Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout38 Development Permit 01-20 Rock Prairie Retail CenterThe City of . College StatiOrl, Texas P.O. Box 9960 September 6, 2001 Joseph I. Pearson Inland Partners, Inc. • 2500 West Loop South, Ste. 400 Houston, TX 77027 Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 www .ci.college-sta ti on. tx . us RE: Construction of rear access roadway In the 30' Public Access Easement and Utility Easement, Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II. Dear Mr. Pearson: • (979) 764-3500 The Department of Development Services of the City of College Station is concerned that the roadway as a subdivision improvement is built properly according to the construction plans. Our legal department perceives this as a violation of subdivision regulations. Therefore, It IS necessary to petition to the Planning & Zoning Commission and not the Project Review Committee . We view this situation as a condition that has developed between the present owner, the previous owner and/or the developer. We consider the responsibility of the cost to be the concern of the developer. It is our position that the public access easement is a subdivision improvement that should be constructed by the developer. It is recommended that sufficient information be forwarded to us with variance request to the Planning & Zoning Commission to justify your position. Section V of the Subdivision Regulations should be referenced for guidance. The staff of the Department of Development Services does not recommend approval of this request for a variance to the subdivision requirement in regards to building necessary roadway structures. It is the City of College Station's policy that the first developer to build adjacent to a platted public street or alley is responsible for designing and constructing the alley or roadway . O :\Group\Deve_ser\Tom V\LOBall\RetCtr_Esmt.doc Home of Texas A&M University j The curb and pavement of this 30' rear access has already been designed into the site plan . The Site Plan and Development Permit review were conducted with this public access included in the construction plans. Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer XC: Natalie Ruiz, Development Review Manager Rock Prairie Retail Center SP (01-77) & DP (01-20) File O:\Group\Deve_ser\Tom V\LOBall\RetCtr_Esmt.doc SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DATE OF ISSUE: OWNER: DELMAR ROCK PRAIRIE LTD 15900 DOOLEY RD ADDISON, TX 75001-4243 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 100020 DP-ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER SITE ADDRESS: 1700 ROCK PRAIRIE RD DRAINAGE BASIN: VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent prop erties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debri s from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area not in the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Date / j 7 -l-01 Owner/ Agent/Contractor Date SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DATE OF ISSUE: OWNER: DELMAR ROCK PRAIRIE LTD 15900 DOOLEY RD ADDISON, TX 75001-4243 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 100020 DP-ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER SITE ADDRESS: I 700 ROCK PRAIRIE RD DRAINAGE BASIN: VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition , placement and state . The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. · In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area not in the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Date / ] 7-l-01 Owner/ Agent/Contractor Date Construction Cost Estimate for Proposed Rock Prairie Retail Center Item No . Quantity Unit Item Description Unit Price 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I 380 L.F . 6" Fire Line , PVC C-900 1 E.A. Fire Hydrant Set 75 L.F . 2" Water Line Copper K 1 E.A. 2" Water Meter 1 E.A. 2" Water Meter for Irrigation 13800 S .F Concrete Access Road 960 L.F . 6" Curb for Access Road REVIEWED FOR cn~.~PL.1/\NCE JUL 3 2001 C OLU::G ~ S i Ai. iui'J ENGINEERING J ~ $30 $3 ,000 $15 $300 $600 $8 .00 $1 .50 Total Amount (Installed) $ 11 ,400 .00 $ 3,000 .00 $ 1,125 .00 $ 300 .00 $ 600 .00 $ 110,400.00 $ 1,380 .00 $128 ,205 Date: To: From : RE: CITY INFRASTRUCTURE INSPECTION NOTICE 7/3/01 ____________ _ _Bob Mosley _____________ _ Deborah Grace Rock Prairie Retail Center -------------------~ Location: _Rock Prairie and Longmire ,'A Public Water Lines/Fire Hydrants 0 Public Sanitary Sewer ~ Engineer 's Estimates Attached 0 Public Storm Sewer ~ Construction Plans Attached :© Public Streets 0 Public Detention Facility )a Driveway Connection to Public Street [}-~ Site Plan Attached 0 Private Construction within easement [} 0 0 No Inspection Required Comments: 6 // 5 > S . .VtAr(.Ll CITY INFRASTRUCTURE INSPECTION NOTICE Date: To: From: Deb orah Grace RE: Rock Prairie Retail Center ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Location: Rock Prairie and Longmire ~ Public Water Lines/Fire Hydrants D Public Sanitary Sewer D Engineer 's Estimates Attached D Public Storm Sewer 'A Construction Plans Attached D Public Streets D Public Detention Facility D Driveway Connection to Public Street [}-D Site Plan Attached D Private Construction within easement 0-D 0 No Inspection Required Comments: ' • K. Chen Engineering •o ''''''"''"c""""' '"'· i~ ~ \~ ~ jl~~~~ ~ Consulting Civil Engineers June 22 , 2001 Mr. Thomas V . Vennochi Jr. City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station , Texas 77842 Re: Rock Prairie Retail Center KCE Job Number: 0186-01 Dear Mr. Vennochi : /·v-~ ~~ /,,, ifl\ 4: I~ if' ; \ ~ ~ \ l~~ f ~ '),~ ii' xi \~~~" ~ ~~ 1• t~ f"J1\:J Yfil> J. i ¥~,~~~~ ' \ ~ ~ Enclosed are set of civil plans showing t revisions requested by the City of College Station on June 20, 2001 . Here are the brief descriptions of how we addressed each comment: ENGINEERING 1. McDonalds and the Retail center is curb o on Longmire at the orooos access drive ......... . We have designed two 1.5-foot wide cc:mcrete flume to control the storm water release to Longmire Dr. that the discharge from both McDonalds and Retail Center will not exceed the capacity of Longmire Dr. Please refer to revised drainage report for detail calculation . };2. ~V The last submitted paving plan and Drainage Report states a flume of 2 ' width . ~ . if \J But it scales to 5 ' and is annotated as such on the previous submittal. Please (' clarify this. ~I ~ We have changed the report and drawing to reflect correct flume width \· 0 ~4 . 6 . Calculate the capacity that could be detained in parking lot at a maximum curb depth o fO . 83 ft ........ . The capacity that could be detained in parking lot is 6580 CF . The Max curb depth is 0 .7 ft and average ponding depth is 0 .35 ft. Provide curb and paving details . The curb and paving details are showed on C-4 Please branch the water supply for the landscaping and building service off the proposed 6" fire line exactly where the proposed meters are located near the east corner of the building. Revised accordingly , refer to sheet C-3 for detail. Please submit a plan & profile with a cross section and a cost estimate of the public access roadway as was done for the McDonald submittal ......... . A P&P sheet with cross section is designed and included in the submittal. 6161 SAVOY , SUITE 310 HOUSTON , TEXAS 77036 PHON E: 713 .952 .6888 FAX : 713 .952 .9994 r Please be advised the cement-stabilized base is no longer allowed in construction of public streets. including public access roadways. We are designed to use lime-stabilized base . Should you have any questions , please call me any time. Sincerely, K Chen Engineering \\SERVER01\shareD\KCC\Project\0186-01 \doc\Staff Comments Reply 0186 .doc Page 2 of DRAINAGE ENGINEERING REPORT FOR INLAND PARTNERS PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER ROCK PRAIRIE RD AND LONGMIRE DR. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS PREPARED BY KG Chen Engineering A DIVISION OF KC UNITED, INC. 6161 SAVOY, SUITE 310 HOUSTON, TX 77036 (713) 952-6888 MAY,2001 I. GENERAL LOCATION Rock Prairie Road is directly to the north of the Center America 's property. Rock Prairie Road is considered a major arterial per the City of College Station. Longmire Drive provides access to the site from the East. Longmire Dri ve is considered a minor arterial per the City of College Station. From the Drainage Policy and Design Standards Manuel for the City of College Station , our property is located on the western most edge of Lick Creek Drainage Basin. Also , we are further defined within the aforementioned drainage basin as sub-basin 8. The primary drainage system for sub-basin 8 is North Fork Lick Creek. The proposed Center America Shopping Center is located within Phase II of the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision. To the west of the Center America Shopping Center is McDonald 's, and the properties to the east and south of the property are currently undeveloped. II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The proposed Shopping Center will be situated on 2.465 acres , located on the southwest comer of the intersection of Rock Prairie Road and Longmire Drive in College Station, Texas. The Shopping Center will encompass all of Lot 1, 2 and 3 in Block 3 of the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision. This site corresponds with the Amended Plat of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of L.O . Ball Memorial Subdivision recorded in March of 2001. Currently, the site is undeveloped and has a natural grassland cover. The proposed development will encompass a parking lot as well as single story building. The owner of the property is Center America Corporation and the current zoning is C-2. The zoning classification will remain unchanged. III. DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION The proposed Shopping Center is going to drain into the storm .sewer system located on Longmire Drive. There are no existing curb inlets in the general vicinity of our site; however, there are . curb inlets further south on Longmire . These inlets were initially designed to handle the post development drainage from our site. The construction plans for L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision Phase II prepared by Municipal Development Group and approved by the City of College Station show the intended drainage for the extension of Longmire Drive . The property is located in Zone "c", areas outside the 100-year flood , as identified by the flood insurance rate map of the federal emergency management agenc y, map no. 480401C0205 C. IV. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Parameters: Area: "c" value (grassy, undeveloped): l 1o (College Station Rainfall Curves): 1100 (College Station Rainfall Curves): TC (See Exhibit 1): 2.465 acres 0.40 5 .20 in/hr 7.80 in/hr 27.00 minutes Based on the parameters listed above, the following pre-development peak discharge rate has been found: Q10(c x lxA): QI 00 ( c x l x A): 5.12 cfs 7.69 cfs V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Parameters: Area: Landscape Area: Impervious Area: Composite "c" value: 110 (College Station Rainfall Curves): l 1oo (College Station Rainfall Curves): TC: 2.465 acres 0.50 acres 1.96 acres 0 .75 6.90 in/hr 10.25 in/hr 13 minutes Based on the parameters listed above, the following post-development peak discharge rate has been found: Q10 (c x l x A): Q100 (c x l x A): IV. STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM 12 .75 cfs 18.95 cfs Longmire Drive is a curb and gutter street with an inlet to the south of the proposed Shopping Center site. The Shopping Center will release the drainage from the site through the access easement to Longmire Drive then travel down the · gutter of Longmire to the existing inlet. The existing gutter discharge of Longmire Street is defined by the following equation: Q = 0.56 * (z/n) * SA0.5 * Y /\2.6 7 Where : Q = gutter discharge in cf~ 2 Z =inverse of crown slope of Longmire Drive (ft/ft)= 33.33 N =roughness coefficient= 0.018 Y = depth of flow (ft) = 0.5 ft Plugging in the known values for each of the variables , yields a gutter discharge amount of 17 .11 cfs . V. IMPACT TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM On Site Drainage Flume To Convey and Control the discharge of storm on the street, we have designed two (2) on site concrete flumes that both are 2-foot wide and 0.5-foot deep (Refer to civil engineering plan for detail). Using the Manning 's equation, we know the capacity of the flume is: Q=(l.486/n) * A * R213 * S 112 Where: Q = 2.72 CFS n = 0.013 A= 1.5* 0 .5 = 0 .75 SF R=0.3 s = 0.5% = 0.005 Q(total di sch arge for tw o flume s)= 2 X 2.72 = 5.44 CFS Therefore the post-development runoffs can be reduced from 12. 