HomeMy WebLinkAbout38 Development Permit 392 Walmart ExpansionENGINEERING REPORT
FOR
THE PROPOSED
"LAKEVIEW ACRES PHASE Il"
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
Prepared For
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
701 South Walton Blvd.
Bentonville, Arkansas 72716
Prepared By
Doucet & Associates, Inc.
1301 Capital of Texas Highway South
Suite B-325
Austin, Texas 78746
I ~Doucet & Associates, Inc.
February 22 , 1993
Ms . Jane Kee
Senior Planner
City of College Station
P .O . Box 9960
College Station , Texas 77842
Re: "Lakeview Acres Phase 11" Subdivision Preliminary Plat
Dear Ms . Kee:
Herewith you will find an application, thirteen copies, the original mylar, and the impact
studies for the proposed "Lakeview Acres Phase II" Subdivision . As you are aware the
subdivision will consolidate nine individual tracts of land into several lots of which the
largest will be used by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc . to construct a Supercenter.
Due to Wal-Mart's purchase agreement with the land owners we need to have the
preliminary and final plats approved by the end of April. To make this schedule it is likely
that we will be submitting the final plat and construction drawings prior to having the
preliminary plat approved by the City Council. We would greatly appreciate anything you
or y our staff could do to help us expedite this project.
Please call me if you need any additional information .
pj?J oJ-
John D. Doucet
1301 Ca pital of Texas Hwy. S., • B-325 • A u sti n , Texas 78746 • 512 /329-8743 • FAX 329-8754
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
General Description ..................................................................................... Page 1
Electric Impact Analysis .............................................................................. Page 2
Traffic Impact Analysis ................................................................................ Page 2
Water Impact Analysis ................................................................................. Page 2
Wastewater Impact Analysis ........................................................................ Page 3
Drainage Impact Analysis ............................................................................ Page 4
Exhibits
Preliminary Plat ........................................................................................ E xhibit 1
Wal -Mart 188 Supercenter Utility Requirement ........................................ Exhibit 2
Existing and Proposed Utilities ................................................................. Exhibit 3
Wastewater Collection System .................................................................. Exhibit 4
Drainage Area Map .................................................................................. Exhibit 5
Appendices
Hydrologic Report ............................................................................... Appendi x A
Preliminary Plat Application Form ....................................................... Appendix B
Hydrology Equations ........................................................................... Appendix C
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The "Lakeview Acres Phase II" Subdivision proposes a consolidation of nine tracts of land
currently owned by five individuals and/or companies . A list of the owners can be found
with the Preliminary Plat Application in Appendix B of this report. The land is 38 .7 total
acres with approximately 2 .0 acres proposed for the Dartmouth Road right-of-way . If the
plat is approved with the Dartmouth alignment as is , there will be three lots east of
Dartmouth with the largest lot being 33 .2 acres . This lot is the location of the proposed
Wal-Mart Supercenter. The other two Jots east of Dartmouth will each be about 1.2 acres
in size and will both have approximately two hundred feet of frontage on FM 2818 .
The fourth lot that is proposed will be a forty feet wide lot between the western right-of-
way line of Dartmouth Road and the easternmost boundary line of Mr . and Mrs . Clint
Bertrand's property . Upon recording of the final plat this lot will be conveyed by Wal-
Mart Stores, Inc . back to the Bertrands .
The 38 .7 acres contains approximately 5 .0 acres of floodplain that is associated with the
Bee Creek Tributary (Tributary A). The Tributary approximately parallels the south
property line with the centerline between 25 and 75 feet south of the lin e .
The site is dissected by a ridge that runs generally in an east-west direction . About one-
third of the subdivision is north of the ridge and slopes towards FM 2818. This property
is drained by culverts that cross under FM 2818 and discharge towards Bee Creek. South
of the ridge the property falls in a southeasterly direction at an average slope of about l. 6
percent. This land drains to Tributary A.
With the exception of two residences at the northwest corner of the property, the site is
undeveloped , and historically has been utilized as farmland . The existing vegetation
consists of Croton Grass, Goldenrod, Three-awn Grass, Blue-eyed Gra ss, Prickly Pear,
and Nightshade. There are several existing oak trees scattered throughout the site .
A sma ll pond approximately 50 feet by 80 feet is located on-site adjacent to FM 2818 .
This pond is not located on a surface drainage feature and only receives sheet flow from
the hillside . The pond is not classified as a jurisdictional pond as defined in Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act and w ill be filled in as part of th e sit e construction .
The site li es in the Lufkin-Tabor soil association , whi c h is the largest soil association in the
area and occupies the entire central part of the county . It consists of grayish droughlty
soils that are low in fertility and productivity . They are called claypan soils because they
have very heavy compacted clay subsoils that area almost impervious to water . The
Lufkin series consists of grayish forested Planosols developed in alkaline clay and sandy
clay . The Tabor series has a yellowish subsoil. Run-off drainage ranges from very slow to
moderate depending on the surface gradient. Internal drainage is very slow .
1
ELECTRIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Electric service for the subdivision will be supplied by the local electric utility company
under the direction of the City of College Station . Presently, there are two overhead
electric utility lines that traverse the site . A single phase line runs across the site in a west
to east direction and was constructed to serve the now abandoned house at the comer of
FM 2818 and the Highway 6 By-Pass . Accord in g to Mr. Tony Michalsky, with the City
of College Station, this lin e can be removed .
The other line is a three-phase transmission line that traverses the site in a north to south
direction . This line will have to remain in servi ce and will have to be re located to
accommodate the proposed building . Both existing and proposed electric lines can be
seen on Exhibit 3 of this report .
Mr. Michalsky has stated that the proposed subdivi sion can adequately be served by the
City . Any required easements for electric utili ty service will be dedicated and recorded as
part of the final subdivision plat or by separate instrnm ents .
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSTS
The traffic impact analysis for this subdivision is bein g prepared by Mr. Mike Mcinturff of
WHM in Austin , Texas and is being submitted under separate cover.
WATER IMPACT ANALYSIS
Water service for the proposed subdivision will be provided by the existing 24 inch water
main on the north side of FM 2818 . The requirem ents for Lot 3 (the proposed Wal -Mart
store) is as follows:
Domestic Demand : 20 gpm average flow
Fire Demand : 1150 gpm with a 38 p si residual pressure
Mr. Dean Sharp , the City's Water and Wastewater Department Supervi sor b e lieves there
is both adequate pressure and water quantity in th e 24-inch line to serve the subdivision
and the proposed Wal-mart store.
As part of the site development process a site specific flow test will be required by Wal -
Mart's insurance carrier to verify the adequacy of th e water system . This information will
also be provided to the City . The existing and propo sed water lines can be see n on Exhibit
3 of this report .
2
WASTEWATER IMPACT ANALYSTS
Wastewater service for the subdivision will be provid ed by an existing 18 -inch wastewater
line which runs along the southeast property bound ary of Lot 3 and by an 8-inch line on
FM 2 818. Lots 1and2 can be served by the existing 8-inch wastewater line in FM 2818 .
The proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter, to be located on Lot 3, can be served by the 18-inch
line as shown on Exhibit 4. An 8-inch wastew at er service is proposed to tie to the 18-inc h
wastewater line . The slope of the 18-inch wastewater line is 0 .16% and has a maximum
capacity of 1885 gpm . The average daily flow for th e Wal-mart Supercenter is 18 .0 gpm.
The peak dry weather flow for the entire service are a if fully built out is 1294 gpm which
represents 68 .7% of the pipe capacity . The peak wet weather flow with full build out of
the service area and with the Wal-Mart store will be 2738 gpm which represents 145% of
the pipe capacity. The peak wet weather flow under full build out exclusive of the Wal-
Mart store is estimated to be 2681 gpm which repres ents 142% of the pipe capacity .
Wastewater Impact Calculations
Peak Dry Weather Flow (PDWF)
Residential lots -2260
Commercial lots -3 0
Average Daily Flow (Wal -Mart)= 18 .00 gpm
Average Daily Flow (Residential): Use 2 .2 capita/lot and 100 gal./ day/capita
Average Daily Flow = (2 .2 capita/lot) x (2260 lots) x (100 gal./day/capita)/
[(24 hrs./day) x (60 min./hr .)] = 345 gpm
Average Daily Flow (Commercial): Use 20 ,000 s .f. of building
per lot a nd 210 gal./day/1000 s.f.
Average Daily Flow = (210 gal./day/1000 s.f.) x (20,000 s .f.)/(24 hrs./day)
x (60 min./hr.) = 44 g pm
Average Daily Flow = 345 + 44 + 18 = 407 gp m
Peaking Factor = 18 + (0 .0144 x 407 ) 0 .5 = 3 . l8
4 + (0 .0144 x 407) 0 .5
PDWF = 407 x 3 .18 = 1294 gpm
Wal-Mart site will produce 4.4% of the proposed peak flow .
Capacity of 18 11 pipe at slope = 0 .16 % is 188 5 gpm
50% capacity = 942 gpm
3
Existing dry weather peak flow is at 65 .6% of capacity
Proposed dry weather peak flow is at 68.7% of capacity
Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF)
PWWF = PDWF + (1,500 gal./acre/day) x 1386 acres/(24 hrs./day x 60 min./hr .)
PWWF = 1294 + 1,500 x 1386/(24x60) = 2738 gpm
Existing PWWF is at 42% above capacity
Proposed PWWF is at 45% above capacity
DRAINAGE IMPACT ANALYSTS
Pre-Development Conditions
The proposed site consists of 38. 7 acres of land located at the southwest corner of State
Highway 6 and FM 2818 (Millers Lane). Approximately 8 .7 acres of land drains overland
to the north toward 3 existing 30-inch rep culverts at Millers Lane . Another 2 .0 acres
drains overland to the northeast toward an existing 30-inch culvert at Miller Lane . The
remaining 28 .0 acres ofland drains to the southeast toward Tributary A of Bee Creek.
Post-Development Conditions
The proposed development on Lot 3 will consist of a 200,000 square foot retail building
and parking area . Two detention ponds are proposed to attenuate th e post-developed
run-off to pre-developed conditions for the 5, l 0, 25 , 50 and 100 year rrequency storms.
Since the drainage area for this site is less than 50 acres, the Triangular Approximation
Method will be used for determining hydrographs. Storage/Routing analysis procedures
will be used to determine the detention pond volume required and outlet structure type.
Any required easements for drainage will be dedicated by the plat or by separate
instruments . The Hydrologic Report can be found in Appendix A of this report.
Preliminary Detention Calculations
Pre-Developed Hydrology (100 year frequen cy storm)
Area l -Drainage to existing culverts along Millers Lane .
4
Drainage Area = 10 .7 acres
c
C -Values : 100 = 0.45
Time of concentration : Tc= ov8rSand flow + channel flow
Overland Flow: Tc= Ln/( 42 S · )
(See Appendix C for definitions of equations used)
L = 300' n = 0 .20 s = 3 .50%
Tc = 300 x 0 .20/(42 x 0 .035 0 .5) = 7 .6 min .
Channel Flow: Tc = LIV Use V = 2 .5 fps , L = 500'
Tc = (500/2 .5) I 60 sec./min .
Tc = 3.3 min .
Tc = 7 .6 + 3.3 = 10 .9 min. use 15 min .
I
100 = 9 . 73 in./hr .
Q 100 = 10 .7 x 0.45 x 9 .73 = 46 .9 cfs
Area 2 -Drainage to Tributary A of Bee Creek
Drainage Area= 28 .0 acres
c
C-Value = 100 = 0.45
Time of concentration : Tc = overland flow+ concentrated flow
Overland Flow : L = 300 n = 0 .2 ~=0 .85 %
Tc = 300 x 0.2/(42 x 0 .0085 ·5) = 15 .5 min.
Concentrated Flow : Tc = Ln I (60 x S o.5)
L = 900 g = 0 .2 0 S = 2 .40%
Tc = 900 x 0 .20/(60 x 0 .024 O. ) = 19 .4 min .
Channel F lo w : Tc =LIV use V = 4 fps , L = l 200'
Tc = (1200/4 .0)/60 sec./min .
Tc = 5 .0 min .
Tc Total = 15 .5 + 19.4 + 5 .0 = 39 .9 min . U se 40 min .
1
100 = 5 .69 in-~~-_) ~ <'.;. ~<>Z_
100= 28 .0 x 0.4-S x 5 .69 = 71.7 cfs
5
Post-Developed Conditions (100 year frequency storm)
Area 1 -Drainage to Detention Pond 1
D .A = 10 .7 acres
c
C -Value = 100 = 0 .75
Tc =Use 5 minutes
I
100 = 14 .76 in ./hr.
