HomeMy WebLinkAbout24 Deveopment Permit 01-10 Blvd Knox Gallery 2 405 University Dr. EDRAINAGE REPORT
FOR THE
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
A New Benjamin Knox Gallery
LOCATED ON
Lot IA, Block "D" of the College Heights Addition
College Station, Texas
PREPARED FOR:
Benjamin Knox
Benjamin Knox Gallery
404 University Drive E .
College Station, Texas 77840
SUBMITTED BY:
Ash & Browne Engineering, Inc.
P.O. Box 10838
College Station, Texas 77842
January 2001
ABEi No. 1032001
0 COPYRIGHf200 1, ASH & BROWNE ENGINEERING, !N C .
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Location ................................................................. 1
Description of Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-BASINS
Primary Basin Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Secondary Drainage Basin Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
Regulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Development Criteria Reference and Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
HYDROLOGICAL CRITERIA
Runoff Calculation Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
TABLE 1
Runoff Coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
TABLE2
b, d, & e Values and Calculated Intensity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
HYDRAULIC CRITERIA
Capacity Calculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Detention and Storag e Calculation Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN
General Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
TABLE3
SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
CONCLUSION
Compliance with City Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Effectiveness of Drainage Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Explanation of the Effectiveness of
Existing and Proposed Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
FIGURES
Figure # 1 -Location Map
Figur e #2 - F .I .RM.
Figure #3 -Existing Conditions
Figur e #4 -Proposed Conditions
CALCULATIONS
Rational Method Runoff Calculations
Drainage Report for January 2001
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
CERTIFICATION
"I certify that this report for the drainage design of The College Station Depot located on Lot IA, Block "D"
of the College Heights Addition was prepared by me in accordance with the provisions of the City of College
Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards for the owners thereof."
Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Texas No. 81890
Drainage Report for January 200I
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Location
The proposed building site is located on Lot IA, Block "D" of the College Heights Addition located in the
City of College Station. The property is located adjacent to University Drive on the south and MacArthur
Street on the east. Immediately adjacent to the west and north of the site are the Northeast 1/i Lots I 7 & I8
and lot 4 of Block "D" of the College Heights Addition, respectively . Refer to Figure #I for the general
location map.
The nearest primary drainage-way is an unnamed tributary of Burton Creek Tributary C . The drainage-way
is located approximately 1, 100 feet to the northeast. The property is located in the "Unshaded Flood Zone
X" as shown on FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) map number 48041COI42C, effective
date July 2, 1992 .
Description of Property
Lot IA contains 0 .48 acres of land which is currently developed . The development of the site consists of
an existing parking lot and concrete foundation for a one-story structure. There are no primary or secondary
drainage-ways within this lot. Several large trees located on the site will be preserved and incorporated into
the new development . The proposed project will involve the construction a new single-story building . The
building will occupy approximately 2,544 SF . The existing parking lot will reused with minor changes.
DRAINAGE BASINS AND SUB-BASINS
Primary Basin Description
The property is located within a drainage Basin I (Burton Creek Drainage Basin) as set forth in the City of
College Station -''Drainage Policy and Design Standards" (Policy). As stated previously, the ''Flood
Insurance Rate Map" produced by FEMA illustrates that the property lies within ''Unshaded Flood Zone X''.
The unshaded Zone Xis defined as "Areas determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain"(FEMA). Refer
to Figure #2 for the FIRM map associated with this project .
Secondary Drainage Basin Description
Figure #3, existing conditions, shows that the existing site runoff discharges directly into that adjacent streets,
University Drive and MacArthur Street. Once the runoff reaches the street, this secondary drainage pathway
then transports the stormwater to the unnamed tributary of Burton Creek Tributary C . Runoff after the
redevelopment is completed will flow along the same path just described . Refer to Figure #4 for the
proposed conditions.
1
-- --------------'
Drainage Report for January 2001
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA
Regulations
No deviations were taken from the City's ''Drainage Policy and Design Standards" when this report was
composed .
