The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About60 Development Permit 505 Carter Creek Reloc M Davis TINYDEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 99-SOSA Carter's Creek Fill Project, Phase 2 @ SH30 FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SITE ADDRESS: Richard Carter League, Abstract N0.8 Approx . 2800 Harvey Rd. DRAINAGE BASIN: DATE OF ISSUE : 1114/2000 VALID FOR 12 MONTHS Carter's Creek EXTENTION OF ORIGINAL PERMIT THRU DECEMBER 31, 2001 OWNER: Fred Martin Highway 30 Partnership 4500 Carter Creek Parkway Bryan, TX 77801 260-1111 c/o Mike Davis (846-7200) CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR CONSTRUCTION AS PER APPROVED PLANS DATED NOVEMBER 15, 1999. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: This may include the installation of additional erosion control measures not shown on the plans. No disturbance is permitted in the floodway except for the construction of the ponds as shown on the approved plans. A survey located fence shall be installed along this floodway line to prevent disturbance. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition , placement and state . The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties , city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work . Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing drainage facilities . I hereby grant this permit for development of an area INSIDE the special flood hazard area . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. ~?' ~~<~5_-o~8_--o~J~~~~~~ Date ~,,_.../o....._1 ___ _ Contractor Date DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 505 Carter's Creek Fill Project@ SH 30 FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Rl0568 R92106 R94987 (remaining l.526 acres) OWNER: SITE ADDRESS: Approximately 2800 Harvey Rd . Fred Martin Highway 30 Partnership 4500 Carter Creek Parkway Bryan, Tx 77801 CINEMARK USA INC 3900 DALLAS PKWY #500 PLANO, TX 75093-7863 260-1111 c/o Mike Davis (846-7200) DRAINAGE BASIN: Carte· TYPE OF DEVELOPME.I'" APPROVED PLANS DJ "EXTENTION OF r The Contractor ' construction si f Drainage Po'· not shown on shown on the ap,_ disturbance. The o~. vegetation occurs prior h. Owner and/or Contractor she.. placement and state. The Owne1 city streets or infrastructure due ll. sedimentation resulting from the permittt, the landscape plan must be completely fencen In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Grdina,. to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and s~. existing drainage facilities . I hereby grant this permit for development of an area inside th.._ shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted t& development permit application for the above named project and all of 1 •. College Station that apply. Date CONSTRUCTION AS PER •fie immediate · '<?:e Station ''\Sures ~ Date ,~/~n/ Owner/ Agent CINEMARK USA Inc. Date Contractor Date DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 99-505A Carter's Creek Fill Project, Phase 2@ SH30 FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SITE ADDRESS: Richard Carter League, Abstract N0.8 Approx. 2800 Harvey Rd . DRAINAGE BASIN: DATE OF ISSUE: 1/14/2 000 OWNER: Fred Martin Highway 30 Partnership 4500 Carter Creek Parkway Bryan, TX 77801 260-1111 c/o Mike Davis (846-7200) Carter's Creek VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR CONSTRUCTION AS PER APPROVED PLANS DATED NOVEMBER 15, 1999. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: This may include the installation of additional erosion control measures not shown on the plans. No disturbance is permitted in the tloodway except for the construction of the ponds as shown on the approved plans. A survey located fence shall be installed along this floodway line to prevent disturbance. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor sha ll assure that all di sturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that an y disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties , city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion , siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area INSIDE the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of ollege Station t pply . Date Owner/ Agent (} _ ~~ Date /-/Lf-{) () Contractor Date DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 505 Carter's Creek Fill Project@ SH 30 FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Rl0568 R92106 R94987 (remaining 1.526 acres) OWNER: FredMartin Highway 30 Partnership 4500 Carter Creek Parkway Bryan, Tx 77801 260-1111 c/o Mike Davis (846-7200) DRAINAGE BASIN: Carter's Creek SITE ADDRESS: Approximately 2800 Harvey Rd. CINEMARK USA INC 3900 DALLAS PKWY #500 PLANO, TX 75093-7863 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR CONSTRUCTION AS PER APPROVED PLANS DATED JUNE 23, 1999. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. This may include the installation of additional erosion control measures not shown on the plans. No disturbance is permitted in the floodway except for the construction of the oonds as shown on the approved plans. A survey located fence shall be installed along this floodway line to prevent disturbance. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as, part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter I 3 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area inside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Date 1 1 6 -~ i;-~r ? ~~~ Owner/ Agent Hwy 30 PartnefShi Date 5tt.vc... W. G, -f ·u. V' Date ~---· Jun-30-99 1Z:35pm Frc11-T-913 c I N E M A R ~ T h c: e cs t S€af In Town FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION FROM: Steven W . Fritzer Real Estate Developer 3900 Dallas Parkway. Suite 500 Plano , Texas 75093 Phone: (972) 665-1018. fax: (972) 665-1004 sfrirzer@cinemark.com PLEASE DEUVER TO: COMPANY NAME: FAX NUMBER: DA TE de TIME: ~, TOTAL PAGES (INCl-UDING COVER): ~ P. 01 /0Z F-376 REGARDING: __..& ......... -__ ,,,""""",~""'-,,,_..c_C,=:;;.ic....;s-...fr._....r;;,~;;z....:~~/'-/+R,-L~.E.,'!)1-1/' t:.....:•:....::~ ...... __ e/ . ·· · . . ·;·:_::: <.:.-.: /-· .. ~~-.. i I \ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION *** CUSTO"ER RECEIPT *** OPER: "RODGERS CT DRAWER: 1 DATE: 6/30/99 00 RECEIPT: 0082633 DESCRIPTION QTY A"OUNT TP T" "!SC ENGR CHARGE 1 $180.08 •3D CK O\C\-5"0 :S-TENDER DETAIL CK 2190 $180.00 DATE: 6/30/99 TI"E: 16:04:50 TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $188._08 A"OUHT TENDERED $180. 8S--THAHK YOU .~ THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS EASEMENT (DRAINAGE) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, REGENCY PARKWAY, INC., a Texas Corporation ("Grantor"), acting by and through its duly authorized officer, the undersigned , of the county of Brazos and State of Texas, for and in consideration of the payment of the sum of TEN AND NOil 00 DOLLARS ($10.00) cash, and other good and valuable consideration, paid to Grantor by Anthony Y. Majors ("Grantee"), has GRANTED , SOLD AND CONVEYED and by these presents do GRANT , SELL AND CONVEY unto the said Anthony Y. Majors the present fee simple owner of Lot Two, Block One, IIlGH RIDGE SUBDIVISION, College Station, Brazos County, Texas , a right- of-way and perpetual easement for purposes of construction, maintaining , repairing, and operating a drainage way and easement for draining, diverting, and/or channeling surface water, drainage water or other water which is or shall be deposited on the Property and/or that flows on or across the Property or any part thereof from adjacent lands so such water may flow and be let into Carter Creek. Which usage shall not impede the drainage of the adjacent tracts of Grantor, its heirs or assigns. The right-of-way and drainage easement shall be on, over, across under and/or through the following described land: All that certain .149 acre tract or parcel of land , being a 40 ' wide by 153 ' long drainage easement, lying and being situated in the RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE , Abstract No . 8, College Station , Brazos County, Texas, and being a portion out of that same 34.13 acre tract conveyed from Bert Wheeler, Inc. to Regency Parkway, Inc., as described by deed recorded in Volume 1082, Page 337 of the Official Records of Brazos County , Texas , and said .149 acre tract being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a Y2" iron rod found at the east corner of Lot Two of the High Ridge Subdivision of the City of College Station (Vol.1878, Pg 53) in the common line of the said High Ridge Subdivision and the said Regency Parkway tract; Thence along the said common line N 55°12 '08 " W a distance of 208.99 feet to an iron rod set at the POINT OF BEGINNING of this 0.149 acre tract; Thence continuing N 55°12 '08 " W a distance of 53.78 feet to an iron rod set at the southwest corner of this tract in the southwest line of the abovementioned Regency Parkway tract; Thence through the said Regency Parkway tract by the following courses : 07 °08 '58 " W -162.34 feet to an iron rod set ; S 55 °12'0 8" E-53 .7 8 feet to an iron rod set; 0004 14-e.O 1-5 4 (3196) S 07 °08 '58 " E -162.34 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.149 acres of land more or less Provided however, it is understood and agreed by Grantor and Grantee that the overriding intent of this easement is to extend the drainage to the creek bed of the adjoining creek (Carter Creek); should that creek move or be diverted in the future by governmental authorities or by natural causes or otherwise then this right-of-way and easement shall be deemed and considered to be extended or reduced in length such that it extends to the creek bed of that creek so that the purposes for which this easement is granted can be fulfilled . Notwithstanding anything else contained herein to the contrary Grantor reserves and 40 fool utility and access easement, parallel to and adjacent to the northeast line of Lot Two Block One of High Ridge Subdivision , along with the drainage rights to flow water over, under or through Grantee's easement for all properties that flow to/or within the easement from the fore mentioned 3 4 .13 acre tract and said Lot Three Block One with the restriction that said drainage rights will not block or hinder the drainage of Lot Two Block One, High Ridge Subdivision, College Station, Texas. Grantee, Grantee's heirs , successors and assigns, shall have the right to clean and cut trees and brush , place a culvert or waterway from time to time, place rip-rap and/or wood or concrete bulk heads and/or lay pipe or pipes and/or construct, p lace, replace, repair and maintain on said easement or under said easement and any and all other improvements which the Grantee, in Grantee 's judgment deems necessary and appropriate for purposes of draining and/or holding surface water from all or any part or portion of the Property, being Lot Two , Block One , HIGH RIDGE SUBDIVISION, or any part thereof, to Carter Creek. This easement shall be perpetual and Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns , are hereby granted the right to assign this right-of-way and easement or any part thereof, or any interest therein for the purposes as herein stated and/or to dedicated all or any part of the easement and right-of-way to the City of College Station and/or any other appropriate governmental body for drainage of surface water purposes, and for the city and/or such governmental bodies to maintain. This right-of-way and easement is appurtenant to said Lot Two, Block One, High Ridge Subdivision, College Station , Brazos County, Texas; and shall be a covenant and easement running with the land and the Property . The Grantee, Grantee 's heirs , successors and assigns, shall have all of the rights and benefits necessary or convenient for the full enjoyment and use of the rights herein granted, including but without limiting the same , the free right of ingress over and across said lands described in said easement only for purposes of inspecting, constructing, maintaining and/or improving said easement for the purposes herein stated. TO HA VE AND TO HOLD said right-of-wa y and easement unto Grantee , Grantee 's heirs , successors, legal representatives and assigns, forever and the undersigned Grantor hereby binds itself, its successors and assigns , to warrant and forever defend all and singular the said easement unto the Grantee , Grantee 's heirs , successors and assigns , against every person whomever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof. 0004 14 -e .O 1-54 (3 196) This easement releases the .115 acre easement on the above described property executed by the Gran tors on the 10 1 h day of March 1995 and recorded in Volume 2315, Page 154 of the OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY , Texas . EXECUTED this the ___ day of _____ , 199 _ REGENCY PAR.KW A Y , INC . By: ----------------Mich a e 1 K. Davis President REGENCY PARKWAY , INC. Accepted------------ Anthony Y. Majors THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the __ day of , 199_, by MICHAEL K. DA VIS , PRESIDENT OF REGENCY PARKWAY, INC., a Texas Corporation , on behalf of said Corporation and in the capacity therein stated . THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS Notary Public in and for The State of Texas This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the ___ day of ____ ~ 199_, by Anthony Y . Majors , in the capacity ; therein stated. 000 41 4-e.01-54 (3 196) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas )R FORMERLY JCY PARKWAY, INC . _ 2315, PAGE 154.K~ MANHOLE ;g' PROPOSED 40' DRAINAGE EASEME NT EXI ST. 20' SAN. SEWER ESM'T VOL. 399, PG. 107 I -------' ' " " ~ //// I. '..:: / ;:<. V I 0 .;:>.. I ..... _, / -:a. ... / r-\' V I , ·~ «_ I "· ,.~ _<:) / / ~ \ UT ILITY EASEMENT VOL. 23 i 5 , PG. 154 rv'1 EXI ST . DRAIN AGE & ~ I 1~ / EXIST. RIP-RAP / / / / / / / / / I I / I I I I I / / / / ··':,_ ,::·;~~;i!J E XIST. P VC / 1 I I / . . . I I I -1:-- E XI ST. LI GHT P C // . ' EXI ST . P VC Ei..E 1-:--·--:--:~ J THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS EASEMENT (DRAINAGE) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS : THAT, REGENCY PARKWAY, INC., a Texas Corporation ("Grantor"), acting by and through its duly authorized officer, the undersigned , of the county of Brazos and State of Texas , for and in consideration of the payment of the sum of TEN AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) cash, and other good and valuable consideration, paid to Grantor by Anthony Y. Majors ("Grantee"), has GRANTED, SOLD AND CONVEYED and by these presents do GRANT, SELL AND CONVEY unto the said Anthony Y. Majors the present fee simple owner of Lot Two, Block One, IDGH RIDGE SUBDIVISION, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, a right- of-way and perpetual easement for purposes of construction, maintaining, repairing, and operating a drainage way and easement for draining, diverting, and/or channeling surface water, drainage water or other water which is or shall be deposited on the Property and/or that flows on or across the Property or any part thereof from adjacent lands so such water may flow and be let into Carter Creek. Which usage shall not impede the drainage of the adjacent tracts of Grantor, its heirs or assigns. The right-of-way and drainage easement shall be on, over, across under and/or through the following described land : All that certain .1 49 acre tract or parcel of land , being a 40 ' wi de by 153 ' long drainage easement, lying an d being situated in the RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE, Abstract No. 8, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being a portion out of that same 34 .13 acre tract conveyed from Bert Wheeler, Inc. to Regenc y Parkway, Inc., as described by deed recorded in Volume 1082 , Page 337 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas , and said .149 acre tract being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a Yi" iron rod found at the east comer of Lot Two of the High Ridge Subdivision of the City of College Station (Vol.1878, Pg 53) in the common line of the said High Ridge Subdivision and the said Regency Parkway tract ; Thence along the said common line N 55°12 '08 " W a distance of 208.99 feet to an iron rod set at the POINT OF BEGINNING of this 0 .149 acre tract; Thence continuing N 55°12 '08 " W a distance of 53.78 feet to an iron rod set at the southwest comer of this tract in the so uth west line of the abovementioned Regency Parkway tract ; Thence through the said Regency Parkway tract by the following courses : 0 7°08 '58 " W -162.34 feet to an iron rod set; S 55°12'08" E-53 .78 feet to an iron rod set ; 0004 14-e .01-54 (3 196) S 07°08 '58" E-162 .34 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0 .14 9 acres of land more or less Provided however, it is understood and agreed by Grantor and Grantee that the overriding intent of this easement is to extend the drainage to the creek bed of the adjoining creek (Carter Creek); should that creek move or be diverted in the future by governmental authorities or by natural causes or otherwise then this right-of-way and easement shall be deemed and considered to be extended or reduced in length such that it extends to the creek bed of that creek so that the purposes for which this easement is granted can be fulfilled. Notwithstanding anything else contained herein to the contrary Grantor reserves and 40 fool utility and access easement, parallel to and adjacent to the northeast line of Lot Two Block One of High Ridge Subdivision , along with the drainage rights to flow water over, under or through Grantee 's easement for all properties that flow to/or within the easement from the fore mentioned 34 .13 acre tract and said Lot Three Block One with the restriction that said drainage rights will not block or hinder the drainage of Lot Two Block One, High Ridge Subdivision, College Station, Texas. Grantee, Grantee 's heirs , successors and assigns, shall have the right to clean and cut trees and brush, place a culvert or waterway from time to time , place rip-rap and/or wood or concrete bulk heads and/or lay pipe or pipes and/or construct, place, replace , repair and maintain on said easement or under said easement and any and all other improvements which the Grantee, in Grantee 's judgment deems necessary and appropriate for purposes of draining and/or holding surface water from all or any part or portion of the Property, being Lot Two , Block One , HIGH RIDGE SUBDIVISION , or any part thereof, to Carter Creek. This easement shall be perpetual and Grantee , Granteg's heirs, successors and assigns , are hereby granted the right to assign this right-of-way and easement or any part thereof, or any interest therein for the purposes as herein stated and/or to dedicated all or any part of the easement and right-of-way to the City of College Station and/or any other appropriate governmental body for drainage of surface water purposes, and for the city and/or such governmental bodies to maintain . This right-of-way and easement is appurtenant to said Lot Two, Block One , High Ridge Subdivision, College Station , Brazos County, Texas; and shall be a covenant and easement running with the land and the Property . The Grantee , Grantee's heirs , successors and assigns, shall have all of the rights and benefits necessary or convenient for the full enjoyment and use of the rights herein granted, incl uding but without limiting the same, the free right of ingress over and across said lands described in sai d easement only for purposes of inspecting, constructing, maintaining and/or improv ing said easement for the purposes herein stated. TO HA VE AND TO HOLD said ri ght-of-way and easement unto Grantee, Grantee's heirs , successors , legal representatives and assigns, forever and the undersigned Grantor hereby binds itself, its successors and assigns , to warrant and forever defend all and singular the said easement unto the Grantee , Grantee 's heirs , successors and assigns, against every person who mever la wfu ll y claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof. 0 004 14-e.O 1-54 (3 196 l This easement releases the .115 acre easement on the above described property executed by the Granters on the 1 orh day of March 1995 and recorded in Volume 2315 , Page 154 of the OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY , Texas . EXECUTED this the !Jo'-ft-day of ;J:~ .. ' 199 _:t . REGENCY PARKWAY: INC. D . By~jr!~~ MiChae!Kavis President REGENCY PARKWAY , INC . Accepted------------ Anthony Y. Majors THE STA TE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the ..!2!!_ day of Juf\l.,. , 1991_, by MICHAEL K. DAVIS , PRE,S~J11 OF REGENCY PARKWAY, INC ., a Texas Corporation , on behalf of said c~?lfti/!1fYAhe capacity therein stated. ·~,,~~~:av···.~S'""~ ~--:: .·:\~\l.'f PUel··. ~ -3~ .. ~~0-..~~ \ {,, ~ f . ~ } i ~ vvt;l.k ~ \ <l"-1,,. ...rJ...{'l l §PUIJiiCi and for -::;, • •c Qf\'to' • ,;:-h f ~ ···.~Plf\~<:> •• •• ~ T e State o Texas ~ ········ :\ ~ ~,, 12-4-2G'\j ,,~ THE STA TE OF TEXAS : ~11111111111\\\\\\\ COUNTY OF BRAZOS This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the ___ day of ____ _ 199 _, by Anthony Y. Majors , in the capacity ; therein stated. 0004 14 -e.O l-54 (3196) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas - THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRA ZO S 5759Zl7 EASEMENT (DRAINAGE ) 3 "I ",... w.o 11 PM : c:: 4 '?~ I;;\\\ I .. ·-· _:_J. c ~w: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, REGENCY PARKWAY, INC., a Texas Corporation ("Grantor"), acting by and through its duly authorized officer, the undersigned, of the County of Brazos and State of Texas, for and in consideration of the payment of the sum of TEN AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($10.00 ) cash, and other good and valuable consideration, paid to Gran tor by TERRY PRUITT, TRUSTEE ("Grantee") , including the conveyance of Lot Three, Block One, HIGH RIDGE SUBDIVISION, a subdivision of the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas, according to the plat thereof filed of record , Volume 1878, Page 53 in the Official Records of Brazos County ("Property"), in exchange herefor, the receipt and sufficiency of such consideration of which is hereby acknowledged, has GRANTED, SOLD AND CONVEYED and by these presents do GRANT, SELL AND CONVEY unto the said TERRY PRUITT, TRUSTEE the present fee simple owner of Lot Two , Block One, HIGH RIDGE SUBDIVISION, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, a right-of-way and perpetual easement for purposes of constructing, maintaining, repairing, and operating a drainage way and easement for draining, diverting, and/or channeling surface water, drainage water or other water which is or shall be deposited on the Property and/or that flows on or across the Property or any part thereof from adjacent lands so such water may flow and be let into Carter Creek . Which usage shall not impede the drainage of the adjacen t tracts of Grantor, its heirs or assigns . The right-of-way and drainage easement shall be on, over, across under and/or through the following described land: All that certain .115 acre tract or parcel of land, being a 40' wide by 125' long drainage easement, lying and being situated in the RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE, Abstract No. 8, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being a portion out of that same 34.13 acre tract conveyed from Bert Wheeler, I nc . to Regency Parkway, Inc., as described by deed recorded i n Volume 1082, Page 337 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, and said .115 acre tract be i ng more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point on the southwes t erly line of the f orementioned 34 .13 acre tract said point being the most Southerly corner of Lot Three Block One of High Ridge Subdivision as shown in Volume 1878 page 53 of the Official Records of Brazos County; VO~ 2315PAS: 154 I I THENCE S 55° 12' 08" E with the northeast line of Lot Two Block One of High Ridge Subdivision for a distance of 15.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 49° 47' 52" E for a distance of 125 feet to a corner in the creekbed of Carter Creek; THENCE S 55° 12' 08" E for a distance of 40.3 feet to another corner in the creekbed of Carter Creek ; THENCE S 49° 47' 52" W for a distance of 125 feet to a corner being also on the northeast line of the forementioned Lot Two; THENCE N 55° 12' 08" W for a distance of 40.3 feet along the northeast line of Lot Two to the POINT OF BEGINNING containing .115 acres more or less Provided however, it is understood and agreed by Grantor and Grantee that the overriding intent of this easement is to extend the drainage to the creekbed of the adjoining creek (Carter Creek); should that creek move or be diverted in the future by governmental authorities or by natural causes or otherwise then this right-of-way and easement shall be deemed and considered to be extended or reduced in length such that it extends to the creekbed of that creek so that the purposes for which this easement is granted can be fulfilled. Notwithstanding anything else contained herein to the contrary Granter reserves an 40 foot utility and access easement, parallel to and adjacent to the northeast line of lot Two Block One of High Ridge Subdivision, along with the drainage rights to flow water over, under or through Grantee's easement for all properties that flow to/or within the easement from the forementioned 34.13 acre tract and said Lot Three Block One with the restriction that said drainage rights will not block or hinder the drainage of Lot Two Block One, High Ridge Subdivision, College Station, Texas. Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, shall have the right to clean and cut trees and brush, place a culvert or waterway from time to time, place rip-rap and/or wood or concrete bulk heads and/ or lay pipe or pipes and/ or construct, place , replace, repair and maintain on said easement or under said easement and any and all other improvements which the Grantee, in Grantee's judgment deems necessary and appropriate for purposes of draining and/or holding surface water from all or any part or portion of the Property, being Lot Two, Block One, HIGH RIDGE SUBDIVISION, or any part thereof, to Carter Creek. This easement shall be perpetual and Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, are hereby granted the right to assign this right-of-way and easement or any part thereof, or any interest therein for the purposes as herein stated and/or to dedicate all " ' /?1 ~o•~r ·155 ....,.1 , _u ,n~ ..... or any part of the easement and right-of-way to the City of College Station and/ or any other appropriate governmental body for drainage of surface water purposes, and for the city and/or such governmental bodies to maintain. This right-of-way and easement is appurtenant to said Lot Two, Block One, High Ridge Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, Texas; and shall be a covenant and easement running with the land and the Property. The Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, shall have all of the rights and benefits necessary or convenient for the full enjoyment and use of the rights herein granted, including but without limiting the same, the free right of ingress over and across said lands described in said easement only for purposes of inspecting, constructing, maintaining and/or improving said easement for the purposes herein stated. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said right-of-way and easement unto Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors, legal representatives and assigns, forever and the undersigned Granter hereby binds itself, its successors and assigns, to warrant and forever defend all and singular the said easement unto the Grantee, Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof. EXECUTED this the Jo'Z1---day of djffi;J.. , 1995. REGENCY PARKWAY, INC. By,~·ad!(~ MI~DAVIS President REGENCY PARKWAY, INC . Accepted THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNT Y OF BRAZOS This instrument was acknowledged before me on th i s the f 6 -.v day of March, 1995, by MICHAEL K. DAVIS, PRESIDENT OF REGENCY PARKWA Y, INC., a Texas Corporation, on behalf of said Corporation and in the capacity therein stated . MONI C11 nt.RPIBALL Nota ry F11 t;<"-· :>1,;,,; -'' T ~~as My Co mm 1ss 1on bp1 r e~ SEPTEMBER 8. 1997 No ary Public in and for The State of Texas VOL 2315P~G :156 THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the / O ;f, __ day of March, 1995, by TERRY PRUITT I TRUSTEE in the capacity ;therein stated. "® MONICA BARRISALL ' Notary Put!ic . State of TP.xas My Commission Expires SEPTEMBERS . 1997 ~------··--·---·-------------·----·--·-··--··· - ary Public in and for The State of Texas VO L 2315PAG t157 . --------··----------------· -~; -· -·-------- MAY-26-1999 WED 01:53 PM C.S. PUBLIC WORKS FAX NO. 409 764 3489 ~ P. 01 ~~\~~ PUBLIC WORI<S 0 Administration N_ Engineering 0 Facility Maintenance 0 Fleet 0 Sanitation 0 Streets/Drainage D Traffic/Signals To: \! Ef g_o l\l l ~A-M . at: 't:> Ff\/ .. S e:?"f2-IC.... e'" .S (company name) This FAX is being sent to you by: -H<.. t4Ni<-SI f\..f\. o N.s; A-\J ><. pltone: 7 fof -3 S '12 111is fax con ta.ins 2 pages includi11g the cover sheel, please call if you don't receive a.If !he illformation . Additional Comments: P:'{I -} ..:t.. tf-A--l\ e> lt\-o r~J ~~ A-"1 E?"~T\ M Ar~ 0 I=' A-DIH \ \ b rH\·L C..t>ST ~ l'le ~"'1"°'19' A:-sr T~\J N.~L \NS"' ~:re-c.:r-~A-Us 6" ~ ~'f c..,+'2...\8'12. t.