Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout22 University Park 00-219 1101 University Dr.March 31, 2010 Jane Kee IPS Group 511 University Drive East Suite 205 College Station, TX, 77840 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fa."'{ 979.764.3496 · RE: Prope1ty located at 1103 University Drive East Dear Ms. Kee: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced prope1ty h as r eceived an administrative adjustment of three (3) parking spaces fr om the number of spaces required by the Unified Development Ordinance, Article 7, Section 2, Off-Street Parking Standards (a 2.5% adjustment). According to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 3.17, the Administrator has the authority to authorize adjustment of up to ten percent (10 %) from any numerical zoning stan dard set forth in Articles 5, 6, or 7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. To approve the applicatio n for an administrative adjustment, the Administrator shall make an affumative finding that specific criteria, as outlined in Section 3.17.E of the Unified Development Ordinance, have been met. The Administrator has found that: Granting the adjustment will ensure the same general level of land use compatibility as the othe1wise applicable standards because the lease space r equiring the additional parking is limited to 3,000 square feet and it has b ee n stated that no group counseling will take place on site; Granting the adjustment will not materially or adversely affect adjacent land uses or i:he physical character of uses in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development; and Granting the adjustment will be generally consistent with the pmposes and intent of this UDO. If you h ave any questions, please feel free to call me at 979.764.3570. Bob owell, AICP Director, Planning and Development Services File# 10-00500047 ---·-·------1 .S -4---------·---------, ·1-C--------------- : 60 -'---=-~"-= - --·------ j I -· I - I - ---· ·--· ~ March 22, 2010 Jane Kee IPS Group 511 University Drive East, Suite 211 College Station, TX 77840 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Re: UNIVERSITY PARK PH 2, BLOCK T, LOT 15A, ACRES 3.046 Ms . Kee , Thank you for meeting with staff to further discuss the above mentioned property. The following is in response to your letter claiming vesting rights for the above mentioned property in relation to the application of the definition of a medical clinic . The subject property was originally part of the University Park Section 2 preliminary plat that was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 4, 1982 . The Texas Local Government Code requires that projects be vested to the code, regulations, and properly adopted policies in place at the time of the original permit. Specifically exempt from these requirements are municipal zoning regulations, prov ided they do not affect landscap i ng or tree preservation, open space or park dedication, property classification, lot size, lot dimensions, lot coverage, or bu i lding size or that do not change development permitted by a restrictive covenant required by a municipality. Staff does not concur that a change in the definition of a type of use allowed within a zoning district qualifies as a change in the overall property classification . Further, ifthe property were to vest to the zoning regulations at the time of the original permit for the project, the definition of a clinic in place in 1982 was as follows: "An institution, public or private, or a station for the examination and treatment of out-patients by an individual or group of doctors, dentists, opticians, veterinarians, or other similar medical professionals" (City Ordinance, 850 -Adopted October 23, 1972). )t:b (/ Changes to the zoning ordinance related to the definition of medical clinics occurred in 199-2, which altered the definition of a clinic to the following: "A facility operated by one or more physic ians, dentists, chiropractors, or other licensed practitioners of the healing arts for the examination and treatment or persons solely on an outpatient basis." It is Staff's belief that based on information provided by Mr. Young, Med Pro's owner, who stated that MedPro employs "an LVN as well as Licensed Chemical Dependency Counselors (LCDC's) as designated by TDSHS" and considers the company as "an outpatient treatment program," that Med Pro is most accurately defined as a medical clinic regardless of the changes to the City's zoning ordinance . the heart of the Research Valley P.O. BOX 9960 110 I TEXAS A VENUE COLLEGE STATION ·TEXAS• 77842 979.764.3510 www.cstx.gov Based on the medical clinic use, the City's zoning regulations require parking at a rate of 1 space per 200 square feet of use. Since the current site has parking provided based a 1:250 ratio , the 3,000 square foot tenant space, if utilized by a medical clinic, will be required to provide 3 additional parking spaces. As you are aware, this parking requirement can be waived with by an administrative adjustment which I am prepared to support, in part due to the previous leasing history of the property. Additionally, if there are continued concerns about medical clinics located in this center, the City also offers options of alternative parking studies to reduce the amount of parking needed on site to address the on -going issues relating to medical uses on this site . If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Bob Cowell, AICP Director, Planning and Development Services Beth Boerboom Planning & Development Services 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, Texas 77840 RE: Claim of Vested Rights for Lot 15, Block "r', University Park #2, City of College Station, Texas Dear Ms. Boerboom: According to Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code, the current owner of the above referenced property, has a vested right to offer lease space to allow Med Pro at a parking ratio of 1 parking space I 250 S.F. Med Pro should be classified as an office based on the regulations at the time this project was approved. At the time that this particular property was platted and then a site plan subsequently approved, the City's Zoning Regulations included the following definition: Clinic: " An institution, public or private, or a station for the examination and treatment of out- patients by a group of doctors, dentists, optician, veterinarians, psychologists, or other similar medical professionals.". The operative word here is "group". As you are aware, Med Pro employs one Licensed Chemical Dependency Counselor (LCDC's) as designated by Texas Dept. State Health Services. An LVN assists the Counselor, as is common in a typical doctor's office. The "Vesting Statute" Section 245.002 of the Local Government Code locks in, for the duration of a real- property "project," the development regulations in effect when the original application for the first necessary permit is filed. The Code specifies that a real-property "project" will be subject to the development regulations in effect when the original application for the first permit required for the project is filed. Each regulatory agency shall consider the approval, disapproval, or conditional approval of an application for a permit solely on the basis of any orders, regulations, ordinances, rules, expiration dates, or other properly adopted requirements in effect at the time the original application for the permit is filed. If a series of permits is required for a project, the orders, regulations, ordinances, rules, expiration dates, or other properly adopted requirements in effect at the time the original application for the first permit in that series is filed shall be the sole basis for consideration of all subsequent permits required for the completion of the project. All permits required for the project are considered to be a single series of permits. Preliminary plans and related subdivision plats, site plans, and all other development permits for land covered by the preliminary plans or subdivision plats are considered collectively to be one series of permits for a project. 511 University Drive East, Suite 211 College Station, TX 77840 979-846-9259 www.IPSGroup.us Texas Attorney General Opinion# JC-0425 in 2001, further clarified that change of ownership of a project does not take away the rights and benefits of the original owner to abide by the regulations in effect at the time of the original project. Our position is further enhanced by the fact that ADI, Advanced Diagnostic Imaging was permitted in this same center as an original tenant. ADI had one licensed professional and therefore, met the definition of office, not clinic at the time. The same right was granted to Dr. Maraist, a Neurologist who has leased space there since the center opened. The following timeline is offered for your review. Pre -2000 Nov. 2000 Mar. 2001 2001 2003 Feb., 2003 June 2003 2005 2010 Original University Park Block T, lot 15 plat Site Plan submittal date Vacating and Amending Plat -University Park Block T, lot 15 Center built consisting of 3 buildings C.O. for Todd Maraist, MD. -Neurologist C. 0. Advanced Diagnostic Imaging UDO date when clinic definition changed Current Owner purchased property Med Pro Park Plaza Center should be considered vested and subject to the rules and regulations existing at the time of site plan submittal. Any tenant with one primary medical professional should be considered an office relative to use and parking. Therefore, we ask that Med Pro be authorized immediately as an office use under the applicable regulation. The property owner has been working with the City for the past few weeks and the delay thus far, has caused much inconvenience for both Med Pro and the property owner. Thank you for your time and consideration. If you have any questions please feel free to call either Natalie or myself at IPS Group. Sincerely, Beth Boerboom -RE: University Park & Med Pro . From: To: Date: Subject: CC: "Natali e Ruiz" <natalie@ ip sgroup.u s> "'Beth Bo er boom"' <bbo erboom@ cstx.gov> 3/16/2 010 4:2 7 PM RE : Uni ve r sity Park & M ed Pro "'L ind say Kramer'" <L kramer @c stx .gov> Page 1 of 2 Sorry, the day got away·from me . I left a voice mail message for you this morning asking for a meeting tomorrow. I just need to get this issue resolved ASAP . Whatever I need t o do, please let me know. Thanks! Natalie From: Beth Boerboom [mailto:bboerboom@cstx.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 16 , 2010 12:37 PM To: natalie@ipsgroup.us Cc: Lindsay Kramer Subject: Re: University Park & Med Pro Natalie, I am on vacation today but will be in tomorrow. If you still want to come in today, perhaps another planner could meet with you and fill me in tomorrow with the information. Sincerely, Beth Beth Boerboom Planning Technician Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Office: (979) 764-3570 Fax: (979) 764-3496 www.cstx.gov City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University® >>>"Natalie Ruiz" 03/15/10 5:50 PM >>> Good afternoon Beth ! Jane and I have been working on the Med Pro leasing case and would like to meet with you tomorrow after l unch to discuss. To give you a head's up, here's what we're thinking : • The discussions/disagreements to date have focused on the functional aspects of Med Pro and whether fi le://C:\Documents and Setti ngs\bbo erbo om\Local Settings\Te mp\XPgrp wise\4B 9F B17D ... 3/17/20 10 Page 2 of2 it meets the definition of a "clinic" in the City's UDO . We're not arguing that point; however, we are arguing the fact that the wrong code is being applied in this case. • The site plan for the Park Plaza office development, consisting of 3 buildings, was approved on February 22, 2001 . The Zoning Ordinance at that time (not the UDO) defined clinic as a "group" of medical professionals . The UDO then changed that definition to a single professional. • The code in which we are vested, the Zoning Ordinance, permits a single medical professional as an office use -not a clinic . In fact, two original tenants of the office complex that are still in operation, meet this exact definition of having only 1 medical professional. We're finishing up a detailed letter with references to Chapter 245 and a development timeline for this property that highlights our vesting argument. I wanted to also let you know that the property owner is very anxious to get this resolved; in fact, if we don't get this resolved this week, the tenant may walk. Thanks again for helping us work through this mess! Natalie Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP Principal IPS Group, Planning Solutions 511 Univers ity Drive East , Suite 205 College Station , Texas 77840 979.846.9259 Office 979 .260 .3564 Fax 979 .229 .6797 Mobile www .ipsgroup .us file://C:\Documents and Settings\bboerboom\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4B9FB17D... 3/17/2010 Page 1of4 Beth Boerboom -MedPro From: Beth Boerboom To: lkramer@cstx.gov Date: 3/16/2010 12:40 PM Subject: Med Pro Attachments: Re: Good Morning Lindsay, Here is the information about MedPro that JP and I have been working on. Natalie may come by today to discuss the vesting issues but hopefully she will come tomorrow when I am back. Beth Jane, As requested, please find below the emails related to Med Pro. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Beth Boerboom Beth Boerboom · Planning Technician Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Office: (979) 764-3570 Fax: (979) 764-3496 www.c stx .gov City of Coll ege Station H om e of Texas A &M University ® Beth Boerboom Planning Technician Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Office: (979) 764-3570 Fax: (979) 764-3496 www.cstx.gov City of College Station Home of Texas A&M University ® file://C :\Documents and Settings\bboerboom\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4B9F7C5A... 3/17 /2010 >>>Jennifer Prochazka 3/14/2010 10:02 AM >>> Natalie, See attached email string to see how MedPro has classified itself as a use. Thanks! Jennifer Prochazka, AICP Senior Planner Dept. of Planning & Development Services City of College Station tel.: 979.764.3570 fax: 979.764.3496 www.cstx.gov >>>Jennifer Prochazka 3/5/2010 1:48 PM >>> Rusty, Page 2 of 4 Based on the description provided, this use is classified by the City as a "clinic." The City defines "clinic" as "a facility operated by one or more physicians, dentists, chiropractors, or other licensed practitioners of the healing areas for the examination and treatment of persons solely on an outpatient basis." To be clear, a clinic use IS permitted in the A-P zoning district. The issue in this case is an inadequate number of parking spaces located on site since a clinic use requires a parking ratio of 1/200 s.f. and a general office ratio of 1/250 s.f. was provided on site. Beth Boerboom, Planning Technician, can discuss the options to move forward, as she had researched these and provided this information to representatives of Oldham-Goodwin and Medpro earlier this week when first asked. I will be out of the office on maternity leave after today, so Beth is your best contact person since she is familiar with both the site and regulations. Thanks Rusty! Jennifer Prochazka, AICP Senior Planner Planning & Development Services City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Office: 979.764.3570 Fax: 979.764.3496 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Website: www.cstx.gov City of College Station Home of Texas A&M Univers ity ® >>> Rusty & Miriam Gerdes Realtors <bcsrealestate@yahoo.com> 3/5/2010 9:49 AM >>> Jennifer, This is a forward from Phil Young with Medpro regarding the type of business that will be a University Plaza. Let me know if you need anything else. Please let me know where we need to go from this stage. Thank you for your help. Rusty Rusty Gerdes, G RI file://C:\Documents and Settings\bboerboom\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4B9F7C5A... 3/17/2010 Miriam Gerdes, GRI, ABR Rusty's Cell: {979) 777-4067 Miriam's Cell: {979) 777-3982 Website: http://www.bcsrealestate.com/ Fax: 979-764-7676 RE/MAX Bryan College Station 3030 University Dr. East #100 College Station, TX 77840 ---On Tue, 3/2/10, Phill Young <phill@medprotc.com> wrote: From: Phill Young <phill@medprotc.com> Subject: Re: parking To: "Rusty & Miriam Gerdes Realtors" <bcsrealestate@yahoo.com> Date: Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 6:08 PM Rusty, Page 3of4 MedPro Treatment Centers is licensed as an Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) by the Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). We are an outpatient drug treatment center that specializes in clients addicted to opioids. We do not have any doctors permanently employed at MedPro. MedPro does employ an LVN as well as Licensed Chemical Dependency Counselors (LCDC's) as designated by TDSHS. The facility is owned and operated by me, Phill Young, a non-medical employee. We do not consider ourselves to be a clinic but rather an outpatient treatment program. Please let me know how you think this will fall under College Station's rules. Ph ill >>>"Jane Kee" <jkee@suddenlink.net> 3/15/2010 8:59 AM>>> Natalie received an email from JP that referenced an attachment that wasn't there. It apparently was an email string from Med Pro that helped you all classify them. Would you please forward that to me. Oldham Goodwin Group called on Friday needing help with this tenant. They said that they had spoken with JP and you about how to class ify Med Pro. We 're trying to come up to speed on everything. Thanks, Beth file://C:\D oc uments an d Se ttings\bbo erboom \L ocal Se ttings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4B 9F 7C5A ... 3/17/2 010 Page 4of4 Jane R. Kee file://C:\Documents and Settings\bboerboom\Local Settings\ Temp\XPgrpwise\4B9F7C5A... 3/17/2010 ,, ><' SITE PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ./ Site plan application completed in full. .,......-$100.00 Application Fee . ..,......--$100.00 Development Permit Application Fee . .,........-$300.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a public waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.) ·_L Ten (10) folded copies of site plan. V" A copy of the attached site plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off. APPLICATION DATA NAME OF PROJECT University Park ADDRESS 110 I University Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 15. Block T. University Park APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project): Name SSRS Steve Ross and Fred Bayliss Street Address 410 South Texas Avenue City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840 E-Mail Address NIA Phone Number (9791 846-4601 Fax Number (9791 846-8596 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: StreetAddress _______________ City _________________ _ State Zip Code ______ E-Mail Address ____________ _ Phone Number ___________ Fax Number __________________ _ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name _____ U.~r'-'b~a=n--=D~e=s=ig~n~G=r--=o~u~P------------------------- Street Address --"'9_,,_0"-9-"'S=o=ut""h""w_,,_e=st-"P--=a"'-r=kw""'ay=-"E=.--=S=u=it=e--=E=--City College Station State Texas Zip Code --~7~7--=8~4~0 ___ _ E-Mail Address dkeating@udgcs.com FaxNumber _ _____.C"-9~79~)--=6~9=6-~9~7=52"-------------~ Phone Number -~C~9_7~91~6~9_6~-9~6_5_3 __ _ OTHER CONT ACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc): Name ____________________________________ ~ StreetAddress __________________ ~City ____________ ~ State Zip Code ______ E-Mail Address------------- Phone Number Fax Number --------------- SITE PLAN APPLICATION SITEAPP.DOC 3/25/99 I of2 - CURRENT ZONING C-B PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY The is currently partially developed with an existing gas distribution center. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Proposed use will consist ofthree (3) buildings. all of which will be used as offices. V ARlANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) Variance to driveway access policy, to accommodate new TxDOT access o(adjacent property. #OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED _ __,J'""""l"--7 __ _ #OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED __ J_2~7 ____ _ 0 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Total acreage ____ _ Floodplain Acreage __ _ Housing Units ____ _ # of 1 Bedroom Units # of2 Bedroom Units # of 3 Bedroom Units # of 4 Bedroom Units FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY ___ #Bedrooms ;:::. 132 sq.ft. ___ #Bedrooms < 132 sq.ft. ,/ COMMERCIAL Total Acreage 3.219 Building Square Feet 29.33 Floodplain Acreage _ _,0"-.0"""'0'---- The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct . ..> .J ttl ,.I c I, ; (L -f ~/trJJ r If/ 11 /tJ() -----~---------------~ SITE PLAN APPLICATION SITE.APP.DOC 3/25/99 Date 2of2 ~-----~~~------.............................. --~ J Project Review Committee STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 2/2/01 UNIVERSITY PARK SECTION II (SP) (0-219) All proposals involving site development or redevelopment in the Overlay District shall require building color approval from the Project Review Committee (PRC). Zoning District: A-P, Administrative Professional and OV, Overlay District Location: 1101 University Dr. Applicant: SSRS Steve Ross and Fred Bayliss Item Summary: The applicant is developing three office buildings on the site, around the existing TXU Gas Distribution and Transmission Facility on the site. You may recall this site recently came before the PRC requesting a driveway variance, which was granted. This is the final step in their site plan approval process. Issues/Items for Review: 1. Architectural character • Color • Building elements • Awnings and canopies design and color 2. Building Signage • Color Supporting Materials: 1. Application 2. Graphic of Building 3. Color Sample J:\PZTEXnPZ0427 4.DOC PLANNING STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.3 Project: UNIVERSITY PARK (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-219) 1. The proposed gravel drive needs to be screened from view, gated, or paved. 2. The "Landscape/Streetscape Requirements" states that 11 trees are required for streetscape. To meet this requirement, 11 canopy trees, 22 non-canopy trees, or a combination thereof, are required to be planted in the first 50 feet behind the property line along the street. Please make this adjustment. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: January 30, 2001 ENGINEERING 1. No comments. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: February 1, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 4 Project: UNIVERSITY PARK SECTION II (SP)'."SITE PLAN (0-219) PLANNING 1. No comments. Mylar signed. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: February 8, 2001 ENGINEERING · 1. No comments. Mylar signed. Reviewed by: Tom Vennochi Date: February 8, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 .• FILE NOTES Project: University Park Phase 2 -D,riveway issues FROM: Tom Vennochi Relevant files - 00-219 SP 01-023 FP 00-201 REZ 00-184 VAR DATE: 2/23/01 Approved TxDOT Driveway Permit with cover letter. DATE: 3/2/01 General Info: West of University Park Phase 2 (Block T, Lot 15)- 1021 Joint Venture: Mike Hoelscher-Attorney 1021 University Drive (979) 846-4726, FAX 846-4725 Block U, Lot 10 -Plat file 84-202 co owner of lot & building w/ Cully Lipsey-Attorney, and Celia Goode-Haddock University Title Co. P.O. Box OT College Station, TX 77841-5079 (979) 260-9818 Lehtoner Investments, Ltd: Alfred Lehtonen 700 Dominik Drive College Station, TX 77840 (979) 693-0261, FAX 693-3828 LOT Investment Inc. Mike Laine (979) 846-2992 James Trotter Robbie Owens DATE: 3/12/01 Letter written to Fred Bayliss from Tom V. DATE: 3/14/01 Letter written to Diane Keaton from Ted M., regards TxDOT Utility (Storm Sewer) Permit. \ I. 2. 4. 5. 6. SUBMIT APPLICATION AND TIIIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 10 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Sheet size -24" x 36" (minimum). A key map (not necessarily to scale). Title block to include: Name, address, location, and legal description Name, address, and telephone number of applicant Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) Date of submittal Total site area North arrow. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. Existing locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site: Streets and sidewalks (R.O.W.). Driveways (opposite and adjacent per Driveway Ordinance 1961). Buildings. Water courses. Show all easements clearly designating as existing and type (utility, access, etc.). 100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note ifthere is none on the site. Utilities (noting size and designate as existing) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets. Meter locations. Topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) 8. Proposed location, type and dimensions of the following.: Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection. Setbacks. Show building setbacks as outlined in Ordinance 1638 Zoning Ordinance, (Section 7, Table A). Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned. Minimum parking space is 9' x 20', or on a perimeter row 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. Handicap parking spaces. \ \ \ 'i PLAN CHECKLIST l of3 I 1CK.DOC 03125199 "~ NOTE: 9. 10. Parking Islands. Raised landscape islands, (6" raised curb) a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are required at both ends of every parking row (greenspace area contiguous to. the end island maybe applied toward the required 180 sq. ft.). Additionally, 180 sq. ft. oflandscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. All required islands must be landscaped or set with decorative pavers, or stamped dyed concrete or other decorative materials as approved. Drives. Minimum drive aisle width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. Curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements.) ' Security gates (show swing path and design specs with colors). Nil Sidewalks (both public and private). Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the Sidewalk Master Plan or ifthe review staff determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). Medians. Show any and all traffic medians to be constructed on site. Landscape Reserve. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Pavement may encroach into this 24' reserve by up to 1134 square feet if streetscape requirement can still be met. In no case may the pavement be less than 6' from the property line. Conunon open spaces sites ('IA Loading docks NA Detention ponds Guardrails Retaining walls All required and other types of fences (a 6' privacy fence is required between industrial/commercial and residential developments as well as between multi-family and single family developments). Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from streets or residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad required.) Show all easements clearly designating as proposed and type (utility, access, etc.). If dedicated by separate instrument list by volume and page. Utilities (noting size and designate as proposed) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings. Meter locations (must be located in public R.0.W. or public utility easement.). Proposed grading (1' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street, highway or designated fire lane. Show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they be any further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by parked cars or a structure. A""":+: nj Arc.Ii: hvt- Show fire lanes. Fire lanes a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement edge of a public street or highway. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface as defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 before a building permit can be issued. Will building be sprinkled? Yes 0 No ® ._ If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted. Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where there may be coriflict with handicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST S!TECK.DOC 03/25/99 2 of3 0 D 11. Show curb and pavement detail. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (fo include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb details may be found in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 and alternatives to those standards must be approved by the City Engineer. No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". 12. Landscape plans as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance# 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans such as: o.g required point calculations ~ additional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets larger than a residential street. ~ calculations for# of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total landscaping points.) li)I.l proposed new plantings with points earned 12! proposed locations of new plantings !2S'I screening of parking lots ~ screening of dumpsters, detention ponds, transformers, NC units, loading docks, propane tanks, utility demarcation point on buildings, or other areas potentially visually offensive. Ga existing landscaping to remain ~ show existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. 13. Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to issuance of C.O.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and \\ill be sized by city according to irrigation demands submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W.? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be any utilities in TxDOT R.O.W. ? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W.? If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted. Yes D No IE Yes m No D Yes 121 No D The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. /{A The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. NA Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). Are there impact fees associated with this development? Yes D No~ NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately. SITE PLAN CHECKLIST SITECK.DOC 03/25/99 3 of3 UNIVERSITY PARK PLAZA A uniquely designed Office I Retail Plaza with over 29,000 s.f. in 3 buildings Owned and Managed by: SSRS, Inc. 410 South Texas Avenue, Suite 110 College Station, Texas 77840 Contact J. Fred Bayliss Architect: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. 