Development Criteria Reference and Constraints
No prior reports or investigations were reviewed for this site. Since no other reports or investigations were
reviewed , this report looks at the impact that the proposed development will have on the down stream
drainage-ways .
The existing site is developed and has an existing parking lot and concrete foundation. At present, runoff
from the site flows to University Drive and MacArthur Street, which is considered to be the secondary
drainage-way. After development, that amount of impervious surfaces (pavement and building) will only
increase by a small amount . Also, the new development will utilize some of the existing parking lot and
landscaping (i.e. existing trees) that are currently on site . Therefore, the drainage from the site will not
change significantly from the existing conditions .
HYDROLOGICAL CRITERIA
Runoff Calculation Method
The Rational Method was utilized to calculated the peak runoff for the site under existing and proposed
conditions . Runoff for all areas was calculated based on "Soil Conservation Service Method" as required by
the Policy .
Runoff coefficients were determined for the existing and proposed land use. The following table shows the
coefficients that were used in the calculations .
TABLE 1
Runoff Coefficients
Land Coverage Type c
Pavement, Building, etc . 0 .90
Landscaped and Grassy 0 .40
Areas, etc.
The site is approximately 167' deep and 125' wide. Because the site is so small , the calculated time of
concentration would be less than 10 minutes for both the existing and proposed conditions . Therefore, in
accordance with the Policy, the minium time of concentration was taken as 10 minutes for both conditions .
With the time of concentration determined , the intensity was determined based on the Weather Bureau
2
--__________ __..
Drainage Report for January 2001
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
(NWS) Technical Paper No. 40 "Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States". T he intensity equation is
as follows :
where: I = Intensity (in/hr)
t c = Time of Concentration (min)
b , d, and e = Values in the following Table .
The following table shows the values of b , d , and e for each storm event :
TABLE2
b, d, & e Values and Calculated Intensity
Storm Event b d e Time of Intensity
(year) Concentration (in/hr)
(min)
2 65 8.0 0.806 10 6 .3
5 76 8.5 0.785 10 7.7
10 80 8.5 0.763 10 8.6
25 89 8.5 0.754 10 9.9
50 98 8.5 0.745 10 11.1
100 96 8.0 0.730 10 11.6
Refer to Calculations for a summary of runoff calculations for each storm event.
HYDRAULIC CRITERIA
Capacity Calculations
No drainage facilities will be constructed as part of this project. See the section entitled ''Drainage Facility
Design" of this report for further discussion on capacity calculations .
Detention and Storage Calculation Method
Calculations show that detention and storage facilities will not be required . See the section entitled ''Drainage
Facility Design" of this report for further discussion on detention and storage facilities .
3
Drainage Report for January 2001
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
DRAINAGE FACil..ITY DESIGN
General Concept
ff from to the adjacent As stated previously, the existing and proposed site conditions will transport runo
streets . Because the proposed improvements are utilizing existing features of the si
site will not be significantly increased . The following table condenses the information
te, the runoff from the
that was obtained from
the Calculations:
Rftum
Period
2
5
10
2 5
50
100
TABLE3
SUMMARY OF CALCULATIONS
EXISTING PROPOSED RUNOFF
CONDITIONS CONDITIONS INCREASE
(cfS) (cfS) (cfs)
2.07 2 .10 0.03
2.52 2.55 0.03
2.82 2.87 0.05
3 .22 3 .27 0.05
3 .65 3 .70 0.05
3 .81 3 .86 0 .05
acilities DetentionF
Required
(YIN)
?
N
N
N
N
N
N
age basin must provide It should be noted that the Policy states that all development in the Burton Creek drain
facilities to detain rainfall events up to and including the 100-year storm event. Altho
of this site will increase the runoff, we believe that the amount to which the runo
insignificant . Therefore, we believe that no detention facilities should be constructed
ugh the redevelopment
ff is increased will be
on this site and that the
increase in runoff will have no effect on the down stream drainage-ways.
