Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
51 Development Permit 618 Pebble Hills Estates I & II
GARRETT ENGINEER{NG COllSUL TUIG EtlGDIURlltG & LAND ·SURVUUIG 4444 CARTER CREEX PARKWAY, SUllE 111 ·BRYAN, TEXAS 111112. (4111) 141-2111 • (411) 14'.JOl4 TO : /.-1~1~ =-Da.t~c~:~<V'.';;..1-_~v~-'--.:.......'1-'--~-- I I . RE: We Are Sending You : __ Hcrcwi·11 lJ11d S C Th F 11 · u __ er . cparnte .over c ·o owmg: Copies Date J_ . : Remarks: By:~U cc~ Description ~ csi~e-r Re ce ived D y :c¥/~ .. ~~ Oth'.ti-CUUU ~ l~U U8:U8 AM C. S. PUB LIC WORKS FAX NO. 9797643489 P. 01 ~ 4p /1/X o<J9 "9 {b ~ tJ-zB-.;0 Pebble Hills Phase I Punch List Sept. 27, 2000 I. C'o111pldl ~ (lctr ntion pond; lit1ilcl li0iHlw nlls 110.'s 4, [i & (i <1rnl ins bll l rip- rnp. Build c·o1H.,ret.o flumr, l'ina.1 grnc10. ancl sc'c'cl. 2. Cle;m <111<1 grnnt. i11sid0 ;rnd 011tsicl0 of all ii1lot anrl junC'tio11 l1oxcs. ;). Gr;1<lc ;rnd ins t.a.JI l'ip-1 ·np at. h0ndwnll ff;3 4. C01nplotc~ siclnw;1 .1ks and lnrnclfr.;1p r;i.mps [i. Hepnir l.JrokNl cnrus , sicl<-w;ilks nnd Ynllry gnt.tc1~; Y<lrio111; lcx~1t.io11s G. Se11l jointi;; in all conc1·c.t0 work ?. Finish pa.vil1g l)lwso l sti·0cts: l'cbl.Jlc Spl'ings and nihl>lo Hidg0 n.t llocky .Mcnilows drive. 8. Finnl ~radc all right. of ways Utility J. Clenn inside 11nd gront. all mm1lioles 2. Clearly mark ;tll wa.tcr 1md sewer scrvic:cs (some missing). 3. A.ajnst, all fire hydrants, Yal\'C boxr.s n.nd blowoffs to concct grack 4. Operate valv~ and hydrants. 5. Build ,·aJvc box p:i.ds 2'1." x 84". G. Fiwtl grade and srod nt.i lit.y casemc.nts . .. Note\: Not. :i, rina.l Jlllll chlist too Hla .ny items incom plctC'. .. U\q, COLLEGE STATION August 3, 1999 Mr. Donald Garrett, P.E. Garrett Engineering 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 108 Bryan, TX 77802 RE: FEMA Floodway Study Lower Spring Creek Dear Mr. Garrett, P. 0. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tet 409 764 3500 . . ~ ~ This is in response to the report submitted on July 29, 1999, for the above referenced project This is a follow-up letter regarding the phone conversation with Earl Havel, of your office, yesterday. As discussed with Mr. Havel, the proposed floodway limits included in the report would increase the water surface elevation by more than one foot This is not allowed by FEMA or city regulations. Sections 4 and 5 as listed in the table of Contents were missing from the report submitted. In addition, the following items should be included prior to forwarding the information to FEMA: • Include a cover letter regarding the study and requested changes to the Flood Insurance Rate Map. • Include FEMA MT-2 Forms 1, 4, 5, and other necessary forms required for the proposed changes. Your office should complete these forms. Note that Form 4 requires that a Floodway Data Table be attached. • Include a copy (as appropriate) of LJA Engineering's Floodplain Study of Spring Creek and include a citation of the source of this study in your report where this information is used. The LJA study is currently under review by FEMA as Case Number 99-06-1336P. This study must be approved before or concurrently with this floodway study. If LJA Engineering does not finalize this revision, you will be responsible for completing the floodplain study. It was also indicated yesterday that you might want to include additional cross-sections in the LJA hydraulic model to refine it. If this is desired, include a "Corrected Effective Model" along with the "Duplicate Effective" and "Revised Conditions Model." If desired, you may pick up the report submitted to make revisions . Copies of the FEMA application forms and instructions are available in our office. If you have any question, please call me at (409) 764-3570. s;µz:t,fJ__ Jeff Tondre, P.E. Graduate Civil Engineer xc: Veronica J.B. Morgan, P.E. Frank Thurmond Home of Texas A&M University Engineer's Estimate For Street, Drainage, Water & Sanitary Sewer Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates -Phases One & Two College Station, Brazos County, Texas Prepared For: Jerry Windham & Frank Thurmond P .O . Box 991 Bryan, Texas 7780 I Telephone: (409) 696-2467 Prepared Bv: Garrett Engineering 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 10 Bryan, Texas 77802 Telephone : (409) 846-2688 *May, 1999 * Street & Drainage Improvements: Water Improvements: Sanitary Sewer Improvements: Engineer's Estimate For Street & Drainage Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates College Station, Brazos County, Texas *May, 1999 * SUMMARY Total Estimated Cost For Street, Drainage, Water & Sanitary Sewer Improvements: $1 ,027 ,282 .75 $188,499 .00 $164 ,981.00 $1,380, 762. 75 Garrett Engineering* 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 108 *Bryan, Texas 77802 • (409) 846-2688 s treet Item No. la. lb. 2. 3. 4 . 5 . 6. 7 . 8. 9. 10 . 11. 12 . • Engineer's Estimate For Street & Drainage Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates College Station, Brazos County, Texas *May, 1999 * &D . rama2e Im 1provements: Description EStimated Unit ' Quantity 30 11 Reinforced Concrete Lay-Down Curb 8,921 L.F . And Gutter Standard 24 11 Reinforced Concrete Curb 2 ,183 L.F . And Gutter 611 Lay-Down Monolithic Curb 391 L.F . 1-112 11 Thickness Asphaltic Concrete 22 ,252 S.Y. Swface Course (Type "D") 6 11 Thickness Compacted Crushed 6,584 S.Y. Limestone Base 7 11 Thickness Compacted Crushed 15 ,425 S.Y . Limestone Base 6 11 Thickness Compacted Lime Stabilized 28,055 S.Y. Subgrade (Assume 5%) 7 11 Thick Reinforced Concrete Valley 4 ,347 S.F. Gutter 4 11 Thick Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk 35 ,006 S.F . Reinforced Concrete C-76 Storm Sewer Pipe 18 11 Diameter C-76 Reinforced Concrete 1085 L.F. Pipe 24 11 Diameter C-76 Reinforced Concrete 813 L.F. Pipe 30 11 Diameter C-76 Reinforced Concrete 798 L.F . Pipe 36 11 Diameter C-76 Reinforced Concrete 61 L.F. Pipe Estimated Alllount Unit Price $10.50 $93 ,670.50 $8.50 $18,555.50 $6.50 $2,541.50 $3.75 $83,445.00 $6.00 $39,504 .00 $7 .00 $107,975 .00 $3.75 $105,206.25 $4.50 $19,561.50 $2 .50 $87,515 .00 $31.50 $34,177.50 $42 .00 $34,146.00 $52.50 $41 ,895 .00 $63 .00 $3 ,843 .00 Garrett Engineering * 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite I 08 * Bryan, T exas 77802 * ( 409) 846-2688 ----------------" St reet Item No. 13 . 14. 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19. 20. 21. • &D . raina2e I morovements: Description Engineer's Estimate For Stree t & Drainage Im provements To Pebble Hills E states College Statio n, Brazos County, T exas *May , 1999 * (continued) Estimated Unit< .... Quantity Estimated Unit Price R einforced Concrete C-76 Sto rm Sewer Pipe (Continued) 42" D iameter C-76 Reinforced Concrete 657 L.F . $73 .50 Pipe Reinforced Concrete Sloped H eadwalls Reinforced Concrete Sloped Headwa ll 1 L.S. $575 .0 0 With Toewalls (HW-1) Reinforced Concrete Sloped Headwall 1 L.S. $7 00.00 With Toewall s (HW-2) Reinforced Concrete Sloped Headwa ll 1 L.S. $1 ,880.0 0 With Toewalls (HW-3) Reinforced Concrete Sloped Headwall 1 L.S . $1,150 .0 0 With Toewalls (HW-4) Reinforced Concrete Sloped Headwall 1 L.S. $1,200 .00 With Toewall s (HW-5) Reinforced Concrete Sloped Headwa ll 1 L.S . $700.00 With Toewalls (HW-6) R einforced Concret e Recesse d Inlet Boxes Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S . $2,3 88 .0 0 With One Extension And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB -1) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet B ox 1 L.S. $2,701.00 With Two Extensions And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-2) Garrett Engineering* 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite l 08 * Bryan, Texas 77802 * ( 409) 846-2688 Amount $4 8 ,2 8 9.50 $575 .0 0 $700.00 $1 ,880 .00 $1,150.00 $1 ,200.00 $700 .00 $2,388.00 $2,701.00 s treet Item No, 22 . 23 . 24 . 25 . 26 . 27 . 28. 29. &D . rama2e Im 1provements: Description Engineer's Estimate For Street & Drainage Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates College Station, Brazos County, Texas *May, 1999 * (continued) Estimated Unit . Quantity Estimated Unit Price Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Boxes (Continued) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S. $3 ,214.00 With Two Extensions And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-3) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S . $2 ,791.00 With Two Extensions And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-4) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S . $2 ,791.00 With One Extension And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-5) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S. $2 ,314.00 With One Extension And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-6) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S . $2 ,473.00 With Two Extensions And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-7) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S . $2 ,5 12 .00 With Two Extensions And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-8) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S. $2 ,655.00 With One Extension And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-9) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S . $2 ,515 .00 With Two Extensions And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-10 ) Garrett Engineering * 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 10 8 •Bryan, Texas 77802 • (409) 846-2688 Aniount $3 ,2 14 .00 $2,791.00 $2,791.00 $2,314.00 $2,473 .00 $2 ,512.00 $2 ,655 .00 $2 ,5 15.00 s treet Item No. 30. 31. 32 . 33. 34. 35 . 36 . 37. 38. • &D . rama2e Im 1provements: Description Engineer's Estimate For Street & Drainage Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates College Station, Brazos County, Texas *May, 1999 * (continued) Estimated Unit .,, Quantity Estimated Unit Price Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Boxes (Continued) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S. $2,026.00 With One Extension And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-11) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box I L.S . $2 ,026 .00 With One Extension And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-12) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S . $2 ,810 .00 With Two Extensions And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-13) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S . $2 ,374.00 With One Extension And Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-14) Reinforced Concrete Recessed Inlet Box 1 L.S. $1 ,863.00 With Manhole Ring & Cover (IB-15) Reinforced Concrete Junction Boxes Reinforced Concrete Junction Box 1 L.S . $648 .00 With Manhole Ring & Cover (JB-1) Reinforced Concrete Junction Box 1 L.S . $1 ,068 .00 With Manhole Ring & Cover (JB-2) Reinforced Concrete Junction Box 1 L.S . $897.00 With Manhole Ring & Cover (JB-3) Reinforced Concrete Junction Box 1 L .S. $753.00 With Manhole Ring & Cover (JB-4) Garrett Engineering* 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 108 * Bryan, Texas 77802 * ( 409) 846-2688 Amount $2 ,026 .00 $2 ,026 .00 $2 ,810 .00 $2 ,374 .00 $1 ,863.00 $648 .00 $1,068.00 $897.00 $753 .00 _. Engineer's Estimate For Stree t & Drain age Im prove ments To Pebble Hills E states Coll ege Statio n , Brazos County , Texas *May, 1999 * (continued) St t & D . ree ramaee I t mprovemen s: Item Description Estimated Unit Estimated No. ' Quantity "' Unit Price Reinforced Concrete Junction Bo xes 39 . Reinforced Concrete Junction Box 1 L.S . $884 .00 With M anhole Ring & Cover (JB-5 ) 4 0 . Reinforced Concrete Junction Box 1 L.S . $73 4 .00 With M anhole Ring & Cover (JB-6) 41. Reinforced C oncrete Junction Box 1 L .S . $1,043 .00 With M anhole Ring & Cover (JB-7) 42 . Roadway Excavation ("In-Place" Quantity) 20 ,46 1 C.Y. $3.50 43 . Roadway Fill ("In-Pl ace " Quantity) 600 C.Y. $4.50 44 . Detetention P ond Excavation ("In-Pl ace" 36,384 C .Y . $3 .5 0 Quantity) 45 . Detetention Pond Embankment ("In-Place" 4 ,200 C.Y. $4.50 Quantity) 46 . TCS#018 L imestone Rock Rubble Rip-Rap 1,067 S.Y. $2 0 .0 0 47. Clearing & Grubbing 12 .3 Acr es $1 ,250 .0 0 Total Estimated Cost For Street & Drainage Improvements: Garrett Engineering * 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 10 8 *Bryan, T exas 77 802 * (409) 846-26 88 Amount "' $884 .0 0 $734.00 $1 ,043 .0 0 $71 ,6 13 .5 0 $2 ,7 0 0 .00 $12 7 ,344.00 $18,9 00 .00 $2 1,340 .00 $15,375 .00 $1 ,027,282. 