The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About60 Development Permit 292 TAMU Oil Well 1 UPRCFigure XII Application Form Development Permit Inside/Outside &tablished Flood Hazard Areas City of College Station, Texas (re: Ordinance No. 1728) Site Legal Description: TAMU -ca 11 ed 150 acres 81/180 Approx 260 northwest of Luther Street ·• Site Address: Approx: 2200' from intersection of FM 2818 and Luther Street 7300 N. FM 2818, Suite 200 Address: F\l;ya n, TX 77803 Telephone No.: (409) 778-8525 Owner: Union Pacific Resources Company 4103 Texas Ave. Suite 212 Architect/ Address: Bryan, -1 H 77802 Engineer: __ K_l _i n_.g;...._E_n g"'""1_· n_e_e_r_i n_.g.__&_S_u_r_v_e.._y_i n_.g....__ _____ Telephone No.: ( 40 9) 846-6212 Contractor: Address: ----------------------,-,,....-----------Telephone No.:---------- Date Application Filed: ____ M __ ay ____ 1_8_,_1_9_9_5 _______ Approved:----------- Application is hereby made for the following specific waterway alterations: Cons true t Oi 1 & Gas Dr i 11 i ng Pad and Access road for Unit Well TAMU No. 1. No portion is within a FEMA Flood Hazard Area. Attached as part of this application: 0 Application Fee O Signed Certificate O Site and Construction Plans, with supporting documentation: two (2) copies of each 0 Other: ------------------ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:!~ fAe-r f 0 fL ()Jj l 0 N 'Pf\ lt Pie (2£ sou.g_e 0 ~ ~ ~m~NI I, rn fr~\ LHN· CJ. ~ ,..) ()./J. f\1\0 ' as owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: The above Drainage Plan and supporting documents complies wiht the requirements of Ordinance No. 1728, and Date Date , r . "') Figure XII Continued CERTIFICATIONS: A. I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application meets flood-proofing requirements as set out in Section of Ordinance No. 1728 Architect/Engineer Date B. I, certify that the finished floor level of the lowest floor , including any basement, of any residential structure as part of this application is or proposed to be at or above the base flood elevation as established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration flood hazard study and maps , as amended. Architect/Engineer Date C. I, B. J. K 1 i ng , certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying capacity of the adjoining waterway or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements concerning encroachments of floodways and of floodway fringes as illustrated in the latest Federal Insurance Study. ~ Arel~~ o.CJ ~ j t/6 - D. I, do certify that any alterations, addressed in Certification "D" do not raise the level of 100-year flood as referred to Certification "B". Architect/Engineer Date REVIEWED FOR APPROVAL: --------------~ Floodplain Administrator Date APPROVAL: Special conditions or comments as part of approval: ----------- Page 2 of 2 fo nuld po pp.doc lli'Jl DRAINAGE REPORT FOR TAMU WELL NO. 1 UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES COMPANY J. E. Scott Survey, A-50 College Station, Brazos County, Texas May 15, 1995 DEVELOPED BY: Union Pacific Resources Company c/o Duane Phillippi 7300 N. F.M. 2818, Suite 200 Bryan, TX 77803 ( 409)778-4867 PREPARED BY: Kling Engineering & Surveying 4103 Texas Avenue, Suite 212 Bryan, TX 77802 (409)846-6212 Drainage Report for Tamu Well No. 1 Union Pacific Resources Company J. E. Scott Survey, A-50 College Station, Brazos County, Texas May 15, 1995 GENERAL LOCATION & DESCRIPTION The proposed drilling site for TAMU #1 is located approximately 260' northwest of Luther Street approximately 2200' from the intersection of F.M. 2818 and Luther Street. (See Appendix 3: "Vicinity Map"). For classification purposes this well is considered to be rural. Currently the site is pasture land. Proposed improvements consist of constructing a 330' x 230' drilling pad and constructing an access road from Luther Street to the drilling pad. The length of the access road will be approximately 100'. A pipe culvert will be installed at the intersection of the access road and Luther Street to facilitate drainage. DRAINAGE BASINS & SUB-BASINS The primary drainageway for this site is White Creek. Runoff proceeds as overland flow into a tributary of White Creek, and ultimately into White Creek. Neither