~&~ ~l-t) c..k''ll D N p~rec...\. City of College Station Public Works Dcpartrnenl r .o. Box 9960 ' Z6 l 3 S. Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 (409) 7G4 -~G90 . .. MAY-26-1999 WED 01:53 PM C.S . PUBLIC WORKS FAX NO. 409 764 3489 P. 02 May 25, 1999 Mr. Frank Simoneaux, Jr . City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Stotion, Texas 77842 Re: City of College Station OTHON , INC . 1 1111 W ilcre st Green , Svitc 1 28 Hov~ton, Tc xo; 77042 713 975 855 5 TEL 713 975 9 068 FAX othoncorp@oth on ,com E·MA IL www.othon .com Wf:BSliE Northeast Sewer T runkline, SS-9805 98140088 CONSULT ING ENGINEERS Civ il. Tron ~µor1o f ion, Erwi ronm2nlo l, Co nsfrvc ti o n Monogement At your request, we hove evaluated the increase in the estimated construction cost of the Northeast Sewer Trunk!ine as a result of the regrading for the Carter Creek Realignment Project. We hove reviewed the partial set of drawings we received from MDG, dated August 1998. The proposed grading will increase the depth of excavation required to construct the proposed Northeast Sewer Trunkline by approximately six feet from the west side of the power line easement to approximately manhole P33 Bl MOl 0 . The increase in estimated construction cost is$ 18,800.00. Also, the regrading work will result in the necessity to redo the topographic survey in the affected area and update the sewer construction plans at an estimated cost of $2,000.00. If I can provide any additional information to assist in this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, OTHON, INC. ~\- (_}_mes W. Keller, P.E. Senior Project Manager u:\?61400BB·Collogo Slal ion No~honS1\L~l\l-lSRT-INCREASE.'"'Pd ~ \.if ·:f. /~frl;(t ~(kl \Ji. ?AO~ ef U/41 ;, :I:ks,JJt.OJJ, ~/;oi..Hok1J.~1 ~.~~ ~~~~~~nt,~! • ~3~~~~~~u~~~1b~ ~~j ) )/ ',,.·'*' I ., , .,.. .. r: I -. ..... . • ...... ,, 06 /11 /99 11 :31 Mr. Mich5el Davis 4002 Aspen Bryan,· TX 77801 Dear '-Hf chaal: '5"409 846 7083 R M & E. P .C. ~~~ DE VELOP MENT SVCS • \..._.. RECE IVED JUN o ? 1999 · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY College of Agriculture end Ufe Sciences Deportment of Entomology Center for Urban and Structural Entomology College station. Texas 77843·2475 (409) 845-58~ FAX (409) 845-5926 June 2, 1999 As a follow-up to the tour your .gave me of the 11 greenbelt 11 area being created along the Ca .rter Creefc, drainage system north of Highway 30 in College Statfon on June · 1. 1999, l present the following observa~fons and opinions: · · · @002 . Any 11 greel)~lt 11 that includes provisions far wetland :areas along its expanse will be a breed1.ng ground for mosquitoes desptte all efforts ta preve.nt such from happen1nQi this ;s a "given" and must be exp•¢ted and accepted by those developing and managing such green· be·lts as well as bj. those lfv.ing by or making recreational · use of· these anviror111enta1 resp;tes. The 011ly way to totally .prevent masquito .breed1ng 1n wetland-type .greenbelts is .!l2!. to .create . then · in the first .place.and landscape areas along drainage systems like as occur along Carter Creek · in .such a manner that w.fll allow complete drainage of all the water off ·the land,with no 1·nstances of water standing anahere on such land for longe'I" than 3 days max1111.1m! This strategy is obviously out a"f t e question for the greenbelt you showed me yesterday. Thus, we must go to the "next best strategy" and that is to do a11 that can be done via landscaping. and water management to ensure that mosqu1to- breeding 1n the proposed gr:eenbelt 1s minimized as much as possible. In minimizing mosquito bre.eding on any type of landscape, it must be understood that we. are dealing with certain species of mosqu ''ftoes that make use of shallow bodies of more or less pennanent standing water as egg-laying and larval development habitats. ~hese species . are called c~llec~'fvely the ."Standi~g Water Mos~u1to Species"; and our research has shown Colle9e ·stat1on to have about O ·to ZS dif erent species of these kinds of mosquf toes-..;one of Which, Cul ex 9uin~uefasciatus, is the primary vector for the bird carried v;rus .that causes St. Louis ·' ncephalftis (SLE) in humans and comnonly occurs in all the creekbeds i~ College Station dµring the hot, su1m1er months when water in these creekbeds gets stagnant and septic. The other major group of mosquito sp@cies we deal with locally are called the "Floodwater Mosquito Seecies" wh1ch do not lay their eggs in standing water but rather in depressions ;n the so1l, artific-ial c;:ontainers. treeholes and other places subject to periodic flooding 'by water result~ng from ra1ns or .1'rrigatiori'.actfvi.t1es entedng · i:.nto . these .locations. Jhe .. •eggs of ·floodwater mosquito species can pers1st for up to 2 to 3 years or ·more ·waiting far the right flooding con- ditions to occur;· and When such flooding does occur, the !ggs hatch errnass. the larvoe develop in the flood water that rena1ns inthe. depressfons or containers that were flooded and an~here from 5 days · to 10 days later (depending on temperature), the adults emerge ennass giYin9 rise to ~xtens1ve populations of blood-seeking mosquito ·adults~ that will persist in an area for up ta a week to 10 days or more. Again our research shows the Colle9e Station area to. have about 20 to 25 different .:species of floodwater mosquitoes ·, with species 11ke Aedes vexans and~ taeniorhynchus being particularly 06 /11 /99 11 : 32 'a'409 8 4 6 7083 R M & E . P .C. ~~~ DE VELOP MENT SVCS .. -.. Re: College Station Gre""'11>elt & tt>s~ito Problsns ·..._ 06/02/99 Page 2 c:ol'llUOn floodwater . mo'squitb .. as.&Qciates ·of creeks running through Col1ege Station, along with Psoro&hora cyanescen~,(where cattle might be pastured) and the ~od1and Psorophora species 01 e Ps. ferox)--all of wham are seriously annoyscme pests of humans and pets wherever they-Occur . I should also ment i on here that greenbelts serve as natural traps and resting areas ·for adult mosquito J)opulations migrating into ' town from areas outside the city (from distances as far away as 20 m11es er more); and once in these greenbelt areas. these migr,1.ting mosquito~s can add to the annoyance and potential d1sease prcblans occurtng "in. and emanatin'g out of the greenbelts ·and 1nto "·the areas · next 'tO ·!Where the greenbelts are :located •. Thus. I do hope the people supporting the concept of developing greenbelts in the College Station area have taken all of this into account and are mak1ng provfs1ons for handling the increased mosquito-related problems that are going to occur 1n the greenbelt areas 1rrespective of what 1s done to 1111nimize the loc&l msqu1·to br.eedfng 'that will oc·cur in these greenbelts! -·-. . -. . -. ---~ . With this having been said, let's now turn our attention to the quest1ons you had about how best to handle the ponding .of water along the proposed Carter Creek green- belt syst1111. Your idea of creating ponds· that w111 hold water at a fixed level con- t1nously and fr.om·which exce~s water can dra1n when flooding occurs is a good one provided the banks :.of ·'these ponds are steep, the pond .1s stocked with fish. the banks are kept fr-ee of vegetation and open to .. wind and wave act1a·n, and an overstory of sem1aquatic vegetation (e.g., cattails, Wit&r .111tes.etc.) is not allowed to build up wHh1n these ponds. Ponds ma1nta1ned in ·this manner will not support the breeding of either Standing ~ater or floodwater mosquito spec1es to any extent. The 1dea of hav- ing some ponds that completely, dry out between floodings is not appealing to me ·in that I see an opportunity for floodwater mosqu1toes to make use of such ponds, particu- larly· after vegetation begins ta build up 1n the bottoms of these ponding areas which w1ll 1mpede the complete drainage of these ponds after f1ood1ng. Also. erosi·on caused by water running out of these . tenporary ponds will give r1.se to depressions which in turn wil 1 give rise to sta11ding wa.ter wnich can .eventually be used by both standing water and floodwater mosquitoes as breeding · sites. .Jf tenporary. ponds are-fnst&lled in ·the College Station greenbelt systen, I strongly reconmend that consideration be given to creating ponding areas · in the bot.torn of these ponds where water can stand continuously and provide refugia for fish populations that can then extend out into the greater expanse of the overa.11 ponding area .at times . when these temporary ponds are flooded thereby ~~ovid1ng natural control of ~he mosquito larvae populations that will '.be spawned when the temporary ponds are flooded. The fish can. then recede back fnto the 11 pondfng areas" as the tanporary ponds drain and w1ll be 1n position then to extend back out into the expanse of the ponds the next time they are flooded. This tactic has been used efihct1vely both in ·salt marsh areas and in rice paddies." I hope the views and corrments I have made will be of some use to you and . others in~ valved in the· p1ann1ng and . design f.or the college Greenbelt Systen. If you or others have any questions or concerns about my cormients and/or suggestions~ please feel free to contact me. Otherwise, I do plan to have one of my 'special problans students con- duct some survey$ in the Carter Creek drainage system th1s month so as to get an up• date on the mosquito species currently active in this area of College Station. I will be most happy to share this ;nformation with you and others that are interested. S1nce~e1y YeY~/ d.77.~ ~11111y K. Olson, Ph.D., BCE Professor @oo :i I Harvey Cargill -Re: Carter Cree k Re location Proj ect • From: Veronica Morgan To: Fsimonea@CITY OF COLLEGE STATION.POLICE DEPARTMENT Date: Subject: 6/14/99 3:30PM ,,r·O n Re : Carter Creek Relocation Project ~--· ~ ( 1'~~ J yes , i recieved the memo and as i currently know it , legal is researching the easement document to see if we can legally preclude or limit the additional fill. jan and i worked on finding the separate instrument easement last week .... mike davis' lawyer is calling our lawyers challenging our right to limit the fill. if harvey finds that we can recoup additional costs to maintain the existing line or pay for the additional cost to the new line then we can discuss the monetary amounts. harvey, please keep us posted on the status ... thanks v »>Frank Simoneaux 06/14/99 02 :51 PM»> I sent a fax a few weeks back about increased costs to the Northeast Sewer Trunkline Project caused by the Carter Creek Relocation Project. Did you receive this, and has Roxanne given an evaluation about whether these costs can be recovered? Also , do you know the status of the project? Thanks for your help . CC: Harvey Cargill , Lawrence Carter c Page 1 I COLLEGE STATION June 23, 1999 Mr. Fred Martin Highway 30 Partnership 4500 Carter Creek Parkway Bryan, Tx 7780 l CINEMARK USA Inc. 3900 Dallas Parkway #500 Plano, Tx 75093-78 63 P. 0. Box 9960 RE: Carter's Creek Fill Project@ SH 30 Pond Nuisance Problems Dear Mr. Martin, 1101 Texas Avenue Tet. 409 764 3500 College Station, TX 77842 s~ I I. 1bis letter is being issued along with Development Permit 505 to bring your attention to potential nuisance problems associated with standing water in the ponds created by the above-referenced project. · The CitY of College Station Drainage Policy prohibits the creation of depression areas that allow stormwater to pond and become stagnant. Due to the close proximity of the Windwood Subdivision, we have concerns that the pond may become a nuisance to the neighborhood. These concerns are exacerbated due to the limited maintenance allowed under the 404 permitting. These ponds are being created as part of the drainage requirements for filling the flood fringe . The owners of the development will be required to maintain the ponds and surrounding areas and prevent or correct any undesirable effects of the pond. _The primary nuisance conce_rns ar.e_mosquitoes and odors. It is recommended that the pond be stocked with Gambusia affinis, "mosquito fish," as a biological control for mosquitoes (refer to City of Austin Environmental Manual for stoking densities). If odors occur, corrective measures such as installing aeration fountains may be required. ou have any question, please call me at(409) 764-3570 . xc: Mike Davis Chuck Ellison, Rodgers Miller & Ellison Home of Texas A&M University COLLEGE STATION June 23, 1999 Mr. Fred Martin Highway 30 Partnership 4500 Carter Creek Parkway Bryan, Tx 7780 l CINEMARK USA Inc. 3900 Dallas Parkway #500 Plano, T x 75093-78 63 P. 0 . Bo x 996 0 RE: Carter's Cree k Fill Project@ SH 30 Pond Nuisance Problems Dear Mr. Martin, 1101 Te xa s Avenue Tet. 4 09 764 3500 College Sta ti on, TX 778 42 This letter is being issued along with Development Permit 505 to bring your attention to potential nuisance problems associated with standing water in the ponds created by the above-referenced ~~ . ".t The City of College Station Drainage Policy prohibits the creation of depression areas that allow stormwater to pond and become stagnant. Due to the close proximity of the Wind wood Subdivision, we have concerns that the pond may become a nuisance to the neighborhood. These concerns are exacerbated due to the limited maintenance allowed under the 404 permitting. These ponds are being created as part of the drainage requirements for filling the flood fringe. The owners of the development will be required to maintain the ponds and surrounding areas and prevent or correct_any_undesirable effects of the pond. The primary nuisance_@Jlee1llS are mosquitoes and odors . It is recommended that the pond be stocked with Gambusia affinis , "mosquito fish," as a biological control for mosquitoes (refer to City of Austin Environmental Manual for stoking densities). If odors occur, corrective measures such as installing aeration fountains may be required . oir ffiive any question, please call me at(409) 764-3570. xc: Mike Davis Chuck Ellison, Rodgers Miller & Ellison Home of Texas A&M University DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 505 Carter's Creek Fill Project@ SH 30 FOR AREAS INSIDE TIIE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF TIIE COLLEGE ST A TION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: R10568 R92106 R94987 (remaining 1.526 acres) OWNER: Fred Martin Highway 30 Partnership 4500 Carter Creek Parkway Bryan, Tx 7780 l 260-1111 c/o Mike Davis (846-7200) DRAINAGE BASIN: Carter's Creek SITE ADDRESS: Approximately 2800 Harvey Rd. CINEMARK USA INC 3 900 DALLAS PKWY #500 PLANO, TX 75093-7863 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR CONSTRUCTION AS PER APPROVED PLANS DATED JUNE 23, 1999. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. This may include the installation of additional erosion control measures not shown on the plans . No disturbance is permitted in the floodway except for the construction of the ponds as shown on the approved plans. A swvey located fence shall be installed along this floodway line to prevent disturbance. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of O~dinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area inside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application/or the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Date / / ~~ Owner/Agent Hwy 30 Partne~hi~ 6 -:2 ~~r r Date Steve... W. £,;, -fze.v- Date Jun-30-99 12:35pm From-T-913 P.01/0Z F-376 (INEMAR!Stz The Best Scot In Town FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION FROM: Steven W . fritzer Real Estate Developer 3900 Dallas Parkway. Suite 500 Plano, Texas 75093 Phone ; (972) 665-1018. Fax: (972) 665-1004 sf rirzer@cinemark.com PLEASE DEUVER TO: COMPANY NAME: FAX NUMBER: DA TE cl TIME: ~, TOTAL PAGES (INCl-Ut>ING COVER): 2-- REGARDING: Cnuc C.,,.k h'll/°J·r-e Y. COMMENTS: ~·It' e,.,,.,{,/ Nf,/. ~ ... 'tlV 't!~ =~~~~~~~"! <;.MM,«,·,, ~I' "'l·-M ~;t' ~~,"~~ ~~~;9 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION *** CUSTOMER RECEIPT *** OPER: !'!RODGERS CT DRAWER: 1 DATE: o/30/99 00 RECEIPT: 0082633 . DESCRIPTIOH !HY Al'IOUMT TP TM MISC EHGR CHARGE 1 $100.00 *3D CK °' C\-50 :::;- TEHDER DETAIL CK 2190 $100.00 DATE: &/30/99 Til'IE: 1&:04:50 TOTAL PERSOHAL CHECK $100.00 AMOUNT TENDERED $100. 00 THAMK YOU Jun-30-99 12:36pm From- D~PMDITftllMIT PEaMrl' NO. 50S Cu1a'• Creek Pill~@ SR lO T-9 13 P.02/02 F-3 76 FOil AJtEAS lNSIDE 11Ul SPBClAl. fl..QQD HAZARD AREA RB: alAPl'JDl 13 OF 1"BE COLLEGE STA'l10.N crrY CODE 811'& UCAL DUCIUP110N: at GSA llnl06 llM91'7 (IT'Plilbamg l.526 -=a) OWQ1&: !'red Manill Hipway 30 ParUllnbip 4500 Cuts CR:dE: Putcny Bryan, Tx 171Ql l60--llll da Miko Pml (846-7l00) lHIAINAG& lL\SINz Cuulr'1 Cra:k srn .AnDUISs ~i••• 2100HaawJM CINEMAlUC USA INC 3900 DAU.AS PKWY #JOO Pl.ANO. TX 750t3·7163 ~~:::=~=-=--:~.:::: ~ -iD acmrdancc wifh dis epprcMd .aac. ClCNlnJ plua II Will a CU Qw af CollcilD 8alioA Dl'IUDllp ~ a:ad Dc:riip CrifClria. Dil lDlY jndydg 11!1 jnpll•Mp pf rldilinDI' Cmli'81 gmppl 7 FM pgg dpnl •1hc ptw. No~ ii DGlldUld ill "'c ftQQdrsv .-fbr dip namaism stdlG _. u .... -lllR'IMll afw A PIM!f lQC!SOd fence @1111$ inAIJgl elpng Sbj• ""'*'¥ HM m .... 4jrpyt=p TK Owner 9Dd/Qr ~ lhlll-.re tbal all dilbamed arw aa: _,_ad 'Nlllbli.-.. al ~ occun prior lO maovaJ al any lilt feociq ar i..y-1-let u9Cd tar raapmuy mUliaD cmlfOI. The Owaes-aml/ar eo--.. UaU 111o illlurc elm Ill)' climQW .,... •im be RCllnlOCI to ial odpwl CCIGIUtiOn. plHIVWI ud llll&O. Tiie Owner Wl/ot Coaltaacsar lllaU be~ b' my duuao ~ litilee•t ~ qiy lll'IClll or ~ ._ TD heavy ndlaay udfor oquipma 11 Ml! u ..--. llihlliaa or ..,.Sinvmcadoa ~from die pcrmidc4 ~ k4J "* Jtlll~ to be pnWOCCCd by~ or• I*' m 1S landlalpG plu m•bc ~tw.I bdcn may~ ~chil pcnaiC cu 'blgiA. .hr~..,.,,,,,, Ooplcr JJ Q/lhc Codi P/OtdlnMt:U Q/IJM Cl& ofCaU.ti• SlvaOfl.......,.., -.JI be ,._ ro 111111n 11ra1 tkvu fi'olll C011S1111CUon. 1ronon, and :scdl111C11t"'101t MaJJ "°' b1 dttpcut•d ,,, c11y 8~ "'a:UlllfB "'"'MB' faclllnu. / lt«nby IJ'illlt dti.r JMnnil p tkJw~ Pf t.111 "1'f!Q uWM rJtc ~lal flood~ ~ .All ditwJai-at #1'111 h U. QCCOl'dQnu -wl,. tlM plMS Mil sp«:ijicaliOM nbMltud to ,..d fll'~ by tJw 00' ~ Ill dw -./oplMlrt Jl'R"lfdr oppli~tlliOll for Ill• abow nam~d po.Jea •d QJI f1f IM "'1du t:111d ~u ef* City Pf Collqs &arian lltai app&. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED : ___ _ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MINIMUM SUBMIITAL REQUIREMENTS $100.00 Development Permit Application Fee. __ Drainage and erosion control plan, with supporting Drainage Report two (2) copies each . __ Notice oflntent (N .O .I.) if disturbed area is greater than 5 acres. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 5 , 't 8 A-cres o ..... + o .- fZ 1~c:..k_o..vd. Co..r+~r L.eq 'j/;'\.Q_ voL.·'fbSft3 u / APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project): Name /t1 rk LJt7£v /s StreetAddress 4ooz A-sf!~ City B l""y~ · State fx Zip Code 77 80/ E-Mail Address 1'11 dq.v /~ (3 e:t{Rh&t f. ,l'le..f Phone Number 84-~ -7zoof1~~~Fax:Numb e r 84-t:, -7-Zt>O , ------------------- PROPER1Y OWNER'S INFORMATION : Name JM t/Jjhw~ 30 fJ,.y ·fneys/,'/o c/o Free/ //1a.,,-IJ ~ Street Address 1-S:oo I C qrfer uee/c... f'kw ¥-City -~S_r~Y'---¥{_.._ ______ _ State TX Zip Code 7 7 BC> I E-fvfail Address __ ' _________ _ PhoneNumber Zbb -//// FaxNumber ________________ _ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER 'S INFOR.iV1ATION : Name ;ti/)~ Street Address State TY. Phone Number Z 5 5 I A -/~" .s /fve S · City C,, /2:-e S /., f1 ._ Zip Code 7 7 8 4D E-Mail Address mi c..s e fe.A/e .f- ~ t.f 3 -S-3.S-7 Fax Number {;.9 3 -1 4-3 Application is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations : Re.c:.A~f i'oVl pe..v-r re v 1'o(/{ & 1 sw.h f411'Jf J I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, ____________ ,~as~iRs~r/owner , he re by acknowledge or affirm that: The information and conclu s io ns co ntain ed in th e above plans and s upporting documents comply with th e current requirements of the City of Coll ege Station , T ex as City Code, Cha pter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards . As a condition of approval of this pe m1it a pplica tion, I agree to co nstruct the improvements proposed in this application 1 CC rdl~/"" and th e r c q"i re m c n ts~h;c Ci ty Cod e. P ro pe rty Owner(s ~ Jtu1<1~ -contractor DEVELOPMENT PER M IT ~ (;1l>/.J l o f 2 DP ERM !T.DOC 3/24199 CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas .) A . I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. Engineer Date B. L certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended . Engineer Date C . I, J.J , B • f:>O\-rc/. et l Jr., P.€, certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying cap~city 1 of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements of the City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning encroachments of floodways and of floodway fringes . ~B,~k Engineer Date D . I, N. B . f3«v-.i e I/ Jr:; p. f: · , do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established m the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study . ~6.~i. ~bf!t~q~ Engineer IYate Conditions or comments as part of approval : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable cod es and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. DEVELOP MENT PERMIT DP ERMIT.DOC 3/24 /99 2 of2 ., 1f. I j f . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: ____ _ DEVEL OPMENT P ERMIT ML'HtV1UM SUBMIITAL REQUIREMENTS $100.00 Development Permit Application Fee. Drainage and erosion control plan, with supporting Drainage Report two (2) copies each. Notice oflntent (N.O.I.) if disturbed area is greater than 5 acres. ov..+ a LEGAL DESCRIPTION f<. i 'c../,,,. o. v d Co.. -r +~ r L-e C< ~ IN<_ vol..· ">'b s ft 3 ./ APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project): Name /W ;'fe-e-'D~v1 S StreetAddress 4ooz A-.s.pe.-YT City B/"vti#'J ~ ____ ___,,./'---'~---------State _.._/..._X_,_· __ Zip Code 7 7 8 O/ E-Mai l Address 1'11dgv1 .s G; ct (RJ, ~ i , ne. ! I c..~11 Phone Number 84-l:. -7 ZD0[771-Z~FaxNumber 8 4l:, -7ZDO I ------------------ PROPERTY OWNER'S fNFORl\1A TIO N: Name tm fUJ'hWCy..; 3 0 fJ~Yf-J1erS~1(? c;/o /Y~d /t1(;{r f/J/1 street Address 4 5 00 I Ccz,, +~v-Cre.c::.k_ Pk IA) r City ~B~r__,V,,__OVf/1~.__ _____ _ State l'f\ Z ip Code 7 7 Se>/ E-Mail Address __ ! ___________ _ Phone Number ZbD-//// Fax Number ________________ _ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFOR.i\IA TION: Name ft({)(:;. Street Address State Tx Phone Number '255 /A -/~45 A-ve S , City G///~ S lc. /-1 "e;r1 Zip Code 7 7 g 1D E-Mail Address /!'/ dj cs (E j1€../Ve f- ~ q 3 _. S-3 S-"<; Fax Number (29 3 -1z4-3 Application is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations: Re. c..-l ~W""-Cl. ,-c'\I\ · re v1'c c.1 & s '< b rn 1· J q./)J ACKNOWLEDGME N TS: I, ------------'~:rgiRs~r/owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and sup porting documents comply \\ith the current req uirements of the City ofColkge Station , Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards . As a c ondition of approval of th is pem1it application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application rding to ese docume ncs ~nd the req u i re m ~nts of Chapter l ~ o f the Coll ea tHion Ciry Code . ~ /(. Y>lt:! DI :• .E. c~· ,-,.T PE .~ t ... ·'-~ .• .::...... ·R :~· D f'f·:R .1.q ·~. J .;C 3 1 ~4 1 99 l Jt l CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.) A. I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is d~signated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the l 00 year storm. Engineer Date B . L certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential structure , proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended . Engineer Date C . I, °N. B. ~C\Y-q e_f { Jr .. P.€. certify that the alterations or deve lopment covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying cap~ciry1 of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements of the Ci ty of College Station City Code , Chapter 13 concerning enc roaclunents of floodways and of tloodway fringes . f/dtt;JB,~k Engineer Date D . I, J.l . 8 · Gttv-cle.f / Jr) p. C · , do certify that the proposed-alterations do not raise the le vel of the 100 year flood above elevation established tn the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Stud v . f/dt!y 6 fl4tt i . L._,_, ?!& { "1'{ . Engineer dfue Conditions or comments as part of approval : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinanc es of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that d ebris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilit ies . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named proj ec t. All of the applicable cod es and o rdinances of the City of Coll ege Station shall apply . DEVELOP~.!ENT PEP~\llT DP ER .\llT.DOC 112 4/99 2 of2 From: To: Date: Subject: "Duncan MacKenzie" <duncan@mail.bio .tamu.edu> "James "Jim" Manhart" <manhart@mail.bio.tamu.edu> 6/23/99 9:11AM Re: Gambusia affinis Hi Jim. Mosquitofish are pretty common. They have been introduced all over for mosquito control, and in some places (e .g ., California), they have gotten out of hand to the point that they may be threatening native populations of cyprinids and even frogs. I expect that many mosquito control districts have experience with them , although they probably have been indiscriminately introducing them. Some practical info could probably be obtained from county pest control offcies. I don't know anybody who is specifically working on them here or elsewhere. Perhaps the person to start with would be the fisheries extension person in WFSC, Michael Masser, at 5-7370. Alternatively, the fish population biologist over there is Kirk Winemiller (5-5777), who may also be a good source of info. Good luck. Duncan Duncan MacKenzie Dept. of Biology Texas A&M University duncan@mail.bio.tamu.edu (409) 845-7701 DATE December 8, 1997 December 11, 1997 December 15. 1997 December 23, 1997 June '97 May 13. 1998 May 13. 1998 May 29, 1998 July 13, 1998 July 14. 1998 July 15, 1998 August 10. 1998 o: \dev _ seIV\v\cctiny CHRONOLOGY OF CARTER CREEK TINY PROJECT (PHASE 1) Submittal of Reclamation Plans Fax from Mark Shavers to V .Morgan re: analysis of current development permit application submitted by Mike Davis. Letter to Mike Davis from Veronica Morgan denying development permit for itemized reasons. Letter from Wayne A. Lea, Department of Army to V. Morgan re: Project will not require Dept of Army authorization under the law. Pictures of Phase I Area Letter to North Bardell from Veronica Morgan regarding missing information from submittal . Submittal of information (see 5/29/98 letter) dated 3/13/98 & 2/17/98 . Letter from Veronica Morgan to Mike Davis re : review of data submitted February 17 , 1998 and May 13 , 1998 data needed complete submittal. EPAN.O.I. Letter from Rabon Metcalf to V . Morgan re: revisions made per 98 review. Site reclamation plan Letter from Municipal Development Group to Veronica Morgan -MDG's response to May 29 , 1998 . Review with hydraulic runs . September 2, 1998 September 16, 1998 September 29, 1998 September 30, 1998 October l, 1998 October 2, 1998 October 9, 1998 October 9, 1998 o:\dev _serv\v\cctiny Fax to Stan Walker (COE) requesting additional interpretation of 1993 NWS Map Letter from Rabon Metcalf (MDG) to Veronica Morgan referring to earlier December 23 , 1997 letter from COE discussing COE will not be involved in small (Phase 1) project. Fax to Stan Walker (COE) from V .Morgan re: concern with the small "POWHh Area" Fax from Stan Walker (COE) to V . Morgan re: interpretation of 1993 NWS map. Letter from Greg Taggart to V . Morgan re : 1993 NES interpretation with attachments 1. USGS Map -Bryan East 2. 1981 CS topo map# 113 3 . Category IA Survey Fax from Stan Walker (COE) to V . Morgan re : interpretation of 1993 NWS map . Memo from V . Morgan to N . Bardell re : review comments. Same memo alone but with Greg Taggart's response . .. \. LETTER OF TRANS MITT AL TO: V "fl-ctJ 1Us. . MUNICIPAL DEYELOPM.EJ.'IT GROUP !OJ HOLLEMAN DRIVE EAST COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 (4C9) 093.5359 (4-09) 6934243 Ei:c Attention FRO:M: Engineering Plamiing Surveying Job No . DATE: REASON: WE ARE SENDING YOU: 0 Attached 0 Under Separate Cover ,.;a---------the Following Items: 0 Samples 0 Prints 0 Shep Drawings 0 Copy cf Letter D S pecificarions D Change Order D ----------------- Cooies I Date I No. I I I I 0 I I I Tuu!IM Ft-n 6N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1RESE ~ "Ll..AJ.'l'SMIITED AS CHECKED BELOW : D For -~~oval [] for Y cur Use As ~ested 0 Approved as Submitted 0 Approved as Noted 0 Rerurned for Corrections D Fer ~evi ew & Comment 0 Description '· ?[Af/S 0 Resubmit __ Copies for Approval 0 Submit __ Copies for Distn'bution 0 Return Corrected Prints -------------------- 0 F0~3IDDUE ---------19 ---0 PRTh'TS RETURJ.~D AFTER LOAN TO US REI\'IARKS: copy TO: --------------SIGNED:(:st:;: r~ Mark S~avers ir (409)696-8601 (on notice) 11il11 .12 .97 <:9 12:08 Cl 1/3 1~~~"'1;f ~~1,~~iillll~--lii FROM :Mark Shauers ~ 400 Suffolk Av enue College Station, TX 7 7840 v oice: (409 )6 9~8601 fa x (upo n n o t ice): (4 09)6~8 601 alternate fax : (40 9)845-6443 TO : Ueronica Morgan, City of College FAX: 764-3496 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 3 Thursday, 11 December, 1 997 Ueronica: The enclosed document was emailed to you this morning. Please accept it in the spirit in which it is offered--to be helpful. Thank you. Mark Mark S!iavers 1r (409)696-8601 (on notice) ltiJ 11 . 12 . 