75 CFS to .::r:'i'()' CFS for the 10-year storm and from 18.95 to 5.44 CFS for the 100-year storm . The excessive water will then be detained in the parking area The post-development runoffs at the site for the 10-year and 100-year storms are both controlled at 5.44 CFS. Total Discharge Based on the Overland Method , the time of concentration for runoff from the proposed retail center to the intersection of Longmire and Access Dr. is 15 minutes. Therefore, the total runoff at the point of discharge can be calculated as following: From McDonald 's: TC= 19 min Area= 1.688 acre I 100 = 9 .0in/hr c = 0 .78 3 .. Q ~ 0.78 x 9 .0 x 1.688 ~ 11.85 CFS . J From Retail Center: " rJ Q = 5.44 CFS ~ Q-'t--cY\ 0() Total to Longmire : With the capacity of Longmire Dr. at 17.11 cfs , we conclude that there is no adverse effect to the existing drainage system. The existing system was designed to handle the post-development runoff from the site. 4 • . . EXHIBIT 1 DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION Given: Area: 2 .465 acres Solution: is : Use Overland Method to determine time of concentration: Where : TC= 3.3 x (l-c )xL05 (S x 100)0 33 TC = time of concentration "c" = runoff coefficient L = maximum length of water travel in meters S = surface slope "c" = 0.40 Existing,; "c" = 0.75 De veloped L = 700 ft (213.36 meters) S = 1.1% (existing ; S=0.9% (proposed), S=0.4 % (Access Rd) Using the values given above , the Time of Concentration for existing conditions :. 27 minutes Using the values given above , the Time of Concentration for proposed conditions is : . ·. 13 minutes' ' 4 /(_f KAi --------------ARCHITECTS -------------- transmittal letter To: Bridgette George Date: 06-25-01 Company: City of College Station From: Wendy Bartley Address: D Cop ies D Urgent Via: 1101 Texas Ave Project No: KAI# 00034 College Station , Texas 77842 Subject: Rock Prairie Retail Center § Specifications § Blue prints § Electronic Files § Shop Dra wings For your Review & Comment For ap proval For your use Plea se Comment Courier Fax X Overnight Delivery US Mail Bridgette - Attached for distribution in the Developmental Permit Process is the following : 6 sets , which include : Also included are: A0.2 Architectural Site Plan A0 .3 Landscaping Plan PP1 Plan Profile -Access Drive C1. Civil Site Plan C2 . Paving Plan C3 . Utility Plan C4 . Joint Plan C5 Plan Profile -Fire Line C6 Erosion Control Plan 2 copies Revised Drainage Report Memo from Joe Pearson to Myself in response recording questions from your office complete with copies of said deeds Please let me know if you have any questions or comments . I can be reached at 713-895-0900 . Thank you K A S T E N D I E C K A S S 0 C I A T E S, I N C. ~Olt11 h{2s./01 t>i : L{ OAVU1 7035 W. Tidwell, Ste. 11 lJ Houston , TX 77092 TEL 713-895-0900 FA X 7 13 -895-8381 email wendyb@Kai Arc h.com .. .' .. -- KAi transmittal letter To: James Healy Date: 06-07-01 Company: Greytok Construction From: Wendy Bartley Address: 1149 Ellsworth Suite 404 Project No: KAI# 00034 Pasadena, Texas 77506 Subject: Rock Prairie Retail Center College Station , Texas D Cop ies D Urgent Via: § Specifications § Blueprints § Electron ic Files § Shop Drawings For your Review & Comment For approval For your use Please Comment Courier Fax Overnight Deliv ery US Ma il James - Attached for your reading pleasure is the EPA Notice of Intent that has been filed _ (Storm Water Prevention Plan) There is one page that you need to sign and date -certifying that you understand and are aware of the report . Once you sign -my understanding is it needs to be posted on the job site . Also attached, Eight (8) sets of Revised Civil Sets . I am attempting to contact and submit for the Clearing and Grading perm it for you -Can 't get anyone there (at the City) that knows anything about how to do it -so, just in case Bubba has to handle I have sent you two additional sets. Let me know if you need anything else -and we'll get you-construction sets first part of next week. Thanks KA S T E N D I E C K A S S 0 C I AT E S, I N C. 7035 W. Ti dwell , Ste. 111J Houston , TX 77092 TEL 713-895-0900 FAX 713-895-8381 ema il wendyb @Kai Arch .com STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER For INLAND PARTNERS A 2.465 ACRE SITE AT ROCK PRAIRIE AND LONGMIRE DRIVE IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS K CHEN ENGINEERING A DIVISION OF KC UNITED, INC. 6161 Savoy, Suite 310 Houston, TX 77036 (713)952-6888 I certify under penalty of Jaw that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that-qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the sy stem, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility offme and imprisonment for knowing violat.ions . ~.., \\ServerO l \s hared \KCC \Project\O 186 -0 I \doc\SWPPP.doc . ( ~~·· ... STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM I. Site Description/lnfonnation ............................................................................................. 1 A. Nature of Construction Activity B . Sequence of Major Activities C. Estimates of Total and Disturbed Areas D. Estimate of Post-construction Runoff Coefficient E. Existing Soils & Runoff Quality Data F. Site Map(s), Narrative G. Receiving Waters II . Controls .................................................. :-....................................................... , ................... 2 A. Erosion and Sediment Controls B . Stonn Water Management C. Other Controls III. Maintenance ....................................................................................................................... 4 IV . Inspections ......................................................................................................................... 4 V. Non-Stonn Water Discharges ............................................................................................ 5 VI. Notice Of Intent (NOi) ...................................................................................................... 5 VII. Certification of Contractors .............................................................................................. 5 VIII . Notice ofTennination (NOT) ........................................................................................... 5 IX. Maintenance of Records .................................................................................................... 5 X. Posting of Pennit Documents ............................................................................................ 6 XI. Plan Revisions/Modifications ............................................................................................ 7 Glossary ......................................................................................................... '. ................... 8 APPENDlX ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Site Maps (See engineering plans) Erosion & Sediment Control Details (See engineering plans) Inspection Fonns & Reports Notice Of Intent Fonns (Copies) Certification of Contractors Notice ofTennination Fonns (Copies) Record of major soil disturbing activities Record of Revisions/Modifications \\ServerO I \shared\KCC\Project\O 186-0 l\doc\SWPPP.doc .. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan This plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Final NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Sites , as published in the Federal Register on September 9, 1992. Should contract documents conflict with the minimum requirements of the General Permit, State or local requirements, the more stringent requirements shall apply. In accordance with the requirements of the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from construction sites, all contractors and subcontractors shall at all times take necessary measures to prevent the flow of sediment and other materials from the work site into the storm sewer system or to any receiving water. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, the placement of straw bale erosion checks and inlet protection, silt fence , riprap stabilization, grassing, sodding, etc . I. Site Description A . Nature of the Construction Activity. The site is currently covered with scattered grass across the surface. The purpose of this project is to remove the unsuitable fill material then recompact with suitable fill, construct a parking lot, utility and warehouse. B. Sequence of Major Activities which disturb soil. (Descriptive) Major soil disturbing activities that will take place !nclude: • Excavation of unsuitable, unconsolidated fill . • Place and compact suitable fill • Construct new pavement and building • Cleanup/Final stabilization C . Estimates of Total Area & Area to be Disturbed. Total 2.465 acre site will be disturbed to accomplish the work. D . Estimate of Post-Construction Runoff Coefficient. The overall estimated post-construction runoff coefficient for this construction site will change from a value of0.40 to a value of0.80. E. Existing Data Giving Soils Information and Quality of any Discharge from the Site. The surface of site typically consists of scattered sandstone and scattered grass. The subsurface of site typically consists of sandstone over weathered shale, silt over weathered shale, and fill material over weathered shale. No data exists on storm water runoff quality from this project. F. Site Map Information: The following information can be found on the maps and plan sheets given on the engineering plans. -Site drainage patterns -Approximate slopes after grading -Outline of areas to be disturbed -Location of major structural & non-structural controls G . Name of and Location of Discharges to Receiving Water(s) and Area of Wetland Acreage at the Site. All storm water runoff from the project site is received by Colorado River There are no designated wetlands on this project. II. Controls In general, for this project the Contractor shall be responsible for the selection and implementation of erosion and sedimentation control and stabilization measures as necessary. Appropriate preventative and control measures shall be implemented prior to commencing any activity, which disturbs the existing surface or could otherwise be considered a pollutant source. The Contractor shall take such measures as necessary to assure compliance with the requirements and intent of the NPDES General Permit for storm water discharges from this project. Such measures shall include, but are not limited to the installation and maintenance of the following: • Perimeter controls such as silt fence, straw bales, or equivalent to prevent offsite sedimentation and/or to prevent run-on to the site . • Silt fence, straw bale , or equivalent erosion checks for ditch and inlet protection to eliminate soils, sediments, or other debris from entering the drainage systems or receiving waters. • Silt fence, straw bale, or equivalent sediment barrier around the perimeter of stockpil.ed soils. • Other controls, as warranted by field conditions and sequencing. • Final stabilization of the site shall be achieved by the Contractor prior to acceptance of the project by the Owner or the City of College Station At a minimum, the Contractor shall install the measures shown on the Erosion Control Plan. I A. Erosion & Sediment Controls 1. Stabilization practices To reduce the erosion potential of disturbed areas, temporary seeding, permanent seeding, mulching or sod stabilization procedures, or their equivalent, must be initiated on all disturbed areas within 14 calendar days oflast activity in that area as required by the General Permit. The owner's construction manager will keep a record of when major activities occur, temporarily or permanently cease, and when stabilization measures are initiated . A copy of this record will be kept with this plan on-site. 2. Structural practices .. The disturbed surface areas for this project are comprised of relatively small drainage areas. Within these small areas, erosion and sedimentation can be effectively controlled using silt fences, straw bales, and sediment traps, as shown on the erosion control plan. During construction and until the site is adequately stabilized, ditches, curb inlets, and basin and drop inlets shall have stone siltation structures, straw bale erosion checks, straw bale dikes, or equivalent installed to significantly reduce the amount of soil and silt entering the underground drainage system and/or receiving waters. All stockpiled soil will be surrounded by a straw bale dike, silt fence, or equivalent to properly control sediment runoff. At a minimum, silt fences will be used as sediment controls on the sideslope and downslope boundaries of the construction and staging areas. Offsite drainage will be controlled through the use of a diversion swale adjacent to the project site. This swale will also collect runoff from the construction area, therefore sedimentation dams will be placed at intervals along the swale as indicated on the erosion control plan . The Contractor is encouraged to limit the number of access points to the site as both a safety measure and a pollution prevention measure. The Contractor shall submit proposed locations of Stabilized Construction Entrances, if different from those shown on the plans, to the Engineer. The Contractor will at all times take such measures -as required to minimize off-site tracking of sediments and debris . Where offsite tracking does occur, the Contractor shall prqmptly remove any such material or debris . The proposed measures for erosion and sedimentation control during construction satisfy the intent of State and local requirements. The applicable erosion control drawings are given in the Appendix (Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Details). B. Storm Water Management Permanent erosion control and sedimentation control measures will be in place when construction is completed and prior to submittal of the Notice Of Termination . Specific locations of these stabilization measures are not given in the drawings but consist generally of the following items. Permanent seeding, mulching or sod stabilization procedures, or their equivalent, shall be initiated on all disturbed areas within fourteen (14) calendar days of last activity in that area. The proposed measures for erosion and sedimentation control after construction satisfy the intent of the State and local requirements . C. Other Controls The Contractor shall at all times take such measures as required to minimize off-site tracking of sediments and debris. Where offsite tracking does occur, the Contractor shall promptly remove any such material or debris. The Contractor shall comply with all Federal, State, and local regulations regarding the collection , storage, and disposal of solid, sanitary, septic, or hazardous waste materials. The Contractor shall designate a maintenance area for his equipment and shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws , codes, ordinances, and regulations (including the obtaining of licenses and permits) regarding the storage, treatment, or disposal of any hazardous materials utilized on the construction site or construction staging areas. In the event of a spill of oil, fuel, or other hazardous material, the Contractor shall notify the appropriate agencies and shall immediately take action to control, contain, and clean up the spill. The Contractor is responsible for all costs, permits, fines, or penalties associated with any spill and shall submit to the Owner copies of any associated paperwork. Should the Contractor delay in spill cleanup, the Owner reserves the right to have the cleanup performed by a licensed . ' disposal contractor at the Contractor's expense. Indemnification- The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Owner and the Engineer and their respective officers, agents and employees, from and against all damages, claims, losses, demands, suits, judgments and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses, arising out of or resulting from non-compliance with this section or the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Other Permits No other discharge permits exist for this site. III. Maintenance The Contractor shall protect erosion and sediment control devices from damage and shall repair and replace dikes, erosion checks , sediment traps, silt fences, and overflow outlets when damaged by construction, natural, and other physical causes. All soil erosion and sediment control devices shall function as originally intended. All stock piled soil shall be surrounded by a straw bale dike , silt fence, or equivalent to properly control sediment runoff. Temporary seeding, permanent seeding, mulching or sod stabilization procedures, or their equivalent, must be initiated on all disturbed areas within fourteen (14) calendar days oflast activity in that area. Stabilized Construction Entrances shall be top-dressed with additional stone as necessary to maintain their effectiveness . The Contractor will at all times take such measures as required to minimize off-site tracking of sediments and debris. Where offsite tracking does occur, the Contractor shall promptly remove any such material or debris. Accumulated sediment shall be removed and disposed of as required to keep the control measure functional. Excess accumulation of sediment at erosion control devices will not be permitted. Inspection services provided by the owner or owner's representatives do not relieve the Contractor's responsibility for inspection and maintenance of the erosion control measures or his duty to comply with this plan and the conditions of the NPDES General Permit. IV. Inspections The site will be inspected by a qualified representative of the CONTRACTOR at least once every seven calendar days and within 24 hours of the end of a rainfall event of 0.5 inches or greater. Where sites have been finally stabilized, inspection will be conducted at least once every month until a Notice of Termination (NOT) is filed for this project. The inspections shall be for evidence of or the potential for pollutants entering the drainage system. In particular, inspection should be made of disturbed areas, storage areas, discharge locations, erosion and sediment control measures, and points of entrance and exit to the site. The inspector shall indicate in his report if rainfall has occurred since the last inspection. When possible, the date and volume of rainfall should also be recorded. A written inspection report will be kept and filed with this plan. Any modifications or revisions to the plan based on results of the inspections shall be made for timely implementation of any changes within seven days of the inspection. Reports shall identify any incidents of non-compliance with the SWPPP and the General Permit and actions taken to ensure compliance. . , V. Non-Storm Water Discharges There are no anticipated non-storm water discharges, other than waterline flushing, from this site. VJ. Notice Of Intent (NOi) For this project, the parties identified below will each file, as co-permittees, a Notice Of Intent (NOi) with the EPA. A copy of each NOi submitted for this project will be posted at the construction site in a prominent place for public viewing. Copies are also included in the Appendix of this document. OWNER: INLAND PARTNERS Contractor: INLAND PARTNERS Under no circumstances will any construction activities identified as potential pollutant sources commence on this contract until 48 hours after submittal of the NOL VII. Certification of Contractors Each contractor identified above shall provide the Owner with a list of their subcontractors. This list shall also identify the responsibilities of the subcontractor with regard to the implementation of and compliance with this plan and the NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit. This list shall be kept in the Appendix . Each contractor and subcontractor performing work which will have an impact on the pollution potential of this project shall be identified herein. Subcontractor information will be provided by the general contractor. It is the responsibility of the General Contractor to obtain certification form s from his subcontractors prior to any work being performed by said subcontractor on this project. A brief description of the work to be performed will be included with the certification. Certification by the subcontractors does not relieve the Contractor's responsibility for inspection and maintenance of the erosion control measures or his duty to comply with this plan and the conditions of the General Permit. The signed certification forms will be submitted to the owner and will be included as part of this plan (File in the Appendix). An example certification form is given in the Appendix. Copies of this form may be used. VIII. Notice of Termination A Notice Of Termination (NOT) may be filed for each co-permittee after the portion of work for which said co- permittee is responsible is finally stabilized and accepted by the Owner and the City of College Station (where applicable). The Contractor shall not file an NOT without the prior approval and acceptance of the work by the owner and the City of College Station A copy of any NOT's filed in association with this project shall be submitted to the owner and filed with this plan . IX. Maintenance of Records This plan and the records required herein will be kept by the owner for a minimum period of three (3) years following the date ·offinal stabilization in accordance with the requirements of the General Permit. . "' X. Posting of permit documents A copy of any Notice Of Intent (NOI) forms submitted for this project will be posted, along with a project description, in accordance with the NPDES General Permit requirements and regulations. Posting can be on the job-site bulletin board or work trailer. Copies of these forms are also contained in this document. . ·' XI. Plan Revisions/Modifications This plan shall be amended whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance, which has a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to the waters of the United States and which has not otherwise been addressed in the plan or if the plan proves to be ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants or in otherwise achieving the general objectives of controlling pollutants in storm water discharges from the site. A record shall be kept of any revisions/modifications identifying the reason for the change, the date made, the date implemented, and the section revised. This record will be filed in the Appendix of this document. GLOSSARY: NOTE: This glossary is to assist in defining the terms and practices used in this plan. Should contract documents conflict with the minimum requirements of the EPA General Permit, the more stringent of the two shall apply. Erosion and Sediment Controls: Structural controls include silt fences , earth dikes, drainage swales, sediment traps, check dams, subsurface drains, pipe slope drains, level spreaders, storm drain inlet protection, rock outlet protection, reinforced soil retaining systems, gabions, and temporary or permanent sediment basins . Non-structural controls include waste disposal , control of off-site vehicle tracking, and compliance with State and/or local solid, sanitary or septic waste disposal regulations. For common drainage areas > IO disturbed acres , a sediment basin with a volume of 3,600 cubic feet per acre drained, or equivalent control measures, shall be provided until final stabilization of the site. Where a basin is not attainable, smaller basins and/or sediment traps should be used. At a minimum, silt fences or equivalent sediment controls are required for all sideslope and downslope boundaries of the construction area. These minimum controls shall also apply to drainage locations serving < IO acres unless a sediment basin with a storage volume of3,600 cubic feet per acre drained is provided. · Stabilization Measures: Stabilization practices may include temporary seeding, permanent seeding, mulching, geotextiles , sod stabilization, vegetative buffer strips, protection of trees, preservation of mature vegetation, and other appropriate measures. Stabilization measures will be initiated as soon as practicable where constructio~ activities have temporarily or permanently ceased. The measures will be initiated no more than 14 days after activity has temporarily or permanently ceased except where construction activity will resume on that portion of the site within 21 days or initiation of stabilization measures is precluded by snow or seasonal arid conditions. Arid conditions may occur in areas where the average rainfall is less than 20 inches. Storm Water Management: Practices include wet ponds, retention structures, flow attenuation using vegetated swales and natural depressions, infiltration and sequential systems using one or more of these practices. ·•' APPENDIX This appendix contains: • Inspection fonns and reports • Notice of Intent (copies) • Certification of Contractors (fonns) • Notice ofTennination fonn (blank) • Record of major soil disturbing activities • Record of changes/revisions Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION Construction Site: Retail Center at Rock Prairie Rd and I .ongmire Dr College Sation, Texas Retail Center (As identified in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and NO!.) The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the referenced project identifies each pollution prevention measure and the contractor(s) responsible for the implementation and maintenance of the measure. All contractors and subcontractors shall be identified in the SWPPP and must sign a copy of the certification statement given ·· below before conducting any professional service at the site identified in the SWPPP. Contractor information: (Name, address, telephone no.) "I certify under penalty of law that I understand the terms and conditions of the general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit that authorizes the storm water discharges associated with industrial activity from the construction site identified as part of this certification." Name of Prime Contractor: (if applicable) Contractor's Signature This certification is to be filed in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Do not submit to EPA . Date . ' EROSJON CONTROL & POLLUTION PREVENTION INSPECTJON REPORT Project· Retail Center KCE Consulting Project No.: --~0~1~8~6~-0~l ______ _ Date : ----------Time: _________ am/pm Has rainfall occurred since the last inspection? _Yes _No ; If yes , Volume= ___ inches This inspection indicates compliance or noncompliance with the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for this project and identifies evidence of or the potential for pollutants entering the drainage system or waters of the United States. Inspection is to be made of disturbed areas, storage areas, discharge locations, erosion & sediment control measures, and points of entrance and exit to the site. Is this project in compliance with the SWPPP? _Yes _No If No, has a copy of this report been given to the Contractor requesting corrective actions?