CONCLUSION
Compliance with City Standards
From the information that is presented in this report, we have shown that the redevel opment of this site will
meet the City's Policy regarding drainage improvements.
Effectiveness of Drainage Design
sed conditions will be The drainage plan shows that the stormwater runoff under the existing and propo
conveyed off of the site and into the secondary drainage-way (i .e . streets) in the sam
storm drainage from the site will transported to the unnamed tributary of Burton Cre
e manner. All of the
ek Tributary C via the
existing streets and storm drains.
4
II
Drainage Report for January 2001
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
Explanation of the Effectiveness of
Existing and Proposed Improvements
The insignificant increase in runoff will have no effect on the down stream drainage-ways . Therefore, no
drainage or detention facilities will be construction as part of the improvements of the site .
5
Drainage Report for January 2001
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
FIGURES
t
SCAL E: 1" = JOO '
1032001-001-01
FIGURE #1
LOCATION MAP
ASll & BROWI'm E!YCH!YEEBIJYG_, l!YC.
Engineers and Consuhants
P .O. Box 10838, College Station, Texas 77842
979-~914 877-245 -4839 Fax: 979-8#-8914
"'ii .... ., -
-..
-J I
0 :.--::---_ VVr~-
i on
COPIED FROM FLOOD INSURANCE MAP
MAP NUMBER: 48041C0 142 C
EFFECTIVE DATE: JULY 2 , 1992
ZONEX
/PROJECT
LOCATION
t
SCALE : 1 • = ±500'
1032001-002-01
FIGURE #2
F.l.R.M.
ASif lk BB.OW1'¥E EIYGJIYEERIJYU1 JIYC.
Engineers and Consultants
P.O. Box 10838 , College Station, Texas 778 42
979-846-6914 877-245-4839 Fax : 979-846-89 14
. '·
I
.~-·
'
\
LEGEND
GRASS
(PERVIOUS)
CONCRETE
(IMPERVIOUS)
BUILDING/STRUCTURE
(IMPERVIOUS)
0----0-EXISTING FENCE
e--e-PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOURS
--OE-EXISTING OVERHEAD
ELECTRIC
-2W-EXISTING 2 "
WATER LINE
-s-EXISTING SEWER
'Q UTILITY POLE
SCALE: 1" = 30'
1032001-003-01
-
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
' I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
.... ' w ' w ' od
_.. .... I
I~~ I <(:
1
0 I
<(I
:::E I
I
<>i I
<>i I
I
,.1
I
I
I
FIGURE#J
EXISTING CONDITIONS
AS1l lk BROW/YE ElYOllYEERIJYO, IJYC.
Engineers and Consultants
P.O . Box 10838, College Station , Texas 77842
9794!46-6914 877-245-4 839 Fax : 979-846-89 14
;I
( . .
• \
--
..
. ,.
-'·
.. ,
j
II
' ,
~ '
r
\
"\.
[J
D
~
... 1-1 I ...
... \ ... t ... ... ... ...
"" ... .. Q,I
~ . . ... 1 ·~ ... ... ... ,
... ... ... .. .
~ ... 4
...
\ \
' \
I \I .
I
I
I
I
I
t l j' ....... ..., ...................... '\.I I i
* + ... • • ~ • • + + --~ I
I
I
I
I
I • •••••••• /_ •• 4 }·,
4 .. .. --.. I
I
I ~ .. -2 41 ..., • / .. • • ·: • : ~
ft..
. . . ' .• , . ' ... · ' . / , . . ·(.. . ·.. . . . ·ri . ' "1·1· w' -~ .. .. 1 • .k' 4 • • PRPOSf=D • 1 • :• ... : c..i
. / • • • .; •
4 PAR IS1 t-J GJ,~~~-• • • fj , ~·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.. CH • 4
"" ..:i •_f\J ·
: ,; ' .. « • • \" • • ~ . • · t .. . ; . .