97 <:9 12 :08 11 Dec 1997 Dear Mrs. Morgan: Please accept this analysis of the current development permit application submitted by Mike Davis and MCG. The Brazos Green way s Counc il has identified many reasons why the permit should be denied. Several of those reasons are listed below. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter, please call me at 696-8601 . Thank you for your consideration . Best regards, Mark Shavers Brazos Green way s Council m-shavers@tamu.edu Reasons for application denial : REASON 1 The developer has submitted a small component of the ultimate project design to rechannelize more than 1 mile of Carters Creek. This request for approval subverts the process of review that protects the community's interest in floodplain management as outlined in the City's current Comprehensive Plan by seeking to avoid proper regulatory review at the city, state, and federal levels. The development permit application should be denied on this basis, alone . REASON 2 The Drainage Policy and Design Standards of College Station's Stormwater Management Plan mandates cons ideratlon of the entl re "regulatory r eac h" along Carters Creek. This means that the applicant's project, the Carters Creek rechannelization project (CCRP) and the policy language in the current C Stn Comprehensive Plan must be considered: p.56, VII.D.l.c. Changes to channel sections are e ncouraged to be part of a masterplan for the modification off a complete length of a regulatory reach for the Primary System. Changes to short reaches of channel must demonstrate compatibility to similar modifications along the length of the regulatory reach. The CCRP development application has been denied. Even if the current application could be separated from the CCRP, problems with the current application require denial . REASON 3 College Station's Stormwater Management Plan is not the exclusive document regulating the entire CCRP. Even if it were, C Stn denied the CCRP this summer. Since then, a variance request wa s denied. Another variance request is being reviewed by the City of Bryan; Bryan's city staff recommends denial of that request . REASON 4 Under Section 5 .G(l) Special provisions of the Floodplain : Cl 2/3 • Mark ~havers 11' (409)696-8601 (on notice) 12'i111 .12 .97 Encroachment shall be prohibited, including fill, new construction ... or other development. The application deliberately misreports the character of the project . It incorrectly reports "only minor filling in the floodway fringe," when most of the project is inside the floodway. Conditional approval would not allevieate this condition . As discussed below, a variance can not be granted. REASON 5 Rise in the base flood elevation: <:9 12 :09 (Section 6.B(S)) No variance shall be allowed within any designated floodway if any increase in water surface elevation would occur during the base flood discharge. HEC2 Hydrological data submitted with the current application shows that prerequisites for granting of variances cannot be satisfied due to increases of up to 1.02 feet in the base flood discharge: REASON 6 Again, this development application should not be granted as it requires a variance, which in turn cannot be granted due to incomplete information provided by the applicant on the current and CCRP applications . (Ordinance 1728), Section 4.B(S): The Administrator must ... assure that adequate maintenance of drainage pathways, including altered or relocated waterways, is provided such that the capacity for carrying stormwater flows is maintained. Yet, The current application makes no allowance for future maintenance of the proposed silt ponds . With time, they will silt, and the flood capacity of the currently existing floodplain will be greatly diminished. No provision is made in this application for assurance that the ponds will be maintained by the ultimate landowner . CONCLUSION The application must be denied since there are no acceptable conditions for approval . Cl 3/3 COLLEGE STATION December 15, 1997 Mike Davis 4002Aspen Bryan, Texas 77801 P. 0 . Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue Tel : 409 764 3500 /.~~'-\ ;\ Re: Carter Creek Floodplain Reclamation at SH30 Dear Mike: College Station , TX 77842 The development permit application for the above project has been denied for the following reasons: Section XI. D. Final Drainage report and Drawings .. "The report shall include a cover letter presenting the proposed design for review and shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer licensed in Texas." The report has not been properly signed and sealed by a licensed professional engineer . Section 5.G. Special Provisions for Floodways / (1) "Encroachments shall be prohibited, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements or existing construction, structures, manufactured homes, or other development." • Without the location of the floodway shown on this property, we cannot ascertain whether any of this fill is in the floodway and the relationship to the floodplain. Section 4.D. Permit Procedures "Prior to the issuance of a development permit, the following requirements shall be met: (2) .... shall include one or more of the following: construction plans, drainage plan, erosion and sediment control plan .... and location of the foregoing in relation to Areas of Special Food Hazard ... " • The City will need additional construction type documents to assure construction in compliance with FEMA regulations regarding fill as well as the City's. The silt fencing shown on your plans does not seem to address migration of soil and sediment to the main channel. Home of Texas A&M University Section VII.D.3. Design Consideration a . Water Surface Profiles "Proposed changes in channel section or alignment shall not increase the existing or ultimate flood elevations as established within or upstream of the area of modification by the adopted Flood Study." • It appears from the analysis that you have a water surface elevation increase of more than one foot (l ')at cross sections 11.45 and 11.46. It is unclear because of the lack of text explaining the runs and the table, whether this rise is a difference between pre and post or post and floodway. Even if it is post and floodway, FEMA will not accept a run with this rise greater than one foot (1 '). Also there appears to be a rise in water surface elevation at other locations. There is currently flooding problems in the Windwood subdivision . This analysis should assure no increase in water surface elevation because of that existing problem. Section VII.D. Modification to Natural Watercourses 1. General "c. Changes to channel sections are encouraged to be part of a masterplan for the modification of a complete length of a regulatory reach of the Primary System. Changes to short reaches of channel must demonstrate compatibility to similar modifications along the length of the regulatory reach." Section 5.D. Methods of Reducing Flood Damage (12) "Require adequate maintenance of drainage facilities such that they retain their capacity for conveyance of stormwater flows." • This project is obviously a portion of your larger project scope, which to date has been denied by the City of College Station. Although we have and will permit fill in the floodplain given the appropriate analysis and review by other regulatory agencies, we have not as a rule allowed silt ponds to be constructed apparently within the floodway without showing a need . If this project is to stand independently of the larger project on it's own merits, it is unclear the reason for the silt ponds . The concern is the potential problems created by these ponds. Perhaps additional information on the ponds, their function, relationship to this immediate project, and maintenance thereof will be helpful to determine their need . General Questions/Concerns/Comments • Please provide text with your computer runs . It is very difficult to review a project of this magnitude without any text describing scope. Please explain the specific project scope, permits received or that will be applied for from all other regulatory agencies involved with the project. Address the functionality of the silt ponds (i .e. will they drain, hold water indefinitely, be manually drained between storm events), specific types of maintenance activities that will occur and the entity responsible for maintenance of the project. • Please show the cross sections used in the pre and post development runs, especially at cross sections 11.51, 11.70 and 11.85 . We need to ascertain the change in these cross sections between these two runs (i .e. if the silt ponds are providing any storage capacity in the runs and the extent of the fill in cross section). Also show on these cross sections the "n" values that you are using. • It appears that there may be a need for another cross section between 11.51 and 11. 70 to further delineate the extents of the proposed fill area. • It appears in the runs that the improved ''n" values are being used on both sides of the creek, when in reality only one side is being cleared and thinned. Also a lower "n" value appears to be used in the channel when there is no work being done within the channel banks. Please explain . • Please provide correspondence from the appropriate utility companies that have facilities within the large power line and gas easement and within which you are cutting up to 6 feet deep (6') for your ponds, hence removing cover from their lines. • Please show the City's existing 21" sewer line in the area, it needs to be field located . Will you be removing any cover from this line? If so, you may need to relocate the line to assure adequate cover. • Please define the acronyms used on your "Compiled HEC-2 Study Results" Table. It is difficult to ascertain what ''NCWSEL" and "FCWSEL" mean. We can only assume that it is ''NOW'' and "FUTURE" or perhaps "FLOODW AY" calculated water surface eleVations. Please provide a legend on that table so that the runs can accurately be evaluated. • Please provide an overall map showing where all cross sections are located. Remember that this project is independent of the overall and will be submitted to FEMA as such, therefore duplicating this information is critical. • Please show the existing floodway and floodplain lines as well as future floodway and floodplain lines. • Please remember that this permit and it's associated fill must receive a LOMR from FEMA. Once you have addressed the above concerns, please submit the appropriate FEMA paperwork and fees for their review . If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. " . DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FORT "' WORTH DISTRICT , CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1 , ,,..JJ\. P . 0 . BOX 17300 "'\'' ' FORT WORTH , TEXAS 76102 -0300 e_G ~\.Q, ~ R EPLY TO ATTENTION OF Environm e ntal Divis ion Regulatory Branch December 23 , 1997 ~ SUBJECT : Project Number 198600970 M s. Veronica Morgan P .O . Bo x 9960 City of College Station Development Services Department College Station , Texas 77842 Dear M s. Morgan : Please reference your letter of December 4 , 1997 , and our discussions with M r . Gregory Tag gart co ncernin g a Reclam ation and Erosion Control Plan dated Novem ber, 1997 , for a 27.32 acre tract near Carters Creek in the city of Bryan , Brazos County , Texas. This project ha s bee n assigned Project Number 198600970. Please continue to use this project number in any future correspondence. We have reviewed this project in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Under Section 404 , the U.S. Army Corp s of Engineers (USACE) regulates the discharge of dredged and fill material into waters of th e United States, including wetlands . The USACE responsibility under Section 10 is to regulate any work in , or affecting , navigable waters of the United States. Based on your description of the proposed work , other information available to us , and current regulations and policy , we have determined that this work will not involve any of the above activities. Therefore, it will not require Department of the Army authorization under the above laws. The permittee has suspended work within waters of the United States , including wetland s, under Project Number 198600970 , and may reapply for a new permit at a later date . The head water determination for this area is still in effect. • -2- Thank you for your interest in our nation's water resources. If you have any questions concerning our regulatory program , please contact Mr. Stan Walker at the address above or telephone (817)978-3551. Copy Furnished: Mr. Gregory K. Taggart Municipal Development Group 203 East Holleman Drive College Station , TX 77840 Sincerely , jJ~ Wayne A. Lea Chief, Regulatory Branch (~ ~~w[~woJ.h-~ .. v .. 1/t-o~g .f ~ ~ ~ l!Slr ~ r&y ~ Wo(LU, et-..... Municipal Development Group 2551A Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77840 Attn: North Bardell March 13 , 1998 Re : Carter Creek Relocation Project -(SH 30 vicinity) Dear North: This letter is a follow-up to our telephone conversation regarding the above referenced project. As discussed in our telephone conversation, the City of College Station cannot complete the review of the above project. This is due to items missing from the submittal, namely : 1. Construction documents for the overflow and discharge piping associated with the ponds 2 . Information regarding the maintenance of the ponds (i .e . who will maintain, proposed maintenance schedules and type of maintenance to be performed) Once these are submitted, we will complete the review of the project. It is my understanding, per our conversation, that you will be discussing the above with Mike Davis. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Veronica J .B . Morgan, P .E . Asst. City Engineer cc:Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services Paul Kaspar, Graduate Engineer Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Mike Davis Linda Huff, City of Bryan Development Permit file March 13, 1998 Veronica Morgan BIGJIWAY 30 PARTBERSBXP 4500 CARTER CREEK PARXWAY #105 BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 409-260-1111 City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842-9960 RE: Maintenance of ponds (excavated area) in flood plain at SHJO Dear Ms . Mo r gan: This will serve to define that the owner of the land containi ng t h e ponds will be responsible for maintaining the banks of the ponds in the event of washout and other general maintenance of the ponds as allowed under the 404 mitigation designation. We are the current owners of the land, and we do accept this responsibility which shall pass as customary with the ownership of the land . Since the ponds are depressions in the ground and will have bermuda grass banks t o prevent erosion, we anticipate very little mainten anc e . ed A. Martin ing Partner 260 .00 ' El evation Mesh 1" x 1 " Screen . .J .-' ,,.-~-,. We l d ed @ Each Wire End 2" Below Level ,c-· ,i ,. ,· _.,.,. .. ~ / .I i .. ./ ( •' I . . - .......... ! l ~-' .: , ... -~-· , ... •··· :-·POND .__,. / ,.-,-· ;.-... ··· ) .J Proposed 18" Equalizer Pipe @ 0% Grade A DRAWi NC OF A POND DRAIN Perforated Pipe With End Cop 1 :4 Slope Up to 4' Gross Slope 1' Min. to Existing J0 C.O.C.S . Son. Sewer 12" Cone. Post with Steel Strop £ to 4' Bury _W 1: 1 SI pY'. Woter Level ' A OF A POND S.IPHON MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP 2551 Texas Ave. South Ste . A• College Station, Texas 77 840 • 409-693-5359 •FAX: 409-693-4243 •EMAIL: mdgcs@gte.net Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants February 16, 1998 Veronica J.B. Morgan Assistant City Engineer City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842-9960 Re: Carter Creek Flood Plain Work at SH 30 Veronica: This will serve as a cover letter for the resubmittal of the referenced project. We have attempted to address all the concerns expressed in your letter of December 15, 1997. A . Copy of HEC -2 for immediate area -please note that the actual increase in ele vation of the floodway at River Mile Cross-Sections 11.45 and 11.4 7 are over 1' in these TCB Data Runs which are the very basis of the FEMA Floodway Study. B . HEC-2 duplicate floodway run -using all Corps (FEMA) data. C. HEC-2 duplicate floodway run adding cross-sections at River Miles 11.51, 11 . 70 and 11.85 -note these runs are added to allow us to adequately describe the actual floodway at points where Carter Creek approaches the intended floodway fringe fill -these runs are not intended to change any original floodway elevations. The n values used in all cases are the same n values as used in the Corps report between Sections 11.47 and 11.88 of the original study. The cross-section data for the new cross-sections was taken from the 1994 College Station aerial topography mapping. Included with these actual runs is an overlay at 1" = 500' of the project with above determined floodway laid over the existing firm map for your direct comparison. All fill is outside the floodway points indicated in this floodway run and only the northeast comer of the proposed fill comes close to the indicated floodway -we will move this point if you so desire. D . A composite data sheet showing the relevant data is taken from the HEC runs indicated above is included in the report with the standard FEMA acronyms defined on said sheet. Veronica J.B. Morgan Page 2 February 16, I 998 E . We emphasize that only floodway fringe fill is being done and no fill is going to take place in the floodway -excavation in the floodway is standard under FEMA rules, and in this case serves several purposes: 1. The major economic benefit is that the excavation provides the dirt that a. the owner needs to fill his flood plain outside the floodway at costs far less than hauled off-site dirt b. is composed of much more uniform topsoil quality soil types for regenerating the vegetation on the ground. 2. After excavation by keeping the depressions approximately 1/2 full , the water surface area will help lower and maintain the n values within the floodway to values near those used by the Corps and FEMA as no maintenance is required in the 3' to 4' depths to avoid vegetative growth that would restrict the flow over that top of the depressions in major storm events. 3 . The top 3' to 4' of stored water in the excavated depressions that is to be slowly drained off to the creek after each storm by internal piping can be used to help store the overflow water north of Highway 30 that comes from the Plantation Oaks area in events less than the annual flood on Carter Creek. 4. During construction, the depressions created by the excavation will keep all construction silt on-site during all normal rainfall events. 5. The ponds will serve for wetlands mitigation with adjoining hardwood areas for dedication to the Corps of Engineers and will be perpetually dedicated as such. 6. The ponds with adjoining hardwoods will become an environmental amenity to the community and help to form a greenbelt around Carter Creek watershed. F . The floodway line, as determined in C. above, has been drawn on the construction drawing, in addition to the 8-1/2" x 11" sheet attached to the report. G. All new cross-sections (being 11.51, 11.70 and 11.85) in C. and D. above are included. 000653 -c .13-22(2917) Veronica J.B . Morgan Page 3 February 16, 1998 H. We will not be asking for a LOMR as no changes in flood plain (floodway) elevations and no channel improvements are being requested; however, after completion (with proper compaction), we will be requesting a LOMA on the compacted fill and as such when the site is surveyed for topography by a surveyor we will show the new flood plain lines on the LOMA, the floodway line will not be changed. I. We will not be removing any cover over any pipe lines, including the City of College Station sewer lines and Old Humble pipe lines -all such lines will be field located and staked during construction to make sure of that fact. J. All cross-sections, except the three discussed in G. above, are the original Corps cross- sections, and only the closest ones to the project on both sides of the project are shown on the attached overview drawings in the report. Sincerely, ~f+k&2/ North Bardell, P . E. C.E.O. NB/kw 000653-c .13-22(2917) SITE DESCRIPTION SHOWING AR EAS TO BE CLEARED, THINNED, FILLED, OR EXCAVATED, WITH PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHY AND FLOW DIRECTIONS ,-.. ' ··~"" \ \..~, ~ ·, f°' \ ·~ \'\ .:.~\ '-· \ \ , CINEMARK THEATER SAM'S CLUB a. n1C. CON1 7. niC CON l $0000 ~ This r eport is for a development permit for fill in the area outside of the floodway . T here are no channel modifications to be performed . Only clearing, excavation, and planting of grass (no fill) are to be performed in the floodway . Discussion of hec2 runs . Included 1.) a partial copy of the original TCB floodway run for the area in question Note that the surcharge at sections 11.45 and 11.46 are above 1.00 feet in these the defining runs for the floodway . Surcharges are normally rounded to the nearest 0 .1 foot . 2 .) a duplicate effective run of the above data on a separate computer for companson. 3 . )Run number two with three cross sections added between 11 . 4 7 and 11. 88-- being 11.51 , 11.70, and 11.88--using College Station Topography data and the original n values (averaged to .072 on the east side of Carter creek)-- This run is done to give a more precise answer for the floodway boundaries between 11.47 and 11 .88, particularly where the creek gets close to a fill boundary. Plots for section 11.51, 11.70, and 11.85 are included (the only cross sections that are different). 4 .) Run number three with the fill in the floodway fringe indicated in cross sections 11.51 , 11.70, and 11.85 to indicate how much the changes modified the existing 100 year flood elevation.--This is a requested run and is not intended to change any FEMA data and does not change the location of the floodway . Note from the compiled hec2 study results that this run indicates an increase in the 100 year elevation at II . 70 , 11. 85 and 11.88 of .01 , .00, and .05 feet respectively---far below the allowed .5 foot elevation rise allowed for filling one side of a floodway and also not e that the excavation from the floodway has lowered the anticipated maximum flood way elevations by . 04 , .10 and . 08 feet respectively . Plots of cross sections 11.51 , 11. 70 , and 11.85 are included showing fill . Please note that the attached floodway map with the property overlaid , which is normally used t o int erpret where fringe fill may occur, shows that all fill is located outside the flood w ay by a considerable distance except at t he northeast comer of the fill where t he fill line approaches the floodway line--for this reason the runs were included to show that at sect ion 11.85 (the NE comer of the fill) the fill as indicated does not encroach on the floodway . If you are not comfortable with this we will move the fill location farther back from the floodway at this point. There is no LOMR. required as there are no channel improvements and no change in flood plain elevation or floodway location is being requested. Upon completion with proper compaction and a topography survey showing the existing floodway line and new floodplain line , the owner will ask for a LOMA. There will not be any cover removed from any pipe line--including the City of College Station sewer line and old Humble pipe lines. All such lines will be field located and staked during construction to assure that fact. The floodway line has been added to the construction drawings. The silt fence has been placed, according to the site topography, at the low points where any water might leave the site during any normal rainfall. The floodway excavation which is normally allowed under FEMA rules serves several purposes . A) The major economic benefit is that the excavation provides the dirt that the owner needs to fill his floodplain outside the floodway at costs far less than dirt hauled from other sites. B) This fill dirt is composed of a uniform topsoil quality soil that is ideal for the fill and for regenerating the vegetation on the fill area. C) By keeping the depressions formed by the excavation with a standing water level, there will be an area formed of a low n value which will be naturally maintained since most vegetation that would restrict the flow of water over the top of the depression during major storm events will not grow in the standing water. D) The top part of the depression is to be drained off slowly after each storm by internal piping and will be used to help store the overflow water from the site and part of the water that can flow N of Highway 30 from the Plantation Oaks area in events less than the annual flood on Carter Creek. E) During construction the depressions created by the excavation will keep basically all the construction silt onsite. F) The depressions will serve for wetlands mitigation and will be perpetually dedicated to the CORPS of Engineers along with the adjoining hardwood areas for that purpose . G) The ponds with adjoining hardwoods will become a natural environmental amenity to the community and will help to form a greenbelt along the Carter Creek Watershed . 'f?u...µs Are. For S~Ta.. -:C1.1~ .. ,,,..14-Y.1~ o,,;l'J /l/o-t-"X N-f'I. w ~e.J io cf,. .,,._,.,,Q.... FE /YI A-It/,,. i... bQ..I' l" COMPILED HEC 2 STUDY RESULTS P'R E. EFFECTIVE DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE CS TOPO--ADDED CROSS SECTS. SECNO NCWSEL FCWSEL SURC. NCWSEL FCWSEL SURC . NCWSEL FCWSEL SURC . 10 .11 245 .6 246 .4 0 .8 245.6 246.4 0 .8 245.6 246.4 0 .8 10 .93 251.06 251.87 0 .81 251.07 251.87 0.8 251.07 251.87 0 .8 11.45 254 .67 255 .69 1.02 254.67 255.69 1.02 254.67 255.69 1.02 11.46 254.72 255.74 1.02 254.72 255.75 1.03 254.72 255.75 1.03 11.465 255.19 255 .97 0 .78 255 .19 255.97 0.78 11.47 255 .22 256 .01 0 .79 255 .22 256 .01 0 .79 255 .22 256.01 0 .79 11.51 255 .34 256 .18 0 .84 11.7 255 .89 256 .87 0 .98 11.85 256 .63 257.61 0.98 11.88 256 .94 257 .92 0 .98 256 .94 257 .93 0 .99 256 .94 257 .93 0.99 11.24 259.26 260 .05 0.79 259.26 260.06 0.8 259 .25 260 .06 0.81 L< SE 0 F6/t S I TE f looJ iu "'i L 0 c. c.··h".,,.. Pbsl REVISED/PROJECT NCWSEL FCWSEL SURC . 245.6 246 .4 0.8 251.07 251.87 0.8 254.67 255 .69 1.02 254.72 255.75 1.03 255.19 255 .97 0.78 255 .22 256 .01 0 .79 255 .34 256.18 0 .84 255.9 256.83 0.94 256 .63 257 .51 0.74 256 .99 257.85 0 .86 259.26 260.05 0 .79 c $ .. f+., A4+c.,,.. uf u-;,o lJ. F / / { . IV f=-luuP P/t4•rJ .._.,.,..,J.~ P: /o•J>tJA'J No14 S ... Ac.t -.r,.,c;,u<L . tw too 1" FlooQ C.lc. ... 4'-1.- ,.,~ 'Ii ,.. 4-IJ £k.c ~" S& cio; !t,,,-1-ic.,;#u~ . FJ11olwA..f ~ill £1,,J,._'f,,.I'"'' ...,,......_ S'A.-a F-foul'"'') "'~ ,. "'"" NCWSEL IS THE NATURAL I 00 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATION AND FCWSEL IS THE ENCHROACHMENT (FLOODW A Y) WATER SURFACE ELEV A TION AND SURC . IS THE SURCHARGE DUPLICATE RUN USING TCB DATA----NOTE ELEVATIONS EHTER.EP AT 11.46S TO HATCH TCB BUN--ACTUAL RUNS COME IN WITH LOWE!<. ELEVATIONS THIS RUN USED ONLY TO TEST COMPUTER RUNS OF DATA.--REQUIRED IN FEMA STUDIES 1******************************************** * HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES * * * Version * 4 .6.0; February 1991 * * * * RUN DATE OSFEB9B TIME 13:36:40 * •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ************************************* HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Vera ion 4.6.0; February 1991 ************************************* x x x x x x x x x x x x Tl CARTERS CREEJC FROM RIVER MILE 10.11 TO 12.24 T2 highway 30 partnerahip DUPLICATE HEC2---FEMA (TCB) T3 100--FLOODWAY COMPARISON- J1 I CHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT 0 6 0 0 0 J2 NPROF I PLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH 1 0 -1 0 0 J3 VARIABLE CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT 3B 43 1 7 26 200 XJOOOOOC xxxxx x x x x x >OOOC x x x x x x XJOOOOOC xxxxx 100 YR FREQUENCY INPUT METRIC HVINS Q 0 -1 0 FN ALLDC IBW 0 0 0 10 34 JS LPRNT NUMSEC ********REQUESTED SECTION NUMBERS******** -10 -10 NC .OBS .01S .060 .1 .3 QT 9 7BBO 14050 17290 19740 22420 37960 NH 5 .07 313B .065 31B9 .OBO 3360 NH 4BOO ET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Xl 10.11 49 313B 31B9 24BO 2560 279B GR 263.1 1000 251.6 1200 24B .6 1255 247.2 GR 243.9 1500 243 1600 241.B 1700 240 .B GR 239 .B 2000 239 .S 2100 239 .7 2200 239 .9 GR 239 .9 2SOO 240 .l 2600 240 .2 2700 240 .l GR 240.4 3000 242 .l 3100 242 .7 313B 23S .B Dr·98dup.out xxxxx x x x x xxxxx x xxxxxxx *************************************** * U .S . ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * * 609 SECOND STREET, SUITED * * DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 9S616-46B7 * * (916) 7S6 -1104 * • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• THIS RUN EXECUTED OSFEB9B 13:36 :41 WSEL FQ 24S.60 0 CHNIM ITRACS 0 0 SB 3 46 22420 22420 22420 .07 33B5 .OB5 9 .1 1B50 3300 1300 245 .4 1400 1BOO 240 .5 1900 2300 239.9 2400 2BOO 240.3 2900 314B 229.7 3154 GR GR GR GR GR QT NH NH ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR NC ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR ET Xl X3 SB ET Xl X2 XS BT BT BT BT 229.6 242 241.3 253.7 255.9 9 5 5890 0 10.93 270.l 265.7 260.6 236 246.7 24!1.6 245.5 245.6 252.5 2!19.5 263.7 266.4 268 .085 0 11.45 272.3 262.9 265.5 245 246.9 249.4 250.4 247.7 2!13 260 0 11.46 10.0 1.25 0 11. 465 0 8 13 1900 256.l Or-98dup.out 3170 3360 3500 4000 4500 7800 .075 0 65 1000 1400 1800 2021 2200 2600 3051 3200 3700 4100 4500 !1000 !1500 .080 0 48 800 1300 2100 2929 3250 3290 3400 4100 4880 !1700 0 0 0 l.30 0 0 0 2!12.5 800 263.8 !1100 233.8 239.2 241.8 253.8 258.6 13800 2010 0 2000 269.5 264.3 253.9 236.5 246 24!1.2 241 24!1.8 2!1!1.!I 261.2 264.4 266.l 268.3 .065 0 2900 258.!I 266.7 268.l 24!1 241. 