Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout186 Zoning Board of Adjustments March 15, 1983AGENDA March 15, 1983 7:00 P.M. Zoning Board of Adjustment CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS l. Approval of Minutes -Meeting of February 15, 1983. 2. Consideration of a variance request to the required front setback line (Table A) when constructing a new building at 205-207 University Drive in the Northgate area. Application is in the name of Louie A. Walston. 3. Other Business. 5. Adjourn. ) .......... / MINUTES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Zoning Board of Adjustments February 15, 1983 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Cook, Members MacGilvray, Wagner, Upham and Council Liaison Boughton MEMBERS ABSENT: Member Donahue and Alternate Member Lindsay STAFF PRESENT: Zoning Official Kee, Assistant to Zoning Official Dupies and Planning Technician Volk AGENDA ITEM NO. l: Approval of Minutes from January 18, 1983 Mr. Wagner made a motion to approve the minutes as written; Mr. MacGilvray seconded; motion carried unanimously. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consideration of a variance request to the front setback for an existing residence at 706 Chalet Court. Application is in the name of B. C. Walling. Mrs. Kee explained the request for variance and suggested the Board may want to develop a pol icy to be followed in the future. Mr. W. Crenshaw was sworn in and stated that he was the developer of this subdivision and that Jim Wright was the builder rather than Blackburn & Riley as the Board had been informed. He told the Board the house had been sold as a cash transaction and now Mr. Walling is merely trying to borrow money against the house. Mr. MacGilvray asked Mrs. Kee about the 3 options she had presented in her memo which are as fol lows: (l) Grant the variance. (2) Deny the variance if you are willing to instruct the City to take action to remove or correct the violation. (3) Neither grant nor deny the variance but authorize the staff to write a letter to the lender indicating the City's knowledge of the problem but that nothing will be done to enforce compliance. Mrs. Kee explained that the City Attorney leans toward granting a variance when only a few inches are involved, but for an encroach- ment of this magnitude perhaps the third option would be best. Mr. Upham stated that this Board is not a civil court, and should not say this encroachment is o.k. Mike Calliham, an attorney representing Mr. Crenshaw and Mr. Walling was sworn in and stated that a corporation of which Mr. Walling is president bought this house for cash and Mr. Wall ing's children are living in it, and will be for a longer time than was originally anticipated, and now the company needs the cash it had invested. Since the land was surveyed and the encroachment noted, Mr. Walling cannot get a title pol icy on the house, and Brazos Savings will not accept the letter as had been stated on the appl i- cation. He then passed around statements signed by neighbors in the area stating they have no objections to the City granting this variance. He also passed around photos of the subject house. The Chairman cal led Jim Wright, the builder of the house forward and swore him in, and asked him to explain as much as he could about the circumstances surrounding the construction of this house. He offered that perhaps his concrete man had measured from the curb, which is 5 ft. from the property line, but he really doesn't know this for sure, and cannot understand how this encroachment was missed. ' \ / ZBA Minutes 2-15-83 page 2 Mr. Wagner stated that the Board cannot 11 sl ip this by 11 and then questioned why the City Attorney would offer the third option if it is not acceptable. Past cases were dis- cussed whi ch had gone to the City Council and for which the Council had forwarded a letter to the lender which had been accepted. Mr. Upha m pointed out this Board cannot speak for the Council and this Board does not have the authority to rule on this case and he recommends it be taken to the City Council or the courts for action, as this Board cannot compromise the zoning ordinance. Mr. Calliham offered to contact lending institutions for the Board, and Mrs. Kee suggested that if this was done, whoever con- tacts the lending institutions should also find out what they would do if they find out the Board wi ll never grant a variance for this type of encroachment. She further sug- gested that per haps the City Attorney