The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About31 Development Permit 320 Douglas NissanLENTZ ENGINEERING, L.C. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS AND P LANNE R S Ci t y of College Station Buil ding Officials 1101 Texas Avenue P .O . Box 9960 College S t ation, Texas 77842 Ge n tlemen : October 8, 1996 Please be advised that we have changed the size of Sanitary .Sewer from 6'' to 4" all the way to the point of connection, to the City Man Hole . A 4" line is more than adequate to carry the flow and fixt u re units of this project . If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. I rema in, 1328 SOUTH LOOP WEST, SUITE 201 (713) 796-1212 Very yours, c. President HOUSTON , TEXAS 77054 FAX (713) 796 -1 219 R.P.L.S . DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO . 320 Douglass Nissan FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Greensworld Phase II SITE ADDRESS: 1003 State Highway No. 6 East OWNER: Douglass Nissan DRAINAGE BASIN: Carter's Creek, Basin 6 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: This permit is valid for site construction in accordance with the approved plans . Contractor shall prevent silt and debris from leaving the site in accordance with the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. Owner and/or contractor shall be responsible for any damage to existing city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment. In accordanc~ with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply . A£~e ~ o-:gvsf 81 /1'f& Date ~u r= .:t4 t9U From: To: Date: Subject: Samantha Smith SHOMEYER 8/8/96 10:42am Douglass The only other thing I want to ask is this. When you reviewed Douglass the last time, did you check to see if the meter sizes shown match their proposed demands? If not, perhaps we can catch it with the site/bldg plan review. I know we can't hold up this review, so I'm sending it back with no comment regarding the meters. ACCOUNT NO. __________ _ 380974 {%;&! CJ I.,,~ Jqs-~~ THANK YOU Pa id by _ Check_~sh ·--- DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 320 Douglass Nissan FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Greensworld Phase II SITE ADDRESS: 1003 State Highway No. 6 East OWNER: Douglass Nissan DRAINAGE BASIN: Carter's Creek, Basin 6 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: This permit is valid for site const ction in accordance with the approved plans . Contractor shall prevent silt and de s from leaving the site in accordance with the City of College Station Drainage Policy nd Design Criteria. Owner and/or contractor shall be responsible for any damage existing city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment · In accordance ·th Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures all be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation sh not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . I her y grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard are . All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitte to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the ab e named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that ply . Date • Owner Date Contractor Date 4103 Texas Avenue, Suite 212 Bryan, Texas 77802 TO ATTENTION S:_~\/E WE TRANSMIT: 0 Under Separate Cover OEnclosed VIA : DMail DMessenger D Federal Express D Express Mail 0 Special Courier D Picked Up By Your Office NO. KLING ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors Tel. (409) 846-6212 Fax (409) 846-8252 DATE PROJECT NO . P.O. Box 4234 Bryan, Texas 77805 PROJECT NAME Do THE FOLLOWING : DPrints DCopies DOriginals DPlat D Field Notes DPlans DReport D Estimate DCut Sheets D Computer Printout DFile DContract 0 DESCRIPTION REFERENCE C-t c J- ~: ~r Review & Approval 0 Your Review & Comment )si:Your Review & Distribution / 0 Your Review, Revision & Return 0 Your Signature & Return 0 Your File and/or Use DAs Requested By : 0 Please Acknowledge Receipt of Enclosures 0 Please Return Enclosures To Us 0 Copies Of This Letter Of Transmittal Sent To : If Enclosures Are Not As Noted , Please Notify Us At Once. ·- CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Pn'it 0 r rr Bo )b') I 10 1 fexa<> nur College ~la.of. f e..11as 7764 2 9960 (4 0 91 76·t 3500 VIA HAND DELIVERY Augusta, 1996 Mr. Patrick Wi lli ams , P.E. Texas Dep a rt me nt of Trans po rt ati o n 1300 N. Texas Avenue · Bryan, TX 7780 3 RE: Driveway Access Permit Douglas s Nissan Dear Mr. Will iams : Attached are three copies of a Driveway Access Permit for a proposed Douglass Nissan car dealership located along State Highway No. 6 , nea r its southeast intersection with University Drive (F .M. 60). Please sign these and return two copies. One copy will be kept for our records and the other will be forwarded to the applicant. If you have any questions, please contact me at 764-3570 . Sincerely, Samantha Smith Engineering Assistant ·1 cc : Shir ley Volk, Developme nt Coord i nato r Thomas Baber, Kling Engineering '\ ,, Ho m e "f T~Kas A&/11\ .lt Figure XII Application Form Deve lo pment Permit Inside/O utside F.stablished Flood Hazard Areas City of C ollege Station, Texas (re: Ordinance No. 1728 ) SiteLegalDescription: Lot 1, Block 1, Greensworld Subdivision, Ph. Two, 3.817 Ac. Tr. SiteAddress: Approx. 1000 1· south of the intersection of State Hwy 6 and University Drive 1214 S. Texas Ave. Owner: Dougla.s..s Nissan. Inc. Address: Bryan. TX 77803 Architect/ Engineer: Kling Engineering & Surveying Contractor: Comanche Contractors, Inc. TelephoneNo.: (409) 775-1500 .4103 Texas Ave. Suite 212 Address: Bryan, TX 77802 TelephoneNo.: (409) 846-6212 P .O. Box 70068 Address: Houston, TX 77270-0068 TelephoneNo.: (713) 362-4545 Date Application Filed:_J_u_ly~2_4_,_1_9_9_6 ________ Approved: __________ _ Application is hereby made for the following specific waterway alterations: Construction of new car lot along Carters Creek. Attached as part of this application: ~ Application Fee D Signed Certificate X] Site and Construction Plans, with supporting documentation: two (2) copies of each D Other: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: I, Noble Douglass , as owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: The above Drainage Plan and supporting documents complies with the requirements of Ordinance No. 1728 , and ~ Owner Date ~ Developer Date ~ Contractor Date Page 1 of 2 Figure XII Continued CERTIFICATIONS: A. I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application meets flood-proofing requirements as set out in Section of Ordinance No. 1728 Architect/Engineer Date .. B. I, certify that the finished floor level of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential structure as part of this application is or proposed to be at or above the base flood elevation as established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration flood hazard study and maps, as amended. Architect/Engineer Date C. I, certify that the alterations or development covered by this permits all not d' 'nish the flood-carrying capacity of the adjoining waterway or crossing this permitted s1 e and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements concerning encroachments of floodways and of floodway fringes as illustrated in the lat st Federal Insurance Study. Date "' ,. D. I, do certify that any alterations, addressed in Certification "D" do not raise the level of 100-year flood as referred to Certification "B". Architect/Engineer Date REVIEWED FOR APPROVAL: -------------=----.,.......,--=---.,..-,---,--..,.--------Floodplain Administrator Date APPROVAL: Special conditions or comments as part of approval:------------------------------- Page 2of2 forms\dpopp.doc 11/9 1 rfa,, ~r-<G Pi-~ Wo{f PcVl C~ l2cv1 '~J v~~iY/~e fZerort- Do~ltA-% I~ t~a f'7 J:::i t'l:-Pl ow n:po r'·+ V i1/t4 n ·v~ 1 ~.:~j ~ fZepc.:r-+ --=..;;;....,;;., brvt ai:J cz nd E ~i elaYJ-7 '7$'7 11/14 V1 ~ 11 f l4n Jcff_,Son IZ-1~c. AJci ' I ~ /V~ 0 c()H Ve}. Cl ,'t'Jic.