511 University Dr. E., Suite 210 College Station, Texas 77840 (979) 846-4601 Ci vii Engineer: Urban Design Group 3660 Stoneridge Rd., Suite ElOl College Station, Texas 77840 -------------------------------------------------------------- Contractor: W. M. Klunkert, Inc. William Stoltzer Parkway College Station, Texas 77840 INCORPORATED 511 University Dr. East SUI le 201 College station, TX 77840 Voice 409 260 2635 Fax 409 846 8224 www.arkltex.com PLASTER -Upper wall PLASTER -Lower wall ACCENT PAINT UNIVERSITY PARK PLAZA College Station, Texas Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities Fonn 1058 (Rev. 12-96) Previous versions are obsolete. on Highway Right of Way To: t:/J1 foo Hwy. - Control o..50 (;.; Section Permit No. of The Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the State, hereby authorizes -5 S JR. S J L tJ c_ , hereinafter called e Grantee, tq (re) construct an access ~riveway or, 1heJ~rigtlt of 11/·'fY '}butting highw~. ~~ () S y--C~_)jj~~ "3 ~AJA-J-~hJ~ Subject to the following: --;r---{) ~ 1. The Grantee is responsible for all costs associated with the construction of this access driveway. 2. Design of facilities shall be as follows and/or as shoVfn. on sketch: One drive ,entrance into property (30' wide) One drive entrance on adjacent property (28' ·wide) All construction and materials shall be subject to inspection and approved by the State. 3. Maintenance of facilities constructed hereunder shall be the responsibility of the Grantee, and the State reserves the right to require any changes, maintenance, or repairs as may be necessary to provide protection of life or property on or adjacent to the highway. Changes in design will be made only with approval of the State. 4. The Grantee shall hold harmless the State and its duly appointed agents and employees against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit. 5. Except for regulatory and guide signs at county roads and city streets, the Grantee shall not erect any sign on or extending over any portion of the highway right of way, and vehicle service fixtures such as service pumps, vendor stands, or tanks shall be located at least 3.6 meters (12 feet) from the right-of-way line to ensure that any vehicle services from these fixtures will be off the highway. 6. This permit will become null and void if the above-referenced driveway facilities are not constructed within six (6) months from the issuance date of this permit. 7. The Grantee will contact the Stat~ rep~Jl.ntative d/r · J/e.11 l fJl/u /t/ Ai , telephone W11> 7 7£-l{cJ S~ at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to beginning the work authorized by this permit. Texas Department of Transportation The undersigned hereby agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in this permit for construction of an access . driveway on the highway_ right-of-way. / SJ'/{. ~ /,.JC ""-0'" ,) ,/, I -//.' ~gned: 4 /J. (l-/,w.M~.-~,.,,,... ..... // ~ (Property owner or owner's representative) jr/01 Date: _ __:_1~0~t.!._}_.D_o _________ _ Date: February 21, 2001 FM 60 -W. of Spring Loop University Park II Block T, Lot 15 1101 University Dr. College Station, Tx. Driveway Permit GENERAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS (Driveway Permit l : 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Traffic Control plan is required per TMUTCD prior to· start of construction work in the FM 60 right-of-way. Areas within ROW disturbed by construction shall be restored to equal or better conditions than existing prior to construction. Contractor sh~ll be responsible for locating all utilities within the right-of-way construction site. Contacts with local utility companies and utility locators are required. Lane closure allowed between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. only. Reinforcing for concrete driveways shall consist of No. 4 bars, 18" o.c.b.w. Contractor shall notify Mr. Karl Nelson at TxDOT (778-6233) at least 48 hours in advance of any work to coordinate site improvement activities with ongoing FM 60 construction. · ' . ' Fonn 1058 (Rev. 12-96) Back Access Driveway Regulations The Texas Transportation Commission, in recognition of its responsibility for the safety and utility of public highways under'. . its jurisdiction, has directed the adoption of rules and regulations to accomplish a coordinated development between highways and abutting property. For this purpose, the booklet enWled "Regulations for Access Driveways to State Highways" was published and adopted, setting out departmental policies to regulate construction and maintenance of access driveway facilities. Sketch of Installation See attached construction plans t ...... : -. . UNIVERSITY PARK PLAZA A uniquely designed Office I Retail Plaza with over 29,000 s.f. in 3 buildings Owned and Managed by: SSRS, Inc. 410 South Texas Avenue, Suite 110 College Station, Texas 77840 Contact J. Fred Bayliss Architect: The Arkitex Studio, Inc. 511 University Dr. E., Suite 210 College Station, Texas 77840 (979) 846-4601 Civil Engineer: Urban Design Group 3660 Stoneridge Rd., Suite ElOl College Station, Texas 77840 ---------------------------------- Contractor: W. M. Klunkert, Inc. William Stol tzer Parkway College Station, Texas 77840 --------------- INCORPORATED 511 University Dr. East SUl!e 201 College station, TX 77840 Voice 409 260 2635 Fax 409 846 8224 www.arkltex.com PLASTER -.Upper wall PLASTER -Lower wall ACCENT PAINT ·UNIVERSITY PARK PLAZA College Station, Texas -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER ,l,~~~!-t!llti~~t~~;~~" !-\'_(}() 1(11(0( ~ We are transmitting the Following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): D Master Development Plan w/CJ Redlin es a Development Permit App. D Preliminary Plat w/CJ Redlines a Conditional Use Permit a Final Plat w/CJ Redlin es a Rezoning Application D FEMA CLOMNCLOMP,/LOMNLOMR w/CJ Redlines a Variance Request x Site Plan w/[J Redlines x Other-Please Specify [J Grading Plan w/CJ Red lines Letter Attached [J Landscape Plan w/[J Redlines Cl Irrigation Plan w/l:l Redlin es Cl Building Construction Documents w/l:l Redlines INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: Cl Waterline Con~truction Documents w/ [J Redlines Cl Sewerline Construction Documents w/ [J Redlines Cl TxDOT Driveway Permit [J TxDOT Utility Permit Cl Drainage Construction Documents w/ Cl Redlines Cl Street Construction Documents w/ CJ Redlines Cl Easement application with metes & bounds description Cl Drainage Letter or Report w/ CJ Redlines CJ Fire Flow Analysis w/ 0 Redlines Special Instructions: PROJECT: University Park Project TRANSMIT AL LETIER TRANSMIT.DOC 03/23/99 Cl Other -Please Specify ~m Urban Design Group Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Department of Development Services City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-9960 Re: University Park Section II, Block T, Lot 15 Dear Natalie, January 17, 2001 Attached are revised plans on the University Park Project that we discussed yesterday. The revisions include requests by the Contractor and/or the Architect, and are noted below as well as highlighted on the plans. The vacating and plat is underway. We would like to stay on schedule with the building plans so that the contractor can begin as soon as possible, even with only a grading permit if there are remaining comments. We have not heard from TxDOT or received comments from them through the City. Please let us know if you need any thing from us on that approval. Revisions this submittal: Relocated fire hydrant in median (Cl) Added light pole locations in parking lot medians (Cl) Added steps and landings at proposed entries to Bldg A (Cl), step details (C7) Added AC unit locations at rear of Bldgs A, B, and C (Cl) Re-graded area between Bldg Band C (C3) Added sign location on University Drive (Cl) Added fence nofe on detail (C7) Revised HC ramp per ADA requirements (Cl) Re-defined limits of sawcut (C3) Added HC ramp and note along University Drive (C3) Added TxDOT HC ramp detail sheet (RAMP-OOB) Added callouts for storm sewer crossings (C3) Added callouts for utility crossings (C5) Deleted asphalt paving option (C7) If the st1;1ff has any questions, or wants to meet, we are available. When the PRC is scheduled for the building, let me know. Thanks for all your help. Sincerely, ~~ URBAN DESIGN GROUP Deborah L. Keating, P.E., Partner C:~~~~ocOffice Box l01 5 3 • College Station, Texas 77842 • 409 • 69 6 • 9653 /1\.-o< ~ University Park PROBABLE COST ESTIMATE /f '{J'lJ .All i I /7l~t''l (Public Improvements Only) // :J-. / PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Standard Fire Hydrant 2 Reinforced Concrete Handicap Ramps l EA 3 6" Reinforced Concrete Paving l"/..iJ!; ( SY 4 Reinforced Concrete Curb & Gutter:_, 5 12"X6" MJ Tapping Sleeve & Valve 6 6''X6" MJ Tapping Sleeve & Valve 7 18" RCP Storm Sewer 9 6" 45° MJ Bend w/ thrust blockin 10 6 11 MJ Gate Valve W/ Box 11 6" PVC C900,CL200 Waterline Structural Fill 12 Reinforced Concrete Junction Box b. 13 1 1/2" Water Meter 14 15 16 17 LF 400 EA 1 EA LF EA EA ? LF EA EA EA SF EA LF ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST Contingency (15%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $8,685.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $520.00 $400.00 $1,200.00 (.) $9,840.00 $3,000.00 $12,000.00 $750.00 $64,350.00 $360.00 $2,346.00 $16,276.00 $2,441.40 $18,717.40 Urban Design Group's (UDG) opinions of probable construction cost provided for herein are made on the basis of our experience and qualifications and represent our best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineering firm generally familiar with the construction industry and applicable development regulations. However, since UDG has not obtained approval from the appropriate jurisdiction and UDG has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, UDG cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable construction cost prepared by UDG. • • CostEst2 1 University Park PROBABLE COST ESTIMATE (Public Improvements Only) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS I I Standard Fire Hydrant EA 1 $2,500.00 Reinforced Concrete Handicap Ramps EA 4 $500.00 3 611 Reinforced Concrete Paving SY 193 $45.00 4 Reinforced Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 400 $20.00 5 12''X6" MJ Tapping. Sleeve & Valve EA 1 $2,500.00 6 6''X6" MJ Tapping;Sle~ve & Valve EA 1 $2,000.00 7 18" RCP storm se-wer LF 13 $40.00 9 6" 45° MJ Bend w/ thrust blockin EA 1 $400.00 10 6" MJ Gate Valve W/ Box EA 2 $600.00 11 6" PVC (C900,CL200 Waterline Structural Fill LF 164 $60.00 12 Reinforced Concrete Junction Box EA 1 $3,000.00 13 1 1/2" Water Meter EA 3 $4,000.00 14 6" x 2" Reducer EA 2 $375.00 15 Sidewalk SF 1287 $50.00 16 6' x 6' Transformer PAD EA 2 $180.00 17 3-4" PVC Conduits LF 391 $6.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCT10N COST Contingency (15%) TOTAL CONSTRUCT10N COST I $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $8,685.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $520.00 $400.00 $1,200.00 $9,840.00 $3,000.00 $12,000.00 $750.00 $64,350.00 $360.00 $2 346.00 $16,276.00 $2,441.40 $18,717.40 Urban Design Group's (UDG) opinions of probable construction cost provided for herein are made on the basis of our experience and qualifications and represent our best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineering firm generally familiar with the construction industry and applicable development regulations. However, since UDG has not obtained approval from the appropriate jurisdiction and UDG has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, UDG cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable construction cost prepared by UDG. CostEst2 1 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764-3570 I Fax (979)764-3496 Date: December 11, 2000 # of pages including cover:_5 __ If you did not receive a complete fax_, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: ___ U_D_G_,_,_St_e~v~e_R_os_s __ _ FAX: 696-9752,846-8596 COMPANY: ____________________ _ RE: ___________ u=n=i __ ve=r-=si=--ty,__P"-'a=r=k"----------- FROM: ____ B"""'r ...... id~g,...._e ....... tt __ e ___ G'"'"'"e.-...or~g,...e __ _ PHONE: (979)764-3570 COMPANY: ______ C_ity~o~f~C~o~lle_.,g,......e--S_..ta~t..__io_..n _______ _ REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review D Replay ASAP [gl FYI The following are comments from our Electrical and W /WW Divisions that I received today. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you, Bridgette a &122 tu . ' ' .. ) j ; ' f -'I l •J t .l I ' .. : J ,1_, ,,_ __ :c-: .. _ ·Be ..... _____ :.:_. j· -G·-1 ··-··-i: i 2'X1Z' lf>S11:ft rfAo --:·--... \, .. :... --1 · .. 1' "· 'I ,, \' 1· . , ·I· J Q -9 1 ;o,"1 (3' PARKJNG '"~PAC-CS ' ''·\ ?. :1' \!8 PAf?t-; I NG ';;PACl'.S ... .;. .j\ .. ·~-~ -~~-\ . . -~_.-... ,,. ..... ,,. ·\.- \.: -~- .,. J· 1· ,_ ., .. ·\ ., . \• \ ... 'I' -ur··· 1.· J . · L_. . ... ( . J LJ -. ~ . -~· .... ~_. .... ,..;., . : .. f!ff. ~ ......... J2IS IC ' . . . ..,_., ,.· ·j ., . .,. ·.l . ~-.. ".?··-- " ,, ,, ~ ·i . , . . .... :,- " ... II PllfKING ~iJtJIR . ·.'.· -i· ·I ···~··· ......... ·········-· .:.:...--- ·, '· ... PROP 6 II GAS ~· (_~ ----------'-· ·------- ./ I 1~~:. 'I. r/. f ! i·. i I ~~( .\.h~r-! ·-~ .i }·: I'" I-· r- . ·-' 7 . • •LU f" I": ;;;,, ·-' .._.; ·~ .. J J ,, ~ _.,,.,. i ·: I J. ·i ,, ·~; I I : j . ~ .~ I: ; l -.5: -. ;.~ .· ·; ::. ' --. '··:~~ ·.: ~-,· .. ' / / • ·' I ' ' ~~:t. 113' l· .- .. _;_··· .,, ,. ' ..... ;=~. -. ~ ··,--.. ....•. : .. . t:"" •,\. __ ........ • 9.04() .·~~' .... .. - ,..,.· .. ..... ·· f ·.·, : ... ·. r·.: :":· - ·• '.• ··~ '7.: . . ·(·'.\~_. . _, ._.-· .. -_..!'. ,.,· J_:··· _.,.:.·· ·J '• .;". ····' -J~~~~r~11;1l:Ji~:4,~J:t ,~~~~~~~,'5~-:-; ~,..:, ... : -.. _. __ ··: . . . ~~ . .' ~- -.. •' """~-i ! •. •i .· ../· ...... ..' -~-... .• ~ . . ~,: - _.:., .. · ,: .. _r .\ •,_.I \ : ... -: ! '•.. -~ . .. ~ : ' ~ .. · .··.· :·L· ~< ,. .•• ;-· ·r·· '..' .. . _, ·I ..:..,;..: J.· S.00 ~-!If Il:ldS . I " ,_ \ : .,. '/ t-I· . ~ .,. 1 -~ ,.,, [" ;-" --'l ,.:. . -~, I ~·, -.-·~ ~·. ~-~-. '"I,... ·· 1" r" .1 .. ~ ! " .. , . .'} .-::: -~'-'.· ;..;. ·-/" .~en ., 1. J,.-. -~~---. ] . II . ~,,on~~:~~~-. ·(. C· -,, I . I l· ~· .. ,. .. 1· -1 ,1 . ·f -b---4~<: I ' 1. •. ' f C<>-t, I h~,.l ): .. t~at4~~:.~ ·t 1) .1· ,, ,i-., ! . V-??'_ ~\'<.1-W; Qj'"' \ /~'<10 \ . , .. -1 ... I · " ..... ~, i . r ~ ·1 , ];. 'it\ 0) ~-,,-} <;'\ \,\ \ <(' d.M 1· .~ ·t· -~ •f' ., t· ·t ., ... ·,. ·r ·-'i° t' ·:-r--~ ' '/' ' I i '• I ':1 f, t !i I i . ,. :e4fL -----------·, , /Ul. t . -~; "~ 110----;' ., .:z, -r ( .-::><..·:-:--........_ ., : :w 1-. • • : -----:· --I .-. . :·~ -~:;:-....___I . :i· ,.·i· 'r. ; .. / · r '·, -.c-___ f--_ Ji. f; t-. l '· _j . ...,,.. -'''"/ ·; ".!: '·.., . . .... -----------,. l ' . I ·-....· .1 :... ----. (~.~ I --6 y ····Ji'· I y / ~-. I .... ttimrJd I ~'~/ I I I : / ; ! i / ;· ~I ":/ "/. ' -!' '/_. -.. -. . I . _ __:__....;-;;;.....,..--iJ j r . I -. .--' -:--'............ / -I/ :· ---: I i II. ----~-'"' I ~ .· I I/ . ....__">.... I '<.. ·--' \) "r./ (} I. - . .,.~ 7~----. __ .o) I I ' -.. t "~ · .. ~· ·. I , v . _j . " , ·'· )( I lo~; ---.::6 -. : : . I~~-----.()Z:.~~ (°',\:?? •. . ..,..Qi, . ' . . ' . '' ~~ !ll;DfclS ·-:-.I .,. .. ,.:-. -.... ____ --... ·------.....:. ... , !':· ;_· ·.;,· :{-:·:~.: _-.:, .. "·\· ~ .... '' .. : ~--'. : '.. ::':~ ; ; ' ' ~: ~.