HomeMy WebLinkAbout21 Development Permit 483 Scott and White PharmacyAUG 21 '97 13:38 FR PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE512 474 8181 TO 914097643496--19 P.01
Facsimile
Transmittal
To
F'trm
Fa,.-: No.
From
Architects
Engineers
Consultants
6o6 West Avenue
Austin Texas 78701
TEL 512 472 6721
FAX 512 477 J2II
Austin
Dallas
Houston
Washington DC
PageSoutherlandPage
1Q!ll
Shirley Volk Re S&W Pharmacy
City of College Station Job No. 196074
409· 764-3496 Date/Time 21August97
Bruce Leslie Pages 6 +L/ =JO
(Number of pages including cover page)
If you do not rcc:eiw all of the pages of this fax, pl~ose call the Receptionist at (5:i::z) 472-6;n.
Comments
Shirley,
Attached please find the X drawings that will be issued to Acklam Construction as part of an
RFP to modify the construction of the Driveway Entrance off of the Highway 6 Access Road.
These modifications were negotiated by Jim Alvis, P.E., of our office with TXDOT, and
address their requested changes.
Tommy Barnes of Acklam Construction informs me that the 24" Post Oak near the pull
through canopy is not doing well. Before construction, 1/3 of the tree was dead. They have
had to cut back the tree to get the drilling rig into to drill piers for the canopy, and had to bore
through some of it's root structure. Consensus opinion between the Owner and the
Contractor is that the tree may not sul'\live construction due to it's proximity to the building.
Please advise if this tree may be removed. See attached sketch.
Thanks in advance for your help.
AUG 21 '97 13:39 FR PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE512 474 8181 TO 914097643496--19 P.02
Communication
Memorandum
To:
--..... -
Prom · _J utit> ' .
Re· l)t,.JG,s. X-1 f X-..< •
Date
Project
Copies
606 West Avenue
Aust1n Tuu 7S701
tel SU 472 6'721
faX S12. 477 3111
·2-.20-9?-
~17tJ PF Cl:JU~£ ~h1'HiV1 '1'AV'-~~
rtt,,,e,_ 1"1~1174.f 0-6,+ j IXOOT-P/f7Pf~iv 1U11tn-g
I
-1;,.e_ ~~~ r;/~-s. X-/ f X-2
Co>"\v't-y ~ -G/b.J,~ ~~:
!) j_q 11 CtA./v~r-c-r~cJ,1~V\.eo{_ i-to
pc.r.::.Jl~J . 'f?_c>w c...~ '°'-void
eve,~ -6' "3 IAy eh·OJA..-C-(_ UZ""-• 'r.W...
~ 1S 0 h~V\.c:L ;~ pt/?e) .
2J .~ip -12A:p @ tJo('tJ.... e,v.e{_ t7f' ~/verf:
is e;r~~ -to ex1~t;,~ <:O~t"~-te-
.P/~e..
3) 2 -s'' fl~ ~ed.. ~
e.¥1.l:ra.~ t:).('1Ve_ @. locc..b°""'s.
wk./~ cvJve..rt--r1p-rc..p ~-ts
r;J.r"1V~.
'-/) Dt!,-f4.,/ o-f culveff r;'p-r~? (x-2)
S) eej,_.--~,·~ ~ CC.CLJIN\Wl..Od.dc )'1ew
~~::C or-ieV\.Uc,""
c_,) Crow""" ~~ i11 £ <'~ exc~ -to
Yl.t.w ~s to oe,rec.-t-w~r Co .f'/v-MA,.s.
AUG 21 '97 13:39 FR PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE512 474 8181 TO 914097643496--19 P.03
/ / /
/ . / /
/ /
/ /
/
/
Sheet Tltle;
CULVERT DESIGN
REVISIONS
Project Name:
SCOTT & WHITE
PHARMACY
---........ -....... _
--
. '
N.. ..
1)
PageSoutherlandPage
Project Number:
Date:
Scale:
Sheet Number.
196074
20AUG97
l" = 30'
X-1
AUG 21 '97 13:40 FR PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE512 474 8181 TO 914097643496--19 P.04
#3 BARS @ 12" O.C.
EA. WAY OR
6X6XW2.9XW2.9 WIRE
1% SLOPE 1% SLOPE
MESH~
rt-~===:.::::::::::::~~~~--=======~=---, T r--· , • ·--... ---· .. -. ------.-----.----.
18"
------------------·---J_ PIPE 0.0. + 3'-0"
~ -·1 ~ 4"
SECTION A· A
CONCRETE RIP-RAP
• -
PageSoutherlandPage --·-....... _________ -=:""'
Sheet Title:
RIP· RAP
DETAIL
Project Name:
SCOTT & WHITE
PHARMACY
18~8 1!9l
Project Number: 196074
Date: 20AU097
Scale: NTS
Sheet Number!
X·2 I
l/)
lSl
0...
(J)
..-l
I
I
ill
(J) v
["') v
ill
['-
(J)
lSl v
..-l
(J)
D
I-
..-l
CD
..-l
CD
PAD MOUNTED
TRANSFORMER
(BY DEVELOPERS)
v .. __._. __ ,. ... ,_J ____ _
['-v
0 z a:
_J
'
PAVEMENT
. --: .. C.ONTRACTION
···-""'
; .'JOIN.I---., ~~~-~-·:·--~~" /\ _ ... ,--~. --w; · i7C.1
,·-"!'"P -•• ~ r-__, -4. -- - -• y .. ~-I • ' ;\-. ·_,.
