HomeMy WebLinkAbout27 Development Permit 01-08 Sweetwater Sub 1From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Spencer,
"Kent Laza" <klaza@tca .net>
"Spencer Thompson" <sthompson@ci.college-station .tx .us>
5/22/01 9:36AM
Sweetwater Subdivision
I called Young's superintendent on the Sweetwater job. He said he will begin putting the erosion
measures in place today and should have it completed by Thursday or Friday . I'll look for it the next time
I'm out there as well.
*****************************************
Kent Laza
McClure Engineering , Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838 office
(979) 639-2554 fax
*****************************************
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 2
OP 01-os
Project: DP-SWEETWATER FOREST PH 1-DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (1-100008)
ENGINEERING
1. The Water Analysis Report and Sewer Analysis Report have been reviewed and
stamped for approval. Your copy is ready for pick-up.
2. Please submit a "Culvert Analysis" sheet (2) similar to Exhibits C-2 thru C-4 for
the culvert under Green's Prairie Road . I will add it to the document. This
information is to ensure compliance with the County Road and Bridge Division .
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date : February 26 , 2001
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the City of College Station ,
must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled " on your plans . Any additional changes on
these plans that have not been pointed out to the City , will constitute a completely new review .
Staff Rev iew Comment s Page 1 of 1
-
•·
-
Water System Distirbution Analys1s
FOR
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
.,, g
Q:
"~ D :;;; e a.. .
i ~
VICINITY MAP
NTS
January, 2001
Prepared By:
McC lure Engineering, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838
REVIEWED FOR
FEB 2 6 2001
COLLEGE S AflON
TJT. t s t D . t . b t . EANGINE RIN rra er ys em 'IS Jr u Jon na rysJs
FOR FILE
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
State Highway 6
n)\
VICINITY MAP
NTS
January. 2001
Prepared By:
McClure Engineering, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive. Suite 103
College Station. Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838
WATER SYSTEM DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS
FOR
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION PHASE 1
INTRODUCTION
The Sweetwater Forest Subdivision will be located northeast of the intersection of
Greens Prairie Road and Woodlake Drive in southern College Station. Phase 1 of the
development consists of 22 residential lots that are 1 acre in size or larger. Future
residential development is expected with Phase 2, which will contain a maximum of 28
lots located north of the current site. This report provides an analysis of the proposed
water distribution system for Phase 1 of the development. The computer model used for
this analysis was the Kentucky Pipe Network Analysis Program (KYPIPES).
MODELING DATA
Exhibit A is a schematic drawing of the proposed water system for Phase 1 of the
subdivision. The source of potable water is a 1 O" line on Greens Prairie Road that is
owned by the Wellborn Special Utility District. Flow test data and pressures were
obtained from the district staff and the City of College Station. The reported pressure and
elevation is shown below.
Node 0 (Exhibit A) -Pressure= 80 psi@Elevation 325'
With this information, the water system in Phase 1 was modeled under two
scenarios. The first modeled the system assuming peak domestic demands. The second
added a fire demand at two hydrants located at the most hydraulically remote point in the
system. This point is near the end of the cul-de-sac on Regal Oaks Drive.
The following system information was used as input for the computer model:
Demands
Domestic = 3 gpm* per residence (Ph. 1 -22 lots, Ph. 2 -28 lots)
Fire Flow= 2 adjacent hydrants flowing at 750 gpm each
*Note: The TNRCC requirement is 1.5 gpm.
WATER SYSTEM DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
RESULTS
Printouts from the two simulations are shown in Exhibits B and C. The lowest
pressure in the system under static domestic demands is 81.70 psi at Node 5. This
pressure is well above the minimum TNRCC requirement of35 psi.
The lowest system pressure under combined domestic and fire flow demands is
71.87 psi at Node 5. The minimum TNRCC requirement is 20 psi.
CONCLUSION
The proposed water system in the Sweetwater Forest Subdivision is able to
provide adequate flowrates for fire fighting needs and still maintain residual pressures
above those required by TNRCC and the City of College Station. It should be noted that
the Wellborn Special Utility District is in the process of upgrading their water
distribution system. The upgrade includes a water tower and larger trunk lines
throughout the system. These improvements should serve to increase water pressure at
the connection point to the Sweetwater Forest system and raise the available pressures
above those shown in this report.
WATER SYSTEM DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDMSION
2
EXHIBITB
Sweetwater Forest Subdivision, Phase 1
Static Pressure Test
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program
* for the Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Pipe Network Systems
* FORTRAN VERSION -3.40 (01/02/91)
*
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DATE: 1/29/2001
TIME: 9:58: 8
INPUT DATA FILENAME --------------swstat.dat
TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME --------swstat.out
************************************************
S U M M A R Y 0 F 0 R I G I N A L D A T A
************************************************
U N I T S s P E C I F I E D
FLOWRATE IS EXPRESSED IN GPM AND PRESSURE IN PSIG
P I P E L I NE ' AN D p u M p D A TA
PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS K FIXED GRADE
(FEET) (INCHES)
1 0 1 330.0 8.0 150.0 1.50 509.00
2 1 2 725.0 8.0 150.0 1.10
3 2 3 790.0 8.0 150.0 1. 40
4 3 4 360.0 8.0 150.0 1.10
5 2 5 105.0 6.0 150.0 .80
6 2 6 360.0 8.0 150.0 1. 60
7 3 7 605.0 6.0 150.0 3.30
A SUCCESSFUL GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED
J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E DAT A
JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND ELEVATION CONNECTING PIPES
1 3.00 319.00 1 2
2 24.00 317.00 2 3 5 6
3 33.00 309.00 3 4 7
4 6.00 304.00 4
5 .00 320.00 5
6 84.00 314.00 6
7 .00 311. 00 7
0 U T P U T O .P T I 0 N D A T A
OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE OUTPUT EACH PERIOD
S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N
THIS SYSTEM HAS 7 PIPES WITH 7 JUNCTIONS , 0 LOOPS AND 1 FGNS
*************************************
S I M U L A T I 0 N R E S U L T S
*************************************
THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY .00000
S I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N (L A B E L)
Sweet Water Subdivision FLOW TEST VERIFICATION
Res.Demand=3.0 GPM (DEVELOPED) Fire Flow = 750 GPM
January, 2001 McCLURE ENGINEERING
p I p E L I N E R E S U L T S
PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOW RATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD
1 0 1 150.00 .14 .00
2 1 2 147.00 .29 .00
3 2 3 39.00 .03 .00
4 3 4 6.00 .00 .00
5 2 5 .00 .00 .00
6 2 6 84.00 .05 .00
7 3 7 .00 .00 .00
J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E R E S U L T S
MINOR LOSS
.02
.02
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
VELO CITY
.96
. 94
.25
. 04
.00
.54
.00
JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND GRADE LINE ELEVATION PRESSURE
1 3.00 508.84 319.00 82.26
2 24.00 508.53 317.00 83.00
3 33.00 508.51 309.00 86.45
4 6.00 508.51 304.00 88.62
5 .00 508.53 320.00 81.70
6 84.00 508.48 314.00 84.27
7 .00 508.51 311. 00 85.59
S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES
PIPE NUMBER FLOWRATE
1 150.00
NET SYSTEM INFLOW 150.00
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW .00
NET SYSTEM DEMAND 150.00
D A T A C H A N G E S FOR NEXT S I M U L A T I 0 N
D E M A N D C H A N G E S
DEMANDS ARE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL VALUES BY A FACTOR 1.00
HL/1000
.42
.40
.03
.00 .
.00
.14
.00
EXHIBITC
Sweetwater Forest Subdivision, Phase 1
Full Demand and Fire Flow Conditions
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * K Y P I P E * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* University of Kentucky Hydraulic Analysis Program
* for the Distribution of Pressure and Flows in Pipe Network Systems
* FORTRAN VERSION -3.40 (01/02/91)
*
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DATE: 1/29/2001
TIME: 9:58:25
INPUT DATA FILENAME --------------swfire.dat
TABULATED OUTPUT FILENAME --------swfire.out
************************************************
S U M M A R Y 0 F O ·R I GIN AL D A T A
************************************************
U N I T S s P E C I F I E D
FLOWRATE IS EXPRESSED IN GPM AND PRESSURE IN PSIG
p I P E L I N E AN D p u M p DAT A
PIPE NO. NODE NOS. LENGTH DIAMETER ROUGHNESS MINOR LOSS
(FEET) (INCHES)
1 0 1 330.0 8.0 150.0 1. 50
2 1 2 725.0 8.0 150.0 1.10
3 2 3 790.0 8.0 150.0 1. 40
4 3 4 36b.O 8.0 150.0 1.10
5 2 5 105.0 6.0 150.0 .80
6 2 6 360.0 8.0 150.0 1. 60
7 3 7 605.0 6.0 150.0 3.30
A SUCCESSFUL GEOMETRIC VERIFICATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED
D A T A J U N C T I 0 N
JUNCTION NUMBER
1
N 0 D E
DEMAND
753.00
774.00
ELEVATION
319.00
317.00
309.00
304.00
320.00
314.00
311. 00
CONNECTING PIPES
2
3
4
5
6
7
33.00
6.00
.00
84.00
.00
0 U T P U T 0 P T I 0 N D A T A
1 2
2 3 5
3 4 7
4
5
6
7
OUTPUT SELECTION: ALL RESULTS ARE OUTPUT EACH PERIOD
S Y S T E M C 0 N F I G U R A T I 0 N
THIS SYSTEM HAS 7 PIPES WITH 7 JUNCTIONS , 0 LOOPS AND
*************************************
S I M U L A T I 0 N R E S U L T S
*************************************
THE RESULTS ARE OBTAINED AFTER 2 TRIALS WITH AN ACCURACY
6
K FIXED GRADE
509.00
1 FGNS
.00000
S I M U L A T I 0 N D E S C R I P T I 0 N (L A B E L)
Sweet Water Subdivision FLOW TEST VERIFICATION
Res.Demand=3.0 GPM (DEVELOPED) Fire Flow = 750 GPM
January, 2001 McCLURE ENGINEERING
p I p E L I N E R E S U L T S
PIPE NO. NODE NOS. FLOWRATE HEAD LOSS PUMP HEAD
1 0 1 1650 .00 11. 69 .00
2 1 2 897.00 8.31 .00
3 2 3 39.00 .0 3 .00
4 3 4 6.00 .00 .00
5 2 5 .00 .00 .00
6 2 6 84.00 .05 .00
7 3 7 .00 .00 .00
J U N C T I 0 N N 0 D E R E S U L T S
MINOR LOSS
2.58
.56
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
VELOCITY
10.53
5. 72
.25
.04
.00
.54
.00
JUNCTION NUMBER DEMAND GRADE LINE ELEVATION PRESSURE
1 753.00 494.73 319.00 76.15
2 774.00 485.86 317.00 73.17
3 33 .00 485.83 309.00 76.63
4 6.00 485.83 304.00 78.79
5 .00 485.86 320.00 71.87
6 84.00 485.80 314.00 74.45
7 .00 485.83 311. 00 75.76
S U M M A R Y 0 F I N F L 0 W S A N D 0 U T F L 0 W S
(+) INFLOWS INTO THE SYSTEM FROM FIXED GRADE NODES
(-) OUTFLOWS FROM THE SYSTEM INTO FIXED GRADE NODES
PIPE NUMBER
1
FLOWRATE
1650.00
NET SYSTEM INFLOW
NET SYSTEM OUTFLOW
NET SYSTEM DEMAND
D A T A C H A N G E S
1650.00
.00
1650.00
FOR NEXT
D E M A N D C H A N G E S
S I M U L A T I 0 N
DEMANDS ARE CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL VALUES BY A FACTOR 1.00
HL/1000
35.43
11. 46
.03
.00
.00
.14
.00
vi 1 ~0 1 ~vvi ii :q~ tAA VIV /U4 ~4~l \,;ULl.t;(;t; !:ff AT 1 UN J'LIB . LITL .