~:~5 12/13/00 17:41 • 'B979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 5634 12/13 17:37 04'41 4 OK 96969752 14! 001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER We are transmitting the Following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): Cl Master Development Plan w/O Red lines Cl Preliminary Plat w/O Redlines 0 Final Plat w/O Redlin es Cl FEMA CLOMA/CLOMP,/LOMAILOMR w/CJ Redlines CJ Site Plan w/CJ Redlines 0 Grading Plan w/O Redlines 0 Landscape Plan w/CJ Redlines D Irrigation Plan w/D Redlines 0 Building Construction Documents w/D Redlines INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: 0 Development Permit App. 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Rezoning Application 0 Variance Request CJ Other-Please Specify Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities on H1¥Y ,Right of Way 0 Waterline Construction Documents w/ CJ Redlines D Sewerline Construction Documents w/ D Redlines CJ T:xDOT Driveway Permit D T:xDOt Utility Permit CJ Drainage Construction Documents w/ CJ Redlines D Other -Please Specify D Street Construction Documents w/ CJ Redlines D Easement application with metes & bounds description CJ Drainage Letter or Report w/ D Redlines CJ Fire Flow Analysis w/ CJ Redlines Special Instructions: PROJECT: University Park Project NATALIE/BRIDGET-Attached please find the requested extra copies of TxDots' Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities on Highway Right of Way. Thanks. Travis Scott. TRANSMITALLETTER TRANSMIT.DOC 03/23/99 . " ·.;. ;_.. ,;:. ,'):· ,•\_, _:.:~:.:...:,, . .;...': : ~- -~ DEVELOPMENT. SERVICES I /;)JI TRANSMITTAL LETTER . /{)'j() fl{}c, (,,..,····---... .... \ ) Name/Firm: Address: Date: / -~ -() I Phone: Cl7Cf-&q(CJ-C/!ft5 3 · Fax: q19-& C?&r C/1 S.!2 · We are transmitting the following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): D Master Development Plan D · Preliminary Plat D Final Plat D FEMA CLOMA/CLOMR/LOMNLOMR ~ SitePlan D Grading Plan D Landscape Plan 0 Irrigation Plan D Building Construction Documents w/ D Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ D _Jkedlines w/ ff Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ D Redlines w/ 0 Redlines w/ D Redlines INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS ( ··-·~l infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: D Waterline Construction Documents w/ D Redlines D Sewerline Construction Documents w/D Redlines D Drainage Construction Documents w/ _Q _ _!l_~.4!ines D Street Construction Documents w/ D Redlines D Easement application with metes & bounds decsription D Drainage Letter or Report w/ D Redlines D Fire Flow Analysis w/ D Redlines Special Instructions: t}niversi Ii J!ar k. D Development Permit App. D Conditional Use Permit D Rezoning Application'·"'· D Variance Request D Other -Please specify . .··. D TxDOT Driveway Permit D TxDOT Utility Permit D Other -Please specify .... (:''·''""'·'·----------------------'--------------- \ ' \ ,' ....____, TRANSMITTAL LETIER TRANSMIT.DOC 03123/99 l cifl From: To: Subject: Bridgette George Deborah Keating University Park Vo-d-f l Good evening! I discovered some construction plans for this project that have redlines on them that I do not believe have been returned to you. There have been some personnel changes in the Utility Department and we are getting some of the plans back later than we used to, hence they were not returned with the original staff review comments. I wanted to make sure that you received these comments prior to you resubmitting the revised site plans. I apologize for any inconvenience. Please pick them up at your convenience at Development Services. When resubmitting the revised plans, please include the redlines. CC: Natalie Ruiz / 12105/00 18:07 '8'979 764 :)496 DEVELOP)iENT SVCS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMEl\TT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 ·College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (97f)) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496 December 5, .WOO TO: FROM: SUI3JI:CT: fa·b:m Dnic;n Group, Via fr,x G9G-9752 \ll . 1Ii\·GZ Bri:igette Gc.o~·ge, Asst. Develor.'me11t Co;:xdinator ~J] 'J 'f University P.·u-.k -Site P111.11 Staff reviewed the ajo\TC-rncntio~ed site p!.:n as re~uested. 111e follov-..ing rag::'. is a list of staff review comments dctailin.g items that need t::-be addr=ssed. Please addres<.: the cornm~nts and s~ibmit the follov."ing illforr!1aii01-. for fi:.1iher staff revic".v: T\>.·o (2) cc·mpldc sets of cm:.:-:ruct:o:i _:_ocume!1ts for the proposec; <l~!vclcpment witil The L't'Yi~ed site and lands.::apin;; ~.'ians att~.ched. If !hex are comment!: t'.1at you are not add!·e.ssing w:th the revised site. plan, plt>::<..-e attach a· letter explaining the. C.eta~ls. [f you have any questio~1s 0r r:.eed addi~ioirn! infcrn~.:tti0n, please call me at 7b4-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Steve Ross and Fred Bayliss, Via fax 846-8596 Case file #00-219 Home of Texas A&M Unive~sity ~001 12105/00 18;.08 PLANNING es1s 764 3496 DEYELOPHENT SYCS STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.1 Project: UNIVERSITY PARK (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-219) 1. Please include in the title block the address and legal description of the project. 2. Please include the submittal date and any subsequent revision dates on the site plan. 3. On the site plan, please lnclude the zonhg of the subject property and all abutting parcels. 4. Please clarify the boundaries of the 10 ft utility easement that runs along the back of the property (one side is shown to be an OU line instead of the property line). 5. There are tvvo 15 ft. ease:nerits (?) running parallel to each other. "15"' is called out but there is no description. 6. Add a note stating the 100-year floodplain does not exist in this area. 7. Please describe the uses of the proposed buildings (e.g., Office Building). 8. Buildings B and C require 73 parking spaces (parking and landscaping are rounded up). Please make this adjustment. 9. Please call out the curb cut radii. 1 O. A 6-ft. privacy fence is required between commercial and residential developments. Please make this addition to the site plan. 11. Please provide a material and height description of the dumpsters' screening fences. 12. It is unclear how the buildings will receive electricity. Please clarify. 13. Please provide a note or add to the detail how the fire lanes will be striped (colors, lettering size, striping location, etc.). · 14. Regarding Landscaping Planting Notes #3 and #4, please note: for the landscaping point calculations to remain valid, the numbers, sizes, and types of landscaping described on the plan will need to remain the same or exceed what will be shown. 15. The site area on the landscaping plan is not consistent with that on the site plan. Please make the appropriate adjustment(s). 16.The points required by streetscaping are added to the landscape points for the total points required. The additional points do not have to be made in the streetscape area, but may be scattered throughout the site. Landscaping in the streetscape area will count for points (this includes the required streetscape trees). 17.Although staff can not require it, the TXU Gas Distribution and Transmission Facility should be screened by landscaping from the Staff Review Comments Page 1 of2 !41002 / " ]2/05/00 18:09 '5'979 764 3~96 DEYELOPMENT SVCS proposed buildings. Please consider doing this. Other items that couid be considered visually offensive may be required to be screened if they are added to revised plans and visible from the ROVv. 18. Irrigation will not be evaluated with the site plan. Please include a note that irrigation will be approved prior to C.O. Reviewed by: Mo!!~· Hitchcock Date: December 4. 2000 ENGINEERING 1. We need to process the TXDOT Form 1058 (Permit tc Construct Access Driveway Facilities on Highway Rigi-:t of './'Jay) to TXOOT. \f\fe need tvvo originally signed driveway pe;mi1s (i="orn1 1058) for our files from them. Please send three additional ccpies of the 'Site Plan' to us, so we can forward to TXDOT. 2. Please develop a chart showing s:;we~ $ervice demand (g:::d) and water service demand {gpm) on the Utility Plan. 3. Please clarify the note on the Utili!y Plan, "INSTALL: ... VJ)'e to connect to ex 6" waterline" (bottom, middle of ::age). 4. What is trie intent of the note o;-; the detention pond detalis (S~eet CB. bottom right)? Who is going t: b'Jiid the junction box at the outfall cf the pond? 5. Please send an additional copy of ~'.ie ·s:te Plan·· to us. c.1ic what type of construction the buiidings will be, so we can 7orward th:s in~orrnadon to the Fire Marshall. 6. Show detail showing the side s!~;:;es, :!'epth and genera! ::onstruction of the detention pond. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 12/5/00 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer responsible for installing conduit per city spec and design. 2. Developer responsible for providing easements to cover al! primary electrical lines and equipment. 3. Developer needs to provide electrical load information as scan as possible. Staff Review Comments Page 2 of2 ' ' 12/05/00 18:10 '8'97U 754 :l49G DE\'ELOP\ll:\T ~;\'CS .. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 11/30/00 MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum l:3reaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. Back F!c\V devises must be tested upon installatior; '1s per Cit}' Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: Rob Werley 3. There is a problem with the enclosure on the east side of the c-:;ti!pi·?.>'. by the detention pond. There is an island directly i:·i front of the pad at r.: 30 foot dist<1nce, too close for a front end loader approach. There are tv10 possible solutions. Either move t:;e enclosure 3J feet t~) the :;c:·:h. ,-,, make the: west enclosure into a double unit wifr; a 12 by 24 foot p2d Reviewed by: Peter Caler November 30. :~0 1.}'.J NOTE: Any changes made tc the plans, that· !lave not been requested by lhe City of College Station, must be explained in your r,ext transn,ittal letter and ''bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Ccn!T'.erts Page2of2. lf.l oo.; I I I CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM December 5, 2000 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Urban Design Group, Via fax 696-9752 '~"~ Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator V ~ University Park-Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: __ Two (2) complete sets of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: ~~~ Steve Ross and Fred Bayliss, Via fax 846- Case file #00-219 Home of Texas A&M University , .. PLANNING STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.1 Project: UNIVERSITY PARK (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-219) 1. Please include in the title block the address and legal description of the project. 2. Please include the submittal date and any subsequent revision dates on the site plan. 3. On the site plan, please include the zoning of the subject property and all abutting parcels. 4. Please clarify the boundaries of the 10 ft. utility easement that runs along the back of the property (one side is shown to be an OU line instead of the property line).·,' 5. There are two 15 ft. easements (?) running parallel to each other. "15"' is called out but there is no description. 6. Add a note stating the 100-year floodplain does not exist in this area. 7. Please describe the uses of the proposed buildings (e.g., Office Building). 8. Buildings B and C require 73 parking spaces (parking and landscaping are rounded up). Please make this adjustment. 9. Please call out the curb cut radii. 10. A 6-ft. privacy fence is required between commercial and residential developments. Please make this addition to the site plan. 11. Please provide a material and height description of the dumpsters' screening fences. 12. It is unclear how the buildings will receive electricity. Please clarify. 13. Please provide a note or add to the detail how the fire lanes will be striped (colors, lettering size, striping location, etc.). 14. Regarding Landscaping Planting Notes #3 and #4, please note: for the landscaping poinf calculations to remain valid, the numbers, sizes, and types of landscaping described on the plan will need to remain the same or exceed what will be shown. 15. The site area on the landscaping plan is not consistent with that on the site plan. Please make the appropriate adjustment(s). 16. The points required by streetscaping are added to the landscape points for the total points required. The additional points do not have to be made in the streetscape area, but may be scattered throughout the site. Landscaping in the streetscape area will count for points (this includes the required streetscape trees). 17.Although staff can not require it, the TXU Gas Distribution and Transmission Facility should be screened by landscaping from the Staff Review Comments Page 1of2 I proposed buildings. Please consider doing this. Other items that could be considered visually offensive may be required to be screened if they are added to revised plans and visible from the ROW. 18. Irrigation will not be evaluated with the site plan. Please include a note that irrigation will be approved prior to C.O. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: December 4, 2000 ENGINEERING 1. We need to proc~ss the TXDOT Form 1058 (Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities on Highway Right of Way) to TXDOT. We need two originally signed driveway permits (Form 1058) for our files from them. Please send three additional copies of the 'Site Plan' to us, so we can forward to TXDOT. 2. Please develop a chart showing sewer service demand (gpd) and water service demand (gpm) on the Utility Plan. 3. Please clarify the note on the Utility Plan, "INSTALL: ... wye to connect to ex 6" waterline" (bottom, middle of page). 4. What is the intent of the note on the detention pond details (Sheet CB, bottom right)? Who is going to build the junction box at the outfall of the pond? 5. Please send an additional copy of the 'Site Plan' to us, and what type of construction the buildings will be, so we can forward this information to the Fire Marshall. 6. Show detail showing the side slopes, depth and general construction of the detention pond. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: 12/5/00 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer responsible for installing conduit per city spec and design. 2. Developer responsible for providing easements to cover all primary electrical lines and equipment. 3. Developer needs to provide electrical load information as soon as possible. ,., Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2 Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 11/30/00 MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. ,,, 2. Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. Reviewed by: Rob Werley 3. There is a problem with the enclosure on the east side of the complex by the detention pond. There is an island directly in front of the pad at a 30 foot distance, too close for a front end loader approach. There are two possible solutions. Either move the enclosure 30 feet to the north, or make the west enclosure into a double unit with a 12 by 24 foot pad Reviewed by: Peter Caler November 30, 2000 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 3 of 2 ~12/06/00 09:38 '5'979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TUIE USAGE TUIE PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 5532 98468569 UNIVERSITY TOWER 12/06 09:36 01'51 4 OK ~ 12/05/00 18: 11 '0'979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START THIE USAGE THIE PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 5527 12/05 18:07 04'01 4 OK 96969752 141001 i ·I ____ -::__,1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER We are transmitting the Following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): a Master Development Plan w/D Redlines a Preliminary Plat w/Cl Red lines a Final Plat w/D Redlines a FEMA CLOMA/CLOMP,/LOMA/LOMR w/Cl Redlines x Site Plan w/Cl Redlines a Grading Plan w/D Redlines x Landscape Plan w/Cl Redlines a Irrigation Plan w/Cl Redlines a Building Construction Documents w/Cl Redlines INFRAS1RUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: 0 Waterline Construction Documents w/ Cl Redlines D Sewerline Construction Documents w/ Cl Redlines Cl Drainage Construction Documents w/ Cl Redlines Cl Street Construction Documents w/ Cl Redlines Cl Easement application with mete8 & bounds description Cl Drainage Letter or Report w/ Cl Redlines Cl Fire Flow Analysis w/ Cl Redlines Special Instructions: a Development Permit App. a Conditional Use Permit a Rezoning Application a Variance Request x Other-Please Specify letter check comments #3 Cl TxDOT Driveway Permit Cl TxDOT Utility Permit Cl Other -Please Specify PROJECT: University Park Project -per staff comments # 3, attached please find two copies of revised site, and two copies of revised landscaping. Also attached please fmd the originals for approval. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. TRANSMITALLETTER TRANSMIT.DOC 03/23/99 .i{ ,,· ., . ,. \,.' CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM January 23, 2001 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Urban Design Group, Via fax 696-9752 Bridgette George; Asst. Development Review Manager ~ University Park -Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Five (5) revised site plans; and, Two (2) landscaping plans If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: cc: Staff review comments 2l/ (p LJlol SSRS Steve Ross and Fred Bayliss, Via fax 846-85fm Case file# {rf/ Home of Texas A&M University .f PLANNING STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: UNIVERSITY PARK (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-219) 1 . Please change the zoning of the lot to A-P to reflect the recently approved rezoning. 2. There are two 15-ft. easements that run parallel to each other but are not labeled. Please identify these easements that run NE to SW across the property. 3. To adequately screen a dumpster, an 8-ft. fence is needed. Please make this adjustment. 4. Please note: Signage will be permitted separately. 5. Unless the proposed gravel drive will be screened or gated, the drive to the gas facility needs to be paved. 6. Building A is not showing any handicap-accessible entry into the building. 7. The project's streetscaping tree requirement is being met with 8 canopy trees and 6 non-canopy trees. The "Streetscape Provided" section may remain on the plan if it is desired to keep the point calculations separate (this is not required by the City), or all landscaping point calculations may be shown together; but it should be made clear that the streetscaping tree requirement is being met through 8 canopy and 6 non-canopy trees. 8. Is the transformer on the parking island in the public access easement proposed or existing? If it is proposed, it needs to be screened with landscaping from the ROW. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: January 22, 2001 ENGINEERING 1. Please send three additional copies of the 'Site Plan' sheet only to us, so we can forward the driveway permit to TXDOT. 2. Please show water service demand (gpm) per each of the three buildings. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 3. Please review and revise your cost estimate. Items 2-5 are not annotated on the plans. Item 11 has an incorrect quantity. And several items from the utility plan are not listed on the cost estimate. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: January 22, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 2of1 01/24101 11: 25 ~979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 6267 98468569 UNIVERSITY TOWER 01/24 11:23 01'25 3 OK ~ UUJ_ 01/23/01 16:27 '5'979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 6248 01/23 16:24 03'03 3 OK 96969752 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER We are transmitting the Following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): · a Master Development Plan w/l:l Redlines a Preliminary Plat w/l:l Redlines a Final Plat w/l:l Redlines a FEMA CLOMA/CLOMP,/LOMA/LOMR w/l:l Redlines x Site Plan w/l:l Redlines a Grading Plan w/l:l Redlines X Landscape Plan w/l:l Redlin es l:l Irrigation Plan w/l:l Redlines a Building Construction Documents w/l:l Redlines INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: l:l Waterline Construction Documents w/ l:l Redlines l:l Sewerline Construction Documents w/ l:l Redlines l:l Drainage Construction Documents w/ l:l Redlines l:l Street Construction Documents w/ l:l Redlines l:l Easement application with metes & bounds description l:l Drainage Letter or Report w/ l:l Redlines Cl Fire Flow Analysis w/ l:l Redlines Special Instructions: PROJECT: University Park Project Third Submittal a Development Permit App. a Conditional Use Permit a Rezoning Application a Variance Request x Other-Please Specify Letter Attached Revised Estimate l:l TxDOT Driveway Permit Cl TxDOT Utility Permit l:l Other -Please Specify / University Park PROBABLE COST ESTIMATE (Public Improvements Only) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Reinforced Concrete Handicap Ramps EA 4 3 6" Reinforced Concrete Paving SY 193 4 Reinforced Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 400 5 12''X6'~ MJ Tappin Sleeve & Valve EA 2 6 6''X6" MJ Tapping Sleeve & Valve EA 1 7 18" RCP Storm Sewer LF 13 8 6" 45° MJ Bend w/ t lo 9 6" 11.25° MJ Bend w/thrust blocking EA 1 10 2" 45° MJ WYE w/thrust blocking EA 1 11 6" MJ Gate Valve W/ Box EA 1 12 6" PVC (C900,CL200) Waterline Structural Fill LF 150 13 2" PVC C900, CL200 Waterline Sturctural Fill LF 147 14 Reinforced Concrete Junction Box EA 1 15 1 1/2" MJ Water Meter EA 3 16 6" x 2" MJ Reducer . EA 2 17 4" Reinforced Concrete Sidewalk SF 1287 18 6' x 6' Transformer PAD EA 2 19 3-4" PVC Conduits LF 340 20 12" MJ Gate Valve EA 1 21 2" MJ Gate Valve EA 3 22 2" MJ Plug EA 2 . 23 Back Flow Prevention Device EA 1 $1,000.00 $45.00 $10.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $45.00 $400.00 $400.00 $300.00 $600.00 $65.00 $25.00 $3,500.00 $500.00 $375.00 $3.00 $1;000.00 $6.00 $1,500.00 $300.00 $50.00 $500.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $4,000.00 $8,685.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $585.00 $400.00 $300.00 $600.00 $9,750.00 $3,675.00 . $3,500.00 $1,500.00 $750.00 $3,861.00 $2,000.00 $2,040.00 $1,500.00 $900.00 $100.00 $500.00 $58,546.00 Contingency (15%) $8,781.90 ------- \~\ fiJs. . ~~ .. '/~~~ . . ~~,~~ ~ l·Z3·t:::>/ NOTES CONCERNING OP~~OBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $67,327.90 Urban Design Group's (UDG) opinions of probable construction cost provided for herein are made on the basis of our experience and qualifications and represent our best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineering .firm generally familiar with the construction industry and applicable development regulations. However, since UDG has not obtained approval from the appropriate jurisdiction and UDG has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, UDG cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual.construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable construction cost prepared by UDG. CostEst3 1 / -.-... ~. --.. -. i· ·., <· ····.~ •.; ,_ ~m Urban Design Group Natalie Ruiz or Bridgette George Development Coordinator Department of Development Services City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-9960 January 25, 2001 Re: University Park Section II, Block T, Lot 15 Dear Bridgette, Attached please find our third submittal on the University Park project with revisions as per staff comments# 2 received January 23rd via fax. We have addressed the comments as requested. Please note the callout on the site plan for the 15' easements covering the gas lines are described verbatim from the surveyor's research of the property, and include the recording information on the easement itself. We are concerned for the delay in forwarding the driveway permit to TxDOT for their review. With our first submittal to staff in November, we included an original signed TxDOT application and additional plans for TxDOT's review. The first set of comments from staff requested two additional original signed TxDOT applications. We obtained those documents and submitted again. The comments received yesterday indicate the plans still haven't been forwarded to TxDOT for their review. Our conversation with TxDOT confirmed this. We have submitted additional separate site plan sheets (requested by staff) and additional full sets of plans (which TxDOT will need) on previous submittals. What can be done to expedite this review? As per page one of the fax, we are submitting five revised site plans, and two landscape plans. As per engineering comment number 1, we are submitting three additional site plan only sheets. However, as we discussed with TxDOT representatives, they will need full sets of plans for their review of the drives and the grading/drainage. Therefore, please find three additional sets for TxDOT review. cc: Steve Ross, Fred Bayliss C:\ruiz4.doc Sincerely, ,£l~/J7A //~ URBAN DESIGN GROUP Deborah L. Keating, P.E., Partner Post Office Box 10153 • College Station, Texas 77842 • 409 • 69 6 • 9653 •• • • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM ~\q~ February 1, 2001 FROM: Urban Design Group, Via fax 696~975?. ~'' .. I ·1 \ \ Bridgette Georse, Asst Development Review Manager ~ (\ TO: SUBJECT: lfniv.:rsity Park -Sit~ Pfm1 Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The folk>Vling page is a list cf staff reYiew comment~ detailing items that need to ix addressed. Ple.ase address the attached co:r:'.11tlents and submit the bllowing information for further staff review: T\vo (2) revised site and landscaping plans (additional sets v.,ill be required cmce the plans have b~en approved); $100 processing fee for the next round cf three (S) staff reviews; If there are comments that you are not. addressing with the revised site plan: please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional i.!.1formaton, please 'calI me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Home of Texas A&M University r-, ----"-----• STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.3 Project: UNIVERSITY PARK (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-219) PLANNING '\ 1 .. The proposed gravel drive needs lo be screened from view, gated. or 'paved. 2. The "Landscape/Streetscape Requirements'' states that 11 trees are required for streetscape. To meet this requirement, 11 canopy trees, 22 non-canopy trees, or a combination thereof, are required to be planted in ~he first 50 feet behind the property line along the street. Please make this ,adjustment. - Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: January 30, 2001 ENGINEERING 1. No comments. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: February 1, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1of1 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 I Fax (979) 764-3496 ~ ·.·' MEMORANDUM February 1, 2001 TO: Urban Design Group, Via fax 696-9752 n~ nik\J Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager ~ ·t FROM: SUBJECT: University Park -Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the attached comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) revised site and landscaping plans (additional sets will be required once the plans have been approved); $100 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews; If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: SSRS Steve Ross and Fred Bayliss, Via fax 846-85'p'i Case file #00-219 -- Home of Texas A&M University ,. PLANNING STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 3 Project: UNIVERSITY PARK (SP)-SITE PLAN (0-219) 1. The proposed gravel drive needs to be screened from view, gated, or paved. 2. The "Landscape/Streetscape Requirements" states that 11 trees are required for streetscape. To meet this requirement, 11 canopy trees, 22 non-canopy trees, or a combination thereof, are required to be planted in the first 50 feet behind the property line along the street. Please make this adjustment. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: January 30, 2001 ENGINEERING 1. No comments. Reviewed by: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date: February 1, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1of1 02/02/01 12:09 '0'979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 6446 02/02 12:07 02'02 2 OK 96969752 ~001 02/02/01 14:25 'a979 764 3496 DEVELOP!IENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START THIE USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 6462 9p8468569 UNIVERSITY TOWER 02102 14:24 01'47 4 OK 141001 PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC) MEETING October 19, 2000 TO: FROM: Debbie Keating, Urban Design Group, Via fax 696-9752 Fred Bayliss, Via fax 846-8569 PRC Review Subcommittee: Karl Mooney, P &Z Commissioner Ray Harris, P &Z Commissioner Carolyn Williams, P&Z Commissioner Staff Attending: Natalie Ruiz, Development Review Manager Ted Mayo, Assistant Cify Engineer Tammy Macik, Secretary SUBJECT: Driveway Variance for property located at University Park, Section II -The prop()~<;ll of a driveway variance for a planned commercial development on the north side of University Drive west of the intersection of University Drive and Spring Loop. The PRC held a meeting on Wednesday, October 11, 2000 to review the above-mentioned project. Assistant City Engineer Ted Mayo opened the discussion and said that the staff denied the request for the driveway variance because University Drive is a major arterial. Mr. Mayo stated that another reason for denial is the nature of University Drive and the fact traffic is increasing. Mr. Mayo said that TXdot is planning to widen University Drive to include raised medians. The west driveway would be located in a proposed median cut by TXdot which means · the additional access would only be right turn in and right turµ out which is adjacent to Holiday Inn Express. Applicant Debbie Keating stated that they needed the driveway for the safety of their customers. Commissioner Harris motioned to grant a total of 2 access points for both the subject property and the adjacent property to the west contingent upon one of the 3 driveways shown on the plan being closed. Commissioner Williams seconded and the motion passed 3-0. · .. / '· .