having a
rad ius of25.00 feet ;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: N 02° 45' 43" W -35 .36 feet) to the end of said curve;
N 42° 14' 17" E for a distance of22.00 feet;
N 47° 45' 43" W for a distance of 50.00 feet;
S 42° 14' 17" W for a distance of 22.00 feet to the beginning of a clockwise curve having a
radius of 25 .00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears: S 87° 14' 17" W -35 .36 feet) to the end of said curve;
N 47° 45' 43 " W for a distance of 50.08 feet to the beginning of a clockwise curve having a
radius of 25 .00 feet;
Along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27 feet (chord
bears : N 02° 45' 43" W -35.36 feet) to the end of said curve;
N 42° 14' 17" E for a distance of 22.00 feet;
N 47° 45' 43" W for a distance of 85.00 feet to the southeast line of The Barracks II
Subdivision, Phase 300, (plat 11209/184);
THENCE N 42° 14' 17" E along the common line of said remainder of 108.88 acre tract and
said Phase 300, same being the extension of the northwest line of Deacon Drive West, for a
distance of 360.02 feet to the beginning of a counterclockwise curve having a radius of 25 .00
feet ;
THENCE along said curve through a central angle of90° 00' 00" for an arc distance of 39.27
feet (chord bears: N 02° 45' 43" W -35 .36 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing
13 .931 acres of land, more or less,
SAVE AND EXCEPT all of Parkland Areas No . 3 (0.38 acre) and No. 4 (0.41 acre) as
reflected on the plat of The Barracks II Subdivision, Phase 100, recorded in Volume 10570,
page 293, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, said Parkland Areas being revised by
City of College Station Ordinance No. 2012-3452 and being further revised by a plat of The
Barracks TI Subdivision, Phase 101 , recorded in Volume 11191, page 123, Official Records of
Brazos County, Texas, for a net total of 13 .137 acres, more or less .
NOTE -This Company does not represent that the above acreage or square footage
calculations are correct.
TITLE APPEARS TO BE VESTED IN:
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC
by Warranty Deed with Vendor's Lien from Arrenia H. Ellis, Florence H. King, Lewis M .
Haupt, ill and Luella H. Trotter, dated May 13 , 2010, recorded in Volume 9627, page 73,
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
SUBJECT TO:
LIENS:
Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Fixtures, Financing Statement and Assignment of Rents and
Leases dated May 13, 2010, executed by Heath Phillips Investments, LLC to Julius C. Dunlap,
Trustee, securing one note of even date payable to American Momentum Bank, in the principal
amount of $2,994,200.00, recorded in Volume 9627, page 80, Official Records of Brazos County,
Texas, and as modified rearranged and/or extended by instruments recorded in Volume 10220,
page 151 and Volume 10470, page 133, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas. (covers
108.88 acres)
Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Fixtures, Financing Statement and Assignment of Rents and
Leases dated October 4, 2011, executed by Heath Phillips Investments, LLC to Tom Giesenschlag,
Trustee, securing one note of even date payable to Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd., in the principal
amount of $2,600,000 .00, recorded in Volume 10364, page 96, Official Records of Brazos County,
Texas. (covers 108.88 acres)
ABSTRACTS OF JUDGMENTS/FEDERAL AND/OR STATE LIENS:
NONE OF RECORD
EASEMENTS:
Right-of-Way Easement from J . W. Mochas to Sinclair Refining Company, dated September 6,
1947, recorded in Volume 132, page 68, Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Right-of-Way Easement from P. D. Gandy et ux to City of Bryan, dated December 22, 1949,
recorded in Volume 141, page 392, Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Right-of-Way Easement from Arrenia Haupt Ellis et al to Wellborn Special Utility District, dated
May 12, 1999, recorded in Volume 3645, page 298, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Temporary Construction Easement from Arrenia H. Ellis et al to City of College Station, Texas,
dated May 24, 2006, recorded in Volume 7233, page 103, Official Records of Brazos County,
Texas.
Temporary Blanket Utility Easement from Heath Phillips Investments, LLC to City of College
Station, Texas, dated November 1, 2011, recorded in Volume 10420, page 239, Official Records
of Brazos County, Texas.
OUTSTANDING MINERALS AND/OR ROYAL TIES:
Royalty reservation in Deed from S. F. Machos et al to P . D. Gandy, dated October 3, 1949,
recorded in Volume 140, page 614, Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Title to this
reservation has not been traced subsequent to the date of the above-cited instrument.
Mineral and groundwater reservation in Deed from Arrenia H. Ellis, et al to Heath Phillips
Investments, LLC, dated May 13, 2010, recorded in Volume 9637, page 73, Official Records of
Brazos County, Texas. Title to this reservation has not been traced subsequent to the date of the
above-cited instrument.
OIL & GAS LEASES:
Estate created by Oil and Gas Leases from Florence Haupt King et al to Baker Exploration
Company, dated December, 1993, recorded in Volume 2020, pages 93, 113, 122 and 140, Official
Records of Brazos County, Texas. Title to this lease has not been traced subsequent to the date of
the above-cited instrument.
Estate created by Oil and Gas Lease from Lewis M. Haupt to Baker Exploration Company, dated
January 5, 1994, recorded in Volume 2020, page 146, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Title to this lease has not been traced subsequent to the date of the above-cited instrument.
Estate created by Memorandums of Oil and Gas Lease(s) from Luella H. Trotter, et al to BRW
Land Services, dated December 19, 2012, recorded in Volume 11145, pages 9, 14, and 16, Official
Records of Brazos County, Texas. Title to said lease(s) has not been traced subsequent to the date
of the above-cited instrument.
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD:
Restrictive covenants recorded in Volume 8986, page 115 and Volume 10671, page 145, Official
Records of Brazos County, Texas.
TAXES/ASSESSMENTS:
NONE REQUESTED
MISCELLANEOUS:
Terms, conditions and stipulations contained in Bill of Sale for Water rights from Haupt Family
Partnership to the Haupt Water Partnership, dated December 7, 2000, recorded in Volume 4012, page
288, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
The terms, conditions and stipulations contained in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions, executed by Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd., dated March 3, 2009, recorded in Volume
8986, page 115 and amended in Volume 10671, page 145 and management certificate in Volume
9520, page 215, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
Maintenance charge as set forth in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions executed
by Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd., dated March 3, 2009, recorded in Volume 8986, page 115 and
amended in Volume 10671, page 145, Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
All leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of coal, lignite, oil, gas and other minerals, together with
all rights, privileges and immunities relating thereto, appearing in the Public Records, whether listed or
not. There may be leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of mineral interests that are not listed.
. .
THIS TITLE REPORT IS ISSUED WITH THE EXPRESS UNDERSTANDING, EVIDENCED
BY THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAME THAT THE UNDERSIGNED, Brazos County
Abstract Company DOES NOT UNDERTAKE HEREIN TO GIVE OR EXPRESS ANY
OPINION AS TO THE VALIDITY OF THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY ABOVE
DESCRIBED, NOR AS TO THE VALIDITY OF ANY OF THE INSTRUMENTS REPORTED
HEREIN, INCLUDING THE PURPORTED DEED(S) ESTABLISHING THE RECORD
OWNER(S) CITED ABOVE, BUT IS SIMPLY REPORTING BRIEFLY HEREIN AS TO THE
INSTRUMENTS FOUND OF RECORD PERTAINING TO SAID PROPERTY, AND IT IS
EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THIS TITLE REPORT IS NEITHER A
GUARANTY NOR WARRANTY OF THE TITLE. BY ACCEPTANCE OF THIS TITLE
REPORT IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE ISSUER HEREOF IS
EXPRESSLY Lll\fiTED TO THE ACTUAL MONET ARY CONSIDERATION PAID FOR
SAID REPORT BY Heath Phillips Investments, LLC
P. 0. Box 262
Wellborn, TX 77881. THIS SEARCH HAS BEEN LIMITED TO THE ABOVE
MATTERS AND THE ABOVE TIME PERIOD; AND WE HA VE NOT SEARCHED FOR,
NOR HA VE REFLECTED HEREIN, ANY EXAMINATION AS TOT AX SUITS, SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS, CONFLICTS OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS WHICH MAY AFFECT TITLE
TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IF TITLE INSURANCE COVERAGE, WHICH IS NOT
PROVIDED BY TIDS REPORT, IS NEEDED, SAID COVERAGE IS AVAILABLE
THROUGH THE APPLICABLE PROMULGATED POLICY(IES), AND AT A SPECIFIED
RATE PREMIUM.
Brazos County Abstract Company
Please direct inquiries to:
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU
OF
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF SOLE MEMBER
OF
HEATH PHILLIPS INVESTMENTS, LLC
A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The undersigned , be ing the Sole Member named in Heath Phill ips Investments, LLC's
(here inafter the "Company") Certificate of Format ion filed with the Secretary of State of Texas ,
hereby adopts the following resolutions in lieu of an organizational meeting of the Member.
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
RESOLVED , that the acknowledgment of fi li ng issued by the Sec retary of State of Texas ,
and the certified copy of t he Certificate of Fo rmation f iled on November 23 , 2009 , are accepted
and approved in all respects ; and the Secretary is directed to place same in the Company record
book .
COMPANY AGREEMENT
RESOLVED , that the form of the company agreement for regu lati ng and managing
Company affa irs subm itted to the undersigned is approved and adopted as the Company
Agreement of the Company .
RESOLVED , that the secretary is di rected to place the Company Agreement in the
Company reco rd book , and maintain a copy of the Company Agreement at the Co mpany's
principal office .
PRINCIPAL OFFICE
RESOLVED , that t he Company's pr incipal office be established and maintained at 4490
Cast legate Dr ive , College Station , Texas 77845 , and that meetings of the Member from time to
time may be held e ither at the Company's princ ipal office or at such other place as the Member
may select.
OFFICERS
RESOLVED , that the following persons were nom inated to the office preced ing their
na me:
UNANIM OUS WRITTEN C ON SENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATI ONA L MEETING PAGE 1 OF4
Office
Pres ident
Secretaryrrreasurer
Officeholder
Heath Ph illips
Heath Phillips
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST CERTIFICATES
RESOLVED , t hat t he specimen membersh ip interest certificate proposed for use as the
Company's cert ificate for membersh ip interest is adopted as the Company's form of Membership
Interest Certificate ; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the specim en Membersh ip Inte rest Certificate be appended
to t he min utes of th e meet in g .
COMPANY RECORD BOOK
RESOLVED, that the Company, through its secretary , shall mainta in and authent icate in
the Company record book the appropriate bus iness records , including but not lim ited to originals ,
cop ies or cert ified copies of the Company's Certificate of Formation , the Acknowledgment of
Filing , the Company Agreement , the Membersh ip Interest transfer ledger, minutes of the meetings
and of other proceedings of the Members , Managers , and any comm ittee established by the
Managers ; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the secretary is to ma inta in in the Company record book
reco rds perta inin g to the issuance and transfe r of Membership Interest In the Membership Inte rest
Cert ifi cate stubs and Membership Interest transfer ledger respectively .
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST ISSUED
RESOLVED , that the Member be , and hereby is , authorized to issue from t ime to time
authorized Membership Interests of the Company for money paid , labor done, promissory note , or
persona l property or real estate or leases the reof actually acquired and upon such terms as the
Mem ber in the Member's d iscretion may determ ine ; and
RESOLVED FURTHER , than an offer be issued to the fo ll owing to pu rchase one hundred
percent (100 %) of the Membership Interest of the Company in the percentages and for the
cons ideration ind icated opposite each name :
UNANIMOU S WRITTEN C ONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATION AL M EET ING PAGE 20F 4
Member's Name Member's Interest Consideration
Heath Phillips 100% $1 ,000 .00
RESOLVED , that the Member is authorized to issue additional Membership Interest to
appropriately qual ified purchasers .
COMMENCING BUSINESS
RESOLVED , that cons ideration has been received for the issuance of Membership
Interest, and that the Company consequently is able to commence and transact business and to
incur indebtedness.
ORGANIZATIONAL EXPENSES
RESOLVED , that the Company treasurer be and hereby is authorized to pay all charges
and expenses incident to or arising out of the organization of and to reimburse any person who
has made any d isbursement therefore . ·
BANK ACCOUNT
RESOLVED, that the treasurer be and hereby is authorized to open a bank account on the
Company's behalf with any banks the Member deems appropriate.
LICENSES AND PERMITS
RESOLVED, that Company officers are directed to obtain in the Company's name such
other licenses and tax permits as may be required for the conduct of Company business by any
federal , state , county, or municipal governmental statute, ordinance , or regulations , and are
directed and authorized to do all things necessary or convenient to qualify to transact Company
business in compliance with the laws and regulations of any appropriate federal, state, or
municipal governmental authority.
OTHER STATES
RESOLVED , that for the purpose of authorizing the Company to do business in any state ,
territory or dependency of the United States or any foreign country in which it is necessary or
expedient for the Company to transact business, the proper Company officers are hereby
authorized to appoint and substitute all necessary agents or attorneys for service of process , to
designate and change the location of all necessary statutory offices and to make and file all
necessary certificates, reports, powers of attorney and other instruments as may be required by
the laws of such state, territory, dependency or country to authorize the Company to transact
bus in ess therein .
UNANIMOUS WRIITEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONA L MEETING PAGE 30F4
FISCAL YEAR
RESOLVED , that the Company fiscal year shall begin on January 1, and end on
December 31, subject to change by resolution , as appropriate, at the discretion of the Member.
CARRY ON BUSINESS
RESOLVED, that the signing of these m inutes shall constitute full consent, confirmation ,
ratification , adopt io n and approval of the holding of the above meeting , the actions hereby taken,
the resolutions herein adopted and waiver of notice of the meeting by the signatories .
Dated : November 23 . 2009 ~4
Heath Phillips
A true copy of each of the following papers referred to in the foregoing minutes is appended
hereto:
Specimen Membership Interest Certificate
P:\Gentry\Phillips_Heath_lnvestmentsLLC_\Unanimous Written Consent_OrgMtg .doc
UNANIM OUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE40F 4
UNANIMOUS WRIITEN CONSENT IN LIEU
OF
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF SOLE MEMBER
OF
SUPERIOR STRUCTURES, LLC
A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
The undersigned, be ing th e Sole Member named in Superior Structures , LLC's
(hereinafter the "Company") Certificate of Formation filed w ith the Secretary of State of Texas ,
hereby adopts the following resolutions in lieu of an organizational meeting of the Member.
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
RESOLVED , that the acknowledgment of filing issued by the Secretary of State of T exas ,
and the certified copy of the Certificate of Formation filed on Septembe r 6, 2007 , are accepted
and approved in all respects ; and the Secretary is directed to place same in the Company record
book.
COMPANY AGREEMENT
RESOLVED , that the form of the company agreement for regul at ing and manag in g
Company affairs submitted to the undersigned is app rove d and adopted as the Company
Agreement of the Company .
RESOLVED , that the secretary is directed to place the Company Agreement in the
Company record book, and maintain a copy of the Company Agreement at th e Company's
pr incipal office .
PRINCIPAL OFFICE
RESOLVED, that the Company's principal office be established and ma intained at 4490
Castlegate Drive , College Station, Texas 77845 , and that meetings of the Member fr om time to
time may be held either at the Company's principal office or at such other place as the Member
may select.
OFFICERS
RESOLVED , that the follow ing persons were nominated to the office preceding their
name :
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE 1Of4
Office
Preside nt
Secretary/Treasurer
Officeholder
Heath Phill ips
Heath Ph illi ps
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST CERTIFICATES
RESOLVED , that th e spe cim en membersh ip interest c erti fi ca te proposed for use as the
.Co m pany's cert ifi cate for membersh ip interest is adopted as the Company's fo r m of Membership
Interest Certificate ; and
RESOLVED FURTHER, th at the spec im en Me mbershi p Interest Cert ificate be appended
to t he minutes of the meeting .
COMPANY RECORD BOOK
RESOLVED , that the Company, through its secretary, shall maintain and authent icate in
the Company reco rd book t he appropriate business records , includ ing but not li mited to origi nals,
cop ies or cert ified copies of the Company 's Cert ificate of Formation, the Acknowledgment of
Fili ng, the Company Agreement , the Membe rsh ip Interest transfer le dger, minutes of the meetings
and of other proceedings of the Members . Managers , and any comm ittee established by the
Managers; an d
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the secretary is to m aintain in the Company record book
records pertain ing to the issuance and transfer of Membersh ip Interest in the Membership Interest
Cert ificate stubs and Membership Interest transfer ledger respectively .
MEMBERSHIP INTEREST ISSUED
RESOLVED , that the Member be, and he reby ls, authorized to issue from time to time
aut horized Membership Interests of the Company for money paid, labor done , promissory note , or
personal property or real estate or leases thereof actually acquired and upon such terms as the
Member in the Member's discretion may determ ine ; and
RESOLVED FURTHER , than an offer be issued to the follow ing to purchase one hundred
pe rcent (100%) of the Membership Interest of the Company in t he percentages and for the
consideration indicated opposite each name :
U NANIMO US WRITIEN C ONSENT IN LIE U OF ORGANIZATI ON AL MEET ING PA GE 2 0 F4
Member's Name Member's Interest Consideration
Heath Phillips 100% $1 ,000 .00
RESOLVED, that the Member is authorized to issue additional Membership Interest to
appropriately qualified purchasers .
COMMENCING BUSINESS
RESOLVED, that consideration has been received for the issuance of Membership
Interest, and that the Company consequently is able to commence and transact business and to
incur indebtedness .
ORGANIZATIONAL EXPENSES
RESOLVED, that the Company t reasurer be and hereby is authorized to pay all charges
and expenses incident to or arising out of the organization of and to re imburse any person who
has made any disbursement therefore .
BANK ACCOUNT
RESOLVED, that the treasurer be and hereby is authorized to open a bank account on the
Company's behalf with any banks the Member deems appropriate .
LICENSES AND PERMITS
RESOLVED, that Company officers are directed to obtain in the Company's name such
other licenses and tax permit s as may be required for the conduct of Company business by any
federal, state, county, or municipal governmental statute , ordinance, or regulations , and are
directed and authorized to do all things necessary or conven ient to qualify to transact Company
business in compliance with the laws and regulations of any appropriate federal , state , or
municipal governmental authority.
OTHER STATES
RESOLVED , that for the purpose of authorizing the Company to do busin ess in any state ,
territory or dependency of the United States or any foreign country in which it is necessary or
exped ient for the Company to transact business , the proper Company officers are hereby
authorized to appoint and substitute all necessary agents or attorneys for service of process, to
designate and change the location of all necessary statutory offices and to make and file all
necessary certificates, reports, powers of attorney and other instruments as may be required by
the laws of such state. territory, dependency or country to authorize the Company to transact
business therein.
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE30F4
FISCAL YEAR
RESOLVED, that the Company fiscal year shall begin on January 1, and end on
December 31 , subject to change by resolution , as appropriate , at the discretion of the Member .
CARRY ON BUSINESS
RESOLVED, that the signing of these minutes shall constitute full consent , confirmation,
rat ification , adoption and approval of the holding of the above meetin g , th e actions hereby taken .
the resolutions herein adopted and waiver of notice of the meeting by the signatories.
Dated : September 7, 2007 ~~ Heath Ph illips
A true copy of each of the following papers referred to in the forego ing minutes is appended
hereto:
Specimen Membership Interest Cert ificate
P:\Gentry\Phillips_Heath_LLC_ 19097\Unanimous Written Consent_OrgMtg .doc
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING PAGE 4 OF 4
AB Project Reprint Confirmation Page
E ABPRJB4814564 Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
Architectural Barriers Project Registration Confirmation Page
Tuesda~ May06, 2014
PERSON FILING FORM
Name: Eddie Hare Phone: 979-820 -0149
Person Address: 5855 Foste r Road, Bryan, Tx 77807
Ras Number: 00000008
Project Name: The Barracks II Subdivision, Ph 105 106
Project City of College Station Right of Way
EABPRJB4814564
Address: Intersection of Deacon Driveand General Parkway
College Station , TX 77845 County: Brazos
TENANT
Contact Name: Phone:
Contact Address:
BUILDING/FACILITY Name: City of College Station Right of Way
FACILITY Owner: City of College Station Phone: 979-764-3570
Owner Address: 1101 Texas Ave ., College Station, TX 77840
Contact Name: Danielle S ingh Phone:
Contact Address:
Contact Email: dsingh@cstx.gov
DESIGN FIRM Name: Schultz Engineering LLC Phone: 979-764-3900
Firm Address: 2730 Longmire , Ste A, Co ll ege Station, TX 77845
Designer Name: Joseph Schult z, PE Emai: joeschultz84@verizon.net
Type of License: Engineer License Number: 65889
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Start Date: 05/2014 Completion date: 1212014 Estimated Cost: $137 ,500.00
Type of Work: New Construction
Type of Funds: This project is privately funded , on private land for private use .
Are the private fonds provided by a tenant? No
State Lease No. :
Scope of Work: Sidewalks , ramps and crosswalks for a new street
Does this building(s) have more than one level? Not a building
Are there any elevators, escalators, or platform lifts in this building? Not a building
Are there any boiler in this building? Not a bu ilding
This AB Project registration Confirmation Page, construction documents, and applicable fees must be submitted in accordance with the
Texas Administrative Code Chapter 68, Rule 68.51.
If TDLR will be performing the review or inspection services , see Ru le 68 .80.
If a RAS will be performing the re\/iew or inspection services , please contact the RAS as they set and collect their own fees, see Rule 68 75 .
In accordance w it h Rule 68 52, the owner of a building or facility must also obta in an inspectio n from the department or a registered
accessibility specialist not later than the first anniversary of the completion of construction . Request for inspection shall be made by
completing the Request for Inspection form and submitting it no later than 30 calendar days after the completion of construction .
Y !Jftos://www.tdlr.texas.gov/ ABProjectReg istrationOnline/ ABProjectPri ritCo nfirmation.aspx?strProjNum=EABPRJB4814564[5/6/2014 10: 16:00 AM]
EDDIE HARE-ACCESSIBILITY SPECIALIST
TDLR/TAS Registered Accessibility Specialist #0008
5855 Foster Road * .Bryan, Texns 77807
(979) 775 -6850 office * (979) 775 -6820 fax * (979) 820 -0149 cell * (877) 381-9685 toll free
May 10 ,2014
Danielle Singh
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave.
College Station, Texas 77840
Re: The Barracks II Subdivision . Phases l 05 & I 06 EABPRJB4814564
City of College Station Rights of Way@ Intersection of Deacon Drive and General Parkway
Colle ge Station , Texas 77845
PLAN REVIEW-COMPLETED
Dear Danielle Sin gh;
Enclosed are the results of the plan rev iew completed on the referenced facility. Identified on the report are areas
of nonconfonnance with accessibility standards adopted by th e Texas Departm ent of Licens ing an d Regulation
for the purpose of ensuring compliance with Texas Go vernm en t Code, Chapter 469.
Although deficiencies may have been noted, th e reference proje ct may be eligible for Inspection approval if
constructed in accordance with the Tex as Accessibilit y Standards . Items which are the respons ibility of the owner
should be referred to the appropriate person for action .
The building or facility owner must req uest an inspection from the Department, (or a Departm ent authorized
provider of inspection serv ices) no .later than thirty (30) days after completion of construction. If the
completion date provided on the Project Registration Form is no longer correct, notify this office (in
writing) of the revised completion date as soon as possible.
This det ermination doe s not address applicability of th e Americans with Di sa bilities Act (ADA), (P.L. 101-3 36)
or any other local , state, or federal requirement. For information on the ADA Hotline, (800) 949-4232 , or the
United State s Depar tment of Justice at (202) 514-0301.
Please reference the Department assigned project number (EA BPRJ #) in all future correspondence
pertaining to this project.
Sincerely,
Eddie
Accessibility Specia li st ICC# 1131801 -21
HAS# 0008
Cc: Schultz Engineering
Tl/£ REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AS CONTRA CT DOCUMT:N TS AND FIELD INSPECTIONS. Bl" Tlf/S REGI STER£!! ACCESSSllll/Tr SPECI A l.IST.
EDD/£ HART:. FOR THI: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF L I CENSING AND REGULATION (Tf)L R), AUSTIN. TEXAS. JS BASED ON BEST EFFORTS
ENDEAVOR FOLLOWING I NSTRUCTION ,fND CERTI FICATION Br BOT// TDL R AND I C/JO. PIAN REV/Ell' AND I NSPECTION JN NO WA)'
WARR~N~S COMPLETE COMPLIANCE TO T/lE TEXAS 1ICCESS/Bf./Tl' S7i1NIJARDS. Tll/S BUSINESS. THE /'IWFESSIONAL. lllS f:t\lf'l .Or!:"I :"!>'.
AND CLIENT FOR WllOMTHE REVIEW OR I NSPECTION I S MADE AGREE;.<; TO HOUJ HA/l,\ILESS 1fND INOEMN/fT TllERt:GISTERED
;:~~EJSIBIL TY SPF.Cf..IUST. EDDIE I/ARE. AND THE TDLll Fl/Oil/ AND AGA I NST AN!' L/lfBll./Tr All/SING FROM TJ/£ f'F.RF()f(,\/ANCE OF THE
..... ..
TAS 2012 Plan Review for EABPRJB4814564, The Barracks U Subdivisiou, Phases 105 and 106,
May 10, 2014
Scope of'\Vork: New sidewalks, curb ramps and cross walks within a new subdivision in the Rights of Way of
the City of College Station, Texas.
Findings: There are no comments or deficiencies noted from this review of the plans submitted; the reference
project may be eligible for Inspection approval if constructed in accordance with the Texas Accessibility
Standards.
This project meets or exceeds the right of Way section of the Adn1inistrative Rules 68 .102.
Public Right-of-Ways Projects. (New section effective Februa1y 1, 2005, 30 TexReg 382;
amended effective March 1, 2001, 32 TexReg 884 ; amended effective March 15, 2012, 37
TexReg 677)
THE REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AS CONTRACT DOCUMEN TS ,JN/) FIELD INSNX.,:TJONS. Bl' Tl/IS REGISTERED ,ICCESSS/11L/Tr SPEC/AUST.
EDDIE HARE , !-'OR THE Tl~XAS DEl'.IRTMENTDF l.I Cf:NSiN<i AND REGULATION (71)/.R). AUSTIN, TEXAS. t!; JJASED ON BESr EFl'ORTS
ENl)l:.'A l'OR FOl.LQIVING INSTRUCTION AND CERTIFICATION Bl'BOT!ITDLR A 1\rD ICBO. PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION IN NO WA l'
WARRANTS CO.\/Pl.1-:TE COAll'l.!ANCE TO THE TEXAS ACCESS!llUTl' Sli fNDARDS. THIS IJUSINl:.SS. THf: PRO!-'HSSIONA ! .. HIS £,\f PLOYEl:S.
ANDCUENT FOR 11'/fO,\f TllE REI !Ell' OR./NSN:CTION IS MADE AGREES TO HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNJFJ' Tl/£ REGISTERED
ACCf:SSIBILT!' SPECIALIST. EDDIE I/ARE. AND TllE TDLR FRO.II AND AGAINST A.Vr UABIL!TI' ARISING FROM T/fE PF:RFORMANCH OF THI:..
WORK .
'
CITY OF COILEGE STAT IO
Home o/Texas A&M Univmity •
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO .: l Lf -6 2-
DATE SUBMITTED:® /10/1 y
TIME : ID : 00
STAFF : _,/&,........,.S~-------
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
P lease check one of the options below to clearly define the purpose of your submittal.
0 New Proj ect Subm ittal
O Incomplete Project Submittal -documents needed to complete an application . Case No .:
--------~ ~ Ex isting Project Submittal. Case No.: 14-00900082
Project Name THE BARACKS II SUBDIVISION -Ph 105 & 106
Contact Name JOE SCHULTZ P.E. Phone Number 979 . 764 .3900
------------~
We are transmitting the following for Planning & Development Services to review and comment (check all that apply):
O Comp rehensive Plan Amendment
0 Rezon ing Application
D Conditional Use Permit
D Prel i minary Plan
0 Final P lat
D Development Plat
D Site P lan
D Specia l D istrict S ite Plan
0 Specia l D istrict Build ing I Sign
0 Landscape Plan
D Non-Residential Architectural Standards
0 Irrigation Plan
D Variance Request
0 Development Permit
0 Development Exaction Appeal
D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
0 Grading Plan
~ Other -Please specify below
Engineer's Estimate of Construction Remaining
Financial Guarantee
INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set:
D Comp rehensive Plan Amendment D Waterline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Driveway Permit D Sewerline Construction Documents
D TxDOT Utility Permit D Street Construction Documents
D Drainage Letter or Report D Easement Application
D Fire F low Analys is D Other -Please specify
Special Instructions :
10/1 0 Print Form :J
September 1 7, 2014
Jason Schubert, AICP
Principal Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77840
Re: The Barracks II Subdivsion -Ph 105 & 106-14-00900082
Dear Mr. Schubert:
Office: 979 .764 .3900
Fax : 979 .764 .3910
Attached is the Engineer's Estimate for construction remaining for the Barracks II
Phase 105 & 106 financial guarantee and the financial guarantee.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Schultz Engineering, LLC.