!
i
Flow Test Report
i
Dale _.[.:......I -~d_;fo:;:..-....;E)~{-Time
I
Test made by !:
i
i
Location: A'O')~La.rx\ !AG i rod
Purpose of te ~t: f /'Dw Tc:~i
Representativ ~ : C d-y 0 f C.. S
i
Witness : : m i~1L§..s
5-\3
Fiow hydrant tj umber. _ ..... $._-_..._J .c:;3""-==--= Nozzle size_:_d,M.J.....a..:$~;()~-__ _
i
Pitotreading :; _1~5::-.. ........ ~==G .P .M .: Jl.l.]o
I
Stanc h)ll!rart ~umber : <Q-1
Static: ~ :;)_ P.S.I . Residual : ~ 'd.. P .S .I.
I
~002
Remarts : ' -----<~~~~~~==---="---~~~~~~~~~~~--
£!_ e Gi:.At\k M ~ w'~l (k ~(\ ~ '3;}.o
[I . e. Nou ~ x.. 3.?-S
_§£ 0 ..,. N GJ... =
1
+ 3 2 .: .5 2.5 -1 ~3 • 'i 33
~-w
COlll(;l STATION
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
PERMITNO. 100008
DP-SWEETWATER FOREST PH 1
FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE
SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Sweetwater Forest Phase I
DATE OF ISSUE: April 2, 2001
OWNER:
MCDOUGAL, ESTHER JANE GRANT
4150 SHADOWBROOK CIR
COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845-8299
SITE ADDRESS:
3370 GREENS PRAIRIE RD W
DRAINAGE BASIN:
Peach Creek
VALID FOR 12 MONTHS
CONTRACTOR:
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: FULL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans and / or City Standards.
All trees must be barricaded , as shown on plans, prior to any construction. Any trees not barricaded will not count
towards landscaping points. Barricades must be 1' per caliper inch of the tree diameter.
The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site
in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design
Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation
occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay ba les used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor
shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition , placement and state. The Owner
and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy
machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work .
Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any
operations of this permit can begin.
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station , measures shall be taken to
insure that debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage
facilities. If prescribed erosion control measures are insufficient, it is the duty of the contractor to modify the control
measures in such a manner as to ensure compliance with City Ordinances.
I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the specia l flood hazard area. All development shall be in
accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit
application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply .
Date ' fPoloL
Date ~ /
Owner/ Agent/Contractor
j
I I ,
i I
I I·
I I
' I I 1
I i I I
I
I
I
I . I i I
1 · I I 'I
I
Sewer Syste1n AnaJy,._c:;1:5'
FVl?
SWEETWATER f-ORES'T SUBDIVISION
VICINI T>' A1AP
NTS
January, 2001
Prepared By:
McClure Engineering. Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838
I
----·--------------·--·-----·--..J
-
REVIEWED FOR
FEB 2 6 2001
COLLEGE STA flON
Sewer System
FOR
A E INE RING na ys1s
I
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
" g
or:
.)\ ~
~
• i
~
VICINITY MAP
NTS
January, 2001
Prepared By:
McClure Engineering, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838
SEWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
FOR
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
INTRODUCTION
The Sweetwater Forest Subdivision will be located northeast of the intersection of
Greens Prairie Road and Woodlake Drive in southern College Station. Phase 1 of the
development consists of 22 residential lots that are 1 acre in size or larger. Future
residential development of the same density is expected with Phase 2, which will contain
a maximum of28 lots located north of the current site.
At the present time there is no municipal sewer system in the vicinity of
Sweetwater Forest. Privately owned septic systems will be used for sewage disposal until
a municipal system is available. In keeping with the requirements of the City of College
Station, a gravity sewer system has been designed to demonstrate that the subdivision can
be adequately served when lines are extended to this portion of the city. This report
analyzes the proposed sewer system in Phase 1, and accounts for flows from future
development in Phase 2. The purpose is to determine the appropriate line sizes based on
anticipated flowrates.
The majority of Sweetwater Forest Subdivision lies in the Peach Creek drainage
basin, which slopes southward toward· Greens Prairie Road. When the gravity system is
built, sewage from this development will be collected near the creek crossing on Greens
Prairie Road. From there, it is anticipated that a lift station will pump the sewage
westward into the Lick Creek sewer basin ..
DATA
Exhibit A shows the proposed sewer system for Phase 1 and the anticipated
location of Phase 2. Exhibit B is a spreadsheet used to compute the pipe sizes and slopes
needed to carry the anticipated flows. Flowrates are calculated assuming 300 gpd from
all lots in the development at density of 1 lot per acre, which is the maximum density
recommended for this area in the Comprehensive Plan for College Station. The first set
SEWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
of computations provides an analysis for Phase 1 only. The second set includes both
phases under fully developed conditions. The second scenario is provided to demonstrate
that the proposed sewer system can effectively serve the area under ultimate development
conditions.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSTIONS
The calculated slopes for Peak Flows and Average Daily Flows (ADF) are shown
in red on Exhibit B. These figures are the slopes at which the pipes must be laid to
achieve a flow velocity of at least 2 fps. Any slope greater than this figure will produce a
higher velocity and greater capacity. The red text indicates that the computed slope is
lower than the minimum slopes required by TNRCC. Therefore when the pipes are laid
on the minimum TNRCC slope or greater, they will easily carry the wastewater loads
passing through them.
All of the pipe sections have adequate capacity to carry wastewater flows from
the proposed development if they are laid at the minimum slopes required by TNRCC.
This same wastewater system can also provide adequate service to Phase 2 of the
subdivision if it is developed at the maximum housing density recommended by the
Comprehensive Plan for College Station.
SEWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
2
WATER TRANSMISSION AND RESALE AGREEMENT
This Water Transmission and Resale Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered
into this the __ day of , 2000, by and between the City of College Station
("City") and Wellborn Special Utility District ("Wellborn").
ARTICLE 1.
RECITALS
1.1. The city is a home rule municipality duly organized under the laws of the State
of Texas. The City owns a potable water system and provides retail water service within its
city limits pursuant to its Certificate of Convenience and Necessity ("CCN") issued by the
Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission . The City also sells water to Wellborn for
an agreed cost pursuant to an existing water supply contract which is deemed to be in the best
interest of both the City and Wellborn.
1.2 Wellborn is a Special Utility District created pursuant to authority of the Texas
Constitution and Chapter 65 of the Texas Water Code and as further regulated by Chapter 49 of
the Texas Water Code and the Local Government Code as a body politic. Wellborn installs,
maintains and operates a potable water system and provides retail water service in the limits of
the City, in the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the City and in the area adjacent to the City's
service area pursuant to its CCN issued by the Texas Natural Resources Conservation
Commission. Wellborn purchases potable water from the City pursuant to a water supply
contract ("Water Supply Contract") as one of its sources of water, which it furnishes to its
customers.
1.3 The Sweetwater Forest Subdivision is located within College Station's corporate
boundaries with frontage on Greens Prairie Road near the district headquarters and facilities of
Wellborn and City does not currently have an existing potable water system ("City's System")
in the area of Sweetwater Forest Subdivision.
1.4 Wellborn's existing water system is capable of transporting potable water from
Wellborn's Points oflnterconnection with the City's System to Sweetwater Forest Subdivision.
Wellborn is ready and willing to serve the retail customers of Sweetwater Forest Subdivision
within the limits of the City and could provide service if permitted by the City .
1.5 Sweetwater Forest Subdivision, by and through its owner/developer Fain
McDougal, desires to gain access to the City's System by utilizing Wellborn transmission lines
in order to serve the retail customers within the subdivision rather than pay the cost of
installing delivery transmission lines that would directly connect the subdivision to the City's
System. To provide such service, Fain McDougal must obtain from Wellborn water
transmission services to transport sufficient potable water from the City's System to
Sweetwater Forest Subdivision. Wellborn desires to assist Fain McDougal and to provide such
services as requested to a master meter location owned by the City. Wellborn is not willing to
O/groupl legal/wat ertrans . doc
02119101
,
make such agreement to sell to a master meter except in these particular circumstances where
the subdivider was first outside the corporate limits of the City and had paid for oversized main
water lines owned by Wellborn for anticipated expansion of subdivider's previous development
activity, but which has subsequently become incorporated within the City and Wellborn is not
permitted to provide service to the newly incorporated area .
1.6 Wellborn and the City expressly agree to incorporate the existing Water Supply
Contract, dated October 22, 1992, into this Agreement and all the terms and condition shall
remain in full force and effect as to Sweetwater Forest Subdivision . The Water Supply
Contract, as to Sweetwater Forest Subdivision shall not be terminated as long as this
Agreement is in effect.
1. 7 By the authority of the City Council of the City of College Station, City enacted
a resolution on , authorizing the purchase of water transmission
services from Wellborn in accordance with the terms set forth in the said resolution and
approving the execution of this Agreement.
1.8 By the authority of the Board of Directors , Wellborn enacted a resolution on
__________ , authorizing the sale of water transmission services to the City in
accordance with the terms set forth in the said resolution and approving the execution of this
Agreement.
ARTICLE2 .
PROVISION OF WATER TRANSMISSION SERVICE
2.1 WATER TRANSMISSION SERVICE
Water Transmission Service shall mean the use of Wellborn's water system to
transport potable water from the City's System to a master meter owned by the City from which
it shall deliver retail service to the Sweetwater Forest Subdivision residential customers as part
of the City's System. Wellborn's obligation to provide water shall continue so long as this
agreement shall be in effect and City supplies the required water into Wellborn's system.
Without regard to whether or not the current water supply contract dated October 22, 1992,
shall terminate, be extended or amended, or a new contract be executed by the parties for the
general supply of water to Wellborn, the City will continue to transfer water to Wellborn in the
same manner and in sufficient quantities to meet requirements of this contract so long as it
shall be in effect under the same rates, terms and conditions contained in the October 22 , 1992 ,
Agreement, except that paragraph 3 of such agreement shall not apply hereto since Sweetwater
Forest Subdivision is within the city limits and service area of the City of College Station. At
such time as the City has water transmission system services available to transport potable
water to the Sweetwater Forest Subdivision, Wellborn shall terminate transmission services to
the subdivision within thirty (30) days from the date it receives written notice from the City to
so terminate . At such time, Wellborn will make no claim ofright or entitlement to any existing
infrastructure, customers, and/or easements which lie within the Sweetwater Forest
Subdivision, none of which were ever deemed to be a part of the Wellborn's system .
Olgroup /legall wat ertrans . doc
09115100
- 2 -
2.2 WELLBORN'S OBLIGATION
Well born will use reasonable diligence in providing water transmission service
under this Agreement, but does not guarantee against interruption; it being understood that
occasional interruptions are inevitable. Wellborn will operate and maintain its water system in
accordance with Good Utility Practices in order to provide the City with water transmission
service and with the same level of service it provides to its own customers. Wellborn does
not, however, make any representation or warranty that its system is now or will be adequate
for the City requirements. Wellborn agrees to make available to City any information
regarding such lines and capacity if a request is made from the City.
2.3 POINTS OF INTERCONNECTION
A narrative description and vicinity map of Points oflnterconnection existing on
the execution date of this Agreement and the location of the City's master meter at Sweetwater
Forest Subdivision are attached as Exhibit A.
2.4 RATE: PAYMENT
The City agrees to pay a monthly rate of $2 .33 (which includes 15% line loss)
per thousand gallons of water delivered at the Point of Delivery to the master meter owned by
the City at Sweetwater Forest Subdivision. Such rate is equal to the exact amount charged by
the City to Wellborn for such water under the current or subsequent water supply contract plus
15% to reimburse Wellborn for its line loss. City may, at the City's election, have such
amount credited each month against the amount payable to the City for water it has purchased.
2.5 PLEDGE OF REVENUES
The obligations of the City to make payments under this Agreement shall
constitute an operating expense of its potable water system payable solely from the revenues
and receipts of such system .
2.6 WATER QUALITY
Wellborn agrees to take all reasonable steps to protect the quality of the potable
water transported for the City while the water is in Wellborn's transmission system in the same
manner as provided for the benefit of its own customers.