--~ .. t ..... .i \. ~ Bert wooeter,_,/·--- ~"ii~ ",< ... -..dt't ,,,.r' f __ ,./ .. '-. \. .. -·-! · ...... , ... :i ,_ .. ·_-_: .. ·· .. . -·_) ..... ,.-·...,.\ J ....... ..._ . ) ':. __ ..... i ' ..... -·-··· k condominiums cedar cree .. t Spirit f)eVelopmen ,... ... -.. / .. ,._ -,_ \ \, '\ \ \ ' ' \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ! ' i I j \ '· \. \ I \ ' \ ! \ :. \ D ' ' ., __ .......... . :;.'~ .. ~:-::-J.--- \ .. , ./ __ ~::::;:;:;::·.-('::fl ii-)~ '. <J!2 _ O_ c · Ci ,,._ i i i f \ l ~ I .. ··•7 • -=r~ -y"'--. ~,.~------ ./ ~ ......... ,,. 1arttdr.id ... Bank\, \. - \ l ·,, " ·,_ TX/Hotel t Managernen .., \ .... ... ...... -...... ..._ ....... ...... ~.··-.. ~ -' j • "-~--._ --_,_;l ::r·--·-----L------··-IL =-; ~{~.} .. ~m Urban Design Group Natalie Ruiz or Bridgette George Development Coordinator . Department of Development Services City of College Station PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-9960 February 8, 2001 Re:· University Park Section II, Block T, Lot 15 Dear Bridgette, Attached please find final plans revised per staff comments# 3, received February 2nd via fax. We have addressed the two comments as requested. The owner of the project would like to start the site work as soon as possible. Would it be possible for us to obtain a development permit for the project excluding work in the right of way, since TxDOT has not issued a permit? cc: Steve Ross, Fred Bayliss C:\ruiz5.doc Sincerely, ~~ URBAN DESIGN GROUP Deborah L. Keating, P.E., Partner Post Office Box 10153 • College Station, Texas 77842 • 409 • 69 6 • 9653 ~ I Texas Department of Transportation 1300 N. TEXAS AVE. • BRYAN, TEXAS 77803-2760 • (409) 778-2165 Project: Highway: CSJ: County: STP 2000(253)UM FM60 0506-01-069 Brazos Mr. Thomas V. Vennochi, Jr. City of College Station P. 0. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Dear Mr. Vennochi: February 23, 2001 ;ii'•. We have reviewed the driveway permit submitted for this property improvement. We agree with the driveway locations and geometrics as submitted. We have discussed with the design engineer, Ms. Deborah Keating of Urban Design Group, that the sequencing of our ongoing roadway improvement project with the priyate property improvement is critical. · ,:;..:,·;.~ ~ Our roadway contraCtor has initiated work along the front of this property and will be removing the.existing (east) driveway to place the new driveway as roadway widening progresses. As they develop this driveway ahead of our contractor, I recommend placing only a temporary pavement structure on the State right of way rather than the expensive concrete driveway proposed. Our contractor will be paid to place the final concrete driveway after the roadway is widened. It is my recommendation that the ne_w location (west) driveway not be built ahead of our roadway widening as it would have to be removed and_-reconstructed in our roadway widening efforts. If the property owner can wait, our contractor will construct the west driveway. Therefore, they will not pay the cost to construct it and we will not pay our contractor to remove it. \ I also discussed with Ms. Keating the need to submit a separate utility permit (TxDOT Form 1023) for the proposed. drainage tie to .the State's storm sewer system. Again I stressed the importance Of the construction sequencing. She may elect to tie to an existing curb inlet until our contractor breaks the line to tie it into the proposed storm sewer system. All proposed details and hydraulic calculations will be submitted through your offices. If we can provide further assistance in this matter, please contact Karl Nelson at 778-6233. KRN/bja cc: Project File Project Inspector District Construction Sincerely, o~ u).~f.E_ Catherine Hejl, PE Area Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409)764-3570 I Fax (409)764-3496 Date: February 28~ 2001 # of pages including cover:__.7'--_ If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. tla~.cJ J~,"' TO: Mike~-ser/Cully Lipsey FAX: 846-4 725 . ""' COMP ANY: ______ ___..l-=0=2 ..... 1 =-'Jo=i=nt~V..__e=n=tu=r--.e _______ _ FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. PHONE: (409)764-3570 COMP ANY : _____ -=C-=ity~o-=-f-=C-=o=lle=-=gs>=e-=S"""'ta...,.tl=· o-==n _______ _ REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review D Replay ASAP IZJ FYI - Page #1 is the cover letter for TxDOT's permit application response with their concerns in regards to the new driveways. Page #2. 3 & 4 are the permit documents themselves that we received from TxDOT. Page #5 is the minutes from the City's Project Review ' Committee. Page #6 is a Preliminary Design Schematic from TxDOT. Please call if I could be of any further assistance. ~ I Texas Department of Transportation 1300 N. TEXAS AVE. • BRYAN, TEXAS 77803-2760 • (409) 778-2165 Project: Highway: CSJ: County: STP 2000(253)UM FM60 0506-01-069 Brazos _ Mr. Thomas V. Vennochi, Jr. City of College Station P. 0. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Dear Mr. Vennochi: February 23, 2001 We have reviewed the driveway permit submitted for this property improvement. We agree with the driveway locations and geometrics as submitted. We have discussed with the design engineer, Ms. Deborah Keating of Urban Design Group, that the sequencing of our ongoing roadway improvement project with the private property improvement is critical. - Our roadway contractor has initiated work along the front of this property and will be removing the.existing (east) driveway to place the new driveway as roadway widening progresses. As they develop this driveway ahead of our contractor, I recommend placing only a temporary pavement structure on the State right of way rather than the expensive concrete driveway proposed. Our contractor will be paid to place the final concrete driveway after the roadway is widened. It is my recommendation that the new location (west) driveway not be built ahead of our roadway widening as it would have to be removed and reconstructed in our roadway widening efforts~ If the property owner can wait, our contractor will construct the west driveway. Therefore, they will not pay the cost to construct it and we will not pay our contractor to remove it. I also discussed with Ms. Keating the need to submit a separate utility permit (TxDOT Form 1023) for the proposed drainage tie to the State's storm sewer system. Again I stressed the importance of the construction sequencing. She may elect to tie to an existing curb inlet until our contractor breaks the line to tie it into the proposed storm sewer system. All proposed details and hydraulic calculations will be submitted through your offices. If we can provide further assistance in this matter, please contact Karl Nelson at 778-6233. KRN/bja cc: Project File Project Inspector District Construction Sincerely, c~ uJ-~f.6_ Catherine Hejl, PE Area Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer __ , Permit to Construct Access Driveway Facilities Fonn 1058 (Rev. 12-96) Previous versions are obsolete. on Highway Right of Way /:111 loo Hwy. - Control Cb5o (p Section To: Permit No. of The Texas Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the State, hereby authorizes ..5 S !( S J I. tJ c_ , hereinafter called e Grantee, tq (re) construct an access ~riveway op,~~~Trig,tlt of V/-'t-Y c;butting highw~. ~~ <:) s t-eoe~~~~~ "l ~ AUJ-~hff~ Subject to the following: --r ---iJ ~ 1. The Grantee is responsible for all costs associated with the construction of this access driveway. 2. Design of facilities shall be as follows and/or as shown on sketch: . . . dhe drive :entrance into property (30' wide) One drive entrance on adjacent property (28'-wide) All construction and materials shall be subject to inspection and apprqved by the State. 3. Maintenance of facilities constructed hereunder shall be the responsibility ofthe Grantee, and the State reserves the right to require any changes, maintenance, or repairs as may be necessary to provide protection of life or property on or adjacent to the highway. Changes in design will be made only with approval of the State. 4. The Grantee shall hold harmless the State and its duly appointed agents and_ employees against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit. 5. Except for regulatory and guide signs at county roads and city streets, the Grantee shall not erect any sign on or e)(tending over any portion of the highway right of way, and vehicle service fixtures such as service pumps, vendor stands, or tanks shall be located at least 3.6 meters (12 feet) from the right-of-way line to ensure that any vehicle services from these fixtures will be off the highway. 6. This permit will become null and void if the above-referenced driveway facilities are not constructed within six (6) months from the issuance date of this permit. · · 7. The Grantee will contact the Stat~ repJY~ntative d/r · A/e Al J11/u. N Af , telephone W11J 77%-LcJ S~ at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to beginning the work authorized by this permit. · Texas Department of Transportation The undersigned hereby agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in this permit for construction of an access driveway on the highway_ right-of-way. / SJ' ;t. J', /,.JC ,,~~ ~-t1!L-t:/ S>Jned: ;!,, /Z a-1k-f.l~r-41/"1A (Property owner or owner's representative) jr/01 Date: __ 1__;0_t__,__}_P_o_· --------- Fann toss (Rev. 12-96) Back Access Driveway R·egulations The Texas Transportation Commission, in recognition of its responsibility for the safety and utility of public highways under~ its jurisdiction, has directed the adoption of rules and regulations to accomplish a coordinated development between highways and abutting property. For this purpose, the booklet entitled "Regulations for Access Driveways to state Highways" was published and adopted, setting out departmental policies to regulate construction and maintenance of access driveway facilities. · Sketch of Installation See attached construction plans £#<:'· '- .. :·.~.;~~~-~J~[f ~~ _. . :.:::-_...-. Date: February 21, 2001 FM 60 -W. of Spring Loop University Park II Block T, Lot 15 1101 University Dr. College Station, Tx. Driveway Permit GENERAL SPECIAL PROVISIONS (Driveway Permit ) : 1) Traffic Control plan is required per TMUTCD prior to start of construction work in the FM 60 right-of-way. 2) Areas within ROW disturbed by construction shall be restored to equal or better conditions than existing prior to construction. 3) Contractor shall be responsible for locating all utilities within the right-of-way construction site. Contacts with local utility companies and utility locators are required. 4) Lane closure allowed between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. only. 5) Reinforcing for concrete driveways shall consist of No. 4 bars, 18" o.c.b.w. 6) Contractor shall notify Mr. Karl Nelson at TxDOT (778-6233) at least 48 hours in advance of any work to coordinate site improvement activities with ongoing FM 60 construction. PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC) MEETING October 19, 2000 TO: FROM: Debbie Keating, Urban Design Group, Via fax 696-9752 Fred Bayliss, Via fax 846-8569 PRC Review Subcommittee: Karl Mooney, P&Z Commissioner Ray Harris, P&Z Commissioner Carolyn Williams, P&Z Commissioner Staff Attending: Natalie Ruiz, Development Review Manager Ted Mayo, Assistant City Engineer Tammy Macik, Secretary SUBJECT: Driveway Variance for property located at University Park, Section II -The proposal of a driveway variance for a planned commercial development on the north side of University Drive west of the intersection of University Drive and Spring Loop. The PRC held a meeting on Wednesday, October 11, 2000 to review the above-mentioned project. Assistant City Engineer Ted Mayo opened the discussion and said that the staff denied the request for the driveway variance because University Drive is a major arterial. Mr. Mayo stated that another reason for denial is the nature of University Drive and the fact traffic is increasing. Mr. Mayo said that TXdot is planning to widen University Drive to include raised medians. The west driveway would be located in ~ proposed median cut by TXdot which means the additional access would only be right turn in and right turn out which is adjacent to Holiday Inn Express. Applicant Debbie Keating stated that they needed the driveway for the safety of their customers. Commissioner Harris motioned to grant a total of 2 access points for both the subject property and the adjacent property to the west contingent upon one of the 3 driveways shown on the plan being closed. Commissioner Williams seconded and the motion passed 3-0. i ( I l J'X pol f (l_Df osf3 D ,,,.JI f) e t.11N6 cedar creek condomrn1ums \ / i.J\\ . ...f , / .f t t' ,., .. -........... ~ J:,~~ f;. i I ) ' I( "'! \-.,) I ... .r!' f J \, o~ Fti" (,o (UNIV· l>f.) \ ';,( ,/ .·· .. ·. . "'" , .• ,.. y' • "; I f ··,·\1/:~<1!f0VO.'!!~.-J!!.~t>J/U.J$'··'"f J)f{IV~SJ \ \ / • ( • --(~,~-··,:~).~, ::y. ~(~) •\ G<O \ \ :~ ... ) / ..... , .. _,.,· ., ' .' .. \..-· ·, ,/ ;._ ·,, .;."~/ ( ) '" .-.. sprrtt IJ&leTopmeni \ \ Berl wooeJer ,_,..-·· ,,,,,,.,,. ,.,, .. ,... ;· , .. ,_, \. ;.::;·\ //, C"· · ... -<~~~~,\.,) ·:~:· V.\ (~> :· oo'_~; c~_~l ) \ · _·:····.. \ ···•· n ,. ..... , -"''1 I ' D'"'ld ·W S""rmardo 8i . ---.... . "' . ~ --·· · ··-' --~·~ "'.. .,_, ·· · .... t \ s J camprse · - --=-=-: --=~ .. ------+9-''-\\ ..... j .• ("• ( ' '., • • ·"·.~" "'·~ ~· ........... ... .!:..:.~ .• .s:•·:......... · .. ,, ... -.. ........ ., ~ ----,Ji . ' 4 ~-- ---~ .. ~ .. ---·--.. ··~ -r--~ ''"\· ..... ~' \ \ \ I __ ~~---! -__ . _ .-. .. ..... ·. , ,.. · · ·· \ om • --_ --~·---• • .. ·--•-'-'"' ' • ,·•. .. ' • I "-· I f·g14 ----=-~==-=·--'· . -. -~--'--'-'-l . "" .. , / i l'I I 3 =tr -... -..i.. - - - - -= = :::--i::=-;.:.;::-=~=-=..H•-·--~·., ...... ~M··---\, ~-- -..:::::.. '"' -._ -•--· • t ;; 'I t - - - - - - --.J.;~i:.:'::: =-...:: --w•-• -••••--•-•·•-' - - -·--·--··--~1\0HH• 8·-RH ABB I - - - -- - - ---·--STATE OF TEXAS~ ,.:., -·.-•-·r-~--"--a ----,--~----===4 ___ ,.....,,_.__ . ---'?II'' p I ' -· DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AT I ON-~---~":'...;;;;;..::-..=...::-_::--:-=·~ --::"""::" ---I -r ••>w w":" -• SQ a . Sf a 2li . . ;_. ·' --·-----'\"' ·~;=-----····--... .:::..~-;;;;. . ...;:,~---"5 BRYAN 01sm1ct --~. :·c;~· · ~·:~ -0--· µ+.( -PRELlMINARY DESIGN SCHEMATIC FM 60 <UNIVERSITY DR.> FROM CARTERS CREEK RELIEF BRIDGE TO TARROW ST. fR{j,I: CARTERS CREEK RELIEF BRIDGE TO: TARROW ST. LENGTH: 2. 624 KM t1. 631 MILESl BRAZOS COUNTY DESIGN SPEED • 80 KPH <SO MPHl 1995 ADT • 20, 900 . , 2015 AOT • 31, 700 CO!ITROL-SEC-JOB: 0506-01-069 PLAN VIEW SCALE 1 : 2000 PROHLE VIEW SCALE H • 1:2000 v .. 1:~00 MEDIAN OPENINGS TO BE DETERMINED IN PS&E IN COORDINATION WITH THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION. NOT A BlDDlNG OOCWENT Ma.rloe Maness, P. E. •81094 om ':-.1----,~ ; .. , ' JI / ,f / I' ' . ' {~ ... ~/ -,.._, ... 