Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
49 Regular Meeting 7.19.77
AG ENDA ZONING BOARD OF ADJU STMENT July 1 9 ' 1977 7:30 p. m. 1. Approval of the minutes of t he meeting of May 17, 1977. 2. Consideration of a request for variance from Ken ~1artin at Pepe 1 s Mexican Food, 107 Dominik Drive. 3. Consideration of a request for variance from Dennis Jerke at 307 Glad e Street • . 4. Othe r Business 5. ·Adjourn AGENDA ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT July 19, 19'77 7:30 p. m. 1. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of Ap+il 19, 1977. 2. Consideration of a request for variance from Ken Martin at Pepe's Mexican Food, 107 Dominik Drive. 3. Consideration of a request for variance from Dennis Jerke at 307 Glade Street. 4. Other Business 5. Adjourn July 18 ' 1977 MEMORANDUM TO : FROM : SUBJECT : ' _, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 Zoning Board of Ad j ustment Bui l ding Official Meeting of July 19 , 1977 1 . Wi t h the exception of the minimum h eight question every aspect of t h e applica tion compl i es with the requirements of the Zoning Ord inance. The sign appe ars to be shielded f rom ad jacent resi- dent ial property. A photograph of t h e exi s ting property will be available a t the meeting . 2 . The applicant has enclosed a plan of the proposed add i tion. The resubdivisio n of this tract wa s made in September, 1975 and a copy of a portion of that pla t is enclosed. Page 2 of 2 REQUEST FOR VARIANCE Present z oning of land in questionr,X..__ _____ _ Section of ordinance from which variance is sou ght_\_'-------~--~--~ The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested: __ ~~· This variance is necessary due to the following unique and special conditions . of the land not found in like districts: The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: _______ _ This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following The · facts · stated by me in this application are true and correct. Applicant Date REVIEW AND COMMENT: Building Official: __________________ _ REVIEW AND CO:MNENT: Fire Marshal REVIEW AND COMMENT: City Engineer: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~~ The Zoning Board of Adjustment has examined the facts presented herein and reflected in the minutes of the public meeting of and have determined that the requested variance (IS I IS NOT) contrary to the public interest and that unique and special conditions (DO /DO NOT) exist as stated hereinand as reflected in the minutes of the Board's proceedings and the -variance as requested herein (IS / IS NOT) approved subject to the following terms and conditions: · · Chairperson, Zoning Board of Adjustment Date Filed NOTE: Any person or persons or any tax:;iayer or any officer, department, board, commission or committee of the City, jointly or severally, aggrieved by any dacision of the Board of Adjustment, may present to a court of record a petition, verified, setting forth that such decision is illegal, in whole or in part, specifying the grounds of the illegality. Such petition shall be presented to ·the cou.rt "Within ten (10) days after the filing of the decision in the office of the Board. . ··-r-" . ._; __ .