--bi dJ p la07 ~ J1/z.1 p 5K:H i I/·; l r / rin of C 0,·m"S.! f-h 't { {b~.s f W~5-/-cr11) fZe v1 Seel H re f a _,,c: /cta>r,·Y'IJ e f (4 '1 Ec:J_eA we.A~ _ ./Q.:._A _ . Prdi 1>1~~e ~rf-_ v/~ Lon-7fy-{j-cfz(m Dees csf /P,,/ufi·L) ~ ·r:1r-cJ,vn: ·_ TAFl u -#= l o,-f Well -~ Clti7.Si(._, fZ-evtlfj --1c,v. d~, rcrv,.-f-%H ---~ ~DrS af-(;l)PC -l"""(_,v,·>e,d 0 -i I c -~, C-10, c-11 ~Vind.6f-r;Y1c ., Lo_f5 'i'RA I>.., Cf f?;(b ____ e-ey_i ~ r'-0_~~{fur urrrt)l/'A/) .. % Ede~Lw_clss __ 5-=A __ _ __ _ _ -_ g_e v1·s~.d ~ pf an5 (-Gr __ ttff~Va f) . 7% -------- i l/Z:o 11 11/~z. Y1 11/z.4 f s~ nd?ton~ I -Lofs C/J-6 _l 1KB (SS> --~ --11/5 p il/ZBp i 1/,2'1 Of ilfZ'1 1 ti/Zic< 11/Z&F lyZ~n 11/10 - IZ(5p 3.s 3.5 '1 r:, .,,I ,-.;' no f') f) ho Pl an ~ A riov~ ~+ VJot P Pe Vl ~ ~v . r-ch-t ir"l 1 :J wa.11 shc ~h. DouJ ti.% . N ~?S~Vl "Dr~ I YI tij-e, rcror--f-t rc.,,vi~ ,k.., s ~v 'd {. la?s ic . rz~~ I:; fZc V1 ~d cl J 7f / T?D ~ / P{~va 5 IZ e v i~ ci r-J r-p r c °'<() ~ I ., ) C r 1 .:::]~ { Pa 1/L p 14 20{ l2ev1 .?e-d 5'~di "j clind WL p/~"'5 S hc vi al"lc;1~li Ph 47e '? -r-cv ,-0 eo~s~r. civ.is:i 7. [no d~ ~v1·i-U /f ] Oa0ic. i2eA I~ -r'"'-"'S c A(c, ,.,,, ) L un c5 rr'!~ r-e . ~ff' S'f-or~51C:-PhP!'X-Z '7 i h: ,a V1 d ~u r (d ,J P(~1 n s P~r k:0Jq/ ~i e-l!\J Vr ~ R-r f- {,,1 s hi_ I Ya rL C c-~ f-e.r 0 1 f-r Co nsl-ruoh &n Pou; ~f?P Apy /' fZ-e.v: l7r11 1 er+ '7 1 t-.c, Co V1 0 frv vh t:J n I/be;.,~ -· S l,ef)cA n do~0 P Ma 'X. 3 _~cc v doc -s + d~ rp +- v v/~ v/~ v/~ .V 111 12-/~ n i l/7n 12/~p I t(t?I iZ/;3F 12/14 p it-/ 1q r7 1/3r ovf- I '-/t7:Jp f2/8r 12/~r iah:~ l'lo /. l ,, J z./ 14 n ti c HGW to/rsf Ylo HELVt ' l / ltJeq iZ/Z4 r 1 /4-~ tl.O t'l o CITY OF COLLEGE STATION December 13, 1995 Mr_ Thomas Baber Kling Engineering Pos t Office Box 9 9 60 1 10 1 Texas Av e nue College S t ation, Texas 77842-9960 (409) 764-3500 4103 Texas Avenue , Suite 212 Bryan, TX 77802 RE : Douglass Nissan TxDOT Permit for State Highway 6 Dear Mr. Baber, In reviewing the attached Douglass Nissan construction documents, I have noted that all of the City's previous concerns have been addressed except one. Before any work can begin within the State Highway 6 right-of-way, TxDOT will need to review and approve a permit for the driveway entrance . Please prepare the necessary documents in triplicate and submit them to the City so that we may forward them to TxDOT. Please include erosion control on the grading design. We need some means of ensuring that the Contractor will prevent silt and debris from leaving the site in accordance with the City's criteria . Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 764- 3570 . Sincerely, Samantha Smith Engineering Assistant Ho me of Texas A&M Univ ersity ··--· DATE = 12-6-95 PAGE NO. JOB NAME = MAXIMUM WATER DEMAND FOR BUILDING * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * * * * * * * * * * * Univers ity of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * * <<< FOR SEMINAR PURPOSES ONLY >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DATE: 12/ 6/1995 TIME: 8:35: 9 INPUT DATA FILENAME --------------NISSAN.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME --------NISSAN.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME ---NISSAN.RES ************************************************ S U M M A R Y 0 F 0 R I G I N A L D A T A ************************************************ U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOWRATE HEAD CHGL) .•.••.•••• =gallons/minute = feet PRESSURE ...••....••• = psig P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NOOE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE PIPE NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS NUMBER #1 #2 (ft) C in) COEFF. PU -PUMP LINE MINOR LOSS COEFF. FGN-HGL (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-FG 0 323.0 2 2 216.0 3 2 4 152.0 4 1 3 154.0 5 3 5 9.5 6 5 6 5.0 J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E D A T A JUNCTION NUMBER JUNCTION TITLE EXTERNAL DEMAND 18.0 120.00 .00 482.80 18.0 120.00 .00 8.0 120.00 .00 8.0 120.00 .00 6.0 120.00 .00 1.5 80.00 .00 JUNCTION ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES (Q?Jl) (ft) DATE = 12-6-95 PAGE NO. 2 JOB NAME = MAXIMUM WATER DEMAND FOR BUILDING 1 .00 259.50 2 4 2 .00 259.00 2 3 3 .00 263.70 4 5 4 .00 263.00 3 5 .00 263.70 5 6 6 61.20 263.70 6 0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N NUMBER OF PIPES ••••••••••••••••••• (p) = 6 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NOOES ••••..••.• (j) 6 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ..•••....•• (l) 0 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NOOES •...••• (f) NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES •..••.....•• (z) = ************************************* S I M U L A T I 0 N R E S U L T S ************************************* THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00000 P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS COOE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NOOE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO. 1000 (Q?Jl) (ft) (ft) (ft) Cft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-FG 0 61.20 .00 .00 .00 .08 .00 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3 2 4 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4 1 3 61.20 .02 .00 .00 .39 .12 5 3 5 61.20 .00 .00 .00 .69 .49 6 5 6 61.20 4.41 .00 -~ 882.55 J U N C T 0 N N 0 D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION DATE = 12·6·95 PAGE NO. 3 JOB NAME = MAXIMUM WATER DEMAND FOR BUILDING NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .00 482.80 259.50 223.30 2 .00 482.80 259.00 223.80 3 .00 482.78 263.70 219.08 4 .00 482.80 263.00 219.80 5 .00 482.78 263.70 219.08 6 61.20 478.36 263.70 214.66 S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NOOES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NOOES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE (gpm) 61.20 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 61.20 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = .00 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 61.20 **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 12/ 6/1995 TIME: 8:35: 9 96.76 96.98 94.94 95.25 94.93 93.02 DATE = 12-6-95 PAGE NO. JOB NAME = AVERAGE WATER DEMAND FOR BUILDING * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * * * * * * * * * * * University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * * <<< FOR SEMINAR PURPOSES ONLY >>> * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * DATE: 12/ 6/1995 TIME: 8:41:19 INPUT DATA FILENAME --------------NISSAN.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME --------NISSAN.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME ---NISSAN.RES ************************************************ S U M M A R Y 0 F 0 R I G I N A L D A T A ************************************************ U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOIJRATE =gallons/minute HEAD CHGL) ••.•.••••• = feet PRESSURE •••••••••••• = psig P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS COOE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE PIPE NOOE NOS. LENGTH NUMBER #1 #2 (ft) FG -FIXED GRADE NODE RV -REGULATING VALVE DIAMETER ROUGHNESS C in) COEFF. PU -PUMP LINE MINOR LOSS COEFF. FGN-HGL (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-FG 0 1 323.0 2 1 2 216.0 3 2 4 152.0 4 1 3 154.0 5 3 5 9.5 6 5 6 5.0 J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E D A T A JUNCTION NUMBER JUNCTION TITLE EXTERNAL DEMAND 18.0 120.00 .00 482.80 18.0 120.00 .oo 8.0 120.00 .00 8.0 120.00 .00 6.0 120.00 .00 1.5 80.00 .00 JUNCTION ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES (gpm) (ft) DATE = 12-6-95 PAGE NO. 2 JOB NAME = AVERAGE WATER DEMAND FOR BUILDING .00 259.50 2 4 2 .00 259.00 2 3 3 .00 263.70 4 5 4 .00 263.00 3 5 .00 263.70 5 6 6 30.10 263.70 6 0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A OUTPUT SELECTION: All RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N NUMBER OF PIPES ••••••••••.••..••.• (p) = 6 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES ..••..•••• (j) = 6 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ..•••....•• (l) 0 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NODES ••.•... (f) NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES ....••...... (z) = ************************************* S I M U L A T I 0 N R E S U L T S ************************************* THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00000 P I P E L I N E R E S U l T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NOOE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO . 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/S) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-FG 0 30.10 .00 .00 .00 .04 .00 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3 2 4 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4 1 3 30.10 .00 .00 .00 .19 .03 5 3 5 30.10 .00 .00 .00 .34 .13 6 5 6 30.10 1.19 .oo ·'0 "·" J U N C T 0 N N 0 D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION DATE = 12-6-95 PAGE NO. 3 JOB NAME = AVERAGE WATER DEMAND FOR BUILDING NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ps i ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .00 482.80 259.50 223 .30 2 .00 482.80 259.00 223 .80 3 .00 482.79 263.70 219.09 4 .00 482.80 263.00 219.80 5 .00 482.79 263.70 219.09 6 30.10 481.61 263.70 217. 91 S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S (+) INFLOIJS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (-) OUTFLOIJS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE (gpm) 30.10 NET SYSTEM INFLOIJ 30.10 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOIJ = .00 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 30.10 **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 12/ 6/1995 TIME: 8:41 :20 96.76 96.98 94.94 95.25 94.94 94.43 DATE = 12-6-95 PAGE NO. JOB NAME = NAXIMUM IRRIGATION DEMAND * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * * * * * * * * * * * University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * * <<< FOR SEMINAR PURPOSES ONLY >>> * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * • * * * * • * * * * * * * * DATE: 12/ 6/1995 TIME: 8:53:45 INPUT DATA FILENAME --------------NISSAN.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME --------NISSAN.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME ---NISSAN.RES ************************************************ S U M M A R Y 0 F 0 R I G I N A L D A T A ************************************************ U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLO\JRATE •••••••••••• =gallons/minute HEAD CHGL) ••.••••••• feet PRESSURE •••••••••••• = psig P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS COOE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NOOE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE PIPE NOOE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS NUMBER #1 #2 (ft) C in) COEFF. PU -PUMP LI NE MINOR LOSS COEFF. FGN -HGL (ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-FG 0 323.0 2 2 216.0 3 2 4 152.0 4 1 3 154.0 5 3 5 9.5 6 5 6 5.0 J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E D A T A JUNCTION NUMBER JUNCTION TITLE EXTERNAL DEMAND 18.0 120.00 .00 482.80 18.0 120.00 .00 8.0 120.00 .00 8.0 120.00 .00 6.0 120.00 .00 1.5 80.00 .00 JUNCTION ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES -· (gpm) (ft) DATE = 12-6-95 PAGE NO. 2 JOB NAME = MAXIMUM IRRIGATION DEMAND .00 259.50 2 4 2 .00 259.00 2 3 3 .00 263.70 4 5 4 .00 263.00 3 5 .00 263 .70 5 6 6 52.00 263.70 6 0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N NUMBER OF PIPES •••..•••...•....... (p) 6 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES •.•••..•.. (j) 6 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ••...•..... (l) 0 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NODES •.••••• (f) NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES ............ (Z) = ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• S I M U L A T I 0 N R E S U L T S ************************************* THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS YITH AN ACCURACY = .00000 P I P E L I N E R E S U L T S STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE FG -FIXED GRADE NOOE PU -PUMP LINE CV -CHECK VALVE RV -REGULATING VALVE TK -STORAGE TANK PIPE NOOE NOS. FLO'WRATE HEAD PUMP MINOR LINE HL/ NUMBER #1 #2 LOSS HEAD LOSS VELO . 1000 (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft/s) (ft/ft) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-FG 0 1 52.00 .00 .00 .oo .07 .00 2 2 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3 2 4 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4 3 52.00 .01 .00 .00 .33 .09 5 3 5 52.00 .00 .00 .00 .59 .36 • . . . .. ,. 9 .10 6 5 6 52.00 3.26 .oo (0 J U N C T 0 N N 0 D E R E S U L T S JUNCTION JUNCTION EXTERNAL HYDRAULIC JUNCTION PRESSURE JUNCTION DATE = 12-6-95 PAGE NO. 3 JOB NAME = MAXIMUM IRRIGATION DEMAND NUMBER TITLE DEMAND GRADE ELEVATION HEAD PRESSURE (gpm) (ft) (ft) (ft) (psi) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .00 482.80 259.50 223.30 2 .00 482.80 259.00 223.80 3 .00 482.79 263.70 219.09 4 .00 482.80 263.00 219.80 5 .00 482.78 263.70 219.08 6 52.00 479.52 263.70 215.82 S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NOOES (-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NOOES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE (gpm) 52.00 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 52.00 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = .00 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 52.00 **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 12/ 6/1995 TIME: 8:53:46 96.76 96.98 94.94 95.25 94.94 93.52 " ' .. ,. ""'"" ......... ......... ......... ::c::c::c "'"'"' 000 11100 -N -N., .,.,., ---~~~ NNC"I VJ '1 ~ Q... >- CXl ~ ~ L1 ' "'3 ~ ~ ~ F.M. l.11 o @ 'JlS~.o 5J I . ® 1-.!R? I 0 -...9 -~ \ ~ ~E=&J .s 'I\) C) (tU) ?tt~<== .IL Lcrr \I BIK-/ W tit. t~~ 'D r=MA>-.l t::> t=Cic 'B f...l.l u l "'\~ \(VI~ ::.('1 \, ~ ~ .0 Yvt ~V1-;... 0 <jf' a._~ -:;.. ~ 0 I lo 0. p lo'"V1 I· ~or<_ I<;;:__J?;,TA-r rY-l --VV\~ = 5:J-9p r [ .. 'F&r~I e 1 oop~1 * '\~':~ ~ 1/v1..L}1b/+.f ::.. :;_ o,g ~- fL.@ ~ 5,.. TOI,. L t-\-~A.D = L/gJ-,SO Federal Emergency Management Ag~n!=Y Washington , D.C . 20472 AUG 15 1995 OU PL1CA E The Honorable Larry Ringer Mayor , City of College Station P .O . Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-0960 Dear Mayor Ringer : IN REPLY REFER TO: Case No.: 95-06-365A Community : City of College Station, Texas Community No .: 480083 Map Panel Affected : 0142 C T-218-65 -R This is in response to a letter from Mr. Michael K . Davis, Trustee, requesting that the Federal Emergency Management Agency determine whether the following property is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA ), an area that would be inundated by a flood having a I-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). This property has been elevated by the placement of fill . Property Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Greensworld Subdivision Phase Two , as described in the Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument No . 