Q 100 = 10 .7 x 0 .75 x 14 .76 = 118.4 cfs
Area 2 -Drainage to Detention Pond 2
D .A = 28 .0 acres
c
C-Value : 100 = 0 .72
Tc = Use 10 minutes
I
100 = 11. 64 in./hr.
QlOO = 28 .0 x 0.72 x 11.64 = 234 .7 cfs -;..,,
DETENTION POND VOLUME REQUIRED (100 year frequen cy storm)
Detention Pond 1 = 2 1,477 c .f.
Detention Pond 2 = 88 ,007 c .f.
6
EXHIBITS
APPENDICIES
APPENDIX A
HYDROLOGIC REPORT
AREA 1-EX. DRAINAGE TO
CULVERTS AT MILLERS LN
Hyd. No. 1
Hydrograph type = RATIONAL
Storm frequency = 100 yr
Time of cone. = 15 min
Runoff coeff. .45
HYDROGRAPH DISCHARGE TABLE
TIME--OUTFLOW TIME--OUTFLOW
(min cfs) (min cfs)
1. 00 3.12 2.00 6.25
5.00 15.62 6.00 18.74
9.00 28.12 10.00 31. 24
13.00 40.61 14.00 43.74
17.00 40.61 18.00 37.49
21.00 28.12 22.00 24.99
25.00 15.62 26.00 12.50
29.00 3.12 30.00 0.00
Peak discharge
Time interval
Intensity
Basin area
= 46.86 cfs
= 1 min
= 9.73 in/hr
= 10.7 ac
TIME--OUTFLOW TIME--OUTFLOW
(min cfs) (min cfs)
3.00 9.37 4.00 12.50
7.00 21. 87 8.00 24.99
11.00 34.36 12.00 37.49
15.00 46.86 16.00 43.74
19.00 34.36 20.00 31. 24
23.00 21. 87 24.00 18.74
27.00 9.37 28.00 6.25
31. 00 0.00 32.00 0.00
Q (cfs) RATIONAL
54.0 Hydrograph No . 1
----------~
48 .6
43.2
37 .8
32.4
27 .0
21.6
16 .2
10 .8
5.4
0.0 I I I I
-Outflow
~a;=46 .86
/ ""' / ~
// ~ / '
/ "" ",
0 3 6 9 12 16 19 22 25 28 32
Time (min)
CF11 Screen CFZ1 Print CF31 Edit CP1 Hard Copy CEsc] Menu [Space] More
I
I
HYDROLOGIC REPORT
AREA 2-EX. DRAINAGE TO
TRIB A OF BEE CREEK
Hyd. No. 2
Hydrograph type = RATIONAL
Storm frequency = 100 yr
Time of cone. = 40 min
Runoff coeff. = .45
HYDROGRAPH DISCHARGE TABLE
TIME--OUTFLOW TIME--OUTFLOW
(min cfs) (min cfs)
1. 00 1. 79 2.00 3.58
5.00 8.96 6.00 10.75
9.00 16.13 10.00 17.92
13.00 23.29 14.00 25.08
17.00 30.46 18.00 32.25
21. 00 37.63 22.00 39.42
25.00 44.79 26.00 46.59
29.00 51. 96 30.00 53.75
33.00 59.13 34.00 60.92
37.00 66.29 38.00 68.09
41. 00 69.88 42.00 68.09
45.00 62.71 46.00 60.92
49.00 55.54 50.00 53.75
53.00 48.38 54.00 46.59
57.00 41. 21 58.00 39.42
61. 00 34.04 62.00 32.25
65.00 26.88 66.00 25.08
69.00 19.71 70.00 17.92
73.00 12.54 74.00 10.75
77.00 5.38 78.00 3.58
Peak discharge
Time interval
Intensity
Basin area
71. 67 cfs
= 1 min
= 5.69 in/hr
= 28 ac
TIME--OUTFLOW TIME--OUTFLOW
(min cfs) (min cfs)
3.00 5.38 4.00 7.17
7.00 12.54 8.00 14.33
11. 00 19.71 12.00 21. 50
15.00 26.88 16.00 28.67
19.00 34.04 20.00 35.83
23.00 41. 21 24.00 43.00
27.00 48.38 28.00 50.17
31. 00 55.54 32.00 57.34
35.00 62.71 36.00 64.50
39.00 69.88 40.00 71. 67
43.00 66.29 44.00 64.50
47.00 59.13 48.00 57.34
51.00 51. 96 52.00 50.17
55.00 44.79 56.00 43.00
59.00 37.63 60.00 35.83
63.00 30.46 64.00 28.67
67.00 23.29 68.00 21.50
71. 00 16.13 72.00 14.33
75.00 8.96 76.00 7 .17
79.00 1. 79 80.00 0.00
Q (cfs) RATIONA.L
Hydrograph No . 2 83 .0 --r-----------------------..
74 .7
66.4
58 .0
49 .7
41.5
33.2
24.9 /
8.3
-Outflo
/~=7 1 66
"
/
16.6 //
0.0 --+--~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-__..___,
0 8 16 24 32 41 49 57 65 73 81
Time (m in)
CF11 Screen CFZ1 Print CF31 Edit CPJ Hard Copy CEsc] Menu [Space] More
HYDROLOG I C REPORT
AREA 1-DEVELOPED
DRAINAGE TO DETENTION
POND 1
Hyd. No. 3
Hydrograph type = RATIONAL
Storm frequency = 100 yr
Time of cone. = 5 min
Runoff coeff. = .75
HYDROGRAPH DISCHARGE TABLE
TIME--OUTFLOW TIME--OUTFLOW
(min cfs) (min cfs)
1. 00 23.69 2.00 47.38
5.00 118.45 6.00 94.76
9.00 23.69 10.00 0.00
Peak discharge
Time interval
Intensity
Basin area
= 118.45 cfs
= 1 min
= 14.76 in/hr
= 10.7 ac
TIME--OUTFLOW TIME--OUTFLOW
(min cfs) (min cfs)
3.00 71. 07 4.00 94.76
7.00 71. 07 8.00 47.38
11.00 0.00 12.00 0.00
Q (cfs)
136 .0
122 .3
108 .7
95 .1
81.5
68.0
54.4
40 .8
27.2
13.6
0.0
0
RATIONAL
Hydrograph No. 3
/"\ = 11 8.45
I '\
/ '\
/ ~
/ "' / ~
/ '\
2 3 4 6 7 8
-Outflo
'\
9 10 11
Time (min)
£F1l Screen CFZl Print £F3l Edit £Pl Hard Copy £Escl Menu £Space] More
HYDROLOGIC REPORT
AREA 2 -DEVELOPED ....
DRAINAGE TO DETENTION
POND 2.
Hyd. No. 4
Hydrograph type = RATIONAL
Storm frequency = 100 yr
Time of cone. = 10 min
Runoff coeff. .72
HYDROGRAPH DISCHARGE TABLE
TIME--OUTFLOW TIME--OUTFLOW
(min cfs) (min cfs)
1. 00 23.46 2.00 46.93
5.00 117.32 6.00 140.79
9.00 211.18 10.00 234.65
13.00 164.25 14.00 140.79
17.00 70.39 18.00 46.93
Peak discharge
Time interval
Intensity
Basin area
= 234.65 cfs
= 1 min
= 11.64 in/hr
28 ac
TIME--OUTFLOW TIME--OUTFLOW
(min cfs) (min cfs)
3.00 70.39 4.00 93.86
7.00 164.25 8.00 187.72
11.00 211.18 12.00 187.72
15.00 117.32 16.00 93.86
19.00 23.46 20.00 0.00
Q (cfs)
27 0
243
216
189
162
135
108
81
54
27
0
0
RATIONAL
Hydrog raph No . 4
~= 234.6 4
/ ~ // ~ / ' / ~
-Outflo
/ ~
/ ~
2 4 6 8 11 13 15 17 19 22
Time (min)
CF11 Screen CFZ1 Print CF31 Edit CP1 Hard Copy CEsc] Menu [Space] More
S = (Qp -Qt)*60*Td QUICK STORAGE ESTIMATE Detention Pond 1
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee£
ll
n 1.
ll
ll 2 .
ll
ll
ll
n
ll
ll
n
ll Qp
ll Qt
ll Tp
n Td
ll
ll
INFLOW HYDROGRAPH No. 3 ........ .
TARGET OUTFLOW (cfs) = 46.86 .....
118.45 cfs
46.86 cfs
5 min
= 5 min
n Estimated storage (cuft) = 21477
ll
Hyd.
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
ll
Qpeak Hyd. Qpeak ti
ll
46.86 2 71. 67 ll
118.45 4 234.65 ll
0.00 6 0.00 ll
0.00 8 0.00 ll
0.00 10 324.00 n
0.00 12 o.oo ll
0.00 14 0.00 ti
0.00 16 0.00 ll
0.00 18 0.00 ti
0.00 20 0.00 ll
ll
ti
ll
ll
ll
ll
n (acft) 0.493 n
ll ll
aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee¥
Change item number: o
S = (Qp -Qt)*60*Td QUICK STORAGE ESTIMATE Detention Pond 2
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee £
0 0
0 1. INFLOW HYDROGRAPH No. 4 ••••••••• Hyd. Qpeak Hyd. Qpeak 0
0 0
0 2. TARGET OUTFLOW (cfs) = 71.67 ..... 1 46.86 2 71. 67 0
0 3 118.45 4 234.65 0
0 5 0.00 6 0.00 0
0 7 0.00 8 o.oo 0
0 9 0.00 10 324.00 0
0 11 0.00 12 0.00 0
0 13 0.00 1 4 o.oo 0
0 15 0.00 16 0.00 0
0 Qp 234.65 cfs 17 0.00 18 0 .00 0
0 Qt 71. 67 cfs 19 0.00 20 0.00 0
o Tp = 10 min 0
o Td 9 min 0
0 0
0 0
0 Est i mated storage (cuft) = 88007 0
0 0
0 (acft) 2 .020 0
0 0
aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee¥
Change item number: o
APPENDIXB
P&Z Case No.
Date Received
APPLICA'l'ION FOR REVIEW AND APPHOVAL
Master Preliminary Plat X Preliminary Plat ---
NAME OF SUBDIVISION "Lakeview Ac re s Phase II" ----------------
OWNER See Attached List AG E N'l1 Doucet & Associates, Inc.
ADDRESS ADDRESS 1301 Capital of Tx. Hwy. S. B-325
Austin, Texas 78746
PHONE PHONE (512) 3 29-8743
LICENSED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER John D. Doucet, P.E.
ADDRESS 1301 Capital of Tx. Hwy. S. B-325
PHONE (512) 329-8743
SPECIFIC LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
South of FM 2818 , north of t ributary to Bee Creek, west of East
By-Pass (Hwy. 6) and east of Texas Avenue.
TOTAL ACREAGE OF SUBDIVISION 38.71 RIGHT-OF-WAY ACREAGE 2.0
NUMBER OF LOTS BY ZONING DISTRICT 4 (currently in R~_l~)~~~-
AVERAGE ACREAGE OF EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT BY ZONING DISTRICT
N/A
REQUESTED VARIANCES TO ORDINANCE NO. 690 (SUBDIVISON REGULATIONS)
I'l' IS THE RESPONSIBILI'l'Y O'l' 'l'HE APPLICAN'l' TO NO 'l'IFY ALL LENDERS
ON THIS PROPERTY OF THIS PROPOSAL.
THE UNDERSIGNED HERBY REQUESTS APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF COLLEGE
STATION OF THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED PLAT:
---+.-:-~o____r:J.~. ~~{ ~~~(signature & title )
Rev. 8/91
d.k/?> (date)
WAL-MART SUBDIVISION
LIST OF OWNERS
NAME ADDRESS NAME OF CONTACT PHONE NO.
Baptist Church Loan 333 North Washington #306 Bruce Bowles (214) 828-5140
Corporation Dallas, Texas 75246
K3 Enterprises 2707 Normand Circle Larry Saherwhite ( 409) 696-1844
College Station, Texas 77845
Billy Sharp 2301 North Texas Billy Sharp (409) 778-2301
Bryan, Texas 77801
Clint Bertrand 120 Millers Lane Clint Bertrand ( 409) 693-1051
College Station, Texas 77840
Dartmouth J. V. 4444 Carter Creek #208 Chuck Ellison, Trustee ( 409) 260-9911
Bryan, Texas 77802
APPENDIX C
It is often desirable to develop a composite runoff coefficient based upon
the percentages of different types of surfaces in the drainage area. This
procedure is of ten applied to typical "sample blocks" as a guide to
selection of reasonable values of the coefficient for an entire area.