3 l>R.tv~S March 12, 2001 Fred Bayliss 410 South Texas A venue College Station, Texas 77840 RE: Driveway Variance for University Park II Mr. Fred Bayliss: It has come to our attention that an agreement might not have been reached between yourself and the property owners to the west of your proposed University Park Plaza (University Park Section II Subdivision, Block T, Lot 15) in regards to closing their existing driveway off of University Drive. We would like to remind you of the motion passed by the City of College Station Project Review Committee (PRC) in reference to your request for a variance to our 'Driveway Access Location and Design Policy'. Please find attached the minutes from the PRC meeting of October 11, 2001. It was motioned by Commissioner Harris " ... to grant a total of 2 access points for both the subject property and the adjacent property to the west contingent upon one of the 3 driveways shown on the plan being closed." If you are unable to meet this condition you would be required to resubmit your site plan. Also attached, for clarification, is an illustration depicting the 3 driveways of concern. We have recently been contacted by individuals involved with the properties west of your subject tract. Please consider this as soon as possible. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 Sincerely, Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer xc: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Mike Hoelscher, 1021 Joint Venture Alfred Lehtonen, Lehtonen Investments, Ltd. encl. o: \group\dev _ serv\txdot\Bayliss.doc ·- FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409)764-3570 I Fax (409)764-3496 Date: March 13 ~ 2001 # of pages including cover:_4,___ If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: ___ ~F=-=r=e=d-=B=a,,,_yl=is=s...._ __ _ FAX: 846-8569 --~~~~--- COMPANY: __ ...... F~re~d_B~a.....,.y~li~ss~/S~t~ev~e~R=o~s=s_(R~os~c~o_H~o~ld~i ..... ng..,...s ...... ~ ~In~c.....,..) __ _ RE: University Park Section II~ Lot 15 i Block T f"J1 FROM: Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. PHONE: M®)764-3570 COMP ANY : _____ """'C"""i......,.ty"""'o"'""f_.C ...... o-=ll=e.,...ge __ S=t=at=io"""n _______ _ REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review D Replay ASAP ~ FYI We are sending original copy by post mail. COLLEGE STATION P. 0. Box March 12, 2001 Fred Byliss 410 South Texas A venue College Station, Texas 77840 RE: Driveway Variance for University Park II -" Mr. Fred Bayliss: Phone# Fax# b It has come to our attention that an agreement might not have been reached between yourself and the property owners to the west of your proposed University Park Plaza (University Park Section II Subdivision, Block T, Lot 15) in regards to closing their existing driveway off of University Drive. We would like to remind you of the motion passed by the City of College Station Project Review Committee .(PRC) in reference to your request for a variance to our 'Driveway Access Location and Design Policy'. . . ·. -.,l!\i:. Please find attacned the minutes from the PRC meeting of October 11, 2QO 1. It was motioned by Commissioner Harris " ... to grant a total of 2 access points for both the subject property and the adjacent property to the west contingent upon one of the 3 driveways shown on the plan being closed." If you are unable to meet this condition you would be required to resubmit your site plan. Also attached, for clarification, is an illustration depicting the 3 driveways of concern. We have recently been contacted by individuals involved with the properties west of your subject tract. Please consider this as sbon as possible. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 ~14~~/ T~mas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer xc: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Mike Hoelscher, 1021 Joint Venture Alfred Lehtonen, Lehtonen Investments, Ltd. encl. o:\group\dev serv\txdot\Bayliss.doc -Home of Texas A&M University 03/13/01 09:05 'U979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 6975 9p8468569 UNIVERSITY TOWER- 03/ 13 09:03 01'43 4 OK 03/13/01 09: 11 '0'979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 6976 9p8464725 HOELSCHER LIPSEY 03/13 09:10 00'34 1 OK 141001 03/13/01 09:14 ~979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 6977 9p6933828 03/13 09:14 00'28 1 OK 141001 .·.:. ,,:.;. ·.:___ .. ~. . .. , . ~ .. ,. ... ·--. '_.-....... ~ .. -cfZ~) --'-,. TO: File FROM: Tom Vennoc~ RE: University Park P~021 Joint Venture Lehtonen Investments Ltd. - 700 Dominik Drive, College Station, Texas 778 40 DA 'ilh-ecPr'.~~~en -G~nera/ Managing Partner General Info: (409) 693-026! Fax 693-3828 West of University Park Phase 2 (Block T, Lot 15)- Mike Hoelscher-Attorney 1021 University Drive 846-4726, FAX 846-4725 ~ . Block U, Lot 10 -Plat file 84-202 co owner of lot & building w/ Cully Lipsey-Attorney, and Celia ... Dniver~ity Title c~-~~ ' • Relevant files - 00-219 SP 01-023 FP 00-201 REZ 00-184 VAR 3/1<>/. 1;/fi/$i[f. J5A-l GYd ~ fj G J Lehtonen Investments Ltd 700 Dominik Drive, College Station, Texas 7l8_40 Alfred Lehtonen G~neral Managing Partner ., > . . ·,. (409) 693-026! Fax 693-3828 Lehtonen Investm t L d 700 Dominik Drive Coll S ~n S, t . ' ege tat1on, Texas 77840 Alfred Lehtonen G(!neral Managing Partner ··~Ji V~clui "\;. LOI T:,.J..u!.-STWl~----f 'D-Je: . V'l\\'\le.-LA-: µ.e_ J ~e.s T (\0-tt e.J\.- RD G>~ \ e... o..A.)~s ( 409) 693-0261 Fax 693-3828 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE March 14, 2001 Deborah Keating , P. E. Urban Design Group 2700 Earl Rudder Frwy. S. Ste. 4300 College Station, Texas 77845 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960 (409) 764-3570 RE: TXDOT Utility Line Pennit-University Park Section II, Lot 15, Blk. T-Storm Sewer Tie-in Dear Ms. Keating: Attached is correspondence from TXDOT regarding resubmittal of the permit application for the storm sewer tie-in to the TXDOT System on University Drive. Please prepare the required response and resubmit 3 originals, i.e., Form 1023 with attachments thru me for submittal to TXDOT. No work is to be performed within the TXDOT ROW of University Drive until this permit is approved by TXDOT. . Sincerely, ~~-~e='6" Teddy D. Mo; P:E. Asst. City Engineer CC: Natalie Ruiz Fred Bayliss Project file Encl. (i§m . .:s Vennochi -Re: help ' .,. From: To: Date: Subject: Celia: Jim Callaway Celia Goode-Haddock 3/26/01 9:49AM Re: help The Project Review Committee recently heard a variance request related to the driveways in question. The PRC approved a variance request for the development east of your site. Part of the approval included granting a shared driveway that would align with TxDOT's proposed median break. The PRC required that the existing drive be closed as a condition for granting the new drive. I was not at that PRC meeting, but, it is my understanding that the PRC was advised that the property owners that used the existing drive were agreeable to closing it. Based on your email, it appears that this is not the case. I suggest that the developer of the site to the east of you get with our staff to take this item back to the PRC. I also suggest that he include representatives of all of the properties that use the existing drive in his request to the PRC. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I can be of any assistance. Jim C. >» Celia Goode-Haddock <celia@UTITLE.com> 03/23/01 03:35PM >» Jim: I know you are probably not the person to ask, but I know you will direct me. On the expansion of University Drive East, according to the highway department, University Title Company will have two curb cuts. One of those currently exists and the other is to be built. The second cut will be at a median and our original curb cut will only allow traffic to exit west. Steve Ross owns property to our east and is building 3 office buildings. According to the highway department, that property will be allowed a curb cut to the front building and they will also share the cross over curb cut with University Title Company. Here's where I need your help. According to Thomas Vennochi, Jr. at the city, these two properties can only have 2 curb cuts. Because of the high volume of both employee traffic and customer traffic into University Title Company, Coventry Glen Realty and David Skinner, not to mention the other tenants, we wish to have this decision changed. Just at University Title Company we average 50 closings per week and that usually translates into four (4) extra cars per closing. We believe that the decision to only allow two curb cuts is unreasonable and would create a traffic nightmare and unsafe conditions. Please let me know who to talk to and where we need to bring our crowd of angry protestors. Celia celia@utitle.com <mailto:celia@utitle.com> Celia Goode-Haddock University Title Co. P. 0. Box DT College Station, Texas 77841-5079 979.260.9818 P_age 1. / I Thorn~s Vennochi -Re: help www.utitle.com<http://www.utitle.com> CC: 'bexco@tca.net'; Billy Haddock (E-mail); 'Cully Lipsey'; J. Fred Bayliss (E-mail); 'joobin@tamu.edu'; 'jtcpa@aol.com'; 'lehtonen@tca.net'; Lynn Mcllhaney; 'Mike Caldwell'; 'Mike Hoelscher'; Tom Brymer; 'wls@tca.net' Page 2 I ilii . JSU I a:. u c:a: Thomas V. Vennochi, Jr. City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 11111 fl111H11 i11i11 lu jiJj n1il 1l 111H11li11 ull11il1111l111l' ' ' ' 1<, I Si Ji l I l l as ass I. I ,, t £ZS$ I. i I I 't J Q Lehtonen Investments, Ltd. March 29, 2001 Thomas V. Vennochi, Jr. City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Dear Mr. Vennochi: -.~ ·~ t' . Re: University Park Section II, Lot 15, Block T, 1101 University Drive East I am writing to you as the General Partner of Lehtonen Invesbnents II, Ltd., which owns the building situated on Lot 2, Blk. U, University Park Section II, locally known as 1003 University Drive, East, College Station, Texas. This building, occupied by Coventry Glen Realty, is in the office pcuk immediately west of the above referenced development now under construction. On October 19, 2000 the Project Review Committee of the City of College Station considered a driveway variance for the above referenced development. The ruling was to allow a second shared access driveway into Lot 10 Blk. U that would align itself with TxDOT' s proposed median break on University Drive. However, this ruling was subject to the existing driveway entrance into our office park being closed. This ruling was made without notice to the affected property owners or without there approval. Cutting to the chase of the matter, it is readily apparent that the City of College Station· has approved a final plat for the referenced development without the applicant demonstrating verifiable legal access to the buildings shown on the plat. Accordingly, I strongly suggest that the current site plan be revoked and the applicant be required to resubmit a revised site plan. This matter should then be reconsidered by the Project Review Committee at a hearing to include representatives of the affected properties. Only in this manner can an informed ruling be forthcoming. Sincerely, Alfred Lehtonen, General Partner Lehtonen Investments II, Ltd. 700 Dominik Drive I College Station, Texas 77840 I ( 409) 693-0261 I Fax 693-3828 . ' ' JAMES D. TROTTER, CPA ntant East, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77840 City o~ College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Attn: Thomas V. Vennochi, Jr. I.>"" ti g, . U,iOQilJ.k SWtd•< ; "#.I· 17 i> 'i .()l!ilfN+"9) h*'°*"""" @I, * U.S. POSTAGE ! I ..P>S 44, SJ, J!( .• Md l(,!lifiJiiif41:W / · r I /, ;fL, ! ,,.. ' ' ~ --· L 0 T Investments 1005 University Drive East, Suite 103 College Station, Texas 77845 Phone (979) 846-2992 Fax (979) 846-3166 City of College Station, Texas Thomas V. Vennochi, Jr. P. 0. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 March 28, 2001 Mr Vennochi, Thank You, for having a meeting with me to discuss the University Drive construction currently taking place. We own a building at the above address and we are very concerned about closing driveways into our complex. We have not had any meetings or given our consent to Mr. Fred Bayliss to close any of the driveways into our project. Please keep us informed about this matter as it affects our property significantly. Sincerely, ~~c~ Michael C. Laine ... : .. ',I • .. , .. ,. ' .. VI' VU, V.L .1..1. • .J..~ "Q"l:f 1::1 /04 J4!Jfj DEVELOPJ\IENT SVCS TRANSJ\IISSION OK . TX/RX NO. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIJ\IE USAGE TIJ\IE PAGES RESULT ********•*•**************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** 8524 9p8467868 07103 11:10 01'58 3 OK 141001 The Ci!J7of College Station, Texas P.O. Box 9960 • July 3, 2001 Bo Miles 4090 Raymond Stotzer Parkway College Station, Texas 77845 Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. 1101 Texas A venue • College Station, TX 77842 www.ci.college-station.tx.us RE: Detention Pond Fencing for University Park II Mr. Bo Miles: • (979) 764-3500 My immediate concern upon reading your facsimile addressed to Bridgette George ( dtd. 06/22/01), is of health and safety. Per the detention pond details on sheet C7, the depth of the pond and vertical retaining wall will range from approximately 7' to 9'. My guidance would be to use a chain link fence at least 4' tall. There is a note stating that details can be found in the achitectural drawings, but I couldn't find that reference. Attached is a copy of requirements out of the 2001 International Building Code for fencing around a swimming pool that I suggest you follow. The City always encourages the positive aesthetics of extensive landscaping. A safety fence should supplement the landscaping and deter adventurous children attracted to a 'hidden playground'. There sh9uld be a gate with a width of no less than 10' for access to the pond for maintenance purposes. Having concrete exposed should not present any problems of the pond is properly safeguarded with a fence. Absolutely no trees or bushes should be planted in the bottom of the pond. This would detract from the volume capacity the pond was designed to handle. Please consid~r this as soon as possible. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 ;!;th j/ !-p~- Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer xc: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Coordinator Ted Mayo, Assistant City Engineer O:\group\dev _ serv\ Tom V\DetFence.doc Home of Texas A&M Unhrersity '·, ! .~;. '\ '' \ ~~ /11 :·¥ ··i :-.'( ·'' SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 3108.4 Loads. Towers shall be designed to resist wind loads in accordance with EIAffIA 222-E. Consideration shall be given to conditions involving wind load on ice-covered sec- tions in localities subject to sustained freezing temperatures. 3108.4.1 Dead load. Towers shall be designed for the dead load plus the ice load in regions where ice formation occurs. 3108.4.2 Wind load. Adequate foundations and anchor- age shall be provided to resist two times the calculated wind load. 3108.5 Grounding. Towers shall be permanently and effec- tively grounded. SECTION 3109 SWIMMING POOL ENCLOSURES 3109.1 General. Swimming pools shall comply with the requirements of this section and other applicable sections of this code. 3109.2 Definition. The following word and term shall, for the purposes of this section and as used elsewhere in this code, have the meaning shown herein. SWIMMING POOLS. Any structure intended for swim- ming, recreational bathing or wading that contains water over 24 inches (610 mm) deep. This includes in-ground, aboveground and on-ground pools; hot tubs; spas and fixed- in-place wading pools. 3109.3 Public swimming pools. Public swimming pools shall be completely enclosed by a fence at least 4 feet (1290 mm) in height or a screen enclosure. Openings in the fence shall not permit the passage of a 4-inch (102 mm) diameter sphere. The fence or screen enclosure shall be equipped with self-closing and self-latching gates. 3109.4 Residential swimming pools. Residential swimming p~ols shall comply with Sections 3109.4.l through 3109.4.3. Exception: A swimming pool with a power safety cover or a spa with a safety cover complying with ASTM F 1346. 3109.4.1 Barrier height and clearances The top of the barrier shall be at least 48 inches (1219 mm) above grade measured on the side of the barrier which faces away from the swimming pool. The maximum vertical clearance between grade and the bottom of the barrier shall be 2 inches (51 mm) measured on the side of the barrier which faces away from the swimming pool. Where the top of the pool structure is above grade the barrier is authorized to 2000 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE® 3108.4-3109.4.1.7 be at ground level or mounted on top of the pool structure, the maximum vertical clearance between the top of the pool structure and the bottom of the barrier shall be 4 inches (102 mm). 3109.4.1.1 Openings. Openings in the barrier shall not allow passage of a 4-inch (102 mm) diameter sphere. 3109.4.1.2 Solid barrier surfaces. Solid barriers which do not have openings shall not contain indenta- tions or protrusions except for normal construction tol- erances and tooled masonry joints. 3109.4.1.3 Closely spaced horizontal members. Where the barrier is composed of horizontal and verti- cal members and the distance between the tops of the horizontal members is less than 45 inches (1143 mm), the horizontal members shall be located on the swim- ming pool side of the fence. Spacing between vertical members shall not exceed 1.75 inches (44 mm) in width. Where there are decorative cutouts within verti- cal members, spacing within the cutouts shall not exceed 1.75 inches (44 mm) in width. 3109.4.1.4 Widely spaced horizontal members. Where the barrier is composed of horizontal and verti- cal members and the distance between the tops of the horizontal members is 45 inches (1143 mm) or more, spacing between vertical members shall not exceed 4 inches (102 mm). Where there are decorative cutouts within vertical members, spacing within the cutouts shall not exceed 1.75 inches (44 mm) in width. 3109.4.1.5 Chain link dimensions Maximum mesh size for chain link fences shall be a 2.25 inch square (57 mm square) unless the fence is provided with slats fastened at the top or the bottom which reduce the openings to no more than 1.75 inches (44 mm). 3109.4.1.6 Diagonal members. Where the barrier is composed of diagonal members, the maximum open- ing formed by the diagonal members shall be no more than 1.75 inches (44 mm). 3109.4.1.7 Gates. Access gates shall comply with the requirements of Sections 3109.4.1.1 through 3i09.4.l.6 and shall be equipped to accommodate a locking device. Pedestrian access gates shall open outwards away from the pool and shall be self-closing and have a self-latching device. Gates other than pedestrian access gates shall have a self-latching device. Where the release mecha- nism of the self-latching device is located less than 54 inches (1372 mm) from the bottom of the gate, the release mechanism shall be located on the pool side of the gate at least 3 inches (76 mm) below the top of the gate, and the gate and barrier shall have no opening 653 3109.4.1.8-3109.4.3 greater than 0.5 inch (12.7 mm) within 18 inches (457 mm) of the release mechanism. 3109.4.1.8 Dwelling unit wall as a barrier. Where a wall of a dwelling serves as part of the barrier, one of the following shall apply: ~. Doors with direct access to the pool through that wall shall be equipped with an alarm which produces an audible warning when the door and its screen are opened. The alarm shall sound continuously for a minimum of 30 seconds immediately after the door is opened and be capable of being heard throughout the house during normal household activities. The alarm shall automatically reset under all con- ditions. The alarm shall be equipped with a manual means to temporarily deactivate the alarm for a single opening. Such deactivation shall last no more than 15 seconds. The deac- tivation switch shall be located at least 54 inches above the threshold of the door. 2. The pool shall be equipped with a power safe- ty cover which complies with ASTM F 1346. 3. Other means of protection, such as self-clos- ing doors with self-latching devices, which are approved by the administrative authority shall be accepted so long as the degree of pro- tection afforded is not less than the protection afforded by Section 3109.4.1.8, Item 1or2. 3109.4.1.9 Pool Structure as Barrier. Where an aboveground pool structure is used as a barrier or where the barrier is mounted on top of the pool struc- ture, and the means of access is a ladder or steps, then the ladder or steps either shall be capable of being secured locked or removed to prevent access, or the ladder or steps shall be surrounded by a barrier which meets the requirements of Sections 3109.4.1.l through 3109.4.1.8. When the ladder or steps are secured, locked, or removed, any opening created shall not allow the passage of a 4 inch (102 mm) diameter sphere. 3109.4.2 Indoor swimming pools. Walls surrounding indoor swimming pools shall not be required to comply with Section 3109.4.1.8. 3109.4.3 Prohibited locations. Barriers shall be located so as to prohibit permanent structures, equipment or sim- ilar objects from being used to climb the barriers. 654 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 2000 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING cooE® I ' I I ' \ I .f i .I ~! ~ t1 1. __ ·;::;_ I ! I I DRAFT June 27, 2001 Bo Miles 4090 Raymond Statzer Parkway College Station, Texas 77845 RE: Detention Pond Fencing for University Park II Mr. Bo Miles: My immediate concern upon reading your facsimile addressed to Bridgette George (<ltd. 06/22/01), is of health and safety. Per the detention pond details on sheet C7, the depth of the pond and vertical retaining wall will range from approximately 7' to 9'. My guidance would be to use a chain link fence at least 4' tall. There is a note stating tha~ details can bfmound ·n the 1 achitectural drq.wings., but J couldn't fl.Rd t~t r,:.:erence. .i-lJ.,.--LQ l.S c-c..o.p ""* gv -t1 ../--{.,a...; _ t ~~~\.......JI ~· \.~ ~ ~ .!.--'O c.....,. ..... ~ d... ~·~·~ p--t' Tk--t-5 U)~~::v Th~City ~'f;;;;s encourages the positive aesthetics of extensive landscaping. A safety fence . should supplement the landscaping and deter adventurous children attracted to a 'hidden playground'. There should be a gate with a width of no less than 10' for access to the pond for maintenance purposes. Having concrete exposed should not present any problems of the pond is properly safeguarded with a fence. Absolutely no trees or bushes should be planted in the bottom of the pond. This would detract from the volume capacity the pond was designed to handle. Please consider this as soon as possible. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 Sincerely, Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer xc: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Coordinator Ted Mayo, Assistant City Engineer 0:\group\dev _serv\Tom V\DetFence.doc 05/22/2001 10:53 979-845-7858 W M KLUNKERT PAGE 01 W.M KLUNKERT, INC.------GENERALCONTRACTORS 4090 Raymond Stotzer Parkway (979) 846-2717 C~llege Station, Texas 77845 FAX (979) 846-7868 FAX TRANSMISSION DATE: --'{o,........(--=-z..::;.._;:-L=+-'( O......._} __ FROM:~ M \LE"-S ATTN: ~~\>~-erst c.\~' ~~ ~~ s"ih-"T~ ~~~~""-~:C 5'4.G'S · fax#: 1\ Cs::>~ -~~C\. ~ NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:. __ HARD COPY TO FOLLOW: Y ( ) N ( ) MESSAGE: REF: (_)\l..\~i:&-~\"'N ~~\.6 Offius \\C>\ (_)"\~.\:::>~. ~~~~~ -=:.c:. ~ '3?~J>,sc:.us::p;uv. Urry.. &:iug..,,}"'2..C.V:fi!:..r -c.-.J1'ft.. ~~ii~• p?r\_.\\.._ fuz... ~\t\t;(g!nu"' ~"'~"J>e; 1~o'"'J:.~1:>. ~ L\~~ \fuia ~~'~u'"" ~\L ~?e ~c.Ei' '~' ~"""'.a-s '"°' ~ ~'"\ ~~ ~\..d~ \~ ""'0L~"'V>S L.cJeu..... ~\T'~ L~~~C..~\"G.. C?~"' ... ~ ~ :_· ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ -g~\~~~ I~" ~ ~("'t>,J$'~) W ~\\A.l-~ \H.~ ,.,_~~ l~ ~'-'Ei"~~ \>\~~\C..\ -L~~\ ~US~ \\k~ T'\~\S: ~~ 7 ~ ) 4?-~\\... (_ '\:ii,~ ~,;;i:.B ~'-'\~ES'-\""'~ ~'\~'-.lrQl...G .. ~ 'n'"t"' ~U\.2..S't-\~. I Mo.~ '"""'"""'"~'v...e .._.,w, .... """" ~'-~ i..-~ss \>\.,..,. ~ ... ":tz\0 ~o-, V c"'-~ ~e: ?\..~' ~ees \ t\. ~\)bo~ ~F 't>d>o~\::> • ~e:. ~s ~"'"e.~ e"i-.V>~~\.\~.,~T~"':( -P~C'to6e L~ """'_. ~~~ ~~ ~5 ~~ CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION The enclo,ed informatloo Is Intended for the recipient named above:, and unless otherwise expressly indicated, Is confldc:ntlal, and prhilcged information. Any dissemination, distribution, or copying of the enclosed material other than 8.'j intended is strictly prohibited. Jr you have: ~c:ived this znateri11I In crl'Or, please notify sender immediately by telephone, at sender's cxpcn$e, and destroy the enclosed material. Your cooperadon ls appreciated. COLLEGE STATION P. 0. Box 9960 June 27, 2001 Bo Miles 4090 Raymond Stotzer Parkway College Station, Texas 77845 RE: Detention Pond Fencing for University Park II Mr. Bo Miles: 1101 Texas Avenue Tel: 409 764 3500 College Station, TX 77842 In r~sponse to Tom Vennochi's comments regarding the fencing for your detention pond, Planning would like to remind you that if fencing is used, and if it is visible from University Drive, it will need to be screened from the right-of-way with vegetation. Universitiy Park II already has an approved landscaping plan. Should landscaping above and . beyond what was approved be added to the site for fence screening, no new plans will need to be submitted. If the planned landscaping is reconfigured on the site to screen the detention pond and count towards meeting the landscaping requirement, a new landscape plan will need to be submitted. Please call me at 764-3570 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~~~<:_""'-~----- Molly Hitchcock Staff Planner, Development Services O:\group\dev serv\Molly\scrfence.doc -Home of Texas A&M University P. 0. Box 9960 March 12, 2001 Fred Byliss 410 South Texas A venue College Station, Texas 77840 RE: ·Driveway Variance for University Park II :\ Mr. Fred Bayliss: . ·.~ 1101 Texas Avenue Tet. 409 764 3500 College Station, TX 77842 It has come to our attention that an agreement might not have been reached between yourself and the property owners to the west of your proposed University Park Plaza (University Park Section II Subdivision, Block T, Lot 15) in regards to closing their existing driveway off of University Drive. We would like to remind you of the motion passed by the City of College Station Project Review Committee (PRC) in reference to your request for a variance to our 'Driveway Access Location and Design Policy'. Please find atta~ii'6d the minutes from the ·PRC meeting of October 11, 2QO 1. It was motioned by Commissioner Harris " ... to grant a total of 2 access points for both the subject property and the adjacent property to the west contingent upon one of the 3 driveways shown on the plan being closed." If you are unable to meet this condition you would be required to resubmit your site plan. Also attached, for clarification, is an illustration depicting the 3 driveways of concern. We have recently been contacted by individuals involved with the properties west of your subject tract. Please consider this as sbon as possible. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at 979-764-3570 · ~ft-~/,/ Tamas v. Vennochi Jr. Graduate Engineer xc: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Mike Hoelscher, 1021 Joint Venture Alfred Lehtonen, Lehtonen Investments, Ltd. encl. o:\group\dev serv\txdot\Bayliss.doc -Home of Texas A&M University PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC) MEETING March 13, 2001 TO: Steve Ross and Fred Bayliss, SSRS, Inc., Via Fax 846-8596 Debbie Keating, Urban Design Group, Via Fax 696-9752 FROM: PRC Review Subcpmmittee: Rick Floyd,, P&Z Commissioner Joe Horlen, P&Z,.Commissioner Judy Warren, P&Z Commissioner Staff Attending: .-~·-.. ~··~.'\ Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner JessicaJimmerson, Staff Planner Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner Tom Vennochi, Graduate Engineer, Development Services Donald Harmon, Graduate Engineer, Public Works Tammy Macik, Secretary SUBJECT: University Park Section II -Proposal of the architectural character and building signage for three office buildings located at 1101 University Drive East (00-219) The PRC held a meetinz on Wednesday, February 7, 2001 to review the above-mentioned project. Commissioner Floyd stated that the proposal seemed to be straightforward therefore they began with a motion. Commissioner Warren made the motion to approve the architectural character and building signage for the three office buildings. Commissioner Horlen seconded and it passed 3-0. TO: File FROM: Tom Vennochi RE: University Park Phase 2 -Driveway issues Relevant files - 00-219 SP 01-023 FP 00-201 REZ 00-184 VAR DATE: 2/23/01 Approved TxDOT Driveway Permit with cover letter. DATE: 3/2/01 General Info: West of University Park Phase 2 (Block T, Lot 15)- 1021 Joint Venture: Mike Hoelscher-Attorney 1021 University Drive (979) 846-4726, FAX 846-4725 Block U, Lot IO-Plat file 84-202 co owner of lot & building w/ Cully Lipsey-Attorney, and Celia Goode-Haddock University Title Co. P.O. BoxDT College Station, TX 77841-5079 (979) 260-9818 Lehtonen Investments, Ltd: Alfred Lehtonen 700 Dominik Drive College Station, TX 77840 (979) 693-0261, FAX 693-3828 LOT Investment Inc. Mike Laine (979) 846-2992 I I ! I I I I \ ) \/' James Trotter Robbie Owens DATE: 3/12/01 Letter written to Fred Bayliss from Tom V. DATE: 3/14/01 Letter written to Diane Keaton from Ted M., regards TxDOT Utility (Storm Sewer) Permit. IL~ridg~tte-·George-:.. TXU Gas Site· From: Edwin Hard To: Bridgette George; Natalie Ruiz Date: 9 · AM Subject: TXU Gas Site Last THurs. Debbie Keating and the developer of the undeveloped site on University Drive (with the TXU Gas facility on it) came in and talked to rile about an additional curb cut on this site ... a second one that we told them in the predevelopment meeting would not meet the driveway ordinance. I told then them that I would not approve the driveway b/c it would be a variance of about 100'. This is just a heads-up b/c I anticipate that they'll be submitting a letter (I told them to you Natalie) . requesting a variance from the PRC. In light of the driveway concerns voiced at the last P&Z, it doesn't appear that their chances are good. If Debbie contacts any of you regarding this, be sure and let her know what P&Z did last week with the Harley plat. Edwin Hard, AICP Transportation Planner CC: Spencer Thompson; Ted Mayo