HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-75FOR OFFIC~ ysE ON 'cr._
CASE NO .: _,.j_'-\:-'r-'-'T'""':o::=--'....,....,.,,---
DATE SUBMITTED: y . W·l1
C ITY OF C mLEGE STAT ION
Home o/Texas A&M Un iversity•
TIME : \\: \0
STAFF: ~
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION
WOLF PEN CREEK DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
(Check all that apply. Note: All items checked must be presented to the Design Review Board at the
same time): D Site Plan I Building ~Building ~Sign
frtV"'o.s.k.1 Pot~cA MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (D $350 Design Review Board Application Fee.
lf Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided .
For Site Plan I Building consideration :
~ $932 Site Plan Application Fee .
.. b $600 (min im um) Development Permit Application I Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee . Fee is
1 % of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance
is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
D $350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review Application Fee (if applicable).
D Fourteen (14) folded copies of site plan.
D One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan .
D One (1) copy of the following for building review (if applicable).
D Building elevations to scale for all buildings .
D A list of building materials for all facade and screening .
D Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette.
D Two (2) copies of the grading , drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
D Two (2) copies of the public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
D The attached Site Plan and Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklists (if
applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not check off.
For Building consideration:
0'" $250 Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review Application Fee (if applicable).
~ One (1) copy of building elevations to scale for all buildings .
10': IA list of building materials for all facades and screening . ~olor samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette .
~The attached Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklist with all items checked off
or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off (if applicable).
For Sign consideration :
~Ten (10) copies of sign details with dimensions.
D Ten ( 10) copies of the building elevation showing sign placement (if attached sign age is proposed).
~Ten (10) copies of color samples.
~Material samples .
NOTE: Proposed development in Wolf Pen Creek must be reviewed by the Design Review Board . When staff has
completed their technical review of the proposal , it will be scheduled for consideration by the Design Review
Board . Ten (10) copies of all current design plans and color samples will be required for the Board .
1/11 Page 1of11
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference ____ f\(___,.~.:...VJ~----------
NAME OF PROJECT C 4'fl(l~ cf-1~!J Pa ,'n ~ Chv;c/h
ADDREss 1 2 ;;i s--s. re-?("' s. &e:...
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) ------------------------
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name C\o~=to~(0f r l?:;fI-Qe?,>,Fflc.E-mail
Street Address t;'i .;f(, Cr c ~~ 0
City (3 ry tf '1 State T>(
Phone Number "'/ 71-g 'f (;-. 53 6 6 Fax Number
Zip Code 77 8' 0~
-"
q 7'?-g' 'ft"-356 s=:
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION :
Name Seo f:J.. w,"I &112rf
Street Address
E-mail SGf/H fl.ronnh%po1'nfchi~r4
city Coll9L ShJ-tan State __ tJ,__~X-----Zip Code ______ _
Phone Number Cf 3 G-3 0 7-4/ Of 7 Fax Number
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.):
Name V 14-E-mail __________ _
Street Address ___ 7 _______________________________ _
State Zip Code City ----------------------------------
Phone Number Fax Number ------------------------------
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made ,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
I Yes
I No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
City Project Number (in known):
Date I Timeframe when submitted :
1/11 Page 2of11
..
Proposed use of property &1'J. b"::J Sfr..,., fvc~ fo 12..c'114 1b, n ,,4,,,t. c4",,'7C! h c4~.
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? I Yes '):(No
Squarefootageofattachedsign /3:2 t/1 l~ff C/<,lr\/.,'a"J /JOt/J Ea,.fLt.-fl.-r,..hJ; l.l;icJ,.p,...o,-,/..
Square footage of freestanding sign / 80 tP Ont Sl·o/c. """ ly L.".Jl>
tv' jA For Site Plan consideration, describe how the following proposed elements meet the goals of the special district plan and 'f IT related regulations :
Site Lighting:
Solid Waste :
Relationship of building(s) to site :
Relationship of building(s) and site to adjoining areas:
Building footprint design :
Miscellaneous structures and street hardware:
Landscaping :
Site Maintenance:
1/11 Page 3of11
For Building consideration, describe how the following proposed elements meet the goals of the special district plan and
related regulations :
Building Lighting :
Solid Waste Screening :
Relationship of building(s) to site :
Relationship of building(s) and site to adjoining areas:
T'> 1> e. sl-41:> t t>h e-rl r A
r+ ,,.p Pt4r .s h b <-
Building design :
7~ f .S "/p"'!J H,, L-vl f~ pt"' Credr~~1 ~;r.