Suggested coefficients with respect to specific surface types .are given in
Table 2-3 . These values reflect the maximum impervious coverage allowed by
the City's Zoning Ordinance.
2.4.2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION
The time of concentration is the time associated with the travel of runoff
from an outer point which best represents the shape of the contributing
areas. Runoff from a drainage area usually reaches a peak at the time when
the entire area is contributing, in which case the time of concentration is
the time for a drop of water to flow from the most remote point in the
watershed to the point of interest. Runoff may reach a peak prior to the
time the entire drainage area is contributing. Sound engineering judgment
should be used to determine the time of concentration. The time of
concentration to any point in a storm drainage system is a combination of
the sheet flow (overland), the shallow concentrated flow and the channel
flow, which includes storm sewers. The minimum time of concentration for
any area shall be 5 minutes.
A. Sheet Flov
Sheet flow is shallow flow over land surfaces which usually occurs in
the headwaters of streams. The engineer should realize that sheet flow
occurs for only very short distances in urbanized conditions.
Urbanized areas are assumed to have sheet flow of 300 feet or less.
The following equation 2-2 has been developed for sheet flow of less
than 300 feet.
Tc (Eq. 2-2)
where,
Tc Time of Concentration in minutes
L Length of the reach in ft.
n Manning's n (see table 2-4)
s Slope of the ground in ft/ft
B. Shallow Concentrated Flov
After a maximum of 300 feet sheet flow becomes shallow concentrated
flow. The time of concentration for shallow concentrated flows can be
computed from equation 2-3 which is as follows:
Tc (Eq . 2-3)
where,
Tc Time of Concentration in minutes
L Length of the reach in ft.
n Manning's n (see table 2-4)
s Slope of the ground in ft/ft
DRAINAGE 11/20/89 Page 2-8
Manning's 11 n"
0.016
0.02
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.6
TABLE 2-4
MANNING'S "n" FOR OVERLAND FLOV
AND SHALLOV CONCENTRATED FLOV
Condition
Concrete (rough or smoothed finish)
Asphalt
0-50% vegetated ground cover, remaining
bare soil or rock outcrops, minimum
brush or tree cover
50 -90% vegetated ground cover, remaining
bare soil or rock outcrops, minimum -
medium brush or tree cover
100% vegetated ground cover, medium-
dense grasses (lawns, grassy fields
etc.) medium brush or tree cover
100% vegetated ground cover with areas
of heavy vegetation (parks, green -
belts, riparian areas etc.) dense under -
growth with medium to heavy tree growth
Source: City of Austin, Watershed Management Division
C. Channel or Storm Sever Flow
The velocity in an open channel or a storm sewer not flowing full can
be determined by using Manning's Equation. Channel velocities can also
be determined by using backwater profiles. Usually, average flow
velocity is determined assuming a bank-full condition. The details of
using Manning's equation and selecting Manning's ''n" values for
channels can be obtained from Section 6.
For full flow storm sewer conditions (pressure flow) the following
equation should be applied:
where
DRAINAGE
v QIA
V Average velocity, ft/s
Q Design discharge, cfs 2 A Cross -sectional area, ft
11120/89
(Eq. 2 -4)
Page 2-10
TABLE 2-2
RATIONAL METHOD RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR COMPOSITE ANALYSIS
Runoff Coefficient (C)
Return Period
Character of Surface 2 5 10 25 50 100 500
Years Years Years Years Years Years Years
DEVELOPED
Asphaltic
Concrete/Roof
0.73
0.75
o. 77 0.81
0.80 0.83
Grass Areas (Lawns, Parks, etc.)
Poor Condition (grass cover
Flat, 0-2% 0.32
Average, 2-7% 0.37
Steep, Over 7% 0.40
Fair Condition (grass cover
Flat, 0-2% 0.25
Average, 2-7% 0.33
Steep, Over 7% 0.37
less
0.34
0.40
0.43
on 50
0.28
0.36
0.40
than 50
0.37
0.43
0.45
to 75
0.30
0.38
0.42
0.86
0.88
percent
0.40
0.46
0.49
percent
0.34
0.42
0.46
0.90 0.95 1.00
0.92 0.97 1.00
of the
0.44
0.49
0.52
area)
0.47
0.53
0.55
of the area)
0.37 0.41
0.45 0.49
0.49 0.53
0.58
0.61
0.62
0.53
0.58
0.60
Good Condition (grass cover larger than 75 percent of the area)
Flat, 0-2 r.
Average, 2-7%
Steep, Over 7%
UNDEVELOPED
Cultivated Land
Flat, 0-2%
Average, 2-7%
Steep, Over 7%
Pasture/Range
Flat, 0-2%
Average, 2-7%
Steep, Over 7%
Forest/Yoodlands
Flat, 0-2%
Average, 2-7%
Steep, Over 7%
0.21
0.29
0.34
0.31
0.35
0.39
0.25
0.33
0.37
0 .22
0.31
0.35
0.23
0.32
0.37
0.34
0.38
0.42
0.28
0.36
0.40
0 .25
0.34
0.39
0.25
0.35
0.40
0.36
0.41
0.44
0.30
0.38
0.42
0.28
0.36
0.41
0.29
0.39
0.44
0.40
0.44
0.48
0.34
0.42
0.46
0.31
0.40
0.45
0.32
0.42
0.47
0.43
0.48
0.51
0.37
0.45
0.49
0.35
0.43
0.48
0.36 0.49
o.46 o.56
0.51 0.58
0.47
0.51
0.54
0.57
0.60
0.61
0.41 0.53
0.49 0.58
0.53 0.60
0.39
0.47
0.52
0.48
0.56
0.58
Source: 1. Rossmiller, R.L. "The Rational Formula Revisited."
2. City of Austin, Yatershed Management Division.
DRAINAGE 11/20/89 Page 2-7
WALMARTSUPERCENTER
REVIEW COMMENTS
.-k )~ 0 ~ Pe:f2.-M 1T
\,/I/ f't L t1 ~
1. Plat doesn't appear to reflect detention areas. All areas reserved for
detention shall be platted as some type of easement.
2 . Conceptually the design parameters are okay. In the design you will
be required to analyze not just the 100 year, but 5 , 10, 25, 50, as
well, and design outlet control structures to accommodate the smaller
design storms as well.
3. For the plat, the elevation of the 100 year flood needs to be shown, in
addition to the location of the floodplain.
4. For future purposes , the drainage report submitted with the
construction documents must show all calculations for sizing of pipes,
sizing of ponds, profiles of all public storm sewers, and detailed plans
of detention ponds, including cross-sections.
5. Must adhere to College Station standards in drainage design of
parking lot (i.e. cannot exceed depth of flow in parking areas).
6. Drainage calculations will be forwarded to the Highway Department
for their review since your proposed improvements tie into theirs.
7. Need to tie outlet pipe from pond # 1 into existing 3011 RCP under FM
2818 to provide for subsurface.
8. It appears that a retaining wall will be necessary for pond #2. The
pond appears to require a depth 8-10 feet to provide for adequate
storage of stormwater.
9. The proposed contours don't tie into existing contours. There is a
difference in grade of 8-10 at location of proposed extension of
Dartmouth and the edge of the detention pond. Applicant needs to
address this difference in grade.
l o .
DA Douc et & Associates, Inc.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO : City o f College S t a t i o n JOB NO.: 00102.00
110 1 Te x a s Ave. DATE : 3/1/93
Co l l e g e Station, Tx . PROJECT: Colle ge Stat i on
ATTN: Debb ie Kei;!t i n g Wal -M art Supercenter #11 50
~TACHED 0 UND ER SEPARATE C OVER WE ARE SENDING YOU:
~BORNE EXPRESS D FEDERAL EXPRESS D U.S . MAIL D OTHER
~S REQUESTED
D FOR YOUR INFORMATION
D FOR YOUR COMMENTS
D FOR YOUR APPROVAL
D RETURN TO OUR OFFICE
D LET'S DISCUSS
D FOR SIGNATURES
D OTHER
REMARKS :
D J.WVOICES D
B"PRINTS D
D COST ESTIMATES D
D QUAN T ITY LIST D
D FINAL MAP/PLAT D
D PARCEL MAP/PLAT D
D SPECIFICATIONS D
D ORIGINAL TRACINGS D
BOUNDARY SURVEY
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
ALTA SURVEY
CUT SHEETS
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
STAKING PLAN
HARD COPY
REPRODUCIBLES
-:-----;:--..,,-----.,.----------------------2 c opies of drainage a r ea map
COPY TO: ASSOCIATES , INC.
BY:
1301 Ca oit al of Texas Hwy. S., • B-325 • Austin, Texa 78746 • 512/32 9-8 743 • FAX 32 q_3 75 4
-l---· ------------. ·-·-----------------------------·----------·------
.t~:~~:~_-: :,-_ _c-=-:-=--=_,. ~cCORD ENGINEERING, INC.
Jtt ~~~~-·-:c.:'~=~-=-
---·--------------------------------··-···---------··-·------------
ransmission &
Distrib ·ion Superintendent
City of College Station
P . ~Box 9960
October~~: 1994 /
~.Jv
RE: Walmart Expansion -Electric Service
Dear Ray:
In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the load and service requirements
for the Walmart Expansion proposed for construction on Brothers Boulevard . We have planned
the on-site electric distribution layout to serve this project to be underground, in accordance
with the requirements of your City 's line extension policy. Enclosed herewith for your review
and use are five (5) copies of our proposed electric distribution layout for th is facility. A
Project Cost Estimate and . a Bill of Material for the above referenced project are also enclosed.
A diskette has been provided which includes this project electrical layout for your use.
A 750 kVA, three-phase, 12 ,470 GND Y/7 ,200 volt primary to 480Y/2 77 volt secondary
pad-mounted transformer has been planned for installation to provide the requested service
utilization voltage level for the Walmart Expansion . The new 750 kV A pad-mount transformer
will replace the existing 500 kV A pad-mounted transformer that is in service at the present
time. The increase in the transformer size was necessary to accommodate the new load
addition for the Walmart Expansion . Meterin g for the Walmart Expansion is proposed to be
accomplished at the transformer using 800 /5 ampere current transformers and a meter with
demand indication of at least 5 .0. Specifications for your use in purchasing this transformer
are enclosed.
In accordance with your City policy , the developer should plan to furnish and ins tall,
in compliance with City specifications, all required electrical conduit and pour the requ ired
concrete pad for said 750 kV A transformer. The electric layout drawing enclosed provid es
details regarding the required number and sizes of conduit, installation depth , proposed conduit
locations, riser pole conduit requirements , etc; the transformer pad details should be furnished
when the dimensions of the transformer proposed to be used are known.
In accordance with the riew policy of your City, the developer is responsible for
reimbursing your City for 20% of the cost of installation, including labor, materials, and
standard fee percentages for engineering and overhead cost for the proposed electric layou t.
' . --------------·---·----·---------... -· . ---· ------...
.REC EIVED o~r 7 r ·
•
City of College Station
October 14, 1994
Page Two
We compute that the 20% contribution required for the Walmart Expansion computes to be
$5,459.40. This cost estimate was calculated based on a total project cost estimate of
$27,297.00. The total underground cost includes a standard allowance of 30% to cover your
City's labor related overhead costs, 7% material handling costs, and 8.5 % to cover your City's
administrative and engineering costs.
I trust we have provided herein the information you need on this project. If not, or if
questions arise, please let us know.
DW/mw
Enclosures
cc:
...
Yours very truly,
McCORD ENGINEERING, INC.
David Witte
Engineering Assistant
· • McCord Engineering, Inc.
CS-13-\.1.11
09/22/94
WORK ORDER NO. ----
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
WAL-MART EXPANSION -UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE -UNDERGROUND (U) CONSTRUCTION UNITS
COST ($) PER 1 ASSEMBLY
LETTER -------------------------TOTAL
CODE ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION QTY LABOR MAT. TOTAL COST $
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
UC2 3 PH UG CABLE TERMINAL POLE 3 373. 75 514.51 888.26 2664.78
UD#1/0 URD 1/0 PRIMARY URD CABLE 3.630 550.00 1189.00 1739.00 6312.57
UG17-2-750 3 PHASE UG 750 KVA LOOP FEED 1 344.71 9259.84 9604.55 9604.55
UM6-1 LOAD BREAK ELBOY ~1 47.75 55 .19 102.94 2161. 74
UM6-6 GROUND ROD ASSEMBLY 7 15.00 9.05 24.05 168.35
UM33 SECTIONALIZING ENCL. MULTI PHASE 1 802.50 643.14 1445.64 1445.64
UM48-2 MULTI-PHASE UG GROUNDING SPEC. 3 .01 .00 .01 .03
---------22357.66
TOTAL LABOR = 5372.74
TOTAL MATERIAL = 16984.92 ---------
TOTAL = 22357.66
LABOR OVERHEAD 30% = 1611.82
MATERIAL HANDLING 7% = 1188.94
---------
TOTAL 25158.42
ENGINEERING & OVERHEAD 8.5% = 2138.47
---------
GRAND TOTAL 27296.89
ROUNDED TO $27,297.00
---------DEVELOPERS CONTRIBUTION 20% = $5,459.40
* DENOTES HOT WORK
McCord Engineering, Inc.