7 5 Engineer's Estimate For Water Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates College Station, Brazos County, Texas *May, 1999 * w Im ater 1orovements: Item Description Estimated Unit Estimated No. Quantify ' Unit Price I. 8" Diameter C900 -Class 200 P.V.C. 5188 L .F . $17 .00 Water Line 2. 6" Diameter C900 -Class 200 P.V.C . 1311 L.F. $16 .00 Water Line 3. 1-112" Type "K" Copper Service Line 2673 L.F . $14 .00 4 . 16 " Diameter Machine B oring With 16" 60 L.F . $75 .00 Steel Casing (3/8" Min. Wall Thickness) 5 . 18" x 8" M.J. Tapping Saddle With 8" M.J. 1 EA $3 ,500.00 Tapping Gate Valve And Box 6 . 8" x 8" M.J. Tee 4 EA $250.00 7. 8" M .J. Gate Valve With Box 7 EA $475.00 8. 6" M .J. Gate Valve With Box 4 EA $375.00 9 . 8" Plug With 2" Blow-Off Assembly 1 EA. $450.00 10 . 6" Plug With 2" Blow-Off Assembly 5 EA. $400 .00 11. Fire Hydrant With Appurtenances 4 EA. $1 ,750.00 12 . 8" x 11-114 Degree M .J . Bend 1 EA $250 .00 13 . 8" x 45 Degree M.J. Bend 8 EA $250 .00 14. 6" x 45 Degree M .J. Bend 4 EA $225 .00 15 . 8" x 6" M .J. Tee 3 EA. $300.00 16 . 8" x 1-112" Service Saddle With 1-1/2" 30 EA. $250 .00 Corp. Stop, 1-112" x l" x l" Wye With 2-1" Stops Garrett Engineering * 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 108 *Bryan, Texas 77802 * (409) 846 -2 6 88 Amount $88 ,196 .00 $20 ,976 .00 $37 ,422 .00 $4 ,500 .00 $3 ,500.00 $1 ,000 .00 $3 ,325 .00 $1 ,500 .00 $450.00 $2 ,000 .00 $7 ,000 .00 $250 .00 $2 ,000.00 $900.00 $900 .00 $7 ,500 .00 • Engineer's Estimate For Water Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates College Station, B razos County, Texas *May, 1999 * (continued) w Im ater 1provements: Item 'Description ,. ········: Estimated Unit ' Estimated No. Quantity Unit Price 17 . 6" x 1-112" Service Saddle With 1-1/2" 28 EA. $235 .00 Corp. Stop, 1-112" x I" x I" Wye With 2-1" Stops 18. 8" x 6" M .J . Reducer 2 EA $250 .00 Total Estimated Cost For Water Improvements: Garrett Engineering* 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 108 *Bryan, Texas 77802 * (409) 846-2688 Amount $6 ,580 .00 $500.00 $188,499.00 • - s . amtarv s ewer Im iprovcmcnts: Item Desc ription No: l . Tie Into E xisting Manhole 2 . Standard Manhole (0' -8' Depth) 3 . Extra Depth Manhole Wall (Over 8') 4 . 4" Diameter P.V.C. Service Line 5. 6 " Diameter SDR 26-3034 P.V.C . Sanitary Sewer Service (5' -7' Depth) 6. 6" Diameter SDR 26-3034 P. V.C. Sanitary Sewer Service (7' -9' Depth) 7 . 6" Diameter SDR 26-3034 P . V.C . Sanitary Sewer Service (9' -11' Depth) 8. 8" Diamet er SDR 26-3034 P.V.C. Sanitary Sewer Service (7' -9' Depth) 9 . 8" Diameter SDR 26-3034 P.V.C. Sanitary Sewer Service (9' -11' Depth) 10 . 8" Diameter SDR 26-3034 P.V.C . Sanitary Sewer Service (11' -13' Depth) 11. 12 " Diameter SDR 26-3034 P.V.C . Sanitary Sewer Service (9' -11' Depth) 12 . 12 " Diamet er SDR 26-3034 P.V.C. Sanitary Sewer Service (11' -13' Depth) 13. 6" x 4" Cross 14 . 6"x 4"Tee 15 . 8" x 4" Tee 16 . 4 " x 4" Wye Engineer's Estimate For Sanitary Sewer Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates College Station, Brazos County, Texas *May, 1999* Estimated U nit ,,, Quantity 1 EA 20 EA 5 V.F . 2038 L.F. 467 L.F . 1220 L.F . 1220 L.F . 810 L.F . 700 L.F . 500 L.F . 158 L.F. 70 L .F . I EA 19 EA 12 EA. 53 EA. Estimated Unit Price $500 .00 $1 ,400 .00 $135 .00 $14 .00 $14 .00 $15 .00 $16 .00 $19 .00 $20 .00 $21.00 $29.00 $30.00 $250.00 $200.00 $250.00 $25 .00 Garrett Engineering * 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Su ite I 08 * Bryan, T exas 77802 * ( 409) 846-26 88 Amount $500 .00 $28,000 .00 $675.00 $28,532 .00 $6,538 .00 $18,300.00 $19,520 .00 $15 ,390.00 $14,000 .00 $10,500 .00 $4,582 .00 $2 ,100.00 $250.00 $3 ,800.00 $3 ,000.00 $1 ,325 .00 ,) - Sanita Item No: 17. 4"Plug 18 . Trench Safety rovements: Description · Engineer's Estimate For Sanitary Sewer Improvements To Pebble Hills Estates College Station, Brazos County , Texa s *May, 1999 * (Continued) ' Estimated ··· Quanti 113 5144 lJnit EA. L.F . Total Estimated Cost For Sanitary S Estimated Unit Price $25 .00 $1.00 ewer Improvements: Garrett Engineering * 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite I 08 * Bryan, Texas 77802 * (409) 846-2688 - Amount $2 ,825 .00 $5 ,144 .0 0 $164,981.00 / DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT N0.618 PEBBLE HILLS ESTATES PHASE I & II FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pebble Hills Estates Phase I & II OWNER: Jerry Windham & Frank Thurmond P .O. Box 991 Bryan, Texas 77801 409-696-2467 DRAINAGE BASIN: Spring Creek Tributary SITE ADDRESS: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:This permit is valid for (Give specific instructions to the owner as to what is covered by this permit. Specify only what the City bas permitted and nothing else!) The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. This permit, being temporary, is valid only within sixty (60) days of the date shown below, and is not intended to allow the complete development of the site as proposed. Any work performed after the expiration of this permit is not covered, and is considered unauthorized. (Use this paragraph only for fill permits and partial permits.) In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Administrator/Representative Date Owner/ Agent Date Contractor Date ., NPDES FORM TtUS FORM REPLACES PREVIOUS FORM 351D-6 (8-92) Form Approved . OllB Ma .2040«lll ~ eiqilNa: W1·M See Reverse for Instructions &EPA United states Envirorvnenlal Protection Agency Washington. CC 20460 Notice of Intent (NOi) for Stonn Water Dleehargn At90Clated with lnduatrlal Activity Under a NPDES General Permit .... &.tmlssion of 1hil Notice of Intent oonelitutae notice that the ~identified In Section II at this form lntenda to be authorized by a NPOES permit Issued for storm water discharges associated with Industrial ~n the te Identified In Section Ill of this form. Becomln~ ~rmlttae oblgat.a such~ to comply 'Mttl 1h8 tarma and condtllens of tfll pennlt. NECESSARY INFORMATION MUST ae PROVIDED 0 HIS FORM. I. Penn it Selection: You mu.t indicate the NPOES stonn Water general permit under Which you are applying for ooverage. Check one of th&M. Basellne D Baseline ~ Multl-Sec~r D Industrial Construction (Group Permit) II. Faci lity Opera1Dr I nformetlon 7(,~,tl ,g,,M o.N ~J POOne :~o ,q I ~19 ;l/IZ-1i1,17 1 Name : l j1ft;.1 ~1~1 v. ! .~~LI I 8))1~ .A 1M1 f I~ 1~1A ,N.IL Addr98&: I p, /) 1 ,i10 ,x , //19 1/1 Status of I p I I I I I I I t I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I OWner/Operalo r: City: 1 $1~1 ~1A 1Ai1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I State:~ ZIPCode : IZ1 11~1 0 1 L 1 ·1 I I I I Ill. Facillty/SHe Location ll"lfonnation Name : jf 1f.16 J3 ,l-1£..1 J, 11L.1l.1S1 I I Is the facility located on D I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lrdan lslds? (Y or N) Address: I I I I I . . . I ' ' ' ' . City : 1 ~ 16> /...1 L-1 E 1 ~1e 1 It, 1/1 .41 7". I 1 01 /II I I I I I I I I State: ~ ZJPCode:I Z1 11.B1k1. I I I I ! Latitude: 1 3 1 o l ~13 1 .i>1 4' Loogitude: lo 1214'1L1.SI L 1BI Quarter: LLJ Section: LLJ Township: l I I I I RMg11: I I I I I IV. Site Activity lnfonnatiOn MS4 Operator Name: 1l 11 ;f ,¥1 1 0 1 ~1 1C..1 () 1"' 1t--1 e.~ le, .~-:!1 A 1-/, L 101N I I I I I I I I Rec:eMng WllttU Body: I ~ 11" 1 fS ( 1 N1 Gu 1 l 1~E 1 ~1~ ,-r;'fl..t I 181 Uil'1A11<tv'1 I I If you are fling as a eo·permlttoo , MYll:~ectnr eumi agg1biHJl1 cc1x · enter stonn water general permit number. l I Based on the l!"tstructlons provided In Addendum H ct the Multi·Sector pennit, are 11pecie1 Identified In AddendlJTl H SIC Of Oe$lgnattd Primary : I 1t 10 1 I 2nd: I I in proximity to the atonn water dscharges to be covered Activity Code: I I I ll"lder this permtt , or the areas d Br.AP eonstruotlon to D contJol ~storm water discharge8? [I] Cf orN) Is the facility required to submit monitoring data? (1, 2, 3, or 4) Will construction (land disturbing actlvitie&) be conducted D If You Have Another Existing NPDES I I tor storm wat8r contrOI&? (Y er N) Permit, Enter Permit Number : I I I I I I I I D Is applcarrt subject to and in complianee with a written historic oreservation ..,,reement? i'v or Nl V. Additional lniormatlon Raqt.ired for Construction Activities Only Project Start Clat&: Completion Date: la the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan [] 1 0,~1L1 IUI 1 01~ I/ 1? 12191 Estimated Area to be I . I~! .. [),O, I In compliance with State and/ar' Local Olsttri>ed (In Acres): sediment and erosion plans? Cf or N ) VI. Certification: The tertif.calion statement in Box 1 applies to aB. appllcantll. The cer11flcatlon statement i"I Box 2 applies .llDl)£ to facillli&S applying for the Multi-Sector storm water general permit. - BOXl BOX2 .A.LL APPLICANTS: MULTI-SECTOR STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT APPLICANTS ONLY: I certify under penalty of law that this I certify l.llder penalty at law that I have reed and understand the Pan I .B. ellgltility requifements for docl.ment NICI all attachments we!'e cove~ under the Mulll-Sector stonn water general permit, lncluting those reqt.iremants relating to ~epared ll'lder ~ direction or supervision the pro ectlon of species ldentlfted In MdMdum H. ar.oordance wl a system <Se5igl'\8CI to To the best o1 :Yi knowledge, the discharges covered inlar th is permit. and construction of BMPs t o assura that 11J8.l lftad personnel property gather and ...... uate the Information contl'Ol &U>rm wa er run-off, are not likely to and wlY not likely aaverserv affect anJ spec lu ldenuttlld In submitted. Based on my lnqulfy of the Addendum H of the Multi-sector !11Dnn water general permit or are otherwise ell bis for cov81'age due person or persons who manage the system , to pnwlous authortz.atlon under the Enc!angnd Specla Act or true perscna dlr.ctly responalOle for To the best at my knowledge , I further certify that such clacharges, and constructlon of BMPs to gathering the infonnaion, the Information submitted Is, to the best ot my knowledge contro111tonn water run-oft, do not have an frffect on properties listed er eligible for ll&iing on the and belief, true , acaJrate, and complete . I National Register of Hls1Dnc Places under the National Historic Preservation Act. or are otherwise am aware that 1here are significant p.naitles elglble for coverage due to a pr8Yious agreement under the Nalonlll Historic Preservation Act. for subrTitUng falH lnform11tlon, llc;:luding the I i.lderstand that continued coverage under the M~Sactor general pemit Is contingent upon =ty Of fine and imprisonment for violations. maintaining eligibili ty as provided for in Part 1.6 . -. Print Name · 11), E> ,tJ 1 A ,l.)) ,/,!,.A ,/2.,f?.., £,I". "f': ' I I I I . I . I . I I i I I I 0am: 10 ,Z I I 11 1 qix 1 1 SJanan ...... Wvu , ' '"j 7"J /J.//;(7}/--.. -· - Instructions -EPA Form 3510.0 Notice Of Intent (NOi) For Storm Water Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity To Be Covered Under a NPDES General Permit Who Must Fiie A Notice Of Intent (NOi) Form Federal law at 40 CFR Part 122 prohibits po int source d i scharg~s of storm water associated with industrial activity to a water body(ies) of the U.S . without a Nationa l Pollutant Discharge Eli mination System (NPDES) permit. The operator of an industrial activity that has such a storm water discharge must submit a NOi to obtain coverage under a NPDES Storm Water General Permit. If you have questions about whether you need a permit under the NP DES Storm Water program , or if you need information as to whethe r a particular program is administered by EPA or a state agency, te lephone or wri te to the Notice of Intent Processing Center at (703) 931 -3230 . Where To Fiie NOi Form NOls must be sent to the following address : Storm Water Notice of Intent (4203 ) 401 M Street, S.W. Washington , DC 20460 Completing The Form ' You must type or print, using upper-case letters , in the appropriate areas only . Please place each character between the marks . Abbreviate if necessary to stay with in the number of characters allowed for each item . Use one space for breaks between words, but not for punctuation marks unless they are needed to clarify your response . If you have any questions on this form , call the Notice of Intent Processing Center at (703) 931 - 3230 . Section I Permit Selection You must indicate the NPDES storm water general permit under which you are applying for coverage . Check one box only . The Baseline Industrial and Basel ine Construction permits were issued in September 1992 . The Multi -Sector Permit became effective October 1, 1995. Section II Facility Operator Information Provide the legal name of the person , firm , public organizat ion , or any other entity tha t operates the facility or site described in th is application . The name of the operator may or may not be the same as the name of the facility . The responsible party is the lega l entity that controls the facility's operation , rather than the plant or site manager. Do not use a colloquial name . Enter the complete address and telephone number of the operator. Enter the appropriate letter to indicate the legal status of the operator of the facil ity : F =Federal ; S =State; M =Public (other than federal or state); P = Private . Section Ill Facility/Site Location Information Enterthe facility's or site's official or legal name and complete street address , includ ing city, state, and ZIP code. Do not provide a P.O . Box number as the street address . If applying for a Baseline Permit and the facility or site lacks a street address, indicate the state and either the latitude and longitude of the faci lity to the nearest 15 seconds Q[ the quarter, section , township , and range (to the nearest qJarter section ) of the approximate center of the site . If applying for the Multi-Sector Pernolt Indicate the complete street address and either the latitude and longitude of the facility to the nearest 15 seconds 2! the quarter, section, township, and range (to the nearest quarter section) of the approximate center of the site. All applicants must ind icate whether the facility is located on Indian lands. Section IV Site Activity Information If the storm water discharges to a mu nicipal separate storm sewer system (MS4), enter the name of the operator of the MS4 (e .g., municipality name , county name)· and the receiving water of the discharge from the MS4 . (A MS4 is defined as a conveyance or system of conveyances (i ncluding roads with drainage systems , munic ipal streets , catch basins, curbs , gutters, ditches, man -made channels, or storm drains) that is owned or operated by a state , city, town , borough , county , parish , district, association , or other public body which is designed or used for collecting or conveying storm water.) If the facility discharges storm water directly to receiving water(s), enter the name of the receiving water(s). If you are filing as a co-permittee and a storm water general permit number has been issued , enter that number in the space provided . Ind icate the monitoring status of the facility . Refer to the perm it for information on monitoring requirements. Ind icate the monitoring status by entering one of the following : 1 = Not subject to monitoring requ irements under the conditions of the perm it. 2 = Subject to mon itoring requ irements and requ ired to submit data . 3 = Subject to monitoring requ irements but not required to submit data . 4 = Subject to monitoring requ irements but submitting certification for mon itoring exclusion . List, in descending order of significance , up to two 4-digit standard industrial classification (SIC) codes that best describe the principa l products or services provided at the facility or site identified in Section Ill of this application . If you are applying for coverage under the construction general permit, enter "CO" (which represents SIC codes 1500 -1799). For industri al activities defined in 40 CFR 122 .26(b)(14)(i)-(xi) that do not have SIC codes that accurately describe the principal products produced or services prov ided , use the follow ing 2-character codes . HZ = Hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilit ies , including t hose tha t are operating under interim status or a perm it under subtitle C of RCRA [40 CFR 122 .26 (b)(14)(iv)]; LF Landfills , land appl ication sites, and open dumps that receive or have rece ived any industrial wastes , including those that are subject to regu lation under subtitle D of RCRA [40 CFR 122 .26 (b)(14)(v)]; SE Steam electric power generating fac ilities, includ ing coa l handling sites [40 CFR 122 .26 (b)(14)(vii)]; TW Treatment works treating domestic sewage or any other sewage sludge or wastewater treatment device or system , used in the storage , treatment, recycling , and reclamation of mun icipal or domestic sewage [40 CFR 122 .26 (b)(14)(ix)]; or, CO = Construction activities [40 CFR 122 .26 (b)(14)(x)]. If there is another NPDES permit presently issued for the fac ility or site li sted i n Section 111 , enter the permit number. If an application for the facility has been subm itted bu t no perm it number has been assigned , enter the application number. Facilities applying for coverage under the Multi-Sector storm water general permit must answer the last three questions in Section IV . Refer to Addendum H of the Multi-Sector general permit for a list of species that are either proposed or li sted as threatened or endangered . "BMP" means "Best Management Practices" that are used to control storm water discharges . Indicate whether any construction will be conducted to install or deve lop storm water runoff controls . Section V Additional Information Required for Construction Activities Only Construction activities must complete Section V in addition to Sections I through IV . On ly construction activities need to complete Section V. Enter the project start date and the estimated completion date for the entire developmen t plan . Provide an estimate of the total number of acres of the site on which so il w ill be disturbed (round to the nearest acre). Indicate whether the storm water pollution prevention plan for the site is in complian ce with approved state and/or local sed iment and erosion plans , perm its , .ir storm wa ter management plans . Section VI Certification Federal statutes provide for severe penalties for subm itting false information on t his appl ication form . Federal regulations requ ire this application to be signed as follow s : For a corporation : by a respo 0 nsible corporate officer, which means : (i ) president , secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal bus iness function, or any other person who performs sim ilar policy or decision making functions , or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing , production , or operating fac ilit ies em ploying more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expend it ures exceed ing $25 million (in second-quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign docume nts has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corpo rate procedures ; For a partnership or sole proprietorship : by a genera l partner or the proprietor ; or ·For a municipality, state, Federal, or other public facility: by either a pr incipal ex ecu ti ve officer or ranking elected official. Paperwork Reduction Act Notice Public r eporting burden for this app lication is estimated to average 0.5 hours per application , including time for reviewing instructions, searchi ng existing data sou rces , gathering and maintaining the data needed , and completing and rev iew ing the colle ct ion of information . Send comments regarding the burden estimate , any other aspect of the collection of information , or suggestions for improving this form , including an y suggestions which may increase or reduce this burden to : Ch ief, Information Po licy Branch , 2136 , U .S. Environmental Protection Agency , 401 M Street, SW, Washingto n, DC 20460 , or Director , Office of Information and Regulatory Affa irs , Office of Management and Budget , Washington , DC 20503 . COLLEGE STATION P. 0 . Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue Tel : 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM College Station , TX 77842 ~ ~~ ~f June 16, 1999 TO: Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services FROM: Y,ve Beachy , Director of Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Pebble Hills Detention Facility The Parks & Recreation Board , at their meeting on June 8th, agreed to the following recommendations regarding the design and construction of the detent ion pond to be located in the park site : 1) The design should move the "pilot" channel to the east side of the detention facility to the extent feasible; 2) that the materials used to construct the detention pond (other than the poured concrete) be considered for aesthetics; and 3) that extreme care be taken to carefully protect the beneficial vegetation outside of the detention pond area during construction. This action was approved by unanimous vot e with Allen , Crompton and Davis abs ent. Cop ies : Parks & Recreation Board PARD Staff Veronica Morgan Home of Texas A&M University Figure XII Application Form Development Permit Inside/Outside Established Flood Hazard Areas City of College Station, Texas (re: Ordinance No. 1728) Si~~galDescri~~n =-~~~~~e~l ~~~J~,t~ls~i~$'~~Le~6~-~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~=o~~~~~~~~~ Site Address:--------------------------------- Owner: J~~ ~tihJA tA ~ i:@~IL "JFiJ12MocJb Address: P. 0. lox. qq I W~ 1 1??o I Telephone No.: LAUi -Z.'il.P1 Architect/ /' Engineer: GA-mT'r' tJ"1,J@:;fZ..1,,{~ Address: /l./J~e. t~ Ate~ Telephone No.:~--............ """~:;....'_~__;~_,,_:...;;.,_ ____ _ Contractor: Address: -------------------------------Telephone No.:---------- Date Application Filed :---------------Approved:----------- Attached as part of this a pplication: O Application Fee O Signed Certificate O Site and Construction Plans, with supporting documentation: two (2) copies of each O Other: ACKNOWLEDGEMEN ~ I, &~ Tk/~ , as owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: ting documents complies wiht the requirements of Ord ina nce No . 1728, Date F-2 f -'7~ Date ~2 1-7~ Date Page 1 of2 • Figure XII Continued CERTIFICATIONS : (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas .) A. I, , certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. Engineer Date B . I, , certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps , as amended . Date ' ~;qq / Conditions or comments as part of approval : ------------------- In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . I hereby grant this permit for development . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the. City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply . DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMITNO. 