- AGENDA ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT July 19, 1977 7:30 p. m. 1. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of April 19, 1977. 2. Consideration of a request for variance from Ken Martin at Pepe's Mexican Food, 107 Dominik Drive. 3. Consideration of a request for variance from Dennis Jerke at 307 Glade Street. 4. Other Business 5. Adjourn CITY OF COLLEGE STATION POST OFFICE BOX 9960 11 01 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 July 18' 1977 MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Board of Adjustment FROM: Building Official SUBJECT: Meeting of July 19, 1977 1. With the exception of the minimum height question every aspect of the application complies with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The sign appears to be shielde d from adjacent resi- dential property. A photograph of the existing property will be available at the meeting. 2. The applicant has enclosed a plan of the proposed addition • • The resubdivision of this tract was made in September, 1975 and a copy of a portion of that plat is enclosed. --".:.> .....• ---.--~2?LIC-~IC~·f / : . ~: ::! o :f An :):::..i ~~ ~l t __ Y:.o.\e><-n..._._.H ..... a r~t ... i .._.n _,,,..d ""'b"""a_.....P~e~p""e-'...,s~t1,..ec..ox..i.i~c,s;ia.,_n~'li'c.i...ou..awd1-.-________ :__ ______ _ !::::=.:::ess ___ 1_8_0_3_S_._T_e_x_a_s_A_v_e_n_u_e_D_r~y~a_n-L,.,_TX_i _____ ~(=l~07~~D~orru::.:.=·~n=i~k~)---------~ ?~_J:-:e __ 7_7_9_-_7_5_0_o _______ Lot _l_C __ Blo:::k ___ A ___ S,J.o::1ivi.sion. Culp eppe r Plaza D ~s~rip t ic~, If applicable '/, , ~ (Appeal, lTonconforni~g Use, Varianc e) !~_,, ___ s:::;;i-..· g..,n-....V..;..a;;;.r;;..;ia;;;;n=c•e----A~tion req~ested: .Adj oi!lers notified -. Mailing Date X....._ ___ J_u_l.::.y_l .... 3~,_1_97_· _? _________ ....._ ____ _ MP11E ADDRESS Frc!l current ta.-v:: rolls, College Station Tax Assessor Jame s Duc kett · -. - J . c . CUl pep p er-· ... Ki c·k erilio. ·c·orp. · ;.·· 1300 Texas Ave nue, Hous t o n~ TX . ·---,,_, . -~--. .. -. ·---:--· <~--~?ut e_ 5 ~:-::Bo3C99ff.~· '"Br yan ; .. TX .. ·· -_.. . . ...., . -.-.•. ~ ·-:.~ .. ·-- :·· .. :.··-·- -..;.:•::......... . ,..,-:_: .-~ --·. -.-.-·-. . _:.. .. - Alfo n so . Quit ta=-'.::.:·~-:-~. ::::..::"::..:;::=Tefr.-Ky:Ie' st':-;-=-cOirege-S'ta t1.on·; -:-n -.,----~-:-:· :-·-· :'. : . ,-··:-·:--·=<· -.. ._." ·... -~ · -. . ~; .... ·~-:::~~~~;ii~~~~~~~~~tti~;~~~~~1~;::~~:~.~~:~~-~~~:.·:~.~~,~~~z:;··;.'):L ~~~~:;~~;;:~~~~~~~~~;_-=,~··_, .r • :_. •• -::-···-.-_ • ....,, -: ~ • ..._ ~-·-:-·_;.-=-::: .-• •• . -·-'-~ .. ,. -o t -... r . '• •, . ; I ~~ • , .. ·• -·~ •• · ·Hele n B o~----· -...... ,, ... ·, .... ._1 12 --xyie ~--·st:-,-·cai f e ·g e· ~st a t iori; "·TX · ··-... ·--•• _! -:;:::-.·--• ..... Ro bert Alexander 200 Kyle: St., Co l l e ge Sta tion, TX. · A. L . Witcher, 204 Kyle St ., Co l l e ge St a t ion, TX ... J,i >' .· .· ·:·- .• . . ~ .. ---.. f:.~d::-ess 307 GiLADE SrReeT ) WLLE~E &ittzoN ) 15<. 17MO ?'.::Jr:.e 846 -903 I Lot l clo~lc Su b:livisio:o.. LlN1Vff51TY.::0UTH D330riptic::i, If applicable_:/---------------------~- , ~ (Appeal, lfo~confo!"T'1i"!g Use, Variance) .< \/AR IA.Nd: Action req~ested: Adjoiners notified -Mailing Date ' --------------------- lr.Pl'iE ADDRESS From current ta..-..: rolls, College Station Tax Assessor EL :SA.'