the drilling pad nor the access road lies within the 100 year floodplain according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map for Brazos County, Texas, and Incorporated Areas (See Appendix 2: "Flood Plain Map"). Two primary studies have been performed on White Creek and its tributaries. The first is a study performed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in July, 1992, titled ElQQ.d. Insurance Study -Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas. The purpose of this report was to investigate the existence and severity of flood hazards for Brazos County and to aid in the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. The second study is the Stormwater Management Plan, Phase III, performed by Walton and Associates -Consulting Engineers, Inc. contracted with the City of College Station in 1987. The purpose of this study was to gain knowledge of the existing and future drainage conditions in the City and to identify flood problems and flood prone areas. TAMU Well No . 1 Drainage Report Page 2 DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA/FACILITY DESIGN A topographic plat was prepared to show existing conditions, the limits of the proposed improvements, and to delineate the drainage areas created by the construction of the access road (See Appendix 4). The Rational Method and Manning's Equation were used to determ ine the size of the culvert needed to carry the 25 year storm event. The Rational Method was used to calculate the peak runoff and Manning's Equation was used to determine the diameter of the pipe. The following table summarizes the parameters used and the results they produced. Drainage Area (Acres) 2.12 Pasture Area (Acres) 1.68 Road Area (Acres) 0.44 Composite Runoff Coef. 0.35 Intensity (in /hr) 9 .86 Q25 cfs 7.3 Pipe D ia . (CMP) 24" Pipe Dia . (RMP) 18 " Because of the terrain it may be difficult to install a 24 11 diameter CMP , however , an 18 11 reinforced concrete pipe may also be used. This decision is left up to the owner. CONCLUSIONS TAMU #1 is considered to be a rural well , and the drainage analysis has been performed accordingly. One 24 11 corrugated metal pipe , or 18" reinforced concrete pipe will be installed at the intersection of Luther Street and the proposed access road to facilitate drainage. No adverse impact from the 25 year event is expected to adjo ining or downstream landowners or downstream drainage structures . 11 I hereby certify that this report (plan) for the drainage design of the TAMU Well No. 1 was prepared by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards for the owners thereof." Register Professional Engineer State of Texas No. 24705 TAMU Well No. 1 Drainage Report Page 3 APPENDICES 1) General Location Map -U.S. G. S. Quad 2) Flood Insurance Rate Map -FEMA 3) Vicinity Map 4) Topographic plat -Kling Engineering 5) Calculations -Rational Method 6) Calculations -Manning's Equation kcs95-0lb :ltamu#l .11>t en en WWW a: a: a: <( <( <( a: 55~ en en ~ LO LO iI I I I I en en en I-I-1- LJ WWW uwww :::c :::c :::c en en en en oggg -C\I C\I I I I I <O r--"" (') (') (') (') C\I C\I C\I -s> 9 9 9 (') (') (') .... w :I 0 0 l <.... = I 0 l<A...\ ""'" c ~ ( C!:). 1-.,_) (_ I . ~ y ) + { D '1-i" )l ()I 'f-'+) =. -z_. \1- APPENDIX 5 CALCULATIONS . RATIONAL METHOD Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data Mannings Coefficient Channel Slope ·Diameter Results Depth Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope TAMU #1 2.12ac Drainage Area Worksheet for Circular Channel d:\fmw\tmau#1.fm2 TAMU #1 Circular Channel Manning's Formula Full Flow Capacity 0.024 0.010000 ft/ft 2.00 ft 2.00 ft 12.25 ft3/s 3.14 ft2 6.28 ft 0.00 ft 1.26 ft 100 .00 % 0.019217 ft/ft 3.90 ft/s 0.24 ft FULL ft FULL 13 .18 ft3/s 12.25 ft3/s 0.010000 ft/ft APPENDIX 6 CALCULATIONS MANNING'S EQUATION Kling Engineering & Surveying May 17, 1995 10:42:08 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterb ury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1 666 Fl owMaster v4 .1 c Page J o f 1_ Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data Mannings Coefficient Channel Slope ·Diameter Results Depth Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope TAMU #1 2.12ac Drainage Area Worksheet for