should be contacted for advice. Mr. Wagner asked if he could include in a motion that in addition to having this survey taken, he could add a statement to the effect that if the lending institution would find a letter ac- ceptable, that staff be instructed to submit this type of l etter. Mrs. Cook said she did not think this would be possible in a tabling situation. Mr. MacGilvray then made a motion to table this request pending results of a survey of lending institutions and Mr. Upham seconded the motion. Mr. Wal 1 ing asked if the Board is recomm endi ng a letter from Council following the results of the survey taken by Mr. Cal 1 iham, and Mr. MacGilvray explained that Mr. Cal 1 iham is welcome to draft a letter which staff will review, and under Other Business, this Board will issue further instructions to staff. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Con sideration of a request for a ruling concerning the use of an accessory structure as a residence in a si ngle family r esidential zo ne . Application is in the name of Ronald Cru se . Mrs. Kee ex plain ed what Mr. Cruse was proposing in his new home, and then gave staff's interpretation of the ordinance, which would prevent the inclusion of two separate cook- ing facilities in this home, even if one is meant for his mother-in-law. Discussion fol low ed concerning past cases, and Mr. Upham 1 ikened this request to one which a Mr. Martinez had requested recently which the Board denied. Ron Cruse came forward and was sworn in and pointed out this proposed home wit h two separate cooking facilities is being built on two lots, and that if two separate ho mes were built there (on e on each lot) he speculated that more people would be 1 iving there. He suggested if the Board interprets as does the staff, he would 1 ik e to see an ordinance drafted to the effect that blood relatives could 1 ive in an adjoining unit in an R-1 area. Mrs. Cook pointed out that it is this Board's duty to enforce the current ordinance and if the ordinance was changed sometime in the future, so be it, but this Board must be consis- tent with its rulings, and variances to the ordinance require specific reasons concern- ing the land to be met before they are granted. Mr. Cruse pointed out that the cur- rent ordinance allows for servants quarters, and does not spell out these quarters cannot have cooking facilities. He then stated he would change his plans if necessary to get a permit to begin his home, but wants the Board to make a ruling on this. Mr. Wagner said a duplex (a sol id wall between units) would not be allowed in the area because of zoning. Mrs. Kee pointed out that in the most simplistic sense, Mr. Cruse is creating a duplex. Mrs. Kee then requested that the term "cooking facilities" be clarified. Mr. \fagner said he was upset that 6 years had passed since the Board had requested a definition of duplex and none has been forthcoming. He then suggested perhaps the type of access door be used as a criteria. Mr. Upham then made a motion to uphold the interpretation made by the Zonin g Of fic ial in the enforceme nt of Section 1-D.l of this ordinance, as the decision or interpretation meets the spirit of this ordinance and substantial justice was done. Mr. Wagne~ seconded the motion which carried wnanimously (4-0). ) ZBA Minutes 2-15-83 page 3 Mr. Cruse then asked for clarification and was informed the cooking facilities he pro- posed must be removed. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Other Business Mr. Wagner made a motion for staff to go to Council with a strong recommendation that "duplex" be defined, and suggested that such current criteria such as kitchen be given low priority because of the advent of microwaves, and to give mother-in-laws the same privileges as servants. Mrs. Kee pointed out that kitchen is the criteria and not ser- vants quarters, which is provided for in the current ordinance. Mrs. Kee read from the Building Code the definition of a dwelling unit, and then Mr. Wagner withdrew his motion for lack of a second. Mr. Wagner then made a new motion that staff go before the City Council with a request from the Board that Council supply at that meeting, a re-definition of Section 1-D. l Accessory Use or Structure, or Building. Mr. Upham seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). Mr. Wagner then made a motion to recommend to the City that the City Attorney canvass the lending agencies to determine the propriety of a "lenders letter" and that this be done in cooperation with other attorneys in the City who handle real estate trans- actions. Further, that if such letter is found to be acceptable, that the staff be given the authority to provide same to lenders. Mr. MacGilvray seconded the motion, which carried unanimously (4-0). Clifton Cox came forward to advise the Board that he planned to request a variance to the ordinance concerning off-site signs for a condominium complex, and would be asking permission to put up an off-site sign to advertise the Doubletree Condos. Dis- cussion of the sign ordinance followed and Mr. Wagner said he is of the opinion that all signs should come down, then mentioned some specific signs which particularly offended him. Mr. MacGilvray announced the next Northgate Committee meeting would be held in North- gate, commencing at 11 :30 a.m. on February 23rd in the parking lot behind Duddleys Draw, and invited this Board, the P&Z Commission and the City Council to attend. · Mrs. Kee mentioned the memo from the City Attorney which had been included in the packets concerning the operating hours of the Pizza Hut. Mr. Wagner then made a motion to adjourn which Mr. Upham seconded. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). APPROVED: Acting Chairman ATTEST: \ Dian Jones, City Secretary _) C i ty of Colle g e Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 11 01 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 March7, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Board of Adjustment FROM: Jane R. Kee, Zoning Official SUBJECT: Agenda Items for March 15, 1983 Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Request variance to required front setback I ine (Table A) when constructing a new building at 205 & 207 University Drive in the Northgate area. Application is in the name of Louie A. Walston. The applicant is requesting a variance to the front setback for the construction of a new building at 205-207 University Drive. The application is fairly clear. I have advised the applicant that by Tuesday he should be able to tell the Board how much of a variance he wants as well as where the front property 1 ine is in relation to the curb along that part of University Drive. OTHER BUSINESS The staff is currently working on an amendment to the sign regulations as recently directed by the Council. We are also currently reviewing all of the sections of Ordinance 850. Any amendment to clarify the definition of accessory structure or duplex will be handled at the same time that amendments are proposed to Ordinance 850 in its entirety. The item tabled at the last meeting concerning the structure sitting over the front setback has not been resolved. sent a memo to the City Attorney the day after the Board's last meeting but have heard nothing to date. I will try to contact him prior to Tuesday night. sjv .. -) ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTHENT FILE NO. Name of Applicant __ .;...L_o_uie A . Wa l ston }failing Address ____ 7~0~7!..__:.A~v~o:'...!.'..n~d~a=l~e--------------------------- Phone --~1~·1o~m!.l.!.s;.e......!.lB~2~2~-~3~s~o~sL__...o~f~f~1~·c.,s;e 8 23-0 11 4 Location: Lot 15a _£__],_Sb Block -"""8 __ Subdivi s ion Boye t t Thi s i s located at 205 & 20 7 University Drive Description, If appli~able ------------------------------- In the northgate a rea. Open aspha l t l ots with the De l uxe Burge r to the immediate west si de and Aggie l and F low ~r Shop to the ajoining east side . The l ots g~Jthrough from Uni ve r s i ty Dr , to Patri c ea Street, Action requested: I ' Va ri an re of 2 5 ft set back o n the fircc:::0Lllnu:t~--"P"'o~r~m~iµ5;;.i5;;;.;1j...;· a~n~t-;:.,_ oA--- bui l d over front set back line ·~·-... NANE ADDRESS (From current tax rolls, Colle ge Station Tax Assessor) List attac hed. , ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTNENT FILE NO. Present zoning of land in q ues ti on ______ ....JC'-"-::..i,l_.;;G.i:e:..1.n.1--1C-1oJJmUJ.m:ll+., ------------- Section of o ·.rcinance from which variance is sought _____ T....,.a ..... b ..... J..s;;e;__..:A,__ ________ _ The following specific v2riation from the ordinance is requested: To b uild a new construction ;; a l i g n ed wi th the fro nt of my exi st ing building (.\ggi e l and Flowers) This would align the building wi th a ll other structures in that b l ock , the appearance wou l d be nicer and a llow easy par k ing • Tw o parking spaces could be added to the r epr of the buildi ng . These spaces are necessary to me et parking requirements fo r the f ootage of the bui lding c . This variance is necessary due to the following unique and special condition s of the land not found in like districts: I Should the b u ilding be set back there wo uld be 2 parking spaces in the fro nt of the business . University Dr. has a s l i ght ·curve at this point • If the parking spa c e s were in front o f t he building it would be more difficul t t o exit back on to University ··~ The o t her buildings are set forward . The b uilding woald be rrnoxe visable, tl1e r efote not s l owing traffic down, The following alternatives to the requested variance are possibl e : ____ _.T_._a..._._p ...... J ace-t b e buildinq baek 25 ft , from the eJ<isting Agg i e l~nd Plowe... s Baildii19 and p ut 2 par king space s in from of the building . This variance wlll not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following ., . f~ct~: Tt will a lig n the front of the baildings Lo give a better appearance It will enab ~.I;:.b etter p arking situation o n Un iversity Drive . Wi ll spee d exiting from Nnive rsity Dr. The b uilding wil l not interfear with any ot he r drive or parki ng area . The fact s stated by me in this application are tru e and correct. Date ' I Blk. l, Lot 13B Boyett Southland Corporation 7-Eleven #23984 100 Boyett College Station, Tx . 77840 Blk. 1 Lot 13C Boyett Seeger, Annie Mrs. Est. c/o Jack Boyett 100 Boyett P. 0. Box 1424 College Station, Tx. 77 840 Blk. 8, Lot 7-14, 21 Boyett Boyett, A. P. Jr. etal 107 Boyett College Station, Tx. 77 840 Blk. 8, Lot 3 Boyett Ballard, Donald J. Rt. 2, Box 4221 Bryan, Tx. 77801 Blk. 8, Pt lot 5 Boyett Harper, Wm. P. 215 Un iversity College Staiton, Tx. 77 840 Blk. 8, Lot 4,6 Boyett Schulman, Bi 11 2109 Vinewood Bryan, Tx. 77801 Blk. 9, Lot 5,6 Boyett Christian Science Society 201 Boyett College Station, Tx. 77 840 Blk. 8, Lt 17, 17, 18 Boyett Moore, W. T. Bo x 3697 Bryan, Tx. 76501 Blk. 9, Lot 4 Boyett Blk. 8 , Lot 19 Boyett Bankston, Norma Sue 1103 N. 11th St. Temple, Tx. 76501 Blk. 9, Lot l,2,3 Boyett Brazos Coin Operator, Inc .. 201 Patricia College Station, Tx. 77840 Blk. 10, Lot 4 Boyett Ha 11 , Boyd G. P. 0. Box 17343 Salt Lake City, Utah 84117 Blk. 19, Lot 5,6 Boyett Boyett, Jack P. 0. Box 1424 College Station, Tx. 77840 Blk. 8, Lot 20 Boyett Boyett, vJ. G. 7626 Chattington Dallas, Tx. 75248 Texas A&M University c/o James Bond 319 Systems Bldg. College Station, Tx. 77840 ' . AGENDA March 15, 1983 7:00 P.M. Zoning Board of Adjustment CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS l. Approval of Minutes -Meeting of February 15, 1983. 2. Consideration of a variance request to the required front setback line (Table A) when constructing a new building at 205-207 University Drive in the Northgate area. Application is in the name of Louie A. Walston. 3. Other Business. 5. Adjourn. \ MINUTES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Zoning Board of Adjustments February 15, 1983 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Cook, Members MacGilvray, Wagner, Upham and Council Liaison Boughton MEMBERS ABSENT: Member Donahue and Alternate Member Lindsay STAFF PRESENT: Zoning Official Kee, Assistant to Zoning Official Dupies and Planning Technician Volk AGENDA ITEM NO. l: Approval of Minutes from January 18, 1983 Mr. Wagner made a motion to approve the minutes as written; Mr. MacGilvray seconded; motion carried unanimously. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consideration of a variance request to the front setback for an existing residence at 706 Chalet Court. Application is in the name of B. C. Walling. Mrs. Kee explained the request for variance and suggested the Board may want to develop a pol icy to be followed in the future. Mr. W. Crenshaw was sworn in and stated that he was the developer of this subdivision and that Jim Wright was the builder rather than Blackburn & Riley as the Board had been informed. He told the Board the house had been sold as a cash transaction and now Mr. Walling is merely trying to borrow money against the house. Mr. MacGilvray asked Mrs. Kee about the 3 options she had presented in her memo which are as follows: (l) Grant the variance. (2) Deny the variance if you are willing to instruct the City to take action to remove or correct the violation. (3) Neither grant nor deny the variance but authorize the staff to write a letter to the lender indicating the City's knowledge of the problem but that nothing will be done to enforce compliance. Mrs. Kee explained that the City Attorney leans toward granting a variance