The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About25 Devlopment Permit 99-293 Stata Corporation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J:N00lRIPOlRAT£1D 511 University Or. East Su ite 201 College Statio n, T X n840 Voice 409 260 2635 Fax 400 846 8224 www .arkl tea . com Principals Charlie Burris, AIA cburris@arkitex .com Chad Grauke, AJA cgrauke@a rkitex .com Dr. Elton Abbott, AJA eabbott@arkitex .com Mike Tibbetts, AJA metibb@swbell .net Austin Office Voice 5t 2/244 · 7870 Fa x St 212 44 -0237 16 February 2000 Ms Natalie Ruiz College Station Planning Division City of College Station College Station, .TX 77845 Re: A New Building for Stata Corporation Project Number 9832 Dear Natalie The following comments are in regards to the "Development Permit Issuance Checklist" that was received 4 February 2000. 1. The application dated 16 November 1999, was signed. 2. Erosion Control Plan is shown on drawing C-1 3. The Building site is less that 5 acres. IF EPA N.0.1. is required for the future development, it will be submitted when the future development occurs. 4. The Public Utility Easement for the water line is dedicated by the enclosed (2) Field Notes and Sketch of Easement from McClure Engineering 5. Sealed Engineers Estimates are enclosed (2). Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Michael S . Record, AIA Project Architect Item No. I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Lot 2 Block 4 (Sta ta Corporation) Business Center at College Station College Station, Brazos County Engineer's Estimate February, 2000 Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Water System Construction 6" PVC Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. 150 20.00 6" PVC Water Line, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 83 14 .00 Fire Hydrant Assembly EACH 2 1850.00 6"x 90 degree Bend EACH l 300.00 6"x 13" Anchor Coupling EACH 1 110.00 6"x6" Tee EACH l 135 .00 6" x 2" Tapped Tee EACH 2 160.00 Connect to existing pipe EACH 2 100 .00 Trench Safety (water line) L.F. 233 l.00 Water System Subtotal Total Construction Cost Page I of I Total 3,000.00 1,162 .00 3,700 .00 300.00 110.0 0 135 .00 320.00 200.00 233 .00 9,160 .00 $9,160.00 2/16/00 Estimate .xis Item No. I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Lot 2 Block 4 (Sta ta Corporation) B u siness Center at C ollege Station College Station, Brazos Cou nty Engineer's Estimate February,2000 Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Water System Construction 6" PVC Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. 150 20.00 6" PVC Water Line, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 83 14 .00 Fire Hydrant Assembly EACH 2 1850 .00 6"x 90 degree Bend EACH 1 300.00 6"x 13" Anchor Coupling EACH I 110.00 6"x 6" Tee EACH I 135 .00 6" x 2" Tapped Tee EACH 2 160 .00 Connect to existing pipe EACH 2 100.00 Trench Safety (water line) L.F. 233 1.00 Water System Subtotal Total Construction Cost Page I of I Total 3,000.00 1,162.00 3,700.00 300.00 110 .00 135 .00 320.00 200.00 233.00 9 160 .00 $9,160.00 2/16/00 Estimate .xis 611 Unlwno~o .. e-1 Softe 201 CoA egt ;:\_,Ofl, TX 77&40 "*• 4(» 290 2636 ..... 4al 846 82:!4 .,,w.arlllteK.oom Principals Cbarllo Jlurrio, AIA cb u rr is@arlcit~.0001 Chad Orauke, AIA cgrs 11ke@orlcit4!.X.CO!ll !>r. Elti:>n Al>bott, A.IA <Sbbolt@"~rlcite.x.ro.rt ll!lb T!bb~tlo, AJA mctibb@5wbol l.net PHONE NO. 4098468 2 2 4 13 August 1999 Ms. Kim Foutz College Station Economic Development City of College Station College Station, TX 77845 . Re: A New Building for Stata Corporation Project Number 9832 Dear Kim Aug. 1 3 1 999 1 2 :08PM P2 ~1)7.~ In response to Veronica Morgan 's request, This letter is for the "file " regarding the floodplain . We recognize that the 100 yr. floodplain for the property will need to be defined and that a drainage easement will cover this area. This has not been done because the topographic survey has not bee completed. The easement wm be dedicated as part of the building permit process . However, there is a finger of the creek that extends on the property in the North East corner where the future building(s) will be located. It is my understanding that it has been agreed upon that this area will be filled and th at the easement will be revised. Is it better to have the current drainage casement shown for the future work ( +~5 years) to eliminate the need for a revised floodplain later? Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ~~ Michael S. Record, AIA Project Architect I Kim Fouti -letter to stada? From: To : Date: Subject: kim , Veronica Morgan Kim Foutz 5/28/99 11 :55AM letter to stada? what i need for the file is something either from you or a letter to stada that says: *acknowledging the plat requirement to define the 1 OO yr floodplain on the property and provide a drainage easement to cover that area *stating why it couldnt be done with the plat (i.e. don t have enough topo at this time ) *stating that it will be dedicated by separate instrument as part of the building permit process (i.e . a c.o . on the building could not be issued without this be ing filed for record and a b.p. couldnt be issued unti l we know where the easement will be located ) hope th is helps .. thanks v FRO M : A F TE X STU DIO I NC PHONE NO. : 4098468224 Au g. 13 1999 12 :07PM Pl S11 Ut>IV•"'"Y Dr. E<>ot $uJt• 201 Coll ege$~ rx ""'° 'All•• ~2Q):;:ol:)~ Pllx w;i~OZM www.t.r:tlte:r..oorn Principals Charlie Burrls1 AIA <;bu rri~rlcilcx.oo.n CllMI Oraulce, AIA C8f3Ukt@arkit~x.~om or. IE:lton Abbott, AIA ..,bbo<r@ukitcx.com 1111110 Tibbetts, AU m"'lbb@swboll .net Austin Office \/qin 6 t 2/244-7BTO Faz :u2n•4-023 7 11~w.~~~~~~rn~11 FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER TO: Kim Foutz FROM: Mike Record~ PROJECT: Stata Corp. PAGES (including cover): 02 WITH: CS Economic Development DATE: 13 August 1999 PROJECT NO: 9832 FAX NUMBER: 764-3481 If you do not receive all of the indica ted pages, please call us immediately at (409) 260-2 635. Original lo Jollo w in mail: y es Cii) Kim, The following letter is in regards to the floodplain for the Stata site. Do you know what the status of the clearing permit is? Thank you, Mike Record, AlA Project Architect 16 February 2000 Ms Natalie Ruiz College Station Planning Division City of College Station College Station, TX 77845 Re: A New Building for Stata Corporation Project Number 9832 · · !'. Dear Natalie The following comments are in regards to the "Development Permit Issuance ~ ~ ~ ~-heckli st" that was received 4 February 2000. ~ The application dated 16 November 1999, was signed. Erosion Control Plan is shown on drawing C-1 .~.,~~lJ~ : The Building site is less that 5 acres. IF EPA N.O.I. is required for the future development, it will be submitted when the future development occurs. 511 University Or. East ~ Suite 2~'" ('" Coll ege Station, TX ns40 The Public Utility Easement for the water line is dedicated by the enclosed (2) Field Notes and Sketch of Easement from McClure Engin eering Sealed Engineers Estimates are enclosed (2). Vojce 409 260 ~5. Fax 400 846 8224 www .ut1tu.com Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Principals Charlie Burris, AIA cburris@arkitex.t·om Chad Grauke, AIA cgrauke@a rkitex .com Dr. Elton Abbott, AIA eabbo11@a rkitex.com Mike Tibbetts, AIA metibb@swbel l.net Austin Office Voice 51212 44 ·7870 Fa x 512/24 4·0237 Sincerely, Michael S. Record, AIA Project Architect Project Name: BUYJ./.l55 cr~e 1'/-tl!E ,i.7 1-JJL Review Date: //-22.-J? Reviewer:_J_,./) .... 8=----------- Drainage Reports ~ Ef I Primal)' drainage system identified ~Surrounding developments shown IY Local streets, drainage systems shown Descriotion 19'; Acreage of project rr / Land cover described [J / Primmy/secondary systems within property shown cf General description D ~nage Basins ci'J R.cferences to FIRMs if applicable e1' , Secondary system flow patterns and impact of development on existing system Proposed pathways to Primal)' system shown or described D si Criteria Any deviation from standards being requested? Ht> rtf /Discussion of site constraints and capacities (streets, existing structures, etc .) rs/ Discussion of any applicable previous drainage studies and how this plan will affect it H rolo ·c Criteria Rainfall/runoff calculation method described and calculations provided cr / Detention discharge I storage calculation method I calculations G" / Storm recurreru:c intervals used rt Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used if not referenced in Standards rdaulic Criteria Identify capacity of systems used :i; Specify velocities at critical points in system rt / Identify detention I retention outlet and routing 19"' Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used not referenced in Standards D6inage Facility Design d Disaiss drainage patterns I flows (pre vs. post) HPI D Arc they draining water onto another property owner? -if so, is it where the water flowed before? and is it not / more than what flowed there before? and no faster than it flowed before? ri . Disaiss erosion control measures employed ~ Discuss detention pond design (sideslope, low flow channels, outlet works, freeboard, emergency spillway) >JA 0 Discuss maintenance access and responsibilities Co clusions Verify compliance with DPDS (signed and sealed certification) 0 Explain effectiveness of improvements with regard to controlling discharges of S -100 year storm by a) Detaining b) Accommodating runoff in existing I proposed easements or ROW discharging into primaiy system c) Combination ofa & b 9ofl2 Project Name:,-=.