Pio h--, 'h f-,. fl-r-c_. t:lt.,,.. ol a cl -., k t,, Me
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete.
1"-16-/~
Date
1/11 Page4of11
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued .
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein .
3. If revoked , all work must cease until permit is re -issued .
4 . Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued .
5. The perm it will expire if no significant work is progressing w ithin 24 months of issuance .
6 . Othe r permits may be required to fulfill local , state , and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compl iance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construct ion including NOi and SWPPP .
7. If requ ired , Elevation Certificates w ill be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab
pre-pou r) and post construction .
8 . Owner hereby g ives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to ve rify
compl iance .
9 . If, stormwater mitigation is requ ired , including detention ponds proposed as part of this project , it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10 . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in c ity streets , or
existing drainage fac ilities . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply .
11 . The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Gu idelines Technical Specifications , and Standard Deta ils . All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations . A i'
12. Release of plans to g. H-. I· D(s~~S 1 ..J-''1 '-· (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only . I understand that final approval and r~ase of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Perm it.
13. I, THE OWNER , AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION , ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
ACCURATE. '
Sv "'" i HtA p rt.,,,•'() .Jr '7 Vv I-Hi rv RA
Property Owner(s) Date
Engineer Certification: \\1~
1. The .project has been design ~ensure that stormwater mitigation , including detention ponds , proposed as part
of the project will be con~trw ed first in the construction sequence . ·
1/11
2 . I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local , State and Federal Permits prior to construct ion
includ ing NOi and SWPPP .. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES : i.e ., projects over 10 acres may
requ ire sedimentation basin .
3. The information and conclus ions conta ined in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station , Texas City Code , Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
. Design Guidelines '.'All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ord inances
of the C ity of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4 . I, THE ENGINEER , AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN , AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION , ARE , TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE , TRUE , AND
ACCURATE.
Enginee r Date
Page5of11
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study , that the
,hilterations or development covered by this permit, shall not:
l \~i) increase the Base Flood elevation ;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second . This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities .
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11 .3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
D .. If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under
separate letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill/ Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following :
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm .
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C . I, , certify that the construction , improvement , or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation . I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments .
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 6of11
~ (
1 L Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
'If' required).
1-------------1
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor , including all utilities , ductwork and any basement , at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour) and post construction.
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I, ----------------, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial , industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities , ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer I Surveyor Date
OR
I , , certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation , and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab
pre-pour) and post construction .
Engineer I Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
1/11 Page 7of11
C rTY OF C oll.EGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M University"
SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
D Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
D A key map (not necessarily to scale).
D Title block to include:
D Name , address , location , and legal description
D Name , address, and telephone number of applicant
D Name , address , and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
D Name , address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
D Date of submittal
D Total site area
D North arrow .
D Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
D Ownersh ip and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels.
D The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site .
D The density of dwell ing units per acre of the proposed project.
D The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each . If different uses are to be
located in a single building , show the location and size of the uses with in the building . Build ing separation is a
minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection .
Locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site:
Des ignate between exist ing and proposed
D The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
D Phas ing . Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements .
D Bu ildings (Existing and Proposed).
D Setbacks according to UDO , Article 5.
D Building elevations , color samples , and materials list for buildings (as appl icable). Indicate placement of materials on
facades .
D Include t he following dimensions:
D Total vertical square footage minus openings (for each fayade separately)
D Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fayade separately)
D Total vertical squa re footage of each color (for each fac;:ade separately)
Geography
D Water courses .
D 100 yr. floodplain and f loodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site . Please note if there is none
on the site w ith confirm ing FEMNFIRM map number.
D Exist ing topography (2 ' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information . (If plan has too much
information , show dra inage on separate sheet.)
D Proposed grading (1 ' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information . (If plan has too
much information , show drainage on separate sheet.)
1/11 Pag e 8of11
Streets, Parking, and Sidewalks
D Existing streets and sidewalks (R.O .W.).
