HomeMy WebLinkAbout55 Regular Meetings 4.19.77AG E~illA
Zoning Board of Adjustment
Apri l 19, 1977
2. Determination of a request for variance from Dr. James R. Bradley
at 209 Dooinjk Drive.
J. Consideration of a request for variance from Cruse Corporation
at 118 Richards Street.
4. Co~sidaration of a request for variance from Area Progress
Corporation at 1305 FM 2818.
5. Other Business .
6. Adjourn
.AGENDA
Zoning Board o f Adjustment
Ap ril 19, 1977
l. A:;Jp::-ov al of t ee :minute s o f the meeting of Mar ch. 15 , 1 97 7.
2. Determination of a request for variance from Dr. James R. Br-adley
at 209 Dominik Drive.
J. Consideration of a request for variance from Cruse Corporation
at 118 Richards Street.
4. Consideration of a request for variance from Area Progress
Corporation at 1305 FM 2818.
5. Other Business .
6. Adjourn
! .-. '
'
\
·,
MEMBERS PR.ES~~:
MEMBERS ABSE~:
VIS ITORS PRESENT :
MINl.ffES
Zoning Board of Adjustment
Ma rch 15, 1977
Chairman Weis s, Members Hughey, Storts,
Council Liaison Ringer, Building Official
Ko~hle r
Comstock , Runnels
Phil Springer
1. Aoproval of the minutes of the meeting of February 15, 1977:
Hughey moved that the minutes be approved as rsad. The motion was
seconded by Storts and unanimously approved .
2. Consideration of a request for variance from Dr. James R. Bradley
at 209 Dominik Drive: This item was deferred to allow time for
Dr. Bradley's representative to be present.
3. Consideration of a request for variance from Mr. Phil Springer
at 801 University Drive. Koehler stated that the application was for
expansion of a non•conforming use rather than a variance as shown on
the agenda. Mr. Springer said that the value of the addition was
about 127. of the value of the structure, that the sign did not conform
to the size and hwight limits established in December of 1976 and
was intended to advertise a drive·thru service permitted prior to that
time and requiring a substantial investment.
Weiss observed that the value of the expansion was within ·the l imits
provided by ordinance. Board members concurr ed that the addition
proposed would not increase the extent of non-conformity in any
substantial way and would not prolong the like of the structure.
Weiss moved that the permit be approved. The motion was seconded
by Hughey and unanimously approved.
2. Consideration of a request for variance froM Dr. James R. Bradley
at 209 Dominik Drive: Koehler explained that the ordinance required
greater parking for a medical clinic than for a retail commercial use
and presented Dr. Bradley's application. He said that he _had .been
contacted by two nearby owners who said that they had no objection
to the request. The Board noted the following points:
)
i
·, There · was no nearby on-street parking for overflow,.
Dev e lo plll.:!nt of adjacent lots would be adversley effected
by persons att e mpting to park on other's property.
The building layout indicates a possibility of expansion of t he prac -
tice by employing addi t ional assistants, increasing parking
requirements beyond the pre s ent esl:i inat e .
A future owner or practicioner could change the nature of
the p ractice to operate without appointments and thus increase
parki ng r squi reme nts .
The Board agr~ed to defer action until the me e ting oi .
April 19, 1977 in order that the applicant might have
a chance to respond and directed the Building Of f icial
to infor.ia tha applicant.
4. Other Business: There was no other business.
5. Adjourn: Ringer moved that the raeeting be adjourned. The
motion was seconded by Storts and unanimously approved.
---··--. _..:_ .
-~ .... -. __ . . I ---.........
-----·---·-
/'
I
I
I _I
I ~--..-..,,...., .... I ···,~· f'!T ..... . CIT Y OF COLLEGE STATION ~~~-~·~~J~_:i
POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1 I 0 I T E XAS AVENUE
77840
----
COLL E G E STATION , TE XAS
April 14, 1977
MEMORA."IJl) UM
FROM: Building Official
TO: Zoning Board of Adjustment
SUBJECT: Meeting of April 19, 1977
Item 2: Dr. Bradley will be present to explain the proposed
dental clinic parking variance which has been def erred to this
meeting. A sketch of the floor plan is attached.
