Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9 High Ridge 05-22Item Number Quantity Unit 1 1 LS 2 346 LF 3 1 EA 4 2 EA 5 346 LF 6 580 SY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HIGH RIDGE SUBDIVISION SEWER EXTENSION Engineer's Opinion of Cost B&A Job # 70 13 Description Mobilization Furnish and install 8" PVC sanitary sewer by open cut Make tie-in to existing manhole Furnish and install standard precast manhole Trench safety Hydromulch disturbed areas Construction Subtotal Unit Total Cost Cost $2 ,500.00 $2,500.00 $25 .00 $8 ,650 .00 $750.00 $750 .00 $3 ,000 .00 $6,000 .00 $3.50 $1,211.00 $1 .50 $870 .00 $19,981.00 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Piltnnint & Dnxlopmmt Snvim SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: High Ridge Subdivision, L2, B1 DATE OF ISSUE: 9/19/5 OWNER: Anthony Majors -Varsity Ford TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 05-22 FOR AREAS INSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE ADDRESS: 1201 Earl Rudder Fwy S. DRAINAGE BASIN: Carter's Creek VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: Full Development Permit All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans All trees required to be protected as part of the landscape plan must be completely barricaded in accordance with Section 7.5 .E., Landscape/Streetscape Plan Requirements of the City's Unified Development Ordinance, prior to any operations of this permit. The cleaning of equipment or materials within the drip line of any tree or group of trees that are protected and required to rema in is strictly prohibited . The disposal of any waste material such as , but not limited to, paint, oil, solvents, asphalt, concrete , mortar, or other harmful liquids or materials within the drip line of any tree required to remain is also prohibited. All construction to be in compliance with TPDES . The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. If it is determined the prescribed erosion control measures are ineffective to retain all sediment onsite , it is the contractors responsibility to implement measures that will meet City, State and Federal requirements . The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition , placement and state . The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work . In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . I hereby grant this permit for development of an area inside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Da~ f'. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Case No. Cf?~?-~ Date Submitted s ,~l·CJS C ITY OF C OLLEGE STATION ' D Pl1m11ing & De11elopmmt Seruit:t•t DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MINIMUM SUBMITTAL R EQUIREMENTS $200.00 development permit fee. Drainage and erosion control plan, with supporting D Notice of Intent (N.0 .1.) if disturbed area is greater th rainage Report two (2) copies each an 5 acres 1·0!. , l~ Date of *Required Preapplication Conference: '2." *(Required for areas of special flood hr;;) 9 A \-;} f!J) d LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lor 2. f3K I HUiJI APPLICANT'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Pro e...~\ "E?o.vl tzuc\dd ~ R1tJ6C 5d~, Name Bil.ST M!LJ./t.,(...Y ject): lollf«.c.J//.,, ~ E-Mail h/e~/~1'1e~rtAlil• '0111 Street Address 11 Z 2. 8/ltJADMOO/l. Su. '/'IC Z.10 City /JR.YAN State TX. Zip Code 7780Z Phone Number Z"~-l ( Z 5 Fax Number 2t:.O · l tl4 cit PROPERTY OWNER 'S INFORMATION: Name AN'lllONY /lfA'JOf.$ E-Mail Street Address \/"1tlU11Y FO"" feJJZJ, +l,A ,J d£ ~J~7t Zip Code City ___________ State ___ _ Phone Number ____________ _ Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name S A-IH! AS All L.&~I E-Mail Street Address _____________ _ City ___________ State ___ _ Zip Code Phone Number ____________ _ Fax Number Application is hereby made for the following developments pecific site/waterway alterations: EA4.1H~~ -~U ACKNOWLEDGMENTS : ffirm that: -:>. I, __ , design engineer/owner, hereby acknowledge or a The information and conclusions contained in the above current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas plans and supporting documents comply with the City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Desi ta dards . 6/13/03 1 of2 .