·-...:..
-~~~-~------~---------------~---~--------~--::J..ttE~wa=~~~=~==~=---~--
~~=~~=~==~~==~====~ ssm~~~~~~=====_..J~~---_,....,.,_ ___________ _
'-----J....:l!:C:r::.=*:-====o... ::: ::::: :::: = ::::: :: ::: ;:: :: ::: :: ::: ::::: ::::
SPILL CURB
t-4r~M~ IN' w~.Y~ fftf-E.·--." CA .. CH cpRB
IN (i.V6rt:J~ I
-.:.:.r -'~ ...!i.... -··-'... " .... _
__. -~,..,,,. ,_, _____ -----_____________ _..,
__. __, ...... --...... -,_ ~-.-.----"'"' - -~ ,_ r--r-r--.,....; _.,..... --,.---~_.J---,,._,__. ,_ -_..I --_,__ -__. ...--,.-,......, ----------,.--,,...,.~ ------___ ,...., __ ,._ ______ _
------------_________ _,
--..-~~--.....--...-·-----------..------,....----~ ------,..----__. ______ ,,__
___ r--' _____ _
--,-.J-----------------,..-J----...... --_..-_____ .-J _ _,, __
~------,....,---,,.._J ~-------_..-,...J-
-,,..---...--~-,-..1---------...-,....,..-...------------~.,,.-.I ___ ,.:.,,,_ _ _,,
---~----~-
UTI:.JTY fAS[\IF Nl 1 ; \ .'
--..-~----..------.. ,.._._.1,,___, _______ ,,,-,1)
' .
·1
'··
SIDEWALK
,,--,
I ' . I '--:
!"'\
\ ./ .... _
-,r~~'---
1' l
··., ..,,,l
/
; .· ~ ,
·, l ,.
\ . '
' 1'\ I I "-...,
(TYP.}
c
lY w
I
1-
:::J
D
Ul
w~s22s29'·;-=:::::+::=:======~;:--::=--1=:::._-=~-=================~_::".:=-J.~~~~~~~3;~=====--=~...::::'.:=-~====~~
w
(!) a:
0...
lY
LL
lSl v
["')
..-l
['-
(J)
..-l
N
(!)
:::J a:
I
I
:SAN;!A.~'1 St:WEP.___.../
1/A'l HOLE
w
"Z ::;
Ill'.
IJ ,_ :
EXISTIM~ 4' SiOEWALI(
REF. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION t-----sm. DRIVEWAY DETAILS
ALLOW 2% MAX X-SLOPE WHERE
SIDEWALK CROSSES DRIVE.
PAVEMENT
CONTRACTION JOINT
E.>m
NOTES:
_ 1)
2
REFERENCE SHEET C8-2 FOR PAVEMENT
a) CONSTRUCT SPILL ·cuRBS WHERE POSI
AWAY FROM THE .CURB AND GUTTER.
b) C'!ON~TRI Jr.T f'.ATr~ r1 IODC WLJC"DC" one
UJ
ISi
0...
(fl
...;
I
I
UJ
(fl
"'1" Q ....
UJ
['-
(fl
ISi
"'1" ...;
(fl
0
I-
...;
CD ...;
CD
"'1"
['-
"'1"
C\I ...;
If) w
l'J
([
0...
t=I z
([
_J
O:'. w
I
1-
:::J
0
(.f)
w
l'J
([
·.::.-·
-,
~r-"'1" ' ~-
•.
SAW-OUT
4' SIDEWAU< SECTION ··
CURR lit GUTTFR SH~TION
S.o\tt;l l\RY SEW[R
IAAN HOU:
----.. __
AUG 21 '97 13:41 FR PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE512 474 8181 TD 914097643496--19 P.07
Texas
Department
of Transportation i
FAX COVER SHEET
Number of pages: ~ {including this sheet)
PHONE#:~ ----~~~~~~~~
BRYAN AREA OFFICE, DISTRICT 17 FAX# : (40~) 778-9708
TO: ~\~ ~l-'\ll\
COMPANY: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DEPARTMENT:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PHONE#:--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
FAX#: ~l-L) ~ll -3z\\
IFYOll CD NOT ~i;lllE T1iG etrnRE FlllC O)i{ IF Nl't COPreB AA!; ILLEGlaLE. PL!i.llSG CONTACT THE SElilDER IMMEDIAlCLY AT tKl. NUMBER SHOWN llBCl'w'E.
'·.
AUG 21 '97 13:41 FR PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE512 474 8181 TD 914097643496--19 P.08
..
Siarc J>qaruqmt ar H!gbWllJS
aid Public T'lllllpalU!km
.Parm IO!S--1.trr. 12.416
Permit to Comtrud Access Driveway Facilities
on Highway Right of Wa~
couege Station I T x 77840
Hwy. ~ Permit No. __ _
Control ~Section I~ To: Scott and White Pharmacy
1110 S.H. 6 South
TheS;tate D~cot of Highways and Public Transportation, hereinafter calleci the State, hereby autho~ Scott and ·
White PH.armacy CS • hereinaft.er called the grantee, to (ie) comtruc:t' an o.cccs8:tfilj'W~ ff. ~ ~ ·
right of way abutting highway no. in Brazos : Cou11ty1 located a •
Subject to the fallowing:
. ;·
1. The.grantee is CC5pCJDSiblc for all costs aJ.Socla.ted wilh the COnstruCtiOll of this &Cl:C3S driveway •.
2. Design of facilities shall be a.s follows and/or as shown on sketch: h:.' 1~ "'r'l_ if: 9@...J.. II ~;:1ZITE'}~ o,c._
SEE ~'!'?ACHED DRAWINGS
All construction and materials shall be subject to inspection and approval by the State.