_ Yes _No Summary of Inspection: -(Include observations of any evidence of non-compliance or of pollutant sources not identified in the plan . Attach additional sheets if necessary .) Summary of Corrective Actions Requested: (Attach additional sheets ifnecessary.)' Will the results of this inspection require modification of the SWPPP? _Yes_ No Inspector's Signature Date Distribution: D Grading Contractor D Paving Contractor D Utility Contractor D Paving Contractor D City of Oklahoma City D Erosion Control Measmes· INSPECTION REPORT Erosion Control -Pollution Prevention General comments ; pollutant s011rces not identified in the plan ; evidence ofnon-compliance·. " . Revision No Section(s) affected Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Record of Revisions\Modifications Date Plan Modified Date Implemented Drawings Rev modified? cy . •. Date· Activity Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Record of Major Soil Disturbing Activities June 21, 2001 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM Wendy Bartley, KAI Architects, Via fax 713-895-8381 Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager DP-ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER -DEVELOPMENI' PERMIT Staff reviewed the above-mentioned development permit as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: __ Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764 ..:3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Delmar Rock Prairie, LTD, 15900 Dooley Road, Dallas, TX, 75244 Ke Chen, KC Engineering, Via fax 713-952-9994 Case file #01 -20 Staff Review Comments Page 1of3 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: Op-Rock Prairie Retail Center-Development Permit (01-20) ENGINEERING 1. The point of outfall for both McDonalds and the Retail Center is the curb opening on Longmire at the proposed access drive. The gutter capacity equation (Q=0.56 *(z/n)*SA0.5 *YA2.67) was properly used , and compared to the flow, per the developed acreage, of the McDonalds property in the drainage report for McDonalds. The drainage report for the Rock Prairie Retail Center , when comparing the total flow to this same gutter capacity , needs to include the total developed acreage for both , McDonalds and the Retail Center. The amount of flow from the Retail Center that cannot be handled by the capacity of the gutter will be the amount to be detained in the parking lot and/or by the flume. 2. The last submitted Paving Plan and Drainage Report states a flume of 2' width , but it scales to 5' and is annotated as such on the previous submitta l. Please clarify this . 3. Calculate the capacity that could be detained in parking lot at a maximum curb depth of 0.83 ft. Design a flume opening and/or weir that would control the flow to where the required gutter capacity on Longmire is not exceeded . Please show calculations how you will meet this criterion. 4 . Provide curb and paving details . 5. Please branch the water supply for the landscaping and building service off the proposed 6" fire line exactly where the proposed meters are located near the east corner of the building. 6. Please submit a plan & profile with a cross section and a cost estimate of the public access roadway as was done for the McDonald submittal. According to our 'Drainage Policy and Design Standards ', the minimum longitudinal gutter slope has to be .004 ft/ft. 7 . Please be advised that cement stabilized base is no longer allowed in construction of public streets , including public access roadways . Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 06/20/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station , must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled " on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review . Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 3 • Transmit Log Record BitWare Client Page 1 Status Log Date Time To Company Application OK 612 .2 6/21/01 16:23 :18 Wendy Bartley KAI Architects Microsoft Word -PZ04993.DOC KAi ---------------ARCHITECTS -------------- transmittal letter To: Spencer Thompson Date: 06-11 -01 Company: City of College Station From: Wendy Bartley Address: 1101 Texas Ave . Project No: KAI# 00034 College Station, Texas 77842 Subject: Rock Prairie Retail Center 1-979-764-3570 College Station D Copies CJ Urgent Via: § Specifications § Blueprints § Electron ic Files § Shop Drawings For your Review & Comment For approval For your use Please Comment Courier Fa x Overnight De li very US Mail Spencer: Attached please find six (6) copies C2 -Paving plan (which also shows grades) I am sending this, along with the previously sent Erosion Control Plan in order for you to issue a clearing and grading permit for the above referenced site . Let me know when the permit is ready, so I can send my contractor by for signatures . Also, we are hav ing so many problems with the phone system in and around Houston, I am concerned that I will not be able to receive your comments via fax. My email address is wendyb@KaiArch .com This may be a safer method . If your only comments pertain to the dra inage report , perhaps I should have my engineer call you directly? Whatever will expedite we are willing to do, just let me know. Thanks for all your help KAS T E N D I E C K A S S 0 C I AT E S, I N C . 7035 W. Tidwe ll , Ste . 111 J Houston , TX 77092 TEL 713-895-0900 FAX 713-895-838 1 email wendyb@ KaiArch.com STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. Project: ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER (DP)-DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (01-100020) ENGINEERING 1. Sheet C-6 looks good. Please submit the grading plan (6). If it is approved, a Clearing and Grading Permit will be issued. The set of plans that relates to the permit (cover sheet, erosion control sheet and grading sheet) will be stamped and must accompany the Clearing and Grading Permit on the job site. 2. Concerning your drainage report: the time-of-concentration on this site appears to be exaggerated. Please show calculations. There is a maximum depth in parking lots of 0.83 ft. Please show calculations how you will meet this criterion. Please locate flume on drawing. You can not discharge a concentrated flow onto a neighboring property without the property owner's permission or a drainage easement. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: June 11, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments J :\PZTEXT\PZ04957.DOC Page 2of1 J STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 3 Project: ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER (SP)-SITE PLAN (1-500077) ENGINEERING The following items included here as part of the site plan review comments are actually comments necessary to be addressed for the Development Permit: 1. To add clarification to Engineering comment #2 by Spencer Thompson on the previous Staff Review Comments No. 2, it is usual and typical that the domestic and irrigation lines/meters are branched off the fire line just before it enters the building . This is convenient because everything is in the same easement and only one plan & profile drawing is necessary. As you have the domestic and irrigation line , the section between the 8" main and the meters is considered public infrastructure and will need a plan & profile drawing. The easy fix would be to immediately branch the domestic and irrigation meters where they are off the fire line. 2 . Just to reiterate comment #3 by Spencer Thompson , A cost estimate is required with any additions to city infrastructure . 3 . Drawings of city infrastructure (plan & profiles) are necessary in the final submittal of approved plans so they could be stamped and forwarded to the Department of Public Works to be available to the city inspectors during construction . r'i, 4 . Please submit an Erosion Control Plan (also necessary for the final submittal ~ and the Development Permit). 5. References to the local government in the backfill detail on sheet C-3 should be to the City of College Station (COGS). 6 . The sanitary sewer with manholes at the rear of the property is existing . Please annotate it properly. 7 . The easement for the fire line still needs to be determined . 8. The Drainage Report has been preliminarily approved. The final approval is dependent on the determination of the outfall point and conveyance . Additional permanent erosion control might be necessary if the curbed rear access road is not built. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 05/31/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and Staff Review Comment s Page 3 of 1 I "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 4of1 Project Name: f'oJft~ &! ctf) Review Date: s /t~/ o I ' .--1 ; I Reviewer: / g "4-V-r- Public Water Infrastructure General raU u d/i layout sheet-showing easements (platted or by seyara~ / ~},,; parate instrument easements are needed -do not approve until we get them recorded ~ I. _ J 7 TXDOT permits needed? tN IJ . bl()../y.__K--fL"!. 1 Sealed and Signed ft _ ~ Engineers Estimates N ~ ~ ~ine;ipe material ~ IJJA,~q{J ""'~ Pipe sizes (alloWable ... , ,12,16,18 -note no 10" approved) ~ ~ Depth(4'+~max Separation distances (I'NRCC) ~ All utilities in plan & profile w/sizes and type \."ill Private vs. Public line distinction Wyes not past property line (so meter can be within ROW/easement) 0 Max # of connections for size waterline (I'NRCC) """-"El Pipe deflection (noted as o/o, degrees, radius -with begin/end cwve, not atjt) '-.... '-E:l Grades -existing and proposed (centerline, right and left) shown in profile ""'"El Full TNRCC compliance ~ ~C:,Sn :!.thU::ri=: ;~:;profile (crossings) ~ Size/Location sufficient for overall City needs/masterplan ~ Minimize dead-end lines ~Lines located in PUFJR.OW - "-..(] Stationing on all fittings and taps ~ Yalves "'-. 'iJ Valve spacing (500') "'-.'a Valves -system isolation · Backflow preventers/ and check valves uses as necessary (@irrigation/fire sprinkler/poolslha7.ards) Blowoffs (FH ok too) @ end of dead end lines 1 Valves -at hydrant ~Air release valves at all major high points '-. fire Hydrants '-"ii Fire hydrant spacing (Coverage) \. "O Fire hydrant location (relative to curb) Fire-hydrant -detail/type specified Fire flow calculations provided Service Lines ; Services provided to all lots to a point beyond sidewalks on both sides of street ~ Service lines -materials and size specified from main to meter · l o{ll I Project Name:. __________ _ Review Date:. __________ _ Reviewer: ------------- Public Water Infrastructure( cont.) ~dard Details noted or included (referenced as city of CS Standard Details) t:l-· Details for all non-standard items (included/ok) (not on CS Std. detail sheet) ""-.. 0 All MJ valves and fittings ~ "0 Thrust blocking ~ Easement width adequate '-~ Embedment details (specify option) l ~ "iJ Trench safety if deeper than 5' l O I ~ Erosion control notes r b 1 The following items are variances to the College Station public waterline standards: 2oCl2 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER (SP)-SITE PLAN (1-500077) PLANNING 1. You were correct on the parking legend for the retail center . However, on A0.2 you are showing a tenant listing with square footages. Papa Johns Pizza, Marble Slab Creamery, Quiznos and Subway are considered restaurants. In the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance in section 9 -12, footnote ** States : No more than twenty-five (25%) percent of any shopping center square footage shall be utilized for restaurants, nightclubs, taverns, bars or theaters unless additional parking is provided in accordance with the above requirements for that square footage of such uses in excess of 25%. Twenty-five (25%) percent of 22,000 sq. feet is 5,500'. Your proposed restaurants come out to be 5,950', this exceeds the twenty-five (25%) percent by 450'. This will require you to have three additional spaces for your required parking legend. Therefore your required parking will be 148. Please be aware this could effect your vacant space. I was told by Joe Pearson that Papa Johns Pizza may be take out only. If this is the case please note this on the site plan. Take out only means: There will be no on site consumption on the premises . (See Attached) 2. Developer responsible for showing building setbacks on site plan. Setbacks are addressed in the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance in section 7-52 in the District Use Schedule -Table A. Your property is zoned C-1 & C-2. (See Attached) Reviewed by : JENNIFER REEVES Date: 05/23/01 "1 An J,J~ ~NEERING ~' ~v_// ~. An .easement is necessary for the waterline . Please provide an easement ded1cat1on with metes and bounds. c,-°3 ~· Concerning the meters, please consider placing your meters off the 6" line just S.PJ-before it enters the building . This is a pedestrian traffic area and not a automobile area. A cost e~timate is required with ~~y addi~ion~ t?. City infrastructure . The cost estimate 1s a separate document, 1t 1s for City hab1hty purposes only, and must be sealed by an engineer. Staff Review Comments J :\PZTEXT\PZ04879 .DOC Page 1 of 1 Concerning the water demand table. We size all meters in the City based on the engineer's estimates of water demand. If the demand is 25 gpm , a 5/8 -inch meter will be installed. You are estimating 18 Service Units at 315 gpd/ SU = 5670 gpd . This comes out to be 4 gpm. Even using our Peaking Factor of 4 .5 th is is only 18 gpm . This means that a 5/8-inch meter will be sized for this entire building. Note : 50 gpm (1" meter), 100 gpm (1 .5" meter), 160 gpm (2" meter). Is this what you require? Please confirm that the 8" waterline at the ry ar of the y roperty is ex}sting an ~ not 0 v proposed (conflicting notes on Sheet C-3). f c_!: (No c-) s~ u:t'J e1J1 5 i,lf The Drainage Report is a requirement of the Development Permit and will be reviewed with that submittal. A grading plan is required for approval of a Development Permit. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date : May 23, 2001 NOTE : Any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the City of College Station , must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled " on your plans . Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City , will consti tute a completely new review. · Staff Review Comments J:\PZTEXT\PZ04879 .DOC Page 2 of1 ' o\ AFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER (SP)-SITE PLAN (1-500077) PLANNING 1. Need to correct parking legend on site plan , 88 parking spaces are required . 2 . Please label building setbacks on the site plan . 3. Please show the location of FDC at the building . 4. City of College Station requires #4 rebar on curb construction. 5. Gates are not allowed on dumpster screening. 6. The 30' Access Easement perpendicular to Longmire Drive that will be constructed with McDonalds and The Rock Prairie Retail Center needs to reflect permanent or temporary curbing . Staff is assuming that The Rock Prairie Retail Center will construct both on-site and off-site access easements as reflected on the site plan . 7. You do not meet the interior island . requirements . Please show 180 square feet of interior island for every 15 interior parking space. 8. You need to add an end island on the South East corner of your property where you are showing 5 parking spaces. . 9. The City of College Station Driveway Access Location and Design Policy (as excerpted from Ordinance #1971) calls for a 55' Driveway Throat Length for a Major Arterial. The City of College Station Thoroughfare Plan has Rock Prairie Road labeled as a Major Arterial. The plans for The Rock Prairie Retail Center are showing the driveway throat length for the shared driveway with McDonalds as 40', and the driveway west of the property next to The Med. as a 50' driveway throat length. These driveway throat length depths have oeen approved per Ted Mayo, Asst. City Engineer, Under his authority per ordinance. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves l Date: 03/27/01 . I o\:1 . Reference to the 'Before You Dig ... ' and the 'Utility Contacts ' note on Sheet '/J v C-2/3 , our area code has changed from 409 to 979 . . 11""1 · ~ O!l-2. Reference 'Utility Construction No~~ #2, S!J.i~t..t_C-3 ~ I do not see a backfill ~~EB and bedding detail on Sheet C-4 . S"'e~ e:;J/i!l~Nll.{ V-.1 -l-\_.-3 . A Public Utility Easement is necessary for the proposed 6 " fire line and i.-v hydrant. ~v-'> Staff Review Comments Page 1of1 . . '\P, -~1 ( '6 ,,.~ . . . tJl-~;~ _... 4 . Plan & Profile drawings , signed and sealed by an engineer are necessary for ~ the proposed 6" fire line and hydrant. ' ~'l. ~ !> -5 . An estimate signed and sealed by an engineer are necessary for the SV-<;> proposed 6" fire line and hydrant. # ~'f-6. Please show the estimated demand for domestic water, irrigation water and ~j..t.-sewer usage: minimum , average and maximum on the architectural site plan. We will size the meters and stamp the plans accordingly . tt l> f7TO --7 . Your s ite plan checklist states that the building will be sprinkled? If so , a fire line to the building will be required in a public easement , with a plan & profile , and a back flow device . o¥--. 8. The meters need to be inside a public easement. 9 . A Drainage Report is necessary to show that the additional runoff onto rock Prairie Road can be handled in the curb flow according to our 'Drainage Policy and Design Standards '. 10 . To approve a grading/paving plan , we need to account for all runoff from the site . Where is the roof drainage and drainage in the rear of the lot going? Reviewed by : Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 3/22/01 ELECTRICAL 1. Need to show 2 -4" pvc conduits extended from the padmount transformer to the rear property or past any pavement into next property. 2 . Also if this project is built before the McDonalds project conduit will need to be stubbed out into McDonalds property . (If McDonalds is built first they will install conduit this your property line.) 3 . Easement will be necessary to cover all electric infrasturcture as installedon property. 4. Temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. (Required before CO will be issued). Upon completion of project the developer/owner provides surveyed sealed meets and bounds descriptive easement to cover the electric infrastructure as installed. Our legal department will prepare the documents and send them out for signatures and upon filing the temporary blanket easement is released . Reviewed by : Tony Michalsky Date : 3-26-01 Staff Review Comments Page 2of1 . ~ MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2 . Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394 . Reviewed by: Rob Werley NOTE: Any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans . Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City , will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 3of1 ,. • • • f ( DRAINAGE ENGINEERING REPORT FOR INLAND PARTNERS PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER ROCK PRAIRIE RD AND LONGMIRE DR. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS PREPARED BY K~ Chen Engineering A DIVISION OF KC UNITED, INC. 6161 SAVOY, SUITE 310 HOUSTON, TX 77036 (713) 952-6888 MAY, 2001 .• " . . \ A • ( I. GENERAL LOCATION Rock Prairie Road is directly to the north of the Center America's property. Rock Prairie Road is considered a major arterial per the Cit¥ of College Station. Longmire Drive provides access to the site from the East. Longmire Dri ve is considered a minor arterial per the City of College Station. From the Drainage Policy and Design Standards Manuel for the City of College Station, our property is located on the western most edge of Lick Creek Drainage Basin. Also, we are further defined within the aforementioned drainage basin as sub-basin 8. The primary drainage systeml r sub-basin 8 is North Fork Lick Creek. The propos ~a Shopping C ~ter is located within Phase II of the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision . To the -west of the Center America Shopping Center is McDonald 's, and the properties to the..QA5 t amL south of the property ~ IS currently undeveloped . ~"" pJ -\o --1.k ~ . II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The proposed Shopping Center will be situated on 2.465 acres, located on the southwest comer of the intersection of Rock Prairie Road and Longmire Dri ve in College Station, Texas. Th~hopping Center will encompass all of Lot 1, 2 and 3 in Block 3 of the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision. This site corresponds with the Amended Plat of Lots 1, 2 , 3, and 4 of L.O . Ball Memorial Subdivision recorded in March of 2001. Currently, the site is undeveloped and has a natural grassland cover. The proposed development will encompass a parking lot as well as single story building . The owner of the property is Center America Corporation and the current zoning is C-2. Tl)e zoning classification will remain unchanged . III. DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION The proposed Shopping Center is going to drain into the storm .sewer system located on Longmire Drive. There are no existing curb inlets in the ge neral vicinity of our site; however, there are ' curb inlets further south on Longmire. These inlets were initially designed to handle the post development drainage from ( our site. The construction plans for L.O . Ball Memorial Subdivision Phase Ij prepared by Municipal Development Group and approved by the City of College Station show the intended drainage for the extension of Longmire Dri ve. The property is located in Zone "c", areas outside the 100-year flood , as id entified by the flood insurance rate map of the federal emergency management age nc y, map no. 480401C0205 C . .J J - . , SJ -';"-"" e Jrf_i-~~ i= , . --s,>tt\) --- b'L)} ; GPb --~ ~ -ool=:[ - -CJ->·l-~a'O a '-.~ -r----'":"-~~~~ ""'--'-----=-, ,, ~ ·o ·-v ~-=--~~,...;.; : , , ~.-~i ::. -;:J.rYo ..S. °) h -:-~ r ·-y - .. ,_ .. -... , ,.,-~-;. -h 1 / oi w)s ~ d . . IV. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS v. IV. Parameters: Area: 2.465 acres ... "c" value (grassy, undeveloped): 110 (College Station Rainfall Curves): I 1oo (College Station Rainfall Curves): TC (See Exhibit 1 ): 0.40 4 1S ~ ~ 5.20 in/hr f.o.1 7.80 in/hr . . I 0, 3 27 .00 minutes / h. 2-f "'1 A,I Based on the parameters listed above , the following pre-development peak discharge rate has been found: Q10 (c x Ix A): Q1 00 (c x Ix A): 5.12 cfs 7.69 cfs DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Parameters: Area: Landscape Area: Impervious Area: 2.465 acre s 0.50 acres 1.96 acres 0.75 h Composite "c" value: 110 (College Station Rainfall Curves): 1100 (College Station Rainfall Curves): TC: 6 .90 in/hr 10.25 in/hr 13 minutes Based on the parameters listed above, the following discharge rate has been found : Qio (c x I x A): Q1 00 (c x Ix A): STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM 12.75 cfs 18.95 cfs o.8 1./7:J 10.1J I'). I ·ttt1N • post-dev elopment peak f'f '.2---l Jrl tJ1~--<1V "''Tl u(V' Longmire Drive is a curb and gutter street with an inlet to the south of the proposed Shopping Center site. The Shopping Center will release the drainage from the s it ~:!h ro11gh the access easement to Longmire Drive then travel down the gutter of Longmire to the existing inlet. The existinggutter discharge of Longmire Street is defined by the following equation: Q = 0 .56 * (zJn) * SA0.5 * Y/\2.67 Where: Q = gutter discharge in cfs 2 ' ... I Ill\ ,//f . v. Z =inverse of crown slope of Longmire Drive (ft/ft )= 33.3 3 N =roughness coefficient = 0.018 ' Y = depth of flow (ft) = 0.5 ft Pluggin ~wn values for each of the variables1 yields a gutter discharge amount ~-t\ ') \~A·~ IMPACT TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ~/" ~ _<b'"\ On Site Drainage Flume To Convey and Control the di of storm on the street , we have designed an on site concrete flume that '2-foo wide and 0.5-foot deep (Refer to civil engineering plan for detail). Usi anning 's equation , we know the capacity of the flume is: Q=(l.486/n) *A* R213 * S 112 Where: n = 0.013 A = 2 * 0.5 = 1 SF R= 1/3 s = 0.5% = 0.005 ' ~5 /13/2001 08:53 713 9529994 K CHE N ENGINEER I NG PAGE 01 K .. Chen Engineering Ao1v1s1onotKcun1ted.1nc. Consulting Civil Engineers FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL To: Mr. Spencer Thompson Fax#: 979-764-3496 Company: The City of College Station From: Ke Chen, P .E . Job#: 0186-01 Date: 6/13/01 Page(&): 4 CC: D Urgent 0 For Review D Call 4pon ReceiptO Original to Follow RE: Retail Center on Rock Prairie •Comments: Dear Spencer: Faxed here are the information that you request. Should you have any questions regarding the project, please call me any t ime . Thanks 6161 SA VOY. SUITE 310 HOUSTON , TEXAS 77036 PHONE : 713 .952 .6888 FAX : 713 .952 .9994 K CHE N ENGINEE RIN G ~5 /13/2001 08:53 EXHIBIT 1 DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION Given: Area: 2.465 acres Solution: Use O•ierland Method to determine tin:ie of concentration: Where : TC = time of concentration "c" =runoff coefficient L = maximum length of water travel in meters S = surface slope "c" = 0.40 Existing ,; "c" = 0.75 Developed L = 700 ft (213.36 me~ S 1.1° (existing; S ~(proposed) PAGE 02 Using th values given above , the Ti of Concentration fi:n~conditions I IS: l<i 11 7 (.>. C •.I.\ .. ~(, CC) (.,• 3~~ ~ ~ I-;, 100 ~tr\~ · -. ' .