(ED . aot GLA'DE. f":>T: I JAM~S )NALLACf:.. ·30b GtLAt?E. sr. . . ···-- \203 f1\B\< PLACE ioNV BROWN Boq 6LADE. sr: TOM. yORDf\N · 31 \ GiLf\De. ST. KATH R'(Nf:. CARROLL 101 tql-ADe cpr: HL(GH PARRISH l20Z PAR~ PLACE WALTER t{\EI ER 310 · HOLtcK CLYDE-GRet:::R .... J,i ~· .. . P age 2 of 2 F i le No. _____ _ REQUE ST F OR V A..R..I.Al.\J CE Present z oning of land in que stion >' f(.-/ S e ction of or d inance f r ora 'Which varia.11ce i s sought_>_: ___ _,.(_...T..._tt._b __ ~ _____ '·A"'-"_) ___ _ The follo-w:]n g s pecific vari a tion from the or dinance is reque sted: 'I · g~ A . a FOOT Mrl.J IMUM DlSTANCE. FFDM. ;'.:>(DE_ l?RoPERTY - LINt:, ro n(E sufft?RT' R?sT5 OF MY PROPOSED cAR. R;g!'" AS A VARIANCE. FROM THE RE&UIRED 7. 5 FCQ'C M!NtMUM Df'SW-.la:. Tb:..s variance is necessary du e to t h e f ollowing unique and spec i al condit i ons . of the land not found in like d istricts: (S EE. Dl~RAW\J 1H IS LOT 1"5 CN LY f:JO / w !DE-.w !TH A 20 / w lDE House; CE~IEld::D oN 1r. WI:> LEAVES oNt.Y 15" DN A SIDE FoR ADDlDOtJ . OF A CAR PORT: TH~ BACK VAt<P rs FENCcD AN P \-/AS A aTIO oN IT~ rD D!E.. SIDE Wf\ti:E MY DRtVt=WA'( )S L-0~ IS TH t=. ~L-'( l..O~ICAI-Ft.ACE. ID cot-.J,s~uc.r A cA'R FbR\. The following alternatives to the reque sted variance are possi b l e: . n~F-ONLV Of.HE12. AbTEENAD\JE.. 1$ ro PuT 1HE CARR2fSJ: I~ M.Y FRoNr YARD w HIGH WOU.kD ~ UtJAa:eEfABI F AND . DETRACT . ERtlA THE.. 8JEUC. VIEW OF MY }k)Me:.. This variance -wiJJ. not be contr~ to the public interest by virtue of the following :facts: THE o' DISTJ\t..llE.. W PRQPEg[Y LINE . LEAVES :SUFFlC.ll;N) STRUCTUF;E. TO Al-LoW FOR. At.JY lfilRUSIDt.J BY UTILftY E<RUIP- MteNr WlTHour CAUSrN6 DAMAGE TO PERsoNA.L FROFERt'(: The .facts · stated by me in this application are true and correct. ~w.~ 7/1h? APPllcant ~ ~ b a te HEVIEW AND COMMENT: Building Offici al: ___ _..,...----------~- Ld (,) <( ,- _J ()._ o: uJ ~ "J a: <t CL z a;.. .~~. ~ (.fl U l i 0 0 .~ rrs "1:-i i 1 H'(~ U<' 11 --------' ' . (0 I I I .. ~~d:::l _;~9.L £~,~./ j/4/.. -c/o.?J _ti.P?LI~.ANT PHONE /) ~/~ HAJLI NG ADD:'.1.ESS '') 0 7 --,, - LOT BLOCK SUBDI VISIO N d1.~_4{~.:-« - STREET ADDRESS ..:,,i 0 7 PLUMB ER ET ,F,C m e I AN 0imw CO NSTRUCTIO N ORESIDE1T C£: OCOMME..R.C IAL TYPE: D DEHOLITIO N US E: ODUPLEX OOTHE.R. {!d/!:_£7;7 ,-;/] _/- 0 EOVE ON .OAP ARTMENT []REP AIR/ AD DI/DIO N D\-JELLIHG U1UTS: TOTAL AREA HEAT"~ AREA COST $ _,f'CJO , o o d4 -~ FEE: FOUNDATION PARTITIOUS -t. @J.00 ,?7, ob . :> @2 .00 EXTR.B.I OR WINDOWS @1.00 ' -© .40 A, (ex.cl.k itchen & bath) -@ .15 RO OF /v .{d.//_,,,j A'~NO. OF ROOMS -J? - BATH S NO. OF BLDGS ·ocARPORT 0SINGLE 0ATTACHE D _ TOTAL $ 300 OGARAGE ODOUBLE QDET ACHE D CENTRAL HEAT/AIR: TO NS GAS AIR · RECIEPT NO BUILDI NG O?FICIAL DATE ISSUED L-, the undersigned, hereby certify that the information stat ed herein and in the attached plans is true and correct and that the construction proposed compl ies wi th the Zoning Ordinance, the Building Code and co~ditions of approval of the plat of the land. I also certify that I am familiar 'With the regulations abo ve mentioned and with the conditions of issuance of this permit and I lL~derstand that I am p ersonally liable to the penalties provided by law for each a..'1d every day 's violation of any of the above regulations in addition to the c osts of remo vi.