2.7 METERING
City shall maintain at its own expense, at the Point of Delivery to the master
meter, the necessary metering equipment, including a meter house or pit, and the required
devices of standard type for properly measuring the quality of water delivered by Wellborn. It
shall be the duty of City to accurately measure the deliveries, to pay Wellborn based upon such
measurements and to maintain the measuring devices so that the water delivered is accounted
for accurately. The metering point will be equipped with back flow prevention devices
O!g roup/legal/watertrans .do c
09115100
- 3 -
meeting American Water Works Association (AWWA) specifications and City of College
Station standards.
ARTICLE3
GENERAL PROVISIONS
3 .1 TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall be effective from the date of its execution by both the City
and Wellborn and continue in effect for a period of five (5) years unless terminated earlier by
written agreement between Wellborn and City so long as the City has no transmission lines
within the vicinity of Sweetwater Forest Subdivision where it would be feasible to tie directly
into the City's System. This agreement will automatically renew unless terminated by the
parties as evidenced by a written instrument approved and executed by both parties thirty (30)
days prior to the date of renewal. It is at the sole discretion of the City to determine the
feasibility of accessing the Sw eetwater Forest Subdivision with the City's System. After the
City determines that the access is feasible, Wellborn shall terminate water service to
Sweetwater Forest Subdivision within thirty (30) days of written notification to cease service.
The customers residing in Sweetwater Forest Subdivision shall then be connected to the City's
System.
3.2 FORCE MAJEURE
If for any reason of "force majeure", either City or Wellborn shall be rendered
unable , wholly or in part, to carry out its obligation under this Agreement, other than the
obligation of City to make the payments required , then if the party shall give notice of the
re asons in writing to the other party within a reasonable time after the occurrence of the event,
or cause relied on, the obligation of the party giving the notice , so far as it is affected by the
"force majeure ," shall be suspended during the continuance of the inability then claimed, but
for no longer period.
The term "force majeure" as used in this Agreement shall mean acts of God ,
strikes , lockouts, or other industrial disturbances, acts of public enemy, orders or actions of any
kind of government of the United States, or of the State of Tex as , or any civil or military
authority , insurrections , riots , epidemics , land slides , lightning , earthquakes , fires , hurricanes,
storms , floods , washouts , droughts, arrests , restraints of government and people , civil
disturbances , explosions , breakage or accident to machinery, pipelines, or other structures ,
partial or entire failure of water supply including pollution (accidental or intentional) and any
inability on the part of Wellborn to transport water on account of any other cause not
reasonably within the control of the party claiming the inability.
Olgroup /leg allwat ertran s. do c
09115100
- 4 -
3.3 NON-ASSIGNABILITY
The City and Wellborn understand and agree that any assignment of rights or
delegation of duties under this Agreement is void without prior written consent of the other
party.
3.4 AGREEMENT
This Agreement and the Water Supply Contract of October 22, 1992 contain the
entire Agreement between the City and Wellborn for the provision of water services supplied to
Sweetwater Forest Subdivision. For the purposes of this agreement, no oral understanding,
statements, promises, verbal agreements, or conversations with any officer, agent or employee
of the City or of Wellborn, either before or after the execution of this Agreement, shall effect or
modify any of the terms or obligations hereunder. It is expressly understood that all water
system lines within the Sweetwater Forest Subdivision shall be the property of the City, free of
charge.
3.5 SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this agreement are severable and if, for any reason, any one or
more of the provisions contained in the Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or
unenforceable in any respect, the invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any
other provision of this Agreement and this Agreement shall remain in effect and be construed
as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions had never been contained in the
Agreement.
3.6 NOTICES
All notices, payments and communications ("notices") required or allowed by this
Agreement shall be in writing and be given by depositing the notice in the United States mail
postpaid and registered, or certified with return receipt requested and addressed to the party to
be notified. Notice deposited in the mail in the previously described manner shall be
conclusively deemed to be effective from and after the expiration of three (3) days after the
notice is deposited in the mail. For purposes of notice, the addresses of and the designated
representative for receipt of notice for each of the parties shall be shown above the signatures
of the individuals who signed this Agreement on behalf of the City and Wellborn. Either party
may change its address by giving written notice of the change to the other party at least fifteen
(15) days before the change becomes effective.
3.7 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
All amounts due under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, payments due
under this Agreement, or damages for the breach of this Agreement, shall be paid and be due in
Brazos County, Texas, being the place of performance agreed to by the parties. In the event
Olgroup /legal/watertrans. doc
0911510 0
- 5 -
that any legal proceeding is brought to enforce this Agreement or any provision hereof, the
same shall be brought in Brazos County, Texas.
3.8 DUPLICATE ORIGINALS
Wellborn and City acting under authority of their respective governing bodies,
shall authorize the execution of this Agreement in duplicate counterparts, each of which shall
be an original. Each party shall submit written evidence in the form of bylaws , charters,
resolutions, or other written documentation specifying the authority of such party's
representative to sign this Agreement which evidence provided shall be attached to this
Agreement.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
P. 0. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
By: _____________ _
By: ___________ _
Lynn Mcllhaney, Mayor
Date : _____ _
ATTEST:
By: --------------Connie Hooks, City Secretary
Date: ___________ _
APPROVED:
Thomas E. Brymer, City Manager
City Attorney
Charles Cryan, Director of Fiscal Services
Olgroup/legal/watertrans. doc
09115100
-6 -
WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT
P . 0 . Box 250
Wellborn, Texas 77881
Approved as to Form and Legality:
Attorney for Wellborn Special
Utility District
Date: ---------
Date
Date
Date
Item
No .
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
I I
I2
13
I4
I5
I6
I7
I8
I9
20
2I
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3I
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
5I
52
Sweetwater Forest Subdivision
Engineer's Estimate
February 2, 2001
Description Unit Quantity
Pavi ne Construction
Prepare Work Area Acre 5.5
Earthwork C.Y. 4,077
1.5" HMAC S.Y. 9,659
6" Lime Stabilired Subgrade (6%) S.Y . I3,2I 7
Extra Lime Ton 50
6" Concrete Apron S.Y. 359
6" Crushed Limestone Base S.Y. I2 ,727
Curb & Gutter (Type 2) L.F . 498
SiQTls Barricades. and Traffic Control Lump Sum I
Estimated
Unit Price
3,000.00
3.50
4.60
2.50
80.00
30.00
5.60
7.00
5,000 .00
Paving Subtotal
Drainaee Construction
I8" RCP , structural backfill L.F . 56 25 .00
24" RCP , structural backfill L.F. 106 28 .00
30" RCP , structural backfill L.F. I68 40 .00
48" RCP, non-structural backfill L.F. 74 80.00
Sloped Headwall for I8" RCP, 4:I slope EACH 2 750 .00
Sloped Headwall for dual 24" RCP, 4:I slope EACH 2 I,200.00
Sloped Headwall for dual 30" RCP , 6 : I slope EACH 2 I ,300.00
Sloped Headwall for 48" RCP, 4 :I slope EACH 2 I ,900.00
Erosion Control Matting S.F. 4,890 1.50
4' Wide Land Lok GT Erosion Matting (ditch liner) L.F. 2,710 1.00
Grouted Rip-Rap S.F. 4,69I 3.25
Straw Bale Barrier EACH 64 40 .00
Cellulose Fibermulch Seeding (20 ft. each side) S.Y. 13,200 0.35
Construction Exit for Silt Control S.Y. 67 I0 .00
Inlet Protection for Slooed Headwall EACH 4 50.00
3-4" PVC Conduit L.F. 45 10.00
Silt Fence L.F. I ,750 2.00
Drainage Subtotal
· Water Line Construction
8" PVC C900 Water Line, Structural Backfill L.F. 132 22.00
8" PVC C900 Water Line, Non-Structural Backfill L.F. 2,350 I7.00
8" PVC C900 Water Line, w/I 6" steel casing L.F . 54 38.00
8" PVC C900 Water Line, w/restrainedjoints L.F. 2I2 20.00
6" PVC Water Line, Structural Backfill L.F. I62 I9.00
6" PVC Water Line, Non-Structural Backfill L.F. 558 I5.00
6" PVC C900 Water Line, w/I2" steel casing L.F. 45 35 .00
Fire Hydrant Assembly EACH 4 I ,800 .00
10" x 8" Tapping Sleeve and Valve EACH I 2,000.00
8" Gate Valve EACH 5 600.00
8"x 13" Anchor Coupling EACH IO 130 .00
8"x 8" Cross EACH I 300 .00
8"x8" Wye EACH I 300.00
8"x6" Tee EACH I 250 .00
8"x 6" Reducer EACH I I00.00
8"x 45 degree bend EACH 2 I75 .00
8"x 22.5 degree bend EACH I I75 .00
8"x I 1.25 degree bend EACH 2 I75.00
8"Cap EACH I 75.00
6" Gate Valve EACH I 400.00
6"x 13" Anchor Coupling EACH I I00.00
6"x 22.5 degree bend EACH I I25.00
2" Blow Off EACH 3 400.00
Master Meter EACH I 8,000.00
I" Type K Coooer Water Ser. (70 ft. avg . len!rth) EACH I 650.00
I .5'' Type K Cooner Water Ser. (77 ft. avg . len!rth) EACH 5 700 .00
Water Line Subtotal
Tota l Estimated Construction Cost
Total
I6,500.00
I4,2 69.50
44,43I.40
33,042.50
4,000.00
I0,770 .00
7I,271.20
3,486.00
5 000 .00
202,770.60
I ,4 00 .00
2,968 .00
6,72 0.00
5,92 0.00
I ,500 .00
2,400.00
2,600.00
3,800.00
7,335.00
2,710 .00
I5,245 .75
2,5 60 .00
4,620 .00
670.00
200 .00
450.00
3.500.00
64 ,598 .75
2,904.00
39,950.00
2,052.00
4,240.00
3,078.00
8,370 .00
I ,5 75.00
7,2 00 .00
2,000.00
3,000 .00
1,3 00.00
300.00
300.00 _, ..... ~
250.00 ---~OF
100.0 .. '\~ .......
350,
.....
?mn:l I7
35
7 ,v, ........
\. 659 40< ~1 ~ .. 100.~
125.00 .__. __
1,2 00.00 I~
8,000.00 2/2
650.00
3,5 00.00
91 544.00
358,913.35
Item
No.