6 249 248.6 248.9 253.8 261.l 0 0 0 2. !I 0 0 1 2!13.8!1 272 3500 257.7 3172 3363 3600 4100 4600 16900 .06 0 2050 1100 1500 1900 2027 2300 2700 3053 3300 3800 4200 4600 5100 5600 .3 0 3347 114!1 1600 2200 2967 3259 3300 3600 4300 !1000 !1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 2!14.40 2200 254.l 242.3 239.3 245.1 253 260.6 19250 2050 0 3920 269.1 263.7 249.4 237.8 246.2 245.2 239.3 246.4 2!17.6 261.7 266.7 266.4 269 .5 0 2700 2!13.8 264.2 266.!I 249.1 240.9 249.9 250.2 251.8 257.7 268.4 0 50 0 21.0 0 25 250.9 254.78 1400 268.8 5900 3189 3380 3700 4200 4700 21800 .08 0 3840 1200 1600 1975 2035 2325 2800 3074 3400 3900 4300 4700 5200 5700 0 2700 1162 1800 2400 3000 3268 3325 3700 4800 5100 6200 0 50 0 7.70 0 25 0 255.19 264.9 3800 261.l 242.SI 241.7 249.3 254.5 263.2 36830 30!11 0 4330 268.9 267 248.9 247.4 246.l 245 241.2 247.l 258.7 263.3 266.4 266.8 269.9 0 2700 253.6 257.8 247.2 251.6 238.9 251 249 254 260.4 0 50 0 1122 0 25 0 257.07 2400 250.9 3200 338!1 3800 4300 4800 21800 .065 9.1 0 1237 1700 2000 2050 2400 2900 3111 3!100 4000 4360 4800 5300 5800 9.1 1200 1878 2800 3226 3275 3347 3760 4830 5400 9.1 1.00 248 3.70 9.1 0 0 255.97 1600 266.5 6200 241.3 241.6 252.5 254.8 21800 3113 2000 0 267.3 266 247.8 247.l 246.9 245.5 245 249.3 258.7 262.7 266.5 267.6 271.3 2900 2!19.0 263.8 248.4 2!10.!I 238.9 2!11. 9 250.11 247.9 260.9 2900 250.9 0 2900 0 0 255.97 266.7 4400 268.4 3300 3400 3900 4400 21800 .08!1 3170 0 1300 1740 2010 2100 2500 3000 3113 3600 4007 4400 4900 5400 5890 4300 1240 1900 2900 3241 3277 3349 3800 4850 5600 4300 0 0 0 4300 0 0 2600 251.2 NC ET Xl NH .075 0 ll .47 5 NH 4300 ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR NH 0 ll. 880 275.l 268.l 252.0 251.2 251.3 251.2 253.6 242.4 252.3 269.8 5 NH 3421 ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR 0 12.24 265.6 254.3 254.5 254.4 254.3 247.9 259 .OB 0 0 .070 0 47 1000 1500 2000 2500 2908 3000 3400 3433 3700 4200 .075 0 35 1000 1400 1900 2400 2538 2835 3100 .06 0 3241 2908 0 3400 273.4 263.0 251.7 251.2 247.3 251.8 253.8 244. 7 253.5 274.8 2509 0 2800 257.7 254.8 254.2 254.4 255.7 247.9 259.9 Tl CARTER CREEJC-100 Y:&AR FLOODWAY T2 JV T3 CARTER CREEJC-100 YE.AR FLOODWAY Jl ICHECJt 0 J2 NPROP 2 Dr·91!dup.out INQ 8 I PLOT NINV PRFVS -l IDIR XSECV .l 0 3300 .060 0 3454 1100 1600 2100 2600 2920 3100 3409 3439 3800 4300 .065 0 2867 1038 1500 2000 2500 2600 2849 3200 STRT XSECH .3 0 50 2944 0 2000 271.4 258.2 251.4 251.3 246.l 251.7 244.9 253.5 255.7 2538 0 1800 255.9 254.6 254.l 253.8 256 256.7 263.3 0 50 .075 0 2000 1200 1700 2200 2700 2929 3200 3420 3454 3900 .075 0 1900 1100 1600 2100 2509 2700 2867 3300 METRIC HVINS -l FN ALI.DC Q 0 50 3409 0 2165 269.3 252.5 251.4 251.l 247.3 252.2 243.3 253.6 258.8 2820 0 1900 255.9 254.5 254.l 251.3 256 257.5 269.9 IBW WSEL 246.40 CHNIH 9.l l .065 9.l 1300 1800 2300 2800 2938 3300 3425 3500 4000 .06 9.l l 1200 1700 2200 2515 2800 2900 3400 FQ 2900 .2 3454 2010 268.7 251.9 251.2 251.4 251.5 252.l 242.3 252.2 264.2 2867 1450 -.2 254.3 255.3 254.4 251.3 255.l 258.9 270.l I TRACE 4300 0 .075 3545 1400 1900 2400 2900 2944 3325 3430 3600 4100 .075 2867 0 1300 1800 2300 2527 2820 3000 3421 THIS RUN EXECUTED OSFEB98 13:36:41 ************************************* HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Vera ion 4.6 .0 ; February 1991 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• NOTB-ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OP CROSS-SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OP BRRORS LIST 100 YEAR --100 YEAR FLOODWAY COMPARISON- SUMMARY PRINTOUT SECNO Q CWSEL VOL VCH HV .OlK KRATIO EG QWBIR 10 .110 22420.00 24S.60 .oo 3 .39 .08 6617.81 .00 24S .68 .oo 10 .110 22420.00 246 .40 .00 3.SS .10 6612.01 .00 246 .SO .oo 10.!130 21800.00 2Sl .07 864.80 4 .30 .11 Sl!l0.31 .78 2Sl.18 .oo 10.!130 21800 .00 2Sl.87 745.0!l 4 .47 .14 Sl!l6.47 . 7!l 2S2.0l .00 11 . 4SO 21800 .00 2S4 .67 1494.SO 2 .38 .06 6860 .67 1.32 2S4 .73 .00 11 . 4SO 21800 .00 2SS .69 1264.89 2 .76 .09 6502.43 1 .25 255.78 .00 11.460 21800 .00 254 .72 1S08 .0l 2 .36 .06 6987 .90 1.02 2S4 .77 .oo 11 .460 21800 .00 255 .7S 127S.S6 2 .74 .09 6604 .78 1.02 2S5 .83 .00 • 11.465 21800.00 2SS .l!l 1S15.14 2 .lS .OS 8036.84 1.lS 2SS .24 .oo • 11 .465 21800.00 255.!17 1281.01 2 .6S .08 6961 .73 1 .os 2S6 .05 .00 11.470 21800.00 2S5.22 1S2!l.81 2 .32 .OS 7!160 .13 .9!l 25S .28 .00 11. 470 21800.00 2S6.0l 12!11.96 2 .84 .O!l 6940.51 1.00 2S6.10 .oo 11 .880 21800 .00 256 .94 2078.02 2 .96 .06 7011. 87 .88 2S7 .00 .oo 11 .880 21800.00 257 .93 1744.47 3 .00 .08 7361 .80 1.06 258 .00 .oo 12.240 21800.00 2S9.26 2493.62 3 .91 .10 SllS.92 .73 2S9 .36 .oo 12.240 21800.00 260.06 211!1.37 3 .62 .12 S243.27 • 71 260 .18 .00 SUMMARY OP ERRORS AND SPBCIAL NOTES NOTB SECNO-11.465 PROFILE-1 WSEL BASED ON XS CARD CAUTION SECNO-11.465 PROFILE• 1 HYDRAULIC JUMP D .S . NOTE SECNO-ll.46S PROFILE• 2 WSEL BASED ON XS CARD CAUTION SECNO-ll .46S PROFILE• 2 HYDRAULIC JUMP D .S . Dr-98dup .ou t FLOODWAY DATA , 100 YEAR--100 YEAR FLOODWAY COMPARISON- PROFILE NO . 2 -------FLOOD WAY -------WATER SURFACE ELEVATION STATION WIDTH SECTION MEAN WITH WITHOUT DIFFERENCE ARXA VELOCITY FLOOD WAY FLOODWAY 10.110 1450 . 9078. 2.5 246 .4 245.6 .8 10 .930 1170. 7521. 2 .9 251.9 251.1 .8 11 .450 1400. 9251. 2.4 255 .7 254.7 1.0 11 .460 1400. 9340. 2.3 255.7 254 .7 1 .0 11 .465 1400 . 9644 . 2.3 256 .0 255 .2 .8 11.470 1400 . 9436 . 2.3 256.0 255.2 .8 11 . 880 1535. 9965 . 2.2 257.9 256.9 1 .0 12 .240 1417. 8097 . 2.7 260.1 259 .3 .8 Dr-98dup .out ! J I J I J 1 in Horiz . = 400 ft 1 in Vert . = 16 ft ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -------- ---- ---- ~ ~---- "" ~ ~ '" ' "" ~ -./'--.... ______..... u o. .... Rw SU • 11 IS CARTER CREEK PROfU:S I _____. -_-J -/ ~ ~ ~ .. . /' ~J /----v v w .. / / -~ ..--- g c 0 ~ Ui Dr-pre Riv Sta= 11.85 CARTER CREEK PROFILES 260------------------------------------------------------------------------255---~__.,~~~~-+-~~~~~~1--~~~~~-+-~~~~~~-+-~~--+-~~--2so-1-~~~~~~-+-~~~~-'IF'--~1--~~---''<---+--+-~~~---1-1-~-+-~~~~~--t 245---~~~~~~-+-~~~~~~1--~~~~~-t-~~~~t--t-~-+-~~~~~--240_..--..-......... --..--+-...... --..-......... --P.....-...... --..-....... --..-............ ,......p.. ...... --..-... ....,. ...... 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Station (ft) -Ground • Bank Sta Dr-pre Riv Sta= 11.7 CARTER CREEK PROFILES ~---------.072 ---------~ 0 I--.075 ___, 260----------------------------------------------------____ _,, ____________ _,. 6 • 5 Ground • Bank Sta g 250 c 0 :;:; 111 a; ijj 245 235_.,--,.....,.. ..... --.......... --..... """" ...... --.,...-+-~--..-..... --................ --......... --..... -+-...... --....-..,.. ........... 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Station (ft) g c: .Q -ro ~ w Dr-pre Riv Sta= 11.51 CARTER CREEK PROFILES .072 ----~ 260 0 .075 ---------~ 6 5 255--t----+-------+--------1---------+-------+---------if-I 250 245 240--t--------t-----tlt9--t--------+-------t---------t 0 500 1000 1500 2000 235-r-i--i--.,..-.,..-:t~_,.._,.._,..-+~~--...--...-+......,.......,.......,.......,.~~~r--r--__J 2500 Station (ft) -Ground • Bank Sta RUN USING CORPS DATA (TCB STUDY) WITH 3 NEW CROSS SECTIONS ADDED TO CHECK ACTUAL LOCATION OF FLOODWAY AT SECTIONS BETWEEN CORPS CROSS SECTIONS. THIS RUN IS NOT MADE TO CHANGE ANY FEMA DATA 1••·········································· * HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES * • • Version • * RUN DATE 4 .6 .0 ; February 1991 11FBB98 TIKK 14:45:22 • • • • ******************************************** ************************************* HJl:C-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Ver•ion 4.6 .0; February 1991 ************************************* x x x >OOOOOOC x x xxxxx x x x x >OOOOOOC x xxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x >OOOOOOC xxxxx Tl CARTERS FROM RIVER HILB 10.11 TO 12 .24 100 YR FREQUENCY T2 highway 30 partner•hip exi•ting topoqraphy xxxxx x x x xxxxx x x >OOOOOOC ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * 609 SECOND STREET, SUITED * DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616-4687 * (916) 756-1104 • • • • *************************************** T3 100 YEAR --100 YEAR FLOODWAY COMPARISON-FLOODWAY DETERMINED NEW CROSS SECTIONS 11.51--11 .70--11 .8!5 Jl I CHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSEL FQ 0 6 0 0 0 0 -1 0 24!5 .60 0 J2 NPROF I PLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECB FN ALLDC IBW CBNIM I TRACE 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J3 VARI AB LB CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT 38 43 1 7 26 10 34 58 3 46 200 JS LPRNT NUMSEC ********REQUESTED SECTION NUMBERS******** -10 -10 NC .08!5 .07!5 .060 .1 .3 QT 9 7880 14050 17290 19740 2 242 0 3 7 960 22420 22420 22420 NB 5 .07 3138 .065 3189 .OB O 336 0 .07 3385 .OBS NB 4800 ET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 .1 1 850 3300 Dr-98 prc.out Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR QT NH 10.11 263.1 243.9 239.8 239.9 240.4 229.6 242 241.3 253.7 255.9 9 5 NH 5890 ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR NC ET Xl 0 10.93 270.1 265.7 260.6 236 246.7 245.6 245.5 245.6 252.S 259.5 263.7 266.4 268 .085 0 11.45 GR 272.3 GR 262.9 GR 265.5 GR 245 GR 246.9 GR 249.4 GR 250.4 GR 247.7 GR 2.53 GR 260 ET 0 Xl 11.46 X3 10.0 SB 1.25 ET 0 Xl 11. 465 X2 0 X.5 8 BT 13 Dr-98prc.out 0 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3170 3360 3500 4000 4500 7800 .075 0 65 1000 1400 1800 2021 2200 2600 3051 3200 3700 4100 4500 5000 .5500 .oeo 0 48 800 1300 2100 2929 3250 3290 3400 4100 4880 .5700 0 0 0 1.30 0 0 0 252.5 800 3138 251.6 243 239.5 240.1 242.1 233.8 239.2 241.8 253.8 258.6 13800 2010 0 2000 269.5 264.3 253.9 236.5 246 245.2 241 245.8 255.5 261.2 264.4 266.1 268.3 .065 0 2900 258.5 266.7 268.l 245 241. 6 249 248.6 248.9 253.8 261.1 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 1 253.85 272 3189 1200 1600 2100 2600 3100 3172 3363 3600 4100 4600 16900 .06 0 2050 1100 1500 1900 2027 2300 2700 3053 3300 3800 4200 4600 5100 5600 .3 0 3347 1145 1600 2200 2967 3259 3300 3600 4300 5000 5900 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 254.40 2480 248.6 241.8 239.7 240.2 242.7 242.3 239.3 245.1 253 260.6 19250 2050 0 3920 269.1 263.7 249.4 237.8 246.2 245.2 239.3 246.4 257.6 261.7 266.7 266.4 269 .5 0 2700 253.8 264.2 266.5 249.1 240.9 249.9 250.2 251.8 257.7 268.4 0 50 0 21.0 0 25 250.9 254.78 1400 2560 1255 1700 2200 2700 3138 3189 3380 3700 4200 4700 21800 .08 0 3840 1200 1600 1975 2035 2325 2800 3074 3400 3900 4300 4700 5200 5700 0 2700 1162 1800 2400 3000 3268 3325 3700 4800 5100 6200 0 so 0 7.70 0 25 0 255.19 264.9 2798 247.2 240.8 239.9 240.1 235.8 242.9 241. 7 249.3 254.5 263.2 36830 3051 0 4330 268.9 267 248.9 247.4 246.l 245 241.2 247.1 258.7 263.3 266.4 266.8 269.9 0 2700 253.6 257.8 247.2 251.6 238.9 251 20 254 260.4 0 50 0 1122 0 25 0 257.07 1300 1800 2300 2800 3148 3200 3385 3800 4300 4800 21800 .065 9.1 0 1237 1700 2000 2050 2400 2900 3111 3500 4000 4360 4800 5300 5800 9.1 1200 1878 2800 3226 3275 3347 3760 4830 5400 9.1 1.00 248 3.70 9.1 0 0 255.97 1600 2 24.5.4 240 . .5 239.9 240.3 229.7 241.3 241.6 252.5 2.54.8 21800 3113 2000 0 267.3 266 247.B 247.1 246.9 245.5 245 20.3 258.7 262.7 266.5 267.6 271.3 2900 259.0 263.8 248.4 250 . .5 238.9 251.9 250.9 247. 9 260.9 2900 0 250.9 0 2900 0 0 255.97 266.7 1400 1900 2400 2900 3154 3300 3400 3900 4400 21800 .OBS 3170 0 1300 1740 2010 2100 2500 3000 3113 3600 4007 4400 4900 5400 5890 4300 1240 1900 2900 3241 3277 3349 3800 4850 5600 4300 0 0 0 4300 0 0 BT BT BT NC ET Xl NC ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR NC ET Xl GR GR GR GR 1900 256.1 .075 0 11.47 .072 0 11.51 258 250 238 248 247.4 254 .072 0 11.70 260 253 239 256 NB .072 BT 0 Xl 11.85 GR 260 GR 251.2 GR 254 GR 252.4 NB 5 NB 4300 ET 0 Xl 11.880 GR 275.1 GR 268.l GR 252.0 GR 251.2 GR 251.3 GR 251.2 GR 253.6 GR 242.4 GR 252.3 GR 269.8 NB 5 NB 3421 BT 0 Dr-98pre.out 263.8 5100 .08 0 0 .075 0 28 0 532 859 1163 1617 2400 .075 0 16 0 1600 1810 2250 .075 0 18 0 1060 1810 2080 .070 0 47 1000 1500 2000 2500 2908 3000 3400 3433 3700 4200 .075 0 3500 257.7 .06 0 3241 .065 0 831 250 250.7 240 247.1 248 256 .065 0 1750 252 252 250 .065 0 1810 254 252 240 254 2908 0 3400 273.4 263.0 251.7 251.2 247.3 251.8 253.8 244.7 253.5 274.8 2509 0 2200 254.1 .1 0 3300 .1 0 891 191 714 865 1229 1865 2455 .1 0 1835 250 1650 1835 .1 0 1880 195 1200 1830 2230 .060 0 3454 1100 1600 2100 2600 2920 3100 3409 3439 3800 4300 .065 0 268.8 5900 .3 0 50 .3 0 200 248 250 250 248 248.7 257 .3 0 840 250 249 251.5 .3 0 650 252 249 240 258.0 2944 0 310 271.4 258.2 251.4 251.3 246.1 251.7 244.9 253.5 255.7 2538 0 3800 261.1 0 50 0 180 407 831 891 1248 1905 2480 0 860 710 1700 1875 0 620 500 1350 1860 2280 .075 0 200 1200 1700 2200 2700 2929 3200 3420 3454 3900 .075 0 2400 250.9 0 50 0 180 248 240 251.5 248.8 249.6 0 1020 250 253 250.5 0 775 251 252 253.5 260 3409 0 185 269.3 252.5 251.4 251.1 247.3 252.2 243.3 253.6 258.8 2820 0 266.5 6200 9.1 1 9.1 0 422 837 932 1419 2070 9.1 0 940 1750 1990 9.1 0 730 1500 1880 2300 .065 9.1 1300 1800 2300 2800 2938 3300 3425 3500 4000 .06 9.1 3 4400 268.4 2900 .2 470 0 249.2 238 250 248 250 630 0 252 239 252 640 0 250 253 252.9 3454 2010 268.7 251.9 251.2 251.4 251.5 252.1 242.3 252.2 264.2 2867 1450 2600 251.2 4300 0 1890 0 492 845 1023 1507 2250 1990 0 1520 1780 2100 1975 0 880 1700 1975 .075 3545 1400 1900 2400 2900 2944 3325 3430 3600 4100 .075 2867 Xl 12.24 35 2800 2867 1800 1900 1900 1 -.2 0 GR 265.6 1000 257.7 1038 255.9 1100 255.9 1200 254.3 1300 GR 254.3 1400 254.8 1500 254.6 1600 254.5 1700 255.3 1800 GR 254.5 1900 254.2 2000 254.1 2100 254.1 2200 254.4 2300 GR 254.4 2400 254.4 2500 253.8 2509 251.3 2515 251.3 2527 GR 254.3 2538 2!55.7 2600 256 2700 256 2800 255.1 2820 GR 247.9 2835 247.9 2849 256.7 2867 257.5 2900 258.9 3000 GR 259 3100 259.9 3200 263.3 3300 269.9 3400 270.l 3421 Tl CARTER CREEK-100 YEAR FLOODWAY T2 JV T3 CARTER CREEK-100 YEAR FLOODWAY J1 IC!mCK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSEL FQ 0 8 -1 246.40 J2 NPROP I PLOT PRFVS XSECY' XSECH FN ALLDC IBW CHNIM I TRACE 2 -1 Dr-98prc.out 4 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4 .6.0; February 1991 ************************************* NOTB-ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OP CROSS-SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST 100 YEAR --100 YEAR FLOODWAY COMPARISON- SUMMARY PRINTOUT • • • tlECNO Q 10 .110 22420.00 10 .110 22420.00 10 .930 21800.00 10.930 21800.00 11.450 21800.00 11 .450 21800.00 11.460 21800.00 11 .460 21800.00 11.465 21800.00 11.465 21800.00 11.470 21800.00 11.470 21800.00 11.510 21800.00 11.510 21800.00 11.700 21800 .00 11.700 21800.00 11.850 21800.00 11.850 21800.00 11.880 21800.00 11.880 21800.00 12 .240 21800.00 12.240 21800.00 CWSEL 245.60 246.40 251.07 251.87 254.67 255.69 254.72 255.75 255.19 255 .97 255 .22 256.01 255.34 256 .18 255 .89 256.87 256.63 257.61 256.94 257.93 259.25 260.06 VOL .00 .oo 864.80 745.09 1494.50 1264.89 1508 .01 1275 .56 1515.14 1281.01 1529.81 1291.96 1586.74 1334.13 1830.B4 1528.62 1986.31 1661.99 2056.46 1725.36 2472.56 2100 .59 SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTBS VCH 3.39 3.55 4.30 4.47 2.3B 2.76 2.36 2 .74 2.15 2.65 2.32 2.B4 2.55 3 .16 3 .93 4.14 3.82 4.00 2 .96 2.99 3 .90 3 .62 HV .OB .10 .11 .14 .06 .09 .06 .09 .05 .OB .OlK 6617.Bl 6612 .01 5190 .31 5196.47 6B60 .67 6502.43 69B7.90 6604.7B B036 .B4 6961 .73 .05 7960 .13 .09 6940 .51 .04 10148.23 .07 8515.74 .09 .12 .09 .11 .06 .OB .10 .12 6656.91 6639.47 6573.31 6604.55 7030.24 7376.55 5120.48 5246 .7B NOTE SECNO- CAUTION SECNO- NOTE SECNc:>m CAUTION SECNO- 11 .465 PROFILE• 1 WSEL BASED ON X5 CARD 11.465 PROFILE• 1 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S. 11.465 PROFILE• 2 WSEL BASED ON X5 CARD 11.465 PROFILEm 2 HYDRAULIC JUMP D .S . KRATIO .00 .oo .78 .79 1.32 1.25 1.02 1.02 1.15 1.05 .99 1.00 1.27 1.23 .66 .7B .99 .99 1.07 1.12 .73 .71 WARNING SECNc:>m 11 .700 PROFILEz 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE Dr-98pre .out BG 245.6B 246.50 251.18 252.01 254.73 255.7B 254.77 255.83 255.24 256.05 255.28 256 .10 255.38 256.25 255 .99 256.99 256 .71 257.72 257.01 25B.Ol 259.36 260.lB QWEIR .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo .oo .oo .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo .00 .oo .oo .00 .oo FLOODWAY DATA , 100--FLOODWAY COMPARISO N- PROFILE NO . 2 -------FLOOD WAY -------WATER SURFACE ELEVATION STATION WIDTH SECTION MEAN WITH WITHOUT DIFFERENCE ARXA VZLOCITY FLOODWAY FLOOD WAY 10 .110 1450 . 9078. 2.5 246 .4 245.6 .8 10 .930 1170 . 7521 . 2.9 251.9 251 .1 .8 11 . 450 1400. 9251 . 2.4 255.7 254 .7 1.0 11 . 460 1400 . 9340. 2.3 255 .7 254 .7 1.0 11 .465 1400 . 9644. 2.3 256.0 255 .2 .8 11 .470 1400 . 9436. 2.3 256 .0 255 .2 .0 11 .510 1420 . 10735. 2.0 256.1 255 .3 .8 11.700 1360 . 8797 . 2.5 256.9 255 .9 1 .0 11 . 850 1335 . 8731. 2.5 257.6 256.6 1.0 11 .880 1535. 9978. 2 .2 257 .9 256.9 1 .0 12 .240 1417 . 8100. 2 .7 260 .1 259.3 .8 Dr-98prc .out 6 ! 1 ' J ! J 1 In Horiz . = 400 ft 1 in Vert . = 15 ft -~ --- -'--------------- ---- ---- -~ --- -~ --- ---- ---- ---- "" - : ""' -~ --- -----__....... --- ---- ---- ... ,;. ..._ --. _____. r-J ---..........._ ./- 'w'" -,.._,.. • t I 1 CARTER CREEK PfO'US "" .. . -r ~;1 A ) v \ I LI 1-.1 -Airr.IS...• 11 ii CARTERCREEKPAC7US .. . I _/--.... ~ 1 -r -- u g c: 0 dr98post Riv Sta= 11.85 CARTER CREEK PROFILES ---------------.072 --------------~ 6 0 260-.----------------.... ----------------..... ---------------------------6--7 5 5 ~ 250-...---------+-------=l!F----lf-------'<---t'----+------l--l----I Ui 240--...------..... --.--.... ---+---.-..... ------..---,__ .... ______ .,......,. __ ..,.. ______ ............. ._ ....... 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Station (ft) • Ground • Bank Sta g c: 0 :;:::; nJ ~ iTI dr98pos t Riv St a= 11 .51 CARTER CREEK PROFILES ---------.075 --------- 255---\-------+--------+-------~--------+-----+---1 250 245 240-t--------+-----.... --+--------+--------t--------t 235_..,--.... ._ ..... --........... --..... _. .... --........ ---i_.._ ..... --.............. --......... --,.... ........ --.,....._ ..... __, 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Station (ft) Ground • Bank Sta 260 g 250 :\ -~ - - -1---_ 255 -c 0 .. - I'll > Q) - iii - 245 - - - - 240 - - - - 235 0 500 dr98post Riv Sta= 11 .7 CARTER CREEK PROFILES .072 -: 0 f--.075 ____, 6 5 I i i ~) • 1---------r /\ I - -~ Ill 1111 1000 1500 2000 Station (ft) 2500 • Ground • Bank Sta POST FILL DATA RUN TO SHOW ACTUAL EFFECTS OF FRINGE FILL REQUESTED RUN----RUN IS NOT MADE TO CHANGE ANY FEMA DATA . (NO FLOODWAY FILL) . NOT A LOMAR REQUEST. 1******************************************** * HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES * • * Version • * RUN DATE 4.6.0; February 1991 11FEB98 TIME 14 :46 :28 • • • • ******************************************** ************************************* HBC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4.6.0; February 1991 ************************************* x x x x xxxxxxx x x xxxxx x x x x x xxxxxxx xxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxxxx xxxxx Tl CARTERS CREEK FROM RIVER MILE 10.11 TO 12.24 100 YR FREQUENCY T2 highway 30 partnership existing topography and FRINGE FILL T3 -100--POST FLOODPLAIN revised 11.51--11.8.5-FLOODWAY SAME AS PRE J1 ICBECIC INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS 0 6 0 0 0 0 -1 J2 NPROF I PLOT PRFVS XSECV XSBCB FN ALLDC 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 J3 VARIABLE CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT 38 43 1 7 26 10 200 Q 0 IBW 0 34 J.5 LPRNT NUHS:&C ********RBQUESTED SECTION NUMBERS******** -10 -10 NC .085 .07.5 .060 .1 .3 QT 9 7880 140.50 17290 19740 22420 37960 NB 5 .07 3138 .065 3189 .080 3360 NB 4800 BT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Xl 10.11 49 3138 3189 2480 2560 2798 GR 263 .1 1000 251.6 1200 248.6 1255 247.2 GR 243.9 1500 243 1600 241.8 1700 240 .8 GR 239 .8 2000 239.5 2100 239.7 2200 239.9 GR 239.9 2500 240 .1 2600 240.2 2700 240 .1 GR 2 40.4 3000 242 .1 3100 242.7 3138 235 .8 GR 229.6 3170 233 .8 3172 242 .3 3189 242 .9 DrJ8post.out xxxxx x x x xxxxx x x xxxxxxx WSEL 24.5 .60 CHNIH 0 .58 22420 .07 9.1 1300 1800 2300 2800 3148 3200 *************************************** * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * • • 609 SECOND STREET, SUITE D DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616-4687 (916) 7.56-1104 • • * • *************************************** FQ 0 I TRACE 0 3 46 22420 22420 338.5 .08.5 1850 3300 24.5.4 1400 240 . .5 1900 239.9 2400 240 .3 2900 229.7 3154 241.3 3300 GR GR GR GR QT NH 242 241.3 253.7 255, 9 9 5 NH 5890 ET 0 Xl 10.93 GR 270.1 GR Z65.7 GR 260.6 GR 236 GR 246.7 GR 245.6 GR 245.5 GR 245.6 GR 252.5 GR 259.5 GR 263.7 GR 266.4 GR 268 NC .085 ET 0 Xl 11.45 GR 272.3 GR 262.9 GR 265.5 GR 245 GR 246.9 GR 249.4 GR 250.4 GR 247.7 GR 253 GR 260 ET 0 Xl 11.46 X3 10.0 SB 1.25 ET 0 Xl 11.465 X2 0 XS BT BT BT BT NC ET Xl 8 13 1900 256.1 .075 0 11.47 Dr98post.out 3360 3500 4000 4500 7800 .075 0 65 1000 1400 1800 2021 2200 2600 3051 3200 3700 4100 4500 5000 5500 .080 0 48 800 1300 2100 2929 3250 3290 3400 4100 4880 5700 0 0 0 1.30 0 0 0 252.5 800 263.8 5100 .08 0 0 239.2 241.8 253.8 258.6 13800 2010 0 2000 269.5 264.3 253.9 236.5 246 245.2 241 245.8 255.5 261.2 264.4 266.1 268.3 .065 0 2900 258.5 266.7 268.1 245 241.6 249 248.6 248.9 253.8 261.1 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 1 253.85 272 3500 257.7 .06 0 3241 3363 3600 4100 4600 16900 .06 0 2050 1100 1500 1900 2027 2300 2700 3053 3300 3800 4200 4600 5100 5600 .3 0 3347 1145 1600 2200 2967 3259 3300 3600 4300 5000 5900 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 254.4 2200 254.l .1 0 3300 239.3 245.1 253 260.6 19250 2050 0 3920 269.l 263.7 249.4 237.8 246.2 245.2 239.3 246.4 257.6 261.7 266.7 266.4 269 .5 0 2700 253.8 264.2 266.5 249.l 240.9 249.9 250.2 251.8 257.7 268.4 0 50 0 21.0 0 25 250.9 254.78 1400 268.8 5900 .3 0 50 3380 3700 4200 4700 21800 .08 0 3840 1200 1600 1975 2035 2325 2800 3074 3400 3900 4300 4700 5200 5700 0 2700 1162 1800 2400 3000 3268 3325 3700 4800 5100 6200 0 50 0 7.70 0 25 0 255.19 264.9 3800 261.l 0 50 241. 7 249.3 254.5 263.2 36830 3051 0 4330 268.9 267 248.9 247.4 246.1 245 241.2 247.1 258.7 263.3 266.4 266.8 269.9 0 2700 253.6 257.8 247.2 251.6 238.9 251 20 254 260.4 0 50 0 1122 0 25 0 257.07 2400 250.9 0 50 3385 3800 4300 4800 21800 .065 9.1 0 1237 1700 2000 2050 2400 2900 3111 3500 4000 4360 4800 5300 5800 9.1 1200 1878 2800 3226 3275 3347 3760 4830 5400 9.1 1.00 248 3.70 9.1 0 0 255.97 1600 266.5 6200 2 9.1 l 241. 6 252.5 254.8 21800 3113 2000 0 267.3 266 247.8 247.1 246.9 245.5 245 249.3 258.7 262.7 266.5 267.6 271.3 2900 259.0 263.8 248.4 250.5 238.9 251.9 2.50.9 247.9 260.9 2900 0 250.9 0 2900 0 0 255.97 266.7 4400 268.4 2900 .2 3400 3900 4400 21800 .085 3170 0 1300 1740 2010 2100 2500 3000 3113 3600 4007 4400 4900 5400 5890 4300 1240 1900 2900 3241 3277 3349 3800 4850 5600 4300 0 0 0 4300 0 0 2600 251.2 4300 0 NEW CROSS SECTION DATA IN FILL AREA --CROSS SECTIONS 11.51, 11.70, 11.85 SE& THESE CROSS SECTION PLOTS NC .072 .075 .065 .1 .3 ET 0 Xl 11.51 GR 258 GR 250 GR 238 GR 248 GR 247.4 GR 248.7 GR 252 ET 0 Xl 11.70 GR 260 GR 253 GR 2351 GR 244 GR 258 ET 0 Xl 11.85 GR 260 GR 251.2 GR 254 GR 253 NB 5 NB 4300 ET 0 Xl 11.880 GR 275.1 GR 268.1 GR 252.0 GR 251.2 GR 251.3 GR 251.2 GR 253.6 GR 242.4 GR 252.3 GR 2651.8 NB 5 NB 3421 ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR 0 12.24 265.6 254.3 254.5 254.4 254.3 247.51 2551 Dr98post.out 0 33 0 532 8551 1163 1617 1905 2330 0 21 0 1600 1810 1956 2265 0 17 0 1060 1810 1980 .070 0 47 1000 1500 2000 2500 25108 3000 3400 3433 3700 4200 .075 0 35 1000 1400 1900 2400 2538 2835 3100 0 831 250 250.7 240 247.1 247.7 249.6 256 0 1750 252 252 250 250.5 0 1810 254 252 240 257 25108 0 3400 273.4 263.0 251.7 251.2 247.3 251.8 253.8 244. 7 253.5 274.8 25051 0 2800 257.7 254.8 254.2 254.4 255.7 247.51 2551.51 0 8511 1511 714 865 12251 1830 2070 2350 0 1835 250 1650 1835 19510 0 1880 195 1200 1830 151516 .060 0 3454 1100 1600 2100 2600 25120 3100 34051 34351 3800 4300 .065 0 2867 1038 1500 2000 2500 2600 28451 3200 0 200 248 250 250 248 246.0 250 257 0 840 250 2451 251.5 252 0 650 252 249 240 25144 0 310 271.4 258.2 251.4 251.3 246.1 251.7 244.51 253.5 255.7 2538 0 1800 255.51 254.6 254.1 253.8 256 256.7 263.3 0 180 407 831 8511 1248 1850 2110 2354 0 860 710 1700 1875 2030 0 620 500 1350 1860 .075 0 200 1200 1700 2200 2700 251251 3200 3420 3454 35100 .075 0 15100 1100 1600 2100 25051 2700 2867 3300 0 180 248 240 251.5 248.8 246.0 254 0 1020 250 253 250 256.0 0 775 251 252 253.5 34051 0 185 269.3 252.5 251.4 251.1 247.3 252.2 243.3 253.6 258.8 2820 0 1900 255.51 254.5 254.1 251.3 256 257.5 2651.51 51.1 0 422 837 5132 14151 1856 2150 51.1 0 5140 1750 1905 2045 51.1 0 730 1500 1880 .065 51.1 1300 1800 2300 2800 25138 3300 3425 3500 4000 .06 51.1 1 1200 1700 2200 2515 2800 25100 3400 3 470 0 2451.2 238 250 248 248 252 630 0 252 2351 244 257.0 640 0 250 253 252.51 3454 2010 268.7 251.SI 251.2 251.4 251.5 252.1 242.3 252.2 264 .2 2867 1450 -.2 254.3 255.3 254.4 251.3 255.1 258.51 270.1 18510 0 4512 845 ~023 1507 1865 2221 19510 0 1520 1780 1926 20451 1975 0 880 1700 1975 .075 3545 1400 1900 2400 25100 25144 3325 3430 3600 4100 .075 2867 0 1300 1800 2300 2527 2820 3000 3421 Tl CARTER CREEK-100 YEAR FLOODWAY T2 JV T3 CARTER CRE&K-100 YEAR FLOOD WAY J1 I CHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRIC HVINS Q WSBL FQ 0 8 -1 246 .40 J2 NPROF I PLOT PRFVS XS BCV XSBCH l'N ALI.DC IBW CHNIH ITRACB 2 0 ************************************* HBC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4.6 .0; February 1991 ************************************* NOTE-ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OF CROSS-SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST 100--POST FLOODPLAIN rev SUMMARY PRINTOUT SBCNO Q CWSBL VOL VCH HV .OlK KRATIO BG QWBIR 10.110 22420.00 245 .60 .oo 3.39 .OB 6617.81 .oo 245 .68 .00 10 .110 22420.00 246.40 .oo 3.55 .10 6612.01 .00 246.50 .00 10.930 21800 .00 251.07 864.80 4.30 .11 5190.31 .78 251.18 .00 10.930 21800.00 251.87 745 .09 4.47 .14 5196.47 .79 252.01 .00 11.450 21800.00 254 .67 1494 . so 2.38 .06 6860 .67 1 .32 254.73 .oo 11. 450 21800.00 255.69 1264 .89 2.76 .09 6502 .43 1.25 255.78 .00 11.460 21800.00 254 .72 1508.01 2 .36 .06 6987 .90 1.02 254 . 77 .oo 11.460 21800.00 255 . 75 1275.56 2.74 .09 6604 .78 1.02 255.83 .oo * 11. 465 21800.00 255.19 1515 .14 2.15 .05 8036 .84 1.15 255.24 .oo * 11. 465 21800 .00 255.97 1281 .01 2.65 .08 6961 . 73 1.05 256.05 .00 !1.470 21800.00 255.22 1529.81 2 .32 .05 7960.13 .99 255 .28 .oo 11.470 21800.00 256 .01 1291.96 2.84 .09 6940 .!51 1.00 256.10 .00 11.!510 21800.00 2!5!5.34 1!585.62 2.63 .04 9811 .63 1 .23 2!55.39 .00 11.510 21800 .00 2!56 .18 1334.26 3 .12 .07 8605.78 1 .24 2!56.25 .00 11.700 21800.00 2!5!5.90 1823.13 3.76 .09 6963.22 .71 2!5!5 .99 .oo 11 .700 21800.00 256.83 1533.02 3.85 .11 7129.28 .83 2!56.93 .oo 11 .8!50 21800 .00 2!56 .63 1971 .19 4.09 .10 6150 .28 .88 256 .74 .00 11 .850 21800.00 257 .51 1668 .00 4 .07 .12 6451 .20 .90 257 .63 .00 11.880 21800 .00 256 .99 2039 .54 2 .93 .0 6 71 2 1. 94 1.16 257 .05 .oo 11.880 21800 .00 257 .85 1730 .49 3 .04 .08 7 224 .79 1 .12 257 .93 .00 12.240 21800.00 2!59 .26 2457 .77 3 .90 .1 0 5 1 28 .33 .72 259 .36 .oo 12 .240 21800.00 260 .05 2102 .52 3 .63 .12 5 2 1 8 .59 .7 2 260.16 .00 Dr98post.out 4 ....... h SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES NOTE SECNO- CAUTION SECNO- NOTE SECNO- CAU'l'ION SECNO- FLOODWAY DATA , PROFILE NO . 2 ll.46S PROFILE-1 WSEL BASED ON XS CARO 11.46S PROFILE• 1 HYDRAULIC JUMP D .S . ll.46S PROFILE-2 WSEL BASED ON XS CARO ll .46S PROFILE• 2 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S . 100--POST FLOODPLAIN rev -------l"LOODWAY -------WATER SURFACE ELEVATION STATION WIDTH SECTION MEAN WITH WITHOtrr DIFFERENCE AREA VELOCITY l"LOODWAY l"LOODWAY 10 .110 14SO. 9078 . 2 .S 246.4 24S.6 .8 10.930 1170. 7S21 . 2 .9 2Sl.9 2Sl .1 .8 11. 4SO 1400. 92Sl. 2.4 2SS.7 2S4 .7 1.0 11. 460 1400. 9340. 2.3 2SS .7 2S4 .7 1.0 11 .46S 1400. 9644 . 2.3 2S6 .0 2SS .2 .8 11 .470 1400. 9436. 2.3 2S6 .0 2SS.2 .8 11 .SlO 1420. 10800. 2 .0 2S6.1 2SS.3 .8 11.700 1360. 9164 . 2 .4 2S6 .8 2SS.9 .9 11.8SO 133S. 8601. 2 .S 2S7.S 2S6.6 .9 11 .880 1S3S . 98SO. 2 .2 2S7 .9 2S7 .0 . 9 12 .240 1417. 8073 . 