HomeMy WebLinkAbout196 UnlabledJl • SI:l-<DER; ComplefC items 1, 2, and 3 .
.,., Add your address in the "RETU RN TO ~l ...-~-----~-ve_r_•~-~----------lli-il--11--11-.1
~ 1. .-The fo llowin g service is rc q;.1es!ed (check one.) ~o
~Show to whom and da te ddivercd. ••••••••••• ~¢
0 Show t o whom, date and addres~ of delivery ... _¢
0 RESTRICTED DELNERY
Show to whom and da'e deli·:ered ............ __ ¢
0 RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
Show to whom, date, :md address of delive ry.$ __
(CONSULT POSTMAS TER FOR FEES)
2. VICL_J ADDRESSED TO :
;:: ~~d.c?~
~ {,/3(9~
~ 3. ~~ /:{ 77~~
~ REGISTERED NO . INSURED NO .
• -1
:ti
~ ---(A_l_w _ _.,_s_o_b_t_a.~:n-sig.....,_n""'a-t-.J"'-ro-o_f,_ac-· _r_.e~--or-a_ge_n_,t),...--
~ ---------------------· ~ I have received the article descri!ie d above.
~ DA d dre ssee OAutharlzed agent
.c
z
Ill c
:D m c
~!<---""""---'--I----='--"--~
c
0 m
::rl
RETURN TO
@tY:Stiiti,8iiii.fi> Code) -
;J; • SEN!::ER: Comp;ete items 1, 2, ~.,j 3.
;;"
:l
A d your addres:: in t.'le "RETUR N TO" space on
rtWe1~
~1 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-1
~ 1, The following service is rc que~!e1 (check one .) / _
:4 ~Show to Vthom ~kd date delivered ••••••••••• .'20¢
~ ·. -0 Show. to whom, date and a.!drcss of delivery ••• _¢
:<; . 0 RESTRIC"1E D ELNERY
"" Show to v.h om and date de.ivered •••••••••••• _ ¢
0 RESTRICTLD DELNERY.
Show to whom, date, and addre ss of delivery.$ __
(CONSULT POSTM ASfff' FOR FEl:S)
~·~~ i 3.~ior?K 77fo /
~ R t GISTERE!> NO . INSURED NO .
• -1
~ ~~~~~~~~-=~.c.....o....:...::.~=-='-"'~~~~--,~~
c (Always o h tain sig nature of addressee or agent) § ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
;;; I have received the artide descnoed above.
::;
m
.0 z
~
" "' c
SIGNATURE OAddrcuee OAuthorized age11t
~T--~~~-===--~-"-lr~--=:::;_-"::::....~
0
n
tn
:II ...
~ -:---;-::;;;:~-:;:;;:-;;;;;-;-;-:;-;;;-:;;;~7,;;;:---'--'~~:J;:j~jll~:i'f
111 II. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE:
0
~
r.._~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..._....,'"""'-W..__.
• RETURN TO
• • SEN.DLR: Com plete it.ms 1, 2, and 3.
Add y our a ddress in the '"RETUl!.N TO" space on
rev cne..
1. TI1e.Jallowing service is requested (check one .)
.-fE' Show to wham and d l te delivered. ••••••••••• b:> ¢
? 0 Show to v:~om, date an:! a:!dres; o f delivery ••• _¢
~ 0 RESTRICTED DELIVI:RY
~ Show to whom a.ad date delivere d.···········-¢
0 RF.STRICTED DEL'VI: Y.
Show to whom , date , and address of delive ry.$ __
(CONSULT PO STMASTER FOR FEES)
~ '~ce ss~JdLrf, 5}r
i l7t/c:J~~ i a. ~~ 77d'c/o _
~ REGISTERED NO . INSU RliO NO.
_-1
(Always cbtain signsture of ecldrtlS$08 Of' agent)
6. UNABLE TO DE LIVER BECAUSE :
k . ' ' ... UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV'{'~ P lvl -=:. OFFICIAL 8 .USINESS ffHALTY FOll -PRIVATE ~-SENDER INSTRUCTIONS \ "' ., ,USE TO AV01i:i.PAYl4El'I -, Print your name, addraa, and ZIP Code in the sp-~41JV/. p Q '? ./ OF POS!_AGE. ~----. • Complete lt!tms 1, 2, a11d 3 on tha ma;11. ~. ·• " --• Attach to front of ll'tjcla If sp1ta p1rml" oth-i. lfflx to back of ertlcll. ~ Endora st1c11 •R1111m Receipt Rlqlllllld" adjant to number. RETURN TO
(Street qr P.O. Bait
~~~/Y7 7cf</t
(Qt)', State, and Code)
......... __ _
j1•SENDER:
-~ 1.
C=.plete items 1, 2, ond 3.
Add )'OUI addrc&s in the "RETURN TO" spoce on
reve:3e.
The Jollowing service is requeste'd (d1eck one .)
IB' Show to whom &nd date delivered. ••••••••••• fu ¢
0 Show to whom, date and address of di:>liver/ ••• _¢
0 RESTRICTED DELIVERY
"" Show to whom and date d~livcrcd •••••••••••• _ ¢
0 RESTRlC ED DELIVERY.
Show to whom, date , and ad:!ress of debery.$ __
(CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES)
~~~~E~~
~ 'J'9~-"c~
I ¥"/~~ .=;i~ ~ 3. ~PT~ 770 ~1
m REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. -~
6. UNABLE TO DEL! ER BEC f,L<SE:
e or agent)
POSTMAR K
CLERK'S
INITIALS
'A'GPO : 1979-300-459
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER I NSTRUCTIONS ,. Print your name, address, end ZIP Code in th1 IP~ below. • Complete items 1, 2, and 3 on th• rw1111. • Attach t.o front of article if space permits, Othll'jlfis!I 1ffix to b11:k of an.icle. • Endone ertid• •ft1t11m Rectipt R1qu1ct.1d• 1djlClnt to number. RETURN TO ./ PENAL TY FOR PR IV,t. TE use TO Avoid PAYMENT OF POST AGE, '300
. ' (Stieet Of P.O. Bax) ~~2IP[!) 77f./(
;].? .SEN DE R:. Ccrr.plete items 1, 2, an d 3.
Add your 3ddress in the wRETUR N TO" ap oce on
rcvers.e.
..,.,
0
3
"' ~ .-
L. ..
? u;
" "'
l . The foll owing service is requested (check one.)
ll5' Show to whom and elate delivered. •.••••••••• fu~
0 Show to wt.om, date and a1dress of delivery ••• _'_¢
0 RESTRICTr:D DELIVI.:RY
Show to w:wm :ind date delivered •••••••••••• _¢
0 RESTP.ICTfD DELIVERY.
Show to whom, date, and ajdress of delive ry.$ __
(CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR F EES)
~ .. ~~ ~ i.~~O/>-
~ REG ISTE RE D NO. CERTIFIED N O. INW RED NO .
• -4
:II m a
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
-1 m
::D
IT'
.c
~
:II m c
>--~~~~~~~~~~~~-+--... z v
n ,..
:.tJ
,. \
UNITED STATES POSTAL OFFICIAL BUSINESS . SENDER INSTRUCTION 0 Print your nama, 1dd111a, and ZIP Code in th • Complete items 1, 2, and 3 on the • Attach to front of article if spect permi ii; othwwlll affilt to beck of artlcla. • Endonl anlcla "R1tum Receipt R1qu1ltld" ad nt to numbar. RETURN TO
"'.SENDER: Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
"Tl
0
3
Add yow address In the "RETURN TO" space on
reverse.
Tl\efallowing service is requested (check one .) /
!£f" Show to whom and date deliver ed., •••••••••• ~¢
D Show to whom, date and ad dress of deli very ••• _¢
0 RESTRICTED DELIV ERY
Show to whom and da te delivered •••••••••••• _¢
0 RESTRICTED DE LIV ERY.
Show to whom , da te, and address of delivery.$ __
(CONSULT POSTI..!ASTER FOR FEF.5)
INSURED NO.
I have received the article described above.