•4 . ;. . . . .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tij I w ,
0:: I _,. t-I
I \ en , 1~~ I ~I o '
1
' ~:
2: I
I
c.,., I
c..i I
\
I _,
I
I
I
LEGEND
WOOD DECK 0--0-EXISTING FENCE
(PERVIOUS) t--e-PROPERTY LINE
GRASS EXISTING CONTOURS
(PERVIOUS) --OE-EXISTING OVERHEAD
CONCRETE ELECTRIC
(IMPERVIOUS) -2w-EXISTING2"
WATER LINE
PROPOSED -s-EXISTING SEWER BUILDING/STRUCTURE b. UTILITY POLE (IMPERVIOUS) SCALE : 1" = 30'
1032001-004-01
FIGURE#4
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
ASll l!lt BROWJYE EJYGIJYEEIUJVG1 IJYC.
Engineers and Consultants
P.O. Box 10838 , College Station, Texas 7784 2
979-846-69 14 877-245-4839 Fax: 979-846-891 4
, ...
-,
. ,
1
i •
"
• I
Drainage Report for January 2001
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
CALCULATIONS
THE COLLEGE STATION DEPOT
A NEW BENJAMIN KNOX GALLERY
RATIONAL DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
Existing and Proposed Conditions
January 2001
ABEi No. 1032001
By: JOB
DRAINAGE AREA TYPES EXISTING
Pervious Areas (Grassy/Landscaped Areas)
Impervious Areas (Concrete, Building, etc.)
Pervious Areas (Grassy/Landscaped Areas)
Impervious Areas (Concrete, Building , etc.)
Description
See Note 1 below.
Description
See Note 1 below.
Time of Concentration
Area
acres
0.2100
0.2700
Total: 0.4800
Existin
NA
Pro osed Flow Path
Length Slo e Data
ft End Elev.
NA NA
Tc Used
Runoff
Coefficient
0.40
0.90
0.681
Slope
%
NA
Slope
%
NA
PROPOSED
Area Runoff
Coefficient
acres
0.20 0.40
0.28 0.90
0.4800 0.692
Velocity Time
f min.
NA 10.0
TOTAL: 10.0
Velocity Time
f s min.
NA 10.0
TOTAL: 10.0
Conditions 10 min. 10.0 min. 10.0 min . Intensity = b/ (Tc+ d)"e
sed Conditions 1 O min . 10.0 min. 10.0 min.
Storm BRAZOS COUNTY
Period Exist in Pro sed Existin Pro sed Increase
b d e Intensity Intensity Runoff Runoff
ear in/hr in/hr cf s cf s cf s
2 65 8.0 0.806 6 .3 6.3 2.07 2.10 0.03
5 76 8 .5 0.785 7.7 7.7 2.52 2.55 0.03
10 80 8.5 0.763 8.6 8.6 2 .82 2.87 0.04
25 89 8.5 0.754 9.9 9.9 3.22 3.27 0.04
50 98 8.5 0.745 11.1 11 .1 3.65 3.70 0.05
100 96 8.0 0.730 11.6 11 .6 3.81 3.86 0.05
Note(s):
1. Time of Concentration for site is less than 1 O minutes for existing and proposed conditions.
2. Increase in flow is insignificant; therefore, detention is not required .
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
2/7/oj
~
ne/Firm : @Ce.~-1/~,t(~->"~'='hr-.
ress: ?II Uf1·v~,,. 1y U. ~' '5k ZO/
u/ktfc-.::;M,~, k
Date: -1JP ?:eb. c?I
Phone : Z6<:?-e6L;>
Fax : ~46-8 z;z_~
e are transmitting the following for Development Services to review and comment : (Check all that apply.):
0 Master Development Plan
0 Preliminary Plat
0 Final Plat
D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMA/LOMR
l3'"""Site Plan
13' Grading Plan
~Landscape Plan
0 Irrigation Plan
~Building Construction Documents
w/ D Redlines
w/ 0 Redlines
w/ D Redlines
w/ 0 Redlines
w/ 0 Redlines
w/ D Redlines
w/ D Redlines
w/ 0 Redlines
w/ 0 Redlines
-~FRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
.lf infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set.