CS-13-\.1.11
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
\./AL-HART EXPANSION -UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE
B I L L 0 F M A T E R I A L
H A T E R I A L CATALOG
CODE ITEM NO. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION REF. NO.
----------------------------------------------25 c 6 5/811 X 12 11 MACHINE BOLT 32002000014
25 c 7 5/811 X 14 11 MACHINE BOLT 32002000015
25 d 14 211 X 211 SQUARE \./ASHER 32002000031
25 j 38 LAG SCREW 1/211 X 411 28504700010
28 Ul 50 UG EQUIPMENT LOCK 832040
27 bu 64 1/0 H-TAP COPPER CONN 28502200003
25 p 65 CONNECTOR COMPRESSION 285022
28 ae 128 MOV LIGHTNING ARRESTER 28500300001
28 af 131 100 AMP OPEN TYPE S&C 28502800001
25 ai 150 8 1 COPPERWELD GROUND ROD 28503800001
25 aj 156 5/811 GROUND ROD CLAMP 28504700025
28 ap 168 SMALL HOTLINE CLAMP 28504700027
28 Uhe 197 LARGE METAL JUNCTION 28504500005
24 bv 220 \.IRS 352 STIRRUP 28504700081
29 Ugp 223 1/211 X 2 1/211 BRASS BOLT 32002200002
29 Ugp 225 1/2' BRASS NUT 32002200004
29 Ugp 226 1/211 BRASS ROUND \./ASHER 32002200005
29 Ugp 227 1/211 BRASS LOCK \./ASHER 32002200006
27 Uhp 230 1/0 LOADBREAK ELBOW 28508200001
27 Ugk 232 1/0 POLE TYPE TERMINATOR 28508200003
26 Uj 303 STANDOFF POLE TYPE 28504700022
28 f d 330 R3-CA 3 POSITION EQU. MT 28504700058
28 Uan 419 750 KVA TRANS. 277/480 28508600050
27 Uhv 523 1/0 URD AL. PRIMARY 28008000001
25 p 759 #6 H3 COPPER CONNECTOR 28502200002
28 an 780 TRANSFORMER GROUND LUG 28502200026
27 cj 783 1/0 BARE STRANDED COPPER 28008000009
28 ·FUSE 803 50 AMP FUSE LINK 28503400012
Uhs 27 868 COLD SHRINK SLEEVE 28508200019
09/22/94
WORK ORDER NO. ----
TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
QTY. COST $ COST $ -----------------------12 .67 8.04
18 .78 14.04
33 .15 4.95
12 .44 5.28
3 6.00 18.00
6 1. 74 10.44
12 .29 3.48
9 26.40 237.60
9 39.77 357.93
7 8.33 58.31
7 .72 5.04
9 6.01 54.09
1 625.00 625.00
9 7.37 66.33
24 1.54 36.96
24 .36 8.64
48 .42 20.16
24 .08 1.92
21 45.00 945.00
9 24.98 224.82
9 8.44 75.96
6 75.74 454.44
1 9164.00 9164.00
3.630 1189.00 4316.07
12 .50 6.00
4 1.30 5.20
12 .36 4.32
3 2.78 8.34
24 10.19 244.56
---------16984.92
Revised 1/88
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
THREE-PHASE
PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
SPECIFICATION PMT-2
AND
BID SHEET
Page 1 of 1
PROJECT: Walrnart Expansion
Item Quantity Description
1 1 750 kV A, three-phase, 60 hertz, oil-filled, compartmented, pad-mounted
Manufacturer
Catalog Number
transformer, 12,470Y/7,200 volt primary voltage to 480Y/277 volt
secondary voltage, 95 kV BIL, wye-grounded wye-grounded connection
with standard accessories and two 2-1/2 % taps above and below normal
voltage. Transformer to have a deadfront with a loop feed high-voltage
termination to consist o f six (6) universal bushing wells and have access
doors with side hinges to permit horizontal swing. Transformer is to be
protected with a Bay-0-Net drawout fuse assembly, and is to have thread-
ed in-line copper stud secondary bushings with jamnut and standard
NEMA, 6-hole, copper with tin plating, H spade terminals attached there-
to.
Bid As Specified
(Item )
Alternate Bid
(Item )
No Load Loss (Watts)
Load Loss (Watts)
Impedance ( % )
Delivery
Unit Bid Price ($)
Total Item Price ($)
Total Item Owning Cost ($)
(Computed Per Given Formula)
Bidder
..
Signature --Bidder's Sales Representatives
Date
\ t ~ I
I
January 6, 1994
Adams Consulting Engineers
6320 Copeland Road
PO Box 13155
Tyler, TX 75713
Attn:· Todd Williams
Dear Todd,
CITY OF COi 1 EGE STATION
Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77642-9960
(409) 764-3500
As per your request, I have looked at your WalMart expansion drawings and the "unknown" pipe
location exiting the Albertsons site. My concern is that with the lo ca tion of this pipe unknown,
there may be problems in the field during construction. You may make a note on the plans to
require the contractor to field verify, however please be aware that once field verified, if it will
affect your design you must resubmit design drawings and possibly even an addendum to your
drainage report and the contractor will not be allowed to proceed with construction on this area
of the site until all of these items are prepared and approved. We will do all we can to expedite
the review/approval process but you need to anticipate a possible 2-1 /2 to 3 week total approval
time_ This time does not account for any of your design time. Typi ca lly, we find that this upsets
both contractors and owners to have this occur during the construction phase. You may either
field verify that line, now during the design phase or during the construction phase. Please be
advised that there are some "timing" and possibly "cost" risks in waiting until construction. You
may also want to advise your client of the pros and cons to each altern a tive.
I hope this answers your questions. If you have any other problem s or questions, please do not
hesitate to call.
Home of Texas A&M University
E
~
[
)
~
L
D
"\
D
Sl
'1
J'• :r· .....
I
~ r~ w
F
~T S R S H.<\l :.... '·.•:_;-f"E..Ht rJ!<° .. 1
'\DIM (; .-.... R u·:.:s1._.P!~
~· OF .;,. Brn--::.•)l lS a_;i:
__,
; .. :,.. ..
.-·r:,.
-~
'\
.~'
'
!' l / ;';
/
t:~ :~
l·-" · ·-. ,_ I" ·-
~. --.
IUU' ..:
th tl
'
. l
\
/\
\ .
. •
..
-'! .. -. -
;.-.r
::., ~ ! ti .,
I' .""; -
I.
1:
...
"':;.......:.. _ ___:..~ft
--• 1) ,.)
,. -. '
..
·\
I
[
~r
; I
/ ./ ., I
I.
·. 'i~~ ~~-) / L
:.. / " ..
I I
L •. • ' I I
I t
\
'1.1'. ,: /\ !
11 Ii .,._,
11 \_
I I ' r--. '1\. . ; \ ., I •' ......-. \ ·.·' . ' .
~.I l ~1· ··1i:..-:-._1L
/ / ' I
I
f
I -•.:±}-
.-::...:~--~-=-~.
--.. ,""'
-(
•''
4'-tF.t.'" •1 ~·i1 ~
q.•J •:t. .•
•,
'• '
....
I
I~~ ---
... ,..., ltj J..;"&. fU
•. r ,.v,.1<1f, ..ft } t•o
t-..... )T PM.~£'""-..
.'C uo.:».v n 1 .~~
1r.r im-... ~u-
C•J
D
CL
__J
•I
1-
(J
I-
DEC-21-1993 08: 3E. FROM ADAM'::i LU ~~'::iUL I 11'1Ll t:.r~L1 l l'lt:.t:.I'<" IW
CONSULTING ENGINEER S, INC .
CIVI I NVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS• SURVEYORS
D TE
TO: NAME
COMPANY
FAX NO.
F OM: NAME
*********************** *********
FACSIMILE (FAX) COVER SHEET
***•*****************************
PAG ES TO FOLLOW~/~~
* * * * * * * *
....I
~ 1?£ ~#tre ~z<,~
* * * * * * * *
vo~r
7
6320 Copeland Ro ad• P.O. Box 131555 •Tyler. Texas 75713 • (903) 561 -8919 •FAX (903] 561-3287
]
E ::.
[
j
t
L
" \j
,,
r< r• ,..,
I
D
"\J
I u
.1l
I
,~LGE RT S D N S
I ;~> ,, .
/
I ' " /
.,/
l/ ' /
·1 /
/
/
,. I ,
/
/
f .Nl :Jl-J EO FLCr'h
..
·-/
1 LM J\ll. :-1 :o ±
~·r E).1$T Is" P
C'l iSJ
Q_
_J
•I
t-o t-
:1EC-20-1 993 10: 25 FROM ADAMS COt-.JSUL TI t m C.t lli I 1 '~1::.1::.rc I u ......
ADAMS CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, INC .
CIVIL/ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS • SURVEY OR S
*********************************
FACSIMILE (FAX) COVER SHEET
*************** *********** ****
DATE _..c..../..::...~_-_..P---=-C/_-_._z=3 ___ P GES TO FO LOW_) __
* * * * * * * *
TO : NAM E
COMPANY
FAX NO.
* * * * * * * *
Ff 0 • : rAME
-----·----
6320 Copeland Road• P.O. Box 131555 •Tyler. Texas 75713 • (903J 56 1·8919 •FAX ~903 ] 56 ·3287
-. TRANSM I SS I Ot'l REPORT ******************** ( SEP 22 '94 15:05 ) ********'!(*******************************************" .~(**********'!(*********************** * * * * * DATE START REMOTE TERMir'lHL MODE TIME RESULTS TOTAL DEPT. * * TIME IDEt'ffIFICATIOf'l PAGES CODE * * j * * '' l * * •"I"' I * * ~3EF' 22 1 s: 04 409 754 3452 G3EST 01 '00" rn< 01 ;j·: * * j( t t· * * * * * "· * t: * ··tc Post-It™ brand fax transmittal memo 7671 0. From Co. Dept. Phone# Fax #XJ Fax# * * * * ***************;! kl ;t:.f()t(;j(******'l(*;jc.f(,kj,*;f;t.'ld<,j(,f(:l"lr* f(,j ,j(;t.;t. t t.;t I l°'l·+.kt;,f...f..t< h,I, f..*:>:*;t"t· 'l·***'t;:t;:t:t· ti .t·;t<:t...t::f t t::t;.t:
J
J ;r
J
:J
I) ,..
5
.J
5
't:'.
L
0
")
D
Sl
:r sR SH.>\LL "iC"i' PERfOR t,t
'I.DIN G :,;RO <:>::CLR [S
5' OF "._BER"."SO NS EL '::G .
. ~.L BfR T SC l..,i S
/
/ I
/,
' I r;1
; ~ / . N / . /
,• . /
: I
l i ' , ,
l ./ FIMSHED FLOGR ELE\1. = 27 4.i Li
D E C -21 ~1993 09 :35
... --f
FROM TO
ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
CIVIL/ENV IRONM ENTAL ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS
*********************************
FACSIMILE (FAX) COVER SHEET
*********************************
r.~.1.
DA TE _ .... Lf~~--_.2....-"t:J_--"""-z-=3 ___ P.AGES TO FOLLOW_/ __
* * * * * * * *
TO: NAM E
COMPA NY
FAX NO.
