HomeMy WebLinkAbout56 Development Permit 402 Easterwood Well No 2DRAINAGE REPORT
FOR
EASTERWOOD WELL NO. 2
UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES COMPANY
John H. Jones, A-148
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
July 23, 1996
DEVELOPED BY:
Union Pacific Resources Company
c/o Duane Phillippi
7300 N. F.M. 2818, Suite 200
Bryan , TX 77803
( 409)778-4867
PREPARED BY:
Kling Engineering & Surveying
4103 Texas Avenue , Suite 212
Bryan, TX 77802
(409)846-6212
Drainage Report
for
Easterwood Well No. 2
Union Pacific Resources Company
John H. Jones Survey, A-148
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
July 23, 1996
GENERAL LOCATION & DESCRIPTION
The proposed drilling site for the Easterwood #2 is located approximately 700' east of the
State Highway 60 bridge at Turkey Creek Road (See Appendix 3: "Vicinity Map"). For impact
purposes this well is considered to be rural. Currently the site is vacant with field grasses, brush
and trees. Proposed improvements consist of constructing a 330' x 230' drilling pad and
constructing an access road from the highway 60 access road to the drilling pad. Two corrugated
metal pipes will be installed along the access road to facilitate drainage .
DRAINAGE BASINS & SUB-BASINS
The primary drainageway for this site is White Creek. Runoff proceeds to the creek from
two sub-basins. Sub-Basin 1 runoff flows overland and through highway 60 drainage structures
and into a tributary of White Creek and ultimately into White Creek. Sub-Basin 2 runoff flows
overland and into the Easterwood airport storm sewer system and ultimately into White Creek.
Neither the drilling pad nor the access road lies within the 100 year floodplain according to the
Flood Insurance Rate Map for Brazos County, Texas, and Incorporated Areas , Map No .
48041C0143 C, effective July 2, 1992 (See Appendix 2: "Flood Plain Map").
Two primary studies have been performed on White Creek and its tributaries. The first
is a study performed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in July, 1992, titled El.ood
Insurance Study -Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas. The purpose of this report was
to investigate the existence and severity of flood hazards for Brazos County and to aid in the
administration of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973 . The second study is the Stormwater Management Plan, Phase III, performed by Walton
and Associates -Consulting Engineers, Inc. contracted with the City of College Station in 1987.
The purpose of this study was to gain knowledge of the existing and future drainage conditions
in the City and to identify flood problems and flood prone areas.
Easterwood Well #2
Drainage Report Page 2
DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA/FACILITY DESIGN
A topographic plat was prepared using City of College Station 2' contour maps to show
existing conditions, proposed improvements, and to delineate the drainage areas. Under proposed
conditions, three drainage areas exist; DA-01, DA-02, and DA-03. Of these, DA-01 and DA-
02 are in Sub-Basin 1 and DA-03 is in Sub-Basin 2 with DA-01 draining to a 24" RCP under
the Easterwood· airport entrance/exit drive. Under proposed conditions, five drainage areas are
delineated due to the configuration of the access road and well pad; DA-Nla, DA-Nlb, DA-N2,
DA-N3, and DA-N4. Of these, DA-Nla through DA-N3 are in Sub-Basin 1 and DA-N4 is in
Sub-Basin 2. Additionally, DA-Nla and DA-Nlb drain to the 24" culvert. The capacity of this
culvert assuming a minimal slope of 0 . 8 % is 20 cfs, post developed flow to the culvert is < 6 cfs
for all storm events. The Rational Method was used to calculate the peak runoff using the 25 year
event as the design storm. The tables in Appendix 5 summarize the parameters used and the
results they produced (See Appendix 5). Two corrugated metal pipe culverts will be required
beneath the access road. It is recommended that a swale be graded around the pad to direct runoff
through Sub-Basin 1 and preclude runoff From Sub-Basin 2 (see Appendix 4). Culverts for
drainage areas DA-Nla and DA-N2 were designed using Manning's Equation (See Appendix 6).