when only a few inches are involved, but for an encroach- ment of this magnitude perhaps the third option would be best. Mr. Upham stated that -this Board is not a civil court, and should not say this encroachment is o.k. Mike Calliham, an attorney representing Mr. Crenshaw and Mr. Walling was sworn in and stated that a corporation of which Mr. Walling is president bought this house for cash and Mr. Wall ing 1 s children are living in it, and will be for a longer time than was originally anticipated, and now the company needs the cash it had invested. Since the land was surveyed and the encroachment noted, Mr. Walling cannot get a title pol icy on the house, and Brazos Savings will not accept the letter as had been stated on the appl i- cation. He then passed around statements signed by neighbors in the area stating they have no objections to the City granting this variance. He also passed around photos of the subject house. The Chairman cal led Jim Wright, the builder of the house forward and swore him in, and asked him to explain as much as he could about the circumstances surrounding the construction of this house. He offered that perhaps his concrete man had measured from the curb, which is 5 ft. from the property line, but he really doesn't know this for sure, and cannot understand how this encroachment was missed. \ \ ZBA Minutes 2-15-83 page 2 Mr. Wagner stated that the Board cannot 11 sl ip this by 11 and then questioned why the City Attorney would offer the third option if it is not acceptable. Past cases were dis- cussed which had gone to the City Council and for which the Council had forwarded a letter to the lender which had been accepted. Mr. Upham pointed out this Board cannot speak for the Council and this Board does not have the authority to rule on this case and he recommends it be taken to the City Council or the courts for action, as this Board cannot compromise the zoning ordinance. Mr. Calliham offered to contact lending institutions for the Board, and Mrs. Kee suggested that if this was done, whoever con- tacts the lending institutions should also find out what they would do if they find out the Board will never grant a variance for this type of encroachment. She further sug- gested that perhaps the City Attorney should be contacted for advice. Mr. Wagner asked if he could include in a motion that in addition to having this survey taken, he could add a statement to the effect that if the lending institution would find a letter ac- ceptable, that staff be instructed to submit this type of letter. Mrs. Cook said she did not think this would be possible in a tabling situation. Mr. MacGilvray then made a motion to table this request pending results of a survey of lending institutions and Mr. Upham seconded the motion. Mr. Wal 1 ing asked if the Board is recommending a letter from Council following the results of the survey taken by Mr. Cal 1 iham, and Mr. MacGilvray explained that Mr. Calliham is welcome to draft a letter which staff will review, and under Other Business, this Board will issue further instructions to staff. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration of a request for a ruling concerning the use of an accessory structure as a residence in a single family residential zone. Application is in the name of Ronald Cruse. Mrs. Kee explained what Mr. Cruse was proposing in his new home, and then gave staff 1s interpretation of the ordinance, which would prevent the inclusion of two separate cook- ing facilities in this home, even if one is meant for his mother-in-law. Discussion followed concerning past cases, and Mr. Upham 1 ikened this request to one which a Mr. Martinez had requested recently which the Board denied. Ron Cruse came forward and was sworn in and pointed out this proposed home with two separate cooking facilities is being built on two lots, and that if two separate homes were built there (one on each lot) he speculated that more people would be 1 iving there. He suggested if the _Board interprets as does the staff, he would 1 ike to see an ordinance drafted to the effect that blood relatives could 1 ive in an adjoining unit in an R-1 area. Mrs. Cook pointed out that it is this Board's duty to enforce the current ordinance and if the ordinance was changed sometime in the future, so be it, but this Board must be consis- tent with its rulings, and variances to the ordinance require specific reasons concern- ing the land to be met before they are granted. Mr. Cruse pointed out that the cur- rent ordinance allows for servants quarters, and does not spell out these quarters cannot have cooking facilities. He then stated he would change his plans if necessary to get a permit to begin his home, but wants the Board to make a ruling on this. Mr. Wagner said a duplex (a sol id wall between units) would not be allowed in the area because of zoning. Mrs. Kee pointed out that in the most simplistic sense, Mr. Cruse is creating a duplex. Mrs. Kee then requested that the term 11 cooking facilities 11 be clarified. Mr. \./agner said he was upset that 6 years had passed since the Board had requested a definition of duplex and none has been forthcoming. He then suggested perhaps the type of access door be used as a criteria. Mr. Upham then made a motion to uphold the interpretation made by the Zoning Official in the enforcement of Section 1-D.1 of this ordinance, as the decision or interpretation meets the spirit of this ordinance and substantial justice was done. Mr. Wagner seconded the motion which carried ~nanimously (4-0). ) ) ZBA Minutes 2-15-83 page 3 Mr. Cruse then asked for clarification and was informed the cooking facilities he pro- posed must be removed. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Other Business Mr. Wagner made a motion for staff to go to Council with a strong recommendation that 11 duplex 11 be defined, and suggested that such current criteria such as kitchen be given low priority because of the advent of microwaves, and to give mother-in-laws the same privileges as servants. Mrs. Kee pointed out that kitchen is the criteria and not ser- vants quarters, which is provided for in the current ordinance. Mrs. Kee read from the Building Code the definition of a dwelling unit, and then Mr. Wagner withdrew his motion for lack of a second. Mr. Wagner then made a new motion that staff go before the City Council with a request from the Board that Council supply at that meeting, a re-definition of Section l-D. l Accessory Use or Structure, or Building. Mr. Upham seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). Mr. Wagner then made a motion to recommend to the City that the City Attorney canvass the lending agencies to determine the propriety of a 11 lenders letter 11 and that this be done in cooperation with other attorneys in the City who handle real estate trans- actions. Further, that if such letter is found to be acceptable, that the staff be given the authority to provide same to lenders. Mr. MacGilvray seconded the motion, which carried unanimously (4-0). Cl if ton Cox came forward to advise the Board that he planned to request a variance to the ordinance concerning off-site signs for a condominium complex, and would be asking permission to put up an off-site sign to advertise the Doubletree Condos. Dis- cussion of the sign ordinance followed and Mr. Wagner said he is of the opinion that all signs should come down, then mentioned some specific signs which particularly offended him. Mr. MacGilvray announced the next Northgate Committee meeting would be held in North- gate, commencing at ll :30 a.m. on February 23rd in the parking lot behind Duddleys Draw, and invited this Board, the P&Z Commission and the City Council to attend. Mrs. Kee mentioned the memo from the City Attorney which had been included in the packets concerning the operating hours of the Pizza Hut. Mr. Wagner then made a motion to adjourn which Mr. Upham seconded. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). APPROVED: Acting Chairman ATTEST: Dian Jones, City Secretary City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 11 01 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE ST ATION, TEXAS 7 7840 March7, 1983 MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Board of Adjustment FROM: Jane R. Kee, Zoning Official SUBJECT: Agenda Items for March 15, 1983 Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Request variance to required front setback 1 ine (Table A) when constructing a new building at 205 & 207 University Drive in the Northgate area. Application is in the name of Louie A. Walston. The applicant is requesting a variance to the front setback for the construction of a new building at 205-207 University Drive. The application is fairly clear. I have advised the applicant that by Tuesday he should be able to tell the Board how much of a variance he wants as well as where the front property 1 ine is in relation to the curb along that part of University Drive. OTHER BUSINESS The staff is currently working on an amendment