570434 , in Volume 2266, Pages 240 and 241, in the Office of the Recorder, Brazos County, Texas Street Address: 1003 East Bypass Community: City of College Station ~: Texas All fees necessary to process this Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), a total of $425, have been received . On July 25, 1995, we received all information necessary to process Mr. Davis' request. After comparing this information to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map for your community, we determined that the property described above would not be inundated by the base flood. Therefore, this letter revises the NFIP map for Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas (NFIP Map Number 48041C0142 C, dated July 2, 1992), to remove the property from the SFHA. The property is now located in Zone X (shaded), an area of moderate flooding outside the SFHA . Although the criteria for removal of a parcel of land based on fill have been met for this request, we encourage you to require that the lowest adjacent grade and lowest floor (including basement) of any structure placed on the property be elevated to a level at or above the base flood elevation. l 2 OUPL!CATE You should note that this property could be inundated by a flood greater than the base flood or by local flooding conditions not shown on the NFIP map. Also, although we have based our determination on the flood data presently available, flood conditions may change or new information may be generated that would supersede this determination . Even though this property is not included in an SFHA, it could be inundated by a flooding event of greater magnitude than the base flood. In fact, more than 25 percent of all losses in the NFIP occur to structures located outside the SFHA in Zones B, C, or X. More than 25 percent of all policies purchased under the NFIP protect structures located in these zones. This clearly illustrates that there is a risk of flooding in non-SFHAs. That risk is just not as great as the flood risk to structures located in SFHAs. In order to offer flood insurance protection to owners of such structures, the NFIP offers two types of flood insurance policies: the Standard Policy and the Preferred Risk Policy (PRP). The PRP is available at low cost for one-to four-family homes located outside the SFHA with little or no loss history. The Standard Policy is available for all other structures . Owners should discuss their individual flood risk situation and insurance needs with their insurance agent or company before making a final decision regarding flood insurance coverage. To ensure continued eligibility to participate in the NFIP, your community must enforce its floodplain management regulations using, at a minimum, the flood elevations and zone designations shown on the NFIP map for your community, including the revision effected by this letter. This response is based on the minimum criteria established by the NFIP. State and community officials, based on knowledge of local conditions and in the interest of public safety, may set higher standards for construction in the floodplain . If the State of Texas or your community has adopted more restrictive or comprehensive floodplain management criteria , those criteria take precedence over the minimum Federal criteria. This revision has been made pursuant to Section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-234) and is in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (Title XIII of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Public Law 90-448), 42 U.S.C. 4001-4128, and 44 CFR Part 65 . Because this LOMR will not be printed and distributed to primary map users, such as local insurance agents and mortgage lenders, your community will serve as a repository for these new data. We encourage you to disseminate the information reflected by this LOMR throughout your community so that interested persons, such as property owners, local insurance agents, and mortgage lenders, may benefit from the information. We also encourage you to prepare an article for publication in your community's local newspaper that would describe the changes that have been made and the assistance that officials of your community will give to interested persons by providing these data and interpreting the NFIP maps . A copy of this LOMR is being sent to your community's official NFIP map repository where, in accordance with regulations adopted by your community when it made application to join the NFIP, it should be attached to the community's official record copy of the NFIP map, which is available for public inspection . i... ... • t OUPL!CATE 3 If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please contact Ms. Agnes De Coca of our staff in Washington, DC, either by telephone at (202) 646-2746 or by facsimile at (202) 646-4596 . cc : ~o mmunity Map Repository Mr . Michael K . Davis Trustee Sincerely, 4L J 1 11 Michael K. u9 ey, P . E ., Chief )f}/f Hazard Ide titjtation Branch / ' Mitigation !/ ak r ' ~UG 161995 Community Map Repository National Flood Insurance Program Subject: Letters of Map Change Dear Community Official: DUPLICATE Michael Baker Jr., Inc. 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 600 Alexandria , Virginia 22304 (703) 960-8800 FAX (703) 960-9125 On behalf of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), we are enclosing a copy of recent Letters of Map Amendment (LOMAs) and/or Letters of Map Revision (LOMRs) issued to amend or revise the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map for your community. As you know, the repository is a local resource for information about the risks of flooding in your community . A FEMA priority is to ensure that changes to the flood-risk information, such as those resulting from the issuance of a map amendment or revision, are sent to the repository for the benefit of the public. Please note that NFIP regulations require that the repository attach the copy of the LOMA and/or LOMR to the appropriate NFIP map on file. FEMA appreciates your cooperation in maintaining this valuable community resource. If you have any questions, or if the address of the repository for your community has changed, please contact me at the telephone number provided above. Sincerely, MICHAEL BAKER JR., INC. C. Edward Crawford LOMA/LOMR Manager Cit A Total Quality Corporation ~({' d1-z;~ ~h~le_ {,,J-,lh,I ~ \[fi.,..1W'7 r'\) e.h hi E-. 'ft,7 f""S'S ~"'') leer' [i.eJ."7 Q, A-nc r+e-.A-i•-· We re.u.~l ~t S:M1 1f .._,,,.( C.1n~,......rl,.. I ~ ... \,,e_ ') /\ 0" lo;. vk_.. t. ~ l'U-~ d <:s+,,_.., ce (2n,"" tl--t. ~fWfi a..J ned•'J PH 1 7 vJ f-4 re.ar +o ,,.,, d-r· w I ....1-wvera:!Je ~vi~) nccclul loeF ~<Js ·i'n fJrik< \,, .. ~,j.. ~e~ sJl!i t.Ac.-i-A .. ws w i th.vf e .x: c(e.1 :~; ,,.. " ti.,.,..,,,.. vV o.,.; 1-l e. 7 . Our ruoll~-..., ts flod Vt<.r7•~ tzz,rzl ,,~ +o l "°F > "'"" ,r . 11'1""-s i ~~[I~ t-z:"f" le~ e..,-. re.'1'17 ;VC-l ~rfc.r l 1 "-<-) to t oor +. Ci"~· s I"""" ~ +o ""'-r " 5uc.,,,i -h"'t:-;"'tv tN I~' 6lo") ~F"*· t;-k Nr;te ft> WF 1/i v~ ._75 iS5-I.• 1t(~r; l DATE = 11-14-1995 PAGE NO. JOB NAME = NISSAN FIRE FLOIJS *.* * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E 2 * * * * * * * * * * * University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program * * Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Piping Networks * * <<< FOR SEMINAR PURPOSES ONLY >>> * * * * * • * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * DATE: 11/14/1995 TIME: 10: 2:37 INPUT DATA FILENAME --------------nissan.DAT TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME --------nissan.OUT POSTPROCESSOR RESULTS FILENAME ---nissan.RES ************************************************ S U M M A R Y 0 F 0 R I G I N A L D A T A ************************************************ U N I T S S P E C I F I E D FLOIJRATE •••••••••••• =gallons/minute HEAD (HGL) ••••••••• = feet PRESSURE •••••••••••• = psig P I P E L I N E D A T A STATUS CODE: xX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE FG -FIXED GRADE NODE RV -REGULATING VALVE PU -PUMP LINE PIPE NUMBER 1-FG 2 3 4 NODE NOS. #1 #2 0 1 2 2 4 3 LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS (ft) (in) COEFF. COEFF. 323.0 216.0 152.0 154.0 18.0 18.0 8.0 8.0 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E D A T A JUNCTION NUMBER JUNCTION TITLE EXTERNAL DEMAND (gprn) JUNCTION ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES (ft) FGN-HGL (ft) 482.80 DATE = 11-f4-1995 JOB NAME = NISSAN FIRE FLO\JS 2 3 4 .00 .00 2000.00 2000.00 0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A 259.50 259.00 263.70 263.00 2 4 3 2 4 PAGE NO. 2 3 OUTPUT SELECTION: All RESULTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TABULATED OUTPUT S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N NUMBER OF PIPES ••••••••••••••••••• (p) = 4 NUMBER OF JUNCTION NODES •••••••••• (j) = 4 NUMBER OF PRIMARY LOOPS ••••••••••• (l) = 0 NUMBER OF FIXED GRADE NODES ••••••• (f) NUMBER OF SUPPLY ZONES .••••.•.