Difference between pre and post developed flowrates for the two sub-basins is as follows:
Sub-Basin Q10pr/ QIOpost Q25pre/ Q25post Q100pr/Q100post
(cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
#1 20. 7/24.9 23. 7/28.6 28.0/33.8
#2 21.2/17.5 24.3/20.1 28.8/23.9
TOTAL 41.9/42.4 48.0/48. 7 56.8/57.7
Table 1
CONCLUSIONS
Easterwood Well #2 is considered to be a rural well, and the drainage analysis has been performed
accordingly. Two 18" corrugated metal pipes will be installed at proper locations along the proposed
access road to facilitate drainage. No adverse impact from the 25 year event is expected to adjoining or
downstream landowners or downstream drainage structures.
Easterwood Well #2
Drainage Report Page 3
APPENDICES
1) General Location Map -U.S. G. S. Quad
2) Flood Insurance Rate Map -FEMA
3) Vicinity Map
4) Topographic plat -Kling Engineering
5) H ydrologic -Rational Method
6) Hydraulic -Manning's Equation
kcs95-01 b : \cast#2 .rpt
0
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
s:::::J3::13====::i:======:c:===::::E:=====i============3:=====i
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
DOTTED LINES REPRESENT 5-FOOT CONTOURS
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
. ;
APPENDIX 5
HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS
RATIONAL METHOD
7/19/96 A&M EASTERWOOD WELL NO . 2
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS
PRE-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS:
LAND USE: VACANT
LAND COVER : FIELD GRASSES/BRUSH/WOODED/CONC. DRIVE
AREA: 14.316
SUB-BASINS: 3
AREA DESCRIPTION :
(acres)
DA-01 1.750 AVE. SLOPE OF 2.3% TO 24" R.C .P.@ INTERSECTION
DA-02 5.549 AVE . SLOPE OF 1% TO AIRPORT EXIT DRIVE (N)
DA-03 7.017 AVE . SLOPE OF 1% TO AIRPORT EXIT DRIVE (S)
TOTAL 14.316
PRE-DEVELOPED SUB-BASIN CHARACTERISTICS:
HYDRAULIC SLOPE AVERAGE VELOCITY TIME OF RUNOFF INTENSITIES
LENGTH (hi) (F/C .O.C.S . D.P.&D .S.) CONCENTRATION COEFFICIEN i(10) i(25) i(100)
(ft) (%) (ft/sec) (min) (C) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr)
DA-01 866 2 .3 2.76 5 0.27 8.63 9.86 11 .64
DA-02(1) 811 1.0 0.85 16 0.27
DA-02(2) 341 0.8 2.3 2 0.90
(TOTAUAVE) 18 0.46 6.56 7.52 8.90
DA-03(1) 884 1.0 0.85 17 0.27
DA-03(2) 507 0.7 1.98 4 0.90
(TOTAUAVE) 21 0.50 6.05 6.94 8.22
Q=C*i*A
RETURN
BASIN 10 YR 25 YR 100 YR
DA-01 4.08 4 .66 5.50 (cfs)
DA-02 16.63 19.05 22.54
DA-03 21 .20 24 .32 28.81
TOTALS 41 .91 48 .03 56 .85 PRE-DEVELOPED
7122196 A&M EASTERWOOD WELL NO . 2
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS
POST DEVELOPED SUB-BASINS
!THESE ARE BASICALLY THE SAME AS PRE-DEVELOPED SUB-BASINS BUT ARE ADJUSTED TO
REPRESENT PROPOSED DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
AREA DESCRIPTION :
(acres)
DA-N1a 1.038 AVE. SLOPE OF 2 .3% TO ACCESS ROAD
DA-N1b 0.712 AVE. SLOPE OF 2 .3% TO 24" R.C .P. @ INTERSECTION
DA-N2 0 .542 AVE. SLOPE OF 1% TO ACESS ROAD
DA-N3 5.877 AVE . SLOPE OF 1% TO AIRPORT EXIT DRIVE (N)
DA-N4 6 .147 AVE . SLOPE OF 1% TO AIRPORT EXIT DRIVE (S)
TOTAL 14.316 ·
PRE-DEVELOPED SUB-BASIN CHARACTERISTICS:
HYDRAULIC SLOPE AVERAGE VELOCITY TIME OF RUNOFF INTENSITIES
