The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10 Development Permit 5000-81 Express Stop 2551 Texas Ave Ste A«~ COLllGl STATION DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO . 500081 DP-EXPRESS STOP FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE ST A TION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DATE OF ISSUE: OWNER: DOSANI , AKBER KARIM DBA JACK'S GROCERY COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: SITE ADDRESS: 450 SOUTHWEST PKWY E DRAINAGE BASIN: MAIN BEE CREEK III VALID FOR 12 MONTHS CONTRACTOR: FULL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT All construction must b e in compliance with the approved construction plans. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Co ll ege Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction , erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. The Owner and/or Co ntractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work . Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and spec ific ations submitted to and approved by the City Eng ine er in the development permit applicat ion for the a bove named project and a ll of the codes an d ordinances of the City of College Station that apply. -cO\ Date I ~;\.;)!.. f'IU.: Sttoo rJ ® .._ ___ D_A_TE_SUB __ MITIE __ D_:='="=' t=!IAA!!!ll:-1!/l~o~ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ML'HMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS S 100.00 Development Permit Application Fee. ~Drainage and erosion control plan, with supporting Drainage Report two (2) copies each. ~Notice of Intent (N.O.I.) if disturbed area is greater than 5 acres. APPLICANT (Primary Contact for the Project): Name :fA't:?ot-J Nl E:"TLALE { MPf;') ' ~ $1~ Street Address 255\ tr2..XM bJf:.-~ City __ c-=-'-. S_, ______ _ State -i;_ Zip Code lt8~ 0 Phone Number {qr-z9j ~3-S?SC\ E-Mail Address r Me±(a.[f-@roJ<j C6.C ~. Fax Number ( o°I ?:>-'1 'Z. '{ '!:? PROPERTY OWNER'S INFOR.i\1ATION : Name -------------------------------------~ Street Address City -------------- State Zip Code ______ E-Mail Address ------------- Phone Number Fa"< Numbe r ------------------------------ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S I).'FOR.!\ifATION: Name -i3PrME f. <:-, Aer:' L. \ cAt-..H · Street Addr es s City -------------- State E -Mail Address -----Z ip Code _____ _ ------------- Phone Number Fa 'X Number ------------------------------ Applicatio n is hereby made fo r the following de velopm en t specific site/waterway alteratio ns : ACKNO\VLEDGMENTS: I, }.~ti-Ln\ f? ~LIJ"i. , desig n engineerl.on'tler., hereby acknowledge or affirm that: The informatio n and conclusions con Li.incd in th e abo ve plans and supporting documents comply v.ith the curren t requirements of th e City of Co lkge St::it ion, T ex::i s City Code, C h3.pte r 13 and its assoc iated Drainage Pol icy and Desi gn Sl:lnd:irds . As a c onditio n of approv::il of th is pem1it ::ipplic ::it io n, I ::ig ree to cons truct the improvements proposed in this application according to these documents ::ind the requirements of Chapter 1:3 o f the Co llege Station City Code . f}J5)rf3 . a-e M ,b: P.rop~rr:• Q•,1;'ftetts) Cont racto r PP--$tC,N W 0nNEDl2- DEVEL O ?~.::O~T PE?-'.l!T DPER.'.Ul.::X.C 3r ::.;:99 l ofZ '"' . CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.) .- F A. I, N,4 , certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100 year storm . Engineer Date B. L lb-brH ~. ~\..1..)e . , certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential stru cture, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended. ~~~ Engineer Date C . L N /A , certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall not diminish the flood-carrying capaciry of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations or development are consistent v.ith requirements of the City of College Station City Code , Ch.apter 13 concerning encroachments of floodways and offloodway fringes . .{..... Engineer Date -.:.:··-:.:... D . I , N/A , do certify that the proposed alterations do no t raise the level of the 100 year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal In s urance Administration Flood Haz::.rd Study . Engineer Date Conditions or comme nts as part o f approval: ---------------------------- ln accordance with Chapter 13 o f rhe Code of Ordinanc es of the City of College Stat ic~ measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction , e ro s ion, and sedi mentatio n shall not be deposited in city sueets. or existing drainage facilit ie s All development shall be in :1c co rd:uicc \\·irh the plan s and sp ecificatio ns submitted to and approved by the City Engineer fo r the above named proj ect. A ll o frh~ ::i pplicable codes and ordinances of the City of Colkge Sution shall appl y . DE VELO?~.:E'-."T P E:<..'-!rT DPER.'.!IT !)QC J . 2.; 9 9 2 of:? ~ )0 ;;,{_ s o )0 ~ ,2-... 7 !? ~/f 7L f) \,L\~ fo ~ ],,Of ';~ z..,J 5 2-, 'Y :::: 2.1 05s -- II I .II :I I I I 11 II I I I II 11 II II Ill I I I I II ' II II Ill I I Ill 111 DE VELOPMEl'fI SERVICES TRANS MITT AL LETTER NameJFinn: J?A~N M'E.76\l p (YV\PC~ Address: "2.55'\ I~ A\Jt=-. S ·) 'S-te A LOL-\.-P-0€. $-rA'""tl\>N I "JX 778'-tt> Date: ~ \ / zz/ oa L Phone: Co'1~ -s~s'1 Fax: lf1~-~·u{3 We are transmitting the followin g for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): 0 Master Development Plan w!O Redlin es 0 Preliminary Plat w10 Redlin es 0 Final Plat w10 Red lines 0 FEJ\tfA CLOt-.1.A/CL0~1R/LOMNLOMR w/ 0 Redlines 0 Site Plan w10 Redlin es D Grad in g Plan w!O Redlin es 0 L c.nds cape Plan w!D Redlin es 0 Irrigation Plan w!O Redlines 0 Buildi11g Construction Docu ments w!O Redlin es INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The foUov.ring are included in the com plete set : D Wate rline Construction Docum ents w/ 0 Redlines 0 Sewerline Construction Documents w/O Redlines 0 Drai nage Construction Documents w/ 0 Redlines D Street Construction Documen ts w/ 0 Redlines 0 Easement application with metes & bounds decsription 0 Drainage Letter or Report w/ 0 Redlines 0 Fire Flow Analysis w/ 0 Redlines Special Instructions: TRANS).!:71.:.J... L::1TER. TRA'iS .'