SIGNATURE 0Addreuee 0Authorlzed agent
POSTMARK
----------~-..,.---~~-----------
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the SlllCI below. • Complete items 1, 2, and 3 on the rwe.-.. • AttKh to front of anicl1 if 1111e1 p1rmit1, otherwise affix to beck of 1rticl1. • Endol'l8 anicl1 "Return Receipt Requemd• 1dj1C1nt to numblr. RETURN TO PENAL TY FOR PAIVA TE USE TO AVOID PAY ... ENT OF POSTAGE. $300 r~ -U.S.MAIL -e ""
~ • SENDER: Co"'flete items 1. 1, &n J 3.
6' A:I~ y our address in the "RElURN TO" space on
31 -~~~~~-'""-u~~a_·~~~~~~~~~~~~~--..
en l. The following 7mcc is requ.cs.te1 ·~ (check one.) I
.. -lJr'Show to t\<Il otn and d3te ac~1vercd. ••••••••••• ~
0 Show to wh om, date and i:ddress o f delivery ••• _¢
0 RESTRICTI:D DELNERY <D .....
CD Show to whom and date deliver.ed •••••••••••• _ ¢
0 RESTIUCTED DELIVERY.
Show to whom, date, and a:I .:!ress of delive ry.$ __
(CON SllLT PQ :;TMASTE FOR FEES)
::W 2.<.ARTI C~~D~
~/~~~
: ~;;:4-,.~kl~~G's/
~ 3. P.:~n cLe :::escnt rl"to N:
~ REGISTE~ED NO. INSURED NO.
:I
(Always ol>ta in signature of addressee or agent)
I h•w -"'"<ho ~bod ...... SION:;;;E~
DATE OF DELIVERY AK
ADDRESS (C omplete only if
• •
Ix 77J7y1
~)
~ e SENDER: Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
;r Add 1our ad<!re•s in the "R£:TURN TO" apace on
31 -~~~~~-'•_•_•r_<e_·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-1
~ 1. The_joll~'ir.g service is request~~ (check one.) /
~ [!f' Show to whom and date <le.:.1ver ed. ••••••••••• ~-¢
0 Show to whom, date iuid aJdres3 of delivery ••• _¢
0 RESTRlCTED DELNERY
t,-
?
''" ...,
<O
z
~
;II
Ill
Show to wl:.om and date c!clivered •.•••••••••• _·_ ¢
0 RESTRICTED DELNERY.
Show to whom, date , anj address of delivery.$ __
(CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES)
INSURED NO.
0
~~~~~~~~~~~~-r.....;;.'--~
~ 5. A;;>CitESS IC-0mt>le1a o.-,fy I r
n m ::r:
::! ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~..:'.'""'° .. ~~ro-~-:::~
m 6.
0
S':
~
rL....~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"'-~~~~-"
*Gl'O: 1979-300-459
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, llldrnt, end ZIP Code In the spaca below. • ·Complete Items 1, 2, and 3 on !he 111ve1'11. • Attach to front of article If spac1 perm its, 01h-m 1fflx to back of 111ic11. • Endonl lrtlcle "Return RICllpt Requutacr lllilcent to number. RETURN TO PENAL TY FOR PRIVATE USE TO M/010 PAYMENT OF POSTAGE, $300
(Street or P.O. Bax)
~ ~~z:i 77,/';4
CZ • SENDER: Complete items l , 2, anj 3.
;;i Add your address i.'1 tile "RETURN TO" ~nee on
~i -~~..,.-~~-~-ve_r_~_·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ l. Th/f0!lowir.; service is re qi;~!~d (check one .) {;;,
. c!f Sh ow to whom and date delivered ........ ••••'-¢
C S!;ow to whom , date ar.j ad dreS! of delive:y ••• _ ¢
0 RESTf CTED DELIVERY
s:1.ow t o whom and da te d~'.ive red •••••••••••• -¢
0 P.ES TRlCTrD DELIVE RY.
Show to v>hom, <!ate, an d address o f deliv~ry.$ __
(CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEIS)
~ 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED T O: ~ ~w~~~ i 3. ~~~ -r; 77,N,,
~ REGISl l:REO NO. INSURED NO .
.....
I have r~cei...-ed the article described above .
C!G NATURE O Addre-OAuthorlzed aacnt
e-.~
>-t--~~-~~~~~~~~~~~--1
~ 5. ADORE$:$ (COM !c-te only if ......... ,
~ .... :;;
jj, a. UNABLE TO DELIVER BEC
c
~ > F1-..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-'==-....:~~~~
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, addms, and ZIP Code in the space below. • Complett lttms 1, 2, and 3 on th1 mt111. • Attach to front of article if splCI parmits, oth-ill affix to baclr. of article. • Endo111 articl1 "Rltllm R11:11ipt Requlltld" ldj1C1ntto number. ' RETURN TO PENALTY FOR PRJV1'TE USE TO 1'VQIO PAYMENT OF POSTAGE. $300 (I]) (~ <J: P.O. Box)
~~.-r:rnJ'W at(. staie, a,nd lJP Code) .
. ~
A G E N D A
Zoning Board of Adjustme nt
City of College Station, Texas
June 15, 1982
7:00 P.M.
1. Approval of Minutes from May 18, 1982.
2. Reconsideration of Conditional Vartance Approved 7-21-81 for an Arcade
at 315 University in the name of Mike Walsh.
3. Reconsideration of a Variance Request to Section 8 -Ordinance 850 -
Parking Requirements for a sandwich shop at 411 University Drive in
the name of Centex Subway, Inc.
4. Reconsideration of a Variance Request to Table A -Ordinance 850 -
Minimum Setback Requirements for a convenience store at 301 University
in the name of Southland Corporation.
5. Reconsideration of a Variance Request to Table A -Or din a nce 850 -
Minimum Setback Requirements for a commercial project at 700 University ~~
Drive in the name of Mac Randolph.
6. Consideration of a Variance Request to Table A -Ordinance 850 -
Minimum Rear Setback Requirements for a carport at Lot 20, Block C
Lincoln Place Subdivision (714 A-B Vassar Court) in the name of
Robert H. Hens~rl ing.
7. Adjourn.
• l
,.
(
(
(
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
AGENDA ITEM NO. l:
MINUTES
City of College Station, Texas
Zoning Board of Adjustment
May 18, 1982
7:00 P.H.
Board Chairman Cook, Members Wagner, Upham, Donahue
and Alternate Member Lindsay
D. MacGilvray and Council Liaison P. Boughton
Mayor Halter (for administering Oath of Office) ,Zonfng
Official Kee, Zoning Inspector Keigley, Assistant Director
of Planning Callaway, and Planning Technician Volk
Swearing in of new members.
Mayor Halter administered the oath of office to new members Mary Kaye Donahue
and Hugh Lindsay, and to re-appointed members Jack Upham and Gale Wagner.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Approval of Minutes from April 20, 1982.
Mr. Wagner made a motion to approve the minutes, Mrs. Cook seconded the mot.ion.
Motion carried unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3:, Consideration of a Variance Request to Section 8 -Ordi-
nance 850 -Parking Requirements for a sandwich shop at 411 University Drive
in the name of Centex Subway, Inc.
Mrs. Cook recommended that this item and item #6 be tabled until staff, City
Council and ZBA members have a chance to do a thorough study of the Northgate
area. Discussion followed with Jack Boyett, who spoke from the floor, indica-
ting that he had made the trip to gain information concerning what had been
proposed in the Northgate area. Mrs. Cook indicated that she was aware of this,
and that the City appreciated his concern, but that the ZBA with the .new mem-
bers was not in a position to discuss the matter at hand until further study
could be made.
Mr. Wagner made a motion to table both Items 3 and 6 on the Agenda. Mrs.
Donahue seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration of a Variance Request to Table A -Ordinance
850 -Minimum Setback Requirements for a residence at 305 Pershing in the name
of Michael Murphy.
Mrs. Cook pointed out that this item had been tabled during the meeting on
April 20, 1982. Jack Upham then moved to remove this item from its tabled state;
Mr. Lindsay seconded the motion. Motion to remove item from tabled stated
carried unanimously.