=.:..=::..::..~:..:...:.L=~""'"'(,l/."""'s.£= T r-..OZ: R.eviewDate: //-zz.-17 R.eviewer:.~J:.:to.[)::::i1i.8 ________ _ Drainage Reports(cont.) ~etndices ~ ~erences (all criteria and technical information used) 19"' Hyqrologic computations ~/Land use assumptions for adjacent property [Y / Minor/major storm runoff at specific points IJ _/Historic/fully developed runoff specific points If' Hydrographs at critical points lystraullc computations M' Culvert capacities (headwater and tailwater assumptions) iii/ Storm sewer capacities f/A o ,,.8treet capacities ~Storm inlet capacities (inlet control rating) Q" , Open channel design ID/ Detention area I volume capacity I outlet capacity Attafbed Drawings UY' ,tLc>cation map with drainage patterns IY fioodplain map if any ~Drainage plan with topo (existing and proposed with arrows if needed) 19"' Details of outlet structures 10 oC12 SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS usr CllECICED onr wrre 10 FOLDED corms OF SITE PLAN FOR RE.VIEW SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). 2. 3. a a a [J [J a I 4. ~ 5. ~ 6. '---'~ ~ a ~ ~ cY A key map (not necessarily to scale). Title block to include: Name, address, location, and legal description Name, address, and telephone number of applicant Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) Date of submittal Total site area North arrow. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels . Existing locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Streets and sidewalks (R.O .W .). Driveways (opposite and adjacent per Driveway Ordinance 1961). Buildings. Water courses . Show all easements clearly des ignating as existing and type (utility, access, etc.). l 00 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site . Utilities (noting size and designate as existing) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets . ·Meter locations . Topography (2, max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information . (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Proposed location, type and dimensions of the following .: Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements . The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each . If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. Setbacks . Show building setbacks as outlined in Ordinance 1638 Zoning Ordinance, (Section 7, Table A). Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned . Minimum parking space is 9• x 20', or on a perimeter row 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang . Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal . Handicap parking spaces . SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITE.CK.DOC 03/lS/99 1 of3 NOTE: D a ~ ~ a a a a 9. 10. Parking Islands. Raised landscape islands, (6" raised curb) a minimwn of 180 sq. ft . are required at both ends of every parking row (greenspace area contiguous to the end island maybe applied toward the required 180 sq. ft.). Additionally, 180 sq. ft . of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided . All required islands must be landscaped or set with decorative pavers, or stamped dyed concrete or other decorative materials as approved . Drives . Minimwn drive aisle width is 23' with bead-in parking or 20' without parking . Curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts . Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements .) Security gates (show swing path and design specs with colors). Sidewalks (both public and private). Sidewalks are required at time of development if property bas frontage on a street shown on the Sidewalk Master Plan or if the review staff determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10 .2 of the Zoning Ordinance). Medians. Show any and all traffic medians to be constructed on site . Landscape Reserve. A twenty four foot setback from R.O .W . to curb of parking lot is required. Pavement may encroach into this 24' reserve by up to 1134 square feet if streetscape requirement can still be met. In no case may the pavement be less than 6' from the property line. Conunon open spaces sites Loading docks Detention ponds Guardrails Retaining walls All required and other types of fences (a 6' privacy fence is required between industrial/commercial and residential developments as well as between multi -family and single family developments). Sites for solid waste containers with screening . Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required .) Show all easements clearly designating as proposed and type (utility, access, etc.). If dedicated by separate instrument list by volume and page. Utilities (noting size and designate as proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transfonner locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings . Meter locations (must be located in public R.O.W. or public utility easement.). Proposed grading (l' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Show proposed and existing fire hydrants . Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer . Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane . Show fire department connections . FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. Show fire lanes . Fire lanes a minimwn of 20 feet in width with a minimwn height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a public street or highway. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface as defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 before a building permit can be issued. Will building be sprinkled? Yes D No D If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts . SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.DOC 0312Sl99 lof3 ·-- . . ~ 11. Show curb and pavement detail . A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception . (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dwnpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Cl CJ Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl 12. • Curb details may be found in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 and alternatives to those standards must be approved by the City Engineer. No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". IAU>dscape plans as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance# 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown OD a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded OD the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans such as: CJ required point calculations CJ additional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets larger than a residential street. CJ calculations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total landscaping points.) CJ proposed new plantings with points earned Cl proposed locations of new plantings Cl screening of parking lots Cl screening of dwnpsters, detention ponds, transformers, AJC units, loading docks, propane tanks, utility demarcation point on buildings, or other areas potentially visually offensive. Cl existing landscaping to remain CJ show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. 13. Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.O.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demands submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. 14 . 15. 16 . 17. 18. 19. Is there any landscaping in TxDOT RO.W.? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be any utilities in TxDOT RO.W. ? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be access from a TxDOT RO.W . ? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted . Yes CJ No Yes CJ No Yes Cl No The total nwnber of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximwn and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximwn demands in gallons p?y). Cl 20 . Are there impact fees associated with this development? Yes Cl No ~ NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.DOC 03125199 3 o(J DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTA_L LETTER qq_5CD2q3 Name/Finn: M,'k~ ~e-c.ord / 1he Ar~/hx, ~fer/;~, "1c. I Date: Z8 Jt/I y Jqqq ; Address: 511 (I,,,· v e~'it ly-f),, E.. -s 1-e eo1 Phone: ~ 60 -Z:. 6 SS' Fax : t5 4~ -BZZ.tf We are transmitting the following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply .): D Master Development Plan D Preliminary Plat D Final Plat 0 FEMA CLOMNCLOMRJLOMNLOMR D SitePlan 0 Grading Plan 0 Landscape Plan 0 Irrigation Plan D Building Construction Documents w/ 0 Redlines w/ 0 Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ 0 Redlines w/ 0 Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ 0 Redlines w/ 0 Redlines w/ D Redlines ~FRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS ~ii infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: D Waterline Construction Documents w/ D Redlines D Sewerline Construction Documents w/D Redlines D Drainage Construction Documents D Street Construction Documents w/ 0 Redlines w/ D Redlines D Easement application with metes & bounds decsription D Drainage Letter or Report w/ D Redlines D Fire Flow Analysis w/ D Redlines Special fnstructions : TRANSMITI AL LETTER TRANSMIT.DOC 03/23/99 ~Development Permit App. D Conditional Use Permit D Rezoning Application D Variance Request D Other -Please specify ~k ?kt#t ~/ l~lk-o! j,,-k,-,f D TxDOT Driveway Permit D TxDOT Utility Permit D Other -Please specify 1 ofl FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: ____ _ DA TE SUBMITI'ED: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS /$100.00 Development Permit Application Fee. __ Drainage and erosion control plan, with supporting Drainage Report two (2) copies each. __ Notice of Intent (N.0.1.) if disturbed area is greater than 5 acres. State TX Zip Code -?7840 E-Mail Address ,d1?t! (63k/Z.Y::!f-'6-"K. C.04-7 PhoneNumber Z{:,o-Z.