·, ....
3. Maintenance of facilities coastructed bemlnder shall be the rc:;sponsibility of the grantee. a.ild the Sr.ate reserve:S the right
to require auy changes, maintclUIDC'e or repairs as may be necessary to provide protection .of life Qr 'property on or adja-
cent to the highway_ Changes in de=iign will be made only with appravaliof the State_ . ' .
4. The Grantee shall hold.harmless the State and its duly appointed agents~ employees against any action for personal
. inj~ or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this ~t.
· S. · Tbe Grantee shall not erect any sign on or extending over any portion of ihe highway right of way, and vehicle service
fixtUR:S such as service pumps. vcnder stands, or tanks shall be located at least.twelve (12) feet from the right-of.way.
line to eDSU.R that any vehicle services from th~e fixtures ~ be off the pjghway _ ·
6. This permit wiD. ·become null and void if the above-referenced driveway facilities aze not c:ons~ctcd ~thin ~ix (6)
· . months from the issuance date o!-dlls permit.;· · . . J. :· d . .:J-,/ · . . ·.. ·
7. The Grmiecwill con~ the State's reprcsenta.ti~c ~ 6'~ ·. · · ·. t~bo~e
( 'fdCi/ ) ? 2 f -xa 6'f at least twenty-four (24) houn pri~ ~-~eginning t~e work authorized by this pennit •
. ::J.I· ~ ·.
SEate Bepanmutt cf Hipwa:1l'll
. ; . wl Pabiic 'f1:au;8R&!km. ·
~EXAS DEPAR~~ OF TRANSPOR~A7XON
Area.,; Engineer Giilrial P z' ccr· ·
· · Patr;Lck '!' •. Wi11.iams. ·p. E' ·
The und~gned hereby agrees to comply with the terms and condiliom set fo~ i : or c_ons~c:r.ion of an access
driveway on the highway right of way. G \ r-~ ·_'! .'\ . ·
. ·.-. Signed::AJ::::.-,;,.,::~__,~:..__~~-=:...:....:..~~~~~~
/,_oo\~. /k. ~'.
~ sl T? 77J>·~d
L~o\c;) ~CJJ-3~'1 3
f,f'( (_'fat) .... 6 'i I 3.f 7 ~
--
AUG 21 '97 13:42 FR PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE512 474 8181 TO 914097643496--19 P.09
GENERAL SPECIAL fROVISIQNS (Driveway & Qratnagtl :
1)
2)
3)
4}
5)
8)
7)
8)
. ·
Traffic Cc;mtrol plan Is required, as per TMUTCD, prior to start of
construction work in SH 6 right-of-way_ ·
Areas within ROW bared by construction shall . be revegelated to egual/
,better conditions than existing prior to construction.
Temporary erosion control measures shall be ~rovided, where required,
to avoid siltation of existing drainage structures: and ditches.
Omit proposed curb & gutter section connecting i Brazoswood Drive to
SH 6 West frontage read (C 2-1) or provide positive means for existing
runoff to enter ditch between frontage road arid proposed· development
Note: Curb & Gutter does not exist @ site. (819/97)
Deflect south end of proposed 2.4" RCP (bend/curve/etc.) ·approximately
15° to be parallel to ROW line & approx. 20' east. (CS-1)
Note : Extend RCP south of existing FH. (8/9197)
Provide handicap access for proposed sidewalk i If terminating in TxDOT
ROW .. (C&-1) Note: ·Existing sidewalk has handicap access. (8/9/97) . : .
Connect SET @ north end of proposed 24." R9P to existing concrete
flume (bowl) With relnfcrced concrete riprap (S-= 15%). (C5-1) ( t:: 4")
Provide sag vertical curve from edge of frontage read over proposed
24" RCP ·to prevent runoff from flowing directly into frontage road. (CS-1)
Note: Frontage road drains towards curb-line -·
In lieu of sag venlcal, proposed Inlets (2.-101
) located
50' west of frontage road curb + addition of curb slots
@ 24" RCfl driveway entranceJJipe should hanc:jle oackjng
·. lot runoff. < Q<a = S cfs l -normal crown to be maintained.
~M1m~ .
·' -
AUG 21 '97 13:42 FR PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE512 474 8181 TD 914097643496--19 P.10
UUI .L4'1 WI' ... ""!llVV •IW ··--.... -..... -··
~· I Texas Department of Transportation
1!00 N. TEXAS AVE •• BRYAN, Tex.AS nso3.:21ea • (~09) 778-2165
AugustB,1997 '.
Mr. W. Paul Kaspar
Graduate Engineer
City of Collage Station
P. 0. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842-0960
RE: Access Driveway & Drainage Permit
SH s @ Brazoswood Dr. -
Scott & White Pharmacy
Dear Mr. Kaspar ;
After reviewing the above referenced permit the following items need to be addressed :
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
. 6)
.·
Traffic Control plan is required, as per TMUTCD. prior to start of
construction work in SH 8 right-of-way.
Areas wifhin ROW bared by construction shall ~ be revegetated to equa~
better conditions than existing prior to construc~ion.
. .
Temporary erosion control measures shall be provided, where required,
lO avoid siltation . of existing drainage structure~ and ditches.