Item 3: The Cruse Corporation desires to construct a single
family residence adjacent to an existing non-conforming resi-
dence in the Richards Addition. T'ney request a variance to t he
provision of Table A which states that "in no case shall a single
family residence be built within 15 feet of another building."
A sketch is attached.
Item 4: Area Progress Corporation is constructing a veterinary -
clinic and requests a variance to the parking ratio. They pro-
pose to provide 11 spaces on the lot for a 1750 square foot building
(1 space per 160 square feet). A sketch is attached.
PO ST OFF IC E BOX 9?60 11 0 1 TEXAS AVENUE
COL LEGE STATION. TEXAS 77340
.March 16, 1977
Dr. J~es R. Bradley
3414 Park ~ay Terrace
Bryan, TX 77801
Dear Dr. Bradley:
The Zoning Board of Adjustment considered your request
for variance at their meeting of March 15,. 1977 and
concurred in tabling your request deferring a final de-
cision until their raeeting of April 19, 1977.
The board noted the following points which they considered
pertinent to the case:
In the event that your parking needs exceed the
space available, even though at infrequent times,
there is no public on-street pa~king anywhere near
your site. (On-street parking will not be alhiwed
on Dominik and there are no nearby side streets.)
Future develop~nt of adjacent sites might be
adversely effected if ov~rflow from this opera~ion
attempts to park in another parking lot.
The layout of tha building indicates that i~
would be possible to expand the practice (i.e •.
Dentist, Dental assistant, Hygenist, receptionist,
three patients being treated ar.d three or four
waiting).
It is possible through tha life of the structure
to change occupancy or owner/operators who would
conduct their practice in such a fashion as to
require more~parking.
------
...... .. --
·. ~ The Board stated that they ~ere inclined to deny th e
,.
r equest , but they chose to d~fer a decision u ntil the
next m e e ti~g to a llow you an O?µurtunity to pres2nt any
infor.-:i.at i on you may have.
WK/rm
... -;.. ·-
_______ _J
------;·-----
• -·---•••• o;r
·es err t zoni..."'lg oi' l.s.'1d in question._-'C"'----1~----·. .
5ectia:J of ord-i '1&.'1ce fro!Il T,{hic:~ vari ance is sought _____ _._-__,C"-, ----------
Tne fo lloi;.dng sp ecific vari2.t ion. from the ordina.."lce is requested: To cons t n"".,.,,1"""~·.::..t __
parking at the ratio of 1 space per 15 0 sq. ft. for a dental office in lieu
of 1 per 100 sq . ft . a s required.
Th~s V3.riance is necsssa...--y du9 to· the following unique and s pecial conditions .
o f the land not found in li~e districts:
Th is l and is zorn~d commPrc; al and this reqnes± ; s f o,.. a oQa.t.-1 offiao for one (1)
dentist, one (1) dental assistant and one (1) receptionist. Patients will be by
appointment only and three patients will be the ma.x:im.um number at any one time.
The follm.r.in.g alter.natives to the requested variance are possible: _______ _
Additional s ~ac es c m1Jd b 0 added in ±ho r o a .,.. of ±b ~ J;miJ...:i iag l;nrt ,rotld require
removal of trees.
This variance "tri..ll not be contrary to the public interest by vi..-rtue of the .following
facts:~-~Ih~e~~d~e~n~t~a.l...._.o~r-r_,_·c~e.._1~10.·1~ .• l_p....,...r~o-v.i~d~e._..a~m~p~J·e~p~a~r-k~i~n~g,,,.._..f~o~r.......,p~a~+~,-·e~n ....... +~s_...a.n~d----...--..--~
em.plovees. T'qe u ar;\>ini area is des jgoa +.0 a in th e .f.,..apt for p(;l+i e n +2 a nd in th li
j
rear for emnloyees anci pat1ents j~ necessary
The .facts stated by ma in this application are trua and correct.
Fe bruarv ±4, 1977'
Appl;cant Date
PcEVIEW Af.11) COMMEN T: Build.L."!g Official: _______________ _._ _____ _
I .