-- • As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application according to these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the College Station City Code Contractor CERTIFICATIONS: A. I, __ , certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm . Engineer Date B . I, __ , certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor , including any basement, of any residential structure , proposed as part of th is application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended . Engineer Date C. I, IJjf_, certify that. the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood - carrying capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements of the City of College Station City Code , Chapter 13 concerning encroachments of floodways and of floodw ays fringes . ~~ S/z3/D5 > I Date D. I, __ , do cert ify that the proposed alterations do not ra ise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study . Engineer Date Conditions or comments as part of approval : ------------------------ In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction , erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . All development shall be in accordance w ith the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply . 61 13/03 2 of 2 Bleyl & Associates Project Engineering & Management May 27 , 2005 Alan Gibbs , P .E . Development Engineer Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Re: High Ridge Drainage Improvements Dear Alan, 1 722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan, TX 77802 To provide some background, you and I have met a few times both alone and with other staff members and discussed the floodplain and floodway locations that affect the vacant property just north of the current Varsity Ford Dealership. The desire of the property owner, Tony Majors, is to create a buildable commercial lot fronting SH6 that does not have any floodplain within its limits . The stated desire of the City 's Greenways Coordinator is to obtain unimproved floodplain in support of the Greenways Program, preferably at low or no cost. It is your stated desire to assure that any improvements to the property comply with the Flood Hazard Protection Ordinance, specifically that no fill be placed within the floodway of Carters Creek. To meet these multiple objectives, Bleyl & Associates has prepared a design that produces a reasonable sized, floodplain free commercial lot, as well as a large greenways dedication. This is achieved through minor filling of a portion of the flood fr ii!ge to physically relocate the floodplain , replatting the lot to dedicate the greenway area to the City, and a LOMA-F permit application to relocate the floodplain limit on the FIRM. Near the middle of the property in question, the distance from the centerline of the creek, to the location where the BFE contacts the actual surveyed topography is approximately 325 feet. The fill proposed would move the floodplain approximately 130 feet closer to the creek. Because the entire width of the floodway at this location per the FIRM is over 1900 feet , and because the maximum depth of fill proposed is only 4 feet , it is our opinion that this fill is minor in nature and will not affect the flood capacity of the creek. Bryan (979)-268-1125 (979)-260-3849 Austin (512)-328-7878 (512)-328-7884 Fax Conroe (936)-441-7833 (936)-760-3833 Fax Any time encroachment is made into the floodplain , it is incumbent on both the designer and the floodplain administrator to verify that the encroachment does not extend into the floodway. At this time, the regulatory floodway is shown very close to the western high bank of Carters Creek at this location. While the FIS does not provide a distance from the creek centerline to the edge of the floodway , the FIRM indicates a distance that scales to approximately 60 feet. Because the topography of the site supports this floodway location, we do not believe it is necessary to prepare a complete recalculation of the Carters Creek Flood Data, to state definitively that the grading proposed at this time does not approach the location of the floodway. Therefore we first ask that you accept our determination that the current actual floodway limit is located very close to that shown on the FIRM, and thus is over 100 feet from the maximum encroachment proposed. This would mean that our proposal meets the requirement of avoiding fill in the flood way. Second, we ask that you accept our determination that the amount of fill proposed is very minor, and fits within the stated purposes of the LOMA-F encroachment process . In summary, we believe that we have provided a proposal that is both beneficial to the public, in that all remaining floodplain within the original lot will be dedicated to the City as public greenway, as well as meets the interests of public safety in meeting the requirements of the Flood Hazard Protection Ordinance. Once you have reviewed this letter and the supporting documents, I ask that we be able to meet to discuss your observations and reactions, and so better understand our mutual positions with regards to this development. You may reach me at any time at 255-8766. Thank you for your continued cooperation and assistance. ~If Brett McCully, P .E. Sr. Project Engineer I Branch Manager Cc: Phil Kirk Bleyl & Associates Project Engineering & Management 1 722 Broadmoor Suite 2io Bryan, TX 77802 TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: Alan Gibbs , P.E . FROM: Brett McCully, P.E. FIRM: City of College Station DATE: August 29 , 2005 RE: High Ridge Grading ,,.MESSAGE: Alan, Attached you should find four copies of our revised grading plans for the fill adjacent to the Varsity Ford dealership. We have added the erosion protection note per your email directions, and provide the attached plans for approval. Should you have any further comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Bryan (979)-268-1125 (979)-260-3849 Austin (512)-328-7878 (512)-328-7884 Fax YY\0- [;6-d~ 4~ ooprn B --~0--o:s- Conroe (936)-441-7833 (936)-760-3833 Fax From: To: Date: Subject: Brett , Alan Gibbs bmccully@bleylengineering .com 8/19/2005 12 :20:38 PM High Ridge DP for fill (DP 05-22) I only had one comment on your plans -add a note to comply with the Drainage Policy and Standards X .C.2 -Surface Treatment (for Permanent Erosion Control). Additionally , I am in agreement with your letter and the process you outlined . Thanks , Alan Alan P. Gibbs , P.E. Sr. Asst. City Engineer -Development Public Works Department City of College Station P. 0 . Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Ph : (979) 764 -3570 Fx : (979)764-3496 agibbs@cstx.gov www.cstx .gov CC: George, Bridgette Bleyl & Associates Project Engineering & Management July 28 , 2005 Alan Gibbs , P .E . Development Engineer Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O . Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Re: High Ridge Drainage Improvements Dear Alan, To provide some background, you and I have met both alone and with other staff members and discussed the floodplain and floodway locations that affect the vacant property just north of the current Varsity Ford Dealership. 1 722 Broadmoor Suite 210 Bryan, TX 77802 The desire of the property owner, Tony Majors, is to create a buildable commercial lot fronting SH6 that does not have any floodplain within its limits . The stated desire of the City 's Greenways Coordinator is to obtain unimproved floodplain in support of the Greenways Program, preferably at low or no cost. It is your stated desire to assure that any improvements to the property comply with the Flood Hazard Protection Ordinance, specifically that no fill be placed within the floodway of Carters Creek. To meet these multiple objectives, Bleyl & Associates has prepared a design that produces a reasonable sized, floodplain free commercial lot, as well as a large greenways dedication. This is achieved through minor filling of a portion of the flood fringe to physically relocate the floodplain, replatting the lot to dedicate the greenway area to the City, and a LOMA-F permit application to relocate the floodplain limit on the FIRM. Some weeks back, we submitted both Development Permit and Platting application packages for review. On June 14th , we discussed comments relating to both the grading/drainage and platting proposals. What follows is my understanding of the comments raised, and our responses to each issue. High Ridge Drainage Development Permit Bryan (979)-268-1125 (979)-260-3849 Austin (512)-328-7878 (512)-328-7884 Fax Conroe (936)-441-7833 (936)-760-3833 Fax The primary concern raised was that the floodway limits for Carters Creek was not defined on the drawings , so Staff was unable to verify that the grading was outside of the floodway. Since this meeting, we have physically surveyed the location of the we stern high bank of Carters Creek near the site , and have indicated its location on the grading plans . We have also applied the floodway section information from the FIS to this field determined high bank location, and have indicated what we believe to be the most reasonable location for the floodway line. A secondary concern was raised that the grading appeared to cross over the centerline of the drainage along the northern property line. We have attempted to clarify the drawings to indicate that the centerline is not crossed, and in fact very little fill is being placed within the drainage at all. High Ridge Subdivision Plat The first comment made questioned why we had designated the proposed greenway s dedication as a numbered lot. This was an error on our part, and will be changed to remove the lot numbering in our next submittal. A comment was made that the plat would be processed as a replat instead of as a minor plat as submitted. As submitted, the plat would have qualified as a replat. However once the greenways dedication area is no longer denoted as a lot per the comment above , it would no longer fit the City 's definition of a replat, and thus should be defined and processed as a minor plat. A comment was made to include the extents of the existing parking on the eastern comer of the site to clarify the relation of the proposed lot line and the parking area. We agreed to provide a separate document which shows the physical relationship between the existing