(
(
page 2
} . ZBA Minutes -May 18, 1982
Mrs. Kee then explained the item, and Mr. Murphy asked to be heard from the floor.
Michael Murphy was sworn in and stated that he was amending his original request
from cons ide ration of a variance, to requesting th at the setback to his proposed
addition to his house be establish e d by measurement from the centerline of the
alley rather than from the property I ine.
Mr . Upham stated that the ZBA could not establish pol icy, and that alleys do
exist even though they might be practically abandoned , and that they can always
be reactivated.
Mr. Murphy indicated that in the course of the informal conversation concerning
his request during the last meeting, it was suggested that a precedent for this
type of measuring for setbacks had been established at an earlier date, but he
did not know where this had been done. He further indicated that if measure-
ment was made from the centerline of the alley, his addition would be no further
back than any of his neighbors because deed restrictions had indicated that
setbacks would be 10 feet from the alley, and his garage had been removed at an
earlier date, but his neighbors still had the original garages or utility sheds
on their properties.
Mr. Lindsay asked about utilities being located in the alley, and Mr. Murphy
indicated that some are on the right-of-way, with water and sewer probably being
in the alley. Mr. Upham indicated that the sewer 1 ine was probably in the alley
and the wa ter 1 ine was probably located on the prop ert y line .
Mr, Callaway explained that on September 10, 1979 the Board did justify a va ~i ance
requested by C.E.Olsen by using the centerline of the alley to measure a rear
setback, the result still being a 50 foot separation between property owners.
Mr. Wagner and Mr. Upham agreed that a measurement of 25 feet from the centerline
of the alley would be ag r eeable to them. A motion was made by Mrs. Cook to the
effect that she moved to authorize a variance to the minimum setback requirement
indicated in Table .A, Ordinance 850 as it wil 1 not be contrary to the public
interest, due to following unique and special conditions of the land not normally
found in 1 ike districts: location of the 10 foot alley . And because a strict
enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship,
and such that the spirit of this Ordinance shall be observed and substantial
justice done, with the following special condition: The 25 foot setback should
be measured from the centerline of the alley. Mr. Wagner seconded the motion.
Motion carried !unanimous l y.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Consideration of a Variance Request to Table A -Ordinance
850 -Minimum Steback Require me nts for a comme rcial project at 700 University
Drive in the name of Mac Randolph.
Mrs . Cook called for som eo ne in the audience to present this request, but there
was no on e present. Mr. Callaway indicat ed that a similar request in a similar
situation, but at a different loc a tion and with different pe ople involved, had
been approved.
Mrs. Donahue made a motion to table this r e quest due to the fact that there was
no one pre sent at the meeting to represent the own er . Mr. Wagner seconded the
motion to table the request. Motion carried unanimously, and this request was
tabled until the next meeting.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Consideration of a Varianc e Req uest to Table A -Ordinance
850 -Minimum Setback Requireme nts for a convenience store at 301 Univ ers ity
(
(
page 3
ZBA Minutes -May 18, 1982
in the name of Southland Corporation.
This agenda item was tabled at the same ti me Agenda Item No. 3 was tabled due
to the need for further study of conditions in the Northgate area by staff, City
Council and ZBA. Motion was made by Mr. Wagner and seconded by Mrs. Donahue,
and carried unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Consideration of an Appeal Alleging an error in interpre-
tation of Section 8-D.10 -Ordinance 850 -Fuel Price Signs for a commercial
project at 2200 Longmire in the name of Automotive Service World.
Steve Parker, owner of the property in question was sworn in and presented a
site plan covering the location in question. He stated that he had received
a letter from Jane Kee on 5-4-82 which was delivered by Joan Keigley at 2:25 p.m.
and it stated that he had a deadline of 3:45 p.m. to comply with Ordinance 1183
concerning his fuel sign which is portable. He addressed Section 8 D. 10 of Ordi-
nance 850 which states filling stations will be allowed one sign per site ad-
vertising the current price of fuel only, the area of which will not be included
in the allowable area of their detached sign. He gave the background of his
business and said that at the time of opening this business in 1980 he vo wed
to comply with the City Ordinances, and presented pictures of his site which
showed signs which had complied at the time he opened for business . He indicat ed
that he had talked with Mr. Ash and Mrs. Kee and had proposed to make his portable
fuel sign permanent by putting it, at the same location, in concrete footings.
Mrs. Kee had interpreted that this would not bring the fuel sign in compliance
because the fuel price sign must meet the regulation of Section 8 and therefore
could not be a separate detached sign.
Mr. Parker stated that there are now other businesses in College Station which
are out of compliance on this date, and presented 3 photos of businesses which
were displaying fuel price signs that he had taken today, and furnished the
names and addresses of these businesses.
Mr. Wagner asked why Mr . Parker did not want to affix his fuel price sign to
his detached sign, to which Mr. Parker replied that because his detached sign
was so far back from the curb because of the layout of his site, it would not
serve the purpose of the fuel price sign, which is information to the consumer,
and also because it would be an inconvenience and possible hazardous condition
because of the height involved for an employee to change the sign so -often.
Mrs. Kee presented the staff 1s view and indicated that since creation of the
position of Zoning Inspector, the department had concentrated on bringing
businesses in compliance with sign regulations, and that putting the fuel price
sign in concrete footings would create two detached signs on the site. She
also referenced the memo from the Traffic Engineer concerning portable signs
in which Mr . Black stated 11 Portable signs do not convey informat ion to drivers
as well as permanent 1 ighted signs placed at heights above eight f ee t. These
signs (portable signs) also create sight distance hazards for drivers exiting
driveway s and adjacent city streets. For these rea sons, portable signs should
be discouraged .11
Mr. Parker rebutted with the statement that portable type fu e l signs had been
used for many years. Mrs. Cook reaffirm ed that th ere had be en a great deal of
difficulty in managing all situations prior to the establishment of the position
of Zoning Inspector due to the lack of staff, and no w that we hav e the personnel
(
(
ZBA Minutes -May 18 , 1982
to handle inspections, th e aim is to get a consisten t interpretation of the Ordinanc e .
Mr . Upham i ndicated that a l aw without eff e ct is in effect no law. Mr. Parker then
brought up the photos of the businesses he had furnished that appeared to be out of
compliance, and Mr. Upham assured him that these would be taken care of immediately.
Mrs. Cook pointed out that there were old businesses which may not conform be-
cause they had been esta b lished prior to enactment of the Ordinance, but that
in the event they ever wanted to change the sign , they would have to comply with
current Ordinances.
Mrs. Donahue asked why fuel price signs came under the same regulations of other
signs when they were add r essed separately in the Ordinance. Mr. Lindsay asked
why the section 8-D.10 entitled Sp e cial Proviso -Fuel Price Signs had been
established if it had not been intended that these particular signs be handled
differently from other detached signs. Mrs. Kee indicated that as she interpreted
the Ordinance, fuel price signs must comply with all sections of the ordinance
dealing with signs, in addition to section 8-D.10. Mr. Lindsay said that in his
interpretation, section 8-D. 10 would indicate that there could be two detached
signs -one regular and one detached but that Section 8-D. 11 pertaining to
Portable/Trailer Signs would not apply, except to define portable/trailer signs.
Mrs . Cook indicated that she be! ieves that the Special Proviso would allow a
permanent fuel price sign on the property in addition to the allowed detached
sign . Mr . Upham said that he believed that fuel price signs would not have been
mentioned separately at all unless the mention was made with Mrs. Cook's inter-
pretation in mind . He further indicated that fuel price signs are essential ~to
this business, but that t hey must not be a hazard. He also indicated that what
the Ordinance says and what was meant for it to say might be two different things.
Mrs . Cook proposed that t he ZBA interpret the Ordinance as it reads, and then go
back to City Council for clarification or an Amendment. She further reiterated
that there could be no portable/trailer signs used as fuel price signs. Mr.
Lindsay indicated that he interpreted the Special Proviso to cover the accepta-
bility of portable signs for fu e l price signs as well. Mrs. Cook recalled that
there would be no portab l e signs except for those permitted on a temporary basis.
Mr. Upham concurred.