Circular Channel d :\fmw\tmau#1 .fm2 TAMU #1 Circular Channel Manning's Formula Full Flow Capacity 0.013 0.010000 ft/ft 1.50 ft 1.50 ft 10 .50 ft3/s 1.77 ft2 4.71 ft 0.00 ft 1.25 ft 100 .00 % 0.00977 4 ft/ft 5.94 ft/s 0.55 ft FULL ft FULL 11 .30 ft3/s 10 .50 ft3/s 0.010000 ft/ft Kling Engineering & Surveying May 17 , 1995 10:43:2 5 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brooks ide Road W at erbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 F lowMaster v4.1 c Page 1. of '1. DRAINAGE REPORT FOR TAMU WELL NO. 1 UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES COMPANY J. E . Scott Survey, A-50 College Station, Brazos County, Texas May 15, 1995 DEVELOPED BY: Un ion Pacific Resources Company c/o Duane Phillippi 7300 N. F.M. 2818 , Suite 200 Bryan , TX 77803 ( 409)778-4867 PREPARED BY: Kling Engineering & Surveying 4103 Texas Avenue , Suite 212 Bryan , TX 77802 ( 409) 846-6212 Drainage Report for Tamu Well No. 1 Union Pacific Resources Company J.E. Scott Survey, A-50 College Station, Brazos County, Texas May 15, 1995 GENERAL LOCATION & DESCRIPTION The proposed drilling site for TAMU #1 is located approximately 260' northwest of Luther Street approximately 2200' from the intersection of F.M. 2818 and Luther Street. (See Appendix 3: "Vicinity Map"'i: For classification purposes this well is considered to be rural.V"'Currently the site is pasture land. Proposed improvements consist of constructing a 330' x 230' drilling pad and constructing an access road ~m Luther Street to the drilling pad. The length of the access road will be approximately 100'. A pipe culverywill be installed at the intersection of the access road and Luther Street to facilitate drainage . ./ DRAINAGE BASINS & SUB-BASINS The primary drainageway for this site is White Creek( Runoff proceeds as overland flow into a tributary of White Creek, and ultimately into White Creek. Neither the drilling pad nor the / access road lies within the 100 year floodplain according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map for Brazos County, Texas, and Incorporated Areas (See Appendix 2: "Flood Plain Map"). Two primary studies have been performed on White Creek and its tributaries. The first is a study performed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in July , 1992, titled Eloo.d. Insurance Study -Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas. The purpose of this report was to investigate the existence and severity of flood hazards for Brazos County and to aid in the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. The second study is the Stormwater Management Plan, Phase III, performed by Walton and Associates -Consulting Engineers, Inc. contracted with the City of College Station in 1987. The purpose of this study was to gain knowledge of the existing and future drainage conditions in the City and to identify flood problems and flood prone areas. TAMUWellNo. 1 Drainage Report Page 2 DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA/FACILITY DESIGN A topographic plat was prepared to show existing conditions, the limits of the proposed improvements, and to delineate the drainage areas created by the construction of the access road (See Appendix 4). The Rational Method and Manning's Equation were used to determine the size of the culvert needed to carry the 25 year storm event. The Rational Method was used to calculate the peak runoff and Manning's Equation was used to determine the diameter of the pipe. The following table summarizes the parameters used and the results they produced . Drainage Pasture Area Road Area Composite Intensity Q25 Pipe Dia . Pipe Dia . Area (8.Qres) (AQres) (AQres) RllnQff CQd, (inlhr) ds (CM£) (RM.E) 2 .12 1.68 0.44 0 .35 9.86 7.3 /' 24" I' 18" V' Because of the terrain it may be difficult to install a 24 11 diameter CMP, however, an 18 11 reinforced concrete pipe may also be used. This decision is left up to the owner. Vo~ ~ CONCLUSIONS ./ TAMU #1 is considered to be a rural well, and the drainage analysis has been performed accordingly. One 24 11 corrugated metal pipe, or 18 11 reinforced concrete pipe will be installed at the intersection of Luther Street and the proposed access road to facilitate drainage . No adverse impact from the 25 year event is expected to adjoining or downstream landowners or downstream drainage structures. ii 11 1 hereby certify that this report (plan) for the drainage design of the TAMU Well No. 1 was prepared by me (or under my supervision) in accordance with the provisions of the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards for the owners thereof. 