2 .7 260.1 2S9.3 .8 Dr98post.out s March 13, 1998 Veronica Morgan HIGHWAY 30 PARTNERSHIP 4500 CARTER CREEK PARKWAY #105 BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 409-260-1111 City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842-9960 RE: Maintenance of ponds (excavated area) in flood plain at SHJO Dear Ms. Morgan: This will serve to define that the owner of the land containing the ponds will be responsible for maintaining the banks of the ponds in the event of washout and other general maintenance of the ponds as allowed under the 404 mitigation designation. We are the current owners of the land, and we do accept this responsibility which shall pass as customary with the ownership of the land. Since the ponds are depressions in the ground and will have bermuda grass banks to prevent erosion, we anticipate very little maintenance. ed A. Martin ging Partner March 13, 1998 Veronica Morgan BJ:GHWAY 30 PARTBERSBJ:P 4500 CARTER CREEK PARlt1fAY #105 BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 409-260-1111 City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842-9960 RE: Maintenance of ponds (excavated area) in flood plain at SHJO Dear Ms. Morgan: This will serve to define that the owner of the land containing the ponds will be responsible for maintaining the banks of the ponds in the event of washout and other general maintenance of the ponds as allowed under the 404 mitigation designation. We are the current owners of the land, and we do accept this responsibility which shall pass as customary with the ownership of the land. Since the ponds are depressions in the ground and will have bermuda grass banks to prevent erosion, we anticipate very little maintenance. ed A. Martin ging Partner Perforated Pipe With End Cop 1 :4 Slope 1' Min. to Existing ~ C.O.C.S. San. Sewer 12" Cone . Post with Steel Strop to 4' Bury 1: 1 Slope <01 x41 x 2.1 6? Water Level Poly Perforated Pipe With End Cop 1 :4 Slope Up to 4' Gross Slope 1' Min. to Existing J0 C.O.C.S . Son. Sewer 12" Cone . Post with Steel Strop to 4' Bury 1: 1 Slope Water Level B" Dia. Continuous Poly A OF A POND S.IPHON 260.00' Elevation 1" x 1" Welded Wire Mesh Screen @ Each End 2" Below Level Proposed 18" Equalizer Pipe @ 0% Grade A DRAWING OF A POND DRAIN COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS BRAZOS COUNTY [ Preporod for. ) Seel•· 1 ,. 2• Sheet: or MIKE DAVIS ote: MAR H 25 1998 rown By: C.LE. M.D.G. No. 2917 -000653 260 .00' Elevation Mesh ,./ ...... · .. J / POND ! j 1" x 1" Screen ,. _,..i ,· Welded @ Each Wire End 2,, Below Level ·' -/ _,..,.-i ( ,-· ; ,..-~ ·' ,,/ r ... ' , ,. .-..- ·" i Proposed 1 8" Equalizer Pipe @ 0% Grode A DRAWi NC OF' A POND DRAIN M.O.G. No. 2917 -000653 ~---...... COLLEGE STATION Mike Davis Riverview, Inc. 4002 Aspen P. 0 . Box 9960 Bryan, Texas 77801 I .. '1J ,~ @S~'a:> (Lt: ~~ R.a~~fD 0 Dear Mike: 110 1 ·;·exas Av enue Tel 409 764 3500 College Station, TX 77842 May29, 1998 We have completed the review of the material you submitted for the above referenced project To recap the status of what has bee n submitted to da te . !lus project was orig inally submitted on Nove mber 26, 1997 and the City denied the pcnnit on December 15, 1997 due to incompleteness and ordinance non- compliance. On February 17, 1998 you resubmitted the project. Again the submittal had several items originally requested in the December 1997 letter that were not included. We previously responded that the City could not complete the review wil110ut this additional information. In early May, I received a number of phone calls from Gregg Taggert with MDG. He was inquiring if the City had completed the review of the additional information submitted to the City on March 31, 1998. I explained that the submittal I received on March 3 lst was for the larger Carter Creek Relocation Project and not for this small Reclamation Project at SEDO. O n May 13 , 1998 you met with me to go over what to date had been submitted to the City. During our discussio n it became apparent that approximately 6 loose sheets of paper were submitted on March 3 lst for the small Reclamation Project at SEDO . They we re submitted without benefit of a cover letter or explanation of what they were nor which project they were for. The same day, March 3 lst, a large 3 ring binder was submitted with a cover letter and description for ~e large Carter Creek Reclamation Project. The loose sheets were given to me with the large b inder and the assumption was made that they belonged together. On May 13th after our discussion, the sheets were removed from the binder and logged in for review. Please remember in the future to submit information with a cover letter or submittal sheet to explain what project the submittal pertains to and the contents of the submittal. With more than 40 sets of plans and reports alone per month (which does not include letters, casements and other miscellaneous items for review) coming into this office, we cannot guess which project a few single sheets of paper belongs to. Especially in this case; when documents for one . project can easily be mistaken for those belonging to the large Carter Creek Reclamation Project because of the data overlap. The following are our comments on the project (the submittal made on February 17,1998 and the subsequent information submitted to complete the request). These items are ones needed before we can grant approval : / 1. The fill at _Station 11.88 and 11.85 berund the Cinemark is located within the flood way of Carters v' Creek. This fill area seems to provide no purpose for this project, it certainly is not meant for reclamation of the floodplain given its shape arid size. It appears to i;e some type of diversion structure which does not fit with your request for a simple floodplain reclamation plan. Due to this and its location within the floodway this area should be removed from the plan. 2. Since it appears that your single 24 "x36" plan sheet will be the only item that will be submitted to a contractor for construction, please assure the following items are included on that sheet or a second page to the construction plans: · ~ Notes regarding the lift depths and compaction requirements for fill as stated in the FEMA regulations. Home of Texas A&M University /b . Plans for the piping diagram between the ponds and locations of these pipes shown on the plan view. / c . Locations of all underground pipes. This is essential to assure that they are not distuibed by your locations of ponds. This request was made in earlier comments and still has not been addressed on the plans. The City requires on all construction plans that the locations of existing utilities be shown and does not allow someone to simply make a statement that they will be located in the field prior to construction. In this case we are contemplating 6-8 feet of cut in some areas, the City needs to see the locations of all utilities in relation to that cut and fill associated with the berms. V'I d . Location of all sill fencing . Some has been shown to date. The plan still does not address silt migration toward the creek, as all silt fencing is located only on the SH30 side of the plan. This comment again was one made in an earlier review. / c . Note on the plan that all side slopes shall not exceed 4 : 1. In particular where this is a concern is adjacent to Furrows. On the fill plan in that area you need to make the proposed contours tie to existing contours, we will not accept a note to the contractor to "tie to adjacent tract". This is of concern because the grades to tie to appear to be well into another property owners tract. This type of detail should not be worked out in the field but rather on a set of construction documents. Also your transition to the existing concrete access drive appears to contain some almost vertical slopes . Please show the contours as they approach the drive and assure that the slopes are no more than 4: 1. Also spot a top of pave ment elevation on the drive. V f. Add a general note regarding where sodding or seeding is to be used. along with notes regarding the required timing of grass establishment. . / 3. At station 11. 7 remove the excess storage area from your cross section included in the HEC-2 runs . V During the 100-year storm event, the ponds are full and storage capacity for those should not be used in the runs. In addition. this storage capacity is being used by the program from station 11.7 to station 11.85 where the cross section changes. This gives a false sense that this storage capacity is there when in reality it is not / 4. At station 11.7 you show two channels. The second channel depicted on the left overbank is not there. V You may have picked up the meander in the stream and that is why you show two channels at this cross section. 5. Add a cross section at 11.52+ to depict the beginning of the benned fill area. This again was a comment madr earlier in a review where we requested additional cross sections to further depict the fill. ~ll\~~-tt>~~cA-~t. (Y ~ 6 . Also from an ear'Iier review the question was asked why you Sianged the "n" value in the channel and left overbank when with this project you have stated that you are not doing anything in that area. You stated that you did not use different "n"s from tli"se used in the FEMA runs. From the runs the "n" values used in the original FEMA runs were : Left Overbank =.075 Right Overbank =.08 Channel =.06 .. in your "fill" runs you used beginning at station 11.51 Left Overbank =.072 Right Overbank =.075 Channel =.065 The only one of these that should have changed is the right overbank. Since you disagreed with this statement earlier please let us know if we have misinterpreted your runs. 7. The plans for the pond piping need to be more descriptive. Keep in mind that this should be a construction document Please show flowlines at each pond location, pipe materials, headwall details, etc. From what you have submitted, we cannot tell how the ponds drain nor how full they will stay. The l: I slope on the pond siphon diagram is unacceptable if you propose that the City ever have any maintenance responsibilities. Also the 5+ feet of fill on the City sewerline is also unacceptable. 8. Several questions regarding maintenance have still not been addressed. Although you submitted letters from property owners that say they will maintain the ponds, it does not address a maintenance schedule nor the level of maintenance that will be given to the ponds. It does refer to a 404 mitigation area and the .. 1 /J maintenance iated with that type of facility. Please clarify what 404 maintenance means. -OA wt. Ok.. ~ ~ ~o..'! 9. It appears that the Corp will be asking for no disturbance of any wetland areas that you may create with the large reclamation project How does the Corp view our easements in these wetland areas and our rights to install new pipelines through the area and disturb these new wetlands with construction equipment? 10 . You will need to submit this data to FEMA as a LOMA based on fill in order to accurately depict the new floodplain line that you ~~.hf~': F blished. This must be done within 6 months of the completion of the fill operation. ~~ Other miscellaneous items that I am sure you are aware of but we have not received to date are: )( • A completed development permit application. i< • The fees associated with the permit and inspection. v • A copy of the NOI for the project If you have any questions, please call. Veronica J.B. Nl'Cl1rgan, Asst. City Engineer cc~ Jim Callaway, Director of Development Services Linda Hu.ff, City of Bryan Mark Smith, Director of Public Works North Bardell, MDG THIS FORM REPLACe0 1 REVI OUS FORM 3510-6 (8-98) 0 Form Approved. OMS No. 2040-0188 --See Re " ::.e for Instructions OEPA Un ited States Environmental Protection Agency NP DES Washington, DC 20460 FORM Notice of Intent (NOi) for Storm Water Discharges Associated with CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Under a NPDES General Permit Subm ission of this Notice of Intent constitutes notice that the party identified in Section I of this form intends to be authorized by a NPDES permit issued for storm water discharges associated with construction activity in the State/In dian Country Land identified in Section II of this form . Submission of this Notice of Intent also constitutes notice tha t the party identified in Section I of this form meets the eligibility requirements in Part 1.8. of the general permit (including those related t o protection of endangered species determined through the procedures in Addendum A of the general permit), understands that continued •authorization to discharge is contingent on ma intaining permit eligibility, and that implementation of the Storm Water Po ll ut ion Prevention Plan required under Part IV of the general permit will begin at the time the permittee commences work on the construction project identified in Secion II below. IN ORDER TO OBTAIN AUTHORIZATION, ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED MUST BE INCLUDED ON THIS FORM. SEE INSTRUCTION S ON BACK OF FORM . I. Owner/Operator (Applicant) Information Name : Id ! 1K 1E1 1 l/l ~I Y:i/ 15 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Phone : I L/1 0 I 9 1 ~ t/1 ~ 31 lf , 2 ~ I Add ress : f-t 10 10 121 ,A I Si P1E.1N 1 Status of [EJ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Owner/Operator: City : 1£3Rilf1li1"11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I State : /T1XI Zip Code : 111 ] 810t f I -I I I I I II. Project/Site Information Is the facility located on Indian Country Lands? Project Name: 1C tj 1 e ii 1 E 1 § I C1 "-1B 6 ~ 1R1gcILv41rr11ft.t11 l 1Q 1/J I IP, r2.10 0 1 i Yes D No0 Project Address/Location : Ni f 1 1l.1Ni1 1E 1e.1S.1 EiC. IT I I 1Q NI 10 1P I I fl1W 1 Cf I Z21Q I Ff-1 1Si lf1&.1 I I City: 1C 1Q 1L. 1(.,, E 1Crr 6 1Si I iA-1 1 1 l 10 N 1 I I I I I I I I State : CZl.6J Zi p Code : If 17 18 rf.. 1() I -I I I I I Latitude : i :2 10 1°'2 I I 13 10 I Longitude: I 'l 1 f.R 1 1'3 1Y 10 1t./1 County: '8(2.,.(-t 12101 S I I I I I i I I I I I I I Yes ~ No O .... Has the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) been prepared? .... Optional : Ad dress of location of 0 Add ress in Section I above D Address in Section II above ffother address (i f know n) below: SWPPP for viewing SWPPP 2 1 ~7i£1 A1 Phone : Add ress : I i5 15 1 l 1 171~ X.4 15 1 iA 1 V /21N1 U1 E'.1 I I I I I I I I : 1'10 ~ ii619Q 1 5 1 3~1 1 1 City : k'.:'.:-10 1l 1L 1E Gr 1E 1 1S1T1 fti /1 I 101t\l1 I I I I I I I State: ITJlg Zip Code: 17 17 181 1'.15!-1 I I I i Name of Receiving Water: 1C1A1 '.er1 f.1 (1 1C1 ~ e1EJK.i I I I I I I I I I I I I - ID 11 1 D I ( I ; ,g_ IL g I If. ( I 01 f 1 l Fl {l 18 I Based on instruction provided in Addendum A of the permit, are Month Day Year Month Day Ye ar there any listed endangered or threatened species , or designated Estimated Construction Start Date Estimated Completion Date critical habitat in the project area? Estimate o f area to be disturbed (to nearest acre): I I I I 121 lfl Yes D No g/ Estimate of LJkelihood of Discharge (choose only one ): I have satisfied perm it eligib ili ty with regard to protection of 1. 0 Unlikely 3. 0 Once per week endangered species through the indicated section of Part 1.8.3 .e.(2) 5. 0 Continual of the permit (check one or more boxes): 2. ~nee pe r month 4. 0 Once per day I (alD (b)Q (c)O (d)D Ill . Certification I ce rtify unde r penalty of law that this docu ment and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to a ssure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information subm itt ed . Bas ed on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage thi s system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the in formati on , the information submitted is, to the best of my know ledge an d belief , true . accurate , and com pl ete . I am awa re that there are sign ifica nt pena lties for subm itti ng fa lse information , includ ing the possibi lity of fine anc imprisonment for knowing vio lat io ns . Pr int Name: 'N01Je..1T 1H 1 1B 1 ,~,q 1!2 10 1/i1L 1L I ~1 R.1 I ! : I I I I I I I I I Da te: ! ()17 1I 131 9 fi I 1~~ f{ _tpi!/,;.. Sig na ture : )/./. t ~ v EPA Form 35 i 0 -9 replaced 3510-6 (8-98 ) &EPA ( structions -EPA Form 3510-9 f"J Notice of Intent i rlOI) for Storm Water Discharges Associated witr ,./ Construction Activity to be Covered Under a NP DES Permit Form Approved. OMS No. 2040-0188 Who Must File a Notice of Intent Form Under the provisions of the Clean Water Act . as amended, (33 U.S .C . 1251 et.seq .; the Act), except as provided by Part 1.8.3 the permit. Federal law prohibits discharges of pollutants in storm water fro m construction activities without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit. Operator(s) of con struction sites where 5 or more acres are disturbed, smaller sites that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale where there is a cumulative disturbance of at least 5 acres , or any site designated by the Director, must submit an NOi to obtain coverage under an NPDES Storm Water Construction General Permit. If you have questions about whether you need a permit under the NPDES Storm Water program. or if you need information as to whether a particular program is administered by EPA or a State agency, write to or telephone the Notice of Intent Processing Center at (703) 931 -3230. Where to File NOi Form NOls must be sent to the following address : Storm Water Notice of Intent (4203) US EPA 401 M. Street, SW Washington, D .C . 20460 Do not send Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPP Ps) to the above address . For overnighVexpress delivery of NOls, please include the room number 2104 Northeast Mall and phone number (202) 260-9541 in the address . When to File This form must be filed at least 48 hours before construction begins . Completing the Form OBTAIN AND READ A COPY OF THE APPROPRIATE EPA STORM WATER CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT FOR YOUR AREA. To complete this form, type or print, using uppercase letters . in the appropriate areas only. Please place each character between the marks (abbreviate if necessary to stay within the number of characters allowed for each item). Use one space for breaks between words , but not for punctuation marks unless they are needed to clarify your response. If you have any questions on this form , call the Notice of Intent Processing Center at (703) 931-3230 . Section I. Fac ility Owner/Operator (Applicant) Information Provide the legal name, mailing address. and telephone number of the person , firm, public organization, or any otner entity that meet either of the following two criteria: (1) they have operational control over construction plans and specifi cations, including the ability to make modifications to those plans and specificatio ns ; or (2) they have the day-to-day operational control of those activities at the pro ject necessary to ensure compliance with SWPPP requirements or other permit conditions . Each person that meets either of these criteria must file this form . Do not use a colloquial name. Correspon- dence for the permit will be sent to this address. Enter the appropriate letter to indicate the legal status of the ow ner/operator of the project: F = Federal ; S = State; M = Public (other than federal or state); P = Private . Section II. Project/Site Information Enter the offic ial or legal name and complete street address. including city, county, state, zi p code, and phone number of the project or site . If it lacks a street address , indi cate with a general statement the locatio n of the site (e.g ., lntersecion of State Highways 61 and 34 ). Complete site information must be provided for permit coverage to be granted. The app lica nt must also provi de the latitude and longitude of the facility in degrees, minutes , and seconds to the nearest 15 seconds. The latitude and longitude of your fac ility can be located on USGS quadrangle maps. Quadrangle maps can be obtained by calling 1-800 USA MAPS. Long itude and latitude may also be obtained at the Census Bureau Interne t site: http ://www .census.gov/cgi-bin/gazetteer. La titude anc ion gitude for a facil ity in dec ima l fo rm must be converted to degree s , m ir.·..:tes and seconds for proper entry on the NOi form. To convert decima l latit~C:e or longitude to degrees . minute s . and seconds , follow the steps in the fc ilowi ng examp le. Convert decimal latitude 45 .1234567 to degrees, minutes , and seconds . 1) The numbers to the left of the decimal point are degrees. 2) To obtain minutes, multiply the first four numbers to the right of the decimal point by 0 .006. 1234 x .006 = 7.404. 3) The numbers to the left of the decimal point in the result obtained in step 2 are the minutes: 7'. 4) To obtai n seconds , multiply the remaining three numbers to the right of the decimal from the result in step 2 by 0.06: 404 x 0.06 = 24.24. Since th e numbers to the right of the decimal point are not used, the result is 24'. 5) Tne conversion for 45.1234 = 45' 7' 24'. Indicate whether the project is on Indian Country Lands . Indicate if the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been developed. Refer to Part IV of the general permit fo r information on SWPPPs. To be eligible for coverage, a SWPPP must have been prepared. Optional: Provide the address and phone number where the SWPPP can be viewed if different from addresses previously given. Check appropriate box. Enter th e name of the closest water body which receiv es the project's construction storm water discharge. Enter the estimated construction start and completion dates using four digits for the year (i.e . 05/27/1998). Enter the estimated area to be disturbed incl ud ing but not limited to : grubbing, excavation, grading , and utilities and infrastructure installation . Ind icate to the nearest acre ; if less than 1 acre, enter ·1 ." Note: 1 acre= 43 .560 sq . ft . Indicate your best estimate of the likelihood of storm water discharges from the project. EPA recognizes that actual discharges may differ from this esti mate due to unforeseen or chance circumstances. Indicat e if there are any listed endangered or thrt'atened species, or designated critical habitat in the pro ject area. "" Indicate which Part of the permit that the applicant is eligible with regard to protection of endangered or th rea tened species, or designated critical habit at. Secti on Ill. Certification Federal Statutes provide for severe pena lti es for submitting false information on thi s application form . Federal regulations require this application to be signed as follows : For a co rporation : by a respons ible corporate officer, which means : (i) president, secretary, treas urer. or vice president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs simi lar policy or decision making functions. or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production. or operating facilities employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (i n second-quarter 1980 dollars). if authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures; For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner of the proprietor, or For a municipality, state, federal. or other public faci lity: by either a principal exec:.rtive or ranking elected offic ial. An unsigned or undated NOi form will not be granted permit coverage. Paperwork Reduction Act Not ice Put::iic reporting burden for this appl ica ti on is estimated to average 3.7 hou•s. This estimate includes time for reviewing instructions , searching ex isti ng data sources , gathering and maintaining th e data needed, and corr.::i leting and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor. and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMS control number. Ser.d com ments regarding the burden estimate, any other aspect of the coil ec:ion of informatio n. or suggestions for improving this form, includin g a n:1 s~ggestions which may in crease or reduce th is burden to: Director. OF=:: Regulatory Information Divis ion (2137 ), U.S. E:-:v ironmental Protection Age ncy. 401 M Street, SW, Washington. D.C. 20<:60. Include the OMS cor.:rcl number on any correspondence . Do not send the completed form to ::-:;s address . A BRIEF GUIDE TO REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING POLLUTION PREVENTION PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Storm water runoff is part of the natural hydrologic cycle . However, human activities, particularly urbanization , can alter natural drainage patterns and add pollutants to the rainwater and snowmelt that run off the earth's surface and enter our Nation's rivers , lakes, streams, and coastal waters . In fact, recent studies have shown that storm water runoff is a major source of the pollutants that are damaging our sport and commercial fisheries , restricting swimming , and affecting the navigability of many of our Nation's waters . The States and many municipalities have been taking the initiative to manage storm water discharges more effectively . Recognizing the importance of this problem, the Congress also directed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop a Federal program under the Clean Water Act to regulate certain high priority storm water sources . The issuance of storm water discharge permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NP DES) is a major part of the Agency's efforts to restore and maintain the Nation's water quality . Under NPDES General Permits for Storm Water Discharges From Construction Activities, EPA requires the development and implementation of a pollution prevention plan-designed to reduce pollution at the source , before it can cause environmental problems that cost the public and private sectors in terms of lost resources and the expense of environmental restoration activities . OVERVIEW OF POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS To walk you through the requirements, the guide is organized according to the phases of the pollution pr-;vention planning and implementation process . A set of work sheets and a model plan at the end of the document are provided to further clarify requirements . As shown on the chart on the following page, pollution prevention planning requirements have been organized to provide you with a step-by-step process for ensuring that pollutants are not making their way into the storm water discharges from your site . The six major phases of the process are (1) site evaluation and design development , (2) assessment , (3) control selection and plan design , (4) certificat ion and notification , (5) construction/implementation , and (6) final stabilization/termination. In addition, all permit holders must meet a number of general requirements , and certain permit holders will have to meet special requ irements. This document provides background information on pollution prevention planning requirements for General Permit applicants . At the end of this document we have provided a checklist and sample Pollution Prevention Plan . A detailed manual on how to develop and implement your pollution prevention plan is available at a modest cost from the National Technical Information Service . The manual, titled Storm Water Management for Construction Activities: Developing Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices, provides much more specific information than this brief guide . Instructions for ordering the detailed manual and a list ing of other references that you may find useful can be found at the end of this guide . Review Draft Page 1 Review Draft Full page graphic goes here SIX PHASES FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION Pagel SITE EVALUATION AND DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE The first phase in a preparing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for a construction project is to define the characteristics of the site and the type of construction that will be occurring . This phase is broken down into four requirements: (A) collect site information, (8) develop site design , (C) describe construction activity , and (D) prepare pollution prevention site map . (A) Collect Site Information In evaluating your si t e, you mus t collect the following existing information: • Site map-The map should be a drawing, preferably to scale and preferably topographic , of the construction site . The best way to obtain a site map is to have your site surveyed by a professional surveyor. Alternatively , topographic maps may be available from your State or local government, or you may use the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographical maps. Your site map will be used in subsequent steps of the development of your pollution prevention plan . The scale of the map should be small enough so that you can easily distingu ish important features such as drainage swales and control measures that will be added later. • Soils information-Soil s information should be based on information from your specific site . Sources of so il s information could include soil borings or other geotechnical investigations . Soil Conservation Service (SCS) soil surveys may also be used , and SCS surveys typically indicate whether a soil is erodible . • Runoff water quality-Runoff water quality data may sometimes be available from your state.Qr local government, e.g., the local municipal separate storm sewer authority . You may also be able to obtain runoff water quality information from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), State , or local watershed protection agencies . • Name of receiving water-Identify the name and loca tion of the body of water, e.g ., stream , creek, run , wetland , river, lake , bay , ocean , that will receive the runoff from the construction site . If the receiving water is a tributary include the name of the ultimate receiving body of water if possible . If the site drains into a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System , identify the syst em and indicate the receiv ing water to which the system discharges . This information is usually available from county , State , or USGS maps . (B) Develop Site Plan Design The next step is to develop a site plan design based primarily on the goals and objectives of the proposed facility . There are several pollution prevention principles that you should consider when you develop the site plan for the project: • Disturb the smallest vegetated area possible. • Minimize the amount of cut and fil l. • Limit impacts to sensitive areas such as : -Steep and/or unstable slopes -Surface waters , including wetlands -Areas w ith erodible so il s -Ex isting drainage channels . Review Draft Page3 (C) Describe Construction Activity In preparing your plan , you should (1) describe the purpose or goal of the construction project (e .g., a single family residential development, a multistory office building, or a highway interchange) and (2) list the soil disturbing activities necessary to complete the project. (Soil disturbing activities might include clearing , excavation and stockpiling , rough grading, final or finish grading, preparation for seeding or planting, excavation of trenches , demolition , etc .). (D) Prepare Pollution Prevention Site Map The final step of the site evaluation and design development phase is to combine the information collected so far into a comprehensive pollution prevention site map . The following additional information must be included on the map collected in Step A: • Slopes after grading-Indicate the location and steepness of slopes after grading . • Disturbed areas-Indicate the areas of soil disturbing activities or the total area of the site where soil will be disturbed. Also draw an outline of areas that will not be disturbed . • Drainage patterns/discharge points-Indicate the drainage patterns of the site after the major grading activities and the location of the points where storm water will discharge from the site. -Note the downhill direction the runoff will follow as it flows across the site for the drainage pattern of the site . -Use arrows to indicate which direction runoff will flow in. Show the areas where there will be overland flow and the location of swales or channels . If there is a new or proposed underground storm. drain system on the site , this should be indicated on the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan site map as well. Review Draft Page4 ASSESSMENT PHASE Once the characteristics of the site and the construction have been defined , the next phase in developing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan is to measure the size of the land disturbance and estimate the impact the project will have on storm water runoff from the site based on in formation collected in Phase 1. Three things should be done to assess the project: (A) measure the site area , (8) measure the drainage areas , and (C) calculate the runoff coefficient. (A) Measure the Site Area The general permit requires that you indicate in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan estimates of the total site area and the area that will be disturbed . If the information is not available from one of these sources , you may measure by using the grid method or by using a planimeter. Planimeters are available from Engineering and Surveyor Supply Stores . (B) Determine the Drainage Areas Determine the size of each drainage area for each point where concentrated flow will leave the site . Drainage areas are portions of the site where runoff will flow in one particular direction or to a particular discharge point. These data will help you select and design the sediment control and storm water management measures for your project in the next phase of the plan . Use the drainage patterns indicate d on the site map to determine the drainage areas . (Drainage areas are not required to be included in the pollution preven tion plan .) (C) Calculate the Runoff Coefficient The general permit requires that you estimate the development's impact on runoff after construction is complete . This is done by estimating a runoff coefficient of the site . The runoff coefficient is an estimate of the fraction of total rainfall that will appear as runoff . (For example , the "c" value of lawn area is 0.2, which indicates that only 20 percent of the water that falls on grassed areas will end up as surface runoff. In contrast , the "c" va lue of a paved area can be 0. 9 or higher , indicating that 90 percent of the rain falling on this type of surface will run off.) Review Draft Pages CONTROL SELECTION/PLAN DESIGN PHASE After you have collected the information and made measurements , the next phase is to design a plan to prevent and control pollution of storm water runoff from your construction site . To complete the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan , (A) select erosion and sediment controls, (B) select other controls, (C) select storm water management controls, (D) indicate the location of controls, (E) prepare an inspection and maintenance plan, (F) prepare a description of controls , (G) prepare a sequence of major activities , and (H) incorporate State or local requirements. The following subsections explain how the controls you select should be described in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. (A) Select Erosion and Sediment Controls The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must include a description of the measures to be used for erosion and sediment controls throughout the construction project. These controls include stabilization measures for disturbed areas and structural controls to divert runoff and remove sediment. Erosion and sediment controls are implemented during the construction period to prevent and/or control the loss of soil from the construction site into the receiving waters . Your selection of the most appropriate erosion and sediment controls depends on a number of factors , but is most dependent on site conditions . The information collected in the site evaluation , design and assessment phases is used to select controls . Some controls are discussed below : • Stabilization-The EPA general permit requires that areas of the construction site that were disturbed in the past but will not be redisturbed for 21 days or more be stabilized by the 14th day after the last disturbance. Stabilization measures include the following : .... Temporary seeding-Temporary seeding is the planting of fast-growing grasses to hold down the soil in disturbed areas so that they are less apt to be carried offsite by storm water runoff or wind . Permanent seeding-Permanent seeding is the use of permanent vegetation (grass , trees , or shrubs) to stabilize the soil by holding soil particles in place . Mulching-Mulching is the placement of material such as hay, grass , woodchips , straw , or gravel on the soil surface to cover and hold in place disturbed so ils . • Structural control measures include the following : Silt fence-A silt fence is a temporary measure consisting of posts with filter fabric stretched across the posts and sometimes with a wire support fence . The fence is installed along the downslope or sideslope perimeter of a disturbed area . Runoff passes through the openings in the fabric , while sediment is trapped on the uphill side. Sediment trap-A sediment trap is formed by excavating a pond or by placing an earthen embankment across a low area or drainage swale . It has an outlet or spillway made of large stones or aggregate . The trap retains the runoff long enough to allow the silt to settle out. Sediment basin-A sediment basin is a settling pond with a controlled water release structure , e.g., a riser and pipe outlet with a gravel filter , which slows the release of runoff. The basin detains sediment- laden runoff from larger drainage areas long enough for most of the sediment to settle out. The EPA general perm it requires that a sediment basin be installed in any dra inage location where more than 10 acres in the upstream bas in are disturbed at one time . The sediment basin must provide at least 3,600 cubic feet of storage for every acre of land that drains to it. For drainage locations with 10 or fewer disturbed acres , sediment traps , filter fences , or equivalent measures must be installed along the downhill boundary of the construction site . Review Draft Page6 (B) Select Other Controls In addition to erosion and sediment controls , the Pollu t ion Prevent ion Plan for your project must address the other potent ial pollutant sources that may exist on a construction site . They include proper waste disposal , compliance with applicable State or local waste disposal , sanitary sewer or septic system regulations , control of offsite vehicle tracking , and control of allowable non-storm water discharges , as explained in the following bullets : • Ensure proper disposal of construction site waste materials . • Treat or dispose of sanitary wastes that are generated onsite in accordance with State or local requirements . Contact the local government or State regulatory agency . • Prevent offs ite tracking of sediments and generation of dust. Stabilized construction entrances or veh icle washing racks should be installed at locations where vehicles leave the site . IM"lere dust is a problem, implement dust control measures such as irrigation . • Identify and prevent contamination of non-storm water discharges . 'Mlere non-storm water discharges allowed by the general permit exist , they should be identified and steps should be taken to prevent contamination of these discharges. (C) Select Storm Water Management Controls Storm water management controls are constructed to prevent or control pollution of storm water after the construct ion is completed . The general permit requires that storm water management controls be installed for construction projects where flow rates after construction exceed flow rates before construction . These controls include the following : • Retention pond-A pond that holds runoff in a reservo ir without release except by means of evaporation , infiltration , or emergency bypass . • Detention pond-A pond that holds or detains runoff in a basin for a limited time releasing it very slowly a ll owing most of the sed iments to drop out. • Infiltration measures-Measures that allow the percolation of water though the ground surface into subsurface soil. Specific measures include infiltration trenches, basins , and dry wells . • Vegetated swales and natural depressions-Grass-lined ditches or depressions that transport runoff , filter sediments from the runoff , and enhance infiltration of the runoff. Selection of the most appropriate storm water management measures depends upon a number of factors , but most of all upon s ite cond it ions . EPA expects that most measures can be designed to remove 80 percent of the total suspended solids from post-construction runoff. IM"len you select storm water management measures for a development project , consider the impacts of these measures on other environmental media (i.e ., land , air, and ground wa ter). For example , if the water table is unusually high in your area , a retention pond for contaminated storm water could lead to contaminat ion of a ground water source unless special preventive measures are taken . EPA strongly discourages the transfer of pollution from one environmental medium to another and prohibits the adoption of any storm water management practice that results in a violation of other Federal , State , or local environmental laws . In addi t ion to pollutant removal , the storm water management port ion of the plan must address velocity dissipation at discharge locations . Development usually means an increase in speed with which the site will drain because of the addition of paved areas , storm sewers , curbs , gutters , etc. T he general permit requires that velocity dissipat ion devices be placed along the length of any outfall where erosive conditions ex ist. The potent ial for eros ion is Review Draft Page 7 primarily dependent upon the velocity of the storm water discharge and the type of material that lines the channel. One velocity dissipation device is the Riprap outlet protection , which is stone or riprap placed at the discharge point to reduce the speed of concentrated storm water flows. (D) Indicate the Location of Controls on the Site Map Pollution prevention measures must be shown on the pollution prevention site map , including the location of each measure used for erosion and sediment control , storm water management, and other controls . Wien this has been done , the s ite map is ready to be included in the Pollut ion Prevention Plan . Note : It may not be feasible to indicate some controls on the site map , e .g., waste control measures . (E) Prepare an Inspection and Maintenance Plan After the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan is prepared and the necessary controls are installed , you will be responsible for inspecting and maintaining them . The general perm it requires that you prepare a description of the procedures to mainta in the pollut ion prevention measures onsite . An inspection and maintenance checklist indicating each of the control measures proposed for the construction site should be included in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan prior to starting construction . (F) Prepare a Description of Controls Once you have finished planning your construction activities and selected the controls, make a list of each type of control you plan to use on the site . Include a description of each control , describe its purpose , and explain why it is appropriate in this location . The description should also include specific information about the measure such as size, materials , and methods of construction . Read your permit ca refully to ensure that your plan includes all of the required controls . (G) Prepare a Sequence of Major Activities You shou ld prepare a sequence of major activities that in cludes the installation of all the controls , earth disturb in g activities , all stabilization activities , and the maintenance required for the controls. The sequence should clearly in dicate th e order in which each of the activities described takes p lace . Several general principles are helpful in developing the sequence of major activities : • Install downslope and sideslope perimeter controls before the land disturbing activity occurs . • Do not disturb an area until it is necessary for construction to proceed . • Cover or stabilize disturbed areas as soon as possible . • Time activit ie s to limit impact from seasonal cl imate changes or weather events . • Delay construction of infiltration measures unt il the end of t he construction project when upstream drainage areas have been stabilized . • Do not remove temporary perimeter controls until after all upstream areas are finally stabilized . (H) Incorporate State or Local Requirements The plan mus t be in compliance w it h applicable State or local storm water management, eros ion , and sediment control requirements. This is done by incorporating the State or local requirements (by reference) into the plan , Review Draft Pages thereby allowing States and localities the flexibility to maintain their existing programs and providing additional authority for enforcement. The State or local erosion and sediment control or storm water management program requirements may be identical to requirements in the general permit. Some of them could be different. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan components of an NP DES storm water permit ensure that a minimum level of pollution prevention is required . Review Draft Page9 CERTIFICATION AND NOTIFICATION PHASE Once the site description and controls portion of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan have been prepared, you now must (A) certify the pollution prevention plan and (B) submit a Notice of Intent to the appropriate agency . The checklist provided at the end of this document will be very useful in evaluating whether all the required items are included in your Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan prior to certifying the plan or submitting a Notice of Intent. (A) Certify the Pollution Prevention Plan Construction activities often have a number of different short-term contractors and subcontractors coming onsite during each phase of the project development. The EPA general permit requires that the contractors and subcontractors responsible for implementing measures in the Pollution Prevention Plan be listed in the plan and that they sign a certification statement that they understand the permit requirements . This requirement holds each contractor/subcontractor responsible for certain permit conditions . Your plan should identify the Authorized representative . The authorized representative should be someone at or near the top of the management chain , such as the president, vice president , or a general partner, who has been delegated the authority to sign and certify this type of document. In signing the plan, the authorized representative certifies that the information is true and assumes liab ility for the plan . Please note that Section 309 of the Clean Water Act provides for significant penalties where information is false or the permittee violates , either knowingly or negligently , permit requirements . (B) Submit a Notice of Intent The General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity from Construction Activities requires that you submit a Notice of Intent (NOi) at least 48 hours before construction activities begin . The NOi is essentially an application and contains important information about your site, including site location , owner information , operator (general contractor) information , receiving water(s), existing NPDES Permit Number (if any), existing quantitative data , and a brief description of the project. EPA has developed a one-page form to be used by industrial facilities and construction activities when they submit NO ls . This form indicates all the information that you are required to provide and must be used in order for the NOi to be processed correctly . NOls for the EPA General Permit will be submitted directly to EPA's central processing center at the following address : Storm Water Notice of Intent P.O. Box 1251 Newington , VA 22122 The party or parties who have day-to-day responsibilities for site operations, and the party or parties who have control over the designs and specifications necessary to ensure compliance with plan requirements and permit conditions , must submit an NOi. It is anticipated that there will be projects where more than one entity (e.g ., the owner, developer, or general contractor) will need to submit an NOi so that both of the require men ts for an operator are met. In this case , those persons will become co-permittees . Deadlines-There are different deadlines for subm itting NO ls depending on whether the construct ion starts before or after October 1, 1992 . Review Draft Page 10 • Before October 1, 1992-For construction activities that have started before October 1, 1992, and plan to continue beyond this date , the NOi must be submitted on or before October 1, 1992. • After October 1, 1992-lf construction will not begin until after October 1, 1992 , a NOi must be postmarked at least 48 hours before construction begins . • The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be completed prior to the submittal of an NOi. Review Draft Page 11 CONSTRUCTION/ IMPLEMENTATION PHASE Once you have prepared a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and filed a Notice of Intent, you may then start construction of the project. However, you have not yet met all requirements of your permit. You should now do th e things that you said you would do in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan : (A) implement the controls , (B) inspect and maintain the controls , (C) maintain records of construction activities , (D) update/change the plan to keep it current, (E) take proper action when there is a reportable quantity sp ill, and (F) have plans accessible. (A) Implement Controls The first action that should be taken is to construct or perform the controls that were selected for the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan . The controls should be constructed or applied in accordance with State or local specifications . If there are no State or local specifications for control measures , then the controls should be constructed i n accordance with good engineering practices . The controls should be constructed and the stabilization measures should be applied in the order that you indicated in the sequence of major activities . To ensure that controls are adequately implemented, it is important that the work crews who install the measures are experienced and/or adequate ly trained . Improperly installed controls can have little or no effect and may actually increase the pollution of storm water. It is also important that all other workers on the construction site be made aware of the controls so that they do not inadvertently disturb or remove them . (B) Inspect and Maintain Controls As discussed previously , inspection and maintenance of the protecti ve measures that are part of this plan are as im portant to pollution prevention as proper planning, design/selection , and installation . • Inspection-The EPA General Permit requires inspection every 7 days or within 24 hours of a storm of 0.5 in ches in depth . All disturbed areas of the site , areas for material storage, and all of the erosion and sediment controls that were identified as part of the plan should be inspected. Controls must be in good operating condition until the area they protect has been completely stabilized and the construction activity is complete . • Maintenance/repairs-The inspector should note any damages or deficiencies in the control measures on an i nspection report form provided for this purpose . These reports document the inspection of the pollution prevention measures . These same forms can be used to request maintenance and repair and to prove that i nspection and maintenance were performed . The operator should correct damage or deficiencies as soon as practicable after the inspection, and any changes t hat may be required to correct deficiencies in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan should be made as soon as practicable after the inspection . (C) Maintain Records of Construction Activities In addition to the inspection and maintenance reports , the operator should keep records of the construction activity on the site. In particular, the operator should keep a record of the following information : • The dates when major grad ing activities occur i n a part icu lar area • The dates when constructi on activ it ies cease in an area , temporarily or permanently • The dates when an area is stabilized , temporarily or permanently . Review Draft Page 12 These reco rds can be used to make sure that areas where there is no construction activ ity will be stabilized w ith in the required ti meframe. (D) Update/Change the Plan For a construction activity to be in full compliance with its NP DES storm water permit , and for the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to be effect ive , the plan must accurately reflect site features and operations . Wien it does not, the plan must be changed . The plan must also be changed if the operator observes that it is not effect ive in minimizin g pollutant discharge from the site . If, at any time during the effective period of the permit, the permitting authority finds that the plan does not meet one or more of the minimum standards established by the general perm it , the permitting authority will notify the permittee of required changes necessary to bring the plan up to standard . (E) Report Releases of Reportable Quantities Because construction activities may handle certain hazardous substances over the course of the project, spills of these substances in amounts that equal or exceed Reportable Quantity (RQ) levels are a possibility . EPA has issued reg ul ations that define what reportable quantity levels are for oil and hazardous substances . These regulations are found at 40 CFR Part 110, 40 CFR Part 117, or 40 CFR Part 302 . If there is a RQ release duri ng the construction period , then you must take the follow ing steps : • Notify the National Response Center immediately at (800) 424-8802 ; in Washington , D.C., call (202) 426 -2675 . • Submit a written descript ion of the release to the EPA Regional office providing the date and circumstances of the re lease and the steps to be taken to prevent another release . • Modify the po lluti on prevent ion plan to include the information listed above. (F) Provide for Plan Location and Access The genera l permit has specific requirements regarding plan locati on and access . • Plan location-A copy of the Pollution Prevention Plan must be kept at the construction site from the tim e construction begins until the site is finally stabilized . • Retention of records-Retention of records requires that copies of the Storm Water Pollut ion Prevent ion P lan and all other reports required by the perm it , as well as all of the data used to complete the NOi be re ta i ned for 3 years after the completion of final site stabil ization . Review Draft Page 13 • Access-Although plans and associated records are not necessarily required to be submitted to the D i rector , these documents are considered to be "reports" according to Section 308(b) of the Clean Water Act. Upon request , the owner or operator must make these plans available to the Director, or any State or local agency who is approving erosion and sed iment control plans , or storm water management plans . If s ite storm water runoff is discharged to a mun icipal separate storm sewer system , the plans must be made available upon request to the municipal operator of the system . Review Draft Page 14 FINAL STABILIZATION/ TERMINATION PHASE Your permit for discharge of storm water associated with a construction activity will remain in effect until the construction is completed . Typically, the storm water discharge associated with an industrial activity is eliminated when the site is finally stabilized . V'vtlen storm water discharge associated with an industrial activity ceases , the owner/operator of the facility can be relieved of permit by submitting a Notice of Termination. Final stabilization-The notice of termination (NOT) cannot be submitted until all construction activities for the project have been completed and all areas are finally stabilized. The permit defines final stabilization as uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent or equivalent measures such as riprap for the areas of the site not covered by permanent structures or pavement. Notice of Termination-The NOT must include the name and address of both the owner and operator, as well as a certification signed by both parties . It will note that construction activities are complete, the site has been finally stabil ized, and the site no longer has a discharge associated with an industrial (construction) activity covered under the permit. V'vtlen the permit is terminated, it will relieve the permittees of their responsibility . EPA has developed a one-page NOT form to be submitted to the same address as the NOi. Review Draft Page 15 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP 2551 Te xas A ve. S outh, Ste. A •Co llege Station, Texas 7784 0 • 409-693-53 59 •FAX: 4 09-693 -4243 •E-ma il: mdgcs@gte.n et E ngineerin g, Surv eying , Planning and Environmental Co ns ultants July 14 , 1998 Veronica Morgan, P .E . City of College Station Development Services College Station, TX Re: Carter Creek, Site Reclamation Plan, MDG No. 000653-2787 Dear Veronica : Per y our review letter dated May 29 , 1998 , the requested changes have been made to the Site Reclamation Plan and calculation reports . Also , please find enclosed a copy of the N OI for this project. Per Mike Davis the Development Permit application and fees have already been ..... submitted for this project. If you would , please verify your records on this matter and if they have not been paid we will take care of it. Below I have addressed questions nine and ten : 9) The public easements that the City of College Station has in the area were ob t ained prior to the creation of these wetlands and therefore supercede . The City will still maintain the right to ex ercise their easements to their full extent . 10) Once the construction of this project is completed, we will submit the necessary data to FEMA as a LOMA. Also , w e have restructured the organization of the project since it has reached the stage of preparing construction documents . I believe this will help aid you with getting any necessary questions answered . Roughly, the duties will be broken down in the following manner with N orth Bardell as the project manager : Rabon Metcalf •!• Preparation of all construction drawings for site reclamation, siltation ponds , and main creek relocation ; 000653-c.19 .doc Greg Taggart •!• Procurement ofFEMA and CORP easements and submissions ; •!• Review of hydrologic data ; •!• Administrative items , such as agreements between City and de veloper and maintenance contracts . MDG-1 Please feel free to call me if you have any questions . RM/tm Enclosures : NOi Application Revised HEC 2 Data Revised Drawings Cc: Mike Davis, Riverview, Inc . 000653-c.19 .doc MDG -2 COLLEGE STATION Mike Davis Riverview, Inc. 4002 Aspen P. 0 . Box 9960 Bryan, Texas 77&01 I . '1J ,.,Q.J.@S~':P ~: S~ RR~~fD 0 Dear Mike: 1101 Texas Avenu e Te/: 409 764 3500 College Statio n, TX 77842 May29, 1998 We have completed the review of the material you submitted for the above referenced project. To recap lhe status of what has been submitted to d ate. th.is project was origi nally submitted on Nove mber 26, 1997 and the City denied U1e permit on December 15 , 1997 due lo incompleteness and ordinance non- compliance. On February 17,1998 you resubmitted the project. Again the submittal had several items originally requested in the December 1997 letter that were not included. We previously responded that the City could not complete the review wiU10ut this additional information. In early May, I received a number of phone calls from Gregg Taggert with MDG. He was inquiring if the City had completed the review of the additional information submitted lo the City on March 31, 1998. I explained that the submittal I received on March 31st was for lhe larger Carter Creek Relocation Project and not for this small Reclamation Project at SH30. On May 13,1998 you met with me lo go over what to date had been submitted to the City. During our discus s ion it became apparent tlia.t approximately 6 loose sheets of paper were submitted on March 31st for the small Reclamation Project at SH30 . They were submitted without benefit of a cover letter or explanation of what they were nor which project they were for. The same day, March 3 lst, a large 3 ring binder was submitted with a cover letter and description for the large Carter Creek Reclamation Project. The loose sheets were given to me with the large binder and the assU.mption was made that they belonged together. On May 13th after our discussion, the sheets were removed from the binder and logged in for review. Please remember in the future to submit information with a cover letter or submittal sheet to explain what project the submittal pertains lo and the contents of the submittal. With more than 40 sets of plans and reports alone per month (which does not include lettecs. casements and other miscellaneous items for reView) coming into this office, we cannot guess which project a few single sheets of paper belongs to . Especially in this case; when documents for one . project c3.n easily be mistaken for those belonging to the large Carter Creek Reclamation Project because of the data overlap. The followi.Dg are our comments on the project (the submittal made on February 17,1998 and the subsequent information submitted to complete the request). These items are ones needed before we can grant approval: l. The fill at _Station 11 .88 and 11.85 behind the Cinemark is located. within the flood way of Carters Creek. This fill area seems to provide no purpose for this project, it certainly is not meanf. for reclamation of the floodplain given its shape and siz.e . It appears to be some type \lf diversion structure which docs not fit with your request for a simple floodplain reclamation plan.. Due to this and its location within the floodway this area should be removed from the plan. 2. Since it appears that your single 24"x36" plan sheet will be the only item that will be submitted to a c:Ontractor foe construction, please assure the following items are included. on that sheet or a second page to the construction plans: . · a. Notes regarding the lift depths and compaction requirements for fill as stated in the FEMA regulations. Home of Texas A&M University / / b . Plans for the piping diagram between the ponds and locations of these pipes shown on the plan view. c. Locations of all underground pipes . This is essential to assure that they are not distwbed by your locations of ponds. This request was made in earlier conunents and still has not been addressed on the plans . The City requires on all construction plans that the locations of existing utilities be shown and does not allow someone to simply make a statement that they will be located in the field prior to construction. In this case we are contemplating 6-8 feet of cut in some areas, the City needs to see the locations of all utilities in relation to that cut and fill associated with the benns. d. Location of all silt fencing . Some has been shown to date. The plan still does not address silt migration toward the creek, as all silt fencing is located only on the SfDO side of the plan. This conunent again was one made in an earlier review. c . Note on the plan that all side slopes shall not exceed 4 : l. In particular where this is a concern is adjacent to Furrows. On the fill plan in that area you need to make the proposed contours tie to existing contours, we will not accept a note to the contractor to "tie to adjacent tract". This is of concern because the grades to tie to appear to be well into another property owners tract. This type of detail should not be worked out in the field but rather on a set of construction documents. Also your transition to the existing concrete access drive appears to contain some almost vertical slopes. Please show the contours as they approach the drive and assure that the slopes are no more than 4: I. Also spot a top of paveme nt elevation on the drive. f. Add a general note regarding where sodding or seeding is to be used, along with notes regarding the required timing of grass establislunent. 3 . At station l l. 7 remove the excess storage area from your cross section included in the HEC-2 runs. During the lOO-year stonn event, the ponds are full and storage capacity for those should not be used in the runs. In addition., this storage capacity is being used by the program from station ll.7 to station 11.85 where the cross section changes. This gives a false sense that this storage capacity is there when in reality it is not 4. At station 11. 7 you show two channels. The second channel depicted on the left overbank is not there. You may have picked up the meander in the stream and that is why you show two channels at this cross section. 5. Add a cross section at l l .52+ to depict the beginning of the bermed fill area. This again was a comment made earlier in a review where we requested additional cross sections to further depict the fill . 6 . Also from an earlier review the question was asked why you changed the "n" value in the channel and left overbank when with this project you have stated that you are not doing anything in that area. You stated that you did not use different "n"s from those used in the FEMA runs. From the runs the "'n" values used in the original FEMA runs were : Left Overbanlc =.075 Right Overbanlc =.08 Channel =.06 / in your "fill" runs you used beginning at station 11.51 Left Overbank =.072 Right Overbank =.075 Channel =.065 The only one of these that should have changed is the right overbank. Since you disagreed with this statement earlier please let us know if we have misinterpreted your runs. 7. The plans for the pond piping need to be more descriptive. Keep in mind that this should be a construction document Please show flowlines at each pond location. pipe materials, headwall d etails, etc. From what you have submitted, we cannot tell how the ponds drain nor how full they will stay. The l :l slope on the pond siphon diagram is unacceptable if you propose that the City ever have any maintenance responsibilities . Also the 5+ feet of fill on the City sewerline is also unacceptable. 8. Several questions regarding maintenance have still not been addressed. Although you submitted letters from property owners that say they will maintain the ponds, it does not address a maintenance schedule nor the level of maintenance that will be given to the ponds. It does refer to a 404 mitigation area and the maintenance associated with that type of facility. Please clarify what 404 maintenance means. 9. It appears that the Corp will be asking for no disturbance of any wetland areas that you may create with the large reclamation project. How does the Corp view our easements in these wetland areas and our rights to install ne w pipelines through the area and disturb these new wetlands with construction equipment? 10 . You will need to submit this data to FEMA as a LOMA based on fill in o rder to accurately de pict the new floodplain line that you will have established. This must be done within 6 months of the completion of the fill operation. Other miscellaneous items that I am sure you are aware of but we have not received to date are : • A completed development permit application. • The fees associated .with the permit and inspection. • A copy of the NOi for the project. If you have any questions. please call. Veronica J.B. fvlO·l'gan. Asst. City Engineer ~~ f t.m Callaway, Dicector ofDevclopment Services Unda Huft: City of Bryan Marie Smith. Dicector of Public Works North Bardell, MDG MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP 25 51 Texas Ave. South , S te. A •College Station , Texas 7784 0 • 409-693-53 59 •FAX: 409-693-4243 •E-mail: mdgcs@gte .net August 10 , 1998 Veronica Morgan, P .E . City of College Station Development Services College Station, TX Engi neerin g, Surveying , Plannin g and E nvironmental Consultants Re: Carter Creek, Site Reclamation Project, MDG No. 00 0 114-2902 Dear Veronica : Per our meeting on August 7, 1998 , the following changes have been made to the submitted site reclamation plans : •!• Adjust grades and flowlines of all excavation area ponds and drain lines so that the ponds will be fully draining after each rainfall event . •!• Additional note stating the conditions of access to the site to prevent damage to trees outside of the project area. As we discussed at the meeting we will need to find out if a Development Permit Application and fee has been turned in for this project. If not let us know and we will deliver on A.S.A.P . Below , I hav e address each one of your question in your letter date May 29, 1998 to help and aid in the re view of this project. 1) The fill area behind the Cinemark has been relocated behind the FEMA floodway line as graphically determined by FEMA FIRM community panel No. 48041C0142 , July 2, 199 2, see note #4 sheet # 1. 2 ) A dd ition construction plans shown and indicate the following items : a See note #1 sheet #1. b Piping between ponds is shown on sheet # 1 in plan view and details and profiles are shown on sheet #2 . c All existing util ities are shown on sheet #1. No cut is being made where the exi sting utilities are located . The existing 21 " RCP sanitary sewer line that is being cross has been located and we will be crossing under the sewer with a 8" PVC drain line . d Adequate silt fencing has been shown . From topography and spot ele vation the direction of runoff will be toward SH 3 0 . Runoff drain toward the overhead elec t rical easement and t hen flo w t oward SH 30 to the state highway right-of-way and then into Carter Creek. The required NOI was submitted in our last package dated July 14, 19 9 8. e Al l proposed grading contours are properly shown with a maximum 4 : 1 side slope and tie 000114-c.19 .doc MDG -1 into existing contours. f See note #3 sheet # 1. 3) Not applicable . The floodway line now shown is by graphically means straight from the FEMA panel. 4) Not applicable . The floodway line now shown is by graphically means straight from the FEMA panel. 5) Not applicable . The floodway line now shown is by graphically means straight from the FEMA panel. 6) Not applicable . The floodway line now shown is by graphically means straight from the FEMA panel. 7) Pond piping diagrams are as shown on sheets #1 & #2 with necessary headwall and piping details . 8) As we discussed at the meeting, no maintenance will be required for the ponds since they are the 404 easement. The Corp . as requested that these areas remain undisturbed and natural in nature after the creation on the ponds. Furthermore, the ponds have been made to be self- draining to reconcile your public safety and welfare concerns. 9) Attached is a copy of the 404 easement. Paragraph one of the second page states that any prior easements have right to ingress and egress over this easement. 10) Once the construction ofthis project is completed, we will submit the necessary data to FEMA for a LOMA. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions . RM/tm Enclosures : (2) Revised drawings ( 1) 404 Easement . .. 0001 14-c.19 .doc MDG -2 DEED RESTRICTIONS AND GRANT OF RIGHTS THE STATE OF TEXAS : :KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF BRAZOS : Whereas the Highw ay 30 Partnership (hereinafter called the Granter) is the fee simple owner of that 11.99 Acre tract (The Tract) or parcel in the Richard Carter League, College Station, Texas; which is described in drawing and by metes and bounds in Exhibit A attached hereto . Whereas, The Tract is part of a mitigation tract under the regulatory authority of the Fort Worth District of the U. S . Army Corps of Engineers (hereinafter called Grantee), pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, under Project Number 198600970 (The Project). Whereas Granter has agreed to Deed Restrict The Tract, along with the existing hardwoods area and wetlands to be created, as mitigation and as consideration for Grantee 's allowing the completion of the filling of the wetlands listed in The Project. Therefore for the consideration herein noted, Gran tor does restrict the use and title to the 11.99 acre tract described in Exhibit A as follows; 1. No commercial, industrial, agricultural, or residential developments, structures (including signs), or buildings shall be allowed or permitted on the tract. 2. No lumbering, mowing, burning, draining, plowing, or filling shall be allowed except as necessary for the construction of the ponds with their projected drainage and site flow and flow diverter dike as necessary for the mitigation indicated in aforementioned Project Number 198600970. 3. There shall be no grazing or keeping of cattle, sheep, horses, or other domestic livestock. 4. These deed restrictions can be changed, modified or revoked only upon written approval of Grantee, whose approval must be notarized and recorded on or with the document modifying these restrictions. 5. After construction of ponds and dike, The Tract is to be kept as a natural habitat for wildlife. For enforcement thereof, Grantor grants Grantee the following rights; A. The right to enforce, in a reasonable manner, by proceedings at law or in equity the covenants previously set forth. The Grantee does not waive or forfeit the right to take action as may be necessary to insure compliance with the covenants and purposes of this grant by any prior failure to act. B. The right to enter the tract at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting for compliance. DR -h"'y30 .wks ·. ·, These rig , and restrictions are granted subject to "'" easements in existence prior to Jan . 1, 1997 and their rights ofingress and egress to such easements and Grantor specifically reserves the right to grant utility easements to the City of College Station should they become necessary in the future and reserves a 40 foot access easement across The Tract as depicted in the drawing on Exhibit A. The terms and conditions of this Deed restriction and Rights conveyance shall be recorded in the Deed Records of Brazos County and shall bind Gran tor, to the extent of his equitable interest in The Tract ; and, these restrictions and rights shall run with the land and be binding on the undersigned and its heirs and assigns forever. Executed this the 29th day of September, 1997. _,..-'Sudhir D . Patel , M . D ., Partner ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Texas I County of Brazos Subscribed and Sworn to before me, the undersigned authority, on this the 29th day of Septi!'mber, 1997 by Sudhir D. Patel, M.D. that he executed this document acting in the capacity stated for the purposes indicated . ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Texas I County of Brazos PATRICIA L CEARLEY 1 Notaty Public, State of Texas M Commission Expires SEPiEMS!tR 5, 2ooo Notary Public, State of Texas Notary's name print~ PnTte,'<7/8 1 .ett.r!eu._ My commission expires: __ 0 Subscribed and Sworn to before me, the undersigned authority, on this the 29th day of September, 1997 by Alfred A. Martin that be executed this document acting in the capacity stated for the purposes indicated. DR-hwy30 .wks BEVERLY TYDLACKA Nota ry Publ ic . Sta te oi Texa s Mv Co mm issio n Expires ' MAY 27. 2001 Nota Nota My commission expires: __ ---- EXHIBIT "A" METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION WITHDRAWING OF A 11 . 99 ACRE TRACT (SECTION 404, CLEAN WATER CONSERVATION, CONSERVATION AREA) RICHARD CARTER LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO . 8 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS Metes and bounds description of all that certain 11. 99 acre tract or parcel ofland, lying and being situated in the Richard Carter League, Abstract No . 8, College Station, Brazos County , Texas , and being a portion of that same 29 .92 acre remainder tract conveyed from Sudhir D . Patel, M.D ., to Highway 30 Partnership as described by deed recorded in VOLUME 2108 , PAGE 150 of the Official Records ofBrazos County , Texas and a portion out of that same 66.37 acre composite tract conveyed from Bert Wheeler. Inc. to Regency Parkway, Inc ., as described by deed recorded in VOLillvffi 1219 , PAGE 287 of said Official Records , said 11 .99 acre tract being more particularly described as follows : COMMENCING at the south end or point of tangency, of the curve in the northwest right-of way line of Texas State Highway No. 30. THENCE S 42° 15' 33" W -6 .12 feet with said right-of way line to a point for the PLACE OF BEGINNING. THENCE S 42 ° 15' 33" W -187 .93 feet with said right-of way line to a point for corner, and ly ing in the southwest line of the 60' wide Exxon pipeline easement, as described in VOLlflvlE 822 , PAGE 746 of said Official Records. THENCE N 39° 39' 00" W -1655 .21 feet across said 29 .92 acre tract with said easement line to a point for comer. THENCE N 50° 21' 00" E -49 .66 feet to a point for comer in the ne w agreed boWldary line be tween said Highway 30 Partnership and said Regency Parkway, Inc. THENCE S 61° 37' 47" E -364.44 feet to a point for comer in the northeast line of a .io• wide City of Bryan electric easement, as described by deed recorded in VOLUME 307 , PAGE 316 of the Deed Records of Brazos County , Texas . THENCE S 39° 39' 00 E -410 .00 feet with said easement line to a point for corner. THENCE N 35° 57' 50" E -117 .63 feet across 29 .92 acre tract and said 66 .37 acre composite tract to a point for corner. THENCE S 39° 39' 00" E -460 .00 feet across said 29 .92 acre tract to a point for comer. THENCE N 13° 19' 06" E -495 .48 feet across said 29 .92 acre tract to a point for comer in said new agreed boundary line . THENCE S 56° 40' 17'' E -408 .90 feet across said 29 .92 acre tract with the projected southwest line of a sanitary sewer easement and the actual southwest line of said easement to a point for comer. THENCE S 33° 15' 49" W -414 .31 feet across said 29 .92 acre tract to a point for beginning of a curve to the right. THENCE in a southwesterly direction for a distance of 239.49 feet along the arc of said curve (Curve data : radius= 1654 .58 feet, tangent= 119 .95 feet, the chord bears S 37° 21' 46" \V -239 .28 feet) to a point for end of said curve and lyi ng in the northeast line of said City of Bryan electric easement. THENCE S 39° 39' 00" E -181.95 feet wi th said easement line to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 11. 99 acres of land . September, 1997 Municipal Development Group College Station, Texas 000653-c.05-23(2i87) \ . \ '. ~ \, \. I \ ' ' \ _J ' U\·. I ~~ ~--L __ ... -, 11 ,..~ II 1fj // ======== . ==== ~ ======== = ====JJ ~~ \ RUNS ARE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ACTUAL FLOODWAY LOCATIONS BETWEEN THOSE DESIGNATED IN THE FIS STUDY AND FOR THE DIRECT INFORMATIONAL COMPARISON OF THE ACTUAL RISE IN FLOODPLAIN CAUSED BY THIS FLOODPLAIN FRINGE FILL UNDER THE SAME MANNINGS N VALUES AS THOSE USED IN THE FIS STUDY--THE ACTUAL 0 SITE N VALUES SHOULD BE LOWER AND RESULT IN LOWER ACTUAL FLOODPLAIN AND FLOODWAY ELEVATIONS. COMPILED HEC 2 STUDY RESULTS EFFECTIVE FIS DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE CS TOPO--AD DED CROSS SECTS. REVISED/ POST PROJECT SECNO NCWSEL FCWSEL SURC . NCWSEL FCWSEL SURC . NCWSEL FCWSEL SURC . NCWSEL FCWSEL SURC. 10 .11 245 .6 246.4 0 .8 245.6 246.4 0.8 245 .6 246.4 0.8 245 .6 246.4 0 .8 10 .93 251.06 251.87 0 .81 251.07 251.87 0.8 251.07 251.87 0 .8 251.07 251.87 0 .8 11.45 254 .67 255.69 1.02 254 .67 255 .69 1.02 254 .67 255.69 1.02 254 .67 255 .69 1.02 11.46 254.72 255 .74 1.02 254.72 255 .75 1.03 254 .72 255 .75 1.03 254 .72 255.75 1.03 11.465 255.19 255.97 0 .78 255 .19 255 .97 0 .78 255 .19 255.97 0.78 11.47 255.22 25 6.0 1 0.79 255.22 25 6 .01 0 .79 255 .22 25 6.01 0.79 255 .22 256.01 0 .79 11 .51 255 .34 256 .18 0.84 255 .34 256.18 0 .84 11.55 255.45 256.35 0.9 255.45 256.34 0.89 11.7 255 .98 256 .96 0.98 255 .92 256.79 0 .87 11 .83 25 6.53 257 .5 0 .98 256.52 257.35 0 .83 11.88 256 .94 257.92 0.98 256 .94 257.93 0 .99 256 .94 257 .93 0 .99 256 .96 257.8 0 .84 11.24 259.26 260 .05 0 .79 259 .26 260 .06 0.8 259 .25 260 .06 0 .81 259 .26 260.04 0 .78 PRE POST THIS RU USED TO FIND ACTUAL FLOODWAY LOCATIONS BETWEEN CROSS SECTIONS 11.47 AND 11 .8 8 NOTE THAT AT ALL POINTS PRIOR TO 11.88 THE FINAL FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION ISAT OR BELOW THE EX I STING LEVEL DUE TO THE SLIGHTLY I NCREASED FLOW AREA IN THE FLOOD WAY DUE TO THE EXCEVATION (EVEN WITHOUT THE POTENTIALLY LOWER NV ALUES)--AT 11.88 THE ELEVATION IS I NCREASED ONLY .02 FEET----WA Y BELOW THE .05 FEET ALLOWED FROM FLOODWAY FRINGE FILL ON ONE SIDE OF A FLOODPLAIN. THE BASIC CONCLUSIO FROM THESE HEC2 RU SIS THAT THE FLOODWAY FRINGE FILL WITH THE PROPOSED EXCAVATION WITHIN THE FLOODWAY WILL BE WELL WITHIN THE GUIDELINES OF ALLOWED FLOODPLAIN MODIFICATIONS AND I ACTUALITY WILL NOT EVEN SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE ANY FLOODPLAIN ELE NCWSEL IS TIIE NATURAL 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATION FCWSEL IS TIIE ENCROACHMENT (FLOODWAY} WATER SURFACE ELEVATION SURC. IS TIIE SURCHARGE OF FCWSEL OVER NCWSEL NCWSEL JS THE NATURAL I 00 YEAR WATER SURF ACE ELEVATION AND FCWSELIS THE ENCHROACHMENT (FLOODW AY) WATER SURF ACE ELEVATION AND SURC. JS THE SURCHARGE 1******************************************** * HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES * * * Version * * RUN DATE 4 .6 .0; February 1991 07JUL98 TIME 21:33:28 * * * * ******************************************** ************************************* HEC -2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4.6.0 ; February 1991 ************************************* x x x xxxxxxx xxxxx x x x x x x xxxxxxx x xxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxxxx xxxxx Tl CARTERS CREEK FROM RIVER HILE 10 .11 TO 12 .24 100 YR FREQUENC Y T2 highway 30 partnership existing topography T3 100--FLOODWAY COMPARISON-FLOODWAY DETERM INED 11 .51--11.85 Jl ICHECK 0 J2 NPROF 1 INQ 6 I PLOT 0 NINV 0 PRFVS -1 IDIR 0 XS ECV 0 J3 VARIABLE CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT 38 43 1 7 200 STRT 0 XS ECH 0 26 METRIC 0 FN 0 10 HVINS -1 ALLDC 0 34 Q 0 IBW 0 JS LPRNT -10 NUMSEC -10 ********REQUESTED SECTION NUMBERS******** NC QT NH NH ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR .085 9 5 4800 0 10.11 263 .1 243.9 239.8 239.9 240.4 229 .6 242 241 .3 253.7 255.9 Drprrjmc.o ut.wps .075 7880 .07 0 49 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3170 3360 3500 4000 4500 .060 14050 3138 0 3138 251 .6 243 239 .5 240 .1 242 .1 233 .8 239 .2 241 .8 253.8 258.6 .1 17290 .065 0 3189 1200 1600 2100 2600 3100 3172 3363 3600 4100 4600 .3 19740 3189 0 2480 248.6 241.8 239 .7 240 .2 242 .7 242 .3 239 .3 245.1 253 260 .6 2 2420 .080 0 2560 1255 1700 2200 2700 3138 3189 3380 3700 4200 4700 37960 3360 0 2798 247.2 240.8 239.9 240 .1 235 .8 242 .9 241 .7 249 .3 254 .5 263 .2 xxxxx x x x xxxxx x x xxxxxxx WSEL 24 5.60 CHNIH 0 5 8 22420 .07 9 .1 1300 1800 2300 2800 3148 3200 3385 3800 4300 4800 *************************************** * U .S . ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * * * 609 SECOND STREET, SUITED DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616-4687 (916) 756-1104 * * * * *************************************** FQ 0 I TRACE 0 3 22420 3385 1850 245 .4 240 .5 239 .9 240 .3 229 .7 241.3 241.6 252 .5 254 .8 46 22420 .085 3300 1400 1900 2400 2900 3154 3300 3400 3900 4400 QT NH NH ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR NC ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR ET Xl X3 SB ET Xl X2 XS BT BT BT BT NC ET Xl 9 5 5890 0 10.93 270.1 265.7 260.6 236 246.7 245.6 245.5 245.6 252.5 259.5 263.7 266.4 268 .085 0 11. 45 272.3 262.9 265.5 245 246.9 249.4 250.4 247.7 253 260 0 11.46 10.0 1.25 0 11.465 0 8 13 1900 256.1 .075 0 11. 47 7800 .075 0 65 1000 1400 1800 2021 2200 2600 3051 3200 3700 4100 4500 5000 5500 .080 0 48 800 1300 2100 2929 3250 3290 3400 4100 4880 5700 0 0 0 1.30 0 0 0 252.5 800 263.8 5100 .08 0 0 13800 2010 0 2000 269.5 264.3 253.9 236.5 246 245.2 241 245.8 255.5 261.2 264.4 266.1 268.3 .065 0 2900 258.5 266.7 268.1 245 241.6 249 248.6 248.9 253.8 261.1 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 1 253.85 272 3500 257.7 .06 0 3241 16900 .06 0 2050 1100 1500 1900 2027 2300 2700 3053 3300 3800 4200 4600 5100 5600 .3 0 3347 1145 1600 2200 2967 3259 3300 3600 4300 5000 5900 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 254.40 2200 254.1 .1 0 3300 19250 2050 0 3920 269.1 263.7 249.4 237.8 246.2 245.2 239.3 246.4 257.6 261.7 266.7 266.4 269 .5 0 2700 253.8 264.2 266.5 249.1 240.9 249.9 250.2 251.8 257.7 268.4 0 50 0 21.0 0 25 250.9 254.78 1400 268.8 5900 .3 0 50 21800 .08 0 3840 1200 1600 1975 2035 2325 2800 3074 3400 3900 4300 4700 5200 5700 0 2700 1162 1800 2400 3000 3268 3325 3700 4800 5100 6200 0 50 0 7.70 0 25 0 255.19 264.9 3800 261.1 0 50 36830 3051 0 4330 268.9 267 248.9 247.4 246.1 245 241.2 247.1 258.7 263.3 266.4 266.8 269.9 0 2700 253.6 257.8 247.2 251.6 238.9 251 249 254 260.4 0 50 0 1122 0 25 0 257.07 2400 250.9 0 50 21800 .065 9.1 0 1237 1700 2000 2050 2400 2900 3111 3500 4000 4360 4800 5300 5800 9.1 1200 1878 2800 3226 3275 3347 3760 4830 5400 9.1 1.00 248 3.70 9.1 0 0 255.97 1600 266.5 6200 9.1 1 21800 3113 2000 0 267.3 266 247.8 247.1 246.9 245.5 245 249.3 258.7 262.7 266.5 267.6 271.3 2900 259.0 263.8 248.4 250.5 238.9 251.9 250.9 247.9 260.9 2900 0 250.9 0 2900 0 0 255.97 266.7 4400 268.4 2900 .2 21800 .085 3170 0 1300 1740 2010 2100 2500 3000 3113 3600 4007 4400 4900 5400 5890 4300 1240 1900 2900 3241 3277 3349 3800 4850 5600 4300 0 0 0 4300 0 0 2600 251.2 4300 0 MANNINGS N OF LEFT OVERBANK IS THE AVERAGE (ROUNDED TO THREE DEVIMAL PLACES) OF THAT CALCULATED FROM THE NH IN THE LEFT OVERBANK OF CROSS SECTION 11.88---SEE NH PRIOR TO SECTION 11.88 BELOW NC .071 .075 .065 .1 .3 ET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.1 505 1785 Xl 11.51 28 831 891 200 180 180 0 0 0 Drprrjmc.out.wps 2 GR GR GR GR GR GR ET Xl GR GR GR GR ET 258 250 238 248 247.4 254 0 0 532 859 1163 1617 2400 0 250 250.7 240 247.1 248 256 0 191 714 865 1229 1865 2455 0 REQUESTED ADDITIONAL CROSS SECTION 11.55 18 1048 1143 258 0 252 245 251.5 940 250 1048 251 1189 250 1249 249.1 2165 250 2265 0 0 0 0 248 250 250 248 248.7 257 0 220 250 238.3 249.8 256 0 407 831 891 1248 1905 2480 0 215 524 1082 1438 2415 0 248 240 251.5 248.8 249.6 0 220 249.4 238.3 249.2 0 NOTE TOPO CHANGED FROM ACTUAL AT STATION 1700-REQUEST OF CITY REVIEWER Xl GR GR GR GR 11.70 17 1760 1835 610 635 800 ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR NH 260 253 239 252 11.83 258 249.0 247 252 252.2 5 NH 4300 ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR NH NH ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR 0 11. 880 275.1 268.1 252.0 251.2 251.3 251.2 253.6 242.4 252.3 269.8 5 3421 0 12.24 265.6 254.3 254.5 254.4 254.3 247.9 259 Drpnjmc.out.wps 0 1600 1782 2100 25 0 705 1185 1705 1863 .070 0 47 1000 1500 2000 2500 2908 3000 3400 3433 3700 4200 .075 0 35 1000 1400 1900 2400 2538 2835 3100 252 252 239 256 1705 254 250 247 240.5 252 2908 0 3400 273.4 263.0 251.7 251.2 247.3 251.8 253.8 244.7 253.5 274.8 2509 0 2800 257.7 254.8 254.2 254.4 255.7 247.9 259.9 250 1650 1808 2250 1764 137 709 1203 1730 1965 .060 0 3454 1100 1600 2100 2600 2920 3100 3409 3439 3800 4300 .065 0 2867 1038 1500 2000 2500 2600 2849 3200 250 252.5 250.0 480 252 251.2 250 240.5 252.7 2944 0 440 271.4 258.2 251.4 251.3 246.1 251.7 244.9 253.5 255.7 2538 0 1800 255.9 254.6 254.1 253.8 256 256.7 263.3 710 1700 1835 520 261 790 1209 1745 2025 .075 0 255 1200 1700 2200 2700 2929 3200 3420 3454 3900 .075 0 1900 1100 1600 2100 2509 2700 2867 3300 250 253 251.5 690 250.7 250.8 252 252 254 3409 0 260 269.3 252.5 251.4 251.l 247.3 252.2 243.3 253.6 258.8 2820 0 1900 255.9 254.5 254.1 251.3 256 257.5 269.9 422 837 932 1419 2070 9.1 0 595 1108 1749 9.1 0 940 1750 1875 9.1 545 1040 1480 1764 2100 .065 9.1 1300 1800 2300 2800 2938 3300 3425 3500 4000 .06 9.1 1 1200 1700 2200 2515 2800 2900 3400 3 249.2 238 250 248 250 580 0 250 250 248.9 525 0 252 252 250.5 540 250 250 252.7 252.5 260 3454 2010 268.7 251.9 251.2 251.4 251.5 252.1 242.3 252.2 264.2 2867 1450 -.2 254.3 255.3 254.4 251.3 255.1 258.9 270.1 492 845 1023 1507 2250 1955 0 685 1143 1950 1960 0 1520 1760 1990 1830 701 1179 1586 1828 2167 .075 3545 1400 1900 2400 2900 2944 3325 3430 3600 4100 .075 2867 0 1300 1800 2300 2527 2820 3000 3421 ************************************* HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4 .6 .0 ; February 1991 ************************************* NOTE-ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OF CROSS -SECTION NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST 00--FLOODWAY COMPARISON- SUMMARY PRINTOUT SECNO Q CWSEL VOL VCH HV .OlK KRATIO EG QWEIR 10 .110 22420 .00 245 .60 .00 3.39 .08 6617 .81 .00 2 45 .68 .00 10.110 22420 .00 246 .40 .00 3 .55 .10 6612 .01 .00 246 .50 .00 10 .930 21800 .00 251 .07 864 .80 4 .30 .11 5190 .31 .78 251 .18 .00 10.930 21800 .00 251.87 745 .09 4.47 .14 5196 .47 .79 252 .01 .00 11 . 