HomeMy WebLinkAbout36 Development Permit 494 Greensworld Phase Fill PermitKLING ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING
4103 Texas Avenue, S.~te 12
Bryan , Texas 77802 l 1
TO
ATTENTION
WE TRANSMIT :
D Under Separate Cover
~losed
VIA:
DMail
~ssenger
D Federal Express
D Express Mail
D Special Courier
D Picked Up By Your Office
NO.
2 Do..tt..,~.r: /\
I !Li. ....... -~~
I
·-
Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors
Tel. ( 409) 846-6212
Fax (409) 846-8252
THE FOLLOWING :
D Prints
DCopies
D Originals
DPlat
D Field Notes
D Plans
D Report
D Estimate
D Cut Sheets
D Computer Printout
D File
DATE
PROJECT NO.
PRO J ECT NAME
REFERENC E
D Contract ,;f
rtJ P.P.P -f fl-P~.,,~ f:r
/'-(TV ~ ~ *'.llr11l> "(
/V"t1 t( ti' l>A~ > '\
DE SCRIPT IO N
y".2_ -n-JI. 7
-""'t:/)"Jt ·--,._.n~
~ (~1o0-) l~~P:. ~ .. <RZ .. ~~ -·,;.,.,o,,,~
r
FOR:
P.O. Box 4234
Bryan, Texas 77805
D Your Review & Approval
D Your Review & Comment
D Your Review & Distribution
D Your Review, Revision & Return
D Your Signature & Return
D Your File and /or Use
D As Requested By :
D Please Acknowledge Receipt of
Enclosures
D Please Return Enclosures To Us
D Copies Of This Letter Of Transmittal
Sent To :
If Enclosures Are Not As Noted ,
Please Notify Us At Once .
Signed /~L
Figure xn
Application Form
Development Permit
Inside/Outside Established Flood Hazard Areas
City of College Station, Texas
(re: Ordinance No. 1728)
2.94 Ac. Tr. (proposed Greensworld Phase 3 Subd.) out of the Regency Parkway Inc.
Site Legal Description: 5.05 Ac. Tr. (Vol. 1219, Pg. 280) & remainder of the Davis/Scarmardo Const. Co.
34.13 Acre Tract (Vol. 1082, Pg. '337).
Site Address: ___ __. ........ ..._ __________________________ _
Owner: Regency Parkway, Inc.
Architect/
Engineer: Kling Engineering & Surveying
Contractor: __ _....._N .... l .... A.___ ____________ _
1005 E. Bypass
Address: College Station, TX 77840
Telephone No.: (409)696-3749
4103 Texas Ave. Ste. 212
Address: Bryan, TX TI802
Telephone No.: (409)846-6212
Address: ------------Telephone No.: _________ _
Date Application Filed: ______________ Approved: ___________ _
Application is hereby made for the following specific waterway alterations: Placement of the fill on the flooclway
fringe to reclaim floodplain and recompaction of proposed buUding pad to 95% Std. Proctor (ASTM D 698 ).
Attached as part of this application:
181 Application Fee
181 Signed Certificate
181 Site and Construction Plans , with supporting documentation: two (2) copies of each
0 Other:
-----------------~
ACKNQWLEDGEMENTS:
I, Michael K. Davis , as owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that:
The above Drainage Plan and supporting documents complies with the requirements of Ordinance No . 1728,
and
'o1{r'7
~ -=D"'"""e_v....,el .... o_pe_r __________________ Date
Contractor Date
Page 1of2
Figure XII Continued
CERTIFICATIONS:
A. I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or
proposed to be on this site as part of this application meets flood-proofing requirements as
set out in Section of Ordinance No . 1728
Architect/Engineer Date
B. I, certify that the finished floor level of the lowest
floor, including any basement, of any residential structure as part of this application is or
proposed to be at or above the base flood elevation as established in the latest Federal
Insurance Administration flood hazard study and maps, as amended.
Architect/Engineer Date
C. I, B · J · Kling certify that the alterations or development covered
by this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying capacity of the adjoining waterway or
crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with
requirements concerning encroachments of floodways and of floodway fringes as illustrated
in the latest Fede l Insurance Study.
Date
D. I, do certify that any alterations, addressed in
Certification "D" do not raise the level of 100-year flood as referred to Certification "B".