11 ~-·· Register Professional Engineer State of Texas No. 24705 TAMU Well No. 1 Drainage Report Page 3 APPENDICES 1) General Location Map -U.S. G. S. Quad 2) Flood Insurance Rate Map -FEMA 3) Vicinity Map 4) Topographic plat -Kling Engineering 5) Calculations -Rational Method 6) Calculations -Manning's Equation kes95-0I b:\tamu#l .rpt (/) (/) WWW a: a: a: <(·~~a: gg ~ Ll) Ll) u:: I I I I (/) (/) (/) tLJ tLJ Iii u www ::t :::r:: :::r:: :::r:: (/) (/) (/) (/) oggg """"'"' I I I I (¥) ~ S'; S'; N NN .-999 (¥) (¥) (¥) .... "' :I 0 u A ,-L D 1\-0 ":::: D . ++ =--'- l <... : \ 0 l'A-\ "'- c ~ ce!:).1--i-) c.1 .(.,, y) +(D,i~)Le>. v-+) =- -z_. \L APPENDIX S CALCULATIONS . RATIONAL METHOD ~ . Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data Mannings Coefficient Channel Slope ·Diameter Results Depth Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slo~e TAMU #1 2.12ac Drainage Area Worksheet for Circular Channel d:\fmw\tmau#1.fm2 TAMU#1 Circular Channel Manning's Formula Full Flow Capacity 0.024 0.010000 ft/ft 2.00 ft 2 .00 ft 12 .25 ft3/s 3.14 ft2 6.28 ft 0.00 ft 1.26 ft 100.00 % 0.019217 ft/ft 3.90 ft/s 0.24 ft FULL ft FULL 13.18 ft3/s 12 .25 ft3/s 0.010000 ft/ft I APPENDIX 6 CALCULATI ONS MANNING 'S E QUATION Kling Engineering & Surveying May 17, 1995 10:42:08 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside R oad Waterb ury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1 666 FlowMaster v4 .1 c Page 1 of1.. Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data Mannings Coefficient Channel Slope ·Diameter Results Depth Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope TAMU #1 2.12ac Drainage Area Worksheet for Circular Channel d :\fmw\tmau#1.fm2 TAMU #1 Circular Channel Manning's Formula Full Flow Capacity 0.013 0.010000 fUft 1.50 ft 1.50 ft 10 .50 ft3/s 1.77 ft2 4.71 ft 0.00 ft 1.25 ft 100.00 % 0.00977 4 fUft 5.94 fUs 0.55 ft FULL ft FULL 11.30 ft3/s 10.50 ft3/s 0.010000 ft/ft I Kling Engineering & Surveying May 17, 1995 10:43:25 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 FlowMaster v4.1 c Page 1,of1,. , PRESUBMISSION CONFERENCE REPORT June 30, 1995 TO : Ernest Bruchez, Bruchez & Goss Attorneys 3131 Briarcrest, Suite 200, Bryan, TX 77802-3052 Sharon K. Cook, Union Pacific Resources P . 0 . Box 7, Ft. Worth, TX 76101-0007 FROM : Project Review Committee il L Joey Dunn, Staff Planner /l Kent Laza, City Engineer Craig Hall , P&Z Representative 0S9ers Attending Natalie Thomas, Planning Technician Shirley Volk, Development Review Coordinator Don Lusk, Electrical Line Designer Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation Mike Willey , Risk Manager SUBJECT : Oil Well P ermit -TAMU Well #1; proposed oil well to be located on the Texas A&M University's south Easterwood campus in the general area between F .M . 2818, the city limits and the Easterwood Airport . A Presubmission Conference Meeting was held Wednesday, June 28, 1995 to discuss the above mentioned oil well permit. The Conference recommended approval of the application with the recommendations listed in the Environmental Impact Analysis prepared by Esmond Engineering and the following considerations : Signs erected at the intersection of Stillwater Road and the site access road to identify well operator and 24 hour notification telephone number. Adequate screening is provided by existing vegetation . However, if surrounding vegetation is removed or the well site becomes visible to Stillwater Road, then landscaping will be reviewed at permit renewal in one year. If the access road location changes , staff must review the new location prior to City Council consideration . THIS OIL & GAS OPERATIONS PERMIT APPLICATION WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT 7:00 P .M . ON THURSDAY, JULY 13 , 1995 IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL ROOM LOCATED AT 1101 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH.