Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout23 Development Permit 01-12 Gateway Ph 2 1401 University EDATE: 17/MAY/Ol The engineer called to ask if his driveway permit could be sent as soon as possible when he sends in the additional 3 copies of Site Plans . DATE: 01/Jun/Ol Awaiting the following: their next submittal with P&P of Fire and Sanitary Sewer; min-max avg. demand table; and, completed TxDOT utility permit for which I left a message with Danny Miller. TxDOT driveway permit has been forwarded to Jay Page. DATE: 07/Aug/01 TxDOT Utility permit has been returned appproved. All permits with attached material needs to be forwarded to applicant with the Development Permit. TxDOT Driveway permit has been resubmitted to TXDOT showing University Drive widening and driveway tie-in . Called Danny Miller and requested a cost estimate for the Sanitary Sewer, Water Line and Street construction. He said he would like to send in mylars for stamping then send us the required copies. He also said not to expect anything within the next three weeks because he needs to receive payment from Extended Stay America for his services. 4 GENERAL INFO : Files- pp 00 -232 FILE NOTES Project: Gateway , Phase 2 1401 University Drive East DP 00 -089 Partial (for boring) FP 0 1-047 SP 01-053 DP 01-012 Partial (for C learing and Grading) Architect-Michael Bakke, Spitznagel , Sioux Falls , SD Hotel Owner, Construction Manager-John Hopkins, Extended Stay America, Spartanburg, NC Engineer-Danny Miller, Langaro & Clark, Austin, TX DATE: 11/APR/01 LOMR was submitted . See Spencer Thompson. FP mylar was resubmitted (2 sheets) with staff review comments #2 satisfied. It w as checked and filed in the PIP draw on 17/APR/O1 . For info prior to April 11 , see FILE NOTES in HTE under 00 -232 , PP. DATE : 14/MAY/Ol Staff Review Comments #2 for the SP have been returned by TV /MH. Roadway , Fire Line and Sanitary Sewer infrastructure are involved. Awaiting copies of Site Plan to forward to TxDOT with driveway ap plication (which is in the DP fo lder). A driveway letter is on the 0 \: drive. The Construction Manager has expressed a desire for a C learing and Grading Permit. DP 01-012 has been drawn up as a partial permit (which is in the DP folder) but has not been issued . A phone message has been left for the architect stating that the DP was ready. r DATE: 17/MAY/Ol The engineer called to ask if his driveway permit could be sent as soon as possible when he sends in the additional 3 copies of Site Plans. FILE NOTES Project: Gateway, Phase 2 1401 University Drive East DATE: 02/JAN/01 File -DP 00-89 FROM: Thomas V . Vennochi Jr. Reference the applicant's transmittal letter. They wish to clear what is necessary to gain access for their boring equipment and vehicles in order to take soil samples . Therefore, it is not necessary for them to obtain a full permit at this time. A partial permit for clearing and grading only is all that is required this time . Furthermore, item #3 (Grading Plan) on the Development Permit Issuance Checklist is not necessary, at this time, for a partial permit, but is eventually necessary for a full permit. DATE: 10/JAN/01 File -PP 00-232 FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. No driveway to University Drive will be allowed by plat for Lots 5, 6, 7, or 8. Refer to the original preliminary plat for approved driveway locations for each individual lot based on internal circulation layout. Access to University Drive for Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 was not able to meet the driveway ordinance as originally platted on the Master Preliminary Plat. When a median is installed on University Drive, driveway possibilities will be more flexible. DATE: 07/MAR/01 File -PP 00-232, FP 01-47 FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. The preliminary plat was approved, with conditions, by the P&Z Commission on 18/JAN/01. The final plat was on the P&Z Agenda for 15/MAR/01. Because the PP conditions were not met the staff was going to deny the FP. In lieu of this Kling Engineering opted to pull the FP from the agenda. DATE: 12/MAR/01 File-PP 00-232, FP 01-47, SP 01-53 FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. FAX to Danny Miller: This is to recap the points of our meeting this afternoon. Attached are revised Staff Review Comments No. 1 (Site Plan) to lift the 'Stop Review'. The Assistant City Engineer has determined that no detention is necessary . We will proceed with Comments No. 2 after the re-submittal. We will check with our Water/Waste Water Department to assure that the sanitary sewer has been upgraded. You will meet the conditions for the Preliminary Plat and represent those changes on the Final Plat to which you will resubmit both on Monday, March 19, 2001 in order for the Final Plat to go to the P&Z Committee on April 5, 2001. We are waiting to receive your LOMR. DATE: 28/MAR/01 File -PP 00-232, FP 01-47 FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Nothing was submitted on March 19 to satisfy the PP!FP requirements stated in the above note . I left a message, in regard to the deadline requirements , with Danny Miller on March 23. Kling Engineering submitted the FP only on March 26 w it h the current FEMA map flood plain depicted. I called Stuart Kling on March 28 and told him that the new flood plain needs to be depicted. They have satisfied the conditions for the PP on the FP, but I told him that a copy of the PP is necessary (with the conditions satisfied) to be on file in our office . He said he would submit the PP and resubmit the FP today. Later called in by Danny Miller, he said he was depicting the current FEMA map flood plain because technically the LOMAR has not been approved and , therefore , according to the City of Austin, the current FEMA map flood plain should be shown on the FP . I told him we accept the n ew revised flood plain per his drainage report and the flood plain administrator's (Assistant City Engineer, Ted Mayo mentioned above in the FAX to Danny Miller) agreement that a 0 .01 rise in the base flood elevations and no detention is acceptable. He requested to have the FP pulled from the April 5th P&Z agenda and will have revised PP !FP by April 9111 for the April 19th P&Z meeting. I told him he must send us a written request to pull the FP by noon March 29t h, or we will recommend disapprov al to th e Commission. l'Vlayo -Gateway hase II-TXDOT Driveway Permit From: To: Date: Subject: Ted Mayo dmiller@longaroclarke.com 6/11/01 11 :05AM Gateway Phase II-TXDOT Driveway Permit I received a call last Friday from Jay Page with TXDOT who said they were stopping review of the Gateway Phase II driveway permit because it did not reflect a tie-in to the new University Drive cross-section which is currently under construction . He asked that you call and visit with Asst. Area Engineer Karl Nelson . I do not have a number for Mr. Nalson but Jay Page can be reached at (979) 778-6233 . This will probably require a new submittal. Revised submittals should be submitted thru this office . Thanks College Station, Embracing the Past , Exploring the Future Page 1 [r ed M ay O -R E".""'Gateway Phase 11':"'r x t 5"d'r *'Driveway Perm it From: To: Date: Subject: "Danny Miller" <dmiller@longaroclarke.com> "Ted Mayo" <Tmayo@ci .college-station .tx .us> 6/1 1/01 11 :45AM RE : Gateway Phase II-TXDOT Driveway Perm it Ted , I talked to Karl and Jay at TxDOT this morning . They are providing me with the construction plans for University Drive , and I will redesign the driveway to connect w ith the future pavement section , and then will resubmit to the C ity for subm ittal to TxDOT. Thanks fo r your help , Danny M iller, P.E. Longaro & Clarke , Inc. 1101 Cap ital of Texas Hwy South Building C , Suite 100 Austin , Texas 78746 Ph 512 -306-0228 Fx 512-306-0338 -----Orig inal Message----- From : Ted Mayo [ma ilto :Tmayo@ci.college-station .tx .us) Sent: Monday , June 11 , 2001 5:06 PM To: dm iller@longaroclarke.com Subject: Gateway Phase II-TXDOT Driveway Perm it I received a call last Friday from Jay Page with TXDOT who said they were stopping review of the Gateway Phase II driveway permit because it did not reflect a tie-in to the new University Drive cross -section which is currently under construction . He asked that you call and visit w ith Asst. Area Eng ineer Kar l Nelson. I do not have a number for Mr. Nalson but Jay Page can be reached at (979) 778-6233. This will probably require a new subm itta l. Revised submittals should be submitted thru this office . Thanks College Station , Embracing the Past , Exploring the Future College Station . Embracing the Past , Exploring the Future . Page 11 COLLEGE STATION P. 0. Box 9960 August 7, 2001 Texas Department of Transportation A TIN: Catherine Hej I, P .E. 2102 Tabor Road Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Driveway Permit For Gateway Phase II OnFM60 Dear Ms. Hejl : 1101 Te xas Avenue Tel 409 764 3500 College Station , T X 77 84 2 Please find enclosed three copies of the driveway permit and the applicant 's current construction plans for the above referenced project. This is the applicant's second submittal pe r your previous comments via e-mail and telephone (e-mails enclosed). Please direct your attention to the Site Plan, sheet 4, for necessary information . They represent the widening on University Drive by showing the proposed curb. The plan has received approval by our review staff. Please return two signed copies of the permit for our distribution at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 s · ely, I / ' / j. ~ v. £l..il_/IN4"" ~J.