* * * * * * * *
FR OM: NAM E
vo~r
· 6320 Copel an d Roa d • P.O. Box 131555 •Ty ler. Texas 75713 • (903) 561 -8919 •FAX (803} 561-3287
. I I• ....---~" ''<:..... ' / . I ,i.,.----\ 1 ' ~,_... .,_, l~/1, ... , , ~ ~ I " ,,., ~ ,, J, . ' "' ""' CT & ? .U•~ ,x1'.:> . J .: " :i----"'lf/, "v \ ~ / ,--' ul~Ul>E E.<,'>.1 _JI ·\, . " \ / ', •-1/ ~.,._...-.. Fi Nl"S HEO FL O:JR £-.i.V. 274.lD ~< 1'· ~~~P-----y-·-/ ;,; '----) 10 // ~<'~ ~---+f/-'--Ci.;RE;' I ),\ \ \ \ ' ·, /~<£' ""/. " Jo/ , / ·\, , ,_ ·J . ~ , ,/ ~ •;. """1" I;; , / ''\ ' \ I " , 0 /I . .'ii I/\.\ \. \ I ", ';' ,I // "< / v / ·')\\ \ ' -'!"> .::;,, ·/ /~·. \ ' I ·,\ \ ', -~ ~ ' / .... , ~ I ' '/ / 1' ·, '" ' ' ' o"> ,P j I I I ' h ' ,,_ I . I ' / . ""' ' ' ''·· \. '' \., ·~, //' s. ........ I I " . ./ 'l-I' \ ""'-..1 : l / '1\ "' ,', · I • '-. t I \ . ~ 0 ii i I! i' /' , ~ ' I ~~ ·r-t I , \ 1 I ~; \ 11 II r-'. ; ---·:1: L\ · If.· ·.L " i/ .. j . ·""' -:-· ,, R L > ,'; J \; J. '-·---) l::'. u u 2: .'.J 7 jJ .'.J 2: _J .:J J1 7 5 J [! I ::) r 5 l::'. L ,, \J ;) ... ·1 J) J) ~ Sl \J I J .1.1 .'.:) 1,,, ........ I' . ;r ., " . ... I~~ " \ \ I ' "' ' ,, I ~'·~,, ""' /% ' ' , ' ' 'l ' / L'-'r ""· -I ,_, ·~ ' ''• '; ' ,, = 'I ' I / f. '---' ' '' \ <:<>I ., I, ~ ~ I " " -'"'" ' •' / /I !_a; / )\ ~1" \ \ 1 ·•, .. , 101 ~ '~ 1, "''2'"'';',c,;oe·~~ / 'I l /LL. I/, /, -·· --, ,,.~ I ~ "• ' oq ' CL.q>. ', > ~<> • --· I ' •'' ' I» ' ,,, ,' " '' I. ' /" " • /\ ••. -:; <, ; i ·-~ ,.~ .\ I £•• . ' '. . I/ 1', ~ '~''""" '".'?; • • ' I "•" ' . , .. ~. · ' ' ' L-~--, <c ~~ ·-"< / }\, ~-~·11-t ' I J/ ''-',--. :;.t>\-fll,/. l'OliCA/ /I,,., 1.1 /.@, .... # '-"-~ •. =~-..-,.,, _.,;,,~,.... / " -\ I I . ' \ '· • / ' I /I / ; / / LL---"-::!:;-_-·--1 ;;::,-J ~ -' !:.-' A\ 11 I ... ' ,.., I l; , ' ' L ' -----II -=-1.11; -G' <' / ,,, : "'• '' \ \ ;;. ' -'...! ..... ~ --....: l -:::. ~ -7 : .I / ;\\ "~ -~ .• ' \ ,, .. ,,, '_, '~~"'-·-I •' "~-I. \I ' ' ' '•'' '.... •. . -.. ,, ,, . """ . ' A '\'.' "' ·:<-, ,, :"'~''' \"!" . • • ,, _,""'' ~~OAC .... [ L;(l!>iltcC i 11 "/C ---: 1.>~. , ""'--!--"" -c> ,,. , '"" .,. . , ,.~. '-",.. ., . '""""" .. I· 2'5· •• ~ _ -/'.~....... . \ \ • ~ '• ".<~-.. "'··" -,.)~<-~ i''' • ''·. .. •.\• -••~<" , ''° I .... /D> ' • \ ';. .~~. ''"'[ .. ,;.;,, ~~ ~"'~~' < • '"~ ). ./ '--?'-' ' .,. '·''"~ ~ --':\·~· ; ;• ·;., . ' . ~· -~ ' /.' ~. . ' ~.. ' -' "'"'"'-'" ~ --;:;--~ "'~ \, / ' ,,\ ~ "" ..-0 .,,_ ~" , .-,c•, ...._ ·-__ .... -.... -....c.. . ---~''·, "· .-!,., , i;,_y, c ~ \ ,. , ., .. ,, ""'-"" ' -...; .. ,, "' ..... •'' . ' "~/"' ·""'-~ o"-~ "cc ~-' \ " '' ';~---'l •; I # ,, '-·. \ . " -. ' . " ' .. ,, .. ., I ' :....-::: / .,,.'t!" '--\-... • •· '• ~ '-',, ·-c~,:t.: ~ v;;.~. ~ I ·", . / " .. ..... ......_ "' ' ' . ·· 'r' ·' '........ " '. · LM,, //~,,, .. -j/1!/,.:o ~.,/~-"r ,-,/../l:r1f,~,..., '·. '0...~/~~,~H ( /~, ~-~#' -/ ~ . • ;. /.<4-h.. \~. ;' ,1."-\-_\ , A\ 11""""' =~/'~ ,,_~_,L _ --~/·z , eKae P. \ -, ~1e':,.._ l' "-\ /,l-•. '"'· o. ., • • 7 7 '', " • A/.I: • ". ,.. "~ /£,)> ;//" --'-.... '~~ ~ F . / / • ire. , --. ', • ,;-, ~/;/:/ / / JI~' I ofe./o&,.,,~ ,JJ i , ,-.. , .. 21s..i." ~ .,, "/ " -inJ~ 1,_ ~., · ./ .r ltt r, I '-~--,., ~, < " /. " ' ' ,,, ... =n '.:-·'.>f.~ ;:'. :/,?;., ,f>•/Pe. :J"t1S· I I ·.' " l ' "' , ")' ""' ... ,... ' I ,,')..I / /,./'¢,~\ I '-,"<,,!"'"'. ,< G., "''' •,•,:r ..1 ,..-/'/"' , .. , I , '\{;n~"' ., · \""'" >•MO;f' <../, ..-;::..... '· "--·----· """'-.. j / *"\ • \.~ ~f' / ~. ";,..,___" '· ' , '('• ' O.'v •, y /~/ L __ .. --'---• · ' .. 1. '\) l! , "" .. ' . ' I -., '~" ,,., / / ~ / \ " ' .. " " =·"~ / / "' ,./ ' ' . . .,//.,/" . ' ' .,. ~~-.... \ '1 "-. ' r ~/-~/ I , ~-/~/ . \ {". /.~> l -'"/ / , ALBERTSQNS /
DEC-20)1993 10: 25 FROl1 IU
.. • • 0 " ./' L "I o
ADAMS CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, INC.
CIVIL/ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS
*********************************
FACSIMILE (FAX) COVER SHEET
*********************************
DATE -L~-=..~....:._--==-_:1-=tf)=---__._7~3c..____ PAGES TO FOLLOW_/ __
* * * * * * *" *
TO: NAME
COMPANY
FAX NO.
* * * * * * * *
FROM: NAME
COMMENTS
· 6320 Copeland Road •P.O. Box 131555 •Tyler. Texas 75713 • (903) 561-8919 • FAX (903] 561·3287
ACCOUNT NO. fJ%--OO(){) -lf Lj '2 -3> ~ q 0 {OD.OD 323838
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
$ LOO.DO ~ II
::E1vEooF bDP ·~s W~ll/l,N>y ' 19 cit
Paid by_ Check J "!> ~ 3 Cash __ THANK YOU Lil-@
NP DES
FORM &EPA
See Reverse for Instructions rorm "fJP'UVt:<J. a..a No.~
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
Notice of Intent (NOi) for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial
Activity U'4 der the 1"~?01;$ Ganeral Permit
Submission of this Notice of lnten1 constitutes notice that the party identified in Section I of this form intends to be authorized by a NPDES permit issued for storm
wat61' discharges aSsociated with industrial activity in the State identified in Section II of th is form . Bacoming a permittee obligates such 'discharger to comply with
tt".a terms ar.d conditions of the permit. ALL NtCESSAAY INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED ON THIS FOAM. •
I. Facility Operator Information
Name :
City :
II. Faci!ity/Slle Locatioo Information
Name :
C ity:
L.atituda :
Ill. Site Activity Information
MS4 Opera1or Name:
Aoceiving Water Body: I B 1 E 1 E 1 1 C 1 R 1 E 1 E 1 K 1
If You are Filing as a Co-permittee.
Enter Storm Water General Permit Number:
S IC 6< Designated
A£.1ivity Code: Primary: IC 1 Or
Ii This Facility is a Member of a Group
Aw/iccltion, !:nter Group Application Number:
If You Have Other Existing NPDES
Permits. Enter Permit Numbers:
2nd :
IV. Additional Information Required for Construction Activities Only
Project Completion
Start Date: Date:
IO, 51 2, 81 9, 41 Estimated Area to be
Disturbed (in Acres):
t .
Phone: I 501 r I 2i13t ltf100r
Slatus of GJ
Owoor/Cporator:
State: I A, RJ ZIP Code: ~172=!1~1=6~~~~~~~~
Is the Facility l.ocatod 01 r-lN
Indian lands? ('( or N) LBJ
A;e Tr.ere ExistinQ . n
Quantitative Data1 {Y or N) LNJ Is the Facility Required to Submit ii
Monitoring Data? (1, 2 , 0< 3) W
3rd : 4th :
Is the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
in Compliance with State and/or Local
Sediment and Erosion Plans? (Y or N) GJ
V. Certification : I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in aa:ordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible tor gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and comple te . I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine ancf imprisonment for
knowing ~iolations. . , . ·
Pnnt Na."Tle :
r ""+
Signature:
EPA Form 3510-0 (8 ·92) @ Printed on Recycled Paper
ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Civil/Environmental Engineers • Surveyors
6320 Copeland Road • Tyler, Texas 75703
P.O. Box 131555 • Tyler, Texas 75713
(903) 561-8919 FAX (903) 561-3287
DATE ?-s--9 JOB Nb
7/-P/AJ
TO e~ PF ~/~e _s-~~~
>
>
/Id?/ ~,J'a.s #v~.
WE ARE SENDING YOU O Attached O Under separate cover via _________ the following items:
~nts 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications 0 Shop drawings
O Copy of letter O Change order o ______________________ _
COPIES DATE NO .
I ~ l//'s-/4'>-r$' 9 ,
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
~approval 0 Approved as submitted
0 For your use 0 Approved as noted
0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections
0 For review and comment 0
DESCRIPTION
/ &?. , // /.:5 ,,
0 Resubmit __ copies for approval
0 Submit __ copies for distribution
0 Return __ corrected prints
0 FOR BIDS DUE _________ 19 ___ 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS _~.I~---""'W~' :h~v_··~S.~t:!.~"'4~/~--"'~---"~-~""""--"'~--tC-~_h_1/_s._e_'-"'A-"--~7--=-~-,,..,-=-=-0-'-/'-/"_C;)_t(../____!_, --
@ 40"k Pre-Consumer Content • 10% Post-Consumer Content
COPY T0_~,,1--.-~~l·~~~'tf!."'---------------
SIGNED: c-/~
PROOUCI 140 /NEBSJ Inc., Gro11Jo, Ma 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
. I
·I
ft .
AM PAD
. 'I
~: ~
S0' I ~'
':Q ,
""
22-141 50 SHEETS
22-142 100 SHEETS
22-144 200 SHEETS
f
~'17 ~ '\1Et9
~18
/~-:·---r \
_I .. , ll! \
I ,1:5 \
I 21
I ~ \
I ( \
I I \
/ c1 \ ~ I ~1 \ f29
I &>~ ~ \ I
I •12 ul.fcf... \ I
I \ I
/o \e3-../ca
----•10 '< I $ ~
I I J I ' ' ,(\~1 ~~ \ ' 7 /
1 ,1 \Y ~ / I ,. •u 6 /
I ' /
I ----/ ·~', // ~.----;:-/ y
I ~ / /
I ~ /
\ ----· /.
I •'9-.---~·..-.l / ,,.. \ct,a / ---..-6 ~ / \lL\D' i ~ 4 I 0 1 _..-
-- - - - -----~ ------------
30
\
A &~rn ~ £/t'v <ii) =50
(}7)( cp fh = 5 I
r '
L -'--. '
\
\
\
'
\
2. Emergency Overflow Requirements
a. The geometrY_ shall be that of a rectangular weir~
b. Surface treatment shall be consistent with the expected
velocities at ultimate conditions. Velocities shall be
1 imited or proper surface treatments provided as per
the recommendations in Sections VII -Open Channel Flow
and Section VIII -Culverts.
~~,...;;~~--~1111111'!1
'llra r-0ond h e-p~~me
3. Storage Depths
The maximum storage depths for design and ultimate
conditions shall he limited as follows:
Facility Design Ultimate
Location Hydrograph Hydrograph
Parking Areas .83ft 1.Sft
Roof tops .Sft 1.0ft
Landscaped Areas 3.0ft 4.Sft
4. Permanent Storage Facilities
All facilities located on natural streams or water
courses that are designed with a permanent storage
component sha 11 meet a 11 criteria in terms of design and
construction for Dams and Reservoirs as required by the
Texas Water Commission.