The following are included in the complete set :
0 Waterline Construction Documents w/ D Redlines
0 Sewerline Construction Documents w/D Redlines
0 Drainage Construction Documents w/ D Redlines
0 Street Construction Documents w/ D Redlines
0 ysement application with metes & bounds decsription
13"" Drainage Letter or Report w/ D Redlines
0 Fire Flow Analysis w/ D Redlines
Special fnstructions:
~~e~~s
TRANSMITTAL IEITER
TRANSMIT.DOC 03/23199
D Development Permit App.
D Conditional Use Permit
D Rezoning Application
D Variance Request
D Other -Please specify
D TxDOT Driveway Permit
~ TxDOT Utility Permit
D Other -Please specify
1 ofl
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764 -3496
MEMORANDUM
March 14, 2001
TO: Mike Record, The Arkitex Studio, In c. Vi a fax 846 -8224
FROM: Natalie Ruiz , Development Coordinator
SUBJECT: New Benjamin Knox Galleiy-Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff
review comments detailing items that ne ed to be addres sed. The next submittal will be the
third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed
on the next submittal, another $ 100 processing fee will n ee d to be submitted for the
subsequent set of three (3) reviews . Pl ease address the comments and submit the following
information for further staff review:
Three (3) complete sets of building construction documents (architectural and
civil plans) for the proposed development with the revised site and landsc aping
plans attached;
Three (3) sets of the revis ed site plan and civi l plans only;
Two (2) copies of the revised site and landscape plan sheets only; and,
PIPP Application a nd the associated information for work proposed in the City 's
right-of-way.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details . If you h ave any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 764 -35 70.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: Benjamin Knox , Via fax 694 -9 141
Cas e file #01 -38
Home of Texas A&M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 2
Project: BENJAMIN KNOX GALLERY #2 (SP)-SITE PLAN (1-500038)
PLANNING
1. Staff feels that the addition of two more trees in the rear of the property
would satisfy the POD requirement.
2. The streetscape screening shrubs along McArthur St. need to be placed
inside the property line .
3. The developer needs to provide a Private Improvement In the Public
R.O.W . Permit (PIP), for the two trees that are in the Public R.O.W. along
McArthur St..
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date : 03/08/01
ENGINEERING
1. The drainage report is OK.
2. Please show your proposed domestic water, irrigation and sanitary sewer
util ity connections on the site plan. Also show the existing city utilities to
which you are connecting .
Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date : 03/13 /01
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the
City of College Station , must be explained in your next transm ittal letter and
"bubbled " on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City , will constitute a completely new review .
Staff Review Comme nts Page 1 of 1
03 /14 /01 16:54 '5'979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX 0 .
CONNECTION TEL
CO NNECTION ID
START TIME
USAGE TIME
PAGES
RES ULT
*************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT ***
***************************
7025
9p6949141
03 /14 16:53
00 '43
2
OK
141001
03 /14/01 16:52
< '
'5'979 764 3496 DEVELOPME T SVCS
TRANSMISSION OK
TX /RX NO.
CO ECTION TEL
CONNECTION ID
START TIME
USAGE TIME
PAGES
RESULT
*************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT ***
***************************
7024
9p8468224
03 /14 16:51
01'22
2
OK
~UOl
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
MlNIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
../ Site plan application completed in full.
---V $100 .00 Application Fee .
~$100.00 Development Permit Application Fee.
__ $300.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a public
waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved .)