Mr. Upham made a motion as follows: 11 1 move to interpret Sections 8-D.6,
8-D .9, 8-D. 10, 8-D . 11 and such other paragraphs as are applicable of Ordinance
850 as pertains to fuel price signs only, that the intent is that a fuel price
sign separate from the one allowe d detached sign is permissible and that since
there is a prohibition against portable signs, such intent would have been that
it be permanent, so long as it meets all oth e r requirements of Section 8-D .6,
8-D .9 and 8-D. 10. Th e r e fore I move that Mr. Parker be allowed to make this
sign permanent and that all other similar businesses be apprised of this, and
further recomm e nd that a ll oth e r fu e l price signs be investigat e d and even
further recomm e nd that th e Council review this opinion and det e rmine whether
in fact it is acceptabl e to th e m, and if not, to rem e dy it through an Amendment.11
Mr. Wagn e r second e d th e motion. Motion carried unanimously.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: Oth e r bu s ine s s.
There was none.
page 5 ,
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9: Adjourn.
Mr. Lindsay moved to adjourn, Mr. Upham seconded. Motion carr ied un a ni mous ly.
APPROVED:
Vi Burke Cook> Chairman
( .
(
'
C ity of C ollege Station
POST OFFICE BOX 9960 I I 0 I TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, T EXAS 77840
June 7, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Zoning Board of Adjustment
FROM: Jane R. Kee, Zoning Official
SUBJECT: Agenda Items, June 15, 1982
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Reconsideration of Conditional Variance approved 7-21-81
for an Arcade at 315 University in the name of Mike Walsh.
Mr. Wal .sh will be present to ask the Board for ~he extension of a Conditional
Variance to parking requirements granted on 7-21-81 for an Arcade in Nor t h-
gate. Enclosed please find copies of the minutes from the 7-21-81 meeting .
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Reconsideration of a Variance Request to Se ction 8 -Ordi-
nance 850 -Parking Re uirements for a sandwich shop at 411 Universit Drive
in the name of Centex Sub way, Inc. Tabled at previous meeting)
The applicant is requesting a variance to 10 parking spaces for a sandwich
shop proposed to be located at 411 University Drive. The operation will have
30 seats but no cooking-will be done on the premises. Under Ordinance 850,
restaurants have a parking requirement of 1 space per 3 seats, and no employee
requirement. These spaces are to be located on the property or on property
under the same ownership within 200 feet.
There have been 5 applications for parking variances in the Northgate area
over the l~st 2 years. The following is intended to help the members recall
each request and the ultimate decisions:
Date
!-::---=---1-15-80
1-20-81
4-21-81
5-19-81
7-21-81
Decision
Denied-6 spaces
App roved-1 3 spaces
Approv e d-20 spaces
Denied -6 spaces
Approv e d-6 spaces
Type Activity Applicant
Arcad e -405 Univ.Dr. J.P.Jones
Restaurant-403 U.Dr.Flowers &
Larson
Restaurant-501 U.Dr.J.R.Lamp
Arcad e 315 U.Dr. Ed Walsh
II II
Comments
Never Built
w/stipulation
that parking be
provided for e mploye
w/condition of
1 yr.to improve
parking.
Mr. Phil Callihan will be present at the meeting to ans we r any qu es tions.
Memo -ZBA
June 7, 1982
page 2
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Reconsideration of a Variance Request to Table A -Ordinance
850 -Minimum Setback Requirements for a convenience store at 301 University
in the name of Southland Corporation. (Tabled at previous meeting)
The applicant is requesting a variance to the rear setback for a convenience
store in Northgate where the 12th Man Bar was located. The side property line
of the Alamo Bar adjoins the rear property line of this lot. The staff is not
opposed to this variance if the applicant constructs a 4 hour fire wall. This
variance is preferable to any reduction in parking or landscaping requirements
which would be necessary if the structure cannot be expanded to the rear pro-
perty line. This variance is also preferable to the possibility of another
nightclub or restaurant locating in this area.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Reconsideration of a Variance Request to Table A -Ordinance
850 -Minimum Setback Requirements for a commercial project at 700 University
Drive in the name of Mac Randolph. (Tabled at previous meeting)
The applicant has an existing office building which encroaches the front set-
back by 1.24 ft. This has been the case for approximately 5 years. Now a site
plan has been submitted to re-use the existing slab and expand the office build-
ing. The site plan has -been approved by the Project Review Committee and the
Planning and Zoning Commission pending approval by the ZBA.
The existing building is on a corner lot but poses no visual problem for traffic.
The Board must consider this as a variance request and not as an expansion to
a non-conforming structure, as the expansion far exceeds 25 percent.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Consideration of a Variance Request to Table A -Ordinance
850 -Minimum Rear Setback Re uirements for a Car ort at Lot 20, Block C, Lincoln
Place Subdivision 714 A-B Vassar Court in the name of Robert H. Hensarl ing.
The applicant is requesting a variance to the rear setback in a duplex zone
which abuts a single family zone for an existing carport which was constructed
earlier this year without a building permit. The carport encroaches the set-
back by approximately 5 feet and also encroaches a utility easement. Mr. Hensarling
is in the process of going to the City Council to request abandonment of the
utility easement. Upon noticing the carport the staff notified Mr. Hensarling
that it must be taken down,at which point a hearing was requested before the
Board.
As a staff mem ber I have two concerns. The first is the lack of unique and
special conditions in this case and the second involves the builder of the
single family residences which share the rear access with this duplex. The
staff spent considerable time working with this builder, who is from out of
town, to insu~e that each single family residence would meet all setbacks and
other City codes and still have a carport. This was achieved and all the
single family residences across from Mr. Hensarling 1 s have carports which
meet setbacks.
Enclosed in your packet is a copy of the Lincoln Place plat indicating the
lot in question and the location of the easement and rear setback.
(
(
Minutes
Zoning Board of Adjustment July 21, 1981 Page 3.
Mr. Spearman expressed his appreciation for the granting of the variance and
stated they had completed many buildings in the College Station area and this
was the first time they had needed to request a variance.
G. Wagner stated the design of the whole project is a credit to the area; if
it had the appearance of some other projects, he would not have been in favor
of the variance.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4, Consideration of a request for a variance to the off-street
parking requirements to allow the operation of an arcade at 315 University
Drive, College Station, Texas. Application is in the name of Edward J. Walsh.
Ed Walsh, applicant, reminded the board he had been before them at the May
meeting requesting a variance to parking requirements at 315 University
Drive for the purpose of operating an arcade at that location which would
not sell food or beverages, and this request had been denied.
He stated he has a variance to y parking spaces which applied to his retail
business, Budget Tapes and Records, which had been closed .·in March of this
year and has been informed by the Zoning Official that the change of use
and the type of business requires 7 spaces. He stated he has o.ne parking
space in the front of the business and his landlady has designated six parking
spaces on the rear parking lot for his specific use.
He further pointed out he had been in business in that location for ten years
and has a remaining eight years on the existing lease at a sum of $80o+ per
month. Costs, due to interest rates, are such that opening a retail business
in the location is impossible, and the retail business would generate greater
traffic than the proposed arcade~
He outlined Charlie's Grocers, University Bookstore and the Bactstage Restaurant
as being the businesses which share the parking area with him. He stated he had
observed Charlie's grocery and it does not have drive-in traffic; the bookstore
closes at 5:00 p.m. which releases their parking ~paces after that time. He
also stated that part of the parking problems in the Northgate area al'l.e caused by
university personnel and students parking in the available spaces.
D. MacGilvray asked if any of the stores could be entered from the rear.
Mr. Walsh stated they all have rear access but it is not used, the doors are
kept locked probably for security reasons.
Mr. Don Ganter, owner of Dixie Chicken, stated the ones who violate the parking
are the students.
Board member Vi Burke entered the meeting at 7:45 p.m.
Chairman Harper offered to bring her up to date and she stated she was familiar
with the case.
Mr. Walsh stated the ordinance requires 7 spaces and he has 7 spaces.
( Zoning Official Kee called the attention of the board to Sec. 7 and Section
3.A.2 of the zoning ordinance. Sec. 7 of the ordinance outlines minimum parkihg
requirements, dimensions and access, off-premises locations, development and
maintenance, surfacing and other requirements for parking.
