The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About122 Regular Meeting 9.10.79Ar, ENDA Zoning Board of Adjus tments September 10 , 1 9~9 . l. Consideration of a request for t he expansion of a non - conforming structure i n the name of Minn i e Smi t h To dd~ 609 Maryem. 2. Consideration of a request fo r a variance in t he name of C. E. Olsen, 409 Dexter . 3. Recons~deration of a request fo~ the expansion of a non • . -- conforming use in the name of Larry Hickman, 300 West Dexter. 4. Consideration of a request for a variance in the name of John Paul Oones, 405 University Drive. City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 T E XAS AVENUE COLLEGE Sf A TI0::--1 . TEX.A.S 77840 September 6, 1979 MEMORANDUM: TO : Zoning Board of Adj ustmen t s FROM : Jim Callaway, Zonin g Of fi cial SUBJECT: Agenda Item s , Septemb er 10, 1979 . Due to the early date of this meet ing, the minute s of the last Board of Adjustments meeting were not available in time _for inclusion in this packet. Thes e minutes wi l l be pre sented for consideration at the ~ext me eti ng. AGENDA ITEM NO . 1 -The Todds ca nno t be issued a bui1din g permit for the addition of a bathr oom to their home because of a garage, attached to their house , which does not meet the required setbac.ks. The main structur.e (house) does. meet all requirements of Section 11-B.3.C . of the Zoning Ordinance and I recommend approval. AGENDA tTEM NO. 2 -Mr. Olsen has modified his requ~st for a· variance so that he will in effect have a 25-foot rear setback to the adjacent lot (as separated by a 13-foot alley). This request appears much more reasonable than the earlier appli- cation, and shows a viable alternative to that application. AGENDA ITEM -NO. 3 - Thi s item was pl aced in the agenda f or reconsideration as approved by tf1 e board. Information from the original hearing is included i n this packet. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 -Mr. Jones, who failed to receive a variance from the off-street parking requ i r ements fo r -a r estaurant has submitted a request for a variance from Section 7-B.2., which requires off-premises parking lots to oe within 200 feet of a new use. I am not sure of the status of Mr. Jones ' efforts to aquire a parking lot. I am sure he will present additional information at the meetinq. ·zoNING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO~ -. ,. -.~ . . ::-·~~c.:_·.:;.· . .. :.i-. ~ · .... Name of Applicant JOHN Paul .Jones Mailing Addr.~ss -P. o ~··Box · 9069 ,"···college ··s -t;_\;i~{i, ·;~~~::!'~72~f 9•16 -~~;.~:;~:;~;.~:~;;'.:'1.~:1ti~£t;'I·2 ···:l'. :~~~1f ;\~1~~1~¥1f /-lZ'" Location· ·. ,:.,, :. Lot 1 2 ·•'.··•,., .. ·--~---Bloclr -·· ··2 · -. ~ •. · Sub d:t:v1 si on ·Boyett'·'·<'5•:<<.<<·.-..".,·~·/,.R-~. -.-.~".r .. ~-. :~~w;~::~~7-2f¥-t11~-i:~~;:7f:~'.j<::i'::::: .. ~!:\~.*~~;~r:~~f~?~1~;fi~;,~r~~~~~~~~:~~~~~®~~~~f ~~:g}{*~~v~,mr .. · , .. ,~ . _ :l.f~: .. ';Description :-...: If··applicable :-.BuiJ.ding is located ·"on the · northeast···co'T"ner-'<'t'.:9.'--.. . ·:: ;i_\i1 }l~~~~~%~~~f.~~t!:i(0,~~t~~~-,_·,·:~i·*1~:;;if:~;:&l'.Ji·fy~l:6:;~i~'*~~')"'ffr~~~:'.~-:'};-:::;~.~~~~~~~'ii/:'':Jf~;:;;~:·,;i:*~;~i;f~t.~;,':l::~-~~~~~$/t~~~~~-, ·~\,::,::~\-,,."'~of:::.;the->intersection ·~of University ·Drive ·'and · College -Main:·:;;?~r;;:c :--:-\:c~:·:\":f,-> .. .--:·Action\·~iequested: ·Applicant"-requests . a va ri~nce .· be granted ·:-:'''~:1r.;;:<.;'f;~.l1!1f4''~~::;.?i0;{~,1~~4!'f'!1,J -.. ~:>;~~~:;;:~~•;JifwAitg~t15f~·~~1:~i¥6~~~~~~:-,, .. _ .. o::'.~:,-~ ~:~J.(~0.~::~-?;~7~~~:\~::;:~~~~~r;~~~~~1~~~~~1t:~z:~~?~~-;~~ · .. --~~-~1a~IW~i1Jjji~1~~1 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUS'TI1ENT FILE NO. Present zoning of land in question Section of · ordinanc& from which variance -'-:-.: I. ',. . 1 . -~ ~~;,K\:-~'~~-~.:-~~-':..~·t . '...:_,,;..,,~;·._ .!._-'--'-: ·-, .,. •. been ,described.~.(;,,;··:·.:·.:.-. ·:.;;,.,··), ;:·i . ~ "i :, ' ' . 1. We will cater to dorm residents. This is walk in traffic. Our marketing efforts will be focused on these students. 2. Our peak hours of operation will differ from that of our most immediate neighbors; Bookstores, Shoe stores, Barbershops, .· Engineering Supplies, Dry cleaners, Photography studios, Camera store, Insurance agencey, and Jewelry store . 3. The parking problem ls one that i s inherent to the entire North- gate area. Our parking lot will h elp relieve both the day and and night congestion. · 4. We are aiding in the organization of' a concer ted e f :f ort: on the :pa.rt of -the Northgate mer~hants to raise funds for the placement of a patrolman to monitor ·: the one-hour parking spaces in •_ the Nor thga te area.. • · . ' . AGENDA ITEM NO . 1 , ·zoNING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO . Name of Applicant Mailing Address "'!",· ..... . :·. : _-_ .. '• ::: .. · ... : ·-···::: ... Phone ·'·· ·-··\·:.· / . -~. ·: ·-·~.:·i:~;j~~~.CiI~~;i~~)~B1~':;6¥-~~~-~~~.:~~;~.'.~:·~:.~:- . ~.'-:.::C-0 ? :.::=:fj;t;~';.~:·-;.~·:;::~:~;'.{;'.$.•c{:.:J2/ ,./2\/.;, Description,. .. If . applicable ._ ••.•• • .•• ~-.-:·· • .%) • ;~-:-.~·-=·· .... _:·,··:;_.·".;;,:~:'· .:·:. ·' . -.. ·• ·. Mdi:tion. O£t··a.: m ·n4: :aathroOa:.: '• !. :~..:·:·. ;.·1 , • • • .... ••. . I., • •.• .• : •-)··. ---~·,;-~; !·: .. ;-, :,:· ""-' ~ .. _. __ ,_:;•. . ·:· .: . .. . :: ...: : ;~. -.-;-: -.~-.. : : ·· .. -~·:-.~-~ 7:· ._:·:. .. •'. · .. =· ,.·. . :.-. ,·: .. (:&om current tax rolls, . .. . . . . . -~--,seei ~a;t~ch~ 11·at. --J ·-·· •••. . :,• ;. ~--~-:~ -: ~ -~ ~. ~·. -~-. .. · ... -·· -.,,-~-,__:· .. : .. ;:/.• .. :-; ... -~-;:': .·:'.· .. • •. _· .. :_._.· .. ~ .. -~·_,.-... _··.:,-~·'.-':7~;----.·.::··~. ;_· .. ~:~~-... :~/-~ ... ~_~::·~·:·.: .. ~ .. '" ~-. ··. ··~-:~ ... ·.· ._, . ..::. . . ... · -•. ·; •;.·" ,. ····. ;_-: .. ~::.r,. .\ ~ ... · .:· .. .,_ .... -. .-r: ·~ ' -:,.· • :.·::'.~ .. ,; .. ':"~·;·;~~-~:~';:;_~.:.)·~::::~;?~~\(~:~Y;i{~:l : ·, ..... _. . \--,-~";. ::;_;~-~~::· ... ,.· ._ . .,.. - . .. .-.. ... ; .· ~ -.· .. • • . . • .• •.:. ----~~;.·: •• f~-~ :·: : . ~ ";: . :-.... . .... . 1 •• • .• •.• -•• ~.·.:.;i: ___ ·:.~.~f~:~.··.· .... -:;,..:. r ,. :~:·:,. · • . ,, .. ···-··-· .. ... .. . ............. -. _, .... -~:~:;,.=:_.: ... ~-............... · ...... : •.. :.::.." .. :·:.:;:· . .:.. ~-· ~ ~ ':..---~. -# •• ::..: ;·;_~:.~:;:..:.;; • .;.;:;:-... -::. .. .. ' ..... • ........ :. ·• .. . ,_.·; :·. : ~ ;~w ~~~ ZO NING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. Present zoning of land in question ·_\ __ \_,,_-__ ,_-'--S"""-''-·'.;...N__.\.,_, -'\-'~ .... ·--~-'i~r-· -'c:-..;....:..:./':.o"....;•:...\..;._.;J::....-,---------.. Section of · ordinance from which variance is sought \. ..... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . .. · . Th e ·fol~owing .from the o r d inance is requested: : .. · -l--~~=--i......i...1~_:,:.;.;;;..;_i_~,.--:..~~::..;.:._--==~~.l..!.L...:£.....:..:~·,...:: ..... ::...::.,.'-::....;<"~· t.l,.·:!...;·~~·v1~-~c. ....... \L·x:J:..!::::·: .. ~v!...·. ·-=o~·-_...;_·:.::t<:·. ·~:c'o:'':~?tt}~/;y: ... ;::·:::~1ft~~f~~;~~~~~::~1!.~JZ:~~0~~:;;~::· .. , .. ·. ./·.;''.'.::::;:;_::·:.··.-. .:::~:~ .. ~;;·;··,-·'-···::·~;?f.~:~·:··::~:··: · ,, . ·. • .· · ,~:~~~~~~~~~w~~~It1~~~4~;:§':':~01l'r~;;~~~"-·;~'~;'':'-!%i~±(.'j;;{:·:.-.·.:::~_:.~.~-~---•.~:·.;,:_,..:·:::e~::-.:.;.~.·::. __ ·.~.~-~-::~.-~.~ .. ,:''_ .. -:-.~.~ .. -... ~:···.-·.~.:,.;_~.~--;_·.·~.:.:.~.:.:.:~--~.:-~··:·~.~.:_:··~:~_::._ .. ~.::;··_~:~_;:1~.·.:.-~r.: .. ~.·~_,~-n.-.:.~._._-:•--.'..-.~-:.:_:~;,;_·~-~---~·; : .. ,,:~:\~~~~~~1i~}'/:~~lit~~~ftf~~:iff.:~t~:0~~1~ftf :\'~:;':~::/: c: -. : ··: ;\~l~L~:iIT.