618 PEBBLE HILLS ESTATES PHASE I FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PEBBLE HILLS ESTATES PHASE I DATE OF ISSUE: 12/28 /1999 OWNER: Jerry Windham & Frank Thurmond P .O. Box 991 Bryan, Texas 77801 409-696-2467 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Full Permit SITE ADDRESS: 308 Greens Prairie Road East DRAINAGE BASIN: Spring Creek VALID FOR g_ MONTHS CONTRACTOR: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: for subdivision infrastructure as per approved plans . The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties , city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion , siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work . Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . I hereby grant this permit for development of an area INSIDE the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of Coll ge Station that apply. Date Date Contractor Date 01/01/00 13:26 GARRETT ENGINEERING ~ 409 764 3496 GJ01 THIS FORM REPLACES PREVIOUS FORM 3510-6 (B-96) See Reverse for Instructions Form Approved. OMa No. 2040-0188 NPOES FORM &EPA United Stales Environmental Ptotoction Agency Washington. DC 204GO Notice of lntont (NOi) for Storm Wator Dlschargos Associated with CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Under a NPDES Genoral Pormlt Submlssio:i or lhis Notice of Intent conslltute& notico U1at tho patty tc:Jontiried in Section I of Ulis form Intends to be authorized by a NPOES permit issued fo< storm woter discharges a$$0dated with construction activity tn tho SUllellndian Country Land ldenLilieC lrl Section 11 of this form, Subrni3sion ol this Notice of Intent also conslitulos l'\Olic:<:1 lllal tho party identified in Section I or tills form nieots tho oligit>ility roquirnnionts in Part 1.6, of tho general permit (incluoing those related to protection of ondangorod species deiermined U1rough U10 procedures In Addendum A or U1e general pormil), understands that continued aUlhof'!zatlon 10 discharge is conting(IN on maintaining pe<rnit eligibility, and that implementation or the Storm Water PoUulion Prevention Plan required unO'lr Part IV or ttie general perrnit will t>ggln at the time ttie permittee commences work on lhe construction project identified in SeciOn II below. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN AUTHORIZATION. ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED MUST 8E INCLUOEO ON THIS FORM . SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK OF FORM . I. O,wnor/Oporator (Applicant) Information I Neme : tJ 1E1rl.11?rC1 WI l IN 1pt-J 1A !M1 1~ 1 1f'1E; iA 1N 1(1 J( 1H 1t .. rn:1H10Nl"Phone: Address : IJ2iO f><' I 1!zrf (O!?j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I Status of Owner/Oporator: City : ~'{~1N1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I Stata : o:::KJ Zip Codti : 0 Q 8 0 61 -I I I I I u. Projec;l/Slte Information Is the facility located on Indian Country Lands? Projee1Nama : lf?t;.1f71£?1L1Et 1Hd1£c1kG1 1-1 1P1HIA6!€1 iI1 I I I I I I I I YesO Nofa"'· ProjectAddres5'Location :t31r21EE1N!:21 1PJ~t1fll1E1 1@1A1Q1 I I I I I I I l_J_L I I I City : (: Q Lil 1e;:J416 1'5CT1Arn l 10!\.L I I I I I I I I Stele: 1Li)(1 Zip Codo; 0 r7 18J41$j -I I I I I Lalitude : !g,1'2 l;21~IS"141 LOl'lgilvdo : t;?ft ~I { 15i I i&i County: lf,telA r2.101S1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I Has tho Storm Walor PoUution Prevention Plan (SWPPPJ been prepared? Yes 0 No;z/ Optlonal : Addross or location of SwPPP lor vlowlng 0 Address In Soctlon I <ibove 0 Address In Section II abovo 0 Other address (ir known) l>Erlow : SWPPP ·Phone: Addteu:I I I I Ill I I I I l I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I -I City : l..l__1-1._J_J__I I l I I l I I I I I I I I I I I II 1t 1Z.~1 I 1<J ft BJ II 17..ISd !2,.10101~ Uonll'I Osy '!tier Month Oay 'ltlor E&Umatad Co<1strvct ion Start Oate Estimated Cornplel iOI' Date -. E&timale of ares lo be di3turt>ed (lo nearest a<:re): ~,. «:2 01 I I Estimate or Likelihood ol Oischargo (choose only Olle): 1. 0 Unlikely 3. 0 Onoo P6' week 5 . 0 Continue! 2. ~ Once per month 4 . 0 Once por day Ill. Ctrtlncatlon State : l...L.J Zip Codo: I I I I I l -l l I I I I J Baaed on instruction provided In Addendum A of tho pormlt. are U1ere any listed endangered or threatened speclos, or dosignatoo critic.al habitat in the l)(Oject area? ... Yes 0 No Q"/ I have salisOed perrnil eligibility with regard 10 p<oleclion ol endangered spr.tcies through the indicated secilon of Pan l.B.3.e.(2) ol the permit (check ono ot more boxe&); caiO !b10 cc>O (dl0 I ce _rtlfy under penalty of law !fiat this document -and all auachmonts were prepare<J under my direction or supervision In accordance will'I a system designed t~ assuro !hat quahOed per&0nnel prope<ly gather and evaluate tho lnlotniatlon aubmilled. Based on my inquiry of the person or porso11s who manage lhos systom. ot !hose persons dlre<:lly responsible lor gathering tho information, the inrormetion submilted Is, to tlu,1 best of my knowladgo ano bol!or, 1tue . aecurato . and comptote . t em aware ltiat thero aro slgniOcant penallie6 ror submlltlng raiso lnfomialion, including the possibility ol r.ne Jnd · ·· Imprisonment ror knowing violations . :::,~:=·~~~~~~-'.-1--~~--' -~--~~_LJ Dalo: Ll..JZ!!i '2 ff ff] ----------------------------·--.-- EPA Form 3510·9 roplacod 3510·6 (0·90) 01/01/00 13:26 GARRETT ENGINEERING ~ 409 764 3496 GJ01 THIS FORM REPLACES PREVIOUS FORM 3510-6 (8-96} Form Approved. OMS No . 2040-0' ea See Reverse for Instructions OEPA United Stales Environmental Protection Agency NPDES Washington. DC 204GO FORM Notice of lntont (NOi) for Storm Water Discharges Associated with CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Under a NPDES Genoral Pormlt Submission or thia Notice of lntel'\I col'\stllUle& notico that IM party lclontlfied lri Section I of this form tnionels to be aulhori<:ed bY s NPOES permit issued ror storm woter discharges associaled with construction activity In tho Stale/Indian Countty Lend Identified hl Section II or this form , Submission of t'11s Notice or Intent also constitutes no1lco Iha! tho party identified in Section I of Ulls form niee\$ the oli9ibility roqu itunionts in Part 1.8. of tho general permit (incluOing those related to protection of ondangorod species deiermined through U\o procedures In Addendum A of the general pormit), undors1<1nds tha1 continued authorization to discharge is contingent on maintaining permit eligibility, and that implementation of the Storm Water PoUulion Prevention Plan required unoer Part IV of ttie general 11errnil wUI bogln al !ho time the permillee commence& work on the construct ion proj ect identified in Seeion II below. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN AUTHORIZATION, ALI. INFORMATION REQUESTED MUST BE INCLUDED ON THIS FORM . SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON BACK OF FORM . I. Ownor/Oporator (Applicant) lnfonnatlon I t:Lo t1 18 14-ilo ll5 1~ 4 1S I Name : IJ 1Eirl.1~1"(1 WI I IM 1'2 tJ. I~ IM1 l~I 1f'1g1A IN 1(1 Tr IH l~l~lttl'2NIPPnone : Address : lf:iio r;t I Status of [EJ 1~1'.! 1012j I I l I l I l I I I I I I I l l l I I I I I I I Owner/Operator: City; ~~~1?J1 l I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I Stale: a:::KJ Zip Co<Ja: on~ 06"1-1 I I I I U. Proj"USltt Information Is lhe facility localed on Indian Country Lands? Projeel Namo : 1e ~1ezi211 '"''~ 1tl1! 1t.c1k61 1-I 1E::'.1HIA6!€1 iI1 I I I I I I I I Yes 0 No g--· Project Addres5/Location : t31rz 1e.e 1rJ1:21 1Pl~l lfl l lf;;l 11Z!Qia 1'21 I I l I I I I l-Ll l I I City; Ct:2' . ..:IC 1~1e1 l:5C::OA.r'T"I I 1a\..L I l l I I I l I State ; 1[j)(J Zip Code: t:2 r1. l~,41c;j -I I l I I Latitude ; ~1'2l2l1~l~141 Longilvdo : loft' ~I l l~ I I~ I County: t~etA rl..101S1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Has the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPPJ been prepared? YesO No~ Optional : Addross or location of 0 Address In Soctlon I <1bove SWPPP for viO'Wlng 0 Address In Section II abovo 0 Other address (if known) b&lciw ; SWPPP ·Phone : Addreas : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I -1 City : l..LLL..J.__L_I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I State : LJ_J Zip Coda : I I I I I 1-1 I I I I ' Name of Receiving Waler; 121e1e 11 1~ 14'1 c1e1e:i~1'1 ([1g I~ 151'.Uf IA 1r2.!Yl I I II 1ZIZ1~ll 1~1~ Al 1112.l~d i2.10101Q1 Baaed on instruction provided In Addendum A of lM permit. are Motllfl 08y 'lti8t Monl/1 Day """' lhere any listed endsngerod or threatened specios. or dosignated E&Umaltd Construction S1ar1 Oate Es~mated Compleliofl Date crltlcal habitat in the project area? .~ -. Ei;timsle of srea lo be di3turtied {to nearest acre): ~1.001 I I Yes 0 No Q" .. Estimate of Likelihood of Discharge (choose only one): I have satisfi ed permit eligibility with regard to protection ol 1. 0 Unlikely 3. 0 Once per wool< 5 . 0 Continual endangered sp(1cies through tne indicated secUon of Part l.B .3.e .(2) of 1'1e permit (ctisck ono or more boxe5); 2. ~ 01'\CO PO I month 4. 0 Once por day (a>D (blO (ciO (dl0 Ill. Ctnlncatron I certlry under ponalty of taw ttiat this document .and all auachmonts were prepareo under my direction or superv isi1m In accordanco with a system designad to assuro that qualiOed personnel property gather and evaluate tho Information aubmilled . Based on my inquiiy of the person or porso11s who manage this system . or those persons dlre<:tly resPonsible lor gathering ll'le information. the informelion submitted Is, lo the best of my knowladge ano boliof, true, eceurato , aml complete . l am aware lhal there arc slyniOcant penalties for submitting fatso Information, including the poss ibility of fona ilnd . .. Impr isonment for knowing violalions • ::~:.~:,:·~:~~-~]:__:_~-1--~~--I -~-~~ ____ ::~~~<' ~-=f---- EPA Form 35\0·9 roplocod 3S10·6 (0·90) ( \ '·' ( 1 0 /22 /99 09 :56 '5'409 764 3737 CS PARKS & REC Among the issues discussed were: • Silting sources and removal • The location and configuration of a pilot channel • Fire ant problems • Protection of vegetation • The aesthetics of the facility and the materials used • The extent of construction damage • Whether the facility would be a retention and/or detention pond 8. George Dresser made a motion that the Board go on record as (I) supporting the movement of the pilot channel to the east side of the retention pond to the extent feasible; (2) that the materials used to construct the retention pond, other than the poured cement concrete-be considered for purposes of aesthetics; and (3) that extreme care be taken that beneficial vegetation outside the area of the retention pond be carefully protected during the construction phase . John N . seconded the motion. The Board was in favor and the motion passed 4-0 . Discussion and possible consideration of additional lights at A&M Consolidated High School tennis courts: Eric P . mentioned that he had spoken with the CSISD staff and the Electrical Engineer with Britt Rice Electric, (who was involved in the installation of the original lights). Eric said that unfortunately, because of cost saving measures, the existing system was not put in to make it easy to light the additional six courts (currently, there are three lit courts). He mentioned that the existing poles were not loaded to put in additional fixtures, so more poles would have to be put up. He went on to say that there is also a shortage of power. There is only enough power available to light three courts . Eric said that it would be in the $30,000 range to get three courts lit. George would like to continue to gather more information on this, and (1) find out if the tennis courts are viewed as public-use courts, and (2) get a preliminary engineering cost estimate. 9. Consent Items: -Capital Improvement Report: There was no discussion on this item . -·Discussion of next meeting date and agenda: John N . would like to know the status of the Rock Prairie jogging trail (from the Board meeting of April 13, 1999). Chris B. would like information on the amount of tax dollars that go to economic development and what the percentage is . 