(
(
Minutes
Zoning Board of Adjustment July 21, 1981 Page 4.
She e x plained Sec . 3-A.2. as not allowing for designation of parking spaces to
one business when the same spaces are necessary to the support of adjacent busi-
nesses.
D. MacGilvray stated he could not visualize anyone parking at the rear of the
building and walking around to the front.
Mr. Walsh stated they cut through Dixie Chicken or Dudley's.
D. MacGilvray stated it appeared the square footage of each of these businesses
is needed in order to determine exactly what the total parking requirements are
in this ··area.
Chairman Harper stated the ordinance is not intended to provide parking on the
basis of present use in the area. Any of the business es involved can change
the use of their operation, so long as it is allowed by the ordinance within
their zoning classification , and develop a greater need for parking which is
already at variance and shared.
Mr. Walsh stated what this comes down to is that the landlord has the right
to designate her own parking as she sees fit, and she has made this designation
of 6 spaces for his benefit .
Chairman Harper stated the landlord does have that right, however, petitioners
make a presentation with as many factors in their favor as possible, just as
this board must review the case based on the negativ e side and what is the
intent of the ordinance.
D. MacGilvray asked the parking requirements for the Backstage Restaurant.
Zoning Official Kee stated it is 14 space s ; Charlie's Grocery is 8 plus em-
ployee parking and the bookstore is 8 plus employee parking.
Mr. Walsh inserted that Charlie's is open until 9:00 or 10:00 p.m. and does
not have drive-in traffic and the bookstore closes at 5:00 p.m. He further
pointed out the designation has only been made to him; the others have not
been to the board for a change in operation.
Chairman Harper replied that whether the others use the parking or not, the
requirements of the ordinance are not changed.
Mr. Walsh stated the point is the par kin g is not used by others, and he has
8 years to go on his l ease and he is stuck with that.
Mr. Ganter stated that he and tw o other bu s iness oper ators in the northgate
area have leased a parking lot. They plan sometime th is year to h ave a person
on duty to make certain that no one other than customers of th e businesses i s
allowed to park there.
Mr. Walsh st ated he would be wil ling to do th e same thing for the 6 spaces
designated for his use. He stated he would b e happy to have the cars towed
away.
(
(
Minutes
Zoning Board of Adjustme nt July 21, 1981 Page 5.
Vi Burke stated this problem in Northgate is a .. coritJiri.uing on e . The board
h as heard the same justifications over and over. Each t ime a varianc e is
granted, the problem is compounded that much more.
P. Boughton informed the board that City Council had knoc k ed off a large
bond issue because the City was unable to get the cooperation of businesses
in that area.
G. Wagner suggested one solution might be for the business operators in that
area to petition the City Council to develop and approve an Ordinance which speci-
fically addresses the problems in Northgate and provides a different set of
requirements for that area.
V. Burk stated perhaps it was time for the board to deny variance requests
until such time the business operators forced the property owners and landlords
to meet with the City and begin to seek solutions to the problem
Mr. Walsh stated if that was going to be the position the board assumed, it
should begin with new business operators in the area, not with those who
have had their business there for many years.
V. Burk stated there are disasters which occur throughou t the nation; fir e s ,
floods and collapsed buildings. No one ever reacts until there is a disaster
and then everyone is in error. She stated there is def initely a saf ety h az ard
because of the automobile traffic and ped e strian traffic in that area . It
appears the problem will n ever be address e d until a disa s t e r occurs.
She asked Mr. Walsh, "where for instance is your landlord?" She stated that
the operators of the businesses are alway s here, and ther e is no solution or
relief for their problems, but the owners of the proper ty never appear nor offer
any assistance in developing a solution to the problem . She remarked that the
ZBA has the right of .subpoena and suggested perhaps this is the time for that
process to begin.
Mr. Walsh replied the board could take that action, but in any event he, the
operator, would be the looser; If his variance is not granted, he will be forced
into bankruptcy and he still is stuck with a lease in exc ess of $800+ per month.
V. Burke stated he would not have to pay the lease if he filed bankruptcy and she
also stated she strongly felt if the parking to support a business operation can-
not be provided by the property owners 1.t o th e tenants as required by the zoi;r ing ·.
ordinance, without variance, the lease surely can be brok en.
Chairman Harper form e d the following motion which was g i ven s e cond b y D. Ma cGilvray.
Mov e to authorize a varianc e ba s ed on the of f -stree t p a r kin g prov i d e d by the
owner of the building in th e adjac en t par k ing lot (6 spa ces ) and including one
on-site space; the 6 de s i gna ted p a rkin g spac e s will b e f o r the sole u se o f the
busine ss at 315 University and the op e r a tor o f the bu s ines s wi ll contr ol the
park ing to make c e rtain it is for his us e ; this varia n ce is authoriz e d sp e cifically
for the use of an arcade busine ss, not selling food or bever age s; s a id park ing
lot to be broug ht up to the standard s and requir eme nt s o f Ord inan ce 8 5 0 for
parking lots.
Vot e -motion fail e d.
For: MacGilvr ay
Again s t: Harper, Wa g n e r, Burke and Bou g hto n.
(
Minutes
Zoning Board of Adjustment July 21, 1981 Page 6.
Chairman Harper then formed the following mo t ion which was given second by
G. Wagner.
Move to authorize a variance based on the off-street parking provided by
the owner of the building i n the adjacent parking lot (6 spaces) and including
one on-site space; the 6 designated parking spaces will be for the sole use
of an arcade operation at 315 University Drive, not selling food and beverages;
said parking lot to be brought up to the standards and requirements of Ordinance
850 for parking lots; the owner of the property to submit to the Zoning Board
of Adjustment a plan for the parking lot which is in compliance with Ordinance
850 and showing how many b us inesses can be served by the lot and further, the
variance is authorized for a period of one (1) year from this date and becomes
open for review by this bo a rd for parking requirement compliance.
Jane Kee pointed out this could place Mr. Walsh into the position of having
made a monetary investment which could become a considerable loss if the variance
is not extended after the one year period.
After a brief discussion, Chairman Harper called for the question and the
motion was approved by the unan im ous vote of the board.
APPROVED:
Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary
NOTES ON CONSIDERATION OF A VARIAI!C:2: REQUEST
Zoning Board of Adjustment Hearing
Request by----------------------------' Applicant
Board Members Participating:
This request is for a variance of -------------~---~---
Describe Nature of Request:
What public interest or interests are involved?
How is the public interest affected?
Identify any existing special con ditions.associated. with this property.
Special conditions identified by the applicant include:
Id:entify any unnecessary hardships .relating to this property.
Identify any hardships unique to this property.
If this request is granted, ho w will the "spirit of the ordinance"
be observed?
De scribe the rational you have us e d to come to your d ec ision in this
matter.
ZONING BOARD OF AD JUSTMENT
FOR MAT FOR MOTIONS
Variances: From Section 11-8.5
I move to (authorize or deny) a variance to the
yard (6 -G) -------
lot width (Table A) -------
lot depth (Table A) -------
sign regulations (S e ction 8) -------
mini mum s e tback (Tabl e A) -------
parking requir eme nts (Section 7) -------'
fro m th e t erms of thi s or d i nanc e as i t (will not , will) be co nt ra ry t o t he public
interest, due to the (lac k of, followin g ) unique and special conditions of the
land not normally found in 1 ike distric t s :
l. 5.
2. 6.
3. 7. ------------------'-----------------
4. 8 .
and because a strict enforc e me nt of th e provisions of the Ordinance
(would, would not) result in unnec e ssar y hardship, and such that the
spirit of this Ordinanc e shall be ob s erve d and substantial justice done,
and with th e following spe cial con d i t ion s :
l. 4.
2. 5.
3. 6.
:/;
!
