HomeMy WebLinkAbout146 Zoning Board of Adjustments November 18, 1980\
City of College Station
POST OFFICE BOX 9960 I I 0 I TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840
November 10, 19 80
MEMORAN9UM
TO: Members of the Zoning Board of Ad"ustment
PROM: Jim Callaway, Zoning Official
SUBJECT: Regularly Scheduled Meeting, November 18, 1980
Due to a lack of variance requests, there will not be a Zoning
Board of Adjustment meeting on Novem5er 18, 1980.
l .I
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO.
Name of Applicant Brentwood, Inc. (Richard Smith)
Mailing Address 3743 Texas Avenue, Bryan, Texas 77801
Phone 846-3743
Location: Lot Blocks 2 & 3 Subdivision Brentwood, Section 5
Description, If applicable See Exhibit A hereto
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Action requested: Approve duplex zoning on lots which do not meet the width require-
ment of the zoning ordinance.
NAME ADDRESS
(From current tax rolls, College Station Tax Assessor)
BLOCK l
LOT l Schabel, David J. 2314 Auburn Court
LOT 2 Jones, Chalan P. o. Drawer CR, c. s.
LOT 3 Threan, Thomas 23l0 Auburn Court
LOT 4 Fletcher, Sterling D. 2308 Auburn Court
LOT 5 Valdez, Guillermina G. 2306 Auburn Court
LOT 6 Lifland, Andrew T. 2304 Auburn Court
LOT 7 Davidson, James E. 2302 Auburn Court
LOT 8 Craig, William H. 2300 Auburn Court
LOT 9 Miller, Robert D. 2301 Auburn Court
LOT 10 Knox, George W. 2303 Auburn Court
LOT 11 Thompson, Aylmer H. P. 0. Box 9187, c. s.
LOT 12 Young, Clifford P. 0. Drawer CE, c. s.
LOT 13 Connelly, Jon Christie 2309 Auburn Court
LOT 14 Callaway, John R. 2311 Auburn Court
LOT 15 Miller, Gerald E. 2313 Auburn Court
LOT 16 Morley, Ronald 23l5 Auburn Court
Joe Courtney, Inc. P. 0. Box 4305, Bryan, TX 77801
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO.
Present zoning of land in question R-1 (chanqe to R-2 is pending)
~ Section of ordinance f rom wh i ch variance i s s ought ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The followi n g spec ific variation from the ordinance i s reques ted : Lot width
This variance is nece ssary d ue t o the f ?llow ing unique and sp e cial condition s o f
the land n o t f o u nd i n like d i s t ricts :
See Exhibit B hereto
The following alternatives to the requested v arianc e are po ss ible :
None
This var i ance will not be contrary to the public i n teres t b y virtue of the following
I ' facts: See Exhibit B hereto
The facts stated by me in this application are tru e and corr ect.
Applicant Date 1
Exhibit A to Zoning Board of Adjustment
Application of Brentwood, lnc.
Block 2 Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 8
Lot 9
Lot 10
Lot 11
Lot 13
Block 3 Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 9
Lot 10
Lot 11
Lot 12
.;
Exhibit B to Zoning Board of Adjustment
Application of Brentwood, Inc.
History of the Property
The lots which qre the subject of this application were
zoned R-2 (duplex) by action of the city council on .l//fA /2.t H).) /Y 7(,
(Ordinance No. /t>ll ) . It later became apparent 1 /
that the market for duplex lots was not strong enough
to justify developing the entire property for duplexes and
upon request by the owner, Brentwood, Inc., the city
council zoned the property back to R-1 on ~£8~v~y~~1 1977 1 (Ordinance No. 1010 ) .
In 1980, the market for duplexes strenghthened
dramatically and the owner has firm contracts for the sale
of the subject lots contingent upon having them zoned back
to R-2. This zoning application is pending at this time.
Current Situation
Although the lots met all the requirements of duplex
zoning when they were platted, because of a very recent
amendment to the zoning ordinance, 19 of the 44 lots in
Blocks 2 and 3 do not now meet the width requirement.
Factors involving "unique and special conditions of the
land" and "undue hardship"
This case is unique and special in that the lots have
already been platted and all improvements including streets,
sidewalks, sewer and water lines, street lights and fire-
plugs have been installed. At the time of platting, all
requirements of duplex lots were met.
Failure to grant the variance would impose undue hard-
ship because 5 lots would be lost. These lots have an
aggregate value of $55,000 and this cost would have to be
absorbed by the remaining 39 lots. This would add a direct
cost of over $1,400 to each lot. The 5 lots which would
be lost have a total width of 350 feet (5 x 70'). Only
an aggregate of approximately 50 feet is needed to bring
the 19 lots up to the prescribed width. Therefore, it
would eliminate 350 feet of lots to gain a combined
50 feet of width for the 19 affected lots.
Public Interest
Through recent action, the College Station City Council
and staff have made an attempt to meet the increasing
demand for affordable first homes and rental property for
young couples. This effort comes at a time of increasing
housing costs which have priced most young couples out of
the market. It is consistent with this effort to approve
the requested variance. The direct cost increase as
stated above of $1,400 per lot will be avoided by granting
this variance.
Does this variance observe the "Spirit of the Zoning
Ordinance?"
My impression of the purpose of amending the zoning
ordinance was to lower housing costs by allowing duplexes
to be split in half for separate sale. To allow this to
happen, a minimum duplex lot width of 70 feet was adopted.
Since the duplexes in my subdivision will not be "split"
the 70 foot width appears to not be necessary. Also the
total area of my lots as now platted exceeds the new mini-
mum area by up to 50 %. While the lot widths are short by
from 1-5 feet, the depths are well in excess of the mini-
mum required.
~ ZONJiNG BOARD OF AilJUSTMENI' FILE NO. -------
REVIEW AND COM1ENI': Building Official
REVIEW AND CXM1ENI': Fire Marshall
REVIEW AND COM1ENI': City Engineer
DATE SET FOR HEARING --------------------------
ADJOINERS NOTIFIED --MAILING DATE --------------------
-,
The zoning Board of Adjustrrent has examined the facts presented.
herein and reflected in the minutes of the public rreeting o f
and have detennined. that the
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
requested vari ance ( IS I IS 001' ) contrary to the public
interest and that unique and special condition s ( 00 / 00 l'J0'1' ).
exist as staed herein and as reflected in the minutes of the
Board's proceedings and the variance as requested herein ( I S /
IS NY!' ) approved subject to the foll<JN ing terms and conditions :.
Chairperson Date
Zoning Board of Adjustment
NOTE: Any person or persons · or any ta.:r:payer or any officer-,.
de partment, board, corronission or c orroni ttee of the Ci -ty, jointly or
severally, aggrieved by any decision of the Board of Adjustment,
may present to a court of record a peti t i on, v erified, setting forth
that such decision is illegal, in whole or in part, specifying the
grounds of the illegality. Such petition shall be presented to the
court within ten (10) days after the filing of the decision in the
office of the Board.