Deven Doyen, P .E.
Civil Engineer
P.O . Box 11995 • College Station , Texas 77842
schultzengineeringllc .com
Item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive , Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No. 12327
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
Enl!ineer's Estimate of Construction
Descri ption Unit Estimated Unit Price nuantitv
General Items
Mobilization, Overhead and Construction Staking LS 1 $ 40,000.00
Topsoil Removal and Replacement, complete in place LS 1 $ 12,000.00
Install End of Street Signs, complete in place EA 2 1 $ 150 .00
Street Name Signs, complete in place EA 7 $ 350.00
Stop Signs, complete in place EA 7 $ 400.00
Pavement Striping and Markings, complete in place LS 1 $ 5,000.00
Erosion & Sediment Control -SWPPP Implementat ion & Maintenance, Silt LS 1 $ 7,500.00 Fence, Construction Exit, Rock Filter Darn, etc., complete in place
Hydroseed and Hydromu!ch, complete in place SY 5,240 $ 0.5 0
General Items Subtotal
Street Constructioll Items Concrete Pavement
Excavation & Grading, complete in place LS 1 $ 60,000 .00
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 6" deep, c omplete in place SY 6,153 $ 2 .10
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 8' deep, complete in place SY 9,376 $ 2 .80
Hydrated Lime, complete in place (27 lb/sy for 6' deep & 36 lb/sy for 8' deep) Ton 252 $ 170.00
6' Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 4,033 $ 32 .00
7' Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 8,463 $ 35 .00
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Aprons -6' Thick w/ Monolithic Standard SF
Curb, complete in place
4,390 $ 4 .50
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Alleys -6' Thick, complete in place SF 8,590 $ 3.90
Concrete Sidewalk & Ramps -4" thick, complete in place SF 35,800 $ 3.50
ADA Ramps -Detectable Warning Surfaces, complete in place EA 24 $ 500.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal
Page lof4
Total %Complete Amount Amount
"uanti"' Comnlete ($) Remainirtll ($)
$ 40,000.00 95% $ 38,000.00 $ 2,000.00
$ 12,000.00 50% $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00
$ 3,150.00 0% $ $ 3,150.00
$ 1,400.00 0% s $ 1,400.00
s 1,600.00 O"/o $ $ 1,600.00
$ 5,000.00 ()'lo $ -$ 5,000.00
$ 7,500.00 80"/o s 6,000.00 $ 1,500.00
$ 2,620.00 O"/o $ $ 2,620.00
$ 73,270.00 Remaining Subtotal $ 23,270.00
$ 60,000.00 95o/, $ 57,000.00 $ 3,000.00
$ 12,921.30 100% $ 12,921.30 $
$ 26,252.80 100% $ 26,252.80 $
$ 42,840.00 100% $ 42,840.00 $
$ 129,056.00 60% $ 77,433 .60 s 51 ,622.40
$ 296,205.00 90% $266,584.50 s 29,620.50
$ 19,755.00 O"/o $ $ 19,755 .00
$ 33 ,501.00 0% $ -$ 33 ,501.00
$ 125,300.00 ()'/, $ $ 125,300.00
$ 12,000.00 O"/o $ $ 12,000.00
s 757,831.10 Remaining Subtotal $ 274,798.90
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
Ene:ineer's Estimate of Co nstruction
Item Description Unit Estimated Unit Pri ce Total %Complete Amount Amount
Ouantitv Oua.ntitv Comolete ( $) Remainin2 ($)
Storm Sewer Construction Items
19 36" RCP P ipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 603 $ 90.00 $ 54,270.00 IOOolt $ 54,270.00 $
20 36" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1,043 $ 80.00 $ 83 ,440.00 100% $ 83 ,440.00 $
2 1 30" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill. complete in place LF 80 $ 70.00 $ 5,600.00 IOOolt $ 5,600.00 $
22 30" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfil~ complete in place LF 143 $ 60.00 $ 8,580.00 IQOO/, $ 8,580.00 $
23 24" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 41 4 $ 45 .00 $ 18,630.00 1()()0/, $ 18,630.00 $ -
24 24" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 273 $ 40.00 $ 10,920.00 IQOO/, $ 10,920.00 $ -
25 18" RCP Pi pe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 425 $ 32.00 $ 13,600.00 1()()0/, $ 13,600 .00 $
26 18 " HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 159 $ 32.00 $ 5,088 .00 I QOO/, $ 5,088.00 $
27 Curb lnlet -IO' wide, complete in place EA 4 $ 3,500.00 $ 14,000.00 70'/t $ 9,800.00 $ 4,200.00
28 Curb lnlet -IO' x 8', complete in place EA 2 $ 3,750.00 $ 7,500.00 70% $ 5,250.00 $ 2,250.00
29 Curb Inlet -5' wide, complete in place EA 6 $ 2,500.00 $ 15,000.00 70% $ 10,500.00 $ 4,500.00
30 Curb Inlet -5' x 8', complete in place EA 2 $ 2,750.00 $ 5,500.00 70"/, $ 3,850.00 $ 1,650 .00
31 Curb Inlet • I 5' wide, complete in place EA I $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 70'/, $ 3,150.00 $ 1,350.00
32 Alley Gutter Area Inlet -V-4430 complete in place EA 3 $ 3,500.00 $7,000 ()'/, $ s 7,000.00
33 3'x3' Junction Box, complete in place EA I $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 70% $ 1,050.00 $ 450.00
34 8'x4' Junction Box, complete in place EA 2 $ 3,000 .00 $ 6,000.00 70"/, $ 4,200.00 $ 1,800.00
35 8'x8' Junction Box, complete in place EA I $ 3,250.00 $ 3,250.00 70'/, $ 2,275 .00 $ 975 .00
36 TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 2,98 1 $ 2.00 $ 5,962.00 ()'/, $ -$ 5,962.00
37 Rock Riprap, complete in place SY 65 $ 25 .00 $ 1,625 .00 ()"/, $ $ 1,625 .00
38 Concrete Flume, complete in place SF 3,43 3 $ 6 .00 $ 20,598.00 ()'/, $ $ 20,598 .00
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal s 292,563.00 Remaining Subtotal s 52,360.00
Page 2 of 4
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
En2ineer's Estimate of Construction
Item Description Unit Es timated Unit Price Total %Complete Amount Amount
Ouantitv Ouantitv Comdete ($\ Remainin2 1$\
Wate r Construction Items
39 12' C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 546 $ 40.00 $ 21,840.00 100% $ 21 ,840.00 $
40 16' Casing, complete in place LF 52 $ 80.00 $ 4 ,160.00 100% $ 4,160.00 $
41 Connect to Existing 12'1 Water Line EA 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/o $ 1,000.00 $
42 12'>< 6' MJ. Tee, complete in place EA I $ 700.00 $ 700.00 100'/, $ 700.00 $
43 12'>< 12' M.J . Tee, com plete in place EA I $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/, $ 1,000.00 $
44 12' " 8' M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 1 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 100'/o $ 800.00 $
45 12" M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 2 $ 1,850.00 $ 3,700.00 100'/o $ 3,700.00 $ -
46 12" "45' M.J . Bend, complete in place EA 4 $ 650.00 $ 2,600.00 100% $ 2,600.00 $ -
47 4' Blowoff Assembly, complete in place EA 2 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,400.00 80% $ 3,520.00 $ 880.00
48 Waterline Testing LS I $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 0% $ $ 1,5 00.00
49 8' C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 15 16 $ 28.00 $ 42,448 .00 100'/o $ 42,448 .00 $
50 6' C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, compl ete in place LF 1330 $ 24.00 $ 31,920.00 100'/o $ 31 ,920.00 $
51 Connect to Existing 8' W ater Line EA I $ 500.00 $ 500.00 100'/o $ 500.00 $
52 Connect to Existing 6' W ater Line EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/o $ 1,000.00 $
53 Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert. e><tensio n), complete in place EA 4 $ 3,500.00 $ 14,000.00 90% $ 12,600.00 $ 1,400.00
54 8'x 8' M.J . Tee, comp lete in place EA I $ 600.00 $ 600.00 100'/o $ 600.00 s
55 8'>< 6' M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 3 $ 550.00 $ 1,650.00 100% $ 1,650 .00 $
56 6'>< 6' M.J. Tee, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/o $ 1,000.00 $
57 8' M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 5 $ 1,050.00 $ 5,250.00 100'/o $ 5,250.00 $
58 6' M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 3 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 100'/. $ 3,000.00 $
59 8' "45° M.J . Bend, com plete in place EA 33 $ 500.00 $ 16,500.00 100'/o $ 16,500.00 $
60 8' x 11 . 25' M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/o $ 1,000.00 s
61 6' "45° M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 4 $ 450 .00 $ 1,800.00 100'/o $ 1,800.00 $
62 6' x 11.25° M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 4 $ 450 .00 $ 1,800.00 100°/o $ 1,800.00 $
63 l ' Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length -2 ft) (8' Line) EA 2 $ 700.00 $ 1,400.00 100°/o $ 1,400.00 $
64 1.5' Water Service,< 15 ft (avg l ength~ 2 ft )(8' Line) EA 6 $ 750.00 $ 4,500.00 90% $ 4,050.00 $ 450 .00
65 l ' W ater Service,< 15 ft (avg length • 2 ft ) (6' Line) EA 4 $ 650.00 $ 2 ,600.00 90% $ 2,340.00 $ 260.00
66 1.5' Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length = 2 ft ) (6' Line) EA 17 $ 800.00 $ 13 ,600.00 90"/, $ 12,240.00 $ 1,3 60.00
67 1.5' Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (6' Line) EA 15 $ 1,200.00 $ 18,000.00 90"/o $ 16,200.00 $ 1,800.00
68 2' Blowoff Assembly, complete in place EA 3 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 90% $ 2,700.00 $ 300.00
W a ter Construction Items Subtotal s 207,268.00 Rem ai nin g Su btota l s 7,950.00
Page 3 of 4
L .
Barracks II Subdivision P hases 105 &106
n21neer s s mate o E • E ti re onstruchon
Item Descriptio n Unit Estimated Unit Price Total %Complete Amount Amount
Ouantitv Ouantitv Comolete 1$\ Remainino 1$)
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items
69 6" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 696 $ 20.00 $ 13 ,920.00 100'/o $ 13 ,920.00 s
70 6" PVC Sewer Line -ASTM D-2241 -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 20 $ 22 .00 $ 440.00 100'/o s 440.00 s
71 8" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Ba ckfill, complete in pl ace LF 1,393 s 24.00 $ 33 ,432.00 100'/o s 33 ,432.00 s
72 6" Cleanou~ complete in place EA 2 $ 750.00 s 1,500.00 90% s 1,350.00 s 150.00
73 4' Sewer Service-Single (avg. length -4ft), complete in place EA 4 $ 300.00 s 1,200.00 90% s 1,080 .00 s 120.00
74 4' Sewer Service-Do ubl e (avg length-4 ft ), com plete in place EA 19 $ 400.00 s 7,600.00 90% s 6,840.00 s 760 .00
75 4' Sewer Service-Single (avg length-48 ft), complete in place EA 5 s 850.00 $ 4,250.00 90% $ 3,825 .00 $ 425 .00
76 4' Sewer Service-Do uble (avg length-48 ft ), complete in pl ace EA 27 $ 95 0.00 $ 25 ,650.00 90% s 23 ,085 .00 s 2,565 .00
77 Tie-In to Existing 8' PVC Sewer Line, complete in place EA 1 $ 1,000.00 s 1,000.00 100'/o s 1,000.00 s
78 Co ncrete Manhole -4' Dia. -complete in place EA 8 s 2,800 .00 $ 22,400.00 90% s 20,160 .00 s 2,240.00
79 TV Testing and Ins pection, complete in place LF 2,109 s 2.00 s 4,218 .00 O'lo s s 4,218 .00
S1nit1ry Sewer Construction Items Subtotll s 115,610.00 Rem1ining Subtota l s 10,478.00
Remaining
Generol ltems Su btotal S 73,270.00 $ 23,270.00
Street Construction Concrete Pav ement Items Subtotal $ 757,831 .10 $ 274,798 .90
Storm Sewer Construction Items Su btotal $ 292,563.00 s 52,360.00
Water Construction Items Sub total S 207,268.00 s 1,400.00
S1nitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotll S 115,610.00 s 1,800.00
50% Additional for Gra" S 3 ,750.00 s 1,310.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION! S 1,450,292.10 I s 354,938.90 I
Page 4 of 4
October 6 , 2014
Jason Schubert
Principal Planner
C ity of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77840
Re: The Barracks II Subdivsion -Ph 105 & 106-14-00900082
Dear Mr. Schubert:
Attached are the following items for the above referenced projest:
1. Mylar original of the Final Plat
2. CAD file of plat on a CD
If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Schultz Engineering, LLC.
Joe ~
Civil Engineer
P.O . Box 11995 • College Station , Texas 77842
sch ul tzengineeringllc.com
Office: 979 .764.3900
Fax : 979 .764.3910
~hultz Eng ineering, LLC
May 1, 2014
Jenifer Paz
Staff Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77840
Re: The Barracks II Subdivsion -Ph 105 & 106-14-00900082
Dear Ms. Paz:
Office: 979 .764 .3900
Fax: 979 .764.3910
Attached are one (1) 24" x 36 " copy of the revised Final Plat, one (1) 24" x 36" copy
of the grading and erosion control plan, thirteen (13) 11" x 17" copies of the revised
Final Plat, 2 sets ofrevised construction documents , the revised Engineer's Estimate,
and the response to staff comments.
If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Schultz Engineering, LLC.
Joe hultz , P.E.
Civi Engineer
P.O . Box 11995 • College Station , Texas 77842
schultzengineeri ngllc.com
•...................... _____ , _____ :CITY OF COLI.EGE STAT ION
Hom e of Texas A&M University •
-_,_____ ~z;::;;a;::;uz ::::&«!M
MEMORANDUM
DATE : April 9, 2014
TO : Heath Phill ips , via ; heath superiorstructures@yahoo .com t/"'
FROM : Jenifer Paz , Staff Planner
SUBJECT: THE BARRACKS II PH 105 & 106 (FP)
Thank you for the submittal of your FINAL PLAT -RESIDENTIAL application . Danielle Singh
and I have been assigned to review this project and it is anticipated that the review will be
comp leted and any staff comments returned to you on or before Thursday , April 24 , 2014 . If you
have questions in the meantime , please feel free to contact us
PC : Joe Schultz , Schultz Engineering LLC , via ; joeschultz84@verizon.net
P&DS Project No . 14-00900082
Pl1m11ing & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 11 0 1 TEXAS AVENU E• COLLEGE STAT ION · TEXAS · 77842
TEL 9 7 9 .764.:~5 7 0 ·FAX . 97 9 .7 64 .34%
C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
SCALE:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT MANAGER:
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning & Z oning Comm ission
October 2, 20.14 ,..,,,
FINAL PLAT
for
The Barracks II Phases 105 & 106
14-00900082
80 townhouse lots , 3 common areas , and 0.56 acres of parkland
dedication on 13 .14 acres
3100 Travis Cole Avenue , generally located near the intersection
of Deacon Drive West and General Parkway
POD Planned Development District
Heath Phillips , Heath Phillips Investments , LLC
Jason Schubert , AICP , Principal Planner
jschubert@cstx.gov
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Page 1 of 3
•"-1,"-
Planning & Zoning Commission
Octobe r 2 , 2014
N
CX)
0
' ~
"7 u.i
l() >
;.: <t
I uJ a.. _J _o -o
(/) (/) ~O>
Ci ~
0:: f-
<t 0 co 0
w c;:;
:i:::
f-
s:
UJ
> w
0::
f-z
UJ
~ a..
0
_J w >
UJ
Cl
Pag e 2 of 3
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation:
Zoning:
Preliminary Plat:
Site Development:
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication:
Greenways:
Pedestrian Connectivity:
Bicycle Connectivity:
Impact Fees:
REVIEW CRITERIA
2002
A-0 Agricultural Open upon annexation
A-0 Agricultural Open to POD Planned Development District
(2011 ); POD Planned Development District to POD Planned
Development District to revise layout and add additional use
(2012); POD Planned Development District to POD Planned
Development District to add a 29-acre tract development and
revise some of the commercial uses (2014)
2011 , revised in October 2012 and again in February 2014
Phases 100-104, 200 , 201 , and 300 have been filed for record .
Final Plat applications have been submitted for Phases 108 and
400 and are currently under review .
Neighborhood park land dedication was provided with previous
phases and 0 .56 acres of additional parkland is proposed with this
Final Plat. The Parks & Recreation Advisory Board recommended
to accept the proposed parkland at their October 9, 2012 meeting
when the parkland for this development was reconfigured due to
US Army Corps of Engineers drainage requirements . Also , as the
developer is constructing Neighborhood Park improvements ,
parkland dedication fees of $50 ,000 (80 lots x $625) for
Community Parks are due prior to filing of the Final Plat.
N/A
Sidewalks are provided on both sides of all streets within the
development.
Bikes lanes will be provided along Deacon Drive West (Major
Collector) and General Parkway (Minor Collector).
The subject tract is located within the Steeplechase Sanitary
Sewer Impact Fee Area and will be required to pay $357.74/LUE
(Living Unit Equivalent) at time of building permit.
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with
the Subdivision Requirements contained in the Unified Development Ordinance .
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning & Zoning Commission
,_ October 2 , 2014
Page 3 of 3
City of College Station
Administrative Approval for Required Parkland Dedications of Less than Five Acres
1. Applicant Name: _____________ =H ..... ea=t~h~P~h~i=lli~PS~-----------------
Address: ___________ ----'-P~·=O"'--. =B=ox'-'--=26=2=--'-Vl/'-'e=ll=b=or~n"---'-T....,X~7~7~8=8..._1 ____________ _
Phone: _____ 9_79_-_22_9_-_5_90_6 _____ _ E-Mail: ____ h_e_at_h_s~up~e_r_io_rs_t_ru_c_tu_r_e_s~@~y~a_h~o ..... o~.c~o_m __ _
2. Development Name : ____ -=B=-=a=r'"""ra=-=c"--'k=s-'-'ll'"""'S""'u""b""d'"'-iv'-'-is=i=o'""'""n ...... P ...... h,_1.:....:0=-=5,_&=-'1~0=6 ___ _ Project #: __ 1_4_-9_0_0_08_2 __
Development Location: ____________ 3=-1.:....:0:....:0,_T"'"""r'-=a'-'-v=is'-C=-o=l=e ...... A.:...:v-=e'---------------
3. Dwelling Units: ~Single Family ___ Multi-family Units , located in Neighborhood Park Zone ~15~-
_§Q_ Single Family Multi-family Units , located in Community Park Zone B
4. Development Fees and Dedication Requirements:
a. Land Dedication or Fee in Lieu of Land (Choose One):
Neighborhood Community
Single Family : One (1) acre per 117 DU 's 0 .56 ac One (1) acre per 128 DU 's ___ ac = --~0-~56~_ac
Multi-family : One (1) acre per 117 DU 's ____ ac One (1) acre per 128 DU 's ___ ac = ______ ac
TOTAL = ---=0.=56=----Acres
-OR-
Fee Paid in Lieu of Land Dedication
Neighborhood Community
Single Family : @ $274 .00 per DU $ ____ _ @ $250 .00 per DU $ __ 2~0~0~0~0-= $ __ 2=0~0~0~0 __
Multi-family : @$274.00 per DU $ ___ _ @ $250 .00 per DU $ ____ _ = $ ____ _
TOTAL (Neighborhood and Community) = $ _____ _
b. Development Fee:
Neighborhood Community
Single Fam ily @ $362 .00 per DU $ ___ _ Single Family@ $375.00 per DU $ 30 ,000 = $ 30 ,000
Multi-family @ $362 .00 per DU $ ___ _ Multi -family@ $750 .00 per DU $ __ _ =$ __ _
TOT AL (Neighborhood and Community) = $ 50,000
5. Comments: An additional dedication of 0.56 acres will be made for Neighborhood parkland . Neighborhood Parkland
was previously dedication with previous phases ; development of neighborhood park will be completed by the developer.
The City of College Station agrees to accept:
GRAND TOTAL (Neighborhood and Community) 80 Units x $625 = $ 50 000
Land Dedication _o...., ...... 5 ...... 6 ______ _
Name Date
vr PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
AGENDA CITY OF C OLLEGE STAT ION
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2012
BOARD TOUR -5:45PM
REGULAR MEETING -7:30PM
Stephen C. Beachy Central Park Conference Room
College Station, TX 77840
The City Council may or may not attend the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Tour & Regular
Meeting.
1. Call to order and Roll Call.
2. Possible action concerning requests for absences of members.
3 . Hear visitors .
4. Tour and discussion of Parks and recreation facilities.
• Leave from Central Park -1000 Krenek Tap Rd ., College Station, TX
• Wolf Pen Creek Park -1000 Colgate Dr., College Station, TX
• Veterans Park & Athletic Complex -3101 Harvey Road, College Station, TX
• University Dog Park -300 Park Road, College Station, TX
• Thomas Park -1300 James Parkway, College Station, TX
• John Crompton Park -201 Holleman Drive West, College Station, TX
• Georgia K. Fitch Park -1100 Balcones, College Station, TX
• Creek View Park -1001 Eagle Avenue, College Station , TX
• Pebble Creek Park -401 Parkview Street, College Station, TX
• Lick Creek Park -3600 East Rock Prairie Road, College Station, TX
• Wood Creek Park -9100 Shadowcrest Drive, College Station, TX
• Emerald Forest Park -8400 Appomattox, College Station, TX
• Return to Central Park -1000 Krenek Tap Rd., College Station, TX
-Reconvene for Regular Meeting -
5 . Call to order and Roll Call.
6 .
8.
Consideration, possible approval, and discussion of minutes from the meeting of
September 11, 2012.
Presentation, possible action , and discussion concerning The Barracks II revised
preliminary and parkland abandonment.
Update on Park Maintenance Standards quarterly report for FY'12.
9. Discussion and possible action concerning revisions to the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board Goals for FY13.
The building is wheelchair accessi ble. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made at least 48 hours
before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov.
10 . Report, possible action, and discussion concerning the current Capital Improvements
Program:
};;-Capital Improvements and Park Land Dedication Project Lists of October
2012.
};;-Dedications of Less than Five Acres
• Williams Creek, Phase 6 -Park Zone 6
• Site plan, 717 University Drive -Park Zone 1
11. Presentation , possible action, and discussion on future agenda items : A Board Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of
specific factual infonnation or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
};;-Next Regular Meeting -November 13, 2012
12 . Adjourn.
Notice is hereby given that a Board Tour and Regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board of College Station,
Texas will be held on the 9th day of October 2012. For the tour to begin at 5:45 p .m. at Stephen C. Beachy Central Park,
1000 Krenek Tap Rd. and the meeting to reconvene at 7:30PM, College Station, Texas , 77840. The fo/fowing subjects will be
discussed, to wit: See Agenda.
Posted this the 5th day of October, 2012, at 5:00 p .m.
f, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board of the City
of College Station, Texas is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said no/ice on
the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas and on the City's website, www.cstx .gov. The
Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general pubfic at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on October
5, 2012 at 5 :00 p.m., and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the schedufed time of said meeting.
This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Half on the fof/owing date and time :
Dated this __ day of ______ , 2012.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATTON, TEXAS
BY:.
ST ATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the ___ day of _____ ~ 2012.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
THE BARRACKS 11PH105-106
3100 TRAVIS COLE AVE .
Case :
14 ~082
FINAL
PLAT
Zoning Districts
R -4
R Rural R -6
E Estate MHP
RS Rstricted Subu ba.n 0
GS General Suburban SC
R-18 Sirvt1le Family Residential GC
D Duplex Cl
T Townhouse S.P
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Multi-Famliy BPI Business Par Industrial
H igh Density Multi-Family tAP N atura l Areas Protected
Manufactured' Home Par k C -3 Lg ht Commercial
OffiCE M -1 Light I ndustr ial
Suburb.an Commercial M -2 Heavy Indus trial
General Commercial C -U CollEije and Univ.as ity
Commercia~lndustrisl R& D Research and Development
Business Par P-M UD Plsnne.O Mixed-U-.e Development
THE BARRACKS Iii PH 105-106
3100 TRAVI S COLE AVE .
Ca se :
14 -082
POD
WPC
tiG -1
NG-2
NG -3
ov
ROD
KO
Pls.nned Development Dis !rid
Wolf Pen Cree!t Dev. Corridor
C cr e Northgate
Transitions.I N<M'thg ate
Res identi.s.I orthg s.te
Corridor Ovaisy
Redevelopment District
Kren ek Tap Over h;iy
FI NAL
PLAT
Scale: 1 Inch= 300 Fee
Area: 13.931 Acres (606,829.40 Square Feet)
CLOSED
4-10-2014
BR
14-082
FINAL PLAT
THE BARRACKS II SUBDIVISION PH 105 & PH 106
BLK 20, 21, 22, 24 ,26 LIS 1-9, 1-33, 1-13 , 1-16 , 4-12 , 1-3 & COMMON AREAS
ACRES 13.14
Area: 13 .931 Acres (606,829.40 Square Feet)
Perimeter: 4628.017 Feet
Ga12 = 0.024 (North 66° 12' 22" West)
GAP error ca1mot be greater than 0.10 (See SOP for Exceptions)
1. N42°14'17"E 360.02'
2. N02°45'43"W Ch35.36 ' Rad
3 . N42°14'17"E 67.00'
4. N87°14'17"E Ch35 .36' Rad2
5 . N42°14'17"E 21.50'
6 . S47 °45'43"E 85.00'
7. S42 °14'17"W 21.50'
8. so2°45'43"E Ch35 .36' Rad2 .
9. S47 °45'43"E 65.00'
IO. N87 °14'17"E Ch35.36' Rad
11. S47 °45'43"E 24.00'
12 . so2°45'43"E Ch35.36' Rad :
13 . S47 °4 5'43"E 65.00'
14 . N87 °14'17"E Ch35 .36' Rad
15 . N42 °14'17"E 16.51'
16 . S47 °4 5'43"E 50.00'
17 . S42 °14 '17"W 16.51 '
18 . so2°4 5'43"E Ch35.36' Rad
19 . S47 °45'43"E 190 .00'
20. N87 °14'17 "E Ch35 .36 ' Rad
21. N42 °14'1 7"E 16 .50'
22 . S47 °45'43"E 50.00'
23. S42 °14'17"W 16.50'
24 . so2°45'43"E Ch35.36' Rad:
25 . S47 °45'43"E 65.00'
26. N87 °14'17"E Ch35 .36' Rad
27 . S47°45'43 "E 24.00'
28. so2°45'43"E Ch35.36 ' Rad:
29. S47°45'43"E 65.00'
30. N87 °14'17"E Ch35.36' Rad
31. N42 °14'17"E 139.01'
32 . S47°45'43"E 67 .00'
33. so2°45 '43"E Ch35 .36' Rad:
34 . S47 °45'43"E 253.37'
35. S42 °14'17"W 24 .00'
36. so2°45'43"E Ch35.36' Rad:
37. S42 °14'17"W 65 .00'
38 . S87 °14'17"W Ch35 .36' Rae
39 . N47 °45'43"W 111.79'
40. S42 °14'17"W 180 .01'
41. N47 °45'43"W 3.50'
42 . S42 °14'17"W 86.00'
43. S47 °45'4 3"E 88.00'
44 . so2°45'43"E Ch35.36' Rad
45. S42 °14'17"W 171.71 '
46. N47 °45'43"W 613 .00'
47. N42 °14'17"E 70 .70'
48. N02 °4 5'43"W Ch35 .36' Ra•
49 . N47 °45 '43"W 228.00'
50. S87 °14 '17"W Ch35 .36' Rae
51. S42 °14 '17"W 107 .00'
52. N47 °45'43"W 125 .00'
53 . N02 °45'43"W Ch35 .36' Ra 1
54 . N42 °14 '17"E 22.00'
55 . N47 °45'43"W 50.00'
56 . S42 °14'17"W 22 .00'
57 . S87 °14'17"W Ch35 .36' Rae
58 . N47 °45'43"W 50.08'
59 . N02 °45'43"W Ch35.36 ' Ra1
60. N42 °14'17"E 22.00'
61. N47 °45'43"W 85.00'
LETTER OF COMPLETION
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
Dear Sir:
DATE: f2c;/ :Z C/-jO/t/
RE : COMPLETION OF J3At?/l/lc/c"S J[..
72'--u/Ofi ·7;0~---·. P/±-B:<
The purpose of our letter is to request that the following listed improvements be
approved and accepted as being constructed under City inspection and completed
according to plans and specifications as approved and required by the City of College
Station, Texas. This approval and acceptance by the City is requested in order that we
may finalize any subcontracts and to affirm their warranty on the work. This approval
and acceptance by the City of the improvements listed below does hereby void t he letter
of guarantee for the listed improvements on the above referenced project.
The one-year warranty is hereby affirmed and agreed to by 6/?E:E.ivs fJ?//$"/lt:E .:z:;..;v£,5 T0/l .5..
and by their subcontractors as indicated by signatures below.
WORK COMPLETED
"~ d<IA<h
.. -d~IA~~
LC,)cJt&.
WARRANTY DATE
-··C?d g0-;~l
C2c7 ;2 0-/,f
Owner: 11/?f Contractor: G.ALhV! /?wu,w ~~
P.hon~ Num~ert"g;t?~2',-:-~-947~~-~t -;'~~J?~9~1~u ·~-~~~:~. :~'2--6.S.-r'fl:-~~-t't.
Address: L/~90 cA.stZEGAf:E}Jll.Address: '~f<;o cds1?£ &AJ7 011.
CC/6-G!&E c57/IT.£<JJ tY c;zu..EGf ,S/A'/-7.0:)
Z7ITS ;/)( .7/'i?~f "i7:d ) Signature:~~ ~
Revised 1131/07
t,LJY PLAT FILED ··-· 3°"8fTE ESMTS Al.ID
. -~ 1IMP BLANKET ElllT ....
~llOOTMP UMTS• ...
SOP: Filing of Final Plats -Letters ~f Completion , /
Engineering Inspector/D~te: ,I'6(."'fl Y'f ;~-) o-2-Pi -1r
Project Engineer/Date: ~'1 e,llQ S \ '1f\\ I b l=<-1 / /4
DP Number: \ J.f-'t1__ I
04/23/14
Inspectors shall acquire written (i.e. email) punchlist comments and subsequently written
confirmation from the following contacts before forwarding Letter of Completion to development
review engineer:
0'rosion/Drainage: Donnie Willis (0: 764-6375, C: 229-7632)
</' CS Water Services -General: Charles "Butch" Willis (0: 764-3435, C: 777 -1202)
• Water -coordinate fire flow analyses (or the design engineer for non-city utilities)
and confirm test results meets min requirements with the dev review engineer
(specific hydrants to test, if simultaneous, and min allowable flow)
• Sanitary
o CS Water Service -Liftstation: Doug Wallace (0: 764-6333)
o CS Electric and Streetlights: Gilbert Martinez (0: 764-6255)
o CS Public Works -Traffic Signs/Markings): Lee Robinson (0: 764-3695)
~ BTU Electric and Streetlights: Sonia Creda (0: 821-5770)
John Fontinoe or Randy Trimble (0: 821-5728)
,,.C...-onfirm with development review engineer that service agreement is in place with BTU
¢"' Non-City Utility Service Providers: (Wellborn Water SUD, Brushy Creek SUD, Wickson
Creek SUD, etc) confirm with development review engineer that infrastructure is complete
and for outstanding issues,
o Digital Constrution Pictures: From contractor on CD-R, Inspector to confirm and file
o Record Drawings: (2 Red-Lined Copies) for all Public Infrastructure with the
following attestation:
"I, General Contractor for development, certify that the
improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and that said improvements are
shown substantially hereon. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, that the
materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any are stated correctly
hereon."
General Contractor
/Record Drawings: (2 Red-Lined Copies) for Public Drainage Infrastructure including
Private Detention Facilities with the following attestations:
"I hereby attest that I am familiar with the approved drainage plan and associated
construction drawings and furthermore, attest that the drainage facilities have been
constructed within dimensional tolerances prescribed by the Bryan & College station
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines and in accordance with the approved construction
plans or amendments thereto approved by the City of College Station ."
(affix seal) Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Texas No. ___ _
"I certify that the subdivision improvements shown on this sheet were actually built, and
that said improvements are substantially as shown hereon. I further certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that the materials of construction and sizes of manufactured items, if any,
are stated correctly hereon."
General Contractor
Inspectors to review Red-lined Record Drawings, upon acceptable confirmation of drawings,
inspector to:
~file one set of Record Drawings in Public Works files, and
~forward one set of Record Drawings to Jeffery Speed (CSU)
Inspectors should forward Letters of Completion to the development review engineer that
reviewed and stamped the construction plans after confirming:
/ the date on the Letter of Completion Warranty should reflect the date when all associated
punchlist items are completed, and
/the Owner is shall be listed as the one affirming the one-year warranty
Development review engineer to:
o add Dev Permit Number to Letter of Completion
o stamp the Letter of Completion to confirm by initialing that the final plat is filed (or mylar
is ready to be filed), all necessary easements (including offsite) have been filed, and
blanket easement issues are resolved, and
o initial and route the Final Plat mylar for filing. (Note if the developer provided surety the
plat it may have been filed ahead of construction.)
Deborah Grace-Rosier {Planning) to file the Final Plat utilizes a coversheet to confirm:
o infrastructure is accepted by Letter of Completion -or-Surety is provided and acceptable,
o signed and notarized mylar of final plat,
o parkland dedication has been paid,
o digital file of final plat is provided,
o a current paid tax certificate has been submitted,
o sidewalk fee in lieu paid (if applicable), and
Development review engineer, upon the filing of Final Plat, stamp the Letter of Completion
with the new stamp and verify-initial-n/a the Final Plat was filed, offsite easements have been
filed, we have all necessary easements, etc -and then forward the Letter of Completion to Alan
Gibbs (City Engineer) for final signature.
Carol (Sr. Asst. City Engineer) to:
o enter the engineer's estimate and Letter of Completion date into Inspection List
o forward hard original of finalized Letter of Completion to Crystal (P&DS).
Crystal to: verify
o signatures on the Letter of Completion,
o forward scanned copy of Letter of Completion and associated Engineers Estimate to the
owner, developer, contractor, Terry Boriskie (Building), Ben Mccarty (Building), Chris
Haver (Building), carol Thompson (Accounting), Kristina Keller (Accounting), Courtney
Kennedy (Accounting), Jeffery Speed (CSU), Stephen Maldonado Sr. (CSU), Charles
"Butch" Willis (CSU), carol Cotter (Engineering), Alan Gibbs (Engineering), Erika Bridges
(Engineering), Danielle Singh (Engineering), Gilbert Martinez (Electric) and Deborah Grace-
Rosier (Planning). Kristina Keller will forward to Diane Broadhurst (CSU) after her review.
o if don't have email addresses, mail copies to the owner and contractor, and
o place the original in Development Permit file.
Deborah to place a hard copy of the Letter of Completion in the associated Planning Final Plat file.
Item
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No.12327
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
E ' Er t re t r ngmeer s s 1ma e o ODS rue IOD
Description Unit
General Items
Mobilization , Overhead and Construction Staking LS
Topsoil Removal and Replacement, complete in place LS
Install End of Street Signs, complete in place EA
Street Name Signs, comp lete in place EA
Stop Signs , complete in place EA
Pavement Striping and Markings, complete in place LS
Erosion & Sediment Control -SWPPP Implementation & Maintenance, Silt Fence , LS Construction Exit, Rock Filter Dam , etc ., complete in place
Hydroseed and Hydromulch , complete in place SY
St reet Construction Items Co ncrete Pavement
Excavation & Grading, complete in place LS
Mixing & incorporation of lime , 6" deep, complete in place SY
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 8" deep, complete in place SY
Hydrated Lime, complete in place (27 lb/sy for 6" deep & 36 lb/sy for 8" deep) To n
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY
7" Reinforced Concrete Pavemen t w/Curb, complete in place SY
Reinfo rced Concrete Pavement -Aprons -6" Thick w/ Monolithic Standard Curb, SF complete in place
Reinforced Concrete Pavement - All eys -6" Thick, comp lete in place SF
Concrete Sidewalk & Ramps -4" thick, complete in place SF
ADA Ramps -Detectable Warning Surfaces, complete in place EA
Estimated Unit Price Quantity
I $ 40,000.00
1 $ 12 ,000.00
21 $ 150.00
7 $ 350.00
7 $ 400 .00
1 $ 5,000.00
1 $ 7,500 .00
5,2 40 $ 0.50
General Items S ubtota l
1 $ 60,000 .00
6,153 $ 2.10
9,376 $ 2.80
252 $ 170 .00
4,033 $ 32 .00
8,463 $ 35 .00
4,390 $ 4.50
8,590 $ 3.90
35 ,800 $ 3.50
24 $ 500 .00
Street Construction Concrete Pave ment Items Subtotal
Page 1of4
Total
$ 40 ,000 .00
$ 12 ,000 .00
$ 3,150 .00
$ 1,400 .00
$ 1,600.00
$ 5,000 .00
$ 7,500 .00
$ 2,620 .00
$ 73,270.00
$ 60,000 .00
$ 12 ,921.30
$ 26,252 .80
$ 42,840 .00
$ 129,056 .00
$ 296,205 .00
$ 19 ,755 .00
$ 33,501.00
$ 125,300 .00
$ 12 ,000 .00
$ 757 ,831.10
I Barracks II S ubdivision Phases 105 &106
E ' Er t re t r nemeer s s 1ma e o ons rue 100
Item Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Ouantitv
Sto rm Sewer Construction Items
19 36" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 603 $ 90 .00 $ 54,270 .00
20 36" HDPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 1,043 $ 80.00 $ 83 ,440 .00
21 30" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 80 $ 70 .00 $ 5,600 .00
22 30" HDPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 143 $ 60 .00 $ 8,580.00
22 24" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 414 $ 45 .00 $ 18,630 .00
23 24" HDPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 273 $ 40 .00 $ 10 ,920 .00
24 18" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 425 $ 32 .00 $ 13 ,600 .00
25 18" HDPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 159 $ 32 .00 $ 5,088 .00
26 Curb Inlet -10' wide, complete in place EA 4 $ 3,500 .00 $ 14,000 .00
27 Curb Inlet -IO' x 8', complete in place EA 2 $ 3,750.00 $ 7,500 .00
28 Curb Inlet -5' wide, complete in place EA 6 $ 2,500.00 $ 15 ,000.00
29 Curb Inlet - 5' x 8', complete in place EA 2 $ 2,750 .00 $ 5,500 .00
30 Curb Inlet -15' wide, complete in place EA I $ 4,500 .00 $ 4,500.00
31 Alley Gutter Area Inlet -V-4430 complete in place EA 3 $ 3,500 .00 $7 ,000
32 3'x3' Junction Box, complete in place EA I $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
33 8'x4' Junction Box, complete in place EA 2 $ 3,000.00 $ 6,000 .00
34 8'x8' Junction Box, complete in place EA 1 $ 3,250.00 $ 3,250.00
35 TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 2,981 $ 2 .00 $ 5,962 .00
36 Rock Riprap, complete in place SY 65 $ 25 .00 $ 1,625 .00
37 Concrete Flume, complete in place SF 3,433 $ 6.00 $ 20,598.00
Storm Sewe r Construction Items Subtotal s 292,563.00
Page 2 of 4
I
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
E • Er t re t r ngmeer s s 1ma e o ODS rue IOD
Item Description Unit Estim ated Unit Price Total Ouantitv
Water Construction Items
38 12" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer w ire -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 546 $ 40.00 $ 21 ,840.00
39 16" Casing, complete in place LF 52 $ 80.00 $ 4,160 .00
40 Connect to Ex ist ing 12" Water Line EA I $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000 .00
41 12 "x 6" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 1 $ 700.00 $ 700 .00
42 12"x 12" M .J . Tee, complete in place EA I $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
43 12 " x 8" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA I $ 800 .00 $ 800.00
44 12" M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 2 $ 1,850 .00 $ 3,700.00
45 12 " x 45° M .J . Bend, complete in place EA 4 $ 650.00 $ 2,600.00
46 4" Blowoff A ssembly , complete in place EA 2 $ 2,200 .00 $ 4,400.00
47 Waterline Testing LS I $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
48 8 " C 900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1516 $ 28 .00 $ 42 ,448 .00
49 6 " C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1330 $ 24 .00 $ 31 ,920.00
50 Connect to Exi sting 8" Water Line EA I $ 500.00 $ 500.00
51 Connect to Exi sting 6" Water Line EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000 .00
52 Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert. extension), complete in place EA 4 $ 3,500.00 $ 14,000.00
53 8"x 8 11 M .J. Tee, complete in place EA I $ 600.00 $ 600.00
54 8 "x 6 11 M.J. Tee, complete in place EA 3 $ 550 .00 s 1,650.00
55 6"x 611 M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
56 8 11 M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 5 $ 1,050.00 $ 5,250.00
57 611 M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 3 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00
58 8" x 45° M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 33 $ 500.00 $ 16 ,500.00
59 8 11 x 11.25° M .J . Bend, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
60 6 11 x 45° M.J . Bend, complete in place EA 4 $ 450.00 $ 1,800.00
61 611 x 11 .25° M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 4 s 450.00 $ 1,800.00
62 I " Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length = 2 ft) (8" Line) EA 2 $ 700.00 s 1,400 .00
63 1.5" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length= 2 ft) (8 11 Line) EA 6 $ 750.00 $ 4,500.00
64 1" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length= 2 ft) (6" Line) EA 4 $ 650.00 s 2,600 .00
65 1.5" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length = 2 ft) (6" Line) EA 17 s 800 .00 $ 13 ,600 .00
66 1.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (6" Line) EA 15 $ 1,200.00 $ 18,000.00
67 2" Blowoff Assembly, complete in place EA 3 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00
Water Construction Items Subtotal $ 207,268.00
Page 3 of 4
' ' t I
Item
68
69
70
7 1
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
•
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
E ' E f t fC t f ngmeer s s 1ma e o ODS rue IOD
Description Unit Estim ated Uni t Price Total Ouantitv
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items
6" PV C Sewer Line -D3034 -Stru ctu ral Bac kfi ll , co mpl ete in pl ace LF 696 $ 20.00 $ 13,920.00
6 " PV C Sewer Li ne -ASTM D-22 41 -Structural Bac kfill , complete in pl ac e LF 20 $ 22 .00 $ 440.0 0
8" PVC Sewer Li ne -D3034 -Stru ctural Bac kfi ll , co mpl ete in pl ace LF 1,3 93 $ 24 .00 $ 33 ,432 .00
6" C leanout, co mpl ete in place EA 2 $ 750 .00 $ 1,500 .00
4" Sewer Service-Sin gle (avg. lengt h = 4ft), co mplete in place EA 4 $ 300.00 $ 1,200 .00
4" Sewer Serv ice-Double (avg length = 4 ft ), complete in place EA 19 $ 40 0 .00 $ 7,600 .00
4" Sewer Service-S in gle (avg length = 48 ft ), complete in place EA 5 $ 850.00 $ 4,2 50.00
4 " Sewer Service-Double (avg length = 48 ft), complete in place EA 27 $ 950 .00 $ 25,650.00
Tie-In to Exi sti ng 8" PV C Sewer Lin e, compl ete in pl ace EA I $ 1,000 .00 $ 1,000.00
Concrete Manhole -4' Di a. -co mpl ete in pl ace EA 8 $ 2,800 .00 $ 22 ,400 .00
TV Test ing and Inspection, complete in pl ace LF 2,109 $ 2.00 $ 4,2 18 .00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 115,610.00
General Items Subtotal $ 73,270.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal $ 757 ,831.10
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 292 ,563.00
Water Construction Items Subtotal $ 207,268.00
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 115,610.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $ 1,446,542.10
P-12327
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING. LLC.
Page 4 of 4
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. DP 14-82
CITY OF COLU:GE STAllON
P/11111JJirt, & l>m::lo/mmt .Sn.>im
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The Barracks 11
Section 105 & 106
DATE OF ISSUE: 5/22/2014
OWNER:
Heath Phillips Investments , LLC
3302 General Parkway
College Station, Tx 77845
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
Terminus of Deacon Dr.
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Bee Creek Trib. "B"
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Full Development Permit
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein . If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-
issued .
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance .
4 . Other permits may have been required to fulfill local, state and federal requirements. Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits .
5. Stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing
drainage facilities . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on-site, it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City , State , and Federal requirements .
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy .
8. All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to , paint, oil ,
solvents, asphalt, concrete , mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited .
9. All construction shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines , Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed .
10 . Special Conditions :*** TCEQ PHASE II RULES IN EFFECT***
I, ________________ , the Contractor, hereby agree to comply with all conditions herein.
Contractor Signature Date
Phone number E-mail
I hereby grant this permit for development. Contact / 51 ~ f:'o1 1~ , the Public Works
Inspector assigned to this project 24 hours pr ior to beginning construction for scheduling required Inspections.
V4L I-5 /2z //<I
Date1 I
Drainage Report
for
The Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 & 106
College Station, Texas
April 2014
Owner/Dev eloper:
Heath Phillips Investments , LLC
3302 General Parkway
College Station, TX 77845
Prepared By:
Schultz Engineering, LLC
-
TBPE Firm No. 12327
P.O. Box 11995
College Station, TX 77842
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-3900
Drainage Report -Executive Summary
The Barracks II Subdivision, Phases 105 & 106
College Station, Texas
ENGINEER
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
P.O . Box 11995
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone: (979) 764-3900
Fax: (979) 764-3910
O\VNERIDEVELOPER
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC
3302 General Parkway
College Station, TX 77845
Phone: (979) 690-5000
GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
This project consists of the development of Phases 105 & 106 of the Barracks II Subdivision in College Station.
Phases 105 & 106 are townhouse residential developments , which will include the construction of utility and
roadway infrastructure.
Location :
Description :
• Area :
• Proposed Land Use :
• #of Lots:
• Existing Land Use :
• Land Description :
Primary Drainage Facility:
Flood H azard Information:
FEMAFIRM:
Floodplain:
Phases 105 & 106 are located northeast of Phases 103 & 104 and north of Phase
102 of the Barracks II Development. The Barracks II Subdivision is a 108-acre
development located midway between Rock Prairie Road and Cain Road in
south College Station. It is bounded on the west by Holleman Drive South and
on the east by Old Wellborn Road.
13.14 Acres
Townhouse Residential
80 lots
Vacant
The terrain slopes generally towards the north.
Tributary B.3 of Bee Creek
#48041 C0305F, Dated April 2 , 2014
None of this phase of the development lies within the floodplain.
HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS
The existing site is cleared. The elevations range from 309 to 295, sloping generally in a northerly direction. The
runoff will be directed to the roadways and the proposed storm sewer system & concrete flumes will discharge into
the existing stream and the existing detention facilities on Lot 1, Block 28 Phase 300 of The Barracks II Subdivision.
Ultimately, this runoff flows into Tributary B .3 of Bee Creek.
GENERAL STORMWATER PLAN
The drainage plan for this development will involve the installation of storm sewer pipes and inlets , which will
collect and convey the runoff into the existing storm sewer system and then to the existing detention pond. This
development will also involve the installation of concrete flumes along Travis Cole A venue, which will collect and
convey the runoff into the existing stream and then to the existing detention pond. The runoff that is collected by
the existing detention ponds will be discharged into tributary B.3 of Bee Creek.
The detention pond analysis and design for this phase is covered under the drainage report titled, "The Barracks
Detention Facility Design City of College Station, Texas, Dated July 2012" prepared by Kimley-Hom and as
modified in September 2013 by a revised design prepared by Kimley-Hom.
COORDINATION & STORMWATER PERMITTING
This project has a Notice of Intent filed with the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality. No other permits
are anticipated for this project.
DRAINAGE DESIGN
General Information :
Street Design:
Tc Methodology:
Tc Minimum:
D esign Storm Event:
Pipe Materials:
Manning 's n Values:
Runoff Coefficients:
Design Constraints:
Stormwater runoff from Phases 105 & 106 of the subdivision will be collected
by a storm sewer system and will ultimately discharge into tributary B3 of Bee
Creek or into the existing stormwater detention pond. The location of the
drainage areas for evaluation of the gutter depth check, inlet sizing, pipe
evaluation and channel sizing are shown on Exhibit A & B. Refer to Exhibit B
for the locations of the inlets, storm sewer pipes and concrete flumes.
Armored Avenue:
Standard Cross-Section (3% cross-slope, 27' B-B Residential Roadway)
Lay down curb and gutter on residential streets
Travis Cole Avenue:
Street Cross-Section (2% full cross-slope, 27" B-B)
Lay down curb and gutter
General Parkway & Tang Cake Drive:
Collector Street Cross-Section (3% cross-slope, 38' B-B)
Standard Curb and gutter
Deacon Drive West:
Collector Street Cross-Section (3% cross-slope, 48' B-B)
Standard Curb and gutter
Concrete Pavement
Standard recessed curb inlets (5', 10', & 15 ' in length)
TR55
10 Minutes
10 year design storm & 100 year analysis for residential and collector streets &
storm sewer
Class III RCP, Profile Gasket in accordance with ASTM C443 , ASTM C76 and
Corrugated HDPE Storm Sewer Pipe with smooth interior
0.013 for pipes
0.018 for Streets
0.75 for developed lots
0.45 for undeveloped land
Max. water depth in gutter: 4.5 " or 0.375' for the 10 year design storm for
residential and collector streets
Design Software:
D esign Results:
Detention Analysis:
Applicable Exhibits:
CONCLUSION
Min. pipe flow velocity: 2.5 fps
Max. pipe flow velocity: 15 fps
100-yr storm runoff maintained within the ROW (3" above curb)
25% reduction of cross-sectional area of pipes less than 24" in diameter
Min. l ' freeboard for the 10 year design storm depth of flow
Excel Spreadsheets, Hydraflow Express Extension for AutoCAD Civil 3D 2013,
& Autodesk Civil 3D Storm Sewer Analysis.
·The software was used to compute pipe capacities, flow rates and velocities,
compute hydraulic grade line elevations, headwater elevations , gutter depth &
inlet sizing .
The requirement for a 25% reduction in cross sectional area of pipes 24" in
diameter or less is achieved by using internal pipe diameters that are less than
the standard diameter. The 24" diameter pipe areas were reduced by 25% and a
20.6" diameter pipe was used in the analysis and the 18" diameter pipe areas
were reduced by 25% and a 15 .6" diameter pipe was used in the analysis.
The data presented in the Appendices indicates the gutter depth, inlet sizing ,
pipe sizes and channel sizing is in accordance with the requirements of and the
City of College Station.
The stormwater runoff from the Barracks II Subdivision was previously studied
and detention ponds were designed for the entire development including this
phase. See the drainage report titled, "The Barracks Detention Facility Design
City of College Station, Texas, Dated July 2012" and as modified in September
2013 by a revised design prepared by Kirnley-.
Exhibit A -Drainage Area Map
Exhibit B -Drainage Plan
Appendix Al -Drainage Area Summary
Appendix A2 -Tc Calculations
Appendix Bl -Depth of Flow in Gutter
Appendix B2 -Storm Sewer Inlet Summary
Appendix Cl -Storm Sewer Pipe Summary
Appendix C2 -Concrete Flume Summary
Appendix D -Technical Design Summary
The storm sewer, inlets & channel drainage system for Phases 105 & 106 of the Barracks II Subdivision will
function within the requirements and restrictions of the BCS Design Guidelines.
CERTIFICATION
I, Joseph P . Schultz, Licensed Professional Engineer No. 65889, State of Texas, certify that this report for the
drainage design for The Barracks II, Phases 105 & 106, was prepared by me in accordance with the requirements
of the Bryan/College Station Unified Drainage Design Guidelines for the owners of the property. All licenses and
permits required by any and all state and federal regulatory agencies for the proposed drainage improvements have
been issued.
EXHIBIT A
DRAINAGE AREA MAP
APPENDIX Al
DRAINAGE AREA SUMMARY
APPENDIXA1
Barracks II Phases 105 & 106
ea Summa~ Drain age Ar
Area#
The Ra11onal Method :
Q=CIA
Q =Flow (els)
A= Area (acres)
C = Runoff Coeff.
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
I = Rainfall Intensity (in/hr)
Brazos County:
Area, A c le
(acres) (min)
2.52 0.55 27.0
0.47 0.75 10 .0
0.21 0.75 10.0
0.43 0.75 10 .0
0.29 0.75 10.0
0.08 0.75 10.0
0.08 0.75 10.0
1.22 0.65 25 .0
0.4 7 0.75 10.0
0.45 0.75 10 .0
0.37 0.75 10.0
0.48 0.75 10.0
0.66 0.75 10.0
0.23 0.75 10 .0
0.22 0.75 10.0
0.84 0.75 10 .0
0.29 0.75 10.0
0.42 0.75 10 .0
0.39 0.75 10.0
0.97 0.75 10.0
0.28 0.75 10.0
0.27 0.75 10.0
0.59 0.75 10.0
0.43 0.75 10.0
0.1 9 0.75 10.0
0.65 0.75 13.0
0.06 0.75 10.0
0.54 0.65 16.0
0.45 0.75 10.0
0.47 0.75 10.0
0.23 0.75 10 .0
0.39 0.65 10.0
0.37 0.75 10.0
0.19 0.65 10 .0
0.11 0.75 10 .0
0.20 0.75 10.0
0.35 0.75 10 .0
0.53 0.75 10.0
0.23 0.75 10 .0
0.30 0.75 10 .0
0.16 0.75 10 .0
0.28 0.75 10.0
0.05 0.75 10.0
0.33 0.75 10.0
0.29 0.75 10.0
0.02 0.75 10.0
0.4 2 0.75 10 .0
0.02 0.75 10.0
0.37 0.75 10.0
0.12 0.75 10.0
I = b I (le+d)"
le= Time of concentration (min)
10 year storm
b = 80
d = 8.5
e = 0.763
10 year storm 100 year storm
1,,
(In/hr)
5.251
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
5.489
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
7.699
8.635
6.969
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
8.635
= c;i,i
(Cfs)
7.28
~3.04
1.36
2'l8
1.88
,o.52 .;
0.52
4.35 ':!',
3.04
h 2.9f .
2.40
3.11 ' ;;
4.27
1.49
1.42
;5.44. ·"·
1.88 "
2.72 ,.
2.53 '
6.28 .,
:' 1.81
1.75
3.82 ,..
2.78 ;,,
-1.23 ,.
3.75
0.39 ,{
2.45
2.91 .~
"' 3.04
1.49 '•'
2.19 ''
2.40 '
1.07 ,
.0.-71 : "
f>1.Jil·
2.27
3.43 ,;
1.49 .,,
1.94
1.04
1.81
0.32 ..
2.14
.1.81i.
0.13' •.·
2.72
0.13 '''.
2.40
0.78 ,.':
1, = u1v•so)
L =Length (fl
1,,.
(In/hr)
7.163
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
11.639
11 .639
7.477
11.639
11.639
11.639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
11.639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
10.400
11 .639
9.434
11 .639
11.639
11 .639
11.639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .63 9
11.639
11.639
11 .639
11.639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
11 .639
V = Veloclty (ft/sec)
JOO vear storm
b = 96
d = 8.0
e = 0.730
a1iio
(ds) •.
9.93
4.10
1.83 •1
3.75
2.53 '}
-0.70 -
o.7o
5.93
4.10 >
3.93
3.23
4.19 ,.
5.78
" 2.01
1.92
7.33 ·
2.53 ."
3.67
3.40
8.47
2.44
• 2.36
5.15
3.75
1.66
5.07
0.52
3.31
3.93
4.10
• 2.01,fr
2.95
3.23
1.44 I
0.96
1.75
3.06 .,
. 4.63
2.01 -
2.82 '
1.40
2.44
0.44
·2.ee •
•'2.53'•
0.17 °
3.67
.. o.1i >.
-3.23
'°1.05
APPENDIXA2
Tc CALCULATIONS
T _, = lime of concentration for sheet flow (hr)
L = length (ft)
n = Manning 's roughness
P2 = 2-yr rainfall intensity (in/hr) for Brazos Co.= 4 .5 in/hr
S = slope (Ml)
Sheet Flow
Drainage Length Slope T"'"' Area#
ft % min .
101 0.21'" 200 ~ ·" 2 • 21
108 ,,.\W.24 ., 175 1 25
127 '0.24 '' ~ 75 " 13
129 0.24 1 00 16
Length
ft
V•" 280
.;...,
.
AppendixA2
TIME OF CONCENTRATION COMPUTATIONS
Barrac ks II .Phases 105 & 106
Concent rated Flow
Slope Velocity
% ft/sec
2 '1.0
""'" o.p '"'"'•· ... !E> 0.0
0.0 -
T R-55 M ethod
MINIMUM Tc= 10 MINUTES
V_.. =water velocity in ditch (ft/sec)
S = slope of ditch (ft/ft)
v, ... "' =water velocity in gutter (ft/sec)
S = slope of gutter (ft/ft)
Gutte r Flow -1
T ...,,._. Length Slope Velocity
min ft % ft/sec
5 ". 0.0
0 '! ~;r ·. ,:,.,.,;; : '4 0.0 .>
0 : •'":'" .'0.0
0 ''"··'. 0.0
T -
min
0
0
0
0
Length
ft
"' 284 ,•.50
50
100
f
T =travel time throug h ditch or gutter (min)
L = length of travel path (ft)
V = velocity (fVsec)
Gutter Flow -2
Slope Velocity T-Total
% fVsec min min
1.25 \~ 3:0 ;• 2 27
C· ">'' 1'·.'.· .~ '-'''0 •3.0 Gt!. 0 25
"' 1 . 3.0 0 13
3.0 16
Tc
Design
min
' 27
'"'"''25
•13
16
APPENDIX Bl
DEPTH OF FLOW IN GUTTER
APPENDIXB1
Barracks II Phases 105 & 106
Depth of Flow in Gutter
(Refer to Exhibit B for Gutter Locations}
Gutter/Inlet
location
S104A
S105A
8105 8
S107A
S108A
$1088
S109A
S110A
S111A
8 111 B
$114A
8117 A
511 8A
9119A
5119 B
5120A
$120 B
5125A
5126A
81268
S 127A
5 127 B
T201 A
T201 B
T203A
T203B
T204A
T204 B
T205A
T205B
T206A
T206 B
A
/vea I (acres)
104 0.430
106 0.080
105 0.290
108 1.220
113 0.660
111 0.370
109 0.470
108 1.220
110 0.450
115 0.220
114 0.230
11 7 0.280
118 0.290
122 0.280
119 0.420
120 0.390
123 0.270
126 0.190
128 0.060
125 0.430
127 0.650
129 0.540
209 0.530
210 0.230
207 0.200
208 0.350
205 0.190
206 0.110
203 0.390
204 0.370
201 0.470
202 0.230
nansverse <Crown> slooe rtvm
27 street • 0.0300
38 street • 0.0300
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.65
0.75
0.75
0.75
0,65
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0 .75
0.75
0.75
0.65
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.65
0.7 5
0.65
0.75
0.75
0.75
Slope
(tuft)
0.0080
0.0080
0.0080
0.0183
0 .0060
0.0115
0.0115
0.0115
0.0115
0.0060
0.0060
0.0080
0.0080
0.0060
0.0080
0.0080
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0240
0.0060
0.0293
0.0100
0.0060
0.0110
0.0100
0.0334
0.0060
..
(min)
10.000
10.000
10.000
25.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
25.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
13.000
16.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
Straight Crown Flow (Solve d to find actual depth of flow in gutter yl :
Q • 0.56• (z/n)• s '12 • y0 c> y= (Q/ (0.56"' (z/n) • 5 112)},,.
n • Roughness Coefficient • 0.018
S • StreeVGutter Slope (ft/R)
y • Depth of now at Inlet (ft)
z • Reciprocal of crown slope: 2T street.. 33
1,.
(in/hr)
6.327
6 .327
8.327
3.881
6.327
6.327
6.327
3.881
6 .327
6 .327
6.327
6.327
6.327
8.327
6 .327
6 .327
6.327
6.327
6 .327
6.327
5.587
5.017
6.327
6.327
6.327
6.327
6.327
6.327
6.327
6 .327
6 .327
6 .327
a.,
(cfs)
2.78
0.52
1.88
4.35
4.27
2.40
3.04
4 .35
2.91
1.42
1.49
1.81
1.88
1.81
2.n
2.53
1.75
1.23
0.39
2.78
3.75
2.45
3.43
1.49
1.30
2.27
1.07
0.71
2.19
2.40
3.04
1.49
10..year storm
011 +bypass l---''"'-T"'"'---1
(els) (ft) (In)
0.269 3.22
0.143 1.72
0.232 2.78
0.272 3.26
4.27 0.333 3.99
4.87 0.309 3.71
0.259 3.11
0.297 3.56
3.47 0.272 3.27
1.61 0.231
0.224 2.69
0.229 2 .74
0.232 2.78
1.81 0.241 2.90
2.72 0.266 3.19
2.53 0 .259 3.11
1.75 0.238 2.88
0.209 2.50
0.135 1.63
0.283 3.40
3.88 0.320 3.84
2.45 0.270 3.24
0.307 3.68
0.173 2.07
0.213 2.55
0.195 2.34
0 .180 2.16
0 .170 2.04
0 .231 2.n
0.243 2.92
0.212 2.55
0.224 2.69
Standard Curb-1Q..yr storm max design depth-4.5"
v
(fps)
2.32
1.52
2.10
3.53
2.31
1.50
2.71
2.97
2.35
1.50
1.78
2.08
2.10
1.87
2.30
2.26
1.85
1.70
1.27
2 .08
2.20
2.01
2.19
2.99
1.n
3.58
1.98
1.48
2.45
2.43
4.05
1.78
Barracks II Phases 105 & 106
Depth of Flow in Gutter
(Refer to Exhibit B for Gutter Locations)
S104A 104 0.430
S105A 106 0.080
51058 105 0.200
S107A 108 1.220
S108A 113 0.660
5108 B 111 0.370
5109A 109 0,470
8110A 108 1.220
8111A 110 0.450
5111 8 11 5 0.220
S114A 114 0.230
S 117A 117 0.280
S118A 118 0.290
S119A 122 0.280
8 11 98 119 0.420
S120A 120 0.390
51208 123 0.270
S125A 126 0.190
S126A 128 0.060
51268 125 0.430
S127A 127 0.650
$1278 129 0.540
T201 A 209 0.530
1201 B 210 0.230
T203A 207 0.200
T203B 208 0.350
T204A 205 0.190
T204 B 206 0.110
T205A 203 0.390
T205 B 204 0.370
T206A 201 0.470
T206B 202 0.230
Transverse (Crown> s lope (ft/ft)
27 street • 0 .0300
38 street = 0 .0300
c
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.65
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.65
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.65
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.65
0.75
0.65
D.75
0.75
0.75
Slope
(ft/ft)
0.0080
0.0080
0.0060
0.0183
0.0060
0.0115
0.0115
0.0115
0.0115
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0080
0.0060
0 .0080
0.0080
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0060
0.0240
0.0060
0,0293
0.0100
0.0060
0.0110
0.01<>0
0.0334
0.0060
{min)
10.000
10.000
10.000
25.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
25.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
13.000
16.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
10.000
Stra ight Crown Flow {Solved to find actual depth of flow In gutter yl·
Q • 0 .56 • (z/n) • s 112 • ym o:> y={Q/ (O.S&• (z/n)• S 112)}w
n •Roughness Coerticient • 0.018
S • StreeVGutter S lope (ft/ft)
y • Depth of now at inlet (ft)
z • Reciprocal of crown s lope: 2Tstreet• 33
'·· {infhr)
11.639
11.639
11 .639
7.4n
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
7.4n
11.639
11.639
11.639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11.639
11.639
11.639
11.639
11 .639
10.400
9.434
11.639
11 .639
n .639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
11 .639
APPENOIXB1
100-year stOfm
a,. 0 1" + bypass y,.. Allowable
>--lfl_) _~-1;-.,--t Depth (cfs) (els)
3.75 0.300 3.60 8"
0.70 0.160 1.92 8"
2.53 0,259 3.11 8"
5,93 0.305 3.66 8"
5.76 5.76 a.Jn 4.47 8"
3.23 7.18 0.358 4.29 8"
4.10 0.290 3.48 8"
5.93 0.333 4 .00 8"
3.93 5.13 0.315 U.78 8"
1.92 2.31 0.264 3.17 8"
2.01 0.251 3.01 8"
2.44 0.256 3.07 8"
2.53 0.259 3.11 8"
2.44 2.44 0.270 3.24 8"
3.67 3.67 0.298 3.57 8"
3.40 3.41 0.290 3.48 8"
2.36 2.36 0.266 3,20 8"
1.66 0.233 2.80 8"
0.52 0.151 1.82 8"
3.75 0.317 3.80 8"
5.07 5.32 0.361 4.34 8"
3.31 3.31 0.302 3.63 8"
4.63 0.343 4.11 8"
2.01 0.193 2.32 8"
1.75 0.238 2.86 8"
3.06 0.218 2.62 8"
1.44 0.201 2.41 8"
0.96 0.190 2.28 8"
2.95 0.259 3.10 8"
3.23 0.272 3ZT 8"
4.10 0.238 2.85 8"
2.01 0.251 3.01 8"
v
(fps)
2.50
1.64
2.26
3.82
2.49
1.51
2.92
3.21
2.37
1.65
1.92
2.24
2.26
2.01
2.48
2.43
1.99
1.83
1.37
2.24
2.33
2.17
2.36
3.22
1.85
3.86
2.13
1.59
2.65
2.61
4.36
1.92
Top of
Curb
304.67
305.12
305.12
304.70
303.74
303.74
305.36
305.38
303.74
303.74
304.29
303.35
303.35
301 .98
301 .98
301 .98
301.98
302.05
301 .52
301 .52
301 .52
301.52
302.63
302.63
302.91
302.91
304.06
304.06
304.32
304.32
304.35
304.35
100-year storm
Gutter Gutter ROW Freeboard
FL Runoff, Elev. Elev. ft.
304.17 304.47 304.90 0.43
304.62 304.78 305.35 0.57
304.62 304.88 305.35 0.47
304.20 304.51 304 .93 0.42
303.24 303.61 303.97 0.36
303.24 303.60 303.97 0.37
304.86 305.15 305.59 0.44
304.86 305.19 305.59 0.40
303.24 303.56 303.97 0.41
303.24 303.50 303.97 0.47
303.79 304.04 304.52 0.48
302.85 303.11 303.58 0.47
302.85 303.11 303.58 0.47
301.48 301 .75 302.21 0.46
301 .48 301 .78 302.21 0.43
301 .48 301.n 302.21 0.44
301.48 301.75 302.21 0.46
301 .55 301 .78 302.28 0.50
301.02 301 .17 301 .75 0.58
301 .02 301 .34 301 .75 0.41
301 .02 301 .38 301 .75 0.37
301.02 301.32 301.75 0.43
302.13 302.47 302.86 0.39
302.13 302.32 302.86 0.54
302.41 302.65 303.14 0.49
302.41 302.G3 303.14 0.51
303.56 303.76 304.29 0.53
303.56 303.75 304.29 0.54
303,82 304.08 304,55 0.47
303.82 304.00 304.55 0.46
303.85 304.09 304.58 0.49
303.85 304.10 304.56 0.48
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS N0.1
Project: The Barracks Ii Ph 105 & 106 (FP) (14-00900082)
PLANNING
1. Rename "Approval of Planning & Zoning Commission " to "Certificate of Planning & Zoning
Commission "
2. Add Volume & Page for Phase 103 & 104.
3. Community Parkland dedication and development fees of $50 ,000 (80 lots x $625) will be due prior to
filing of the final plat.
Reviewed by : Jenifer Paz Date : March 17 , 2014
ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
1. Please show the Private Drainage Easements across Parkland Tract 8 adjacent to this plat.
2 . Please add a note stating that this site lies within the Steeplechase Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area .
3. Lines surrounding parkland that has already been dedicated should be the bold property boundary
line . Also , please add the hatching for the parks to your legend .
4 . The drainage easements between the lots and through parkland tract 9 should be private .
5. Please add a note stating that the private drainage easements will be maintained by the HOA.
6. The property line on block 20 between lots 5 & 6 is not labeled .
Construction Plan Comments
7 . The street sign located south of the Deacon/General Parkway intersection should be located on the
west side for a future stop sign along General Parkway .
8. Stop bars are only necessary at intersections with Minor Collectors and larger; the stop bar at the
intersection of Travis Cole and Armored Avenue can be removed .
9. The raised pavement markers along the 8" white stripe should be Type 11-C-R.
10 . Please provide a detail for backfill for HOPE pipes .
11 . Please provide steel casing for the 8" water line crossing under Deacon Drive .
12. FYI-there may be additional sidewalk ramps required for street crossings . We will send any
comments regarding the crossings separately .
Reviewed by : Danielle Singh Date : March 24 , 2014
ADDRESSING
1. Addresses for this project will be verified and distributed after the final plat has been approved and
filed at the Brazos County Courthouse .
2 . The proposed street names have been preliminarily approved and will be re-verified prior to filing any
plats to ensure no duplicate street names are being created within Brazos County .
3. Block Ranges :
3100 Airborne Ave@ 3100 Travis Cole Ave
3200 Travis Cole Ave
3300 Travis Cole Ave @ 200 Armored Ave
3400 General Pkwy @ 100 Tang Cake Dr
Reviewed by : Robin Krause , Permit Technician Date : March 14 , 2014
CITY OF C OLLEG E STAT!
Home a/Texas A&M University•
MEMORANDUM
March 24 , 2014 /
TO : Heath Phillips , via ; heath superiorstructures@yahoo .com V
FROM : Jenifer Paz , Staff Planner
SUBJECT: THE BARRACKS II PH 105 & 106 (FP)
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned final plat as requested . The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items that need to be addressed . If all comments have been addressed and the
following information submitted , your project will be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting held in the City Hall Council Chambers , 1101 Texas Avenue .
One (1) 24 "x36 " copy of the revised final plat ;
One (1) 24 "x36 " grading and erosion control plan;
Thirteen (13) 11 "x17 " copies of the revised final plat ;
Parkland Dedication in the amount of $50 ,000 must be submitted prior to the filing of the
final plat ;
One ( 1) Mylar original of the revised final plat (required after P&Z approval); and
One (1) copy of the digital file of the final plat on diskette or e-mail to :
pdsdigitalsubmittal@cstx .gov .
Upon receipt of the required documents for the Planning & Zoning meeting , your project will be
considered formally filed with the City of College Station . Please note that this application will expire in 90
days from the date of this memo , if the applicant has not provided written response comments and
revised documents to the Administrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein .
If all comments have not been addressed your project will not be scheduled for a Planning & Zoning
Comm ission meet ing . Your project may be placed on a future agenda once all the revisions have been
made and the appropriate fees paid . Once your item has been scheduled for the P&Z meeting , the
agenda and staff report can be accessed at the following web site on Monday the week of the P&Z
meeting .
http ://www .cstx .gov/pz
Please note that a Mylar original of the revised final plat will be required after P&Z approval and prior to
the filing of the plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at
979 .764 .3570 .
Attachments : Staff Review Comments /
PC : Joe Schultz , Schultz Engineering LLC , via ; joeschultz84@verizon .ne tV
P&DS Proj ect No . 14-00900082
Planning & De velopment Servi.ces
P.O. BOX 9%0 • 110 I TEXAS .AVENUE • COLLEGE STAT ION • TEXAS • 77 842
TEL 979.764.35 70 ·FAX. 979.7 6 4.34 %
cstx.gov/devservices
..
RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: The Barracks Ii Ph 105 & 106 (FP) (14-00900082)
PLANNING
~-
12 ·
Rename "App roval of Planning & Zoning Commission " to "Certificate of Planning & Zoning
Commission"
The certification title has been changed.
Add Volume & Page for Phase 103 & 104.
The Volume and Page for Phase 103 & 104 has been added to the plat.
3. Community Parkland ded ication and development fees of $50,000 (80 lots x $625) will be due prior to
fil ing of the final plat.
Noted.
;ENGINEERING COMMENTS NO. 1
I 1. Please show the Private Drainage Easements across Parkland Tract 8 adjacent to this plat.
J The Private Drainage Easements across Parkland Tract 8 have been added to the plat .
./2. Ple ase add a note stating that this site lies within the Steeplechase Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area .
Note #9 has been added to the Plat. j 3. Lines surround ing parkland that has already been dedicated should be the bold property boundary
line . Also , please add the hatching for the parks to your legend.
Parkland hatches have been added to the Legend and existing parkland boundaries within
/ 105and106 are shown as a bold line. h . The drainage easements between the lots and through parkland tract 9 should be private.
Drainage Easements have been revised to Private. /5. Please add a note stating that the private drainage easements will be maintained by the HOA.
/
Note #10 has been added to the plat.
6. The property line on block 20 between lots 5 & 6 is not labeled.
The property line between Lots 5&6, Block 20 has been labeled.
onstructi on Plan Comments
The street sign located south of the Deacon/General Parkway intersection should be located on the
west side for a future stop sign along General Parkway.
j The sign located south of Deacon/General intersections has been relocated.
8. Stop bars are only necessary at intersections with Minor Collectors and larger; the stop bar at the
intersection of Travis Cole and Armored Avenue can be removed.
/ The stop bar at Travis Cole and Armored Avenue has been removed.
V 9. The raised pavement markers along the 8" white stripe should be Type 11-C-R.
/ The ca/louts for raised pavement markers along the 8" white stripe have been revised.
v'10 . Please provide a detail for backfill for HOPE pipes .
A backfill detail for HDPE pipe has been added to sheet 12 of 26.
}),1. Please provide steel casing for the 8" water line crossing under Deacon Drive .
/ Steel Casing has been added to the water crossing under Deacon Drive. v' 12. FYI -there may be additional sidewalk ramps required for street crossings. We w ill send any
comments regarding the crossings separately.
ADA ramps have been added to cross General Parkway south of the Tang Cake
intersection.
,. .
ADDRESSING
1. Addresses for this project will be verified and distributed after the final plat has been approved and
filed at the Brazos County Courthouse.
Noted.
2 . The proposed street names have been preliminarily approved and will be re-verified prior to filing any
plats to ensure no duplicate street names are being created within Brazos County.
Noted.
3. Block Ranges :
3100 Airborne Ave @ 3100 Travis Cole Ave
3200 Travis Cole Ave
3300 Travis Cole Ave @ 200 Armored Ave
3400 General Pkwy @ 100 Tang Cake Dr
The Signage Plan has been updated with this information.
Please note the following changes to the plans:
Inlets 117, 118, 119 & 123 have been changed to 5' inlets and storm pipes 201 & 202 have been
changed to 18" HOPE pipes due to the excess capacity that is available in the previous design
for these structures.
The 12" Cross at the intersection of Deacon Drive and General Parkway has been changed to
a 12"x8" Tee. An additional 12" Tee was located across General Parkway to better provide
water access to the future phase 401.
A Fire Hydrant (#4) was added at the 90 degree turn in Travis Cole Avenue. This was to better
provide fire hydrant access to the townhomes.
Sewer line S-4 was moved to the other side of the townhomes on block 26. This was so that
any future buildings in phase 400 placed at the building setback wouldn't be too close to
sewer line S-4.
All of these changes are reflected in the revised Engineer's Estimate attached to this
submittal.
APPENDIXB2
STORM SEWER INLET SUMMARY
APPENDIXB2
Barracks II Phases 105 & 106
Storm Sewer Inlets in Sump - Design Analys i s
In let Area# Inlet Type Q10 010 010 Q100 0100 0100*
No . cfs ft. in . cfs ft. in .
S105 106 10 0.5 2 0.072 0.86 0.70 0.087 1.05
S108 113 15 6.75 0.303 3.63 9.7 1 0.386 4 .63
S111 110 10 3.66 0.264 3.16 5.52 0.347 4 .16
S119 122 10 1.81 0.165 1.98 2.44 0.202 2.42
S 120 120 10 2.53 0.206 2.47 3.41 0.252 3.02
S126 128 10 0.39 0.059 0.71 0.52 0.072 0.87
S127 127 10 3.86 0.273 3.28 5.32 0.339 4 .06
T201 209 5 3.43 0.401 4 .82 4.63 0.490 5.88
T203 207 10 1.30 0.132 1.58 1.75 0.161 1.93
T204 205 10 1.07 0.116 1.39 1.44 0.142 1.70
T205 203 10 2.19 0.187 2 .25 2.95 0.229 2 .74
T206 201 10 3.04 0.233 2.80 4 .10 0.285 3.42
*ROW elevation is 8" above gutter line so 100-yr storm runoff is contained within ROW
Assume 10% clogging for design
AppendlxB2
Grate Inlet Design Summary
Grate A c tual
Des i gn Ag
10-Y ear Storm 100-Yea r Storm
Inlet Grate Ag Cont rlbut Clogging Cal c ulatec
Number Size i ng Area A., 0 10 Depth, y 0 100 Depth, y
(ft') % 1tt21 (c fs) (ft) (in) (cfs) (ft) (in)
S101 V-4430 Gutter Inlet 1.84 102 25 1.38 3.04 0.21 2.51 4 .10 0.38 4.56
S103 V-4430 Gutter In let 1.84 103 25 1.38 1.36 0.04 0.50 1.83 0.08 0.91
S104 V-4430 Gutter Inlet 1.84 104 25 1.38 2.78 0.18 2.10 3.75 0.32 3.82
APPENDIX 82
Barracks II Phases 105 & 106
Storm Sewer Inlets on Grade -Design Ana lysis
Inlet Length Street 010 L 10 , ft. Bypass 0100 L 100, ft. Bypass
No . ft. Slope cfs Desifi!n cfs cfs Design cfs
S107 5 1.83% 4.35 16.88 2 .31 5.93 19.52 3.48
S109 10 1.15% 3.04 12.41 0 .16 4 .1 0 14.28 0.47
S110 10 1.15% 4.35 14.68 0.56 5.93 16.98 1.20
S114 5 0.60% 1.49 7.30 0.19 2.01 8.40 0.39
S117 10 0 .80 % 1.81 8 .73 0 .00 2.44 10.04 0 .00
S118 10 0.80% 1.88 8 .87 a.ob 2 .53 10 .21 0.00
S 125 5 0.60% 1.23 6 .67 0.10 1.66 7.68 0.25
Assume 10% clogging for design
Se= Sx + (a/w )* Eo
Eo= Ow/O = 1 -[ 1 - W /T]2·67
L=Kc*Q047*S0·3*(1 /(n *Se) )0·6
W = Width of Depressed Gutter (ft) = 2
Sx=Cross flow of Road Surface 0.03
T=Total Spread of water in gutter (ft) 12 .5
a=Gutter depression depth (ft}= 0 .33
n=Manning's Roughness Coefficient= 0 .018
Kc= 0 .6
Ow=Flow in w idth , W
E=Efficiency of inlet or percentage of interception
S=Longitudinal Slope
Li=Curb opening le ngth
Se= Sx + (a/w)* Eo 0.091412
Eo= Ow/O = 1 - [ 1 - W /T]2·67 0.372194
APPENDIX Cl
STORM SEWER PIPE SUMMARY
APPENDIXC1
Barracks II Phases 105 & 106
Storm Sewer Pipe Design Analysis (10 yr Storm)
HG10
Depth
Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe
No . Size Length Slope
(inches) (feet) (%)
Nonnal Deplh Surcharged
Q10 V10 Depth HG10 V10
(els) (fps) (feet) Slope (fps)
Downstream
Top Pipe
Structure Elev. FL
Upslream
Top Pipe HG10
Structure Elev. FL Elev.
Below
Gutter
(feet)
101 18 80.1 0.30 3 .02 3.49 0.82 0.08% 1.71 5 103 30 5.03 302.00 5101 305.27 302.24 303 .18 1.61
102 24 13.5 0.30 7.27 3.57 1.44 0.10% 2.32 5103 305.03 301 .50 5 102 305.47 301 .55 303 .11 1.86
103 24 160.8 0.3 0 7 .92 4.43 1.26 0.12% 2.52
<----
5 104 304.67 300.92 ~ 305.03 301.404 302.83 1.70
104 30 38.0 0.30 9 .67 3.33 1.74 0.06% 1.97 5105 305.12 300.21 5 104 304.67 300.322 302.08 2.09
105 30 93.5 0.30 11 .83 3.41 1.87 0.08% 2.41 5107 304.70 299.83 5 105 305 .12 300 .11 301.94 2.68
107 30 48.7 0.30 12.29 3.51 1.99 0.09% 2.50 5108 303.74 299.58 5107 304 .70 299 .73 301.73 2.47
108 30 42.0 0.30 14 .39 4.12 2.01 0.12% 2.93 5111 303.74 299.35 5108 303 .74 299.48 301.55 1.69
109 18 42.0 0.30 3.02 3.50 0.81 0.08% 1.71 5110 305.36 301 .05 5109 305.36 301 .17 302.09 2.77
110 24 197.4 0.30 5.42 4.03 1.31 0.06% 1.73 5111 303.74 299 .85 51 10 305.36 300.45 301 .61 3.25
111 36 93 .5 0.30 27.07 4.42 2.46 0 .16'Yo 3.83 5114 304.29 298 .47 5111 303.74 298 .75 301 .31 1.93
112 24 87.0 0.30 3.08 3.33 8 .93 0.02% 0.98 5114 304.29 299 .97 5112 303.99 300.24 301 .03 2.46
114 38 198.5 0.30 30.92 5.56 2.31 0.21 % 4.38 5 118 303.35 297 .78 5114 304.29 298 .37 300.84 2.95
115 24 31 .9 0.30 5.38 3.40 1.11 0.06% 1.71 5116 303.99 299.63 5115 303.16 299 .73 300.94 1.72
116 24 43.2 0.30 5.34 3.89 0.99 0.06% 1.70 5117 303.35 299.40 5116 303.99 299 .53 300.85 2.84
117 24 42.2 0.30 7 .10 4.25 1.25 0.10% 2.26 5118 303.35 298.78 5117 303.35 298 .9 300.24 2.61
118 2-36 172.0 0.30 38.28 3.51 2.40 0.33% 5.42 5120 301.98 297.16 5118 303 .35 297.875 299.94 2.91
11 9 18 42.2 0.3 0 4.45 3.96 1.11 0.18% 2.52 5 120 301 .98 298.66 5 119 301 .98 298.79 299.9 9 1.49
120 2-36 66.5 0.30 45.46 3.65 2.61 0.46% 6.43 5122 302.52 296.86 5 120 301 .98 297 .06 299.69 1.79
121 24 110.2 0.30 6.12 3.90 1.50 0.07% 1.95 5122 302.52 297.86 5121 302.24 298.19 299.61 2.13
122 2-38 127.7 0.30 50.54 3 .85 2.69 0.57% 7.15 5 125 302.05 296.38 5 122 302.52 296.76 299.44 2.58
123 18 96.4 0.30 3.77 3.71 1.17 0.13% 2.13 5 125 302.05 297.88 51 23 301 .80 298.17 299.31 1.99
125 2-36 91 .9 0.30 54 .63 4.02 2.76 0.67% 7.73 5127 301 .52 296.00 5 125 302.05 296.28 299 .08 2.47
126 18 52.2 0.30 3.06 3.46 1.18 0.08% 1.73 5127 301 .52 297.50 5126 301 .52 297.66 298.81 2.21
127 2-36 91 .7 0.30 60.21 4.49 2.70 0.81 % 8.52 5 129 301 .39 295.62 51 27 301 .52 295.9 298.71 2.31
128 18 112.0 0.30 2.86 3.42 1.01 0.07% 1.62 5 129 301 .39 297.12 5 128 301 .01 297.46 298.38 2.13
129 2-36 109.3 0.30 62.55 5.00 2.48 0.88% ass-5130 300.03 295.20 5 129 301 .39 295.82 298.22 2.67
130 2-38 32.3 0.30 62.55 5.79 2.14 0.88% 8 .85 OUT 298 .00 295.00 5130 300.03 295.1 297.57 1.98
201 24 142.3 1.00 4.90 5.10 0.74 0.05% 1.56 T202 304 .04 296.47 T201 302.63 297.9 298.81 3.52
202 24 18 .6 1.00 4.89 4 .95 0.76 0.05% 1.56 TOUT 292 .20 296 .20 T202 304.04 296.37 297.24 6.30
Notes
1. Friction losses and minor losses for 18" diameter pipe are computed as for a 15.6" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area .
2. Friction losses and minor losses for 24" diameter pipe are computed as for a 20.8" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area .
APPENDIX C1
Barracks II Phas es 105 & 106
Storm Sewer Pi pe Design Analysis (100 yr Storm)
Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe
No . Size Length Slope
{Inches) (feet) (%)
Nonnal Depth Surcharged
0100 V100 Depth HG100 V100
(els) (fps) (feet) Slope (fps)
Downstream
Top Pipe
S tructure Elev. FL
101 18 80.10 0.30 4 .37 3 .50 1.30 0 .17% 2.47 5103 305.03 302.00
102 24 13.50 0.30 9.91 4.28 1.72 0.19% ~ 5103 305.03 301 .50
103 24 160.80 0.30 10.89 5.12 1.72 0.23% 3 .47 5104 304 .67 300.92
1D4 30 38.00 ~ 18.10 3.69 2.50 0.19% 3 .69 5105 305.12 300.21
----105 30 93 .50 0.30 18.98 3 .87 2.50 0.21% 3 .87 5107 304.70 299 .83
107 30 48.70 0.30 19.85 4.04 2.50 0.23% 4.05 5108 303.74 299.58
----108 30 42.00 0.30 20.51 4.20 2.50 0.25% 4.18 5111 303.74 299.35
109 18 42.00 0.30 6 .10 4.59 1.30 0.34% 3.45 5110 305.36 ~
110 24 197.40 0.30 8.54 4.13 1.72 0.14% 2.72 5111 303 .74 299.85
111 36 93.50 0.30 33 .83 4.79 3.00 0.26% 4.79 5114 304.29 298.47
112 24 87.00 0.30 4.20 3.37 1.72 0.03 % 1.34 5114 304.29 299 .97
114 38 198.50 0.30 38.22 5.73 3.00 0.33% 5 .41 5118 303 .35 297.78
__ 1_15 __ 24 31 .90 0.30 7.37 3.49 1.72 0.11% 2.35 5116 303.99 299 .63
116 24 43.20 0.30 7.72 3.93 1.72 0.12% 2.46 5117 303.35 299 .40
117 24 42.20 0.30 10.92 4.72 1.72 0.23% 3.48 5118 303.35 298.78
118 2-36 172.00 0.30 50 .01 3.64 3.00 0.56% 7.08 5120 301 .98 297.16
119 18 42.20 0.30 5.75 4.36 1.30 0.30% 3.26 5 120 301 .98 298.66
120 2-36 66.50 0.30 57 .49 4 .07 3.00 0.74% 8.14 5122 302.52 296 .86
12 1 24 110.20 0.30 8.41 4.00 1.72 0.14,,o 2.6 8 5122 302.52 297.86
122 2-36 127.70 0.30 65.22 4.61 3.00 0.95% 9 .23 5125 302.05 296.38
123 18 96.40 0.30 5 .16 3.89 1.30 0.24% 2.92 5125 302.05 297.88
125 2-36 91 .90 0.30 71 .43 5.05 3.00 1.14% 10.11 5127 301 .52 296.00
126 18 52.20 0.30 5.24 3.95 1.30 0.25% 2.97 5127 301 .52 297.50
__ 1_27 __ 2-36 91.70 0.30 78.65 5.56 3.00 1.38% 11 .13 5129 301 .39 295:62
128 18 11 2.00 0.30 3 .91 3.50 1.30 0.14% 2.21 ------------5129 301 .39 297.12
129 2-36 109.30 0.30 82.21 5.84 2.95 1.51 % 11 .64 5130 300.03 295.20
130 2-36 32 .30 0.30 82.17 6 .44 2.54 1.51% 11 .63 OUT 298.00 295.00
201 24 142.30 1.00 6 .6 0 5.35 0.91 0.08% 2.10 T202 304.04 296.47
202 24 16.60 1.00 6.60 5.34 0.90 0.08% 2.10 TOUT 292.20 296.20
Notes
1. Friction losses and minor losses for 16" diameter pipe are computed as for a 15.6" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area .
2. Friction lo sses and minor losses for 24" diameter pipe are computed as for a 20.B" diameter pipe which represents a 25% reduction in pipe flow area .
Ups tream
Top Pipe
Structure Elev. FL
5101 305.27 302.24
5102 30 5.47 301 .55
5103 305.03 301.404
5104 304.67 300.322
5105 305.12 300.11
5107 304.70 299.73
5108 303 .74 299.48
5 109 305.36 301.17
5110 305.36 300.45
51 11 303.74 298.75
5112 303.99 300.24
5114 304 .29 298.37
5115 303.16 299.73
5116 303.99 299.53
5117 303.35 298.9
5118 303.35 297.675
5119 301.98 298.79
5120 301 .98 297.06
5121 302.24 298 .19
5122 302.52 296 .76
5123 301 .80 298.17
5125 302.05 296.28
5126 301 .52 297.66
5127 301 .52 295.9
5128 301 .01 297.46
5129 301 .39 295.62
5130 300.03 295.1
T201 302 .63 297 .9
T202 304 .04 296.37
HG10 0
Elev.
305.57
305.43
305.21
304 .67
305.20
304.32
303.10
305.11
305.35
302.98
303.99
303 .26
303 .03
302.84
302.73
302.93
301 .76
301.27
301 .36
300.94
300.95
300.35
300.75
299.70
299.43
298.95
300.03
298.76
297.41
HGiOO
Dep th
Below
ROW
{reet)
0.03
0.37
0.15
0.33
0.25
0.71
0.97
0.58
1.09
0.33
1.36
0.46
1.48
0.95
0.55
1.04
1.21
1.91
1.18
2.03
1.10
2.15
1.91
2.77
0.33
4.20
6 .96
APPENDIXC2
CONCRETE FLUME SUMMARY
Barracks II Phases 105 & 106
AppendixC2
Proposed Flume Analysis
Concrete Flume Summary
Drainage Storm (yr) Areas
25 207 ,208
100 207 ,208
25 207, 208,
2J5
JOO 207 , 208 ,
2J5
Storm (yr) Drainage
Areas
25 205 ,206
JOO 205 ,206
25 205, 206,
2J6
100 205 , 206,
216
..
Drainage Storm (yr) Areas
25 203 ,204
JOO 203 ,204
25 203, 204,
218
JOO 203 , 204,
2J8
Drainage Storm (yr) Areas
25 20J , 202
100 201 , 202
25 20J , 202,
220
JOO 20J, 202 ,
220
Q (cfs)
3.56
4 .80
5 .70
7.68
Q (cfs)
1.78
2.40
3 .66
4 .93
Q (cfs)
4 .58
6 .J8
7.30
9 .85
Q (c fs)
4.53
6 .JJ
6 .93
9.34
FLUME203
Bottom Width Flume Slope Depth (ft) {ft) (ft/ft)
Flume203A
0.5 5.0 0 .020
0.5 5.0 0 .020
Flume203 B
0 .5 5 .0 0 .008
0 .5 5.0 0 .008
FLUME204
Bottom Width Flume Slope Depth (ft) (ft) (ft/ft)
Flume204A
0 .5 5 .0 0 .020
0 .5 5 .0 0 .020
Flume204B
0.5 5 .0 0 .008
0.5 5.0 0.008
FLUME'205
Bottom Width Flume Slope Depth (ft) (ft) (ft/ft)
Flume205A
0 .5 5 .0 0 .02 0
0 .5 5 .0 0 .020
Flume205 B
0.5 5 .0 0.008
0 .5 5 .0 0 .008
FLUME206
Bottom Width Flume Slope Depth (ft) (ft) (ft/ft)
. ' Flume206A
0.5 5 .0 0 .020
0.5 5.0 0 .020
Flume206 B
0 .5 5.0 0 .0 08
0 .5 5 .0 0 .008
Velocity Flow · Freeboard to
Manning's n Top of Concrete (ft/s). Depth (ft) Curb (ft)
0 .018 3 .56 0 .20 0.30
0.Dl8 . 4 .00 0 .24 0 .26
0 .018 3.26 0.35 O.J5
O.OJ8 3.66 0 .42 0.08
Velocity Flow Freeboard to
Manning's n Top of Concrete . (ft/s) Depth (ft) Curb (ft)
O.O J8 2.74 O.J3 0.37
O.O J 8 3 .00 O.J6 0.34
O.OJ8 2.71 0.27 0 .23
0.0 18 3 .08 0.32 0 .18
'
Velocity Flow Freeboard to
Manning's n Top of Concrete (ft/s) Depth (ft) Curb (ft)
O.OJ8 3 .98 0 .23 0 .27
0 .01 8 4.41 0 .28 0 .22
0 .018 3.56 0 .41 0 .09
0 .018 4 .02 0.49 0 .0 1
Velocity Flow Freeboard to
Manning's n Top of Concrete (ft/s) Depth (ft) Curb (ft)
O.OJ8 3 .94 0.23 0 .2 7
O.O J8 4.53 0 .27 0 .23
O.Dl8 3.55 0.39 0.1 J
0.018 3 .9 7 0.47 0.03
APPENDIXD
TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
The Cities of Bryan and College Station both require storm drainage design to follow these
Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines. Paragraph C2 of Section Ill (Administration) requires
submittal of a drainage report in support of the drainage plan (stOrmwater management plan)
proposed in connection with land development projects , both site projects and subdivisions .
That report may be submitted as a traditional prose report, complete with applicable maps,
graphs , tables and drawings , or it may take the form of a "Technical Design Summary". The
format and content for such a summary report shall be in substantial conformance with the
description in th is Appendix to those Guidelines. In either format the report must answer the
questions (affirmative or negative) and provide, at minimum, the information prescribed in the
"Techn ical Design Summary" in this Appendix .
The Stormwater Management Technical Design Summary Report shall include several parts
as lis ted below. The information called for in each part must be provided as applicable . In
addition to the requirements for the Executive Summary, this Appendix includes several
pages detailing the requirements for a Technical Design Summary Report as forms to be
completed . These are provided so that they may be copied and completed or scanned and
digitized . In addition , electronic versions of the report forms may be obtained from the City.
Requirements for the means (medium) of submittal are the same as for a conventional report
as detailed in Section Ill of these Guidelines.
Note: Part 1 -Executive Summary must accompany any drainage report
required to be provided in connection with any land development project ,
regardless of the format chosen for said report.
Note: Parts 2 through 6 are to be provided via the forms provided in this
Appendix. Brief statements should be included in the forms as requested,
but additional information should be attached as necessary.
Part 1 -Executive Summary Report
Part 2 -Project Administration
Part 3 -Project Characteristics
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Part 6 -Conclusions and Attestation
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT
Part 1 -Executive Summary
This is to be a brief prose report that must address each of the seven areas listed below.
Ideally it will include one or more paragraphs about each item.
1. Name , address, and contact information of the engineer submitting the report, and
of the land owner and developer (or applicant if not the owner or developer). The
date of submittal should also be included .
2 . Identification of the size and general nature of the proposed project, including any
proposed project phases. This paragraph should also include reference to
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 1of26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D-TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
applications that are in process with either City: plat(s), site plans, zoning requests ,
or clearing/grad ing permits, as well as reference to any application numbers or
codes assigned by the City to such request.
3. The location of the project should be described . This should identify the Named
Regulatory Watershed(s) in which it is loca ted, how the entire project area is
situated therein, whether the property stradd les a watershed or basin divide , the
approxima te acreage in each basin , and whether its position in the Watershed
dictates use of detention design . The approximate proportion of the property in the
city limits and within the ET J is to be identified , including whether the property
straddles city jurisdictional lines. If any portion of the property is in floodplains as
described in Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by FEMA that should be
disclosed .
4. The hydrologic characteristics of the property are to be described in broad terms:
existing land cover ; how and where stormwater drains to and from neighboring
properties; ponds or wetland areas that tend to detain or store stormwater; ex isting
creeks , channels, and swales crossing or serv ing the property; all existing dra inage
easements (or ROW) on the property, or on neighboring properties if they serv ice
runoff to or from the property.
5. The general plan for managing stormwater in the entire project area must be
outlined to include the approximate size, and extent of use , of any of the following
features : storm drains coupled with streets ; detention I retention facilit ies; buried
conveyance conduit independent of streets; swales or channels ; bridges or culverts;
outfalls to principal watercourses or their tributaries; and treatment(s) of ex isting
watercourses. Also, any plans for reclaiming land within floodplain areas must be
outlined.
6. Coordination and permitting of stormwater matters must be addressed . Th is is to
include any specialized coordination that has occurred or is planned wi th other
entities (local , state , or federal). This may include agencies such as Brazos County
government, the Brazos River Authority , the Texas A&M University System , the
Texas Department of Transportation , the Texas Commission for Environmental
Quality, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Environmental Protection Agency,
et al. Mention must be made of any permits , agreements , or understandings that
pertain to the project.
7. Reference is to be made to the full drainage report (or the Technical Design
Summary Report) which the executive summary represents . The principal
elements of the main report (and its length), including any maps, draw ings or
construction documents, should be itemized . An example statement might be :
"One __ -page drainage report dated one set of
construction drawings ( sheets) dated , and a
___ -page specifications document dated ____ comprise
the drainage report for this project."
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 2 of26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Start (Page 2.1)
.,. Engineering and Design Professionals Information · ~ .
Engineering Firm Name and Address: Jurisdiction
Schultz Engineering, LLC City: Bryan
P.O. Box 11995 ./ College Station
College Station, Tx 77842 Date of Submittal:
March2013
Lead Engineer's Name and Contact lnfo.(phone , e-mail, fax): Other:
Joseph P. Schultz, PE email: joeschultz84@verizon.net
Phone: 764-3900 fax: 764-3910
Supporting Engineering I Consulting Firm(s): Other contacts :
n!a
.... . Developer I Owner I Applicant Information . , ..
Developer I Applicant Name and Address: Phone and e-mail :
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC 979-690-5000
3302 General Parkway
College Station, TX 77845
Property Owner(s) if not Developer I Applicant (&address): Phone and e-mail :
-. ~ _,,, :r. . .,,. --7··;."". -Project Identification
Development Name: The Barracks II Subdivision, Phases 105 & 106
Is subject property a site project , a single-phase subdivision , or part of a multi-phase subdivision?
Multi-Phase Subdivision If multi-phase, subject property is phase 6 of 13
Legal description of subject property (phase) or Project Area:
(see Section II , Paragraph B-3a)
Crawford Burnett League, A-7
If subject property (phase) is second or later phase of a project , describe general status of all
earlier phases . For most recent earlier phase Include submittal and review dates.
Housing construction is complete and on-going in the previous phases (Sections 103, 104 & 300)
General Location of Project Area, or subject property (phase):
Between Old Welborn Road and Holleman Dr. South, North of Rock Prairie Road West and South of Cain
Rd.
In City Limits? Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (acreage):
Bryan : acres. Bryan: College Station:
College Station : 13·14 acres. Acreage Outside ET J:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 3 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Continued (page 2.2)
Project Identification {continued) ..
~
Roadways abutting or within Project Area or Abutting tracts, platted land, or built
subject property: developments:
Old Wellborn Rd. The Barracks Section 102, 103, 104 & 300
Holleman Drive South
Named Regulatory Watercourse(s) & Watershed(s): Tributary Basin(s):
Bee Creek Trib B.3
...
• ,. 0 Plat Information For Ptoj~ct or Subject Property {or Phase)_
'•,
Preliminary Plat File#: 14-oo9oooio Final Plat File#: NIA Date: April 2014
Name: THE BARRACKS II (PP) Status and Vol/Pg : submitted with this project
If two plats, second name: File#:
Status: Date:
. ·'' .Zoning fnforniation For Project or Subject Property {or Phase) , ,r···· .
:, •. ? • ' ' ' • ' ' ·':. ' ! .,,.. ~
Zoning Type: PDD Existing or Proposed? Existing Case Code:
Case Date Status:
Zoning Type: Existing or Proposed? Case Code:
Case Date Status:
. • ' ·-t'· .J-· • ' ; ,.'""' .' .. , [ •.
· Stormwater Management Planning For Project qr ·subject Property {or Phase)
.~ . . . . ~
Planning Conference(s) & Date(s): Participants:
NIA
Preliminary Report Required? NIA Submittal Date Review Date
Review Comments Addressed? Yes --No --In Writing? When?
Compliance With Preliminary Drainage Report. Briefly describe (or attach documentation
explaining) any deviation(s) from provisions of Preliminary Drainage Report, if any.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 4 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 2 -Project Administration I Continued (page 2 .3)
. •· •.· Coordination For Project or Subj~ct. P~operty ·(or Phas~)' ,,: .. .. {~: .
:.· .· ,,,, ...
. ''· •: .. ... . . . . . '
Note: For any Coordination of stormwater matters indicated below, attach documentation
describing and substantiating any agreements , understandings, contracts , or approvals.
Coord ination Dept. Contact: Date : Subject:
With Other
Depart ments of
Jurisdiction
City (Bryan or
College Station)
Coord ina t ion W it h Summ.arize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
Non-jurisdiction
City Needed?
Yes No ./ -- --
Coord i nation with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
Brazos County
Needed?
Yes --No _L
Coord ination with Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
TxDOT Needed?
Yes No ./ --
Coord ination wi t h Summarize need(s) & actions taken (include contacts & dates):
TAMUS Needed?
Yes No ./ --
' . .. ,
Pern:iits For Project "9 r~subjefa ~roperfy."(<?r Phase)\·:::·.:~ ·:: -.·· ;-.:~··· :. .
~ , , \,;,• "'' ~-"''"" '-
As to stormwater management, are permits requ ired for the proposed work from any of the entities
listed below? If so , summarize status of efforts toward that objective in spaces below.
Entity Permitted or
Approved?
US Army Crops of P ermitted Engineers
No Yes ./ --
US Environmental
Protection Agency
No ./ Yes -
Texas Commission on Approved Environmental Quality
No Yes ./ ----
Brazos River
Author ity
No _:[__ Yes -
STORMWATER DES IGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Status of Actions (include dates)
Permit approved.
NOi for entire Subdivision
Page 5 of26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -ProQert~ Characteristics I Start (Page 3.1)
Nature. and .Scope of Proposed Work ..
Existing: Land proposed for development currently used , including extent of impervious cover?
Proposed development is residential subdivision. High density. Impervious co ver = 75%
Site __ Redevelopment of one platted lot, or two or more adjoining platted lots.
Development __ Building on a single platted lot of undeveloped land .
Project __ Building on two or more platted adjoining lots of undeveloped land .
(select all __ Building on a single lot, or adjoining lots, where proposed plat will not form applicable) a new street (but may include ROW dedication to existing streets).
__ Other (explain):
Subdivision __ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more platted lots.
Development _!__ Construction of streets and utilities to serve one or more proposed lots on
Project lands represented by pending plats.
Site projects: bu ilding use(s), approximate floor space , impervious cover ratio.
Describe Subdivisions: number of lots by general type of use, linear feet of streets and
Nature and drainage easements or ROW.
Size of 80 lots. Approximately 3333' of Streets.
Pro~osed
Project 4.79ac. -ROW
Is any work planned on land that is not platted If yes, explain :
or on land for which platting is not pending?
./ No Yes ----
FEMA Floodplains ". . "',;~'. " .c i r:; ..
'·
'
Is any part of subject property abutting a Named Regulatory Watercourse I No __ Yes_!_ (Section II, Paragraph B 1) or a tributary thereof?
Is any part of subject property in floodplain I No_{_ Yes Rate Map area of a FEMA-regulated watercourse? --
Encroachment(s) Encroachment purpose(s): __ Building site(s) __ Road crossing(s) into Floodplain
areas planned? __ Utility crossing(s) __ Other (explain):
No ./ --
Yes --
If floodplain areas not shown on Rate Maps, has work been done toward amending the FEMA-
approved Flood Study to define allowable encroachments in proposed areas? Explain.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 6 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~ert~ Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.2)
...
Hydrologic Attributes of Subject PropertY (or Phase) • i
....
Has an earlier hydrologic analysis been done for larger area including subject property?
Yes Reference the study (&date) here , and attach copy if not already in City files.
./ Kimley-Horn Study (July 2012 & Revised September 2013) -Analyzed downstream flooding --potential and detention pond design.
Is the stormwater management plan for the property in substantial conformance with the
earlier study? Yes -./ -No --If not, explain how it differs.
No If subject property is not part of multi-phase project , describe stormwater management
plan for the property in Part 4.
--If property is part of multi-phase project , provide overview of stormwater management plan
for Project Area here . In Part 4 describe how plan for subject property will comply
therewith.
Do existing topographic features on subject property store or detain runoff? ~No --Yes
Describe them (include approximate size, volume, outfall , model, etc).
Any known drainage or flooding problems in areas near subject property? __ No ,/ Yes
Identify:
The area around Cain Road and Old Wellborn Road.
Based on location of study property in a watershed, is Type 1 Detention (flood control) needed?
(see Table B-1 in Appendix B) Already Provided in previous phase
_!__Detention is required. --Need must be evaluated. __ Detention not required .
What decision has been reached? By whom?
If the need for How was determination made?
Type 1 Detention
must be evaluated:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 7 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Pro~ert~ Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.3)
'' Hydrologic Attri~utes .of Subject Property (or~Pha,se) (contiri~ed)
Does subject property straddle a Watershed or Basin divide? _.:[__No --Yes If yes,
describe splits below. In Part 4 describe design concept for handling this.
Watershed or Basin Larger acreage Lesser acreage
Above-Project Areas(Section 11, Paragraph 83-a)
Does Project Area (project or phase) receive runoff from upland areas? __ No _:[_ Yes
Size(s) of area(s) in acres: 1) 2.52 2) 3) 4)
Flow Characteristics (each instance) (overland sheet, shallow concentrated, recognizable
concentrated section(s), small creek (non -regulatory), regulatory Watercourse or tributary);
Each instance is overland sheet flow and shallow concentrated flow.
Flow determination: Outline hydrologic methods and assumptions:
Rational Equation. C-values
0. 75 for Developed Lot Areas, 0.65 for Developed Park Areas, 0.45 for Undeveloped Areas
Does storm runoff drain from public easements or ROW onto or across subject property?
./ No --Yes If yes, describe facilities in easement or ROW :
Are changes in runoff characteristics subject to change in future? Explain
Yes. As adjoining tracts develop and install detention ponds, their outflows will be conveyed through
this tract by the proposed storm sewer.
Conveyance Pathways (Section II, Paragraph C2)
Must runoff from study property drain across lower properties before reaching a Regulatory
Watercourse or tributary? ./ No Yes
Describe length and characteristics of each conveyance pathway(s). Include ownership of
property(ies ).
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 8 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 3 -Property Characteristics I Continued (Page 3.4)
, Hydrologic Attribut.es ofSubj~ct Property (or Phase) (continued)
Conveyance Pathways (continued)
Do drainage If yes , for what part of length? % Created by?_£_ plat, or
easements __ instrument. If instrument(s), describe their provisions.
exist for any
Drainage easements convey drainage from Travis Cole Avenue to the existing
drainage pathway.
part of
pathway(s)?
No --
~Yes
Pathway
Areas
Nearby
Where runoff must cross lower properties, describe characteristics of abutting lower
property(ies). (Existing watercourses? Easement or Consent aquired?)
Existing watercourse crosses the downstream properties. See Kimley Horn Report
Describe any built or improved drainage facilities existing near the property (culverts,
bridges , lined channels, buried conduit, swales , detention ponds , etc).
Detention Ponds constructed with previous phases.
Drainage f--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Facilities Do any of these have hydrologic or hydraulic influence on proposed stormwater
design? __ No _L Yes If yes , explain:
See Kimley Horn Report, Phase 100 Report by Phillips Engineering and Phases 101 -104 &
300 Report by Goodwin-Lasiter, Inc.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 9 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage ConceQt and Design Parameters I Start (Page 4.1)
.. S~ormwater Management Concept . ·.• -.. ;;,. '"·
Discharge{s) From Upland Area{s)
If runoff is to be received from upland areas, what design drainage features will be used to
accommodate it and insure it is not blocked by future development? Describe for each area,
flow section , or discharge point.
Runoff from upland areas will be captured in publicly owned storm drain systems as the subdivision
develops.
Discharge{s) To Lower Property{ies) (Section II, Paragraph E1)
Does project include drainage features (existing or future) proposed to become public via
platting? --No __:f_ Yes Separate Instrument? ./ No -Yes
Per Guidelines reference above, how will __ Establishing Easements (Scenario 1) runoff be discharged to neighboring ~ Pre-development Release (Scenario 2) property(ies)? Combination of the two Scenarios --
Scenario 1: If easements are proposed, describe where needed, and provide status of actions
on each . (Attached Exhibit# )
Scenario 2: Provide general description of how release(s) will be managed to pre-development
conditions (detention, sheet flow, partially concentrated , etc.). (Attached Exhibit# )
Detention Pond.
Combination: If combination is proposed, explain how discharge will differ from pre-
development conditions at the property line for each area (or point) of release.
If Scenario 2 , or Combination are to be used , has proposed design been coordinated with
owner(s) of receiving property(ies)?
documentation.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
./ No
Page 10 of 26
--Yes Expla in and provide
APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.2)
Stormwa~er IVianage,_ment (:oncept (continued) .,_ · •. • ,. ,. • .• 1
Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project
Identify gaining Basins or Watersheds and acres shifting: -
Will project resu lt
i n shifting runoff
between Basins or
between 1-:-::W-::-h-a-,-t _,.de-s-,-ig-n-an-d-,--m-,-it.,--ig-a--,-tio-n---,--is_u_s-ed-:--to_c_o_m_p_e_n_s_at_e_,f_o_r i-n-cr_e_a-se_d_r_u_n-off----1
Watersheds? from gaining basin or watershed?
./ No
Yes
How will runoff from Project
Area be mitigated to pre-
development conditions?
Select any or all of 1, 2,
and /or 3, and explain below.
1. __ With facility(ies) i nvolving other development projects.
2 . _{_Establ ishing features to serve overall Project Area .
3. _{_On phase (or site) project basis within Project A rea .
1. Shared facil ity (type & location of facility; design drainage area served ; relationship to size of
Project Area): (Attached Exhibit# )
2. For Overall Project Area (type & location of facilities): (Attached Exhibit #A )
E xisting detention ponds will s erve the proposed de velopm ent
3. By phase (or site) project: Describe planned mitigation measures for phases (or sites) in
subsequent questions of this Part.
('·
"O
Q) [/) c:: Q)
ffi >-
0:::
[/) c::
Cl ·u;
Q) 0 Oz
ro J.t l
~
<(
Are aquatic echosystems proposed? __ No
project(s)?
__ Yes In which phase(s) or
Are other Best Management Practices for reducing stormwater pollutants proposed?
__ No ____{__Yes Summarize type of BMP and extent of use:
Silt f ences, construction exits, rock check dams, seeding and ero sion matting.
If design of any runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of B-CS Technical
Specifications , check type facility(ies) and explain in later questions.
__ Detention elements __ Conduit elements __ Channel features
__ Swales __ Ditches __ Inlets __ Valley gutters __ Outfalls
__ Culvert features __ Bridges Other
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 11 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.3)
Stormwater Management Concept (cbntinued)
' -: .. ~· -.; f"' .
Within Project Area Of Multi-Phase Project (continued)
Will Project Area include bridge(s) or culvert(s)? ~No __ Yes Identify type and
general size and In which phase(s).
If detention/retention serves (will serve) overall Project Area, describe how it relates to subject
phase or site project (physical location, conveyance pathway(s), construction sequence):
The detention ponds constructed with the previous phases will serve this phase. Runoff will enter the
pond through the underground storm drains.
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site)
If property part of larger Project Area, is design in substantial conformance with earlier analysis
and report for larger area? ___:!__Yes No, then summarize the difference(s):
Identify whether each of the types of drainage features listed below are included, extent of use,
and general characteristics.
C'-·
-0
Q) II) ~ Q)
II) >-
i I
~ 0
"(jj z
~ "' -<
Typical shape? I Surfaces?
Steepest side slopes: Usual front slopes: Usual back slopes:
Flow line slopes: least. ____ _ Typical distance from travelway:
typical greatest ___ _ (Attached Exhibit # )
Are longitudinal culvert ends in compliance with B-CS Standard Specifications?
___ Yes No, then explain:
At intersections or otherwise, do valley gutters cross arterial or collector streets?
./ No __ Yes lfyesexplain:
Are valley gutters proposed to cross any street away from an intersection?
./ No __ Yes Explain: (number of locations?)
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 12 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.4)
.·
Stormwater Management Concept (continued) .. '
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
C'-· "C
a> en en a>
:J >-
E
2. .t i ~ en
c ·-0 ~z
Gutter line slopes: Least 0.60 Usual 0.60 Greatest 3.5
Are inlets recessed on arterial and collector streets? _:!._Yes
iden t ify where and why.
__ No lf "no ",
Will inlets capture 10-year design stormflow to prevent flooding of intersections (arterial
with arterial or collector)? _:!._ Yes __ No If no, exp lain where and why not.
Will inlet size and placement prevent exceeding allowable wa ter spread for 10-year
design storm throughout site (or phase)? __.f__ Yes __ No If no , explain .
Sag curves : Are inlets placed at low po ints? _:!._Yes __ No Are inlets and
condu it sized to prevent 100-year stormflow from ponding at greater than 24 inches?
~Yes __ No Explain "no " answers.
Will 100-yr stormflow be contained in combination of ROW and buried conduit on
whole length of all streets? ~Yes __ No If no , describe where and why .
Do designs for curb, gutter, and inlets comply with 8-CS Technical Specifications?
./ Yes __ No If not, descr ibe diffe rence(s) and attach justification .
Are any 12-inch laterals used? ~No
used .
__ Yes Identify length(s) and where
Pipe runs between system I Typical 50' Longest 199
access points (feet): ----- -----
Are junction boxes used at each bend? ./ Yes __ No If not, explain where
and why .
"C_§ I ~------------------.--,------,--,-:--..,-;-----:----::----1
Are downstream soffits at or below upst ream soffits? Least amount that hydraulic ~ Yes ./ No __ If not, explain where and why: grade line is below gutter line
(system-wide):
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 13 of 26
1.05'
APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.5)
-" Stormwater Management Concept (continued) . ~ ·~. . ..
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
U)
Cl>
(.) c
~ c
~
......... 0
~E
::::l L.. -~ .E c .
0 .E (.) c ._,. ·-
E <DE
Cl>
-C'IJ CJ) CJ)
~Cl>
c:2 ·-> ~ e
" a. Ea;
.9 ~
Cf) CJ)
Cl> -~
C'IJ a.
Cl>
CJ)
Describe watercourse(s), or system(s) receiving system discharge(s) below
(include design discharge velocity, and angle between converging flow lines).
1) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle?
Bee Creek Trib B.3 @ 0°, < 2 fps
2) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle?
3) Watercourse (or system), velocity, and angle?
For each outfall above, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour of
receiving and all facilities at juncture?
1) Outfall from this development will occur into downstream pipes from prev. phases
2)
c _£. 3)
C:-·
CJ) -Cl>
~CJ)
-Cl> CJ)>-
! I
~ 0
CJ)Z
::::l
iv11
CJ)
~ <:t:
Are swale(s) situated along property lines between properties? _!__No __ Yes
Number of instances: For each instance answer the following questions.
Surface treatments (including low-flow flumes if any):
Flow line slopes (minimum and maximum):
Outfall characteristics for each (velocity, convergent angle, & end treatment).
Will 100-year design storm runoff be contained within easement(s) or platted drainage
ROW in all instances? __ Yes __ No If "no" explain:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 14 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Pag e 4 .6)
~ * •. 'w. '
St9rm_water Management Concept {con.tinued)
"
With in Or Serving Subject Property {Phase, or Site) {continued)
Cl)
(].) .c
.B
i:5
(].)
"C ·u;
"C co
0
0:::
Cl)
(].) >-
Are roadside ditches used? ___:/__No __ Yes If so, provide the following :
Is 25-year flow contained with 6 inches of freeboard throughout? __ Yes __ No
Are top of banks separated from road shoulders 2 feet or more? __ Yes __ No
Are all ditch sections trapezoidal and at least 1.5 feet deep? __ Yes __ No
For any "no" answers provide location(s) and explain :
If condu it is beneath a swale , provide the following information (each instance).
Instance 1 · Descr ibe general location , approximate length :
Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combination?
If "no " explain :
Yes No lj c r-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 co Space for 100-year storm flow? ROW Easement Width z t5
l'I ~
0 :;::;
C'-·
Cl)
Qi c c co .c
:0
"C co
>. c co
(..) L..
c .2 (].) c a. 0 0 :;::; ...... co
~ §
-~ .2 c
.!; (].)
-c E (].) co ~ Cl)
Cl)~ § ·:;: :;::; e ~ a.
Swale Surface type , minimum
and maximum slopes :
Conduit Type and size, minimum and maximum
slopes, design storm:
Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains , inlets by type):
Access Describe how maintenance access is prov ided (to swale , into conduit):
Instance 2 Describe general location , approximate length:
Is 100-year design flow contained in conduit/swale combinat ion?
If "no " explain:
Yes No
~ ~ ~S~pa_c_e_f_o_r_1_0_0--y-e-ar_s_t_o-rm~fl-ow~?-R~O-W~~~~E-as_e_m_e_n_t~~~-W~id-th~~~~~~
0 .c
(..) Cl)
-2 ~ ~ c co
Swa le Surface type, minimum
and maximum slopes:
Conduit Type and size , minimum and maximum
slopes, design storm:
0 a. 1---~~~~~~~~~~~-'---~-,-,-~~~--.,.~~~--,-------,---,----.,.~~-,---~~~
~ 5l Inlets Describe how conduit is loaded (from streets/storm drains, inlets by type):
1 E,
~ 1---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--.,.~~~----,,-,-,.---~~~
<( Access Describe how maintenance access is provided (to swale , into conduit):
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 15 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4. 7)
Stormwater Maragement Concept (continued)
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
c "ffi
0.. E x e UJ ._
If "yes" provide the following information for each instance:
Instance 1 Describe general location , approximate length, surfacing:
~ en Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? __ Yes __ No Is swale wholly
c >-a> within drainage ROW? ___ Yes ___ No Explain "no" answers:
.; I t--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
u Access Describe how maintenance access is provide:
~ 0 '§ z
~./I r-:----.,..~~-=--=-~-:-:---~~-----:--:----,,---~~-----:~~,.--~~~~~~~~~~~~
'"' Instance 2 Describe general location , approximate length, surfacing :
Q)
·;:: C'·
:J (/)
.0 c
-Q) 5 E
£. Q) -(/) ·3 co
Q)
(/) .._
Q) 0
1~
0:: ~ -~
:0
C'·
"'C
:J a.
c Q) (/) co
0 -a. a.
0 x .._ UJ
a.
(/) (/) -Q) c >-Q)
E
I
Q)
> 0 .._
a.
E 0 z
Qi .;J c c co
£.
()
Is 100-year design flow contained in swale? __ Yes __ No Is swale wholly
within drainage ROW? __ Yes __ No Explain "no" answers:
Access Describe how maintenance access is provided:
Instance 3. 4. etc. If swales are used in more than two instances, attach sheet
providing all above information for each instance.
"New" channels: Will any area(s) of concentrated flow be channelized (deepened,
widened, or straightened) or otherwise altered? __ No __ Yes If only slightly
shaped, see "Swales" in this Part. If creating side banks, provide information below.
Will design replicate natural channel? __ Yes __ No If "no", for each instance
describe section shape & area, flow line slope (min . & max.), surfaces, and 100-year
design flow, and amount of freeboard:
Instance 1:
Instance 2:
Instance 3: ·
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 16 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage ConceQt and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.8)
Stormwater Management Concept .{continued) .
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Existing channels {small creeks}: Are these used? ~ No --Yes
If "yes" provide the information below.
Will small creeks and their floodplains remain undisturbed? __ Yes No How
many disturbance instances? Identify each planned location :
For each location, describe length and general type of proposed improvement
(including floodpla in changes):
For each location , describe section shape & area , flow line slope (min . & max.),
surfaces , and 100-year design flow .
........
"O
Q)
::J c :;::; Watercourses {and tributaries}: Aside from fringe changes , are Regulatory c
0 Watercourses proposed to be altered? ~No Yes Expla in below. (..) ---
fl') -Submit full report describing proposed changes to Regulatory Watercourses. Address c
Q) existing and proposed section size and shape, surfaces, alignment, flow line changes, E
Q) length affected , and capacity , and prov ide full docu.mentation of analysis procedures > 0 and data . Is full report submitted? Yes No If "no " explain: .... --c..
E -
Q) c c
Ctl All Proposed Channel Work: For all proposed channel wo rk , provide information .J::
(..) requested in next three boxes.
If design is to rep licate natural channel , identify location and length here , and describe
design in Special Design section of this Part of Report .
Will 100-year flow be contained with one foot of freeboard? Yes --No If --
not , identify location and explain:
Are ROW I easements sized to contain channel and required maintenance space?
--Yes --No If not, identify location(s) and explain:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 17 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage ConceQt and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.9)
Stormwater Management Concept (continued) ''
, "· ' , , ' ,,, '
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
How many facilities for subject property project? For each provide info. below.
For each dry-type facilitiy: Facility 1 Facility 2
Acres served & design volume + 10%
100-yr volume: free flow & plugged
Design discharge (10 yr & 25 yr)
Spillway crest at 100-yr WSE? __ yes --no __ yes --no
Berms 6 inches above plugged WSE? __ yes --no __ yes --no
Explain any "n o " answers:
C/)
Q) >-
I For each facility what is 25-yr design Q , and design of outlet structure?
Faci lity 1:
0 z Facility 2 :
~1 Do outlets and spillways discharge into a public facility in easement or ROW?
Facility 1: __ Yes No Facility 2: Yes No ------
C"· If "no" explain: "O
Q)
C/)
0 a.
0 .... c.. For each, what is velocity of 25-yr design discharge at outlet? & at spillway?
C/)
Q) Facility 1: & Faci lity 2: & ~
'(3 Are energy dissipation measures used? No Yes Describe type and ro --u. location:
c
.Q c
Q) -Q)
0
Q) For each, is spillway surface treatment other than concrete? Yes or no, and describe: .... <t: Facility 1:
Faci lity 2:
For each, what measures are taken to prevent erosion or scour at receiving facility?
Facility 1:
Facility 2:
If berms are used give heights, slopes and surface treatments of sides.
Facility 1:
Facility 2:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 18 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce12t and Design Parameters J Continued (Page 4.10)
' , ..
Stormwater Management Concept {continued) .. )
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Do structures comply with B-CS Specifications? Yes or no , and explain if "no":
(/)
Facility 1;
(!)
~ =:c ~ (!) Facility 2: IJ.. ::::l c c~
0 c
~ 0 c u
(!)--For additional facilities provide all same information on a separate sheet. (!)
0
Are parking areas to be used for detention? __ No --Yes What is
maximum depth due to required design storm?
Roadside Ditches: Will culverts serve access driveways at roadside ditches?
--No --Yes If "yes", provide information in next two boxes .
Will 25-yr. flow pass without flowing over driveway in all cases? --Yes --No
Without causing flowing or standing water on public roadway? --Yes --No
Designs & materials comply with B-CS Technical Specifications? __ Yes --No
Explain any "no" answers :
C'-·
(/)
O'l c ·u;
Are culverts parallel to public roadway alignment? __ Yes No Explain : (/)
0 --L. (/) ()
(!) (!) ->-Cll
I > ·;:: Creeks at Private Drives: Do private driveways, drives, or streets cross drainage 0. -ways that serve Above-Project areas or are in public easements/ ROW? Cll
"O 0 No Yes If "yes" provide information below. (!) z ----~.ti How many instances? Describe location and provide information below.
(!) Location 1: ~
::::l u
(!) Location 2 : L.
~
Location 3 :
For each location enter value for: 1 2 3
Design year passing without toping travelway?
Water depth on travelway at 25-year flow?
Water depth on travelway at 100-year flow?
For more instances describe location and same information on separate sheet.
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 19 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D-TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage ConceQt and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.11)
:
StOrmwater Management Concept (continued)
•; r ,,, ,,
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Named RegulatoQl Watercourses {&Tributaries}: Are culverts proposed on these
facilities? No __ Yes, then provide full report documenting assumptions,
criteria , analysis, computer programs, and study findings that support proposed
design(s). Is report provided? __ Yes --No If "no", explain:
........ Arterial or Major Collector Streets: Will culverts serve these types of roadways? -(l)
(l)
No Yes How many instances? For each identify the ~
Cl) ----
(l) location and provide the information below. -Cl) co Instance 1: (l) ....
>-~
I~ Instance 2:
Instance 3: c
0 :;; Yes or No for the 100-year design flow: 1 2 3 0 co z E
~1 ~ Headwater WSE 1 foot below lowest curb top?
Spread of headwater within ROW or easement?
E C'-· co Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C-11 )? Cl) Cl)
~"C Explain any "no" answer(s): ·-c ~co
0 c .... 0
(,) :;;
>.co co (,) s: _Q
"C (l) co ..0 Minor Collector or Local Streets: Will culverts serve these types of streets? 0 ·-........
(,) (,) No Yes How many instances? for each identify the ·-Cl)
-(l) -----g "C location and provide the information below:
0. (l)
-0. co~ Instance 1:
"C >. Instance 2: (l) c
Cl) co
::J-Instance 3: Cl) 0
t Cl)
(l) (l)
For each instance enter value, or "yes" I "no" for: 1 2 3 ~ (,) ::Jc (,) co Design yr. headwater WSE 1 ft. below curb top? -(l) Cl) .... c
<{ ·-100-yr. max. depth at street crown 2 feet or less? (l) ....
0 Product of velocity (fps) & depth at crown (ft)= ? E ....
Is velocity limited per conditions (Table C-11 )? g
Limit of down stream analysis (feet)?
Explain any "no" answers:
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 20 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.12)
"· . ' i, :f:J .~ .
Stormwater Management Concept (coriti'nued) . .(
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
All Proposed Culverts: For all proposed culvert facil ities (except drivew ay/roadside
ditch intersects) provide information requested in next eight boxes.
Do cu lverts and travelways intersect at 90 degrees? Yes No If not , ----iden ti fy location(s) and intersect angle(s ), and justify t he design(s):
Does dra i nage way alignment change within or near limits of culvert and surfaced
approaches thereto? __ No --Yes If "yes" identify location(s), describe
change(s), and j ustification :
Are flumes or conduit to discharge into culvert barrel(s)? __ No __ Yes If yes ,
iden ti fy location(s) and prov ide justification :
-Are fl umes or conduit to discharge into or near surfaced approaches to cu lvert ends?
" No Yes If "yes" identify location(s), describe outfall design t reatme nt(s): Q) ----::::J c :.;:; c
0
~
en
t
Q)
Is scour/erosion protection provided to ensure long term stab ili ty of culvert structural ~
::::J components, and surfacing at culvert ends? __ Yes __ No If "no" Identify ()
locations and provide justification(s):
Will 100-yr flow and spread of backwater be fully contained in street ROW , and/or
dra inage easements/ ROW? __ Yes --No if not , why not?
Do appreciable hydraulic effects of any culvert ex tend downstream or upstream to
neighboring land(s) not encompassed in subject property? --No --Yes If
"yes" describe location(s) and mitigation measures:
Are all culvert designs and materials in compliance with 8-CS Tech . Specifications?
Yes --No If not , explain in Special Design Section of this Part . --
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 21of26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters l Continued (Page 4.13)
.,
Stormwater Management Concept (cor.itinued)
; ·e . . -
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Is a bridge included in plans for subject property project? _L No --Yes
If "yes" provide the following information .
Name(s) and functional classification of the roadway(s)?
What drainage way(s) is to be crossed?
~ a>
Ol
'O ·c
Ill
A full report supporting all aspects of the proposed bridge(s) (structural, geotechn ical ,
hydrologic, and hydraulic factors) must accompany this summary report . Is the report
prov ided? --Yes --No If "no" explain :
Is a Stormwater Provide a general description of planned techniques:
>. Pollution Prevention ro ck riprap, silt fence ins tallation and inlet protection :!: ro Plan (SW3P) :J a estab li shed for
L. project construction? Q) -ro s: --No _L_ Yes
Special Designs -Non-Traditional Methods
Are any non-traditional methods (aquatic echosystems , wetland-type detention , natural stream
rep li cation , BMPs for water quality, etc.) proposed for any aspect of subject property proj ect?
_L No --Yes If "yes" list general type and location below.
Provide full report about the proposed special design(s) including rationale for use and
expected benefits . Report must substantiate that stormwater management objectives w ill not
be compromised , and that maintenance cost will not exceed those of traditional design
so lution(s). Is report provided?
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Yes ----
Page 22 of 26
No If "no" explain :
APPENDIX . D: TECH . DESIGN SUMMARY
As Rev ised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.14)
.. . . --Stormwater Management Concept (continued) ' . ,.
Within Or Serving Subject Property (Phase, or Site) (continued)
Special Designs -Deviation From B-CS Technical Specifications
If any design(s) or material(s) of traditional runoff-handling facilities deviate from provisions of
B-CS Technical Specifications , check type facility(ies) and explain by specific detail element.
--Detention elements __ Drain system elements --Channel features
--Culvert features --Swales --Ditches --Inlets __ Outfalls
__ Valley gutters __ Bridges (explain in bridge report)
In table below briefly identify specific element, justification for deviation(s).
Specific Detail Element Justification for Deviation (attach additional sheets if needed)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Have elements been coordinated with the City Engineer or her/his designee? For each item
above provide "yes" or "no", action date, and staff name:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
,
Design Parameters
( ~ . .-. . ,, . . .... :, ... ¥<'' .) ... _i:'i, tf.
' ,,t.~ _. ~ < '•,C ·' '·-· 'ii:L . .'t·.'•.
Hydrology
Is a map(s) showing all Design Drainage Areas provided? _L__ Yes --No
Briefly summarize the range of applications made of the Rational Formula :
Pipe Design, Inlet Design and Gutter Depth Check
What is the size and location of largest Design Drainage Area to which the Rational Formula
has been applied? 2.52 acres
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Location (or identifier): 101
Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D-TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Conce~t and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4.15)
Qesign · Parameters (continued);:
·~ ... L ·< ' ~..: -
Hydrology (continued)
In making determinations for time of concentration, was segment ana lysis used?
No ./ Yes In approximately what percent of Design Dra inage Areas? JOO %
As to intensity-duration-frequency and rain depth criteria for determining runoff flows, were any
criteria other than those provided in these Guidelines used? __.:f__ No __ Yes If "yes"
identify type of data , source(s), and where applied:
For each of the stormwater management features listed below identify the storm return
frequencies (year) analyzed (or checked), and that used as the basis for design .
Feature Analysis Year(s) Design Year
Storm drain system for arterial and collector streets JO & JOO JO
Storm drain system for local streets JO & 100 JO
Open channels NIA NIA
Swale/buried conduit combination in lieu of channel NIA NIA
Swales NIA NIA
Roadside ditches and culverts serving them NIA NIA
Detention facilities: spillway crest and its outfall NIA NIA
Detention facilities: outlet and conveyance structure(s) NIA NIA
Detention facilities: volume when outlet plugged NIA NIA
Culverts serving private drives or streets NIA NIA
Culverts serving public roadways NIA NIA
Bridges: prov id e in bridge report. NIA NIA
Hydraulics
What is the range of design flow velocities as outlined below?
Design flow velocities; Gutters Conduit Culverts Swales Channels
Highest (feet per second) 4.05 8.85 NIA NIA NIA
Lowest (feet per seco nd) 1.27 1.56 NIA NIA NIA
Streets and Storm Drain Systems Provide the summary information outlined below:
Roughness coefficients used:
For conduit type(s) RCP
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
For street gutters:
HDPE
Page 24 of 26
O.OJ8
Coefficients: 0.013 0.013
APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage ConceQt and Design Parameters I Continued (Page 4 .16)
....
Design Parameters (continued) ,, .. '1:' ' : . ~ ' · .
Hydraulics {continued)
Street and Storm Drain Systems (continued)
For the following , are assumptions other than allowable per Guidelines?
Inlet coefficients? ./ No Yes Head and friction losses ./ No Yes ----
Explain any "yes" answer:
In conduit is velocity generally increased in the downstream direction? _:L Yes --No
Are elevation drops provided at inlets, manholes, and junction boxes? _:L Yes --No
Explain any "no " answers:
Are hydraulic grade lines calculated and shown for design storm? ./ Yes --No
For 100-year flow conditions? _:L Yes --No Explain any "no " answers :
What tailwater conditions were assumed at outfall point(s) of the storm drain system? Identify
each location and explain:
Yes, the storm drain system was designed taking into account a tail water o/295.0'.
Open Channels If a HEC analysis is utilized, does it follow Sec Vl.F .5.a? __ Yes __ No
Outside of straight sections, is flow regime within limits of sub-critical flow? __ Yes __ No
If "no" list locations and explain :
Culverts If plan sheets do not provide the following for each culvert , describe it here.
For each design discharge, will operation be outlet (barrel) control or inlet control?
Entrance, friction and exit losses:
Bridges Provide all in bridge report
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 25 of 26 APPENDIX. D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
SECTION IX
APPENDIX D -TECHNICAL DESIGN SUMMARY
Part 4 -Drainage Concept and Design Parameters Continued (Page 4.17)
. < Design Para.meters (conthiued}' ;: .
Computer Software
What computer software has been used in the ana lysis and assessment of stormwater
management needs and/or the development of facil ity designs proposed for subject property
project ? List them below, be ing sure to identify the software name and version , the date of the
version , any app licable patches and the publisher
Excel spreadsh eets, A utodesk Ci vil 3D Storm S ewer A naly sis and H y drojlow
Part 5 -Plans and Specifications
Requ irements for submittal of construction drawings and specifications do not differ due to use of a
Technical Design Summary Report . See Section Ill , Paragraph C3 .
: , ,' t -~. Conclusions ;•, . ' ·',,·I' .
Add any concluding information here : . . . . . . Th e storm sewer system and detention faczl1ti es are desig n ed in
accordance with the BCS Drainag e Des ig n Guidelines.
, ;· Attestation : <
Provide attestation to the accuracy and completeness of the foregoing 6 Parts of this Technical
Des i n Summa Draina e Re art b si nin and sealin be low.
State of Texas PE No .. __.b.c... .. _)_B_o_({) _Cf_
STORMWATER DESIGN GUIDELINES
Effective February 2007
Page 26 of 26 APPENDIX . D: TECH. DESIGN SUMMARY
As Revised August 2012
Item
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No. 12327
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
E ' E f t fC t f n2meer s s 1ma e o ons rue ion
Description Unit
General Items
Mobilizat ion, Overhe ad and Cons tru ction Staking LS
Topsoil Removal and Replacement, complete in place LS
Insta ll End of Street Signs , complete in place EA
Street Name Signs , complete in place EA
Stop Signs , complete in place EA
Paveme nt Striping and Markings, co mpl ete in place LS
Erosion & Sediment Control -SWPP P Implementation & Maintenance , Silt Fence, LS Co nstru ction Exit, Rock Filter Dam, etc ., complete in place
Hydroseed and Hydromulch , complete in place SY
Street Construction Iteois Concrete Pavement
Excavatio n & Grading, complete in place LS
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 6" deep , complete in place SY
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 8" deep, co mpl ete in place SY
Hy drated Lime, co mplete in place (27 lb/s y for 6" deep & 36 lb/sy for 8" deep) Ton
6" Reinfor ced Co ncrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY
7" Reinforced Conc rete Pavement w/Curb, comp lete in place SY
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Aprons -6" Thick w/ Monolithic Standard Curb, SF co mpl ete in place
Re inforc ed Concrete Pavemen t -Alleys -6" Thick, complete in place SF
Concrete Sidewalk & Ramp s -4" thick, complete in place SF
ADA Ramp s -Detectable Warning Surfaces, complete in place EA
Estimated Unit Price Ouantitv
I $ 40 ,000 .00
I $ 12,000 .00
2 1 $ 150 .00
7 $ 350 .00
7 $ 400 .00
1 $ 5,000 .00
l $ 7,500 .00
5,240 $ 0.50
General Items Subtotal
l $ 60,000.00
6,153 s 2.10
9,3 76 $ 2.80
252 $ 170 .0 0
4,033 $ 32.00
8,463 $ 35 .00
4,39 0 $ 4.50
8,590 $ 3.90
35,800 $ 3.50
24 $ 500 .00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal
Page 1of4
Total
$ 40 ,000 .00
$ 12,000 .00
$ 3,150 .00
$ 1,400 .00
$ 1,6 00 .00
$ 5,0 00 .00
$ 7,50 0.00
$ 2,620.00
$ 73,270.00
$ 60 ,000 .00
$ 12,921.30
s 26,252 .80
$ 42,840 .00
$ 129 ,056.0 0
$ 296,205 .00
$ 19,755 .00
$ 33,501.00
$ 125 ,3 00 .00
s 12,000 .00
$ 757,831.10
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
E ' E . fC ngmeer s shmate o onstruchon
Item Description Unit Estimated Uni t Price Total Ouantitv
Storm Sewer Construction Items
19 36" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 603 $ 90 .00 $ 54,270.00
20 36" HOPE Pipe, comp lete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1,043 $ 80 .00 $ 83,440.00
21 30" RCP Pipe, com plete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 80 $ 70 .00 $ 5,600.00
22 30" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill , complete in place LF 143 $ 60 .00 $ 8,580.00
22 24" RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 414 $ 45 .00 $ 18 ,630.00
23 24" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 273 $ 40 .00 $ 10,920.00
24 18" RCP Pipe, comp lete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 425 $ 32 .00 $ 13,600.00
25 18" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 159 $ 32 .00 $ 5,088.00
26 Curb Inlet -IO' wide, complete in place EA 4 $ 3,500 .00 $ 14 ,000 .00
27 Curb Inlet -IO' x 8', complete in place EA 2 $ 3,750 .00 $ 7,500 .00
28 Curb Inlet -5' wide, complete in place EA 6 $ 2,500 .00 $ 15 ,000.00
29 Curb Inlet -5' x 8', complete in place EA 2 $ 2,750 .00 $ 5,500.00
30 Curb Inlet -15' wide, complete in place EA 1 $ 4,500 .00 $ 4,500.00
3 1 Alley Gutter Area Inlet -V-4430 complete in place EA 3 $ 3,500 .00 $7,000
32 3'x3' Junction Box, complete in place EA I $ 1,500 .00 $ 1,500.00
33 8'x4' Junction Box, complete in place EA 2 $ 3,000 .00 $ 6,000.00
34 8'x8' Junction Box, complete in place EA I $ 3,250.00 $ 3,250.00
35 TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 2,981 $ 2.00 $ 5,962 .00
36 Rock Riprap, comp lete in place SY 65 $ 25 .00 $ 1,625 .00
37 Concrete Flume, complete in place SF 3,433 $ 6.00 $ 20,598 .00
Storm Sewer Construction Items Subtotal $ 292,563.00
Page 2 of 4
I
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
E ' Er t re t r ngmeer s s 1ma e o ons rue 100
Item Description Unit Esti mated Unit Price Total Quantity
Water Construction Items
38 12" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wi re -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 546 $ 40.00 $ 21,840.00
39 16" Casing, complete in place LF 52 $ 80 .00 $ 4,160.00
40 Connect to Existing 12" Water Line EA 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
41 12"x 6" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 1 $ 700.00 $ 700.00
42 12"x 12" M .J. Tee, complete in place EA 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
43 12" x 8" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 1 $ 800.00 $ 800 .00
44 12" M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 2 $ 1,850.00 $ 3,700.00
45 12" x 45° M.J . Bend, complete in place EA 4 $ 650.00 $ 2,600.00
46 4" Blowoff Assembly, complete in place EA 2 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,400.00
47 Waterline Testing LS 1 $ 1,500 .00 $ 1,500.00
48 8" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1516 $ 28 .00 $ 42,448.00
49 6" C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1330 $ 24 .00 $ 31 ,920 .00
50 Connect to Existing 8" Water Line EA 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00
51 Connect to Existing 6" Water Line EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
52 Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, vert. extension), complete in place EA 4 $ 3,500.00 $ 14 ,000.00
53 8"x 8" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 1 $ 600.00 $ 600.00
54 8"x 6" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 3 $ 550.00 $ 1,650 .00
55 6"x 6" M.J . Tee, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
56 8"M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 5 $ 1,050 .00 $ 5,250 .00
57 6" M.J. Gate Valve, complete in place EA 3 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000 .00
58 8" x 45° M.J . Bend, complete in place EA 33 $ 500.00 $ 16 ,500.00
59 8" x 11.25° M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00
60 6" x 45 ° M.J. Bend, complete in place EA 4 $ 450 .00 $ 1,800.00
61 6" x 11.25° M.J . Bend, complete in place EA 4 $ 450.00 $ 1,800.00
62 I" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length= 2 ft) (8" Line) EA 2 $ 700 .00 $ 1,400.00
63 1.5" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length= 2 ft) (8" Line) EA 6 $ 750 .00 $ 4,500 .00
64 I" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length = 2 ft) (6" Line) EA 4 $ 650.00 $ 2,600 .00
65 1.5" Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length = 2 ft) (6" Line) EA 17 $ 800.00 $ 13 ,600 .00
66 1.5" Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 48 ft) (6" Line) EA 15 $ 1,200.00 $ 18,000.00
67 2" Blowoff Assembly, complete in place EA 3 $ 1,000 .00 $ 3,000 .00
Water Construction Items Subtotal $ 207,268.00
Page 3 of 4
"
Item
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Barracks II Subdivision Phases 105 &106
E E · t re t r n2meer s shma e o ODS rue IOD
Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total Ouantitv
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items
6" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 696 $ 20.00 $ 13,920.00
6" PVC Sewer Line -ASTM D-2241 -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 20 $ 22 .00 $ 440.00
8" PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1,393 $ 24.00 $ 33 ,432 .00
6" Cleanout, com plete in place EA 2 $ 750.00 $ 1,500 .00
4" Sewer Service-Single (avg. length= 4ft), complete in place EA 4 $ 300 .00 $ 1,200.00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length= 4 ft), complete in place EA 19 $ 400 .00 $ 7,600.00
4" Sewer Service-Single (avg length= 48 ft), complete in place EA 5 $ 850.00 $ 4,250 .00
4" Sewer Service-Double (avg length= 48 ft), complete in place EA 27 $ 950 .00 $ 25,650 .00
Tie-In to Existing 8" PVC Sewer Line, complete in place EA 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000 .00
Concrete Manhole -4' Dia -complete in place EA 8 $ 2,800.00 $ 22,400.00
TV Testing and Inspection, complete in place LF 2,109 $ 2.00 $ 4,218.00
Sanitary Sewe r Construction Items Subtotal $ 115 ,610.00
General Items Subtotal $ 73,270.00
Street Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal $ 757,831.10
Storm Sewer Construction Items Su btotal $ 292,563.00
Water Construction Items Subtotal $ 207,268.00
Sanitary Sewer Con struction Items Subtotal $ 115,610.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $ 1,446,542.10
F-12327
SCHULTt ENG!NEEalNG1 LLC.
Page 4 of 4
AB Project Reprint Confirmation Page
EABPRJB4814564 Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
Architectural Barriers Project Registration Confirmation Page
Tuesday, May 06, 2014
PERSON FILING FORM
Name: Edd ie Ha re Phone: 979-820-0149
Person Address: 5855 Foste r Road, Bryan , Tx 77807
Ras Number: 00000008
Project Name: The Barracks II Subdivision , Ph 105 106
Project City of Co ll ege Station Right of Way
EABPRJB4814564
Address: Intersection of Deacon Driveand General Parkway
College Station , TX 77845 County: Brazos
TENANT
Contact Name: Phone:
Contact Address:
BUILDING/FACILITY Name: City of College Station Right of Way
FACILITY Owner: City of College Station Phone: 979 -764 -3570
Owner Address: 1101 Te xas Ave ., College Station , TX 77840
Contact Name: Danielle Singh Phone:
Contact Address:
Contact Email: dsingh@cstx .gov
DESIGN FIRM Name: Schultz Engineering LLC Phone: 979-764 -3900
Firm Address: 2730 Longmire , Ste A , College Station, TX 77845
Designer Name: Joseph Schultz , PE Emai: joeschultz84@verizon .net
Type of License: Engineer License Number: 65889
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Start Date: 05 /2014 Completion date: 12/2014 Estimated Cost: $137 ,500 .00
Type of Work: New Construction
Type of Funds: This project is privately funded , on private land for private use.
Are the private funds provided by a tenant? No
State Lease No. :
Scope of Work: Sidewalks , ramps and crosswalks for a new street
Does this building(s) have more than one level? Not a building
Are there any elevators, escalators, or platform lifts in this building? Not a building
Are there any boiler in this building? Not a building
This AB Project registration Confirmation Page , construction documents , and applicable fees must be submitted in accordance w it h the
Texas Administrative Code Chapter 68 , Rule 68 51 .
lfTDLR will be performing the review or inspection services , see Rule 68 80 .
If a RAS will be performing the review or inspection services , please contact the RAS as they set and collect the ir own fees , see Rule 68 75 .
In accordance w ith Rule 68 52 , the owner of a building or fac ility must also obta in an inspection from the department or a registered
access ibility specialist not later than the first anniversary of the completion of construction . Request for inspection shall be made by
completing the Request for Inspection form and submitting it no later than 30 ca lendar days after the completion of const ruct ion.
https ://www .tdlr.texas .gov/ ABProjectRegistrationOnline/ ABProjectPrintConfirmation .aspx?strProjNum=EABPRJB4814564[5/6/2014 10 : 16: 00 AM]
EDDIE HARE-ACCESSIBILITY SPECIALIST
TDLR/T AS Registered Accessibility Specialist #0008
5855 Foster Road * Bryan, Texas 77807
(979) 775-6850 office * (979) 775-6820 fa x * (979) 820-0149 cell * (877) 381 -9685 toll free
May 10 , 2 01 4
Danielle Singh
City of College Station
1101 Texas Ave.
College Station, Texas 77840
Re: Th e Barrack s II S u bdi v is io n . Phases I 05 & I 06 EABPRJB4814564
City of Co ll ege Station Ri g ht s of W ay @ ln te rsection of Deacon Dri ve a nd G e neral Parkway
Co ll ege Stati o n, T e xas 778 45
PLAN REVIEW-CO M PL E TED
Dea r Dani e ll e S in g h ;
Encl o sed a re the res ul ts of th e pl a n rev iew co mpl ete d o n th e re fe re nce d fa c ilit y . Id entifi ed o n th e re port a re area s
of noncon forma nce w ith ac cess ibility st a nd a rd s ad o pted by th e T exas D e partm e nt o f Li cen s in g a nd Reg ul atio n
for the purpose of en s urin g compli a nce w ith T exas G overnm e nt Cod e , C hapte r 4 6 9 .
A lt houg h d efic ienci es may have been noted , th e re fer en ce proje ct m ay be e li g ibl e for In s pection a pprova l if
constru cted in ac corda nce w ith th e Texa s A ccess ibility St a nd a rd s. It e m s whi c h a re th e re s po ns ib ili ty of th e ow ner
sh o uld be referred to t he a ppropri ate p ers on fo r ac tion.
The building or facility owner must request an inspection from the Department, (or a De partment a uth ori z ed
prov id e r of in s p ection se rv ices) no later than thirty (30) days after completion of construction. If the
completion date provided on the Project Registration Form is no longer correct, notify this office (in
w ritin g ) of the revised completion date as soon as possible.
Th is d et e rm ination d oes not a ddress a pplica bility of th e A m e ric an s w ith Di sa bil iti es Ac t (A DA), (P .L. I 01 -336)
o r a ny oth e r loca l, s tate, o r fe d era l require m e nt. Fo r in for m a ti o n on t he ADA Ho tlin e, (8 00 ) 94 9 -4232 , o r th e
Uni t ed Stat es De partm e nt o f Ju s ti ce a t (2 0 2) 5 14 -030 I .
Please reference the Department assigned project number (EA BPRJ #) in all future correspondence
p e r t aining to t his p roj ect .
Si ncere ly,
Eddi e
Access ib ili ty Spec ia lis t ICC# 1131801-21
RAS# 0008
Cc: Schultz E ngi neerin g
THE REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AS CON TR ACT DOCUMEN TS AND FI ELD INS PEC TI ONS. BY TH IS REG IS TERED ACCESSSIBL!TY SPECI ALIST.
EDD IE HARE. FO R THE TEXAS DEPARTM EN T OF LICENSING AN D REGU LA TI ON (TD LR). AUS TI N. TEXAS. IS BASED ON BES T EFFORTS
ENDEAVOR FOL LOWING INS TR UC TI ON AND CE R TI FICA TION BY BOTH TDL R AND ICBO PL AN REV IEW AND INS PEC TION IN NO WA)'
WA RR AN TS COMPLE TE COMP LIANCE TO TH E TEXAS ACCESS/BL/T Y STANDA RDS. TH IS BUS INESS. TH E PR OFESS IONA L. HIS EMPLO>EES.
AND CLI EN T FO R WHOM TH E REVIEW OR INS PEC TI ON IS MADE AGREES TO HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMN IFY TH E REG IS TERED
ACCESSIBILTY SPECI ALIS T. ED DIE HARE. AND THE TDLR FR OM AND AGA INS T AN Y LI ABILI TY ARISING FROM TH E PERFO RMA NCE OF THE
WO RK
TAS 2012 Plan Review for EABPRJB4814564, The Barracks II Subdivision, Phases 105 and 106,
May 10, 2014
Scope of Work: New sidewalks, curb ramps and cross walks within a new subdivision in the Rights of Way of
the City of College Station , Texas.
Findings: There are no comments or deficiencies noted from thi s rev iew of the plans s ubmitted; the reference
project may be eligible for Inspection approval if con structed in accordance with the Texas Acces s ibility
Standards.
This project meets or exceeds the right of Way section of the Administrative Rules 68 .102 .
Publ ic Right-of-Ways Projects . (New section effective February 1, 2005, 30 Tex Reg 382 ;
amended effective Ma rch 1, 2007, 32 TexReg 884 ; amended effective March 15, 2012, 37
TexReg 677)
TH E REVIEW OF DOCUMEN TS AS CON TR AC T DO CU ME N TS AND FIELD INSPEC TIO NS. BY TJ-f!S REG IS TE RED ACCESSS IBUTl' SPECI ALIS T.
EDD IE HARE. FOR TH E TEXA S DEPARTMtN T OF LIC ENS ING AND REGULA TI ON (TDL R). AUS TI N. TEXA S. IS BAS ED ON BES T EFFO RTS
EN DEAVO R FOLLOWING INS TR UC TI ON AND CER T/FI CA TI ON B Y BOTH TDL R AND IC BO PLA N RE VIEW AND INS PE C TI ON IN NOWAY
WA RR AN TS COMPLE TE COMP LIANCE TO TH E TEXAS ACCESS/Bl/TY S TAN DARDS. TH IS BUS INESS. TH E PROFESSIONA L. HIS EM PLO l'EES.
AND CLI EN T FO R WHO M TH E REVIEW OR INSPEC TI ON IS MADE AGREES TO HOLD HARML ESS AN D INDEMNIFY TH E REG IS TERED
ACCESS /BIL TY SPECIALIS T. EDD IE HARE. AND TH E TDLR FROM AND AGA INS T AN Y LIABILITY ARIS ING FR OM TJ-f E PERFO RMANC E OF TH E
WORK
. .
Sewer System Report
for
The Barracks II Subdivision
Section Phases 105 & 106
College Station, Texas
April 2014
Prepared By:
Schultz Engineering, LLC
TBPE Firm No. 12327
P.O. Box 11995
College Station, TX 77842
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 764-3900
F-12327
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Barracks II Subdivision is a 108-acre development in the area generally bounded by Wellborn
Road on the east, Holleman Drive South on the west, Cain Road to the north and Rock Prairie Road to
the south. It is zoned PDD and is comprised of a mixture of residential and commercial land uses as
shown on Exhibit A . There are 425 residential lots planned for the site and 25.3 acres of commercial
property. The area surrounding the site is generally undeveloped, with the exception of three
residential developments adjoining the tract on the south. The majority of the area between Cain Road
and Rock Prairie Road is described as General Suburban in the City's Comprehensive Plan, which
implies that it is likely to develop in a similar manner as The Barracks II Subdivision
Phases 100-104, 200 and 300 have been completed or are under construction. Phases 105 & 106 are
unchanged from the Preliminary Plat and will add 80 new lots.
Sewer service to the area is provided by 18" and 12" lines running along Old Wellborn Road and along
the south property line of The Barracks II Subdivision. These lines will be the primary outfall for this
development, but they are also intended to serve other adjoining tracts in the same sewer basin. These
adjoining areas are identified as:
CSISD Tract -23.50 acres
Mayo Tract -24.99 acres
Turner Tract (partial)-15.08 acres
Barger Tract (partial) -18.06 acres
All four of these tracts are presently zoned R. None of these tracts affect this portion of the Sewer
System .
Design Criteria:
P rimary S ewer Outfall SJ & S2: Phases 105 & 106 {Travis Cole Ave .) -8" sewer line at existing terminus of
Travis Cole Ave (Discharges into existing 12" along Deacon Drive West).
Primary Se wer Outfall SJ & S4: Phases 105 & 106 (Tang Cake Drive)-Existing 12" sewer line along Old
Wellborn Road
Domestic Demand:
Avg. Pop Density:
Average Flow:
Peaking Factor:
Commercial Demand:
Avg. Pop Density:
Average Flow:
Peaking Factor:
Pipe:
Applicable Exhibits:
2.67 people per lot
100 gpd/cap or 267 gpd per lot
4
30 people per acre
50 gpd/cap or 1500 gpd per acre
4
PVC 03034 SOR 26
Exhibit A & B -Sewer Exhibit
Exhibit C -Sanitary Sewer Analysis Spreadsheet
Conclusion:
The sewer system shown in Exhibits A & B has been laid out using the criteria in the Bryan/College
Station Design Guidelines and TCEQ. It is analyzed assuming peak flow conditions when this
portion of the subdivision is fully developed. The spreadsheet in Exhibit C shows all lines depicted in
Exhibits A & B to be capable of carrying the flows that come to them under these conditions. This
analysis will be used as the basis for all subsequent sewer line designs in the subdivision. The system
will function as intended as long as the line sizes and slopes are equal to or greater than those shown
herein. It should be noted that any significant additional flow from off-site sources will likely exceed
the capacity of several lines, so careful study is advised of any changes to the contributing area.
Line Contributing Flows ... .. "; » "; "; .... e == u ·o c 0 ~ rn .., 0 z c ; <( ... .. .. .., E ~~ .... "" -e ·E .. ::> .. 0 0 "ii 0. Q e ., .... 10: z ci:: 0 .s 0 .. e From To c u z c;; c .. e .., .. = ... e .Cl';; 267 1200 1500 1050 "" ·c c. GPDper GPO per GPO per GPDpei ~ = ::> 0 0 10: u Lot Acre Acre Acre MH# MH# !.<>ts Acres Acres I Acres GPO GPO C02 MH7 5 0 0 0 1,335 -MH7 MH4 12 0 0 0 3,204 1,335 MH4 MH3 30 0 0 0 8,010 4,539 MH3 MH2 9 0 0 0 2,403 12,549 MH2 MHl 3 0 0 0 801 14,952 MHI EXMHI 12 0 0 0 3,204 15,753 Exhibit C The Barracks II Phases 105 106 Sewer Analysis Spreadsheet Sewer Lines Sl S2 Flow Calculations Peaking Peak Avenge Daily Flows Infiltration Size Material (ADF) (10%ADF) Factor Flows GPO CFS CFS CFS (m.) 1,335 0.0021 0.0002 4.00 0.008 6 03034 4,539 0.0070 0.0007 4.00 0.029 6 03034 12,549 0.0194 0.0019 4.00 0.080 8 03034 14,952 0.0231 0.0023 4.00 0.095 8 03034 15,753 0.0244 0.0024 4.00 0.100 8 03034 18,957 0.0293 0.0029 4.00 0.120 8 03034 Page I of I Mannings n 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 0.013 Pipe Calculations Min. Actual Slope Inside Manning Pipe Peak Design for Es:isting Friction Slope Slope Flow Diameter Slope Peak or Designed Peak Flows Check Depth Flows Systems Inches 'Vo % % Inches 5.793 0.346 0.80 0.80 OK 0.75 5.793 0.533 0.80 0.80 OK 1.13 7.754 0.402 0.55 0.55 OK 1.83 7.754 0.430 0.55 0.55 OK 1.95 7.754 0.444 0.55 0.55 OK 1.99 7.754 0.340 0.55 0.40 OK 2.33
Line Contributing Flows ~ .. -; ;... -; -; ... e :: u ·u = 0 0 ~ ~ < .... 0 ;z: -= .. .. .. ., ~ ii:~ ... ~-e :: .. ;J .. 0 0 "ti ..,c e ~ ... Ii: ;z: 0 0 From To ~ = u .s ;z: .. e (ii = • e ., .. :s .... 267 1200 1500 1050 e .I:>~ ~ ·c c. GPDper GPDper GPDper GPDpet ii: = ;J 0 0 Ii: u Lot Acre Acre Acre MH# MH# Lots J Acres Acres Acres GPO GPO C03 MH6 8 0 0 0 2,136 -C04 MH6 5 0 0 0 1,335 MH6 MH5 17 0 4.91 0 26,634 3,471 • Exhibit C The Barracks II Phases 105 106 Sewer Analysis Spreadsheet Sewer Lines S3 S4 Flow Calculations Average Daily Flows Infiltration Peaking Peak Size Material (ADF) (10% ADF) Factor Flows GPO CFS CFS CFS (m.) 2,136 0.0033 0.0003 4.00 0.014 6 03034 1,335 0.0021 0.0002 4.00 0.008 6 03034 30,105 0.0466 0.0047 4.00 0.191 8 03034 .• ,, Page I of I Mannings n 0.013 0.013 0.013 Pipe Calculations Min. Actual Slope Manning Pipe Peak Inside Design for Existing Friction Slope Slope Flow Diameter Slope Peak or Designed Peak Flows Check Depth Flows Systems Inches ~. % % Inches 5.793 0.471 0.80 0.80 OK 0.85 5.793 0.346 0.80 0.80 OK 0.75 7.754 0.470 0.55 0.55 OK 2.70
~hultz Engineering, LLC
April 3, 2014
Alan Gibbs, P .E.
City Engineer
Development Services
City of College Station
College Station, Texas
RE: Letter Acknowledging City Standards -The Barracks II Subdivision
Phases 105 & 106
Dear Mr. Gibbs:
Office : 979 .764 .3900
Fax : 979 .764 .3910
The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge that the construction plans for the water,
sanitary sewer, streets and drainage for the above-referenced project, to the best of my
knowledge, do not deviate from the B/CS Design Guideline Manual except that Sewer
Line S-1, shown on Sheet 24, has a slope of 0.40% to match the existing pipe stub. No
other alternate design or construction methodology was used .
I also acknowledge that, to the best of my knowledge, the details provided in the
construction plans are in accordance with the B/CS Standard Details.
Sincerely,
J~:.~
Civil Engineer
F-12327
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
P.O. Box 11995 • College Station , Texas 77842
schultzengineeringllc .com
.. '
Water System Report
for
The Barracks II Subdivision
Phases 105 & 106
College Station, Texas
April2014
Prepared Bv:
TBPE Firm Registration No . 12327
2730 Longmire, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
979.764.3900
General Information
Location:
General Note :
Land Use:
Phases 105 & 106 are located northeast of Phases 103 & 104 of the
Barracks II Development. The Barracks II Subdivision is a 108-acre
development located midway between Rock Prairie Road and Cain Road
in south College Station. It is bounded on the west by Holleman Drive
South and on the east by Old Wellborn Road.
The water lines to serve these 80 residential lots will be a 6" along Travis
Cole Avenue, an 8" line along General Parkway, an 8" along Tang Cake
Drive, an 8" along public alley 1 and a 12" line along Deacon Drive
West. These lines will create loops in the system along Deacon Drive
West, Capps Drive, and General Parkway. These lines will connect to
existing waterlines along Deacon Drive West (12"), Capps Drive (6"),
Travis Cole Avenue (6"), and General Parkway (8"), all constructed in
previous phases.
Single family residential
Design Criteria/ Analysis
Primary Water Supply: Existing 12" water line along Deacon Drive West and Existing 8"
waterline along Capps Drive.
Existing System Pressure Tests:
Flow Hydrant -See Appendix A
Flowrate: 1,190 gpm
Static Pressure: 7 5 psi
Residual Pressure: 55 psi
Exh ibits: Exhibit A -Water Layout
Appendix A -Hydrant Flow Test Results
Appendix B -WaterCAD Analysis Summary-Domestic Demand
Appendix C -WaterCAD Analysis Summary-Fire Flow Demand @FHl
Appendix D -WaterCAD Analysis Summary -Fire Flow Demand @ FH2
Fire Flow:
Domestic Use
1,000 gpm for Single Family Residential
1.5 gpm per lot for Single Family Residential
Phases 105 & 106-80 Lots= 120 gpm
Total Domestic Demand= 120 gpm
The proposed 12'', 8" & 6" waterlines are in accordance with the BCS
Water Design Guidelines. This report provides the results of the water
system analysis under the fire flow and domestic demand requirements,
(1120 gpm) which produced the lowest pressure in the system.
Conclusion
Summary of Calculations
Pressure 70.5
Domestic Demand Min.
Velocity Max 1.6
Pressure 57 .9 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 1 Velocity Max 4 .4
Pressure 57.3 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 2 Velocity Max 5.3
Pressure 52.9 Domestic Demand & Fire Min.
Hydrant 3 Velocity Max 6 .4
The minimum pressure (52.9 psi) for this system occurs when a Fire
Flow demand is set at Fire Hydrant Number 3 . The Max Velocity for this
system occurs at the same demand when the velocity in Pipe P-14 has a
velocity of 6.4 fps .
All of these pressures exceeds the 20 psi and 35 psi minimum pressure
requirements, respectively. The maximum pipe velocities are less than 12
fps .
The proposed 12", 8" and 6" water lines meet or exceed all of the design
criteria for the City of College Station and the Wellborn Special Utility
District. It will provide adequate water pressure, flowrate and velocity
for both domestic and fire flow demands .
Appendix A
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC
FIRM #12327
WATER SYSTEM FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT
9-19-2013
Date:
Water System Owner: _Wellborn SUD __________________ _
The Barracks II Subdivision
Development Project:
Papa Bear Drive & Towers Parkway
Flow Test Location : ---------------------------
Nozzle size (in .): _2 .5 __
60
Pitot Reading (psi): __ _
1300 Flowrate (gpm): ___ _
Discharge Coeff: (c) = 0.90
Flowrate Formula: Q=29 .84cd 2p 112
c = discharge coeff.
d =orifice size (in)
P = pitot pressure (psi)
Hayes Lane and Papa Bear Drive
Pressure Gauge Location : ---------------------------
75
Static Pressure (psi):
65
Residual Pressure (psi):
3265
Computed Discharge at 20 psi Residual Pressure: QR= _____ _
Note: The flow test and report were prepared in accordance with NFPA 291.
Joe Schultz
Report Prepared by:
Ricky Flores
Others Present: Clenden Adams -Wellborn SUD_
_Britt Curless. _______ _
Pipe Number EX-P-1 EX-P-2 EX-P-3 EX-P-4 P-1 EX-P-8 EX-P-10 EX-P-12 EX-P-13 P-12 P-8 P-7 P-6 P-5 P-2 P-3 EX-P-7 EX-P-6 EX-P-5 EX-P-9 EX-P-11 P-14 P-13 EX-P-14 P-10 P-11 P-4 P-9 P-RES Length (ft) 641 736 337 95 368 230 431 153 226 343 418 298 9 398 100 31 613 618 180 254 159 547 691 96 48 43 40 48 29 Appendix B WaterCAD Analysis Summary Pipe Analysis -Domestic Demand Size (in) Material Hazen-Williams C 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 12 PVC 150 12 PVC 150 12 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 12 PVC 150 12 PVC 150 6 PVC 150 6 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 6 PVC 150 6 PVC 150 6 PVC 150 6 PVC 150 6 PVC 150 6 PVC 150 12 PVC 150 8 PVC 150 12 PVC 150 WaterCAD Analysis Summary Junction Analysis -Domestic Demand Juncuon Junction Elevation Demand Pressure (psi) (gpm) EX-J-1 306.89 14 70.6 EX-J-2 306.58 69 70.7 EX-J-3 302 26 72.9 EX-J-4 302.5 0 72.6 J-1 302.38 0 72.6 J-2 302.15 0 72.7 J-3 301.66 32 72.9 EX-J-8 307.8 48 70.2 EX-J-11 307.6 17 70.2 EX-J-13 306.7 0 70.6 J-12 305.69 18 71.1 J-9 305.41 0 71.2 J-8 303.76 0 71.9 J-7 302.7 0 72.4 FH-2 302.66 0 72.4 FH-1 301.84 0 72.9 EX-J-7 305.6 44 71.1 EX-J-6 304.31 0 71.8 J-14 307 50 70.5 FH-3 304.86 39 71.4 J-13 304.56 35 71.6 J-10 302.84 63 72.3 J-11 304.36 63 71.6 J-4 301.64 0 72.9 J-15 305.59 32 71.1 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) -71 0.46 -163 1.04 358 1.02 205 0.58 205 0.58 58 0.37 48 0.3 2 0.01 2 0.01 -16 0.1 -48 0.3 -111 0.71 -174 1.11 -174 1.11 32 0.09 32 0.09 -38 0.43 -59 0.67 -153 0.98 22 0.14 29 0.33 -20 0.23 -59 0.67 -94 1.07 -63 0.71 -63 0.71 0 0 32 0.2 547 1.55
. .
Pipe
Number
EX-P-1
EX-P-2
EX-P -3
EX -P-4
P-1
EX-P -8
EX-P-10
EX-P-12
EX-P-13
P-12
P-8
P-7
P-6
P-5
P-2
P-3
EX-P -7
EX-P-6
EX-P-5
EX-P-9
EX -P-11
P-14
P-13
EX -P-14
P-10
P-11
P-4
P-9
P-RES
Append ixC
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-1)
Length (ft) Size (i n) Material Hazen-
Will iamsC
641 8 PVC 150
736 8 PVC 150
337 12 PVC 150
95 12 PVC 150
368 12 PVC 150
230 8 PVC 150
431 8 PVC 150
153 8 PVC 150
226 8 PVC 150
343 8 PVC 150
418 8 PVC 150
298 8 PVC 150
9 8 PVC 150
398 8 PVC 150
100 12 PVC 150
31 12 PVC 150
613 6 PVC 150
618 6 PVC 150
180 8 PVC 150
254 8 PVC 150
159 6 PVC 150
547 6 PVC 150
691 6 PVC 150
96 6 PVC 150
48 6 PVC 150
43 6 PVC 150
40 12 PVC 150
48 8 PVC 150
29 12 PVC 150
WaterCAD Analysis Summary
Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-1)
JUnCtlOI
Junction Elevation Demand Pressure
(gpm) (psi)
EX-J-1 306 .89 14 58 .3
EX-J-2 306.58 69 58 .6
EX-J -3 302 26 61
EX-J-4 302 .5 0 60.4
J-1 302 .38 0 60.4
J-2 302 .15 0 60.1
J-3 301.66 32 60 .3
EX-J-8 307 .8 48 57.9
EX-J-11 307.6 17 57 .9
EX-J-13 306 .7 0 58 .3
J-12 305 .69 18 58.7
J-9 305.41 0 58 .8
J-8 303.76 0 59 .4
J-7 302.7 0 59 .9
FH-2 302 .66 0 59 .9
FH -1 301.84 1,000 60 .2
EX-J-7 305 .6 44 59
EX-J -6 304 .31 0 59 .6
J-14 307 so 58 .2
FH-3 304 .86 39 59 .l
J-13 304 .56 35 59.4
J-10 302 .84 63 59 .8
J-11 304.36 63 59 .2
J-4 301.64 0 60.4
J-15 305.59 32 58 .7
Flow(gpm)
-148
-29 8
1223
1,064
1,064
134
164
143
143
125
94
31
-32
-32
1032
32
-77
-40
-159
81
4
-45
-84
-119
-63
-63
0
32
1547
Velocity (ft/s)
0.94
1.9
3.47
3.02
3 .02
0 .86
1.05
0.91
0.91
0 .8
0.6
0.2
0.21
0 .21
2.93
0.09
0.88
0.46
1.02
0.52
0.05
0.51
0.96
1.35
0.71
0.71
0
0.2
4.39
. Pipe Number EX-P-1 EX-P-2 EX-P-3 EX-P-4 P-1 EX-P-8 EX-P-10 EX-P-12 EX-P-13 P-12 P-8 P-7 P-6 P-5 P-2 P-3 EX-P-7 EX-P-6 EX-P-5 EX-P-9 EX-P-11 P-14 P-13 EX-P-14 P-10 P-11 P-4 P-9 P-RES Appendix D WaterCAD Analysis Summary Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-2) Length (ft) Size (in) Material Hazen-WilliamsC 641 8 PVC 150 736 8 PVC 150 337 12 PVC 150 95 12 PVC 150 368 12 PVC 150 230 8 PVC 150 431 8 PVC 150 153 8 PVC 150 226 8 PVC 150 343 8 PVC 150 418 8 PVC 150 298 8 PVC 150 9 8 PVC 150 398 8 PVC 150 100 12 PVC 150 31 12 PVC 150 613 6 PVC 150 618 6 PVC 150 180 8 PVC 150 254 8 PVC 150 159 6 PVC 150 547 6 PVC 150 691 6 PVC 150 96 6 PVC 150 48 6 PVC 150 43 6 PVC 150 40 12 PVC 150 48 8 PVC 150 29 12 PVC 150 WaterCAD Analysis Summary Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-2) Ju.,~rnJFJ Junction Elevation Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) EX-J-1 306.89 14 58 EX-J-2 306.58 69 58.4 EX-J-3 302 26 61 EX-J-4 302.5 0 60.5 J-1 302.38 0 60.S J-2 302.15 0 60.3 J-3 301.66 32 60.5 EX-J-8 307.8 48 57.5 EX-J-11 307.6 17 57.3 EX-J-13 306.7 0 57.S J-12 305.69 18 57.8 J-9 305.41 0 57.6 J-8 303.76 0 58.1 J-7 302.7 0 58.4 FH-2 302.66 1,000 58.4 FH-1 301.84 0 60.S EX-J-7 305.6 44 58.8 EX-J-6 304.31 0 59.6 J-14 307 so 57.6 FH-3 304.86 39 58.7 J-13 304.56 35 59.4 J-10 302.84 63 58.3 J-11 304.36 63 57.8 J-4 301.64 0 60.5 J-15 305.59 32 57.5 Flow (gpm) -236 -371 1150 857 857 222 304 350 350 332 300 237 174 -826 32 32 -130 -107 -293 66 -62 -112 -151 -186 -63 -63 0 32 1547 Velocity (ft/s) 1.5 2.37 3.26 2.43 2.43 1.42 1.94 2.23 2.23 2.12 1.92 1.52 1.11 5.27 0.09 0.09 1.47 1.21 1.87 0.42 0.71 1.27 1.71 2.11 0.71 0.71 0 0.2 4.39
. " . Pipe Number EX-P-1 EX-P-2 EX-P-3 EX-P-4 P-1 EX-P-8 EX-P-10 EX-P-12 EX-P-13 P-12 P-8 P-7 P-6 P-5 P-2 P-3 EX-P-7 EX-P-6 EX-P-5 EX-P-9 EX-P-11 P-14 P-13 EX-P-14 P-10 P-11 P-4 P-9 P-RES Appendix E WaterCAD Analysis Summary Pipe Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-3) Length (ft) Size (in) Material Hazen-WilliamsC 641 8 PVC 150 736 8 PVC 150 337 12 PVC 150 95 12 PVC 150 368 12 PVC 150 230 8 PVC 150 431 8 PVC 150 153 8 PVC 150 226 8 PVC 150 343 8 PVC 150 418 8 PVC 150 298 8 PVC 150 9 8 PVC 150 398 8 PVC 150 100 12 PVC 150 31 12 PVC 150 613 6 PVC 150 618 6 PVC 150 180 8 PVC 150 254 8 PVC 150 159 6 PVC 150 547 6 PVC 150 691 6 PVC 150 96 6 PVC 150 48 6 PVC 150 43 6 PVC 150 40 12 PVC 150 48 8 PVC 150 29 12 PVC 150 WaterCAD Analysis Summary Junction Analysis -Fire Flow Demand (FH-3) JUll~"v' Junction Elevation Demand Pressure (gpm) (psi) EX-J-1 306.89 14 57.7 EX-J-2 306.58 69 58.l EX-J-3 302 26 61 EX-J-4 302.S 0 60.S J-1 302.38 0 60.S J-2 302.15 0 60.6 J-3 301.66 32 60.8 EX-J-8 307.8 48 57.2 EX-J-11 307.6 17 56.9 EX-J-13 306.7 0 57.4 J-12 305.69 18 57.9 J-9 305.41 0 58.2 J-8 303.76 0 59.1 J-7 302.7 0 59.8 FH-2 302.66 0 59.9 FH-1 301.84 0 60.7 EX-J-7 305.6 44 58.S EX-J-6 304.31 0 59.2 J-14 307 so 55.8 FH-3 304.86 1,039 52.9 J-13 304.56 35 58.3 J-10 302.84 63 59.8 J-11 304.36 63 58.9 J-4 301.64 0 60.8 J-15 305.59 32 58.1 Flow (gpm) -260 -432 1089 442 442 246 339 -235 -235 -253 -285 -348 -411 -411 32 32 -141 -81 -647 103 558 509 -530 -565 -63 -63 0 32 1547 Velocity (ft/s) 1.66 2.76 3.09 1.26 1.26 1.57 2.16 1.5 1.5 1.62 1.82 2.22 2.62 2.62 0.09 0.09 1.6 0.92 4.13 0.66 6.33 5.77 6.02 6.42 0.71 0.71 0 0.2 4.39
CASE NO.:
TIME:
STAFF:
CITY oF Coll.EGE STATI ON
Home o/T= A&M Univmity 0
T-J'ib,,L------~
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) 0 Minor
($700)
0 Amending
($700)
'~nal
($932)
0 Vacating
($932)
0Replat
($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? D Yes ~No Is this plat Commercial D or Residential IZJ
/ MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
-~ $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
17i~33 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
~ $600 (m inimum) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure , $600 minimum (if fee is > $600 , the balance is
,;i{le prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
d8f Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
/hay not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
~ Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
lg] Two (2) copies of the grading , drainage , and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report .
~ Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
~ _9opy of original deed restrictions/covenants for re plats (if applicable).
~Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current with in ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership , liens ,
/ ~cumbrances, etc .
/~ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station , Brazos County and College Station l.S.D.
lg] The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete . If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application , it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such . Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference __ N-+0-*--------------
NAME OF PROJECT The Ba"acks II Subdivision Phases 105 & 106
ADDRESS Intersection of Deacon Drive and General Parkway
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
East Side of Holleman Drive South between Cain Road and Rock Prairie Road
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Heath Phillips E-mail heath_superiorstructures@yahoo.co
St reet Address P. 0. Box 262
----------------------------------~
City Wellborn Zip Code 77881 ------
Phone Number 979-229-5906 Fax Number 979-703-7903 ----------------
1/11 Page 1of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified . Please attach an additiona l sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Heath Phillips Investments, LLC (Heath Phillips, manager) E-mail heath_ superiorstruct ures@yahoo.co
Street Address
City Wellborn
P.O. Box 262
State Tx Zip Code 77881 ------
Phone Number 979-229-5906 Fax Number 979-703-7903
---------------~
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION :
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC -Joe Schultz E-mail ;oeschultz84@verizon.net
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 ------
Phone Number 979.764.3900 Fax Number 979.764.3910 -----------------
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ~Yes O No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so , please prov ide the Volume ____ and Page No . __ _
Total Acreage _1_3._1_4 _______ _ Total No. of Lots 80 ------R-0-W Acreage 4. 79 Acres
Existing Use Vacant
-------------~
Proposed Use Townhouse Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 80 I POD
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.08 POD ___ , __ _ _ __ , __ _
Floodplain Acreage None -----------------------------------
1 s there Special Flood Haz ard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes IX No
Th is information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided i n Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is th is application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting t he
appl ication be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
IX Ye s
) No
If yes , provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name : THE BARRACKS II (PP)
City Project Number (if known): 14-00900010
Date I Timeframe when submitted : 2/5/14
1/11 Page 2 of9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
VVIA
Requested waiver to subdivision r ulations and reason for same if a plicable :
Regarding the waiver request , explain how :
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict appl ication of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
NIA
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the appl icant.
NIA
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety , or welfare , or inj urious to other
property in the area , or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
r
4 . The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
r
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicab le):
1. I An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or w ill be provided outside the right-o f-way ;
2. I The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative , or other natural conditions exist so t hat strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keep ing w ith the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan ;
3. I A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4 . I Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate I
rural context;
5. I When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle , Pedestrian , and
Greenways Master Plan ;
1/1 1 Page 3 of 9
6. I The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. I The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning & Zoning Commission .
Requested Oversize Participation None
-----------------------------~
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
3408' Streets
6816' Sidewalks
2075' Sanitary Sewer Lines
3397' Water Lines
0 Channels
2998' Storm Sewers
1692' Bike Lanes I Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
(). S <e No. of acres to be dedicated + $ 5 o, Doo development fee
___ No. of acres in floodplain
___ No. of acres in detention
---No. of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND :
__ No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ = $ --------
{date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board ----
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true , coffect, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Signature and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit m~y be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements . Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOi and SWPPP .
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required , including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11 . The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12 . Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION , ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
--~t~ -~-0_/1_~~~~-
Property Owner( s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1/11
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local , State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOi and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES : i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City~~tion , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All devel~fii'ftt~E[~~1~igned in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Stati<»faA~·S nCf~~~I Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER , AGRf#'J\l"~ AN TIF\ Tiflt-T ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPM ~-• . ~A,;lt>ij, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACC TE ~•oo":o o~uoeo.~ar.: •• §.QJ~.l}L]~96 .}i~
~-0 .... a~~mr, : <.<;·!>: ~~·{~,~:~~<{?0~~~1· ~ -5 .-11
---;4--U-=---i+---~~·s..· ~~~.i-c-.%r.=.~f""'-,1.:;.·~·i_,.;.,~:..;;;'~-.....:'.~::.:.fr~~:~~::;.~;,::/ Date
Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the
alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
t he floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances , Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area ; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities .
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
D * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following :
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction , improvement, or fill covered by this
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 6 of 9
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, . certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------. certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I, , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
1/11 Page 7 of9
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
lZI Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch.
IB'l Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
[gl Title Block with the following information :
lZI Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor.
lZI Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
~ Date of preparation.
lZI Engineer's scale in feet.
~ Total area intended to be developed .
lZI North Arrow.
~ Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines .
~ If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
~ All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
~ Ownership and Dedication
~ Surveyor and/or Engineer
~ City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat)
[ZI Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
~ Brazos County Clerk
lfl.d-Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ET J Plats only)
rW-If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
tf/}; If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
~ Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway , if applicable, according to the most recent available
data.
Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data.
Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2).
The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center
angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
~
1/11
lZI Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Public and private R.O.W . locations and widths . (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
Page 8 of9
Existing
~
~
~
~
Proposed
~
~
~
~
Alleys .
Easements .
A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be
rev iewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of the ir
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration .
IZ! Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following :
lRJ Street, alley and sidewalk plans , profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall
street , alley and/o r sidewalk layout of the subdivision . (may be comb ined with oth er
utilities).
Sewer Design Report.
Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision . (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas .)
Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report .
Water line plan showing fire hydrants , valves , etc. with plan and profile lines showin g
depth and grades . One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivisio n.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growt h
areas .)
Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile , inlets , storm sewer and
drainage channels , with profiles and sections . Drainage and runoff areas , and runoff
based on 5 , 10, 25 , 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure desig n,
channel lining design & detention if used . One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of t he subdivision .
l8J Deta iled cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
l8] Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee I surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6 .
l8] Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
~ Eros ion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
l8J All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed .
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City pri or to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration .
l8] Are there impact fees associated with this development? l8] Yes 0 No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
l8] Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? 0 Yes lRl No
If yes , TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prio r to filin g
the plat at the Courthouse.
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOi) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
PrintFonri I
1/1 1 Pag e 9 or 9
~hultz Engineering , LLC
November 4, 2014
Jason Schubert, AICP
Principal Planner
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77840
Re: The Barracks II Subdivision -Ph 105 & 106 -14-00900082
Dear Mr. Schubert:
Office: 979.764.3900
Fa x : 979.764 .3910
Attached is the revised Engineer's Estimate for construction remaining for the
Barracks II Phase 105 & 106 financial guarantee amount. The remaining wo rk is
primarily sidewalks and drainage flumes which will be completed with the
townhome construction. A financial guarantee in the amount of $354,938 .90 was
provided. The attached estimate is in the amount of $74 ,349.00. The Developer,
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC , requests a release of the difference in the
estimates , $280 ,589 .90.
If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Schultz Engineering, LLC.
JoeS~
Civil Engineer
P.O . Box 11995 • College Station , Texas 77842
sch ul tzengineeri ng ll c.com
Item
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING, LLC.
2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
College Station, Texas 77845
Firm No . 12327
Ba rra cks II S ubdivis ion Phases 105 &106
E E r t r e t r n2meer s s 1m a e o OD S rue 100
Description Unit Est imated Unit Price Ouantitv
G e nera l Items
Mobilizat ion, Overhead and Construct ion Staking LS I $ 40,000.00
Topsoil Removal and Replacement, complete in place LS I $ 12,000.00
Install End of Street Signs, complete in place EA 21 $ 150.00
Street Name Signs, complete in place EA 7 $ 350.00
Stop Signs, complete in place EA 7 $ 400.00
Pavement Striping and Markings, complete in place LS I $ 5,000.00
Erosion & Sediment Control -SWPPP Implementation & Maintenance, Silt LS I $ 7,500.00 Fence, Construction Exit, Rock Filter Darn, etc .. complete in place
Hydroseed and Hydromulch, complete in place SY 5,240 $ 0.50
General Items Subtotal
Street Construction It ems Concrete Pavement
Excavation & Grading , complete in place LS I $ 60,000.00
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 6' deep, complete in place SY 6,153 $ 2.10
Mixing & incorporation of lime, 8" deep, complete in place SY 9,376 $ 2.80
Hydrated Lime, complete in place (27 lb/sy fo r 6" deep & 36 lb/sy fo r 8' dee p) Ton 252 $ 170.00
6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 4,033 $ 32.00
7' Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/Curb, complete in place SY 8,463 $ 35 .00
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Aprons -6' Thick w/ Monolithic Standard SF 4,390 $ 4 .50 Curb, complete in place
Reinforced Concrete Pavement -Alleys • 6' Thick. complete in place SF 8,590 $ 3.90
Concrete Sidewalk & Ramps -4" thick. compl ete in place SF 35,800 $ 3.50
ADA Ramps -Detectable W arning Surfaces, complete in place EA 24 $ 500.00
Str eet Construction Concrete Pavement Items Subtotal
Pa ge lof4
Total %Complete Amount Amount
Ouantitv Comclete ($) Remainin• ($)
$ 40,000.00 100°/o $ 40,000.00 $
$ 12,000.00 100% $ 12,000.00 $
$ 3,150.00 0% $ $ 3,150.00
$ 1,400.00 ()"/, $ $ 1,400.00
$ 1,600.00 ()"/, $ $ 1,600.00
$ 5,000.00 100°/o $ 5,000.00 $
$ 7,500.00 90% $ 6,750.00 $ 750.00
$ 2,620.00 ()"/, $ $ 2,620.00
$ 73 ,2 70.00 Re maining Subtotal $ 9,520.00
$ 60,000.00 9 8% $ 58,800.00 $ 1,200.00
$ 12,921.30 100% $ 12,921.30 $
$ 26,252.80 !()(JO/, $ 26,252 .80 $
$ 42,840.00 100°/o $ 42,840.00 $
$ 129,056.00 100-/o $129,056.00 $
$ 296,205 .00 100-/o $296,205.00 $
$ 19,755 .00 100-/o $ 19,75 5.00 $ .
$ 33,501.00 100-/o $ 33,501.00 $ .
$ 125,300.00 68~. $ 85 ,204.00 $ 40,096.00
$ 12,000.00 100-/o $ 12,000.00 $ .
$ 757,831.10 Remaining Subtot al $ 4 1,296.00
Barracks II S ubdivis ion Phases 105 &106
E E r t r e t r ne:mee r s s 1ma eo ons rue 100
Description Unit Estimated Unit Price Total %Complete Amount Amount
Item Ouantitv Ouantitv Comolete ($) Remainini< ($)
Storm Sewer Constru ction It e ms
19 36' RCP Pipe , complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 603 $ 90.00 $ 54,270.00 100'/o $ 54,270.00 $
20 36" HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, co mplete in place LF 1,043 $ 80.00 $ 83 ,440.00 100'/, $ 83 ,440 .00 $
21 JO ' RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 80 $ 70.00 $ 5,600.00 100'/, $ 5,600.00 $
22 JO ' HOPE Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF l4J $ 60.00 $ 8,580.00 100'/o $ 8,580 .00 $
2J 24" RCP Pipe, comp lete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 414 $ 45 .00 $ l8,6JO.OO 100'/, $ 18,630.00 $ -
24 24' HOPE Pipe, comp lete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 273 $ 40.00 $ 10,920.00 lOO'Yo $ 10,920 .00 s
25 18 ' RCP Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 425 s 32 .00 $ 13,600.00 100'/, $ lJ,600.00 $ -
26 l 8' HOP E Pipe, complete in place -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 159 $ 32 .00 $ 5,088.00 100'/o $ 5,088.00 s
27 Curb Inlet -1 O' wide, complete in place EA 4 $ J ,500.00 $ 14,000.00 lOO'Yo $ 14,000.00 s -
28 Curb Inlet - l O' x 8', complete in place EA 2 s J,750.00 $ 7,500.00 100'/, $ 7,500.00 $ -
29 Curb Inlet -5' wide, complete in place EA 6 s 2,500.00 $ 15 ,000.00 100'/o $ 15,000.00 $
JO Curb Inlet -5' x 8', complete in place EA 2 $ 2,750.00 $ 5,500.00 IOO'Yo $ 5,500.00 s -
31 Curb Inlet -15' wide, complete in place EA 1 s 4,50000 $ 4,500.00 100"/, $ 4,500.00 s
32 Al ley Gutter Area Inlet -V-44JO complete in place EA J $ J,500.00 $7 ,000 100"/, $ 7,000.00 s
JJ 31xJ ' Junction BOK. comp lete in place EA l $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 100"/, $ 1,5 00.00 s
34 8'x4' Junct ion Box, complete in place EA 2 s J,000.00 $ 6,000.00 100"/o $ 6,000.00 s -
J5 8'x8' Junction Box, complete in place EA 1 s 3,250.00 s J ,250.00 100'/o $ J ,250.00 $
36 TV Testing and Inspecti on, complete in place LF 2,98 1 $ 2.00 $ 5,962.00 100'/o $ 5,962.00 $
37 Rock Riprap, complete in place SY 65 $ 25 .00 $ 1,625 .00 ()"/, $ $ 1,625.00
38 Concrete Flume, complete in place SF J,43J s 6.00 s 20,598 .00 ()"/, $ $ 20,598.00
Storm Sewer C onstructio n Items Subtotal s 292,563 .00 Remain ing Subtola l s 22,223.00
Pa ge 2 of 4
Ba rracks II Subdivision Pha ses 105 &106
E ' E f t f C t f n2meer s s 1ma e o ORS rue IO R
Item Desc riptio n Unit Estimated Unit Price Total o/oComplete Amount Amount
Ouantitv Ouantitv Comolete ($1 Remainino 1$1
Water Construction Items
39 12' C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 546 s 40.00 $ 21,840 .00 100'/, $ 21 ,840 .00 $
40 16' Casing, complete in place LF 52 $ 80 .00 $ 4,160.00 100'/o s 4,160.00 $
41 Connect to Existi ng 12" Water Line EA I s 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/o $ 1,000 .00 $
42 l 211x 6" M.J. Tee, comple te in place EA I s 700.00 $ 700.00 100'/o $ 700 .00 $
43 12 'x 12 ' M.J . Tee, complete in place EA I s 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/o $ 1,000.00 s
44 12' x 8' M.J . Tee, complete in place EA I $ 800.00 $ 800.00 100'/, $ 800.00 $
45 12' M.J . Gate Valve, co m plete in place EA 2 $ 1,850.00 $ 3,700.00 )()()'/, s 3,700 .00 $
46 12' x 45 ° M.J . Bend, complete in place EA 4 s 650.00 s 2,600.00 100'/o $ 2,600.00 s
47 4' Blowoff Assembly, complete in place EA 2 s 2,200.00 $ 4,400.00 100'/o $ 4,400.00 $
48 Wate rl ine Testing LS I s 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 100'/o $ 1,500.00 $
49 8' C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structura l Backfill, complete in place LF 15 16 $ 28 .00 $ 42,448.00 100'/, $ 42,448.00 $ .
50 6' C900 Water Pipe w/tracer wire -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1330 $ 24 .00 $ 31 ,920.00 100'/, $ 31 ,920.00 $
51 Conn ect to Existing 8" Weter Line EA I $ 500.00 $ 500.00 100% $ 500.00 $
52 Conn ec t to Existing 6" Water Line EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 IOOY, $ 1,000.00 $ .
53 Fire Hydrant Assembly (w/valve, ve rt . extension), complete in place EA 4 $ 3,500.00 $ 14,000.00 100'/, $ 14,000.00 $ .
54 8'x 8' M.J . Tee, complete in place EA I $ 600.00 $ 600.00 100'/, $ 600.00 $ .
55 S"x 6" M.J . Tee, co mpl ete in place EA 3 $ 55 0.00 $ 1,650.00 100% $ 1,650.00 $
56 6'x 6' M.J . Tee, com pl ete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/, $ 1,000.00 $
57 8' M.J . Gate Valve, complete in place EA 5 $ 1,050.00 $ 5,250.00 !()()'/, $ 5,250.00 $
58 6' M.1. Gate Valve, compl ete in place EA 3 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 IOOY, $ 3,00000 $
59 8' x 45° M.J . Bend, compl ete in place EA 33 $ 500.00 $ 16,500.00 100'/. s 16,500.00 $
60 8' x 11.25° M.1. Bend, complete in place EA 2 $ 500.00 $ 1,000.00 100'/o s 1,000.00 $
61 6' x 45° M.J . Bend, compl ete in place EA 4 s 450.00 $ 1,800.00 100'/o s 1,800.00 s
62 6' x 11 .25° M.J. Bend , complete in place EA 4 $ 450.00 $ 1,800.00 100'/o $ 1,800.00 $
63 I ' W ater Service,< 15 ft (avg length-2 ft)(8' Line) EA 2 $ 700.00 $ 1,400.00 100'/o $ 1,400.00 $ .
64 l..S.' Water Service,< 15 ft (avg length -2 ft)(8' Line) EA 6 $ 750.00 $ 4,500.00 )()()'/, $ 4,500.00 $
65 I ' W ater Service,< 15 ft (avg length -2 ft ) (6' Line) EA 4 $ 650 .00 $ 2,600.00 100'/o $ 2,600.00 $
66 1.5' W ate r Service,< 15 ft (avg length-2 ft ) (6' Line ) EA 17 $ 800.00 $ 13,600.00 100'/o $ 13,600.00 $
67 1.5' Water Service,> 15 ft (avg length= 4 8 ft)(6' Line) EA 15 $ 1,200.00 $ 18,000.00 100'/o $ 18,000.00 s
68 2' Blowoff Assembly, complete in place EA 3 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 !()()'/, $ 3,000.00 $
Water Constr uction Items Su btotal s 207,268.00 Re maining S u btotal $ .
Page 3 of 4
Barracks II S ubdivisio n Pha ses 105 &106
E E · r e ngmeer s shmate o on struchon
Item Desc rip tion Unit Esti mated Uni t Price Ouantitv
Sa nitary Sewer Co nstruction Items
69 6' PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill, comp lete in place LF 696 $ 20.00
70 6 ' PVC Sewer Li ne -ASTM D-224 1 -Structural Backfi ll , complete in place LF 20 $ 22.00
71 8' PVC Sewer Line -D3034 -Structural Backfill, complete in place LF 1,393 $ 24 .00
72 6' Cleanout, complete in place EA 2 $ 750.00
73 4' Sewer Service-Single (avg. length -4ft), complete in place EA 4 $ 300 .00
74 4' Sewer Service-Do u ble (avg length -4 ft), complete in place EA 19 $ 400 .00
75 4' Sewer Serv ice-S in gle (avg le ngth • 48 ft), complete in place EA 5 $ 850.00
76 4' Sewer Service-Do ubl e (avg length = 48 ft ), complete in place EA 27 $ 950 .00
77 T ie-In to Ei<isting 8' PVC Sewer Line, complete in p lace BA I $ 1,000.00
78 Concrete Manhole -4' Dia. -complete in place BA 8 $ 2,800 .00
79 TV Testing and Ins pec tion, complete in place LF 2,109 $ 2 .00
Sa nitary Sewer Con•tructi on Item• S ubtotal
General Item• Subtotal s
Street Construction Concrete Pav em e nt ltem1 Subtotal s
Storm Sewer Con!ltruction Items Subtotal s
Water Con•truction Item• S ubtotal s
Sanitary Sewer Construction Items S u btotal s
50% Additio na l for Grau s
TOTAL CONSTR UCTIO N! S
Page 4 of 4
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
s
Total %Complete Amount
Ouantitv Comnlete I$)
13,920.00 100'1/, $ 13,920.00
440.00 100'/o $ 440.00
33 ,432 .00 100'/o $ 33,432.00
1,500.00 100'/o $ 1,500.00
1,200 .00 100'/, $ 1,200.00
7,600.00 100'/, $ 7,600.00
4,250.00 100% $ 4 ,250.00
25 ,650.00 100'/. $ 25,650 .00
1,000.00 IOO% $ 1,000.00
22,400.00 100'/, $ 22,400.00
4,2 18.00 100'/. $ 4,2 18 .00
115,610.00 Remainins Subtotal
Remaining
73,270.00 s 9,520.00
757,831.10 s 41,296.00
292,563.00 s 22,223 .00
207,268.00 s -
115,610.00 s -
3 ,7 50.00 s 1,310.00
74,349.oo I
F'-12327
SCHULl'Z ENGINEER!~; LL<:,;
Amount
Remaininlt ($)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
s -
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. DP 14-82
CITY OJ' CoLLEGE S"Ji\'llON
PJa.,,ui"I. & l'>t.1"tlcpml'ffl Smmtt
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The Barracks II
Section 105 & 106
DATE OF ISSUE: 5/22/2014
OWNER:
Heath Phillips Investments, LLC
3302 General Parkway
College Station , Tx 77845
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
CONDITIONS:
SITE ADDRESS:
Terminus of Deacon Dr.
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Bee Creek Trib. "B"
VALID FOR 24 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
Full Development Permit
1. No work beyond limits covered in permit is authorized .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein . If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re-
issued .
3. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance .
4. Other perm it s may have been required to fulfill local , state and federal requirements . Construction will be in
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits .
5. Stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds will be constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
6. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that all debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing
drainage fac iliti es . Construction Site Notice or Notice of Intent (NOi) along with Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWP3) will be kept and maintained on-site during construction as per TPDES permitting requirements . If it is
determined that the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment on -site , it is the
Contractor's responsibility to implement measures that will meet City , State, and Federal requirements .
7. All disturbed areas will be re-vegetated prior to Letter of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy .
8. All trees requ ired to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Section of the City's Unified Development Ordinance , prior to any operations of this
permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and
required to remain is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to , paint, oil ,
solvents , asphalt, concrete , mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to
remain is also prohibited.
9. All construct ion shall be in accordance with the stamped approved plans and specifications for the above-named
project and al l of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station , as well as State and Federal Regulations
that apply . Only those deviations from BCS Unified Design Guidelines , Specifications and Details specifically
requested and approved will be allowed .
10. Special Con itions : *** TCEQ PHASE II RULES IN EFFECT ***
-----==-...11.#.-~
Contractor Signature
tJ? <J) .J-J-fl -s=2 0 e:, tf 4r C1@/t{~ rz._12..A 4=.5---Z::wNflt:>tV 't'> • U>IU.
E-mail Phone number
I hereby grant this perm it for development. Contact {5v<&tJ Koi 't0 , the Public Works
lnmzed to !hi~ proz 24 hours prior to beginning construction~ kd/i ed Inspections .
City Engineer/Repres tative Date I I