10. Adjourn: George moved to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded by Sarah. The Board was in favor and the meeting adjourned at 9:38 p .rn. \._ Parks & Recreation Board Public Hearing/Regular Meeting June 8, 1999 Page 5 l4JJ!!l3 ._. __ _ ( 10 /22 /99 09 :55 'a409 764 3737 CS PARKS & REC 4. Approval of Minutes from Tuesday, April 13, 1999 and Minutes from Tuesday, May 11, 1999: Sarah Birkhold made a motion to approve the minutes from April 13, 1999 as written. John Nichols seconded the motion. The Board was in favor and the motion passed 4-0 . John made a motion to approve the minutes from May 11, 1999 . Sarah seconded the motion. The Board was in favor and the motion passed 4-0 . 5. Discussion and possible consideration of archeological study at Lick Creek Park: Steve said that this item was requested by one of the Board members at the last meeting . Steve said that the Department has spoken with a representative from the Archeology Department at Texas A&M University . He is interested in doing this study, beginning in January, as part of a class project that would include students from several relevant departments. Steve said that all requirements could be fulfilled by contracting through the Archeology Department instead of through a professional service. He went on to say that t he intent of the study is to provide a survey, and also a detailed history of the site and an interpretation of the results . The Department could use the study to develop various exhibits and displays. Steve said that the Department has requested funds for this study in their budget process . 6. U pdate on Richard Carter Park Landscape Volunteer Program: Steve said that one of the employees that works at the Conference Center, Frank Haislip, has an interest in the Master Gardening Program. He has coordinated with the program to work on site and has secured volunteers and juvenile services "boot camp" workers to work on the project. The City would incur no expenses from the project. iscussion and possible consideration of Park Land dedication for Pebble Hills state: Eric Ploeger introduced members from Garrett Engineering who are interested in a plan for the Pebble Hills Subdivision. He mentioned that a few years ago, the Parks Board accepted a Park Land Dedication for Pebble Hills. Garrett Engineering has made a fow minor changes to the design There was discussion on the detention pond, whether or not the pond would be part of the land to be dedicated to the city, and if it would be part of Parks Maintenance responsibility . Since maintenance, and who is responsible for it, has been a concern of several subdivisions previously, it is a good idea to confront the issue up-front. Chris Barzilla pointed out that a hole in the ground can be made into a real pond, stocked with fish, and used by neighborhoods, rather than just left to become a maintenance problem. Frank Thurman (Garrett Engineering), however, pointed out that to create a full-scale pond would incur a lot of up-front costs, because of the amount of di rt that has to be excavated and hauled away. \: Parks & Recreation Board Public Hearing/Regular Meeting June 8 , 1999 Page 4 14100 2 REVIEWED FOR c0~ ~o, I~ "'CE OCT 2 B 1999 COLLEGE Q 1 A I IUl'-J Fire Flow Analys1sNG~G For Fire Hydrants 1 - 4 Pebble Hills Estates -Phases One & Two College Station, Brazos County, Texas Prepared For: Jerry Windham & Frank Thurmond P .O . Box 991 Bryan, Texas 77801 Telephone: (409) 6%-2467 Prepared Bv: Garrett Engineering 4444 Carter Creek Parkway Suite 108 Bryan, Texas 77802 Telephone: (409) 846-2688 *May, 1999 * Analvsis For: . Static Conditions -No Fire Flow Fire Flow Analysis 18" Water Line Fire Hydrant 4 P-8 P-2 J-5 P-7 J-1 P-3 Fire Hydrant 1 P-6 P-4 P-5 Fire Hydrant 2 Fire Hydrant 3 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01/99 03:03:21 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Detailed Report for Reservoir: 18" Water Line Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary x y Connecting Pipes P-1 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 10,010.28 ft 10,056.34 ft Calculated Results Summary Time Constituent Hydraulic (mg/I) Grade (ft) 0 .00 hr NIA N/A Title: Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Reservoir Reservoir Inflow Outflow (gpm) (gpm) N/A N/A Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Hydraulic Grade Line Zone Academic Edition Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 0 .00 ft Zone-1 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051] 06/01/99 03:04:22 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1 Detailed Report for Junction: Fire Hydrant 1 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary x y Connecting Pipes P-3 P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> 10,049.99 ft 10,013.66 ft Roughness Elevation Zone Calculated Results Summary Time O.OOhr Constituent (mgn) N/A Hydraulic Pressure Demand Pressure Grade (psi) (gpm) Head (ft) (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed Academic Edition Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 276.83 ft Zone-1 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051 I 06/01 /99 03:04:22 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 2 Detailed Report for Junction: Fire Hydrant 2 Note : The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary x y Connecting Pipes P-4 P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> 10,049.79 ft 9 ,954.28 ft Roughness Elevation Zone Calculated Results Summary Time 0 .00 hr Constituent (mg/I) N/A Hydraulic Pressure Demand Pressure Grade (psi) (gpm) Head (ft) (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static . wed Academic Edition Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 260.00 ft Zone-1 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 [051) 06/01/99 03:04:23 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page3 Detailed Report for Junction: Fire Hydrant 3 Note : The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary x y Connecting Pipes P-5 P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> 9 ,975.99 ft 9,954.22 ft Roughness Elevation Zone Calculated Results Summary Time 0 .00 hr Constituent (mg/I) N/A Hydraulic Pressure Demand Pressure Grade (psi) (gpm) Head (ft) (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed Academic Edition Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 260.46 ft Zone-1 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) 06/01/99 03:04:23 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page4 Detailed Report for Junction: Fire Hydrant 4 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated . Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary x y Connecting Pipes P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 9 ,976.01 ft 10,043.41 ft Calculated Results Summary Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Elevation Zone Time Constituent (mgll) Hydraulic Pressure Demand Pressure Grade (psi) (g pm) Head (ft) (ft) 0 .00 hr N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :lhaestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 275.50 ft Zone-1 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01/99 03:04:24AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 5 Detailed Report for Junction: J-1 Note : The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary x y Connecting Pipes P-2 P-7 P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> 10,010.41 ft 10,013.76 ft Roughness Elevation Zone Calculated Results Summary Time 0 .00 hr Constituent (mg/I) N/A Hydraulic Pressure Demand Pressure Grade (psi) (gpm) Head (ft) (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 276.83 ft Zone-1 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01 /99 03:04:24 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page6 - Detailed Report for Junction: J-5 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary x y Connecting Pipes P-6 P-7 P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> 9 ,976.00 ft 10,013.61 ft Roughness Elevation Zone Calculated Results Summary Time 0.00 hr Constituent (mg/I) N/A Hydraulic Pressure Demand Pressure Grade (psi) (gpm) Head (ft) (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 275.50 ft Zone-1 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] 06/01/99 03:04:24 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 7 - Detailed Report for Pipe: P-1 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness 18" Water Line Diameter PMP-1-ln Material No Roughness 1.00 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1 .28 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient 0 .00 hr N/A N/A N/A Title: Pebble_Hi lls_Estates c :\haestadlacademic\wtrc\static .wcd N/A (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051] 06/01/99 03:04:25 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 8 - Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated . Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness PMP-1-0ut Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 639.00 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .37 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient 0 .00 hr N/A N/A N/A Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) 06/01/99 03 :04:25 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 9 - Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated . Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> J-1 Fire Hydrant 1 No 122.52 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient 0 .00 hr NIA NIA NIA Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static . wed (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 [051) 06/01/99 03 :04:25 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 10 Detailed Report for Pipe: P-4 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated . Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899.75 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Total Headless (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Headless Gradient 0 .00 hr N/A N/A N/A Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :lhaestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed N/A (ft) (ft) N/A N/A N/A NIA Academic Edition (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) N/A N/A Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 [051) 06/01 /99 03:04:26 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 11 Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated . Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 2 Diameter Fire Hydrant 3 Material No Roughness 827.65 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Base-Physical Base-Operati onal Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Total Headless (mg/1) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Headless Gradient 0 .00 hr NIA NIA NIA Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static . wed (ft) (ft) NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Academic Edition (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) NIA NIA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01/99 03:04:26 AM © Haestad Methods , In c . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 12 Detailed Report for Pipe: P-6 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated . Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 3 Diameter J-5 Material No Roughness 700.03 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5 .35 Total Headloss (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Headloss Gradient 0 .00 hr N/A NIA N/A Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd (ft) (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Academic Edition (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) N/A N/A Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01/99 03:04:26 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 13 Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated . Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 580.19 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .89 Total Headloss (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Headloss Gradient 0 .00 hr NIA NIA NIA Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd (ft) (ft) NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Academic Edition (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) NIA NIA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051) 06/01/99 03 :04:27 AM © Haestad Methods, In c . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 14 Detailed Report for Pipe: P-8 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed. The calculated results may be outdated. Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> J-5 Fire Hydrant 4 No 38.36 ft Open Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .87 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd 06/01/99 03:04:27 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 15 - Detailed Report for Pump: PMP-1 Note: The input data may have been modified since the last calculation was performed . The calculated results may be outdated . Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary x y Elevation Initial Condition Summary Status Pump Definition Summary Pump Type Shutoff Head Design Head Maximum Operating Head 300 .0 ··················-· Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> 10,010.24 ft 10,041 .28 ft 289.10 ft On Standard (3 Point) 265.38 ft 242.31 ft 219.23 ft ---·-···--·-·r··-·····················r······· Roughness From Pipe To Pipe Relative Speed Factor Shutoff Discharge Design Discharge Maximum Operating Discharge Pump Curve PMP-1 Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> P-1 P-2 1.00 0 .00 gpm 1,000.00 gpm 1,160.00 gpm 250.0 ....................... , ......................... , .......................................... . : : _...._ ________________________ .,_ . . ....... ;········-····--·-·····-··:·······---········-··--·: 200.0 ................... . . . -----------------------~------------------------... . . ~ ~ "C : ~g ::::: ···········································] : ....................................... . . . ____ ., _________________________ , -----------------------•----: : : . . l ~ ------------------ 50.0 ············································ . . ····----····-·-········:······-··-·--·----·-----T···----·---·--·--·-----·1 ······-··---··-·----·····-··--··--··-·······-·-··· ----------------···----: o .o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 .0 200.0 Title: Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 400.0 06/01 /99 03:04:27 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 600.0 800.0 1000.0 1200.0 1400.0 1600.0 1800.0 Discharge (gpm) Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 [051] (203) 755-1666 Page 16 Detailed Report for Pump: PMP-1 Time Calculated Results Summary Status Constituent (mg/I) From To Flow Head Relative Grade Grade (gpm) (ft) Speed (ft) (ft) 0 .00 hr NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Useful Power (Hp) NIA T itle: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\st atic .wcd Academic Edition 06101199 03:04:27 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051] (203) 755-1666 Page 17 Analysis For: Fire Hydrants 1 & 2 Flowing 750 gpm Each Scenario Summary Label Demand A lternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometri c Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-1 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness 18" Water Line Diameter PMP-1-ln Material No Roughness 1 .00 ft M inor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From Grade (ft) To Grade (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1 .28 Total Headloss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1 ,500.00 0 .27 0 .00 -0.14e-2 0 .42e-5 0 .14e-2 0 .14e-2 1.41 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 0 3 :16 :55 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 3 7 Brooks ide Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051 ] (203) 755-1666 Page 8 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> PMP-1-0ut J-1 No 639.00 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .37 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOf!) 0 .00 hr Open NIA 1 ,500.00 9 .57 112.03 89.57 19.08 3 .38 22.46 35.14 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd 06/01/99 03:16:55 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page9 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 1 Material No Roughness 122.52 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1 , 129.37 7 .21 89.57 86.53 2.16 0 .88 3.04 24.84 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestadlacademic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:16:56 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page 10 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899.75 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 379.37 2.42 86.53 83.87 2.11 0 .55 2 .66 2 .96 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd 06/01/99 03 :16:56 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury , CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 11 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 2 Diameter Fire Hydrant 3 Material No Roughness 827.65 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) M inor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open NIA -370.63 2.37 83.87 85.98 1.86 0 .25 2 .11 2 .55 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel c :\haestad\acaclemic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01/99 03:16:56 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 12 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initia l Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 3 Diameter J-5 Material No Roughness 700.03 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5.35 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A -370.63 2 .37 85.98 88.02 1 .57 0 .47 2 .04 2 .91 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03:16 :57 AM © Haestad Methods , In c. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page 13 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 580.19 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .89 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A -370.63 2.37 88.02 89.57 1 .30 0 .25 1.56 2 .68 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03:16:57 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page 14 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Detailed Report for Pipe: P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> J..S Fire Hydrant 4 No 38.36 ft Open Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .87 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 0 .00 0 .00 88.02 88.02 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01/99 03:16:57 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 15 Analysis For: Fire Hydrants 2 & 3 Flowing 750 gpm Each Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-1 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 18" Water Line PMP-1-ln No 1 .00 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From Grade (ft) To Grade (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1.28 Total Headloss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1,500.00 0.27 0 .00 -0.14e-2 0.42e-5 0.14e-2 0 .14e-2 1 .41 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01 /99 03:24:03 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page 1 Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-In itial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness PMP-1-0ut Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 639.00 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade (ft) (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1,500.00 9 .57 112.03 89.57 19.08 3 .38 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static . wed Academic Edition Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .37 Total Headless Headless Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 22.46 35.14 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] 06/01/99 03 :24:04AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 2 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 1 Material No Roughness 122.52 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 790.82 5 .05 89.57 88.02 1 .12 0 .43 1.55 12.66 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 [051] 06/01/99 03:24:05 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 3 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899.75 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A 790.82 5 .05 88.02 77.42 8 .22 2 .38 10.60 11 .78 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) 06/01 /99 03:24:05 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page-4 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initia l Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 2 Diameter Fire Hydrant 3 Materia l No Roughness 827.65 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Flow Velocity From To Friction Minor Total Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Head loss (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade Loss Loss Headloss Gradient 0.00 hr Open N/A Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd (ft) 40.82 0 .26 n .42 (ft) (ft) (ft) n .39 0 .03 0 .3e-2 Academic Edition (ft) 0 .03 (ft/1 OOOft) 0.04 Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01/99 03 :24:06 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 5 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> Fire Hydrant 3 J-5 No 700.03 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5 .35 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A -709.18 4.53 77.39 84.32 5 .23 1.70 6.93 9 .90 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03:24:06 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) (203 ) 755-1666 Page 6 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 580.19 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2.89 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ftls) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOfl) 0 .00 hr Open N/A -709.18 4 .53 84.32 89.57 4 .33 0.92 5.25 9 .05 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestadlacademic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01 /99 03:24:07 AM © Haestad Methods, In c . Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page 7 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Detailed Report for Pipe: P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter Fire Hydrant 4 Material No Roughness 38.36 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .87 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00hr Open N/A 0 .00 0.00 84.32 84.32 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051] 06/01/99 03:24:07 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page8 Analysis For: Fire Hydrants 3 & 4 Flowing 750 gpm Each Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-1 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 18" Water Line PMP-1-ln No 1 .00 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness M inor Loss Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From Grade (ft) To Grade (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1 .28 Total Headloss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1 ,500.00 0.27 0 .00 -0.14e-2 0.42e-5 0 .14e-2 0 .14e-2 1 .41 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03:27:34AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 1 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness PMP-1-0ut Diameter J -1 Material No Roughness 639.00 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .37 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) {ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open NIA 1,500.00 9.57 112.03 89.57 19.08 3.38 22.46 35.14 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :lhaestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 0 3 :27:34AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page 2 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/1) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> J-1 Fire Hydrant 1 No 122.52 ft Open Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open NIA 536.52 3 .42 89.57 88.83 0 .55 0 .20 0 .74 6 .08 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01 /99 03:27:35 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page 3 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899 .75 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) M inor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open NIA 536.52 3 .42 88.83 83.72 4 .01 1 .10 5 .11 5 .67 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd 06/01/99 03:27:35 AM © Haestad Methods, In c. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page4 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 2 Diameter Fire Hydrant 3 Material No Roughness 827.65 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 536.52 3 .42 83.72 79.52 3 .69 0 .52 4 .21 5 .08 Title : Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01/99 03:27:36 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 5 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 3 Diameter J-5 Material I No Roughness 700.03 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5 .35 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A -213.48 1 .36 79.52 80.24 0 .57 0 .15 0 .72 1.03 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestadlacademic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03:27 :36 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page 6 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 580.19 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .89 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A -963.48 6 .15 80.24 89.57 7 .64 1 .70 9 .34 16.09 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestadlacademic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01 /99 03:27 :37 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 7 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter Fire Hydrant 4 Material No Roughness 38.36 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150 .0 1 .87 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 750.00 4 .79 80.24 79.25 0 .32 0 .67 0 .98 25.63 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) 06/01/99 03:27:37 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 8 Analysis For: Fire Hydrants 4 & 1 Flowing 750 gpm Each • • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-1 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 18" Water Line PMP-1-ln No 1 .00 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From Grade (ft) To Grade (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1.28 Total Headloss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 1 ,500.00 0 .27 0 .00 -0.14e-2 0.42e-5 0 .14e-2 0 .14e-2 1.41 Title: Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:30:20 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness PMP-1-0ut D iameter J-1 Material No Roughness 639.00 fl Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .37 Flow (gpm) Velocity (fl/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (fl) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (fl) (fl) (fl) (fl) (fl/1 OOOfl) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1,500.00 9.57 112.03 89.57 19.08 3 .38 22.46 35.14 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03 :30:20 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 2 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 1 Material No Roughness 122.52 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A 919.61 5 .87 89.57 87.51 1 .48 0 .58 2.06 16.84 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD Y3 .0 (051) 06/01/99 03:30:21 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 3 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe : P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899.75 ft M inor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) M inor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 169.61 1 .08 87.51 86.92 0.48 0 .11 0 .59 0 .65 Title : Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c :\haestad\academic \wtrc \static.wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (05 1) 06/01/99 03 :30:21 AM © Haestad Method s, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 4 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 2 Diameter Fire Hydrant 3 Material No Roughness 827.65 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A 169.61 1 .08 86.92 86.43 0 .44 0.05 0.49 0 .59 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static . wed Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01/99 03:30:22 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 5 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed R eport for Pipe: P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 3 Diameter J-5 Material No Roughness 700.03 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5.35 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 169.61 1 .08 86.43 85.97 0.37 0 .10 0.47 0 .67 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051) 06/01/99 03:30:22 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 6 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter J-1 Materia l No Roughness 580.19 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .89 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A -580.39 3 .70 85.97 89.57 2.99 0 .62 3 .61 6 .22 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:30:24 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page7 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Altern ative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibrati on Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P -8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter Fire Hydrant 4 Material No Roughness 38.36 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .87 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open NIA 750.00 4 .79 85.97 84.98 0 .32 0 .67 0 .98 25.63 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestadlacademic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01/99 03 :30:24AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 8 Analysis For: Fire Hydrant 1Flowing1500 gpm • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mgll) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-1 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 18" Water Line PMP-1 -ln No 1.00 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From Grade (ft) To Grade (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1.28 Total Headloss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1,500.00 0.27 0 .00 -0.14e-2 0.42e-5 0 .14e-2 0 .14e-2 1 .41 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:33:18 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 1 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness PMP-1-0ut Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 639.00 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2.37 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1,500.00 9.57 112.03 89.57 19.08 3 .38 22.46 35.14 T itle: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 0 3:33:18 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 2 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> J-1 Fire Hydrant 1 No 122.52 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 1,257.23 8.02 89.57 85.84 2 .64 1 .09 3 .73 30.44 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd 06/01/99 03:33:18 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 3 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899.75 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open NIA -242.77 1 .55 85.84 86.99 0.92 0.22 1.15 1.28 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:33:19 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page4 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mgll) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> Fire Hydrant 2 Fire Hydrant 3 No 827.65 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open NIA -242.77 1.55 86.99 87.95 0 .85 0 .11 0 .96 1.16 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:33:19 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page 5 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 3 Diameter J-5 Material No Roughness 700.03 fl Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5 .35 Flow (gpm) Velocity (fl/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (fl) (fl) (ft) (fl/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A -242.77 1 .55 87.95 88.87 0.72 0.20 0.92 1 .31 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:33:20 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page 6 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 580.19 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .89 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A -242.77 1 .55 88.87 89.57 0 .60 0 .11 0.70 1.21 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:33:20 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page7 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Detailed Report for Pipe: P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter Fire Hydrant 4 Material No Roughness 38.36 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .87 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Friction Loss (ft) M inor Total Headless Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) (mgll) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade (ft) (ft) O.OOhr Open NIA 0 .00 0 .00 88.87 88.87 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Proj ect Engineer: Kenneth Havel Academic Edition WaterCAD v3.0 [051) 06/01199 03:33:21 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page8 Analvsis For: . Fire Hydrant 2 Flowing 1500 gpm • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-1 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 18" Water Line PMP-1-ln No 1 .00 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness M inor Loss Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From Grade (ft) To Grade (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1 .28 Total Headloss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A 1,500.00 0 .27 0.00 -0.14e-2 0 .42e-5 0 .14e-2 0 .14e-2 1.41 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03:35:40 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 1 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness PMP-1-0ut Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 639.00 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Resu lts Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .37 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1 ,500.00 9 .57 112.03 89.57 19.08 3.38 22.46 35.14 Title: Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01199 03:35:41 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051] (203) 755-1666 Page 2 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 1 Material No Roughness 122.52 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 881.49 5.63 89.57 87.67 1.37 0 .54 1.90 15.54 Title : Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd 06/01/99 03:35 :41 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page3 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899.75 fl Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Flow (gpm) Velocity (fl/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (fl) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (fl) (fl) (fl) (fl) (fl/1 OOOfl) O.OOhr Open NIA 881.49 5 .63 87.67 74.67 10.05 2 .96 13.00 14.45 Trtle: Pebble_Hills_Estates Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition WaterCAD v3 .0 (051) 06/01/99 03:35:42 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page4 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 2 Diameter Fire Hydrant 3 Material No Roughness 827.65 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A -618.51 3 .95 74.67 80.15 4 .80 0 .69 5 .49 6 .63 Title: Pebble_Hills_£states c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:35:42 AM © Haestad Methods, In c . Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 5 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 3 Diameter J-5 Material No Roughness 700.03 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5 .35 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open NIA -618.51 3.95 80.15 85.51 4 .06 1.30 5 .35 7 .65 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01199 03:35:43 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051] (203) 755-1666 Page6 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter J-1 Material No Roughness 580.19 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .89 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A -618.51 3 .95 85.51 89.57 3 .36 0 .70 4 .06 7 .00 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd 06/01/99 03:35:43 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page 7 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Detailed Report for Pipe: P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> J-5 Fire Hydrant 4 No 38.36 ft Open Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .87 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 0.00 0 .00 85.51 85.51 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 Title : Pebble_Hills_Estates c :'lhaestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] 06/01 /99 03:35:44 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 8 Analysis For: Fire Hydrant 3 Flowing 1500 gpm • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-1 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 18" Water Line PMP-1-ln No 1.00 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From Grade (ft) To Grade (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1.28 Total Headloss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A 1,500.00 0.27 0 .00 -0.14e-2 0.42e-5 0 .14e-2 0 .14e-2 1 .41 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01199 03:37:54 AM (!;) Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 1 - Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative T race Alternati ve Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I ) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> PMP-1-0ut J-1 No 639.00 ft Open Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .37 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1 ,500.00 9 .57 112.03 89.57 19.08 3.38 22.46 35.14 Title: Pebble_H ills_Estates c :lhaestad\academic\wtrc\stat ic .wcd 06/01/99 03:37:55 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . Academic Edition 3 7 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project E ngineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051] (203) 755-1666 Page 2 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 1 Material No Roughness 122.52 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 683.98 4 .37 89.57 88.39 0 .86 0 .32 1.18 9.62 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01/99 03:37 :55 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 3 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fire Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899.75 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 683.98 4 .37 88.39 80.33 6.28 1.78 8 .06 8 .96 Title: Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:37:56 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 4 - Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 2 Diameter Fire Hydrant 3 Material No Roughness 827.65 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 683.98 4.37 80.33 73.71 5 .78 0 .84 6 .63 8 .00 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051) 06/01/99 03:37 :56 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 5 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status T ime Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternativ e Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 3 Diameter J-5 Materi al No Roug h ness 700.03 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5 .35 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (fl) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient (ft) (ft) (fl) (fl) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A -816.02 5 .21 73.71 82.74 6 .78 2 .26 9 .03 12.90 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\acadernic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Proj ect Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01/99 03:37:57 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 6 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Base Base-Average Da ily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter J -1 Material No Roughness 580.19 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .89 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) M inor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft} (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open NIA -816.02 5 .21 82.74 89.57 5 .62 1 .22 6 .84 11 .78 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\aca demic\wtrc\static. wed Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01/99 03:37:57 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc . 37 Brookside Roa d Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Pag e 7 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Detailed Report for Pipe: P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter Fire Hydrant 4 Material No Roughness 38.36 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .87 Time Status Constituent Flow Velocity From To Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (mg/I) (gpm) (ft/s) Grade Grade (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A 0 .00 0 .00 82.74 82.74 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) 06/01199 03:37:58 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 8 Analysis For: Fire Hydrant 4 Flowing 1500 gpm - • Scena rio Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/1) D etailed Report fo r P i pe : P -1 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> 18" Water Line PMP-1-ln No 1 .00 ft Open Physical Alternative O perational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From Grade (ft) To Grade (ft) Friction Loss (ft) Minor Loss (ft) Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 48 in PVC 140.0 1.28 Total Headloss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1 ,500.00 0 .27 0 .00 -0.14e-2 0.42e-5 0 .14e-2 0 .14e-2 1.41 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03:40:12 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page 1 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-2 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> PMP-1-0ut J-1 No 639.00 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .37 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A 1,500.00 9 .57 112.03 89.57 19.08 3.38 22.46 35.14 Title: Pebble_H ills_Estates c :\haestad\ac ademic\wtrc\static . wed 06/01/99 03 :40:12 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 [051) (203) 755-1666 Page 2 - Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Detailed Report for Pipe: P-3 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> J-1 Fire Hydrant 1 No 122.52 ft Open Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .09 Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 462.83 2 .95 89.57 89.01 0 .42 0.15 0 .56 4 .60 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestadlacademic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01/99 03:40:13 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer : Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051] (203) 755-1666 Page 3 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent {mg/1) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-4 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 1 Diameter Fi re Hydrant 2 Material No Roughness 899.75 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 6 .01 Flow {gpm) Velocity {ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss {ft) Minor Total Headless Loss Headless Gradient {ft) {ft) {ft) {ft) {ft/1 OOOft) 0.00 hr Open N/A 462.83 2 .95 89.01 85.14 3 .05 0 .82 3 .87 4 .30 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static . wed Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01/99 03:40:13 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 4 • Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-5 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Fire Hydrant 2 Fire Hydrant 3 No 827.65 ft Open Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .85 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open N/A 462.83 2 .95 85.14 81 .95 2 .81 0 .39 3 .19 3 .86 Title: Pebble_Hills Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static.wcd 06/01199 03:40:14 AM © Haestad Methods , Inc . Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 [051] (203) 755-1666 Page 5 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-6 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness Fire Hydrant 3 Diameter J-5 Material No Roughness 700.03 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results S u mmary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 5 .35 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open NIA 462.83 2 .95 81 .95 78.85 2 .37 0 .73 3 .10 4 .43 Title : Pebble_ Hills_ Estates c:\haestad\academic\wtrc\static .wcd Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01/99 03 :40:1 4AM © Haestad Methods , Inc . 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 6 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-7 Base Base-Average Daily Base-Initial Settings Base-Age Alternative Base-Trace Alternative <none> J -5 J-1 No 580.19 ft Open Physical Alternative Operational Alternative Constituent Alternative Fire Flow Alternative Roughness Diameter Material Roughness Minor Loss Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 2 .89 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Headloss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) 0 .00 hr Open N/A -1 ,037.17 6 .62 78.85 89.57 8 .75 1 .97 10.72 18.48 Title: Pebble_Hills_Estates c :\haestad\academic\wtrc\static. wed 06/01/99 03:40:15 AM © Haestad Methods, Inc. Academic Edition 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA Project E ngineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3.0 (051) (203) 755-1666 Page 7 Scenario Summary Label Demand Alternative Initial Settings Alternative Age Alternative Trace Alternative Calibration Summary Demand Geometric Summary From Node To Node Check Valve Length Initial Condition Summary Status Time Status Constituent (mg/I) Detailed Report for Pipe: P-8 Base Base-Average Daily Physical Alternative Base-Initial Settings Operational Alternative Base-Age Alternative Constituent Alternative Base-Trace Alternative Fire Flow Alternative <none> Roughness J-5 Diameter Fire Hydrant 4 Material No Roughness 38.36 ft Minor Loss Open Calculated Results Summary Base-Physical Base-Operational Base-Constituent Base-Fire Flow <none> 8 in PVC 150.0 1 .87 Flow (gpm) Velocity (ft/s) From To Grade Grade Friction Loss (ft) Minor Total Head loss Loss Headloss Gradient (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/1 OOOft) O.OOhr Open NIA 1,500.00 9 .57 78.85 75.04 1 .14 2 .66 3 .81 99.24 Title : Pebble_ Hills _j;:stoites c:\haestad\a«ad8fTlio\~rc\6t;ltic . wed Academic Edition Project Engineer: Kenneth Havel WaterCAD v3 .0 (051] 06/01~ Q3 :«J :1~ AM 'P Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 8