to the sign regulations as recently directed by the Council, We are also currently reviewing all of the sections of Ordinance 850. Any amendment to clarify the definition of accessory structure or duplex will be handled at the same time that amendments are proposed to Ordinance 850 in its entirety. The item tabled at the last meeting concerning the structure sitting over the front setback has not been resolved. sent a memo to the City Attorney the day after the Board's last meeting but have heard nothing to date. I will try to contact him prior to Tuesday night. sjv ZONING BO ARD OF ADJUST HENT FILE NO. _Hailing Address ____ 7.:....0=-~7 A:..:..:....::v o.:..:n=d=a~l~e:__ _________________________ _ Phone ---=Il=o=rn=e--"'8~2=2~-~3~5~0~5~~C~f~f-1_·c~e 8 23 -0 11 4 Location: Subd i vision Boy e t t Thi s i s l o cate d a t 205 & 20 7 Un i v e rsity Drive Description, If appli~able ------------------------------- In the northgat e a r e a. Op en asphalt l ots with the De l u xe Burge r to the i mm edia t e west si de and Agg i e l and F l ow ~r Shop to t he ajoining e ast s i de . The lots g oil-Jthrou g h f r om Un iversit y Dr , to Pat r i c e a Stre e t. Action requested: --1./ __ _j\ula~r~1w·a~n~cae~aDL.f-L.2~5---I:f~t~~s~e~t~b~a~c~1~-~o~nn-:t~h~~-1;f•r~o~n~t.--.-~P~eHr~m~i~s~s~i~·a~n~t80e--- b ui l d o ver f ron t set IJ.~k line , NA.NE ADD RESS (Fro m curre nt tax rolls, Co l l ege Sta tion Tax Assessor) Li s t a tta c hed. '. .. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTI1ENT FILE NO. Section of ordinanc e from which variance is sought _____ T....,,,.,a .... b ..... J .,_e_.._A.___~------- The following specific variation from the ordinanc e is requested: To build a new construction ;; ali g ned with the front of my existing building (Aggieland Flowers) Thi s wou ld align the bui l ding with a ll other stru ctures in that b l ock . ~he appearance wou l d be nicer and allow easy parking • Tw o parking spa ces could be added to the r e~r of the b uil d i ng . These spaces are ne cessa r y to me et parking requ i rements for the footage of the buildi ng . . This variance is necessary due to the following unique and special condition s of the land not found in like districts: I Shou l d the b ui l ding be set back there wo uld be 2 parking spaces in the front of the busine ss . University Dr . has a s l ight curve at this po int • If the parki ng spa c e s were in front of the building it wou l d be more difficult to exit back on to University .. ~ The other buildings are set forward. "Phe building would be man e visable , theie:Eore not s l owing .traffic down. The followin g alternatives to the requested variance are possible : -----T .... o;,.i._p.....,.Jaca..tb 0 .bui l d i ng back 25 ft. from the eJdsting Aggieland F lower s .BuildiJig and p ut 2 parkin;g s pa c e s in from o f the building . This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following f·~c~~: It "'i ll a l ign the fron t of t he buildi n gs Lo give a beL.tet appeatance It wi ll enab ~.l?-be tt e r p arking situation on University Drive . Wi ll speed exit ing from Nniversity Dr . The bui l ding wil l not interfear with any other drive or parki ng area . Th e fact s stated by me in this application are t r u e and correct. ,, /} d<~t l~ ~lc ld (::..::_i..4.:_?L~~---- App licant Da te I • Blk. l, Lot 13B Boyett Southland Corporation 7-Eleven #23984 100 Boyett College Station, Tx. 77840 Blk. l Lot 13C Boyett Seeger, Annie Mrs. Est. c/o Jack Boyett 100 Boyett P. 0. Bo x 1424 College Station, Tx. 77 8 40 Blk. 8, Lot 7-14, 21 Boyett Boyett, A. P. Jr. etal l 07 Boyett College Station, Tx. 77 840 Blk. 8, Lot 3 Boyett Ballard, Donald J. Rt. 2, Bo x 4221 Bryan, Tx. 77801 Blk. 8, Pt lot 5 Boyett Harper, Wm. P. 215 University College Staiton, Tx. 77840 Blk. 8, Lot 4,6 Boyett Schul man, Bi 11 2109 Vinewood Bryan, Tx. 77801 Blk. 9, Lot 5,6 Boyett Christian Science Society 201 Boyett College Station, Tx. 77840 Blk. 8, Lt 17, 17, 18 Boyett Moore, W.T. Bo x 3697 Bryan, Tx. 76501 Blk. 9, Lot 4 Boyett Blk. 8, Lot 19 Boyett Bankston, Norma Sue 1103 N. 11th St. Temple, Tx. 76501 Blk. 9, Lot l,2,3 Boyett Brazos Coin Opera tor, Inc .. 201 Patricia College Station, Tx. 77840 Blk. 10, Lot 4 Boyett Ha 11 , Boyd G. P. 0. Box 17343 Salt Lake City, Utah 84117 Blk. 19, Lot 5,6 Boyett Boyett, Jack P. 0. Box 1424 Colle ge Station, Tx. 77840 Blk. 8 , Lot 20 Boyett Boyett, vi.G. 7626 Chattington Dallas, Tx . 75248 Te xas A&M University c/o Ja mes Bond 319 Systems Bldg. Colle ge Station, Tx. 77840