-----------· ·----
' 1
I
. l
I
' I •
' .,
l
r-~ I· :
. ' r
I q
ii
,J
"
·'
1:
I
1 .
II r ii
i :
' i• I
I
I
I
Ii
Ii
11
1:
I
I
I
I
·-· __ .. __ ----·--------·-···---------·--·-·--------·· -1 --I
! (: t -·-----·---y------t.:-.. :-F·-~'.\/~::-.::·t-..1/:-,'(
1. ,:;\ ,---.--~ j . --=--: __ : -_--~= :..-;.--:-:~"'
" ' ~ ' '
t
. . .. . ' . \
I ·,· ,i·.. ·"·· ---··-··-... -.~(~--• • • • ' .
' .. , ...... :.· .' .
r
-. --.---' . ' . . .
' .• ... . ' . ·~ . . •. . .
\
u ---,!.l~-' ~-; :'J•, -,.J ', , ', • ' , , < ·, ;< '·~ • , ·. • /''K ·~:-~~]'
I
\
--· 1· . . :, .. ·, . ._·,. ·."· . ,· ;. .......... :..
'· .. ·.~
:<l
Ill . rn
\_'.\
·r
/ .. -
. ' I .... ...
Cl
..
I ..
--,---1-_·----·--J ___ ----
" / .
--r ' -)l '1 \ --~-:.----1
?'. ·v,.r ... " I
.... 1 ... ' \, . ,. ... , J t
\i ... ' .
. . . ,,,.,J..-·-----~-..... -
/_
.\\ .. -··
: rj
t l\
(i\
I
\ ...
. \\ ...
i l\
'( ....
I
',
Section of ordinance fro~ which varia_~ce i s sought
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
5-D Table "A"
Yee follou:ii:g specific variation from the ordinan ce i s request.ad:
~~~~~~~~~
To construct
a residence 12 feet 6 inches froru a n exi s ti ng re sid·ence .
This variance is necessary due to the f'ollo"Wing unique and special conditions _
of t~a land not found in like districts:
Exis t ing home is built 4'411 off p-r opert:y line -our home ha3 3•4» o fr commo n
property line and 7' 11~" off the open property l in&.
T"ne follov.i.ng alternatives to the requested variance are possible~~------------~
Redesign the home we haye set up on the lot.
T"cis variance 'will not be contrary to the public .. interest by vii..-tus of'" the f'olloi.rl.ng
··:.
f'acts: ___ E_x_i_s_t_i_n_,.a,,__h_ome __ s __ i_n_t_h_e_a_r_ea...,,__a_r_e_n_o_t_-_b_u_i_l_t_. _t_o __ a_n_y __ a_p_pa_r_e_n_t_" ·_o_rd_i_n_an_c_s_._· _--_--_· _-_--' ~----· -
··-..... ·---··--·
-. . ·-..... ,_. -
r ;;
, ........ -.:. = .· .. ·~. ::.
. ~· .--
T'ae·· f'acts · stated by me in this application are true
Applicant
:;. --· -. ·.. ':: --.. ···· -----. . ... -.. -
.. ,.-._. · ... --=· ..... ~. \.:_:-:~-: -~
. . ~. __ :-..:-·
-·, . ··-·. -: ~ ;. .~ -. -•• -·. . -r:-•. .. . -..
and correct~·:~ ·,:c cco ;: '~ : ~~~&i.f :;:
. , '3-24-77
Date-
-...
: ... .-~. . . ··-·
. _I '
... :··--:-·-----
.--.. ----:.. -.... -
... _ ... _ .
.r-~s;ent .. zoning o f l::i..ricl in question._-'-=:...l.------
S e ction of o:-0.i..n.an.ce f::co::i whic'.-1 varia_'1ce is sought __ ----------------
T!:e follo1.-d r>,g spec ific variatio!l fros the o::-di..ri ai'1c e is reque sted : ___ ......Qrd ·i nance
requires 1 car per 190 s_q . ft.; we want to prov i de 10 spaces f or 'Tete ri nary Clinic
!.?~oper3. t ed by one Vet . , Dr . George w:-u_ te .