•... (z) = ************************************* S I M U l A T I 0 N R E S U l T S ************************************* THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY = .00000 P I P E l I N E R E S U l T S PU -PUMP LINE STATUS CODE: XX -CLOSED PIPE CV -CHECK VALVE FG -FIXED GRADE NOOE RV -REGULATING VALVE TIC -STORAGE TANK PIPE NUMBER 1-FG 2 3 4 NOOE NOS. #1 #2 0 1 1 2 2 4 3 FLO\JRATE (gpm) 4000.00 2000.00 2000.00 2000.00 HEAD LOSS (ft) 1.n .32 11.63 11. 78 JUN CT I 0 N N 0 DE RES u ·L TS PUMP HEAD (ft) .00 .00 .oo .00 MINOR LOSS (ft) .00 .00 .00 .00 LINE Hl/ VELO. 1000 (ft/s) (ft/ft) 5.04 5.32 2.52 1.47 ill] 76.49 76.49 ' .·- Jo~ JUHCTIOll NUMBER 1 2 3 JUNCTION TITLE DATE = 11-14-1995 EXTERNAL DEMAND (gpm) .00 .00 2000.00 JOB NAME = NISSAN FIRE FLOWS 4 2000.00 HYDRAULIC GRADE (ft) 481.08 480.76 469.30 469.14 JUNCTION ELEVATION (ft) 259.50 259.00 263. 70 263.00 PRESSURE HEAD (ft) 221.58 221.76 205.60 PAGE NO. 3 206.14 S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S (+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES (·) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE (gpm) 4000.00 NET SYSTEM INFLOW = 4000.00 NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW = .00 NET SYSTEM DEMAND = 4000.00 **** KYPIPE SIMULATION COMPLETED **** DATE: 11/14/1995 TIME: 10: 2:37 JUNCTION PRESSURE (psi) 96.02 96.10 89.09 89.33 ,· ,,,.,,.,, ......... ......... ......... :t ::t ::t "',,,.,, 000 11100 -N -N• ......... ---~t-4r:. NNN II, -r. s :.t S: ~ Q:. VJ '1 ~ Q.. J- Q'J. h. v.r ~ l '--3 ~ ~ ~ -....9 -~ \ "::" ~ - r{\ r-1 t\' ' = co - --1-----~ ® 1-.<R? I 0 pJ I (::, ~E::E:N ~ I/\) ('.) R_U) ?tt~E:: .IL LOI" \I Bl~) ... 't .. ------------------___ C}, :=.. C>,. ----------------_,4_ =-_ _l_/J?_y!_p;_s J r-,, ___ _ ------------- ------ ----- ----------------.-------------------------- --;; d-fu r~ __________ :______J_~--=----=----------------· --*-----~f-~_c_e_~fr'Of"LLb~---'-----__ _ ___________ _ --------'------'-'~ \c\ Jt; I ~,d,,__ I < 570 l".30 1 .\.cf <l'f .l.~ .. t\ ). -=: D 0 'FfO' --~ Sh~ __ ---~-----~---------------=--I'-· --~-+ ~ ?o ~ 11 ::. V % _____ _} (:;f/ __ /v -f I~ / 1 \I\~ _ -----~~_%_( ~---=0'---,.-~_o __ o __ 1\ _. :: ~~~ -b _~fr _~ )1 ~'{ \ -=--')~lb l\ -Lt __ I\ ___ ~~ ~ ?--~ 9',, /05 1 . -\.o _ro-p .. ---------~ __ J_t ___..~~-0__;_°2_0 ___ n_---«---t-o/,o __ ~o 1 11 1L ____ . ------~-----.------.--'--,\ -t------t---"'--f-o_bS t ' '' ------ \ -14 -' I --T'i\v " i: \ . ( (' --Jir --- ------· fV~~( {~~-? }? 1 ~'b_ --------------------- V t =-~ ?'l/r1 + ~ ot. -r-'7 5D -,-?/i-7 5' -~ 1¥-00 :J.pvi, ko __ t , -{)()C87~~ --~ ~v ~ KLING ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING 4103 Texas Avenue, Suite 212 Bryan, Texas 77802 TO ATTENTION CL/fkfk WE TRANSMIT : 0 Under Separate Cover 0 Enclosed VIA: OMail OMessenger 0 Federal Express 0 Express Mail 0 Special Courier 0 Picked Up By Your Office NO . I K'YPIPE Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors Tel. (409) 846-6212 Fax (409) 846-0652 0 Prints D Copies DOriginals D Plat 0 Field Notes O Plans D Report 0 Estimate D Cut Sheets 0 Computer Printout O File 0 Contract 0 DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT NO . PROJECT NAME REFERENCE ~/ ,,n::. Fl ()Ml A/1//1 I L/{./.J W/ Clf/C...u..IA-'r1nvi I ~i.~r I 5£-c-r /),. LJ .I 1'1.t:L ,,.,,c 4-t"'."&-..t. ~ rfll"IA~ h ~ ,_..., J9!A...V1~ .I , /]_ /),....A.., ---,,.,,_ /:("'/J!:lo---h .I ., FOR: P.O. Box 4234 Bryan, Texas 77805 0 Your Review & Approval 0 Your Review & Comment 0 Your Review & Distribution 0 Your Review, Revision & Return 0 Your Signature & Return DYour File and/or Use DAs Requested By : 0 Please Acknowledge Receipt of Enclosures 0 Please Return Enclosures To Us 0 Copies Of Thi s Letter Of Transmittal Sent To : If Enclosures Are Not As Noted , Please Notify Us At Once. Signed: \ ll c uL' Station :::- 00 8J "-ZONE X "-zoNE x ZON E AE / / ZO NE X / / // / / /, / I ZONE X ../ / . / -~-5 1 3 - @--- (EL 987 ! RM7X •M1 .5 •R,·ll·•l" ··d 111 I I"'"' 111.Jp 1~ h 11 U'-t dot.' .. not '1 ('l p~c;,.11 !!\ di.11n.1gt~ "io urces u• I ltI7 .11 d .\reds . Thl· < updJTPd flnod ha1 . or < o n ,tr uctll)n p u· CoJ~la1 b,1,e tloo<i 1 f'tft•(lS ol \\cl\e Jel l• develop<'Ti hv th!' Are.1> of sµe< 1a l fl o. , .• ind vr ((·r IJtn a .. ca'!I n o t con1rol ..,11uct urP.;, Hn1111d;m<".., of the 1: i 1l'f\<\-l"t'I (10'" '-.('(! \\II!' r 1·).!,H I to rC'q Ht1\Hh,,J\ .\ul!h1. 1 . 1 ;ii, .H ;1ro. th. f,, ,,,110 1 ''t'h.'il( ( 11 tHlf,1'1 !1r: ii'.)' <OlllJc t ,1pp1oprid ' Lh .mgt~d .. ub Pqu f-pr co nm 1nrt\ 1n 6.0 nt lilt food 11 1111< I K •'!\'t :•' 1•11 llodl 11 .1,•r11 1 'h'\\ l(•n .1 l'i i1·;•' t '"''ht 111 1 j , 11·1rn•rll II' II lf.1IH I .1._-•·lll CIC FOR .___;~~5Bj~~~~'..l:~ M~~~~~-#L-"'-"~~~~~~~~~~~:1£...~~~~~~~~~ WANTS TO SEE YOU 03 /20 /96 09 :03 'B409 846 8252 KLI NG EN GR ~~~ SHI RLY VOLK/COCS KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING T E L E C 0 P I E R C 0 V E .R S H E E T (EF :fueover) DATE_3 __ ;_· 2_o_~_',9_b-=------- Please deliver the following pages to: Fax Number:_7_fc_4_3_4_: _9~-=------------- From: 'Fizcg;;> ;4,,/1./£: Kli~inaerlng J. Surveying 4103 South Texas Ave .• Suite 212 Bryan, Texas 77802 Phone: (409)846 -6212 Fax : (409)846-8252 We are transmitting --~-___ page(s), including this cover letter from our fax number listed above. If any pages are missing or incomplete, please contact sender. Regarding: 6t2t:??:aN?11 Uk-D Ll~L,..; N'l:f ~~o.;~· 14100 1 03 1 20 1 96 09:04 '0'409 846 8252 OJ /20/96 WED 08:53 FAX 409 822 6915 ~ t/Ufl'!Hf 15 :43 U409 845 6Z5l! KLlNG ENGi< DOUGLAS NISSAN KLING £NCR KLING ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 4105 TCDI A'ftll~. S..-C 212 llryMl, TGM T7I02 aJ. Jalns:. PL. ll.P.LJ. s.M. k1J.n&. LP-1-S. March 1, 1996 MEMO: Ccnuulting Eqillun • L.nd Su .. ..-.,...-. TO: Noble Douglass FROM: Fred Paine Kling Engineering · RE : a• Gate Valves to 1arve Lot 1, Block 1, Phase II, Greensworld Subdivision ~uu~ ~001 ~002 At the request of the City of College Station Engineering department, this is to notify you that the twos· gate valves which are required at the end of the two tees shown on the attached drawing were not included under the Mike Davis 1 a• waterline extension project. The Davis project did provide the two a· tees which your project wil use, however, the B" valves required at the end of the tees were not included. The installation of the 8" valves will require the draining and chlorination test on the 1 a· waterllna. The cost ttl install these twos· valves 11 approximately $1000 each . This work should be done by your utility contractor as he installs the fire lines on your project. Please sign any Questions, v Noble Douglass he space provided below and return to me. Should you have may call me at 846-6212. 3-f(/-(jfO Data FILE NOTE March 25, 1996 Noble Douglass called to say that he is fine with placing the valves on with this construction . So this will clear Mike Davis ' contractors obligation to place the 8" valves on. Veronica cc: John Logan Shirley Volk -fl I e__ t ~ 7;Jd0 ,_D<Ju7 l/fsS !l),·:s ~ ,,/A.J f../eAdJc.vA-/1-t-:8A-/1/lk /}Aef --/00/ /l/7~~A~ 4' £/1.sl: @ .:57o;e/7'/ 7::fC.41/V Colle1 e :S/A-'17oA.J1 kA:A:s. £;=:-F/ue/U-f. 4 If:; C12cJvN'cR £/f?cJ. e z~() JU:,fe.:;: /.) J?e~du~ cfe/J/(,,is) .f'ct~/Jj:!_;, 11-Nc!l /77~j~(C,i f<t, a .f mve,,A;, To satOf e.11-/{,'f-j /Je ~w. 2.) ~/4~~ ~A./cfl /fA~k /l.~ /tA/ fo .b~:se d I ~oA.J~~eleJ '9-~/7/lt:!X. s/zc tE //·o -r,; Z ~-Cl . .3.)..:T,v/;// w,:f;{ j/Ut/tf!/ ~ set!C/~ ~ c:o/l/eA'er'e /7/~~e.mt!'AJ.r, ~) Kt/ IZll-jf sAl'f-11 ~~fe.vcl +-/8'~ /:,eytJ'PCIJ ecfje a I' e(j/fJ L-/le I-~. rT -----~-ir CTION --------- •' JO ;v.rs . 1 ! . -~ .) .... .... l(/qJ'es: JleArd'tV#//-... .8Ar1//e ~ ~ S7c:r:t:~ V,z~AJ _E.,L'//v~.vr '11·--'Z /.) #r /l~/A./,/;,"-e/;vy ~A,e.s A-r / z "' CJ. t:!. fi. a z.) ,,,.']" ~o/t.AJe~ J,.,¢.,e.s ~ ~, t::' /t:J'1/f - /J"ri .:s/ales. APPROVED FOR &, '-,,, Rek~ t A.Jct/~ ;G t D -~ ... . \ ... \) D ~ .. .. , .... -~ I -i--- ' ~ l tJ./. s. .. ···--·------·----·-------------·-·--·-·--·----·--····· ·-- .. ··-·-·----·------- ···-··-··--------------··-··-···-... ··-----M~·-z -. --M--~-..... t9td .~.n~~4::/ ____ '!