__,, o as V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer xc: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator TxDOT Utility Permit File Encl. Form 1058 (3) Construction Plans (I) O :\group\dev _ serv\txdot\Gateway Ildrive2 .doc Home of Texas A&M University The City of College Station, Texas Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. P.O . Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • Coll ege Station , TX 77842 www.ci.coll ege-s ta tion.tx.us May 30, 2001 Texas Department of Transportation ATTN: Catherine Hejl , P.E . 2102 Tabor Road Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Driveway Permit For Gateway Phase II OnFM60 Dear Ms. Hejl: • (979) 764-3500 Please find enclosed three copies of the driveway permit and the applicant's construction plans for the above referenced project. The applicant is proposing access at a point which has been predetermined with regard to access issues with surrounding property and the proposed median opening on FM 60. Please direct your attention to the Site Plan , sheet 4 , the Driveway Plan & Profile, sheet 8, and the General Details, sheet 11 for necessary information. A 24" culvert is proposed in the drainage report although not designated in the plans. The applicant has not done a detailed culvert design because he is assuming that your review will include any recommendations needed to meet the widening of University Drive . The plan has received approval by our Project Review Committee of Planning & Zoning Commissioners. Please return two signed copies of the permit for our distribution at your earliest convenience . If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer xc: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator TxDOT Utility Permit File Encl. Form 1058 (3) Site Plan (3) O :\group\dev _ serv\txdot\Gateway 1irive.doc Home of Texas A&M University 05 /0J /Ol 14; !)J 'O'l:l7l:I 764 J496 Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities on Highway Right of Way Form 1058 (Rev. 12-96) l'n!Yious vor:sions '"" obsolclo. To sb,,, k_,, Q. r.., b""j i 4o e. i.lc,u-;. si. Hwy. Control Permit No. Section __ .. , ............ --- The Texas Department of T ransoortation, hereinafter called the Slate, hereby aurhori>.os C~ J ~ 4"'1. "-C:CA, ~~~~~ti; ~~l~ea~-~~~~~ee, t~ ?s) ~~~~.~~~a~:d ~c=~~-wa~p ~~~;j ~i8;.!!2Jr:~~ Subject to the following: :f fl~r;; b t:a~I-B~p:u5 1 . The G rantee is responsible for all costs associated with the constru c rion of this access driveway. All construction and materials shall be subject to inspection and approved by the State. 3. Maintenance of facilities constructed hereunder shall be the responsibility of the Grantee, and the State reserves the right to require . any changes , maintenance, or repairs as may be necessary to provide protection of life or property on or adjacent to the highway. Changes in design will be rnade only with approval of the State . 4. The Grantee shall hold harmless ·th~,State and its duly appointed agents and employees against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit. 5. Except for regulatory and guide signs at county roads and city streets, the Grantee shall not erect any sign on or extending over any portion of the highway right of way, and vehicle service fixtures such as service pumps, vendor stands. or tanks shall be located at least 3 .6 meters (12 feet) from the right-of -way line to ensure that any vehicle services from these fixtures will be off the h ighway. 6. Th is permit will become null and void if the above -referenced driveway facilities are not constructed within six (6) months from tr1e issuance dace of tl1is permit. 7. The Grantee will contact the State.'s representative --· --·-·······-----·--·. telephone ( ) at feast twenty-four (24) hours prior to beginning the work aut11orized by this permit. Texas Department of Transportation Date of Issuance --··· 6 i5 iri(:t'Eng ine er The undersigned hereby agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in this permit for construction of an access d:JNeway on the highway right-of-way. ( ;J ;J . Signed : --1..-L----~E=--~-__::..._ _ _.::::=:......,.--1r., o \o\ Date pf~~-:, M ~/"'"~"w''-'l FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Te xas Avenue South , PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 7784 2 Phone ( 409)764-3570 I Fax ( 409)764-3496 Date: June 1 2001 #of pages including cover: \. --1" If you did not rece ive a complete f ax, p lease ca ll our office imm edi ately f or a new tr ans;;;;;r TO: ___ --'D~ann=-y-"M'"--==il=le=r ___ _ FAX: (512) 306-0338 COMPANY: _______ -=L"'""o=n_..ga=r-=-o--=&-=---=C-=la=k=e ________ _ RE: ________ __;:G=a=te~w~a~y--'P~h=a=se-=-=2---------~ FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. PHONE: (409)764 -3570 COMP ANY : ______ C~ity~o~f-=-C-=-ol=le""-"g"'""e-"S~t=at~io=n"--______ _ REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review lZJ Reply ASAP D FYI TxDOT Utility Permit Application per phone message. Notice of Proposed Installation Utility Line on Non-Controlled Access Highway Form 1023 (Rev. 9-93) (Previous version(s) are obsolete.) To the Texas Transportation Commission do District Engineer Texas Department of Transportation ____________ ,Texas Formal notice is hereby given that ________________________________ _ Company proposes to place a ___________________________________ _ line within the right-of-way of ______________ in _________________ County, Texas as follows: (give location, length, general design, etc.) The line will be constructed and maintained. on the highway right-of-way as shown on the attached drawing and in accordance with tl~e rules, regulations and policies of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), and all governing laws, including but not limited to the "Federal Clean Water Act," the "Federal Endangered Species Act," and the "Federal Historic Preservation Act." Upon request by TxDOT, proof of compliance with all governing laws, rules, and regulations will be submitted to TxDOT before commencement of construction. Our firm will use Best Management Practices to minimize erosion and sedimentation resulting from the proposed installation, and we will revegetate the project area as indicated under "Revegetation Special Provisions." Our firm will insure that traffic control measures complying with applicable portions of the Texas Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices will be installed and maintained for the duration of this installation. The location and description of the proposed line and appurtenances is more fully shown by ________ complete sets of drawings attached to this notice. Construction of this line will begin on or after the ____ day of ___________ ,19 __ _ By signing below, I certify that I am authorized to represent the Firm listed below, and that the Firm agrees to the conditions/provisions included in this permit. Firm ----------------------- By(Print) ___________________ ~ Signature ____________________ ~ Title _____________________ _ Address ---------------------- Phone No·--------------------~ Fonn 1023 (Rev. 09 -93 ) (Previous Versions Obsolete) APPROVAL Hwy . No. __________________ _ Beg. RM Offset ____ End RM ___ Offset ___ _ Maintenance Section No. ---------------- The Texas Department of Transportation (TxD01) offers no objection to the location on the right -of-way of your proposed _______________ line as shown by accompanying drawings and notice dated except as no te d below. It is expressly understood that the TxDOT does not purport, hereby, to grant any right, claim , title, or easement in or upon this highway: and it is further understood that the TxDOT may re quire the owner to relocate this line, subject to provisions of governing laws, by giving thirty (30) days wriuen notice. You are request e d to notify this office prior to commenceme nt of any routine of periodic maintenance which requires pruning of trees within the highway right-of-way, so thatwe may provide specifications for the extent and methods to govern in trimming, topping, tree balance, type of cuts, painting cuts and clean up. These specifications are intended to preserve our considerable investment in highway planting and beautification, by reducing damage due to trimming. The installation shall not damage any part of the highway and adequate provisions must be made to .cause minimum inconveniences to traffic and adjacent property owners. In the event the Owner fails to comply with any or all of the requirements as set forth herein, the State may take such action as it deems appropriate to compel compliance. • General Special Provisions: • Revegetation Special Provisions: In order to minimize e ro s ion and sedim e ntation resulting from th e proposed installation, the project area will be revegetated Din accordance with TxDOTs Standard Specification It e m 164 which specifies the appropriate grass seed mix to be used, or Das indicated on the auachment. Please notify ____________________________ forty-eight (48) hours prior to starting construction of the line in order that we may have a representative present. Texas Department of Transportation By: _____________ _ District Engineer--District No. ______ _ SPECIAL SPECIFlrATJONS POLES, GUY WIRES, ANCHORS, OVERHEAD LINES, ETC. 1. PERMIT -The person in charge of this installation shall have a copy of the permit and its attachments on the job at all times. Deviations to the approved permit must have prior approval of the Texas Department of Transportation. 