Name o f Applicant Cente x Subway , lnc. D/B/A/ S11hway (Pres Phil C'a l.l.ali;;inL. ___ _
Hailing Address 1701 Southwest Parkway , Suite 11 204, College Station. T exas 77ti ft.O
Phone 713-693-393 8
Locati on : Lots 3 and 9 Block 2 Sub divisi on W. C. Boyett's
Desc ription, If applicable 411 University Drive , Colle ge Station, Te xas
(Appro ximate ly 1.100 square feet of leas e space next door to the l~iversit y Book Store
at North ga te)
A variance to the parking requirements for a fast food sandwich
Action requ e sted: shop with seating for 30 customers and no cooking on the premisi s .
NAHE ADD RES S
(From current tax rolls, Col i2g2 Station Tax Assessor)
Ei\SE SEE THE I IST ATTAC ·
. .,,
FIU : ?:o .
Present zonin[; of la'.1d i.n qu c.:~;l i.un C-1
Section of ordinance fro;n which variance is sOuf;ht --~S:'..:e=..·v~c-'"r''---------------
The follo~lng specific v~riation from the ord inancr is requested:
Request a variance for 10 cu s tomer parking spaces. Employee parking spaces will h r•
provitit..!J by tii~ ;_~rndlorJ in the parking lot bellino t11e buildin ~.
This variance is necessary due to the following unique and speci~l conditions of
the land not found in like districts:
Th e Northgate distri c t is comp.l.c..tk>ly developed. The anl y opportunity for a new
busine ss in this area is to remodel an existing structure or lease space wjtb
no o ppo rt unit Y to creat e addi tion LI l.1,.__1...C~llt..::Sut...1.01.lmwe:::...rL-~P.ca...1.r...l:'k...;iuni;g~-----------·------
The following alternatives to the requ ested v aria nce are possibJ.e :
Not to locate at Northgate
This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following
faces: The nature of th e busine ss is a fast food sandwich shop that Pill cater ta
pedestrians who already live and work nearb y . Since there will be no
cooking or game machin es in the stor e , cus_t.mnr.es wj 11 he served q1ii cl:l y ---------and have no reason to lin ge r in th e store after eating. Therefore, any
__________ c_u_s_t:_omer who was driv~~g,_an auto a nd s topped t .Q.._p_ur.chase a ..s.a.nillilch__woulr.1._
not need a parkin g plLicc very lon g. Subway will help improve th e appearance
of the Horth ga tc are3 bv providing a n all glilliS front and a bright, ch.ee.r~'
decor.
th i::; ;1ppli c ntion nr c tr u e and correct.
S -6-81--
Applico.nt Date
e A.::1v TcdK J~;; c:_v t1--0 z_-;vr__ _
NOTES ON CO NSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUE ST
Zoning Board of Adjust me nt He aring
Requ e st by ____________________________ ,. Applicant
Board Members Participating:
This request is for a variance of -------------~--~~~~
Section
Describe Nature of Request:
What public interest or interests are involve d?
How is the public interest affected?
Identify any existing special conditions.associated with this property.
Special conditions identified by the applic ant include:
Id:entify any unnecessary hard s hips .relating to this property.
Identify any hardships unique to this property.
If this reque s t is grant e d, how will the "spirit of the ordinance"
b e ob s erved?
De s cr ibe the rationa l you h ave u se d to come to yo ur d e cision in thi s
ma t ter .
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR MAT FOR MOTIONS
Variances: From Section 11-8.5
I move to (authorize or deny) a variance to the
yard (6-G) -------·
lot width (Table A) -------
lot depth (Table A) -------
sign regulations (Section 8) -------
minimu m setbac k (Table A) -------
parking requirements (Section 7)
------~
fr om th e term s of this ord i nanc e a s i t (will no t, wi ll ) be c ontr ary to t he public
interest, due to the (lack of, following) unique and sp e cial con d itions o f the
-land not norm a lly found in like districts:
l. s.
2. 6. --------------------------------
3. 7. --------------------------------
4. 8.
-------------------------------~
and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance
(would, would not) result in unneces s ary hardship, and such that the
spirit of this Ordinance shall be observe d and substant£al justice do ne ~
and with the following s pecial co nd itions:
1. 4 .
2. 5 .
3. 6.
, '
ZO:NU:G BOARD OF ADJUSTNENT FILE NO.
Name of Applicant Southland Corporation c/o Jack Ort
~---------'--------------------------
Hailing Address 887l Tallwood, Austin, Texas 78759
Phone 512-346-4190
Location: 13 Subdivision W. C. Boyett Addition Block ---1 Lot ----
Description, If applicable Attached
----~~----------------------~
Action ~equested: Variance to rear setback
v _v ,_!(',; /J'r.u ...;,.;i_)~.'~ .
NANE ADDRESS
(From current tax rolls, College Station Tax Assessor)
_Attached
• ING BO.ARD OF ADJUSTI1 ENT FILE NO.
P re sent z oni ng o f l a nd in que stion C-1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----,~~~~~~
Section of ordinance from which variance is so ugh t Table A
The following specific v2.riation from the ordin 2IJ.c e is requested: A variance to
reduce the rear set back requirement for building is requested in order to develop _a
7-Eleven convenience food store and gasoline island as shown on the attached site plan.
This variance is necessary due to the following unique and special conditions of
the land not found in like districts: .
The narrow dimensions and resulting size of the subject orooertv prohibit the
developme nt of a 7-Eleven convenience store which will include adequate parking and
lan dscaping in conjunction with adequate accessibility and man e uv e rability on the
property .
The followi n g alternative s to th e requested v a rian ce are po s sib l e: A 7-Eleven
can be developed on the subject property if the park ing and landsc ap e r e quirements
are reduced. However, assessibility to the stor e and the g asoline island will be
impared in . this situation.
This variance will not be contra ry to the publ ic intere st by virtu e of the following
f~:::t ~: A 7-Eleyen convenj ence food stare and gaso1ine instal 1 at ion will be c;Ievelop e d
with adequate p a rking and land scaping in plac e o f what was previ ously The 12th Man Ba r .
Th e exist ing structur e is a conv e rted s ervice st a t i on which has been v acat e d.
The fac t s st ated b y me in th is app lication ar e t~ue and correct.
Sout b land J&.r:p ora t j on Q ,_ /:'.' 6/ f Aprll 2 n, 1 9 82
Ap plic a nt ~ Da t e
NOTES ON CONSIDERATION OF A V A RIA N C ~ REQUE ST
Zoning Board of Adjust ment Hearing
Re qu e st by---------------'----------------' Applicant
Board Members Participating:
This request is for a variance of ~-------------,------~~---
Describe Nature of Request:
What public interest or interests are involve d?
Ho w is the public interest affect e d?
Identify any existing special conditions.associated with this property.
Sp e cial conditions identified by the applic a nt include:
·,
Id·entify any unnecessary hard s hips .relating to this property.
Ident i fy any hardships uniqu e to this prop e rty.
If this request is granted, how will the "s p i rit of the ordinance"
b e obse rved?
Describ e the r a tional you h ave us ed t o come t o your d e cision in th is
matter .
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FORMAT FOR MOTIONS
Variances : From Section 11-8.5
I move to (authorize or d e ny) a variance to the
yard (6-G) -------
lot width (Table A) -------
lot depth (Table A) -------
sign regulations (Section 8) -------
minimum setback (Table A) -------
parking requireme nts (Section 7)
------~
f r o m th e terms of this ordin a nce a s it (w i l l no t, will) be co ntra ry t o t he publi c
interest, due to the (lack of, following) unique and special conditions o f the
'land not normally found in like districts:
l. s.
2. 6.
---------------~---------------~
3. ].
-------------------------------~
4 . 8.
-------------------------------~
and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance
(would, would not) result in unnecessary hardship, and such that the
spirit of this Ordinance shall be observe d and substantial justice don e ,
and with th e following sp e cial con d itions:
l. 4.
2. s .
3. 6.
r---
ZON[N G HOA RD OF ~DJUS ~~IB~T FILE NO.
Na me o f Ap p lican t
Ha ilin g Address
Phone 69614141
Location: Lot
Action r e q ueste d:
~c Randolph
700 University Drive East
A Block 700 Subdiv ision University Park Ea s t
Al low 1' -2t 11 partial intrusion into 25' building set back line
for a distance of 11' Approx.