_~.,_' __ . --~-~--=--/~)--~idMt1¢'_( :~ __ ;' ~-f-!,-~; L ; :.S _--z ;:__~~ ~-:· :_~ ~_y _ a?dtJI(/ ~ . _ --··-. ·-·--__ -;; ___ f~.Sv'-f.e -~-~µe~de ___ w,,~// r:, '"// .. _ . ·-·----~_/./¥. _t:d(/t~h-~.s __ e ___ /Z,/?.~~/-___ ..... . --···-·-·· ·------· --------·-· ----------------·--··--·--·---···-..... . --·--·-----·---·-···· ---·-·-··· . -·-· --. --.... . . -. -···· ·-. -·-·· -----· ---·---------. ·---APPR -VED FOR - I ·---··--------·· ---··-·-···-···-------------------·. ___ _. ___ ·-· -· --. -. --. - --·· ..... --··· --··-- ·-----. -~. -----·· -----·-------·····--··---· ....... ·- . ~ . _____ (lA.f~:Vv.e.s -~_"__(!_(l~~e_~ bA-_&S _________ ... ___ . _ ¥ .. ~_/2 . ~~~---J · _ _Id_ __ $/&.<!~ __ -4/_(_~f,{~ ------· --. ----··-· ------· . . . .. /Adi --~~/,4/fi.~.e_~.#'_A// -~-=--=-e-~-~------·----·--·---···--- . .. -~-1>1/ . --·---------------; . ' . . ·-------11* ------------··-.. --·--. ---··t --···-··-·-··--·---~----··-----·---·---.. -.4 ---·······--------------~e~s.L&,/:~_ _f. _ ... __ \i ·-·----.. --l -- DRAINAGE REPORT FOR DOUGLASS NISSAN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 GREENSWORLD SUBDIVISION -PHASE II, 3.817 ACRES Richard Carter Survey, A-8 College Station, Texas July 24, 1996 Revised August 15, 1996 DEVEWPED BY: Castles Design Group c/o E. Wayne Alderman, AJA 4120 Bellaire Boulevard Houston, TX 77025 (713) 664-7974 PREPARED BY: Kling Engineering & Surveying 4103 Texas Avenue, Suite 212 Bryan, TX 77802 (409) 846-6212 Drainage Report for Douglass Nissan, Lot 1, Block 1 Greensworld Subdivision -Phase II, 3.817 Acres Richard Carter Survey, A-8 College Station, Brazos County, Texas July 24, 1996 Revised August 15, 1996 GENERAL LOCATION & DESCRIPTION The proposed site is Lot 1, Block 1, Greensworld Subdivision, Phase II, which is located on the east side of State Hwy 6, East Bypass approximately 800 feet south of the F .M. 60 intersection. The site is bounded by a vacant lot covered with grass to the north, by a golf pro shop and parking area to the south, by the East Bypass to the west, and by a line near and approximately parallel with Carters Creek to the east. The site has a few scattered trees, with a cluster of trees near the bypass, but primarily the site is covered with grass. Runoff proceeds as overland flow across the tract and flows into Carters Creek, the primary drainageway. The proposed improvements involve the construction of a 19,642 square foot-building, a 303 stall parking facility, the corresponding utilities, and drainage structures involved therewith. DRAINAGE BASINS & SUB-BASINS The site is within the Carters Creek drainage basin. The site drains directly into Carters Creek, a primary channel (See Appendix 1: "General Location Map"). According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map for Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated areas, (See Appendix 2: "Flood Plain Map"), the site is within the 100 year flood plain. However, the site was removed from the flood plain by way of a Letter of Map Revision based on fill (LOMR-F) that was prepared and approved in April, 1995. A topographic plat was prepared showing the existing and proposed drainage for the site (See Appendix 3:"Proposed Grading Plan"). The details for this plat are also in Appendix 3. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA No detention will be provided for this site. It is prudent and the policy of the City of College Station to " ... encourage the rapid conveyance of stormwater through and out of the city within the primary system." (Page 8 of the City of College Station's Stormwater Management Plan -Drainage Policy and Design Standards). The decision for no detention was based upon the following: Douglass Nissan -Greensworld, Ph. II Drainage Report Page 2 Time concentration for basin Time concentration for site Time to peak - > 120 Minutes 10 Minutes - > 80 Minutes The Time of Concentration for the project site is substantially less than the time to peak flood . Consequently the runoff from the project site is expected to be gone before the peak flood level comes. Therefore, no increase in the peak flood level is expected. The rational method was used to calculate the peak runoff for the 25 and 100 year storm events. The table below lists the parameters used and the results they produced: STORM EVENT: Au.,p A,,.. Au.,p A,,... cimp c, ... ~i.alkr) Q2.jptoc Q2'polt 6Q -pre (ac) -pre (ac) -post(ac) -poll (ac) (cf1) (cf1) (cfs) 25 year 0 4 .76 3 .26 1.50 0.9 0.35 9 .86 16 .4 34 .7 +18.3 100 year 0 4 .76 3 .26 1.50 0 .9 0.35 11.64 19 .4 41.0 +21.6 As indicated in the flow chart below, storm runoff will proceed as sheet flow until it is intercepted by one of a network of swales, flow through the network of swales and into one of three inlet grates where it will be taken underground into one of two 24" RCPs. Runoff will proceed through the RCPs to an inlet/junction box that also serves as a stilling well. The bottom of the stilling well is at 246.00. Runoff then proceeds through another 24" RCP @ 0.5 % slope then discharges through a baffled outlet and into Carters Creek. Normal water elevation for Carters Creek is@ 245.9. ·::··~,. ........... ::o...:::x :· RAINFALL___. SHEET FLOW NT'Eft<%PTED llY NETWOAKOf' PAAKHOLOT SWALES ~:::-.:· . :-:. DISOWIGED THllOUOH 1 Of' 3 tllETGRATES (NEENAHR~ DISOWIOES tlTO STl.LtlG WELL ·:.:·· ·:.::·· ..... :- DISOWIOES ~.:~=o ----~~~ CAllTERS CREEK PROCEEDS ___. DOWNSTREAM Douglass Nissan -Greensworld, Ph. II Drainage Report Page 3 To design the grate inlets, the drainage areas contributing to each inlet were delineated (See Appendix 4: "Inlet Drainage Areas"). The 100 year design storm and the orifice equation were then used to calculate the required open area of the grate. A Neenah R-6672-M or equal was selected for all three inlets. The table below summarized the results: Inlet# 1 2 3 Drainage Area 1.92 Ac. 1.13 Ac. 1.22 Ac. Q100(cfs) 15.8 11.8 10.9 c 0.7 0.7 0.7 H(ft) 1.0 0.5 0.5 ~(ft2) 2.81 2.97 2.74 A 1 ra1e(ft2) 3.0 3.0 3.0 The storm sewer system was designed so to minimiz.e the amount of flooding in the parking lot during the 100 year storm event. Inlet control, exit control and pipe carrying capacity for each RCP were taken into consideration before selecting the size of pipe needed. The following table summarizes the results for the analysis: Line Inlet Size Inlet Control Inlet Control Q15 Q100 Exit Velocity 100 yr Elev. Area RCP RCP Grate 25 year ft/s in parkin~ lot A 1 24" 24.9 cfs 19.2 cfs 13.20 15.80 261.2 B 2 24" 24.9 cfs 19.2 cfs 10.00 11.80 261.0 c 3 24" 24.9 cfs 19.2 cfs 32.50 38.20 10.35 260.7* *Emergency spillway will be utilized during 100 year and greater storm events . To minimize flooding in the parking lot, an emergency spillway was designed for each inlet area (See Appendix 3: "Grading Plan). Inlet areas #1 and #3 are not expected to need the emergency spillways during the 100 year event. Inlet #2, however, will be using the overflow spillway for the same event. A flow velocity of 10.35 ft/s was calculated for the outlet during the 25 year event. A baffled outlet (See Appendix 3: "details") was designed with the purpose of dissipating some of this energy and deterring erosion. CONCLUSIONS As a result of this development, an increase in runoff is expected. The additional runoff will not be attenuated, but no increase in peak flood elevation is expected and no damage to downstream structures or land owners is expected. Douglass Nissan -Greensworld, Ph. II Drainage Report Page 4 "I hereby certify that this report (plan) for the drainage design of Dou~lass Nissan -Lot 1, Block 1, Greensworld, Ph. II was prepared by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards for the owners thereof. " REFERENCES Stoanwater Mana&ement Plan, Phase II: Draina2e Policy and Desi20 Standards, City of College Station , Ordinance No. 1728, prepared by: Walton & Associates, October , 1987. Stormwater Mana&ement Plan, Phase III: Draina2e System Analysis, City of College Station, prepared by: Walton & Associates , August, 1986 . APPENDICES 1) General Location Map (U .S .G.S .) Quad -Bryan East, Tex. 2) Flood Plain Map -Community No. 480083 , Panel No. 142C Effective Date: Ju ly 2 , 1992 3) Grading Plan and Details 4) Inlet Drainage Areas 5) Calculations kcs96-0lb:\nium.rpt APPENDIX 1 GENERAL LOCATION MAP (U.S.G.S.) QUAD -BRYAN EAST, TEX. APPENDIXS CALCULATIONS .,,.,,.,, ............ ......... ......... :r:r:r .,,.,,.,, 000 inoo -C"4 -C"4'1t "'"'"' ---NNN ("4("4("4 Ge A ~1Tt-... '5 .f 2.. 4 "f .5ifL°" -0 I q 4 Ater~ l..J, 7/p A-q -:-4, 7 (, ~ ~ 4, 7(p a Jt>-r~ ... (tJ-~s-r t.~3x .;. 71,) -/¥-'I ~/'.1 a %.If' 1r('_,, = ( (). 3 ~ [ 9. ~ )( Iii 76) -.. ;, . t/ ~ ?,J' O,co·,o~ -{o.,y.X, 11./.?y)(_'I· 1') o:.. 19. ~'-~" A W-Af ... .3. 2.(p C, ""'r i::: t7 · ?tJ 4~ -=-I, S-~ ~ :. t), 'ft:) Ge. .. ~·'rl~·"-'J +~'*'JLJ,ro) ~ J.1,7~ (Q,C)-P~ • (o,7{(~-t..3X4-lb) -=-~ lf-cJ-~ <Q~r"sr : (p1~( q -Xlo "{ 4-a~j -:. 34. 7 c0 Qtoo ~T ~ (D·?t!-'J /l .L,tt)L~-7W .. 41 ·D C~.s 6Q\O .... bQi.s-:;, /::Q100 ~ so . + -I c.t . \f -=.. l lP . 0 c.. ~ s 34.7 -l<o-lf-.,._ {<l.·S <:.~,i 4(.o-{q .lj. ~ 21·Cocf~ (), 7Jj- . ~ 1 Q ~ 1) C, ) V\A 11---f\ '/-}'d '/--f" .J b I -{/ } ctrv '1) °1 1q m _J.Ql })V\llfdlt1d \/\\ VU>lf4"d-lo rOO\J .JY>d~ OQI .. 7( 1' I . iX'-. •7,<z, Jw £& (~/aj (. y ~ ilf!~ 1?. '/ ~ ,(8·;;1A_ss1.)c.\c;_10·0 '(Joi) ~ ,_ U 1 ~"' 'b -i ---T\ ~· [ /?/ o '?"'7. -' ..... j7 G~'Z.. L \ -/--- J h OO\ j~ \Q)~v.Q.) flLJ °" ?hf ~f ~()-~r=> 1\- S" j b --p -z. -= 7 ~ i?-z lL ·o/-pr-z. -vi Gt. j-Jy -~ C2 ~ -f?-J "r d'J ~ Nit 1 )r "l-=> k s-r-=> h. °)I "::. _\iAltffi t(L"O')Z. -:. ~'g")y ~ J-.,'O ~~ ~01tl-fQ) .,_,,~.£ o · 1 -s rf~.1h-t -,,J',.. ~r; \ 1'.Jna A1-T?H) W-"ZL"l,-<l ~l'~ ~-n -zTJ l&·i ~. (1Azli./7j~~/ -:oa1V' _. J {fif)z/L 'Oj ~. (~1/ ~ .s-i-y <..~ ~Jh --~>~~ -z f j s<Z Z -=-__::__;_J ;z-~ I /0 t ~?? J :.,~t) ~ (il't/(h61'/JX'-L-o) -1""'-00 \o \ ~J~ t-'lZ:-1] ~ \.~~· \J\~o' \> /\~L·O) -: 1 ~'-?'-~ -= ~ ':) OL'O -=. ~ 't/ o-\l ·o .,,_ .... ""'' t1 -z. ~ ., Ob ·O ~ ,J..,.,/ \ ~~v "'?--0 [., {:> . \ ::. I~ f~f ""T ~-00111 000 "'"'Ill ::c:::c "'"'"' "'"'"' -4 -4 -4 111111111 ~,.-;-~~/',,,,,er I I I ~ ~;,// O 'TZ \ ~~F'/o Q~cl h"ft?1~1 rls --Ji.J-1 :;1~ t?5?7 "ff c;t" ~">7/..:;:> :;; '/~~ CJ , aq <-'/V, /2/ ~c:1 LA I ......... u r-/i.:·';.? ,.# .vv-I/ ,/ 07/, ...)J I r;' ;,. oqi -. I' 3 \a --3J. .-v"'?J ~ ' 1 f 7 I I I (,'I ;: .. J hr ·f )( t zg )"1 )., 11 (t/a) \-1 -~ f)TCJ.~) z (~I J '0) bJ = ( -=-H I ..___ _____ /,.-----~- -C g Z -~ Qw:J ~-'O 1"' "'"'""O .. I "''b ~ ~~ -f-V•<Tf\C) "'od-h O:.)j Jf,- 0-~ _l_O) <Y.iv-.1"A?>-od ""l tu.d ...... i -,1~"-y=> ~ I ~a...1_,.,, -:;:..,.. £I , --.. y ........ ~1 ·1 -1, ...... v-:J ~ ..... "''f...,,/Yl?/">7.? I • ..,_ 0 OUI 000 ""'"" ::c:::c '"""" '" '" '" ......... Ill""" "'"'"' ......... ......... ......... ::::c::c "'"'"' 000 onoo -N _N.., "'"'"' ---NNN ~NN ~I c I~ . ._./_.. ho'1.s c., 'I g/,~/i .fN /~.f ..# ~ J/,~f ~ c. q; i7 :.-o.'31 Ar-or .: /. 1-'L c.~-::. c. 9c c.,,.,., ~ = c. 4o C,,_ ~ (o.9oYo.91) -r{eJ. yv_[c?. ~;) -= t). 77 /, '2 2-Q ~~-,.,,n~ -(o, 71 ){ f.!(, f /. -zz) ~ (<J. ~ C ~ J 0. ~ -,.,,,_ • -( t>. 77)'1 /. foiJ-)< w_.) = [o. 'f d's\ ()1r.1°r"-~. A /0.9 1•e ----~ . ...__7)n-=.2(=3:z=-.2''f.---s-) -: z. 7 ~ +t ?-ll.Ss ~ E8\\~ \-\ 'R -1..a < -r 1. -1--1 ( S "'=CME:-as: J~ ) A'? v t>... 't--<--=-3. o ..rt-2. -,I{ C ke c.k.. c:l e ~.+c.... 1 .__ p--e.. L\,"'-~ Lor ~() ;f, /t"tJ ,vr ii'~...,,' 1... 2..9 "'i "L L Q 1<~'3 )~A 'L \.\ ~ \ ~11 v rl v ' i--:0 icr ( ~.013 J i~!~!!.J (1/LJ)t1/:3 2(32.'--)(~·lY)t--== OJ.?'i" ~ 0.'7 ... Q ==-(() .9 .•---·-------·~ -· ___________________ .;. --~-----. ··--·~-,-r .~-. ~R__+~ ~\f v : '2.(pE>.? ·..::;. /otJ t~a..,-.f!~c-:/ e/€1/A.no...... I,..., ?"'-<e...t1,v.J.. /ar k}t LL ~ Q_ '2.h 0, 1 c:QUL -b b c.._Jc._ !).) ~--..e__r -<l+ 'l'" c+ <. -? ~o ~"'r ~~.c...\-.... ~ I~ 0-o_l \)tf~ I" ~ C\_v\_l(J.) Lot-@ 0. i' @t q . a~<- DRAINAGE REPORT FOR DOUGLAS NISSAN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 GREENSWORLD SUBDIVISION -PHASE II, 3.817 ACRES Richard Carter Survey, A-8 . College Station, Texas November 10, 1995 DEVELOPED BY: Matthews & Associates, Inc. cl o Dede Matthews 4444 Carter Creek Parkway, Ste. 107 Bryan, TX 77802 (409) 846-7861 PREPARED BY: Kling Engineering & Surveying 4103 Texas Avenue, Suite 212 Bryan, TX 77802 (409) 846-6212 Drainage Report for Douglas Nissan, Lot 1, Block 1 Greensworld Subdivision -Phase II, 3.817 Acres Richard Carter Survey, A-8 College Station, Brazos County, Texas November 10, 1995 GENERAL LOCATION & DESCRIPTION The proposed site is Lot 1, Block 1, Greensworld Subdivision, Phase II, which is located on the east side of State Hwy 6, East Bypass approximately 800 feet south of the F.M. 60 intersection. The site is bounded by a vacant lot covered with grass to the north, by a golf pro shop and parking area to the smith, by the East Bypass to the west, and by Carters Creek to the east. The site has a few scattered trees, with a cluster of trees near the bypass, but primarily the site is covered with grass. Runoff proceeds as overland flow across the tract and flows into Carters Creek the primary drainage way. The proposed improvements involve the construction of a 28,924 square foot building, a 275 stall parking facility, the corresponding utilities, and drainage structures involved therewith. DRAINAGE BASINS & SUB-BASINS The site is within the Carters Creek drainage basin. The site drains directly into Carters Creek, a primary channel (See Appendix 1: "General Location Map"). According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map for Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated areas, (See Appendix 2: "Flood Plain Map"), the site is within the 100 year flood plain. However, the site was removed from the flood plain by '\\'.ay of a Letter of Map Revision based on fill (LOMR-F) that was prepared in April, 1995. A topographic plat was prepared for the purpose of showing the existing contours (See Appendix 3: "Existing Conditions"). Another plat was prepared showing the proposed grading/drainage for the site (See Appendix 4: "Proposed Grading Plan"). The details for this plat are also in Appendix 4. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA No detention will be provided for this site. It is the policy of the City of College Station to " ... encourage the rapid conveyance of stormwater through and out of the city within the primary system." (Page 8 of the City of College Station's Stormwater Management Plan - Drainage Policy and Design Standards). The decision for no detention was based upon the following: Douglas Nissan -Greensworld, Ph . II Drainage Report Page 2 Time concentration for basin Time concentration for site Time to peak - > 120 Minutes 10 Minutes - > 80 Minutes ,· The Time of Concentration for the project site is substantially less than the time to peak flood. Consequently the runoff from the project site is expected to be gone before the peak flood level comes. Therefore, no increase in the peak flood level is expected. The rational method was used to calculate the peak runoff for the 25 and 100 year storm . events . The table below lists the parameters used and the results they produced : STORM EVENT: 25 year 100 year 0 0 4 .66 3.12 1.54 0.9 4 .66 3.12 1.54 0.9 1tilllht) (cfa) Q2Spfe Q25poot t. Q (cf a) (cfa) 0.35 9 .86 16 .1 33 .5 +17.4 0.35 11.64 19.0 39.6 +20.6 As indicated in the flow chart below, storm runoff will proceed as sheet flow until it is intercepted by one of a network of swales, flow through the network of swales and into one of two inlet grates where it will be taken underground into one of two 30" RCPs . Runoff will proceed through the RCPs to a junction box that also serves as a stilling well. The bottom of the stilling well is at 246.00. Runoff then proceeds through another 30" RCP @ 0.5 % slope then discharges through a baffled outlet and into Carters Creek. Normal water elevation for Carters Creek is @ 245 .9. RAINFALL SHEET FLOW NTERCEPTED BY NElW>RK~ PAAK.NCJ LOT S/Nl<US DISOWIGED THllOUGH 1 OF 2 NLETGRATES (NEENAH R·3475-I') CARR IE D BY 1 ~ 2 'JtTRCP IJISOWIGES NTO STLL.1"G WELi. ENTERS 'JCT RCP 0 D .~SLOPE ~INTO CARTERS PROCEEDS DOWNSTREAM Douglas Nissan -Greensworld, Ph. II Drainage Report Page 3 To design the grate inlets, the drainage areas contributing to each inlet were delineated (See Appendix 5: "Inlet Drainage Areas"). The 25 year design storm and the orifice equation were then used to calculate the required open area of the grate. A Neenah R-3475-F was selected for both inlets. The table below summarized the results: Inlet# 1 .2 Drainage Area 2.41 Ac. 1.34 Ac. Q25(cfs) 18.21 12.78 C H(ft) Arcq(ft 2) 0.7 0.4 5.13 0.7 0.4 3.59 Agra1e(ft 2) 5.41 5.41 The storm sewer system was designed so to minimize the amount of flooding in the parking lot during the 100 year storm event. Inlet control, exit control and pipe carrying capacity for each RCP were taken into consideration before selecting the size of pipe needed. The following table summarizes the results for the analysis: Line Size Inlet Control Inlet Control Carrying ·~ *H100 Q2.5 QIOO Exit Velocity Ree Ree Qmt~ ell'21l!<ill'. 2S ~~ar A 30" 38.0 cfs 19.2 cfs 58.0 0.41 0.61 18.21 21.5 B 30" 38.0 cfs 19.2 cfs 50.2 0.21 0.30 12.78 15.09 c 30" 38.0 cfs 29.0 30.99 36.59 6.31 *H values represent the elevation below the storm event elevation at which point exit begins to control. To minimize flooding in the parking lot, an emergency spillway was created by a 4' curb cut at elevation 261.5 (See Appendix 4: "Grading Plan) to provide overflow control for the Inlet #1 drainage area. Overflow control for the Inlet #2 drainage area is provided by a 40' long curb with a constant _elevation at 261.50. The 30' RCP's along with the overflow spillways are expected to minimize flooding in the parking lot during the 100 year event. A flow velocity of 6.31 ft/s was calculated for the outlet. A baffled outlet (See Appendix 4 "details") was designed with the purpose of dissipating some of this energy and deterring erosion. CONCLUSIONS As a result of this development, an increase in runoff is expected. The additional runoff will not be attenuated, but no increase in peak flood elevation is expected and no damage to downstream structures or land owners is expected. Douglas Nissan -Greensworld, Ph. II Drainage Report Page 4 "I hereby certify that this report (plan) for the drainage design of Douglas Nissan -Lot 1, Block 1, Greensworld, Ph. II was prepared by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards for the owners thereof." REFERENCES Stonnwater Management Plan, Phase II: Drainage Policy and Design Standards, City of College Station, Ordinance No. 1728, prepared by: Walton & Associates, October, 1987. Stormwater Management Plan, Phase III: Drainage System Analysis, City of College Station, prepared by: Walton & Associates, August, 1986. APPENDICES 1) General Location Map (U.S.G.S.) Quad -Bryan East, Tex.) 2) Flood Plain Map -Community No. 480083, Panel No. 142C Effective Date: July 2, 1992 3) Existing Conditions 4) Grading Plan 5) Inlet Drainage Areas 6) Calculations kca9S-02b:\niaaan .rpt APPENDIX 1 GENERAL LOCATION MAP (U.S.G.S. QUAD -BRYAN EAST, TEX.) APPENDIX 6 CALCULATIONS /. ) -JI °)"6~ -( 6)d'J'ft X--r1· f l)(rz.L·o) ::::: JsQd-oo'(J - S-j-:> s·cz~ -.\1~·rX,i·bJfl'::J)-= ...iSC'd ~ _c:-r; !::) rf' f7 'be .::. (Cl)" ·j? )(£ 1 '3 A_ Cl '..J) ::: J Jr;,rf_ 010 ~ ~ '0 s (Ii .9 j (f\ Of, I 0 7 + ( -c: I 'E x 0 h, 0) ~ ,i W\O? ? 06 1 0 -:: .,1~1 :;> O h 'O-=:~ fr s · / ~ Z I . S -") "J 'j? -::. ~ ·tyt ..,,, z..1 ·~ = ~s a· o -Lo-z.·~ -=-d'-'V\ 1 \1 f'j/ ()'bl : (/'?'fr ffr°l '//Jsr..·o ).,.. -;.;J.p~'b f j I I ' i I ~ ( ~ 1 'fl A lf) lJ . b K ~c; ~ ' <2) ;: ~<rd - 5 t/ sf' I 1' I = ( 1 C7) '1' )(?. ~ I 8 x s er. '0) ~ ?cYd-O/b '56 o / It .s ~ I 0 .::. ~'""J ~--., '1 °) I -r -\; I/ "') -0 '1) ") I tT --1 ol.'V '>""°2:' L--ti8 rQ..,.. ~15?wv ],,, LI '8.. s: -= ~.l.·~v ...,...,..., ~~~ ---,. ,. ,. ,. ..., -...,_ 00 UI 000 ""'"" ::c::c::c '"'"'" '" '" '" -4 -4 -4 "'"'"' ,,,.,,.,, ......... ......... ......... :c :c :c .,,.,, Ill 000 11100 -C"4 -C"4., ., ., ., ---NNN NC"4C"4 ;.t Ca k~ i r_")'"-yo.. /I I Io IV\ LeT #: \ CA v_ s. ..,4-\ V') 1 ':.-:::i. . 4-':?::. "'-<-A°;;,,...,,,,. -:-0 I lo 0 G.-<-A 1 ~.., -:: I . 2 s ~ '-,···· c '---= (o.G a':(O.~s)+(J._g3y_o.:__og) ,_. ().70 ~I '1-~ ~2-::0/,,.,1 :::; (0.71:,'J.CJ,f~)(-;;...y.3) ~ /f.21 c./.s Q100 /vi 1 "; ( o. r b 'j I/, IP 'f) ( z. LI 3) =-2J. ro c {--.s IV\LE'.J3F 1-C-A..lL~ /. A I "'I 'L ~ I . fa -z. ~L.. A ~ -:.. o . '"2-S <--'-A I ._... f -::.. l 1 7:3 + ~<-c. c.. -=-(([)I "]_ g) ( 0 I 3 5) 1-(I. ~ _±)(_ z, . 1 ~) =-CJ ' g c) /.(S?'.2-._ Qz.s--i"',_ ::: (o. ~D){ ( 8'fp)( /,ts,-;;) -:: ;i. 7 Y r_ I_; Q/00-IV\~ -;:. (ti. ~c .X/!, ~7" x J 1 &, )-) := /S. 0 J c l.s :,;,. D-"01~......., \VI l-e_+ s. bc.....<,,. .... J ~ {). 5 1-e~ r-e V'-C v? f { <Jf2.. /Yl /-e i It I a~.s-I""' ":; 1 e. ,._ r c_+.s (!... -=:c 0 I 1 ~-=-o.+ ~ ==-32. 1-~h~~ C:.14--f-{r o\l '"""-P k. 7°VtA....v1 i-J 411 .. t-. c. = -::; I I ]-) -=-$"", 13 .I-1 z.. L -/ r;-":, \,....._ ( 0. ( {j-C? 2, :;ji. ~) ~ R-?tf7S--F A=-€11/fr~ So.ff C2---.5.~\ (o.-i)bj(o ... i')-=-/9.t-1-~I ""'"" ......... ......... ......... ::z:::z:::z: ""'"" 000 11100 -<"4 -<"4· ••• ---"~" C"4C"4C"4 } I 4 -'2-~ ---_. -. Ji-u ( /g,"}.-) I 2--S---... iif'q I) __ -::.. _ -Q, 4-+ j_{_ ?1--1-J ' ·-w .. -.::_-7 -'-~-~·~ --. -I · · I oo -. \_. (o, 71'1· 'i 1) · ---O • lo I -. -'%-(~ i.-,;i .. \ --- 13-Y-1-I (,~_f-v~ '!:. ·J~,, ~-c -~-~:-;~~!:.<-low .fl_L 2S: '1 ~c.-..-- 1-l~oJ ltv't I 4r ~ 2f'_'y~_,,;;..-~ Y~'1 r +-'2.-~I ID I l b~ lo r · ..... . -+~ too '1eo..r. ~Loocl l ~"-t-11 .~f-v-~ .fk loo 'i-e~ e v ' -----• ...,.--T;;;:,.. . --• / 12. ia \ · , .._ l (o,7r 'f· 91).) -::.. .o, l. I '2..L-i,'3-.y -~ -· --~--~ -_,... ..... ___ ---·--- ~ /00 ~ (~·· ?\ ';t-· :...o, 7 i;-.q 1) j :: o . :2;ic I -~ ( ~l. '~) r .1 _i ___ --1 r- .,,.,,.,, ......... 111111111 111111111 :z::z::z: "'111111 000 11100 -C"4 _C"4., """""" ---~~c:. C"4C"4C"4 .. _.;...._ .,.. _____ - -·--+----.. - Q::: I , -----·~·--·- I c • . vJJ. / .... +'. -/) . ~--~-~ 3o u Rc...--P ~· I - -.,.,. - . ) --------t-..:...........;._____ -·· ·-- ----..I. . --' -1 -, -- -~ ~-r·-- ' ~ --·-~- ---~ .. ·; - i . Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data Mannings Coefficient Channel Slope -Diameter Results Depth Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent FuU Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope ~t· ' LINE "A" -30" R.C.P. Worksheet for Circular Channel d:\fmw\nissan.fm2 NISSAN -COLLEGE STATION Circular Channel Manning's Formula Full Flow Capacity 0.013 0.020000 ft/ft 2.50 ft 2.50 ft 58.00 ftl/s ... 91 ft2 7.85 ft 0.00 ft 2.38 ft 100.00 % 0.017335 ft/ft 11 .82 ft/s 2.17 ft FULL ft FULL 62.40 ftl/s 58 .00 ftl/s 0.020000 ft/ft Kling Engw-ing & Sl.lfVeYing Nov 10 , 1995 1<4:26:29 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 FlowMaster v-4 .1 c Page 1 of 1 Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data Mannings Coefficient Channel Slope ·Diameter Results Depth Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope ~t ' LINE "B" -30" R.C.P. Worksheet for Circular Channel d:\fmw\nissan.fm2 NISSAN -COLLEGE STATION Circular Channel Manning's Formula Full Flow Capacity 0.013 0.015000 ft/ft 2.50 ft 2.50 ft 50.23 ff'/s 4.91 ff! 7.85 ft 0.00 ft 2.30 ft 100.00 % 0.013015 ft/ft 10.23 ft/s 1.63 ft FULL ft FULL 54.04 ff'/s 50.23 ff'/s 0.015000 ft/ft Kling Engi..-ing & Surveying Nov 10, 1995 14:25:41 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 FlowMaster v4.1 c Page 1 of 1 Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data Mannings Coefficient Diameter Discharge Results Channel Slope Depth Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope :,f ' LINE "C" -30" R.C.P. @25 YEAR STORM Worksheet for Circular Channel d:\fmw\nissan.fm2 NISSAN -COLLEGE STATION Circular Channel MaMing's Formula Full Flow Slope 0.013 2.50 ft 30.99 ft3/s 0.005709 ft/ft 2.50 ft 4.91 ft2 7.85 ft 0.00 ft 1.90 ft 100.00 % 0.006683 ft/ft 6.31 ft/s 0.62 ft FULL ft FULL 33 .34 ft3/s 30.99 ft3/s 0.005709 ft/ft Kling Engi..-ing & Surveying Nov 10, 1995 14:47:32 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 FlowMaster v4.1 c Page 1 of 1