This varia..11.ce is necessa...ry due to the following unique a.'1d special conditions .
of the la.rid not found in like districts:
Veterinarian clinic has approximately 1750 sq. ft. & (400 sq. ft. kennel snace)
P~rit icipated use for one doctor, and one assistant and approximately three (maximum.)
customers.
T'~e followi_ng alternatives to the requested variance are possible: ________ _
This lot and the five adjacent lots have adjoining access and parking easements
providing approximately 50 car spaces which also join 7-11 store with another
twenty spaces.
T'cis variance i;.Jill not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following
Tne ·facts stated by me in this application are true and correct.
W.D. Fitch for A.P.C. 4-12-77
Appl;cant Date
P.EIJIEH MID COHHENT: Buildin.g Official: ____________________ ~---
.. -· .. -·-·-,---
' ~: ~I
1 ··-
Co9e s
Wo rk -
Room
1·--
I
i
I
i
/,
I~ I '\'· '~~ I
I
/I , / ./J /-//r '·l ,r-/;r; > ,:_, •. ,., {..,c://..o.
I' .. -· ~ l ./ ," / .._ ._,..._ /
;_.·) ...... ,/I //·.'7 .·.., -/,/,. -
!/ . -. . , / /. , '/L ~·
-===-=--~-·-··-=-"'~~.=-=-~--~--==-=--~~~-~---=---=------=--------=-----=
ryylJ2..v ~ -
~ O/n::l!Lo._ f2u.r~\JflL{:P -
F5+mts -
TbrrJ ~ttl.-
qb hmJ 1Juq~ -
t_@o ~-
UlTU.L1~ o~ . ~~-~14~
~ -tu Q.br{)L)
TO WHO M I T MAY CONCERN :
The Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of College Station
will consider a request for a variance from Area Progress Corporation,
at their called meeting in the Council Room in the College Station
City Hall at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday April 19, 1977, the facts o f the
case being as follows:
The applicant requests a variance to the parking area requirements
of the Zoning Ordinance in order to construct a veterinary clinic
building at 1305 FM 2818.
Further information is available at the office of the Building
Official of the City of College Station, telephone 846-8886.
William F. Koehler
Building Official
MINUTES
Zoning Board of Adjustment
April 19 , 19'77
MEMBERS PRESENT : Acting Chairman Runnels , Membe r s Comstock , Storts ,
Council Liaisson Ringer serving as alternate member .
MEMBERS ABSENT : Chairman Weiss , Member Hughey
1. App r oval of the minutes of the meeti ng of March 15 , 1977: No corrections
being offered , the minutes were declared approved .
2. Determination of a request for vari ance from Dr . James R. Bradley
at 209 Dominik Dr: Buil ding Official Koehler reviewed the progress .of
the case at the previous meeting. Dr . Bradley s t ated that the Board was
correct in its assumptions of the number of empl oyees who could be required
in the future . He pointed out that more than three patients waiting would
be an impracticality for a dentist and that two local dentist , Dr . King and
Dr . Payne had told him that they never had more than 10 persons in their
offices at any one time . He said that his plan had already been amended to
provide 10 spaces .
Runnels moved that the variance be granted to allow 10 spaces to be
provided. The moti on was seconded by Storts and unanimously approved .
J . Consideration of a request for variance from Cruse Cor p oration at
118 Richards St.: Koehler reviewed the points made in the application and
said that he knew of no practical problem which would be created by the
prox:ilnity of the structures proposed. Mr . Cruse stated that he had been
unfamiliar with building in older parts of the Ci ty when he made the design
and contractual arrangements with the prospective purchaser . Mr . Sam Ford
stated that in his opinion , there would be no opposition from anyone in the
neighborhood to the proposal.
Runnels moved that the variance be granted as requested . The motion
was seconded by Storts and unanimously approved.
4. Consideration of a request for variance from Area Progress Corporation
at 1305 FM 28 18 : Koehler reviewed the statements of the application and
said tha t the ordinance would normally require 17 spaces rather than the 11
provided. He pointed out that both access and parking were to be common to
adjacent commerc i al lots . Mr . John Heyde · stated that Area Progress Corporation
would pave rear areas in completing the center and pointed out that the plans
showed mo st of the building area to be workrooms not generating any substantial
amount of parking demand . Dr . White , the lessee , said that his practice
would require only himself and one assistant with a maximum of three
customers by appointment .