74
y ct-e lw.
5,1
S,c,ro l']-l2-4o
I o,"z
"f ~~
r ~~o-~s -oo
-3'1-~z-oo ____ 6_1 ______ Lf ?. <J 7
q~ cr,u
{_,;Z?-/-t/-5 -!OJ
--------h-1--------'i~.0_z.. ___ +-~B_s_-_l4-_-_so---1------__ _j-'--7 ___ --1 _$)__, fS _ rs
s.~ _ _J_1_ 5f fie_ ___ T 8
4 !>~ __ 8i__---1_!P .3t) ____ T _l3 ____ _
'i t:>f 130 5{), ~ --_I._~ -----
qt> 110 50.5: ----r 5 --
3fZ. ----+'-t~ ______ i.._~_1--__ us_-_z _;-_l-_<>--+----·--_ _j_? _ 6i_:__28 ___ ---~~----_
t-1~
'f1 ; -----+~.-----' ___ eB-----+-__ z;_-:r_4--_4_z -_z.o-----i------------_J_7 2 --Sl . 9 7 __ ----Tf3: -
' tf I C,
tf)
It, 4-e/'rt F
I '1
rnz.
! '11<>+
IS ·' !
I
/89 ____ 1/f, I ______ FL~o r...+'0 . 'fS 11
r e-p
("J I ili /f'
" _, l fj __ 5f._5j tqe __ aF H.wo.Ll = Te,
&;
1:1ro n
,' uSti
·--------1-_?_:,_l-_?_1-~o ________ L0_ __ Sf. 3~
2-I ---to18
~
l<ffe._ "t: _ _$ b~s _ ~~-3-_Su bt l="ro~--_
3w"'
----------
-----,----
I
--f -
11 8_ -
1_1-8 __ SD. 2._7 ___
1
f
#: w ~. _ _____!t_ .If--~ -~2t-dts+ , -.eJev. de-:;c.. --
-.. _,
~If)
z.; 5"185" 5""52-'343-o"f-SO -~iP-~j , IB
z+ ,~
loq4 63__ · 10"4 3Z-7-~Z:::::4v. 1/8. 7ft TS= 4:: Ca1-c. /={~
oZZ
qtfZ-11-78 Zfi ., 'z. !}z.4.-50-lo ~Q --18 -----------
2"
,, ot
to~' 10 be> If. 1-8 .~3 T5=-<f: ~ Fl<-<-. ~'!-~1 -:SI> ·--·----·--
i:r I~ (,o qq tt.1+ t>3 -z...1-30 -----~-18.7 rs: -=-Cf c.a-c. Fli.-..e
l6 r,r,? (s, ~(, 3'?7-C>z.-5"""D /pl_ 3.03 IB
-·---·
Vi 41-0 3'7/ 08 -r7 -4() _if _ SS.52 T/$ ------------------
3C ,, ,1 lo~..., lo -SZi-z..o _81) 'ff;.63 f5 =-f. lt:M,c., ~wl"'C ------
3( ;-55" 5 l'i of,,.-77 -<f:D . 7 s 'f.1S T.$
. ----
------------
--~---1---------'+-------J-----1---------·---
------+t+---------1---· --1-----11------+----
-----1------1------t---------
_______ J _____ ------· ---------------------
!,I
-·-----~------·-----+------·--------
--------------------·----
---------------··
l
,
Ut1-5-1994 13:39 FROM ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEER TO
TO:
FROM:
RE:
.
•
COMMENTS
r.t:JJ..
ADAMS CONSULTING ENG INEERS, INC.
CIVIL/ENVIRONMENTAL ENG INEERS • SURVEYORS
*************************** •••••
rACSIMILE (FAX) COVER SHEET
*********************************
DATE ___ c_ .... _/_5_--~-~---PAGES TO FOLLO ._/ __ _
* * * * * * * *
NAME
COMPANY
FAX NO.
* * * * * * * * _;£//ti/~
6320 Copeland Raad• P.O. Box 131555 •Tyler. Texas 75713 • (903} 561-8919 • FAX (903) 561-3287
I
• DAMS ONSUL TING NGINEERS. INC .
!VIL/ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS · SURVEYORS
June 14,T994--
Veronica Morgan
City of College tation
1101 Texas Ave.
College Station, Tx . 77840
Re: Wal-· rl E~n
Store# 1150
1815 Brothers Blvd.
College 'talion~ T .
Dear Veronica:
Adams onsu ting Engineers, c. ( .C E .. ) is serving a. e-civil consultant for th~
expans~un of the College Station Tx Wal-Mart Store. We have mcluded in our plans
drainage ca cu ations s wing the effects of a 25yr. and 100 yr. storm on this area after the
expansion.
a-;ed upon our ca culations, the expansion oft 1e Wal-Mart store i~ producing an mcreased
run off of about 10 cfs. a.-.e' on e drainage report ~normed by Joe. Orr, Inc. for th
Sout.l wood P aza tention asi.n, the maximum amount of run-off allowed is 259 cf:
efore e e.'tpansion, he actua amount of run-off is 180 cfs. This wol!ld mean thu ther 1~
a disc rge of 79 c ·s remaining. Therefore, based upo "' afom1~ntion d report. the
expansion of t te art Store wil not causin any ove-rflow of the existitl Southwood
Plaza Detention Basin.
If you have any further que.tions. ) ease contact me @ (903) 561-8919.
Sincerely,
ADAMS CO I G El rGJNEERS, INC.
(Y~v~
Todd Williams
Project Managt1
6320 Copeland Road 11 PO Box 131555 • Tvler. Texas 75713 • [9031 561-8 9 19 • FAX rqn11 SRV:'!~R7
TOTAL P.02
----~---
--~------
--------i~Tk-/'XY\ ~llT I ----
------- -~ ·v~~~:(Y-1~~---r =~+\iJ-------
-------------~
---=-~ ~--------
----
------- -----__ _s&Y\,& -~ ~ _5!~ ~ ~:::L-c~~ -~ ~: __ = ~ -
_ __ _ _ __ _ _ --~·-t :L -~-~ 'n? ~(\so~{«-_-__:_:-_ -
--. -------·--_ -s~?,"'~~:-~~\]~=_:-_ _:__---
------ - - ----=-s~-o~ ~ ~_±~_ g _:-_ __:=_ _:-::-_
_--_-----= ~--~--=~ -'~~~\of~~ --
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Dear All :
-~~CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
~ ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION
Post Offic e Bo x 9960 11 0 1 Te x as A ve nue
College Station, Texas 77842-0960
(409 ) 764-3570
MEMORANDUM
April 22, 1994
North Bardell , lvIDG
Todd Williams, Adams Consulting
William Kellett , William Kellett Engineering
Stan Stephen, Brazos Valley Credit Union
R . Stanley Bair, Brazos Valley Credit Union
Lance Taylor, First Federal Motor Bank
Louis Gaston, First Federal Motor Bank
Albert F . Jesse, Albertson, Inc .
Chris Anderson, Callaway Architects
Robert E . Laskey, Needham, Wright, & Laskey Engineers
Veronica Morgan, Asst. City Engineer
Pipe capacity and detention volume available for projects in the Longmire/
FM 2818 area of College Station
The City of College Station Engineering staff is currently working with you on a development
project in the above referenced area. Currently, we have 4 entities vying for the pipe capacity and
detention volume that exists in and around the Alberstons/Walmart complex. With this amount of
development and the potential for one entity requesting "more than their allotted amount" of
capacity or volume, we felt it necessary to notify you all of the protocol we will use in the review
of your proposal.
As you may be aware there are 2 drainage reports previously completed for this area. All of you
have referenced these reports in your drainage discussions with us . These reports outline the
following :
1. The 2 -42" pipes under the Albertsons parking lot will accommodate the flow for the
entire 44 acre drainage basin given a composite "C" factor of .85 .
2. The detention pond as originally designed will accommodate the flow for the entire 44
acre drainage basin given a composite "C" factor of .70 .
Given these assumptions, you will be asked with your proposal to verify that your site does not
exceed either "C" factor . If your site does exceed these factors , it will be your responsibility to
seek other methods to detain or handle the increase in runoff over these assumed amounts . In
addition, all of you have assumed that the existing detention facility, which is several years old ,
still has its original capacity . We do not think this is a good assumption .. The City will be
surveying and verifying capacity during the first or second week of May and we will notify all
parties of the outcome of this survey . If you feel you will require this information prior to this
schedule, we may have to work out alternate arrangements with you. If the original capacity is
not there, the City will schedule maintenance to clean the pond and return it to it's original
capacity. If any of you wish to exceed your "available increased runoff" as outlined in the prior
reports, you do have the option of expanding the existing pond, if feasible. The City will not be
responsible for any expansion of the pond above and beyond it's original state .
In conclusion , all of you have "reserved" capacity in the lines and pond for the amount assumed in
the original Albertsons/Walmart reports . The City will verify the capacity in the existing pond.
Any additional runoff above the increase assumed by these reports will have to be handled by each
development independently via onsite or offsite improvements . If you all would prefer to handle
your additional increases collectively , we would certainly be pleased to review a proposal of this
nature.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call . I can be reached at ( 409) 764-3 570
between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Thank you for your cooperation .
cc : Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
Brett McCully, Project Manager
David Pullen , City Engineer
drainage development permit file(s)
JOB NO.------SHEET __ )_ OF ~f __
CLIENT Wee I l"1. CL,,--.+
PROJECT 9) _. Ot icV L c/fr1ae ..:_Sraf-/m,...
' ~/ .
PREPARED BY e i. . s· DATE / ) '3 /9 c..; I
no.h..:iru\ ~.-as:. )(:,')d..s
-....)
8 <...:i:>• ~.::.!:. / C<.,-nrnerc. )a.\
c, -=.-., i. s -;.. ""15
C... ~ , 1&-S -c 7 S
37. b .. ~e
lv• 2. AC.,
v::-/ c ..-.: ., '7c ( B (.;..:..~ 1") f!;;.,S (_ ·CCI•")') rnec C-1n...I )
(_ vfl d~~ ~.k f"''-' f\O h;i n~) ')r-c..:>s lo r>e.l ~)
' J
...:./ e,, -~ ,~o
37·SftC ( .. 19 +· &.-z, (.-io)
...-;4 •. 0
5)(.3 be:><-cclve.;-\ 1J.1c\e~ ·-1 e;i<.c<..!> P.'Ye0-...:C..
~ i ~ ·75~ !",.°\cfC
cdJM IP
3. .s:-J'tC c '7c>/JF
3-s .( . .3)( ~. &l.)
f_ ~~ {TA. -:IDT)
Vo ·l~.-ne... ~ Lc.'1 rh:-F1
~C\.,.
\/c/i:;.rK. .... .+.. ... \ :: • B ~) Ac-· F--
TF'A~JSf'lb :)Int I PEPORT
t t I t t I<* I< t Kl t f, 1-¥+ 1· td
~ HF'R 27 '94 12· .... J r
k t I t t "'t t t j( It It t t >t<>t,KI t I++ I H·-t*Ji. i-*l + f k l+<.t tct*:t :l·*+A .*+.+ f .t*l<f ',k.YI t It t .. +.i
ii
t * t DHTE SlH T REMOTE. TERMirlHL fk1Df TIME RESULTS TOrnL DEPT. * * TIME TDD lT IF ICATICll1 PAGES CODE *
~ * + *
'j( * * -jF'F' z~ l. . .:'.: ~7 qL1::i 561 1287 G':{EST 01 '24" OK 02 *
j( *
t *
I *
j( * * ~ * * * * I Ji.
* * * ·+;
* * + *
t * + *
ff * I "I<
t:I ++ti~ f I'.¥ t 1 h**-1· t t:Y I' l'>f,f:*t.f. t' I .>t<+.t Kt.H 1 .. ¥+.*f+. t I 'I >I*·+·+ f.·t Ii··+ ***'f·t:·p1.+.*·+ f)j• 1'.t*i 't.:+::tc .kl·*KH.*****+ f'.¥1'*
Owner: F.D.I.C.