•. 27 minutes ~ 1,,.., v.,. -v"l. t..:~ v 1 '!10 L/ ., -{~ /'\v Using the values given above, the Ti e of Concentration fo.r ~ conditions is : ~ :. 13 minutes 4 •• • ( ..... . · >56'30'orw 155.0J' / ··~ ... .... <a -·.~~ ~-:,, ,.';:~Q ~--~'Q.,. ~ ~· •lL. "" "'&.. ~,.-v-• '9o,. ..... ~ 9o.1t ~ ~ ..c:-.. .. .,,. r~ ·r""" ~ ~ S): ..... ~// ~~%-~~ ~~") ,..~ ·• f,( • .._ ' l',l,.J ., '( <' ~ :.;_·{ . "" I ·-... )'. ~"! .. ~ "'·' .r~, .... >1(}, ~.,.~ ~"~"" -I ., -b;~ """' 0:, ~ Jo8.-So~ ~l ~'c~. ~~~-') (<>a ... ~~ ···~: ., s 0 "\>... ,,~ ·'""b~ iy,, 'lJ G) fTl CS> loJ " . ~ ~ ~ H m H ti .Qi en "' ..... l•J "' l\J CS> CS> ..... CS> OJ Ul loJ '"' ..... l•J lD Ul l\J lD ~5 /13 /2001 08:53 ... ¥ __ ,, ...... ----•l ·i•• .. ~ 713'352'3'3'34 K CHEN ENGINEERING PAGE 04 ) .a., '::; o..n f"JU/"UI\ I., ......... . .. KAi ---------------ARCHITECTS -------------- transmittal letter To: Bridgette George Date: 05-19-01 Company: City of College Station From: Wendy Bartley Address: 1101 Texas Avenue Project No: KAI# 00034 Co llege Station , Texas 77842 Subject: Rock Prairie Retail Center D Cop ie s D Urg ent Via : 979-764 -3570 § Spe ci fi cations w Bluep ri nts § Electroni c Files § Shop Drawing s For your Review & Comm ent For appro va l For your use Pleas e Comme nt Co urier Fa x Overnight Deli ve ry US Mail Attached fo r your review and Comments : Two cop ies each : C ivil Package (5 sheets) Revised Architectural Site Plan Landscape Plan Attached to each set you will find my written responses to Staff Comments , and a Drainage Report prepared by our civil engineer. I would a lso like to request all applications required to replat Lots 1,2,3 and the contiguous easement to reflect a change from public access to a pri vate easement. My understand ing is that the platting process can run simultaneously with our const ruction but must be completed prior to an issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy . Thanks for all your help -- KAS T E N D I EC K AS S 0 C I ATES, I N C. 7035 W. Tidwell , Ste . 11 1 J Houston , TX 77092 TEL 713-895-0900 FAX 713-895-8381 emai l wendyb@ Ka iArc h .com .. KAi transmittal letter To: S ite Plan Rev iew Board Date: 05-19-01 Company: City of College Station From: Wendy Bartley Address: Project No: KAI# 00034 Subject: Rock Prairie Retail Center D Urgent For your Review & Comment For approval For your use D Cop ies w Specifications § Blueprin ts § Electronic Files Via : x Courier Fa x Overnight Delivery § Shop Drawings Please Comment US Mail In Response To Your Comments: P)anning: \)f . Parking legend is correct -v ia conversation with Jennifer Reeves -parking ratio is based on a retail center . x._2. Per the Survey and the Plat there are no building lines to label. All easements and proposed / ease ments are labeled. (Survey was submitted previously .) ~J...43. Locat ion of the FDC is located on the A02 -Architectural Site Plan -./4. Reference sheet C-4 for details showing #4 rebar ./5. Gates have been removed . Reference A02 -Architectural Site Plan It has been determined that the 30' access easement at the rear of the property does not have to be / paved v y. Interior islands have been revised on A02 -Architectu ral Site Plan i/8. There has been an island added on the South East corner. ~gi neerin g : J y. T he area code has been corrected on Sheets C2 and C3 v'2 . Deta il has been added \3. The proposed 6" fire line has been placed within the Electrical Easeme nt (confirmed with Tony Michalsky that this is perm itted.) The proposed easement is shown on C-3 X 4. Plan and Pro fil e drawings have been completed . See Sheet C-5 XS . The 6" fire line and hydrant are shown on C3 . Unsure what type of est im ate you are ask ing for 6. Est im ated Water Demand has been adped. Reference Sheet A02 -Architectural Si te Plan 7 . The building will be sprink lered . Plan and profile drawings have bee n provided -see Sheet C5 8. Meters are now located in the public easement at the rear of the property, 9. Drainage report has been provided and attached to this sheet 10. Dra ina ge has been revised -per our meeting on 4-25-01 . We have added a swa le in the easement at th e rear of the property and a 5' concrete flume along the ea st property line . Electr ical: 1. Condu it is sho wn -see Sheet C3 2 . So noted 3. I have provided Bridgette George all the necessary paperwork for the blanket easement. 4 . I have provided Bridgette Geo rge all the necessary paperwork for the blanket easement. KA S T E N D I E C K :\ S S 0 C I AT E S, I N C. 7035 W. Tidwell, Ste . 111 J Houston, TX 77092 TEL 713-895-0900 FAX 7·13-895-8381 email wendyb@KaiArch .com ., DRAINAGE ENGINEERING REPORT FOR INLAND PARTNERS PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER ROCK PRAIRIE RD AND LONGMIRE DR. COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS PREPARED BY K~ Chen Engineering A DIVISION OF KC UNITED, INC. 6161 SA V~Y, SUITE 310 HOUSTON, TX 77036 (713) 952-6888 MAY,2001 ., I. GENERAL LOCATION Rock Prairie Road is directly to the north of the Center America 's property. Rock Prairie Road is considered a major arterial per the City of College Station. Longmire Drive provides access to the site from the East. Longmire Dri ve is considered a minor arterial per the City of College Station. From the Drainage Policy and Design Standards Manuel for the City of College Station, our property is located on the western most edge of Lick Creek Drainage Basin. Also , we are further defined within the aforementioned drainage basin as sub-basin 8. The primary drainage system for sub-basin 8 is North Fork Lick Creek. The proposed Center America Shopping Center is located within Phase II of the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision. To the west of the Center America Shopping Center is McDonald 's, and the properties to the east and south of the property are currently undeveloped. II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The proposed Shopping Center will be situated on 2.465 acres , located on the southwest comer of the intersection of Rock Prairie Road and Longmire Drive in College Station, Texas. The Shopping Center will encompass all of Lot 1, 2 and 3 in Block 3 of the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision. This site corresponds with the Amended Plat of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision recorded in March of2001. Currently , the site is undeveloped and has a natural grassland cover. The proposed development will encompass a parking lot as well as single story building. The owner of the property is Center America Corporation and the current zoning is C-2. The zoning classification will remain unchanged . III. DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION The proposed Shopping Center is going to drain into the storm sewer sy stem located on Longmire Drive. There are no existing curb inlets in the general vicinity of our site ; however, there are ' curb inlets further south on Longmire. These inlets were initially designed to handle the post development drainage from our site. The construction plans for L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision Phase II prepared by Municipal Development Group and approved by the City of College Station show the intended drainage for the extension of Longmire Drive . The property is located in Zone "c", areas outside the 100-year flood , as identified by the flood insurance rate map of the federal emergency management agenc y, map no. 480401 C0205 C. .. IV. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Parameters: Area: "c" value (grassy, undeveloped): 110 (College Station Rainfall Curves): I1oo (College Station Rainfall Curves): TC (See Exhibit 1): 2.465 acres 0.40 5.20 in/hr 7.80 in/hr 27.00 minutes Based on the parameters listed above, the following pre-development peak discharge rate has been found: Q10 (c x Ix A): Q100 (c x Ix A): 5.12 cfs 7.69 cfs V. DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Parameters: Area: Landscape Area: Impervious Area: Composite "c" value: 0.75 110 (College Station Rainfall Curves): 1100 (College Station Rainfall Curves): TC: 2.465 acres 0.50 acres 1.96 acres 6.90 in/hr 10.25 in/hr 13 minutes Based on the parameters listed above, the following post-development peak discharge rate has been found: Q 1o (c x Ix A): Q100 (c x Ix A): IV. STREET DRAINAGE SYSTEM 12 .75 cfs 18.95 cfs Longmire Drive is a curb and gutter street with an inlet to the south of the proposed Shopping Center site. The Shopping Center will release the drainage from the site through the access easement to Longmire Drive then travel down the gutter of Longmire to the existing inlet. The existing gutter discharge of Longmire Street is defined by the following equation: Q = 0.56 * (z/n) * S"0.5 * Y"2.67 Where: Q = gutter discharge in cfs 2 .. v. Z =inverse of crown slope of Longmire Drive (ft/ft)= 33 .33 N =roughness coefficient= 0.018 Y =depth of flow (ft)= 0.5 ft Plugging in the known values for each of the variab les , yields a gutter discharge amount of 17 .11 cfs. PACT TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM The ost-development runoffs at the site for the 10-year and 10 -year storms respec ·vely are 12.75 cfs and 18.95 cfs. With an on site draina flume controls the disc ge, we conclude that there is no adverse effect to t existing drainage system. e existing system was designed to handle the po -development runoff from the sit 3 I .. EXHIBIT 1 DETERMINATION OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION Given: Area: 2.465 acres Solution: is : Use Overland Method to determine time of concentration: Where : TC= 3 .3 x (1-c) x L05 (S x 100)°33 TC = time of concentration "c" = runoff coefficient L = maximum length of water travel in meters S = surface slope "c" = 0.40 Existing,; "c" = 0.75 Developed L = 700 ft (213.36 meters) . S = 1.1 % (existing; S=O. 9% (proposed) Using the values given above, the Time of Concentration for ex isting conditions :. 27 minutes Using the values given above, the Time of Concentration for proposed conditions is : : . 13 minutes 4 ( .. ~·-..... --12 ·.&•• _ ..... -~---=1----+---+-----!--------+--------+-~---..,_ _____________ ..._ ______ ...._ ___ ~=·~~----: .... -_ -_ -_-_----1------,----..,. ---+-----"""'T"__,,_.,~~-----------lo~ c: i~ <. - c Q -c::I I() ~ ID -c u c <.,; c c <.,; -c ~ c e ~ ------ .., ,.., ~r-----------4-----....J ........ 4-----iC..--_.,.~--~~--~~-,,1.:+------1---------+--------12 -=:::~5~~~~a3~==E~E~~~~~Ti-~ 1----4-----_._ > ~ ~ ..-. FfV~----Jl.-...J.----..l..~..J.~.L..-------L...1....1-.....!..'J...J.._ __ .J.. __ _J ______ ~.------~---l.N~---------;;!0"1 G .a.I ~ cO l"JU/"UI\ I '.<11tUllUI llDIUIOY - C-2- Ill [Ted .May.9...,-, Re : Cement sta 6'ffi zed base From: To: Date: Subject: Thomas Vennochi Tmayo@ci .college-station .tx .us 6/15/01 2:56PM Re : Cement stabilized base I will not be available until June 18th . If it can't wait, ask for Ted or Spencer. Have happy Father's Day and weekends . >» Tmayo 06/15/01 14 :56 »> Tom, several months ago Mark Smith , Public Works Director, issued a derictive disallowing cement stabilized base on public streets . I noticed that the approved McDonalds plans specify cement stabilized base including the public access easement. Please make contact with the design engineer and request a change . Thanks College Station, Embracing the Past , Exploring the Future Page 1 1 ~~ COLLEGE STATION PERMIT NO. 100020 DP-ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE : CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ROCK PRAIRIE RETAIL CENTER DATE OF ISSUE: 06/12/01 OWNER: DELMAR ROCK PRAIRIE LTD 15900 DOOLEY RD ADDISON , TX 75001-4 243 SITE ADDRESS: 1 700 ROCK PRAIRIE RD DRAINAGE BASIN: LICK CREEK VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: CLEARING AND GRADING ONLY SPECIAL CONDITIONS: All construction and erosion control must be in compliance with the approved construction plans The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and /or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and /or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for an y damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and /or equipment as well as erosion , siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or ex isting drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for developm e nt of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and appro ved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply . Date I Date }--~ l DP-Clearing and Grading Page 1 of 1 06 /13 /01 10:09 'B9 79 764 3496 DEVELOP MENT SVC S TRA NSMISSIO N OK TX /RX NO. CO NNE CTIO N TEL CO NNE CTIO N ID ST ART TIME USAGE THIE PAGES RES ULT ···········••i••··········· *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 8275 13895838lppp396 06 /13 10:08 00 '4 0 1 OK @00 1 KAi ---------------ARCHITECTS -------------- transmittal letter To: Bridgette George Date: 06-06-01 Company: City of College Station From: Wendy Bartley Address: 1101 Texas Avenue Project No: KAI# 00034 College Station , TX 77842 Subject: Rock Prairie Retail Center 979-764-3570 D Copies D Urge nt Via : § Spe cificati ons § Blueprints w Electronic Files § Shop Draw ings For your Review & Comment For approval For your use Please Comme nt Cou rier Fax x Overnight De livery US Mail In response to Developmental Checklist: 1. 