Runnels moved that the variance be granted as requested . The motion
was seconded by Ringer and unanimously approved .
5. Other business : There was no other business .
6. Adjourn : There being no other business, the meeting was declared adjourned .
----: .
AGENDA
Zoning Board of Adjustment
Ap ril 19, 19'77
l. A?:;iroval of the minut es of the meeting of Ha rc h 15 , 1977.
2. Determination of a request for variance from Dr. James R. Br adley
at 20 9 Dominik Drive.
J. Consideration of a request for variance from Cruse Corporation
at 118 Richards Street.
4. Consideration of a request for variance fr om Area Progress
Corporat ion at 1305 FM 2818.
5. Other Business .
6. Adjourn
! .
.,.
-,
... -
MEMBERS PRESENI:
MEMBERS ABSE NI':
VISITORS PRESENr:
MINUTES
Zoning Board of Adjustment
March 15, 1977
Chairman Weiss, Members Hughey, Storts,
Council Liaison Ringer, Building Official
Ko eh ler ·
Comstock, Runnels
Phil Springer
1. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of February 15, 1977:
Hughey moved that the minutes be approved as read. The motion was
seconded by Storts and unanimously approved.
2. Consideration of a request for variance from Dr. James R. Bradley
at 209 Dominik Drive: This item was deferred to allow time for
Dr. Bradley's representative to be present.
3. Consideration of a request for variance from Mr. Phil Springer
at 801 University Drive. Koehler stated that the application was for
expansion of a non-conforming use rather than a variance as shown on
the agenda. Mr. Springer said that the value of the addition was
about 127. of the value of the structure, th•t the sign did not conform
to the size and height limits established in December of 1976 and
was intended to advertise a drive-thru service permitted prior to that
time and requiring a substantial investment.
Weiss observed that the value of the expansion was within the limits
provided by ordinance. Board members concurred that the addition
proposed would not increase the extent of non-conformity in any
substantial way and would not prolong the like of the structure.
Weiss moved that the permit be approved. The motion was seconded
by Hughey and unanimously approved.
2. Consideration of a request for variance from Dr. James R. Bradley
at 209 Dominik Drive: Koehler explained that the ordinance required
greater parking for a medical clinic than for a retail commercial use
and presented Dr. Bradley's application. He said that he _had been
contacted_ by two nearby owners who said that they had no objection
to the request . The Board noted the following points:
' ~... . '
There was no nearby on-street parking for overflow.
Development of adjacent lots would be a.dversley effected
by persons attempting to park on other's property.
The building layout indicates a possibility of expansion of the prac-
tice by employing additional assistants ., i ncreasing parking
requiremen.ts beyond the pre .>ent estimate.
A future owner or practicioner could change the nature of
the practice to operate without appointments and thus increase
parking requirements.
The Board agreed to defer action until the meeting of
April 19, 1977 in order that the applicant might have
a chance to respond and directed the Building Official
to inform the applicant.
4. Other Business: There was no · other business.
5. Adjourn: Ringer moved that the meeting be adjourned. The
motion was seconded by Storts and unanimously approved.
,.;.
l
_I
April 14, 197 7
MEMORAND UM
FROM:
TO :
SUBJ EC T:
CIT Y OF CO L LEGE STA T I ON
POST OFFIC E BOX 9960 l 1 01 T E XAS AV E NUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840
Building Official
Zoning Bo ard of Ad j ustment
Meeting of April 19, 1977
Item 2: Dr. Bradley will be present to explain the proposed
dental clinic parking variance which has been deferred to this
meeting. A sketch of the floor plan is attached.
Item 3: The Cruse Corporation desires to construct a single
family residence adjacent to an existing non-conforming resi-
den ce in the Richards Addition . They request a variance to the
provision of Table A which stat es that 11 in no case shall a single
family residence be built within 15 feet of another building."
A sketch is attached.
Item 4: Area Progress Corporation is constructing a veterinary
clinic and requests a variance to the parking ratio. They pro-
pose to provide 11 spaces on the lot for a 1750 square foot building
(1 space per 160 square feet). A sketch is attached.