~~ FaxNumber e/<fG-8Zt:.~ --=::;.....::;_---=___;__~---- PROPERTI OWNER'S INFORMATION: - Name W,·/1;4'77 4ovld /.:::;+a.-ft:1t Urpe1,;a_l-,'o~ Street Address "7 o Z (/ 4; v e ,..c;/.J y P..., IE . City Co/l-e94 S ./rd1'(JJ.7 State T'X Zip Code "77 e4 O E-Mail Address w 9 of.lk/ (tig~ · ~ Phone Number ~9~-4'6t:o FaxNumber ~~-460 1 .CIBTECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name (Tl,'ke 1Ze£.,O;-J / 1Ju.4 rk.,-J.fx ~k/,o, /,,c.. Street Address ? II (/'1/ve,,-~i/.>-· D,,. /?., "5fe zo1 City Colle~ ?~..f.1'tl"" State TX Zip Code '7-? e cfo E-Mail Address .h1Sr~g;-/t:1 ·J-6t: .CQ .... Phone Number 'Z '1o-Z0 ~ Fax Number _ .... f?:::......:...eF_G_-..::::f?'-z,::....::;.z _.:1 _________ _ Application is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations : C. /~,.,.,·"75 q .. J ~"'"'J:,b ,-,,5 Jo aa:-047p/,·sh 45~,,-v<y -?~e.a:~c/,~ 1-f!,/t'i- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, design engineer/owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: ----------~ The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code , Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application according to these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the College Station City Code. ... 0perty Owner(s) DEVELOPMENT PERMIT DPERMIT.DOC 3/24199 Contractor 1 of2 CERTIFICATIONS: {foi:: ~op_Qs_~_~l~@ti_ons within designated flood hazard ~reas .) \. I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part Jf this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year stonn. Engineer Date B. I, certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended . Engineer Date C . I, certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirem ents of the City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning encroachments of floodways and offloodway fringes . Engineer Date D. I, do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study. Engineer Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: --------------------------- In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT DPERMIT.DOC 3124/99 2of2 511 University Dr. East Suite 201 CoUoge Station, TX 77840 Voice 409 260 2635 Fax 400 846 8224 www.arkltu:.oom Principals Charlie Burris, AIA cburris@a rkit ex.com Chad Grauke, AIA cgra uke@a rkit ex .com Dr. Elton Abbott, AIA eabbott@a rkit ex.com Mike Tibbetts, AIA meti bb@swbell.net Austin Office Vo ice 5 121244·7870 F•x 51 2 /2 44 ·0237 28 July 1999 Ms. Kim Foutz College Station Economic Development City of College Station College Station, TX 77845 Re : A New Building for Stata Corporation Project Number 9832 Dear Kim This letter is to serve as our notice of intent to selectively clear the site and is accompanies the Development Permit. As we have discussed, the site that Stata Corp will be developing has dense vegetation. In order to get an accurate topographic and tree survey , the site will have to be cleared to some extent. We propose to have the site selectively cleared to remove undergrowth and trees that are less than 2 1/2 inch caliper. The clearing will occur in the "Developed Area" of the site. A portion of the site will need to be cleared in the "LAUE". This will be an area approximately 20 feet wide to access the "Developed Area" of the site. Please refer to the attached preliminary site plan . The Client intends to selectively clear the site and maintain it. It will not remain in a "cleared" stage but will be an"improved " site . We are now aware of the Navasota Ladie 's Tresses being located on the site as a result of our recent conversations and correspondence with you. After the City stakes the locations of these plants on the site , the clearing crew will be directed to avoid any disruption to these plants . During the staking process, please make sure that a buffer zone is provided with enough clearance so that the plants are not disturbed. Your consideration of the proposed clearing is greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me . Sincerely , ~A?:.r/ Michael S. Record , AIA Project Architect