O Existing Dri veways , bot h oppos ite and adjacent to t he site accord ing to UDO , Article 7.
O Proposed drives . M inimum drive aisle width according to UDO , Article 7
O Indicate proposed d riveway throat length accord ing to UDO , Art icle 7
0 Proposed curb cuts .
O For each proposed curb cut (i ncluding driveways , streets , alleys , etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and
opposite side of the street to determine separation d istances between existing and proposed curb cuts .
D Proposed curb and pavement detail.
O A 6 " ra ised curb is requ i red around all edges of all parts of a ll paved areas without exception . (To include island ,
planting areas , access ways , dumpster locations , util ity pads , etc.) No exception will be made for areas
designated as "reserved for future parking".
0 Proposed medians.
O Proposed sidewalks (both public and private).
O Proposed pedestrian/bike circulation and facilities fo r non-residential buildings (UDO , Article 7).
O Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn , tabulated , and dimensioned.
O Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal.
D Handicap parking spaces.
O Parking Islands drawn and dimensioned with square footage calculated accord ing to UDO, Section 7 .2 or 7 .9
for non -residential buildings.
O Parking setback from R.O .W. to curb of parking lot as required .
O Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the appl icant or where there may be
conflict w ith pedestrian or bike facilities , handicap accessible routes or above ground util ities , signs or other confl icts.
O Security gates, showing swing path and design specs w ith colors .
D Guardra ils. Include design and colors.
0 Traffic Impact Analys is for non-residential development (UDO , Article 7).
0 Please note if none is required .
0 Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O .W.? 0 Yes O No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application .
Easements and Utilities
D Easements -clearly designate as existing or proposed and type (utility , access , etc .)
D Utilities (noting size and designate as existing or proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site , including bu ilding
transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to bu ildings, and drainage inlets .
0 Sewer Design Report (i f applicable).
D Water Des ign Report and/or Fire Flow Report (if applicable).
0 Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
0 Meter locations, exist ing and proposed (must be located in public R.O .W. or public utility easement).
0 Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include
D Min imum water demands
0 Maximum water demands
0 Average water demands in gallons per minute , and
0 Maximum sewe r loadings in gallons per day
O Will there be access f rom a TxDOT R.O .W.? O Yes 0 No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted with this application .
1/11 Pa ge 9of1 1
Fire Protection
D Show fire lanes . Fire lanes with a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be
established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a
public street or highway.
D Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a
project , and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1 ,
R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street , highway or designated fire
lane .
NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City , and drives must have an all weather surface before a
building permit can be issued .
D Will building be sprinkled? D Yes D No
If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted . If Yes ,
D Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any
further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or
a structure.
Landscaping
D Landscape plans as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The landscaping plan can be shown
on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those
trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in
easements .
Include information on the plans such as :
D required point calculations
D additional streetscape points required . Streetscape compliance is required on all streets .
D calculations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
landscaping points .)
D proposed new plantings with points earned
D proposed locations of new plantings
D screening of parking lots, 50% of all shrubs used for screening shall be evergreen.
D screening of dumpsters, concrete retaining walls , off street loading areas , utility connection points , or other
areas potentially visually offensive .
D existing landscaping to remain
D show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan . Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are
up before the first development permit is issued .
D Buffer as required in Article 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
D Show irrigation system plan . (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of
C.O .) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping . Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water
systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demand submitted by applicant and must
include backflow prevention protection .
D Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O .W .? D Yes D No
If yes , then TxDOT permit must be submitted at the time of application .
Other
D Common open spaces sites
D Loading docks
D Detention ponds
D Retaining walls
D Sites for solid waste containers with screening . Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or
residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required .)
D Are there impact fees associated with this development? D Yes D No
NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately .
11 11 Page 10of11
CITY OF C OLLEGE STATION
Home o/Texas A&M Univmity0
NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Section 7.9 Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
0 Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum).
0 Title block to include:
0 Name , address , location , and legal description
O Name , address , and telephone number of applicant
O Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
O Name, address , and telephone number of architecUengineer (if differs from applicant)
0 Date of submittal
O Scale should be largest standard scale possible on sheet.
O List of colors from the City of College Station color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents.