450 21800 .00 254 .67 1494 .50 2.38 .06 6860 .67 1.32 254 .73 .00 11. 450 21800 .00 255.69 1264 .89 2 .76 .09 6502 .43 1 .25 255 .78 .00 11 .460 21800 .00 254.72 1508 .01 2.36 .06 6987 .90 1 .02 254 . 77 .00 11 .460 21800 .00 255.75 1275 .56 2 .74 .09 6604 .78 1 .02 255 .83 .00 * 11 . 465 21800.00 255 .19 1515 .14 2 .15 .05 8036 .84 1.15 255 .24 .00 * 11 .465 21800.00 255.97 1281 .01 2 .65 .08 6961 .73 1.05 256 .05 .00 11.470 21800 .00 255.22 1529 .81 2 .32 .05 7960.13 .99 255 .28 .00 11 .470 21800 .00 256 .01 1291 .96 2 .84 .09 6940 .51 1.00 256 .10 .00 11. 510 21800 .00 255.34 1586 .74 2 .54 .04 10184.46 1.28 255.38 .00 11 .510 21800 .00 256 .18 1331 .78 3.52 .09 7641.14 1.10 256 .27 .00 11 .550 21800 .00 255 .45 1653 .35 3 .17 .06 8409 .16 .83 255 .51 .00 11 .550 21800 .00 256 .35 1379 .42 3.78 .10 7396 .35 .97 256 .45 .00 11 . 700 21800 .00 255.98 1818 .92 3.99 .09 6610.88 .79 256 .07 .00 11. 700 21800.00 256.96 1517 .04 4.02 .11 6886 .59 .93 257 .07 .00 11.830 21800.00 256 .53 1938 .70 3.50 .08 6910 .42 1.05 256 .61 .00 11.830 21800 .00 257.50 1620 .08 3.83 .11 6653.38 .97 257.60 .00 11. 880 21800 .00 256.94 2038 .61 2 .96 .06 7014 .55 1.02 257.00 .00 11.880 21800 .00 257.93 1710 . 02 2.99 .08 7373 .36 1.11 258.01 .00 12.240 21800.00 259.25 2454.34 3.90 .10 5118. 45 .73 259.36 .00 12.240 21800 .00 260 .06 2085 .18 3.62 .12 5246.01 . 71 260.18 .00 Drpnjmc.out. wp s 4 SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES NOTE SECNO= CAUTION SECNO= NOTE SECNO= CAUTION SECNO= FLOODWAY DATA , PROFILE NO . 2 1 1.46S 11 .46S 11. 46S 1 1.46S PROFILE= 1 WSEL BASED ON XS CARD PROFILE= 1 HYDRAULIC JUMP D .S . PROFILE= 2 WSEL BASED ON XS CARD PROFILE= 2 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S . 00 --FLOODWAY COMPARISON - -------FLOO D WAY -------WATER SURFACE ELEVATION STATION WIDTH SECTION MEAN WITH WITHOUT DIFFERENCE AREA VELOCITY FLOODWAY FLOOD WAY 10 .110 14SO . 9078 . 2 .S 246 .4 24S .6 .8 10 .930 1170 . 7S21 . 2 .9 2Sl .9 2Sl .l .8 11 . 4SO 1400. 92Sl . 2 .4 2SS .7 2S4 .7 1.0 11 .460 1400 . 9340 . 2 .3 2SS .7 2S4 .7 1.0 ll .46S 1400 . 9644 . 2 .3 2S6 .0 2SS .2 .8 11 .470 1400 . 9436. 2.3 2S6 .0 2SS .2 .8 11 .SlO 1280 . 962S . 2 .3 2S6 .1 2SS .3 .8 11 . sso 137S . 9S23 . 2 .3 2S6 .3 2SS .4 . 9 11 . 700 143S . 9140 . 2 .4 2S7 .0 2S6 .0 1 .0 11 . 830 1290 . 8680. 2 .S 2S7 .S 2S6.S 1.0 11. 880 1S3S . 997S. 2 .2 2S7 .9 2S6 .9 1.0 12 .240 1417 . 8099. 2 .7 260 .1 2S9 .3 .8 Drprrj mc.out.wps 5 !******************************************** * HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES * * * * Version 4.6 .0; February 1991 RUN DATE 07JUL98 TIME 21 :32 :21 * * * * * ******************************************** ************************************* HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Version 4 .6 .0 ; February 1991 ************************************* x x x xxxxxxx xxxxx x x x x x x xxxxxxx x xxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxxxx xxxxx Tl CARTERS CREEK FROM RIVER MILE 10 .11 TO 12 .24 100 YR FREQUENCY T 2 highway 30 p a rtnership PROPOSED topography and FRINGE FILL T3 -1 0 0--POST FLOODPLA I N rev ised 11 .51 --1 1 .85 -FLOODWAY STATIONS SAME AS PRE Jl !CHECK 0 J2 NPROF 1 INQ 6 I PLOT 0 NINV 0 PRFVS -1 !DIR 0 XSECV 0 J3 VARIABLE CODES FOR SUMMARY PRINTOUT STRT 0 XSECH 0 METRIC 0 FN 0 HVINS -1 ALLDC 0 Q 0 IBW 0 38 43 1 7 26 10 34 200 JS LPRNT -10 NC .085 QT 9 NH 5 NH 4800 ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR 0 10.11 263 .1 243.9 239.8 239.9 240.4 229 .6 242 241 .3 253 .7 255.9 NUMSEC -10 .075 7880 .07 0 49 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3170 3360 3500 4000 4500 .060 14050 3138 0 3138 251 .6 243 239.5 240 .1 242 .1 233.8 239.2 241 .8 253 .8 258 .6 ********REQUESTED SECTION NUMBERS******** .1 17290 .065 0 3189 1200 1600 2100 2600 3100 3172 3363 3600 4100 4600 .3 19740 3189 0 2480 248.6 241 .8 239.7 240.2 242.7 242.3 239 .3 245 .1 253 260.6 22420 .080 0 2560 1255 1700 2200 2700 3138 3189 3380 3700 4200 4700 37960 3360 0 2798 247.2 240.8 239 .9 240 .1 235 .8 242.9 241 .7 249 .3 254 .5 263.2 xxxxx x x xxxxx x x x xxxxxxx WSEL 245 .60 CHNIM 0 58 22420 .07 9.1 1300 1800 2300 2800 3148 3200 3385 3800 4300 4800 *************************************** * U .S . ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * * * 609 SECOND STREET, SUITED DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616-4687 (916) 756-1104 * * * * * *************************************** FQ 0 I TRACE 0 3 22420 3385 1850 245 .4 240 .5 239 .9 240 .3 229 .7 241 .3 241.6 252 .5 254.8 46 22420 .085 3300 1400 1900 2400 2900 3154 3300 3400 3900 4400 QT NH NH ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR NC ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR GR ET Xl X3 SB ET Xl X2 XS BT BT BT BT NC ET Xl NC 9 5 5890 0 10.93 270.1 265.7 260.6 236 246.7 245.6 245.5 245.6 252.5 259.5 263.7 266.4 268 .085 0 11. 45 272.3 262.9 265.5 245 246.9 249.4 250.4 247.7 253 260 0 11. 46 10.0 1.25 0 11. 465 0 8 13 1900 256.1 .075 0 11.47 .071 7800 .075 0 65 1000 1400 1800 2021 2200 2600 3051 3200 3700 4100 4500 5000 5500 .080 0 48 800 1300 2100 2929 3250 3290 3400 4100 4880 5700 0 0 0 1.30 0 0 0 252.5 800 263.8 5100 .08 0 0 .075 13800 2010 0 2000 269.5 264.3 253.9 236.5 246 245.2 241 245.8 255.5 261.2 264.4 266.1 268.3 .065 0 2900 258.5 266.7 268.l 245 241.6 249 248.6 248.9 253.8 261.1 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 1 253.85 272 3500 257.7 .06 0 3241 .065 16900 .06 0 2050 1100 1500 1900 2027 2300 2700 3053 3300 3800 4200 4600 5100 5600 .3 0 3347 1145 1600 2200 2967 3259 3300 3600 4300 5000 5900 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 254.4 2200 254.1 .1 0 3300 .1 19250 2050 0 3920 269.1 263.7 249.4 237.8 246.2 245.2 239.3 246.4 257.6 261.7 266.7 266.4 269 .5 0 2700 253.8 264.2 266.5 249.1 240.9 249.9 250.2 251.8 257.7 268.4 0 50 0 21.0 0 25 250.9 254.78 1400 268.8 5900 .3 0 50 .3 21800 .08 0 3840 1200 1600 1975 2035 2325 2800 3074 3400 3900 4300 4700 5200 5700 0 2700 1162 1800 2400 3000 3268 3325 3700 4800 5100 6200 0 50 0 7.70 0 25 0 255.19 264.9 3800 261.1 0 50 36830 3051 0 4330 268.9 267 248.9 247.4 246.1 245 241.2 247.1 258.7 263.3 266.4 266.8 269.9 0 2700 253.6 257.8 247.2 251.6 238.9 251 249 254 260.4 0 50 0 1122 0 25 0 257.07 2400 250.9 0 50 21800 .065 9.1 0 1237 1700 2000 2050 2400 2900 3111 3500 4000 4360 4800 5300 5800 9.1 1200 1878 2800 3226 3275 3347 3760 4830 5400 9.1 1.00 248 3.70 9.1 0 0 255.97 1600 266.5 6200 9.1 1 21800 3113 2000 0 267.3 266 247.8 247.1 246.9 245.5 245 249.3 258.7 262.7 266.5 267.6 271.3 2900 259.0 263.8 248.4 250.5 238.9 251.9 250.9 247.9 260.9 2900 0 250.9 0 2900 0 0 255.97 266.7 4400 268.4 2900 .2 21800 .085 3170 0 1300 1740 2010 2100 2500 3000 3113 3600 4007 4400 4900 5400 5890 4300 1240 1900 2900 3241 3277 3349 3800 4850 5600 4300 0 0 0 4300 0 0 2600 251.2 4300 0 ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR NH NH ET Xl GR GR GR GR GR GR GR 0 11.51 258 250 238 248 247.4 248.7 252 0 33 0 532 859 1163 1617 1905 2330 0 831 250 250.7 240 247.1 247.7 249.6 256 0 891 191 714 865 1229 1830 2070 2350 0 200 248 250 250 248 246.0 250 256.25 0 180 407 831 891 1248 1850 2110 2351 0 180 248 240 251.5 248.8 246.0 254 REQUESTED CROSS SECTION--NOTE EVEN UNDER ZERO MAINTAINENCE EXPECTED MANNINGS N OVER THE POND WILL BE HUCH LESS THAN THE .075 USED IN THIS REPORT, THE LOWER N WILL ELEVATIONS, REVISION OF WHICH 11.55 23 1048 258 0 252 251.5 251 248 249 0 940 1189 1551 2040 0 250 250 247 256 0 ONLY LOWER THE 100 YR AND FLOODWAY IS NOT BEING REQUESTED. 1143 220 215 245 1048 1249 1555 2073 0 250 238.3 247 247 256.5 0 524 1082 1265 1838 2075 0 NOT ALL STATIONS ARE NOT ACTUAL TOPOPOGRAPHY, BUT ARE RAISED AT REQUEST OF CITY REVIEWING ENGINEER--ACTUAL MANNINGS N WILL LOWER FLOODWAY AND FLOODPLAIN BUT SUCH IS NOT REQUESTED HEREBY 11.70 22 1760 1835 610 635 260 0 252 250 250 710 253 1600 252 1650 252.5 1700 239 249 257 11.83 258 248.5 247 252 252.2 5 4300 0 11.880 275.1 268.1 252.0 251.2 251.3 251.2 253.6 1782 1914 2049 24 0 705 1185 1700 1863 .070 0 47 1000 1500 2000 2500 2908 3000 3400 239 249 258 1705 254 250 247 240.5 254 2908 0 3400 273.4 263.0 251.7 251.2 247.3 251.8 253.8 1808 1980 2265 1764 137 709 1203 1727 1871 .060 0 3454 1100 1600 2100 2600 2920 3100 3409 250 250.5 480 252 251.2 250 240.5 256 2944 0 440 271.4 258.2 251.4 251.3 246.1 251.7 244.9 1835 1990 520 261 790 1209 1747 1880.0 .075 0 255 1200 1700 2200 2700 2929 3200 3420 220 249.4 238 .3 247 248 0 800 250 253 251.5 252 690 250.7 250.8 252.0 252 257.25 3409 0 260 269.3 252.5 251.4 251.l 247.3 252.2 243.3 9.1 0 422 837 932 1419 1856 2150 9.1 0 595 1108 1523 1853 9.1 0 940 1750 1875 2030 9.1 545 1040 1480 1767 1885 .065 9.1 1300 1800 2300 2800 2938 3300 3425 505 0 249.2 238 250 248 248 252 580 0 250 250 248 248.6 525 0 252 252 250 256.0 540 250 250 252.7 252.5 3454 2010 268.7 251.9 251.2 251.4 251.5 252.1 242.3 1785 0 492 845 1023 1507 1865 2221 1955 0 685 1143 1527 1880 1960 0 1520 1760 1905 2045 1830 700 1179 1586 1828 .075 3545 1400 1900 2400 2900 2944 3325 3430 GR 242 .4 3433 244.7 3439 253 .5 3454 253 .6 3500 252 .2 3600 GR 252 .3 3700 253 .5 3 800 255 .7 3900 258 .8 4000 2 64 .2 4100 GR 269 .8 4 2 00 274 .8 4300 NH 5 .07 5 2509 .065 2538 .075 2820 .06 2867 .075 NH 3421 ET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 .1 1450 2867 Xl 12 .24 35 2800 2 867 1800 1900 1900 1 -.2 0 GR 265.6 1000 257 .7 1 038 255 .9 1100 255 .9 1200 254 .3 1300 GR 254 .3 1400 254 .8 1500 254 .6 1600 254 .5 1700 255 .3 1800 GR 254 .5 1900 254 .2 2000 254 .1 2100 254 .1 2200 254 .4 2300 GR 254.4 24 00 254.4 2500 2 53 .8 2509 251.3 2515 251.3 2527 GR 254.3 2538 255 .7 2 600 256 2700 256 2800 255 .1 2820 GR 247.9 2835 247 .9 2849 2 56 .7 2867 257 .5 2900 258 .9 3000 GR 2 59 3 1 00 259 .9 3200 263 .3 3300 269 .9 3400 270 .1 3421 Tl CARTER CREE K-100 YEAR FLOOD WAY T2 JV T3 CARTER CREEK -100 YEAR FLOOD WAY Jl I CHECK INQ NINV IDIR STRT METRI C HVINS Q WSEL FQ 0 8 -1 246.40 J2 NPROF I PLOT PRFVS XSECV XSECH FN AL LDC IBW CHN IM I TRACE 2 0 ************************************* HEC-2 WATER SURFACE PROFILES Versi on 4 .6 .0; February 1991 ************************************* NOTE-ASTERISK (*) AT LEFT OF CROSS-SECTI ON NUMBER INDICATES MESSAGE IN SUMMARY OF ERRORS LIST 100--POST FLOODPLAIN rev SUMMARY PRINTOUT SECNO Q CWSEL VOL VCH HV .OlK KRATIO EG QWEIR 10 .110 22420 .00 245 .60 .oo 3.39 .08 6617 .8 1 .00 245.68 .00 10 .110 22420 .00 246 .40 .00 3.55 .10 6612 .01 .00 246.50 .00 10 .930 21800 .00 251.07 864 .80 4.30 .11 5190 .31 .78 251.18 .00 10 .930 21800 .00 251.87 745 .09 4.47 .14 5196 .47 .79 252.01 .00 11 . 450 21800.00 254 .67 1494.50 2 .38 .06 6860 .67 1.32 254.73 .00 11 .450 21800 .00 255 .69 1264 .89 2 .76 .09 6502 .43 1 .25 255.78 .00 11 . 460 21800 .00 254 .72 1508 .01 2 .36 .06 6987 .90 1 .02 254 .77 .00 11 . 460 21800.00 255 .75 1275 .56 2 .74 .09 6604 .78 1.02 255 .83 .00 • • • ll.46S 21B00.00 ll.46S 21BOO.OO 11.470 21BOO.OO 11.470 21BOO.OO 11. SlO 21BOO. 00 11.SlO 21BOO.OO 11.SSO 21BOO.OO 11.SSO 21BOO.OO 11.700 21BOO.OO 11.700 21BOO.OO ll.B30 21B00.00 ll.B30 21BOO.OO 11.BBO 21BOO.OO ll.8BO 21BOO.OO 12.240 21BOO.OO 12.240 21BOO.OO 2SS.19 2SS.97 2SS.22 2S6.0l 2SS.34 2S6.1B 2SS.4S 2S6.34 2SS.92 2S6.79 2S6.S2 2S7.3S 2S6.96 2S7.BO 2S9.26 260.04 lSlS.14 12Bl.Ol 1S29.Bl 1291.96 1S8S.62 1331.Bl 16SO.SS 13B3.22 lBll. 23 1S31.0B 1922.44 1632.7B 2019.9S 1 721. OS 2437.0S 2091.21 SUMMARY OF ERRORS AND SPECIAL NOTES 2.lS 2.6S 2.32 2.B4 2.62 3.Sl 2.B9 2.9B 4.10 4.07 4.02 4.19 2.94 3.07 3.90 3.64 .OS .OB .OS .09 .04 .09 .06 .07 .10 .11 .09 .11 .06 .OB .10 .12 NOTE SECNO= CAUTION SECNO= NOTE SECNO= CAUTION SECNO= ll.46S PROFILE= 1 WSEL BASED ON XS CARD ll.46S PROFILE= 1 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S. ll.46S PROFILE= 2 WSEL BASED ON XS CARD ll.46S PROFILE= 2 HYDRAULIC JUMP D.S. 8036.84 6961.73 7960.13 6940.Sl 9847.B4 76S9.S2 9239.33 937S.98 6416.76 6742.31 6S31.B4 6S4B.12 7073.SO 7136. 22 5123.66 S202.61 l. lS l.OS .99 1.00 1.24 1.10 .94 1.22 .69 .72 1.02 .97 l.OB 1.09 .72 .73 WARNING SECNO= 11.700 PROFILE= 1 CONVEYANCE CHANGE OUTSIDE ACCEPTABLE RANGE FLOODWAY DATA, PROFILE NO. 2 100--POST FLOODPLAIN rev -------FLOODWAY -------WATER SURFACE ELEVATION STATION 10.110 10.930 ll.4SO 11. 460 11. 46S 11.470 11. SlO 11.SSO 11.700 11. B30 11.BBO 12.240 WIDTH SECTION HEAN WITH WITHOUT DIFFERENCE 14SO. 1170. 1400. 1400. 1400. 1400. 12BO. 137S. 143S. 1290. 1S3S. 1417. AREA VELOCITY FLOODWAY FLOODWAY 907B. 7S21. 92Sl. 9340. 9644. 9436. 9639. 11033. 9030. BS78. 9776. 80SB. 2.S 2.9 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.4 2.S 2.2 2.7 246.4 2Sl.9 2SS.7 2SS.7 2S6.0 2S6.0 2S6.l 2S6.3 2S6.B 2S7.3 2S7.B 260.1 24S.6 2Sl. l 2S4.7 2S4.7 2SS.2 2SS.2 2SS.3 2SS.4 2SS.9 2S6.S 2S7.0 2S9.3 .B .8 1.0 1.0 .8 .B .B .9 .9 .8 .B .8 2SS.24 2S6.0S 2SS.2B 2S6.10 2SS.39 2S6.27 2SS.SO 2S6.41 2S6.02 2S6.90 2S6.61 2S7.46 257.03 257.BB 259.36 260.lS .00 .00 .oo .oo .oo .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL YUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP TO: FROM: DATE: MDG JOB NUMBER: ~o {It/ -12.?oL- A TI ACHED PLEASE FIND: NO. OF COPIES: DESCRIPTION: THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: 0 FOR APPROVAL ~YOUR USE 0 AS REQUESTED 0 OTHER: ------------------------~ COMMENTS: HFiYlE-($ --CHE 0S>cu?e>&:Q, -_________ _______.. ., Environmental Division Regulatory Branch December 23 , 1997 SUBJECT: Project Number 198600970 Ms . Veronica Morgan P .O . Box 9960 City of College Station Development Services Department College Station , Texas 77842 Dear Ms . Morgan : Please reference your letter of December 4 , 1997 , and our discussions with Mr. Gregory Taggart concerning a Reclamation and Erosion Control Plan dated November , 1997 , for a 27 . 32 acre tract near Carters Creek in the city of Bryan , Brazos County, Texas. This project has been assigned Project Number 198600970 . Please continue to use this project number in any future correspondence. We have reviewed this project in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 . Under Section 404 , the U.S . Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) regulates the discharge of dredged and fill material into waters of the United States , including wetlands. The USACE responsibility under Section 10 is to regulate any work in , or affecting , navigable waters of the United States. Based on your description of the proposed work , other information available to us, and current regulations and policy , we have determined that this work will not involve any of the above activities. Therefore , it will not require Department of the Army authorization under the above laws. The perrnittee has suspended work within waters of the United States , including wetlands , under Project Number 198600970 , and may reapply for a new permit at a later date . The headwater determination for this area is still in effect. -2- Thank you for your interest in our nation's water resources. If you have any questions concerning our regulatory program , please contact Mr. Stan Walker at the address above or telephone (817)978-3551. Copy Furnished: Mr. Gregory K. Taggart Municipal Development Group 203 East Holleman Drive ~ollege Station , TX 77840 Sincerely, Wayne A. Lea Chief, Regulatory Branch . . FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 #PAGES INCLUDING COVER ~ If you did not receive a complete Jax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO :~W COMPANY: ClITTp0f o~s DEPARTMENT: PHONE : (6\1)0(1....---c::-~--@--! ----FAX-.-. -+-@~1 1),..--qi_g __ --=-z=--1'2_0 __ _ PHONE : [Aa\) 104-2)1o FAX: l461J1cA-?A:qft? REMARKS: D Urgent ~ For your review 0 Reply ASAP D Please Comment 23'l~~:..u~~9'e~~ ........ ~=~~ :~,;,:-~~..t.~s.;;:--... ~?~~~·".""7"-....: ~~:.-~ .~-------- •·-:-·SPECIAL NOTE -.~-·-·'·"··*~·~•...:""it .. « .. _ _.,, ... ._, · --· · · . '' ·-~:;. ,_ i /'•z94 \ • ff ... -....;__/ . ' ·j ~ • '- /• . "· ;/. ___ ..;: -- )<"' ' .• ~ POWHh~ ~/ I '-,'-, ~ \ • '· It / ;...,, \. ._'l \~ \\ . ~ --'\. '· P.f'.o\A. .--~~ '--· ( -.. • . ". .-----'- Z68· . P< TO TE:I: -i ~-' ... 1qq3 J~.~~~ ---llJQR. GO ()Y\ '-Jtu ~ · --= ---=__: _ __::_::_~----~~ ~ ,. I I , 20(JJ . -------· · "· This document :;.;;;...._ pr~-p~r~· primarily by stereoscopic analysis of high altitude aerial photographs. Wetlands were identified on the photographs based on vegetation, visible SYMBOLOGY EXAMPLE . \ '/} '"U. c ~ -···'~':<;:,,::.., '(.,{,01 • Sut ; Z:-~ hydrology, and geography in accordance with Classifica- tion of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (FWS/()~S .~91_~1 ,.,Pec~~ber _197!;Jl:_The aeri~I photographs typically reflect cond1t1ons during the spec1f1c year and season when they were taken . In addition, there is a margin of error inherent in the use . of the aerial photographs. Thus. a detailed -Ori the ground and historical_ analysis of a single .site" inay· re.suit iri' a revision "of the wetland boundaries established through ·photographic interpretation. In addition, some small wetlands and those obscured by dense forest cover may not be included on this document. · · --· ~ Federal , State and local regulatory agencies with jurisdic- tion over "'!'etlands may define.and describe_wetlands _in _a .,·. ·:::.. --differ~~.~_rjl'_e'U!}~~j~ ... !~-i~..J.~:'.?~!~~-J~~-.r~~· ~ · · ~t'.i,!!.eithe~ffi;;t de~.g~~u_g~f th.1~~';~ ..., ri AfinA·!h'9Timits o ~orooi1etarv 1unsC:fict1o~nv. Federal SYSTE'-1 I SUBSYSTEM : ,.. c /.. .... .r-'-LAS ....., L2Ell2f ·~ 'suBC1.ASS . WJ.TER REGIME UPlAND .tNON-WETu.NDl in ltaliawieied/tt!!Jt • WEllAOS .-Et •Some-.s~' (INTB&tlBQH» 1iontlf~ •This~ J!Ftlbe 0 n eariiiat< NWSlitn' Bar(ilBi.or~ ver~. . , .. .. _ -/' _ ,--J ~ . ... ,•)'' ~ \ -e=-,+ _./ l ' -.. -. --~.} / .-··-··--( -----/., . . " ·~. ./ ,, ~ r ,/ ·" /? ___.. .· " ./ . . ~,~ c .i:;·:( I \ ; ··' /( I ' l -, • ). • I ') ~ ~ "~~ '.~ + ' ~·' + I rl/ ~,, I!· ~~ + COITERLIN( ( (' : ,, AS X•ICT£D ~:uosON c•m< It 1 /-~I• -. . #' \ •' ' l ., ,' r _;, / 7' \ + + CENTERLINE OF ,,. V' ' :'\~' <i» ' . ~ ,£' .. OEPIC""El:CARTEBY. CREEK ~'' _,,.•· .. --, ,, ' •' i:.:-·' , , ,-~ \ ~-....... l ,,n,' +, , . 2 . J /~ ~·' ,---' ::-----~-::-/'m ----v _J " l1 ,r,/'~,;r5-c~· \ '-'V ·:>"' \"'.: ~ '--=---" . ,~r~_,,~~ ( r ,,;-~ ,,,~-~\ " ) /, . \ ; ' '\ ~~,• ~-_./_ ,,~ ,..-I (l... (' .// -.....__,' -/." -c;NTEA:JNE ~ ... ~":!"~; -~ + f) '/ -·· _,,-11.,~ + , .. -;: -----.. -_. 7-0:XON \P!l.NCi (3 Thtt) _, ~ FILL AREA "-=c~~ ACRoS .--~--.... "~ .. • ~ .~~1. s:l 'q4~tJvJS ~ -.. .J-'> • \~~ \ (?+ 1'-./"'\._ I .~ ~ + SEP-30-98 15 ,45 FROM ,CORPS OF ENGINEERS ID ,817+978+7545 PAGE 1/1 C:OliU1UHO/ OFFICE Stan Walker . -· CUSSlflCA TION l'RE~DEHCE '. DA FORM 3918-R, JUL 90 FACSIMILE TRA.JfSMITI.U HEADER SHEET llAMEJ Cff!C:E STl.ISOL CESWF-OD-R OFFICE TE!.iPtlONE HO. (lfUTOVON!CommJ. (817)978-355 l F.UNO • !AUTOVON/Coltl111J. (817)978-# 7Slf S NO . PAGi:S tlrtdu!ing tin Hudttl rlATE-TIME MONTI! TEAR REl.fASeirs ~NATURE DA FORM 391!-ll. AUG 72 IS OBSOLETE ~n.1 0 TO : FROM : DATE: LETTER OF TRANSMITTA ~ I l!J 1 •W 2551 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE A COLl.EGE STATION , TEXAS 77840 11 Ph: (409)893-5359 Fx: (4 09)693-4243 /I\ Engineering · Planning · Surveying MDG JoB NUMBER, 2 'foZ-Dri f n9-ed A TI ACHED PLEASE FIND : NO. OF COPIES: DESCRIPTION: 4 -US.6 > I THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITIED AS CHECKED BELOW: 0 FOR APPROVAL 'Ji( FOR YOUR USE 0 AS REQUESTED 0 OTHER: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ COMMENTS ' .4-,,15tAL e_y-s. 1=: f7l/V{ !io pt er.h P'1-f S ..fo "'S~ tA.lc?( ~ ' {/ S I GNED : OCT-02-98 09 :13 FROM:CORPS OF ENGINEERS 10:817+978+7545 PAGE 1/4 FACSlMllf TRUSMlii.U HEADER SHEET Fi!OM: TO: COl.IMANO/ OFF!Cf Stan Walker . -· ClASSIF!C.l TION PRECEDENCE DA FORM 3918-R. JUL 90 N.lME! OFF!~ STMBOL CESWF-OD-R DATE-TIME OFRCf raE?liOHE NO . (,llf!()V(J!t'/CD11111'1J. (817)978-3551 FAX NO • /AfJT(JVONICotMt.J. (817)978·-7S'f S MOlffil '!CAR RH.EASER"S SIGNATURE tl:l.'K '!2.10 / 0 (\ I I /. f ..-; / I I I I / / OF ENGINEERS \ I ' ) I \ ' l I ; JD ,817+978+7545 \ \ \ \ x254,I PAGE / I \ \ 0 / / r··. J I 4000 5000 6000 1000 r£E I "3 ~·====i==:==:::3:====~ 0 FtT I D/\lUM Of 192') J> ACCURACY STANDARDS ADO 80225, OR RESTON, VIRG I NI A 22092 fMBOLS IS AVAIL ABLE ON REQUEST 3096 -424 - R O~D CLASSl flCAl lON Heavy ·duty.-.. ·--Light-duty ... _ .... F"·-= ~= Medium-duty ...... ~~ Unimproved di1 1· <~~~="'~~· ... ---------.,-fJ U.S. Route () State Roule FJG. j_ • BRYAN EAST, TEX . t-13037 .5 -W96 I 5/7 .5 1962 PH O TORE VI SED 19BO PMA 6745 Il l NE -SERIES V602 • . J>~M ~ ' / 0 n """ I G fl.) I ID ro G ID .... ~ "11 ilO 0 :I n 0 ilO "O Cf) 0 "11 tT1 :z: C'l ..... :z: tT1 tT1 ilO Cf) ..... 0 .. ro .... -.I + ID -.I ro + -.I (11 ~ (11 ---~~ . f'6•~ (CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ~ ~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842-0960 (409) 764-3570 Memorandum To: Mike Davis North Bardell, MDG From: Veronica Morgan, Asst. City Engineer Date: October 9, 1998 Re: Review of the fill permit for Carter Creek@ SH30 SITE RECLAMATION PLAN The following comments are new due to new or additional data being added since the last submittal. Is it possible to tie your proposed storm sewer behind Cinemark into the existing storm sewer that is currently discharging into the creek? This will avoid an additional discharge point into the creek. Please show the existing Cinemark storm sewer location and any easements that exist to cover that utility. Placing the fill on the sewerline increases the City's maintenance cost and ability for City , crews to maintain the lines. Please shift the fill to the other side of the easement and place the toe of the slope at the easement line. It seems the fill area has increased in size and scope since the earlier HEC runs, it doesn't appear to be reflected in the HEC runs submitted this time . Please rerun the HEC analysis to reflect the additional fill. Storm Sewer Lines # 1 and 2 need to be public lines because the alley is public. These lines will need to be located in ded icated public easements . Please provide easement documents prior to construction. Can you send the discharge from Storm Sewer #2 into the first pond to reduce "erosion spot locations" along the banks of the creek? Is the 0 .87 acre fill area behind Furrows reflected on your HEC runs? It seems to have increased in size since the last submittal and HEC runs . How does this increased fill affect the water surface elevation along the Carters Grove tributary? Especially under the less frequent storm events? Will you be increasing the occurrences of residential flooding in Windwood? ··sui/ding a Better City in Partnership with You· Are you planning to change drainage patterns to send more water to Carters Grove Tributary? It appears that you will be increasing that flow. Staff is concerned with increased volume headed to the tributary. Will this development increase the frequency of flooding or make it worse on the homes that currently flood? Staff can not locate an application or $100 fee for this project. Please bring in a receipt or contact us with an approximate time frame of when it came in and Staff will research it. MISCELLANEOUS DRAINAGE DETAILS Some of the following comments are also new due to new details or information being added since the last submittal . Can the 6" stones set in cement stabilized sand handle to erosive velocities? Staff is concerned that it may be gone after the first hard rain . In the Typical Pond Drain Pipe (Type 2) Detail, how are you going to construct the sewer line? Will you bore under our pipe, or if not, what type of embedment will there be around our major trunk sewerline? City staff is extremely concerned about how this construction will occur without distrupting this major sewer line . Your old profile showed that you would be above our sewerline . What are the velocities exiting the Type 1 Leveling Pipe . Once these velocities are established it will set the type of erosion control necessary at the outlets of the pipe . Provide toewalls at the ends of the headwalls at each pipe outlet. The concrete headwall shown in the Type 2 Drain Pipe does not look like the details shown for the concrete headwall with wingwalls (30 degree flare). Are these the same? Are the storm sewer lines shown in the profile going to have the 30 flare headwalls? If not is there another detail? On the Type 2 plan view, please show the creek centerline and top of banks to define where the outlet will enter the creek. Referencing the Line # 1 Storm Sewer Profile, any horizontal or vertical change in alignment requires a junction box with a manhole lid . Staff can not tell if your creating a change in vertical alignment or not. If you are please remove the bend and put in a junction box. Contact staff to work out details . Referencing Storm Sewer Line #1 , what is the exiting velocity and it appears that the profile at the outlet is going uphill? •pf CITY OF COLLEGE STATION I DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 9W:IJ l l01 Texas Avenue College Stat ion . Texas 77842-0960 (409) 764-3570 Memorandum To: Mike Davis North Barde~ MDG From: Veronica Morgan, Asst. City Engineer Date: October 9, 1998 Re: Review of the fill permit for Carter Creek@SH30 > SITE RECLAMATION PLAN ~ b~tA.~ The following comments are new due to new or additional data being added since the last l\ . submittal. Is it possib~e to tie your ?ropo~ s,tonn sewer behind. Cin~mark. into the ~sting ~orm ~(Pr sewer that is currently d.ischatgmg mto the creek? This will avoid an additipnal ~schare..e. ~ ·rn'"" point into the creek. S ~ ~ 1 ,r~c-t4'1 f (~ , Please show the existing Cinemark storm sew~ Io~tion and any easements that exist to cover that utility. -S ~ P LCA.. '\ c-v ~ 'vVl ~ Placing the fill on the sewerline increases the City's maintenanc.e cost and ability for City , crews to maintain the lines. Pleases~ the fill to the other s!de of,the easement and place the toe of the slope at the easement line. > Nor 71/;c__q 61-c It seems the fill area has increased in size and scope since the earlier HEC runs, it doesn,t appear to be reflected in the HEC runs submitted this time. Please rerun the HEC analysis to reflect the additional fill. //cs f-· 4 f-f · Storm Sewer Lines # 1 and 2 need to be public lines because the alley is public . These lines will need to be located in dedieated public easements . Please provide easement documents prior to construction. Can you send the discharge from Stonn Sewer #2 intq the first gond to reduce ':rrosion spot locations" along the banks of the creek? A-r:Aof t"e.>S<ef --Sf...,,,J "( ,-~ ,·..., Cll rv-(/')\.) .s -·-Is the 0 .87 acre fill area behind Furrows reflected on your HEC runs? It seems to have increased in size since the last submittal and HEC runs. How does this increased fill affect the water surface elevation along the Carters Grove tnoutary? Especially under the less frequent storm events? Will you be increasing the occurrences of residential flooding in Wmdwood? ··sulfding a Better City in Partnership with You· .. ~ . ,. Are you planning to change drainage patterns to send more water to Carters Grove Tributaxy? It appears that you will be increasing that flo~. Staff is concerned with '.L 1 _ increased volume headed to the tributary. N<:f "'-f 1\.I ~ -~ ~ w 1 r"'f Will this development increase the ~uency of flooding or make it WJWM; on the homes that CWTently Bood? -N 'l.Jlf ~ f-, v A:.--6· ~ f'~ 1 · Staff can not locate an applicatihn or $100 fee for this project. Please bring in a receipt or contact us with an 8P.Proximate time frame of when it came in and Staff will research it . s~ +:F v.i ,'t\ -t=;·,..J. . MISCELLANEOUS DMJNAGE DETAILS Some of the following comments are also new due to new details or infonnation being added since the last submittal . Can the 6' stones set in cement stabilized sand handle to erosive velocitift? StaffW , concerned that it may be gone after the first hard rain. -; ~ ~,, ~ ~ C\. +:r't . P 1 v~ In the Typic:al Pond Drain Pipe (Type 2) Detail, how are you going tb construct the --== 'ST-""' ''' line? Will you bore under our pipe, or if not, what type of embedment will there be around our major trunk scwcrline? City staff is extremely concerned about how this construction will occur without distrupting this major ~ line Your oJd profile sh~,.-ed . that you would be above our sewerline. > Gi\1 e-. ~' e' .~ Pe-fat 1 ( s., spe c1 t-t ~';1!/: What are the velocities exiting the Type 1 Leveling Pipe. Once these velocities are 2 spcc1'+'1 ve./o . established it will set the type of erosion control necessaiy at the outlets of the pipe.~ Provide toewalls at the ends of the headwalls at each pipe outlet. The concrete headwall shown in the Type 2 Drain Pipe does not look like the details ~s ... '1.t;,. shown for the concrete headwall with wingwalls (30 degree flare). Are these the same? ~. / Are the storm sewer lines shown in the profile going to have the 30 flare headwalls? If not .i:.r~l . .... th detail? olc.-f-1.' 1s were ano er .t., Sv.- On the Type 2 plan view, please show the creek cent~e and top ofbanka to define Je{~'!:-' where the outlet will enter the creek. 01<. • >o Ro.. Referencing the Line #1 Storm Sewer Profile, any horizontal or vertical change in ,__;wri alignment requires a junction box with a manhole lid. Staff can not tell if your creating a change in vertical alignment or not. If you are please remove the bend and put in a junction box. Contact staft'to work out details. ;> A-J of c.J~ ~ f, ·...,.,,, /!.oxe...S · Referencing Stonn Sewer Line #1, what is the exiting velocity and it appears that the profile i.t the outlet is going uphill? At v-~ of 1' s c. "( s:: ~:/Nor 1'/t ~ (I.) f!._ f.oo) ,' f ( el .y' f '.., f-t'vl f ( fVV'I VI' c.IJ flJ ( of Y' C((.,.,, c:r. f'"Y-~ !3 . y-