2. LIABILITIES -The Texas Department of Trausportation assumes no responsibility for conflict with other pipe lines or utility lines. Prior to beginning operations permission to crnss existing pipe lines or utility lines must . be obtained from the utility company involved. Gr; ntcc ; ;;st 1'lc · ft.:: r cs·rnns::.,:,:( · or ~ ... · :Hr h ;·,;_; 0 maintenance or construction operations of the Transportation, or their contractors. is Texas "' • 5 . s Department ~ s 0 of 3. SAFETY -Warning and protectivr. devices shall be used to prevent creation of a traffic hazard and to ensure the safoty of the public in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Parking of employee's cars and trucks on both sides of the pavement will be prohibited and all such vehicles shall be parked on one side of the road and in no instance closer than a minimum of eight feet from the edge of the pavement. All construction equipment and materials stored on highway right-of-way shall be stored in such a manner and at such locations (a minimum of 30 feet from nearest traffic lane) as not to interfere with the safe passage of traffic. ~ Any rock or tree limbs which were disturbed during installation will be removed. Entire area shall be left in a neat and presentable condition when work is complete. 4. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION -Longitudinal lines on the right-of-way shall be limited to single pole construction. Transverse lines should desirably be limited to single pole construction; however, where an existing or proposed utility is supported by "I-(" frames, towers, etc., the same type structures may be utilized for the crossing provided all other requirements herein are met. 5. VERTICAL CLEARANCE-Except as stated herein, the minimum vertical clearance above the highway shall be not less than 22 feet for power lines, and 18 feet for communication and cable television lines. These clearances may be greater, as required by the National Electric Safet)• Code and governing laws. Page 1 of 3 6. LOCATION (A) In rural areas and at uncurbed sections in urban areas, poles supporting longitudinal lines shall be located from one to three feet from the right-of-way edge, except that at the option of the Department this distance may be varied at short breaks in the right- of-way line. Guy wires placed within the right-of-way shall be held to a minimum and should normally be in line with the pole line; however, other locations may be permitted, but in no case shall the guy wires or poles be located closer than the minimum allowed for the specific design values for the highway class and volumes as shown in Appendix A of the section. At curbed sections, in urban, areas, poles shall be located as far as practical behind the outer curbs and p1 ;eferably adjacent to the ri g ht-of-w ay line. Steel rnles witl bases re ter th: 1 36 i c cs s a l 101 e pa Cl ' i 1'n 1e rig l -o -way except in extreme hardship situations and if sufficient space remains for other utilities. Exceptions may be c,pnsidered where ample right-of-way exists and the poles are to be placed outside of the clear zone or in accordance with the minimum allowed for the specific design value for the highway class and volume, whichever is greater. (B) At crossings, no poles will be permitted in the center median of any highway. Poles will only be permitted in outer separations or more than three feet inside the right-of-way v't'here the right-of-way is of such extreme width (over 300 feet) that the cost of spanning it is excessive and where poles can be located in accordance with the intent and provisions of paragraph (1) of the subsection. (C) As a general rule, overhead power, communication and cable television line crossings, at bridges or grade separation structures should be avoided, if possible. If rerouting the line completely around the structures should be avoided, if possible. If rerouting the line completely around the structure and approaches is not economically feasible, a minimum horizontal distance of 150 feet or a minimum vertical clearance of 30 feet should be provided to insure adequate safety for construction and maintenance operations. 7. IIORIWNT AL CLEARANCES -The following Appendix A indicated the design values for horizontal clearances. Page 2 of 3 Location Rural Rural Rural Rural Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Functional Classification Freeways Arterial Collector Local Freeways All (curbed) All (uncurbed) All (uncurbed) All (curbed) APPENDIX A llORIZONT AL CLEARANCES Design Speed (mph) All All 45 or more 40 or l~ss All All 45 or less 45 or more 40 or less 50 or more Avg. Daily Traffic All 0 -750 750 -150 1500 or mor e All All All All All All All All Clear Zone Width (ft) 2,3,4 Minimum Desirable 30 (16' for ramps) 10 16 16 30 3 0 (Use above rural arterial criteria) 10 10 30 (16' for ramps) 1.5 from 3' curb face (Use above rural arterial criteria) 10 (Use above rural arterial cr-iteria insofar as available border width permits) l. Average ADT over project life, i.e., 05 (present ADT and future ADT). Use total ADT on two-way roadways, directional ADT on one-way roadways. 2. W/O barrier or other safety treatment of appurtenances. 3. Measured from edge of travel lane for all cut sections and for all fill sections where side slopes arc 6:1 or flatter. Where fill slopes are steeper than 6: 1 it is desirable to provide a hazard-free area beyond the toe of slope. 4. Desirable, rather than minimum, values should be used where feasible. Page 3 of 3 2/91 SPECIAL SPECIFICATICNS Water Lines Crossing and Parallel 1. PERMIT -The person in charge of this installation shall have a copy of the permit and its attachments on the ·job at all times. Deviations to the approved permit must have prior approval of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation. 2. LIABILITIES -The State Department of Highways and Public Transportation assumes no responsibility for conflict with other pipe lines or utility lines . Pri or to beginning operations permission to cross existing pipe lines or utility lines must be obtained from the utility .company involved .. Grantee asst..nnes full responsibility for any damage to this line as the resLlits of maintenance or construction operations of the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, or their contractors. 3 . SAFETY -War ning and protective d ev i ces s ha l l b e use o preven creation of a tr · ffic hazai:' a d to ensure t he s a f ety o f the public in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 4. Line shall be placed within 5 feet of the right of way line, and top of pipe shall be a miniml.llTI of 24 inches below the natural ground. Line shall never be placed on front slope of highway.*** 5. Backfill shall be made in 6-inch lifts. Each lift shall be compacted with mechanical tamps , or equal, to a density equal to that of the surrounding ground. 6. Line shall be placed through a hole bored beneath the pavement and 10 feet each side thereof. 7. Line shall be placed through a steel casing which is approximately the S?JT!e diameter as the bored hole, and said casing shall extend from front of ditch to back of ditch. 8. Top of pipe shall be a minimum of 24 inches beneath the grade line in the ditches. 9. All above ground appurtenances shall be located at the right of way line or a waximum of one (1) foot from the right of way line where special circumstances dictate. All below ground appurtenances shall have a 36" minimum cover. 10. Trenching or open cuts through any existing paved surface will not be permitted without prior approval. 11. Any rock or tree limbs which wer e disturbed during installation will be removed. Entire area shall be left in a neat and presentable condition when work is complete. ***When Plastic Pipe is ·used, top of pipe shall be a mini.mun of 30-inches bel<YJ natural ground, and encased right-<:>f-vay line to right-<:>f---.ra.y line. M-iere plastic pipe is installed longittrlinally, a durable metal vi.re shall be concurrently installed or other means for detection purposes. PLANNING 1. OK. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP)-SITE PLAN (01-053) 2. Please show the lot boundaries clearly and make sure the owners of abutting properties are identified . If the Extended Stay is only a part of the larger Lot 1, please clarify that the boundary shown around the hotel site is the limit of the project. 3. OK. 4. OK. 5. See Engineering comment #3 . 6. If the island at the building entrance is not an interior island , then 276 sq .ft. of interior islands still need to be provided on the site . Could the entrance island be treated with enhanced paving? If it was decorative- for example, brick pavers-it would meet the interior island requirement. 7. I apologize-my math was off on this comment; but more interior islands are needed . The number of islands is determined by the total of all interior spaces divided by 15 . This gives developers the flexibility to increase the number of parking spaces in some areas while providing the island on a different row . The hotel has 97 parking spaces , 84 of which are considered interior (not against the ROW). 83 I 15 = 5.53 interior islands needed. Four are provided so 1.53 islands, or 276 sq.ft., are needed . The end islands are great. 8. OK. 9 . OK. 10.1 am having difficulty finding the ANSI note. Please let me know where it is or include it on the page with the accessibility details . 11 .0K. 12 .0K. 13.0K. 14.0K. 15.0K. 16.0K. 17 .0K. 18.0K. 19.0K. Reviewed by : Molly Hitchcock Date: May 11, 2001 Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 ~ Vt¢-? ~ .,. /'?.. ENGINEERING t?t-/IJ/17 ? ' ~Please provide us with a plan & profile of the fire line and the sanitary . ~wer line that will become public infrastructure. ~We need three additional site plan sheets to forward to TxDOT for their approval in their review process. lease provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). Reviewed by: Thomas V . Vennochi Jr. Date : 5/9/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station , must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans . Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 2of1 Ill (" PLANNING 1. OK . STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.2 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP)-SITE PLAN (01-053) 2 . Please show the lot boundaries clearly and make sure the owners of abutting properties are identified . If the Extended Stay is only a part of the larger Lot 1, please clarify that the boundary shown around the hotel site is the limit of the project. 3 . OK . 4 . OK. 5 . See Engineering comment #3. 6 . If the island at the building entrance is not an interior island , then 276 sq.ft . of interior islands still need to be provided on the site. Could the entrance island be treated with enhanced paving? If it was decorative- for example, brick pavers-it would meet the interior island requirement. 7 . I apologize-my math was off on this comment ; but more interior islands are needed . The number of islands is determined by the tota l of all interior spaces divided by 15 . This gives developers the flexibility to increase the number of parking spaces in some areas while providing the island on a different row . The hotel has 97 parking spaces , 84 of which are considered interior (not against the ROW). 83 I 15 = 5 .53 interior islands needed . Four are provided so 1.53 islands , or 276 sq .ft., are needed . The end islands are great. 8 . ·OK. 9 . OK. 10 . I am having difficulty finding the ANSI note . Please let me know where it is or include it on the page with the accessibility details . 11 .0K. 12 .0K. 13 .0K. 14 .0K. 15 .0K. 16 .0K. 17 .0K. 18 .0K. 19 .0K. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date : May 11 , 2001 St aff Re v iew Co mm ents Page 1 of 1 • ~ 7-~4?/ t /' ENGINEERING 1. Please provide us with a plan ~f the fire line and the sanitary sewer line that will become public infrastructure . 2 . Vf!e need three additional site plan sheets to forward to TxDOT for their approval in their review process. 3 . Please provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum , maximum and average demands ..i n gallons per minute) and se wer loadings (max imum deman d s-in gallons per day). Reviewed by : Thomas V . Vennochi Jr. Date : 5/9/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the City of College Station , must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled " on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review . Staff Review Co mments Pag e 2 of 1 • ...~ ~ ... , ~ .. . .. . , 1 I • . ' . • ,..... .. . .. . ' ... • ' Development Permit Issuance Checklist ©i2 ~(~(otl. $100 Application Fee (i) ~fo~t'Z. Application Complete and Signed 11 i/ 3. Grading Plan (submitted & approved) ii .::aL 4. Erosion Control Plan (submitted & approved) 5. EPA N.O.I. submitted for sites > 5 acres 6. Tree Barricade Plan (if applicable) D 7. Drainage Report/Letter (submitted & approved) ©Da ~f 8. $300 Infrastructure Inspection Fee (if applicable) D 9. Easements dedicated (separate instrument) D 10. TxDOT Permits issued (if applicable) D __ 11. Seale ft£ineer's Esymates Received rJ ;s.±1-12. side Outside~ floodplain (circle~ of ::Il'LI3. Drainage Basi n JS..,d-.,.. G,~ ~·, ~ jJ.:l Moczre D 14. Site Plan approved. Da te: ___ / _____ _ D 15. Development Permit issued. Date: _____ _ "The above checklist must be complete prior to issuing a full development permit on a project. To issue a partial permit for clearing and grading only, items 1-6 must be completed. Please i111"tial eacl! box i f you c!Jeckoff anyoft!Jese items." LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ~ 8-t)j DA TE OB NO {)f'(f'IA S-17-tJJ 113-r~-o) ~ ATIENTlCN £-; Longaro & Clarke, Inc. ~ Consulting Engineer s Land D ~/01::mumJ • S wr17TWaU r Quality Mana g t:mt:rr1 • W t.11Lr R es o urcrs 11a1 ~ofT ..... H~::OWlt.""1/~C. s,,,rw '°""'-""-T-=-'"'"° (,JJ 1) !06-IJ~"'-f"ar f! I:) .1"6-JJ:U.! . TO ~ WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 under separate cover via /;i£'x 0 Shop Drawings 0 Prints %Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications 0 Copy of Lette r 0 Change Order I 1 the following ite ms: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ COPIES DATE NO. THESE ARE TRANSM ITTED as checked below : tJ For Approval 0 For your use 0 As requested 0 Approved as submitted 0 Approved as noted 0 Returned for correctio ns DESCRIPTION 0 Resubmit __ copies fo r approval 0 Submit co pies for distribution 0 Return corrected prints 0 For Review and comme nt D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 FOR BIDS DUE 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN ·1·0 US ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Remarks t e-J . fo w.__ I/, ., . M 11 JV,,//)zAQ/ ?fiL::br ' Lt f /ti c§?tid -• COPY TO : File !f ~nc:osures are noc as no<ed !unaly noafy us a< o ne~ . ../ __ __........_ --- (-; Longaro & C larke, Inc. LEITER OF TRANSM IITAL ~ ~ DATE 08 NO D ~ Corzsulting Engineers S-17-oJ 115-13-o) ~ ATTENTION Land D~lopmenl • Slormwarer Quality Managr-:men:J • WllUr Re:tource:s /JOI Captool o/T<= HlqlrwayA<llr. ~dt>.qC.:;,.,,.. /00 -'"""'Taos 7"7 ..0 (.1 I]) Jt>6-IJ:."'1r -F"ar f! I:} JD6-11:£.!1 . TO Id WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 under separate co ver via £.i£x the foll owing items: 0 Shop Drawings 0 Prints J{Plans 0 Sam ples D Specifications D Copy of Letter 0 Change O rder I 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSM ITIED as checked below: tJ For Approval 0 For you r use 0 As requested 0 For Review and comment 0 FOR BIDS DUE 0 Approved as submitted 0 Approved as no ted 0 Returned fo r correctio ns 0 Resubmit ___ copies fo r approval 0 Subm it cop ies for distribution 0 Return corrected prints D ~------------------------ 0 PRINTS RETURNED A FTER LOAN -1·0 US Rema rks ~j_. -ro~ 1/. COPY TO: File It enc~osures ;lre nor as noced !<.ina ly nonty us at once . " The City of College Station, Texas Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. P .O . Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 www.ci.college-station.tx.us May 30, 2001 Texas Department of Transportation A TIN: Catherine Hej I, P .E. 2102 Tabor Road Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Driveway Permit For Gateway Phase II OnFM60 Dear Ms. Hejl: • (979) 764-3500 Please find enclosed three copies of the driveway permit and the applicant's construction plans for the above referenced project. The applicant is proposing access at a point which has been predetermined with regard to access issues with surrounding property and the proposed median opening on FM 60. Please direct your attention to the Site Plan, sheet 4, the Driveway Plan & Profile, sheet 8, and the General Details, sheet 11 for necessary information. A 24" culvert is proposed in the drainage report although not designated in the plans. The applicant has not done a detailed culvert design because he is assuming that your review will include any recommendations needed to meet the widening of University Drive. The plan has received approval by our Project Review Committee of Planning & Zoning Commissioners. Please return two signed copies of the permit for our distribution at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer xc: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator TxDOT Utility Permit File Encl. Form 1058 (3) Site Plan (3) 0 :\group\dev _ serv\txdot\Gateway II drive.doc Home of Texas A&M University FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Te xas Avenue South , PO Bo x 9960 College Station , Texas 77842 Phone ( 409)764-3570 I Fax ( 409)764-3496 Date: May 3~ 2001 #of pages including co v er:___.2=---- Jf you did no t receive a comp lete fax, p lease ca ll our office immedia tely fo r a new transmitta l. TO : ___ ~D"""'a=n....,n~y'"""M"'°"i,,....,ll=er.._ __ _ F AX: _ _,,,(""""'51=-=2"'"")3:..=0=-6-'""""'03=3'-'"'-8 __ COMPANY: _______ =L=an_g~a=ro<--.;&==....,;:C......,l=ar=k..__ ______ _ RE : _________ ~G=at=e~w~ay.l-"'-P~h~2'----------~ FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. PHONE: (979)764-3570 COMPANY: _____ _,C=i_ty--'o=f ........ C ...... o=ll=ee-ge=--=-St=a=tio=n=--------- REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review ~Replay ASAP D FYI TxDOT Dri veway Permi t ~-v COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 100012 DP-GATEWAY PH 2 FOR AREAS IN THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE ST A TION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DATE OF ISSUE: 05/09/01 OWNER: ROSENBERG, STANLEY D 700 N ST MARY'S, STE 800 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Clearing and Grading Only SPECIAL CONDITIONS: SITE ADDRESS: 1401 UNIVERSITY DR E DRAINAGE BASIN: VALID FOR 6 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion , and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets , or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area directly adjacent to the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development peunit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Date j Owner/ Agent/Contractor Date PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS Page 1 of 1 9-May-01 05 /25 /01 14:35 'a979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TR AN SMISSIO N OK TX /RX NO. CO NNECTI ON TEL CO NNECT IO N ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RES ULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 8062 053367926ppp396 05 /25 14:34 00 '53 2 OK ~UU.1 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409)764-3570 I Fax (409)764-3496 ty\a.,~ d-S-J d-~ e l Date: Ma:y 3 , 200i # of pages including cover:--"2"---_ If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. Mt~ 6cvldcz_ &OS--~~~-l'i o14 TO: Btmny Miller F AX: _ _.