~'.':~Fx ~.~:~~:::~};:r;~0 : -·-: :;~~~ · · -. -. ~ .. --r. -------.;...,..-----,------------------------..;....------------'--------.. ,... .. ~·.--· . ;.·::.·~-~~-~;~---. .... . "! ~~-.::~~~~~~;~·~:~~~~-:~i~:-~~:~~:;;.j;_~:~*-=-1 .~:;,..-;_~-:-. . ... .;,~--:./!·~~;~ :~,·:.::.. -.~._ .. ;,~-,_-:1:~·-_\: ~ ·: . . . •. :~~~:{}i-_: .. •: :~··_: .. :·;::.~~-i~~<~~~ This varian~e . is . ~:~ce~'sary :·du~. :to ... the f ollowio.g :.~ique and si1ecial. conditions of -· . the land ·_n o.t fotind .in :·like::distrlcts: : ; ... ,J .. ::t_·._,;.~~·.. , .. :~ _._:_.:;.:<::~.;_; , •. _~ _,. :· :' .-.}/: ~, -::--=··x_. ~.};.1;::~H~;~. -~.'. . "'·· . ,-.. ; ... ·. -:· ... . :::-::::>·-:-:-~·-.\~ -~, t ~--:.-\~~:?:':·h;~;~ ~~--:F:;~';;:~~{;.tq::.~:--· .. ....... -.. --~ _L::.:~~-.· -·:~ .... ~: . ·: .. .,. -··. ..... : .. }/::.\ .. ~--:~·-.:: ·-:~~--'~.: ... ·· ..... : -:·.1 ·-· -,,-:_-·_, - _ .... _.. . /". :· variance are pos$ible~ ·· .. : ::-_;:.·~~-~ .. ;:-. -. ·---:~ . .:. ·!~·:·: ........ ~ -: · .. :~.;~~~--: The . following alteiaatives· ,to.: tha.requested .. ·. "::. ,-.:;':/:·'. .. ·.-:;:·:. ~~Nf 1~:;: ::~~?',--.~-<:: ·:~~<-(~;?~-· -:·-.: ... .. -·-"::: -~:.~:i~;·:~ · .. - ·=-· J -•• _,.. __ ;' .· ... ,. . .. : .... -· ;·-i.~~-):~. · ... -~ .:'·• -~~--··· · ... ---~. . .--·· .. ·: ·-:::.. ;•·.· ...... _.:.. -~.;:·.~=---: .. : • • : :--.::j~::_.!~! -~·'./• • "0 ~~:-~;~!.~{¥~·;~•f~(:• !~, :.-•-:,.f ::},.=::~w:.:?2.:\~· •: • :.:.:. ~ •.,_ 0 • "-.~ ~f.'::~\ .... ~. ::.:.< :··~." • .... :·,,; • ~~~~:<•::. ,•~' ,..:.:;· .. ·.-·~ :~? .. ~~~~:~. ~ ." The facts · stated ·by· me :.in this application are true and correct. · · . -. . , .··L~f ~~~--~-~:.t .. ~-:·.-.i,L.;.~:.·~.'.~:.:·~.-.·_: ~.-.' .... ~-._:;" .. ~:.-~.;.~.f' . -. ·~.-~·-· .. ;.:<~ · · ...... 1 .1 () ·. __ ---.-:.-~ ~.:~;:.-_·.· .. ··.·. --~.-~--· -~.,·.·~: .~.·_, __ .. . . -~ _.. . ~-· · · .. · -----~: < ·· --. .. :r-..> ~~:·: · <~ · ----.,. · -·-:·'"· · ··. ~---· ·:\\;~ .. >·~·;:;:;1 <'i!.:JCJ ··· ... ·.?~~~i~.~~~~F _;: Date . · · · . ·.~&""'.,;,_-,_ .,-, ·'"?~·~>'·3 ·~--..,.;o;::,..~...._ ... _"-""'•v-.,-.~-~"-7::-! q':{:'.t;"..:r~•!'·---'--...:-'v···.~-:--.,,-:.:•:.r .. _.,.._,_,.-:;?~:~.;. "-''.'i~.":'-'°'! · · ~ ..... -.. · .., -~ ....... _ .. ~.nJ.~~;;.. _:-i.~r.(~~~~~~--·>~~~*=~~!~:·i~~~2~~:.i.~;~ .. ~~f:---~1:-·~,.·~~~.;.~-~-~~:~:-~~~;· "'-.(> I ... ·.·~ fr.I-?. , I S"o?:. (ff' O_j_ 'ff .'hi S ;) 0 1frN 1' W) i s 3 1 f. I w s d JV I ti 111 . ./ ./ 0 I ~L I /;:;> j'::J £::;/ · .. -I ,!/ / ·/ _c;' d AA . ' I ' I . ._:-; t/ ,cJ ./ "I f 7C rf' b J~1v4/>/ .)0 /. '; lfl/1 -Z<Jd ~fl : -~ --h-. ______ _i_ ______ -t-n .. · r.._. .--x--- "' ~--------i *- /-::> l:,l 0 d _i_- k-t I/~ I ~-g - I -fJ I l ..._.__-5·-tr I -I I __ ___._._J . .I I I j.· -------------S~[ ------1 I I /'./O)J_/ ' . . AGENDA !~EM NO . 2 ZO NING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. ---- Mailing Address P. 0. Box 5, Clifton, Texas 76634 Phone '( 817) 675-8644 • Location:t of Lot 11&12 Block 21 Subdivision Co llege Park . ,........• . Desc.ription ~ If applicable Mr. Olsen's property cons ist s of the South half of Lot 11, Block 21 and the North half of Lot 12, Block 21 • . · .. -·. Action .requested: A . variance in . the rear setback ·1-ine required by ~~...,.--~~~~--..~~~~~~--'~~----~~'-'"~~'-=----"--~~~~ 9rd.inance. NAME ADDRESS . (From current tax rolls,. College Station .Tax Ass~ss~r) .. -·· • .• Hensarlin ,· 505 Dexter St. C.S . . Garner, O -Dexter, C.S. John G. Otts, P.O. Box 1122, C. S. Ohannes Ekndyan, 202 Suffock, C. S. Michael Hoelscher, 204 Suffock, C. S. Phillip ~· Goode, Drawer DT, c. s. Sandra Datshkovsky, 212 Suffolk, C. S. ·A. C. MaGee, J01._Suffolk, ·c; S. · Miss Caroline Mitchell ·, 216 Suff olk, c. s. Floyd Manning, 107 Suffolk, C. S. Frank S. Davis, 306 Suffolk, C. s~ John ·Holcomb, J11 ,.Suffolk, C. S. Gerald Collins, 310 Suffolk. C. S. Gloria Lefner, J05 Dexter, C. S. John B. Smith, 121 Gnarled Hollow, Setauket, N. Y. Joseph McGraw, 211 Suffolk, C. S. Bardin Nelson, P.O. Box 1465, C.-S. J. Gordon Gay, 201 Suffolk, C. S. P ... J. Mims, 501 S. Dexter, C. S. Timothy Keneipp, 20J Suffolk, C. S. Wm. Loveless, 215 Suffolk, C. S. v Carl E. Shafer, 207 Suffolk, C. S. .'\. ·. . ... ....-\ /~-. 11733 · ... . . ' ·_,. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. ---- Present zoning of land in question R-1 _ ___.:;-'-------------------~-~ Section of ordinance from which variance is sought 6-G. 2. Rear Yard Reg' d. The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested : (See attached plat.) The _proposed new garage is located 25' -0" f rom t_he rear ;property line of the lot own ed by Miss Caroli n e Mit c hell . ·rr t h e c enter.line of the alley is used as the com...rnon boundry the variance requested is approximately 7'-6". This variance is necessary due to the following unique and special conditions of · the "laIJ.d not ·. f .ound in .. lik~ distric.ts : · · - • I ·Existing drive and cu~b c 0 ut ·remain from original structure . · Exi si:·i ng landscaping, trees and shrubs are situated for old dri yeway. condi ti an . . Strict· enforcem~nt · of .. the -~oning . ordinance. ~ould . result in an unnecessary hardship for the owner. The following alternatives to t he requested variance are .possible:---'---'--'~~~-._.....,_ -.. · · .... This variance will not be contrary to the public interest b y virtue o f the following · :f'~ct~: (1) An existing alley of 15' -3" wide insures access to th:e structures in the immediate area. ( 2) The new garage wi 11 he· So' -·0" from the existing garage located on Miss Caroline Mitchell's property, The facts stated by me in this application are true and correct. \ Date -•. / AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 AGENDA Zoning Board of Ad jus tmen t s September 10 , 1979 1. Consideration of a request for the expansion of a non - conforming structure in the name of Mi nni e Sm ith Todd , 609 Maryem. 2. Consideration of a request for a variance in the name of C. E. Olsen, 409 Dexter. 3 . Retbnside~ation of a request for the expan s ion of a non ~ confonning use in the name of Lar ry Hickm an, 300 West Dexter. 4. Consideration of a request for a variance in the name of John Paul Jones, 405 University Drive. • City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUB COLLEG E STA TION. TEXAS 77840 September 6, 1979 MEMORANDUM: TO: Zoning Board of Adju stme nts . FROM : Jim Callaway, Zoning Of f icial SUBJECT: Agenda Items, Septembe r 10 , 1979. Due to the early date of this meet ing~ the minutes of the last Board of Adjustments meeting were not available in time for inclusion in this packet. These minutes will be presented for consideration at the next meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO. l -The Todd s cannot be issued a building permit for the addition of a bathroom to their home because of a garage, attached to their house, which does not meet the .required s.etbacks .. The main structure (house)' does meet all · requiremerits of Section ll-B~3.C. of the Zoning Ordfoance and I recommend approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 -Mr. Olsen has modified his request for a· variance so that he will in effect have a 25-foot rear setback to the adjacent lot (as separated by a 13-foot alley)'. This request appears much more reasonable than the earlier appli - . cation, and shows a vi'able alternati've tO that application. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 -This item wa s placed in the agenda fo r reconsideration as approved by the board. Information from the original hearing is included in this packet. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 -Mr. Jones, who failed to receive a variance from the off-street parking requ irements for a restaurant has submitted a request for a variance from Section 7-B.2., which requires off-premises parking lots to be within 200 feet of a new use. I am not sure of the status of Mr. Jones' efforts to aquire a parking lot. I am sure he will present additional information at the meetinq. AGENDA ITEM NO. l ·z oN I NG BO ARD OF ADJUST MENT FILE NO . Name of Applicant Mailing Address >': 6o9 ---HA~~ co-~ Sta. t:t cilii -~-_.: ;.; . . .. . P~o2~-· -·-69~~~~~::~: . • : .~,:i.~:. ;.-: • • .-• • ~~:~·:-:. . . . .i ·.·._·,e· --:--~-':_·_-~---.:~_E __ ._::·-:~::·.~,---·_n:._·_. ·_-.. _,·.·_·:·_;.J __ :~:·· ___ :_._._:-:····---.• ----~-.-_ .. ~,=:_._-.·:·-'.·_;::: __ .:-·:~_-_-~_--_-•--.-_,_-_-_-_-_-_--:._:..: .. _·-~----_-_-_·.~~-~-·~:_:_~~----~-·::_::·:-~_: __ .:~_._·_.-_._~_--~----_-:·_-,:=·-•_,_._,,~_:_::_'.~-' .. ::--.~._-_,:~~_ •. -.:_-~•:·--_·.-_~.,·:···.-_~:_· __ --:·_~:_;~-----~--~_-:· __ --~~::_~~·-·: .. _~----~··,·--_-·.:·_·_~.-.~_-_·.~:·.~_-=~_-_; ___ ·::_-.-~:· -::_~-:_:_-_:,._,~· __ :_~.~:-~:_.:_ __ :;_-_·_:_._,_,:._._:_·,:,·.:_-_ .. :-:-'.~_ .. :._~---_:,_ .• _'_-_-_:_-=·.: __ •:: __ : __ ---~.-,:.:~---~_-.. ::·""_ .. -_-'"· .• ~--.'_-.·-:··~--~---·~::··;·,.·_:_~.::--~---__ :_,_.:·.~_:'._-_:: ... ~·~·::,._. __ ,-_;_._'_:: __ : __ :·----_:·::·_.:..~:·.:_.:·-··· __ · . ···• Lo ~f ~~~~/~~NJf -~ t.::;~;;i~~~~;~:: .· < :ubJ~f. t~~ " -~ •= . . . ·. ~ ~:~ .. · : )~ .~:::: : : . : -~ -Description» __ I f a pp licab ie. ., .. _;, .. ,,:,.-·> ·:···-··. _:'~ ·-: :: :p ··_·:··' "~.:---:'·•"_.-. ._ ... :·: ·:~.-:;''.<'" ..... :· .· . ~, \--•.. . . .·." ~-., . . . .· • ., .•. "·"_.,(::;;.:·;;i=·,"':_, . Adcttt!OilL art' ·a: m ·x:r.4 . :aa:tbmciac -:..,.;·";'.';.;--:c, :.< ·,·. :·, .... ::_":'''::.~~~~""":;t;"':<::.;~~~~:":1;:~~~{:\':):_~;·:_:{: ts-' 'Ji.a . . -. .-: ... ·.-. Action ..... · ... ·-~ _;: ......... ~ ~ .. --~ . _. ·' · · ...... / .. -:.: ...:. _::, f ~.~-:. :. ; ~-. -~. ::;; (' ~i··:_>· ; .. request_ed: .··· ': .:: .-~::~~-:-!~:;f~;:-:_: _·,, --~,-~:_'.~:: . · .. -~· . '.:-:-.... ·(:From current tax rolls, .... ~ .... ·:- .; .. .•. • ... · : •. --~ . . .· ., . . ... ·-.:.::·".· .. . ·----~ ·::::-.. -. . ''--•· - ~ .:~_:;·.::.:.:~J.:-- : :._ .. _.·,,: .. --:· "·'!''· ._,· .. ... . . -~. . :.·.-.... ,.-~;_ .... _.:.;_ ..... _'_, · : :_·:~:: ."·.--·:; ~-~ ;-,~: ;_:~;:;~:·.?~X:9~ ::\;;:'.1~{;{!i i:: ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. Present zoning of land in q ues ti on ·_\~\~-~'---~"""><-'--· '-,_J__.,' _\_-s __ · __ "b....;\,_. -'-~"""'"'...-."--'--'--• -'\_0_....,.... ____ ~--- ' Section of · ordinance from which variance is sought ,. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .· .·· . . ~ · .. ·--· ... · ... specific._variati£>n .from . . . -~·~· --. . . -·· ... the ordinance is requested: ., ..... -:i"j_· .. ·:·::~;;7J!~~~~~~~~~~~1f.t-~:~~~~~~;F1: . ··-· .·.. ··.:o_;x~·.·:: :'.,. ->~r ~.:~:r; .. · ·'·-.:·~:::·~.:>c·:'·,~ ;·-: -~i-~::~~ ~~~~~.:.~_:.~= .. ~---~-~--.;,·,:.~~:.~ .... ,.·.~.!-·._: ·.~·:·~-----~~~-~.~-~:-.:.!_~_=.·_~.:.··;·~--~~-:_.~.--:.;_~,;_._.:;·'.,:.~.~-~--.:·~:1·:· .. :.·_.'._·;_::~·._:_i:~_~.~.:.:_~--.'·.~,_:~.--:.:·;·'._-.. ; __ ~_·.~.~.-.:.~ . : .. e.:~:~~~:~~~q~~!#}~·~·:·rti~1~~~~t8%~m:.~f~fff~~;~tf;}~-!~'.rL·_·::·,:.-.~-.;\-3fr~t;:;.}=·;~~:{~~:{§1;~:~t-~7-· ·· -_,. -~:-: -· _: ~ _-_ .. ~'.,::. •. :,.·{~~,;~.--: -~ . _·; ;~;;;·'~\~~:;-~;:".':·~,_~~,,.:1 •;{:~·--~~:;~~!-/~"·;-~.,.. ,;. , . ".. . .;~~:~/!::~·~:.<;-:_~, .. -.:.:~;·<1~~/-'~ ·: . -.--.'~~4.=~.,,;,, .: ..... ·-~--.--=r~§t =::":'· · This variance is ·necessary .due to ·the following ·unique and special con~tions of .·.:·.::<;_:::· the_3-::'1_nd ·_no.t fo~d;-.~~-~~~e_·.:_dis_~~~-ts: .. '·:::~;.:/·~·.-{.~ (.~~--~~::;~bJ}~.:_,> ~ . .-.. • •,, .... ·,. • ,'' , .<.•" •."· ,.···;;'·""•'. * • . I .,, ., _,.· • . : : . .. .. ~ ··--.· :·-. · .. :· ·_ .. -:_. ::·:: ... : .. ~--,' ~-_' .;._.='._:_; ::·.·. ·~:> .·. - The. ·following · alternativ~s :to ~·the..requested '>T:~'.-· :.--::· -. -~~J;.t;_Y::~~!~f~~-~-<~=::\.:·:!,~::·,~;?~~- ···'·• ~ ... : ·'7"-:-"'"":: -.. -!_-'· ...•• ···-.· .:· .... ·. ·-.,·, :-:~·-· :#_;-.-· ....... variance are pos$ible: . . . ~-· .. · -:\_··--~~:-..... · . · ... :.-. ·. · .... :. ... :h .~~--. .. -\-..... : -: ·,_ - ~--·· ... ... - .· .... / ...... :~-: :·-.:.::_· _____________ ,.· ._.-... -~~~5':~--~-·.· .. '\·" The . f;~,~'~·'.'.~t~t~~;~i~t-~~·;rr~ '~~~/~~J{i~~-~~~n-~~f·'~~-~~-~-:~~d ·-~~~~~6~:~=;.:. · .,: ~?.\~!t.~'~' ····;~\:'..~,~>tff;Y . . ·. . >:~~~~~i;;;;~" . -c;~~::!iP:!}"': · -:~:~t"~'i:--'f"Lt-/iit."29 -/~tfhl'~/ icant: ,:: -Date . · · r r-< o /I/ / ' h~-----JS"",5 ---- ' ~ll.2.~ _-.r Po8 cl._ ·~ :!- ~ --I . , I --I I./..~~--..; . , I l./- f -·$5-~ Gr../ , iv fJ / # e S M, · 11t Es f. CM,' ,vf'/,'e 5 N ,· f A /o d J) 1 . ~---'--j_S"" -- _:}£__ Jl? '--t ) ' ., - - - ----~7 - r I I i--r ~. I ti ~ 3'f-8 -~ ' '13 1~e e t...Wlf/ -f r l l'~ . -· I j \. l LI I . -.. -.. , __ _. -- AGENDA ITEM NO , 2 ZO NING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. ---- Mailing Address P.O. Box 5. Clifton, Texas 76634 Phone "( 817) 675-8644 • . . Location:! of Lot 11&12 .. .......... . Block 21 Subdivi sio n Co l l e ge P ark Desc.ription~ If applicable Mr. Olsen's property consists of the So..;;.u;....;t:..;..h;;;.._ __ _ half of Lot 11, Block 21 and the North half of Lot 12, Block 21 . .. . . -.. Action .requested: A . variance in the rear setba·ck ·1.ine . required by ord.inance. NAME ADDREss · (From current tax rolls, College S.tation Tax Ass~ss~r). --·· · .. . . Ge?rge B. Hensarlinf,· 505 Dexter St. C.S. Alice S. Garner, 40 -Dexter, C.S. . John G. Otts, P.O. Box 1122, C. S. Ohannes Ekndyan, 202" Suffock, C. S. Michael Hoelscher, 204 Suffock, C. S. Phillip B. Goode~ Drawer DT, C. S. Sandra Datshkovsky, 212 Suffolk, C. S. A. C. M~Gee, 301· Suffolk, c: S. · Miss Caroline lVIitchell, 216 Suffolk, C. S. Floyd Manning, 107 Suffolk, C. S. Frank S. Davis, 306 Suffolk, C. s~ John Holcomb, 311,.Suffolk, C. S. Gerald Collins. 310 Suffolk. C. S. Gloria Lefner, 305 Dexter, C. S. -.. .. John B. Smith, 121 Gnarled Hollow, Setauket, N. Y. Joseph McGraw, 211 Suffolk, C. S. Bardin Nelson, P.O. Box 1465, c .. s. J. Gordon Gay, 201 Suffolk, C. S. P .. J. Mims, 501 S. Dexter, C. S. Timothy Keneipp, 203 Suffolk, C. S. Wm. Loveless, 215 Suffolk, C. S. v Carl E. Shafer, 207 Suffolk, C. S. . .... . .. 11733 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. ---- Present zoning of land in question R-1 ----'--'--------------------~~-~ Section of ordinance from which variance is sought 6-G. 2. Rear Yard Reg' d. The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested: (See attached plat.) The _proposed new garage is located 25'-0" from t .he rear property lin e of the lot owned by Mi s s Caroline Mi tcheil. ·I f th€ ·ce nter· 1; ne . . . . . . of the-.alley is used as the common boundr y the vari ance requested is approximately 7'-6". ,-., This variance is necessary due to the following unique and special conditi ons of the "lal].d not:· f .ound ·in °Iik~ districts: · . . .• ··. . . · Existing drive and · cu~b c~t ·remain from o riginal structure. Ex j sting . · . : landscaping, trees and shrubs are situated for old driveway condition . . Strict· enforcem~nt·· of . ·the · .zoning ordinance. ~ould . result . in an . unnecessary hardship for the owner. The followi ng alternatives to .the requested variance are .possible:---'-"-'~~-----,- . ' . This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by v i rtue of t he followi ng f~ct~: (1) An existing alley of 15'-3" wide insures access to ttre structures in the immediate area. (2) The new garage will h~ 5o·-·o" from the existing garage located on Miss Caroline Mitchell 's property. The facts stated by me in this application are true and correct. \ Date / AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 • To: The members of the Zoning Board of Adjustment College Station, Texas This is a request for approval of certain changes to the structure at 300 West Dexter, Block 8A, Lot S, College Park subdivision, City of College Station . This is not a request for a variance , but is rather a request for approval of changes in a "non-conforming" structure. ( The changes may be summarized as follows: · 1. The addition of an exterior deck to the se'cond level of · the structure as shown in the accompanying drawing · 2. The addition of approximately 200 square feet of windows to ventilate the attic, insula t ion of the attic,and flooring so as to allow storage there 3. The addition of a 30 square foot balcony at the attic level (also shown in drawing) My reasons for these changes may be summarized as follows: 1. · The . i::ieck outside the second lev el will improve the energy efficiency of the entire hous e. It will provide shade for the first level and it will provide a cool and private outside space for the second level. Air conditioning needs should thereby be substantially reduced for the entire building. 2. The changes in the attic will insulate and ventilate a space that was previously ~ntirely unventilated. The hip-roof design of this building, together with its minimal .. overhang make soffit vents impossibl e • In the suurrner air will circulate freely through the open windows and insulation will , minimize radiant heat from the sun through the roof. In the winter the closed windows will collect the heat of the sun and the insulation will retard its dissipation . The result will be lower heating and cooling costs for the entire structure~ A byproduct of this improvement will be attic storage space. 3. The captured solar energy in winter should enable the growth of plants during those months during wh i ch it would be too cold for them to ·grow outside. In this connection L .included in my plan a small a small balcony outside one of the windows where plants can be aired on those winter days when weather permits~ In accordance with City Ordinance Jlumber 850> these changes do not ·increase the area of the building devoted to a non-conforming use> nor do they prevent a return of such property to conforming use (~ection 11-B-3-b). These changes do not prolong the life of ~h ~ nonconforming use. Moreover> ·they may be construed as less detrimental to the environme~t than the original use (section 11-B-3-c) in that the entire structure becomes more energy efficient upon their completion • 7~ d~;..~ Larry A. Hickman 300 West. Dexter College Station> Texas 77840 . (713) 696 ,6257 .. .. :( .. . ~ I •• ••!• i \ '\ I ,,,_ ··-·\ ... I . . . I . \ "--· '-·-·- ttm t>I D /?J. lfJ? '?'HY ., , (,(o,,.,./(f+n " -. ·u0 .. •/;"--11 , ... • • : -" • ' • • . • I L '~ :(. ·'.·--··-:---·!----:--~·-~-· .-!--·--o ···~t-~· \;-~I I . t I ''---'. __ ... ,,_,, .. C' i '" . ;t t ; . ...) .,. ... . ,.... : ! .•.. ~ • . .. . L.' ~ •. ;, ' ,\ '.·. :s 3d~i 1· ' : . ; {." • ! "'i ''-1 '3~~~ .. f "\ \ ". ----.. ' '-. . -! " ... . • . ·i · -... 1 ... I. ,_... . '. , I ·-·i .. . .... L ..... _ .. ·1 --_ .. i :·--·; \" J ·-·• "-·--. -··• •·•·-••• .. •••-••• \ 1 "\I i i ; ·····. \) ~ ~-·<I : . ..,. .. ·-··• :·-·~,..:'.._:::::::.:;_-'\.., • , . .>.<(~:~ 1 -' .. I \ 11 • " 1 I -. -. ',.1 i . . , . . I \.~ .. ~\;.~ .. i: _: I j ! I ' ~ • • ... • ; : . ' ... ~ ~ ~ ..... :. . '" -----· ~ .... . ·-··--·--··· ... ~ ------.. ·-··· ' __.. -._.._, __ _.,, ·I -~jl,_ - \ ~m t _,_ • AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 City of College Station POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 Se ptember 6, 1979 ME MORA NDUM: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Zoning Board of Adjustments Jim Callaway, Zoning Official Agenda Items, September 10, 1979. Due to the early date of this meeting, the minutes of the last Board of Adjustments meeting were not available in time for inclusion in this packet. These minutes will be presented for consideration at the next meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 -The Todds cannot be issued a buildin g permit for the addition of a bathroom to their home because of a garage, attached to their house, which does not meet the required setbacks. The main structure (house) does meet all requirements of Section 11-B.3.C. of the Zonin g Ordinance and I recommend approval. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 -Mr. Olsen has modified his request for a variance so that he will in effect have a 25-foot rear setback to the adjacent lot (as separated by a 13-foot alley). This request appears much more reasonable than the earlier appli- cation, and shows a viable alternative to that application. AGENDA ITE M NO. 3 -This item was placed in the agenda for reconsideration as approved by the board. Information from the original hearing is included in this packet. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 -Mr. Jones, who failed to receive a variance from the off-street parking requirements for a restaurant has submitted a request for a variance from Section 7-B .2., which requires off-premises parking lots to be within 200 feet of a new use. I am not sure of the status of Mr . Jones' efforts to aquire a parkin g lot. I am sure he will present additional information at the meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO. l ·zoN ING BO ARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name of Applicant Mailing Address ;· .) ,·-~ ·::.· .. Phone·'· / -.....,..--------------,.------·· •' .• ._ •.. ;. ·<i:;: ·. · ·.: L:;;~i~~ ~~~1:~~~{~:~·'.i.8=:I.';ci:f(~~~f :·}}/<~~~: -su~ai~~:~i~d .. . :::C· : ;:~!!;~~:~~--' ·:., .. ; : :·j ;:;;;'i:_J·'(::~~3.) .. ·-~--... ;. _--·~ti~f!\>;\: .... Description-> If applicable · _,. ·' ·' ... • . . -::. .. -:· ..c . ... -·-,; . : .. ·. -·. :~-(· . . ··: · Aa.ai:tioa. o:rt· a:.-so ·n.i..: aa~" . ~-{,.,-.,' ·-,~ -. ...:-: .·-·: !: . ..:. .~ : i-'ti~ ; .. : ~-·-; .... -· . . :·-i .:·· Action request~d: ,·· .. . '._} .. .I : "\: . :.:::.{·/~( .. ·-::--·~: -:,-...... ·· ! •· !_, :. : : -. -i ·~ NAME · !.:> .. :·.>. ~-;·· .,: ?· <"' : .... : . FILE: NO. . ,, ,.._ .~. . ) .-·,.:·.-... · .. ~ -· -.~:~rif~·~~;.~ · · > . - ~Bs~~~/?:J~f ~f~r~~!.:_r ___ ,,~_r_·_,_-_:_~~--I_:_--_:_-_~.•.:_•.~.:-~-~.r..•.; ..,.. ·. ;.."-;_:.:-:;.~:~.._-:~~~:·-.: -·. ·_ ~ ... .. • '· t ? .. ·-:::·· .. -.-.~~--:~/~ . ..... '·..:., ·, :·_; .. ; . ADDRESS - -···-----·-. (:From current tax rolls, College Station Tax As~esso_r) :'~; . ·:~~:\·-: -: ·-~ --·----· .-.· ",·.-·· ·."-::·~- . -· ) '•• .. ~ . ....... . . .-.. ~ .. . '.: ~:=:~· ~ .. ·.~. ·--~:~ ... .• ........ . . ---.;.·: .~ .... : ::.: .. ·.~ -:· ·f: ~ :~~·;·;:· ;;.": :·:: "· -'lo :·. -·;. ·.!l ... ,.., '.· _,· .. ~ .. ··.-.:.::<··· -.' "> ... / ::-....... ;: . .... ::: . .:....;.:_·-.. ~.-· ZO NING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. Present zoning of land in question -·~""-'~-__.l __ ~-£=--'--"-,v~'.,_..:.\~~..__~-~~1 •. _~~~~~~·~\..:....:v::...--~~~~~~~~ \ Section of · ordinance . from which variance is sought \. -..-~-------~~~~~-~----~ The · .following specific'_,yari<:~ioO.: from the ordinanc e is requested : -.· , ...... <: . r J .<:_.\--C.t V C> ...____,,.._,~......,~'-""'"--....... ..__-,. _ _. ............ _ __. ...... -"''-'------=.....,"'-'--'-"""-...J-.-;..>._;.,. _ ___,,,___,,,._,._..._:...:...