NAHE ADDR ESS
(Fro m curre nt tax rolls, Coll ege Station Tax Assessor)
--------------
FILE NO.
Pres e n t z on ing of land in qu es tion C-1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----.,,..--~~~~~-
Section of ordinanc e from whi c h varianc e i s s o u g ht Ord # 850 Sec 5 Table A
The following specific vc..riation from the ordin a i1.ce is requested:
1' -2t" variance on front set back I ine.
This variance is necessary due to the followin g unique and speci~l conditions of
the land not found in like districts:
\Ne arETe":'l..JS 'irg the existing slab for a new h1ii lding modification. The origirp~)
slab had this 1' -2t 11 discrepanc
The following alternatives to the reque s t e d v a riance are possible:
1. Distort the front elevation of t h e new bui I ding to conform to the 25' set ~ack
I ine.
2. Rerr.ove the 1' -2t" slab intrusion and rewori< structure.
This variance will not be cont rary to the public interest by virtue of the following
f~cts: 1. The variance now exist and has ex isted for about 5 years.
2. Site visibility for traffic on T a rrow Drive is not irrpa r ed .
Th e a pp li caU on <ir e tr u e and c o rr e ct.
M:i.c Randol .::>h
------
M
:J
I
-----
--
-.. ..
= j c:r.aM f"l32l 3al ol-
1 '?j'lO? : ~ ~F ~
:e;.~c:n ~·~r\~t ..l?C!l.Lo~ C\
· -~al. 19N 1Jh1 x:a ,_.Jr
_____ ... -
~<--·-----, --
-:-"-? . -~::v--tc;;
t
ll
. !
--------...:::::=::
--
!~ I. -
i <:)
!
I
I
I
i
I
I
I Cl
··~
"t I
--·---..::::---..::::::::::
·---=..--:-::.-
-.,..,.
-w ·
-~----·-·· ---~ _.,_
i ~
ii
li :r
·' :,
~:
I
I '
I :·
..
;
-~
r----
I
I
!
er b@'?
I I ,,
-
I
i
~ -er a
>-,__ -(/) -
a:: w > -2
::::>
I r
0
DON
A••• ••• BOCKMAN SURVEYS
BRYAN,TCXAS
UNIVERSITY PARK EAST
TRACT "B"
SCALE : 1"= 30'
--------------------------~
_. ·----~g ~· 1
Ot
r<l I
133 .51' FINOl.R. -
~~~~--~~~~~~"-A
20°UTILITY EASEMENT
TRACT 11 A11
0.4881 ACRES
4°CONC .WALK
--"I
-0
0
0
I{) 1-z w
~ w
I/)
ct w
t-en ct w.
:.:: er <r c..:
Q)
>-= _
t: t;
I/) <r er a:: w I-> z
::>
NOTES ON CO NSIDERATION OF A VARIANC E REQUEST
Zoning Board of Adjustment Hearing
Requ es t by----------------------------' Applicant
Board Members Participating:
This request is for a variance of ~-----------.,......----~~~~
Describe Nature of Request:
What public interest or interests are involved?
How is the public interest affected?
-Identify any existing special conditions.associated with this property.
Special conditions identified by the applicant include:
Id:entify any unnecessary hardships . relating to this property.
Identify any hardships unique to this property.
If this request is granted, ho w will the "spirit of the ordinanc e "
b e observed?
Descr ibe the rational you have us e d to come to your d ecis ion in this
matter.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FORMAT FOR MOTIONS
Variances: From Section 11-8.5
I move to (authorize or deny) a variance to the
yard (6-G) -------
lot width (Table A) -------
-------lot depth (Table A)
sign regulations (Section 8) -------
minimum setback (Table A) -------
parking requirements (Section 7) ______ _.
from the terms of this ordinance as it (wi l l not , will) be c ontrary to the public
interest, due to the (lack of, following) unique and special conditions of the
'land not normally found in 1 ike districts: -
l. 5.
----------------~----------------
2. 6.
3. 7. ------------------'-----------------~
4. 8.
and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance
(would, would not) result in unnecessary hardship, and such that the
spirit of this Ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done,
and with the following special conditions:
1. 4.
2. 5.
3. 6.
•
ZO~ING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. ----
Phone --""-~-LLJ--=fv'-----L/_,_,_g-=t)--"'f_· __ _
Location: Lot '2ZI:2 Block G Subdivision LJIJC'G /n Pf ttce..
Description, If applicable L/JT,, LO{!llTED ft) L-1.Ue1J?V ,/?u9ecrJ T/'J9<!.I ;L.;
PflRT o ,c-/3, c:· lJ /JC£e-"772..4-e..r ;,u ,?1<!H&.e.,o <2./9£Te:b <.:e.&g«.E,
Action requested: Ul}f?/19,(.)C,(;' TtJ /Zc/J.12,, S€Tl3/9C/<_,
v OJ . -4-u . / . .Pa_. ,__, c. -{-(,,/. ....
NAME ADDRESS
(From current tax rolls, College Station Tax Assessor)
zo~nJG BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. ·__,,.. _ _....
Section of ordinance from wh ich variance is sought
The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested:
This variance is necessary due to the following unique and special conditions of
the ~and not found in like districts:
·~
The following alternatives to the requested v a riance a r e possible:
1) mu2s C t9RPDL' T 1.L.P --S: J=.cc r wl/1 <!.tt /Ot!voe.s
--
This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following
facts:
The facts st a ted by me in this application are true an d corre ct.
Date
R. Carter, Woodland Acres
Tr. 23 Lt 27
E. L. Putz
815 Ashburn
College Station, Texas 77840
R. Carter Addn
Tr. 3
James W. Sims
1409 CAudi 11
College Staion, Texas 77840
Lincoln Place II
Bk B Lt 5-13
Dwayne Rhea Const. Co. Inc.
2751 Longmire
College Station, Texas 77840
Bk B Lt 14
Bart M. Toomey
708 We 11 es l'.)'
College Station, Texas 77840
Bk C Lt 8-17
NPC Realty
Bk C. Lt 21
Scott W. Barnhart
Bk C. Lt 22
John W. Galloway
Bk C Lt 23
Alfred B. Nichols
Woodland Acres
Lt pt of 8
Luther M. Cobb
900 Ashburn
College Station, Texas 77840
Lt Pt of 8
·,Lucille Cobb·
900 Ashburn
College Station, Texas 77840
Lt 9
Archie Bane
2292 Los Robles
Grapevine Texas 76501
•
NOTES ON CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST
Zoning Board of Adjustment Hearing
Request by----------------------------' Applicant
Board Members Participating:
This request is for a variance of
Describe Nature of Request:
What public interest or interests are involved?
How is the public interest affected?
>
Identify any existing special conditions.associated with this property.
Special conditions identified by the applicant include:
·,
Id:entify any unnecessary hardships .relating to this property.
Identify any hardships unique to this property.
If this request is granted, how will the "spirit of the ordinance ..
be observed?
Describe the rational you have u se d t o come to your d e cision in this
matt e r.
,
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FORMAT FOR MOTIONS
Variances: From Section 11-8.5
I move to (authorize or deny) a variance to the
yard (6-G) _______ ,
lot width (Table A) -------
-------lot depth (Table A)
sign regulations (Section 8) -------
minimum setback (Table A) -------
parking requirements (Section 7) ---------'
from the terms of this ordinance as it (will not, wi ll) be contrary to the public
interest, due to the (lack of, following) unique and special conditions of the
·land not normally found in 1 ike districts:
L 5. ------------------=----------------
2. 6. --------------------------------
3. 7. ~--,----------------'----------------
4. 8.
~-------------------------------
and because a strict enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance
(would, would not) result in unnecessary hardship, and such that the
spirit of this Ordinance shall be observed and substantial justice done,
and with the following special conditions:
1. 4.
2. 5.
3. 6.
, Applicant
Describe ~atu ;~ o ~1Reques~:
. ~ /'y...r-
What public interest or interests are involved?
• f\ , '_ • n -/'Vvt· \)~
How is the public interest affected?
~
Identify any existing special conditions.associated with this property.
Special conditions identified by the applicant include:
v~
I d:entify any unnecessary hardships . re la ting to this property.