(i,=5_.._12=.) ...... 13_,._06"'---=o=-im"'-"'---- COMP ANY ~cif-~"O...<?y«-'l btuigEtr6 & Clark FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. PHONE: (979)764-3570 COMP ANY: _____ _,,C ...... ity.....__..o-=-f ..... C-=o=lle""'"g;>""e--=-S'-"'ta=-"t=io""""n _______ _ REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review ~ Replay ASAP D FYI 'FxDOTDriven'ayPefffii+ C\ew-("'S + C::>J ~ Pe..c--.-.....± • DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 100012 DP-GATEWAY PH 2 FOR AREAS IN THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DATE OF ISSUE: 05/09/01 OWNER: ROSENBERG, STANLEY D 700 N ST MARY'S, STE 800 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Clearing and Grading Orily SPECIAL CONDITIONS: SITE ADDRESS: 1401 UNIVERSITY DRE DRAINAGE BASIN: VALID FOR 6 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: All construction must be in compliance with the approved construction plans. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area directly adjacent to the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. Administrator/Representative Date j Owner/ Agent/Contractor Date PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS Page 1 of 1 9-May-01 i FOR OF CASE No"' DA TE SUBMITTED_.._--=-...,__'-"1,.-L..- SITE PLAN APPLICATION MINTh1UM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS _2L Site plan application completed in full . _2{_ $100 .00 Application Fee . X $100 .00 Development Permit Application Fee . Df--of -;t;Y _K_ $300 .00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable . (This fee is payable if construction of a public waterline, sewerline , sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved .) X Ten (10) folded copies of site plan . X A copy of the attached site plan checklist with all items checked .off or a brief explanation as to why they are not che~ked off. , NAME OF PROJECT ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPLICATION DATA . The Gateway Phase Two Lot 1, 2.54 acre APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project): Name Danny Miller -Longaro & Clarke, Inc. Street Address 1101 Capital of Texas South C-1 ~?ty _A_u_s_t_in _______ _ State TX Zip Code 78746 E-Mail Address dmiller@longaroclarke.com PhoneNwnber (512) 306-0228 FaxNumber (512) 306-0338 ----------------- PROPERlY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Stanley D. Rosenberg Street Address 140 East Houston St. 2nd Floor City San Antonio State TX Zip Code 7 8 2 0 5 E-Mail Address -----------~ Phone Number Fax Number ---------------------------~ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S TNFORMATION : Name See Applicant Info Above Street Address----------------~ City-----~----- State Zip Code E-Mail Address ------------------- Phone Number ___________ Fax Number----------------- OTIIER CONT ACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e . project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc .) Name ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ StreetAddress ----------------~ City----------- State Zip Code E-Mail Address ------------------- Phone Number Fax Number SITE PLAN APPLICATION ----------------1 o-f3 SITEAPP 04/13/99 i CURRENTZONING __ C~-_B ______ _ PROPOSED USE OF PROPERlY ____ H_o_t_e __ l _________________ _ V ARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) #OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED ----'9"--"3'--- MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Total Acreage ---- Floodplain Acreage __ Housing Units ___ _ # of I Bedroom Units # of 2 Bedroom Units # of 3 Bedroom Units # of 4 Bedroom Units FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY __ # Bedrooms ~ 132 sq . ft. __ # Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft. none / #OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 97 ---- COMMERCIAL Total Acreage 2.54 acr Building Square Feet 61, 7 24 sq. ft. Floodplain Acreage 0. 12 ac. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached h to are true and correct. SITE PLAN APPUCA TION SITEAPP 04/13/99 Date 3 of3 SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION Application is hereby made for the following development specific waterway alterations: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: I, 'Oa-ww:i d.w; P. €. . , design enginee,/owne<, hereby acknowlodge o' affirm that: The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting docume nt s comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code , Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Poli cy and Design Standards. As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application according to documents and Z" of Chaple< I J of the College Station City Code. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ E~;..,i::.c.--Contractor CERTIFTCA TIO NS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas .) A. I, , certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm. Engineer Date B. I, , certify that the finished floor elevation of the lo west floor , including any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended. Engineer Date c. P-e . certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not g capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent with requirements of the City of College Station City Code, Chapter 13 concerning encroachments of fl ys and of floodway · n ~-15-o! ' Date D. I, do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study . Engineer Date In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, ~d sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities . I hereby grant this permit for development. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. SITE PLAN APPLICATION SITEAPP 04/13/99 4of3 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone ( 409)764-3570 I Fax ( 409)764-3496 Date: May 14~ 2001 #of pages including cover:__,,3.____ If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: _____ D~a=n=n_y~M-==il~le~r ___ _ F AX:_......,.(5'-=-12=+)-=3-"-'06"'--0"-=3-=-3 8,.___ COMPANY: ______ ~L=o=n_g_a~ro~&~C~l~ak~e~------- FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. PHONE: ( 409)764-3570 COMPANY: _______ C"""'i.....,,ty ....... o ..... f ...... C ....... o=ll=ee-ge"'-=-St=a=tio=n=--------- REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review [8J Reply ASAP D FYI PS: John Hopkins has indicated the desire to get a Partial Development Permit for clearing and grading only. in order to have his contractor mobilizing . I have drawn the partial permit and called Michael Bakke who said he would contact John. I have not heard from them since. PLANNING 1. OK. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP)-SITE PLAN (01-053) 2. Please show the lot boundaries clearly and make sure the owners of abutting properties are identified. If the Extended Stay is only a part of the larger Lot 1, please clarify that the boundary shown around the hotel site is the limit of the project. 3 . OK. 4. OK. 5. See Engineering comment #3 . 6. If the island at the building entrance is not an interior island, then 276 sq .ft. of interior islands still need to be provided on the site. Could the entrance island be treated with enhanced paving? If it was decorative-for example, brick pavers-it would meet the interior island requirement. 7. I apologize-my math was off on this comment; but more interior islands are needed. The number of islands is determined by the total of all interior spaces divided by 15. This gives developers the flexibility to increase the number of parking spaces in some areas while providing the island on a different row. The hotel has 97 parking spaces, 84 of which are considered interior (not against the ROW). 83 I 15 = 5.53 interior islands needed. Four are provided so 1.53 islands, or 276 sq.ft., are needed. The end islands are great. 8. OK. 9. OK. 10.1 am having difficulty finding the ANSI note. Please let me know where it is or include it on the page with the accessibility details. 11.0K. 12.0K. 13.0K. 14.0K. 15.0K. 16.0K. 17.0K. 18. OK. 19.0K. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: May 11, 2001 Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 ,I ENGINEERING 1. Please provide us with a plan & profile of the fire line and the sanitary sewer line that will become public infrastructure. 2. We need three additional site plan sheets to forward to TxDOT for their approval in their review process. 3. Please provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 5/9/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans , that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 2of1 C Longaro & Cla rke, In c. L Consulting Engineers Land Development Stormwater Quality Management May 4, 2001 Mr. Thomas V. Vennochi, Jr. City of College Station Development Services 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station, Texas 77842 Re : Extended Stay America -Gateway Phase Two (SP-01-053) L&C Job# 113-13-40 Dear Tom: Water Resources Attached are revised site plans for the above referenced project , addressing staff comments dated March 12 , 2001 . As well , we offer the following responses to the City comments for clarification: PLANNING 1. 2 . 3. 4 . 5 . 6 . Submittal and revision dates have been added to the Cover Sheet. Ownership and zoning is shown on the site plan sheet. The ROW width varies along this section of University Drive , however, the approximate width has been labeled near the site. The existing wastewater line is a 12 " line , and is appropriately labeled . The water and sewer demands are s ~wn at the bot ~ of the legend on the util ity sheet. ~ e_Ji.J_J 1 { f~ s-~ 7 I~ /o/V All parking islands shall be landscaped as shown on the landscape plan . The parking island located at the middle of the northeast face of the building is actually a covered , paved entryway into the building. As this is the main entrance into the building, with heavy pedestrian traffic, it is desirable that it be paved and covered in this manner. This island is not being considered in meeting the parkin_g island requirements. 7 . We have calculated that 2,520 sf of end islands are required , and we are providing 2 ,863 sf of end islands . As well , since the only parking rows with more than 15 spaces are located along the northeast face of the building, the southwest face of the building , and along the southwest property line , only one 180 sf interior island is requ ired for each of these three aisles . This has been provided . All other aisles are less than 15 spaces, and therefore are not required to provide interior islands . 1101 Capital of Texas Highway South • B uilding C, Suite JOO • Austin, TX 78746 •Te l: 512 306-0228 • Fax:512 306-0338 • Mr . Thomas Venno chi, Jr. City of Coll ege Station Development Services May 4, 2001 Page 2 of 3 8. The dumpster pad provided is 17' wide X 12 ' deep , which meets the minimum required 12 ' X 12 '. The gates have been removed. 9. The fire department connection is located near the front entrance to the building, as shown on the utility plan . 10 . This note has been provided . 11. A 6" raised curb is being provided around all paving , with the exception of the parking areas located along the southwest and northwest property lines. This curb is being proposed as a laydown curb in order for drainage from the site to sheet flow off the pavement, and directly into the waterways located along these areas. Otherwise inlets and storm sewers would have to be provided , which causes more erosive conditions, and would be less desirable. Car stops are being provided for all parking spaces affected , as labeled on the site plan sheet. 12. All curbs will be constructed per the details on sheet 11 , which indicate the #4 rebar will be used. 13 . These trees are located within the barricade fencing, but are not completely protected per City criteria. 14 . The number of existing canopy trees outside the barricade area and within the barricade area have been adjusted. 15 . Tree Nos . 326, 327 and 328 have been added to the tree list. 16. No trees outside the boundary have been counted toward this project. 17. The southern and eastern parking islands have been landscaped with shrubs and trees 18. The irrigation note has been revised. 19 . Shrubs have been shown to screen the parking area from the ROW . Engineering ~1. Our understanding is that TxDOT requires developers to work through the City with regard to the design and permitting of driveways . We have included the application for a driveway permit from TxDOT, and it is assumed that review of that permit will include any recommendations needed to adjust the proposed design to meet there planned expansion of University Drive . ~-~­ ~- The TxDOT Driveway Permit Application has been enclosed ... µ1!1111!!1! .... !!lllFtrN~ S /\~ of -sP Each sheet is titled individually along the right hand side of the sheet. / 1101 Capital of ~~woy ~~.ct. Su ::.= :6<1 :1 ~306-0228 •Fax 512 306-0338 , ,' • / '.:r ~-. , ' • Mr. Thomas Vennochi , Jr. City of Colleg e Station Development Services May 4 , 2001 Page 3 of 3 ~4 . ~5 . ~6 . Creek flow arrows have been corrected, and drainage arrows have been added to the drainage area map. The storm sewer line is clearly shown on the grading plan, drainage area map and utility plan . Detailed information is shown on the utility plan . A separate drainage area map has been provided in order to be shown at a smaller scale. The areas where inlets are proposed are -e~roposed sidewalks are shown with a dotted pattern . ~~ ~ Miscellaneous 1. All irrigation systems will be installed per City requirements, and inspected by the City. 2. All back flow preventer will be installed per City requirements, and inspected by the City . We appreciate your review of this project. If you need any additional information , or have any questions , please do not hesitate to call. Yours very truly , \(J ARD & CLAL Danny Miller, . Project Manag OM G :\113-12\DOCS\SiteUpdate1 .doc 1101 Capital of Texas Highway South• Buildin g C, Suite JOO• Austin, TX 78746 •Tel : 512 306-0228 • Fax:512 306-0338 , ' . ' GENERAL INFO: Files- pp 00-232 FILE NOTES Project: Gateway, Phase 2 1401 University Drive East DP 00-089 Partial (for boring) FP 01-047 SP 01-053 DP 01-012 Partial (for Clearing and Grading) Architect-Michael Bakke, Spitznagel, Sioux Falls , SD Hotel Owner, Construction Manager-John Hopkins, Extended Stay America, Spartanburg, NC Engineer-Danny Miller, Langaro & Clark, Austin, TX DATE: 11/APR/01 LOMR was submitted. See Spencer Thompson . FP mylar was resubmitted (2 sheets) with staff review comments #2 satisfied. It was checked and filed in the PIP draw on 17IAPRJO1. For info prior to April 11, see FILE NOTES in HTE under 00-232, PP. DATE: 14/MAY/01 Staff Review Comments #2 for the SP have been returned by TV /MH. Roadway, Fire Line and Sanitary Sewer infrastructure are involved. Awaiting copies of Site Plan to forward to TxDOT with driveway application (which is in the DP folder). A driveway letter is on the 0\: drive . The Construction Manager has expressed a desire for a Clearing and Grading Permit. DP 01-012 has been drawn up as a partial permit (which is in the DP folder) but has not been issued. A phone message has been left for the architect stating that the DP was ready. ;°}MM Drainage Reports Location Primary drainage system identified Surrounding developments shown Local streets, drainage systems shown Description Acreage of project '\.. 'tl Land cover described "'-~ Primary/secondaty systems within property shown "\I General description ""-. »rainage Basins '-.. 'FJ References to FIRMs if applicable Aid rr '")) Secondaiy system flow patterns and impact of development on existing system "'iti Proposed pathways to Primary system shown or described ~ IA.Lit 11 L / tL 5 . "-DesignCriteria /JJ,~ ~ / -:fo~'"';tJJ1~ "-. '!J Any deviation from standards being requested? d J ~ Discussion of site constraints and capacities (streets, existing structures, etc.) ~ Discussion of any applicable previous drai ge studies and how this plan · 1 affect it \. Hydrologic Criteria 2-!Jf I~ ~ \ ~ Rainfall/runoff calculation method described and calculations provided '-\i£J Detention discharge I storage calculation method I calculations . "u Storm recurrence intervals used ~ \.. D Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used if not referenced in Standards Hydaulic Criteria · Identify capacity of systems used \. '1J Specify velocities at critical points in system "el Identify detention I retention outlet and routing ~~ Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used not referenced in Standards ~ »rainage Facility Design ' "El Discuss drainage patterns I flows (pre vs. post) Are they draining water onto another property owner? -if so , is it where th more than what flowed there before? and no faster than it flowed before? /,.J f)~ fore? and is it not Discuss erosion control measures employed ~~ Discuss detention pond design (sideslope, low fl els, outlet works, freeboard, emergency spillway) ~ Discuss maintenance access and responsibilities "-. Conclusions "tJ Verify compliance with DPDS (signed and sealed certification) Explain effectiveness of improvements with regard to controlling discharges of 5 -100 year storm by a) Detaining ~ b) Accommodating runoff in existing I proposed easements or ROW discharging into primary system Q c) Combination ofa & b 9ofl2 I ! Project Name: ___________ _ Review Date: ___________ _ Reviewer: _____________ _ Drainage Reports(cont.) "'-. Appendices '"6 References (all criteria and technical information used) ~ydrologic computations '" lJ Land use assumptions for adjacent property "-.. ~ Minor/major storm runoff at specific points \. "El Historic/fully developed runoff specific points ~ "£1 Hydrographs at critical points ~ Hydraulic computations ~ Culvert capacities (headwater and tailwater assumptions) ~ Storm sewer capacities ~ Street capacities Storm inlet capacities (inlet control rating) Open channel design Detention area I volume capacity I outlet capacity \,_ Attached Drawings ""-. "S Location map with drainage patterns "-. ~ Floodplain map if any "'1n Drainage plan with topo (existing and proposed with arrows if needed) D Details of outlet structures o:\devc _ ser\forms\cngr\chl<lst.doc 3!25199 10 ofl2 ,. --·" ,,, { . "' '\ () l ' ii i( . I ..... _,_~ ' ' ' ,'" \. '· ' . ' •, I , FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409)764-3570 I Fax (409)764-3496 Date: March 12, 2001 # of pages including cover :_4'---_ If y ou did not receive a complete fax, pleas e call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: ___ ~D=-=an=n_y~M"-==il=le=r ___ _ F AX: _ _.....