.!:T.JJC G3 ·23 99 0 Development Permit App . 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Rezoning Application 0 Variance Request 0 Ot her -Please specify 0 TxDOT Driveway Permit 0 TxDOT Utility Permit --S::-Other -Please specify :1'eA1Nka£ ~ftff1 1of1 Drainage Reports Location "\ u Primary drainage system identified \ lJ Surrounding developments shown "8 Local streets, drainage systems shown \ ~escription "\~ Acreage of project "iJ Land cover described ~ Primary/secondary systems within property shown \0 General description \nrainage Basins \'el References to FIRMs if applicable \ ~ Secondary system flow patterns and impact of development on existing system \JiJ Proposed pathways to Primaty system shown or described \~ nesil!D Criteria \ ~ Any deviation from standards being requested? Discussion of site constraints and capacities (streets, existing structures, etc.) Discussion of any applicable previous drainage studies and how this plan will affect it Hydrologic Criteria Rainfall/runoff calculation method described and calculations provided Detention discharge I storage calculation method I calculations Storm recurrence intervals used 0 Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used if not referenced in Standards Hydaulic Criteria Identify capacity of systems used Specify velocities at critical points in system Identify detention I retention outlet and routing 0 Discussion of other drainage facility design criteria used not referenced in Standards Drainage Facility Design ""'"@ Discuss drainage patterns I flows (pre vs. post) \ '1!:J Are they draining water onto another property owner? -if so, is it where the water flowed before? and is it not more than what flowed there before? and no faster than it flowed before? Discuss erosion control measures employed Discuss detention pond design (sideslope, low flow channels, outlet works, freeboard, emergency spillway) 0 Discuss maintenance access and responsibilities Conclusions 0 Verify compliance with DPDS (signed and sealed certification) Explain effectiveness of improvements with regard to controlling discharges of 5 -100 year storm by a) Detaining b) Accommodating runoff in existing I proposed easements or ROW discharging into primary system c) Combination ofa & b 9ofl2 Project Name: ___________ _ Review Date: ------------ Reviewer: _____________ _ Drainage Reports(cont.) "'-Aopendices "\."fl References (all criteria and technical information used) Hydrologic computations "-.. blJ Land use assumptions for adjacent property "-~ Minor/major storm runoff at specific points "" 'ftl Historic/fully developed runoff specific points \. "-o Hydrograpbs at critical points "tJ Hydraulic computations Culvert capacities (headwater and tailwater assumptions) --8-Storm sewer capacities --a-Street capacities -8-Storm inlet capacities (inlet control rating) \. --B-Open channel design "'-0 Detention area I volume capacity I outlet capacity \. Attached Drawings \.\ID Location map with drainage patterns '\. ~ Floodplain map if any ""-~ Drainage plan with topo (existing and proposed with arrows if needed) \ffi Details of outlet structures o:\deve _ su\fonm\engr\chklsldoc 3flS/99 10of12 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No.1 Project: DP-EXPRESS STOP-DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (0-500081) PLANNING 1. The site plan was approved on September 21 , 2000 by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the inclusion of Staff Review Comments No . 3 . These comments are carried forward and need to be addressed in order to receive the Development Permit. They are as follows: 3 . The driveway width for the access fronting Southwest Parkway needs to be reduced . The maximum driveway width for a commercial drive is 36 '. 5 . Drive aisle width between the gas pumps and parking along the building front must scale out to a minimum of 23'. 15. Please furnish a lighting detail that shows how the surrounding properties will be affected by the proposed lighting. 17 . The enlargement of the dumpster pad to accommodate the two proposed dumpsters has decreased the turning corner of the drive- thru to be less than 20'. The rear drive aisle must measure 20 ' at all points. Reviewed by: Shauna Laauwe Date: 12/12/00 ENGINEERING J 1 1 Please rename al) future material to read 'Express Stop', not Exxon at ) ) 1 v n-v 2 ·. Dartmouth Crossing . 1 The hydraulics of your parking lot retention are acceptable . But, your dumpsters will be flooded every time storm water is retained in the parking fl Jo"" . • 'M lot. This will cau e the storm water to become gray water. Iv ~-~fA~ f fo -(QC/, L7 µ..( lfl Reviewed by : Thomas V. Vennochi Jr. Date : 12/12/00 /i~v St aff Rev iew Comments Page 1 of 2 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer responsible for installing conduit per city spec. and design . 2 . Developer responsible for providing and installing street lights per city spec . and design 3 . Developer responsible for providing easements to cover all primary electrical lines and equipment. 4. Developer responsible for providing 5' easements to cover streetlight light services as needed Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker or Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2 . Back Flow devises must be tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394 . Reviewed by: Rob Werley NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans . Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review . Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2