-=~--..l..-=::....::--::0.----__;-. ;, .,_., :·:::~~~i?~~~,j~~~?~~~t~~~~~'f~·:~:" . .. '· ·".!··: . :::.:··.· .... ·. :'. ~-.::;;: •·. ···:·.-~;>--:L)> : .•. ' •· '~?:Jf~~~~~~~-~~t~itH<'.~;~;~:.~,:;:r,'JKi~f<t•,;?r}·f.~%sJiC:J:~~i~l;t -· .:. ,:. ·::~~fy:~~~~;~:::,·:·::~;·~:~-If~~~~~t~~;,~?/!~?+~:;~F~f~~:.~~:~, ... (· .... ;~-~t-;t~{;~f/~::~:~:.~~?:~/:\ff?. ·~~~~~·->·::·:·~·-<,:.~r;-~~~~t,~-:,·:_:· . ~:::--·.;.~ !-:.;;;~ .~ .. ·.1 · .. ~ j~ · ·,~~~·,~::~-~:; . .,.;:.~~~ .~~:_..,~;::.:· ~·~.~~:::~~;t ~~; .~ ·.:._~-: ~ -i~~'.~.~:i~:~~~-?·:~ ;.~.> .. ~ ~-::.;·-~~::.~~;-!-·Y · ·. ·--~~_.:;;..._ :: .. • · · · 1 -··-•• : ;_:-:~:· ..... /~4 !:: . ~ This variance is ·~~ce~sary du~·-'t~ :the f ollowing unique and special c onditions of the land ·no t founcl.'in ·like··distrlcts: ·: ,_:, ..... : :'. · :'..~ .>,: ... >·c.: .:.:·~ -. . _ ~'·:· · . _ ::·_,:-:~~:_::::/N~,;~~.0 _c .. .. -j;%EJ ~:~. · ~v , '·t:i~'L tZ f e_-. 4_;,;;_/':" · · . :'~}'}.\:.}~<.;·' ;·' ·:.~.·~;<·'.:y~,:.,. >' .. ·c. ·-~ >:~·::."_·'· _ .• :: -·.,··.~.!:- ';;c~/VC:'"fe.{i!_j:(J '~E ''·:f!f e ··/Uo/t/C o~:..;··~ -·L'4 ~-.... ·. The .following ._ ,. .... .-.. :~.:..· :;(· : ~lternatives ·to i the"..requested . i ... . -~·-. _., :..·.: .. ·:: ... /:· ~-.--~<_: ;._.: . iddY:.~: ·::~,,~~·;: .. , ,'. -, . ":~--- . -' . -· ...... -.· ... ·-.:·: .-:~~; .. ; .. ~ ·: .. ~~) ·)~:~: ... :·:".~ i ... : -:;« .. -.. '· -: .. ·.·:-.": ,. __ .. variance are _pos$ible: ... ..... ~i.-.-·. .\· .. · .. .. ·-- "'.!'• .. · ---- . ,..!~{;· ... ·~""" . . ' -:···· ----.-.. -._-,-~-.--._-.. -.:,.-_-_-,-.---.-.. -.:-;_-.. ;_-... --=-:.~-.. --.:~-:~ .. -.-. .,.-.:-.·--~---~-~,j-.. :--_.: .. -:;---.-_::-_,-,-\-.,-------------.--_,,-._-.. ----.-.---.-.. -,-..... -;-~.--.;;.-.-.-,--_-_-.-.-.. -.-.• -.~---~·-.. -::.--·-.-.-.-_--_-_-.,-,,---_.;~;~.-: -·· ·t!";:~~~~t:;(;./~:·.: .. ~_-'. ... ·· -·' : :-.-:·.· . -. .. . .. -~~ ."/F ·. ~;::--;:· ... · .. ~·:3_:;~;-~t;-~~::~:~~-:}:_-~:: -~· .. ~\:;,;.~~· -~ {i~~..i.:i; .. · ~ ;,,~· ..... : .. ~~:'-·;;.~.~--~i-::•:.:~:.:~1 :·t.~~~~--~'·o/o/~.kt~T!:{,'f:~~1M'~~~•~~~•i~~.~ .. ~~~-~-;_r.:.~.J~_'~-~.:: 1 ';~.· ,,-.,.. ••·!!.' •• ,,~. ,_._:~:-;'.·!' .~ .. ,.~·_...;,.:O -:",•_,.,,;_.,; .• •_ .... A ·.·'• •. ·-· ::.~.:;,~.'.-• ••. !· .. ·.' .• ·< ... :.·;_1·~·.'-.',·:f...=>.,: ... :,· .. , •. -.:".•. .·.:,·,-',t ... --.,_·... 1 • ·.~ .' •"".'"~ .. : .. ' ; ..... · ·. • • • ",.·,;· .. :;.i•:.::-_:,•."' .... ~:_ ... ~-:-.. .. :;·~~\" • .":":-.~:.;:."~ ·.-. • • --~ _ . .-··-.:~·~ --T , ' • ...--• - · This''va.:ciance wilr·.not:;:·be· ·contrarY.;-to the-publi c ..: interest. by virtue. of the following .:_:.;\..:; .::··~~fti~;;~@~~~'.c"~~~~L~;,~~:=~~~~~~;:1 . -~-' .·. ' - : -:·-. \\ ..... :'. _:.:~~·:::~:¥.fi.t::f~:;~:·}f.<·!~ .• -: .. :/ .... t::·.:~:-???~~-;-.-~·:.~~-;:::.:~·:~ The facts .stated.by me in this application . . . . .. , ·. :L~i~;,~~;1t~~~~;+:.~.'·, . , .~(-~ .. · . :_·--··· ·i·;;=-.:..·· ., . ~~~·: ... _ .~ : ·'":'. · .... • J ·' ·~+: .:· :-. .. .... ~ ... are true and correct:. !"'·-. ·. -·-....... .. .·· -~ '·. <:::.-::,!? ~"~-. ·1· ./r::"°'i:t').'7-<T .. ·· >~_i,:.:i.~?:C.;·.~.·-.:: .... _ .. :~---· 7_ ~ ~7_ . Date v I ' ' ~ I ·r I ' I r. I I -/4-.~ .. ~~- .. r '\:J \ri f ....... Ir+-I :-8 -~ ~ Fr< o fi/ i 4t.~' , ---1 J S',5 - I ~ll.2 l..S-..... ~I 7 r _T Pot~ci._ ·'-.Q I !? ~ * ~ --., -------h=--7 --? I I '\---r $:' I I/ ~ 3Cf-8 -~ ., G ~ ' ~ ~ r - u r 'VI I t ' l3 t(. e e. z.. IA/ 11-/ L !) t ; 7 r .t;L-r--11 84-/ 1 ~ol ?/7/?lr ."J/,'l'r',,,/"/ ~v fJ /A/ e .S 1t1 , 'f It Es f. 07 ,' /'/fo/1°e S 1'11' f-A /o cl J) ,,,- ' 20.s 1 I *""" J2..lf $c I °' ¥,3"" tt::: ~ ~ (!) , AGENDA ITEM NO ~ 2 ZO NING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. Mailing Address P. 0. Box 5, Clifton, Texas 7663~, Phone ( 817) 675-8644 Location:! of Lot 11&12 • Block 21 Subdivision College Park Description~ If applicable Mr. Olsen's property cons i sts of the South half of Lot 11, Block 21 and the North half of Lot 12, Block 21 . . - Action .requested: A. variance in . the rear setback i.J..ne . required by ord_inance. NAME ADDRESS . .. --··. (From current tax rolls, College Station Tax Assessor) Ge9rge B. Hensarlinf, 505 Dexter St. C.S. Alice S. Garner, 40 -Dexter, C.S. . . John G. Otts, P.O. Box 1122, C. S. Ohannes Ekndyan, 202 Suffock, C. S. Michael Hoelscher, 204 Suffock, C. S. Phillip B. Goode, Drawer DT, C. S. Sandra Datshkovsky, 212 Suffolk, C. S. A. C. M~Gee, J01 Suffolk, d~ S. Miss Caroline ~itchell, 216 Suffolk, C. S. . .. Floyd Manning, 107 Suffolk, C. S. Frank S. Davis, 306 Suffolk, C. S. --~-\ _.....;....-- John Holcomb, 311 ,Suffolk, C. S. Gerald Collins, 310 Suffolk. C. S. Gloria Lefner, 305 De xter , C. S. John B. Smith, 121 Gnarled Hollow, Setauket, N. Y. Joseph McGraw, 211 Suffolk, C. S. Bardin Nelson, P.O. Box 1465, C. S. J. Gordon Gay, 201 Suffolk, C. S. P. _J. Mims, 501 S. De xter , C. S. Timothy Keneipp, 203 Suffolk, C. S. Wm. Loveless, 215 Suffolk, C. S. v Carl E. Shafer, 207 Suffolk, C. S. 11733 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. ---- Present zoning of land in question R-1 ~--------------------~--- Section of ordinance from which variance is sought 6-G . 2. Rear Yard Reg' d. The following specific variation from the ordinance is requested: .(See attached plat. ) The _proposed new garage is located 25 '-0" from the rear property line of the lot owned by Miss Caroline Mitche ll.. ·If the center · 1 ; n e of the alley is used as the corrnnon boundry the variance requested is approximately 7'-6". This variance is necessary due to the following unique and special conditions of the land not:·.f.ound in like districts: Existing drive and cu~b c~t ·remain from original structure. Existing landscaping, trees and shrubs are situated for old driveway condition. . . . . . . . -. Strict. eniorcem.~nt of the zoning ordinance would result in an . unnecessary hardship for the owner. The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible: ~~~~~--.,__ . This variance will not be contrary to the public interest by virtue of the following f~ct~: (1) An existing alley of 15'-3" wide insures access ta the structures in the immediate area. ( 2) The new garage wj 11 he 50' -·0" from the existing garage located on Miss Caroline Mitchell's property. The facts stated by me in this application are true and correct. ~l Avq \ 9 "11 Date / AGENDA ITEf".1 NO. 3 To: The members of the Zoning Board of Adjustment College Station, Texas This is a request for approval of certain changes to the structure at 300 West Dexter, Block 8A, Lot 5, College Park subdivision, City of College Station . • This is not a request for a variance, but is rather a request for approval of changes in a "non-conforming" structure . The changes may be summarized as follows: 1. The additibil of an exterior de ck to the se·cond level of the structure as shown in the accompanying drawing 2. The addition of approximately 200 square feet of windows to ventilate the attic, insulat ion of the attic,and flooring so as to allow storage there 3. The addition of a 30 square foot balcony at the attic level (also shown in drawing) My reasons for these changes may be summarized as follows: 1. The d e ck outside the second l e v e l will improve the energy efficiency of the entire house . It will provide shade for the first level and it will provide a cool and private outside space for the second level. Air conditioning needs should thereby be substantial l y r educed for the entire building. 2. The changes in the attic will insulate and ventilate a space that was previously ~ntirely unventilated. The hip-roof design of this building, together with its minimal overhang make soffit vents impossible • In the summer air will circulate freely through the open windows and insulation will , minimize radiant heat from the sun through the roof. In the winter the closed windows will collect the heat of the sun and the insulation will retard its dissipation . The result will be lower heating and cooling costs for the entir e structure. A byproduct of this improvement will be attic storage space. 3. The captur ed solar energy in winter should enable the growth ·of plants dur ing those months during which i t would be too cold for them to grow outside. In this connection !._included in my plan a small a small balcony outside one of the window& where plants can be aired on thos~ winter days when wea ther permits. " In accordance with City Ordinance pumber 850, these changes do not ·iricrease the area of the building devoted to a non-conforming use, nor do they prevent a return of such property to conforming ., use (section 11-B-3-b). These changes do not prolong the life . ;/ of the nonconfoiming ·use. Moreover, they may be construed as less ·' detrimental to the environme~t than the original use (section 11-B-3-c) in that the entire structure becomes more energy efficient upon their completion. . . .. . 7:; d~n.:: Larry A. Hickman 300 West. Dexter College Station, Texas 77840 (713) 696 .6257 -:··. ·~'\ . ----.... --.~ -... ,. ..... _______ _,r .... 'f}~J..___.---~ I '! -..., I U' !.A . ,. v) . ""l /'t.. -.., •,y'/" 0 /' r I l..ul ru\o \A) · '·--.. -··-. ···- ....... ~_,Ca-II-~) ...,___...._ ~= ........ "':' ~ ·: "f "' ' ' '_: •=t .,_ _ _, ··-----··-·--r -. . :7:".:-7." -: .. . ' . ~ .. : .. ~ : i. ~ : ··-• . • I • I :~. : : '. : i i: : : -.... \, ' . . ...... 1 .. : ., .. ' I 1" : """ .,,.;! , .. ; .. ;, ~ ! . · . : ; ~ I ,. ti · ! .:t . WI 1'JCt.cJ .j . . . A~·ltc. ----!>. {i-: , . ,,. A-I-ft(. l.tl1""1o41 ~J -· -...... . -·-. ..._,,, ......... ·--._ ' . i ! .. . I ... \ •.. -----· l I \, -··-----· i i r {) t. /,1 /. .. ' .• AGENDA ITEM NO . 4 ·, ~ .. ·z o NI NG BOA RD OF AD JUSTMENT F ILE N O ~ ,"f •• Nam e of Ap plicant JOHN Paul .Jones Mailing Add r~ss .• :.-.. _ .. _. - Howard; Nanne Shelw. Br '~ ' ,. ZON ING BO ARD OF ADJ US TMENT F I LE NO . Present zoning of land i n question C-1 Gener.a l Co mm ercial · Section of ordinance-from wh i ch variance is .s ought 2 -B.2, Off •Premis e s • . ~ ' I ·, The following specific v aria tion from .t he o rdin a nc e i s r eques ted: requests that reguirements o f same . 'l•'r /'; 'I · i .... · ·'" , • I' •'I 1 ·1 200 feet) f or .·..-,'l ._· .... :s .. ;J ·:'1:' ·:.·' i ... :-1,.-:;~.: •""'- of f -premi se s ·· lo ca t ·1on s ' 'Yor··,brr-·c.tre et . -;; ·:·:·:.....be_:-'wai v ed ·.:"-: . . · · u'i"' :;,i ·'l: • -fi ~ '[-(~'w ·h r · i '•1 fr '('{~' .,,;i .;j \:Wt '{~~ ~:"' :f«i i .\i'C! ,:-. r1\'\ . .~· ,· ':'.;:,• ~;.~ -;_ ._: L ', ~_. i{,:, \... ~"'· ~ . ·· ......... /'t '"' .·""' '·. ,..,. "'..:· .) ~· ·"{_,'~I.: ..,~l • • { •... This . vat iance is · n ecessary:: due' t o ; the f o llo wi ng · unique a n d the 'land·: n o t ;f o und in>:like· ·di s·t~icts ':· ,.~:,;>,,~";-""' ~ . .._,·,·~~~ » . ~:·~- , '=> ·~ltf~;i~'.. ~-r: / ~.> '}•'.'.:~;;,·d~>: :<2: :.;1 ~': ~~'i':;;t::t,'5:;:L..15<~:-~-~:~:~~~~·, L~~::.~·2 f\~,~~:::·.,, It is .. not ·-pos s i ble f o r -tne·-appl i can t ·t o pr ovl de new ,;· ... ~-;; ~ ... :">.~ -. --: ,!'~ · .. :...~;..!.,.,.,-). .. space·_·a~ail~p:i ;':v·l~·i thin The following alt erha tives ··t~ the ._·requested ·v~ria,nce :·: are.· poss~ble :. · ·. ·> ,.·~!~-:~ ·l ·:\, ·t f .·· ., ~ ·-: -.~~-.-;"~~:~.:.~~~~~: .. /; \ /~.rr:·: 1~·.'--'. -. -; ~ .. ~ ._;,· .:,~ -·~-~~"~·:··,·.'.'._·-\~r;~\; .> ~ -i-'~,.,: ... _i{j~f. , . we Kn 'ow -or· no viable ·'alternatives due ·t o . the 1c'Onditi.ons , .. been '" ·1 ·1 •. . .. ~,. :}.!-:i;·'.• 1' ~ .. ,J. -~ .... 1. We will cater to dorm residents. This is walk in traffic. Our marketing efforts will be focused on these students. 2. Our peak hours of operation will differ from that of our most immediate neighbors; Bookstores, Shoe stores, Barbershops, Eng ineering Supplies, Dry cleaners, Photography studios, Camera store, Insurance agencey, and Jew elry store. 3. The parking problem is one that is inherent to the entire North- gate area. Our parking lot will help relieve both the day and and night congestion. · 4. We arff aiding in the organization o f a concer ted effort on the part of the Northgate mer~hants to raise funds for the place ment of a patrolman to monitor the one -h our parking spaces in'_ the Northgate area • . . ( '· MINUTES Zoning Board of Adjustment September 10, 1979 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Harper, Mathewson, Bailey, Jones Boughton, Burke MEMBERS ABSENT: Dubois STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Zoning Official Callaway, Building Official Koehler, Planning Assistant Longley, City Attorney Lewis Agenda Item #1 --Consideration of a request for the expansion of a non-conforming structure in the name of Minnie Smith Todd, 609 Maryem. Mr. Wayne Todd expressed his desire to expand the house to 609 Maryem. Zoning Official Callaway e x 9lained that a non-conforming structure existed on the lot at 609 Maryem but the principal structure and the proposed expansion met all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Mathewson stated that the Board had determined that a plat be sub- mitted locating all buildings on the site when non-conforming structure was involved. Callaway replied that it was his inter- pretation that this policy only involved situations where property line locations were questioned. Mathewson asked if any neighbors had made objections to the request. · Callaway replied that no objections had been received. Chairman Harper stated that the Board had not established any pOlicy which would require all drawings submitted to be prepared by a surveyor. Callaway replied that the board had requested the prep- aration of site plans by a surveyor in cases where the information submitted by a property owner was challenged by others. Chairman Harper moved that the expansion of a non-conforming structure of 609 Maryem be permitted as this would not increase the existing non-conforming or prevent the structure from returning to conformity. Mathewson seconded and the motion passed unanimously. . MINUTES September 10, 1979 Agenda Item #2 --Consideration of a request for a variance in .the name of C. E. Olsen, 409 Dexter. Mr. Jim Holster presented the request for a variance to the board on behalf of Mr. C. E. Olsen, Holster explained the modifications made to the orginal request for a variance so as to provide 25 foot setback from the adjacent lot owned by Ms. Caroline Mitchell and forwarded a letter from Ms. Mitchell to the board. 2 Chairman Harper read Ms. Mitchell's letter to the Board. In said letter, Ms. Mitchell expressed no objections to Mr. Olsen's request, provided thab approval of the request would in no way affect the use of her property. Harper stated that in his opinion the request before the board provided an acceptable setback at that location~ Mathewson inquired as to the reasons for the request. Holster related Mr. Olsents desires to provide a separation between the house and garage and to save existing trees. Mathewson stated that the site under consideration was larger than the minimum lot required and could be utilized in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance. Harper stated that the request was com- patible with the existing pattern of land use in that area. Mathewson restated that the site, being cleared, could comply with the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Tim Kenneip, a resident of the neighborhood, related the history of the neighborhood and stated that the requirements, of the Zoning Ordinance were more appropriate for new developments. Chairman Harper moved to approve the request for a variance in the name of C. E. Olsen, permitting a structure to be built wi.thin 17 feet 7 1/2 inches from the existing alley as this is not contrary to the public interest and due to the unique circumstance of existing rear garages in the neighborhood. Bailey seconded the motion, which was approved by unanimous vote. Burke recommended investigation into non-conforming uses in such areas and that the Planning and Zoning Commission investigate the possibility of addressing problems through ordina nce revision .. Aqenda Item #3 --Reconsideration of a request for the expansion of a non-conforming use in the name of Larry Hickman, 300 West Dexter. Chairman Harper gave background information concerning the past actions of the Board with regards to this request. John Hawtrey, attorney for Larry Hickman, presented excerpt, from Ordinance 850, the Zoning Ordinance for the City of College Station. Hawtrey related past events which led to Mr. Hickman's original request previously denied by the Board. MINUTES September 10, 1979 1. Mr. Hickman's structure is a non-conforming use; 2. A use permit authorizing said non-conforming use was granted upon adoption of Ordinance 850; 3. The Board does have the authority to revoke such a use permit, but that is not the question currently before the board; 4. The Zoning Ordinance regulates modifications of non-conforming uses under Sec. 4-C; and that Sec. 4 and Sec. 11 do not accurately correspond. 3 Hawtrey further stated that the Zoning Ordinance gave the Building Official some degree of responsibility in determining when building permits will be issued in conjunction with non-conforming uses, and whether such building permits would require action by th~ Board. Hawtrey concl11ded by stating that there was no necessity for referring Mr. Hickman's request .to the Board. City Attorney Lewis responded to Mr. Hawtrey's points stating that Hawtrey's arguments raised a legitimate question for the Board to address. Lewis further stated that the City was not attempting to discontinue Mr. Hickmants Use Permit but Mr. Hickman was attempting .. to amend his permit and that the language of Sec. 4-C, Ordinance 850 is broad enough to reconcile the instances where the language of the various sections were unclear. Mathewson stated that the Board had the authority to authorize the extension of a non-conforming use if the enlargement met the require- ments of Sec. 11 and that the issue in question should have come to the Board, that the question to be addressed is the necessity of the extension and whether or not it is incidental to the existing use of the briilding. · Hawtrey stated that Mr. Hickmants request did not constitute an enlargement, but was an add1tion and did not increase floor area. Mathewson disagreed with that definition with regards to the de;k addition. Chairman Harper stated that the Zoning Ordinance addressed the building area of the lot and defined a building. Hawtrey restated that Mr. Hickman's request was not an enlargement of a building devoted to a non-conforming use, and should not have been referred to the Board. Mathewson inquired as to how this case orginally came before the Board. Zoning Official Callaway related the events that led to the original request and added that he could not approve Dr. Hickman's Building Permit without approval of the Board, unless the Board found otherwise. MINUTES September 10, 1979 Chairman Harper invited comments from any interested parties. Mathewson suggested that the Board review the advice of both councils to determine whether or not the Board had authority in this matter and the Zoning Official and the Building Official acted properly in referring this matter to the Board, and that the definition of floor space should be determined. Mathewson moved that the Board find that the Zoning Official and Building Official acted properly in referring this matter to the Board under Sec. 4-C, Ordinance 850 and that the Board had the authority in the question of the deck and the granting of its building permit. The motion was seconded by Burke and passed unanimously. Harper moved that the Board find that the Board authority under Sec. 4-C and that the Zoning Official and the Building Official acted pro~erly in the attic. The motion was seconded by Jones and passed unanimously. Chairman Harper suggested that the Board reexamine the issue of request for an enlargement. Hawtrey requested that the Board issue a Use Permit for the enlargement of a building devoted to a non- conforming use, such extension being necessary and incidental · to such use of the building, does not increase the area of the building devoted to a non-conforming use by more than 25% and does not prolong 1 ·the life of the non-conforming use and does not prevent the return of such building to a conforming use. The request was broken into two parts: l~ The addition of insulation, flooring, and ventilation to the attic. 2. The addition of a deck and balcony. Jones inquired as to whether or not the Board should reconsider a request which had previously been denied. Hawtrey stated that the original request was an appeal to the decision to require a permit for the additions completed and that the appropriate action would be to now hear the request. Callaway suggested the the Board determine whether or not the Board desired to rehear the case. Mr. Hawtrey restated that an actual request for a Use Permit had not formally been made. Chairman Harper moved that the Board reconsider its previous decision to deny permission to enlarge a non-conforming use at 300 w. Dexter. The motion was seconded by Mathewson. Jones inquired as to whether or not the additions requested or the feelings of the neighborhood had changed since the first time this issue came before the Board. 4 MINUTES ~eotember 10, 1979 5 Jim Basset spoke in favor of the request. Hawtrey stated that much of the discussion at the previous con- sideration was not relevant to the question of the deck, attic flooring, and ventilation. Lambert Tll]ilkes stated that the work undertaken increased the floor space of the structure. Duanne Cofe stated that the structure had been extended, and that such extension undertaken without a Building Permit had been a practice at that location in tn.e past. He stated that his opposition to the proposal with regards to the attic modification would be withdrawn if Dr. Hickman removed certain structures from the site. Mrs. Lambert Wilkes stated that she represented others in the neighborhood in saying that the requested additions would not be an improvement in the neighborhood. Chairman Harper pointed out that liking or disliking the appearance of the structure was not an appropriate consideration for the Board. ·· ·chairman Har:oer called for the question and the motion before the Board passed by the following vote: For: Harper, Mathewson, Bailey, Burke, Boughton Opposed: Jones Chairman Harper stated that hi.s original opposition to the request was· due to his concern of a possible intent to use the attic for purposes of adding habitable space, but that this concern was probable inaccurate, but that he was still concerned about the bulk added by the decks·. Hatrey stated that the Board could place restric;::tions upon the,,.Use Permit granted for any extension~ Chairman Harper moved to approve the modifications to the attic, including the additions of approximately 200 square feet of windows and adding flooring under the following conditions; 1. Use of such space shall be used for plant growth and storage space. 2. No habitable rooms or structures shall be constructed. 3. The external greenhouse shall be removed in 180 days. Dr. Richman expressed that the attic was not for residential use. The motion was seconded by Bailey and passed by unanimously. MJNUTES S~ptember 10, 1979 6 Chairman Harper moved that a use permit for a 30 square foot balcony ·at the attic level for the sole purpose of providing an outdoors area for plants. Mathewson seconded the motion which failed by the following vote; For: Opposed: Abstaining: Mathewson Harper, Baily, Boughton, Jones Burke Chairman Harper moved to grant up to a 25% extension of the second floor with a deck on the basis that it is necessary and incedental to the use of the existing structure . . Several members of the audience questioned the necessity of the · second floor deck. Hawtrey replied stating that the second floor apartment was entitled to outdoor living space. Mrs. Lambert Wilkes restated that she spoke for several property owners in saying that the deck was-not an improvement to the neighborhood. Hawtrey inquired as to whether those in opposition were absentee owners or residents of the neighborhood. Mrs. Wilkes replied that she was a property owner, but that the Spriggs, Adams, and Vroomans, were residents. Mr Basset stated as a resi- dent:"that the improvements made to the structure were improvements to the neighborhood relative to past conditions at that site. ·Mathewson pointed out that the deck included 384 square feet while the second fioor included 1176, which would only allow an e x tension of 293.5 square feet, if the second floor were to be the basis for justification. Harper pointed out that ground area coverage should be use as justification. Chairman Harper amended · his motion to include "the deck as built". Mathewson seconded the motion which failed unanimously. Mathewson stated that he would have voted in support of a smaller deck. Chairman Harper concurred, as did Burke, Boughton, with Jones uncertain and Bailey reserving comments. Following questions from the audience Harper stated that the Board would not consider any proposals which did not represent a substantial change from the porposal previously denied. Agenda Item #4 --Consideration of a request for a variance in the name of .John Paul Jones, 405 University Drive. Mr. Tim Keneipp presented a history of the actions taken in pre- paring documentation for a Building Permit for the proposed Corner Pocket, University Drive. He further addressed the problems with meeting the parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance within the Northgate area, the need for a spirit of cooperation in addressing this problem, and efforts underway be Northgate Merchants to address this parking problem. Burke related recent problems she had experienced in attempting MlliUIBS September 10, 1979 7 in attempting to park in the Northgate area. Mr. John Paul Jones addressed the Board with regards to the need for a variance. He pointed out that the hours of operation of his proposed business differed from those of nearby businesses. That he has observed parking available in the vicinity of his site, and that the location and nature of his proposed business would not contribute to the Northgate parking congestion. Efforts .taken to address the parking problem were described as: 1. Efforts to obtain additional police personnel for patroling the Northgate area. 2. The formation of a legal entity to address the overall Northgate parking problem. . 3. Working with the City and other Northgate merchants to develop a parking area located behing Loupot's. 4. Leasing a lot for the operation of a parking lot. Bailey inqui~ed as to the distance from the lot behind Luopot's to the proposed Corner Pocket. Mr. Jones replied that this distance is approximately 350 feet, and that his request for a variance was for a variance from the requirements that such parking be within 200 feet and under the same ownership as the proposed place of business. Callaway related City Planner Mayo's corr@ents regarding his concern over whether or not customers of the Corner Pocket would utilize the parking lot proposed at Church and First Streets, but that any parking problems created by the Corner Pocket should be off- set by this lot. Chairman Harper and Mr. Tim Kenneip stated that this represented Mayo's opinion. Bailey disagreed, stating that granting such a variance would compound the existing parking problems. Mathewson desagreed with Bailey, stating that the parking problem was Northgates loss, that a large number of potential custo~ers were within walking distance, and that the change of use would not adversely affect the Northgate problem. Callaway restated the ordinance requirements and the need for a variance in order to grant a Building Permit. Mr. Jones stated that if a variance was necessary that an ordinance amendment might be in order. Jim Berry, President of the Northgate Merchants Association, con- curred with Mr. Jones remarks concerning efforts of the merchants to address parking problems, relating the history of these efforts and efforts taken to work with the City in addressing these problems. ( \ MINUTRS September lQ, 1979 8 Mr. Jones restated his request for a variance. The need for such variance, and his efforts to provide off-street parking. Chairman Harper moved that the variance be granted, with off-street parking to be provided in either or both of the proposed parking lots. The motion was seconded by Mathewson. Bailey inquired as to how many alternate Board members should vote on the motion before the Board. Chairman Harper appointed Boughton to vote on the motion. A representative of the A & M United Methodist Church spoke in opposition to the variance, stating th~t patrons of the Corner Pocket would utilize church parking facilities. Ms. Jones inquired as to whether or not the proposed business would operate on Sunday and what the hours of operation would be. Mr. Jones replied, stating that this would depend upon the economics of Sunday operations. The granting of the variance failed by the following vote: For: Apposed: Harper, Boughton, Mathewson Bailey, Jones Tim Kenniep expressed a need for a spirit of cooperation in address- --ing Northgate problems. Harper expressed a concern over denying the use of the land in question. Bailey stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council should address the Northgate problem. September 10, 1979 Zoning Board of Adjustments City of College Station College Station, Texas 77840 RE: Zoning variance for C.E. (Pat) Olsen Dear Members of the Board: I have received notice from you of a meeting considering a zoning variance request by Mr. C. E. (Pat) Olsen . Since I cannot be present at the meeting, I send this letter to express my feelings in the matter. I do not object to Mr. Olsen's building his garage 25'0" from my property line provided that by this variance from the building code no restrictions are placed on the use of my property by me or by some future owner of my property. I wish it clearly understood that my rights to build within the property line at the back of my property remain undisturbed. No future building plans of mine or of some future owner of my property must be required, as a result of the approval of Mr. Olsen's variance request, to provide the 50'0" separation between structures which is intended by the zoning ordinance. Very truly yours , c~ffu .11~ .. '