Identify any hardships unique to this property.
If this request is granted, ho w will the "spirit of the ordinance"
b e ob served?
Describ e th e rationa l you have us ed to come to your d ec ision in thi s
matt ~/ PhN~ ~ /
'---· I
I
~ --------
! ________ ..
.•
<
/
--
01
I ~ 1. -l(J=
I
i
I
I
=
ll
i
!
I I,
11
11
i i
I•
1'
I:
. -. -r;;·
--
!~---------~
ii
-y---
1
I
~.1 ·· t
o ~ ~£-&
1
b@t;;
II ii
L----'----------
;I
;1
11
ii
Ii
II
! =();
-~1
. -. ti
·1 II .
17·-o -.
I .
-~
------~
I
l
l
I
I
I
----I
I
I
I
-I
___ :_: ____ ------=::-:--i-
,...__-=---· -~
-! ---..,.;.... •
. ,. ,.,,' 1fi
.__ -··---..... !-------.!-.--~
7
• <>...•· •!:.
\ -_. ---.. c;.,,L __ ;....~-~-
--
~
J_
l~
l~
I ~--~--~
-··---. ----------.L.. --------·-----
I
I
1
-------
1·---------------·
·!>+-------------·------··
I ~, ... ____________ _
'· •.
i··---------·---
I ------·------·-··
--------------------·
··-------------
... ---------_-::..;:::.
I
.. ·(' ..
..
--
·!:·-
--..~---...;;-,;.:·-=-·~·· ... ·---------:----
. I
·~ I, -
!(j
I
I
I
\)
. c; I
'-
-
l
!.
l
~:
r--
1
I
I
<2.·I . i"
~,b6.<; 00t -
11
t=====--=·-· ... ------··
ZONING HOARD OF ADJUST~IBNT FILE NO .
Na me o f Ap p l icant ~-~-rla_c~R_,a_n_d~o_lp,___h~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mailin g Address 700 Univ e r s it y Driv e Ea s t
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
Phone 69614141
Lo cation : Lot
Ac t ion req uested:
A Block 700 Subdivision Univ e rsit y Park Ea s t
Al low 1' -zt" partial intru s ion into 25' bui I d ing se t ba ck I i n e
for a di s tance of 11' Approx .
ADDR ESS
(Fr om c u rre nt tax rolls, Co lleg e Sta tio n Ta x Assessor )
.. l Q. ~:--!G BOARD Or ADJUSTMENT FILE NO.
Pre sent zoning of land in ques tion C-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-,-~~~~~~
Section of ocdi nanc e from whi c h variance i s so~ght Ord # 850 Sec 5 Tabl~ A
The following specific ve.riation from the ordin anc e is requested:
1' -2t 11 variance on front set back line.
This varianc e is necessary due to the following unique and special conditions of
the land not found in like districts:
We arE:l'.'e~vsh9 the existing slab far a new b1ii lding modification. The oriqil(l®,IJ
slab had this 1' -2t 11 discrepancy .
. :-;.....:;.
The following alternatives to the requested vari a nce are possible:
1. Distort the front elevation of the new bui !ding to conform to the 25' set ~ack
I ine.
2. Remove the 1' -2t 11 slab intrusion and rewori< structure.
This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following
f~cts: 1. The variance now exist and has ex isted for about 5 years.
2. Site visibi I ity for traffic on Tarrow Drive is not irrpared.
The facts state s app licat ion are true an d c orrect .
~~~~~~~~~~A=pC._p~li-.c~a~n~t-'LP~H--+-~~
i 'ac Randol .:::>h
University Park East
Tr. B
Norvill G. Ward Tr.
2007 Briar Oak
Bryan, Texas 77801
Chimney Hi 11
Tr. A. 9.92 Acres
John C. Mayfield Jr.
1700 Puryear
College Station, Texas 77840
Fed-Mart
Bk 1
Fed-Mart Stores Inc.
% Harding & Eaves
4615 Southwest Fwy
Houston, Texas 77027
Prairie View Heights
Bk 4 Lt 1, 2, 20' of 3, Bk 5 Lt 1, 2
Mrs. Ethel Banks
% Minnie Armstrong
773 N. Los Robles
Pasadena, CA. 91104
Bk 4 Lt 22
Rober Carle
2216 Shadywood Court
Arlington, Texas 76012
Bk 4 Lt 24, 30' of 25
John C. Watson
P.O. Box 4544
Bryan, Texas 77801
Bk 5 Lt 3
James R. Williams
6400 N. Haven Rd.
Dallas, Texas 75230
Bk 5 Lt 4
Ozden Okuruz Ochoa
615 Peyton
College Station, Texas
Bk 5 L 5
Leland A. Carlson
613 Peyton
College Station, Texas
77840
77840
, ______ . ---·
1K-----~-----=-·-
/, ___ _
I
, __ -----~
·---------· --------1
.'
--.------
II
------n· .. w
; -. -.... _.....__--·-----------~--·--·· ... ---... -· ~-
11
l
I
l
i ,,
I
!'.
I
--
l'~;~--~~---
1------
=
o~f?£ t
II
I
I
1
I r
•••• •••• DON BOCKMAN SURVEYS
BRYAN , T DCAS
UNIVERSITY PARK EAST
TR ACT "s"
p;i 1VAT E ACC ESS EAS EM ENT
2 0 ' UT ILI TY EASEMENT
0 1
r<>1 J-~l
47°50°24"E 13 3 .51' FINO l.R. ·
--'-''-'-'~---'-Q,i ...... ~;..;;; ... :.-:;.;.;..;~~.;....;;.;...;..;.....;;... ------~~~----------....;_.;...
w > -er
Cl
>-,_ -CJ) a:: w > -z
~
-0
.,
,.· . . . ·.·:,:·
TRACT 11 A11
0.4881 ACRES
/
c'C:·.··· •·.,::/ ,:~., ,; , ~ CONG . WALK
, .. ·s; :.':-;. "/~!'.~'./<::.:~ [l
-0
0
0
I() t-z w
2: w
(/)
3:: <t
-\0 w
>-1 -~ ~
..J
I ~ t-
~
(/) 0
I N
/""
t-
(/)
<t w
~ a::
<t a. :
CD >-:
t-t--u (/) <t
a:: a:: w t-
~ z
~
May l 0, 1982
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The Zoning Board of Adjustment for the City of College Station will consider
a request for a variance in the name of:
Mac Randol pH
700 University Drive East
College Station
Texas
Said case will be heard by the Board at their regular
Room, ·colLege Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue on
at 7:.00 p.m.
The nature of the case is as follows:
meeting in the
~,May
~
Council
18' 1892
The Applicant is requesting a variance to the required front setback
on a building located on Lot A Block 700 in University Park.
Further information__ is available at the office of the Zoning Official of the
City ~f College Station, (~13) 696-8868
J a-ne Kee
Zoning Offici a l
LEGAL l~OT IC E :
DATE (S) TO BE PUBL IS HED :
BILL TO : TH E CI TY OF COLLEGE STATIO N
P. 0 .. BOX 9960
COLL EGE STATIO N, TEXAS 77840
TO WHO M IT MAY CO N CERi~:
MAY 12 , 1982
The Zoning Board of Adjustment for the City of College Sta tion will consid e r a r e qu es t
for a varianc e in the name of:
Mac Ra ndo lph
700 Uni vers ity Driv e Eas t
College St ation
Texas
r
-Said ca s e will b e heard by the Board at th e ir r egular mee ting in th e Co uncil Roo m, Coll ege
Station City Hall, 1101 Tex a.s Avenue on Thur s -fl.ay-; Ma y 18, 1982 at 7:00 p.m.
,: . '
Th e n a ture of the case is as follows:
The Applicant is r e qu e sting a v a rianc e t o the required fr o nt
s e tback on Lot A Block 700 in Univ e rsity Park East.
•
Furthe r informa tion is ava ila bl e a t the of fi c e o f t he Zoning Of fici a l of th e City of
Coll eg e Sta t i on, (713) 696-8 86 8 e x t. 247.
J a ne Kee
Zon ing Offi c i a l