parking, fencing and the proposed property lines . A comment was made that the width of the panhandle of the dedication area might be too small to provide for future needs. This was discussed in greater detail with the City 's Greenways Coordinator after our facilitation meeting, and it was agreed that a 20 foot public drainage easement would be included on the plat to provide for these future needs . During the facilitation meeting, a comment was made requesting that a note be added to the plat describing how the existing floodplain location was established. We will add a note to the plat that explains how the FIS flood elevation was applied to the physical ground surveyed topography on the site. Also during the facilitation meeting, a comment was made that we would not be allowed to show the floodplain as proposed by the grading modifications until a Letter of Map Revision was issued by FEMA to indicate the modified location. This comment caused a significant level of concern as it contradicted our tentative agreement reached as a result of meetings earlier in the year. To meet this requirement, as well as the objectives of the property owner, this project must now be re-ordered as follows. • First, the proposed Drainage Development Permit must be reviewed and approved. Second, the grading and fill must be completed in the field and verified. Third, we must prepare and submit a post-construction LOMA-F application through the City to FEMA to effect the relocation of the regulatory floodplain line. Once the LOMA-Fis issued, we understand that we could then proceed with resubmitting the plat with the floodplain in the new location. To this end, we are re-submitting the grading plans after incorporating these comments as the first step in this revised process. Once you have reviewed this letter and the supporting documents, I ask that we be able to meet to discuss your observations and reactions, and so better understand our mutual positions with regards to this development. You may reach me at any time at 255-8766. Thank you for your continued cooperation and assistance. Brett Mc lly, P.E. Sr. Engineer I Branch Manager Cc : Phil Kirk ' ,, 1 . I Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) COMMUNITY AND MAP PANEL INFORMATION LEGAL PROPERTY DESCR IPTION LOMR-F CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS Portion of Lot 2, Block 1, High Ridge Subdivision , as shown on the Plat recorded in Volume 1878, Page 33 , in the Office of the County Clerk, Brazos County , Texas COMMUNITY The portion of property to be removed from the SFHA is more t------------------1 particularly described by the follow in g metes and bounds : COMMUNITY NO.: 480083 AFFECTED NUMBER : 48041C0142C COMMENCING at the westernmost corner of Lot 2, thence MAP PANEL t----------------1 S36 °2 6 '10"E, 21 .63 feet ; thence N75 °58'06"E, 125.57 feet to the DATE : 7/211992 FLOODING SOURCE: CARTERS CREEK APPROXIMATE LATITUDE & LONG ITUDE OF PROPERTY: 30 .638, -96.306 SOURCE OF LAT & LONG : PRECISION MAPPING STREETS 7.0 DATUM: NAO 83 LOT BLOCK/ SECTION SUBDIVISION STREET DETERMINATION OUTCOME WHAT IS REMOVED FROM THE SFHA FLOOD ZONE 2 1 High Ridge 1201 Earl Rudder Portion of X (shaded) Freeway South Prooertv 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD ELEVATION fNGVD 29) 258 .9 feet LOWEST LOWEST ADJACENT LOT GRADE ELEVATION ELEVATI ON (NGVD 29) fNGVD29) -259.5 feet Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) -The SFHA is an area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being eoualed or exceeded in anv oiven vear !base flood). ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS (Please refer to the appropriate section on Attachment 1 for the additional considerations listed below.) LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FILL RECOMMENDATION PORTIONS REMAIN IN THE SFHA This document provides the Federal Emergency Management Agency's determination regarding a request for a Letter of Map Revision based on Fill for the property described above. Using the information submitted and the effective Nationa l Flood Insurance Program (NFlP) map, we have determined that the described portion(s) of the property(ies) is/are not located in the SFHA, an area inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). This document revises the effective NFlP map to remove the subject property from the SFHA located on the effective NFlP map ; therefore , the Federal mandatory flood insurance req uirement does not apply . However. the lender has the option to continue the flood insurance requirement to protect its financial risk on the loan . A Preferred Risk Policy (PRP) is avail~ble for buildings located outside the SFHA. Information about the PRP and how one can apply is enclosed . This determination is based on the flood data presently available . The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this