(5:.....::..1=..,.2)'-=3"""""'06.._-0=-=3;.=..3 8=--- COMPANY: _______ =L~on...,.g,..._a~ro~&---'C=l=ak=e~-------- FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. \'\~ PHONE: (4B9.)764-3570 COMP ANY : _____ ---'C=i-ty.__o=f'--'C"""'o=ll=e-ge=-=-St=a=ti=on=--------- REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review r8:I Reply ASAP D FYI This is to recap the points of our meeting this afternoon . Attached are revised Staff Review Comments No . 1 (Site Plan) to lift the 'Stop Review'. The City Assistant Engineer has determined that no detention is necessary. We will proceed with Comments No . 2 after the re-submittal. We will check with our Water/Waste Water Department to assure that the sanitary sewer has been upgraded. You will meet the conditions for the Preliminary Plat and represent those changes on the Final Plat to which you will resubmit both on Monday. March 19. 2001 in order for the Final Plat to go to the P&Z Committee on April 5. 2001. We are waiting to receive your LOMR. I " STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (SP)-SITE PLAN (01-053) PLANNING The following pages were considered : 3 , 4, 5, 9 , and 10 . 1. Please include the submittal date on the site plan and add revision dates as appropriate. 2. Please show the ownership and zoning of the subject parcel and abutting parcels . 3. Please annotate the ROW width. 4. Please show the size of the existing wastewater line. 5. Please provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum , maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). 6 . Parking islands must be landscaped or treated with enhanced pacing . One island is identified as sidewalk . Please provide more information . 7 . 1032 feet of interior islands are still needed. 8. Unless otherwise required by Sanitation, the dumpster enclosure needs to be 12 ft . x 12 ft. Please remove the gates from the enclosure. 9. Please indicate the location of the fire department connections . 10 . On page 10 , please add a note that the accessible-related details shown will meet ANSI standards . 11 . A 6-inch raised curb is required around all edges of all paved areas . This includes off-street parking areas. 12 . Please verify that #4 bar will be used in curbs. 13 . The following trees are shown within barricade areas but do not have the symbol designating such: 29, 34 , 35 , 43, 295 , 297 , 326 , 328, 334 , and 350. Is it that these trees will be within the fenced area but the fence will not be the appropriate distance from the trunks? Please clarify . 14. There seems to be a discrepancy between the number of existing canopy trees outside the barricade area and within the barricade area. Please confirm these numbers. 15. Please include trees# 326 and 328 in the tree list on page 9. 16 . Trees outside of the property line can not be counted for this project. 17 . Note #2 on page 4 states that all parking islands will be landscaped . Please identify the vegetation to be used in the southern and eastern islands . 18 . Under "Irrigation Notes", please state the irrigation will be approved prior to C .O. 19 . Pa rking requires a continuous screen from the ROW . Please continue the line of shrubs or provide a berm in the gap along the southernmost parking area. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: March 2 , 2001 Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 .. ,,1 ENGINEERING 1. TXDOT is going to add sidewalks, a storm sewer system and place/replace driveways with the ir near future widening of University Drive . It might be to your benefit to coordinate with them on building your driveway . 2. Please send a completed 'Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities on Highway Right of Way' (TXDOT Form 1058) and two copies along with three additional copies of your Site Plan (sheet 4) so we can forward for administrative approval to TXDOT . 3. Please annotate your sheets with ind ividual titles. 4. Your creek flow arrows are going in the wrong direction . I don 't see any flow indicators except for what is in the legend. 5. Please put all of your drainage and storm sewer layout on your grading plan and increase the line widths on the SSLs, which I assume stands for Storm Sewer Line . 6. It appears that you have drainage inlet grates on your sidewalks. Please clarify this. Reviewed by: Thomas V . Vennochi Jr. Date : March 5, 2001 (initial) Mach 12, 2001 (revised) MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: Rob Werley NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 1 U.)/.l.)/U.l .LU: Ul:f • TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 6984 3060338ppppp161 03 /13 10:07 01 '13 3 OK l'1:J UU.l ) STAFF REPORT This has been pulled from the Mar15 P&Z by Stuart Kling on Mara Prepared by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: March 7, 2001 Development Engineering Item: Consideration of a Final Plat for the Gateway Ph 2 (FP) located at 1401 University Drive E. (1-500047). Applicant: Miller, Danny Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends denial because the preliminary plat has not been approved based on rezoning conditions that have not been met. Item Summary: • This property is a 5 . 700-acre tract, to be platted as two separate lots. It is part of the 25.566-acre parent tract. • The applicant intends to build a hotel on the eastern most lot, Lot 1 . There is no use proposed for the western lot, Lot 2, at this time. • It is zoned as C-8, business commercial. • The subject property is bounded on the: North by vacant R-5 zoning to the College Station city line; South by University Drive (TxDOT ROW) with office uses across the road; East by Gateway Phase I (zoned as C-B also, most of which is currently vacant, except for the Exxon station, Cheddar's and The Texas Roadhouse); West by a vacant A-P zoned lot. • The Lot 2 contains mostly floodplain but is still considered developable towards the front of the lot on University Drive. The rear of the lot conta ins part of the access easement necessary to access the R-5 zoning to the north. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: • The City's Land Use Plan classifies this area as Mixed Use . The layout of the tract accommodates uses that comply with the concept of mixed use. • University Drive is depicted as a major arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. • There will not be any Parkland required. The tract contains no Greenway on the Master Plan. • At this time , because of the widening of University Drive by TXDOT, the developer will not be required to install sidewalks on University Drive. The TXDOT project will include sidewalks on both sides of University Drive. • The preliminary plat complies with the Master Preliminary Plat that was approved in October of 1998. • There is no rezoning required. Item Background: The subject property was rezoned from R-1 to R-5 i n 1995 along with the 20 R-5 zoned acres to the north. At that time , the intent was for all of the R-5 area to become a single multi-fam il y development. In 1997 , the property was rezoned to C-8 , which essentially disconnected the future multi- family property from any street frontage . That rezoning included 4 conditions, three of which need to be shown on the plat at this time . There needs to be only one access drive for the entire 5. 700-acre tract. There needs to be access through the subject tract that serves both the R-5 tract to the north and the A-P tract to the west; and there needs to be a 100' landscape buffer between the C-B and R-5 tracts. The Commission on January 18 , 2001 approved the preliminary plat. The conditions as stated in the Staff Recommendations above have not been met. Budgetary & Financial Summary: There is no oversized participation invo lved in this property. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the Fina l Plat. Options regarding th is item are as follows: • Approval with conditions ; • Approval as submitted; • Denial; • Defer action only at applicant's request ; or, • Table only at applicant's request. Supporting Materials: 1 . Location Map 2. Copy of Application 3. Infrastructure and Facilities 4 . Copy of Final Plat INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: Water is being provided through a 12" waterline along University Drive to serve this property for domestic, fire and irrigation usage Sewer: Sewer is being provided through a 12" sewer line that runs along the north edge of the property . Streets: The hotel will be accessed by an existing 60' access easement runn ing along the eastside of the property . There is an ex isting 30 ' wide , concrete paved, cross access & public utility easement joining this one from the east. This cross access easement is off-site to serve the lots west of The Texas Roadhouse from the rear . They are Lots 3, 4 , & 5 of Block 1, Phase I, which have been recently developed. Drainage: Drainage is being handled by the site plan review in accordance with the City of College Station Drainage Ordinance. Approximately one third of the property is in the flood plain . Flood Plain: The plat shows the 100-year floodplain located on the property per the 1992 FEMA maps. There are two separate lots on this plat. Lot 2 of this property is made up mostly of a finger of the Burton Creek floodplain. There is an existing 30' Access Easement running through Lot 2, in the floodplain, serving an oil well north of the parent tract. Impact Fees: None Notification: None Required. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: GATEWAY PH 2 (PP)-PRELIMINARY PLAT (0-232) ENGINEERING 1. We do not require the annotation of wetlands area on our plats here at the City of College Station . Please remove the designation, outline and hatching of the wetlands area from the plat. 2. This Gateway property was rezoned from R-1 to R-5 in 1995 along with the 20 R-5 zoned acres to the north. At that time, the intent was for all of the R-5 area to become a single multi-family development. In 1997 , the property was rezoned to C-B, which essentially disconnected the future multi -family property, to the north of this 5.700-acre tract, from any street frontage. That rezoning included 4 conditions, three of which need to be shown on the plat at this time . There needs to be only one access drive for the entire 5.700-acre tract. There needs to be access through the subject tract that serves both the R-5 tract to the north and the A-P tract to the west ; and that there be a 100' landscape buffer between the C-B and R-5 tracts . Note: The fourth condition of the 1997 rezoning requires the property owner to provide a sewer impact study analyzing the impact of the development on the sewer infrastructure . Staff is currently researching whether this condition has been satisfied with any recent city sewer projects . Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 11 JAN 01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City , will constitute a completely new review . Staff Review Comments Page 1of1 ~ l. )( 2 . 0 3 . ~ ~ I :=g 4 . )d 5. ~ 6 . J1t 7 . ~ 0 .:8' 2 ;gt ~ )gf ~ LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 10 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW SIT E PLAN MINIMUM RE QUIRE M ENT S (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LTh1ITED T O THE FOLLO WING: Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). A key map (not necessarily to scale). Title block to include : Name, address, location, and legal description Name, address, and telephone number of applicant . Name, address, and telephone nQrnber of developer/owne r (if differs from applicant) Name, address, and telephone numb er of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) Date of submittal Total site area North arrow. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels . Existing locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Streets and sidewalks (R.O .W .). Driveways (opposite and adjacent per Driveway Ordinance 1961). Buildings. AJeJ~ Water courses. Show all easements clearly designating as existing and type (utility, access, etc.). 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the p roposed project site, note ifthere is none on the site. Utilities (noting size and designate as existing) within or adjacent to the p roposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets . Meter locations . Topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) ){ 8 . Propo sed location, type and dimensions of the following .: 0 V/A Phasing . Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. B The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building . Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. ~ Setbacks . Show building setbacks as outlined in O rdinance 1638 Zoning Ordinance, (Section 7, Table A). )a" Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned . Minimum parking space is 9' x 20', or on a perimeter row 9 ' x 18' with a 2' overhang. Designate number o f parking spaces ~ _,. required by ordinance and provided by proposal. ~ Handicap parking spaces . SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.DOC 04/09199 I of3 NOTE: 9 . 10. Parking Islands . Raised landscape islands, ( 6" raised curb) a minimum of 180 sq. ft . are required at both ends of every parking row (greenspace area contiguous to the end island maybe applied toward the required 180 sq . ft .). Additionally, 180 sq . ft . of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided . All required islands must be landscaped or set with decorative pavers , or stamped dyed concrete or other decorative materials as approved . Drives. Minimum drive aisle width is 23 ' with head -in parking or 20' without parking . Curb cuts . For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same opposite side of the street to detennine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts . Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance . (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements .) Security gates (show swing path and design specs with colors). Sidewalks (both public and private). Sidewalks are required at time of developm ent if property has frontage on a street shown on the Sidewalk Master Plan or if the review staff determines the necessity . (Refer to Section 10 .2 of the Zoning Ordinan ce). Medians . Show any and all traffic medians to be constructed on site . Landscape Reserve . A twenty four foot setback from R .O .W . to curb of parki ng lot is required . Pavement may encroach into this 24' reserve by up to 1134 square feet if streetscape requirement can still be met . In no case may the pavement be less than 6' from the property line . Conunon open spaces sites Loading docks Detention ponds Guardrails Retaining walls All required and other types offences (a 6' privacy fence is required between industrial/conunercial and residential developments as well as between multi-famil y and single family developments). Sites for solid waste containers with screening . Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas . Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required . (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required .) Show all easements clearly designating as proposed and type (utility , access, etc.). If dedicated by separate instrument list by volume and page . Utilities (noting size and designate as proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings . Meter locations (must be located in public R .O .W . or public utility easement.). Proposed grading (l' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage infonnation. (If plan has too much infonnation, show drainage on separate sheet .) Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any wning district other than R-1 , R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane . Show fire department connections . FDC 's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessibl e from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. Show fire lanes . Fire lanes a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if an y portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a public street or highway . Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted b y the City, and drives must have an all weather surface as defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 before a building permit can be issued . Will building be sprinkled? Yes ~ No D If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be conflict with handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts . SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.DOC 04/09199 11. 12 . 0 13 . 0 14 . 0 15 . 0 16 . 0 !JA 17 . o JJA 18 . 19 . 0 20. NOTE: Show curb and pavement detail. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations , utility pads, etc.) Curb details may be found in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 and alternatives to those standards must be approved by the City Engineer. No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". Landscape plans as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance# 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements . Include information on the plans such as : · required point calculations additional streetscape points required . Streetscape compliance is required on all streets larger than a residential street. calculations for# of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total landscaping points .) ' proposed new plantings with points earned proposed locations of new plantings screening of parking lots screening of dumpsters, detention ponds, transformers, A/C units, loading docks , propane tanks, utility demarcation point on buildings, or other areas potentially visually offensive. existing landscaping to remain show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barric ades are up before the first development permit is issued. Show irrigation system plan . (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.0.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping . Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demands submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O .W . ? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be any utilities in TxDOT R.O .W. ? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O .W.? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted . Yes 0 No~ Yes 0 No~ Yes~ No 0 The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site . The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). Are there impact fees associated with this development? Yes 0 No~ Signs are io be permitted separately. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.DOC 04/09199 3 of3