LENGTH (hi) (F/C .O .C.S . D.P.&D .S.) CONCENTRATION COEFFICIEN i(10) i(25) i(100)
(ft) (%) (ft/sec) (min) (Cave) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr)
DA-N1a 390 2.3 2.76 2 0.27 8.63 9.86 11 .64
DA-N1b 476 2 .3 2 .76 3 0 .30 8.63 9.86 11 .64
DA-N2 435 1.0 0.85 9 0 .27 8.63 9.86 11 .64
DA-N3(1) 1014 1.0 0 .85 20 0.43
DA-N3(2) 450 0.8 2.3 3 0 .90
(TOTAUAVE) 23 0 .57 5.75 6 .60 7 .83
DA-N4(1) 979 1.0 0.85 19 0 .27
DA-N4(2) 594 0.7 1.98 5 0.90
(TOTAUAVE) 24 0.51 5.62 6.45 7.65
Q=C*i*A
RETURN
BASIN 10 YR 25 YR 100 YR
DA-N1a 2.42 2 .76 3.26 (cfs)
DA-N1b 1 .84 2 .11 2 .49
DA-N2 1.26 1.44 1.70
DA-N3 19.42 22.29 26.42
DA-N4 17 .54 20.13 23 .88
TOTALS 42 .48 48 .73 57.75 POST-DEVELOPED
APPENDIX 6
HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
MANNING'S EQUATION
Project Description
Project File
Worksheet
Flow Element
Method
Solve For
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Diameter
Results
Depth
Discharge
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Percent Full
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Maximum Discharge
Full Flow Capacity
Full Flow Slope
24" RCP CAPACITY
Worksheet for Circular Channel
untitled
24 "
Circu lar Channel
Manning 's Formula
Full Flow Capacity
0.013
0.008000 V : H
2.00 ft
2.00 ft
20 .23 ffl/s
3.14 ft 2
6.28 ft
0.00 ft
1.61 ft
100.00
0.008226 V : H
6.44 ft/s
0.64 ft
FULL ft
FULL
21 .76 ffl/s
20 .23 ffl/s
0.008000 V : H
Kling E ngineering & Surveying Jul25, 1996
12:54:04 Haestad M ethods, Inc . 37 Brookside Road W aterbury, CT 067 08 (203) 755-1666
F lowMaster v4 .1 c
Page 1 of 1
Project Description
Project File
Worksheet
Flow Element
Method
Solve For
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Discharge
Results
Depth
Diameter
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Percent Full
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Maximum Discharge
Full Flow Capacity
Full Flow Slope
CULVERT FOR DA-N1 a
Worksheet for Circular Channel
e:\haestad\pi\east2.fm2
EASTERWOOD #2 ACCESS RD CULVERTS
Circular Channel
Manning's Formula
Full Flow Diameter
0.024
0.010000 V : H
2.76 ft3/s
1.14 ft
1.14 ft
1.03 ft2
3.59 ft
0.00 ft
0.69 ft
100.00
0.022232 V : H
2.69 ft/s
0.11 ft
FULL ft
FULL
2.97 ft3/s
2.76 ft3/s
0.010000 V : H
Kling Engineering & Surveying Jul23, 1996
11 :02:02 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666
FlowMaster v4.1 c
Page 1of1
Project Description
Project File
Worksheet
Flow Element
Method
Solve For
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Discharge
Results
Depth
Diameter
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Percent Full
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Maximum Discharge
Full Flow Capacity
Full Flow Slope
CULVERT FOR DA-N2
Worksheet for Circular Channel
e:\haestad\pi\east2.fm2
EASTERWOOD #2 ACCESS RD CULVERTS
Circular Channel
Manning's Formula
Full Flow Diameter
0.024
0.010000 V : H
1.44 ft3/s
0.90 ft
0.90 ft
0.63 ft2
2.81 ft
0.00 ft
0.53 ft
100.00
0.023739 V : H
2.28 ft/s
0.08 ft
FULL ft
FULL
1.55 ft3/s
1.44 ft3/s
0.010000 V : H
Kling Engineering & Surveying Jul23, 1996
11 :01 :23 Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666
FlowMaster 114 .1 c
Page 1of1