determination. If you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA Map Ass istance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FE MA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency , 3601 Eisenhower Avenue , Suite 130, Alexandria , VA 22304-6439 . I=> ~I;: __ Doug Bellomo , P.E., Chief H<>7<>r<1 lrlt>ntifir<>linn C::ortinn Milin:.linn nivi~;"n Page 2 of 2 I I Date: April 13, 2006 I Case No.: , J6-8734A Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington , D .C. 20472 LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL DETERMINATION DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) ATTACHMENT 1 (ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) POINT OF BEGINNING; thence , N75 °58 '06 "E, 259 .30 feet, thence S38 °31 '5dE , 129.93 feet ; thence S77°14'12 "W , 61.31 feet; thence N63°24 '48 "W, 19.45 feet ; thence S82 °29 '21 "W , 58 .29 feet; thence N67°18'18"W, 76 .00 feet; thence N23 °50 '07W, 38 .98 feet ; thence S75 °09 '54 "W , 92 .73 feet ; thence N65 °35 '21"W, 24.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING FILL RECOMMENDATION (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 1 Property.) I The minimum NFIP criteria for removal of the subject area based on fill have been met for this request and the community in which the property is located has certified that the area and any subsequent structure(s) built 6n the filled area are reasonably safe from flooding . FEMA's Technical Bulletin 10-01 provides guidance for the construction of buildings on land elevated above the base flood elevation through the placement of fill. A copy of Technical Bulletin 10-01 can be obtained by calling the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or from our web site at http://www.fema .gov/mit/tb1001 .pdf. Although the minimum NFIP standards no longer apply to this area, some communities may have floodplain management regulations that are more restrictive and may continue to enforce some or all of their requirements in areas outside the Special Flood Hazard Area . PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY REMAIN IN THE SFHA (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 1 Property.) Portions of this property, but not the subject of the Determination/Comment document, may remain in the Special Flood Hazard Area . Therefore , any future construction or substantial improvement on the property remains subject to Federal , State/Commonwealth, and local regulations for floodplain management. LOMR-F This attachment provides additional information regarding this request. If you have any questions about this attachment, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency , 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Su ite 130, Alexandria , VA 22304-6439. ~Jt.,..._ -- Doug Bellomo , P .E .. Chief Hazard Identification Section Mitioation Division ' . ~ ' .. Fed eral Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 THE HONORABLE RON SIL VIA MAYOR, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P.O. BOX 9960 1101 S.TEXASAVENUE COLLEGE ST A TION , TX 77842 DEAR MR . SIL VIA: April 13, 2006 CASE NO .: 06-06-B734A COMMUNITY: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION , BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS COMMUNITY NO .: 480083 This is in reference to a request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) determine if the property described in the enclosed document is located within an identified Special Flood Hazard Area, the area that would be inundated by the flood having a I-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood), on the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. Using the information submitted and the effective NFIP map, our determination is shown on the attached Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (LOMR-F) Determination Document. This determination document provides additional information regarding the effective NFIP map, the legal description of the property and our determination. Additional documents are enclosed which provide information regarding the subject property and LOMR-Fs. Please see the List of Enclosures below to determine which documents are enclosed. Other attachments specific to this request may be included as referenced in the Determination/Comment document . If you have any questions about this letter or any of the enclosures, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center to ll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency , 3601 Eisenhower Avenue , Suite 130, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. Sincerely , t> ~·t....__ __ Doug Bellomo, P.E., Chief Hazard Identification Section , Mitigation Division LIST OF ENCLOSURES: LOMR-F DETERMINA TJON DOCUMENT (REMOVAL) cc: State/Commonwealth NFIP Coordinator Community Map Repository Region Mr. Brett McCully P .E .