Omit proposed curb & gutter seerion connecting · Brazoswood Drive to
SH 6 West frontage read (C 2-1) or provide positive means for eicisting
· runoff to enter ditch between frontage road and proposed development
. '
Deflect south ·end of. proposed 24n RCP (bend/curve/etc.)'" a~proximately
15° to be· parallel to RO't'/ .line & approx. 20· east. (CS-1) ·
Provide handicap access for proposed sidewalk.j if terminating In TXDOT
ROW. (C5-1)
7) Connect SET @ north end of proposed 24'' RCP to existing concrete
flume {bowl) with reinforced concrete riprap (S = ~5%). (C&-1) ·
8) Provide sag ·vertical curve from edge of fro~tage road over · proposed
24" RCP to prevent runoff from flowing directly ,across. frontage road
(CB-1). In no case shall runoff. now across fro~tage road.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call.
JOP
Sincerely,
Patrick T. Wiiiiams, P.E.
. Area Engineer
/.II Equal Opporrunlly Employer
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMIT NO. 483-A
SCOTT & WHI".rE PHARMACY
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Glenhaven Estates -Phase 9
OWNER:
Scott & White Clinic
1600 University Drive East
College Station, TeXas 77840
(409)691-3693
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Carter Creek Basin 6
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
SITE ADDRESS: ·
1600 University Drive East
This permit is valid for site construction as shown on the approved plans.
The Contractor shall take ail necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris froin leaving the immediate .
construction site in accordance. with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College
Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all distllrbed
areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of aily silt fencing or hay bales
used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed
vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall
be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery
and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work.
Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be eompletely fenced
before any operations of this permit can begin.
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be
taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city
streets, or existing drainage facilities.
I hereby ·grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All
development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the
City Engineer in the development permit application for the above nanied project and all of the codes and
ordinances e Cify of ollege Station that apply.
Date
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMITNO. 483
·Scott & White Pharmacy
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Glenhaven Estates -Phase 9
OWNER:
Scott & White Clinic
1600 University Drive East
College Station, Texas 77840
(409)691-3693
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Carter Creek Basin 6
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:
This permit is valid for site clearing and grading only.
SITE ADDRESS:
1600 University Drive East
The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate
construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College
Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed
areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales
used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed
vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall
be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery
and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work.
Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced
before any operations of this permit can begin.
This permit, being temporary, is valid only within sixty (60) days of the date shown below, and is not
intended to allow the complete development of the site as proposed. Any work performed after_ the
expiration of this permit is not covered, and is considered unauthorized.
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be
taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city
streets, or existing drainage facilities.
I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood ha7.ard area. All
development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the
City Engineer in e development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and
· es of City of College Station that apply.
7-Zz.-cn
Date
7/;1.~/77
~ I Date
~ti-~-~/17 · .Sc. ,., , , ~ ~ V ~,-ce ~'\:;;?. tAA.~ ~
\ 1'.lLf_\ 6', Z '1 ~ 4 -C. w ~ i 1\1 le.TS 6d)
-:i:p t=LD~ Te \ 0L:e-r5
~. t;JA. :::. O. j..3 Ae-.
~. ~t-1\?DQ.•\e-l\~t
'fZ v<11-/e<"'° I:'" /w~L.Lc. ::. c0 ~i.e.... . ~i ti
t§:R't o\J5 ~[Nee :::-o. l6 ~e_ .• tfo ,072
-r~A..J_ OA-:..S-&>I
~0?. \\~\ ::: i). ~-r -tJ .. 76
-.,_ 73 --
C.. 6\\oTA.L = c...~ .A,_ ttc: ::: 6'"1.«4~
q-'=' • 'Jg'x,_12-. S >\, .13__ ::::---(, \ \ G 15
q-;::; ~ e...L+ -=-_1jl__ -=-3-• S-l. /l... 4 s:.
(µct f'--T\-(.a ~u >--L">f'.'F-f1-o<-<>..s I Y1. A. VA.t..t_;e.y. \
\____ AMO \:S 7pL~T LNfz::. T\J~o 5~1-t~I5)
~1 C!-~4-4._:..L.o~ ~e---v~.:'le: / JJ. ~ Of:=::P:.~ \~ GlUlTeR
z-;:!. .30,J V\ -;:: • o\8 r Q =-.3. :5 (. ~ J-') ,s;:::-0 %
z i vk Q:::. o. 5lP 'x V\ 1'S~ X J, 3 I '6/3
3. ~~~ 0 . s<r:. \~ X,. o?o17_ X \
~ ~ o. 2 \ f.
pA6E-I or-tf
··~ e.<lf4 C?.;rj 10£ t!.u/Z/3 fAIL:t=-'!S cf);.l (f;/IJNJL
Y::::: · z.-/ /+; fl a.. ~ ..J • .>.b g__ /. s, .> L == Io'
(J_ ::-5' . .
( r<.i:=:-F F, ~,!J;e:E Y-3,)
Qo__ =-. 31 -La...
'3. Sl> ::-I~ I
. l-4..
l CL ~ ~ • le -i ~ l-s-1---{('.i T-{J 'Re 6( IQ . L , -:r~ t D:J ~ ~fYrt.J !<_£
-:::... \ 0 .
l_) L"--
-y; (!,.QNQ_luS\oN
A \0
1 ~t.)\Z-B \~~el \J-/\W A N\:t-J.
~ wrrTER be:.. ~~s:s~ c!)W
~~LL ~ ~F-=-~ ; ~D
"' z ~ a I c.J,-f I~ 14r·l-_1 : ~ . ; . .. . 1.:1\."' I .. . I 1-z_, .. fh· zr -J,r'2..·-. '-1 ; . I I -12.· ' .. ~ ' ! . j·-· . -., I I 1~ II i i ' I I . I ·-.. I .. I . I .. . . . I I 1 ' . _ / _. I I I Nj~"'(. I' • , N I ~:: 1 l 1111~~1111 l . I . . .r~-I--r--i----r---. . I '. -·! .... _ __ _ _ _ __ _ ~~-__ ..•.. -~. ;·-:~ -~,--~~ =-:~ ~-I __ J: _:~ l~·:~f---j---f---1'-_-... -+--t--t·--· ---·-·· ·--· ·-·-··--·-·· ----·-· -----· --..: ----- ------. ---·. ------·-· -··-----··--·----· ... -······ ....... ···-· -----· ·--. -s: ..... ·---·· ·--· --· . -----· . ·-.. .. -. -.... -· . . ···-. ··-· ·-....... ·-5 ..... --· . . .. --· ····· ··-··-·· -··· ·-··-· ·-·-··--· . . ···-· --. -·-... ·-.. -- -·-·-· . .. . -... ·--" ----. -~ .. --1-· -·· · l j -. -... ...... . . ~ ......•.. = .. --~ : ... ·: . ..• .• . --.....•. I . .. . .•. .. :j -. = :J::: -6 -·-1 tiJ1-_ --_ = =-~ = ----... ---·-·;L_;~~+ --. -4r_r _____ r __ 1_ ~---~ __ t __ t __ t_-r~=-14~~4.J:=t:::U~~~~ --··r--1 t ± ) I•··• t •. •••. ~--_ -~ --.. --_ .. ~-_+~_ cl.. i': . .... .. ·-·----·· ~ ... ·-+·-·+--·I I I I -+-I I I I ~' : : 1--ri -1. _ · -' -i I <J I I I -+-ui : ! l l I j . . I ·-. :: ~-~~ :::1,I_i_ I JI--+--i " I I 1 . I t I--+--··-1--+-~ I ' . . · 1 -· ·•· • ·----I I I ' . - - -• ... . I I I • --' ' -,_. '------'------' -----'-----'-----' I'" 5 '(; I "\: 20 35 50 65 ~~ ~~ "~ •~-
ii
II
r.1
['
.J
. .
. i\
~ TRINITY ENGINEERING TESTING CORPORATION
P.O. Box 1994 Waco, Texas 76703 Phone 817/754-0369 Fax 817/754-0478
March 21, 1997
Attn: Mr. Lonnie M. Breaux, AIA
Director of Design
Scott & White Memorial Hospital
2401 South 31st Street
Temple, TX 76508
Reference: Geotechnical Investigation
Scott & White -College Station Pharmacy
College Station, Texas
TETCOReportNo. W-2547
Dear Mr. Breaux:
This report transmits the results of our geotechnical study for the referenced project. Results of field
and laboratory work are included along with our engineering considerations for the project design.
At the request of the project architects, Page Southerland Page a supplement report would be
prepared giving recommendations for a partially suspended floor foundation with removal and
replacement.
Thank you for the privilege of providing you with this service. We appreciate the opportunity to
assist you as the project is. further developed.
Sincerely,
TRINITY ENGINEERING TESTING CORPORATION
~~~~,,,__-
Syed K. Haneefuddin, P .E.
Geotechnical Engineer
SKWdb
Enclosures
~··
. _,.
u
~
·~·Trinicy::;;::=.==-========================================== Engineering Testing R=========== Corporation
E
E
~
~
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-··
•
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
SCOTT & WHITE -COLLEGE STATION PHARMACY
TEMPLE, TEXAS
Prepared For
SCOTT & WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
TEMPLE, TEXAS
AND
PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE, ARCHITECTS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
___ .......... ~~"'"
-.~(. 01-1;..·. \' Prepared By p;,;t-····~····<?u-~&
,..-.· (~~-· ·. .. ·• . . ""°"""·,~" ·. ~ ~. 11« ~ .. '!": ..... ~.:~ f/ ,_..-' \ I,, r 'C!f. :;:p:·:; : ,/ V\...... · • , .• l\f. t Ill+·.·., . .. • . ·/ . '°·· .......•....................... ·.I 'l ··<·> .:.· ·· .. :, : 1 . "·~ ~: Syed K. Haneefuddin, P.E. ··~ ':._ ·~· · · ·
Geotechnical Engineer ·
Report No. W-2547
March 21, 1997
' l
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I'.
1.·
11
'• .fr.i.~Trinicy:;::::;;::==========================::=.=;;::;::============= Engineering. Test:Jng ====· ==· Corporation
PAVEMENT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
General: The pavement thickness required for support of expected traffic at the site is-a function of
the subgrade soil support characteristics, traffic volume and type, and quality of available construction
materials. These __ factors have been analyzed using AASHTO Guide For Design of Pavement
Structures (See Reference 2). · -
Subvade Characteristics: Borings No. P-1 to P-3 were drill~ within the driveways and the parking
areas. The probable subgrade at the site consists of a high plasticity (CH) clay soil. The pavement
support characteristics may be ~ressed in terms of the Resilient Modulus. A Resilient Modulus of
5,000 psi (CBR abotit 4) has been estimated for the high plasticity clay subgrade materials based on
correlation for similar soils.
Traffic Estimate: Traffic volume and type can be depressed in standardized forms in the,tenns of 18-
kip Equivalent Single Axle Load Applications (ESAL). As per th~ design criteri.a provided. by the
client, traffic volumes are estimated to be about 15,000 ESAL's for the parking lots and .about
200,000 ESAL's for the entrance drives.
Flexible Pavement Thickness Desio: We recommend the following pavement structures for he
anticipated ·traffic and subgrade at :..this site. These designs assume proper_. m~tenance_ of the
pavement throughout the duration of its use. · · ·--
1.5 inches
10.S inches
12.0 inches
2.00 inches
16.00 inches
18. 00 inches
PARKING LOTS-
Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete (HMAC)
Crushed.Limestone Base Material
Total Pavement Thickness
ENTRANCE DRIVES
HMAC
CLBM
Total Pavement Thickness
'~==================================
l
' I
,4.;ATrinicyr ~~;;;============================================ ~ Engineering Testing
! , ======-Corporation -1~
Ri2id Pavement Thickness Design: We recommend the following pavement structures for the
anticipated traffic and subgrade at this site. ·
PARKING LOTS
S.O inches ............... Portland Cement Concrete
6.0·inches ............... Non-Pumping Sub-Base 'Material
11.0 inches ............... Total Constructed Pavement Thickness
S.SO inches
6.00 inches
11.SO inches
ENTRANCE DRIVES
Portland Cement Concrete
Non-Pumping Sub-B~ Material
Total Constructed Pavement Thickness
The· non-pumping sub-base may consist of crushed limestone base material .. We recommend that a
rigid pavement section be used, in areas where trash "dumpsters" are located.
L
Pavem~nt on Expansive Soils: Pavement design methods are intended to provide an adequate
thickness of structural materials over a particular subgrade, such that wheel loads are reduced to a
level the subgrade can support. The support characteristics Qf the subgrade does not aceount directly
for the shrink and swell movements of an expansive clay subgrade. Thus, the pavement may be
adequate from a stnlctural standpoint, yet ~ experience cracking and · defoanation due to
shrink/swell movements of the subgrade. ·-
' ,.
l
I
I
I
I
It is, therefore, important to .minimize ·moisture changes in the subgrade to reduce shrink/swell
movements. The pavement and adjacent areas should be well·drained. Proper maintenance should be
peiformed on cracks in the pavement sum.cc to prevent water passing through to the b~_or· subbase
material. Even with these precautions, some movements and related cracking· may still occur,
requiring periodic maintenance-:-·
The pavement cross-section should, if poSStole, be such that a minimum 4-focit wide shoulder,
measured from the edge .of.the pavement, is maintained. This is especially critical in embankment
areas where the shoulder provides lateral support for the pavement subgrade and, equally as
important, serves to minimize changes in soil moisture content under the edge of the pavement. In
addition, the flexible base should extend at least 2 feet beyond the back of the curb in those areas
where a curb section is used.
..
~
f
l
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'·', .4:.1iinicy, ::;;:::;:==============;::::=========================== Engineerhig Testing =========== Corporation ~u-
Specifications: The pavement should be specified,. co~cted and tested to meet the following
minimum standards: · .·,, ·
1. Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete-Texas Department of Transportation, Standard
Specifications For Construction and Maintenance of Highways, Streets and Bridges,
Mar~h 1995, Item 340, Type D.
2. Crushed Limestone Base Material -Texas Department of Transportation, Standard
Specmcations For Construction and Maintenance of Higfiwa.ys, Str~ and Bridges,
March 1995, Item 247, Type A, Grade 2 or better. The base layer should be constructed
in lifts not exceeding 6 inches compacted thickness and to minimum density of95
percent of maximum as determined_ by ASTM D-1557, and riear optimum moisture ..
3. Portland Cement Concrete-Portland Cemeµt Concrete should be specified to contain a
minimum of 5.5 sacks of cement per cubic yard and a minimum 28-day flexural strength
of 600 psi based on third point loading.
4. The subgrade soils should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum density ai
determined by .ASTM D 698-91 at a moisture .content near optimum.
r
ACCOUNT NO·------------------399110
~~--;---L;~~~---' 19 q,
Paid by_Chec Cash __ _ THANK YOU ts~~_i_.
' ~.
Figure XII
Development Permit
City of College Station, Texas
Site Legal Description: Sc~1T -t W1117f fJ1AiM1tt-'/
.Sc.oTT-1-WtiJTt= l'IJ?ttJRJ/J-t.. A-0Yf ITPL
Site Owner:+ .Sc..o-tt, .SJJJ:BulDOD °"" BAJNDJ..e'I I
fo It>//) l}l/OJY
Architect/
Engineer: lM& 5onHFAU1NtJ f/Jlq£ ({.JP)
Contractor: /Jc.J<L.11-1'1 CoN.SiR\JlTJON
Date Application Filed: ________ _
Address: c2YoJ .S, 31:.--r Tt=/1/f~E T7t 7bSo'8
Telephone: JS~~ 7;)4 ~~3~'/
409 iP'"fJ-3/a_~
Address: t,,019 YYest IJ,,,13, lh>1JN Tx 7Slo)
TelephoneNo: SJi). 'i7J. fu7~1
Address: ))03 A/'JOtRso;.J Col.Ltbt 5t-MJ~11/ ftf
TelephoneNo: 1/JLJ ~£lll3 7UC/'{)
Approved: ___________ _
Application is hereby made for the following development specific waterway alterations:
~
0
0
0
0
Application Fee
Signed Certifications
Drainage and erosion control plan, with supporting Drainage Report two (2) copies each.
Site and Construction Plans, with supporting Drainage Report two (2) copies each.
o'ther: ------------------------------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
I, 6aRy 'BRDwN , design engineeiEJtereby acknowledge or affirm that:
The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply
with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its
associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards.
As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements
propos d in this application according to these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of
the a ege St · City Code.
Contractor
,.
Figure XII Continued
CERTrFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.)
A. I, certify that. any nonresidential structure on or proposed
to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its
contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm.
Engineer Date
B. I, certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest
floor, including any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is
at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration
Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended.
Engineer Date
C. I, certify that the alterations or development covered by
this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing
this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements of
the City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning encroachments of flood ways and of
floodway fringes.
Engineer Date
I, do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level
> of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration
Flood Hazard Study.
Engineer Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,
measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall
not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities.
I hereby grant this permit for development. All development shall be in accordance with the plans
and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project.
All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply.
DRAINAGE REPORT
FOR
SCOTT & WHITE PHARMACY
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
DA TE: JULY 1997
I hereby certify that this report for the drainage design of the Scott & White Phannacy in College Station ,
Texas, was prepared under my supervision in accordance w ith provisions of the City of College Station
Drainage Design Policy and Design Standards for the owners thereof.
n:\19607 4\corresplm isc\drainrpt .doc
PREFACE
This report supplements the drainage report which was submitted to the City of College Station for
permitting for the Scott & White Clinic. The initial report was dated January 1993, and was prepared by
PageSoutherlandPage, Architects and Engineers, Austin, Texas.
n:\ 19607 4\corresp'fflisc\drainrpt.doc
I. General Location and Project Description
A. Existing Site Conditions
The site for the new Scott and White Pharmacy is located at the Southwest comer of the
intersection of Highway 6 (East Bypass) and Brazoswood Drive and is a portion of the tract upon
which the Scott & White Clinic was built.
The site is wooded with natural grass as cover. The area consists of severe slopes and ravines .
An existing stormwater detention basin is adjacent to the site . this basin was constructed during
Phase I of the Scott & White Clinic.
The site lies in Basin "B" as depicted on the Developed Drainage Area Map in the report that this
document supplements .
Most of the site and surrounding areas drain to the above mentioned detention basin.
Approximately 0.66 acres drain uncontrolled to an existing culvert that passes under Highway 6.
The detention basin also discharges in this culvert.
B. Developed Site Conditions
The site for the new pharmacy will consist of surface parking and a building. The building will
occupy approximately 0.24 acres and the surface parking will take up approximately 0.58 acres ,
bringing the total impervious covers to a total of 0.82 acres .
The site will drain to the adjacent detention basin . Stormwater will sheet flow to two inlets
located in the driveway adjacent to Highway 6. The stormwater will then be conveyed in closed
conduit to the detention basin .
II. Hydrology I Detention Basin Design
A. In referring to the previous report, and the Drainage Area Map in this report Basin "B " had
approximately 5.61 acres of impervious cove r-which included approximately 2.39 acres of future
surface parking and future building .
As stated previously , the new pharmacy will use up approximately 0.82 acres of the future
impervious cover, leaving a balance of 1.57 acres for future development.
n:\ 19607 4\corresp'vn isc'drainrpt.doc
B. The detention basin in Basin "B• was designed to provide release rates which will be equal to or
less than those which existed prior to construction . These rates took into account a fully
developed basin described above.
The basin 's design volume combined with stage-discharge determined the release rates from the
basin.
The volume is crucial to the function of the basin , and must be maintained if the basin is to
function as intended .
Detention Basin "B• had a design volume of approximately 1. 77 ac/ft at the 100 yr. storm
evaluation of 277.00 ft.
Due to the location of the new entrance drive and the siteing of the new pharmacy ,
approximately 104 cy of fill will have to be placed into the existing detention basin . In order to
compensate approximately 104 cy. of earth will be excavated as a part of site construction. All
excavation will be done in a manner which will maintain the existing side slope ratios . The
volume of fill, at each elevation will be balanced by the same amount of excavation.
In actuality the detention basin in Basin ·B· consists of two parts, and the two are linked together
to act as one basin, with the throttle in the basin that will be disturbed . The smaller pond lies to
the West of the subject basin and will not be touched .
. Table I is an analysis of the pond prior to the cut and fill and after the re-shaping of the pond.
This analysis covers the disturbed pond since the pond to the West will not be encroached upon .
111 Conclusion
The existing detention basin will function as initially intended and will be able to serve the new
Pharmacy . Construction of the pharmacy will not have an adverse effect on downstream systems .
n:\19607 4\correspV1lisc\drainrpt.doc
-----------
TABLE I
EXISTING POND
ELEVATION PERIMETER (FT) AREA (SQ. FT)) VOL (C .F)
272 143 .65 726.42 0
273 342.97 6 ,748.25 3 ,737 .34
274 434 .28 9 ,967 .22 12 ,095.07
275 470.99 12 ,398.47 23 ,277 .92
276 508 .72 15 ,189.78 37,072.04
277 554.83 18,537 .19 53 ,935 .53
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
ELEVATION PERIMETER (FT) AREA (SQ. FT)) VOL (C .F)
272 143 .65 726.42 0
273 341 .52 6 ,746.45 3 ,736 .40
274 435 .08 9,968 .12 12 ,093 .69
275 480 .09 12 ,398 .45 23,276 .98
276 515 .80 15 ,189.32 37,070.87
277 563 .45 18 ,538 .35 53 ,934.71
n :\19607 4\correspmisc\drainrpt.doc
DRAINAGE REPORT
FOR
SCOTT & WHITE PHARMACY
COLLEGE STATION , TEXAS
DA TE : JULY 1997
I hereby certify that this report for the drainage design of the Scott & White Pharmacy in College Station ,
Texas, was prepared under my supervision in accordance with provisions of the City of College Station
Drainage Design Policy and Design Standards for the owners thereof.
n:\19607 4'.correspm isc\drainrpt.doc
0 .?/z/91
_ ... _ .......... ,,,
_,.~t OF 7'.L-\' A~';'.··I ·~~'f'!t ...
I * ,/ ~ • .. \S'fl .,,
l..t.l ........... : .......... \.~.~ J. JA MES C. ALVI S ~ #!-'-·t······················:··~ l-o\ :~~ 'A •.'\ ;I'> 2876 7 .~ o•.<.~;r, 'A I •• i .... ••• ., '1 ., ., . '. ·.' .. ' ..... ;, .,. ~--_ . .., ,,\:.. . _,..;;'" , ..... _,,.._ ... ···
PREFACE
This report supplements the drainage report which was submitted to the City of College Station for
permitting for the Scott & White Clinic. The initial report was dated January 1993, and was prepared by
PageSoutherlandPage, Architects and Engineers, Austin, Texas.
n:\19607 4\correspl/nisc\drainrpt.doc
I. General Location and Project Description
A. Existing Site Conditions
The site for the new Scott and White Pharmacy is located at the Southwest comer of the
intersection of Highway 6 (East Bypass) and Brazoswood Drive and is a portion of the tract upon
which the Scott & White Clinic was built.
The site is wooded with natural grass as cover. The area consists of severe slopes and ravines .
An existing stormwater detention basin is adjacent to the site . this basin was constructed during
Phase I of the Scott & White Clinic.
The site lies in Basin "B" as depicted on the Developed Drainage Area Map in the report that this
document supplements .
Most of the site and surrounding areas drain to the above mentioned detention basin.
Approximately 0.66 acres drain uncontrolled to an existing culvert that passes under Highway 6.
The detention basin also discharges in this culvert.
B. Developed Site Conditions
The site for the new pharmacy will consist of surface parking and a building. The building will
occupy approximately 0.24 acres and the surface parking will take up approximately 0.58 acres ,
bringing the total impervious covers to a total of 0.82 acres.
The site will drain to the adjacent detention basin . Stormwater will sheet flow to two inlets
located in the driveway adjacent to Highway 6. The stormwater will then be conveyed in closed
conduit to the detention basin.
II. Hydrology I Detention Basin Design
A . In referring to the previous report, and the Drainage Area Map in this report Basin "B" had
approximately 5.61 acres of impervious cover-which included approximately 2.39 acres of future
surface parking and future building.
As stated previously, the new pharmacy will use up approximately 0.82 acres of the future
impervious cover, leaving a balance of 1.57 acres for future development.
n:\ 19607 4\correspl/nisc\drainrpt.doc
B. The detention basin in Basin "B" was designed to provide release rates which will be equal to or
less than those which existed prior to construction . These rates took into account a fully
developed basin described above.
The basin 's design volume combined with stage-discharge determined the release rates from the
basin .
The volume is crucial to the function of the basin , and must be maintained if the basin is to
function as intended.
Detention Basin "B" had a design volume of approximately 1. 77 ac/ft at the 100 yr. storm
evaluation of 277 .00 ft.
Due to the location of the new entrance drive and the siteing of the new pharmacy,
approximately 104 cy of fill will have to be placed into the existing detention basin. In order to
compensate approximately 104 cy . of earth will be excavated as a part of site construction. All
excavat ion will be done in a manner which will maintain the existing side slope ratios. The
volume of fill, at each elevation will be balanced by the same amount of excavation.
In actuality the detention basin in Basin "B" consists of two parts , and the two are linked together
to act as one basin , with the throttle in the basin that will be disturbed . The smaller pond lies to
the West of the subject basin and will not be touched .
. Table I is an analysis of the pond prior to the cut and fill and after the re-shaping of the pond.
This analysis covers the disturbed pond since the pond to the West will not be encroached upon.
Ill Conclusion
The existing detention basin will function as initially intended and will be able to serve the new
Pharmacy . Construction of the pharmacy will not have an adverse effect on downstream systems.
n:\19607 4\corresp'roisc\drainrpt .doc
TABLE I
EXISTING POND
ELEVATION PERIMETER (FT) AREA (SQ. FT)) VOL (C.F)
272 143.65 726.42 0
273 342.97 6,748 .25 3,737.34
274 434 .28 9,967.22 12,095 .07
275 470 .99 12,398 .47 23,277 .92
276 508 .72 15,189.78 37 ,072.04
277 554.83 18,537.19 53,935 .53
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
ELEVATION PERIMETER (FT) AREA (SQ . FT)) VOL (C .F)
272 143.65 726.42 0
273 341.52 6 ,746.45 3 ,736 .40
274 435 .08 9,968.12 12,093 .69
275 480.09 12,398 .45 23 ,276 .98
276 515 .80 15,189.32 37,070 .87
277 563.45 18 ,538 .35 53 ,934 .71
n :\196074~espmisc\drainrpt.doc