V Ten (10) folded copies of site plan. · v A copy of the attached site plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
checked off.
APPLICATION DATA
NAME OF PROJECT A 1'.Jc.e.v 1Se.n,J~~.:. ~,.,~'>< 4e../4ry~
ADDRESS c:(os (/,,,·v4~ .,'Y --a.. E.,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lo-f /A. g/oc-/1! 'V v~f,°j14~tJI tze>v&/,·v•'s;·,,_ ol Lofs I" t.; f '! "f:>l~e-1:. "d'
C:.o/1-etJ< ll•:j4-k ~.!,-~.,-,~. Vq4'...,c. ->IS, pl'l~..e.. I e,,1
APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name /17.·i-c.. 1Z~~-.:/, ?:f.12 4"'1:.' l~.c ~ ~ J.,e •
Street Address !?// _?.;....,, Wrl'.-·~ '[);-, £'J ~kzo I City Go//.,~< .:;;7',.,t;.J!r&.
State 7'>< Zip Code "? 7 ~ 4' o E-Mail Address /??st=~ 4,.. )::,,, .,l~'rC · t:. "'~
Phone Number q?#lf-~fP'7·?~ !.> Fax Number '1?9-8'1"~-!l~v~
PROPERlY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name "'fi!,e~ . .i~ ~ · h k-" ">r
Street Address Ji("~ 1//11 W,...r, '>-7:+-. c. City ~,/let[.e "53':~·~4.
State r>< Zip Code -77840
Phone Number 'I 74 -6'16--!?~6'1
E-Mail Address ------------
Fax Number 'f'?t::/-6qtf-q1'(1
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name /ni:-c °ZU:f?l"'e/ / ~ AJ,,,~J~ ~lr.J-,,, 4r.
Street Address tlf ~II ?-,,,,,,.._,h 'Jy 1.J,. IE.., "S./.:e2o,; City Lc:>l/~7-e S~'4i-'""
State' TX Zip Code -?7 8' ~ o E-Mail Address ,,,,.,., s,.. tft c::f • ~ ,,->'-"-• c. (?-
Phone Number t?/71/. Z.Gf?·Z6 ~ ~ Fax Number q?&:i-gefG ~ 8 Z Z:<T
OTIIER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.)
Naine --------------------------------~
StreetAddress ---------------City -------------
State Zip Code _____ E-Mail Address ------------
Phone Number Fax Number _______________ _
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
SITEAPP .DOC 03125199
1 of3
CURRENT ZONING C-I ----------
PRES ENT USE OF PROPERTY
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY
V ARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S)
#OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED //
-~--
l'.J MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Total Acreage ___ _
Floodplain Acreage __
Housing Units ___ _
# of 1 Bedroom Units
# of 2 Bedroom Units
# of 3 Bedroom Units
# of 4 Bedroom Units
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY
__ # Bedrooms ~ 132 sq. ft .
__ # Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft .
• •
# OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED I t7f
c~dur::-~-z..-~-.)
~COMMERCIAL
Total Acreage 0, "'f 8
Building Square Feet "2.'74~
Floodplain Acreage -c::> -
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true and co"ect.
~~ ~l,6.c.~4/.~hc.
ature of Owner, Agent or Applicant
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
SITEAPP.DOC 03/2.5199
2 of3
\ .
. ,
, ,
\
)J . .
SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION
Application is hereby made for the following development specific waterway alterations :
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
I, J . DA.LE 8 ROWJJ.Ej J~J P£., design engineer~ hereby acknowledge or affirm that:
The information and conclusions contained in the above p~~d supporting documents comply with the current requirements of
the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapte-':_$~~!!>.~ated Drainage Policy and Design Standards.
>.. a corulition of approval of this pennit applicatijll': 'l/~~~P.'° improvements proposed in this applioation according to
these docume and the requirements of Cha :r1t1.-bfthe ge Sfalii~City Code .
. . . :·:3::. ~ ....... ?:f:r. I.::.~.~
· / J . DALE BROWNE .uJR'ft---.1,_~ -----------Jlt6!:~~ ~Nt:.I >J.fSF:. r·:: .................... ~ .. ~or ,,~... 81890 ..-~.,,
CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations J~~~~~~~nrrl areas .) ,,~~··~~~--~~i'.J!!_~-;"' "d "al sed be thi . A. I, ceIUiy-a ........... ,, nonres1 enti structure on or propo to on s site as part
of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm.
Engineer Date
B. I, certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any
basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the
latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Haz.ard Study and maps, as amended .
..:.ngineer Date
C. I, certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not
diminish the flood<arrying capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or
development are consistent with requirements of the City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning encroachments of
floodways and of floodway fringes .
Engineer Date
D. I, do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year
flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study.
Engineer Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval :---------------------------
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris
from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities.
I hereby grant this permit for development All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
1pproved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College
JO Shall apply.
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
SITEAPP.DOC 03!2S/99
3 of3
..
Drainage Reports
"-....Location
""'-""9 Primary drainage system identified
"-. "Q Surrounding developments shown
'iJ Local streets, drainage systems shown
Description ~ Acreage of project
'-~ Land cover described
"'-.. ""9 Primacy/secondacy systems within property shown
"El General description
"'-.... ~raina2e Basins
Project Name: g _,Q.M k..M.07(
Review Date: 0 3 J I '; / " I
Reviewer: :fV Y / /
_ "'£l References to FIRMs if applicable ~ Secondacy system flow patterns and impact of development on existing system
'[] Proposed pathways to Primary system shown or described
-........._ ~esil?ll Criteria
""'-'EJ Any deviation from standards being requested?
""-'u Discussion of site constraints and capacities (streets, existing structures, etc.)
'£:J Discussion of any applicable previous drainage studies and how this plan will affect it
........._ Hvdrolol?ic Criteria
"El Rainfall/runoff calculation method described and calculations provided
'~ Detention discharge I storage calculation method I calculations
"'-.[] Storm recurrence intervals used
-0 Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used if not referenced in Standards
"-Hvdaulic Criteria
't:I Identify capacity of systems used \.hi Specify velocities at critical points in system
~ Identify detention I retention outlet and routing
---0 Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used not referenced in Standards
-......... ~rainage Facility Design
"El Discuss drainage patterns I flows (pre vs. post)
~D Are they draining water onto another property owner? -if so, is it where the water flowed before? and is it not
more than what flowed there before? and no faster than it flowed before?
~~ D Discuss erosion control measures employed LAM.l ,\ ~ 1
~~ D Discuss detention pond design (sideslope, low flow channel\, oatlet works, freeboard, emergency spillway)
·~---D Discuss maintenance access and responsibilities
"" Conclusions ~ "1J Verify compliance with DPDS (signed and sealed certification)
"o Explain effectiveness of improvements with regard to controlling discharges of 5 -100 year storm by
U) Detaining
~ b) Accommodating runoff in existing I proposed easements or ROW discharging into primary system
) Combination of a & b
9ofl2
Project Name: ___________ _
Review Date:
-----------~
Reviewer: ____________ _
Drainage Reports(cont.) .1\1? }$-0¥-
\. Apoendices .. \ ~ ~ ~ References (all criteria and technical information used) rv
"-\ ~ Hyclrologic computations
\" 0 Land use assumptions for adjacent property
0 Minor/major storm runoff at specific points
0 Historic/fully developed runoff specific points
0 Hydrographs at critical points
"\ ~ Hydraulic computations
\"" 0 Culvert capacities (headwater and tailwater assumptions)
D Storm sewer capacities
0 Street capacities
0 Storm inlet capacities (inlet control rating)
0 Open channel design
0 Detention area I volume capacity I outlet capacity
""-Attached Drawings ~~ Location map with drainage patterns
"'-. ~ Floodplain map if any ~ Drainage plan with topo (existing and proposed with arrows if needed)
~~ Details of outlet structures
o:\deve _ smrorms\engr\chklst.doc 3fl5199 10ofl2
. ' .. I>
?1~ \]A~ l l""'Lff"' '-"""-'<-""""J.s :[" N \~
f>u1.Lt. R..o .1'.J . Per,....,_,·1-
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496
MEMORANDUM
February 20, 2001
TO: Mike Record, The Arkitex Studio, Inc. Via fax 846-8224
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager
SUBJECT: New Benjamin Knox Gallezy -Site Plfl.ll
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested but had to stop review due to an
incomplete submittal. The following page is a list of preliminary staff review comments
detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the
following information for further staff review:
__ Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a
letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
call me at 764-3570.