~g or correcting a ll such violations whether or not they are s ho ,J on this permit or the attached plans . SIGNAWRE OF APPLIC MIT : ,Jf;_,,,~ /()~,_,,{, DATE L,&;47 I <...s-. , I JI_ 1--tG DRIVE.. -- -. ____. .. pa. - I \OD 307 ~LA-DE. 0 ·Cl F~o FoseD GAR ~RI .. .a ,.r 1-t><.4 Po"'..Jf" ... ---. ~ . Q '~3' ' .. '' t 5"' ..---.- ~ H l=l Pl\TlO ~t £. e)(.1s. Tltt":i ~ .. ~._~ __ ~_.-__ --~t~•~--~. 1 , ' 1 •. ._• MINUTES Zoning Board of Adjustment April 19, 1977 MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman Runnels, Members Comstock, Storts, Council Liaisson Ringer serving as alternate member. MEMBERS .ABSENT: Chairman Weiss, Member Hughey 1. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of March 15, 1977: No corrections being offered, the minutes were declared approved. . 2. Determination o.f a request for variance fr_om Dr. Jamss .R. Bradley 5- " 209 Dominik Dr: Building Official Koehler reviewed the :'progress .. of the case at the previous meeting. Dr. Bradley stated that the Board was · correct in its assumptions of the number of employees \.Jho could be required in the future. He pointed out that more than three patients waiting would be an impracticality for a dentist and that two local dentist, Dr. King and Dr. Payne had told him that they never had more than 10 persons in their offices at any one time. He said that his plan had already been amended to provide 10 spaces. Runnels moved that the variance be granted to allow 10 spaces to be provided. The motion was seconded by Storts and unanimously approved. 3. Consideration of a request for variance from Cruse Corporation a t 118 Richards St.: Koehler reviewed the points made in the application and said-that he knew of no practical problem Which would be created by the pro:ximity of the structures proposed. Mr. Cruse stated that he had been :!..familiar with building in older parts of the City When he made the design and contractual arrangements with the prospective purchaser. Mr. Sam Ford stated that in his opinion, there would be no opposition from anyone· in the neighborhood to the proposal. Runnels moved that the variance be granted as requested. The motion -was seconded by Storts and unanimously approved. 4. Consideration of a request for variance from Area ~regress Corporation : at 1305 FM 2818: Koehler reviewed the statements of the application and said that the ordinance would normally require 17 spaces rather than the 11 provided. He pointed out that both access and parking were to be common to adjacent co:mmercial lots. Mr. John Heyde :.stated that Area Progress Corporation would pave rear areas in completing the center and pointed out that the plans showed most of the building area to be workrooms not generating any substantial amount of parking demand. Dr. White, the lessee, said that his practice would require only himself and one assistant with a maxi.mum of three customers by appointment . Runnels moved that the variance be granted as requested. The motion was seconded by Rlnger and unanimously approved. 5. Other business: There was no other business. \, 6. Adiourn: There being no other business, the meeting was declared adjourned. I