Architect/Engineer Date
REVIEWED FOR APPROVAL:
---------=---..,.......,....,...-.,.-,,-...,..-.,.----~ Floodplain Administrator Date
APPROVAL: Special conditions or comments as part of approval:--------------------
Page 2of2
formsldpopp.doc
11/91
Figure XII
Application Form
Development Permit
Inside/Outside :&tablished Flood Hazard Areas
City of College Station, Texas
(re: Ordinance No. 1728)
2.94 Ac. Tr. (proposed Greensworld Phase 3 Subd.) out of the Regency Parkway Inc.
Site Legal Description: 5.05 Ac. Tr. (Vol. 1219, Pg. 280) & remainder of the Davis/Scarmardo Const. Co.
34.13 Acre Tract (Vol. 1082, Pg. '337).
Site Address=----~----------------------------
Owner: Regency Parkway, Inc.
Architect/
Engineer: Kling Engineering & Surveying
Contractor: __ --o.;u...o....1'---------------
1005 E. Bypass
Address: College Station, TX 77840
Telephone No.: (409)696-3749
4103 Texas Ave. Ste. 212
Address: Bryan, TX 77802
Telephone No.: (409)846-6212
Address: ------------Telephone No.: _________ _
Date Application Filed: ______________ Approved: ___________ _
Application is hereby made for the following specific waterway alterations: Placement of the fill on the floodway
fringe to reclaim floodplain and recompaction of proposed building pad to 95 % Std : Proctor (ASTM D .6 98 .)_._
Attached as part of this application:
181 Application Fee
181 Signed Certificate
181 Site and Construction Plans, with supporting documentation: two (2) copies of each
D · Other: ------------------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
I, Michael K. Davis , as owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that:
The above Drainage Plan and supporting documents complies with the requirements of Ordinance No. 1728 ,
and ~~
({? ~~ J D . ______........11J __ //o,..,..___1 '1_z ___ _ o~c;~~~~Date 7 r ·
~ (
Developer Date
~ ....,.C.,...o-n-tr-ac_t_o_r __________________ Date
Page 1of2
Figure XII Continued
CERTIFICATIONS :
A. I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or
proposed to be on this site as part of this application meets flood-proofing requirements as
set out in Section of Ordinance No. 1728
Architect/Engineer Date ..
B. I, certify that the finished floor level of the lowest
floor, including any basement, of any residential structure as part of this application is or
proposed to be at or above the base flood elevation as established in the latest Federal
Insurance Administration flood hazard study and maps, as amended.
Architect/Engineer Date
C. I, B. J. Klin g certify that the alterations or development covered
by this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying capacity of the adjoining waterway or
crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with
requirements concerning encroachments of floodways and of floodway fringes as illustrated
in th latest Fed l Insurance Study.
/Q,-t 0"1'7
Date
D. I, do certify that any alterations, addressed in
Certification "D" do not raise the level of 100-year flood as referred to Certification "B".
Date
REVIEWED FOR APPROVAL: ------=-...,.......,,.-.,.---,.-0--.,,.--:----F loo d plain Administrator Date
APPROVAL: Special conditions or comments as part of approval:-----------
Page 2of2
formsldpopp.doc
11191
10 1 27 1 97 10:28 "'5'409 846 8252 KLING ENGR ~~~ COCS VOLK /MORGA N
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
4103 Texas Avenue, Suite 212
Bry;an , Texas 77802
B.). Kling, P.E., R.P.LS.
S.M. Kling , R.P .L.S.
October 27, 1997
MEMO
Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors
Telephone 409/84~212
Pax 409/846-8252
TO: Veronica Morgan, P.E .
Assistant City Engineer
City of College Station
FROM:
Post Office Box 4234
Bryan , Texas 77805
FredPaine ~
Greensworld Phase 3 Drainage Development Permi ~ RE:
At the request of the owner, we ask that you hold the application and
fee for this project until further notification.
141003
09 /24 /97 13 :07 'B409 846 8252 KLING E NGR ->->-> COCS VOLK /MORG AN
KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
TELECOPIER COVER SHEET
(EF :faxcoverl
DATE_D-"--9_/z_f......._A_9-"'-7 ____ _
Please deliver the following pages to:
Name: __ ~-~~'/_Ui-__ d __ c:.U._4_N _____ ___, ___ _ cqy DP ~er _5~ -~'~¥i Firm:
Fax Number:
---~~-------------~~~~~-~
From: ~ M1Af§ ~ ..
Kling Engineering & Surveying
4103 South Texas Ave., Suite 212
Bryan, Texas 77802
Phone: 1409)846-6212
Fax : (409)846-8252
We are transmitting B page(s), including this cover letter from our
fax number listed above. If any pages are missing or incomplete, please
contact sender.
a~!>~~~
I
I
VoV -/{-Q&s '.qi• 1.4'-:
1
141001
0 9 1 2 4 1 97 13 :07 '5'4 09 846 8252 KLIN G EN GR -+->-> COCS VOLK /MORG AN
KLING ENGINEERI NG & S U RVIEYllNG
4103 Texas Avc:nue , Suit e: 212
Bryan, Tc:xu 77802
C onsu l t ing E ngineer s • L a n d S u rveyors
Tc:lcphonc: 409/846-6212
Fax 409/846-8252
Post Office Box 4 234
Bryan , Texas 77805
14100 2
BJ. Kling, P .E., R.P.L.S .
S.M. Kling, R.P.L.S .
September 22 , l 997
MEMO :
TO : Veronica Morgan, P .E.
Assistant City Engineer,
City of College Station
FROM: Fred Paine~
RE : Greensworld Phase 3 Waterline
8" line size justification
Greensworld Phase 3 (zoned C-1) has a planned development of a used car lot. The facility is not
expected to be as large as the neighboring Nissan new car lot but for analysis purposes, maximum
peak water demand will be considered the same (49 gpm per 1994 impact analysis Greensworld Phase
2). Accompanying this memo is the output from a KY-PIPE analysis demonstrating the performance
of an 8" line across Greensworld Phase 3 . Three runs were conducted which are as follows :
1) Peak flow (phase 2 & 3)
2) Peak flow (phase 2) +Fire flow (phase 3)
3) Fire flow (phase 2 & 3 ·all interior hydrants)
As shown in the output data, maximum velocities do not exceed 13 feet/sec . Minimum pressure
occurs under scenario 3 and is 82 .8 psi at the hydrant node for phase 3 . The 8" line proves to be
adequate for the development of the phase 3 commercial tract.
09 /24/97 13:08 '5'409 846 8252 KLING E GR
* * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * * * * * * * * * *
• University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * * Distribution of Pressure and Flowa in Piping Networks • * <<< FOR SEMINAR PURPOSES ONLY >>> *
• * • * • * * * * * * * * * * • • • * * * * * * * • * * *
DATE: 9/22/1997
TIME: 16:40:46
INPUT DATA FILENAME ---··········· GWPH3WL.DAT
TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME --------GWPH3WL.OUT
POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME ---GWPH3WL.RES
***********************••·······················
S U M M A R Y 0 F 0 R I G I N A L D A T A
**************•••·······························
U N I T S S P E C I F I E 0
FLOWRATE •.•••••••••• = ;allons/minute
HEAD CHGL) •••••••••• •feet
PRESSURE •••••••••••• • psig
P l P E L I N E D A T A
STATUS CIX>E: XX ·CLOSED PIPE
CV -CHECK VALVE
FG -FIXED GRADE NOOE
RV ·REGULATING VALVE
PU -PUMP LINE
PIPE
NUMBER
1-FG
2
3
4
5
6
NODE NOS.
#1 #2
0 ,
1 2
2 4 , 3
2 5
5 6
J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E
JUNCTION JUNCTION
NUMBER TITLE
LENGTH
(ft)
1175.0
216.0
152.0
154.0
493.0
100.0
D A T A
EXTERNAL
DEMAND
C;pm>
DIAMETER
(in)
ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS
COEFF. COEFF.
18.0 120.00 .oo
18.0 120.00 .00
8.0 120.00 .00
8.0 120.00 .OD
8.0 120.00 .00
8.0 120.00 .00
JUNCTION
ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES
(ft)
FGN·HGL
(ft)
506.80
-·····----------------·-·-······-·········-·--------------·················---
1 .00 260.00 , 2 4
2 .oo 258.00 2 3 5
3 .oo 263.70 4
4 49.00 263.00 3
5 .00 255.50 5 6
6 49.00 256.00 6
0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A
OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT
S Y S T E M C 0 N F I C U R A T l 0 N
NUMBER OF PIPES .•••••••••••••••••. (p) = 6
NUMBER OF JUNCTJON NODES ..•••••••• (j) • 6
+->-> COCS VOLK /MORG AN ~003
09 /24 /97 13 :08 'a'409 8 4 6 8252
NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ••••••••••• (l) = 0
NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NOOES ••••••• (f) • 1
NUMBER OF SUPP LY ZONES ••••••..•••• (z) = 1
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
S I M U L A T I 0 N R E S U L T S
***•·································
KL ING EN GR
THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00000
S I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N (L A B E L)
GREENS\IORLO PHASE 111 • 8" LI NE
WATERLINE ANALYSIS • PROPOSED USAGE · USED CAR LOT
UPDATE PHASE II ANALYSIS
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS Ca:IE: XX ·CLOSED PIPE
CV ·CHECK VALVE
FG ·FIXED GRADE Na:IE
RV ·REGULATING VALVE
PU ·PUMP LINE
TK ·STORAGE TANK
PIPE
NUMBER
Na:IE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD
LOSS
(ft)
PUMP MINOR LINE HL/
VELO. 1000
(ft/;) (ft/ft)
#1 #2 HEAD LOSS
<11pn) (ft) (ft)
1-FG 0 1 98.00 .01 .00 .00 .12
2 1 2 98.00 .00 .oo .00 • 12
3 2 4 49.00 .01 .00 .00 .31
4 1 3 .oo .oo .00 .00 .oo
5 2 s 49.00 .04 .00 .oo .31
6 s 6 49.00 .01 .oo .00 .31
J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E R E S U L T S
JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE
NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD
C11pm> (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 .00 506.79 260 .00 246.79
2 .oo 506.79 258.00 248.79
3 .00 506.79 263.70 243.09
4 49.00 506 .78 263.00 243.78
5 .00 506.75 255.50 251.25
6 49.00 506.75 256.00 250 .75
S U M H A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES
(·) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NOOES
PIPE
NUMBER
NET SYSTEM INFLOW •
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW •
NET SYSTEM DEMAND •
FL~RATE
(!jf:lll)
98 .00
98.00
.00
98.00
D A T A C H A N G E S F 0 R N E X T S I H U L A T I 0 N
D E H A N D C H A N G E S
.01
.01
.08 .oo
.08
.08
JUNCTION
PRESSURE
(psi)
106.94
107,81
105.34
105.64
108.88
108.66
+->-> COCS VOLK /MORG AN ~00 4
09 /24 /97 1 3:08 '5'4 09 846 8252
THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANGES ARE MADE
JUNCTION
NUMBER
6
DEMAND
(gpn)
2000 .00
S I M U L A T I 0 N R E S U l T S
KLI NG EN GR
•••••************••••••••••••*•••••••
THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00000
S I M U l A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N Cl A B E l)
GREENSllORLD PHASE Ill 8,. LINE
PEAK FLOW FOR PHASE 2 & 3 + FIRE FLOW PHASE 3
P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S
STATUS COOE: XX ·CLOSED PIPE FG ·FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE
CV ·CHECK VALVE RV ·REGULATING VALVE TK ·STORAGE TANK
PIPE NOOE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/
NUJl!BER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft)
·····--·-------------------·-----·····-----------------------------····--------1-FG 0 1 2049.00 1.81 .00 .00 2.SS
2 1 2 2049.00 .33 .00 .oo 2.58
3 2 4 49.00 .01 .oo .00 .31
4 1 3 .OD .DO .00 .00 .oo s 2 5 2DOO.OO 37. 71 .00 .00 12.76
6 5 6 2000.00 7.65 .00 .oo 12.76
J U N C T 0 N N 0 D E R E S U L T S
JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULJC JUNCTION PRESSURE
NUJl!BER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD
(gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 .oo 504.99 260.00 244.99
2 .00 504.66 258.00 246.66
3 .oo 504.99 263.70 241.29
4 49.00 504.64 263.00 241.64
5 .00 466.95 255.50 211.45
6 2000.00 459.30 256.00 203.30
S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F l 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES
(·) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES
PIPE
NUMBER
NET SYSTEM INFLOW •
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW •
NET SYSTEM DEMAND =
FLOWRATE
Cgpn>
2049 .00
2049.00
.00
2049 .00
1.54
1.54
.DS
.oo
76.49
76.49
JUNCTION
PRESSURE
(psi)
106.16
106.88
104.56
. 104. 71
91 .63
88.10
~~~ COCS VOLK /MO RGA N lsZl 00 5
09 1 24 1 97 13 :09 '5'409 846 8252 KLI NG E GR
D A T A C H A N G E S F 0 R N ~ X T S l M U L A T l O N
0 E M A N D C H A N G E S
THE FOLL~ING SPECIFIC DEMAND CHANCES ARE HADE
JUNCTION
NUMBER
3
4
6
DEHAND
C;i:n>
2000.00
2000.0D
2000.00
··············•**********************
S I H U L A T I 0 N R E S U L T S
*****************************'********
THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00000
S I M U l A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N CL A 8 E L)
GREENSWORLD SUBDIVISION PHASES 1 & 2 ON FIRE
PIPELINE R E S U L T S
STATUS COOE: )()( ·CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU ·PUMP LINE
CV ·CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TIC ·STORAGE TANK
PIPE NOOE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/
NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000
<;in> Cft> (f.t) (ft) (ft/S) (ft/ft)
-·--------------------------------------------------·-···--------------------·-1-FG 0 1 6000.00 13.25 .00 .oo 7.56
2 , 2 4000.00 1.15 .oo .oo 5.04
3 2 4 2000.00 11.63 .00 .00 12.76
4 1 3 2000.00 11. 78 .DO .oo 12. 76
5 2 5 2000.00 37.71 .00 .00 12.76
6 5 6 2000 .00 7.65 .00 .00 12. 76
J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E R E S U L T S
JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE
NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD
(9i;m) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 .00 493.55 260.00 233.55
2 .oo 492.40 258.00 234.40
3 2000.00 4s1.n 263.70 218.07
... 4 2000.00 480.78 263.00 217.78
5 .00 454.70 255.50 199.20
6 2000.00 447.05 256.00 191.05
S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A H D 0 U T F L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES
(·) cx.tTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NOOES
PIPE
NUMBER
FLOWRATE
(gpm)
11.27
5.32
76.49
76.49
76.49
76.49
JUNCTION
PRESSURE
(psi)
101.21
101.57
94.50
94.37
86.32
82.79
+->-> COCS VOLK /MO RG AN 14!006
09 /24 /97 13:09
' '
NET SYSTEM INFLO!J •
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW s
NET SYSTEM DEMAND •
6000,00
6000.00
.00
6000.00
'B409 846 8252
**** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED ****
DATE: 9/22/1997
TIME: 16:40:46
KLI NG E NGR +->-> COCS VOLK /MORG A 141007
..
-
09 1 24 1 97
t .. 11.(09/95
13 :10
11: 20
'()'409 846 8252
11'409 784 3452
KLING ENGR +·>-> COCS VOLK /MORG AN
COLL STA PUB UTL
Flow Test Report
Date I0-.3 l -~~-Time / J: 00 A.M~
Test made by ; _..J...-U~L:.c....:&:.:L.~...t...:./d~·· _ _..1.A:_iG__.;co .... k~"';.,:cC:.../I'---______ _
Location : ~Vt..:.:...'lff.=--~..::...i.l;..L...jfy;.c....-..1..~.....r...u:;:::,gd~--+---£~"?~V~6..:;___ __ _
Purpose of test :
Reprasenlative :
Witness: . tu ~Or/ Jt 4 &:~. r
Flow hydrant number: (;. -Q ~ / Nozzle size : :;{ , ~
Pitot reading : f;l} G.P.M. : 43 OtJ
Static hydrant number : G--0 D
Static: / ()t} P.S.I. Residual: 97" P.S.I.
~-·~· -
Remal'Xs : E ( o v En.e..A-/f y DC" A;wJ J_
~ [&+;c. /./.tlJrft»'-1 1JJ ~ 1¥2K
141008
~002