2 . 'f-3. 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9 . 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . The application fee was paid with Site Plan Submittal. The application was completed and signed with Site Plan Submittal. The Grading Plan was completed and approved through the Site Plan Approval process Erosion Control Plan is attached. The EPA Notice of Intent is not applicable since this site is under 5 acres Tree Barricade Plan is not applicable A drainage report was submitted through the Site Plan Approval process . Per the request of your engineering staff, we have revised and said revision is attached . $300 Infrastructure Inspection Fee was provided with the original Site Plan Submittal. All paperwork covering a blanket utility easement was sent in with the original Site Plan Submittal. The TxDot requirement is not applicable to this site . The Engineer's estimate is attached This property is outside of the floodplain. This property is located on the western most edge of the Lick Creek Drainage Basin. The Site Plan was approved with comments on June 4th, 2001 . Please let me know once the developmental permit submittal has been reviewed . Our contractors are trying to break ground by June 15th, so I would certainly appreciate an expedient response . Thank you .~~~ Wendy Bartley Project Manager KASTEND IE CK ASS 0 CI ATES, INC. 7035 W. Tidwell , Ste. 111J Houston , TX 77092 TEL 713-895-0900 FAX 713-895-8381 emai l wendyb@ KaiArch .com 1 2 3 4 J/i: -7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Development Permit Issuance Cbeckllst $100 Application Fee Application Completed and Signed Grading Plan (submitted and approved) Erosion Control Plan (submitted and approved) EPA N.0.1 . Submitted for sites > 5 acres Tree Barricade Plan (If applicable) Drainage Report /Letter (submitted and approved) $300 Infrastructure Inspection Fee (If applicable) Easements Dedicated (separate instrument) TXDOT Pennits issued (if applicable) Sealed E:ngineer's Estimates Received Inside I Outside Floodplain (circle one) Drainage Basin--------------- Site Plan Approved. Date: ---------- Development permit Issued. Date:------- • June 4, 2001 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496 -W7 ~~ MEMORANDUM TO: Wendy Bartley, KAI Architects, Via fax 713-895-8381 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager SUBJECT: Rock Prairie Retail Center -Site Plan Staff has reviewed and approved the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following are staff review comments on the construction documents prior to the development permit being issued. Please address the comments and submit the following information for the plans to be stamped approved: $100 Site Plan review fee for the next three rounds of staff review on construction documents. Two (2) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed development; and, One (1) copy of the revised site plan sheet (C-1). If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764- 3570 . cc: Delmar Rock Prairie, LTD, 15900 Dooley Road, Dallas, TX, 75244 Ke Chen, KC Engineering, Via fax 713-952-9994 Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 , I Case file #01-77 Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1 Construction Cost Estimate for Proposed Rock Prairie Retail Center Item No. Quantity Unit Item Description Unit Price 1 380 L.F . 6" Fire Line, PVC C-900 $30 2 1 E.A. Fire Hydrant Set $3 ,000 3 75 L.F. 2" Water Line Copper K $15 4 1 E.A. 2" Water Meter $300 5 1 E .A. 2" Water Meter for Irrigation $600 Total Amount (Installed) $11 ,400 $3 ,000 $1 , 125 $300 $600 $16,425 / 2 3 4 5 6 7· / /9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Engineer's Estimate April 5, 2001 Description Unit Quantity Pmrin Construction Prepare Work Area Lump Sum 1.0 Excavation C.Y. 1,734 6" Reinforced Concrete Pavement w/curb S.Y. 6,622 6" Lime Stabilized Subgrade (6%) S .Y. 7,086 Extra Lime Ton 60 Estimated Unit Price 10 ,000.00 3 .75 28 .00 2.75 90.00 Paving Subtotal Drainage System Construction 15" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. "\5~ 25.00 18" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 28.00 7" ci~f C Mc:·cte ire, S '.r. JC, 140 3 8.0 27" Reinf. Concrete Pipe, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. "63 33.00 l O' Curb inlet Each "'-2 2,900.00 5' Curb inlet Each '-2 1,800.00 Sloped Headwall for 15" RCP Each "-2 550.00 Sloped Headwall for 18" RCP Each ~~ 600.00 Sloped Headwall for 27" RCP Each 800.00 27"x45 de eeRCPBend Each ~l 500.00 27"x 30 degree RCP Bend Each 1 500.00 Reinforced Concrete Flume S .F. ~71 6.00 Dry Concrete Rip Rap S.F. ,132 26.00 Silt Fence L.F. ~2~ 2.00 Inlet Protection Each 50.00 Construction Exit S .Y . 134 25.00 H dromulch Seedin ention Pond S.Y. 910 0.50 Draina e S tern Subtotal Water S stem Construction 12" PVC Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. 100 40.00 12" PVC Water Line, Non-Str Backfill L.F. 400 32.00 6" PVC Water Line, Str. Backfill L.F. 2,045 22.00 6" PVC Water Line, Non-Str. Backfill L.F. 76 20.00 Fire H drant Assembl Each 2 1,800.00 12" Gate Valve\\ Each 2 1,200.00 12"x 13" Anchor Coupling ll Each 2 350.00 12"x 6" Tee i\ Each 2 500.00 6" Gate Valve \\\\\ill I\ \f H l 111 . Each 17 400.00 6"x 13" Anchor Cou lin Each 15 125.00 6"x 6" Cross T Each l 250.00 6"x 6" Tee 111 ·1 r I Each 6 200.00 6"x 45 degree bend \llttl,, Each 6 150.00 6"~ 22.5 degree bend I Each l 150.00 6"x 11.25 d ee bend Each 2 150.00 2" Blow Off Assembly llJ, Each 3 450.00 Con'lft:ct to existing 12" IL & adj . FH Each l 500.00 1.5" Water Ser. (avg. = 37 ft.) Each 9 700.00 1" Water Service av . = 30 ft. Each 4 500.00 Water S em Subtotal Total 10,000.00 6,502 .50 185,416.00 19,486.50 5 400 .00 226,805.00 2,450.00 1,45 6.00 5,3 20 .00 2,079.00 5 ,800.00 3,600.00 1,100.00 2,400.00 1,600.00 500.00 500.00 2,226.00 3,432.00 1,240.00 350.00 3,350.00 455.00 37 858.00 4,000.00 12,800.00 44,990.00 1,520.00 3,600.00 2,400.00 700.00 1,000.00 6,800 .00 1,875.00 250.00 l,200.00 900.00 150.00 300.00 1,350.00 -., -500.00 6,300.00 2 000.00 92 635.00 COLLEGE STATION May 23 , 2001 Mr. Joseph Pearson Inland Properties 2500 West Loop South Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 P. 0 . Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue Tel : 409 764 3500 RE: Status of the proposed Rock Prairie Road Retail Center Mr. Pearson, College Station , TX 77842 This is to inform you that when the following comments are addressed and any comments that may be made in light of the responses to these comments are addressed and no other changes are made to the plans as submitted, the City of College Station will issue a Site Plan Approval on your project by stamping the ~s approved through the Development Services Department. \':)~ Please verify that Papa Johns Pizza is delivery only, and note on the ~l.'l."\ Site Plan · ~,,.. . o\41 Please add Building Setback lines to the Site Plan per Table A (as ~oz. provided) ~ :!> O\'..o Relocate the water and irrigation meter into the public utility easement ~<s. \.. that runs between your lot and the proposed McDonald's lot ~ 'D Correct water demand table to reflect actual water demands for a ~o.}... C \. single meter _ s.P' rj\ "!l Civil plans show an ~ater line as a "proposed" water line . &?, ~ Feel free to contact me with any other questions or comments you may have. Jennifer Reeves Staff Planner Home of Texas A&M University I To: Company: Address: KAi transmittal letter Site Plan Review Board Date: City of College Station From: Project No: 05-19-01 Wendy Bartley KAI# 00034 Subject: Rock Prairie Retail Center D Cop ies § Specifications § Blueprints § Electronic Files § Shop Drawings D Urgen t Fo r your Review & Comment For approva l For your use Please Comment Vi a: x Courier Fax Overnight Delivery US Mail In Response To Your Comments: P)ann ing : v1. Parking legend is correct -via conversation with Jennifer Reeves -parking ratio is based on a reta il center . ;;: 2 . Per the Survey and the Plat there are no build ing lines to label. All easements and proposed / easements are labeled . (Survey was submitted previously .) /7 4 3. Location of the FDC is located on the A02 -Architectural Site Plan /4 . Reference sheet C-4 for details showing #4 rebar /o . Gates have been removed. Reference A02 -Architectural S ite Plan ~-It has been determined that the 30' access easement at the rear of the property does not have to be / paved V 7 Interior islands have been revised on A02 -Architectu ral Site Plan ;;r_ There has been an island added on the South East corner. ~ngineering : ·.-1 . The area code has been corrected on Sheets C2 and C3 v2 . Deta il has been added ;(3. The proposed 6" fire line has been placed within the Electrical Easement (confirmed w ith Tony Michalsky that this is permitted.) The proposed easement is shown on C-3 X4 . Plan and Profile drawings have been completed. See Sheet C-5 :XS . The 6" fire line and hydrant are shown on C3 . Unsure what type of estimate you are asking for 6. Estimated Water Demand has been adped . Reference Sheet A02 -Architectural Site Plan 7. The building will be sprinklered. Plan and profile drawings have beBn provided -see Sheet C5 8 . Meters are now located in the public easement at the rear of the property, 9. Drainage report has been provided and attached to this sheet 10. Drainage has been revised -per our meeting on 4-25-01 . We have added a swale in the easement at the rear of the property and a 5' concrete flume along the east property line . Electr ical: 1. Conduit is shown -see Sheet C3 2. So noted 3. I have provided Bridgette George all the necessary paperwork for the blanket easement. 4 . I have provided Bridgette George all the necessary paperwork for the blanket easement. KA ST E N D I E C K /\ S S 0 C I AT E S, I N C. 7035 W . Tidwe ll, St e. 11 1J Housto n, TX 77092 TE L 7 13-895-0900 FAX 713-895-8381 emai l wend yb@Ka iArc h.co m The City of College Station, Texas P .O . Box 9960 May 16 , 2001 Malcolm D . Gibson . Inland Partners, Inc. • 2500 West Loop South, Ste. 400 Houston , TX 77027 Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. 1101 Tex a s A ve nue • Colle ge Sta tio n, TX 77842 www.ci .c oll ege-s tation.tx.u s RE: Construction of rear acces s roadwa y In th e 30' Public Access Easement and Utility Easement, Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, L.0. Ball Memorial Subdivision , Phase II. Dear Mr. Gibson: • (979) 764-3500 On April 26, 2001, I notified Wendy Bartley, of Kastendieck Associates , Inc ., that the dev eloper of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II would only have to build enough of the rear access road to accommodate solid waste collection. After further clarification through revi ew of the audio tapes of the Project Review Committee Meeting on February 2, 2001, we have verified that it was stated in response to the Commissioners concerns, regarding the various access points to this property, that the developer would build the full length of the roadway in the rear easement of the lots as part of the driveway variance. Mr. Frank Mihalopoulos, as owner of the property, committed to this . Assistant Development Coordinator, Bridgette George, notified Wendy Bartley of this position on Monday, April 30, 2001. This letter is to confirm Ms. George's verbal notification. Before the city can issue final approval of the site plan for this development, we must have assurance that this roadway will be built. This includes submittal and approval of appropriate engineering documents . If you decide to seek reconsideration of the requirement to build the rear access roadway you can request a new PRC meeting to present your case. ~4",//~o~ Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer XC: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Coordinator Jane Kee, City Planner Wendy Bartley, Kastendieck Associates , Inc . Rock Prairie Retail Center SP (01-77) & DP (01-20) File O:\Group\Deve_ser\TomV\LOBall\LOBall_RetCtrEsmt.doc Hom e o f T exas A &M University May 15, 2001 Malcolm D. Gibson. Inland Partners, Inc. 2500 West Loop South, Ste. 400 Houston, TX 77027 RE: ConstrucJion of rear access roadway In the 3dVI>ublic Access Easement and Utility Easement, Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II. Dear Mr. Gibson: On April 26, 2001, I notified Wendy Bartley, of Kastendieck Associates, Inc., that the developer of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II would only have to build enough of the rear access road to accommodate solid waste collection. After further clarification through review of the audio tapes of the Project Review Committee Meeting on Fe bruary 2 , 2001, we have verified that it was stated in response to the Commissioners concerns, regarding the various access points to this property, that the developer would build the full length of the roadway in the rear easement of the lots as part of the driveway variance. Mr. Frank Mihalopoulos, as owner of the property, committed to this. Assistant Development Coordinator, Bridgette George, notified Wendy Bartley of this position on Monday, April 30, 2001. This letter is to confirm Ms. George's verbal notification . Before the city can issue final approval of the site plan for this development, we must have assurance that this roadway will be built. This includes s ubmittal and approval of appropriate engineering documents . If you decide to seek reconsideration of the requirement to build the rear access roadway you can request a new PRC meeting to present your case. Sincerely, Thomas V . Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer XC: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Coordinator Jane Kee, City Planner Wend y Bartley, Kastendieck Associates , Inc. Rock Prairie Retail Center SP (01-77) & DP (01-20) File O :\Group\Deve _ser\ Tom V\LOBall\LOBall_ RetCtrEs mt.doc May 15, 2001 ? Malcolm D. Gibson. Inland Partners, Inc. 2500 West Loop South , Ste . 400 Houston, TX 77027 (µ. , RE: Construction of 0 Public Access Easement and Utility Easement, Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, 1'"1 L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II. Dear Mr. Gibson: On April 26 , 2001, I notified Wendy Bartley, of Kastendieck Associates, Inc., that the developer of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II would only have to build enough of the rear access road to accommodate solid waste collection . After further clarification through review of the audio tapes of the Project Review Committee Meeting on j J I February 2 , 2001 , we have verified that it was cGnditten of-appnwa Q tA r-1.vew ariatt .5 /ts. "-ct. ,,,, r, ,...,~._ hat the developer would 8&:£CqUi:::«t=tYab uild the full length of the roadway/alleyway in the rear ~ ~ asementofthe lots. · r ~ ,,s"\' y~.,,rJ.,0 Mr. Frank Mihalopoulos, as owner of the property, committed to this requirement. Assistant L'V~"'""~ Development Coordinator, Bridgette George, notified Wendy Bartley of this position on (;eL> . /b" Monday, April 30, 2001. This letter is to confirm Ms. George 's verb I notificaf on. < a 1 .c:,.__. lo /J,, • c:..c...__ \'5-S.u'-' .,f;..._Q_ appn:)vc.Q_ C"> I ·~ \\ ~,7 _l_ _Q_ -~-' j-I 4-W') _.. + 1-v:_..,_. K .," IJ c:..o. +.\... t c,.....I\ S . \.._;_~~~ P·-.e ... \._.l.._ S....ibl"'"\,.µ ~ c,.p ~ e:>.ppf'D1"'.......-~- 111cer€1 Y:-~.. •. d ~· .. + ... • /· /'~/ J ,.. -i:> 1 • 2""' 1 / 1 e> r : r "' __., .. ,..,,,-· <J r "'I-'-:\_,"" ...i.. c.1--..... -1"?:> $,.-.ft:-I'< c ,,.., 1....i'A....&,/~ P£_ C £v, ;d.. -Ii.. l"e• -ae ,_,, ~""' c:::.a -9 v. a... "'~ , , h'l~~~ A,~;-· ..... l 'r t::A • Thomas V. Vennoch H'i-. Graduate Engineer ~b Ass )_ XC: Nata.lie...Rui , Development Coordinator Jane Kee, City Planner Rock Prairie Retail Center SP (01-77) & DP (01-20) File O:\Group \Deve _ ser\ Tom V\LOBall \LOBall _ RetCtrEsmt.doc May 15 , 2001 Malcolm D . Gibson. Inland Partners , Inc. 2500 West Loop South , Ste. 400 Houston, TX 77027 RE: Construction o ublic Access Easement and Utility Easement, Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II. Dear Mr. Gibson: On April 26, 2001, I notified Wendy Bartley, of Kastendieck Associates, Inc., that the developer of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II would only have to build enough of the rear access road to accommodate solid waste collection. After further clarification through review of the audio tapes of the Project Review Committee Meeting on February 2, 2001 , we have verified that it was a condition of approval of the driveway variance that the developer would be required to build the full length of the roadway/alleyway in the rear easement of the lots. Mr. Frank Mihalopoulos , as owner of the property, committed to this requirement. Assistant Development Coordinator, Bridgette George, notified Wendy Bartley of this po s ition on Monday, April 30 , 2001. This letter is to confirm Ms. George's verbal notification . Sincerely, Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer XC : Natalie Ruiz, evelopment Coordinator Jane Kee, City Planner Rock Prairie Retail Center SP (01-77) & DP (01-20) File I O :\Group\Deve _ ser\Tom V\LOBall\LOBall_ RetCtrEsmt.doc ------- ~~--------------............ . May 15 , 2001 Malcolm D. Gi bso n. Inland Partn ers , In c . 2500 West Lo op So uth. Ste. 400 Houston, TX 7 70 27 RE: Constr u cti on of 30' Public Accl'ss Easem en t and Utility Easement, Lots 1, 2 a nd 3 of Block Thn•c, L.O. B all Men orial Subdi ·ision, Ph a se II. Dear Mr. Gib son: Per further di scu ssion or the requirement to bui ld the access road in the above mentioned easement, th e staff !'the Depart ment ol' )cvc lop mc nt Se rvices in the City of College Station has realized that au dio tapes or the Pr o_jcct I C\ icw Co mm itt ee Meeting (PRC) on February 2, 2001 determine th at it ,,, s underslO<'d \'0ll we re re qui red to build the full length of the roadway/all eyw ay in the rear easement o ·your lots. This requirem ent was mentionccl h l'lann in g & Zo ni ng Commissioners in the PRC and committed to by Mr. 1·rnnk Mihal(\1101ilPs. T h is dis co urse was not included in the minutes by which we based ou1· conclusions rc1m'sented in my lette r to Wendy Bartley, of Kastendieck Associates , in c ., da ted J\pr il 26 . 200 I Therefore, let it be knm' 11, that th is lcttc ·contai nin g Curt her information supercedes the letter to Wendy Bartl ey o n April 26. 200 I. Sincerely, Thomas V . Venn ochi .Ir. Graduate En gin ee r XC: Natali e Rui z.. i kvclopmc nt ('nor linato r Jan e K ee, Cit) Pla nner Rock P rairi e Retai l Cente r SI (() -77) & DP (0 1-20) File O :\Group\D eve _ ser\Tnm '\LO Ra 1111,0 I ~;i I f. c1 Ct rEsrn t .do c The Ci!f of College Station, Texas Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. P .O. Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 April 26 , 2001 Kastendieck Associates, Inc. Attn: Wendy Bartley 7035 W. Tidwell, Ste. 11 lJ Houston, TX 77092 RE: Construction of 30' Public Access Easement and Utility Easement, Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block Three, www.ci.college-station.tx.us L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase I[. Dear Ms. Bartley: • (979) 764-3500 Per our meeting yesterday and subsequent discussion of the requirement to build the access road in the above mentioned easement, the staff of the Department of Development Services in the City of College Station has determined that you are not required to build the full length of the roadway/alleyway in the easement behind your lots . You may build as much of that roadway/alleyway as necessary for sanitation service to your development. The design requirement is to adhere to the cross-section and pavement design criteria in the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations . Please review at your earliest convenience and if you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer XC : Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Jane Kee, City Planner Rock Prairie Retail Center SP (01-77) & DP (01-20) File Encl. Page 9-2 & 9-3 of COCS Zoning Ordinance Page 9-18 & 9-19 of COCS Subdivision Regulation HTE File Notes J:\Pztext\PZ04743.doc Home of Texas A&M University I Thomas Vennochi -McDonalds From: To: Subject: To File : Thomas Vennochi Bridgette George McDonalds I talked with Ed Lewis (McDonalds ' applicant). He was concerned about the building plan review being held up. I told him he had no worry because developing the roadway plan & profile should not be difficult, to which he agreed . He said he will submit the P&P ASAP. TomV. CC: Jennifer Reeves Page 1 I __ ---·---___ l{fJUU~-- U't ._V I V.1. .J..0 : .J..U ~~ 1 l\J'\. FOR OF"fl'ICI USI ONLY ~ C-J/CASENO. Cl I -71 ~ DATfSuBMITl'ED r C.01 ll<.l ~1,\.llUN DP-0( -d-0 SITE PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ~ Site plan applipuion completed in full. ~ $100.00 Application Fee. ~ $100.00 l\)e.velopment Permit Application Fee. ~ $300.00 Public liifrastructurc Inspection Fee if applicable . (This fee is payable if construction of a public waterline, scwerJine, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved .) N Ten (10) folded copies orsateplan . -.._ A copy of the attached site plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. NAME OF PROJECT ADDRESS APPLICATION DATA LEGALDESCRIPTION \.-OJ" \ l /_' ·::, 'S> BN..l-" Mt:::.-\-iD~\bL Su~D\\/\<s.\o .... i ?\.\p...SE \\ -'-10\... ?c..:>S':L, Pq -z..C..C:, BC-PR. APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project): , . \ . ' Name '<A-\ ~\--\\TECTS -E[Ct--11 µ~D:( ~~11..E"-{ Street Address J 0 -3 s w. ·n D)t--\ t= LL -="=-~ -\ \ \ City -~SJ>:> tJ State T 'f Zip Code ]I o 9 ~ E-Mail Address k\6-.l t> 'f B @ K_c.L\ f«c_h · CC)\A/\ Phone Number 1\ 3-oC\S -a°) oo Fax Number ] \ ~-8°' S-8 3 B \ PROPERlY OWNER'S INFORMATION: {, C u-~.-.lTJ- Name C:> EL ti-k~ ~o C b F' ~ \ R-\E > \...-\ D Street Address \ S°i oo Ooa\..-r:=-{ Tuh D City h:>I' cl-bl'cC's [ddi5(Y) State ·-r 'f: Zip Code 1 S ~::z\=4 E-Mail Address ---------- Phone Number '"15 00 I Fax Number _____________ _ ARCIH'Pl!e'. I OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name \SC ~,,.,..\,SEJ2.A ~°.) M-ni . kf.. C~ > Street Address ~\Ce\ S~'/p'j '*-~ \ c::> City ~'-'~:rorJ State -:'[ 'f Zip Code I ( o "3.G, E-Mail Address k 6h e._"" @ kul1V-. -, ~ co \"V\ Phone Number l \ ?> -'-' 5 J_ -~ ~ Fax Number ] 13-5 c::_, 2 -d\53 >-\ OlHER CONT ACTS (Please specify type of contact, i .e. project manager . tial buyer local contact, etc.)J Name . ? · S , . Street Address 2..'500 W . \ .oo p S()uT\-] ~oCtity ~'>""1-=o t--1 State 1'f Zip Code E-Mail Address _3$? __ =-------- Phone Number ] \ 2 °llAS °'<coo Fax Number :0:1\ ~ 'J \oS 9 \ 1 3 SITE PIAN APPUCATION I ot'3 SITEAPP 04/13199 ., --·-·-· .............. CURRENTZONING~C~\--+t~~-:z_~-~~ V ARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) # OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED \ :-\ L\ MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Total Acreage!' ___ _ Floodplain Acreage __ Housing Units ___ _ # of 1 Bedroom Units # of2 Bedroom Units # of 3 Bedroom Units # of 4 Bedroom Units FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY __ # Bedrooms ~ 132 sq. ft. __ # Bedrooms < 132 sq . ft . # OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED · I ~ 0 COMMERCIAL Total Acreage '2.. .'-\·Ct, Building Square Feet u, ® o Floodplain Acreage r--0- The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and co"ect. SITE PLAN APPIJCATION SITEAPP 04/13199 ::,/\(.,I"' Date I 3of3 ----------------- ' ~uu a SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION wlication is .hcrcby made foe the following development specific waterway altuations: ACKNQWJ..ED6MENTS; I, Aos ~pl-\ \ P -~~oj • design cngioccr/owncr. hcn:by acknowledge or affirm that: Tbe information and c:onclusiom contained in the aboYc plans and mpporting documents comply with the current requi.rcmcnts of the City of College S Texas City Code. Chapter 13 and ils usociated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. Ju a ndition of app this permit application. I agree to construct the improvcmcots proposed in this application according to these ayct • ts of Chapter 13 of the College Station City Code. 1\ .A-•· ~~~~--------~ Contractor CERTIFICATJONSi (for proposed alterations within desi~tcd flood huard areas.) A I, certify that any nonresidential structure on. or proposed to be on. this site as part of this application is designat.ed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. Date B . I. certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any '\SeD1CDt, of any residentia,I stroctu.re, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation ~lishcd in the .test Federal .Insuranoe A&nuustration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended. Date C. I. certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood~ng capacity of the wataway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or cle\'elopment arc consistent with requirements of the City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning encroachments of .floodways and of f1oodway fringes. Engineer Date D. I, do certify that the propost:d alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year . flood above dcvation established in the lat.est Federal Insurance Ad.ministration Flood Ha7Md Study. Engineer Date Conditions or comments as part of approval:------------------------- In accordaooe with Chaptec 13 of the Code of Onlinanocs of the City ol College Station. mcaswcs shall be taken IO insure that debris ~construction. erosion. aod sedimentation shall not be deposited in city stn:cts. or existing drainage facilities. .acby grant this permit for development. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and spoci.fications submitted to ad eppruval by the City Engineer foctbe aboYe named project All oflhc applicable codes and ordinaNU of the City of College SWion shall apply. 3al3