Att achments: Staff review comments
cc: Benjamin Knox, Via fax 694-9141
Case file #01-38
Home of Texas A&M University
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1
Project: BENJAMIN KNOX GALLERY #2 (SP)-SITE PLAN (1-500038)
STOP REVIEW: Submitted plan does not match approved POD. The following
comments do not constitute a complete review.
PLANNING
1. Need to show zoning of subject property as "PDD-8", also need to show
zoning of abutting properties.
2. Need to show R.O.W. width of University Drive.
3. Need to show nearest fire hydrant location to subject property
4. Need to provide streetscape screening "shrubs" on the eastside of property
between parking spaces and Macarthur Street.
5. The POD that was permitted included trees on the rear property line.
6. The landscaping legend needs to be edited ; the site plans shows 2 Water
Oak, 13 Bradford Pear.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 02/16/01
ENGINEERING
1. Need to annotate the existing, proposed and type of pavement. The
pavement surface affects the drainage runoff.
2. The post-development drainage runoff needs to be less than or equal to the
pre-development runoff. A Drainage Report or a Drainage Letter is necessary
to justify this.
3 . Need to show site plan dimensions.
Reviewed by : Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 02/20/01
ELECTRICAL
1. Developer responsible for the installation of conduit per city design and
requirements.
2 . Need electric load data for service requirements ASAP .
3 . If 3 phase service is necessary, MacArthur St will have to be bored by .
developer and necessary conduit install to meet service requirements .
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
4 . Single phase service is existing on the west property line .
Contact Tony Michalsky at 979-764-3438
Reviewed by: Tony Michalsky Date: 02/16/01
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or
Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City
Ordinance 2394 .
2. Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance
2394.
3 . An RPZ type backflow device must protect water service line for ornamental
fountain.
Reviewed by: Rob Werley Date: 2/15/01
4 . Site is OK for 90 gallon curbside service. My only concern is the listing of a
"slab for residential waste container" located on the northwest side of the
structure. It's perfectly acceptable as a storage area , but the truck would not
be able to collect from that location ... ie, the container wou ld need to be rolled
out to the right of way on MacArthur. I just want to clarify that in order to avoid
any future conflicts .
Reviewed by : Pete Caler Date: 2/16/01
NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the
City of College Station , must be explained in your next transmittal letter and
"bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not
been pointed out to the City , will constitute a completely new review.
Staff Revi ew Co mme nts Page 2of1
. .
Transmit Log Record
Status
OK
OK
OK
OK
Da te
2/20 /01
2/20/01
2/20 /01
2/20/01
Time
15 :12 :24
15:12 :38
15 :14 :12
15 :15 :58
To
Mike Record
Benjamin Know
Benjamin Know
Mike Record
BitWare Client
Company
The Arkitex Stud io, Inc.
The Arkitex Studio, Inc.
Application
Microsoft Word -PZ04407 .DOC
Microsoft Word -PZ04407.DOC
Microsoft Word -PZ04376.DOC
Microsoft Word -PZ04376.DOC
Page 1