0 Color samples .
0 List of materials to be utilized .
0 Elevations of each non-residential building and screening structure. Show placement of materials and colors on
the facades according to UDO Section 5.6 .B or 7.9 .
0 Include the following dimensions:
D Total vertical square footage minus openings {for each fac;ade separately)
O Total vertical square footage of transparency (for each fac;ade separately in Northgate)
0 Total vertical square footage of each building material {for each fac;:ade separately)
0 Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fac;:ade separately)
O Graphic representation and/or description of existing buildings in building plot to show material , color, and
architectural harmony.
1111 Print Form Page 11 of 11
C ITY oF C m .IEGE STAT IO
Home o/Texas A&M Univmity'
FOROFFIC
CASE NO .:
DATE SUBMITIED : -=~~.,,.__:;..~=J
TIME :
STAFF :
..._ ___________ _
NON-RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL (NRA) STANDARDS
BUILDING REVIEW APPLICATION
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS :
[2( $350 Non-Residential Architectural Standards I Northgate Building Review Application Fee .
[Lf" Application completed in full. This application form prov ided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided .
0 One (1) copy of building elevations to scale for all buildings .
d A list of building materials for all facades and screening .
!2f Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette.
[J" The attached Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklist with all items checked off
or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference ------------------------
NAME OF PROJECT Ou!--\~ L-\' "-l6 "Po\ 4\ GK-uVU.\f
ADDRESS 117-S IE')U~') A vtt'-l.LllZ )lV!!t-t ; lt.-f.Le-qe S"L~ILvU !'/.. -'1{8'/S
LEGAL DESCRIPTION {Lot, Block, Subdivision) ----------------------
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the proj ect):
Name Q.~ .\ . btSltf A. l ML-. E-mail oH\a8, vaidt:S\g(lt.$. COWi
Street Address 4SLO Mvtf'.'.Q_ wee~ Pi-1.u't ~ S-r c 2c/?
City V/V,'! .fl u State _~_l'I. ______ Zip Code T7 &i 2--
Phone Number l q 1Vf) t5Lite -?-71..t.lr Fax Number ~L~'1_1_vr_}_B_'-llP_-_?~?-'-~---..,.-() \~ ~~~V\
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION : vvv
Name Cou 4ec.;fl% IX11 µ( [1-f,Ul/,ll-t I vt\<;01-\ \N,it..-L-Mu\U2' E-mail Sc..o++@ lDV\11ec..·tt~1n h ·t -V
u I J
Street Address -1LO H-f\~\../ \20A-D
City euL-% e" ~ tl'r1L v L.1 State _---_/ ~y. _____ Zip Code _("--t-'--e_L{O-<=.,_ __ _
Phone Number vf 1t1 -Lttif? -S-S:rs-Fax Number ___________ _
ARCHITECT , ENGINEER , or OTHER CONTACT INFORMATION :
Name ~Q\-tH \2-woes E-mail _)±vhodesf!vu1d.esL9VJS .CUW1
Street Address lJi)OO u.A 1].;fe fl. l/fi;e&IL-Pµ,v.f )IC 2.0':3
City 0\2..\../.f\ µ State --'-/....__ _____ Zip Code / {,fj() Z.
Phone Number ( Vl/P'j) 8'-/le -??leit-Fax Number L ~ 1~) 84& -?30S-
The appli nt has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true
and com c.
Signatur Date
10/10 Page 1 of2
CITY OF C OLLEGE STATIO
Home of Texas A&M University •
NRA BUILDING REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Refer to UDO Sections regarding Northgate Districts or Non-Residential Architectural Standards, as appropriate.
~Sheet size -24 " x 36 " (minimum). 0 Title b lock to include:
l2f Name, address , location , and legal description
r7'l Name , address , and telephone number of applicant ct Name , address , and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
[3' Name, address , and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant)
[2l Date of subm ittal
~Scale should be largest standard scale possible on sheet.
~ List of colors from the City of College Station color palette to be utilized or proposed equivalents . G Color samples.
[2( List of materials to be utilized.
~ Elevations of each non -residential building and screening structure . Show placement of materia ls and colors on the
facades according to the UDO Sections regarding Northgate Districts or Non-Residential Architectural Standa rds .
[2'.f Include the following dimensions:
0 Tota l vertical square footage includ ing open ings (for each fa9ade separately)
0 Tota l vertical square footage of transparency (for each fa9ade separately in Northgate)
[Zf Total vertical square footage of each building material (for each fa9ade separately)
0 Total vertical square footage of each color (for each fa<;ade separately)
[J/ Graph ic representation and/or description of existing build ings in building plot. Show material , color, and
architectural harmony.
10/10 Print Form Page 2 of2
CITY OF COLLEGE S TAT ION
Home o/Texas A&M Univmiry •
MEMORANDUM
March 25 , 2014
TO : RA.I Design Inc , via ; office@raidesign .com
FROM : Jenifer Paz , Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CONNECTING POINT CHURCH (ORB)
Staff reviewed the above-ment ioned site plan as requested . The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that need to be addressed . Please address the comments and
submit the follow ing information for further s taff review and to be scheduled for the next
available Design Review Board (ORB) meeting :
__ Revised elevations (if necessary)
The agenda and staff report for your project can be accessed at the following web site on
Tuesday the week before the ORB meeting .
http://www.cstx .gov/drb
Please note that this application will expire in 90 days from the date of this memo , if the
applicant has not provided written response comments and revised documents to the
Adm inistrator that seek to address the staff review comments contained herein . Addit iona l
construction documents will be required once the ORB has approved the Site Plan , so that they
can be stamped approved . If you have any questions or need additional informat ion , please call
me at 979 .764 .3570 .
PC : Jason Willmore, Connecting Point Church , via : sc;i>!!@connectingpo intchurch .tv .,/
John Rhodes , via : jtrhodes@raidesigns .com V
P&DS Project No . 14-00900075
Planning & Development.Services
P.O. !\OX 9%0 • 110 I TEXAS AVENUE • COLLEGE STAT IO N ·TEXAS • 77842
TEI.. 979.76 ·1.3'\70 ·FAX. 979.76 4 .34%
cstx.gov/devservices
Staff Review Comments No. 1
CONNECTING POINT CHURCH (ORB) -14-00900075
1. Section 5.8 .A.8 , Build i ng Design, states "Materials shall be selected for harmony of the
building with adjoining buildings ," "Materials should be of durable quality ," and "Colors
shall be harmonious and shall us only compatible accents ."
Staff recommends that the proposed paint color , Dark Night , be reconsidered .
2. Is the existing stucco siding proposed to be painted "Beige" or is this the existing paint
color? Please clarify .
3 . Section 5.8 .A.12, Maintenance , states "Materials and finishes shall be selected for their
durability and wear as well as for their beauty. Proper measures and devices shall be
incorporated for protection against the elements , neglect, damage, and abuse."
Staff recommends an alternative material to the signage on the side elevation. Metal
letters , such as the signage on the front elevation , is a more durable material.
4 . Changes may be made based on the comments above or choose to move forward for
consideration by the Design Review Board with the current proposal.
DATE :
TO :
FROM :
C I TY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University •
MEMORANDUM
April 21 , 2014
RA.I Design Inc , via ; office@raidesign.com /
Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
SUBJECT: CONNECTING POINT CHURCH (ORB)
Thank you for the submittal of the revised appl ication and documents for your DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD application . I have been assigned to review this project and it is anticipated that the
review will be completed and any staff comments returned to you on or before Monday, April 28 ,
2014 . If you have questions in the meantime , please feel free to contact me .
PC : Jason Willmore , Connecting Point Church , via : =-sc~=-=-=..:..:..:...:=~=o""-i n:....:..t=-=c"-'h'-=u.:....:rc"""h.:..:...t:..:.v
John Rhodes, via : jtrhodes@raidesigns.com
P&DS Project No . 14-00900075
Planning & Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • l lO l TEXAS AVENUE ·COLLEGE STAT ION ·TEXAS • 77842
TEL 979.764.3570 ·FAX. 979.764.j4%
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 1, 2014
TO : RA.I Design Inc, via ; office@raidesigns .com
FROM : Jason Schubert, AICP , Principal Planner
SUBJECT: CONNECTING POINT CHURCH (NRA)
I reviewed the above-mentioned NON-RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS
application and determined it to be incomplete . The following is the preliminary list of items
needed to complete the submittal. Please submit the following information so this application
can be forwarded for review :
This property is located in the Wolf Pen Creek District. Changes to buildings
and signage in this district require the approval of the Design Review Board
(DRB). Submit a "DRB : Wolf Pen Creek Development Review" application
along with additional fee and supporting materials to replace the application
that was submitted .
Please be aware that if this application is not completed before Monday , May 19 , 2014 , it will
expire and a new application and fees will be necessary to continue the development process .
If you have any questions or need additional information , please call me at 979 .764 .3570
PC : Jason Willmore , Connecting Point Church, via : scott@connectingpointchurch .tv
John Rhodes , via: jtrhodes@raidesigns .com
P&DS Project No. 14-00900075
Plan11ing e!r Development Services
P.O. BOX 9960 • 1 10 1 TEXAS AVENUE · COLLEGE STATIO N · TEXAS · 77842
TEL. 979.764.:n 7o . FAX. 979.7 64.34%
REQUEST:
SCALE:
LOCATION:
ZONING DISTRICT:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT MANAGER:
RECOMMENDATION:
Design Rev ie w Board
May 9 , 2014
CITY OF COLLEGE STt\TJON
Home of Texas A&M Un iversity "
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
for
Connecting Point Church
14-00900075
Building elevations and signage for Connecting Point Church in an
existing building
2 .14 acres
41 O Harvey Road
WPC Wolf Pen Creek
John Rhodes, RAI Designs
Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
jpaz@cstx.gov
Staff recommends approval of all signage and building elevations .
If approved by the ORB , a sign permit will need to be approved for
the sign to be installed .
Page 1 of 3
1J
Ol
(Q
(1)
f\.l
£.
VJ DE V ELOPMENT REVIEW
CONNECTING POlNT CHURCH
410 HARVEY RD.
ITEM SUMMARY: The subject property is located near the corner of Harvey Road and George
Bush East. The applicant is proposing to repaint the existing structure , replace a sign within an
existing cabinet of a freestanding sign and have new attached signage (294 square feet).
ITEM BACKGROUND: The subject property was in itially developed in 1995 for Office Max . In
2011 , Office Max has moved to a new location and the space has remained vacant. Temporary
retail stores have occupied the space since for seasonal operations and sales .
ITEM DETAIL:
Building: The applicant is requesting to change the existing stucco siding fac;ade paint color to
Wall Street (SW7665) and Stolen Kiss Red (SW7586) for some accent. The Stolen Kiss Red
was chosen to complement the adjacent building along Harvey Road . The remainder of the
fac;ade will be the existing beige tone .
Signs: An existing freestanding sign , along Harvey Road , is proposed to include two new signs
within the existing cabinets . New attached signage is proposed on the main entry fac;ade and
along the side fa<;ade , facing Harvey Road . All signs are in accordance with the requirements of
the Unified Development Ordinance .
REVIEW CRITERIA:
Building: The Design Review Board must evaluate the proposed changes in accordance with
the criteria found Section 12-5.8.A.8.h, Building Design , of the Unified Development Ordinance :
h. Colors shall be harmonious and shall use only compatible accents
Signs: The Design Review Board shall evaluate all proposed signage according to the following
criteria :
1. Every sign shall be designed as an integral arch itectural element of the building and site
to which it principally relates .
2. Every sign shall have good scale and proportion in its design and in its visual
relationship to buildings and surroundings.
3. The colors , materials , and lighting of every sign shall be restrained and harmonious with
the building and site to which it principally relates.
4 . The number of graphic elements on a sign shall be held to the minimum needed to
convey the sign's major message and shall be composed in proportion to the area of the
sign face.
5. Each sign shall be compatible with signs on adjoining premises and shall not compete
for attention .
6 . Identification signs of a prototype design and corporation logos shall conform to the
criteria for all other signs .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of all signage and building elevations . If approved by the ORB , a
sign permit will need to be approved for the sign to be installed.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS:
1. Application
2 . Elevations of building facades
3. Sign details
Design Rev ie w Board
May 9 , 2014
Page 3 of 3
...
SIGN FINISH LEGEND
,
POLY-FIBER STAND ALONE
SIGN BACKGROUND
COLOR: SW #6237 "DARK NIGHT"
LETIERING (STAND ALONE)
METAL LETIERS & LOGO (FRONT ELEV.)