Agent: Joe Fuller
{409)285-8330
Lot 4B, Block 15, Ph II
Southwood Plaza
3. 72 ac, 2 C-1 Lots
\l
HILLTOP DR
C-1
PLANNING DIVISION
C-1 R-1
STATE HWY 6 -TEXAS Al/f. STATE HWY
City of Colle
CASE NUMBER :
ACTION REQUESTED:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
I
I
I
I
/"-...J"'-t'
I
I
I
I
o Sewer Line 3
sheet 5 -
\
' ,/
/
/
Lot
N 43'1 27•
0( ------
48
NOV 221 '93 16:38
----------~----...5/14 ___ _
\
\ \ F"igureXll
Application Form
Development Permit
lnside/Outskle Established Flood Hazard Areas
City of 0.llege Station, Texas
(i:e; Ordinance No. 17.28)
Site Legal Description: M,/-~r /' S-;/,~ rtl' -7:?~. z',;/.? ~~ /.S-
Site Address; / l'/S-J(:P r"'1er s /?A;/.
Arcbitb;;t/
Engineer: //~$ 4~_..,.1~~5 Ees/de~, s
Addiess: /P/ 5.° #~~ $,_,,( ff~.f'~
Telephone No.: @;)t;i7 z ~ Yo"~ A'..e. 7..:z >1'
Add~: i,f~j') ~~~..,/ "'.&/. #. 7~7~
Telephone No.: . r •
Contractor. Address:
~~--~~--~~---~--~ _,,......--.....~---~~_....~ Telephone No.: ________ _
Date Application Filed: _.._.~..._~ ..... ( ... lf'/. ... ~-. ..... e_,___.,2_.-.,,~,_ ..... 1 ...... 7_"-"'-~---Approved: -------------
Application is hereby made for the following specific watecway altetations: ----~~-----
Attached as part of this application!
O Application Fee
Cl ~oed C'.ertificate
8"'Site and Construction Plans, with supporting documentation: two (2) oopies of each
0 Othec: -.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
ow;JE111 s At::~ -41 '"?°
l, ~<5l... J. &l<&n..r , as ewaar, hereby acknowledge or affirm that:
The above Drainage Plan and supporting documents complies wiht the requirements of Ordinance No. 1728,
and
Date ·
Date
Page 1of2
NOV 22 '93 16:38 P.6/14
Figure XII Continued
CERTIFICATIONS!
A I, certify that any nonresidencial structure on or
proposed to be on this site as part of this application meets tlood-proofiug requirements as
set out in Section of Ordinance No. 1728
g 61'/4
Architect/Engineer Date
B. l, P"4A// 6-~ J. Rt:>de<..l. • certify that the finished floor level of the lowest
floor, inchiding any basement, of any residential structure as part of this application is or
proposed to be at or above the base flood elevation as established in the latest Federal
Insurance Administration flood hazard study and maps, as amended.
, Ck*'<~~e: & -4-~1_/~_z~:r_/S_9 _:r __ ~-Archit.ect/En~ Date
C. I, Aa-4< G:" ../, d<.2d"~fy that the alterations or development ooveced
by this permit shall not diminish the tlood-can:ying capacity of the adjoining watei:way or
crossing this pennitted site and that such altemtioos or deYelopment are consistent with
requirements concerning encroachments of flood ways and of floodway fringes ·as illustrated
in the latest Federal Insurance Study.
,~,~~ AfCitee Dgl er Date
D. I, ~a_ J. ~.J , do certify that any alrerations, addr~ in
Certification "D" do not raJSe the level of 100-yea.r flood as referred to Certif.cation "B 11
•
,c;;:b_.~~ /t'~.:r/73
Architect/Engi r Date·
REVIEWED FOR APPROV.AL: __ ~__,,,,,.--......,_..,--..,......,,..._,,_....----=-------
Floodplain Administtator Date
APPROVAL: Special conditions or comments as part of approval:---------
·~ ~~ ~~ a)/ &Mu~~~
rs , t-cJ CtU--(,( ~ J:;" d•7)7c.{~3S7o. ~~~
~~r .
~~~
_ r/..jnlv\ ___________ _
__ 02_: ~ :Vf~ltf ~ · ..
--~·M-r$
;O ~Q_, ~ Q\ ~'------------------!
O_ i{v._, A~ l1Q.uL ]t, ~ ~ Cere;., VS . ~· ¥f-
ii
11
111
I
I
I :I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
l
, I
I
I
I
•
I l
I
I
I
. I
I
I
_:.
I
~M ~ ~ f'Td{l e
. --
~~·~~wp ' 1.\)ltrlJ • 1
'
D r (l 0 I •
i '"J VYI YJ •
~~ 'D OY, QI ~ I ft11 1 \)'6 ~ ·~ ~ ~ t
~ 01JrO'lf GM ·w ~ ·
l<i~ ~~.
I
----------------\~ ~\ --·
I
,__ --I
~~ 1TO)lf\'\
I
I
.r-~
•
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Dear All:
~-~ C J:~m~~~~~~~~~~~:~~N
April 22, 1994
College Station, Texas 77842-0960
(409) 764-3570
MEMORANDUM
North Bardell, MDG
Todd Williams , Adams Consulting
William Kellett, William Kellett Engineering
Stan Stephen, Brazos Valley Credit Union
R. Stanley Bair, Brazos Valley Credit Union
Lance Taylor, First Federal Motor Bank
Louis Gaston, First Federal Motor Bank
Albert F . Jesse, Albertson, Inc.
Chris Anderson, Callaway Architects
Robert E . Laskey, Needham, Wright, & Laskey Engineers
Veronica Morgan, Asst. City Engineer
Pipe capacity and detention volume available for projects in the Longmire/
FM 2818 area of College Station
The City of College Station Engineering staff is currently working with you on a development
project in the above referenced area . Currently, we have 4 entities vying for the pipe capacity and
detention volume that exists in and around the Alberstons/Walmart complex . With this amount of
development and the potential for one entity requesting "more than their allotted amount" of
capacity or volume, we felt it necessary to notify you all of the protoco l we will use in the review
of your proposal.
As you may be aware there are 2 drainage reports previously completed for this area. All of you
have referenced these reports in your drainage d iscu ssions with us . These reports outline the
following:
1. The 2 -42" pipes under the Albertsons parking lot will accommodate the flow for the
entire 44 acre drainage basin given a composite "C" factor of .85.
2 . The detention pond as originally designed will accommodate the flow for the entire 44
acre drainage basin given a composite "C" factor of .70 .
Given these assumptions, you will be asked with your proposal to verify that your site does not
exceed either "C" factor . If your site does exceed these factors , it will be your responsibility to
seek other methods to detain or handle the increase in runoff over these assumed amounts. In
addition, all of you have assumed that the existing detention facility , which is several years old ,
still has its original capacity . We do not think this is a good assumption .. The City will be
surveying and verifying capacity during the first or second week of May and we will notify all
parties of the outcome of this survey . If you feel you will require this information prior to this
schedule, we may have to work out alternate arrangements with you . If the original capacity is
not there, the City will schedule maintenance to clean the pond and return it to it's original
capacity . If any of you wish to exceed your "available increased runoff' as outlined in the prior
reports, you do have the option of expanding the existing pond , if feasible . The City will not be
responsible for any expansion of the pond above and beyond it's original state .
In conclusion, all of you have "reserved" capacity in the lines and pond for the amount assumed in
the original Albertsons/Walmart reports . The City will verify the capacity in the existing pond .
Any additional runoff above the increase assumed by these reports will have to be handled by each
development independently via onsite or offsite improvements . If you all would prefer to handle
your additional increases collectively, we would certainly be plea sed to review a proposal of this
nature .
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. I can be reached at (409) 764-3570
between 8 a .m. and 5 p .m.
Thank you for your cooperation .
cc : Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
Brett McCully, Project Manager
David Pullen , City Engineer
drainage development permit file(s)
December 3, 1993
CITY OF COi LEGE STATION
Post0fficeBox9960 llOlTexasAvenue
College Station, Texas 77842-0960
(409)764-3500
'
Adams Consulting Engineers , Inc.
6320 Copeland Rd
Tyler, TX 75703
Attn : Daniel Adams
Dear Mr. Adams ,
The following plans and development permit application are in complete and therefore being
returned to you.
To guide you in the process , I have included a copy of our deve lopment permit process with
the incomplete items highlighted. We do not accept a permit application and drawings alone.
We must have the final drainage report accompany this submitta l in order for us to review it
for compliance with our ordinance. The report should completely explain existing vs.
proposed conditions and your intention for handling the incre as e. Realizing that there have
been two previous drainage reports written on this area, yo u should not have to do a
tremendous amount of work to put this report together. Yo u may use data from these
previous reports to outline existing conditions and simply discus s the changes proposed.
Please note that there are a couple comments made on the propos ed grading plan. This is not
a complete review but rather items that "obviously" need to be discussed in the drain age
report. I cannot complete the review of these plans without a re port.
In addition, we need to receive an application fee of $100.00 with this resubmittal.
If you have any questions or need clarification, please do not hes itate to call. I will be happy
to help you through the report process if you have any questio n. I can be reached at ( 409)
764-3570.
cc: Walma rt Expansion DDP fil e
Home of Texas A&M University
\.
\
January 6, 1994
Adams Consulting Engineers
6320 Copeland Road
PO Box 13155
Tyler, TX 75713
Attn: Todd Williams
Dear Todd,
CITY OF COi 1 EGE STATION
Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842-9960
(409) 764-3500
As per your request, I have looked at your WalMart expansion drawings and the "unknown" pipe
location exiting the Albertsons site. My concern is that with the location of this pipe unknown,
there may be problems in the field during construction. You may make a note on the plans to
require the contractor to field verify, however please be aware that once field verified, if it will
affect your design you must resubmit design drawings and possibly even an addendum to your
drainage report and the contractor will not be allowed to proceed with construction on this area
of the site until all of these items are prepared and approved. We will do all we can to expedite
the review/approval process but you need to anticipate a possible 2-1/2 to 3 week total approval
time. This time does not account for any of your design time. Typically, we find that this upsets
both contractors and owners to have this occur during the construction phase. You may either
field verify that line, now during the design phase or during the construction phase. Please be
advised that there are some "timing" and possibly "cost" risks in waiting until construction. You
may also want to advise your client of the pros and cons to each alternative.
I hope this answers your questions. If you have any other problems or questions, please do not
hesitate to call.
Home of Texas A&M University
Printed by Veronica Morgan
From: Veronica Morgan
To: Kent Laza, Shirley Volk
Subject: fwd: fyi
===NOTE===============10/31/94==9:09am=
please make note that i received a call
from todd will i ams from adams
consulting engineers last week. the
purpose of his call was to ask me for
my help with the city of bryan
electrical department. the power line
along the sh 6 frontage is bryan rea
and adams consulting thought it was the
city of college station's line. they
showed the line on their site plan and
had a callout to it stating "to be
relocated". todd's conment to me was
why didnt' the city of cs tell them
that it wasn't our line during the
review process. i told him i felt sure
that when we saw the conment "to be
relocated" we thought they had already
worked it out with bryan. he said that
the city has now cost them lost time
and money on the project because they
have had to interrupt construction and
try to work out relocation costs with
bryan. i told him that similar to lone
star gas and gte, we expect the
engineer of record to handle
coordination problems with those other
entities. todd also has a problem with
what happened on the waterline
conflict. boy, did i ever want to say
"i told you so" but i bit my tongue.
anyhow, he is not happy with the city
and i'm sure will be telling walmart
that this problem is ours not the
design engineers. do with the info as
you see fit.
p.s. even though not in my scope of
services, i did say if he has a problem
with the city of bryan i would see if
there was something we could do to
moderate.
Fwd=by:=Kent=Laza=====10/31/94==9:15am=
Fwd to: Veronica Morgan
Good for you. We don't need to be
doing their work for them. Moderating
with them and Bryan is OK but don't
spend too much time on it.
Page: 1
9/15/95 9:27am
TO:
FRO
DATE
NA E
co
F X 0.
COMMEN S
12.05.1'391
c.
'"'b?3C1?--p, t
FILE copy
* •••••••••••••••• ** •••••••••.
FAC I ILE FAX) COVER SHEET
• * • * ••• **
*
C/rY .,o ""..e.r~~......vr
,,,;;..r S-oc,v ;11.f ~J.f/,Cf>C.e
/A./ • v ,,,.,..Vt::' ""'9 ~ (.
• * * **** * •• •••• • * ••
If you do not receive a 1 a ~~.
please cal (903) 561-8919. Our Fax
umb r is 903) 561-32 7.
* •••• * ••••.••••••• * * •••• *
I > ,<--4. l _,
F'RuP R POPT
I I J.. k ·t . .-1'-t-.'1<-*·f:*·**~·.y H 1<-**
I I I It It It I .f I I I .f ,t J, t + t If' I I I IHI I I I It
I
I I t t t t I I l' t I I t I·" t I 1 r t I,\ t I I t I
I
I
* I
[1E._1_ lJ''
STHF'T
T fl
I E. F'Ri' 1R 1·1 '::i':=.H "t
I
~HlOT TEF'Mif IH L
IIiEI ffffIU·ffI1.1f I
-1-:.,-,--:0
:ic..01
r 111[1E
1 , -;1 ,E , , r 11 r f-'t , t. I" ·' L 1 F' u:-. f-J3.
I
I [_ ·1p f 1. i[lt I c:; I CJ-~ ·• lJ
THI RE':::>UL T'::·
04 '~2 " E
I [1 [ C'" ":Jl HJ:...i::i I
tttlttlttttlttttt tlttt
t
I
f1_ THL l1E..PT. f ILE I
Pf:i1~ •:; . L1E. r 11'1.
* * t
t
I
,,\ tttlt1 t t tttlttttlltttt1 tt ltf tl+tttt tlt tttttt1ttlttlttlllttttttltttlltl•~>ttt !tit++
rF OM GRP\ M ~ S I NC.
'l' EX PAN ON SUMMARY
s or s ree Add r s Sore Numbez:: at
St or M n ger: Tele h n e ---
l.
l. s 0 0 i 1-rt owned ( ) Leased ( ) .
l. 2 I stor f ree-s anding ( or sho in ce ter ( ) ?
l. 3 Existing Stor size -----Ex i g a ki g sp ces ---
1 4 xp n ion siz nsion rking s c 5 requir d
l. 5 E P n ion o r -ar ( , le t id ( ) I or right side ) .
l. 6 I r loc ·ion of v stibule ~ r d? y No ( )
l. 7 I pr op r y purchase necess r for xp nsion? Yes ( I 0
1. 8 Pr ent doc lo ion? Le f side R gh ide ( . R ar ( )
1.9 Doe pr ent dock h v a nd ? y s ( ) 0 ( )
Q
2. ~ ~~~ ~
2.1 I prop ty in cit r county ( )~~
2.2 Do w hav co of ~ ; J i
2.3 What is r n zon 'ng? ~-I 6e11 e r a,{ ~ m eA. ci rJ.
2.4 I xpan ion prop r y roper y zon d? !; / 0 ( )
2.5 n uf r zon re ired ? e 0 v:
2.6 An buff r ar c0 v r. p 1:. 0 ?
Yes ~ /,e ep._~ (l--/Y"I Gn.-+ ..J.o k )..e_ lo Cd e_~
2.7 t a r city or coun P r ing r uir m nts? 16face/iso ~ ~ ~ /...JLJ.&'c<-t
~ 2.8 Do (~ I\. 1'1Y' e n y Tree ci 0 co nt• r ire
Yes No ( )
2.9 Aft r ><pans on, wi ll t p n~ .l t
r irem n s Ye ( ) No ( b sr:-t fL l\.C>L0 , W ·. L l ~e --k M..e.e....+
fi£o ,
1
::i:.t-3287
.: ..
2. Wh
2.11
2.12 I
2.13 Will
to
of AcJ-t~~~"'"_._-
e to a ply? ~r[e_{ IJo[(c btoc+-~140
L" 1 or va i n e
et? ~lUL ~f\._+e..~
t l? ~ao ::2..LS-
No V
t'ons? Yes ., Yes (
*
•
3 .7
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.3
5.1
• 2
5.
r
a
Ye a
12 .05.1 '?'''1 •i:!O
s to r in ge
s orm/hour /e tc ?
Under hat juri d ie ion i he ro er ?
?\1 or of ngineers
( ) S ta e --
( ) c o un y
<;4 i t y )
P e b ~o nv; f ac which ma a
f ct the p opo ~ work? ek es Ii, No
ye c -VJ;f-W5VV
Is any portion of the exp n )4 area ocated ln
e 1 nds are ? y ( ) 0
y wh area -----
T (T q ypic lly p r o b Lo s Prev n on
Wil pe ormed by Loss Preven ion ( ) or Engln er
Con ) ?
y t ? Size at Base?
bt ollow g form t 'on a the rise :
SYSTEM 1 SYS'l M 2
s tic gauge re i __ psi St tic g uge reading ___ psi
Number of s rinklers -~-
l.
2.
B se of Des ign
Density gpm/sq. ft.
sq. ft . esign area __ _
3
Number of s rinklers ---
Base of Design
1. Density~--g rn/sq. ft.
2. D ig ar a sq. f .
i
I 2. OS. 1·?·~1 1 1: 07·---------....-...----~
•
l~E l { ·S U H E HS
*****•***** *** •••••***************
FACSIMILE FAX) CO E SHEET
*** ***** ***** **** * *** •• ** *
ATE /. /~/~; PAGES T FOL LO ~ II
.. * * * •
TO· AME
CO M NV
FAX NO .
* * • •
F OM: NAM ~ v#Y 4b6!,"1?S-
COMMEN S
EZ> ,ey ~ ,-?..-O,P~,,P;e'/"1 76
c,,ry 4> f:7b,;t.er/V?~A/'T :b Re
;"'i'f e> tr>N 4-J' ~..f ..I' I" tt?C..E, 7 .-o/""'A/.lt. J
/N V~..v"Ce-~ /?Lt. C' ..e-Yo ~4?. ~~
* ** ** ••••••• • **
f y u do not r ce 1ve a pag es,
p e e ca 1 3) 561 -0919. Our Fa
Number is 90 ) 561-3287.
****** * .••••• **** *** •• *******
, 111J CL LAf\ilJ I IUAO •
..
w L -O R E S ,
r: Ad d ress:
oc tion:
Stor umb r:
Telephone Nu
D te :
ode ici l:
s
Bu i lding co
City Limit
Earthquake Code:
El ctric Code:
E y Co e:
Fire Code:
Life Safety Cod :
Mech/Plu ing ode:
Amendmen to co es:
Set B e ire e ts:
Cl a s s if ica o n of Exi tin Bu din
Pro c du r e
I a Pr l i in r y Re iew Acee t ble?
Sho 1 Civils Be th re l a n ?
Can Fees Be P i B Contr ctor?
Sub i d c n s o:
Numb e r of Sets equir d.
Time Sp n or Penni s:
P rmitting rocedure:
c .
r:
:-t..re~~..a. 41:" , ,.,,, e~a--1 q ~ 1
V£.5
.c, .J..J..JJ
Jie..f.'~~ /:'Jrr~ f'~rr.,,..£. t H~
_y e--~ -
-r; A~~ Gtt?V. .fi.
y s
Yes
y
/( No (
j 0
/o )
12.05.1991 11:~;'!€: p
T E PANS I ON SUMMARY
Store umbe r: -----s or Street Add ress :~~~-----Date: ----
Stor Manager:_~-----~-~-Telephone Nu mb er =--~---~~--
1. GENERA L
2
l.l Sor i s a -Mart Owned ( ) Leased ( ).
1.2 Is store f r e -standin ( ) 01 sho ping center )?
1.3 E ist 'ng St ore s ize _______ _ xisting parking spaces -~-
---------Ex ansion arking s aces required l.4 Expansion s ize
.5 Exp n sion to rear ( ), le t side ( ), or right side ().
1.6 Is re o c a i o of ves ibule re ired? Yes ( ) No ( )
1.7 Is property purchase necessary for ex ansion? Yes ( ) No
1.8 Presen ock location? Le side ( ) Righ side { ) R a
1.9 Does present dock have appendage? Yes ( ) No ( )
I s proper y n c ty ) or coun y ( ) ?
o we have copy of zoning regulations? es No
r es e nt z on ing ?
i'<: 2.4 pro ert roperly zoned? Yes ( No ( )
2.5 Any ( ) No ( )
~ 2. 6 Any b uf f e r a re s
Yes ( )
o ld b e effected const ct1on?
* 2.7 What are cit
r-2.s Does arking resently
Yes ( ) No ( )
2.9 A e e p ansi o n,
re quir e n s? Yes
will the
( No
l
requirements?
re irements?
it or count
6.
7.
1J , ...
ys
isch rq
n d and
gprn gplTI
pressur __ ps i 2.
GP d i ch a rge
Re si u 1 pr sure ___ psi
6 .
Ye
• 2 Ar
• 3
6.
I
i s nvest i a ion)
1b'w/ o t h e Soil Con rv fl r ir
(vi{ No ( ) '1 -~ () · 1 _ _ I • .
If yes, exp lain recess ~~ ~ ~
~
t re an soil er o s t~~ !,fJ;Ab ~~
If yes, expl~~
e th r d own stre m o i l e ro i on
ct it d v lo ment?
If a in
a i c it on of exi rn e nt in
good ( ) fai ( )
e of avement?
at i conditi o n of ex is ing vement n
goo ( ) f air ( )
T of a v ement
de l n re ire d?
+-re i r d 'e s ( I
ired? es o
rking
poor (
h
No
i: ck raff le
oor )
y B ,., ( )
)
No
-
.7 L s an addi ional re irern nts or s cial inst uctions
e ?
"* 6 .8 Ar e there n ob i o s conditio that ou d advers y a t
tim o co of th e x sion p r o ject .
s
.1 s or ------------ddress
Te e hone
b
Ci sate ___ _ Zip _____ _
P int of contact:
4
•
I •
e p ~ d n er t 1 . Y s No
s the imated e.i.iver ate?
(
( )
( )
(
(
.2
the
ich o
s a nu
timat
ition
ow
s t
Si ev lo ment
o ion contro
Fir Marsh ll
1 nn i g P r men
s i r we
• c s
i po
8.3 s or
8.5
8.
cost?
requ re e s o pee al instruction .
ng perm s or prov ls a quir ?
0 lans.
SETS
Gr din ----
( ) Burn in
( ) Land ca ing
( ) to s wer
Enviro e 1
{ Highwa --
(
1 0
•
ti L • 51:'11 -~ E ., ..
9. nu r of s a c e
p k n g atio before xpans ion (store) 1000 6 . ft.
9.3 p king r io bef or e P nsion (center ) __/1000 s q. ft.
9 4 s C G pr v after ex an ion store)
9 .5 ark i 9 ratio er xpansion (store) 1000 s . ft.
9.6 Parki ng r t i o ter p n s ion (ce n t er) 1000 q. ft.
9.7 Typ 0 Co ncrete ( ) , Asph lt ( )
w t r con i ions of the 'oints?
ions to be used?
----------------y ·
9.9 Do~ is y fro any re ir ment b 4 cit or count ?
es ( ) No ( )
0 w h n
I a
nts? Ye s (
o com 1 ? -----------
lO.l re f r ont or sid s reets cit , coun or sta jurisdiction?
-------------
o.~ Are there n c nges be ing proposed by city, coun or st t 7
* 10. 3
Yes ( ) No ( )
y e s, p ea se e x n
s b on r i r
im rovernents? Ye s (
I ye , OW UC
o r co s r uction
No ( )
6
of tree or ro d
------
1 • ..
12
•1 r rff • ':it l -<::. b --:.•
l .l P INTI NG
Pol s
Bas
P l o Sig
)
)
( )
( }
l L . 11 • 1 :!' l ~ :
Other -~~~~--~-~~-
11. PAR ING LOT
air
l. ADD IO S
n
(
(
(
(
(
(
{
1. SH M C 0
11.
11. OTHE
Relocate ( )
f yes, where?
Re oca e ( )
Protot p e f ron e
where
(
Pro o ype ize __ _
--------
12. Is lands in re ired for the ex ns on? Yes (
12.2 I h re a 1 ndsca inq ordinance? Yes ( ) No ( )
7
0 )
. '
l • s 1 s cap inq r es nt1 provided? Yes ( ) No ( )
...){ 12.4 v th ordinances chan ed si nce con ruction of the original
l .
s toi. e that y e ire addition 1 1 nd ca in for th total
r ct? Y s ( ) N ( )
12. re er rinted regulations? Yes ( 0
Do w ave a co y s No
1 .6 Who revie s la dsca in lans?
N me
Phone umber
12. Doe the ite have an e is ing sprinkler s stem? Yes ( ) 0 ( )
I yes, ill the e ansion affect he system?
12. W 1 addi ional irrigation b r 1 e ? Yes 0 (
13. e do i iti s presently enter h building (f o , side,
r a , tc.)?
Domestic w er
lephone
El ct ica
Gas
Sewer
Sprinkler
13.2 ow c e xp n ion a e be served b u iliti s (front, sid , r ar,
etc.)?
omestic ater
Tele hone
El ctrical
13. CO TACTS
Ele ctrical
me
Address
P one er
---
8
G
Se er
Sprin ler
Name _
Address
Phone Number
' ,, .... l.
N e
d ess
hon N er
sh al
N me
res ess
hon Numb e r Phone Number
Hea h Department
N m N ---A r A dress
Ph on Numb r Ph on urnber
l . l
1 4 .2
1 • 3
9