I _I
P OST OF F I CE BOX 9960 11 0 1 T EXAS AV E NU E
COLL E G E ST A TION, TEXAS 77 840
March 16, 1977
Dr. James R. Bradley
3414 Parkway Terrace
Bryan, TX 77801
Dear Dr. Bradley:
The Zoning Board of Adjustment considered your request
for variance at their meeting of March 15, 1977 and
concurred in tabling your request deferring a final de-
cision until their meeting of April 19, 1977.
The board noted the following points which they considered
pertinent to the case:
In the event that your parking needs exceed the
space available, even though at infrequent times,
there is no public on-street parking anywhere near
your site. (On-street parking will not be all:"owed
on Dominik and there are no nearby side streets.)
Future development of adjacent sites might be
adversely effected if overflow from this operation
attempts to park in another parking lot.
The layout of the building indicates that it
would be possible to expand the practice (i.e •.
Dentist, Dental assistant, Hygenist, receptionist,
three patients being treated and three or four
waiting).
It is possible through the life of the structure
to change occupancy or owner/operators who would
conduct their practice in such a fashion as to
require more parking.
The Board st a ted that they we r e i nclined t o d eny t he
request, but they chose to defer a d e cision until the
next meeting to allow you an oppurtunity to present any
information you may have.
WK/rm
o-·----·-J:;QUEST FOR VAIU .A.N CE
Fr~sent z oning of 1 8.!l d in que s tion_~C~-~l ____ _
Se c t ion of ordinanc e from "Whi ch var i ance i s s ought _____ ..._...._ ________ ~
Th e f o llo ~dng spec ific vari ation fr om t h e or d lilanc e is requested ; To c o n s t ru.~~c~t'--~
parking at the ratio of 1 spa ce per 150 sq. ft . for a dent a l office in l i e u
of .1 per 100 sq . ft . a s r equire d.
Th~s vari ance i s ne c essary due t o t h e f ollowing unique and special conditions _
of the land not f ound in li..~e districts :
Th is land. is z oned commerci al an d thi s req11 es± is f or a dQatal offioo for one (1 )
dentist , one (1) d ent al assist ant and one (1 ) r e c eptionist . Pat i ent s wi ll be by
app oint men t only a nd t hree pat ient s will be t he maximum num ber at any on e time.
Th e following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: _______ _
Add i t ional spa ces c ou l d be a dd e d in ±ho r oar of ±fa~ "bu jJ.dia.g blo*t would require
removal of tree s .
This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the f ollowing -
employees. Th e Par k in~ area is d Psjgna t.e d in th e front f or p a ti ents ar.;i d in ±hia
j
rear for employees and pat ient s j f n ec essary.
Th e -facts -stated by me in this application are true and correct.
February 14. 1977
Applicant Dat e
P.EVIEW AND co ~~1ENT: Build ing Official: _____ ~-----~-----~----..-~
·';' :11 .•
I
ti
i I\
"
.. . , '·
j •
i
Ii ·I
11
ii
I!
I
I
!/. \
I
..,:.i ~ ~ ...., .
i ..
~-----+-·-(
1 .. T.-----.-· -
r ·
.. l'\ '\·---. )~·: '. ....---,...
?)) ·,-....,...,-r .. ,. ~· .. • ~ r I :/_· ' ~· . J.. . •, ' ,.. J 1-J / ________ \_ -
.\\
' I .
..
-t·
il\
:.c y
l
?age 2 of 2
, RE QUE ST F OR V ARI.Al'l'CE
Pre sent z oning of land in question R-1
5 -D Ta b l e "A" Se c tio n of ordinance f rom which varianc e i s sou ght~~~~~~------~----
To c o nst ruct The followin g s pecific variation from the ordinance is reques ted; __ ~~~~~-
a r esidence 12 fe et 6 inche s f rom an existing r e sidence .
T'nis variance is necessary due to the f ollowing unique and special conditions _
of the land not f 01.md in like districts:
Existing home i s built 4'4" of f property line -our h ome has 8 1 4• off common
property line and 7' 11~" off the open property line.
The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible! _______ _
Redesign t h e bpme we h aye set up on t he lot.
This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue or· the .following
. : -. -
.f t Existing homes in the are~ are not built to any .. apparent ordinance . · · ·· --· ·· .. ac s: _______ _..._.._ _______ ....,.. ______________ __, ___________ ~
' . -~ ··-· ..... '!l ........ -.,_.·~-. .... . . ": .... ·.. ~ .. -· ......... · :~.·:;. /'.~--:-:· ----------------------------------------------.. _~-·--· -.·-..7 .. ,,:~·--~ • ...;--. ... ;,. ..... · ·~;~ ·: ....... ·.;1 · .• _...:;..·: ... ·~,_·_·-.:~1-. ·.·£., .. ·_..._;_·-:..c...-.... : ,.~ .::,..~-:--=·=. -~ -• ·y •• ·-•• .. ···.~:::~-~~-~--~· ..... :-... -~ ~ -. ..... ........ . ... ~ ;· .. !-~--....... _ ... '!'.~ .... ~. ;:.--• • ---·=---
; .· ... :' .. -.. ~-..... ··-'-....... : '..·
~ ..... ~ ... , ... ~ .. . -~ . -.:· ......... ..,._..,. ... -1 • -·----:, --'"!-~ ••• : • ~ 1 . .:::~'::::1·~~~ ·i.:
~--~~-~~-~~------~----~----------~~--~~--~~~---~~~ . -.. · ..
Tiie· facts · stated by me in this application are true and coITect ~~··7-~ ··_:_:~-=--~---. ~--.':;-·-~-:_: ~-: ::
=' •_; --.:~:f -~, :--~ .. ~~ ~···:
• ! --
Roaa'd Cn 1 se 3-24-77
Applicant Da te
P.EVIEW AND COMMENT: Building Official=---------------------
Co " ••
... -:.· -.. . -..... ,... 4 -
~ of 2
_;JiJEST FOR VARI.~fCE
.• .
Present zonin g of l.snd in que stion._-'-=-'------
Section of ordLrian.ce fro!.l. which varian.ce is sought __ -----------~---
Ti:.e follm.ri r.g specific variation from the ordinance is requested: ___ _Drdi na n ce
requires 1 car per 190 s_q. ft.; we want t o provide 10 spaces for Ve t erinary CJ i ui c
t o be operated by one Vet., Dr . Ge orge White.
This variance is necessa_ry due to the following unique and special conditions .
of the land not found in like districts:
Veterinarian clinic has approximately 1750 sq. ft. & (400 sq. ft. kennel spaceJ_
Anticipated use for one doctor, and one assistant and approximately three (maximum)
customers.
The follo 1~...ng alternatives to the requested variance are possible=~---~--~
'Ihis lot and the five adjac~nt lo t s have adjoining access and parking easements
providing approximately 50 car spaces which also join 7-11 store with another
twenty s paces.
This variance v.ill not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following
The .facts stated by me in this application are true and correct.
W.D. Fitch f or A.P.C. 4-12-77
Appl;cant Date
PtEV:rnw AND COMMENT : Building Official: ___________________ _
TO \.lliOM IT MAY CO TCERN :
The Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of College Station
will consider a request for a variance from The Cruse Corporation
at their called meeting in the Council Room in the College St ation
City Hall at 7:30 PM on Tuesday April 19, 1977, the facts of the case
being as follows:
The applicant requests a variance t o the side setback requirements
of the Zoning Ordinance in order to construct a residence at 118 Richards
Street.
Further information is available at the office of the Building Official
of the City of College Station, telephone 846-8886.
William F . Koehler
Building Official
~=-=-=-=-==-~=-=-=--~--=-"--'---~~~~==-=~-~--=~ ~ -----=-x---------------... ----'-'--=,.,.--=-
,,_( . .:.//17
.:::'Y//._//~::',/1 j!Y !.'.'"'<7j.//'-: :-' ;-7c7(7
._,--:-'_,".(// / 7 "/c;~i
· ·/t,/ I /1
·cbt?;; s;_; ?/i'Oij O?J j/
. S t11 00c)1
Ctlftl_ll!IOX 3 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
___.____ ___ J_
,OS