PAINTED LETIERS (LEFT ELEV.)
COLOR: SW #7006 "EXTRA WHITE"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!CO-f\~JN------c -T:lt\fG ----p -Qf t\ff--Tc1.:r o -RCFl
'----------------------------------------~------------------------------------------------~-------------------------------------
' "
SIGN FINISH LEGEND
FRONT ELEVATION
N .T .S . e POLY-FIBER STAND ALONE
SIGN BACKGROUND
COLOR: SW #6237 "DARK NIGHT"
l.ETT1'RING (STAND ALONE)
METAL LETTERS & LOGO (FRONT ELEV.
PAINTED LETTERS (LEFT ELEV.)
COLOR : SW #7006 "EXTRA WH ITE"
Existing
Jenifer Paz
From:
Sent:
Scott Willmore [scott@connectingpointchurch .tv]
Tuesday, April 29 , 2014 9:25 AM
To: Jenifer Paz
Subject: response to staff recomendations
Ms Paz,
Thank you for the staff recommendations . Here is our written response. Your administrative assistant said an
email would be considered a response . If I need to turn in more please let me know.
1. The color Dark Knight was chosen out of the Wolf Pen District book of colors and we chose a dark color
based on Campus View Apartments across the street and another Church in the Wolf Pen Creek District 2
streets from us . The only identifying colors I can see in surrounding businesses is red. Sonic, Fazolli's and
Rudy's all have red. We can have red in the dot on our logo in the middle of the C and we can have red trim. As
for the other colors surrounding us we went with 2 areas and would like to keep it a darker shade of gray , which
this is , trying to strike a neutral color.
Could you please send me 4 alternate colors you would suggest and we would have a better gauge on what you
are wanting but I believe the darkness coincides with Campus View and if we add red trim we would be within
a color all are using. Thanks in advance for color suggestions
2 . The beige on the building is what is currently on the building and wont be painted. We are only painting the
facing and accent striping around the building
3. As for the letters on the side of the building we will absolutely change it to coincide with the materials we
are going to use on the front of the building .
I believe this answers the questions and after the color suggestions I can reply with an alternative. Could you
please tell me where I can locate the complete guidelines/manual for the exterior of buildings and stand alone
monument signs so I can pass it along to our board.
Thank you for all of your help. If I can answer anything else or I need to turn in anything else please let me
know
Thanks ,
Scott Willmore
936-307-4197
Scott Willmore
Senior Pastor
CONNECTING POINT CHURCH
410 Harvey Rd.
College Station , TX 77845
(936) 307-4197
scott@connectingpointchurch.tv
1
Zon.ing Districts
R
E
RS
GS
R-1B
D
T
Rur al
E state
Rstricted Suburba n
Genacal Subur ban
Sing le Fa m ily Residential
Duplex
Townh o us e
R-4
R-6
MHP
0
SC
GC
C l
BP
vr DEVE L OPMENT REVIEW
WOLF PEN
Multi-Famliy
H igh Density Mu lti-Family
Manufactured Home Par
O ffice
Subu r ban Commercial
General Commercial
Ccmmerci a~l ndustrial
B usin ess Par
c
BPI
t:A P
C -3
M -1
M -2
C -U
Rt, D
P-MUD
vVE·sr WOLF ..
B usiness Par Industrial
t atur al Areas Prote cted
Light C ommercial
L ight l ndustris.I
Heavy l ndustri s.I
Cc l~e and Unillers ity
Resear ch a nd Oevel ap.meni
Pls nne-d Mixed-Use Dev elopment
CONNECTING PO INT CHURCH
410 HARVE Y RD -
Case:
14 -075
POD
W PC
I G-1
t G -2
NG -3
ov
ROD
KO
5
Pis nn~ Deotelcpment District
Wolf Pen Cree4c Dev. Corridor
C or e Northgate
Transitions.I Notth9st e
Re:s idential t· crihgst e
Ccrrid-0r Over lay
Red·ev elopment District
Krena Tsp Overlay
DE SIGN REV IE W
BO AR D
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
CONNEC TING PO INT CHURCH
410 HARVEY RD .
Case :
14 -075
DES IG N REV I EW
BOARD