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
Sweetwater Forest Subdivision
Engineer's Estimate
February 2, 2001
Description Unit Quantity
Pavin2 Construction
Prepare Work Area Acre 5.5
Earthwork C .Y . 4,077
1.5'' HMAC S.Y. 9,659
6" Lime Stabilized Subgrade (6%) S.Y. 13 ,217
Extra Lime Ton 50
6" Concrete Apron S.Y . 359
6" Crushed Limestone Base S.Y . 12 ,727
Curb & Gutter (Type 2) L.F. 498
SiQils, Barricades and Traffic Control Lump Sum I
Estimated
Unit Price
3,000.00
3 .50
4 .60
2.50
80.00
30.00
5 .60
7.00
5,000 .00
Paving Subtotal
Drainage Construction
18" RCP, structural backfill L.F. 56 25 .00
24" RCP, structural backfill L.F. 106 28 .00
30" RCP, structural backfill L.F. 168 40 .00
48" RCP, non-structural backfill L.F. 74 80 .00
Sloped Headwall for 18" RCP, 4:1 slope EACH 2 750.00
Sloped Headwall for dual 24" RCP, 4 : I slope EACH 2 1,200.00
Sloped Headwall for dual 30" RCP, 6 :1 slope EACH 2 1,300.00
Sloped Headwall for 48" RCP, 4:1 slope EACH 2 1,900 .00
Erosion Control Matting S.F. 4,890 1.50
4' Wide Land Lok GT Erosion Matting (ditch liner) L.F. 2,710 1.00
Grouted Rip-Rap S.F. 4,691 3 .25
Straw Bale Barrier EACH 64 40.00
Cellulose Fibermulch Seeding (20 ft. each side) S.Y . 13,200 0.35
Construction Exit for Silt Control S.Y . 67 10.00
Inlet Protection for Sloped Headwall EACH 4 50.00
3-4" PVC Conduit L.F. 45 10.00
Silt Fence L.F. I 750 2 .00
Drainage Subtotal
Water Line Construction
8" PVC C900 Water Line, Structural Backfill L.F. 132 22 .00
8" PVC C900 Water Line, Non-Structural Backfill L.F . 2,350 17 .00
8" PVC C900 Water Line, w/16" steel casing L.F. 54 38 .00
8" PVC C900 Water Line, w/restrained joints L.F. 212 20.00
6" PVC Water Line, Structural Backfill L.F. 162 19 .00
6" PVC Water Line, Non-Structural Backfill L.F. 558 15 .00
6" PVC C900 Water Line, w/12" steel casing L.F. 45 35.00
Fire Hydrant Assembly EACH 4 1,800.00
10 " x 8" Tapping Sleeve and Valve EACH I 2,000 .00
8" Gate Valve EACH 5 600.00
8"x 13" Anchor Coupling EACH IO 130 .00
8"x 8" Cross EACH I 300.00
8"x 8" Wye EACH I 300.00
8"x6" Tee EACH I 250 .00
8"x 6" Reducer EACH 1 100 .00
8"x 45 degree bend EACH 2 175 .00
8"x 22 .5 degree bend EACH 1 175 .00
8"x 11.25 degree bend EACH 2 175 .00
8"Cap EACH 1 75 .00
6" Gate Valve EACH I 400.00
6 "x 13" Anchor Coupling EACH I 100.00
6"x 22.5 degree bend EACH I 125 .00
2" Blow Off EACH 3 400.00
Master Meter EACH I 8,000.00
I" Type K Coooer Water Ser. (70 ft. avg. lenllth) EACH I 650.00
1.5" Tvoe K Coooer Water Ser. (77 ft. avg. lenllth) EACH 5 700 .00
Water Line Subtotal
Total Estimated Construction Cost
Total
16 ,500.00
14 ,269.50
44,431.40
33 ,042.50
4,000.00
10 ,770 .00
71 ,271.20
3 ,486 .00
5.000.00
202,770 .60
1,400 .00
2,968 .00
6 ,720.00
5,920.00
1,500.00
2 ,400 .00
2,600.00
3,800.00
7,335.00
2,710.00
15,245 .75
2,560.00
4,620 .00
670.00
200.00
450.00
3 500.00
64 ,598.75
2,904.00
39,950.00
2,052.00
4,240.00
3,078 .00
8,370.00
1,575 .00
7,2 00 .00
2,000 .00
3,000 .00
1,300 .00
300 .00
300.00 ~
--"""' 250.00 --~E. OF
100 .0 ~"\~ ........
350~ z· ..
17'
35 1 ~JKENT"M
7 ~ ....... " ••••
40( ~~ ~ 659 100 .~m_~ ••
125 .00 --
1,200.00 /U!71t:H'l
8,000.00 2/2
650.00
3,500 .00
. 91 ,544 .00
358,913.35
~rv-
3-cib-ol
~ B~451'ct'I\ \";6 McCLURE ENGINEERING, INC. ______ _
March 26 , 2001
Mr. Spencer Thompson
Development Engineer
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
P .O . Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
RE: Sweetwater Forest, Phase 1
Dear Spencer :
Attached please find the following items for the above referenced project :
1. HEC-RAS Analysis has been expanded to include the existing culvert under Greens
Prairie Road . This is in response to February 27 , 2001 staff memorandum . Enclosed
please find two (2) copies of Exhibit E-1 . Please replace the exhibit in the Drainage
Report or allow us to make the revision .
2. Response to Staffs review comments dated 2/12/2001.
3. Seven (7) sets of revised construction drawings . Four (4) sets for your files and three (3)
sets to be returned to me.
Please call when our sets of plans are ready to be picked up . Should you have any questions
or need additional information, please advise .
Very truly yours,
MRM/mlm
attachments
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 •College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838 •FAX (979) 693-2554 •email : mcclure@tca .net
Engineering
2 /1z..f-u:>o I
Response to Staff Review Comments
For Final Plat
1. While it is true that there is no FEMA established I 00-yr floodplain on this property
there is a 100-yr floodplain subsequent to development of Sweetwater Forest and a
100-yr. rainfall event. Please show and label the calculated, post-development , 100-
yr. floodplain on the final plat as required. Please include all affected areas. This
area is regulated by the City Drainage Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations.
The plans have been modified accordingly.
2. Please show minimum floor elevations for 100-yr floodplain impacted lots.
Minimum floor elevations are provided for all lots. Generally, the controlling/actor
is not the floodplain elevation, it is the ability to provide sewer service to the lot.
Electrical
I. Developer responsible for the installation of conduit and streetlight per city design
and requirements.
2. Coordinate necessary easement to cover all electrical infrastructure as installed on
site.
Land Management
1. Lochbury Trail needs to be changed to Lochbury Court.
The plans have been modified accordingly.
2. Please delete the street name Forest Ridge Circle. Lots 12 through 15 will be
addressed off of Regal Oaks Drive.
The plans have been modified accordingly.
Miscellaneous
1. (Provide) design and specs for tie-in to Greens Prairie Road.
These details are shown on Sheet 3 and Sheet SJ of the Construction Plans. They
have been sent to Mr. Ray Crow.
2. Provide stub-ups for water lines.
This comment is not clear. A detail for water service lines is provided on Sheet S2 of
the Construction Plans. It is developed from the city's standard detail and includes a
PVC pipe marker over the end of each service line.
Sweetwater Forest, Phase 1
Response to Staff Review Comments
For Development Permit
Engineering (Street, Water, Sewer Plans)
1. Sheet 1: The "Min F.F. elev." For Lot 5 is lower than for Lot 4. Please check to see if
this is correct.
The plans are correct. The minimum floor elevations shown on the plans are
determined based on their distance from the sewer line , not on the elevation above
the floodplain. A slope of 1 % for the private service line is assumed from the point
where the tap is made to the rear of the assumed house location. The finished floor
elevation is two feet higher than the end of the service line at that point.
2 . Sheet 1 ( + ): Please show and label water services for all lots.
Long side water services are shown on the plans as requested. Short side services
are generally not shown on subdivision plans unless the tap falls beneath a sidewalk
or pavement area. The lots in this subdivision are heavily wooded and dictating the
location of a service will likely force the homebuilder 's plumber to remove trees
unnecessarily when the private service is installed. It is more logical to coordinate
with the homebuilder at the time of construction so that the tap is placed in the most
convenient location for all parties involved. This is consistent with the current
practice for water service installation.
3. Sheet 1: Please include Straw Bale Barrier on Rip-Rap section between Lots 18 and
19.
Grouted rip-rap is used on steep slopes where it is anticipated that erosive velocities
will occur on a regular basis. It consists of non-reinforced concrete with large rock
placed on top to dissipate energy in the water. In our opinion, it is not appropriate
for Straw Bale Barriers to be placed on this material. They are better suited for
flatter slopes where the bales can be staked into the ground and are not easily
washed out. These barriers were incorrectly placed on rock rip-rap elsewhere in the
subdivision. The plans have been modified to relocate the straw bale barriers above
the rock rip-rap so that water is slowed before reaching the steep slopes.
4. Sheets 2 thru 5: Please include "K" values for vertical curves. Crest min. = 30, Sag
min.= 40.
The plans have been modified accordingly.
5. Sheet 4: Please include temporary turnaround at the end of Forest Ridge Drive.
The extension of Forest Ridge Drive is intended to provide side access for Lots 6 and
7, and to prevent any future misunderstanding with the property owners of those two
lots regarding the necessity for the roadway to extend into Phase 2 at that location.
It also allows access to the culvert crossing which doubles as the metering device for
the detention area. All other public vehicles (garbage trucks, fire apparatus, etc.)
can service Lots 6 and 7 from Regal Oaks Drive. For these reasons, we believe a
temporary turn-around is unnecessary.
The Striping and Signing Plan (Sh. 16) shows "END OF ROAD" markers at the
proposed end of Forest Ridge Drive , and a "DEAD END STREET" sign near the
Regal Oaks Drive intersection.
6. Sheet 7: I have included a valve to Inset "A". Sefvicing of the water main along
Regal Oaks Drive (west of Forest Ridge) will be problematic without it, once the City
water supply is put into service .
The plans have been modified to add a fourth valve at this crossing.
7. Sheet 8: Please put note on plans concerning valve and backflow prevention
requirements on irrigation line in median. A P.I.P. will be needed for the "private
improvements in public ROW'' in the median. Please fill out the application and
submit it to this office.
The plans have been modified accordingly. The P.JP. application will be submitted
before the improvements are installed.
8. Sheets 11 thru 15: The sewer design has been "approved" as per meeting the
subdivision requirements. However, these plans will not be stamped for approval for
construction since construction will not occur in the near future.
9. Sheet S2: The fire hydrant detail is quite similar to the City detail except the City
detail has concrete blocking on the valve box. Please include the City detail or add
the necessary notation.
The plans have been modified accordingly.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
February 2 7, 2001
TO: Michael McClure, McClure Engineering, Via fax 693-3838
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Revi ew Manager
SUBJECT: DP -SWEETWATER FOREST PH 1 (1-100008)
Staff reviewed and approved the water Analysis Report and Sewer Analysis for
the above-mentioned project. Attached are staff review comments detailing
additional information that is required. Please pick up your approved copy at
Development Services.
Please submit the following information to be attached to the current document:
__ Two (2) Culvert Analysis sheets
Please call me if you have any questions.
Home of Texas A&M University
Transmit Log Record
Status
OK
OK
Date
2/27/01
2/27/01
Time To
11 :53:02 Michael McClure
11 :57 :40 Michael McClure
BitWare Client
Company
McClure Engineering, Inc.
McClure Engineering, Inc.
Application
Microsoft Word -PZ04439 .DOC
Microsoft Word -PZ04431 .DOC
Page 1
c
. "' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
P&ZCASENO.: -C.,
DATE SUBMITTED: /tJ
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(check one) Minor __ Amending &_Final __ Vacating __ Replat
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
XX Filing Fee of$20Q.00.
XX Development Permit Application Fee of $100.00 (if applicable).
XX I.afrastiucture Inspection Fee of$300.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed.).
XX Application completed in full .
XX Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
__ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) .Master Plan (if applicable).
XX Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station LS .D.
XX A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
XX ·Two (2)copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
APPLICATION DATA
NAMEOFSUBDIVISION ____ SWEEIW ___ ~_l'ER __ FO_RE_S_T~,_PHAS __ E_1 ______________ _
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION located in south College Station in the
north quadrant of the intersection of Grees Prairie Road and Woodlake Drive.
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Mr. Fain McDougal, SWEE'IWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT CO. , LLC
Street Address · 7607 Eastrnark dr., Suite 253C City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77840 E-Mail Address -------------
Phone Number 764-4000 Fax Number 764-5645 ----------------------------
PROPER1Y OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Ester Jane Grant McDougal
City --------------Street Address
---------------~
Sarne as above
E-Mail Address -------------State ----Zip Code _____ _
Phone Number -----------'Fax Number _________________ _
ARCfilTECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McCLURE ENGINEERING, INC.
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive
State TX Zip Code _7_7_8_4_5 ---
City _eo_l_l_eg_e_s_t_a_t_i_o_n _____ _
E-Mail Address -------------
Phone Number 693-3838 Fax Number 693-2554 ----------------------------
FlNAL PLAT APPLICATION
FNLPAPP.DOC Jn~m
I ofJ
...
TOTAL ACRES OF SUBDMSION 38 • 367 A-R.-0-W ACREAGE 5. 272 A. TOTAL# OF LOTS 22 Lots
NUMBER OF LOTS BY ZONING DISTRICT A-OR I 221.ots I I --
AVERAGE ACREAGE OF EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT BY ZONING DISTRICT:
A-OR I 1 • 409 Acres I I ! __
FLOODPLAIN ACREAGE none
PARKLAND DEDICATION ACREAGE _____ ORFEEAMOUNT ____ _
A STATEMENT ADDRESSING ANY DIFFERENCES BE1WEEN THE FINAL PLAT AND APPROVED MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND/OR PRELIMINARY PLAT (IF APPLICABLE):
REQUESTED VARIANCES TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS & REASON FOR SAME _______ _
REQUESTEDOVERSIZEPARTIC~ATION. _____________________ _
TOTAL LINEAR FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED:
3008 L.F. STREETS
_____ SIDEWALKS
3458 L.F. SANITARY SEWER LINES
3482.9 L.F. WATERLINES
137.2 L.F. CHANNELS
_____ STORM SEWERS
_____ BIKE LANES I PATIIS
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station
of the above identified final plat.
Ja~~~
flNALPLAT APPLICATION
FNL.PAPP.DOC 3'25199
t./s/o1
Dafd I
2 of3
1)/-(}g
SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION ~ (5/
Application is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations:
Subdivision construction along the drainage basin . o m-7 an un-named tributary of
Peach Creek.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
I, _______________ __, design engineer/owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that :
The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of
the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards.
As a condition of approval of this pennit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application according to
these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the College Station City Code.
Property Owner(s) Contractor
CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood haz.ard areas.)
A. I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part
of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm.
Engineer Date
B. I, certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any
basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the
latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps. as amended.
Engineer Date . . . -: . :.-:1~'~F'}s-l~, -. -::
C. I, Michael R. McClure, P. E. certify that the alterations or development covered by this -~·· ···~ ~
diminish the flood~g capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing _this permitted site and that such al Ill¥~ ··.";' }'
development are cxmsistent with requirements of the City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerni .eMroac ms ot ... ! .. ~ .. ~
fl~oodwa~ys ~d oftl~~wa ;;~es.. j I l~~~9.~b~~~469h~.~~l
~ (/(!__'!! ~ 'Z 5 JO J '•t~~:tf.91sr~.~<r'J·~.$1.r
En eer Date~ I Ss1 ......... ~<::>-""
ONAL € ~~
D. I, do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year
flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study.
Engineer Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval :----------------------------
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris
from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities.
All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the
above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply.
FINAL Pl.AT APPUCA TION
FNLP APP .DOC <4/l 4/IJ9
3 of3
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DE VELOPME NT SERVI CES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496
MEMORANDUM
Februa ry 12, 2001
TO: Michael McClure, McClure Engineering, Inc., Via fax 693 -2554
FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Review Manager
SUBJECT: DP-SWEETWATER FOREST PH 1 (1-100008)
Staff reviewed the above -mentioned plans and has the following attached comments.
Please address the comments and submit the following for further staff review:
lh!W ?
__ ~ revised sets of construction documents.
If there are comments that your are not addressing on the plans, please provide a memo
stating your reasons. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me.
CC: Fain McDougal, Sweetwater Land Development Co., LLC, Via fax 764-5645
Home of Texas A&M University
J
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: DP-SWEETWATER FOREST PH 1-DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (1-100008)
ENGINEERING (Street, Water, Sewer Plans)
1. Sheet 1: The "Min F .F elev." for Lot 5 is lower than for lot 4 . Please check to see if
this is correct.
2 . Sheet 1 (+): Please show and label water services for all lots .
3. Sheet 1: Please include Straw Bale Barrier on RipRap section between Lots 18 and
19 .
4 . Sheets 2 thru 5 : Please include "K" values for vertical curves . Crest min.= 30, Sag
min .= 40 .
5. Sheet 4; Please include temporary turnaround at the end of Forest Ridge Drive.
6. Sheet 7: I have included a valve to Insert "A". Servicing of the water main along
Regal Oaks Drive (west of Forrest ridge) will be problematic without it, once the City
water supply is put into service .
7. Sheet 8: Please put note on plans concerning valve and backflow prevention
requirements on irrigation line in median . A P.l.P . will be needed for the "private
improvements in public ROW' in the median . Please fill out the application and
submit it to this office.
8. Sheets 11 thru 15: The sewer design has been "approved" as per meeting the
subdivision requirements. However, these plans will not be stamped for approval for
construction since construction will not occur in the near future .
9. Sheet S2: The fire hydrant detail is quite similar to the City detail except the City
detail has concrete blocking on the valve box. Please include the City detail or add
the necessary notation .
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date : February 12, 2001
Please feel free to call Development Services if you have any questions. 979-764-3570
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or
Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance
2394 .
2 . Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394 .
Reviewed by : Rob Werley
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the City of College Station ,
must be explained in you r next transmittal letter and "bubbled " on your plans. Any additional changes on
these plans that have not been pointed out to the City , will constitute a completely new review .
Staff Rev iew Comments
J :\PZTEXnPZ04330 . DOC
Pa ge 1 of 1
I
\
)
Transmit Log Record
Status
OK
OK
OK
OK
Log
99
101
102
100.1
Date
2/13/01
2/13/01
2/13 /01
2/13/01
Time
11 :47 :26
11 :50 :44
11 :52:04
11 :53:00
BitWare Client
To
Michael McClure
Fain McDougal
Michael McClure
Fain McDougal
Company Application
McClure Engineering Microsoft Word -PZ04355.DOC
Sweetwater Land De Microsoft Word -PZ04313.DOC
McClure Engineering Microsoft Word -PZ04313 .DOC
Sweetwater Land De Microsoft Word -PZ04355.DOC
Page 1
Drainage Report
FOR
S/tVEETWA TER FOREST SUBD/VIS/O/v
Stoht Highway 6
VICINITY MAP
NTS
February, 2001
Prepared By.
McClure Engineering. Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive. Suite 103
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838
MAR 3 0 2001 Dra1nage Renort r COLLE~ C· fA ''!ON
FOR ENGINEERf fG
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
State Highway 6
VICINITY MAP
NTS
February, 2001
Prepared By.
McClure Engineering, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693-3838
FIL
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael R. McClure, Registered Professional Engineer No. 32740, State of Texas,
certify that this report for the drainage design for SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION,
was prepared by me in accordance with the provisions of the City of College Station Drainage
Policy and Design Standards for the owners thereof
k;~ zjsf1
MichaeIR:CCIU:>:EJ32740 ::·. ':.;: :· _,,,,, ...... __ .':. . ---a OF .... ,_, . ~t-!"j('~' .. , VI... ··~.TIJ' ft,
. "*I •• *' "*• \* ~ f··· .. ······························i l MICHAEL R. McCLURE l !···································"-~-1) ~ 327 .. Q;:~ l'b ... ~ 40 Q //!}if fa~ •f.91STE1'~··· ~ ~
''"' ss ••·•··•·• _,0 ., ' 10NAL 't;.\-,J' '~ -
DRAINAGE REPORT
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
INTRODUCTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
PRIMARY DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION .
DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
DETENTION DESIGN
CONCLUSION
EXHIBITS
FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EXCERPT
DRAINAGE AREA MAP -HEC-1 ANALYSIS
DRAINAGE AREA MAP -CUL VERT DESIGN
RATIONAL FORMULAS DRAINAGE AREA CALCULATIONS
RCP CUL VERT ANALYSIS: CUL VERT 1
RCP CUL VERT ANALYSIS: CUL VERT 2
RCP CUL VERT ANALYSIS : CUL VERT 4
HEC-1 ANALYSIS
DRAINAGE AREA PARAMETERS
HEC-RAS SUMMARY: POST-DEV WATER SURF ACE ELEVATIONS
DRAINAGE REPORT
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDNISION
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
"A"
"B-1"
"B-2"
"C-1"
"C-2"
"C-3"
"C-4"
"D-1"
"D-2"
"E-1"
ii
INTRODUCTION:
STORM DRAINAGE REPORT
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
This storm drainage report is intended to analyze the drainage infrastructure proposed for the
development of the Sweetwater Forest Subdivision. The existing and proposed conditions are
included to show how the design will achieve the desired drainage objectives of the City of College
Station's Drainage Policy and Design Standards (DPDS).
GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
This site is located in southwest portion of the City of College Station. Sweetwater is
bounded by Greens Prairie Road and the Woodlake Estates Subdivision to the south, Greens Prairie
Road and Wellborn Oaks Subdivision to the west, and the Sweetwater Forest Boundary to the north
and east.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION:
No portion of the site is shown to be within the I 00-year floodplain on the FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas, Map Number
48041 C0205C, effective July 2, 1992. As such, this site is not currently regulated under the l'fational
Flood Insurance Program. The floodplain analysis prepared with this study indicates the presence of a
I 00-year floodplain through the subdivision based on proposed conditions in the drainage basin. The
limits of this floodplain are contained within the drainage easements shown on the plat but they are
subject to change as further development occurs in the drainage basin.
PRIMARY DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Exhibit "B-1" is a drainage area map that shows cop.tours and proposed drainage areas for the
site used for the HEC-1 analysis. Exlubit "B-2" shows the proposed drainage areas for each of the
street crossing culverts. The proposed street will have a 24' wide paved surface with ditches. Storm
STORM DRAINAGE REPORT
SWEE1WATER FOREST SUBDMSION
PAGEl
water from the site will be captured in the ditches along the roads and conveyed to Peach Creek.
Reinforced concrete pipe culverts will be used at the street crossings.
DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA:
Since this project is within the City of College Station's corporate limits, the drainage system
for Sweetwater Forest was designed using the criteria in College Station's Drainage Policy and
Design Standards. The design storm is a 25-year rainfall event for all drainage structures. Flow
calculations for the smaller culverts (culverts 1, 2, and 4) are based on the Rational Method (Exhibit
"C-1"). Flow calculations for culvert 3 (48") and the flood plain analysis were based on the U.S.
Army Corp of Engineer's HEC-1 program (Exhibit "D-1 "). Pipe sizes were determined by analyzing
culvert capacity under inlet and outlet control or HEC-RAS modeling. Exhibit "E-1" is a summary of
the HEC-RAS analysis for the post-development, 100-year rainfall event. Water surface elevations
and top widths from the post development analysis were used to define the drainage easements shown
on the plat
Exlnbits "C-1" and "D-1" indicate the peak runoff calculations for the post-development
conditions of the drainage areas shown in Exlnbit "B-1" and Exlnbit ''B-2". A summary of these
results is shown below:
Drainage Area
C-1
C-2
C-4
Pond 1 (Existing)
Pond 1 (Proposed)
Pt. B * (Existing)
Pt. B * (Proposed)
Flowrates (cfs) from Drainage Areas
Sweetwater Subdivision
5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year
44.1 50.0 57.3 65.1
6.3 7.1 8.1 9.1
23.7 26.8 30.7 34.8
138 182 225 255
135 181 225 255
203 267 334 382
197 263 328 370
100 year
73.5
10.3
39.2
292
292
439
421
• Pt . B is the combination of all Drainage Areas shown on Exhibit B-1
STORM DRAINAGE REPORT PAGE 2
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDMSION
These runoff rates were used to design the roadway crossings shown in Exhibits "C-2"
through "C-4". The resulting culvert sizes are as follows:
Drainage Area
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
DETENTION DESIGN:
Culvert Size
2 -30" Reinforced Concrete Pipes
I -18 " Reinforced Concrete Pipe
I -48 " Reinforced Concrete Pipe
2 -24" Reinforced Concrete Pipes
Detention is provided for this site in order to reduce the post-development peak outflow from
the site to equal the existing peak outflow. The 48" reinforced concrete culvert shown above is
designed to detain water in the channel upstream of the crossing on Forest Ridge Drive. This culvert
reduces the peak outflow from the site for the 2 through I 00-year events. Water surface elevations
for this structure are shown in Exhibit "E-1 ". A second pond will be constructed with future phases
in order to provide additional detention.
CONCLUSION:
Sweetwater Forest is a rural subdivision for single-family residences on lots that are
approximately I acre in size . The change in impervious area from the development of this subdivision
is small and has minimal effects on the existing drainage system
Proposed improvements at the street crossings are designed using guidelines in the City of
College Station's Drainage Policy and Design Standards. Exhibits "C-2" through "C-4" show that all
drainage structures in the Sweetwater Forest Subdivision are capable of passing the 25-year rainfall
event with one foot offreeboard. The 48" culvert on Forest Ridge Drive serves to detain the post-
development runoff from all design rainfall events.
Exhibit "E-1" is a summary of the HEC-RAS analyses for the post-development, 100-year
rainfall event. Water surface elevations and top widths from the post development analysis were used
STORM DRAINAGE REPORT
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
PAGE3
to define the drainage easements shown on the plat. However, since this site is currently unregu1ated
by FEMA, the floodplain boundaries are subject to change as further development occurs upstream.
STORM DRAINAGE REPORT
SWEETWATER FOREST SUBDIVISION
PAGE4
EXHIBIT A
Flood Insurance Rate Mop Excerpt
Brazos County, Texas
and Incorporated Areas
Mop Numbers: 48041 C0205C
Effective Dote: July 2, 1992
~ 3:
c 0 a: UJ ...J ...J
< ~ Q. <( u.
UJ 0 j:: I-c
(!) a: ...J z <( z <( UJ z UJ (.J 5 :J: <( UJ ...J > :1! ...J z ~ ~~ c UJ <( a: b ~ Ci) > I-UJ z
0 z a: UJ <( 0 > UJ c I-::::> <( a: Q. I-0 ...J
NO. AC. 0.4 0.55 0.9 ft .
C 1 18.42 14 .00 4.42 0 .00 8 .03 700 .0
C2 1 .33 0 .00 1.33 0 .00 0 .73 277.0
C4 7.14 0 .00 7 .14 0 .00 3 .93 340 .0
EXHIBIT C-1
Rational Formula Drainage Area Calculations
Sweetwater Forest Phase One
3:
0 3: 3: ...J u. 0 0 c ...J ...J z u. u. ~ 5 a: :J: a: 0 u UJ I-UJ I-u a: ...J I= (!) I= ...J 0 I-0 UJ ...J ::::> z ::::> ...J ...J ii UJ > <( UJ en N '° 0 u. (!) ~ (!) ~ > (.J ::::> ~ CJ !!? CJ
ft . ft. ft. ft/s min min In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs
10 .0 748 .0 8 .0 1.2 19.9 19.9 4.44 35.7 5 .5 44 .1
2 .5 88 .0 2 .0 0 .8 7 .4 7.4 7 .19 5 .3 8 .7 6 .3
3 .0 850 .0 6 .5 1 .2 16.7 16 .7 4 .90 19.2 6 .0 23 .7
0 '° 0 .,.... '° N
:!: CJ ~ CJ
In/Hr cfs In/Hr cfs
6 .2 50.0 7 .1 57 .3
9 .7 7 .1 11 .1 8 .1
6 .8 26 .8 7.8 30 .7
0
!!?
In/Hr
8.1
12.5
8.8
0
0 0 0
'° 0 .,....
CJ :!: CJ
cfs In/Hr cfs
65.1 9.1 73 .5
9 .1 14 .0 10 .3
34 .8 10.0 39 .2
1/17/01
9936-dra .xls
Exhib it C-1
CULVERT#1 _.,., .. .,.,. -vv•H•• -•••-••-Culvert Description Circular Pipe No. Dual 30" RCP Dia. (ft.) Pioes n 2.50 2 0.014 _.,., ...... ..--..·-·1-·---·--·-.. ·-··-Total Flow per Critical Normal Design Flow Pipe Depth(ft.) Depth Storm (cfs) (Cfs) de (ft.) 5 44.10 22.05 1.60 1.72 10 50.00 25.00 1.70 1.90 25 57.30 28.65 1.85 2.24 50 65.10 32.55 1.98 2.50 100 73.50 36.75 2.07 2.50 Invert Elev. (EU) (ft.\ 305.20 EXHIBIT C-2 CULVERT ANALYSIS Sweetwater Forest Phase One ELhl~ H ,.;---TopofRoad ~ELho ~L"•;---------~ TW ~--1.----~-----Eli J Proposed Culvert '--ELo --.. ·-·· -··-····-· ---·-·· -·· .. -··-Outlet Culvert Top Lt. Side Rt. Side Bottom Elev. (ELo) Length Slope of Slope Slope Slope Width n (ft.\ (ft.\ (ft/ft\ Road ke I (ft/ft) (?:1) (?:1) (ft.) 305.03 34.00 0.0050 309.25 0.50 I 0.0060 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.024 HEADWATER CALCULATIONS Control Type Outlet INLET CONTROL OUTLET CONTROL HW of Velocity Freeboard HWi/D HWI EL hi TW de Cdc+ Dl/2 ho 0.97 2.44 307.64 1.26 1.60 2.05 2.05 1.07 2.66 307.86 1.32 1.70 2.10 2.10. 1.18 2.95 308.15 1.38 1.85 2.18 2.18 1.25 3.13 308.33 1.46 1.98 2.24 2.24 1.39 3.48 308.68 1.52 2.07 2.29 2.29 H EL ho Elev. 0.58 307.66 307.66 0.75 307.88 307.88 0.99 308.19 308.19 1.27 308.54 308.54 1.62 308.94 308.94 Control (fM\ Outlet 6.65 Outlet 7.03 Outlet 7.36 Outlet 7.81 Outlet 8.46 (ft.) 1.59 1.37 1.06 0.71 0.31 1/17101 9936-<:011.xls ExhibltC-2
CULVERT#2 Culvert Description Circular Pipe No. 18" RCP Dia. Ill\ Pipes n 1.50 1 0.014 - -Total Flow per Critical Normal Design Flow Pipe Depth(ft.) Depth Storm (cfsl (Cfs) de (It) 5 6.30 6.30 0.95 0.92 10 7.10 7.10 1.05 1.00 25 8.10 8.10 1.10 1.10 50 9.10 9.10 1.15 1.24 100 10.30 10.30 1.20 1.50 Invert Elev. (Ell) (ft.) 321.68 EXHIBIT C-3 CULVERT ANALYSIS Sweetwater Forest Phase One Elhl~ ~....c H _...-:--TopofRoad ~Elho tHWi ~.;-----------~ TW ~:t---:--t. -- --~ - - - - -Eli _Jf Proposed Culvert '---Elo Outlet Culvert Top Lt. Side Rt. Side Bottom Elev. (Elo) Length Slope of Slope Slope Slope Width n (ft.) (ft.) (ft/ft) Road ke I (ft/ft) <?:1) 1?:1) (ft.) 321.05 73.00 0.0086 324.80 0.50 I 0.0060 4.00 4.00 0.00 0.024 HEADWATER CALCULATIONS Control Type Outlet INLET CONTROL OUTLET CONTROL HW of Velocity Freeboard HWl/D HWI Elhl TW de (de+ D\/2 ho 0.99 1.49 323.17 0.78 0.95 1.23 1.23 1.08 1.62 323.30 0.82 1.05 1.28 1.28 1.19 1.79 323.47 0.86 1.10 1.30 1.30 1.25 1.88 323.56 0.90 1.15 1.33 1.33 1.40 2.10 323.78 0.95 1.20 1.35 1.35 H EL ho Elev. 0.60 322.87 323.17 0.76 323.09 323.30 0.99 323.34 323.47 1.25 323.62 323.62 1.60 324.00 324.00 Control (fos) Inlet 5.55 Inlet 5.68 Inlet 5.81 Outlet 6.26 Outlet 6.80 (It) 1.63 1.50 1.33 1.18 0.80 1/17/01 9936-cul2.xls Exhibit C-3
CULVERT#4
Culvert Design Criteria
Culvert Description Ci rcular
Pipe No.
Dua l 24 " RCP Dia . (ft.) Pipes n
2.00 2 0.014
Culvert Anatvsls Calculations
Total Flow per Critical Normal
Design Flow Pipe Depth(ll) Depth
Storm (Cfs) (Cfs) de (ft.)
5 23 .70 11 .65 1.25 1.34
10 26 .80 13.40 1.30 1.48
25 30 .70 15.35 1.40 1.69
50 34 .80 17 .40 1.50 2.00
100 39 .20 19 .60 1.60 2.00
Invert
Elev. (Eli)
(ft.)
312 .25
EXHIBIT C-4
CULVERT ANALYSIS
Sweetwater Forest Phase One
~l ~tHWo z:-•o----===~~~~Ei H
J--~------™ Eli Proposed Culvert ~ - - - --'--_
ELo
tf c Ou all hannel Design Criteria
Outlet Culvert Top Lt. Side Rl Side Bottom
Elev. (ELo) Length Slope of Slope Slope Slope Width n
(ft.) (ft.) (ft/ft) Road ke I (ft/ft) (?:1) (?:1) (ft.)
311 .67 115.00 0.0050 315 .70 0.50 I 0.0060 4 .00 4 .00 0.00 0.024
HEADWATER CALCULATIONS Control Type Outlet
INLET CONTROL OUTLET CONTROL HW of Velocity Freeboard
HWl/D HWi ELhl TW de (de+ D)/2 ho
0.93 1.67 314 .12 1.00 1.25 1.63 1.63
1.02 2.03 314 .28 1.04 1.30 1.65 1.65
1.12 2.24 314 .49 1.09 1.40 1.70 1.70
1.24 2 .47 314 .72 1.15 1.50 1.75 1.75
1.31 2 .61 314 .86 1.21 1.60 1.80 1 .80
H ELho Elev.
0.70 313 .99 314.12
0.89 314 .21 314.28
1.17 314.54 314 .54
1.50 314 .92 314 .92
1.90 315 .37 315.37
Control
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
(fos)
5.28
5.38
6 .54
6.89
7.28
(ft.)
1.58
1.42
1.16
0.78
0.33
1/17/01
9936-{;Ul4 .xls
Exhibit C-4
i·········································
FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKl\GE (HEC-1)
KAY 1991
VERSION 4.0 .lE
Lahey F77L-D!/32 versi!'m 5. 01
Dodson ' Associates, Inc.
RON DATE 10/12/00 TIME 10:18:35 ....•..•............................•....
x
x
x
EXHIBIT D-1
HEC-1 ANALYSIS
x xxxxxxx XlOOOC
x x x x
x x x
xxxxxxx xxxx x XlOOOC
x x x x
x x x x x
x x xxxxxxx xxxxx
x
xx
x
x
x
x
xxx
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER
609 SECOND STREET
DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616
(916) 551-1748
THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-1 KNOWN AS HECl (JAN 73), HEClGS , HEClDB, AND HEClKW.
THE DEFINITIONS OF VARIABLES -RTIMP-AND -RTIOR-HAVE CHANGED FRCM THOSE USED WITH THE 1973-STYLE INPUT STRUCTURE.
THE DEFINITION OF -AMS KK-ON RM-Cl\RD WAS CHANGED WITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS IS THE FORTRJ\1177 VERSION
NEW OPTIONS: DJ\MBREAK OUTFLOW SUBMERGENCE , SINGLE EVENT DllMl\GE CALCUIJ\TION, DSS:WRITE STAGE FREQUENCY,
DSS:READ TIME SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN AND AMPT INFILTRATION
KIND!ATIC WAVE: NEW FINITE DIFFERENCE ALGORITHM
LINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
i0
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4 0
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
HEC-1 INPUT
ID ••••••• 1. •••••• 2 ••••••• 3 ••••••• 4 ••••••• 5 ••••••• 6 ••••••• 7 ....... 8 ••••••• 9 •••••• 10
ID TRIB THROUGH PROP. SUBDIVISION
IT 3 01FEB98 0000 481
IO 5 0
JP 3
JR PREC 13.5 11 9.8 8.8 4 .5
EVENT 500 100 50 25
7.4
10
6 .2
5 2Yr . Storm
KK
KM
KM
KM
KM
.KM
BA
PB
IN
PC
PC
PC
PC
PC
LS
UD
KP
LS
UD
KP
LS
UD
DAI
FILE
Pl
P2
P3
.0905
1
30
.0053
.0712
.2042
.8676
.9588
0
.5
2
0
.5
3
0
.43
9936-1. IHI
IS EXISTING CONDITIONS
IS pHASE ONE AND CONSTRUCTION or POND
IS TOTAL DEVELOPMEllT WITH CONSTRUCTION OF POND 2
OIFEB98 0000
.0108 .0164 .0223 .0284 .0347 .0414 .0483
.0797 • 0887 .0984 .1 089 .1203 .1328 .1467
.2351 .2833 . 6632 • 7351 • 7724 .7989 .8197
.8801 .8914 .9019 .9115 .9206 .9291 .9371
.9653 .9717 .9777 .9836 .9892 .9947 1.000
75
75 0
80 21
KK POND 2 PROP. DET . POND 2 W/ 36" PIPE
RN
KP
RN
KP
RS
SA 0
SE 320.35
SL 321. 85
SS
KK
RS
RC
RX
RY
KK
BA
LS
UD
KP
LS
UD
KP
326
RT . A
1
.075
1000
324
DA 2
.0243
0
.57
2
0
.57
3
ELEV 321. 85
,096 .97 1.30 1. 67
322 324 326 328
7 .07 .6 .5
35 3 1.5
ROUTE TO POINT A
STOR
.05
-1
.075
1018.48 1067.24
322 320
75
75 0
1700 . 0046
1075.24 1084.24 1089 .24 1094.47 1114.47
318.39 318.39 320 322 3 24
.0555
.1625
.8380
.9446
.0632
.1808
.8538
.9519
PAGE
Exhibit D-1
9936-1.0Hl.DOC
1of4
EXHIBITD-1
HEC-1 ANALYSIS
HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 2
LINE ID ••••••. 1. •••••• 2 ••••••• 3 ••••••• 4 ••••••• 5 •••.•.• 6 .••••.• 1 ....... 8 .••••.• 9 .•..•• 10
51
52
53
54
55
56
51
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
61
68
69
10
11
12
13
H
15
16
11
18
19
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
81
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
91
98
99
LS
UD
KK
BA
LS
UD
KP
LS
UD
KP
LS
UD
KK
HC
KK
RN
KP
RS
SA
SE
SL
SS
KP
RS
SA
SE
SL
SS
KK
RS
RC
RX
RY
KK
BA
LS
UD
KP
LS
UD
KP
LS
OD
KK
BA
LS
OD
KP
LS
0
.43
DA 3
.0143
0
.6
2
0
.53
3
0
.53
PT. A
3
POND
312.18
314.18
311
3
312 .18
313. 68
311
RT. B
1
.015
1000
314
DA 4
.0214
0
.8
2
0
.8
3
0
.13
DA 5
.0445
0
.15
2
84 38
15 0
84 38
84 38
PROP. DET. POND 1 W/ 48" PIPE
ELEV 314.18
.23 .51 1.13 2.53
314 316 318 320
12.51 .6 .5
35 3 1.5
ELEV 313.68
.23 .51 1.13 2.53
314 316 318 320
1.01 .6 .5
35 3 1.5
ROUTE TO POINT B
STOR -1
.05 .015 2106 .0029
1242 1250 1258.5 1263.5 1212 1282 1352
312 310 309.06 309.06 310 312 314
15 0
15
78 13
15 0
84 38
HEC-1 INPUT PAGE
LINE ID .•••••. 1 •••.•.• 2 •.••••• 3 ••••••. 4 .•...•• 5 .•..... 6 .•.•... 1 •••••.• 8 •••...• 9 •••.•• 10
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
OD
KP
LS
OD
KK
HC
zz
.42
3
0
• 42
PT. B
3
1········································· .
FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (l!EC-1)
KAY 1991
VERSION 4. 0. lE
Lahey F71L-EM/32 version 5.01
Dodson ' Associates, Inc.
RUN DATE 10/12/00 TIME 10:18:35 .........................................
84 38
TRIB THROUGH PROP. SUBDIVISION
3 IO
IT
OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES
IPRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL
I PLOT
QSCAL
HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA
0 PLOT CONTROL
0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE
U.S. l\RMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER
609 SECOND STREET
DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616
(916) 551-1148
Exhi bitD-1
9936-1.0Hl.rx>C
2 of4
NHIN
IDATE
ITIME
NO
NDDATE
NDTIME
I CENT
EXHIBITD-1
HEC-1 ANALYSIS
3 MINUTES IN CCMPUTATION INTERVAL
1 FEB98 STARTING DATE
0000 STARTING TIME
481 NUMBER OF HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES
2FEB98 ENDING DATE
0000 ENDING TIME
19 CENTURY MARK
CCMPUTATION INTERVAL 0.05 HOURS
TOTAL TIME BASE 2 4 • 0 0 HOURS
ENGLISH UNITS
JP
JR
DRAINAGE AREA
PRECIPITATION DEPTH
LENGTH, ELEVATION
FLOW
STORAGE VOLUME
SURFACE AREA
TEMPERATURE
MULTI-PLAN OPTION
NP LAN
MULTI-RATIO OPTION
SQUARE KI LES
INCHES
FEET
CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
ACRE-FEET
ACRES
DEGREES FAHRENHEIT
3 NUMBER OF PLANS
RATIOS OF PRECIPITATION
13.50 11.00 9 .80 8.80 7 .40 6.20 4 .50
WARNING
1
ROUTED OUTFLOW 383.) IS GREATER THAN MAXIMUM OUTFLOW 381. J IN STORAGE-OUTFLOW TABLE
OPERATION
HYDROGRAPH AT
+
ROUTED TO
+
ROUTED TO
+
HYDROGRAPH AT
+
HYDROGRAPH AT
+
PEAK FLOW AND STAGE (END-OF-PERIOD) SUMMARY FOR MULTIPLE PLAN-RATIO ECONOMIC CCMPUTATIONS
FLOWS IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, AREA IN SQUARE MILES
TIME TO PEAK IN HOURS
RATIOS APPLIED TO PRECIPITATION
STATION AREA PLAN RATIO 1 RATIO 2 RATIO 3 RATIO 4 RATIO 5 RATIO 6
13.50 11.00 9.80 8.80 7 .40 6.20
DAl 0.09 FLOW 345. 266. 228. 197. 153. 117.
TIME 11.80 11.80 11.80 11. 80 11 .80 11. 85
FLOW 345 . 266. 228. 197. 153. 117.
TIME 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.85
3 FLOW 404. 320. 280. 246. 199. 158.
TIME 11. 75 11. 75 11. 75 11. 75 11. 75 11. 75
POND 2 0.09 FLOW 345. 266. 228. 197. 153. 117.
TIME 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.85
2 . FLOW 345. 266. 228 • 197. 153. 117.
TIME 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.85
FLOW 383. 297. 253 . 21 7 . 162. 110.
TIME 11.85 11.85 11.90 11.90 11.95 12.05
PEAK STAGES IN FEET
STAGE o.oo 0.00 o.oo o.oo o.oo o.oo
TIME o.oo o.oo o.oo o.oo 0.00 o.oo
STAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo o.oo
TIME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
STAGE 328.01 327. 61 327. 39 327 .20 326.87 326.49
TIME 11.85 11.85 11.90 11.90 11.95 12.05
RT. A 0.09 FLOW 319. 245. 210. 181. 141. 108.
TIME 11.95 11.95 11.95 11 .95 11.95 12.00
2 FLOW 319. 245. 210 . 181. 141. 108.
TIME 11. 95 11. 95 11.95 11. 95 11 .95 12.00
FLOW 345. 264. 224. 191. 143. 100.
TIME 12.00 12.00 12 .05 12.05 12.10 12.20
PEAK STAGES IN FEET
STAGE 321.80 321. 45 321.26 321. 09 320.82 320. 55
TIME 11.95 11.95 11.95 11.95 11. 95 12.00
2 STAGE 321. 80 321. 45 321.26 321. 09 320. 82 320 . 55
TIME 11.95 11.95 11.95 11. 95 11.95 12.00
3 STAGE 321.91 321. 54 321. 34 321.15 320. 83 320.48
TIME 12.00 12 .00 12.05 12.05 -12.10 12.20
DA 2 0.02 FLOW 86. 66. 57 . 49. 38. 29 .
TIME 11.90 11.90 11. 90 11.90 11.90 11.90
FLOW 86 . 66. 57. 49 . 38. 29 .
TIME 11. 90 11.90 11. 90 11.90 11. 90 11.90
FLOll 113. 91. 80. 71. 58. 48 .
TIME 11. 75 11. 75 11. 75 11. 75 11. 75 11. 75
DA 3 0. 01 FLOW 49. 38. 32 . 28. 22. 17.
TIME 11.90 11.90 11. 90 11.90 11. 95 11.95
FLOW 59. 48. 42 . 37. 31. 25.
TIME 11. 85 11.85 11.85 11. 85 11.85 11.85
FLOW 59. 48. 42 . 37. 31. 25.
RATIO 7
4.50
68.
11.85
68.
11.85
102.
11. 75
68.
ll.85
68.
11.85
61.
12.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
325.12
12.15
62.
12.00
62.
12.00
60.
12.30
320.09
12.00
320.09
12.00
320.06
12 .30
17 .
11.90
17 .
11.90
32.
11. 75
10.
11.95
17.
11.85
17 .
ExhibitD-1
9936-1.0Hl.IX>C
3 of4
TIME
3 CCt!BINED AT
+ PT. A 0 .13 FLOW
TIME
2 FLOW
TIME
FLOW
TIME
ROUTED TO
+ POND 0.13 FLOW
TIME
2 FLOll
TIME
FLOW
TIME
PEAi< STAGES
STAGE
T IME
STAGE
TIME
STAGE
TIME
ROUTED TO
+ RT. B 0 .13 FLqW
TIME
FLOW
TIME
FLOW
TIME
PEAi< STAGES
STAGE
TIME
2 STAGE
TIME
STAGE
TIME
'HYDROGRAPH AT
+ DA 4 0.02 FLOW
TIME
2 FLOW
TIME
FLOW
TIME
HYDROGRAPH A'T
+ DA 5 0. 04 FLOW
TIME
FLOW
TIME
FLOW
TIME
3 CCt!BINED AT
+ PT. B 0.19 FLOW
TIME
2 FLOW
TIME
3 FLOll
TIME
**'* NORMAL END OF HEC-1 •••
EXHIBITD-1
HEC-1 ANALYSIS
11.85 11.85 11.85
452. 348. 299.
11.95 11.95 11.95
461. 356. 306 .
11. 90 11.90 11.95
490. 376. 320.
11.95 11.95 11.95
452. 348 . 299 .
11.95 11.95 11.95
448. 347 . 299.
12.00 12.00 12.00
472. 364. 310.
12 .05 12.05 12 .05
IN FEET
0 .00 0.00 o.oo
0.00 o.oo 0.00
319.07 318. 6 3 318. 40
12.00 12 .00 12.00
319.40 318.95 318.70
12 .05 12.05 12.05
371. 292 . 255.
12.20 12 .20 12.20
370. 292 . 255.
12 .30 12 .25 12.25
385. 302. 263.
12.30 12.30 12.30
IN FEET
312.95 312 . 64 312.47
12.20 12.20 12.20
312. 94 312. 64 312 . 47
12 .30 12.25 12.25
312 .99 312.69 312.50
12.30 12.30 12.30
61. 47. 4 0.
12.10 12.15 12.15
61. 47. 40.
12.10 12 .15 12.15
68 . 54. 46.
12.05 12.05 12.05
132 . 102. 87.
12 .05 12.10 12.10
.209. 168. 148.
11. 70 11 . 70 11. 70
209 . 168. 148.
11. 70 11 . 70 11. 70
561. 439. 382.
12 .15 12.15 12.15
530 . 421. 370.
12.10 12 .05 12.05
543 . 429. 375.
12.10 12.10 12.10
11.85 11.85
258. 201.
11.95 11.95
265 . 208.
11.95 11.95
273 . 206.
12 .00 12 .05
258. 201.
11.95 11.95
259. 202.
12.00 12 .05
265. 200.
12.10 12.10
0 .00 0.0 0
0.00 0.00
318 .19 317. 87
12.00 12.05
318. 49 318.14
12 .10 12.10
225. 182.
12.15 12 .15
225. 181.
12.25 12.25
230. 182.
12 .30 12.30
312 .28 311. 95
12.15 12.15
312.28 311. 94
12.25 12.25
312.32 311. 95
12 .30 12 .30
35 . 27.
12 .15 12.15
35. 27.
12.15 12.15
41. 32 .
12.05 12.05
75. 59 .
12.10 12.10
131. 108.
11. 70 11. 70
131. 108.
11. 70 11. 70
334 . 267.
12.15 12.15
328. 263.
12.05 12.10
329 . 261.
12 .10 12.20
11. 85
153.
11. 95
160.
11.95
146.
12.10
153.
11. 95
152.
12 .10
143.
12 .15
0.00
0 .00
317 . 5 3
12 .10
317. 79
12 .15
138.
12 .15
135 .
12.25
132.
12 .35
311. 59
12 .15
311.56
12 .25
311. 54
12.35
21.
12 .15
21.
12.15
25.
12 .05
45 .
12 .10
88.
11. 70
88.
11. 70
203.
12 .15
197 .
12 .15
192 .
12 .20
11.85
88.
12. 00
95.
11.95
97.
11. 90
88 .
12.00
87.
12 .15
89.
12.20
0 .00
0 .00
316.25
1 2 .15
317. 36
12 . 20
77.
12. 20
80.
12.35
82 .
12.45
310.98
12.20
311. 02
12 .35
311. 04
12.45
12.
12.20
12.
12.20
16.
12.10
26.
12.15
60.
11. 75
60.
11. 75
114 .
12. 20
118 .
12.15
119.
12 . 25
Exhib it D-1
993 6-1.0Hl.DOC
4 of4
General
AREA AREA AREA
# ACRES MILES
DAlCOMB S7 .90 0.090S
DA2 1S.S3 0 .0243
DA3 . 9 .14 0.0143
DA3 9.14 0.0143
DA4 13 .71 0.0214
DAS 28.49 0 .044S
DAS 28.49 0.044S
Exhibit D-2
Drainage Area Parameters
Current Cond.
PLAN I
HYD VERT SLOPE CURVE LAG
LENGTH DROP Fr/FT # HOURS
2103 38 0.018 7S O.SO
22SO 34 0.oIS 7S O.S7
1743 16 0 .009 7S 0 .60
2063 18 0 .009 --
2900 34 0 .012 7S 0 .80
2423 24 0 .010 7S 0 .75
1934 24 0 .012 - -
Prop. Coad.
·PLAN2
CURVE LAG
# HOURS
7S O.SO
7S O.S7
- -
84 O.S3
7S 0 .80
--
84 0 .42
Prop. Cond.
PLAN3
CURVE LAG
# HOURS
80 0.43
84 0.43
- -
84 0.53
78 0 .73
--
84 0.42
Exhibit D-2
Drainage Area Parameters
993~.>ds
Reach SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER SWEETWATER Exhibit E-1 HEC-RAS Analysis HEC-RAS Plan: Plan 01 River: Trib to Peach Cr Reach: SWEETWATER River Sta Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Froude # Chl (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 4592.56 264 317.50 319.10 319.10 319.81 4008.76 264 313.50 316.97 316.97 318.17 2945.30 364 309.95 312.33 312.33 313.13 2870.27 364 309.95 312.33 312.33 313.13 2804.97 Culvert 2739.67 302 308.73 311.48 311.48 312.33 2698.20 302 308.73 311.24 311.24 312.03 1693.21 302 305.00 306.81 306.81 307.62 1000 429 302.25 305.18 305.18 306.08 950 429 302.25 305.2 305.2 306.12 900 Culvert 850 429 301.7 302.76 302.76 303.26 800 429 301.7 302.76 302.76 303.26 (ft/ft) (ft/s) (sq ft) 0.02762 6.8 39.0 0.031281 8.8 30.l 0.026643 7.2 50.6 0.02648 7.2 50.7 0.018002 7.4 49.3 0.026894 7.1 42.5 0.026881 7.2 42.0 0.025771 7.58 56.58 0.025572 7.69 55.76 0.030024 5.68 75.59 0.029989 5.67 75.62 (ft) 27.66 1 12.65 1 31.98 1.01 32 1.01 29.62 1.01 27.67 1.01 26.34 1.01 32.3 1.01 30.8 1.01 76.28 1.01 76.29 1 Exhibit E-1 HEC-RAS Analysis 9936-RAS Output.xis -----================================--=---~~~~~~~~--IZ!!_~~S~I~
Item
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Sweetwater Forest, Phase 1
Estimated Value of Remaining Work
A t2 2001 .W!US '
Description
Install inlet protection on drainage structures w/culverts (sheet 1)
Install silt fence (sheet 1) (done)
Cut ditches to grade (done)
Seal all e xpansion joints
Install concrete rip rap a culvert # 1
Install concrete rip rap in ditches slopes at culve rt #3 (sheet 4)
Install concrete rip rap a culvert #4 (sheet 5)
Install concrete rip rap channel at Regal Oaks Drive (sheet 2)
Install concrete rip rap at Lochbury Court (sheet 5)
Install erosion control matting at culvert #3 (sheet 4)
Install special ditch section at Seminole Pipe Crossing (sheet 3)
Install ditch lining (sheets 2,3,4 , and Sl)
Install straw bale barriers in ditches (sheet 1)
Install all striping and signing (sheet 16)
Water service #4 to include valve and BFP (sheet 8)
Open all water valves (no value assigned)
Locate and mark all water services
Adjust fire hydrants to grade and turn towards street
Adjust water valves to grade
Install blowoffs in double meter boxes
Install brass plugs in all blowo:ffs
Fiber mulch seed all disturbed areas
General clean-up
TOTAL
Items listed above are taken from the city's punch list prepared by Vern Wright.
Estimated
Value
100
100
16 ,583
832
2 ,192
2,560
5,100
100
500
400
400
200
100
4 ,620
500
$34,287
.r .
(all rip rap)
/ .,
/
,.(
·'
I
~ R-02-01MON10:10 AM YOUNG CONTRACTERS FAX NO. 9798232797 P. 02
-THIS FORM REPLACES PREVIOUS FORM 3510·6 (8-98) Fcr:ri Approved. -OMB No. 20~-0\SS
See Reverse ior Instructions
-· Un itiad S tate s E::vironm er.ral Pro :~:io n Ag9ncy
NP DES OEPA Washing tcn, CC 20.!CO
FOAM Notiee of Intent (NOi) for Storm Water Disc."targes Associated with
CONSTRUCTI ON ACTIVITY Uncer a NPOES ~neral Permit -
Sur;m is.s io n of this Notice of Intent consti Mes r.otic2 rtlat the ;iarty ld.:ntifit:d in S ~ctio n I of :his form :ntendS <o be aultlorized by a NPOES permit issued
tor :>torm water disel"larges associiited with tonst;i;e:ion ac:lvity in the S<.ate/lni:ian Ceuntry land identifi ed in $e(::Jon !I of tl"l•S form. Submission of this Notice
ot Intent also constitutes notic2 that the party icemified in S~tion I ol tl"l is farm meets the eligibility reQtJ irernents in P:;;r.1.8. of the general permit {inctud ing ·
th ose relamd co. protection of endangered species determin ed througl'I th e procedures in Ad:lendum A of the ~ene!QJ :iermit), understands that con ti nuad ·
authorization to disc!'lar~'! is contingent on .maintaining permit el igibility. and th al im9!ementation of the Storm Watetr Poilution Prevention Plan requirec u:ider ;
Pan :v of tl'le general permit will beg in at the tirr.e the permirtee commences 1,,ork on the consl!uction prcj2ct icentified in Secion II below. IN ORDE~TO
CST.:..lN AUTHORtZATlON. ALL INFORM;..TICN iiEQUESTED MUST 6E INCLUD ED ON TnlS FCRM. SE: lNS7r;uc7IONS ON 6.4.CK OF ~ORM.
I. Owner/Operator (Applicant) Information
Nal.le : IY 1Q 11.J. 1rJ rk r rC.10 1 y 1Ti e :A--1 C 1 "ii~ 1 ~1 5"1 r.IiJ.} :C..1 I I I I I I ! ?hone : 1 '9 17 I ~ I 7 1 71 ~ IL l I i I : )..I
\
Ac'.cr ess: Ira I 15!0 I j'1 1 ~1 7J4/1 I. Statu s ot [EJ ! ! I I I I I ! ! I ; I I I ' ' I I I ! I Owner/Coerator :
Ci;y: !8 1 !1~1A-1 1V 1 ! I I I I ' I I I I I ; I ' I l State : lIJL! Z::pCxs: 17 17 180Co 1 -' I I I i . i
IL ?roject/Site I n f ormation · I s th e fa cility located on lnc :an I Count ry Lanas?
Prc j«ct Name ; tSw1t: l. er 1WJA 1 Tit>;:, 1f 1a 1t:.1c.i.srr: ! f rlffr.$18 1/1 ' I ! : I Yes O No :xJ i
P~o i ect A~dresstlocation: C 10 11?.1/l.J 1£1 /(; 10 1 ·~1 16 1£:e 1i ~WS i f!..•~1 A-1L 1 ~L 1!: I i..1 b t e. I e. ;C,.1 1'J~ .,Prt{P,J ~I E. '
: ! City: 1C..10 1!.:Jl-! ~1 !.£1 ,1 1.S 1'T"J P.t 'I2 l ! (J 1M I : I i ! I J State: 11:.L:l! Z:;:> Ccc~: I ! I I I I -1 I : I '
Lat ituCJ a: 13 1 Z. ! 0 18 ii iJ l · Long itu ce: i 81~j £ 17 10'71 Councy: IB 1lt.11t-1i.ro 1 S I ·1 i ! I I I I I I I I I i
Has :~e Sto rm Water Po llution Prevention Pfan (SW???) 1:1een prepared'? Yes~ NoO
' Oprional: Address of location of i
SWPPP for viewing 0 Address in S<?C tion I abov e CJ ;..odress in Section ll above .--L.! Otl'ler addr'1SS (rf kn own) belc'N :
SW PPP Phone:
Accress: l I J I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I : I : I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I j
City: I l ! I I· I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I l Stata: UJ z;:i Co~e : I I ! ! I 1 -1 I I I I
Name ot Rece iving Water: I? 1l1A-1C 1/./1 ,c , .e'1£1£11(1 I I I I. I I I l I I I I l ..
!Oi'/i01Z.1 ~orod I 1orf1a1i.1 ~1a 1 0 1 ! I Basec on i nstru:tion prollided in Addendum A ot tl'le permit, are
Month O:iy Year Atlonlfl Day Year tl'lete at1y fisted endangered or threatened speci es, or designated
Estimated Construction Start Oare Estimate!d Completion Date critical habitat in the proj~ area?
Estimate of area to De disturt)e~ {to nearest acre}: I 151 1A1C.1 I Yes 0 No C(}
Estimate of Likelihood of Disc:narge ~choose only one ): 1 have satisfied permit e1igibi«r1 with regard to protection ol
1. 0 Unlikely J. ~ Once per week
endangered species !J'lrough rr.e indicatea section at Part l.B.J.e.{2)
5. 0 Continual of the permit (check one or more boxes):
2. 0 Once oer montti 4. 0 Once per day (a) OC] (bJQ (c) 0 (d)o
Ill. Ccrtific;ation
I c.arrjfy under r:>enally of law !hat this document and all artachm~nls ".'ere preoared under my direction or suoetvision in accordance with a system
designed to as.sure tl'lat qualified oersonnel prope!1y gatrler and evalua te tM inlotmation submin~d. · 6ased on my inquirt of ttre person °' persons Who
manage !Tlis system. or ll'lose persons direcuy respcnsi~le for garnering !he information. tl'le information sutimiited ~. to the best ol my knoWled!]& and
betiel. tt\JO. accurate, and complete . I am aware that there are signilic:int penalties for submitting false lnfom1at!on . including the possibility of flne and
imprisenment for knowing violations.
Print Name : 11F1 I 1T .;1, ,J"'"; 1/l1L 1£1 ~$ e 1J.11 I I I I I l ! ! I I I I I I J Oare: I~ 1J'JZ.1~10, /I
Si9rtJWrc: ~ ~ / ~ -S" <"?"1-.. -
EPA Form 3510·9 roplac:ed 3510-6 {8·98)
! ~.~ MON JO: ID AM
~ Y 0 UNG C ONTRRCTORS, I NC.
YOUNG CONTRACTERS FAX NO. 9798232797 P. 01
PHONE 979-779-1112 FAX 979.az;..V97
F'.O . BOX o7A oRY AN . T)( 77806 7601 W. STATE HWY . 21
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Please deliver rhe following pages to :
---5 fe.Yl£e.r . 1 hl> .""es .~ Name:
Compaz;.y:
Fax Numbe!:::
Total number of pages (including cover page): __ ~-
Date:
From:
Comments: